Next Article in Journal
Emotional Intelligence, Motivational Climate and Levels of Anxiety in Athletes from Different Categories of Sports: Analysis through Structural Equations
Previous Article in Journal
Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogenic Escherichia Coli Isolated from Rooftop Rainwater-Harvesting Tanks in the Eastern Cape, South Africa
Open AccessArticle

Comparing the Effects of Different Body Armor Systems on the Occupational Performance of Police Officers

1
Tactical Research Unit, Bond University, Robina, QLD 4226, Australia
2
School of Community Health, Charles Sturt University, Albury, NSW 2640, Australia
3
New South Wales Police—Health and Fitness Unit, Sydney, NSW 2150, Australia
4
New South Wales Police—Operational Safety and Skills Command, Sydney, NSW 2150, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(5), 893; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15050893
Received: 24 April 2018 / Revised: 27 April 2018 / Accepted: 28 April 2018 / Published: 1 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Occupational Safety and Health)
Policing duties may inherently be dangerous due to stab, blunt trauma and ballistic threats. The addition of individual light armor vests (ILAVs) has been suggested as a means to protect officers. However, the addition of the extra load of the ILAV may affect officer ability to conduct occupational tasks. The purpose of this study was to determine if wearing any of three different ILAVs made by different companies with their preferred materials and designs (ILAV A, 4.68 percent body weight, ILAV B, 4.05 percent body weight, & ILAV C, 3.71 percent body weight) affected occupational task performance when compared to that in normal station wear. A prospective, within-subjects repeated measures design was employed, using a counterbalanced randomization in which each ILAV was worn for an entire day while officers completed a variety of occupationally relevant tasks. These tasks included a victim drag, car exit and 5-meter sprint, step down and marksmanship task. To compare the effects of the ILAVs on these tasks, a multivariate repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted, with post hoc pairwise comparisons using a Bonferroni adjustment. Results showed that performance in each task did not vary between any of the ILAV or normal station wear conditions. There was less variability in the marksmanship task with ILAV B, however. The results suggest that none of the ILAVs used in this study were heavy enough to significantly affect task performance in the assessed tasks when compared to wearing normal station wear. View Full-Text
Keywords: light armor; personal protective equipment; load; law enforcement; occupational tasks light armor; personal protective equipment; load; law enforcement; occupational tasks
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Schram, B.; Orr, R.; Pope, R.; Hinton, B.; Norris, G. Comparing the Effects of Different Body Armor Systems on the Occupational Performance of Police Officers. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 893.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop