Next Article in Journal
Preparedness for Mass Gatherings: Factors to Consider According to the Rescue Authorities
Previous Article in Journal
Job Demand, Job Control, and Impaired Mental Health in the Experience of Workplace Bullying Behavior: A Two-Wave Study
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 4
10.3390/ijerph17041360
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Preparation, Performances, and Mechanisms of Microbial Flocculants for Wastewater Treatment

by
Huiru Li
1,
Shaohua Wu
1,2,
Cheng Du
2,
Yuanyuan Zhong
2 and
Chunping Yang
1,2,3,*
1
College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Hunan University and Key Laboratory of Environmental Biology and Pollution Control (Hunan University), Ministry of Education, Changsha 410082, China
2
Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Petrochemical Pollution Processes and Control, School of Environmental Science and Engineering, Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming 525000, China
3
Hunan Provincial Environmental Protection Engineering Center for Organic Pollution Control of Urban Water and Wastewater, Changsha 410001, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(4), 1360; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041360
Submission received: 20 January 2020 / Revised: 10 February 2020 / Accepted: 17 February 2020 / Published: 20 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Microbiology)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
In recent years, close attention has been paid to microbial flocculants because of their advantages, including safety to humans, environmental friendliness, and acceptable removal performances. In this review, the preparation methods of microbial flocculants were first reviewed. Then, the performances of bioflocculants in the removal of suspended solids, heavy metals, and other organic pollutants from various types of wastewater were described and commented, and the removal mechanisms, including adsorption bridging, charge neutralization, chemical reactions, and charge neutrality, were also discussed. The future research needs on microbial flocculants were also proposed. This review would lead to a better understanding of current status, challenges, and corresponding strategies on microbial flocculants and bioflocculation in wastewater treatment.

1. Introduction

Advances in science and technology have increased productivity. However, every coin has two sides. When we enjoy the convenience they bring to the development of all walks of life, we must also pay attention to the environmental damage and the threat to the health of living organisms during the production process. Bioremediation is the use of living organisms, or part of it, or their metabolites, for the recovery or cleaning up of a contaminated medium such as soil [1,2], sediment [3,4], or liquid/water [5,6]. With the growth of population and the development of science and technology, more water is consumed in daily life and production, and more wastewater is generated. In recent years, both from the perspective of production requirements and environmental requirements, wastewater treatment has been an important part that cannot be ignored [7]. One of the main difficulties in wastewater treatment is that particles dispersed in water cannot be effectively separated due to their solidification stability and sedimentation stability [8]. In order to destroy its stability, some means to make the particles in the water settle down through flocculation and sedimentation is needed. The flocculants mainly include inorganic flocculants, organic polymer flocculants, and microbial flocculants (MBF) [9]. Table 1 shows the advantages and limitations of three types of flocculants. Inorganic flocculants can be divided into two systems of iron and aluminum, which have a good treatment effect on suspended solids and colloidal particles; organic polymer flocculants are mainly polyacrylamide and their derivatives, which have good treatment effects on suspended solids and coarse particles. MBF are divided into extracellular metabolic flocculants, intracellular extractive flocculants, and bacterial flocculants [10]. The scope of application is relatively wide, and some microbial flocculants have the effect of selectively treating wastewater.
For a long time, inorganic flocculants and organic flocculants are mainly used in wastewater treatment both at home and abroad [11]. However, the sludge produced by treating the wastewater with aluminum salt flocculant is often used as a fertilizer in agriculture, resulting in high aluminum content in the soil, causing soil pollution and residue in plants. More seriously, free aluminum ions enter the groundwater, rivers, and lakes through diffusion, infiltration, deposition, and migration, causing water pollution and endangering human health. Iron flocculant itself has strong corrosiveness, which will accelerate the aging of equipment and increase the cost of water treatment [7]. Organic polymer flocculant has the characteristics of less dosage, fast flocculation, but does not produce easily biodegradable residues [12]. Polyacrylamide is the most commonly used in the synthetic organic flocculants [13]. Although the polyacrylamide itself has no toxicity, its difficult degradation easily cause secondary pollution, and the residue of polymer monomer acrylamide is also a very worrying problem, as it not only has a strong neurotoxicity, but also a strong carcinogen [14]. Compared with them, microbial flocculant, which mainly refers to the microorganisms and their metabolites, has the advantages of being effective, low-cost, and a security extensive source [15,16].
Microbial flocculant is a kind of nontoxic biopolymer compound formed by a microorganism or its metabolites, major include glycoprotein, polysaccharide, protein, cellulose, DNA, as well as the flocculation activity of the bacteria [17]. Microbial flocculants are biological macromolecules, and their flocculation activity is affected by the length of the molecular chain. Generally, the longer the molecular chain, the better the flocculation effect. In addition, the molecular structure is also one of the factors affecting the flocculation effect. Due to the influence of space, the flocculation effect of the flocculant molecule with a linear structure is better than that of a branched structure or a crosslinked structure. Microbial flocculants make the suspended particles in the water settle through an adsorption bridging role. The molecular structure of the flocculants contains many hydrophilic groups, such as hydroxyl and carboxyl, and the reactive group promotes flocculant adsorption bridging between the molecules and aerosols because of the neutralization and chemical reaction [15,16].
The discovery and application of microbial flocculants has a history of more than 100 years. In 1876, Louis Pasteur discovered microbial flocculation while studying yeast. This is the first report on the phenomenon of microbial flocculants. In 1899, Bordet discovered that certain bacteria could also produce flocculation. The earliest bacterial flocculant-producing bacteria was Zoogloea, which was isolated from the activated sludge screened by Butterfield in 1935 [18]. In 1976, Nakamura et al. conducted systemic experiments on 214 species of different strains, and finally filtered 19 kinds of microorganisms with flocculation ability [18,19]. Thus, the study of microbial flocculants opened the curtain. More and more microorganisms are found to have or be capable of producing microbial flocculants. In addition, the bacterial species, such as Paenibacillus sp., Alcaligenes latus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Bacillus sp., Rhodococcus sp. and Acinetobacter sp, are innocuous in nature to the ecosystem when in the use of a bioflocculant [20,21]. Until now, it has been found that the microbial flocculants are mainly distributed in mold, bacteria, actinomycetes, and yeast. Common microorganisms that can obtain microbial flocculants include gram positive bacteria (Rhodococcus erythropolis, Nocardia calcarea, Stink bugs bug nocardia, Corynebacterium, etc.), gram negative bacteria (Alcaligenes latus, etc.), and other microorganisms (Agrobacterium, Dematium, Pseudo single cell fungus, Eritrea’s bacillus genus, acinetobacter, Soy sauce aspergillus, Paecilomyces, etc.) [7,9]. Among them, the flocculant produced by Paecilomycin has good flocculation effect on food wastewater, coal slurry wastewater, and textile wastewater [22], and the flocculant produced by Rhodococcus erythropolis [23] has good flocculation effect on fine coal wastewater, papermaking wastewater, and activated sludge.
Up until now, the application of bioflocculants in wastewater treatment have received more and more concerns. This article introduces the development status of microbial flocculation, the mechanism and application of the mechanism of flocculant, predicts the development trend, and gives suggestions on the research and application of flocculants.

2. Preparation of Microbial Flocculants

The formation of microbial flocculant is mainly related to the metabolic behavior of the microorganism itself. A large number of experiments show that the maximum flocculating activity appeared in the mid-late microbial metabolic behavior or stationary phase. This is due to the microbial metabolic activity or self-dissolution behavior, which leads to the flocculation activity that occurs in the middle or late stage of microbial metabolism behavior. The factors that affect the production of microbial flocculant include carbon source, nitrogen source, carbon and nitrogen ratio, temperature, pH, dissolved oxygen, culture time, and so on [24,25]. Some microorganisms need the stimulation of metal ions to produce the required biological flocculants [26,27].

2.1. Effect of pH Value on Production of Microbial Flocculants

Due to electrical neutralization, the surface charge and state of charge of flocculant molecules and suspended particles in water can directly affect the flocculation effect. The pH of the flocculation system will affect the surface charge and the charged state of the colloid particles, thus affecting the flocculation effect [28,29]. Different microbial flocculants have different sensitivity to pH value [30,31]. Microbial flocculant can only show the flocculation activity in a certain range of pH value [32,33]. When the change of pH of the reaction system exceeds this range, it will not only change the state of the charged state and the ability to neutralize the charge, but also change the surface properties of the particles [34]. The research showed that the flocculation of different substances by the same kind of microbial flocculants had different optimum pH value.

2.2. Effect of Temperature on Production of Microbial Flocculants

The effect of temperature on microbial flocculants is divided into indirect effects and direct effects. The indirect effect means that the microorganism has the most suitable growth temperature and the temperature at which the flocculant is generated, and the temperature affects the yield and performance of the flocculants by affecting the microorganism [35]. The direct effect is that the temperature directly affects the molecular motion of the microbial flocculant. Flocculation reaction has a better performance with the rise of the temperature, as it accelerates the speed of flocculants’ molecular movement. However, for protein flocculants when the temperature is too high, it leads to the degeneration of proteins and the destruction of space structure, which finally affects the performance of flocculation reaction. For some flocculants, which are composed of polysaccharide, the change of temperature has little influence on flocculation reaction; after high temperature treatment, the structure of polysaccharide flocculants has little change, and still has the ability to adsorb suspended solid. Therefore, the activity of flocculants is influenced by temperature and it is related to the flocculants’ character.

2.3. Effect of the Dosage of Microbial Flocculants

The dosage of flocculants is one of the factors that affects the performance of the reaction system [36]. Research shows the best dosage of microbial flocculants makes the adsorption of solid particles surface achieve saturation. At this time, adsorption quantity and adsorption bridging action most likely happen. Meanwhile, when the dosage of flocculants is out of range, the performance of flocculation would be influenced [37,38]. When the dosage is not enough, flocculating agents cannot flocculate ions in water completely; when adding too large a quantity of flocculants, reactions between flocculants’ molecules may occur, as a result, affecting flocculation performance [39]. Due to the co-working of adsorption bridging, network capturing, and other functions, even using the same kind of flocculants to treat different substances, the suitable dosage is different.

2.4. Effect of Type and Concentration of Metal Ions

In the application of flocculating agents, coagulants are always used to enhance flocculants’ performance. Different kinds of microbial flocculants used different metal ions as coagulant aids (i.e., Ca2+, Mg2+, Mn2+, Al3+) [40]. The presence of high concentrations of Ca2+ protects microbial flocculants from degradation enzymes. A suitable amount of metal ions has the ability to promote flocculation reaction, among which Ca2+ and Mg2+ ions have obvious effects [41,42], as they can promote the adsorption bridging between flocculant molecules and colloidal particles, neutralize a part of negative charge, and decrease the repulsive interaction between flocculant molecules and colloidal particles [43]. However, when adding too much metal ions, the activity of flocculants would be influenced, because redundant metal ions occupy an activated position of flocculant molecules and hinder adsorption between colloidal particles and flocculants’ surface.

3. Performances of Microbial Flocculants in Treatment of Various Wastewater

For the research of microbial flocculants, the most fundamental purpose is to be used in actual production and life. The sources of different wastewaters are different and the composition varies widely. The biological flocculants required to treat these wastewaters are also very different. There are many types of microbial flocculants, the flocculation mechanisms are different when treating different wastewaters, and the performances they exhibit are also different. Table 2 shows the microbial flocculants used in several common wastewaters. The specific components of these microbial flocculants in wastewater have a good flocculation effect.

3.1. Coal Slurry

Coal slurry is industrial wastewater which is in the process of wet-processing in the coal preparation plant [73,74]. The coal slurry wastewater is mainly a mixture of water and fine coal powder, and the solid particles are fine and the turbidity is high. It is influenced by Brownian motion, gravity, and the interaction between solid particle interfaces. Coal slurry wastewater has both the properties of a suspension and the nature of a colloid. Therefore, it is difficult to clarify naturally. Now, factories still use the high polymer flocculant to deal with coal slurry wastewater in general. However, the use of high polymer flocculant is not only expensive, but also can produce secondary pollution [75,76]. It is very important to find a kind of economic and safe flocculant to deal with coal slime water. In the early 1960s, R.W Smith used mycobacterium to deal with coal slurry and achieved good results [77]. Now, using microbial flocculant to deal with coal wastewater is not only efficient, fast, has no pollution and microbial flocculant, but also can degrade organic pollutants [78]. Compared with foreign countries, the research on the flocculation of coal slurry of microbial flocculant is earlier than China. Liu et al. [79] first studied the breeding of microorganisms for the production of coal slurry flocculant in China. Fine coal is hydrophobic and bacteria are hydrophilic. The surface of bacteria has a strong electron donor property, which interacts with fine coal, which can promote flocculation of slime wastewater [80,81]. In the experiment, the original Phanerochaete chrysosporium domestication and breeding of Phanerochaete chrysosporium was used as flocculant-producing bacteria. The experiment showed that the original Phanerochaete chrysosporium under the experimental conditions the maximum flocculation rate was 93.5%, flocculation acclimation Phanerochaete chrysosporium rate can reach the maximum of 88.68%, and UV mutagenesis and chemical mutagenesis ball Phanerochaete chrysosporium’s highest flocculating rate reached 95.08% and 95.04%, respectively [32,82]. The study also showed that the domestication breeding was helpful to improve the stability of the flocculation coal slurry [83,84,85].

3.2. Food Industry Wastewater

The food sector is one of the sectors that produces the largest amount of wastewater in industrial production, and it is also one of the sectors with the most complex wastewater components. Food wastewater includes grains, fruits and vegetables, meat, eggs, milk, poultry, and so on. The raw materials are wide and varied, and the water quality varies greatly, including starch, protein, oil, and so on, which are not easily melted, and the acid–base salt and sugar. Wastewater that has not been thoroughly processed during food or grocery processing has a high pollution load. Wastewater produced during the production of protein foods has a high nutrient content, which can easily cause eutrophication of water bodies, with dairy products being the most obvious [7,86]. This type of food wastewater is mainly organic pollutants. In 1974, the State promulgated the Water (Prevention and Control of Pollution) Law and amendments, which set limits and requirements for wastewater treatment and rational use of water resources [7,86].
The wastewater from the food processing industry contains a lot of organic matter and suspended matter. The wastewater discharged from the production enterprises, such as beer and gourmet powder, has high BOD and COD. If these wastewaters directly discharged into the environment, it will consume a large amount of dissolved oxygen in the water, directly leading to environmental deterioration. If treated with organic and inorganic flocculant, the flocculation recovery is not easy to be degraded. Experiments proved that the microbial flocculant has a better treatment effect on the food wastewater, and with flocculation recycling being biodegradable, no second pollution was formed.

3.3. Heavy Metal Wastewater Treatment

Heavy metal refers to a metal that has an atomic density of 4.5 g/mL or more. Heavy metal wastewater refers to wastewater containing nickel, cadmium, mercury, lead, chromium, copper, etc., produced in industrial production such as smelting, electronics, and chemical industries. Electroplating, mining, and chemical industries produce large amounts of heavy metal wastewater every year [87]. The discharge of these heavy metal wastewaters into the environment is extremely harmful to the environment and human health. For example, lead can directly damage brain cells, cadmium can destroy bone calcium, mercury can damage the central nervous system, and chromium can cause numbness and mental abnormalities in the limbs. Heavy metals not only have direct hazards, but many heavy metals can cause accumulation poisoning. Japan’s painful and watery disease episodes that shocked the world in the 1960s were caused by cadmium and mercury pollution. A mercury content of more than 0.1 mL per liter of drinking water can cause intense poisoning. However, even if the content is relatively low, long-term drinking will accumulate in the body, causing poisoning. The question of how to remove heavy metal ions in wastewater effectively and at the same time realize the wastewater reuse and recycling of heavy metals is the development direction of heavy metal wastewater treatment [88,89]. Microbial flocculant, as a green flocculant, is also applied to the process of flocculation of heavy metal wastewater [62,90,91,92]. The flocculating effect of microbial flocculants on metal wastewater is not only affected by the nature of microorganisms, but also by the affinity of microorganisms to metals. For example, bacillus flocculant has a good treatment effect on Cu2+ and Pb2+. The removal rate of Cd2+ by Pseudomonas can reach 93.5% [68]. The results show that the biosorption ability of the exopolysaccharides is much higher than that of the extracellular proteins in the extracellular polymers.

3.4. Papermaking Wastewater Treatment

Generally, there are three kinds of raw materials for papermaking: wood, non-wood, and recycled fiber, which are completed through 8 processes and 31 technologies [93,94]. In the process of production, 60 m3 fresh water is consumed per ton of paper, so the paper mill also consumes water [27,95]. If such wastewater cannot be effectively solved, it will easily cause harm to the aquatic environment [96,97]. In the study of papermaking wastewater treatment with the extraction of microbial flocculant, the flocculation effect is good and the removal rate of ammonia nitrogen can be as high as 96% under the optimum flocculation conditions. Fungi are widely used in pulp and paper mill wastewaters [26,98]. This is because compared with bacteria, fungi are more resistant to interference and have the ability to produce extracellular enzymes [99,100], the most common of which is white rot fungi. Trametes pubescens [101] and Phanerochaete chrysosporium [94] are two types of white rot fungi that have been studied intensively. They are capable of degrading lignin and phenolic compounds through the production of peroxidases and laccases [102,103]. Malaviya and Rathore [104] used Merulius aureus, an unidentified genus and Fusarium sambucinum to form a solidifying fungal complex for experimental research on the treatment of kraft paper wastewater. The first two bacteria belong to Basidiomycetous fungi, and the last one belongs to Deuteromycetous fungus. The raw materials for kraft paper production are bagasse and eucalyptus wood, and the resulting pulp color and COD are very high. The experimental results show that using this fungal complex can reduce the wood color and lignin content by 78.6% and 79.0%, respectively, and the COD removal rate is as high as 89.4%. In addition, Pleurotus sajor caju and Rhizopus oryzae species were studied in the experiment. The former belongs to white rot fungi and the latter belongs to soft rot fungi. By using this fungal complex to treat the wastewater produced by the secondary treatment of bleached sulfate blue eucalyptus, the color and COD of the wastewater were significantly reduced. After 10 days of incubation, the removal rate of COD was 74–81% [103]. Liu et al. [105] selected a mechanical pulp for laboratory test. The main component of this mechanical pulp is Aspergillus niger poplar alkaline peroxide. Orthogonal experiments optimized reaction conditions. The results showed that when the inoculation amount was 3% and the reaction pH was 6, the continuous shaking at 160 rpm for 60–72 h, and the reaction was maintained at a temperature of 30 °C, the effect was the best. At this time, the COD removal rate was 60%, and the turbidity and color removal rates were 77% and 43%, respectively. Experiments can obtain about 97% of methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE) extract [105].

3.5. Textile Wastewater Treatment

The textile industry is one of the main producers of industrial wastewater. Different resources and raw materials consume different amounts of water. For example, the pre-treatment water consumption of cotton and wool processing is very large. In contrast, the water consumption of synthetic fibers is much smaller. The amount of water required by different processes also varies. Generally speaking, wet processing operations consume more water. The composition of textile wastewater is also complex. In addition to basic acids and alkalis, dyes that meet various color needs, there are differences caused by different raw materials, such as cotton waste from cotton textile wastewater, proteins and oils from wool textile wastewater, and fiber debris from fiber textile wastewater. In addition, in order to improve the quality of textiles, many additives are added to the textile processing process, which may directly or indirectly cause excessive levels of organic pollutants in textile wastewater and serious excessive levels of heavy metal ions [106]. Therefore, if we only look at the global impact from the perspective of the impact on the environment, it is estimated that the textile industry is the industry with the highest water demand. According to World Bank estimates, textile wastewater accounts for about 17% to 20% of total industrial wastewater. A typical medium-sized textile mill consumes about 200 L/d/kg of textiles. What is more serious is that textile wastewater with a high pollution load can easily cause secondary pollution [107]. The biological treatment of textile wastewater is generally based on the treatment of dissolved matter in wastewater [70]. The removal efficiency of the microbial method is related to the load of the microorganism itself, and is also affected by the oxygen concentration, temperature, and organic load/dye ratio in the system [106,108,109]. Microbial domestication is a good method to obtain microorganisms adapted to the targeted environment. Microorganisms gradually adapt to textile dyes. Newly grown strains are more adapted to environmental requirements. Whether the strains grow or secrete enzymes that solve difficult-to-degrade dyes, such as laccase, tyrosinase, and aminopyrine N-demethylase, this can reduce the harm of textile wastewater to the environment [110]. The efficiency of bioflocculation and biodegradation depends on the adaptability of the microorganisms themselves and the activity of the enzymes produced. In recent years, through the domestication of microorganisms, a large number of microorganisms adapted to the targeted environment have been isolated, thereby obtaining a large number of enzymes. Bioflocculation and biodegradation treatment of wastewater can reduce water consumption and produce no harmful substances in metabolism. Biological treatment is more ecologically friendly, low cost, and competitive in the industry [109].
In the research of treating textile wastewater, the separation of effective microorganisms and the extraction of related enzymes are very interesting research aspects in biology. So far, in the process of treating textile wastewater, a variety of microorganisms (including bacteria, fungi, and even algae) with flocculation and degradation ability have been obtained. In comparison, the bacterial response is more sensitive and the fungus is more adaptable. Algae has a good treatment effect on metal ions and special biological macromolecules. Fungal cultures are able to adapt their metabolism to changing environmental conditions. For them, it is a capability related to survival. Here, intracellular and extracellular enzymes contribute to metabolic activity. These enzymes are capable of degrading various dyes in textile wastewater. Due to the presence of these enzymes, fungal cultures appear to be suitable for degrading dyes in textile wastewater. These enzymes are Lignin peroxidase (LiP), Laccase and Manganese peroxidase (MnP) [111], white rot fungus Pleurotus eryngii [112], and Penicilliumsim plicissimum [113]. However, white rot fungi coriolopsis sp. [111] have long growing seasons, high environmental requirements, and unreliable enzyme production. The main problem with the use of fungi alone is that the system is unstable. It takes 20–30 days for the bacteria to start growing and the fungi will no longer dominate the system and degrade the dye [114]. It has almost no flocculation degradation.
Due to its unique ability to remove azo dyes, algae have received more attention and have been used more widely in the removal of dyes in textile wastewater. In addition, the bio-adsorption process that uses algae waste for decolorization is a practical alternative to expensive activated carbon and other materials.
Generally speaking, bacteria can also degrade organic pollutants in textile wastewater. Bacteria mainly degrade azo dyes. This is because the azo reductase produced by bacteria can break the azo bond under anaerobic conditions, thereby destroying the dye structure and facilitating the further processing of intermediates. In addition, the degradation of disperse red 78 by bacteria (Pseudomonas) was 37% higher than that by the fungal system (Aspergillus oryzae NCIM-1146) [108]. This article reports the degradation pathways and pharmacodynamics of degradation products. Holkar et al. reported that under natural conditions, anthraquinone-based active blue 19 degraded 90% in one day and night, while Wang et al. reported that under anaerobic conditions, anthraquinone-based active black 5 was degraded in five days and nights, at 92% [115,116].

3.6. Printing and Dyeing Wastewater Treatment

Printing and dyeing wastewater refers to the wastewater generated during the printing and dyeing processing of cotton, wool, hemp, fiber, and their mixed textiles. The printing and dyeing wastewater contains textile impurities, dyes, and additives. Printing and dyeing wastewater is mainly produced in several processes such as desizing, scouring, bleaching, mercerizing, whitening, dyeing, and printing. The printing and dyeing wastewater contains high concentrations of textile impurities, dyes, auxiliaries, oils, and slurries [117,118]. Although the pollutants in different printing and dyeing products and the wastewater discharged from different printing and dyeing processes vary greatly, overall, the high content of organic pollutants, large alkalinity, unstable water quality, high chemical oxygen demand, poor biodegradability, and low BOD/COD ratio are the main characteristics of printing and dyeing wastewater [119,120,121]. The chroma of printing and dyeing wastewater is higher than other general wastewater [122,123], and the composition is more complicated than general wastewater. There are many varieties of dyes and intermediates, and even toxic and harmful substances, such as hexavalent chromium and aniline dyes [124,125].

4. Mechanisms of Bioflocculation

In terms of chemical composition, it is mainly produced by microbial metabolism with a flocculation activity of protein, polysaccharide, and some of the flocculant also contains inorganic metal ions spatial structure from the point of view, there are two kinds of microbial flocculants micro stereoscopic structure: fibrous structure and ball. Microbial flocculants have been investigated in different kinds of wastewater treatment as well. Pant and Adholeya [126] used bacterial, fungal, algal, and plant-based systems in the color removal of distillery effluent. In flocculant preparation, different kinds of microbial species have been studied and reported, such as Enterobacter sp. [13,116], Halomonas sp. [127,128], Citrobacter sp. [129], Bacillus sp. [16,130,131,132,133,134,135], and Rhodococcus erythropolis [136,137,138].
In general, development of flocs formed mainly has several steps: (a) Flocculant molecules are gradually dispersed in the solution; (b) Collisions with other particles in the particle carrying a flocculant adsorption; (c) Adsorption of flocculant molecules on the surface of particles [139,140]; (d) Small aggregates grow larger and stronger through continuous collision and adsorption [126]. There have been many hypotheses about the mechanism of microbial flocculant, such as Butterfield’s hypothesis about adhesion, Grabtree’s Ester composite hypothesis based on the study about PHD (Poly-β-hydroxybutyric acid), and Friedman’s extracellular fiber theory [12,141]. However, generally speaking, the hypotheses accepted at the moment are adsorption bridging mechanism, charge neutralization mechanism, chemical reaction mechanism, mechanism of volume sweeping effect, etc. The particle adsorption on the surface of the flocculant is the result of the combined effect of these mechanisms. It is a complicated process as when processing wastewater by microbial flocculant, the flocculation mechanism of many microbial flocculants is not only a single one, but the result of several mechanisms working together [142]. Moreover, when the effect of microbial flocculant was changed, the mechanism was not identical.

4.1. Adsorption Bridging

Flocculation process refers to the process of polymerization of multiple particles [119,143]. In the process of flocculation, there are colloid particles from a stable state [144,145]. According to adsorption bridging theory, microbial flocculant is a kind of chain macromolecule which has the characteristics of high molecular weight and low charge density [119,143]. There are adsorbed active sites on the molecule. Colloidal particles are adsorbed on the molecule by the adsorption of the active site [71,146]. At the same time, multiple microbial flocculant large chainlike molecules through hydrogen bond intermolecular van der Waals forces the particle bypass to be formed by a three-dimensional network structure and set down [147]. The length of the flocculant should be long enough to extend from the surface of the particle to the other in order to effectively build bridges [148]. The space of the flocculation should be large enough, that is, the adsorbing capacity should be large enough, in order to adsorb the attachment particles in the other segment [129]. The suitable chain length and the adsorption capacity can make the bridge contact more resistant to damage and improve flocculation efficiency.

4.2. Charge Neutrality

The flocculant and the adsorption site are opposite charges in many practical cases [149]. There is a negative correlation between chemical oxygen demand and conductivity [150]. The colloid in the water generally carries a negative charge. When adding microbial flocculant, a neutralizing effect occurs between them as the flocculant is macromolecules with a positive charge on the surface [143]. Due to the reduction of the surface charge of the particles, that is, the Zeta potential is reduced, the repulsive force between the particles is reduced [151,152]. By the attraction of van der Waals, colloid and suspended solids gathered to form flocs, then the colloid destabilization, after this, colloids and colloid, or colloid and microbial flocculant were flocculated into large particles [153,154]. The flocculation effect can be influenced by the pH value of the flocculation reaction system due to the change of the water colloid or flocculant [155,156,157,158]. Similar to that, many studies have found that when Zeta potential is close to zero, the flocculation effect is best. Thus, when there is a charge reversal, the attraction between the particles may turn to repulsion, and the particles may be dispersed again.

4.3. Chemical Reactions

Microbial flocculant belongs to the biological macromolecules. Some of the groups on the molecule react chemically with some of the groups on the surface of the colloid. Then flocculation into larger particles precipitate out of the water. The modification of microbial flocculant (adding or reducing the reactive groups on the flocculant molecules) can also change the flocculation effect of the reaction system. The temperature can affect the flocculation effect because the temperature can directly change the activity of the reaction group.

4.4. Volume Sweeping

When added to a certain amount of microbial flocculant, flocculation floc increases with the process continuously, and, settling down, relies on gravity. In the process of sedimentation, floc, just like a sieve, can quickly sweep the volume and capture some colloidal particles dispersed in water material, then become a larger floc. Thus, the colloidal material can be separated from the water by mechanical precipitation. In the process of forming a sieve, the network needs enough nodes to form a sieve. The concentration of impurities in water is inversely proportional to the dosage of microbial flocculant. The higher the concentration of impurities, the less the amount of microbial flocculant. On the contrary, the less impurities in the water, the more flocculant would be needed to achieve the effect of volume sweep.

5. Prospects of Microbial Flocculants

In recent years, microbial flocculant has been identified as a potential solution to a large number of wastewater treatment. However, in practical applications, microbial flocculants work very limited in engineering scale, mainly concentrated in the experimental stage. Some problems, such as a wide variety of microorganisms, microbial variability, and so on, are still widely used in microbial flocculant-caused obstacles. In addition, the screening of efficient flocculants produces bacteria and the high cost of microbial flocculant produces bacteria. The author thinks that the microbial flocculant can be further studied in several aspects.

5.1. Applications of Cheap Culture Media

Carbon source and nitrogen source are the main sources of the growth of microorganisms [159,160]. The use of yeast extract, glucose, and so on in the process of laboratory culture is too large and the cost is too high, which is not conducive to mass production and application. Wastewater, food wastewater, and other wastewater are complex components, which can provide energy for microorganisms while reducing the content of organic matter and nitrogen in wastewater [57,161], given the difference of the contents of the different wastewaters. The reasonable ratio of different wastewater can effectively reduce the external energy, and in the process of building a cheap medium, the water purification effect can be better [162]. Moreover, while screening suitable media, the culture conditions of the microbial flocculant strain can be continuously optimized [163,164], so as to obtain a microbial flocculant with lower cost and a better flocculation effect.

5.2. Production of Composite Bioflocculants

A single biological flocculant is usually selective. When the composition of wastewater is complex in actual production and life, the application of biological flocculants is limited. It is found that in the process of screening bacteria, the mixed bacteria are sometimes more effective than single species [145,165]. Therefore, screening the production bacteria of the composite flocculant in the application process [166] and exploring the synergistic effect of different strains in producing flocculant in the wastewater treatment is of great significance for culturing the composite flocculant bacteria.

5.3. Understanding of Bioflocculation Mechanisms

Pay attention to the specificity and general characteristics of microbial flocculation in wastewater treatment in order to make the microbial flocculant more rapid and effective in the treatment of different wastewater. In addition, some polysaccharide microbial flocculants have special effects of anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidation, and anti-oxidation [167]. Moreover, some polysaccharide-based flocculants can be used as reducing agents and stabilizers to promote the synthesis and separation of some experimental drugs [168].
By studying the effect of similar cells, there is potential to explore effective gene fragments, and through the research of gene transposon, explore the function of training high flocculation effect of flocculants producing bacteria and simultaneous desulfurization and denitrification removal or other organic matter producing bacteria, and explore the application of flocculant-producing bacteria in special water bodies.
Due to the shortage of energy and the serious environmental pollution caused by excessive use of fossil fuels, biofuels have been considered as a potential substitute in recent years. Among them, biodiesel is one of the most commonly used biofuels. Moreover, among many potential biodiesel raw materials, microalgae have the advantages of large output and fast accumulation [169]. Microalgal bacterial flocs is a popular and promising microalgae collection and wastewater treatment method [144,170,171]. Lei et al. [172] have reported that microbial flocculant flocculation-flotation technology can effectively harvest chlorella, and the use of composite flocculants can also enhance the harvest of chlorella [173]. This study provided some insights on the formation of flocs and provided a theoretical basis for further improving the recovery of chlorella and removing nutrients from seafood wastewater [174,175,176].

6. Conclusions

In this review, the principle of flocculation, the synthetic conditions and influencing factors of microbial flocculants, and the application of flocculants in production and life are introduced. It is helpful to understand the mechanism and development status of microbial flocculants, such as the present situation of microbial flocculants, the flocculation mechanism of microbial flocculants, the synthetic conditions and influencing factors of microbial flocculants, and the application of microbial flocculants in wastewater treatment. The performance of microbial flocculants has focused on the application of microbial flocculants in coal slurry, food industry, heavy metal, papermaking, textile, printing, and dyeing wastewater. The development prospects of microbial flocculants are described in this paper.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.L. and C.Y.; methodology, H.L.; validation, C.D. and Y.Z.; formal analysis, H.L. and S.W.; investigation, H.L.; resources, C.Y.; data curation, H.L.; writing—original draft preparation, H.L.; writing—review and editing, S.W. and C.Y.; visualization, C.D. and Y.Z.; supervision, C.Y.; project administration, C.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.:51978178, 51478172 and 51521006); the Department of Science and Technology of Guangdong Province of China (Contract No.: 2019A1515012044 and 2018S0011); the International S&T Cooperation Program of China (Contract No.: 2015DFG92750); the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province of China (Grant No.: LY17E080002) and the Department of Science and Technology of Hunan Province of China (Contract No.: 2017JJ2029 and 2017SK2362).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Gielnik, A.; Pechaud, Y.; Huguenot, D.; Cebron, A.; Esposito, G.; van Hullebusch, E.D. Bacterial seeding potential of digestate in bioremediation of diesel contaminated soil. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2019, 143, 104715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bosso, L.; Scelza, R.; Testa, A.; Cristinzio, G.; Rao, M.A. Depletion of Pentachlorophenol Contamination in an Agricultural Soil Treated with Byssochlamys nivea, Scopulariopsis brumptii and Urban Waste Compost: A Laboratory Microcosm Study. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2015, 226, 183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xu, P.; Lai, C.; Zeng, G.; Huang, D.; Chen, M.; Song, B.; Peng, X.; Wan, J.; Hu, L.; Duan, A.; et al. Enhanced bioremediation of 4-nonylphenol and cadmium co-contaminated sediment by composting with Phanerochaete chrysosporium inocula. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 250, 625–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Abbas, S.Z.; Rafatullah, M.; Ismail, N.; Nastro, R. Enhanced bioremediation of toxic metals and harvesting electricity through sediment microbial fuel cell. Int. J. Energy Res. 2017, 41, 2345–2355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wang, W.; Jiang, F.Y.; Wu, F.; Li, J.H.; Ge, R.; Li, J.; Tan, G.Q.; Pang, Y.L.; Zhou, X.F.; Ren, X.J. Biodetection and bioremediation of copper ions in environmental water samples using a temperature-controlled, dual-functional Escherichia coli cell. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 6797–6807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bosso, L.; Scelza, R.; Varlese, R.; Meca, G.; Testa, A.; Rao, M.A.; Cristinzio, G. Assessing the effectiveness of Byssochlamys nivea and Scopulariopsis brumptii in pentachlorophenol removal and biological control of two Phytophthora species. Fungal Biol. 2016, 120, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Porwal, H.J.; Mane, A.V.; Velhal, S.G. Biodegradation of dairy effluent by using microbial isolates obtained from activated sludge. Water Resour. Ind. 2015, 9, 1–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Oladoja, N.A. Headway on natural polymeric coagulants in water and wastewater treatment operations. J. Water Process Eng. 2015, 6, 174–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Aljuboori, A.H.; Uemura, Y.; Osman, N.B.; Yusup, S. Production of a bioflocculant from Aspergillus niger using palm oil mill effluent as carbon source. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 171, 66–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, L.; Guo, Y.; Yu, W.; Ni, Y.; Wang, X. Application Progress of Bioflocculant on Treatment of Heavy Metal Wastewater. In Proceedings of the 2016 5th International Conference on Environment, Materials, Chemistry and Power Electronics; AER-Advances in Engineering Research; Atlantis Press: Paris, France, 2016; Volume 84, pp. 6–10. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ngo, H.H.; Guo, W. Membrane fouling control and enhanced phosphorus removal in an aerated submerged membrane bioreactor using modified green bioflocculant. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 4289–4291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Luvuyo, N.; Nwodo, U.U.; Mabinya, L.V.; Okoh, A.I. Studies on bioflocculant production by a mixed culture of Methylobacterium sp. Obi and Actinobacterium sp. Mayor. BMC Biotechnol. 2013, 13, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  13. Tang, W.; Song, L.; Li, D.; Qiao, J.; Zhao, T.; Zhao, H. Production, Characterization, and Flocculation Mechanism of Cation Independent, pH Tolerant, and Thermally Stable Bioflocculant from Enterobacter sp ETH-2. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e114591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Guezennec, A.G.; Michel, C.; Bru, K.; Touze, S.; Desroche, N.; Mnif, I.; Motelica, H.M. Transfer and degradation of polyacrylamide-based flocculants in hydrosystems: A review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015, 22, 6390–6406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Zhao, H.; Liu, H.; Zhou, J. Characterization of a bioflocculant MBF-5 by Klebsiella pneumoniae and its application in Acanthamoeba cysts removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 137, 226–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Li, Z.; Zhong, S.; Lei, H.Y.; Chen, R.W.; Yu, Q.; Li, H.L. Production of a novel bioflocculant by Bacillus licheniformis X14 and its application to low temperature drinking water treatment. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 3650–3656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guo, J.Y.; Yang, C.P.; Peng, L.Y. Preparation and characteristics of bacterial polymer using pre-treated sludge from swine wastewater treatment plant. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 152, 490–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bao, J.J.; Jiang, M.Y. The Research Status and Development Trend of Microbial Flocculant. Phys. Procedia 2012, 24, 425–428. [Google Scholar]
  19. Salehizadeh, H.; Yan, N. Recent advances in extracellular biopolymer flocculants. Biotechnol. Adv. 2014, 32, 1506–1522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Wang, L.; Ma, F.; Lee, D.J.; Wang, A.; Ren, N. Bioflocculants from hydrolysates of corn stover using isolated strain Ochrobactium ciceri W2. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 145, 259–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Guo, J.; Yang, C.; Zeng, G. Treatment of swine wastewater using chemically modified zeolite and bioflocculant from activated sludge. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 143, 289–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Takagi, H.; Kadowaki, K. Flocculant production by Paecilomyces sp. Taxonomic studies and culture conditions for production. Agric. Biol. Chem. 1985, 49, 3151–3157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Kurane, R.; Hatakeyama, S.; Tsugeno, H. Correlation between flocculant production and morphological changes in Rhodococcus erythropolis S-1. J. Ferment. Bioeng. 1991, 72, 498–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Van Den Hende, S.; Rodrigues, A.; Hamaekers, H.; Sonnenholzner, S.; Vervaeren, H.; Boon, N. Microalgal bacterial flocs treating paper mill effluent: A sunlight-based approach for removing carbon, nitrogen, phosphorus, and calcium. New Biotechnol. 2017, 39, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Wu, S.H.; Liu, H.Y.; Lin, Y.; Yang, C.P.; Lou, W.; Sun, J.T.; Du, C.; Zhang, D.M.; Nie, L.J.; Yin, K.; et al. Insights into mechanisms of UV/ferrate oxidation for degradation of phenolic pollutants: Role of superoxide radicals. Chemosphere 2020, 244, 125490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Razali, M.A.A.; Ahmad, Z.; Ahmad, M.S.B.; Ariffin, A. Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater with various molecular weight of polyDADMAC induced flocculation. Chem. Eng. J. 2011, 166, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ahmad, A.; Wong, S.; Teng, T.; Zuhairi, A. Improvement of alum and PACl coagulation by polyacrylamides (PAMs) for the treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 137, 510–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yang, C.P.; Qian, H.; Li, X.; Cheng, Y.; He, H.J.; Zeng, G.M.; Xi, J. Simultaneous Removal of Multicomponent VOCs in Biofilters. Trends Biotechnol. 2018, 36, 673–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zouboulis, A.I.; Chai, X.L.; Katsoyiannis, I.A. The application of bioflocculant for the removal of humic acids from stabilized landfill leachates. J. Environ. Manag. 2004, 70, 35–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, Z.; Zhang, J. Preparation of microbial flocculant from excess sludge of municipal wastewater treatment plant. Fresenius Environ. Bull. 2013, 22, 142–145. [Google Scholar]
  31. Wu, S.H.; Li, H.R.; Li, X.; He, H.J.; Yang, C.P. Performances and mechanisms of efficient degradation of atrazine using peroxymonosulfate and ferrate as oxidants. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 353, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhang, D.; Hou, Z.; Liu, Z.; Wang, T. Experimental research on Phanerochaete chrysosporium as coal microbial flocculant. Int. J. Min. Sci. Technol. 2013, 23, 521–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, S.H.; He, H.J.; Li, X.; Yang, C.P.; Zeng, G.; Wu, B.; He, S.; Lu, L. Insights into atrazine degradation by persulfate activation using composite of nanoscale zero-valent iron and graphene: Performances and mechanisms. Chem. Eng. J. 2018, 341, 126–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Huang, X.; Gao, B.; Yue, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, S. Compound bioflocculant used as a coagulation aid in synthetic dye wastewater treatment: The effect of solution pH. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 154, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Li, B.; Yan, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Zhou, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhang, W. Effects of key enzyme activities and microbial communities in a flocculent-granular hybrid complete autotrophic nitrogen removal over nitrite reactor under mainstream conditions. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 280, 136–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Qiu, Z.M.; Jiang, W.T.; He, Z.J. Post-treatment of banknote printing wastewater using polysilicate ferro-aluminum sulfate (PSFA). J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 166, 740–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ariffin, A.; Razali, M.A.A.; Ahmad, Z. PolyDADMAC and polyacrylamide as a hybrid flocculation system in the treatment of pulp and paper mills waste water. Chem. Eng. J. 2012, 179, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, J.P.; Chen, Y.Z.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, S.J.; Yu, H.Q. Optimization of the coagulation-flocculation process for pulp mill wastewater treatment using a combination of uniform design and response surface methodology. Water Res. 2011, 45, 5633–5640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Blanco, A.; Fuente, E.; Negro, C.; Tijero, J. Flocculation Monitoring: Focused Beam Reflectance Measurement as a Measurement Tool. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2008, 80, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zhou, Q.; Lin, Y.; Li, X.; Yang, C.P.; Han, Z.F.; Zeng, G.M.; Lu, L.; He, S. Effect of zinc ions on nutrient removal and growth of Lemna aequinoctialis from anaerobically digested swine wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 249, 457–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wang, Z.; Shen, L.; Zhuang, X.; Shi, J.; Wang, Y.; He, N.; Chang, Y.I. Flocculation Characterization of a Bioflocculant from Bacillus licheniformis. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2015, 54, 2894–2901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Daraei, H.; Rafiee, M.; Yazdanbakhsh, A.R.; Amoozegar, M.A.; Guanglei, Q. A comparative study on the toxicity of nano zero valent iron (nZVI) on aerobic granular sludge and flocculent activated sludge: Reactor performance, microbial behavior, and mechanism of toxicity. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2019, 129, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. He, H.; Wu, B.; Yang, C.P. Effects of fulvic acids and electrolytes on colloidal stability and photocatalysis of nano-TiO2 for atrazine removal. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2019, 16, 7275–7284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Yang, Z.; Wang, W.; Liu, S. Flocculation of Coal Waste Slurry Using Bioflocculant Produced by Azotobacter chroococcum. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 1460–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, D.C.; Hou, Z.X.; Wang, T. Study on Rhodopseudomonas spheroides as Coal Microbial Flocculant. Adv. Mater. Res. 2012, 550–553, 1090–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dong, X.; Guo, J.; Liu, S.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, S. Method for Processing Coal-Water Slurry, Involves Taking Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria, Inoculating Nitrogen-Fixing Bacteria in Liquid Medium, Centrifuging, Adding Coal-Water Slurry, Followed by Performing Flocculation Precipitation Process; University Taiyuan Technology: Taiyuan, China, 2015; Volume 200. [Google Scholar]
  47. Vijayalakshmi, S.P.; Raichur, A.M. The utility of Bacillus subtilis as a bioflocculant for fine coal. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2003, 29, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sari, A.A.; Hadibarata, T.; Hanifah, U.; Randy, A.; Amriani, F.; Lotulung, P.D.N.; Yasin, H.; Saefumillah, A.; Ilyas, M. Bioethanol Mill Wastewater Purification by Combination of Coagulation-Flocculation and Microbial Treatment of Trametes versicolor INACC F200. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2019, 230, 224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Bajaj, I.B.; Singhal, R.S. Flocculation Properties of Poly (gamma-Glutamic Acid) Produced from Bacillus subtilis Isolate. Food Bioprocess Technol. 2011, 4, 745–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dlangamandla, C.; Dyantyi, S.A.; Mpentshu, Y.P.; Ntwampe, S.K.O.; Basitere, M. Optimisation of bioflocculant production by a biofilm forming microorganism from poultry slaughterhouse wastewater for use in poultry wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 2016, 73, 1963–1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Deng, S.B.; Bai, R.B.; Hu, X.M.; Luo, Q. Characteristics of a bioflocculant produced by Bacillus mucilaginosus and its use in starch wastewater treatment. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 60, 588–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Li, Z.; Zhong, S.; Lei, H.Y.; Chen, R.W.; Bai, T. Production and application of a bioflocculant by culture of Bacillus licheniformis X14 using starch wastewater as carbon source. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 136, 313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Agunbiade, M.O.; Pohl, C.; Van Heerden, E.; Oyekola, O.; Ashafa, A. Evaluation of Fresh Water Actinomycete Bioflocculant and Its Biotechnological Applications in Wastewaters Treatment and Removal of Heavy Metals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 3337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Nie, M.; Yin, X.; Jia, J.; Wang, Y.; Liu, S.; Shen, Q.; Li, P.; Wang, Z. Production of a novel bioflocculant MNXY1 by Klebsiella pneumoniae strain NY1 and application in precipitation of cyanobacteria and municipal wastewater treatment. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 111, 547–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Vardhan, K.H.; Kumar, P.S.; Panda, R.C. A review on heavy metal pollution, toxicity and remedial measures: Current trends and future perspectives. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 290, 111197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Gunasundari, E. Adsorption isotherm, kinetics and thermodynamic analysis of Cu(II) ions onto the dried algal biomass (Spirulina platensis). J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2017, 56, 129–144. [Google Scholar]
  57. Jiang, B.; Fu, L.; Cao, W.; Zhang, B.; Li, F.; Liu, Y. Microbial flocculant produced by a novel Paenibacillus sp., strain A9, using food processing wastewater to replace fermentation medium and its application for the removal of Pb(II) from aqueous solution. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2019, 37, 683–697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Feng, J.; Yang, Z.; Zeng, G.; Huang, J.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Wei, S.; Wang, L. The adsorption behavior and mechanism investigation of Pb(II) removal by flocculation using microbial flocculant GA1. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 148, 414–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, J.; Jiang, B.; Zhang, B.; Li, Y.; Fang, P.; Hu, X. The effect of microflocculant MBFA9 and the mechanism of Pb(II) and Zn(II) removal from an aqueous solution. Adsorpt. Sci. Technol. 2019, 37, 451–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Zhou, Y.; Yang, Z.H.; Huang, J.; Xu, R.; Song, P.P.; Zhang, Y.J.; Li, J.; Aloun, M. Ni(II) removal from aqueous solution by biosorption and flocculation using microbial flocculant GA1. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2017, 43, 3939–3959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lin, J.; Harichund, C. Industrial effluent treatments using heavy-metal removing bacterial bioflocculants. Water SA 2011, 37, 265–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Huang, J.; Huang, Z.L.; Zhou, J.X.; Li, C.Z.; Yang, Z.H.; Ruan, M.; Li, H.; Zhang, X.; Wu, Z.; Qin, X.L.; et al. Enhancement of heavy metals removal by microbial flocculant produced by Paenibacillus polymyxa combined with an insufficient hydroxide precipitation. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 374, 880–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Cao, W.; Hao, J.; Lian, B.; Liu, C.; Wu, F. Zeolite and fungi’s flocculability of simulated wastewater containing heavy metal ions or phosphorus. Chin. J. Geochem. 2010, 29, 137–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Czemierska, M.; Szczes, A.; Pawlik, A.; Wiater, A.; Jarosz-Wilkolazka, A. Production and characterisation of exopolymer from Rhodococcus opacus. Biochem. Eng. J. 2016, 112, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Li, S.; Liu, B.; Wang, L.; Yan, Y. Study on treatment of midcourse wastewater in papermaking factory with microbial flocculant. J. Biotechnol. 2008, 136, 672–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Zhong, H. Modified Composite Flocculant Used for Improving Papermaking Wastewater Settling Performance Comprises Inorganic Flocculant, Bioflocculant, Surface Active Agent, Adsorbent And Edta; Anhui Guoneng Yisheng Environmental Prot: Hefei, China, 2016; Volume 2, pp. 1370–1374. [Google Scholar]
  67. Ren, X.L.; Xiang, X.M.; Wang, X.K.; Wang, R.; Zhou, J.T. Study on an Efficient Bioflocculant for Treating Straw Papermaking Wastewater; DEStech Publications, Inc.: Lancaster, PA, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  68. Azzam, A.M.; Tawfik, A. Removal of heavy metals using bacterial bilfflocculanta of bacillus sp. and pseudomonas sp. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag. 2015, 23, 288–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Holkar, C.R.; Pandit, A.B.; Pinjari, D.V. Kinetics of biological decolorisation of anthraquinone based Reactive Blue 19 using an isolated strain of Enterobacter sp. F NCIM 5545. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 173, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Ali, N.F.; El-Mohamedy, R.S.R. Microbial decolourization of textile waste water. J. Saudi Chem. Soc. 2012, 16, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Wang, T.; Tang, X.; Zhang, S.; Zheng, J.; Zheng, H.; Fang, L. Roles of functional microbial flocculant in dyeing wastewater treatment: Bridging and adsorption. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 384, 121506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yang, Z.; Li, M.; Yu, M.; Huang, J.; Xu, H.; Zhou, Y.; Song, P.; Xu, R. A novel approach for methylene blue removal by calcium dodecyl sulfate enhanced precipitation and microbial flocculant GA1 flocculation. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 303, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Ji, Q.; Tabassum, S.; Hena, S.; Silva, C.G.; Yu, G.; Zhang, Z. A review on the coal gasification wastewater treatment technologies: Past, present and future outlook. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 126, 38–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Alam, N.; Ozdemir, O.; Hampton, M.A.; Nguyen, A.V. Dewatering of coal plant tailings: Flocculation followed by filtration. Fuel 2011, 90, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Qian, H.; Cheng, Y.; Yang, C.P.; Wu, S.H.; Zeng, G.M.; Xi, J. Performance and biofilm characteristics of biotrickling filters for ethylbenzene removal in the presence of saponins. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Rese. 2018, 25, 30021–30030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Sabah, E.; Erkan, Z.E. Interaction mechanism of flocculants with coal waste slurry. Fuel 2006, 85, 350–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Misra, M.; Smith, R.W.; Dubel, J.; Chen, S. Selective flocculation of fine coal with hydrophobic Mycobacterium phlei. Min. Metall. Explor. 1993, 10, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Zhang, D.; Dai, W.; Chang, F.; Ji, M. Investigation of filtration specific resistance of coal slurry flocs with microbial and non-biological flocculants. J. China Univ. Min. Technol. 2017, 46, 614–621. [Google Scholar]
  79. Liu, Z.Y.; Hu, Z.Q.; Wang, T.; Chen, Y.Y.; Zhang, J.; Yu, J.R.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, Y.F.; Li, Y.L. Production of novel microbial flocculants by Klebsiella sp TG-1 using waste residue from the food industry and its use in defecating the trona suspension. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 139, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wu, S.H.; Lin, Y.; Yang, C.; Du, C.; Teng, Q.; Ma, Y.; Zhang, D.; Nie, L.; Zhong, Y.Y. Enhanced activation of peroxymonosulfte by LaFeO3 perovskite supported on Al2O3 for degradation of organic pollutants. Chemosphere 2019, 237, 124478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Lin, Y.; Wu, X.; Han, Y.; Yang, C.P.; Ma, Y.; Du, C.; Teng, Q.; Liu, H.; Zhong, Y.Y. Spatial separation of photogenerated carriers and enhanced photocatalytic performance on Ag3PO4 catalysts via coupling with PPy and MWCNTs. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 258, 117969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Li, L.; Zhao, L.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Meng, G.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, J.; Hu, B.; He, Q.; Guo, X. Novel Dispersant with a Three-Dimensional Reticulated Structure for a Coal–Water Slurry. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 8310–8317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Ralph, J.; Catcheside, D. Decolourisation and depolymerisation of solubilised low-rank coal by the white-rot basidiomycete Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1994, 42, 536–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Ralph, J.; Catcheside, D. Involvement of manganese peroxidase in the transformation of macromolecules from low-rank coal by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1998, 49, 778–784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Elbeyli, İ.Y.; Palantöken, A.; Pişkin, S.; Kuzu, H.; Peksel, A. Liquefaction/Solubilization of Low-Rank Turkish Coals by White-Rot Fungus (Phanerochaete chrysosporium). Energy Sources Part A 2006, 28, 1063–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Karadag, D.; Köroğlu, O.E.; Ozkaya, B.; Cakmakci, M. A review on anaerobic biofilm reactors for the treatment of dairy industry wastewater. Process Biochem. 2015, 50, 262–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lin, Y.; Liu, H.Y.; Yang, C.P.; Wu, X.; Du, C.; Jiang, L.; Zhong, Y. Gama-graphyne as photogenerated electrons transfer layer enhances photocatalytic performance of silver phosphate. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 264, 118479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lebeau, T.; Braud, A.; Jezequel, K. Performance of bioaugmentation-assisted phytoextraction applied to metal contaminated soils: A review. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 153, 497–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Garcia-Garcia, J.D.; Sanchez-Thomas, R.; Moreno-Sanchez, R. Bio-recovery of non-essential heavy metals by intra- and extracellular mechanisms in free-living microorganisms. Biotechnol. Adv. 2016, 34, 859–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Wu, X.; He, H.J.; Yang, W.L.; Yu, J.P.; Yang, C.P. Efficient removal of atrazine from aqueous solutions using magnetic Saccharomyces cerevisiae bionanomaterial. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 7597–7610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Zhou, Q.; Li, X.; Lin, Y.; Yang, C.P.; Tang, W.C.; Wu, S.H.; Li, D.H.; Lou, W. Effects of copper ions on removal of nutrients from swine wastewater and release of dissolved organic matters in duckweed systems. Water Res. 2019, 158, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Subudhi, S.; Bisht, V.; Batta, N.; Pathak, M.; Devi, A.; Lal, B. Purification and characterization of exopolysaccharide bioflocculant produced by heavy metal resistant Achromobacter xylosoxidans. Carbohydr. Polym. 2016, 137, 441–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Zhang, C.; Wen, Z.; Chen, J. An integrated model for technology forecasting to reduce pollutant emission in China’s pulp industry. Resources. Conserv. Recycl. 2009, 54, 62–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Zhang, C.; Chen, J.; Wen, Z. Alternative policy assessment for water pollution control in China’s pulp and paper industry. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 66, 15–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Wong, S.S.; Teng, T.T.; Ahmad, A.L.; Zuhairi, A.; Najafpour, G. Treatment of pulp and paper mill wastewater by polyacrylamide (PAM) in polymer induced flocculation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 135, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Pedroza, A.M.; Mosqueda, R.; Alonso Vante, N.; Rodriguez Vazquez, R. Sequential treatment via Trametes versicolor and UV/TiO2/Ru(x)Se(y) to reduce contaminants in waste water resulting from the bleaching process during paper production. Chemosphere 2007, 67, 793–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Kamali, M.; Khodaparast, Z. Review on recent developments on pulp and paper mill wastewater treatment. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2015, 114, 326–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Yang, Q.; Angly, F.E.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H. Wastewater treatment systems harbor specific and diverse yeast communities. Biochem. Eng. J. 2011, 58–59, 168–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Singhal, A.; Thakur, I.S. Decolourization and detoxification of pulp and paper mill effluent by Cryptococcus sp. Biochem. Eng. J. 2009, 46, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Thakur, I.S. Screening and identification of microbial strains for removal of colour and adsorbable organic halogens in pulp and paper mill effluent. Process Biochem. 2004, 39, 1693–1699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Zhang, S.; Jiang, M.; Zhou, Z.; Zhao, M.; Li, Y. Selective removal of lignin in steam-exploded rice straw by Phanerochaete chrysosporium. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2012, 75, 89–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Gonzalez, L.F.; Sarria, V.; Sanchez, O.F. Degradation of chlorophenols by sequential biological-advanced oxidative process using Trametes pubescens and TiO2/UV. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 3493–3499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Freitas, A.C.; Ferreira, F.; Costa, A.M.; Pereira, R.; Antunes, S.C.; Goncalves, F.; Rocha-Santos, T.A.; Diniz, M.S.; Castro, L.; Peres, I.; et al. Biological treatment of the effluent from a bleached kraft pulp mill using basidiomycete and zygomycete fungi. Sci. Total Environ. 2009, 407, 3282–3289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Malaviya, P.; Rathore, V.S. Bioremediation of pulp and paper mill effluent by a novel fungal consortium isolated from polluted soil. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 3647–3651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Liu, T.; Hu, H.; He, Z.; Ni, Y. Treatment of poplar alkaline peroxide mechanical pulping (APMP) effluent with Aspergillus niger. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 7361–7365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Franca, R.D.; Vieira, A.; Mata, A.M.; Carvalho, G.S.; Pinheiro, H.M.; Lourenco, N.D. Effect of an azo dye on the performance of an aerobic granular sludge sequencing batch reactor treating a simulated textile wastewater. Water Res. 2015, 85, 327–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Verma, A.K.; Dash, R.R.; Bhunia, P. A review on chemical coagulation/flocculation technologies for removal of colour from textile wastewaters. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 93, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Lade, H.S.; Waghmode, T.R.; Kadam, A.A.; Govindwar, S.P. Enhanced biodegradation and detoxification of disperse azo dye Rubine GFL and textile industry effluent by defined fungal-bacterial consortium. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2012, 72, 94–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hayat, H.; Mahmood, Q.; Pervez, A.; Bhatti, Z.A.; Baig, S.A. Comparative decolorization of dyes in textile wastewater using biological and chemical treatment. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 154, 149–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Solís, M.; Solís, A.; Pérez, H.I.; Manjarrez, N.; Flores, M. Microbial decolouration of azo dyes: A review. Process Biochem. 2012, 47, 1723–1748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Chen, S.H.; Ting, A.S.Y. Biodecolorization and biodegradation potential of recalcitrant triphenylmethane dyes by Coriolopsis sp. isolated from compost. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 150, 274–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hadibarata, T.; Teh, Z.C.; Rubiyatno; Zubir, M.M.; Khudhair, A.B.; Yusoff, A.R.; Salim, M.R.; Hidayat, T. Identification of naphthalene metabolism by white rot fungus Pleurotus eryngii. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2013, 36, 1455–1461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Yu, J.P.; He, H.J.; Yang, W.; Yang, C.P.; Zeng, G.; Wu, X. Magnetic bionanoparticles of Penicillium sp. yz11-22N2 doped with Fe3O4 and encapsulated within PVA-SA gel beads for atrazine removal. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 260, 196–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Jonstrup, M.; Kumar, N.; Guieysse, B.; Murto, M.; Mattiasson, B. Decolorization of textile dyes byBjerkanderasp. BOL 13 using waste biomass as carbon source. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2013, 88, 388–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Giri, S.S.; Harshiny, M.; Sen, S.S.; Sukumaran, V.; Park, S.C. Production and characterization of a thermostable bioflocculant from Bacillus subtilis F9, isolated from wastewater sludge. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2015, 121, 45–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Wang, H.; Zheng, X.W.; Su, J.Q.; Tian, Y.; Xiong, X.J.; Zheng, T.L. Biological decolorization of the reactive dyes Reactive Black 5 by a novel isolated bacterial strain Enterobacter sp. EC3. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 171, 654–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Zahrim, A.Y.; Tizaoui, C.; Hilal, N. Coagulation with polymers for nanofiltration pre-treatment of highly concentrated dyes: A review. Desalination 2011, 266, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Hu, H.; Zhou, Q.; Li, X.; Lou, W.; Du, C.; Teng, Q.; Zhang, D.M.; Liu, H.Y.; Zhong, Y.Y.; Yang, C.P. Phytoremediation of anaerobically digested swine wastewater contaminatedby oxytetracycline via Lemna aequinoctialis: Nutrient removal, growth characteristics and degradation pathways. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 291, 121853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. He, H.J.; Zhang, X.; Yang, C.P.; Zeng, G.; Li, H.R.; Chen, Y.J. Treatment of Organic Wastewater Containing High Concentration of Sulfate by Crystallization-Fenton-SBR. J. Environ. Eng. 2018, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Tang, W.C.; Li, X.; Liu, H.Y.; Wu, S.H.; Zhou, Q.; Du, C.; Teng, Q.; Zhong, Y.Y.; Yang, C.P. Sequential vertical flow trickling filter and horizontal flow reactor for treatment of decentralized domestic wastewater with sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 300, 122634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yue, Q.Y.; Gao, B.Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Sun, X.; Wang, S.G.; Gu, R.R. Synthesis of polyamine flocculants and their potential use in treating dye wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 152, 221–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Lou, T.; Cui, G.; Xun, J.; Wang, X.; Feng, N.; Zhang, J. Synthesis of a terpolymer based on chitosan and lignin as an effective flocculant for dye removal. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 537, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Wang, Y.F.; Gao, B.Y.; Yue, Q.Y.; Wang, Y.; Yang, Z.L. Removal of acid and direct dye by epichlorohydrin–dimethylamine: Flocculation performance and floc aggregation properties. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 113, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ray, J.; Jana, S.; Mondal, B.; Tripathy, T. Enhanced and rapid adsorptive removal of toxic organic dyes from aqueous solution using a nanocomposite of saponified polymethyl acrylate grafted dextrin with embedded nanosilica. J. Mol. Liq. 2019, 275, 879–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Quinlan, P.J.; Tanvir, A.; Tam, K.C. Application of the central composite design to study the flocculation of an anionic azo dye using quaternized cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydr. Polym. 2015, 133, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Pant, D.; Adholeya, A. Biological approaches for treatment of distillery wastewater: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98, 2321–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. He, J.; Zou, J.; Shao, Z.; Zhang, J.; Liu, Z.; Yu, Z. Characteristics and flocculating mechanism of a novel bioflocculant HBF-3 produced by deep-sea bacterium mutant Halomonas sp. V3a’. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2009, 26, 1135–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. He, J.; Zhen, Q.; Qiu, N.; Liu, Z.; Wang, B.; Shao, Z.; Yu, Z. Medium optimization for the production of a novel bioflocculant from Halomonas sp. V3a’ using response surface methodology. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 5922–5927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Fujita, M.; Ike, M.; Tachibana, S.; Kitada, G.; Kim, S.M.; Inoue, Z. Characterization of a bioflocculant produced by Citrobacter sp. TKF04 from acetic and propionic acids. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2000, 89, 40–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Lee, N.R.; Go, T.H.; Lee, S.M.; Jeong, S.Y.; Park, G.T.; Hong, C.O.; Son, H.J. In vitro evaluation of new functional properties of poly-gamma-glutamic acid produced by Bacillus subtilis D7. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 2014, 21, 153–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  131. Ai, S.J.; Liu, H.Y.; Wu, M.J.; Zeng, G.M.; Yang, C.P. Roles of acid-producing bacteria in anaerobic digestion of waste activated sludge. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2018, 12, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Sathiyanarayanan, G.; Kiran, G.S.; Selvin, J. Synthesis of silver nanoparticles by polysaccharide bioflocculant produced from marine Bacillus subtilis MSBN17. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2013, 102, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yan, Z.; He, H.J.; Yang, C.P.; Zeng, G.M.; Luo, L.; Jiao, P.P.; Wen, S.; Li, H.R.; Lu, L. Biodegradation of 3,5-dimethyl-2,4-dichlorophenol in saline wastewater by newly isolated Penicillium sp. yz11-22N2. J. Environ. Sci. 2017, 57, 211–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Elkady, M.F.; Farag, S.; Zaki, S.; Abu-Elreesh, G.; Abd-El-Haleem, D. Bacillus mojavensis strain 32A, a bioflocculant-producing bacterium isolated from an Egyptian salt production pond. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 8143–8151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Wu, J.Y.; Ye, H.F. Characterization and flocculating properties of an extracellular biopolymer produced from a Bacillus subtilis DYU1 isolate. Process Biochem. 2007, 42, 1114–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Wen, S.; Liu, H.Y.; He, H.J.; Luo, L.; Li, X.; Zeng, G.M.; Zhou, Z.L.; Lou, W.; Yang, C.P. Treatment of anaerobically digested swine wastewater by Rhodobacter blasticus and Rhodobacter capsulatus. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 222, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Kuyukina, M.S.; Ivshina, I.B.; Kamenskikh, T.N.; Bulicheva, M.V.; Stukova, G.I. Survival of cryogel-immobilized Rhodococcus strains in crude oil-contaminated soil and their impact on biodegradation efficiency. Int. Biodeterior. Biodegrad. 2013, 84, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Huang, L.; Ma, T.; Li, D.; Liang, F.L.; Liu, R.L.; Li, G.Q. Optimization of nutrient component for diesel oil degradation by Rhodococcus erythropolis. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2008, 56, 1714–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Lin, Y.; Wu, S.H.; Yang, C.P.; Chen, M.; Li, X. Preparation of size-controlled silver phosphate catalysts and their enhanced photocatalysis performance via synergetic effect with MWCNTs and PANI. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 245, 71–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Wu, M.; Liu, H.Y.; Yang, C.P. Effects of Pretreatment Methods of Wheat Straw on Adsorption of Cd(II) from Waterlogged Paddy Soil. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Zhao, G.; Ma, F.; Wei, L.; Chua, H. Using rice straw fermentation liquor to produce bioflocculants during an anaerobic dry fermentation process. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 113, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Yang, Z.; Wu, Z.; Zeng, G.; Huang, J.; Xu, H.; Feng, J.; Song, P.; Li, M.; Wang, L. Assessing the effect of flow fields on flocculation of kaolin suspension using microbial flocculant GA1. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 40464–40473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Xia, X.; Lan, S.; Li, X.; Xie, Y.; Liang, Y.; Yan, P.; Chen, Z.; Xing, Y. Characterization and coagulation-flocculation performance of a composite flocculant in high-turbidity drinking water treatment. Chemosphere 2018, 206, 701–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Pugazhendhi, A.; Shobana, S.; Bakonyi, P.; Nemestothy, N.; Xia, A.; Banu, J.R.; Kumar, G. A review on chemical mechanism of microalgae flocculation via polymers. Biotechnol. Rep. 2019, 21, e00302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Yang, Z.; Gong, J.; Zeng, G.; Xu, R.; Huang, J.; Xiong, W.; Xu, H.; Zhang, Y.; Ahmad, K. Removing Rhodamine b Based on Enhanced Precipitation of Calcium Dodecyl Benzene Sulfonate Combined with Microbial Flocculation GA1. J. Hunan Univ. Nat. Sci. 2018, 45, 149–156. [Google Scholar]
  146. Han, Z.F.; Dong, J.; Shen, Z.; Mou, R.; Zhou, Y.; Chen, X.; Fu, X.; Yang, C.P. Nitrogen removal of anaerobically digested swine wastewater by pilot-scale tidal flow constructed wetland based on in-situ biological regeneration of zeolite. Chemosphere 2019, 217, 364–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Figdore, B.A.; Winkler, M.K.H.; Stensel, H.D. Bioaugmentation with Nitrifying Granules in Low-SRT Flocculent Activated Sludge at Low Temperature. Water Environ. Rese. 2018, 90, 343–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Hori, K.; Matsumoto, S. Bacterial adhesion: From mechanism to control. Biochem. Eng. J. 2010, 48, 424–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Zemaitaitiene, R.J.; Zliobaite, E.; Klimaviciute, R.; Zemaitaitis, A. The role of anionic substances in removal of textile dyes from solutions using cationic flocculant. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2003, 214, 37–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Bes-Piá, A.; Mendoza-Roca, J.A.; Alcaina-Miranda, M.I.; Iborra-Clar, A.; Iborra-Clar, M.I. Combination of physico-chemical treatment and nanofiltration to reuse wastewater of a printing, dyeing and finishing textile industry. Desalination 2003, 157, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Zhang, Z.; Xia, S.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, J. Characterization and flocculation mechanism of high efficiency microbial flocculant TJ-F1 from Proteus mirabilis. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2010, 75, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Suopajärvi, T.; Liimatainen, H.; Hormi, O.; Niinimäki, J. Coagulation–flocculation treatment of municipal wastewater based on anionized nanocelluloses. Chem. Eng. J. 2013, 231, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Deng, L.; Guo, W.; Ngo, H.H.; Zuthi, M.F.R.; Zhang, J.; Liang, S.; Li, J.; Wang, J.; Zhang, X. Membrane fouling reduction and improvement of sludge characteristics by bioflocculant addition in submerged membrane bioreactor. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2015, 156, 450–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Corsino, S.F.; Capodici, M.; Torregrossa, M.; Viviani, G. A comprehensive comparison between halophilic granular and flocculent sludge in withstanding short and long-term salinity fluctuations. J. Water Process Eng. 2018, 22, 265–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Obaja, D.; Mace, S.; Mata-Alvarez, J. Biological nutrient removal by a sequencing batch reactor (SBR) using an internal organic carbon source in digested piggery wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 7–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Renault, F.; Sancey, B.; Charles, J.; Morin-Crini, N.; Badot, P.M.; Winterton, P.; Crini, G. Chitosan flocculation of cardboard-mill secondary biological wastewater. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 155, 775–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Renault, F.; Sancey, B.; Badot, P.M.; Crini, G. Chitosan for coagulation/flocculation processes—An eco-friendly approach. Eur. Polym. J. 2009, 45, 1337–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Lee, C.S.; Robinson, J.; Chong, M.F. A review on application of flocculants in wastewater treatment. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2014, 92, 489–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Liu, W.; Wang, K.; Li, B.; Yuan, H.; Yang, J. Production and characterization of an intracellular bioflocculant by Chryseobacterium daeguense W6 cultured in low nutrition medium. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101, 1044–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Lei, X.; Chen, Y.; Shao, Z.; Chen, Z.; Li, Y.; Zhu, H.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, W.; Zheng, T. Effective harvesting of the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris via flocculation-flotation with bioflocculant. Bioresour Technol 2015, 198, 922–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. Lian, B.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, J.; Teng, H.H.; Zhu, L.; Yuan, S. Microbial flocculation by Bacillus mucilaginosus: Applications and mechanisms. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 4825–4831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Ajao, V.; Millah, S.; Gagliano, M.C.; Bruning, H.; Rijnaarts, H.; Temmink, H. Valorization of glycerol/ethanol-rich wastewater to bioflocculants: Recovery, properties, and performance. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 375, 273–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Dabrazhynetskaya, A.; Volokhov, D.; David, S.W.; Ikonomi, P.; Brewer, A.; Chang, A.; Chizhikov, V. Preparation of reference strains for validation and comparison of mycoplasma testing methods. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2011, 111, 904–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Gong, X.Y.; Luan, Z.K.; Pei, Y.S.; Wang, S.G. Culture conditions for flocculant production by Paenibacillus polymyxa BY-28. J. Environ. Sci. Health Part A Toxic Hazard. Subst. Environ. Eng. 2003, 38, 657–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. ElMekawy, A.; Srikanth, S.; Vanbroekhoven, K.; De Wever, H.; Pant, D. Bioelectro-catalytic valorization of dark fermentation effluents by acetate oxidizing bacteria in bioelectrochemical system (BES). J. Power Sources 2014, 262, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Yang, Z.; Liu, X.; Gao, B.; Zhao, S.; Wang, Y.; Yue, Q.; Li, Q. Flocculation kinetics and floc characteristics of dye wastewater by polyferric chloride–poly-epichlorohydrin–dimethylamine composite flocculant. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2013, 118, 583–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Ryu, E.; Giri, S.S.; Park, S.C. Characterization of the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of a polysaccharide-based bioflocculant from Bacillus subtilis F9. Microb. Pathog. 2019, 103642. [Google Scholar]
  168. Manivasagan, P.; Kang, K.H.; Kim, D.G.; Kim, S.K. Production of polysaccharide-based bioflocculant for the synthesis of silver nanoparticles by Streptomyces sp. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 77, 159–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Rashid, N.; Ur Rehman, M.S.; Sadiq, M.; Mahmood, T.; Han, J.I. Current status, issues and developments in microalgae derived biodiesel production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 40, 760–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Kligerman, D.C.; Bouwer, E.J. Prospects for biodiesel production from algae-based wastewater treatment in Brazil: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2015, 52, 1834–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Li, X.; Yang, W.L.; He, H.J.; Wu, S.H.; Zhou, Q.; Yang, C.P.; Zeng, G.M.; Luo, L.; Lou, W. Responses of microalgae Coelastrella sp to stress of cupric ions in treatment of anaerobically digested swine wastewater. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 251, 274–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Li, X.; Yang, C.P.; Zeng, G.M.; Wu, S.H.; Lin, Y.; Zhou, Q.; Lou, W.; Du, C.; Nie, L.J.; Zhong, Y.Y. Nutrient removal from swine wastewater with growing microalgae at various zinc concentrations. Algal Res. 2020, 46, 101804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Ma, X.; Zheng, H.; Zhou, W.; Liu, Y.; Chen, P.; Ruan, R. Enhanced Harvesting of Chlorella vulgaris Using Combined Flocculants. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2016, 180, 791–804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Nguyen, T.D.P.; Le, T.V.A.; Show, P.L.; Nguyen, T.T.; Tran, M.H.; Tran, T.N.T.; Lee, S.Y. Bioflocculation formation of microalgae-bacteria in enhancing microalgae harvesting and nutrient removal from wastewater effluent. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 272, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Ndikubwimana, T.; Zeng, X.; Liu, Y.; Chang, J.S.; Lu, Y. Harvesting of microalgae Desmodesmus sp. F51 by bioflocculation with bacterial bioflocculant. Algal Res. 2014, 6, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Wu, S.H.; Liu, H.Y.; Yang, C.P.; Li, X.; Lin, Y.; Kai, Y.; Sun, J.T.; Teng, Q.; Du, C.; Zhong, Y.Y. High-performance porous carbon catalysts doped by iron and nitrogen for degradation of bisphenol F via peroxymonosulfate activation. Chem. Eng. J. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 1. Advantages and limitations of three types of flocculants.
Table 1. Advantages and limitations of three types of flocculants.
TypeMain IngredientsAdvantagesDisadvantagesReferences
Inorganic flocculantsAluminum salt polymers and iron salt polymersLow-cost
Easy to get		High pollution
Difficult to degrade		[7,9]
Organic polymer flocculantsPolyacrylamide and their derivativesLess dosage
Fast flocculation
Easy to separate		Difficult to degrade
Easy to cause two pollution		[12,14]
Microbial flocculantsMicrobes and their metabolitesEffective
Low-cost
Security extensive source		Slow effect
Environmental susceptibility		[15,16]
Table
Table 2. Microbial flocculants used in several common wastewaters.
Table 2. Microbial flocculants used in several common wastewaters.
Wastewater TypeContaminant CategoryFlocculating MicroorganismsReferences
Coal slurry
wastewater		Coal waste slurryAzotobacter chroococcum[44]
Coal slurryRhodopseudomonas spheroides[45]
Coal-water slurryNitrogen-fixing bacteria
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Escherichia coli White rot fungi Yeast Aspergillus niger		[46]
Fine coalBacillus subtilis[47]
Food wastewaterBioethanol mill wastewaterWhite-rot fungus Trametes versicolor INACC F200[48]
Suspended solids Metal ionsBacillus subtilis R 23
B. lichenifomis ATCC 9945A
B. lichenifomis CCRC 12826
B. licheniformis CICC10099		[49]
Poultry slaughterhouse wastewaterComamonas sp.[50]
Starch wastewaterBacillus mucilaginosus MBFA9[51]
Starch wastewaterBacillus licheniformis X14[52]
dairy wastewater Fe Al Mn Zn CODTerrabacter sp.[53]
Municipal wastewaterHarmful algaeKlebsiella pneumoniae strain NY1[54]
Landfill leachatesHumic acidsRhizomonas sp.[29]
Heavy metal
wastewater		Cu(II)Ultrasonic assisted Spirulina platensis[55]
Cu(II)Sulphuric acid modified Spirulina platensis[56]
Pb(II)Paenibacillus sp. strain A9[57]
Pb(II)P. polymyxa CCTCC M206017[58]
Pb(II) Zn(II)Paenibacillus sp. strain A9 (MBFA9)[59]
Ni(II)Paenibacillus polymyxa GA1[60]
Cr(II) Ni(II)Herbaspirillium sp. CH7
Paenibacillus sp. CH11
Bacillus sp. CH15
Halomonas sp.		[61]
Cu, Zn, Pb and CdPaenibacillus polymyxa[62]
Fe (III) Cd(II)Aspergillus niger[63]
MineralsRhodococcus opacus[64]
Papermaking wastewaterCODCr content
absorbance		Aspergillus niger[65]
Detergents
cellulose		Bacillus subtilis
Rhodococcus
Bacteroides succinicum
White rot fungus bacterial		[66]
COD
Colority		PSBF[67]
Textile wastewaterCu(II), Pb(II) and Cd(II)Bacillus sp.
Pseudomonas sp.		[68]
Biavin medium blue dye
Cr(II) Ni(II)		Herbaspirillium sp. CH7
Paenibacillus sp. CH11
Bacillus sp. CH15
Halomonas sp.		[61]
Anthraquinone
based Reactive Blue 19		Enterobacter sp. F NCIM 5545[69]
Acid and reactive dyesPleurotus osstreatus
Aspergillus niger
Penicillium spp.		[70]
Printing and dyeing wastewaterCongo red (CR)Klebsiella peneumoniae[71]
Methylene bluePaenibacillus polymyxa GA1[72]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, H.; Wu, S.; Du, C.; Zhong, Y.; Yang, C. Preparation, Performances, and Mechanisms of Microbial Flocculants for Wastewater Treatment. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041360

AMA Style

Li H, Wu S, Du C, Zhong Y, Yang C. Preparation, Performances, and Mechanisms of Microbial Flocculants for Wastewater Treatment. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(4):1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041360

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Huiru, Shaohua Wu, Cheng Du, Yuanyuan Zhong, and Chunping Yang. 2020. "Preparation, Performances, and Mechanisms of Microbial Flocculants for Wastewater Treatment" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 4: 1360. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041360

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop