Next Article in Journal
Erratum: Xuan Wei, et al. Assessing the Effects of Desertification Control Projects from the Farmers’ Perspective: A Case Study of Yanchi County, Northern China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 983
Next Article in Special Issue
Deeper Spatial Statistical Insights into Small Geographic Area Data Uncertainty
Previous Article in Journal
Diesel Particulate Matter 2.5 Induces Epithelial-to-Mesenchymal Transition and Upregulation of SARS-CoV-2 Receptor during Human Pluripotent Stem Cell-Derived Alveolar Organoid Development
Previous Article in Special Issue
Landscapes on Prevention Quality Indicators: A Spatial Analysis of Diabetes Preventable Hospitalizations in Portugal (2016–2017)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Geospatial Analysis of Environmental Atmospheric Risk Factors in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review

1
CINTESIS—Center for Health Technology and Services Research, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Rua Doutor Plácido da Costa, s/n, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
2
Department of Community Medicine, Information and Health Decision Sciences (MEDCIDS), Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Rua Doutor Plácido da Costa, s/n, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
3
Faculty of Arts and Humanities, University of Porto, Via Panorâmica, s/n, 4150-564 Porto, Portugal
4
Department of Geosciences, Environment and Land Planning, Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre 687, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
5
Earth Sciences Institute (ICT), Pole of the FCUP, University of Porto, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(22), 8414; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228414
Submission received: 30 September 2020 / Revised: 9 November 2020 / Accepted: 10 November 2020 / Published: 13 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Geospatial Information in Public Health)

Abstract

:
Despite the vast evidence on the environmental influence in neurodegenerative diseases, those considering a geospatial approach are scarce. We conducted a systematic review to identify studies concerning environmental atmospheric risk factors for neurodegenerative diseases that have used geospatial analysis/tools. PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for all scientific studies that included a neurodegenerative disease, an environmental atmospheric factor, and a geographical analysis. Of the 34 included papers, approximately 60% were related to multiple sclerosis (MS), hence being the most studied neurodegenerative disease in the context of this study. Sun exposure (n = 13) followed by the most common exhaustion gases (n = 10 for nitrogen dioxide (NO2) and n = 5 for carbon monoxide (CO)) were the most studied atmospheric factors. Only one study used a geospatial interpolation model, although 13 studies used remote sensing data to compute atmospheric factors. In 20% of papers, we found an inverse correlation between sun exposure and multiple sclerosis. No consensus was reached in the analysis of nitrogen dioxide and Parkinson’s disease, but it was related to dementia and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. This systematic review (number CRD42020196188 in PROSPERO’s database) provides an insight into the available evidence regarding the geospatial influence of environmental factors on neurodegenerative diseases.

1. Introduction

The human brain suffers pathological changes in the process of ageing, leading to a range of neurodegenerative disorders [1]. Until 2050, the world’s population over 60 years old is expected to nearly double compared to 2015, reaching 22% [2]. The ageing of the population raises concerns about the future of neurodegenerative diseases [3] and urges the development of better health systems with long-term care tailored to meet the needs of the elderly population [2]. These diseases are characterised by progressive damage or loss of neuronal cells, leading to compromised functioning of the brain, with either motor or cognitive roles being endangered [4]. Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is the most prevalent neurodegenerative disease worldwide [5], and the most common cause of dementia and it is a progressive disease that can be characterised by extensive cognitive damage, commonly affecting the functional competency to perform quotidian actions [6]. Following AD in prevalence, Parkinson’s disease (PD) is defined by the dopaminergic neuronal loss, which presents as a Lewy Bodies (LB) disease that during the course of the disease spreads to different regions of the brain, leading to motor and non-motor symptoms [7]. The third most prevalent neurodegenerative disease is multiple sclerosis (MS), affecting around 2.5 million people worldwide, which is an inflammatory demyelination disorder of the brain, frequently of autoimmune origin [5].
Apart from ageing, the most common risk factors in the development of neurodegenerative diseases include gender, clinical history of hypertension, diabetes, cranial injury, tumours, and infections, as well as smoking and drinking habits [8]. However, the knowledge on the development of most of these diseases remains incomplete, including the influence that environmental factors might have in this context [8]. This review focuses on atmospheric pollution due to its significant impact worldwide, with 91% of the world’s population living under air pollution levels exceeding the established limits by the World Health Organisation (WHO) [9]. Atmospheric pollutants are all “substances, laid by the human activities with enough concentration to cause detrimental influences to health (…)” [10], but some authors also consider natural sources of pollutants [11].
Recent studies point out that atmospheric pollution can trigger mechanisms responsible for neurodegenerative diseases, especially particulate matter with a diameter under 2.5 µm (PM2.5) due to its capacity to reach the brain [12]. Four main pathways have been identified to air pollution reaching the brain [13]: systemic inflammation (in which the pollutant penetrates peripheral organs such as the lungs, provoking a systemic response that transfers the inflammation to the brain) [13,14,15,16,17], nasal olfactory (inhaled ultrafine and fine particles that penetrate the lungs reaching the systemic circulation, the trigeminal nerve, the brainstem, the hippocampus, and the frontal lobe) [18,19,20,21,22,23], adsorbed compounds (particulate matter from air pollution encloses various toxic compounds that may be adsorbed independently of the particle) [24,25,26] and inhaled oxidation (reactive oxygen agents such as ozone, which interact with proteins and lipids in the lungs altering them into toxic compounds that provoke oxidative stress, leading to various brain damages) [27,28,29,30,31]. PM2.5 is associated with AD, PD, dementia, autism, and stroke [32]. Other pollutants such as ozone (O3), particulate matter with a diameter under 10 µm (PM10), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), and sulphur dioxide (SO2) are also toxic to the central nervous system (CNS) [33]. Despite the abundance of studies on neurodegenerative diseases and the environmental influence on the CNS, studies considering a geospatial approach are scarce, and many of them only consider the geographic area as a clustering factor [34,35,36], not proceeding to further analysis.
One of the tools for environmental data extraction and analysis is remote sensing. It has been broadly used in epidemiological studies, increasing the number of publications featuring remote sensing applied to health from 5.6% in 2007 to 13.3% in 2016 [37]. Apart from remote sensing, GIS (geographic information systems), clustering, and spatial models are other tools that can be used to analyse environmental data. Geospatial analysis is a broad concept that combines both exposure assessment methods and posterior statistical analysis, allowing us to integrate information on health and disease of specific regions with environmental data as well as other spatially distributed relevant data such as socio-economic information. Understanding the strengths and limitations of previous studies that used geospatial approach could inform us on how to better delineate future research, thereby maximising the gains regarding the understanding of the geospatial distribution of environmental risk factors associated with neurodegenerative diseases. This type of knowledge is important to establish to aid in planning future policies that mitigate environmental factors, which may be critical in the prevention and progression of neurodegenerative diseases.
It is important to frame the issue of neurodegenerative diseases in the new coronavirus pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Corona Virus-2). This virus can penetrate the CNS mainly through two pathways: by retrograde axonal transport via the cribriform plate, and by the systemic circulatory system [38]. This last pathway is similar to one of the atmospheric pollutants reaching the CNS, raising the hypothesis that this virus may pose a higher potential for neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration [39]. The concept of Neuro-COVID-19 is, thus, being increasingly used in current research [40].
In this systematic review, we aim to identify studies concerning neurodegenerative diseases and their environmental atmospheric risk factors, which have used geographical analysis/tools as part of their work. The methods used to conduct this systematic review are presented in Section 2 (Materials and Methods), including the query used, the inclusion and exclusion criteria, and the study characteristics gathered by the reviewers. In Section 3 (Results), there are two subsections, the first one being identification, screening, and assessment (which explains the main numbers retrieved by the systematic review, from the total number of studies screened to the included papers and their characteristics) and the second being qualitative synthesis (in which the main relations retrieved between the environmental and neurodegenerative diseases are shown). The results from the systematic review are discussed and compared to those in the literature in Section 4 (Discussion), and study limitations are explored. To finalise, a small conclusion is presented in Section 5.

