Next Article in Journal
COVID-19 Outbreak Perception in Italian Dentists
Previous Article in Journal
Sprint Interval Running and Continuous Running Produce Training Specific Adaptations, Despite a Similar Improvement of Aerobic Endurance Capacity—A Randomized Trial of Healthy Adults
Article

Quality of Life of People with Severe Mental Health Problems: Testing an Interactive Model

1
GGZ Breburg Institute for Mental Health Care, 5000 AT Tilburg, The Netherlands
2
GGzE Institute for Mental Health Care, 5600 AX Eindhoven, The Netherlands
3
Scientific Center for Care and Wellbeing (Tranzo), Tilburg University, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(11), 3866; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113866
Received: 10 April 2020 / Revised: 25 May 2020 / Accepted: 28 May 2020 / Published: 29 May 2020
Improvement of subjective quality of life (QoL) is seen as an important treatment outcome in clinical practice. The aim of this study is to test the theoretical model of Cummins, which includes a homeostatic management system. According to this model, objective variables are almost irrelevant to general well-being, while the feeling of having an influence on one’s circumstances (perceived deficit) is related to subjective QoL. The variables of the Cummins model were operationalised based on the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile, a structured interview to assess the subjective QoL of people with severe mental health problems. The Cummins model was tested using structural equation modelling and a mediator model between Objective QoL, Subjective QoL and Perceived Deficit. Subjective QoL and General Well-Being were significantly related and having a meaningful perspective in life was related to General Well-Being. Contrary to the Cummins model, both Objective QoL and Perceived Deficit had a significant relation to Subjective QoL and Perceived Deficit was a partial mediator between Objective QoL and Subjective QoL. Cummins’ theoretical model was partially confirmed. The current study suggests that meaningful (treatment) evaluation of subjective QoL can only be performed if objective QoL, General Well-Being and subjective evaluation (Perceived Deficit and Framework) are taken into account. View Full-Text
Keywords: QoL; objective QoL; perceived deficit; people with severe mental health problems QoL; objective QoL; perceived deficit; people with severe mental health problems
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Geerts, K.; Bongers, I.; Buitenweg, D.; van Nieuwenhuizen, C. Quality of Life of People with Severe Mental Health Problems: Testing an Interactive Model. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113866

AMA Style

Geerts K, Bongers I, Buitenweg D, van Nieuwenhuizen C. Quality of Life of People with Severe Mental Health Problems: Testing an Interactive Model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(11):3866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113866

Chicago/Turabian Style

Geerts, Karen; Bongers, Ilja; Buitenweg, David; van Nieuwenhuizen, Chijs. 2020. "Quality of Life of People with Severe Mental Health Problems: Testing an Interactive Model" Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17, no. 11: 3866. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17113866

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop