Next Article in Journal
Biodegradation of Polyethylene by Enterobacter sp. D1 from the Guts of Wax Moth Galleria mellonella
Next Article in Special Issue
Workplace-Based Organizational Interventions Promoting Mental Health and Happiness among Healthcare Workers: A Realist Review
Previous Article in Journal
Chinese Public Response to Occupational Safety and Health Problems—A Study Based on Psychological Distance
Article

Risk Factors for Workplace Bullying: A Systematic Review

1
Postgraduate Programme in Epidemiology, Department of Social Medicine, Federal University of Pelotas, 96030-000, Brazil
2
Centre for Health Sciences, Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia, 44574-490, Brazil
3
Department of Medical Statistics, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(11), 1945; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16111945
Received: 21 April 2019 / Revised: 21 May 2019 / Accepted: 22 May 2019 / Published: 31 May 2019
Objective: The goal of this study was to systematically review risk factors for workplace bullying. Methods: The search was carried out in two databases. Studies with estimates of risk factors for workplace bullying were included in the review. We assessed the quality of the selected studies using an adapted version of the Downs and Black checklist. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analyses of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were used for reporting papers. Results: Fifty-one papers were included, and 70.6% were from European countries. Women were reported to be at higher risk of being bullied in most studies (odds ratio (OR) from 1.17 to 2.77). Authoritarian and laissez-faire leadership styles were positively associated with bullying. Several psychosocial factors, such as stress (OR from 1.37 to 4.96), and occupational risks related to work organization, such as flexible work methods, role conflict, role ambiguity, monotonous or rotating tasks, high demands, pressure of work, and unclarity of duties were strongly associated with bullying. Discussion: The findings highlight the central role of organizational factors in bullying. Policies to prevent bullying must address the culture of organizations, facing the challenge of developing a new management and leadership framework. View Full-Text
Keywords: workplace bullying; occupational health; epidemiology workplace bullying; occupational health; epidemiology
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Feijó, F.R.; Gräf, D.D.; Pearce, N.; Fassa, A.G. Risk Factors for Workplace Bullying: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16111945

AMA Style

Feijó FR, Gräf DD, Pearce N, Fassa AG. Risk Factors for Workplace Bullying: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2019; 16(11):1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16111945

Chicago/Turabian Style

Feijó, Fernando R., Débora D. Gräf, Neil Pearce, and Anaclaudia G. Fassa 2019. "Risk Factors for Workplace Bullying: A Systematic Review" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16, no. 11: 1945. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16111945

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop