Next Article in Journal
Anthropometric, Body Composition, and Morphological Lower Limb Asymmetries in Elite Soccer Players: A Prospective Cohort Study
Previous Article in Journal
Implementing Appetite to Play at scale in British Columbia: Evaluation of a Capacity-Building Intervention to Promote Physical Activity in the Early Years
 
 
Reply published on 23 March 2020, see Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(6), 2137.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Comment

Comment on Oldenburg, M., Jensen, H.J. Stress and Strain among Seafarers Related to the Occupational Groups. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, doi:10.3390/ijerph16071153

by
David Lucas
1,2,3,*,
Olaf Chresten Jensen
4,
Brice Loddé
1,2,3,
Richard Pougnet
2,3,5,
Jean-Dominique Dewitte
2,3,5 and
Dominique Jegaden
3
1
ORPHY Laboratory, University Brest, F-29200 Brest, France
2
Occupational and Environmental Diseases Center, Teaching Hospital, F-29200 Brest, France
3
French Society of Maritime Medicine Brest, F-29200 Brest, France
4
Centre of Maritime Health and Society, University of Southern Denmark, 6700 Esbjerg, Denmark
5
Laboratoire d’Etude et de Recherche en Sociologie (EA 3149), Université de Brest—Bretagne Occidentale, F-29200 Brest, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(4), 1141; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041141
Submission received: 30 September 2019 / Accepted: 6 February 2020 / Published: 11 February 2020
Recently, Oldenburg M published an article in the journal “Communication” titled “Stress and Strain among Seafarers Related to the Occupational Groups” [1]. They held a study on 323 seafarers on 22 container ships and used a questionnaire built from a previous study on stressors of seafarer [2]. To our knowledge, there is a lack of a methodology and discussion in this study.
In this questionnaire, they included specific job-related factors such as the shipping route, job duration at sea and also physical stressors (noise, seasickness) or psychosocial stressors (shifts, social problems due to migration). Questions on job strain are limited to work demand and management tasks. According to this questionnaire, nautical officers were more frequently mentally stressed, and the authors linked this to higher maximum working hours and higher work demand. However, the questionnaire used was not evaluated and compared to validated questionnaire such as the job demand–control–support model of Karazek [3]. Possibly due to the very specific questions, no comparison with other working populations (port workers, inland engineers, etc.) was done, which decreases the relevance of the data and results of this study.
Interestingly, they found a lack of sleep in respondents, with a daily effective sleep duration of 5.0 h. In this paragraph, the authors talked about chronic fatigue and its relationship with human error in shipwrecks; however, they did not discuss boredom. Boredom is generally considered an emotion; according to Hill and Perkins (1998), boredom occurs when we are faced with a monotonous life combined with frustration [4]. This combination is often found among seafarers, because of the monotony of work on board—routine deck-work or using machinery, being on watch, or doing maintenance tasks—especially at sea. This boredom at work is a source of stress and addiction, according to data from the literature [5,6,7,8,9]. Most of the studies on boredom in working populations have been performed for air and road transport [9,10].
In a recent study, Jegaden et al. interviewed 80 seafarers (40 officers and 40 crew members) and 63 office staff face-to-face with three validated questionnaires: the Boredom Proneness Scale (BPS), the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), and the Job Content Questionnaire (JCQ) [11]. Between the two groups of seafarers, they found significant differences in the boredom disposition score and external stimulation score (respectively, Fischer test values of 5.02 and 8.19; p test values of 0.02 and 0.05). The results of the JCQ by Karasek are significantly different regarding the averages of the job demand and the job control, whereas there is no difference in social support [3]. Compared to the officers and the office staff, the crew have significantly lower job demand and job control results, which ranks them in the “passive” category (51%). On the other hand, the percentage of “actives” is significantly higher among officers (30% vs. 5.1%).
For seafarers, especially in container ships, working tasks and stress levels depend on the voyage episode. Oldenburg et al. described a higher stress level during port stays and less at sea.
According to these different studies, we can divide stress and strain among seafarers with higher job demands and management tasks during port stays and arrival–departure. At sea, the job demand was less, but monotony and repetitive tasks bring about a risk of boredom. Many works have demonstrated a strong link between boredom proneness and depression [12,13,14].
In his review of the literature into the mental health of seafarers, Iversen found that, from 1960 to 2009, 5.9% of total deaths were as a result of suicide and 13.1% of deaths were due to illness [15].
To prevent mental health disorders in seafarers, all characteristics of organization at sea, at port and in different types of vessels have to be included in prevention programs [16], and more research into boredom and stress factors in seafarers and fishermen have to be developed.

Author Contributions

D.L. and D.J. wrote the first draft. O.C.J., B.L., R.P. and J.-D.D. commented and corrected the draft and English language. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Oldenburg, M.; Jensen, H.J. Stress and Strain among Seafarers Related to the Occupational Groups. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Oldenburg, M.; Jensen, H.J.; Latza, U.; Baur, X. Seafaring stressors aboard merchant and passenger ships. Int. J. Public Health 2009, 54, 96–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Karasek, R. Job Demands, Job Decision Latitude, and Mental Strain: Implications for Job Redesign. Adm. Sci. Q. 1979, 24, 285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hill, A.B.; Perkins, R.E. Towards a model of boredom. Br. J. Psychol. 1985, 76 Pt 2, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Fisherl, C. Boredom at Work: A Neglected Concept. Hum. Relat. 2016, 46, 395–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kass, S.; Vodanovich, S.; Callender, A. State-trait boredom: Relationship to absenteeism, tenure and job satisfaction. J. Bus. Psychol. 2001, 16, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Todman, M. The dimensions of state boredom frequency, duration, unpleasantness consequences and causal attributions. Educ. Res. Int. 2013, 1, 32–40. [Google Scholar]
  8. Vodanovich, S.J.; Wallace, J.C.; Kass, S.J. A confirmatory approach to the factor structure of the Boredom Proneness Scale: Evidence for a two-factor short form. J. Personal. Assess. 2005, 85, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Cummings, M.L.; Gao, F.; Thornburg, K.M. Boredom in the Workplace: A New Look at an Old Problem. Hum. Factors 2016, 58, 279–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Casner, S.M.; Schooler, J.W. Thoughts in flight: Automation use and pilots’ task-related and task-unrelated thought. Hum. Factors 2014, 56, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Jegaden, D.; Menaheze, M.; Lucas, D.; Loddé, B.; Dewitte, J.D. Don’t forget about seafarer’s boredom. Int. Marit. Health 2019, 70, 82–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Van Hooff, M.L.M.; van Hooft, E.A.J. Boredom at work: Proximal and distal consequences of affective work-related boredom. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 2014, 19, 348–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Saunders, K.; Rogovin, T.; Eckhoff, M. The effects of boredom and depression on substance use and problematic internet use. J. Addict. Res. Ther. 2012, 3, 4. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mikulas, W.; Vodanovich, J. The essence of boredom. Psychol. Rec. 1993, 43, 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  15. Iversen, R.T. The mental health of seafarers. Int. Marit. Health 2012, 63, 78–89. [Google Scholar]
  16. Jensen, O.C.; Baygi, F.; Charalambous, G.; Flores, A.; Laursen, L.H.; Lucas, D.; Andrioti, D. Mental health promotion program in the workplace with focus on transport. Arch. Psychiatry Ment. Health 2019, 3, 001–011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lucas, D.; Jensen, O.C.; Loddé, B.; Pougnet, R.; Dewitte, J.-D.; Jegaden, D. Comment on Oldenburg, M., Jensen, H.J. Stress and Strain among Seafarers Related to the Occupational Groups. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, doi:10.3390/ijerph16071153. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041141

AMA Style

Lucas D, Jensen OC, Loddé B, Pougnet R, Dewitte J-D, Jegaden D. Comment on Oldenburg, M., Jensen, H.J. Stress and Strain among Seafarers Related to the Occupational Groups. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, doi:10.3390/ijerph16071153. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(4):1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041141

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lucas, David, Olaf Chresten Jensen, Brice Loddé, Richard Pougnet, Jean-Dominique Dewitte, and Dominique Jegaden. 2020. "Comment on Oldenburg, M., Jensen, H.J. Stress and Strain among Seafarers Related to the Occupational Groups. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, doi:10.3390/ijerph16071153" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 4: 1141. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041141

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop