Review Reports

Round  1

Reviewer 1 Report

See the attached file.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you very much. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Figure legends: The legends are missing to describe what indeed is presented. 

Author Response

Thank you. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The study is interesting and the results of the study are valid. However, it was very difficult to read because of lack of claritiy. The reader has to put too much energy into trying to understand the methodology and more. 

There are extensive errors in grammar and writing style. Numerous errors with regard to subject/verb agreement and incorrect verb tense. Also, the manuscript is ladened with incomplete sentences.

Author Response

Thank you. Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round  2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for your revisions to the paper and for adding more information about the analysis method and results. I am still not satisfied with the English, however, and at times it is still impossible to understand exactly what you have done. I saw the receipt indicating you have received editing from an English speaker but I can only conclude that this editor did a very poor job. Please submit your article to a thorough review by a qualified editor so that I can properly assess the article's quality.

Author Response

Thank you for your comments. We have asked MDPI English Editing service for this manuscript.

Reviewer 3 Report

Thank you for the revisions. 

Author Response

Thank you very much for your kind comments.

Round  3

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for the final English edit. The paper is now suitable for publication.

Author Response

Thank you very much for your kind comments.