2. Materials and Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus databases from inception to the 4th February 2020, date in which the last search was run. The oldest study retrieved was from 1951 [41]. All studies with at least one neurodegenerative disease, one atmospheric pollutant or factor, and some geographic approach were included for screening, with a total of 4655 abstracts screened. No papers were excluded due to language restrictions. For the literature review, we screened the databases using the following keywords: [((alzheimer*) OR (ataxia*) OR (Chorea Minor) OR (creutzfeldt*) OR (dementia*) OR (Frontotemporal) OR (Guillian-barre syndrome) OR (Huntington*) OR (kennedy* disease) OR (Lewy*) OR (motor neuron*) OR (Myotonic dystrophy) OR (neurodegen*) OR (parkinson*) OR (pick’s) OR (Prion) OR (progressive AND palsy) OR (progressive muscular atrophy) OR (sclerosis*) OR (*senile) OR (spinal atrophy)) AND ((atmospher*) OR (carbon) OR (environment*) OR (humidity) OR (meteorologic*) OR (nitrogen) OR (ozone) OR (particulate*) OR (PM2*) OR (pollut*) OR (sulphur*) OR (surface pressure) OR (temperature)) AND ((drone) OR (geograph*) OR (imagery) OR (landsat) OR (map) OR (mapping) OR (modis) OR (remote sens*) OR (satellite) OR (sentinel) OR (spatial) OR (topologic*))]. This query was a result of the sensitivity analysis of terms that could be relevant for this review, keywords that added no papers to the results were excluded from the query. These included the terms: geospatial, spatio*, and cartograph*. This review was submitted to PROSPERO under the registration number CRD42020196188.
All studies with at least one neurodegenerative disease, one atmospheric pollutant or factor, and some geographic approach were included for screening. The inclusion criteria were the following: (1) Studying a neurodegenerative disease; (2) Accounting for atmospheric environmental factors or pollutants; (3) Using geospatial analysis or tools; (4) All the previous criteria in the same study. Studies were excluded if: no evidence of geographic analysis was found (stating a geographic area without further analysing it or comparing it to other areas was an exclusion motive), no atmospheric pollutants or factors referred (soil and water pollutants were excluded from this revision) and no focus on neurodegenerative diseases (studies about the mechanisms and biospecimen behind the disease were discarded). Full papers were independently read by the same researchers to apply the inclusion and exclusion criteria further. Unavailable full texts were requested to the authors individually. Those studies that remained unavailable were excluded.
For the included full papers data extraction and analysis, structured forms were created and used by the reviewers. The forms included free writing inputs such as the title, year, country, authors, DOI (digital object identifier), participants, aims, and key findings. Additionally, multiple-choice inputs were available for study type, statistical methods, outcome measurements, study limitations, neurodegenerative disease, environmental risk factors, geographic approach, and type of geographical approach. A level of simplification was applied to categorise the study limitations, to better fit most studies on the main biases and issues encountered. Both reviewers filled these forms independently and discussed the extracted information at the end of the process. Nonetheless, the reviewers had the option to input free text if they considered necessary to complement any of the inputs mentioned. Risk of bias from individual studies was assessed by fitting the study limitations into one or more of the pre-defined form options: none given by the authors; conflict of interests (any conflict of interests stated by the authors); confounding factors (unassessed confounding factors); ecological bias (extrapolation of a conclusion from a population to a patient); exposure assessment (issues with assessing the patient’s exposure to the environmental factor); interpolation (issues with spatially interpolating the environmental factor); recall bias (data collection relying on patient’s memory); migration of patients (patients moving from one residence to another); referral bias (studies relying on the doctor’s referring similar cases); sampling issues (under sampling; over sampling or non-representative sampling); statistical issues (lacking of more relevant statistical methods); study design issues (studies acknowledging inappropriate study design); survival bias (relying on a patient being alive over a period of time); time related issues (inability to assess the amount of time a patient was exposed to the environmental factor); unassessed patients (patients outside the databases not being considered).

3. Results

3.1. Identification, Screening, and Assessment

Of the 4655 articles initially screened, only 34 were included in the final study. The selection process is summarised using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) [42] presented by a flow diagram (Figure 1). In the diagram of Figure 1, it is possible to identify that 4655 records were screened in this systematic review, most of which did not relate simultaneously to neurodegenerative diseases, atmospheric factors, and geographical factors (n = 3239). After screening, 90 full papers were assessed for eligibility, from which nearly half (n = 44) did not tackle any atmospheric pollutants or factors. By the end of the selection process, 34 articles were included. The discrepancy in the total number of excluded studies and the sum of the exclusion reasons categories is due to the overlapping of exclusion reasons.
The number of times each disease, environmental factor, and geographical approach was retrieved are detailed in Table 1. The sum of the categories’ absolute frequencies for environmental and geographic factors exceeds the number of studies because they are not mutually exclusive. Most papers focused on (MS) (56%), of which 63% studied sun exposure as the main environmental factor, mostly using remote sensing data (58%), always combined with another geographic factor. Administrative divisions were the most used geographical approach when considering all diseases (47%).
The main characteristics of the studies—study design, outcomes, statistical methods, and study limitations—are summarised in Table 2. Most of the studies are cross-sectional (n = 12) and correlation was the most reported effect measure (n = 19) and statistical method (n = 22) used. The most common study limitations found were related to exposure assessment (n = 18) and confounding factors n = 15). The full characteristics of the studies can be found in Table 3. This table contains all the characteristics retrieved by the reviewers for each included study: country of origin, year of publication, neurodegenerative disease, environmental factor, geographic factor, study design, study limitations, statistical methods, and outcome. A list of excluded studies [1,7,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96] is also available in Table A1, Appendix A.
The country with the highest number of published papers under the criteria of this systematic review was the United States of America (USA), with nine included papers. It was followed by Canada with five papers. However, Europe, with the aggregation of articles from Bulgaria, England, France, Italy, Norway, and Spain totals twelve included papers. The Middle East and Asia had three papers, and Australia had two papers. Table 4 contains the papers studied by each geographical region, grouped by neurodegenerative disease.
Of the 34 included papers, 19 were published in the last 5 years. Until 2000, only four studies were found corresponding to the criteria of this systematic review, all of which focused on multiple sclerosis. Until 2007, except for a paper focusing on Parkinson’s disease, no other neurodegenerative disease had been considered.

3.2. Qualitative Synthesis

Among the 19 papers focused on MS, with sun exposure being the most studied environmental factor (n = 13), one was methodological and did not measure any outcome related to MS [97]. An inverse association between MS and sun exposure was reported in seven studies [98,99,100,101,102,103,104]. In contrast, in the other three studies, no significant association was found [105,106,107], one of which attributed the results to the adjusting for latitude [105].
As for temperature, five studies found it to be negatively related to MS [98,99,100,103,108] and one found this association to be due to its high correlation with latitude [105]. Precipitation was found to be uncorrelated [98,100,105] or only weakly positively correlated [99,108] to MS. Humidity was focused only on two studies, both of which found no correlation to MS [98,105].
Concerning the environmental pollutants, PM2.5 was found to be positively correlated with MS in one study [109] and not significantly correlated with another [110]. SO2 had no correlation [110,111] except in one study [112]. PM10 and NOX (nitrogen oxides) were studied only twice and studies disagree in the reported correlation [110,112]. Additionally, a study found a positive association between an air quality index (AQI) and MS [113], and magnesium (Mg) was found to be negatively correlated [114], while radon was not found to be associated with MS [115]. In the domain of paediatric MS, PM10 was found to be related to it [116,117], as well as PM2.5, Pb (lead), SO2, and CO [117].
Of the seven studies concerning Parkinson’s Disease (PD), Pb was found to be positively spatially related [118,119], as well as Cu (copper), Mg [118], and Mn (manganese) [120]. PM10 and PM2.5 were not correlated [121], even though one study found a positive non-significant relation [122]. NO2 is the most controversial environmental factor studied in the context of PD, with one study finding positive associations [122,123] and another not finding any association [121]. Another study found an association only when adjusting for smoking [122] and one study found it to be both associated and not associated when comparing different cities [120]. Only one study explored sun exposure and found it to be associated when adjusting for age, positively in older subjects, and inversely in subjects below 70 years [124].
Three studies were included in the context of dementia, which comprehended Alzheimer’s, one of which found a positive relation to temperature [125]. The other two studies agreed that NO2 and PM10 were positively correlated with dementia [126,127]. Furthermore, a study found CO to be inversely correlated with dementia and SO2 and O3 not to be correlated [126].
Concerning amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), two studies were found but with no overlapping environmental factors. A study found NO (nitrogen oxide), NO2, and Cd (cadmium) to be positively correlated with ALS and O3 to be inversely correlated, while benzopyrene was not found to be correlated [128]. The other study found positive correlations between ALS and both precipitation and sun exposure [129].
As for motor neuron disease, in the only study included, it was found to be correlated with Pb [130].
Most studies simply used administrative divisions as geographic analysis to assess exposure to atmospheric factors, but GIS and remote sensing were also broadly used to spatially compute and model those factors. Specifically, studies that used remote sensing focused on NASA’s (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) satellite TOMS (Total Ozone Mapping Spectrometer) to compute the amount of sun exposure [97,101,104,107].

4. Discussion

Multiple sclerosis is known to be tied to latitude, thus raising the suggestion that sun exposure, as well as temperature and humidity, are probably the environmental factors behind that relationship [105]. Sun exposure is one of the strongest correlates to latitude [59] and its relation to MS may be explained by biological mechanisms that suggest that ultraviolet radiation may be immunosuppressive [131]. However, these mechanisms seem to be most relevant in early life [60]. The studies retrieved in this systematic review mostly corroborated this hypothesis [98,99,100,101,102,103,104], although three studies did not [105,106,107], with one even attributing the relationship between sun exposure and MS to the high correlation between sun exposure and latitude [105]. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis also has an environment hypothesis linked to the genetics of the disease and its prevalence. However, studies found in this systematic review focused mostly on water and soil exposures, and are thus outside the scope of this systematic review [61,79]. Another study identified a substantial gap in studies addressing environmental risk factors that may cause ALS [64]. The low incidence rate may be related to the low number of studies concerning the disease [64].
There is evidence that PD is mediated by environmental risk factors such as manganese or lead with the need to better model the exposure geographically model was noted [62]. This corroborates the findings of this systematic review. Dementia risk has been related to occupational exposure to air pollutants such as PM, CO2, CO, and SO2 [90], corroborating the findings in this systematic review. However, as dementia encloses Alzheimer’s disease, but is not limited to it, no studies were found that approached AD individually, and thus the results might have been slightly different if only AD were studied. The geographic distribution of the included studies shows a lack of studies in South America and Africa, creating the opportunity for research in the field of environmental epidemiology of neurodegenerative diseases in these regions. Analysing the source of data from each study closer, the constatation of the lack of studies from these regions remains. Although Africa has the lowest rates of neurodegenerative diseases in the world, the same cannot be said about South America, so this is a good region to develop further research.
The increasing number of papers published over the years reflects not only the general increase in scientific publications but also the availability of the technology to proceed with the geographic analysis of environmental factors. The rising interest and research investment in this thematic are also reflected in the increased number of studies over the last few years. In particular, papers referring to the new COVID-19 pandemic effects on neurodegenerative diseases have raised awareness of the synergy between this virus and the environment, which increases the risk of developing these diseases. Knowing the risk the atmospheric pollution already represents upon the central nervous system, and by adding the risk of COVID-19, which may penetrate the brain through similar pathways to those of air pollution, there is a higher potential for neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration [39]. Interesting positive relations between NO2 levels and COVID-19 fatality rates have been retrieved from a spatial analysis study [132], indicating that this pollutant may weaken the immunity of the lungs, thus allowing the virus to access the bloodstream and eventually reach the brain [133]. Vitamin D has been described as having antiviral properties, and thus the lack of sun exposure may be problematic in people already with neurological conditions, such as MS and PD [134].
One possible limitation of our study might be not having found studies concerning other neurodegenerative diseases, such as Creutzfeldt-Jakob and Huntington’s, therefore not covering the whole domain of neurodegenerative diseases defined at the start of this review. The lack of studies regarding other neurodegenerative diseases is due to the low number of studies using geospatial analysis when considering these diseases. Notwithstanding, most of the included studies focused on MS since it is mostly related to sun exposure—often derived from remote sensing—thus making it the disease most geographically studied. Grey literature was not screened, thus non-indexed papers may have escaped our research. Including this literature could have mitigated the lack of studies focussing on the remaining neurodegenerative diseases that were not found under the scope of this review. As such, further inclusion of this literature could pose an interesting opportunity for future research.

5. Conclusions

The most studied neurodegenerative disease in the context of this systematic review was MS, having over half the studies covering it. It is mostly unanimous that sun exposure is a preventive factor in the development of MS. The relationship to air pollutants remains unknown, and further investigation is needed to understand if such a relationship exists. As for the other diseases, air pollutants have become more broadly studied. Metals such as Pb and Mn were found to be related with Parkinson’s disease and ALS, respectively. NOX is the most common pollutant to be studied, but also the most ambiguous, being found to be both related and unrelated with Parkinson’s disease, and positively correlated with dementia and ALS. The geospatial analysis was mostly used to estimate exposure assessment, either by attributing a value to each administrative division and matching it to the residence of the patient or care unit location or by using remote sensing and GIS to compute the atmospheric factor’s concentration or value geographically. The present systematic review provides a basis of the available evidence regarding the influence of environmental factors on neurodegenerative diseases using geospatial analysis. The ever-increasing amount of data and technological possibilities to advance on this analysis supports the development of further research on this topic. It is important to identify mitigation measures to reduce exposure to air pollution. Regulation on the levels of air pollution and accurate monitoring of these same levels could help ensure that the population isn’t over-exposed to harmful components of the atmosphere.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: M.O., A.R. and A.F.; methodology: A.R. and A.F.; investigation: M.O. and A.P.; writing—original draft preparation: M.O.; writing—review and editing: A.F., A.C.T., A.P., A.R., H.G. and M.L.; supervision: A.F., A.C.T. and H.G.; funding acquisition: M.O., A.F., A.C.T. and H.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, grant number SFRH/BD/147324/2019 and national MCTES funds and supported also by National Funds through FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, I.P., within CINTESIS, R&D Unit (reference UIDB/4255/2020).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to kindly thank the authors who made their studies available for full paper screening when these were not available online.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. List of the 56 excluded papers.
Table A1. List of the 56 excluded papers.
RefCountry (Year)TitleAuthorsExclusion Reasons
[43]Poland (1969)Epidemiological study of multiple sclerosis in western PolandW. Cendrowski, M. Wender, W. Dominik, Z. Flejsierowicz, M. Owsianowski, M. PopielNo ENV
[44]Germany (1969)Multiple sclerosis in EuropeR. C. BehrendNo ENV
[45]Republic of South Africa (1975)Comparative epidemiological studies of multiple sclerosis in South Africa and JapanA. V. Bird, E. SatoyoshiNo ENV
[46]Germany (1984)Epidemiological investigations into multiple sclerosis in Southern HesseKlaus Lauer, Wolfgang Firnhaber, Robert Reining, Brigitte LeuchtweisNo ENV
[47]Italy (1993)Multiple sclerosis: does epidemiology contribute to providing etiological cluesEnrico Granieri, Ilaria Casetta, Maria R. Tola, Vittorio Govoni, Ezio Paolino, Susanna Malagù, Vincenza C. Monetti, Mirko CarrerasNo ENV
[48]Czech Republic (1994)Geographic aspects in the epidemiology of multiple sclerosisP. LenskýNo full paper
[49]France (1995)Epidemiology of Creutzfeldt-Jakob diseaseN. Delasnerie-Laupretre, A. AlperovitchNo full paper
[50]Hungria (1997)Monthly distribution of multiple sclerosis patients’ birthsPadmanabhan Bharanidharan No GEO
[51]USA (1997)The Epidemiology of Multiple SclerosisW. E. Hogancamp, M. Rodriguez, B. G. WeinshenkerNo ENV
[52]Canada (1999)Parkinson’s disease, multiple sclerosis and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: The iodine-dopachrome-glutamate hypothesisHarold D. FosterNo ENV
[53]United Kingdom (2000)Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: toxins and environmentJ. D. MitchellNo ENV, No GEO
[54]Spain (2002)Epidemiologia genetica de la esclerosis multipleD.F. UríaNo ENV
[55]USA (2004)Environmental risk factors in multiple sclerosis aetiologyRuth Ann MarrieNo GEO
[56]Italy (2004)Genes environment and susceptibility to multiple sclerosisStefano Sotgiu, Maura Pugliatti, Maria Laura Fois, Giannina Arru, Alessandra Sanna, Maria Alessandra Sotgiu, Giulio RosatiNo ENV
[57]USA (2005)Autoimmunity: Multiple SclerosisBeau M. Ances, Nancy J. Newman, Laura J. BalcerNo ENV, No GEO
[58]USA (2006)Studies of Multiple Sclerosis in Communities Concerned about Environmental ExposuresDhelia M. WilliamsonNo ENV
[59]USA (2007)Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis Part II Noninfectious factorsAlberto Ascherio, Kassandra L. MungerNo ENV, No GEO
[60]United Kingdom (2008)Environmental factors and multiple sclerosisGeorge C. EbersNo ENV
[61]France (2011)Contribution of geolocalisation to neuroepidemiological studies incidence of ALS and environmental factors in Limousin FranceF. Boumediène, M. Druet-Cabanac, B. Marin, Pierre-Marie Preux, P. CouratierNo ENV
[62]USA (2012)Environmental risk factorsGill Nelson, Brad A. RacetteNo GEO
[63]USA (2012)Predictors of Survival in Patients with Parkinson DiseaseAllison W. Willis, Mario Schootman, Nathan Kung, Bradley A. Evanoff, Joel S. Perlmutter, Brad A. RacetteNo ENV
[64]USA (2012)Spatial clustering of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and the potential role of BMAATracie A. Caller, Nicholas C. Field, Jonathan W. Chipman, Xun Shi, Brent T. Harris, Elijah W. StommelNo ENV
[65]United Kingdom (2013)Epidemiology of neurologically disabling disordersAlan TennantNo ENV, No GEO
[66]Kuwait (2013)Risk factors for multiple sclerosis in Kuwait a population-based case control studyHanan H. Al-Afasy, Mohammed A. Al-Obaidan, Yousef A. Al-Ansari, Sarah A. Al-Yatama, Mohammed S. Al-Rukaibi, Nourah I. Makki, Anita Suresh, Saeed AkhtarNo ENV, No GEO
[67]Spain (2014)Geographical analysis of the sporadic Creutzfeldt Jakob disease distribution in the autonomous community of the Basque Country for the period 1995 2008Saioa Chamosa, Ibon Tamayo, José M. Arteagoitia-Axpe, Ramón A. Juste, Ana Belém Rodríguez-Martínez, Juan J. Zarranz-ImirizalduNo ENV
[68]USA (2015)Association Between Alzheimer Dementia Mortality Rate and Altitude in California CountiesStephen Thielke, Christopher G. Slatore, William A. BanksNo ENV
[69]United Kingdom (2015)Geographical variation in dementia~: examining the role of environmental factors in Sweden and ScotlandTom C. Russ, Margaret Gatz, Nancy L. Pedersen, Jean Hannah, Grant Wyper, G. David Batty, Ian J. Deary, John M. StarrNo ENV
[70]Norway (2015)Socio economic factors and immigrant population studies of multiple sclerosisP. Berg-Hansen, E. G. CeliusNo ENV
[71]Canada (2015)The EnvIMS Study Design and Methodology of an International Case Control Study of Environmental Risk Factors in Multiple SclerosisSandra Magalhaes, Maura Pugliatti, Ilaria Casetta, Jelena Drulovic, Enrico Granieri, Trygve Holmøy, Margitta T. Kampman, Anne-Marie Landtblom, Klaus Lauer, Kjell-Morten Myhr, Maria Parpinel, Tatjana Pekmezovic, Trond Riise, David Wolfson, Bin Zhu, Christina WolfsonNo ENV, No GEO
[72]Sweden (2015)Vitamin D and multiple sclerosis from epidemiology to preventionP. Sundström, J. SalzerNo ENV
[73]USA (2016)Environmental control of autoimmune inflammation in the central nervous systemVeit Rothhammer, Francisco J. QuintanaNo NEURO
[74]USA (2016)Epidemiology of Multiple Sclerosis From Risk Factors to Prevention An UpdateAlberto Ascherio, Kassandra L. MungerNo ENV
[75]USA (2016)Fine Particulate Matter Residential Proximity to Major Roads and Markers of Small Vessel Disease in a Memory Study PopulationElissa H. Wilker, Sergi Martinez-Ramirez, Itai Kloog, Joel Schwartz, Elizabeth Mostofsky, Petros Koutrakis, Murray A. Mittleman, Anand ViswanathanNo NEURO
[76]United Kingdom (2016)Geographical Variation in Dementia Mortality in Italy New Zealand and Chile The Impact of Latitude Vitamin D and Air PollutionTom C. Russ, Laura Murianni, Gloria Icaza, Andrea Slachevsky, John M. StarrNo ENV
[77]Ecuador (2016)Prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Latin America and its relationship with European migrationEdgar Correa, Víctor Paredes, Braulio MartínezNo ENV
[1]USA (2016)Seeking environmental causes of neurodegenerative disease and envisioning primary preventionPeter S. Spencer, Valerie S. Palmer, Glen E. KisbyNo ENV
[78]USA (2017)Associations of Spatial Disparities of Alzheimer’s Disease Mortality Rates and Soil Selenium Sulfur Concentrations and Risk Factors in the United StatesHongbing SunNo ENV
[79]Italy (2017)Incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the province of Novara Italy and possible role of environmental pollutionMarina Tesauro, Michela Consonni, Tommaso Filippini, Letizia Mazzini, Fabrizio Pisano, Adriano Chiò, Aniello Esposito, Marco Vinceti No ENV
[80]France (2017)Small area distribution of multiple sclerosis incidence in western France in search of environmental triggersKarima Hammas, Jacqueline Yaouanq, Morgane Lannes, Gilles Edan, Jean-François VielNo ENV
[81]Spain (2017)The Geography of the Alzheimer’s Disease Mortality in Spain Should We Focus on Industrial Pollutants PreventionÈrica Martínez-Solanas, Montse Vergara-Duarte, Miquel Ortega Cerdà, Juan Carlos Martín-Sánchez, Maria Buxó, Eduard Rodríguez-Farré, Joan Benach, Glòria PérezNo ENV
[82]Iran (2017)The relationship between the amount of radiation, relative humidity, and temperature with the risk of multiple sclerosis in Isfahan province, Iran, during the years 2001-2014A. Karimi, A. Delpisheh, F. Ashtari, K. Sayehmiri, R. MeamarNo full paper
[83]Netherlands (2018)Assessment of residential environmental exposure to pesticides from agricultural fields in the NetherlandsMaartje Brouwer, Hans Kromhout, Roel Vermeulen, Jan Duyzer, Henk Kramer, Gerard Hazeu, Geert de Snoo, Anke HussNo ENV
[84]France (2018)Environmental factors in the development of multiple sclerosisL. MichelNo ENV, No GEO
[85]Iran (2018)Estimated incidence rate of multiple sclerosis and its relationship with geographical factors in Isfahan province between the years 2001 and 2014Fereshteh Ashtari, Arezoo Karimi, Ali Delpisheh, Rokhsareh Meamar, Kourosh Sayehmiri, Salman DaliriNo ENV
[86]Australia (2018)Health outcomes and lifestyle in a sample of people with multiple sclerosis HOLISM Longitudinal and validation cohortsTracey J. Weiland, Alysha M. De Livera, Chelsea R. Brown, George A. Jelinek, Zoe Aitken, Steve L. Simpson Jr., Sandra L. Neate, Keryn L. Taylor, Emily O’Kearney, William Bevens, Claudia H. MarckNo ENV
[87]USA (2019)ALS and environment Clues from spatial clusteringP. S. Spencer, E. Lagrange, W. CamuNo ENV
[88]Italy (2019)Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Descriptive Epidemiology: The Origin of Geographic DifferenceGiancarlo Logroscino, Marco Piccininni No ENV
[89]Iran (2019)Can environmental factors increase the risk of multiple sclerosis A narrative reviewHoda Naghshineh, Seyed Mohammad Masood Hojjati, Ali Alizadeh Khatir, Payam Saadat, Alijan Ahmadi AhangarNo ENV
[90]USA (2019)Increased Dementia Mortality in West Virginia Counties with Mountaintop Removal MiningA. K. Salm, Michael J. BensonNo ENV
[7]China (2019)The interplay of aging genetics and environmental factors in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s diseaseShirley Yin-Yu Pang, Philip Wing-Lok Ho, Hui-Fang Liu, Chi-Ting Leung, Lingfei Li, Eunice Eun Seo Chang, David Boyer Ramsden, Shu-Leong HoNo ENV
[91]Turkey (2002)The etiology and the epidemiology of multiple sclerosisMeral MirzaNo GEO
[92]Russia (2009)Risk factors of multiple sclerosis development in the population of the Rostov regionZ.A. Goncharova, V.A. BaliazinNo full paper
[93]China (2011)Reference value of left atrial diameter of presenile women and geographical factors based on principal component analysisJ. Jing, M. Ge, A.Z. Zhao, G.Z. Liu, S.T. Xiang, X. Wang, Y.P. ZhangNo full paper
[94]Russia (2014)Multiple sclerosis in the Bashkortostan Republic and the Rostov region: A comparative epidemiologic studyK. Z. Bakhtiyarova, Z. A. GoncharovaNo full paper
[95]China (2015)Clinical features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in south–west ChinaQianqian Wei, Xueping Chen, Zhenzhen Zheng, Rui Huang, Xiaoyan Guo, Bei Cao, Bi Zhao, Huifang ShangNo ENV
[96]USA (2016)Multiple Sclerosis EpidemiologyM.T.Wallin, J.F.KurtzkeNo ENV

References

  1. Spencer, P.S.; Palmer, V.S.; Kisby, G.E. Seeking environmental causes of neurodegenerative disease and envisioning primary prevention. NeuroToxicology 2016, 56, 269–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. World Health Organisation (WHO). Ageing and Health. Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health (accessed on 4 September 2020).
  3. Garre-Olmo, J. Epidemiology of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias. Rev. Neurol. 2018, 66, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Liu, Z.; Zhou, T.; Ziegler, A.C.; Dimitrion, P.; Zuo, L. Oxidative Stress in Neurodegenerative Diseases: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Applications. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 2017, 2525967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. World Health Organisation (WHO). Neurological Disorders: Public Health Challenges; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006; ISBN 9789241563369. [Google Scholar]
  6. Campanozzi, M.D.; Casali, E.; Neviani, F.; Martini, E.; Neri, M. Evaluation of the Slopes of Cognitive Impairment and Disability in Alzheimer’s Disease (Ad) Patients Treated with Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors (Achel). Arch. Gerontol. Geriatr. 2007, 44 (Suppl. 1), 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pang, S.Y.-Y.; Ho, P.W.-L.; Liu, H.-F.; Leung, C.-T.; Li, L.; Chang, E.E.S.; Ramsden, D.B.; Ho, S.-L. The interplay of aging, genetics and environmental factors in the pathogenesis of Parkinson’s disease. Transl. Neurodegener. 2019, 8, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Brown, R.C.; Lockwood, A.H.; Sonawane, B.R. Neurodegenerative Diseases: An Overview of Environmental Risk Factors. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 1250–1256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. World Health Organization. Air Pollution. Available online: https://www.who.int/health-topics/air-pollution#tab=tab_2 (accessed on 4 September 2020).
  10. Almetwally, A.A.; Bin-Jumah, M.; Allam, A.A. Ambient air pollution and its influence on human health and welfare: An overview. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 24815–24830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Putta, S.N. Atmospheric-Pollution, Its History, Origins and Prevention. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1984, 106, 3066. [Google Scholar]
  12. Calderón-Garcidueñas, L.; Calderón-Garcidueñas, A.; Torres-Jardón, R.; Avila-Ramírez, J.; Kulesza, R.J.; Angiulli, A.D. Air Pollution and Your Brain: What Do You Need to Know Right Now. Prim. Health Care Res. Dev. 2015, 16, 329–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Block, M.L.; Calderón-Garcidueñas, L. Air Pollution: Mechanisms of Neuroinflammation and Cns Disease. Trends Neurosci. 2009, 32, 506–516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Calderón-Garcidueñas, L.; Mora-Tiscareño, A.; Ontiveros, E.; Gómez-Garza, G.; Barragán-Mejía, G.; Broadway, J.; Chapman, S.; Valencia-Salazar, G.; Jewells, V.; Maronpot, R.R.; et al. Air pollution, cognitive deficits and brain abnormalities: A pilot study with children and dogs. Brain Cogn. 2008, 68, 117–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Tamagawa, E.; Van Eeden, S.F. Impaired Lung Function and Risk for Stroke: Role of the Systemic Inflammation Response? Chest 2006, 130, 1631–1633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Rückerl, R.; Greven, S.; Ljungman, P.; Aalto, P.; Antoniades, C.; Bellander, T.; Berglind, N.; Chrysohoou, C.; Forastiere, F.; Jacquemin, B.; et al. Air Pollution and Inflammation (Interleukin-6, C-Reactive Protein, Fibrinogen) in Myocardial Infarction Survivors. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007, 115, 1072–1080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Calderón-Garcidueñas, L.; Villarreal-Calderon, R.; Valencia-Salazar, G.; Henríquez-Roldán, C.; Gutiérrez-Castrellón, P.; Torres-Jardón, R.; Osnaya-Brizuela, N.; Romero, L.; Solt, A.; Reed, W. Systemic Inflammation, Endothelial Dysfunction, and Activation in Clinically Healthy Children Exposed to Air Pollutants. Inhal. Toxicol. 2008, 20, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Valavanidis, A.; Fiotakis, K.; Vlachogianni, T. Airborne Particulate Matter and Human Health: Toxicological Assessment and Importance of Size and Composition of Particles for Oxidative Damage and Carcinogenic Mechanisms. J. Environ. Sci. Health C Environ. Carcinog. Ecotoxicol. Rev. 2008, 26, 339–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nemmar, A.; Inuwa, I.M. Diesel exhaust particles in blood trigger systemic and pulmonary morphological alterations. Toxicol. Lett. 2008, 176, 20–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Oberdörster, G.; Sharp, Z.; Atudorei, V.; Elder, A.; Gelein, R.; Kreyling, W.; Cox, C. Translocation of Inhaled Ultrafine Particles to the Brain. Inhal. Toxicol. 2004, 16, 437–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Wang, B.; Feng, W.; Wang, M.; Shi, J.W.; Zhang, F.; Ouyang, H.; Zhao, Y.L.; Chai, Z.F.; Huang, Y.Y.; Xie, Y.N.; et al. Transport of Intranasally Instilled Fine Fe2O3 Particles into the Brain: Micro-distribution, Chemical States, and Histopathological Observation. Biol. Trace Element Res. 2007, 118, 233–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Jiao, F.; Lao, F.; Li, W.; Gu, Y.; Li, Y.; Ge, C.; Zhou, G.; Li, B.; et al. Time-dependent translocation and potential impairment on central nervous system by intranasally instilled TiO(2) nanoparticles. Toxicology 2008, 254, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Calderón-Garcidueñas, L.; Solt, A.C.; Henríquez-Roldán, C.; Torres-Jardón, R.; Nuse, B.; Herritt, L.; Villarreal-Calderón, R.; Osnaya, N.; Stone, I.; García, R.; et al. Long-Term Air Pollution Exposure Is Associated with Neuroinflammation, an Altered Innate Immune Response, Disruption of the Blood-Brain Barrier, Ultrafine Particulate Deposition, and Accumulation of Amyloid Beta-42 and Alpha-Synuclein in Children and Young Adults. Toxicol. Pathol. 2008, 36, 289–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Mühlfeld, C.; Rothen-Rutishauser, B.; Blank, F.; Vanhecke, D.; Ochs, M.; Gehr, P. Interactions of nanoparticles with pulmonary structures and cellular responses. Am. J. Physiol. Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2008, 294, L817–L829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Simkhovich, B.Z.; Kleinman, M.T.; Kloner, R.A. Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Injury Epidemiology, Toxicology, and Mechanisms. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2008, 52, 719–726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Peters, A.; Veronesi, B.; Calderón-Garcidueñas, L.; Gehr, P.; Chen, L.-C.; Geiser, M.; Reed, W.; Rothen-Rutishauser, B.; Schürch, S.; Schulz, H. Translocation and potential neurological effects of fine and ultrafine particles a critical update. Part. Fibre Toxicol. 2006, 3, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Pryor, W.A.; Squadrito, G.L.; Friedman, M. A new mechanism for the toxicity of ozone. Toxicol. Lett. 1995, 82, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hollingsworth, J.W.; Kleeberger, S.R.; Foster, W.M. Ozone and Pulmonary Innate Immunity. Proc. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2007, 4, 240–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Guevara-Guzman, R.; Arriaga, V.; Kendrick, K.M.; Bernal, C.; Vega, X.; Mercado-Gómez, O.; Rivas-Arancibia, S. Estradiol prevents ozone-induced increases in brain lipid peroxidation and impaired social recognition memory in female rats. Neuroscience 2009, 159, 940–950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pereyra-Muñoz, N.; Rugerio-Vargas, C.; Angoa-Pérez, M.; Borgonio-Pérez, G.; Rivas-Arancibia, S. Oxidative damage in substantia nigra and striatum of rats chronically exposed to ozone. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 2006, 31, 114–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Angoa-Pérez, M.; Jiang, H.; Rodríguez, A.I.; Lemini, C.; Levine, R.A.; Rivas-Arancibia, S. Estrogen counteracts ozone-induced oxidative stress and nigral neuronal death. NeuroReport 2006, 17, 629–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fu, P.; Guo, X.; Cheung, F.M.H.; Yung, K. The association between PM2.5 exposure and neurological disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 655, 1240–1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shah, A.S.V.; Lee, K.K.; McAllister, D.A.; Hunter, A.; Nair, H.; Whiteley, W.; Langrish, J.P.; Newby, D.E.; Mills, N.L. Short term exposure to air pollution and stroke: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2015, 350, h1295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Willis, A.W.; Evanoff, B.A.; Lian, M.; Criswell, S.R.; Racette, B.A. Geographic and Ethnic Variation in Parkinson Disease: A Population-Based Study of US Medicare Beneficiaries. Neuroepidemiology 2010, 34, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Scott, K.M.; Abhinav, K.; Stanton, B.R.; Johnston, C.; Turner, M.R.; Ampong, M.-A.; Sakel, M.; Orrell, R.W.; Shaw, C.E.; Leigh, P.N.; et al. Geographical Clustering of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in South-East England: A Population Study. Neuroepidemiology 2008, 32, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Noonan, C.W.; White, M.C.; Thurman, D.J.; Wong, L.-Y. Temporal and geographic variation in United States motor neuron disease mortality, 1969–1998. Neurology 2005, 64, 1215–1221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Viana, J.; Santos, J.V.; Neiva, R.; Souza, J.; Duarte, L.; Teodoro, A.; Freitas, A. Remote Sensing in Human Health: A 10-Year Bibliometric Analysis. Remote. Sens. 2017, 9, 1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Achar, A.; Ghosh, C.; Favreau, D.J.; Desforges, M.; St-Jean, J.R.; Talbot, P.J. Covid-19-Associated Neurological Disorders: The Potential Route of Cns Invasion and Blood-Brain Relevance. Cells 2020, 9, 2360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Calderón-Garcidueñas, L.; Torres-Jardón, R.; Franco-Lira, M.; Kulesza, R.; González-Maciel, A.; Reynoso-Robles, R.; Brito-Aguilar, R.; García-Arreola, B.; Revueltas-Ficachi, P.; Barrera-Velázquez, J.A.; et al. Environmental Nanoparticles, SARS-CoV-2 Brain Involvement, and Potential Acceleration of Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s Diseases in Young Urbanites Exposed to Air Pollution. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2020, 1–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bougakov, D.; Podell, K.; Goldberg, E. Multiple Neuroinvasive Pathways in COVID-19. Mol. Neurobiol. 2020, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Rossby, C.G. Über die Vertikalverteilung von Windgeschwindigkeit und Schwerestabilität in Freistrahlbewegungen der oberen Troposphäre. Archiv Meteorologie Geophysik Bioklimatologie Serie A 1951, 4, 3–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The Prisma Statement. PLoS Med. 2009, 339, b2535. [Google Scholar]
  43. Cendrowski, W.; Wender, M.; Dominik, W.; Flejsierowicz, Z.; Owsianowski, M.; Popiel, M. Epidemiological Study of Multiple Sclerosis in Western Poland. Eur. Neurol. 1969, 2, 90–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Behrend, R. Multiple Sclerosis in Europe. Eur. Neurol. 1969, 2, 129–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Bird, A.V.; Satoyoshi, E. Comparative epidemiological studies of multiple sclerosis in South Africa and Japan. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 1975, 38, 911–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Lauer, K.; Firnhaber, W. Epidemiological Investigations into Multiple Sclerosis in Southern Hesse. Ii. The Distribution of Cases in Relation to Exogenous Features. Acta Neurol. Scand. 1984, 70, 266–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Granieri, E.; Casetta, I.; Tola, M.R.; Govoni, V.; Paolino, E.; Malagù, S.; Monetti, V.C.; Carreras, M. Multiple sclerosis: Does epidemiology contribute to providing etiological clues? J. Neurol. Sci. 1993, 115, S16–S23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lensky, P. Geographic Aspects in the Epidemiology of Multiple Sclerosis. Epidemiol. Mikrobiol. Imunol. 1994, 43, 174–176. [Google Scholar]
  49. Delasnerie-Laupretre, N.; Alperovitch, A. Epidemiology of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease. Pathol. Biol. 1995, 43, 22–24. [Google Scholar]
  50. Bharanidharan, P. Monthly Distribution of Multiple Sclerosis Patients’ Births. Int. J. Biometeorol. 1997, 40, 117–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hogancamp, W.E.; Rodriguez, M.; Weinshenker, B.G. The Epidemiology of Multiple Sclerosis. Mayo Clin. Proc. 1997, 72, 871–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Foster, H.D. Parkinson’s Disease, Multiple Sclerosis and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: The Iodine-Dopachrome-Glutamate Hypothesis. J. Orthomol. Med. 1999, 14, 128–136. [Google Scholar]
  53. Mitchell, J.D. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: Toxins and environment. Amyotroph. Lateral. Scler. Other Motor Neuron Disord. 2019, 1, 235–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Uria, D.F. Genetic Epidemiology of Multiple Sclerosis. Rev. Neurol. 2002, 35, 979–984. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Marrie, R.-A. Environmental risk factors in multiple sclerosis aetiology. Lancet Neurol. 2004, 3, 709–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Sotgiu, S.; Pugliatti, M.; Fois, M.L.; Arru, G.; Sanna, A.; Sotgiu, M.A.; Rosati, G. Genes, environment, and susceptibility to multiple sclerosis. Neurobiol. Dis. 2004, 17, 131–143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Ances, B.M.; Newman, N.J.; Balcer, L.J. Autoimmunity—Multiple Sclerosis. In Measuring Immunity; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2005; Chapter 45; pp. 515–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Williamson, D.M. Studies of Multiple Sclerosis in Communities Concerned about Environmental Exposures. J. Women’s Health 2006, 15, 810–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ascherio, A.; Munger, K.L. Environmental risk factors for multiple sclerosis. Part II: Noninfectious factors. Ann. Neurol. 2007, 61, 504–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ebers, G.C. Environmental factors and multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol. 2008, 7, 268–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Boumédiène, F.; Druet-Cabanac, M.; Marin, B.; Preux, P.M.; Allée, P.; Couratier, P. Contribution of geolocalisation to neuroepidemiological studies: Incidence of ALS and environmental factors in Limousin, France. J. Neurol. Sci. 2011, 309, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Nelson, G.; Racette, B.A. Environmental Risk Factors. In Handbook of Parkinson’s Disease; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2013; pp. 341–357. [Google Scholar]
  63. Willis, A.W.; Schootman, M.; Kung, N.; Evanoff, B.A.; Perlmutter, J.S.; Racette, B.A. Predictors of Survival in Patients with Parkinson Disease. Arch. Neurol. 2012, 69, 601–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Caller, T.A.; Field, N.C.; Chipman, J.W.; Shi, X.; Harris, B.T.; Stommel, E. Spatial clustering of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and the potential role of BMAA. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. 2012, 13, 25–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Tennant, A. Epidemiology of Neurologically Disabling Disorders. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 2013, 110, 77–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Al-Afasy, H.H.; Al-Obaidan, M.A.; Al-Ansari, Y.A.; Al-Yatama, S.A.; Al-Rukaibi, M.S.; Makki, N.I.; Suresh, A.; Akhtar, S. Risk Factors for Multiple Sclerosis in Kuwait: A Population-Based Case-Control Study. Neuroepidemiology 2013, 40, 30–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Chamosa, S.; Tamayo, I.; Arteagoitia-Axpe, J.M.; Juste, R.; Rodríguez-Martínez, A.B.; Zarranz-Imirizaldu, J.J.; Arriola, L. Geographical Analysis of the Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease Distribution in the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country for the Period 1995–2008. Eur. Neurol. 2014, 72, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Thielke, S.; Slatore, C.G.; Banks, W.A. Association Between Alzheimer Dementia Mortality Rate and Altitude in California Counties. JAMA Psychiatry 2015, 72, 1253–1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Russ, T.C.; Gatz, M.; Pedersen, N.L.; Hannah, J.; Wyper, G.; Batty, G.D.; Deary, I.J.; Starr, J.M. Geographical Variation in Dementia: Examining the Role of Environmental Factors in Sweden and Scotland. Epidemiology 2015, 26, 263–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Berg-Hansen, P.; Celius, E.G. Socio-economic factors and immigrant population studies of multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2015, 132, 37–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Magalhaes, S.; Pugliatti, M.; Casetta, I.; Drulovic, J.; Granieri, E.; Kampman, M.T.; Landtblom, A.-M.; Lauer, K.; Myhr, K.-M.; Parpinel, M.; et al. The EnvIMS Study: Design and Methodology of an International Case-Control Study of Environmental Risk Factors in Multiple Sclerosis. Neuroepidemiology 2015, 44, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Sundström, P.; Salzer, J. Vitamin D and multiple sclerosis-from epidemiology to prevention. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2015, 132, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Rothhammer, V.; Quintana, F.J. Environmental control of autoimmune inflammation in the central nervous system. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2016, 43, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Ascherio, A.; Munger, K. Epidemiology of Multiple Sclerosis: From Risk Factors to Prevention—An Update. Semin. Neurol. 2016, 36, 103–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Wilker, E.H.; Martinez-Ramirez, S.; Kloog, I.; Schwartz, J.; Mostofsky, E.; Koutrakis, P.; Mittleman, M.A.; Viswanathan, A. Fine Particulate Matter, Residential Proximity to Major Roads, and Markers of Small Vessel Disease in a Memory Study Population. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. 2016, 53, 1315–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Russ, T.C.; Murianni, L.; Icaza, G.; Slachevsky, A.; Starr, J.M. Geographical Variation in Dementia Mortality in Italy, New Zealand, and Chile: The Impact of Latitude, Vitamin D, and Air Pollution. Dement. Geriatr. Cogn. Disord. 2016, 42, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Correa, E.; Paredes, V.; Martinez, B. Prevalence of Multiple Sclerosis in Latin America and Its Relationship with European Migration. Mult. Scler. J. Exp. Transl. Clin. 2016, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Sun, H. Associations of Spatial Disparities of Alzheimer’s Disease Mortality Rates with Soil Selenium and Sulfur Concentrations and Four Common Risk Factors in the United States. J. Alzheimer‘s Dis. 2017, 58, 897–907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Tesauro, M.; Consonni, M.; Filippini, T.; Mazzini, L.; Pisano, F.; Chiò, A.; Esposito, A.; Vinceti, M. Incidence of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the province of Novara, Italy, and possible role of environmental pollution. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2017, 18, 284–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hammas, K.; Yaouanq, J.; Lannes, M.; Edan, G.; Viel, J.-F. Small-area distribution of multiple sclerosis incidence in western France: In search of environmental triggers. Int. J. Health Geogr. 2017, 16, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  81. Martínez-Solanas, È.; Vergara-Duarte, M.; Ortega Cerdà, M.; Martín-Sánchez, J.; Buxó, M.; Rodríguez-Farré, E.; Benach, J.; Pérez, G. The Geography of the Alzheimer’s Disease Mortality in Spain: Should We Focus on Industrial Pollutants Prevention? Healthcare 2017, 5, 89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Karimi, A.; Delpisheh, A.; Ashtari, F.; Sayehmiri, K.; Meamar, R. The Relationship between the Amount of Radiation, Relative Humidity, and Temperature with the Risk of Multiple Sclerosis in Isfahan Province, Iran, During the Years 2001–2014. J. Isfahan Med. Sch. 2017, 35, 434–439. [Google Scholar]
  83. Brouwer, M.; Kromhout, H.; Vermeulen, R.; Duyzer, J.; Kramer, H.; Hazeu, G.; De Snoo, G.; Huss, A. Assessment of residential environmental exposure to pesticides from agricultural fields in the Netherlands. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 2017, 28, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Michel, L. Environmental Factors in the Development of Multiple Sclerosis. Rev. Neurol. 2018, 174, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Karimi, A.; Ashtari, F.; Delpisheh, A.; Meamar, R.; Sayehmiri, K.; Daliri, S. Estimated incidence rate of multiple sclerosis and its relationship with geographical factors in Isfahan province between the years 2001 and 2014. Int. J. Prev. Med. 2018, 9, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Weiland, T.J.; De Livera, A.M.; Brown, C.R.; Jelinek, G.A.; Aitken, Z.; Simpson, S.L.J.; Neate, S.L.; Taylor, K.L.; O’Kearney, E.; Bevens, W.; et al. Health Outcomes and Lifestyle in a Sample of People With Multiple Sclerosis (HOLISM): Longitudinal and Validation Cohorts. Front. Neurol. 2018, 9, 1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Spencer, P.S.; Lagrange, E.; Camu, W. ALS and environment: Clues from spatial clustering? Rev. Neurol. 2019, 175, 652–663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Logroscino, G.; Piccininni, M. Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Descriptive Epidemiology: The Origin of Geographic Difference. Neuroepidemiology 2019, 52, 93–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Naghshineh, H.; Hojjati, S.M.M.; Khatir, A.A.; Saadat, P.; Ahangar, A.A. Can environmental factors increase the risk of multiple sclerosis? A narrative review. Biomed. Res. Ther. 2019, 6, 3513–3517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Salm, A.K.; Benson, M.J. Increased Dementia Mortality in West Virginia Counties with Mountaintop Removal Mining? Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 4278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Mirza, M. The Etiology and the Epidemiology of Multiple Sclerosis. Erciyes Med. J. 2002, 24, 40–47. [Google Scholar]
  92. Goncharova, Z.A.; Balyazin, V.A. Risk Factors of Multiple Sclerosis Development in the Population of the Rostov Region. Zhurnal Nevrologii Psikhiatrii Imeni SS Korsakova 2009, 109, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
  93. Jing, J.; Ge, M.; Zhao, A.Z.; Liu, G.Z.; Xiang, S.T.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.P. Reference Value of Left Atrial Diameter of Presenile Women and Geographical Factors Based on Principal Component Analysis. J. Jilin Univ. Med. Ed. 2011, 37, 1144–1148. [Google Scholar]
  94. Bakhtiiarova, K.Z.; Goncharova, Z.A. Multiple Sclerosis in the Bashkortostan Republic and the Rostov Region: A Comparative Epidemiologic Study. Zhurnal Nevrologii Psihiatrii Imeni SS Korsakova 2014, 114, 5–9. [Google Scholar]
  95. Wei, Q.; Chen, X.; Zheng, Z.; Huang, R.; Guo, X.; Cao, B.; Zhao, B.; Shang, H. Clinical features of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in south-west China. Amyotroph. Lateral Scler. Front. Degener. 2015, 16, 512–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Wallin, M.T.; Kurtzke, J.F. Multiple Sclerosis; Epidemiology. In Encyclopedia of the Neurological Sciences; Elsevier Ltd.: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; pp. 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Schuurman, N.; Amram, O.; Saeedi, J.; Rieckmann, P.; Yee, I.; Tremlett, H. A proposed methodology to estimate the cumulative life-time UVB exposure using geographic information systems: An application to multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2013, 2, 29–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Leibowitz, U. Multiple Sclerosis: Progress in Epidemiologic and Experimental Research. A Review. J. Neurol. Sci. 1971, 12, 307–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Kalafatova, O. Geographic and Climatic Factors and Multiple Sclerosis in Some Districts of Bulgaria. Neuroepidemiology 1987, 6, 116–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Van Der Mei, I.A.F.; Ponsonby, A.-L.; Blizzard, L.; Dwyer, T. Regional variation in multiple sclerosis prevalence in Australia and its association with ambient ultraviolet radiation. Neuroepidemiology 2001, 20, 168–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Sloka, S.; Silva, C.; Pryse-Phillips, W.; Patten, S.B.; Metz, L.; Yong, V.W. A quantitative analysis of suspected environmental causes of MS. Can. J. Neurol. Sci. 2011, 38, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  102. Ramagopalan, S.V.; Handel, A.E.; Giovannoni, G.; Siegel, S.R.; Ebers, G.C.; Chaplin, G. Relationship of UV exposure to prevalence of multiple sclerosis in England. Neurology 2011, 76, 1410–1414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Sun, H. Temperature Dependence of Multiple Sclerosis Mortality Rates in the United States. Mult. Scler. 2017, 23, 1839–1846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gallagher, L.G.; Ilango, S.; Wundes, A.; Stobbe, G.A.; Turk, K.W.; Franklin, G.M.; Linet, M.S.; Freedman, D.M.; Alexander, B.H.; Checkoway, H. Lifetime exposure to ultraviolet radiation and the risk of multiple sclerosis in the US radiologic technologists cohort study. Mult. Scler. 2018, 25, 1162–1169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Norman, J.E., Jr.; Kurtzke, J.F.; Beebe, G.W. Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in U.S. veterans: 2. Latitude, climate and the risk of multiple sclerosis. J. Chronic Dis. 1983, 36, 551–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Monti, M.C.; Guido, D.; Montomoli, C.; Sardu, C.; Sanna, A.; Pretti, S.; Lorefice, L.; Marrosu, M.G.; Valera, P.; Cocco, E. Is Geo-Environmental Exposure a Risk Factor for Multiple Sclerosis? A Population-Based Cross-Sectional Study in South-Western Sardinia. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0163313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Amram, O.; Schuurman, N.; Randall, E.; Zhu, F.; Saeedi, J.; Rieckmann, P.; Yee, I.; Tremlett, H. The use of satellite data to measure ultraviolet-B penetrance and its potential association with age of multiple sclerosis onset. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2018, 21, 30–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Risberg, G.; Aarseth, J.H.; Nyland, H.; Lauer, K.; Myhr, K.-M.; Midgard, R. Prevalence and incidence of multiple sclerosis in Oppland County—A cross-sectional population-based study in a landlocked county of Eastern Norway. Acta Neurol. Scand. 2010, 124, 250–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Tateo, F.; Grassivaro, F.; Ermani, M.; Puthenparampil, M.; Gallo, P. PM2.5 levels strongly associate with multiple sclerosis prevalence in the Province of Padua, Veneto Region, North-East Italy. Mult. Scler. 2018, 25, 1719–1727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Gregory, A.C., 2nd; Shendell, D.G.; Okosun, I.S.; Gieseker, K.E. Multiple Sclerosis disease distribution and potential impact of environmental air pollutants in Georgia. Sci. Total. Environ. 2008, 396, 42–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Iuliano, G. Geography Based Hypotheses About Multiple Sclerosis. Riv. Ital. Neurobiol. 2005, 2, 213–220. [Google Scholar]
  112. Heydarpour, P.; Amini, H.; Khoshkish, S.; Seidkhani, H.; Sahraian, M.A.; Yunesian, M. Potential Impact of Air Pollution on Multiple Sclerosis in Tehran, Iran. Neuroepidemiology 2014, 43, 233–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Ashtari, F.; Esmaeil, N.; Mansourian, M.; Poursafa, P.; Mirmosayyeb, O.; Barzegar, M.; Pourgheisari, H. An 8-year study of people with multiple sclerosis in Isfahan, Iran: Association between environmental air pollutants and severity of disease. J. Neuroimmunol. 2018, 319, 106–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Bølviken, B.; Nilsén, R.; Ukkelberg, A. A new method for spatially moving correlation analysis in geomedicine. Environ. Geochem. Health 1997, 19, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Groves-Kirkby, C.J.; Denman, A.R.; Campbell, J.; Crockett, R.G.; Phillips, P.S.; Rogers, S. Is environmental radon gas associated with the incidence of neurodegenerative conditions? A retrospective study of multiple sclerosis in radon affected areas in England and Wales. J. Environ. Radioact. 2016, 154, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  116. Lavery, A.M.; Waldman, A.T.; Casper, T.C.; Roalstad, S.; Candee, M.; Rose, J.; Belman, A.; Weinstock-Guttman, B.; Aaen, G.; Tillema, J.-M.; et al. Examining the contributions of environmental quality to pediatric multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2017, 18, 164–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Lavery, A.M.; Waubant, E.; Casper, T.C.; Roalstad, S.; Rose, A.; Belman, J.; Weinstock-Guttman, B.; Aaen, G.; Tillema, J.M.; Rodriguez, M.; et al. Urban Air Quality and Associations with Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2018, 5, 1146–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  118. Willis, A.W.; Evanoff, B.; Lian, M.; Galarza, A.; Wegrzyn, A.; Schootman, M.; Racette, B. Metal Emissions and Urban Incident Parkinson Disease: A Community Health Study of Medicare Beneficiaries by Using Geographic Information Systems. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 172, 1357–1363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  119. Santurtun, A.; Delgado-Alvarado, M.; Villar, A.; Riancho, J. Geographical Distribution of Mortality by Parkinson’s Disease and Its Association with Air Lead Levels in Spain. Med. Clin. (Barc.) 2016, 147, 481–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Finkelstein, M.M.; Jerrett, M. A Study of the Relationships between Parkinson’s Disease and Markers of Traffic-Derived and Environmental Manganese Air Pollution in Two Canadian Cities. Environ. Res. 2007, 104, 420–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Liu, R.; Young, M.T.; Chen, J.-C.; Kaufman, J.D.; Chen, H. Ambient Air Pollution Exposures and Risk of Parkinson Disease. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124, 1759–1765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Salimi, F.; Hanigan, I.; Jalaludin, B.; Guo, Y.; Rolfe, M.; Heyworth, J.S.; Cowie, C.T.; Knibbs, L.D.; Cope, M.; Marks, G.B.; et al. Associations between long-term exposure to ambient air pollution and Parkinson’s disease prevalence: A cross-sectional study. Neurochem. Int. 2020, 133, 104615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Lee, P.-C.; Raaschou-Nielsen, O.; Lill, C.M.; Bertram, L.; Sinsheimer, J.S.; Hansen, J.; Ritz, B. Gene-environment interactions linking air pollution and inflammation in Parkinson’s disease. Environ. Res. 2016, 151, 713–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Kravietz, A.; Kab, S.; Wald, L.; Dugravot, A.; Singh-Manoux, A.; Moisan, F.; Elbaz, A. Association of UV radiation with Parkinson disease incidence: A nationwide French ecologic study. Environ. Res. 2017, 154, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Wei, Y.; Wang, Y.; Lin, C.-K.; Yin, K.; Yang, J.; Shi, L.; Li, L.; Zanobetti, A.; Schwartz, J.D. Associations between seasonal temperature and dementia-associated hospitalizations in New England. Environ. Int. 2019, 126, 228–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Li, C.-Y.; Li, C.-H.; Martini, S.; Hou, W.-H. Association between air pollution and risk of vascular dementia: A multipollutant analysis in Taiwan. Environ. Int. 2019, 133, 105233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Chen, H.; Kwong, J.C.; Copes, R.; Hystad, P.; Van Donkelaar, A.; Tu, K.; Brook, J.R.; Goldberg, M.S.; Martin, R.V.; Murray, B.J.; et al. Exposure to ambient air pollution and the incidence of dementia: A population-based cohort study. Environ. Int. 2017, 108, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Povedano, M.; Saez, M.; Martínez-Matos, J.-A.; Barceló, M.A. Spatial Assessment of the Association between Long-Term Exposure to Environmental Factors and the Occurrence of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Catalonia, Spain: A Population-Based Nested Case-Control Study. Neuroepidemiology 2018, 51, 33–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Tsai, C.-P.; Lee, C.T.-C. Climatic factors associated with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: A spatial analysis from Taiwan. Geospat. Health 2013, 8, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  130. Santurtún, A.; Villar, A.; Delgado-Alvarado, M.; Riancho, J. Trends in motor neuron disease: Association with latitude and air lead levels in Spain. Neurol. Sci. 2016, 37, 1271–1275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. DeLuca, H.F.; Cantorna, M.T. Vitamin D: Its role and uses in immunology 1. FASEB J. 2001, 15, 2579–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Ogen, Y. Assessing nitrogen dioxide (NO2) levels as a contributing factor to coronavirus (COVID-19) fatality. Sci. Total. Environ. 2020, 726, 138605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Bornstein, S.R.; Voit-Bak, K.; Schmidt, D.; Morawietz, H.; Bornstein, A.B.; Balanzew, W.; Julius, U.; Rodionov, R.N.; Biener, A.M.; Wang, J.; et al. Is There a Role for Environmental and Metabolic Factors Predisposing to Severe COVID-19? Horm. Metab. Res. 2020, 52, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Hribar, C.A.; Cobbold, P.H.; Church, F.C. Potential Role of Vitamin D in the Elderly to Resist COVID-19 and to Slow Progression of Parkinson’s Disease. Brain Sci. 2020, 10, 284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Systematic review PRISMA flowchart.
Figure 1. Systematic review PRISMA flowchart.
Ijerph 17 08414 g001
Table 1. The number of studies addressing each subtopic of the domains, retrieved from the included studies: neurodegenerative diseases, environmental pollutants/factors, and geographic factors.
Table 1. The number of studies addressing each subtopic of the domains, retrieved from the included studies: neurodegenerative diseases, environmental pollutants/factors, and geographic factors.
Number of StudiesPercentage of Total Entries
Neurodegenerative Disease
Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis25.9
Dementia (includes Alzheimer’s disease)38.8
Motor neuron disease12.9
Multiple sclerosis1955.9
Paediatric multiple sclerosis25.9
Parkinson’s disease720.6
Environmental Pollutant/Factor
Arsenic (As)11.2
Benzopyrene (C₂OH₁₂)11.2
Benzene (C₆H₆)11.2
Cadmium (Cd)11.2
Carbon monoxide (CO)56.1
Cooper (Cu)22.4
Hydrogen sulphide (H₂S)11.2
Humidity33.7
Index22.4
Magnesium (Mg)22.4
Manganese (Mn)11.2
Nickel (Ni)11.2
Nitrogen dioxide (NOₓ)1012.2
Ozone (O₃)44.9
Lead (Pb)56.1
PM₁₀67.3
PM₂₅89.8
Precipitation67.3
Pressure56.1
Radon (Rn)11.2
Sulphur dioxide (SO₂)67.3
Sun exposure1315.9
Temperature89.8
Geographic Factors
Administrative division1624.2
Clustering23.0
GIS1421.2
Latitude57.6
Longitude11.5
Remote sensing1319.7
Residence1421.2
Spatial interpolation11.5
Table 2. Study characteristics summary: study design, study limitations, statistical methods, and effect measures.
Table 2. Study characteristics summary: study design, study limitations, statistical methods, and effect measures.
Number of StudiesPercentage of Total Entries
Study Design
Case-control926.5
Cohort411.8
Cross-sectional1235.3
Ecological617.6
Methodological25.9
Review12.9
Study Limitations
Conflict of interests11.1
Confounding1516.1
Ecological bias33.2
Exposure assessment1819.4
Interpolation33.2
Recall bias33.2
Migration44.3
None is given by the author55.4
Referral bias22.2
Sampling77.5
Statistics1314.0
Study design33.2
Survival bias11.1
Time-related99.7
Unassessed patients66.5
Statistical Methods
ANOVA22.6
Chi-squared56.5
Clustering22.6
Correlation2228.6
Cox regression45.2
Linear regression1114.3
Logistic regression1013.0
None22.6
Poisson regression33.9
Sensitivity analysis1013.0
Spatial autoregressive model11.3
T-test56.5
Effect Measures
Coefficients1424.1
Correlation1932.8
Hazard ratio35.2
None35.2
Odds ratio1119.0
Prevalence46.9
Relative risk46.9
Table 3. Study characteristics of the 34 included papers [97].
Table 3. Study characteristics of the 34 included papers [97].
RefCountry (year)Neurodege-Generative DiseaseEnvironmental FactorGeographic FactorStudy DesignStudy LimitationsStatistical MethodsOutcome
[97]Canada (2012)Multiple sclerosisSun exposureGIS, Remote SensingMethodologicalExposure assessmentNoneNone
[98]Israel (1971)Multiple sclerosisSun exposure, Temperature, Precipitation, HumidityResidenceReviewNone given by the authorsNoneNone
[99]Bulgaria (1987)Multiple sclerosisSun exposure, Temperature, PrecipitationAdministrative division, LatitudeCross-sectionalUnassessed patientsCorrelation, Chi-squared, Linear regressionCorrelation, Coefficients
[100]Australia (2001)Multiple sclerosisSun exposure, Temperature, PrecipitationAdministrative division, Latitude, Remote SensingEcologicalConfounding, Exposure assessmentCorrelation, Poisson regressionPrevalence, Correlation
[101]Canada (2011)Multiple sclerosisSun exposureLatitude, Longitude, Remote SensingCross-sectionalNone given by the authorsCorrelation, Linear regressionCorrelation
[102]England (2011)Multiple sclerosisSun exposureGIS, Remote SensingCross-sectionalConfounding, Sampling, StatisticsCorrelation, Linear regressionCorrelation, Coefficients
[103]USA (2017)Multiple sclerosisSun exposure, TemperatureAdministrative division, GIS, Remote SensingCross-sectionalConfounding, StatisticsCorrelation, Linear regressionCorrelation, Coefficients
[104]USA (2018)Multiple sclerosisSun exposureResidence, Remote SensingCohortConfounding, Exposure assessment, Interpolation, Recall bias, Migration, Survival bias, Time relatedCox regressionRelative risk, Hazard ratio
[105]USA (1983)Multiple sclerosisSun exposure, Temperature, Precipitation, HumidityLatitudeCase-controlNone given by the authorsLogistic regressionRelative risk
[106]Italy (2016)Multiple sclerosisSun exposureAdministrative division, GISCross-sectionalConfounding, Ecological bias, Time relatedCorrelation, Linear regressionCorrelation, Odds ratio
[107]Canada (2018)Multiple sclerosisSun exposureResidence, Remote SensingCohortConfounding, Exposure assessment, Time relatedLinear regressionCoefficients
[108]Norway (2010)Multiple sclerosisSun exposure, Temperature, PrecipitationAdministrative divisionCross-sectionalMigration, StatisticsANOVA, Poisson regressionPrevalence
[109]Italy (2018)Multiple sclerosisPM2.5Residence, Remote SensingCross-sectionalConflict of interests, Confounding, Study designCorrelation, Chi-squaredCorrelation, Coefficients
[110]USA (2008)Multiple sclerosisPM10, PM2.5, NOX, SO2, COAdministrative divisionCross-sectionalNone given by the authorsCorrelation, T-test, Linear regressionCorrelation, Coefficients
[111]Italy (2005)Multiple sclerosisSO2Administrative division, LatitudeCross-sectionalExposure assessment, InterpolationCorrelation, Linear regressionCorrelation, Coefficients
[112]Iran (2014)Multiple sclerosisPM10, NOX, SO2Clustering, GISCross-sectionalConfounding, Statistics, Study designCorrelation, ClusteringCorrelation, Coefficients
[113]Iran (2018)Multiple sclerosisIndexAdministrative division, GIS, ResidenceCross-sectionalExposure assessment, StatisticsCorrelation, Logistic regressionOdds ratio, Coefficients
[114]Norway (1997)Multiple sclerosisMgAdministrative divisionMethodologicalConfoundingCorrelationNone
[115]England (2016)Multiple sclerosisRnResidenceEcologicalSampling, Statistics, Unassessed patientsCorrelation, Chi-squared, Linear regressionCorrelation, Coefficients
[116]USA (2017)Paediatric Multiple sclerosisIndexGIS, ResidenceCase-controlExposure assessment, Statistics, Time related, Unassessed patientsLogistic regressionOdds ratio, Coefficients
[117]USA (2018)Paediatric Multiple sclerosisPM10, PM2.5, NOX, SO2, CO, O3, PbAdministrative division, GIS, ResidenceCase-controlExposure assessment, Referral bias, Time relatedT-test, Logistic regressionOdds ratio
[118]USA (2010)Parkinson’s diseaseCu, Pb, MgAdministrative divisionEcologicalConfounding, Exposure assessment, StatisticsLogistic regression, Sensitivity analysisRelative risk, Odds ratio
[119]Spain (2016)Parkinson’s diseasePbAdministrative division, GISEcologicalExposure assessment, Sampling, Unassessed patientsCorrelation, T-testCorrelation, Coefficients
[120]Canada (2007)Parkinson’s diseaseNOX, MnResidence, Remote Sensing, Spatial interpolationCase-controlConfounding, Exposure assessment, Interpolation, Study design, Time relatedCorrelation, Linear regression, Logistic regression, Cox regression, Sensitivity analysisPrevalence, Correlation, Odds ratio
[121]USA (2016)Parkinson’s diseasePM10, PM2.5, NOXGIS, ResidenceCase-controlExposure assessment, Recall bias, Statistics, Time relatedCorrelation, Logistic regression, Sensitivity analysisCorrelation, Odds ratio
[122]Australia (2020)Parkinson’s diseasePM2.5, NOXResidence, Remote SensingCross-sectionalRecall bias, Referral bias, SamplingLogistic regression, Sensitivity analysisOdds ratio
[123]Taiwan (2016)Parkinson’s diseaseNOX, COGIS, ResidenceCase-controlConfounding, Sampling, StatisticsCorrelation, Chi-squared, Logistic regression, Sensitivity analysisCorrelation, Odds ratio
[124]France (2017)Parkinson’s diseaseSun exposure, PM2.5Administrative division, Remote SensingEcologicalEcological bias, Exposure assessment, MigrationCorrelation, Poisson regression, Sensitivity analysisCorrelation, Relative risk
[125]USA (2019)DementiaTemperatureAdministrative division, Residence, Remote SensingCohortConfounding, Exposure assessment, StatisticsCorrelation, Cox regression, Sensitivity analysisCorrelation, Hazard ratio
[126]Taiwan (2019)DementiaPM10, NOX, SO2, CO, O3ClusteringCase-controlConfounding, Exposure assessment, Statistics, Unassessed patientsCorrelation, Logistic regression, Sensitivity analysisOdds ratio
[127]Canada (2017)DementiaPM2.5, NOX, O3GIS, Residence, Remote SensingCohortConfounding, Exposure assessment, Time related, Unassessed patientsCox regression, Sensitivity analysisHazard ratio
[128]Spain (2018)Amyotrophic lateral sclerosisPM10, PM25, NOX, SO2, CO, O3, Cu, Pb, As, Ni, Cd, C6H6, H2S, C6OH12GISCase-controlEcological bias, Exposure assessment, Sampling, StatisticsT-test, Chi-squared, Linear regression, Sensitivity analysisPrevalence, Odds ratio
[129]Taiwan (2013)Amyotrophic lateral sclerosisSun exposure, Temperature, Precipitation, Humidity, PressureAdministrative divisionCase-controlExposure assessment, Migration, Sampling, Time relatedCorrelation, Spatial autoregressive model, ClusteringCorrelation, Coefficients
[130]Spain (2016)Motor neuron diseasePbAdministrative division, GISEcologicalNone given by the authorsCorrelation, T-test, ANOVACorrelation, Coefficients
Table 4. Studies published by each geographic region, grouped by neurodegenerative disease.
Table 4. Studies published by each geographic region, grouped by neurodegenerative disease.
Amyotrophic Lateral SclerosisDementiaMotor Neuron DiseaseMultiple SclerosisPaediatric Multiple SclerosisParkinson
Asia[129][126] [123]
Australia [100] [122]
Europe[128] [130][99,102,106,108,109,111,114,115] [119,124]
Middle East [98,112,113]
North America [125,127] [97,101,103,104,105,107,110][116,117][118,120,121]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Oliveira, M.; Padrão, A.; Ramalho, A.; Lobo, M.; Teodoro, A.C.; Gonçalves, H.; Freitas, A. Geospatial Analysis of Environmental Atmospheric Risk Factors in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 8414. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228414

AMA Style

Oliveira M, Padrão A, Ramalho A, Lobo M, Teodoro AC, Gonçalves H, Freitas A. Geospatial Analysis of Environmental Atmospheric Risk Factors in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(22):8414. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228414

Chicago/Turabian Style

Oliveira, Mariana, André Padrão, André Ramalho, Mariana Lobo, Ana Cláudia Teodoro, Hernâni Gonçalves, and Alberto Freitas. 2020. "Geospatial Analysis of Environmental Atmospheric Risk Factors in Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 22: 8414. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17228414

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop