Next Article in Journal
What Is the Consensus from Multiple Conclusions of Future Crop Yield Changes Affected by Climate Change in China?
Previous Article in Journal
Marketing Breastfeeding Substitutes: A Discussion Document
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 17
Issue 24
10.3390/ijerph17249231
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Association between Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Age-Related Cataract: A Nationwide Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study

by
Jinyoung Shin
1,
Hyungwoo Lee
2 and
Hyeongsu Kim
3,*
1
Department of Family Medicine, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul 05030, Korea
2
Department of Ophthalmology, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul 05030, Korea
3
Department of Preventive Medicine, Konkuk University School of Medicine, Seoul 05030, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(24), 9231; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249231
Submission received: 30 October 2020 / Revised: 8 December 2020 / Accepted: 9 December 2020 / Published: 10 December 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Environmental Health)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study aimed to investigate the association between ambient air pollutants and cataracts in the general population aged 50 years or older using data from the Korean National Insurance Service—National Sample Cohort. Cataract patients were defined as those diagnosed by a physician and having undergone cataract surgery. After matching the average concentrations of PM2.5, PM10, NO2, CO, SO2, and O3 in residential areas, the association between quartile level of air pollutants and incidence of cataract was analyzed using a multivariate Cox-proportional hazard risk model. Among the 115,728 participants, 16,814 (14.5%) were newly diagnosed with cataract and underwent related surgery between 1 January 2004, and 31 December 2015. Exposure to PM10, NO2, and SO2 was positively associated with cataract incidence, while O3 was negatively associated. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval was 1.069 (1.025–1.115) in PM10 and 1.080 (1.030–1.133) in NO2. However, the association between cataract and the quartile of PM2.5 measured during one year in 2015 was not clear. The HR of female participants aged 65 or older was significantly increased according to quartile of air pollutants. We identified exposure to PM10, NO2, SO2, and O3 associated with cataract development in Korean adults aged ≥ 50 years. This information may be helpful for policymaking to control air pollution as a risk factor for eye health.

1. Introduction

Cataract, opacification of the ocular lens, is one of the major causes of loss of useful vision [1]. Globally, the number of people with a severe visual impairment from cataract is projected to be 220 million in 2020 [2]. Blindness due to cataract increased from 10.9 million to 12.6 million between 1990 and 2015 [3]. The prevalence of blindness due to cataracts was found to vary by geographic region, ranging from 12.7% in North America to 42.0% in Southeast Asia [4]. In an analysis using insurance claims data, senile cataract was the most prevalent cause of hospital admission in South Korea in 2019 (n = 345,853) [5]. As a leading public health issue, a cataract will become more important as the population increases and life expectancy is extended worldwide [1].
Ambient air pollution, such as particulate matter (PM) < 10 μm in size (PM10) and < 2.5 μm (PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and ozone (O3), has been recognized as one of the most serious health issues worldwide. Exposure to air pollutants may impact eye health, affecting allergic conjunctivitis [6], dry eye disease [7,8], and age-related macular degeneration [9]. However, these associations are heterogeneous. For example, PM2.5 increased allergic conjunctivitis from May to July in Japan, while NO2, CO, and oxidants (Ox) were not associated with that condition [6]. Dry eye disease in Taiwan was associated with increasing levels of NO2 and CO over exposure for 10 years [7]. In contrast, in Korean adults, the SO2 level was associated with dry eye disease, while exposure to NO2, CO, O3, and PM10 was not [8].
The effect of long-term exposure to air pollution on the development of cataracts is not evident. In India, women aged ≥ 60 years have an increased risk of cataract due to exposure to biomass fuels [10]. Cumulative cadmium exposure increased cataract risk in U.S. adults aged ≥ 50 years, from 1999 to 2008 [11]. Among 18,622 Korean adults > 40 years of age, evidence for an association between air pollutants and cataract was found in O3 as a protective effect; the prevalence of cataract was not associated with the levels of PM10, NO2, and SO2 between 2010 and 2012 [12]. In our review of the relevant literature, we found that the results may be affected by differences in race, exposure duration, concentration of pollutants, lifestyle, and known risk factors of cataract, including age, genetic influence, exposure to ultraviolet light, smoking, and diabetes [13,14,15]. Therefore, evaluating the association between exposure to ambient PM2.5, PM10, NO2, CO, SO2, and O3 and age-related cataract is meaningful for advanced public health care using a representative national database.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Sources

