Next Article in Journal
Work–Family Conflict, Emotional Responses, Workplace Deviance, and Well-Being among Construction Professionals: A Sequential Mediation Model
Next Article in Special Issue
Sexually Transmitted Infections and Associated Factors in Southeast Spain: A Retrospective Study from 2000 to 2014
Previous Article in Journal
Theoretical Boundary Conditions of Partner Buffering in Romantic Relationships
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Quality of Counselling for Oral Emergency Contraceptive Pills—A Simulated Patient Study in German Community Pharmacies
Open AccessBrief Report

Association between Sexual Habits and Sexually Transmitted Infections at a Specialised Centre in Granada (Spain)

Gregorio Marañón Hospital, 28007 Madrid, Spain
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 18016 Granada, Spain
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 52005 Melilla, Spain
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Granada, 51001 Ceuta, Spain
Department of Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Jaén, 23071 Jaén, Spain
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(18), 6881;
Received: 8 August 2020 / Revised: 11 September 2020 / Accepted: 19 September 2020 / Published: 21 September 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Policies and Strategies in Sexual and Reproductive Health)


Sexually transmitted infections are an important public health issue. The purpose of this study is to analyse the association between different sexual habits and the prevalence of sexually transmitted infections in the population of Granada who consult with a specialised centre. An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted based on the medical records of 678 people from the Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Sexual Orientation Centre of Granada, who were diagnosed positively or negatively with a sexually transmitted infection, during the 2000−2014 period. Sociodemographic and clinical data, as well as data on frequency and type of sexual habits, frequency of condom use and sexually transmitted infection positive or negative diagnosis were collected. Univariate and bivariate analyses were conducted. The most popular sexual habits were vaginal intercourse, oral sex (mouth–vagina and mouth–penis) and the least popular were anus–mouth and anal sex. The use of condom is frequent in vaginal and anal sex and less frequent in oral sex. Sexually transmitted infection is associated with mouth–penis (p = 0.004) and mouth–vagina (p = 0.023) oral sex and anal sex (p = 0.031). It is observed that there is a relationship between the presence of STIs and oral sex practices, people having such practices being the ones who use condoms less frequently. There is also a relationship between anal sex and the prevalence of STIs, although in such sexual practice the use of condom does prevail.
Keywords: sexually transmitted infections; sexual behaviour; sexual health sexually transmitted infections; sexual behaviour; sexual health

1. Introduction

Risky sexual habits and behaviour strongly affect public health. According to the WHO, more than one million people acquire a sexually transmitted infection (STI) every day. The most recent averaged data indicate that one out of 25 people has at least one STI, maybe being infected with several of them at the same time [1].
Complications derived from an STI have a great impact on children’s, teenagers’, and adults’ health and life on a worldwide basis, thus compromising their quality of life. Furthermore, they facilitate indirectly the transmission of HIV and cause cellular changes that lead to some types of cancer. They also impact on domestic economy and national health systems [2].
STIs are more common in people having high-risk sexual behaviour and attitude such as having sexual intercourse without using condoms, having contact without buccal–genital protection, having multiple sex partners, having a high-risk partner (someone having many sex partners or other risk factors), having anal sex or a partner who has an STI, having sexual intercourse with sex workers, or having sexual intercourse with someone who injects or has injected drugs before [3,4]. Moreover, an increase in the use of the Internet and mobile applications to easily meet sexual partners, thus increasing high-risk sexual practices, should be highlighted [5,6].
Hence, it is important to know the population’s sexual habits in order to prioritise sexual health strategies that shall reduce the incidence of STIs, and therefore reduce the morbidity and mortality load worldwide derived from sexually transmitted pathogens.
Research has focused on studying the use of condom and its effectiveness in people with high-risk sexual contact [7,8,9], however, there are only a few studies on general population, which show that they are less aware of risks and motivation for condom use decreases [10,11]. In the United States, among 15−44-year-old people, prevalence of anal intercourse slightly increased from 2002 to 2015 both in women (30–33%) and men (34–38%), condoms being used in 32% in women and 46% in men, and only 7% during oral sex; such low percentages regarding condom use in high-risk sexual practices lead to an increase in the likelihood of getting an STI [12].
In Spain, a Blanc et al.’s study [13] revealed that the use of condom is higher in vaginal intercourse, and diminishes in anal sex and it is used in a lower percentage during oral sex (29.2%, 17.0%, and 2.0%, respectively). These results support the idea that young people use condoms more to avoid pregnancy than to prevent STIs.
Most published studies address sexual habits, condom use, and prevalence of STIs independently [14,15,16]; therefore, the purpose of this study is to analyse the association between different sexual practices and an STI diagnosis in people consulting with the Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Sexual Orientation Centre of Granada (Spain).

2. Materials and Methods

An observational, retrospective and cross-sectional study was conducted based on the medical records of people consulting with the Sexually Transmitted Diseases and Sexual Orientation Centre of Granada, attached to the Andalusian Health Service (Spain). It is the STI reference centre in the Granada province, it belongs to the public health system and it carries out preventive, diagnoses-related and therapeutic activities.
The sample was taken from a database composed of 1437 medical records of subjects attending for consultation associated with the presence or suspicion of an STI between 2000–2014. The sampling and data collection process may be checked in detail in a previous publication [17]. From said database, 678 medical records were taken for this research, which records complied with the criterion of having a test made to confirm or rule out the presence of an STI. Each history corresponds to one subject, so that there is no duplicate information in the final case selection. Every history was reviewed by a member of the research team, who took out data to include them in a data collection sheet created to that effect for this study. One of the disadvantages of this process was related to missing data, so the sample sizes defined for every analysis performed are specified in the data results.
The STI diagnosis was considered a dependent variable, collected as a binary qualitative variable (Yes, No). Sexual habits were established as an independent variable, identifying five practices: vaginal intercourse, oral (mouth–vagina), oral (mouth–penile), oral (anus–mouth), anal (penile–anus) intercourse. Subjects were asked about the frequency of such practices, so every habit was collected as a binary qualitative variable (Never or sporadic, Frequent or always). Additionally, data on condom use were collected for each and every described practice, following the same categorization in answers. To classify the sample, sociodemographic variables (age, sex, nationality, occupation, working status, education level, marital status, and sexual orientation), medical variables (reason for consultation) and risk indicators (age of first sexual intercourse, last time having sex without a condom, number of partners in the last month and in the past 12 months, use of drugs, and prior STI) were collected.
A univariate analysis was conducted by calculating the median (Me), interquartile range (IQR), frequency (n), and percentage (%), according to the variable type. The bivariate analysis was performed in order to analyse the association between STIs (dependent variable) and sexual habits (independent variable), via the chi-square test, by calculating the effect size through the Cramer’s V (V), plus the Odds ration (OR) (Confidence Interval (CI) 95%).
In every case, a significant association was considered with p < 0.05. Univariate and bivariate analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) program, version 22, (IBM, New York, NY, USA).
The study protocol was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of the province of Granada (research protocol approved on 12 February 2012, and 1 April 2015), as well as by the Management Directorate of the Granada-Metropolitan Health District, to which the centre where data were collected is attached.

3. Results

Table 1 shows results corresponding to sociodemographic variables, medical care, and risk indicators. The general profile of the sample was a young subject, Spanish, with higher-level education, employed, mostly single, and heterosexual. The sample included a similar proportion of men and women, although with a slightly higher percentage of men. They consulted with the STI centre for some reason related to STI contagion or suspicion, highlighting the presence of symptoms as the reason for consultation.
Out of 678 analysed cases, 65.5% (n = 444) got an STI positive diagnosis, as opposed to 34.5% (n = 234) of negative cases. Table 2 shows the results of sexual habits and condom use variables in such sexual practices.
