Next Article in Journal
Simulation of Land Use Change and Ecosystem Service Value Dynamics under Ecological Constraints in Anhui Province, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Bone Marrow Oxidative Stress and Acquired Lineage-Specific Genotoxicity in Hematopoietic Stem/Progenitor Cells Exposed to 1,4-Benzoquinone
Previous Article in Journal
Awareness and Knowledge Regarding the Consumption of Dietary Fiber and Its Relation to Self-Reported Health Status in an Adult Arab Population: A Cross-Sectional Study
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Maternal but Not Paternal High-Fat Diet (HFD) Exposure at Conception Predisposes for ‘Diabesity’ in Offspring Generations

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(12), 4229; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124229
by Karen Schellong 1, Kerstin Melchior 1, Thomas Ziska 1, Rebecca C. Rancourt 1, Wolfgang Henrich 2 and Andreas Plagemann 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(12), 4229; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17124229
Submission received: 9 May 2020 / Revised: 9 June 2020 / Accepted: 10 June 2020 / Published: 13 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Endocrinology Meets Environmental Epigenetics)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Overall this is a valuable and well written paper. Given the scope of the target journal, I would like to see a clearer link between the maternal dietary environment and public health protection. This could be exapanded through the introduction and discussion. Currently the paper presents an narrow (single discipline) interpretation of findings. It is common for animal studies to loose sight of the broader impetus for the research. 

The results are text heavy and may benefit from the inclusion of table/s to improve readability. 

A thorough interpretation of the findings has been presented, in the context of animal studies. This is a well designed study and well written paper, however it would benefit by considering public health priorities and implications. The 'where to from here' is lacking. How can these findings be interpreted in consideration of future research and practice priorities. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

I consider the paper very clear and very interesting. The results are hard to go along (a lot of numbers in the text), but I have not an alternative. The solution is to read carefully.

I have not suggestions for changes. Congratulations.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

A well-executed animal model for diabesity. And a well-written manuscript. There are some minor colloquial phrases used in the discussion section. Otherwise, this manuscript is overall an excellent document.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop