Considering the Potential Health Impacts of Electric Scooters: An Analysis of User Reported Behaviors in Provo, Utah
Abstract
:1. Introduction
1.1. Background: e-Scooter Share Programs
1.2. Background: e-Scooters and Health
1.2.1. Injuries
1.2.2. Environment (Air Pollution/Noise Exposure)
1.2.3. Physical Inactivity
1.2.4. Social Exclusion and Community Severance
2. Methods
2.1. Study Context
2.2. Study Design
2.3. Data Analysis
3. Results
3.1. Motivations for Riding e-Scooters
3.2. Destinations of e-Scooter Riders
3.3. Travel Mode Alternatives if Not Using an e-Scooter
3.4. Awareness of and Compliance with Safety Regulations
3.5. Changes to Enable Safer On-Street (vs. Sidewalk) Riding
4. Discussion
5. Conclusions
Author Contributions
Funding
Conflicts of Interest
Appendix A—Zagster Rider Survey Questions
- On your last trip, why did you choose to ride a scooter?
- On your last trip, what mode of transportation would you have taken had a scooter not been available?
- On your last trip, where did you ride to?
- On your last trip, where did you ride from?
- On your last trip, where did you primarily ride?
- If you rode on sidewalks, why did you choose to do so?
- Did you know that Provo City Code 9.15.200 prohibits riding on sidewalks? (Don’t worry, we won’t tell on you.)
- What changes would make you want to ride in the street instead of the sidewalk?
- Where should scooters be staged in the morning that they aren’t currently?
- Anything else you’d like to tell us?
- What city do you live in?
- What is your age?
- What is your gender?
References
- Khreis, H.; May, A.D.; Nieuwenhuijsen, M.J. Health impacts of urban transport policy measures: A guidance note for practice. J. Transp. Health 2017, 6, 209–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hollingsworth, J.; Copeland, B.; Johnson, J.X. Are e-scooters polluters? the environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zhu, R.; Zhang, X.; Kondor, D.; Santi, P.; Ratti, C. Understanding spatio-temporal heterogeneity of bike-sharing and scooter-sharing mobility. Comput. Environ. Urban Syst. 2020, 81, 101483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- van Boven, J.F.M.; An PLe Kirenga, B.J.; Chavannes, N. Electric scooters: Batteries in the battle against ambient air pollution? Lancet Planet. Health 2017, 1, e168–e169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Trivedi, T.K.; Liu, C.; Antonio, A.L.M.; Wheaton, N.; Kreger, V.; Yap, A.; Schriger, D.; Elmore, J.G. Injuries Associated With Standing Electric Scooter Use. JAMA Netw. Open 2019, 2, e187381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kobayashi, L.M.; Williams, E.; Brown, C.V.; Emigh, B.J.; Bansal, V.; Badiee, J.; Checchi, K.D.; Castillo, E.M.; Doucet, J. The e-merging e-pidemic of e-scooters. Trauma Surg. Acute Care Open 2019, 4, e000337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Todd, J.; Krauss, D.; Zimmermann, J.; Dunning, A. Behavior of electric scooter operators in naturalistic environments. SAE Tech. Pap. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Irfan, U. Electric Scooters: Why Bird, Lime, Skip, and Spin are Taking over Cities. Vox. 2018. Available online: https://www.vox.com/2018/8/27/17676670/electric-scooter-rental-bird-lime-skip-spin-cities (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Mathew, J.; Liu, M.; Li, H.; Seeder, S.; Bullock, D.M. Analysis of E-Scooter Trips and Their Temporal Usage Patterns. ITE J. 2019, 89, 44–49. [Google Scholar]
- Nisson, P.L.; Ley, E.; Chu, R. Electric scooters: Case reports indicate a growing public health concern. Am. J. Public Health 2020, 110, 177–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Choron, R.L.; Sakran, J.V. The Integration of Electric Scooters: Useful Technology or Public Health Problem? Am. J. Public Health 2019, 109, 555–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Puzio, T.J.; Murphy, P.B.; Gazzetta, J.; Dineen, H.A.; Savage, S.A.; Streib, E.W.; Zarzaur, B.L. The electric scooter: A surging new mode of transportation that comes with risk to riders. Traffic Inj. Prev. 2020, 21, 175–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dickey, M.R. Electric Scooters are Going Worldwide. Techcrunch. 2018. Available online: https://techcrunch.com/2018/08/12/electric-scooters-all-over-the-world/ (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- NACTO. Shared Micromobility in the U.S.: 2018; NACTO: New York, NY, USA, 2019. [Google Scholar]
- Toll, M. Are Shared Electric Scooters Going Extinct? Lime’s Valuation Reportedly Tanks. Electrek. 2020. Available online: https://electrek.co/2020/05/06/lime-valuation-drops-uber-investment-electric-scooters/ (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Wiggers, K. Bird Raises $275 Million at a $2.5 Billion Valuation; Venturebeat: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2019; Available online: https://venturebeat.com/2019/10/03/bird-raises-275-million-at-a-2-5-billion-valuation/ (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- O’Brien, C. Lime VP on Company’s Meteoric Rise to $1 Billion Valuation; Venturebeat: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2018; Available online: https://venturebeat.com/2018/07/02/lime-vp-on-companys-meteoric-rise-to-1-billion-valuation/ (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Grand View Research. Electric Scooters Market Size|E-scooters Industry Report, 2030. Available online: https://www.grandviewresearch.com/industry-analysis/electric-scooters-market (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- McFarland, M. Lyft Launches a Scooter Service. Uber is Close Behind. CNN Bus. 2018. Available online: https://money.cnn.com/2018/09/06/technology/lyft-scooters-denver-uber/index.html (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Hawkins, A.J. Electric Scooter-Sharing Grinds to a Halt in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. The Verge. 2020. Available online: https://www.theverge.com/2020/3/20/21188119/electric-scooter-coronavirus-bird-lime-spin-suspend-bikes (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Williams, K. Trends in E-Scooter Litigation: An update on the still-evolving body of law. Bench Bar Minn. 2019, 76, 26–29. [Google Scholar]
- Allem, J.P.; Majmundar, A. Are electric scooters promoted on social media with safety in mind? A case study on Bird’s Instagram. Prev. Med. Rep. 2019, 13, 62–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Blomberg, S.N.F.; Rosenkrantz, O.C.M.; Lippert, F.; Christensen, H.C. Injury from electric scooters in Copenhagen: A retrospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e033988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Trivedi, B.; Kesterke, M.J.; Bhattacharjee, R.; Weber, W.; Mynar, K.; Reddy, L.V. Craniofacial Injuries Seen With the Introduction of Bicycle-Share Electric Scooters in an Urban Setting. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2019, 77, 2292–2297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Sipe, N.; Pojani, D. Can e-Scooters Solve the ‘Last Mile’ Problem? They’ll Need to Avoid the Fate of Dockless Bikes. Conversat. 2018. Available online: https://theconversation.com/can-e-scooters-solve-the-last-mile-problem-theyll-need-to-avoid-the-fate-of-dockless-bikes-102633 (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Siman-Tov, M.; Radomislensky, I.; Peleg, K.; Israel Trauma Group. The casualties from electric bike and motorized scooter road accidents. Traffic Inj. Prev. 2017, 18, 318–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Schlaff, C.D.; Sack, K.D.; Elliott, R.J.; Rosner, M.K. Early Experience with Electric Scooter Injuries Requiring Neurosurgical Evaluation in District of Columbia: A Case Series. World Neurosurg. 2019, 132, 202–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bresler, A.Y.; Hanba, C.; Svider, P.; Carron, M.A.; Hsueh, W.D.; Paskhover, B. Craniofacial injuries related to motorized scooter use: A rising epidemic. Am. J. Otolaryngol. Head Neck Med. Surg. 2019, 40, 662–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Burgoyne, J. The Case for Electric Scooters. US News World Rep. 2019. Available online: https://www.usnews.com/news/cities/articles/2019-09-05/commentary-the-case-for-electric-scooters (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Tapper, J. Invasion of the Electric Scooter: Can Our Cities Cope? Guard. 2019. Available online: https://www.theguardian.com/cities/2019/jul/15/invasion-electric-scooter-backlash (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Sikka, N.; Vila, C.; Stratton, M.; Ghassemi, M.; Pourmand, A. Sharing the sidewalk: A case of E-scooter related pedestrian injury. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2019, 37, 1807.e5–1807.e7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Shaheen, S.A.; Cohen, A.P. Shared Micromoblity Policy Toolkit: Docked and Dockless Bike and Scooter Sharing; UC Berkeley Transportation Sustainability Research Center: Richmond, CA, USA, 2019; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Badeau, A.; Carman, C.; Newman, M.; Steenblik, J.; Carlson, M.; Madsen, T. Emergency department visits for electric scooter-related injuries after introduction of an urban rental program. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2019, 37, 1531–1533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Mitchell, G.; Tsao, H.; Randell, T.; Marks, J.; Mackay, P. Impact of electric scooters to a tertiary emergency department: 8-week review after implementation of a scooter share scheme. EMA Emerg. Med. Australas. 2019, 31, 930–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Liew, Y.K.; Wee, C.P.J.; Pek, J.H. New peril on our roads: A retrospective study of electric scooter-related injuries. Singap. Med. J. 2020, 61, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Hamilton, I.A. Electric Scooters were to Blame for at Least 1500 Injuries and Deaths in the US Last Year. Bus. Insid. 2019. Available online: https://www.businessinsider.com/minimum-of-1500-us-e-scooter-injuries-in-2018-2019-2 (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Allen, J.R.; English, K.C.; Rix, K.; Brown, C.V.R.; Ziebell, C.M.; Brown, L.H. 262 Epidemiology of Dockless Electric Rental Scooter Injuries. Ann. Emerg. Med. 2019, 74, S103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Teoh, H. SCDF Received 40 Cases of E-Scooter Fires in 2017, Cautions against Overnight Charging. Yahoo! News. 2018. Available online: https://sg.news.yahoo.com/scdf-received-40-cases-e-scooter-fires-2017-cautions-overnight-charging-073308147.html (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Meheus, F.; Rijal, S.; Lutumba, P.; Hendrickx, D.; Boelaert, M. NTD control and health system strengthening. Lancet 2012, 379, 2149–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- James, O.; Swiderski, J.; Hicks, J.; Teoman, D. Pedestrians and E-Scooters: An Initial Look at E-Scooter Parking and Perceptions by Riders and Non-Riders. Sustainability 2019, 11, 5591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Fang, K.; Agrawal, A.W.; Steele, J.; Hunter, J.J.; Hooper, A.M. Where Do Riders Park Dockless, Shared Electric Scooters? Findings from San Jose, California; Mineta Transportation Institute: San Jose, CA, USA, 2018; pp. 1–5. Available online: https://scholarworks.sjsu.edu/mti_publications (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Portland Bureau of Transportation. 2018 E-Scooter Findings Report; Portland Bureau of Transportation: Portland, OR, USA, 2019. Available online: https://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/article/709719 (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Bhalla, K.; Shotten, M.; Cohen, A.; Brauer, M.; Shahraz, S.; Burnett, R.; Leach-Kemon, K.; Freedman, G.; Murray, C.J.L. Transport for health: The Global Burden of Disease from Motorized Road Transport; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ratinho, T. E-scooters, bikes and urban mobility: Lessons from the streets of Paris. Conversat. 2019. Available online: https://theconversation.com/e-scooters-bikes-and-urban-mobility-lessons-from-the-streets-of-paris-125619 (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Hawkins, A.J. Electric Scooters Aren’t Quite as Climate-Friendly as We Thought. The Verge. 2019. Available online: https://www.theverge.com/2019/8/2/20751610/scooters-electric-dockless-carbon-emissions-study-life-cycle-analysis (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Chester Energy and Policy. It’s a Bird…It’s a Lime…It’s Dockless Scooters! But Can These Electric-Powered Mobility Options Be Considered Sustainable Using Life-Cycle Analysis? 2019. Available online: https://chesterenergyandpolicy.com/2019/01/28/its-a-bird-its-a-lime-its-dockless-scooters-but-can-these-electric-powered-mobility-options-be-considered-sustainable-using-life-cycle-analysis/ (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Moreau, H.; de Jamblinne de Meux, L.; Zeller, V.; D’Ans, P.; Ruwet, C.; Achten, W.M.J. Dockless E-Scooter: A Green Solution for Mobility? Comparative Case Study between Dockless E-Scooters, Displaced Transport, and Personal E-Scooters. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- LINK. Available online: https://www.link.city/#scooter (accessed on 24 June 2020).
- Forouzanfar, M.H.; Alexander, L.; Anderson, H.R.; Bachman, V.F.; Biryukov, S.; Brauer, M.; Burnett, R.; Casey, D.; Coates, M.M.; Cohen, A.; et al. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks in 188 countries, 1990-2013: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013. Lancet 2015, 386, 2287–2323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Sallis, J. Electric Scooters on Collision Course with Pedestrians and Lawmakers. Conversat. 2018. Available online: https://theconversation.com/electric-scooters-on-collision-course-with-pedestrians-and-lawmakers-99654 (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Sustrans. Our Position on E-Scooters. 2019. Available online: https://www.sustrans.org.uk/our-blog/policy-positions/all/all/our-position-on-e-scooters/ (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Kohl, H., III; Murray, T.; Salvo, D. Measuring Physical Activity. In Foundations of Physical Activity and Public Health; Human Kinetics, Inc.: Windsor, ON, Canada, 2019; p. 72. [Google Scholar]
- Schmitt, A. Local Bike Advocates: E-Scooters Are Game-Changing. Streets Blog USA. 2019. Available online: https://usa.streetsblog.org/2019/01/14/local-bike-advocates-e-scooters-are-game-changing/ (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Urbanism Next. Micromobility. The Nexus. Available online: https://www.urbanismnext.org/technologies/micromobility (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Pure Electric. Does An Electric Scooter Keep You Fit? 2019. Available online: https://www.pureelectric.com/blogs/news/does-an-electric-scooter-keep-you-fit (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Healy, G.N.; Winkler, E.A.H.; Owen, N.; Anuradha, S.; Dunstan, D. Replacing sitting time with standing or stepping: Associations with cardio-metabolic risk biomarkers. Eur. Heart J. 2015, 36, 2643–2649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Pandey, A.; Salahuddin, U.; Garg, S.; Ayers, C. Continuous dose-response association between sedentary time and risk for cardiovascular disease a meta-analysis. JAMA Cardiol. 2016, 1, 573–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
- Dempsey, P.C.; Owen, N.; Yates, T.E.; Kingwell, B.A.; Dunstan, D.W. Sitting Less and Moving More: Improved Glycaemic Control for Type 2 Diabetes Prevention and Management. Curr. Diab. Rep. 2016, 16, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Markovich, J.; Lucas, K. The social and distributional impacts of transport: A literature review. Work Pap. Ser. Transp. Stud. Unit. 2011. [Google Scholar]
- Schwanen, T.; Lucas, K.; Akyelken, N.; Solsona, D.C.; Carrasco, J.-A.; Neutens, T. Rethinking the links between social exclusion and transport disadvantage through the lens of social capital. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 2015, 74, 123–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zimmerman, H. As Electric Scooters Proliferate, So Do Minor Injuries And Blocked Sidewalks. NPR. 2019. Available online: https://www.npr.org/2019/03/30/703102986/as-electric-scooters-proliferate-so-do-minor-injuries-and-blocked-sidewalks (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Newberry, L. Fed-up Locals are Setting Electric Scooters on Fire and Burying Them at Sea. Los Angeles Times. 2018. Available online: https://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-bird-scooter-vandalism-20180809-story.html (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- United States Census Bureau. Quick Facts: Provo City, Utah. 2019. Available online: https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/provocityutah (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Pugmire, G. Provo Launches New Motorized Scooter Program. Dly. Her. 2019. Available online: https://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/central/provo/provo-launches-new-motorized-scooter-program/article_d7a19bfb-c57d-5046-93ad-5f0c8ca190b9.html (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Pugmire, G. Ready to Roll: Shareable electric scooters return to Utah County. Dly. Her. 2020. Available online: https://www.heraldextra.com/news/local/central/orem/ready-to-roll-shareable-electric-scooters-return-to-utah-county/article_1f2b5fe4-1fb6-59b6-b53a-500f188b37d3.html (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Provo City. Frequently Asked Questions Regarding Scooters. Available online: https://www.provo.org/home/showdocument?id=15920 (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. 2020. Available online: https://www.r-project.org/ (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- QSR International Pty Ltd. (2018) NVivo (Version 12). Available online: https://www.qsrinternational.com/nvivo-qualitative-data-analysis-software/home (accessed on 17 June 2020).
- Aizpuru, M.; Farley, K.X.; Rojas, J.C.; Crawford, R.S.; Moore, T.J., Jr.; Wagner, E.R. Motorized scooter injuries in the era of scooter-shares: A review of the national electronic surveillance system. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 2019, 37, 1133–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Heesch, K.C.; Sahlqvist, S.; Garrard, J. Gender differences in recreational and transport cycling: A cross-sectional mixed-methods comparison of cycling patterns, motivators, and constraints. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2012, 9, 106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
- Emond, C.R.; Tang, W.; Handy, S.L. Explaining gender difference in bicycling behavior. Transp. Res. Rec. 2009, 2125, 16–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Age (Years) | Total Frequency (%) | Male | Female |
---|---|---|---|
Under 18 | 53 (5%) | 33 (4.9%) | 19 (4.9%) |
18–24 | 601 (56.2%) | 357 (53.0%) | 242 (62.1%) |
25–34 | 212 (19.8%) | 141 (20.9%) | 71 (18.2%) |
35–44 | 114 (10.7%) | 83 (12.3%) | 29 (7.4%) |
45–54 | 62 (5.8%) | 40 (5.9%) | 22 (5.6%) |
55–64 | 24 (2.2%) | 17 (2.5%) | 7 (1.8%) |
65+ | 4 (0.04%) | 3 (0.4%) | 0 (0.0%) |
Total participants | 1070 | 674 (63.0%) | 390 (37%) |
Reason | Total Count (%) | Male | Female | College-Age | Non-College-Age |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
To have fun | 669 (42.2%) | 401 (39.1%) | 268 (48.4%) | 345 (37.6%) | 324 (49.4%) |
To save time | 512 (32.3%) | 338 (32.9%) | 174 (31.4%) | 360 (39.2%) | 147 (22.4%) |
To avoid parking hassles | 205 (12.9%) | 152 (14.8%) | 50 (9.0%) | 120 (13.1%) | 80 (12.2%) |
For environmental reasons | 86 (5.4%) | 57 (5.6%) | 26 (4.7%) | 34 (3.7%) | 48 (7.3%) |
Other | 58 (3.66%) | 44 (4.3%) | 16 (2.9%) | 24 (2.6%) | 38 (5.8%) |
To save money | 54 (3.4%) | 34 (3.3%) | 20 (3.6%) | 35 (3.8%) | 19 (2.9%) |
Total | n = 1584 | 1026 | 554 | 918 | 656 |
Destination | Total Count (%) | Male | Female | College-Age | Non-College-Age |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Rode for fun | 269 (25.3%) | 151 (22.4%) | 118 (30.3%) | 116 (19.4%) | 153 (32.9%) |
Home | 213 (20.0%) | 138 (20.5%) | 75 (19.2%) | 141 (23.5%) | 72 (15.5%) |
Dining/shopping | 182 (17.1%) | 112 (16.6%) | 70 (17.9%) | 92 (15.4%) | 90 (19.4%) |
Social gathering | 170 (16.0%) | 107 (15.9%) | 63 (16.2%) | 104 (17.4%) | 66 (14.2%) |
School | 121 (11.4%) | 89 (13.2%) | 32 (8.2%) | 102 (17.0% ) | 19 (4.1%) |
Work | 84 (7.9%) | 58 (12.9%) | 26 (6.7)% | 33 (5.5%) | 51 (11.0%) |
Public transit stop | 25 (2.3%) | 19 (2.8%) | 6 (1.5%) | 11 (1.8%) | 14 (3.0%) |
Total | n = 1064 | n = 674 | n = 390 | 599 | 465 |
Alternative Mode | Total Count (%) | Male | Female | College-Age | Non-College Age |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bicycle | 41 (4.0%) | 34 (5.2%) | 7 (1.9%) | 17 (2.8%) | 24 (5.5%) |
Not taken trip | 113 (10.9%) | 50 (7.6%) | 63 (16.7%) | 52 (8.7%) | 61 (14.1%) |
Personal vehicle | 294 (28.5%) | 196 (29.9%) | 98 (25.9%) | 149 (24.9%) | 145 (33.4%) |
Pick up/drop off | 32 (3.1%) | 22 (3.4%) | 10 (2.6%) | 11 (1.8%) | 21 (4.8%) |
Public transit | 88 (8.5%) | 59 (9.0%) | 29 (7.7%) | 61 (10.2%) | 27 (6.2%) |
Rideshare | 9 (0.9%) | 4 (0.6%) | 5 (1.3%) | 4 (0.7%) | 5 (1.2%) |
Walking | 449 (43.5%) | 284 (43.4%) | 165 (43.7%) | 302 (50.4%) | 147 (33.9%) |
Other | 7 (0.7%) | 6 (0.9%) | 1 (0.3%) | 3 (0.5%) | 4 (0.9%) |
Total | 1033 | 655 | 378 | 599 | 434 |
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Glenn, J.; Bluth, M.; Christianson, M.; Pressley, J.; Taylor, A.; Macfarlane, G.S.; Chaney, R.A. Considering the Potential Health Impacts of Electric Scooters: An Analysis of User Reported Behaviors in Provo, Utah. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176344
Glenn J, Bluth M, Christianson M, Pressley J, Taylor A, Macfarlane GS, Chaney RA. Considering the Potential Health Impacts of Electric Scooters: An Analysis of User Reported Behaviors in Provo, Utah. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(17):6344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176344
Chicago/Turabian StyleGlenn, Jeffrey, Madeline Bluth, Mannon Christianson, Jaymie Pressley, Austin Taylor, Gregory S. Macfarlane, and Robert A. Chaney. 2020. "Considering the Potential Health Impacts of Electric Scooters: An Analysis of User Reported Behaviors in Provo, Utah" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 17: 6344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17176344