Next Article in Journal
Usability of Clinical Information in Discharge Summary Data in the Diagnosis Procedure Combination Survey for Cancer Patients
Next Article in Special Issue
Flavor Preference and Systemic Immunoglobulin Responses in E-Cigarette Users and Waterpipe and Tobacco Smokers: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
How Does Positive Work-Related Stress Affect the Degree of Innovation Development?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Health Professionals’ Counseling about Electronic Cigarettes for Smokers and Vapers in a Country That Bans the Sales and Marketing of Electronic Cigarettes
 
 
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Brief Report

E-Cigarette Use by Smoking Status in Estonia, 2012–2018

by 1,2,* and 2
1
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Institute for Health Development, 11619 Tallinn, Estonia
2
Institute of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of Tartu, 50411 Tartu, Estonia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(2), 519; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020519
Received: 9 December 2019 / Revised: 10 January 2020 / Accepted: 13 January 2020 / Published: 14 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Electronic Cigarettes: Good and Bad Impacts)

Abstract

:
Background: In the context of declining smoking rates in Estonia, this study aims to analyze the recent trends in e-cigarette use and its associations with smoking status and sociodemographic factors. Methods: Nationally representative data from biennial cross-sectional health surveys in 2012–2018 (n = 9988) were used to describe the prevalence of smoking and e-cigarette use by smoking status in Estonia. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to describe the sociodemographic patterns of e-cigarette use in three subgroups: the general population, smokers, and ex-smokers. Results: The prevalence of current smoking decreased from 45.4% in 2012 to 31.5% in 2018 among men and from 26.6% to 20.0% among women. At the same time, e-cigarette use in the general population had increased to 3.7% among men and to 1.2% among women. The increase in the prevalence of e-cigarette use was statistically significant among men in the general population, smokers, and ex-smokers, but non-significant among women. In addition to period effects, e-cigarette use was patterned by age, gender, and education. Conclusion: In 2002–2018, the e-cigarette use had increased but smoking had decreased in Estonia. A timely and targeted tobacco policy may alleviate the harm of e-cigarette use from the public health perspective.

1. Introduction

Estonian tobacco legislation has witnessed several significant changes over the past decades that have had a positive effect on overall smoking rates. Since the implementation of the Tobacco Act in 2001 and its later revisions [1], the prevalence of current smoking among 16–64 year old adults had decreased during 2000–2016 from 53.5% to 39.3% among men and from 28.3% to 22.3% among women [2]. More recent data from 2018 [3] suggests a further decline, now with 31.5% of men and 20.0% of women being current smokers—figures close to WHO’s projected estimates for 2025 [4].
Electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS), commonly known as e-cigarettes, have become increasingly popular in recent years [5]. As they do not involve inhaling and exhaling the fumes of burning plant material, their use is not considered de jure as smoking and are hence not included when calculating prevalence estimates for smoking [3].
While there is lack of consensus on the long-term harms or benefits of e-cigarettes in terms of smoking uptake or cessation, the majority of e-cigarette users are either current or ex-smokers [6,7,8]. Available evidence suggests that e-cigarettes serve as a possible gateway to cigarette smoking as demonstrated by a recent study [9] where non-smoking adolescent e-cigarette users had higher odds of subsequent smoking. Moreover, the concurrent use of e-cigarettes does not necessarily lead to higher quit rates. On the contrary, an earlier meta-analysis found that the odds of quitting cigarettes were 28% lower in those who used e-cigarettes compared with those who did not use e-cigarettes [10]. Given the accumulating evidence on the health risks of e-cigarettes [11,12], the increasing popularity of e-cigarettes presents a significant public health concern.
The present study is motivated by a hypothesis that the previously described decline in smoking prevalence could—at least partly—be explained by the increasing prevalence of e-cigarettes. Therefore, we will describe the recent trends in e-cigarette use among the adult population of Estonia and analyze its associations with smoking status and sociodemographic factors.

2. Methods

Data from nationally representative cross-sectional postal surveys of Health Behavior among Estonian Adult Population in 2012–2018 were used for this analysis. All surveys were approved by the Tallinn Medical Research Ethics Committee. The detailed description of survey methodology is available elsewhere [3]. This study included 9988 adults aged 16–64 years (4967 men and 5021 women) who had provided data on their a) smoking status, and b) e-cigarette use (daily or several times weekly vs. seldom or never). The prevalence of e-cigarette use, with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) among the general population, smokers, and ex-smokers, was calculated separately for men and women with a Z-test used for a comparison of proportions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to compare the potential socio-demographic variations in e-cigarette users vs. non-users among: (a) the general population, (b) smokers, and (c) ex-smokers. Independent variables included sex, age, education, study year, and smoking status (smoker or non-smoker). The latter was used as a predictor variable for analysis on the general population and as a stratifying variable for other models. The results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). This study used population weights to compensate for the response bias. Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 25.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA, 2017).

3. Results

During 2012–2018, the prevalence of current smoking among 16–64-year-old men declined from 45.4% (95% CI 42.8–48.0) to 31.5% (95% CI 28.9–34.1). Among women, the change was slightly smaller, with 20.0% (95% CI 17.9–22.3) being smokers in 2018 compared to 26.6% (95% CI 24.4–28.9) in 2012. The decline in smoking rates was statistically significant for both genders.
The same period saw a statistically significant increase in e-cigarette use (Figure 1). Among men, the overall prevalence of e-cigarette use increased from 1.4% (95% CI 0.9–2.2) in 2012 to 3.7% (95% CI 2.8–4.9) in 2018. Among women, the e-cigarette use increased from 0.6% (95% CI 0.3–1.1) in 2012 to 1.2% (95% CI 0.7–2.0) in 2018, but the change was statistically not significant.
Among the smoking population, a statistically significant increase in e-cigarette use during 2012–2018 was found only for men. In 2018, e-cigarettes were regularly used by 6.3% (95% CI 4.2–9.0) of smoking men compared to 2.3% (95% CI 1.3–3.7) in 2012. Among smoking women, e-cigarette use was lower (2.0% (95% CI 0.8–4.4) in 2018), and the respective increase from 2012 levels (1.5%; 95% CI 0.7–3.4) was very subtle. Similarly, an increase in e-cigarette use over the study period was observed for non-smoking men. In 2018, 5.2% (95% CI 3.3–7.8) of non-smoking men used e-cigarettes regularly compared to just 1.1% (95% CI 0.4–2.8) in 2012. For non-smoking women, the respective change was from 0.8% (95% CI 0.2–2.3) in 2012 to 2.7% (95% CI 1.3–5.2) in 2018.
The sociodemographic and temporal variations in e-cigarette use are given in Table 1. Among the general population, higher odds for using e-cigarettes were found for men compared to women (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.7–3.1) and at younger ages. Although the educational differences were statistically non-significant in the adjusted analysis, differences in e-cigarette use were found for study year and smoking status variables. While the period effects follow the previously described prevalence trends, smokers had 3.6 times higher odds for being an e-cigarette user than non-smokers.
Among smokers, e-cigarette use was significantly higher among men compared to women (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.6–3.5) and in the youngest age group compared to 45–64-year-olds (OR 2.3; 95% CI 1.1–4.7). Compared to 2012, the relative odds for e-cigarette use among smokers were highest in 2014 (OR 5.0; 95% CI 3.0–8.4).
Among ex-smokers, higher relative odds for e-cigarette use were found in younger age groups (vs. 45–64-year old) and among those with secondary (vs. tertiary) education, but differences in e-cigarette use across the genders were non-significant. Compared to 2012, the use of e-cigarettes was higher in later study years.

4. Discussion

The present study analyzed the trends of e-cigarette use in Estonia where smoking rates among the adult population have substantially decreased in recent years. The e-cigarette use in the general population had increased by 2.3% among men and by 0.6% among women during 2012–2018. Although the overall change was only statistically significant for men, a larger increase was seen among ex-smokers. While these results indicate that e-cigarettes are becoming increasingly popular, their use is patterned by sociodemographic variables.
Before discussing these findings, some potential considerations regarding the data need to be addressed. Firstly, the study is based on repeated cross-sectional data that do not allow establishing causal pathways between e-cigarette use and smoking status. Also, the selection and operationalization of indicators may potentially have affected the results. This is especially relevant for variables on e-cigarette use and smoking status. As the first was initially a frequency variable measured on a 5-point Likert scale, we tested different combinations of these options (e.g., daily/almost daily vs. daily/almost daily or a few times a week) beforehand to ensure the robustness of the results. Regarding the smoking status, e-cigarette use was very low among respondents who had never smoked. Respective analysis of this subgroup was therefore not performed. The methodological consistency of the survey data could be considered as a strength of the study, but the overall response rates (ranging from 51% in 2018 to 62% in 2012) have been declining across the survey years. We used population weighting to assure data representativeness and reduce the potential non-response bias. Although the latter cannot be fully avoided, a previous study using the same survey data demonstrated that response bias had a minimal effect on prevalence indicators [13].
The results indicate that e-cigarette use has increased significantly since 2012 among men irrespective of smoking status. Although the same period saw a substantial decline in smoking prevalence (e.g., 13.9% among men), the concurrent but opposite trends of smoking and e-cigarette use in Estonia cannot be interpreted causally in our data. However, the decline in smoking prevalence surpassed the increase in e-cigarette use in absolute terms. Despite this, the relative change in e-cigarette use—nearly a three-fold increase among smoking men and almost a five-fold increase in non-smokers—is noteworthy.
The prevalence is also slightly higher than in other comparable studies. For example, a study from the United States [14] found that only 0.9% of adults were regular e-cigarette users in 2014, whereas e-cigarettes were regularly used by 5.8% of Estonian men and 2.1% of women in 2014. More recently, Eurobarometer 458 study [15] reported that the highest prevalence (5.0%) of current e-cigarette users in Europe is in the United Kingdom. In this context, the comparable rates of e-cigarette use in Estonia are a cause for concern.
The use of e-cigarettes peaked in 2014 and has since then been declining (except for male ex-smokers). This is explained by deregulating the sale of e-cigarettes and refill liquids in 2013 [16]. These were, since 2007, marketed as medicinal products, greatly constraining their sales. In 2013, all refill liquids with a nicotine content below 2 mg/mL or liquids with a nicotine content up to 4 mg/mL without a specific medical prescription were allowed for retail distribution. The wide availability, media coverage, and also advertising [16] resulted in a sharp increase in e-cigarette use, as also demonstrated by our data. The 2015 revision of Tobacco Act [1] defined e-cigarettes as “products related to tobacco products” and ensued several restrictions to the sale, marketing, and the use of e-cigarettes and refill liquids. Since 2018, the use of e-cigarettes in public spaces is also prohibited, similar to smoking, in order to further restrict their use.
In addition to the previously described period effects, the use of e-cigarettes was patterned by gender (in the general population and smokers), age, and education (in the general population and ex-smokers). Although previous studies have shown mixed findings regarding gender differences in e-cigarette use [5,17], we found a considerably higher e-cigarette use among men. Moreover, e-cigarette use was more prevalent among smokers and ex-smokers compared to the general population. This supports the earlier evidence [6] that many smokers use e-cigarettes concurrently with cigarette smoking. Also, in accordance with earlier studies [18,19], the youngest age group had the highest odds for using e-cigarettes among the general population, but also among smokers and ex-smokers. This may entail a considerable challenge for public health, as recent meta-analysis [20] demonstrated a greater risk for subsequent cigarette smoking among adolescents who use e-cigarettes. E-cigarettes serve as a possible gateway to cigarette smoking [5,21]. The age-difference was even larger for ex-smokers, indicating a potentially higher substitution of conventional smoking with e-cigarettes in younger ages despite the evidence that use of e-cigarettes is not associated with reduced overall quit rates compared to exclusive smoking [22]. Unfortunately, our cross-sectional data does not include data on the timing of smoking cessation or on the uptake of e-cigarette use, and this claim cannot be studied in a more detailed manner. Although higher education and income have been associated with higher e-cigarette use [5], the inverse educational effects found in our data for the ex-smoking population is explained by the interaction’s effects on age—the e-cigarette use is highest among the youngest age group who haven’t completed their education yet.

5. Conclusion

The use of e-cigarettes has increased substantially during 2012–2018 among adult men in Estonia. Despite the opposite trend found for smoking prevalence, it is not certain that the increasing popularity of e-cigarettes explains the decrease in smoking rates in Estonia. However, the e-cigarette use varies greatly by smoking status and sociodemographic background. The higher e-cigarette use among young adults calls for a timely and targeted tobacco policy to alleviate the harm of e-cigarette use from the public health perspective.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization and methodology, R.R. and K.P.; Data Analysis and visualization, R.R.; Writing—Original Draft Preparation, R.R.; Writing—Review & Editing, R.R. and K.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Estonian Research Council (IUT5-1 and IUT34-17).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Tobacco Act. RT I 2005, 29, 210. Available online: https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/525032015017/consolide (accessed on 7 January 2020).
  2. National Institute for Health Development. TKU50: Smoking by Sex and Age 2019. Available online: http://pxweb.tai.ee/PXWeb2015/pxweb/et/05Uuringud/05Uuringud__02TKU__05Suitsetamine/TKU50.px/table/tableViewLayout2/?rxid=5f802542-ea60-4ef5-8aa9-f7381bae8996 (accessed on 7 January 2020).
  3. World Health Organization. WHO Global Report on Trends in Prevalence of Tobacco Smoking 2000–2025, 2nd ed.; 2018; p. 121. Available online: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/272694/9789241514170-eng.pdf?ua=1 (accessed on 6 January 2020).
  4. Filippidis, F.T.; Laverty, A.A.; Gerovasili, V.; Vardavas, C.I. Two-year trends and predictors of e-cigarette use in 27 European Union member states. Tob. Control. 2017, 26, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  5. Glasser, A.M.; Collins, L.; Pearson, J.L.; Abudayyeh, H.; Niaure, R.S.; Abrams, D.B.; Villanti, A.C. Overview of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems: A Systematic Review. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2017, 52, e33–e66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  6. McMillen, R.C.; Gottlieb, M.A.; Shaefer, R.M.; Winickoff, J.P.; Klein, J.D. Trends in Electronic Cigarette Use Among U.S. Adults: Use is Increasing in Both Smokers and Nonsmokers. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2015, 17, 1195–1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Vardavas, C.I.; Filippidis, F.T.; Agaku, I.T. Determinants and prevalence of e-cigarette use throughout the European Union: A secondary analysis of 26 566 youth and adults from 27 Countries. Tob. Control. 2015, 24, 442–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Barrington-Trimis, J.L.; Kong, G.; Leventhal, A.M.; Liu, F.; Mayer, M.; Cruz, T.B.; Krishnan-Sarin, S.; McConnell, R. E-cigarette Use and Subsequent Smoking Frequency among Adolescents. Pediatrics 2018, 142, e20180486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  9. Kalkhoran, S.; Glantz, S.A. E-cigarettes and smoking cessation in real-world and clinical settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Respir. Med. 2016, 4, 116–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  10. Goniewicz, M.L.; Knysak, J.; Gawron, M.; Kosmider, L.; Sobczak, A.; Kurek, J.; Prokopowicz, A.; Jablonska-Czapla, A.; Rosik-Dulewska, C.; Havel, C.; et al. Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob. Control. 2014, 23, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  11. Pisinger, C.; Dossing, M. A systematic review of health effects of electronic cigarettes. Prev. Med. 2014, 69, 248–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  12. Helasoja, V.; Prättalä, R.; Dregval, L.; Pudule, I.; Kasmel, A. Late response and item nonresponse in the Finbalt Health Monitor survey. Eur. J. Public Health 2002, 12, 117–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  13. Levy, D.T.; Yuan, Z.; Li, Y. The Prevalence and Characteristics of E-Cigarette Users in the U.S. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  14. Eurobarometer. Special Report 458 (2017). Attitudes of Europeans towards Tobacco and Electronic Cigarettes. European Union No. 2017, 3983. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/commfrontoffice/publicopinion/index.cfm/ResultDoc/download/DocumentKy/79002 (accessed on 14 January 2020).
  15. Daum, K. E-Sigaretid Eestis: Tarvitamine ja Meediakasutus [E-Cigarettes in Estonia: Use and Media Representations]; Institute for Family Medicine and Public Health: Tartu, Estonia, 2017; Available online: http://rahvatervis.ut.ee/bitstream/1/6753/1/Daum2017.pdf (accessed on 7 January 2020).
  16. Ooms, G.I.; Bosdriesz, J.R.; Portrait, F.R.; Kunst, A.E. Sociodemographic differences in the use of electronic nicotine delivery systems in the European Union. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2016, 18, 724–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Dockrell, M.; Morrison, R.; Bauld, L.; McNeill, A. E-cigarettes: Prevalence and attitudes in Great Britain. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2013, 15, 1737–1744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  18. Lee, J.; Oh, M. The moderating effect of gender on the association between E-cigarette use and smoking status: A cross-sectional study. Addict. Behav. 2019, 93, 108–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Soneji, S.; Barrington-Trimis, J.L.; Wills, T.A.; Leventhal, A.M.; Unger, J.B.; Gibson, L.A.; Yang, J.; Primack, B.A.; Andrews, J.A.; Miech, R.A.; et al. Association between initial use of e-cigarettes and subsequent cigarette smoking among adolescents and young adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr. 2017, 171, 788–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Schneider, S.; Diehl, K. Vaping as a Catalyst for Smoking? An Initial Model on the Initiation of Electronic Cigarette Use and the Transition to Tobacco Smoking Among Adolescents. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2016, 18, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Jackson, S.E.; Shahab, L.; West, R.; Brown, J. Associations between dual use of e-cigarettes and smoking cessation: A prospective study of smokers in England. Addict. Behav. 2019, 103, 106230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Hedman, L.; Backman, H.; Stridsman, C.; Bosson, J.A.; Lundback, M.; Lindberg, A.; Ronmark, E.; Ekerljung, L. Association of electronic cigarette use with smoking habits, demographic factors, and respiratory symptoms. JAMA Netw. Open 2018, 1, e180789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Prevalence of e-cigarette use in Estonia, 2012–2018.
Figure 1. Prevalence of e-cigarette use in Estonia, 2012–2018.
Ijerph 17 00519 g001
Table 1. Mutually adjusted OR with 95% confidence intervals (CI) by smoking status and e-cigarette use.
Table 1. Mutually adjusted OR with 95% confidence intervals (CI) by smoking status and e-cigarette use.
CharacteristicGeneral Population
E-Cigarette Use vs. Non-Use
Smoking Population
E-Cigarette Use vs. Non-Use
Ex-Smoking Population
E-Cigarette Use vs. Non-Use
nOR (95% CI) *nOR (95% CI) *nOR (95% CI) *
Sex
Women582811365113691
Men40842.30 (1.72–3.08)16062.37 (1.60–3.50)12301.52 (0.96–2.42)
Age
45–643308193019511
35–4431031.22 (0.83–1.79)9151.09 (0.69–1.71)8311.83 (0.86–3.89)
20–3429391.89 (1.33–2.69)9811.26 (0.82–1.94)7394.77 (2.43–9.38)
16–195622.90 (1.69–4.99)1452.31 (1.14–4.69)799.94 (3.68–26.84)
Education
Tertiary1782127114761
Secondary70811.32 (0.85–2.04)22270.63 (0.36–1.11)19052.38 (1.17–4.85)
Primary10491.36 (0.78–2.38)4730.70 (0.35–1.37)2181.62 (0.57–4.56)
Study year
20122623191716091
201423774.66 (2.98–7.30)7124.99 (2.98–8.38)6613.67 (1.46–9.23)
201625293.55 (2.22–5.67)7442.46 (1.40–4.35)6705.67 (2.28–14.06)
201823833.51 (2.17–5.70)5982.25 (1.22–4.12)6595.97 (2.40–14.88)
Smoking status
Smoker29713.55 (2.70-4.67)nana
Non-smoker68691nana
* Statistically significant (p < 0.05) associations are given in bold.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Reile, R.; Pärna, K. E-Cigarette Use by Smoking Status in Estonia, 2012–2018. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020519

AMA Style

Reile R, Pärna K. E-Cigarette Use by Smoking Status in Estonia, 2012–2018. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(2):519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020519

Chicago/Turabian Style

Reile, Rainer, and Kersti Pärna. 2020. "E-Cigarette Use by Smoking Status in Estonia, 2012–2018" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 2: 519. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17020519

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop