Next Article in Journal
Correlates of Children’s Independent Mobility in Canada: A Multi-Site Study
Previous Article in Journal
Smart Approaches to Food Waste Final Disposal
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Distribution and Potential Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in Water, Sediments, and Aquatic Macrophytes: A Case Study of the Junction of Four Rivers in Linyi City, China

1
College of Life Sciences, Linyi University, Linyi 276000, China
2
College of Life Sciences, Zaozhuang University, Zaozhuang 277160, China
3
College of Biological Chemical Science and Engineering, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Xiuling Li and Henglun Shen contributed equally to this paper.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(16), 2861; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162861
Submission received: 9 July 2019 / Revised: 5 August 2019 / Accepted: 7 August 2019 / Published: 10 August 2019

Abstract

:
The Yi River, the second longest river in Shandong Province, China, flows through Linyi City and is fed by three tributary rivers, Beng River, Liuqing River, and Su River in the northeastern part of the city. In this study, we determined the concentrations of five heavy metals (Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, and Pb) in water, sediment, and aquatic macrophyte samples collected from the junction of the four rivers and evaluated the potential ecological risk of heavy metal pollution. Most of the heavy metals in water were in low concentrations with the water quality index (WQI) below 1, suggesting low metal pollution. The sediments showed low heavy metal concentrations, suggesting a low ecological risk based on the potential ecological risk index (RI) and the geo-accumulation index (Igeo). The aquatic plant species Potamogeton crispus accumulated considerable amounts of heavy metals, which were closely related to the metal concentrations of the sediment. The plant species Salvinia natans also showed an excellent metal accumulation capability. Based on our results, the junction of the four rivers is only slightly polluted in terms of heavy metals, and the plant species P. crispus is a suitable bioindicator for sediment heavy metal pollution.

1. Introduction

Rivers, especially those flowing through urban areas, play a key role in preserving freshwater, adjusting the local climate, and improving the environmental conditions [1]. However, with accelerated population growth, urbanization, and industrialization, heavy metal pollution of rivers has become a serious issue. In 2007, approximately 90% of the urban rivers in China were polluted, with 900 tons of heavy metals being transported into freshwater bodies [2]. Anthropogenic activities, such as fertilization, inadequate industrial effluent disposal, oil spillage, domestic sewerage disposal, and mineral mining, as well as rain water and atmospheric deposition, are particularly responsible for the increasing accumulation of heavy metals in water, sediments, and macrophytes, significantly contributing to the pollution of aquatic ecosystems [3,4]. The pollution of water bodies with heavy metals seriously threatens aquatic biodiversity because of the toxicity, persistence, bioaccumulation, and non-degradability of heavy metals, and contaminated drinking water represents a severe health hazard in humans [5].
Aquatic macrophytes can accumulate and concentrate large amounts of various substances and can act as bio-filters by accumulating heavy metals from the surrounding environment, making them excellent indicators of heavy metal contamination in aquatic ecosystems [6,7]. Peng et al. found that the aquatic plants Potamogeton pectinatus had high accumulation capacity for cadmium (Cd), lead (Pb), copper (Cu), zinc (Zn), and manganese (Mn) with 596, 318, 62.4, 6590, and 16,000 mg/kg (DW), respectively [8]. Salvinia minima was shown to accumulate metals within tissues when cultivated in higher concentrations of selected heavy metals, with maximum removal rates of 0.0045, 0.0595, 0.1423, and 0.4046 mg/m2·day for Cd, nickel (Ni), Pb, and Zn, respectively [9]. The analysis of water, sediment, and macrophyte samples can be performed to assess the overall heavy metal pollution and the impact of heavy metals on aquatic ecosystems. As carriers of contaminants, sediments are generally recognized as a primary sink for heavy metals in aquatic environments; more than 85% of heavy metals eventually deposit on surface sediments [10].
The investigation of heavy metal concentrations and distribution is useful to determine the pollution level in aquatic environments and to provide basic information for the assessment of environmental health risks [11]. The most commonly cited assessment indices in environmental studies include the water quality index (WQI), the potential ecological risk index (RI), the index of geo-accumulation (Igeo), and the bioconcentration factor (BCF), which are widely used to evaluate heavy metal pollution in water, sediments, and macrophytes. To more deeply understand the issue of heavy metal pollution of water bodies, the integrated application of multi-assessment methods to evaluate the ecological risk is important [12,13,14].
The Yi River (34°23′–36°20′ N, 117°25′–118°42′ E) originates from the southern foothills of the Mountain Lu in Yiyuan County, Shandong Province, and flows into the Yellow Sea from Jiangsu Province; it has a total length of 574 km and a basin area of 17,325 km2 in Shandong Province. As an important tributary of the Huai River, the Yi River is the second longest river in Shandong Province and the largest river in the Yimeng mountainous area. Three tributary rivers including the Beng River, the Liuqing River, and the Su River, feed into the Yi River in the northeastern part of the Linyi City, forming a junction. A rubber dam, the Xiaobudong Rubber Dam with a length of 1135 m, was built 4.5 km downstream of the junction for water storage in 1997, forming the Yimeng Lake with a water surface of 10 km2. The Yi River and the tributaries play important roles in flood control, irrigation, and maintenance of the ecosystems. With the growth of the population and the rapid development of the industry and agriculture, the water area in the junction of the four rivers was contaminated with heavy metals. However, the pollution levels of the water, the sediment, and aquatic organisms are still unknown, and respective studies are scarce. In recent years, river management has ever been strengthened by the local government. Most chemical, electroplating, and manufacturing factories were shut down or moved out of the river basin, but their contribution to heavy metal pollution in the past still lasted. The effluent of sewage treatment plants near the upper stream, non-point source pollution, surface runoff, and automobile exhaust are all potential sources of heavy metals in the water and sediments of the rivers nowadays.
In this context, we collected water and sediment samples as well as samples from two widely distributed aquatic plants, Potamogeton crispus Linn. and Salvinia natans L., from the junction of the four rivers in Linyi City, with the objectives to (1) investigate the contamination levels, distribution patterns, and the potential ecological risks of heavy metals in water and sediments, and (2) evaluate the effects of the inflow of the tributaries on the heavy metal level of the main stream, and (3) assess the bioaccumulation of heavy metals in aquatic macrophytes and its correlation with sediments or water.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Sampling Sites and Methods

Water samples were collected from 12 different areas (three sites at a distance of 50 m for each area) along the junction of Beng River, Liuqing River, Su River, and Yi River in April and September 2017 (Figure 1). The two sampling times were selected because April and September are the ends of the dry season and flood season of the Yi River, respectively. All samples were obtained at a depth of 0.5 m below the water surface, using clean polyethylene bottles (washed with hydrochloric acid and rinsed with distilled water); at each site, three water samples were collected. The samples were filtered through 0.45-μm Millipore filters and acidified with guaranteed grade nitric acid. Areas 1 and 2 represent the Beng River, areas 3 and 4 represent the Liuqing River, areas 5, 6, 7, and 8 represent the upstream of the Yi River (U), areas 9 and 10 represent the Su River, and areas 11 and 12 represent the downstream of the Yi River (D). Yi River (U) and Yi River (D) were selected as reference sites to evaluate the influence of other three rivers on the heavy metal level of the main stream.
The sediment samples were collected along four sections (Figure 1) in April 2017. Each section included three sampling sites, and three replicate samples collected at each site. In each sampling site, approximately the top 10-cm layer of the sediment was sampled using a sediment sampler (PBS-411, Wuhan, China). All samples were sealed in clean polyethylene bags, placed in a cooled box, transported to the laboratory, and air-dried. The samples were decomposed with a microwave (MWD-630, METASH, Shanghai, China) for metal determination. The sampling sites were located using a global positioning system (GPS), and the coordinates of the sites used for water and sediment sampling are provided in Tables S1 and S2, respectively.
Samples of the aquatic plant species P. crispus were collected from eight areas (areas 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, and 12) in April 2017. In the same areas, samples of the plant species S. natans were collected in September 2017. For each sampling site of specific area, plants with approximately 500 g fresh weight from at least three different strains were collected. All plants were rinsed with distilled water immediately after collection. In addition, sediment samples were also collected from the same eight sites containing P. crispus.

2.2. Sample Analysis

Five commonly measured heavy metals (Chromium (Cr), Ni, Cu, Zn, and Pb) were detected in all water and sediment samples. The sediment samples were digested with HF-HClO4, and the concentrations of the heavy metals were determined by inductively coupled mass spectrometry (ICP-MS, iCAP Q, Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA). The recovery percentage of the external standard ranged between 80 and 120% for all elements. The limits of detection were as follows: 0.02 μg/L for Cr, 0.03 μg/L for Ni, 0.01 μg/L for Cu, 0.02 μg/L for Zn, and 0.01 μg/L for Pb. Reference materials of heavy metals in simulated water standard solution (Cr: GBW(E)080403; Ni: GBW(E)080405; Cu: GBW(E)080396; Zn: GBW(E)080400; Pb: GBW(E)080399) were used to ensure data validity and the accuracy and precision of the analysis methods.
Plant tissue digestion was carried out using a method described in [15]. Briefly, the plants were oven-dried at 80 °C for 24 h to constant weight and then microwave-digested in two steps. The first step occurred in 10 mL of 16 mM HNO3 at 70 °C for 5 min, followed by 130 °C for another 5 min and by 150 °C for 4 min. The second step consisted of the addition of 1 mL of H2O2 at 85 °C for 5 min, followed by 130 °C for 4 min. After cooling, the samples were diluted with 1% (v/v) HNO3 to a final volume of 50 mL. Subsequently, the samples were filtered through 0.45-μm cellulose nitrate ultrafiltration membrane filters (Whatman, Maidstone, UK) and acidified with HNO3 to a pH of approximately 2.0, followed by heavy metal detection via ICP-MS.

2.3. Water Quality Index and Potential Ecological Risk Index of Sediments

The WQI represents the total quality of the water with respect to heavy metals [16]:
WQI = 1 n i = 1 n C D i C R i
where CD is the measured concentration of the sample and CR is the reference value according to Class I of the environmental quality standard for surface water in China (Cr, Cu, and Pb ≤ 0.01 mg/L; Zn ≤ 0.05 mg/L; Ni is not included but the level ≤0.01 mg/L was selected as a criterion). The classes of WQI are uncontaminated, low, medium, and high for WQI values ≤ 1, 1 < WQI ≤ 2, 2 < WQI ≤ 3, and >3, respectively.
The geo-accumulation index (Igeo) has originally been used to assess the heavy metal pollution of sediments [17] and is defined as follows:
I g e o = log 2 C j k B j ,
where Cj is the measured concentration of the sample, Bj is the reference value, and k is the geo-accumulation constant (1.5) [18]; Bj is identical with CR.
The Igeo value of each heavy metal is classified into seven grades, ranging from uncontaminated to extremely contaminated (Table 1).
To further evaluate the degree of heavy metal contamination in sediments, the potential ecological risk index (RI), which was proposed by Hakanson [19], was developed based on the sedimentary theory. It can be used for the assessment of sediments and soil in large regional areas [20] and is calculated as follows:
RI = i = 1 n T r i × C j i C R i ,
where Tr is the toxic-response factor and CR is the average background content of heavy metals for soil in Shandong Province, adopted for the present study [21].
Here, Tr accounts for the toxic requirement, and the sensitivity requirement is described as Cr (25) > Ni (10) > Cu = Pb (5) > Zn (1) after series statistic and standardization considering the pollution characteristics of four rivers in Linyi City [22,23].
The following terminology may be used to describe the risk factor:
RI < 150, low potential ecological risk;
150 ≤ RI < 300, moderate potential ecological risk;
300 ≤ RI < 600, high potential ecological risk;
RI > 600, very high ecological risk for the substance in question.
The bioconcentration factor (BCF) for metal uptake by plants was determined as a ratio of metal contents in each plant species. Because P. crispus is a rooted submerged angiosperm and S. natans is a free-floating aquatic plant, biological concentration factors were calculated on a dry weight (mg/kg) basis in different ways [24]:
BCF = Heavy metalplant/Heavy metalsediment (for P. crispus)
BCF = Heavy metalplant/Heavy metalwater (for S. natans)

2.4. Statistical Analysis

The results presented are the arithmetic means with their corresponding standard deviations. Differences between groups were tested for significance via ANOVA, using the software package SPSS 17.0. According to Duncan’s multiple comparison tests, p < 0.05 was considered significant. Correlation coefficients of heavy metals between the plants and sediments (or water) were analyzed using the software package Excel.

3. Results

3.1. Distribution of Heavy Metals in Water and Sediment

As shown in Table 2, the concentrations of three metals (Cu, Zn, and Pb) in April met the standard of Class I (≤10 μg/L) for surface water in China, while the Cr level reached Class IV (10–50 μg/L); Ni is not included in the environmental quality standard for surface water in China. The mean metal concentration in the water samples decreased in the following order: Cr > Ni > Cu > Zn > Pb. Significant variations in the concentrations of metals were found among sites. The concentrations of Cr in the Beng River, the Su River, and the Yi River (D) were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than in the other two areas, while the Ni concentration was highest in the Liuqing River (p < 0.05). However, overall, no clear trend could be observed for the five areas.
Heavy metal concentrations, especially Cr, Ni, and Pb, were significantly lower (p < 0.05) in September than in April 2017 (Table 2). All the four heavy metals (Cr, Cu, Zn, and Pb) were in the range of Class I standard for surface water in China.
Table 3 shows the spatial distribution of the five heavy metals in the sediments of the four sections. The concentrations of all five heavy metals in the sediments were lower than the average background levels of heavy metals for the A horizon soil layer in Shandong Province, China. The Yi River (U) (section II) exhibited relatively low heavy metal levels, especially for Ni, Cu, and Pb. No significant differences were observed among the sediments from the sections I, III, and IV, which represented the Beng River, the junction of the four rivers, and the Yi River (D), respectively, except for significantly high concentrations of Cu and Pb in the sediment of the Yi River (D). The texture properties of the sediments are listed in Table 4. The results showed that the largest proportion (>80%) was sand in the samples from the four sections.

3.2. Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in the Junction of the Four Rivers

3.2.1. Water Quality Index

The WQI serves as an index to determine the pollution levels of water bodies. Figure 2 shows the calculated WQI values in terms of heavy metals. In April, the values were significantly higher (three to four times) than in September. However, although the highest WQI values in April were found for the Su River (1.02) and for the Yi River (1.01), the pollution level was relatively low and followed the order Su River > Yi River (D) > Beng River > Liuqing River > Yi River (U). In September, the WQI levels were far below 1 for all areas, indicating negligible heavy metal pollution.

3.2.2. Potential Ecological Risk Index (RI) and Geo-Accumulation Index (Igeo)

The values of the Igeo and the RI are summarized in Table 5; Igeo was used to evaluate the pollution level in terms of single metals. Based on our results, the river sediments were largely uncontaminated (Class 0) as the Igeo values of the metals were all below zero. The RI values were below 150, ranging from 12.21 to 16.84, which suggest a low ecological risk. In terms of the RI values, the four sections can be ranked in the following order: III > IV > II > I.

3.3. Heavy Metal Levels in Aquatic Macrophytes

Samples of the aquatic macrophyte P. crispus, which was only found in eight study sites, were collected to determine the concentrations of heavy metals. No distinct pattern was found (Table 6); however, the heavy metal concentrations in site 8, which were close to the junction of the four rivers, were significantly higher than those in the other sites (p < 0.05), except for Pb. Samples of P. crispus collected from site 1 of the Beng River accumulated large amounts of Ni and Pb. In contrast, for sites 2, 7, and 11, which were in the Beng River, the Yi River (U), and the Yi River (D), respectively, rather low heavy metal concentrations were detected. The heavy metal levels in the plant samples from site 12, in the Yi River (D), were moderate compared to those of the other sites.
Table 6 also shows the heavy metal concentrations of S. natans. The concentrations of Cr in site 1, Ni and Pb in site 11, and Zn in site 2 were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those in the other sites (26.88 mg/kg Cr, 5.86 mg/kg Ni, 6.57 mg/kg Pb, 46.45 mg/kg Zn). No significant differences (p < 0.05) in the concentrations of Cu were found among all sites.

3.4. Bioconcentration of Heavy Metals by Aquatic Plants

The BCF of heavy metals in P. crispus, which was calculated based on the metal levels in the plants and sediment, is presented in Table S3. Overall, the BCF values of heavy metals in P. crispus did not vary considerably among the eight sites in the Beng River, Yi River (U), and Yi River (D). The values of BCF of all five metals in the plants from sites 2, 7, and 11 were lower than those from plants of the other five sites. Compared to the other heavy metals, the plants showed a relatively poor bioconcentration capacity for Pb. For S. natans, the bioaccumulation capacity was relatively high given the low metal concentrations of the water, with the highest accumulation for Pb (190,200) at site 11 (Table S4). The BCF values followed the order Ni < Cr < Cu < Zn < Pb, with average values of 2.3, 4.3, 12.3, 29.0, and 73.2, respectively. Similar to P. crispus, BCF of heavy metals in S. natans did not show any spatial differences.
The correlation coefficients of the five heavy metals between P. crispus and the sediments of the corresponding sampling sites (Table S5) are listed in Figure 3. Five of the eight study sites showed high correlation coefficients (beyond 0.8). However, the correlation coefficients of the metals between S. natans and water of the corresponding sampling sites were below 0.6 for all sites.

4. Discussion

As a seasonal river in Northern China, the Yi River has different flow rates in different seasons. More than 80% of the annual distribution of runoff are concentrated in the flood season (June to September) [25]. The river runs through Linyi City, and three tributaries feed into in the northeastern part of the City. These two factors inevitably influence the distribution of pollutants, including heavy metals, in the junction of the four rivers. In addition, the rubber dam built downstream in 1997 has created a lake near the junction of the four rivers, which strongly influenced the distribution and deposition of the pollutants released into the upstream.
In the present study, we selected the months of April and September for sample collection, mainly because the river experienced a long-time dry season in April, which probably resulted in the concentration of pollutants, and a three-month flood season in September, with a subsequent dilution. Our results clearly show that the concentrations of the four metals (Cr, Ni, Zn, and Pb) decreased significantly (p < 0.05) in September compared to April (Table 2). Consequently, the calculated WQI values decreased from about 1 to far below 1 (Figure 2), indicating an improved water quality. During the dry season of the rivers, Cr was the main factor contributing to the low water quality and high toxicity, and therefore, the bioaccumulation in aquatic organisms deserves more attention. The element Cr may come from the chemical and electroplating factories. In addition, petroleum chemical industry, agriculture production and the agricultural sideline products can result in Cr accumulation in rivers [26]. In both months, the Cu levels did not significantly fluctuate.
The pollution of sediments with heavy metals can seriously degrade aquatic ecosystems, and their concentrations are considered as reliable indicators of ecosystem health [27]. The results of the present study show that the concentrations of Cr, Cu, Zn, and Pb in the sediments were rather low compared with several rivers in China, such as the Yangze River, the Huaihe River, the Luan River, and the Second Songhua River, with reported maximum concentrations of 205.00, 178.61, 1142.00, and 113.00 mg/kg for Cr, Cu, Zn, and Pb, respectively (Table 7). The concentrations of Cu, Zn, and Pb in the Yi River were also lower than those of Gomti River, Po River, Almendares River, and Lahn River. Compared with the guidelines established by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation [28], which proposed the lowest effect screening levels for Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, and Pb of 26, 31, 16, 120, and 16 mg/kg, respectively, the heavy metal levels in all sites of this study did not exceed the upper threshold values, except for Cu and Pb in the Yi River (D) (section IV, Table 3), which probably originated from industries, atmospheric deposition, and river borne sources [29,30]. Accordingly, the results of the potential ecological risk analysis showed that the sediments in the four sections were uncontaminated, with a low pollution risk, which was reflected by the Igeo and RI values, respectively. The ability of sediments to accumulate heavy metals is affected by the sediment composition [31,32]. The sediment samples collected in this study contained more than 80% of sand, which might explain the low metal concentrations. In addition, the Yi River is an important flood discharge river. The annual runoff in the Yi River was 1.124 billion m3 in 2017, with 60% of which concentrated in July and August [33]. The scouring function of flood may also reduce the deposition of pollutants in the sediments.
The two aquatic macrophytes studied, P. crispus and S. natans, are widely distributed depending on the season, with high growth rate in the Yi River and the Beng River. Investigations on the bioaccumulation potential of these plants may be significant for biomonitoring studies and can provide reference data for the further development of phytoremediation technologies. The two plant species take up nutrients and pollutants differently. While P. crispus is a rooted submerged angiosperm which extracts nutrients and heavy metals mostly from sediments via root hairs and from the surroundings [41], S. natans absorbs nutrients from the surface water as a free-floating aquatic plant. Therefore, the BCF values of P. crispus and S. natans were calculated in this study based on the metal concentrations in the surrounding sediment and water, respectively.
Aquatic macrophytes, including P. crispus and S. natans, are considered resistant to heavy metals and may accumulate large amounts of heavy metals in their tissues [42,43]. Therefore, these species are highly suitable for the use as bio-indicator organisms of heavy metal pollution. While P. crispus has shown potential to accumulate considerable amounts of Cu, Pb, Ni, and Zn [44], S. natans is a hyperaccumulator for Cr, Ni, Cu, and Zn, accumulating amounts of up to 0.5% of its dry weight [45]. This plant species can remove more than one metal when exposed to multi-metal solutions [46]. In the present study, both species showed an excellent ability to accumulate heavy metals (Table 6, Tables S3 and S4). Because P. crispus grew in a fixed region with its roots in the sediment and lived through a long-term dry season, it can also be used as a bio-indicator reflecting the heavy metal pollution of sediments. We found a high correlation between the heavy metal concentrations of P. crispus and the sediments of the corresponding sampling sites (Table 5). In September 2017, P. crispus could not be collected in most of the sampling sites because of increasing water levels, while S. natans could travel a long distance, especially in the flood season, and its growth period in a specific area could therefore not be determined. In addition, this plant appeared in the Yi River and the Beng River, with relatively high heavy metal levels before the flood season. Hence, the potential of S. natans as a bio-indicator is relatively low. The BCF values of heavy metals in S. natans were calculated based on the low metal concentrations of water in September (compared with April), and thus, the bioaccumulation capability of S. natans may be overrated. The factors that influence metal accumulation are plant species, environmental conditions, and the surrounding metal levels. Both environmental conditions and the metal level in water or sediments of the three areas (Beng River, Yi River (U), and Yi River (D)) did not vary greatly. This may be the main reason for no spatial differences of the BCF values. Kastratović et al. observed that BCF of Ni and Sr in Lemna minor from Lake Skadar in Montenegro had no spatial differences [47]. The two plants selectively accumulated heavy metals; while P. crispus accumulated higher levels of Cr, Ni, Cu, and Zn, S. natans showed a high accumulation efficiency for Pb and Zn. Although aquatic plants show high accumulation capacity for specific heavy metals, the metals would release from the plant tissues when the plants die at the end of the growing season, and then return into the water body or sediment. This process should be paid enough attention in phytoremediation using aquatic plants.

5. Conclusions

The concentrations of the heavy metals Cu, Zn, and Pb in water samples were below the first-grade levels outlined in the China Environmental Quality Standards for Surface Water, suggesting a low pollution. The sediment in the junction of the rivers was uncontaminated (Class 0) on the basis of Igeo and RI values. Spatial distribution showed that heavy metal concentration of water and sediment in different areas remained almost constant, except for the relatively low level in the Yi River (U), strongly suggesting that the inflow of the tributaries increased the risk of heavy metal concentration. The aquatic plant species P. crispus accumulated considerable amounts of heavy metals, and there was a correlation between plant and sediment metal concentrations. This indicates that P. crispus is a suitable bio-indicator for heavy metal contamination of sediments. Our work offers information for the Yi River basin management as well as for phytoremediation using aquatic plants.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/16/16/2861/s1, Table S1: Longitude and latitude of the water sampling sites; Table S2: Longitude and latitude of the sediment sampling sites; Table S3: Bioconcentration factors of Potamogeton crispus in April, 2017; Table S4: Bioconcentration factors (×103) of Salvinia natans in September, 2017; Table S5: Heavy metal levels in sediment of eight sites in April, 2017 (mg/kg).

Author Contributions

Investigation, X.L.; writing—original draft preparation, H.S.; methodology, Y.Z. and C.S.; validation, W.C.; project administration, C.H.

Funding

This research was funded by the Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation (LY19C030003), Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation (ZR2016CL05, ZR201702160323), and Hubei Provincial Key Laboratory of Basin Water Resources and Ecological Environment Sciences (CKWV2018492/KY).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

References

  1. Forghani, G.; Moore, F.; Lee, S.; Qishlaqi, A. Geochemistry and Speciation of Metals in Sediments of the Maharlu Saline Lake, Shiraz, Sw Iran. Environ. Earth Sci. 2009, 59, 173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Ministry of Environmental Protection of the Peoples’ Republic of China. 2013 Report on the State of the Environment in China; Ministry of Environmental Protection of the Peoples’ Republic of China: Beijing, China, 2013.
  3. Zhao, X.; Gao, B.; Xu, D.; Gao, L.; Yin, S. Heavy Metal Pollution in Sediments of the Largest Reservoir (Three Gorges Reservoir) in China: A Review. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 20844–20858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Dai, L.; Wang, L.; Li, L.; Liang, T.; Zhang, Y.; Ma, C.; Xing, B. Multivariate Geostatistical Analysis and Source Identification of Heavy Metals in the Sediment of Poyang Lake in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 621, 1433–1444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Yang, Y.; Jin, Q.; Fang, J.; Liu, F.; Li, A.; Tandon, P.; Shan, A. Spatial Distribution, Ecological Risk Assessment, and Potential Sources of Heavy Metal (Loid) S in Surface Sediments from the Huai River within the Bengbu Section, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 11360–11370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Harguinteguy, C.A.; Cofré, M.N.; Fernández-Cirelli, A.; Pignata, M.L. The Macrophytes Potamogeton Pusillus L. and Myriophyllum Aquaticum (Vell.) Verdc. As Potential Bioindicators of a River Contaminated by Heavy Metals. Microchem. J. 2016, 124, 228–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rezania, S.; Taib, S.M.; Din, M.F.M.; Dahalan, F.A.; Kamyab, H. Comprehensive Review on Phytotechnology: Heavy Metals Removal by Diverse Aquatic Plants Species from Wastewater. J. Hazard. Mater. 2016, 318, 587–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peng, K.; Luo, C.; Lou, L.; Li, X.; Shen, Z. Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals by the Aquatic Plants Potamogeton Pectinatus L. and Potamogeton Malaianus Miq. and Their Potential Use for Contamination Indicators and in Wastewater Treatment. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 392, 22–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Iha, D.S.; Bianchini, I., Jr. Phytoremediation of Cd, Ni, Pb and Zn by Salvinia minima. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2015, 17, 929–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhang, H.; Jiang, Y.; Ding, M.; Xie, Z. Level, Source Identification, and Risk Analysis of Heavy Metal in Surface Sediments from River-Lake Ecosystems in the Poyang Lake, China. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017, 24, 21902–21916. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Demırezen, D.; Aksoy, A. Accumulation of Heavy Metals in Typha angustifolia (L.) and Potamogeton pectinatus (L.) Living in Sultan Marsh (Kayseri, Turkey). Chemosphere 2004, 56, 685–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Sekabira, K.; Origa, H.O.; Basamba, T.A.; Mutumba, G.; Kakudidi, E. Assessment of Heavy Metal Pollution in the Urban Stream Sediments and Its Tributaries. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2010, 7, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hou, D.; He, J.; Lü, C.; Ren, L.; Fan, Q.; Wang, J.; Xie, Z. Distribution Characteristics and Potential Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals (Cu, Pb, Zn, Cd) in Water and Sediments from Lake Dalinouer, China. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2013, 93, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wu, B.; Zhao, D.Y.; Jia, H.Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, X.X.; Cheng, S.P. Preliminary Risk Assessment of Trace Metal Pollution in Surface Water from Yangtze River in Nanjing Section, China. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2009, 82, 405–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Balen, B.; Tkalec, M.; Šikić, S.; Tolić, S.; Cvjetko, P.; Pavlica, M.; Vidaković-Cifrek, Z. Biochemical Responses of Lemna Minor Experimentally Exposed to Cadmium and Zinc. Ecotoxicology 2011, 20, 815–826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Sin, S.N.; Chua, H.; Lo, W.; Ng, L.M. Assessment of Heavy Metal Cations in Sediments of Shing Mun River, Hong Kong. Environ. Int. 2001, 26, 297–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Muller, G. Index of Geoaccumulation in Sediments of the Rhine River. Geojournal 1969, 2, 108–118. [Google Scholar]
  18. Barbieri, M.; Nigro, A.; Sappa, G. Soil Contamination Evaluation by Enrichment Factor (Ef) and Geoaccumulation Index (Igeo). Senses Sci. 2015, 2, 94–97. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hakanson, L. An Ecological Risk Index for Aquatic Pollution Control. A Sedimentological Approach. Water Res. 1980, 14, 975–1001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, P.; Qin, C.; Hong, X.; Kang, G.; Qin, M.; Yang, D.; Pang, B.; Li, Y.; He, J.; Dick, R.P. Risk Assessment and Source Analysis of Soil Heavy Metal Pollution from Lower Reaches of Yellow River Irrigation in China. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 633, 1136–1147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. China National Environmental Protection Agency of Background Values of Chinese Soil Elements; China Environmental Science Press: Beijing, China, 1990.
  22. Chen, K.; Zhou, Y.-H.; Zhang, H.-J. Pollution Evaluation of Heavy Metal Element of Water and Surface Sediment in the Dongchang Lake. Period. Ocean Univ. China 2012, 42, 97–105. [Google Scholar]
  23. Yi, Y.; Yang, Z.; Zhang, S. Ecological Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediment and Human Health Risk Assessment of Heavy Metals in Fishes in the Middle and Lower Reaches of the Yangtze River Basin. Environ. Pollut. 2011, 159, 2575–2585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Nguyen, H.L.; Leermakers, M.; Elskens, M.; De Ridder, F.; Doan, T.H.; Baeyens, W. Correlations, Partitioning and Bioaccumulation of Heavy Metals between Different Compartments of Lake Balaton. Sci. Total Environ. 2005, 341, 211–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lu, J.; Lu, B.; Zhang, J.; Wang, M.; Zhu, C.; Liu, H. Study on Ecological Flow and Ecological Water Demand of Yishuhe River Basin. Water Resour. Power 2015, 33, 26–30. [Google Scholar]
  26. Abuduwaili, J.; Zhang, Z.Y.; Jiang, F.Q. Assessment of the Distribution, Sources and Potential Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in the Dry Surface Sediment of Aibi Lake in Northwest China. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0120001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Singh, K.P.; Mohan, D.; Singh, V.K.; Malik, A. Studies on Distribution and Fractionation of Heavy Metals in Gomti River Sediments—A Tributary of the Ganges, India. J. Hydrol. 2005, 312, 14–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Conservation NewYork State Department of Environmental. Technical Guidance for Screening Contaminated Sediments; Wildlife and Marine Department of Fish and Albany Resources, Ed.; Conservation NewYork State Department of Environmental: Albany, NY, USA, 1999.
  29. Förstner, U. Assessment of metal pollution in river waters and estuaries. In Applied Environmental Geochemistry; Thornton, I., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1983; pp. 395–423. [Google Scholar]
  30. Li, X.; Wai, O.W.H.; Li, Y.S.; Coles, B.J.; Ramsey, M.H.; Thornton, I. Heavy Metal Distribution in Sediment Profiles of the Pearl River Estuary, South China. Appl. Geochem. 2000, 15, 567–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Förstner, U.; Wittmann, G.T.W. Metal Pollution in the Aquatic Environment; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  32. Jain, C.K.; Sharma, M.K. Distribution of Trace Metals in the Hindon River System, India. J. Hydrol. 2001, 253, 81–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. China River Sediment Bulletin 2017. Available online: http://www.mwr.gov.cn/sj/tjgb/zghlnsgb/201809/t20180928_1048835.html (accessed on 3 August 2019).
  34. Yang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Shen, Z.; Niu, J.; Tang, Z. Distribution and Speciation of Heavy Metals in Sediments from the Mainstream, Tributaries, and Lakes of the Yangtze River Catchment of Wuhan, China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 166, 1186–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zhang, H.; Shan, B. Historical Records of Heavy Metal Accumulation in Sediments and the Relationship with Agricultural Intensification in the Yangtze–Huaihe Region, China. Sci. Total Environ. 2008, 399, 113–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Liu, J.; Li, Y.; Zhang, B.; Cao, J.; Cao, Z.; Domagalski, J. Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in Sediments of the Luan River Source Water. Ecotoxicology 2009, 18, 748–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lin, C.; He, M.; Zhou, Y.; Guo, W.; Yang, Z. Distribution and Contamination Assessment of Heavy Metals in Sediment of the Second Songhua River, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 137, 329–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Farkas, A.; Erratico, C.; Vigano, L. Assessment of the Environmental Significance of Heavy Metal Pollution in Surficial Sediments of the River Po. Chemosphere 2007, 68, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Olivares-Rieumont, S.; De la Rosa, D.; Lima, L.; Graham, D.W.; Katia, D.; Borroto, J.; Martínez, F.; Sánchez, J. Assessment of Heavy Metal Levels in Almendares River Sediments—Havana City, Cuba. Water Res. 2005, 39, 3945–3953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Martin, C.W. Heavy Metal Storage in near Channel Sediments of the Lahn River, Germany. Geomorphology 2004, 61, 275–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Guilizzoni, P. The Role of Heavy Metals and Toxic Amterials in the Physiological Ecology of Submersed Macrophytes. Aquat. Bot. 1991, 41, 87–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mishra, V.K.; Upadhyay, A.R.; Pandey, S.K.; Tripathi, B.D. Concentrations of Heavy Metals and Aquatic Macrophytes of Govind Ballabh Pant Sagar an Anthropogenic Lake Affected by Coal Mining Effluent. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2008, 141, 49–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Kovacs, M.; Nyary, I.; Toth, L. The Microelement Content of Some Submerged and Floating Aquatic Plants. Acta Bot. Hung. 1984, 30, 173–185. [Google Scholar]
  44. Ali, M.B.; Tripathi, R.D.; Rai, U.N.; Pal, A.; Singh, S.P. Physico-Chemical Characteristics and Pollution Level of Lake Nainital (up, India): Role of Macrophytes and Phytoplankton in Biomonitoring and Phytoremediation of Toxic Metal Ions. Chemosphere 1999, 39, 2171–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Dhir, B.; Srivastava, S. Heavy Metal Removal from a Multi-Metal Solution and Wastewater by Salvinia Natans. Ecol. Eng. 2011, 37, 893–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dhir, B.; Sharmila, P.; Saradhi, P.P.; Nasim, S.A. Physiological and Antioxidant Responses of Salvinia Natans Exposed to Chromium-Rich Wastewater. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2009, 72, 1790–1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Kastratović, V.; Jaćimović, Z.; Đurović, D.; Bigović, M.; Krivokapić, S. Lemna Minor L.: As Bioindicator of Heavy Metal Pollution in Skadar Lake: Montenegro. Kragujev. J. Sci. 2015, 37, 123–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Location of sampling sites in the junction of rivers in Linyi City, China. Number (1) to (12) represent sampling sites of water and aquatic plants. Number I to IV represent sampling sites of the sediments.
Figure 1. Location of sampling sites in the junction of rivers in Linyi City, China. Number (1) to (12) represent sampling sites of water and aquatic plants. Number I to IV represent sampling sites of the sediments.
Ijerph 16 02861 g001
Figure 2. Water quality index (WQI) of heavy metals in the water samples in April and September, 2017.
Figure 2. Water quality index (WQI) of heavy metals in the water samples in April and September, 2017.
Ijerph 16 02861 g002
Figure 3. Correlation coefficients of heavy metals between the plants and water (or sediments).
Figure 3. Correlation coefficients of heavy metals between the plants and water (or sediments).
Ijerph 16 02861 g003
Table 1. Classification of heavy metal pollution in sediment based on Igeo value.
Table 1. Classification of heavy metal pollution in sediment based on Igeo value.
Risk LevelRange of IgeoPollution Degree
0Igeo ≤ 0uncontaminated
10 < Igeo ≤ 1uncontaminated to moderately contaminated
21 < Igeo ≤ 2moderately contaminated
32 < Igeo ≤ 3moderately to heavily contaminated
43 < Igeo ≤ 4heavily contaminated
54 < Igeo ≤ 5heavily to extremely contaminated
65 < Igeo ≤ 10extremely contaminated
Table 2. Heavy metal levels of the water samples in April and September, 2017. (μg/L).
Table 2. Heavy metal levels of the water samples in April and September, 2017. (μg/L).
RiverMonthCrNiCuZnPb
Yi River (U)April28.29 ± 2.70 b3.99 ± 1.07 b2.18 ± 0.68 b0.76 ± 0.44 c0.71 ± 0.20 b
September5.05 ± 0.55 b,*1.32 ± 0.23 b,*1.18 ± 0.34 b1.24 ± 0.37 b,c0.10 ± 0.04 a,b,*
Beng RiverApril39.57 ± 7.05 a5.55 ± 3.29 b1.72 ± 0.55 b1.24 ± 0.70 b,c0.77 ± 0.27 a
September5.87 ± 0.41 a,*1.32 ± 0.29 b,*1.17 ± 0.20 b1.39 ± 0.12 a,b0.05 ± 0.01 c,*
Liuqing RiverApril25.84 ± 3.99 b14.65 ± 2.74 a3.40 ± 1.19 a1.69 ± 1.32 a,b0.70 ± 0.11 b
September4.99 ± 1.36 b,*2.57 ± 1.68 a,*1.92 ± 1.15 a1.62 ± 0.35 a0.14 ± 0.08 a,*
Su RiverApril42.88 ± 10.40 a4.31 ± 2.21 b2.48 ± 1.28 a,b2.34 ± 0.50 a1.02 ± 0.33 a
September6.07 ± 0.23 a,*1.36 ± 0.43 b,*1.04 ± 0.36 b1.47 ± 0.17 a,b,*0.06 ± 0.01 bc,*
Yi River (D)April41.25 ± 8.18 a6.15 ± 2.45 b2.09 ± 0.45 b0.82 ± 0.25 c1.05 ± 0.20 a
September6.06 ± 0.33 a,*1.64 ± 0.14 b,*0.91 ± 0.10 b,*1.05 ± 0.21 c0.04 ± 0.01 c,*
Values represent mean and standard deviation. In each column, different superscript letters indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) between sampling sites for the same heavy metal and same sampling time; “*” means significant difference (p < 0.05) between different months for the same metal and sampling site.
Table 3. Heavy metal levels of sediment from four sections and the average metal levels in the A horizon soil layer in Shandong Province, China. (mg/kg).
Table 3. Heavy metal levels of sediment from four sections and the average metal levels in the A horizon soil layer in Shandong Province, China. (mg/kg).
SectionCrNiCuZnPb
I15.79 ± 1.41 a12.08 ± 1.97 a13.43 ± 3.81 a,b24.27 ± 1.59 a9.92 ± 1.76 b
II12.51 ± 3.00 a7.60 ± 0.83 b8.72 ± 0.63 b19.79 ± 6.47 a8.65 ± 2.41 b
III14.10 ± 1.38 a13.75 ± 1.61 a10.06 ± 3.32 b20.97 ± 2.26 a8.50 ± 0.83 b
IV14.08 ± 2.37 a6.53 ± 0.95 b16.77 ± 1.07 a21.89 ± 1.70 a17.93 ± 3.45 a
A66.0 ± 14.825.8 ± 9.024.0 ± 9.863.5 ± 18.225.8 ± 8.6
In each column, the data with the same superscript letter indicate no significant difference (p > 0.05). “A” means the A horizon soil layer in Shandong Province, China.
Table 4. The textural properties of the sediment samples.
Table 4. The textural properties of the sediment samples.
SectionSand (%)Silt (%)Clay (%)
I81.110.58.4
II83.514.22.3
III84.38.67.1
IV80.612.37.1
Table 5. The geo-accumulation index (Igeo) and risk index (RI) values for the sediments of the junction of the four rivers in Linyi City.
Table 5. The geo-accumulation index (Igeo) and risk index (RI) values for the sediments of the junction of the four rivers in Linyi City.
SectionIgeoRI
CrNiCuZnPb
1−2.63−1.51−1.28−1.94−1.8812.21
2−2.97−2.18−1.90−2.23−2.0815.79
3−2.79−1.33−1.69−2.15−2.1016.84
4−2.80−2.40−0.96−2.08−1.0216.14
Table 6. Heavy metal levels of Potamogeton crispus and Salvinia natans. (mg/kg).
Table 6. Heavy metal levels of Potamogeton crispus and Salvinia natans. (mg/kg).
SpeciesSiteCrNiCuZnPb
P.crispus199.86 ± 1.65 b142.65 ± 7.63 b97.42 ± 2.18 c359.86 ± 5.94 c92.11 ± 0.76 a
289.42 ± 2.82 b22.74 ± 5.21 e66.87 ± 8.26 d445.71 ± 77.02 b18.35 ± 1.86 c
5108.10 ± 9.10 b61.18 ± 23.99 d122.17 ± 4.64 b282.74 ± 107.37 c32.36 ± 10.42 b,c
6110.38 ± 37.74 b111.52 ± 0.70 c123.48 ± 2.57 b313.21 ± 23.64 c17.82 ± 1.66 c,d
787.10 ± 8.25 b54.79 ± 19.86 d75.86 ± 2.28 d400.05 ± 53.35 b11.35 ± 2.08 d
8350.10 ± 48.72 a242.66 ± 18.37 a226.76 ± 32.87 a736.79 ± 38.56 a35.08 ± 5.51 b
1184.90 ± 16.59 b94.78 ± 9.71 c69.20 ± 5.47 d304.69 ± 9.39 c18.37 ± 11.04 c
12133.98 ± 5.92 b113.03 ± 10.77 c104.26 ± 8.31 c353.42 ± 86.00 c39.75 ± 6.01 b
S. natans126.88 ± 1.50 a3.29 ± 0.04 b,c12.00 ± 0.19 a34.47 ± 1.10 b,c4.27 ± 0.15 b
221.16 ± 0.50 c,d2.99 ± 0.13 c10.15 ± 0.38 a46.45 ± 1.71 a4.78 ± 0.60 b
524.97 ± 2.00 a,b3.58 ± 0.31 b24.24 ± 9.75 a37.12 ± 1.99 b3.72 ± 0.30 c,d
623.09 ± 0.62 b,c2.88 ± 0.42 c12.61 ± 0.92 a31.45 ± 2.73 c3.19 ± 0.02 d
723.38 ± 0.15 b,c3.13 ± 0.05 b,c12.04 ± 0.89 a30.54 ± 1.60 c3.46 ± 0.41 d
820.19 ± 0.64 d1.82 ± 0.34 e8.84 ± 1.24 a20.06 ± 0.64 d2.00 ± 0.17 e
1123.5 ± 0.96 b,c5.86 ± 0.21 a15.24 ± 0.78 a40.86 ± 0.73 b6.57 ± 0.44 a
1221.80 ± 0.09 c,d2.69 ± 0.03 d11.20 ± 0.80 a31.91 ± 0.84 c3.40 ± 0.15 d
Table 7. Maximum Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, and Pb concentrations in sediments of the selected water bodies in China from literature.
Table 7. Maximum Cr, Ni, Cu, Zn, and Pb concentrations in sediments of the selected water bodies in China from literature.
SiteMaximum Concentration (mg/kg)Reference
CrNiCuZnPb
Yi River 15.7913.7516.7724.2717.93This study
Yangtze River, China205.00-129.001142.0098.00[34]
Huaihe River, China73.70-54.6083.10113.00[35]
Luan River, China152.73-178.6122.5638.29[36]
Second Songhua River, China69.627.675.4150.537.0[37]
Gomti River, India19.13-35.03101.7075.30[27]
Po River, Italy--90.10305.0098.50[38]
Almendares River, Cuba23.40-420.80708.80189.00[39]
Lahn River, Germany--48.20245.2068.40[40]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, X.; Shen, H.; Zhao, Y.; Cao, W.; Hu, C.; Sun, C. Distribution and Potential Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in Water, Sediments, and Aquatic Macrophytes: A Case Study of the Junction of Four Rivers in Linyi City, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162861

AMA Style

Li X, Shen H, Zhao Y, Cao W, Hu C, Sun C. Distribution and Potential Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in Water, Sediments, and Aquatic Macrophytes: A Case Study of the Junction of Four Rivers in Linyi City, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(16):2861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162861

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Xiuling, Henglun Shen, Yongjun Zhao, Weixing Cao, Changwei Hu, and Chen Sun. 2019. "Distribution and Potential Ecological Risk of Heavy Metals in Water, Sediments, and Aquatic Macrophytes: A Case Study of the Junction of Four Rivers in Linyi City, China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 16: 2861. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16162861

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop