Next Article in Journal
Potential Health Risks of Chemicals in Car Colorant Products
Previous Article in Journal
Epidemiology of Surgical Site Infections and Non-Surgical Infections in Neurosurgical Polish Patients—Substantial Changes in 2003–2017
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(6), 912; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16060912

Identification of Pathogenic Bacteria from Public Libraries via Proteomics Analysis

1
Carnegie Vanguard High School, Houston, TX 77019, USA
2
Amador Valley High School, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA
3
Verna & Marrs McLean Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
4
Advanced Technology Core, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
5
Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, McGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Received: 30 January 2019 / Revised: 25 February 2019 / Accepted: 12 March 2019 / Published: 14 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Environmental Microbiology and Urban Health)
Full-Text   |   PDF [8335 KB, uploaded 14 March 2019]   |  

Abstract

Hazardous organisms may thrive on surfaces that are often exposed to human contact, including children’s library books. In this study, swab samples were taken from 42 children’s books collected from four public libraries in Texas and California. Samples were then cultivated in brain–heart infusion (BHI) medium and then in Luria broth (LB) medium containing either ampicillin or kanamycin. All 42 samples (100%) were positive for bacterial growth in normal BHI medium. Furthermore, 35 samples (83.3%) and 20 samples (47.6%) in total were positive in LB medium containing ampicillin or kanamycin, respectively. Bacterial populations were then identified in samples using an Orbitrap Fusion™ Tribrid ™ mass spectrometer, a state-of-the-art proteomic analysis tool. Identified bacterial species grown in ampicillin included Bacillus, Acinetobacter, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Enterobacter, Klebsiella, Serratia, Streptococcus, Escherichia, Salmonella, and Enterococcus. In contrast, identified bacteria grown in kanamycin included Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, Enterococcus, and Bacillus. The presences of pathogenic bacteria species were also confirmed. The results of this study warrant follow up studies to assess the potential health risks of identified pathogens. This study demonstrates the utility of proteomics in identifying environmental pathogenic bacteria for specific public health risk evaluations. View Full-Text
Keywords: pathogenic bacteria; proteomics analysis; library books; environmental risk pathogenic bacteria; proteomics analysis; library books; environmental risk
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Jung, R.H.; Kim, M.; Bhatt, B.; Choi, J.M.; Roh, J.H. Identification of Pathogenic Bacteria from Public Libraries via Proteomics Analysis. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 912.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top