Next Article in Journal
Effect of Social Media on Child Obesity: Application of Structural Equation Modeling with the Taguchi Method
Next Article in Special Issue
Implementing Supported Employment. Lessons from the Making IPS Work Project
Previous Article in Journal
Development of a Cumulative Exposure Index (CEI) for Manganese and Comparison with Bone Manganese and Other Biomarkers of Manganese Exposure
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Role of Communities in Mental Health Care in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Meta-Review of Components and Competencies
Open AccessArticle

Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data in the Development of Outcome Measures: The Case of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) Measures in Mental Health Populations

1
School of Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, S14DA Sheffield, UK
2
Mapi Research Trust, 27 Rue de la Villette, 69003 Lyon, France
3
Centre for Psychological Services Research, Department of Psychology, University of Sheffield, S102TN Sheffield, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(7), 1342; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15071342
Received: 31 May 2018 / Revised: 19 June 2018 / Accepted: 19 June 2018 / Published: 26 June 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mental Health and Social Care and Social Interventions)
While it is important to treat symptoms, there is growing recognition that in order to help people with mental health problems lead meaningful and fulfilling lives, it is crucial to capture the impact of their conditions on wider aspects of their social lives. We constructed two versions of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) measure—ReQoL-10 and ReQoL-20—for use in routine settings and clinical trials from a larger pool of items by combining qualitative and quantitative evidence covering six domains. Qualitative evidence was gathered through interviews and focus groups with over 76 service users, clinicians, and a translatability assessment. Psychometric evidence generated from data from over 6200 service users was obtained from confirmatory factor models and item response theory analyses. In this paper we present an approach based on a traffic light pictorial format that was developed to present qualitative and quantitative evidence to a group of service users, clinicians, and researchers to help to make the final selection. This work provides a pragmatic yet rigorous approach to combining qualitative and quantitative evidence to ensure that ReQoL is psychometrically robust and has high relevance to service users and clinicians. This approach can be extended to the development of patient reported outcome measures in general. View Full-Text
Keywords: measuring outcomes; mental health; mixed methods; PROM; quality of life; recovery measuring outcomes; mental health; mixed methods; PROM; quality of life; recovery
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Keetharuth, A.D.; Taylor Buck, E.; Acquadro, C.; Conway, K.; Connell, J.; Barkham, M.; Carlton, J.; Ricketts, T.; Barber, R.; Brazier, J. Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Data in the Development of Outcome Measures: The Case of the Recovering Quality of Life (ReQoL) Measures in Mental Health Populations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1342.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Search more from Scilit
 
Search
Back to TopTop