Next Article in Journal
Emerging Resistance of Neglected Tropical Diseases: A Scoping Review of the Literature
Next Article in Special Issue
Editorial for “Long-Term Health Effects of the 9/11 Disaster” in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2019
Previous Article in Journal
Spatial Difference of Transit-Based Accessibility to Hospitals by Regions Using Spatially Adjusted ANOVA
Previous Article in Special Issue
Genetic Variants Associated with FDNY WTC-Related Sarcoidosis
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Air Pollution/Irritants, Asthma Control, and Health-Related Quality of Life among 9/11-Exposed Individuals with Asthma

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(11), 1924; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16111924
by Janette Yung *, Sukhminder Osahan, Stephen M. Friedman, Jiehui Li and James E. Cone
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16(11), 1924; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16111924
Submission received: 25 April 2019 / Revised: 23 May 2019 / Accepted: 25 May 2019 / Published: 30 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Long-Term Health Effects of the 9/11 Disaster)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report


In their manuscript “Air pollution/irritants, asthma control and health-related quality of life among 9/11-exposed individuals with asthma” the authors investigated the association of:

1.    self-reported air pollution/irritants trigger with asthma control clinical;

2.    different levels of asthma control with three domains of impaired HRQoL: self-reported mental or physical unhealthy days, self-reported activity limitation days, and self-reported general health.

in a cohort exposed to the particular matter generated during the World Trade Center incident in 9/11/2001.

 

The thematic of research is well introduced and the results nicely discussed. However, I have some remarks considering the abstract and methods.

 

Regarding the abstract, please improve the distinction between the purpose of the research and the methods by avoiding repetitions in the words used. The main results of the two research objectives should appear clearly, including the association asthma - HRQoL.

 

Regarding the methods, I am quite puzzled by the tool used by the authors to quantify the level of social support. This tool doesn’t look to be validated in social science, as is the case for example for the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived social support. To validate this tool, I will suggest to remove from the present manuscript the association between asthma and social support and to publish it elsewhere, in a sociological journal.

 

Small remark:

Mention please the significance of the acronym PTSD the first time that you cite it in the text (for example in line 146). 

Author Response

Dear reviewer,


Please see attached pdf file for point-by-point response to your comments, for the manuscript titled "Air pollution/irritants, asthma control and health-related quality of life among 9/11-exposed individuals with asthma".  All your comments have been addressed and by red color font.


Thank you very much for taking your time to review my manuscript and the responses to reviewer document. I look forward to hearing from you soon!


-Janette

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Did you have a hypothesis?

If so please state and discuss as such.

Tables spread across two pages. This makes it difficult to take in the data.

How is this paper different that what is already known about asthma?

How will this work inform future research?

Author Response

Dear reviewer,


Please see attached pdf file for point-by-point response to your comments, for the manuscript titled "Air pollution/irritants, asthma control and health-related quality of life among 9/11-exposed individuals with asthma".  All your comments have been addressed and by red color font.


Thank you very much for taking your time to review my manuscript and the responses to reviewer document. I look forward to hearing from you soon!


-Janette

 

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors responded wisely to all my remarks.

I do not have any additional remarks to make on the new version.

Back to TopTop