Urinary and Faecal Incontinence: Point Prevalence and Predictors in a University Hospital
AbstractIncontinence is common and associated with adverse outcomes. There are insufficient point prevalence data for incontinence in hospitals. We evaluated the prevalence of urinary (UI) and faecal incontinence (FI) and their predictors among inpatients in an acute university hospital on a single day. Continence status was recorded using the modified Barthel Index (BI). Baseline characteristics, Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) and ward type were recorded. In all, 435 patients were assessed, median age 72 ± 23 years and 53% were male. The median CFS score was 5 ± 3. The point prevalence of UI was 26% versus 11% for FI. While UI and FI increased with age, to 35.2% and 21.1% respectively for those ≥85, age was not an independent predictor. Incontinence also increased with frailty; CFS scores were independently associated with both UI (p = 0.006) and FI (p = 0.03), though baseline continence status was the strongest predictor. Patients on orthopaedic wards had the highest prevalence of incontinence. Continence assessments were available for only 11 (2%) patients. UI and FI are common conditions affecting inpatients; point prevalence increases with age and frailty status. Despite this, few patients receive comprehensive continence assessments. More awareness of its high prevalence is required to ensure incontinence is adequately managed in hospitals. View Full-Text
Share & Cite This Article
Condon, M.; Mannion, E.; Molloy, D.W.; O’Caoimh, R. Urinary and Faecal Incontinence: Point Prevalence and Predictors in a University Hospital. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 194.
Condon M, Mannion E, Molloy DW, O’Caoimh R. Urinary and Faecal Incontinence: Point Prevalence and Predictors in a University Hospital. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(2):194.Chicago/Turabian Style
Condon, Marie; Mannion, Edel; Molloy, D. W.; O’Caoimh, Rónán. 2019. "Urinary and Faecal Incontinence: Point Prevalence and Predictors in a University Hospital." Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16, no. 2: 194.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.