Table 3 shows the results corresponding to the association between STIs and sexual habits. STI diagnosis was significantly associated with the practice (frequent-always) of mouth–penile oral sex (p = 0.004), mouth–vagina oral sex (p = 0.023), and anal sex (p = 0.031). In the three cases, the effect size was low.

4. Discussion

From among the results of this research, it is worth mentioning the association observed between the STI diagnosis and the frequency of oral sex (mouth–penile and mouth–vagina) and anal sex. Before describing such finding more deeply, there are aspects of the sample features that should be pointed out.
The age of the first sexual intercourse was around 17 years old, which approximates to other studies which establish the commencement of sexual intercourse between 17 and 18 years old [6,18], unlike other studies which point out slightly lower figures, reporting median ages between 15 and 16 years old [19,20]. It has been shown that a reduction in the age of the first sexual intercourse is a factor contributing to an increase in STIs [21,22].
As regards other risk indicators, subjects stated they had one sexual partner or no sexual partner during the last month and approximately 50% stated they had two or fewer partners during the last year, which results are similar to the ones observed in another study [4]. Although our study does not observe an elevated number of sexual partners, an increase in the number of sexual partners is known to be related to an increase in STIs [21,23]. With respect to the use of drugs, most of them stated they did not use or used them sporadically, which findings also coincide with another research [6]. As regards such finding, it should be noted that factors leading to a higher risk of acquiring HIV and STIs include not only early sexual intercourse and a higher number of sexual partners, but also drug use during said intercourse [22,23]. In Europe, an earlier initiation of sexual intercourse is observed, as well as an increase in the number of sexual partners, which would contribute to an increase in the incidence of STIs [21,23].
Regarding the sexual habits analysed, vaginal intercourse stands out as to frequency, followed by mouth–penis and mouth–vagina oral sex. In contrast, there were very few reported cases of mouth–anus oral sex as well as anal sex. Such data are similar to data from another study where higher percentages were found for vaginal intercourse [24], or where oral sex was more frequent than anal sex [18]. Our findings with respect to a higher frequency of vaginal sex as opposed to anal sex may be conditioned by mostly heterosexual subjects in our sample. The importance of anal intercourse as opposed to vaginal intercourse resides in the fact that the former constitutes a higher-risk sexual practice regarding transmission of HIV both for men and women [25].
In relation to condom use, results show an inconsistent use when asking subjects about the time elapsed from the last time they had sex without using a condom, which could increase contagion and transmission of STIs. It is worth mentioning that evidence is firm when relating the low use of condom to a higher risk of getting an STI [13,24,26,27]. In general, the epidemiological studies available has shown that, when condoms are used constantly and correctly, they are highly effective to prevent HIV infection and they reduce the risk of other STIs [28,29].
Upon analysing the use of condom in different sexual practices in detail, it is observed that its use in vaginal intercourse occurs always or frequently, closely followed by its use in anal sex. However, in mouth–vagina and mouth–penis oral sex, the use of condom is non-existent or sporadic. Previous studies consulted have varied results; some of them agree on the use of condom in vaginal intercourse and its non-frequent use in oral sex [13,30], and others report a lower use than the one observed in our study regarding anal sex [13]. Specifically, in the “Encuesta nacional sobre sexualidad y anticoncepción entre los jóvenes españoles” [19] (“National survey on sexuality and contraception among Spanish young people”), the main reason for not always using contraception methods, like condom, resides in the number of occasions in which oral sex is practised (59.1%). A possible explanation for the low use of condom in oral sex could be the fact that people practising it are less aware of the risk of acquiring an STI during oral sex or because they see condoms as a barrier that adversely affects sexual pleasure in the couple.
Our study shows a significant association between mouth–penis and mouth–vagina oral sex and an STI positive diagnosis. As observed, in such sexual practices, the frequency of condom use is low, which could be one of the causes explaining such association. Coincidences with another study were found, which study suggests that many young people are still unaware of the ways in which STIs may be transmitted in oral–genital contact [13] and, although some studies have demonstrated that the risk of getting HIV in oral sex with an infected partner (whether by giving or by receiving it) is much lower than the risk of getting this virus in anal or vaginal intercourse with an infected partner, it is possible that this may not be the case for other STIs [31]; hence, the importance of condom use in oral sex as well.
Furthermore, a significant association between anal sex and an STI positive diagnosis was found; although, it is worth recalling that descriptive data showed this practice is not frequent in the sample studied. Anal intercourse is the riskiest sexual practice as regards transmission of STIs such as HIV, chlamydia, or gonorrhea [32], the risk being higher when a passive role is adopted [33,34], with a probability of infection 13 times higher than for the sexually active partner, due to the fact that the lining of the rectum is thin and may allow HIV to enter the body during anal sex [25].
This study has some limitations, one of them being related to the high percentage of values lost in some variables, since not in all of them data on the same number of subjects were registered; when working with medical records, not all variables are completed. In addition, another limitation is the fact that it is a single-centre and single-province study, which, when extrapolating the results obtained, would limit their external validity. Nevertheless, the WHO has emphasized, in its latest reports, the availability of local data to improve the approach to STIs [2]. Finally, the methodological design used does not allow for the establishment of causal relations, so the associations observed must be considered as hypotheses to be supported by more complex designs and analyses.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, the most frequent sexual practices reported in this research were vaginal and oral (mouth–vagina and mouth–penis) sex, unlike the low frequency of anal sex. Likewise, the use of condom was frequent in vaginal and anal sex, as opposed to the figures observed in oral sex. A statistically significant relationship is established between the presence of STIs and oral and anal sex.
The results obtained in this study may contribute to the design of sex education policies aimed at reducing the risk of certain sexual practices through strategies oriented to an improvement in sexual health and a minimization of exposure to and contagion of STIs. As previously mentioned, the findings of this study are in line with the WHO’s proposal [2] of worldwide strategies to prevent sexually transmitted infections, where disparity in reports among different regions and countries, as well as within every region and every country, is worth mentioning because of the difficulty derived from the lack of local data to globally address STIs, in order to measure the advance towards their control.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.C.S.-B. and A.M.-S.; methodology R.C.S.-B. and C.H.-M.; software, C.H.-M; investigation, R.C.S.-B., C.H.-M., and M.Á.P.-M.; data curation, R.C.S.-B., C.H.-M., and M.Á.P.-M.; writing—original draft preparation, R.C.S.-B., C.H.-M., A.M.-S., M.A.Á.-S., M.G.-L., and M.Á.P.-M.; writing—review and editing, R.C.S.-B., C.H.-M., A.M.-S., M.A.Á.-S., M.G.-L., and M.Á.P.-M.; and supervision, C.H.-M. and M.Á.P.-M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.


This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. World Health Organization. Sexually Transmitted Infections. Available online: (accessed on 13 May 2020).
  2. Organización Mundial de la Salud. Estrategia Mundial del Sector de la Salud Contra Infecciones de Transmisión Sexual Para 2016–2021. Hacia el fin de las ITS. OMS. Available online: (accessed on 6 September 2020).
  3. An, Q.; Wejnert, C.; Bernstein, K.; Paz-Bailey, G. Syphilis Screening and Diagnosis Among Men Who Have Sex With Men, 2008–2014, 20 U.S. Cities. J. Acquir. Immune Defic. Syndr. 2017, 75, S363–S369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. De Munain, J.L. Epidemiología y control actual de las infecciones de transmisión sexual. Papel de las unidades de ITS. Enferm Infecc. Microbiol. Clínica 2019, 37, 45–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Walsh-Buhi, E.; Klinkenberger, N.; McFarlane, M.; Kachur, R.; Daley, E.; Baldwin, J.; Blunt, H.D.; Hughes, S.; Wheldon, C.W.; Rietmeijer, C. Evaluating the Internet as a sexually transmitted disease risk environment for teens: Findings from the communication, health, and teens study. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2013, 40, 528–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Folch, C.; Alvarez, J.L.; Casabona, J.; Brotons, M.; Castellsagué, X. Determinantes de las conductas sexuales de riesgo en jovenes de Cataluña. Rev. Española Salud Pública 2015, 89, 471–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yamamoto, N.; Ejima, K.; Nishiura, H. Modelling the impact of correlations between condom use and sexual contact pattern on the dynamics of sexually transmitted infections. Theor. Biol. Med. Model. 2018, 15, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Medina-Perucha, L.; Family, H.; Scott, J.; Chapman, S.; Dack, C. Factors Associated with Sexual Risks and Risk of STIs, HIV and Other Blood-Borne Viruses Among Women Using Heroin and Other Drugs: A Systematic Literature Review. AIDS Behav. 2018, 23, 222–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thoma, B.C.; Huebner, D.M. Parent-Adolescent Communication about Sex and Condom Use among Young Men who Have Sex with Men: An Examination of the Theory of Planned Behavior. Ann. Behav. Med. 2018, 52, 973–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Buttmann-Schweiger, N.; Nielsen, A.; Munk, C.; Liaw, K.-L.; Kjær, S.K. Sexual risk taking behaviour: Prevalence and associated factors. A population-based study of 22,000 Danish men. BMC Public Health 2011, 11, 764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Vranic, S.M.; Aljicevic, M.; Segalo, S.; Joguncic, A. Knowledge and Attitudes of Sexually Transmitted Infections among High School Students in Sarajevo. Acta Med. Acad. 2019, 48, 147–158. [Google Scholar]
  12. Habel, M.A.; Leichliter, J.S.; Dittus, P.J.; Spicknall, I.H.; Aral, S.O. Heterosexual Anal and Oral Sex in Adolescents and Adults in the United States, 2011–2015. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2018, 45, 775–782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Molina, A.B.; Rojas-Tejada, A.J. Uso del preservativo, número de parejas y debut sexual en jóvenes en coito vaginal, sexo oral y sexo anal. Rev. Int. 2018, 16, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Giménez-García, C.; Nebot-García, J.; Bisquert-Bover, M.; Elipe-Miravet, M.; Gil-Llario, M.D. Infecciones de transmisión sexual en población joven ¿qué mantiene su exposición al riesgo? Int. J. Dev. Educ. Psychol. Rev. INFAD Psicol. 2019, 5, 547–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sviben, M.; Ljubin-Sternak, S.; Meštrović, T.; Vraneš, J. Sociodemographic, Sexual Behavior, and Microbiological Profiles of Men Attending Public Health Laboratories for Testing for Sexually Transmitted Diseases. Acta Derm. Croat. ADC 2017, 25, 125–132. [Google Scholar]
  16. Provenzano, S.; Santangelo, O.E.; Alagna, E.; Giordano, D.; Firenze, A. Sexual and reproductive health risk behaviours among Palermo university students: Results from an online survey. La Clin. Ther. 2018, 169, e242–e248. [Google Scholar]
  17. Pérez-Morente, M.Á.; Sánchez-Ocón, M.T.; Martínez-García, E.; Martín-Salvador, A.; Hueso-Montoro, C.; García-García, I. Differences in Sexually Transmitted Infections between the Precrisis Period (2000–2007) and the Crisis Period (2008–2014) in Granada, Spain. J. Clin. Med. 2019, 8, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Bravo, B.N.; Segura, L.R.; Latorre, J.M.; Villafruela, J.C.E.; Honrubia, V.L.; Marchante, M.R. Hábitos, Preferencias y Satisfacción Sexual en Estudiantes Universitarios. Revista Clínica de Medicina de Familia 2010, 3, 150–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sociedad Española de Contracepción. Encuesta Nacional Sobre Sexualidad y Anticoncepción Entre los Jóvenes Españoles (16-25 Años). Available online: (accessed on 6 September 2020).
  20. Moreno, C.; Ramos, P.; Rivera, F.; Sánchez-Queija, I.; Jiménez-Iglesias, A.; García-Moya, I.; Moreno-Maldonado, C.; Paniagua, C.; Villafuerte-Díaz, A.; Ciria-Barreiro, E.; et al. La Adolescencia en España: Salud, Bienestar, Familia, Vida Académica y Social. Resultados del Estudio HBSC 2018. Ministerio de Sanidad, Consumo y Bienestar Social. Available online: (accessed on 6 September 2020).
  21. Calatrava, M.; Burgo, C.L.-D.; De Irala, J. Factores de riesgo relacionados con la salud sexual en los jóvenes europeos. Med. Clínica 2012, 138, 534–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Teva, I.; Bermúdez, M.P.; Buela-Casal, G. Variables sociodemográficas y conductas de riesgo en la infección por el VIH y las enfermedades de transmisión sexual en adolescentes: España, 2007. Rev. Española Salud Pública 2009, 83, 309–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Morán Arribas, M.; Rivero, A.; Fernández, E.; Poveda, T.; Caylá, J.A. Burden of HIV infection, vulnerable populations and accessbarriers to healthcare. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clin. 2018, 36, 3–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ward, J.; Wand, H.; Bryant, J.; Delaney-Thiele, D.; Worth, H.; Pitts, M.; Byron, K.; Moore, E.; Donovan, B.; Kaldor, J.M. Prevalence and Correlates of a Diagnosis of Sexually Transmitted Infection Among Young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander People. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2016, 43, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Relaciones Sexuales Anales y el Riesgo de VIH. Available online: (accessed on 5 September 2020).
  26. Velo, C.; Cuéllar-Flores, I.; Sainz-Costa, T.; Navarro, M.L.; García-Navarro, C.; Fernández-McPhee, C.; Ramírez, A.; Bisbal, O.; Blázquez-Gamero, D.; Ramos-Amador, J.T.; et al. Jóvenes y VIH. Conocimiento y Conductas de Riesgo de un Grupo Residente en España. Enferm. Infecc. Microbiol. Clínica 2019, 37, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Pérez Morente, M.A.; Campos Escudero, A.; Sánchez-Ocon, M.T.; Hueso-Montoro, C. Características sociodemográficas, indicadores de riesgo y atención sanitaria en relación a infecciones de transmisión sexual en población inmigrante de Granada. Rev. Esp. Salud. Pública 2019, 93, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  28. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Los Condones y las ETS: Hoja Informativa Para el Personal de Salud Pública. Available online: (accessed on 5 September 2020).
  29. Teva, I.; Bermúdez, M.P.; Ramiro, M.T. Sexual satisfaction and attitudes towards the use of condoms in adolescents: Evaluation and analysis on their relationship with condom use. Rev. Latinoam. Psicol. 2014, 46, 127–136. [Google Scholar]
  30. Grupo de Trabajo Sobre Tratamientos del VIH (gTt-VIH). Transmisión sexual del VIH. Guía para Entender las Pruebas de Detección y el Riesgo en las Prácticas Sexuales (2ª Edición). Available online: (accessed on 13 May 2020).
  31. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Available online: (accessed on 13 May 2020).
  32. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). HIV Risk Reduction Tool. Available online: (accessed on 13 May 2020).
  33. Zeng, X.; Zhong, X.; Peng, B.; Zhang, Y.; Kong, C.; Liu, X.; Huang, A. Prevalence and associated risk characteristics of HIV infection based on anal sexual role among men who have sex with men: A multi-city cross-sectional study in Western China. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2016, 49, 111–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Mustanski, B.; Feinstein, B.A.; Madkins, K.; Sullivan, P.; Swann, G. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Rectal and Urethral Sexually Transmitted Infections from Self-Collected Samples among Young Men who Have Sex with Men Participating in the Keep it Up! 2.0 Randomized Controlled Trial. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2017, 44, 483–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Table 1. Sociodemographic features, medical care and risk indicators.
Table 1. Sociodemographic features, medical care and risk indicators.
VariablesMe (IQR)
Age (n = 678)26 (23–33)
Age at first sexual intercourse (n = 322)17 (16–18)
n (%)
Sex (n= 678)
Male391 (57.7)
Female287 (42.3)
Citizenship (n = 671)
Spanish511 (76.2)
Immigrant160 (23.8)
Occupation (n = 630)
Other occupation316 (50.2)
Student229 (36.3)
Sex workers/former workers85 (13.5)
Employment (n = 615)
Active302 (49.1)
Unemployed77 (12.5)
Retired7 (1.1)
Student229 (37.2)
Education level (n = 640)
Without education4 (0.6)
Primary116 (18.1)
Secondary150 (23.4)
Vocational training70 (10.9)
Higher (University)300 (46.9)
Marital status (n = 675)
Single544 (80.6)
Married/Domestic partner92 (13.9)
Separated/Divorced38 (5.6)
Widower1 (0.1)
Sexual orientation (n = 657)
Heterosexual547 (83.3)
Homosexual81 (12.3)
Bisexual29 (4.4)
Reason for consultation * (n = 678)
HIV219 (32.3)
STI symptoms 429 (63.3)
Control20 (2.9)
Follow-up of contacts10 (1.5)
Last time having sex without condom (n = 385)
Never used it31 (8.1)
Last month178 (46.2)
1−6 months147 (38.2)
6–12 months12 (3.1)
Over 1 year17 (4.4)
Partners in the last month (n = 636)
0−1465 (73.1)
254 (8.5)
3−530 (4.7)
+59 (1.4)
Sex workers78 (12.3)
Partners in the last year (n = 633)
0−1229 (36.2)
2102 (16.1)
3−5130 (20.5)
6−1068 (10.7)
11−2021 (3.3)
+2010 (1.6)
Sex workers73 (11.5)
Drug use (n = 288)
No185 (64.2)
Yes103 (35.8)
Prior STIs (n = 542)
No412 (76.0)
Yes130 (24.0)
* HIV: Human Immunodeficiency Virus; STI: Sexually Transmitted Infections; Control: people going to the centre for an STI control; Follow-up of contacts: people who go to the centre because they have had a risky contact.
Table 2. Sexual habits and condom use.
Table 2. Sexual habits and condom use.
VariablesVaginal IntercourseOral (Mouth–Vagina)Oral (Mouth–Penile)Oral (Anus–Mouth) Anal (Penile–Anus)
FrequencyH *
n (%)
U.C. *
n (%)
H *
n (%)
U.C. *
n (%)
H *
n (%)
U.C. *
n (%)
H *
n (%)
U.C. *
n (%)
H *
n (%)
U.C. *
n (%)
Never-Sporadic3 (0.8)131 (36.8)43 (22.5)143 (98.6)38 (15.3)193 (86.5)6 (100)1 (50.0)216 (72.7)61 (43.0)
Frequent-Always358 (99.2)225 (63.2)148 (77.5)2 (1.4)210 (84.7)30 (13.5)0 (0)1 (50.0)81 (27.3)81 (57.0)
Total361 (100)356 (100)191 (100)145 (100)248 (100)223 (100)6 (100)2 (100)297 (100)142 (100)
* H = habit; U.C. = use of condom.
Table 3. Sexual habits and STI diagnosis.
Table 3. Sexual habits and STI diagnosis.
VariablesSTI YesSTI NopVOR (CI 95%)
Vaginal intercourse (n = 361)
Frequent-always22462.613437.4n.s *n.a *n.a *
Oral (mouth–penile) (n = 248)
Frequent-always14569.06531.00.0040.1842.756 (1.364−5.567)
Oral (anus–mouth) (n = 6)
Frequent-always00.000.0n.s *n.a *n.a *
Oral (mouth–vagina) (n = 191)
Frequent-always9463.55436.50.0230.1642.199 (1.104−4.378)
Anal (penile–anus) intercourse (n = 297)
Frequent-always6074.12125.90.0310.1251.854 (1.052−3.268)
* n.s.: not significant; n.a.: not applicable.
Back to TopTop