Data from the Korean Health Insurance Service—National Sample Cohort (NHIS—NSC) were used in this study. The majority of the Korean population (97.2%, approximately 50 million individuals) are covered by the mandatory social National Health Insurance Service. Among them, we selected a random sample of 1 million people (representing about 2% of the total population in 2002, n = 1,025,340) after stratification according to age, sex, income level, and type of health insurance (national health insurance and medical aid program). NHIS provides free biennial health examinations to its members aged ≥ 40 years. Approximately 72% of all eligible persons undergo these examinations [16]. In this study, we also used the results of these health examinations to obtain smoking variables.
The sample cohort resided in 16 regions in Korea, and the change of initial residence was 0–0.3% during the follow-up years [17]. The difference in average health insurance level, which was estimated by income level, was negligible during the cohort years [17]. The NHIS claims data included information on diagnoses, procedures, and prescriptions for inpatient and outpatient visits as identified by the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) codes and the Korean Drug and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Codes.

2.2. Study Participants

This study investigated the association between senile cataract in persons aged ≥ 50 years and their exposure to air pollutants. Exclusion criteria were (1) <50 years old in 2002 (n = 765,221), (2) death during the research period (n = 48,022), (3) change of residence (n = 37,237), (4) missing data on income level (n = 5465), and (5) unmatched with residence area (n = 36,714). Among the remaining 132,681 persons, 13,275 with missing data on smoking status and 3678, who had a cataract diagnosis in 2002–2003, were excluded. Ultimately, 115,728 people participated in this study (Figure 1). A newly developed cataract was defined as a cataract diagnosis (H25, H26) and cataract surgery (S5119) from 1 January 2004, to 31 December 2015, after excluding the patients with a diagnosis of cataract from 2002 to 2003. To define the subject more concisely, we used the definition of cataract, considering both the diagnosis code and treatment code. The index date was defined as the date of the first diagnosis of cataract.
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) of the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea (KUH 2019-05-017), and informed consent requirements were waived due to the use of only de-identified data.

2.3. Air Pollutant Variables

We obtained the average concentrations of PM10, NO2, CO, SO2, and O3 measured hourly from the Korean Air Pollutants Emission Service in 2002–2015. Because PM2.5 has been measured in Korea since 2015, we applied the average concentration of PM2.5 measured hourly during one year. The air pollutants were measured at 268 nationwide surveillance stations covering most residential areas. Residential five-digit codes that classified “Si (city)” by the first two digits and “Gun,” or “Gu” (town) by the following three digits were used to match the location of the air pollution surveillance stations. We calculated the quartiles of the average yearly concentrations of all pollutants.
PM10 and PM2.5 were measured using a β-ray attenuation system (PM-711D, Dongil Greensys, Seoul, Korea). NO2 was measured using a chemiluminescence instrument (CM2041, APM Engineering Co., Ltd., Gyeonggi-do, Korea). CO was measured using a non-dispersive infrared sensor (ZKJ, Dongil Greensys, Seoul, Korea). SO2 was measured using an ultraviolet (UV) fluorescence system (CM2050, APM Engineering Co., Ltd., Gyeonggi-do, Korea). Measurements of all air pollutants were performed according to the standard operating procedures of the Korean Air Pollutants Emission Service of the National Institute of Environmental Research (Incheon, South Korea). The levels of air pollutants and data of meteorological parameters, including annual average temperature, total rainfall, and wind speed, are presented in Supplementary Table S1.

2.4. Other Variables

Participant age was calculated from the birth year until 2002. Health insurance status was divided into 11 categories, 10 national health insurance plans and medical aid based on income status. It was further divided into two groups: lower levels 1–5 in national health insurance and the medical aid level; upper levels 6–10. The residential areas were classified into two groups: Seoul and the six largest cities as “highly urbanized,” and other areas as “less urbanized.” Information on comorbidity was obtained by physician diagnosis using ICD-10 codes before the first diagnosis of cataract: diabetes mellitus (E10–E14); cerebrovascular disease (I63, I64); peripheral vascular disease (I73); chronic pulmonary disease (J44); congestive heart failure (I50); myocardial infarction (I21, I22); malignancy including solitary organ, leukemia, and lymphoma (C00–C97); hemiplegia (G81–G83); liver disease (K74); and chronic kidney disease (N18) [18]. Mental disorders were classified as sensitive information and were masked (F*), and because of this, they could not be differentiated in detail.

2.5. Statistical Analyses

Continuous variables are presented as mean with standard deviation, and the categorical variables are presented as number and percentage of participants. We compared the characteristics of study subjects according to the diagnosis and surgery of cataract using the t-test and Chi-square test. The associations between a per-interquartile increase of air pollutants PM2.5, PM10, NO2, SO2, CO, and O3 from 2002 to 2015 and the incidence of cataract were evaluated using the Cox-proportional hazard regression model after adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, insurance level, urbanization, and comorbidity. We conducted stratified analyses by sex because several previous studies have suggested sex difference in cataract development [4,19]
Additionally, to clarify the effect of age on cataract development, we performed stratified analyses divided by age (younger or older than 65 years). We determined the annual trend in levels of PM10, NO2, SO2, CO, and O3 and the number of diagnosed cataracts according to the quartile of PM10 from 2002 to 2015. All statistical analyses were conducted using SAS software 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance.

3. Results

3.1. Demographic Characteristics

As shown in Table 1, 16,814 patients (14.5% of the total subjects) with cataract were newly diagnosed and treated. The breakdown, according to sex, was 37.4% men and 62.6% women. The cataract patient group was older, more likely to have higher-level insurance, and more likely to live in an area other than Seoul and the six largest cities. Diabetes, cardiovascular disease, mental disorder, and chronic kidney disease were identified in a larger proportion in the cataract group than in the no-cataract group. There was no difference in the comorbid rate of malignancy, hemiplegia, or liver disease.
Data were presented as mean± standard deviation or number (percentage). p values were obtained by t-test or chi-square test between the cataract group and no cataract group. The lower insurance group was composed of subjects with a low income below the median and medical aid. The upper insurance group was composed of subjects with a high income above the median.

3.2. Association of Newly Developed Cataract and Air Pollutants

We found a positive association between PM10, NO2, SO2, and the hazard ratio (HR) of cataract after adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, income level, urbanization, and comorbidity (Table 2). However, O3 was negatively associated with the HR of cataract, and PM2.5 and CO were not associated with cataract in the total population. Increased quartiles of NO2 increased the cataract incidence rate, while increased quartiles of O3 decreased it. However, the effect of PM10 and SO2 on the development of cataract was not dose-dependent.
In a subgroup analysis according to sex, we identified a distinctive association between female patients and cataract incidence. The association in males was weak with PM10 and non-existent with NO2, SO2, CO, and O3; in females, these associations remained consistent. In a subgroup analysis, according to age (65 years old), the associations between PM10, NO2, SO2, and O3 and incidence of cataract were significant only in subjects ≥ 65 years.

3.3. The Annual Trends of Mean Concentration of Air Pollutants and Number of Diagnosed Patients

The upper graph in Figure 2 shows the annual mean concentrations of PM10, NO2, SO2, CO, and O3 from 2004 to 2015. The annual mean concentrations of PM10 gradually decreased in the later period, but those of NO2, SO2, CO, and O3 increased or did not change. The lower bar graph in Figure 2 shows the number of diagnosed patients according to the quartile of PM10. According to decreased annual mean concentrations of PM10, the total number of diagnosed patients decreased from 2004 to 2015. However, there was no proportional trend in cataract incidence according to the quartile of PM10.

4. Discussion

In this nationwide, retrospective, population-based Korean cohort study of claims data, 14-year exposure to PM10, NO2, and SO2 was positively associated with cataract incidence, and exposure to O3 was negatively associated. The effect of air pollutants was more evident in females and subjects aged ≥ 65 years. This study showed that long-term exposure to PM10, NO2, and SO2 might be a risk factor for the development of cataract in the general population aged ≥ 50 years.
A cataract develops from various causes: metabolic disorder, nutritional deficiency, or environmental stressors, such as extreme low or high temperature, radiation (UVB, X-ray, infrared, sunlight), metal ions (mercury, copper, lead), and toxins (acetaldehyde, bisphenol A, smoking) [20]. Although this study could not determine the mechanism, long-term exposure to air pollutants as a cataractogenic stressor may damage the membrane luminal and secretory proteins by oxidative stress from reactive oxygen and nitrogen species [12,20]. Lens opacity from cumulative damage of environmental insults could be accelerated by aging [21]. Additionally, the modification of the lens and weakness of the protective mechanisms against stress that occurs with increasing age may contribute to the development of cataract [21,22]. Because we found that older subjects had a high risk of cataracts from exposure to air pollution in this study, a basis has been laid for reducing exposure to air pollutants as an oxidative stressor in older people.
It is argued that air pollution absorbs UVB photons and reduces the amount of solar UVB radiation reaching the Earth’s surface [23]. However, because PM density, composition, and shape vary spatiotemporally, it is difficult to determine their effects on UV radiation [24]. In general, PM comes from secondary aerosol sources via an atmospheric chemical reaction of gaseous pollutants, such as NO2 and SO2, resulting from fuel combustion. PM also includes various suspended solid particles and liquid droplets that originate from organic or inorganic sources. The hazardous level of PM was determined by the proportions of organic components, such as soil dust or a natural source, and inorganic components, such as motor vehicle operation, biomass/field burning, combustion/industry, or secondary aerosol [25]. Based on the variance of the components, it is thought that cataract incidence is more affected by PM10 than by other pollutants. The association between PM2.5 and cataract incidence could not be confirmed in this study, because the difference in PM2.5 concentration over one year was insufficient to reflect the effects on cataract incidence. The PM2.5 concentration measured over one year showed no significant difference in regional distribution (mean: 23.1 μg/m3; min: 16.0 μg/m3; max: 30.0 μg/m3). Therefore, further research is needed to compare the effects of long-term exposure of PM2.5 and PM10 on cataract incidence in a large population-based cohort after controlling the confounding factors.
Differences in rates of cataract by sex were shown in previous studies [14,19]. In the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015, age-standardized, disability-adjusted life year (DALY) rates were 54.5 among men vs. 65.0 among females in 1990, and 52.3 among men vs. 67.0 females in 2015. Females had higher rates of cataract than males of the same age [19]. The mixed effect of exposure to indoor cooking fuels, outdoor activity, and hormone replacement therapy on cataract should be considered in higher-risk females [10,26,27]. This study adds to existing research on the significant effect of air pollutants on females.
Exposure to ozone is negatively associated with the HR of cataract, similar to another Korean study [12]. In general, exposure to ozone results in the deterioration of the ocular surface and an inflammatory state [28]. However, ozone characteristically does not easily penetrate the cornea due to polarity. Therefore, ozone-related oxidative damage may not directly affect the lens [12]. Although hazards to eye health have been identified in short-term exposure of O3, the risks may not increase for long-term exposure of O3, even at similar concentrations [29]. This may be because the O3 level in the Kim et al. study (below 40 ppm) [29], which was measured in Incheon, South Korea, was similar to the mean level of O3 in our data (max 40 ppm), which did not reach the levels of National Ambient Air Quality Standards (8 hr exposure to 70 ppm) or WHO air quality guidelines (daily maximum 8-hr mean 100 μg/m3) [30]. UV irradiance does not follow the ozone trend, and an increased level of tropospheric ozone may protect the lens from UV exposure [23]. Ozone showed a reverse association with PM10, NO2, SO2, and humidity in dry eye disease [31]. Although we can explain the protective mechanism of ozone on the incidence of cataract in this study, clinical and experimental studies on the relationship are needed to consider a direct role of O3 or a mediator of PM10, NO2, and SO2 with a reverse association.
A linear relationship to the quartiles of pollutants and cataract incidence was not found in this study. We believe that the reason for this finding is a threshold effect, which is that the hazardous effect of air pollutants may not be obvious at low levels of air pollutants below any cut-off value [15]. The levels of National Ambient Air Quality Standards for PM10 and PM2.5 are 150 μg/m3 and 35 μg/m3, respectively [30], which is higher than the maximum values measured in this study (PM10: 61.0 μg/m3 and PM2.5: 30 μg/m3). Therefore, the linear relationship to the quartiles of pollutants and cataract incidence could not be clearly seen below a cut-off concentration of air pollutants, which was not high enough to have an obvious effect.
Characteristics of subjects according to residential area or insurance status show a mixed pattern in cataract incidence. Due to a large number of subjects, there may have been significant statistical differences according to residential area or insurance status, although the difference is clinically meaningless. While cataracts can be predicted to be low due to a reduction of UV irradiance in highly polluted urban areas, eye health risks can be high due to the influence of job or smart device utilization rates in urban areas [23]. Because most of Korea’s territory is mountainous, the distribution of the population is uneven and the degree of urbanization varies, indicating the difference in air pollution concentration. Furthermore, the air pollution surveillance station and ophthalmic clinic for diagnosis and treatment may be arranged along with urban areas or large cities. Therefore, it is necessary to consider the levels of urbanization when you interpreted these results.
A higher risk of cataract was reported in people with low socioeconomic status [14]. However, the proportion of high-insurance-level subjects in the cataract group was high in this study. We think this is because we considered both diagnosis and surgery of cataract in the target population, which may be affected by socioeconomic status.
Though smoking is a known risk factor for cataracts [2], cataract incidence was higher in non-smokers than in smokers in this study. Although the study did not show the smoking rate among women, the smoking experience rate for Korean women aged > 40 is reported to be 2.5% [32]. Because the smoking rate in women was low while the cataract incidence in women was higher than that in men, it could be misinterpreted as if smoking has the protective effect of cataract incidence. Therefore, care needs to be taken when interpreting this result.
This study had several limitations. First, we could not obtain any information on the grade or type (nuclear, cortical, or posterior sub-capsular) of cataract in this database and so did not compare these associations according to grade or type of cataract and air pollution, although the risk factors among types of age-related cataract may be different [22,23]. However, because we defined the study subjects as those who underwent cataract surgery, we can substitute the severity of cataract for select subjects. The study identified the incidence of age-related cataract over 50 years of age, but the age limit should consider the possibility of selection bias. Over the years, the study population got older and maybe reached an age where the cataract is diagnosed less often. Although several previous studies have selected people age 50 or older [13,27,33], we think a consensus of age limitation is necessary. Second, we matched the residence and local air pollutant levels. Therefore, if participants worked at a distant location from their domiciles, our matching system would not have accurately reflected the exposed air pollutant levels. There is a possibility of information bias because subjects were excluded if their residence was changed or not matched. Furthermore, cataract patients diagnosed early in the study did not reflect exposed air pollutants because the average concentration of air pollutants was calculated from 2002 to 2015. Although the long-term exposure of air pollutants is expected to impact significantly, the levels of air pollutants before 2002 cannot be obtained. Therefore, there is a limit to linking prolonged exposure before diagnosis in the subjects who were diagnosed early period. Third, we could not obtain data on traffic-related air pollution or indoor air pollution, which may be the main source of PM in Korea. Additionally, a multiple-pollutant model has been applied because the associations among air pollutants, such as a co-linearity, would have affected it. Last, due to the lack of information about economic status, outdoor activity related to sun exposure, labor effect, and ophthalmic clinic accessibility, we could not consider those possible effects on the results [4,33]
Despite these limitations, the strength of our study is that the effects of long-term exposure of PM10, NO2, SO2, CO, and O3 were reported in the newly developed cataract in the representative subjects. Further study is needed to identify the health effects of other important environmental pollutants that are not well-known, such as asbestos [34,35] and the impact of exposure to air pollutants over the decades, without age restrictions on the subjects.

5. Conclusions

Long-term exposure to PM10, NO2, SO2, and O3 was associated with cataract development in Korean adults aged ≥ 50 years. Especially, cataract incidence has been affected by the annual mean concentrations of PM10. The association between air pollutants and cataract incidence differed according to age (65 years old) and sex. This information may be helpful for understanding eye health and policymaking to control air pollution.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/24/9231/s1, Table S1: The air pollutants and meteorological data in Korea from 2002–2015. Particulate matter <10 μm (PM10), Sulfur dioxide (SO2), Nitrogen dioxide (NO2), Carbon monoxide (CO) and Ozone (O3) were measured between 2002–2015. Particulate matter < 2.5 μm (PM2.5) was measured in 2015. Temperature, rainfall and wind speed were shown at Seoul (Lat.(N) 37˚34′, Long.(E) 126˚57′). Korea Meteorological Administration, Seoul, Korea.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.S., H.L. and H.K.; methodology, J.S. and H.K.; formal analysis, J.S., H.L. and H.K.; writing—original draft preparation, J.S. and H.K.; writing—review and editing, H.L.; and funding acquisition J.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Konkuk University Medical Center Research Grant 2019.

Acknowledgments

We thank Hojin Jeong for cooperation.

Conflicts of Interest

Jinyoung Shin, Hyungwoo Lee, and Hyeongsu Kim declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Asbell, P.A.; Dualan, I.; Mindel, J.; Brocks, D.; Ahmad, M.; Epstein, S. Age-related cataract. Lancet 2005, 365, 599–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Apple, D.J.; Ram, J.; Foster, A.; Peng, Q. Cataract: Epidemiology and Service Delivery. Surv. Ophthalmol. 2000, 45, S32–S44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Flaxman, S.R.; Bourne, R.R.A.; Resnikoff, S.; Ackland, P.; Braithwaite, T.; Cicinelli, M.V.; Das, A.; Jonas, J.B.; Keeffe, J.; Kempen, J.H.; et al. Global causes of blindness and distance vision impairment 1990–2020: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Global Health 2017, 5, e1221–e1234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Lee, C.M.; Afshari, N.A. The global state of cataract blindness. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2017, 28, 98–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Health Insurance Review & Assessment Service. Statistic for Common Disease in South Korea. Available online: http://opendata.hira.or.kr/op/opc/olapHifrqSickInfo.do (accessed on 14 October 2020).
  6. Mimura, T.; Ichinose, T.; Yamagami, S.; Fujishima, H.; Kamei, Y.; Goto, M.; Takada, S.; Matsubara, M. Airborne particulate matter (PM2.5) and the prevalence of allergic conjunctivitis in Japan. Sci. Total Environ. 2014, 487, 493–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhong, J.Y.; Lee, Y.C.; Hsieh, C.J.; Tseng, C.C.; Yiin, L.M. Association between Dry Eye Disease, Air Pollution and Weather Changes in Taiwan. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Um, S.B.; Kim, N.H.; Lee, H.K.; Song, J.S.; Kim, H.C. Spatial epidemiology of dry eye disease: Findings from South Korea. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2014, 13, 31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Chang, K.H.; Hsu, P.Y.; Lin, C.J.; Lin, C.L.; Juo, S.H.; Liang, C.L. Traffic-related air pollutants increase the risk for age-related macular degeneration. J. Investig. Med. Off. Publ. Am. Fed. Clin. Res. 2019, 67, 1076–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ravilla, T.D.; Gupta, S.; Ravindran, R.D.; Vashist, P.; Krishnan, T.; Maraini, G.; Chakravarthy, U.; Fletcher, A.E. Use of Cooking Fuels and Cataract in a Population-Based Study: The India Eye Disease Study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124, 1857–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  11. Wang, W.; Schaumberg, D.A.; Park, S.K. Cadmium and lead exposure and risk of cataract surgery in U.S. adults. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2016, 219, 850–856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Choi, Y.H.; Park, S.J.; Paik, H.J.; Kim, M.K.; Wee, W.R.; Kim, D.H. Unexpected potential protective associations between outdoor air pollution and cataracts. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2018, 25, 10636–10643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Hammond, C.J.; Duncan, D.D.; Snieder, H.; de Lange, M.; West, S.K.; Spector, T.D.; Gilbert, C.E. The heritability of age-related cortical cataract: The twin eye study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2001, 42, 601–605. [Google Scholar]
  14. Nam, G.E.; Han, K.; Ha, S.G.; Han, B.D.; Kim, D.H.; Kim, Y.H.; Cho, K.H.; Park, Y.G.; Ko, B.J. Relationship between socioeconomic and lifestyle factors and cataracts in Koreans: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2008–2011. Eye 2015, 29, 913–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Shin, J.; Han, S.H.; Choi, J. Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Cognitive Impairment in Community-Dwelling Older Adults: The Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Park, H.Y.; Kang, D.; Lee, H.; Shin, S.H.; Kang, M.; Kong, S.; Rhee, C.K.; Cho, J.; Yoo, K.H. Impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease on mortality: A large national cohort study. Respirology 2020, 25, 726–734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Lee, J.; Lee, J.S.; Park, S.H.; Shin, S.A.; Kim, K. Cohort Profile: The National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC), South Korea. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2017, 46, e15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. D’Hoore, W.; Sicotte, C.; Tilquin, C. Risk adjustment in outcome assessment: The Charlson comorbidity index. Methods Inf. Med. 1993, 32, 382–387. [Google Scholar]
  19. Lou, L.; Ye, X.; Xu, P.; Wang, J.; Xu, Y.; Jin, K.; Ye, J. Association of Sex With the Global Burden of Cataract. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018, 136, 116–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Periyasamy, P.; Shinohara, T. Age-related cataracts: Role of unfolded protein response, Ca2+ mobilization, epigenetic DNA modifications, and loss of Nrf2/Keap1 dependent cytoprotection. Prog. Retin. Eye Res. 2017, 60, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Truscott, R.J. Human cataract: The mechanisms responsible; light and butterfly eyes. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2003, 35, 1500–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Beebe, D.C.; Holekamp, N.M.; Shui, Y.-B. Oxidative damage and the prevention of age-related cataracts. Ophthalmic. Res. 2010, 44, 155–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Elminir, H.K. Sensitivity of ultraviolet solar radiation to anthropogenic air pollutants and weather conditions. Atmos. Res. 2007, 84, 250–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zegarska, B.; Pietkun, K.; Zegarski, W.; Bolibok, P.; Wiśniewski, M.; Roszek, K.; Czarnecka, J.; Nowacki, M. Air pollution, UV irradiation and skin carcinogenesis: What we know, where we stand and what is likely to happen in the future? Postepy Dermatol. Alergol. 2017, 34, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Ryou, H.g.; Heo, J.; Kim, S.-Y. Source apportionment of PM10 and PM2.5 air pollution, and possible impacts of study characteristics in South Korea. Environ. Pollut. 2018, 240, 963–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tang, Y.; Ji, Y.; Ye, X.; Wang, X.; Cai, L.; Xu, J.; Lu, Y. The Association of Outdoor Activity and Age-Related Cataract in a Rural Population of Taizhou Eye Study: Phase 1 Report. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0135870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lindblad, B.E.; Håkansson, N.; Philipson, B.; Wolk, A. Hormone replacement therapy in relation to risk of cataract extraction: A prospective study of women. Ophthalmology 2010, 117, 424–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lee, H.; Kim, E.K.; Kim, H.Y.; Kim, T.-I. Effects of Exposure to Ozone on the Ocular Surface in an Experimental Model of Allergic Conjunctivitis. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0169209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kim, Y.; Choi, Y.H.; Kim, M.K.; Paik, H.J.; Kim, D.H. Different adverse effects of air pollutants on dry eye disease: Ozone, PM2.5, and PM10. Environ. Pollut. 2020, 265, 115039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Air Quality Guidelines, Global Update. Available online: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0005/78638/E90038.pdf (accessed on 4 October 2020).
  31. Hwang, S.H.; Choi, Y.H.; Paik, H.J.; Wee, W.R.; Kim, M.K.; Kim, D.H. Potential Importance of Ozone in the Association Between Outdoor Air Pollution and Dry Eye Disease in South Korea. JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016, 134, 503–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Kim, R.; Yoo, D.; Jung, Y.J.; Han, K.; Lee, J.Y. Sex differences in smoking, alcohol consumption, and risk of Parkinson’s disease: A nationwide cohort study. Parkinsonism Relat. Disord. 2020, 71, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, W.; Yan, W.; Fotis, K.; Prasad, N.M.; Lansingh, V.C.; Taylor, H.R.; Finger, R.P.; Facciolo, D.; He, M. Cataract Surgical Rate and Socioeconomics: A Global Study. Investig. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci. 2016, 57, 5872–5881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Adamkiewicz, G.; Liddie, J.; Gaffin, J.M. The Respiratory Risks of Ambient/Outdoor Air Pollution. Clin. Chest Med. 2020, 41, 809–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Vimercati, L.; Cavone, D.; Caputi, A.; Delfino, M.C.; De Maria, L.; Ferri, G.M.; Serio, G. Malignant mesothelioma in construction workers: The Apulia regional mesothelioma register, Southern Italy. BMC Res. Notes 2019, 12, 636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ijerph 17 09231 g001 550
Figure 1. Flow chart of study population.
Figure 1. Flow chart of study population.
Ijerph 17 09231 g001
Ijerph 17 09231 g002 550
Figure 2. Trend in the levels of air pollution (upper) and the patients’ number of diagnosed cataract according to the quartile levels of PM10 from 2004 to 2015 (lower).
Figure 2. Trend in the levels of air pollution (upper) and the patients’ number of diagnosed cataract according to the quartile levels of PM10 from 2004 to 2015 (lower).
Ijerph 17 09231 g002
Table
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study population.
Table 1. Baseline characteristics of study population.
Total (n = 115,728)No Cataract (n = 98,914)Cataract (n = 16,814)p-Value
Age, year60.0 ± 7.259.4 ± 7.563.2 ± 6.9<0.001
Sex <0.001
Male54,679 (47.2)48,395 (88.5)6284 (11.5)
Female61,049 (52.8)50,519 (82.8)10,530 (17.2)
Smoking status <0.001
Non-smoker86,453 (74.7)72,860 (84.3)13,593 (15.7)
Former smoker9663 (8.4)8429 (87.2)1234 (12.8)
Current smoker19,612 (16.9)17,625 (89.9)1987 (10.1)
Insurance levels <0.001
Lower 45,884 (39.6)39,319 (85.7)6565 (14.3)
Upper 69,844 (60.4)59,595 (85.3)10,249 (14.7)
Urbanization <0.001
High 50,207 (43.4)43,382 (86.4)6825 (13.6)
Less65,521 (56.6)55,532 (84.8)9989 (15.2)
Comorbidity
Diabetes mellitus22,314 (19.3)17,734 (17.9)4580 (27.2)<0.001
Cerebrovascular disease4360 (3.8)4200 (4.2)1060 (6.3)<0.001
Peripheral vascular disease4203 (3.6)3347 (3.4)856 (5.1)<0.001
Chronic pulmonary disease2712 (2.3)2172 (2.2)540 (3.2)<0.001
Mental disorder2243 (1.9)1776 (1.8)467 (2.8)<0.001
Congestive heart failure1449 (1.3)1153 (1.2)296 (1.8)<0.001
Myocardial infarction599 (0.52)500 (0.51)99 (0.59)<0.001
Malignancy550 (0.48)475 (0.48)75 (0.45)0.516
Hemiplegia533 (0.46)454 (0.46)79 (0.47)0.848
Liver disease409 (0.36)330 (0.33)79 (0.47)0.526
Chronic kidney disease314 (0.27)254 (0.26)60 (0.36)0.021
Table
Table 2. Hazard ratios (HR) of cataract incidence according to the levels of air pollutants.
Table 2. Hazard ratios (HR) of cataract incidence according to the levels of air pollutants.
Total (n = 115,728)Male (n = 54,679)Female (n = 61,049)<65 Years Old (n = 101,372)≥65 Years Old (n = 14,356)
Adjusted HR95% CIp Value for TrendAdjusted HR95% CIp Value for TrendAdjusted HR95% CIp Value for TrendAdjusted HR95% CIp Value for TrendAdjusted HR95% CIp Value for Trend
PM10Q11 <0.0011 0.0281 <0.0011 0.1061 <0.001
Q21.0711.0261.1181.0761.0041.1541.0681.0121.1271.0110.9541.0701.1291.0591.203
Q30.9920.9511.0361.0160.9471.0890.9800.9281.0350.9460.8941.0101.0310.9661.101
Q41.0691.0251.1151.0941.0211.1731.0581.0041.1160.9980.9431.0551.1431.0711.218
PM2.5Q11 0.5471 0.8911 0.6461 0.4751 0.437
Q21.0120.8331.2300.9340.6791.2841.0390.8101.3140.9070.7201.1421.3870.9392.049
Q30.9270.7601.1301.0010.7521.3330.8660.6571.1410.8830.7061.1051.1270.7191.766
Q40.9050.7721.0620.9170.7171.7840.9030.7311.1150.8730.7241.0541.0790.7911.471
NO2Q11 0.0111 0.1221 0.0011 0.6991 0.004
Q21.0350.9931.0791.0530.9841.1281.0260.9741.0851.0250.9691.0841.0430.9811.108
Q31.0621.0151.1121.0700.9931.1531.0591.0001.1221.0290.9691.0931.1021.0271.181
Q41.0801.0301.1331.0971.0141.1861.0721.0091.1391.0360.9731.1031.1371.0561.224
SO2Q11 0.0261 0.7321 0.0311 0.3321 0.025
Q21.0651.0211.1111.0100.9421.0831.1021.0441.1621.0440.9861.1061.0861.0191.157
Q31.0461.0021.0911.0330.9641.1081.0550.9991.1131.0040.9491.0631.0901.0221.163
Q41.0270.9841.0731.0350.9631.1121.0260.9711.0830.9930.9371.0521.0670.9981.141
COQ11 0.0641 0.2861 0.0331 0.4091 0.091
Q21.0060.9641.0490.9460.8821.0141.0430.9891.1001.0000.9461.0581.0130.9491.080
Q31.0471.0041.0931.0070.9391.0791.0721.0151.1321.0430.9861.1041.0570.9891.129
Q40.9910.9491.0350.9790.9111.0511.0010.9481.0571.0160.9591.0760.9690.9071.036
O3Q11 0.0131 0.1991 0.0221 0.2261 0.017
Q20.9910.9471.0380.9970.9271.0740.9900.9331.0490.9930.9351.0530.9890.9211.063
Q30.9970.9531.0441.0000.9281.0770.9980.9411.0581.0070.9481.0690.9840.9161.057
Q40.9310.8880.9770.9360.8661.0120.9280.8740.9860.9520.8931.0140.9080.8440.977
HRs and 95% confidence interval (CI) were obtained by Cox-proportional hazard regression analysis after adjusting for age, sex, smoking status, income levels, urbanization, and comorbidity.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shin, J.; Lee, H.; Kim, H. Association between Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Age-Related Cataract: A Nationwide Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 9231. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249231

AMA Style

Shin J, Lee H, Kim H. Association between Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Age-Related Cataract: A Nationwide Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(24):9231. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249231

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shin, Jinyoung, Hyungwoo Lee, and Hyeongsu Kim. 2020. "Association between Exposure to Ambient Air Pollution and Age-Related Cataract: A Nationwide Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 24: 9231. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249231

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop