Next Article in Journal
Emotional Intelligence and Its Relationship with Levels of Social Anxiety and Stress in Adolescents
Next Article in Special Issue
Employment and People with Non Communicable Chronic Diseases: PATHWAYS Recommendations and Suggested Actions for Implementing an Inclusive Labour Market for All and Health in All Sectors
Previous Article in Journal
Children and Nature: Linking Accessibility of Natural Environments and Children’s Health-Related Quality of Life
Previous Article in Special Issue
Views and Experiences of Persons with Chronic Diseases about Strategies that Aim to Integrate and Re-Integrate Them into Work: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Studies
Open AccessFeature PaperArticle

Research Project Evaluation—Learnings from the PATHWAYS Project Experience

1
Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 31-034 Krakow, Poland
2
Fondazione IRCCS, Neurological Institute Carlo Besta, 20-133 Milano, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(6), 1071; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15061071
Received: 17 May 2018 / Revised: 22 May 2018 / Accepted: 22 May 2018 / Published: 25 May 2018
Background: Every research project faces challenges regarding how to achieve its goals in a timely and effective manner. The purpose of this paper is to present a project evaluation methodology gathered during the implementation of the Participation to Healthy Workplaces and Inclusive Strategies in the Work Sector (the EU PATHWAYS Project). The PATHWAYS project involved multiple countries and multi-cultural aspects of re/integrating chronically ill patients into labor markets in different countries. This paper describes key project’s evaluation issues including: (1) purposes, (2) advisability, (3) tools, (4) implementation, and (5) possible benefits and presents the advantages of a continuous monitoring. Methods: Project evaluation tool to assess structure and resources, process, management and communication, achievements, and outcomes. The project used a mixed evaluation approach and included Strengths (S), Weaknesses (W), Opportunities (O), and Threats (SWOT) analysis. Results: A methodology for longitudinal EU projects’ evaluation is described. The evaluation process allowed to highlight strengths and weaknesses and highlighted good coordination and communication between project partners as well as some key issues such as: the need for a shared glossary covering areas investigated by the project, problematic issues related to the involvement of stakeholders from outside the project, and issues with timing. Numerical SWOT analysis showed improvement in project performance over time. The proportion of participating project partners in the evaluation varied from 100% to 83.3%. Conclusions: There is a need for the implementation of a structured evaluation process in multidisciplinary projects involving different stakeholders in diverse socio-environmental and political conditions. Based on the PATHWAYS experience, a clear monitoring methodology is suggested as essential in every multidisciplinary research projects. View Full-Text
Keywords: public health; project process evaluation; internal evaluation; SWOT analysis; project achievements; project management and monitoring public health; project process evaluation; internal evaluation; SWOT analysis; project achievements; project management and monitoring
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Galas, A.; Pilat, A.; Leonardi, M.; Tobiasz-Adamczyk, B. Research Project Evaluation—Learnings from the PATHWAYS Project Experience. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 1071.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop