Black Women’s Confidence in the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act

Sutton, Arnethea L.; Henderson, Alesha; Hurtado-de-Mendoza, Alejandra; Tanner, Erin; Khan, Mishaal; Quillin, John; Sheppard, Vanessa B.

doi:10.3390/ijerph16245112

Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Edit a Special Issue

Article Menu

...

Open AccessArticle

Black Women’s Confidence in the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act

Arnethea L. Sutton

^1,*

Alesha Henderson

¹,

Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza

³,

¹,

⁴ and

^1,5

Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA 23298, USA

Department of Oncology, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20007, USA

Greater Washington Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Genetics, Rockville, MD 47872, USA

⁴

Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University School of Medicine, Richmond, VA 23298, USA

⁵

Office of Health Equity and Disparities Research, VCU Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA 23298, USA

Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(24), 5112; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245112

Received: 22 October 2019 / Revised: 6 December 2019 / Accepted: 12 December 2019 / Published: 14 December 2019

(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genomic Applications to Promote Public Health in the Context of Health Disparities)

View Full-Text Download PDF

Browse Figure

Citation Export

Abstract

Black women at-risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) continue to underutilize genetic counseling and testing (GCT). One reason for this disparity is a fear of discrimination from insurance companies if identified as high-risk. The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (GINA) was enacted to protect against this type of discrimination; however, Black women’s levels of confidence in this law are unknown. In this descriptive study, we sought to (1) assess Black women’s confidence in the GINA law and (2) identify multilevel factors related to their confidence in GINA. Ninety-four Black women at-risk of HBOC completed surveys that assessed intrapersonal, interpersonal, and structural factors. Multiple regression analysis determined factors associated with confidence in GINA. Most women were ≤50 years of age (66.0%) and about half never had a cancer diagnosis (51.1%). Confidence in GINA was moderate (mean = 10.67; standard deviation = 2.54; range = 5–15). Women who valued GCT reported more confidence in GINA (β = 0.345; CI 0.017 to 0.673; p = 0.040). Lack of confidence in GINA may serve as a barrier to seeking GCT. Efforts to increase the perceived value of GCT among Black women could be benefited by increasing awareness of national efforts towards privacy protections of genetic information. View Full-Text

Keywords: genetic counseling and testing; Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act; hereditary breast and ovarian cancer; black women

▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sutton, A.L.; Henderson, A.; Hurtado-de-Mendoza, A.; Tanner, E.; Khan, M.; Quillin, J.; Sheppard, V.B. Black Women’s Confidence in the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 5112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245112

AMA Style

Sutton AL, Henderson A, Hurtado-de-Mendoza A, Tanner E, Khan M, Quillin J, Sheppard VB. Black Women’s Confidence in the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(24):5112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245112

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sutton, Arnethea L., Alesha Henderson, Alejandra Hurtado-de-Mendoza, Erin Tanner, Mishaal Khan, John Quillin, and Vanessa B. Sheppard. 2019. "Black Women’s Confidence in the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 24: 5112. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16245112

Find Other Styles

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Abstract views Pdf views Html views

Article Menu

Black Women’s Confidence in the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act

Abstract

Share and Cite

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Further Information

Guidelines

MDPI Initiatives

Follow MDPI