Next Article in Journal
Factors Related to Unemployment in Europe. A Cross-Sectional Study from the COURAGE Survey in Finland, Poland and Spain
Previous Article in Journal
Friday Night Is Pizza Night: A Comparison of Children’s Dietary Intake and Maternal Perceptions and Feeding Goals on Weekdays and Weekends
Article Menu
Issue 4 (April) cover image

Export Article

Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15(4), 721; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15040721

Review
Effects of Mind-Body Exercises for Mood and Functional Capabilities in Patients with Stroke: An Analytical Review of Randomized Controlled Trials
1
Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong, China
2
Depression Clinical and Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02114, USA
3
Behavioral Health Department, The South Cove Community Health Center, Boston, MA 02111, USA
4
School of Kinesiology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
5
Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China
6
School of Humanities and Social Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen 518172, China
7
Department of Physical Education, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 23 February 2018 / Accepted: 10 April 2018 / Published: 11 April 2018

Abstract

:
Objective: The effects of stroke are both physical and mental in nature and may have serious implications on the overall well-being of stroke survivors. This analytical review aims to critically evaluate and statistically synthesize the existing literature regarding the effects of mind-body (MB) exercises on mood and functional capabilities in patients with stroke. Methods: A structured literature review was performed in both English (PubMed, PEDro, and Cochrane Library) and Chinese (Wanfang and CNKI (Chinese National Knowledge Information Database)) databases. Sixteen randomized controlled trials were considered eligible for meta-analysis. Based on the random effects model, we used the pooled effect size to determine the magnitude of rehabilitative effect of MB exercise intervention on depression, anxiety, activities of daily living, and functional mobility among stroke survivors. The sum PEDro score ranged from five to nine points (fair-to-good methodological quality), but the absence of concealed allocation and blinded assessors were reported in most studies. Results: The aggregated results showed that MB exercise intervention is associated with significantly improved ADL (Hedges’ g = 1.31, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.77, p < 0.001, I2 = 79.82%) and mobility (Hedges’ g = 0.67, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.09, p < 0.001, I2 = 69.65%), and reduced depression (Hedges’ g = −0.76, 95% CI −1.16 to −0.35, p < 0.001, I2 = 74.84%). Conclusions: as add-on treatments, the MB exercises may potentially improve depression, activities of daily living, and mobility of these post-stroke patients. Future studies with more robust methodology will be needed to provide a more definitive conclusion.
Keywords:
stroke; rehabilitation; tai chi; mind-body exercise

1. Introduction

Stroke (also called cerebrovascular disease) is a medical condition in which some regions of the human brain receive insufficient blood supply resulting in cell death and, ultimately, a dysfunctional state [1]. According to the World Health Organization, roughly 15 million people worldwide suffer their first-ever stroke each year, one-third of these sufferers died and another one-third have difficulty in performing activities of daily living (ADL) independently [2]. The Chinese Stroke Prevention Report in 2015 indicated that the prevalence of stroke has dramatically increased among Chinese residents and it has become the leading cause of death in China [3]. Physical therapy and device-assisted rehabilitation methods (e.g., virtual reality, robot-assisted therapy) are commonly used for stroke rehabilitation at the rehabilitation centers, but they are costly and time-consuming. Such rehabilitation methods may not be readily accessible to every post-stroke survivor, particularly those with low socioeconomic status [4,5,6,7].
Given the weakness of conventional rehabilitation and technology-based therapy, exercise training for stroke rehabilitation, as an alternative method, has been investigated and positive results were found [8,9]. However, most exercise programs are physically-based training designed to improve musculoskeletal functions (e.g., mobility, strength, power, and proprioception) of stroke survivors [10,11,12]. Unfortunately, mental health problems (depression, anxiety, and sleep quality) also present among stroke survivors with physical disability [13]. A cross-sectional study by Broomfield [14] indicated that 29% and 23% of stroke survivors had reported anxiety and depression, respectively. These same populations of stroke survivors were associated with increased morbidity and mortality [15]. Thus, it is evident that the effects of stroke are both physical and mental in nature and may have serious implications on the overall well-being of stroke survivors. Therefore, it is urgently needed to establish readily-accessible and cost-effective exercise programs which emphasize both physical and mental rehabilitation for these individuals.
Implementing mind-body (MB) exercises (tai chi, qigong, and yoga) may provide a solution for this issue given that these exercises are low-cost, low impact, and of moderate-intensity [16,17,18,19]. MB exercises, characterized by a mind-body practice (slow movements and symmetrical postures with musculoskeletal stretching and relaxation, breath control, and mental focus), have recently increased in global popularity [20,21,22,23,24,25]. According to the National Health Interview Survey, Yoga, Tai Chi, and Qigong are ranked as the top three most widely-used complementary therapies among U.S. citizens [26]. As the popularity of MB exercises continue to increase, clinical trials are beginning to investigate the rehabilitative effects of MB exercises for functional capabilities and mental health among stroke survivors [27,28,29,30,31,32]. However, no systematic review to date has been done to critically evaluate the existing literature on this topic. The aim of this study, therefore, was to systematically assess available evidence regarding the effects of MB exercises on these rehabilitative outcomes among stroke survivors. Findings of this review would allow scholars and clinicians to design and develop effective rehabilitation programs for accelerating the recovery process of stroke survivors, while reducing the cost and personnel needs of administering the rehabilitation.

2. Methods

To eliminate duplicates, we submitted the present study protocol to the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review for evaluation prior to beginning this project. Since no similar studies had been conducted, the registration number (CRD42018085213) was assigned to this project. To precisely present this systematic review, we used the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) checklist.

2.1. Search Strategy

We used both English and Chinese electronic databases for the literature search. The English databases consisted of PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), and Cochrane Library. Given that Tai Chi and Qigong originated from China, two Chinese-language authoritative databases (Wanfang and CNKI) were also searched to maximize the inclusion of relevant literature. With no restriction of publication date, the search terms used for this systematic review included: stroke, cerebrovascular disease, brain ischemia, intracranial hemorrhage, yoga, tai chi/taiji, and qigong. Reference lists of original articles and reviews were manually searched for relevant studies.

2.2. Inclusion Criteria and Study Selection

This systematic review only included randomized controlled trials (RCT) published in peer-reviewed journals. To be included, tai chi, qigong, or toga must have been the primary rehabilitation program and its intervention duration must have lasted at least 4 weeks. Additionally, the number of stroke patients should not have been less than 15 in the eligible RCTs. To compute the pooled effect size of individual outcomes (depression, anxiety, sleep quality, mobility, and ADL) of interest, for both MB and control groups, mean and standard deviation at baseline and post-intervention needed to be clearly reported along with the number of participants of each group. The initially-identified studies were considered eligible only if they satisfied all aforementioned criteria. Two investigators (Liye Zou and Nan Zeng) independently screened and identified the eligibility of all studies according to the inclusion criteria. In case disagreement between the two investigators emerged, a third investigator (Chaoyi Wang) was brought in for discussion until the group came to a consensus regarding eligibility.

2.3. Data Extraction from Eligible Randomized Controlled Trials

Data extraction was independently performed by two investigators (Liye Zou and Nan Zeng). Table 1 provides detailed information about the characteristics of all eligible RCTs. This information included reference, study location, participant characteristics (initial sample size and attrition rate, mean age/age range, course of disease, and type of stroke (ischemic/hemorrhage stroke), MB exercise intervention (Training intensity and training mode), outcomes of interest and its testing instruments, and follow-up assessment.

2.4. Methodological Quality Assessment

Based on previous studies [33,34], the adapted PEDro scale was used to evaluate the methodological quality of all eligible RCTs. Since blinding of participants and instructor(s) are impractical in a non-pharmaceutical intervention study, we removed these two items. Given that stroke survivors could not be forced to discontinue other mainstream rehabilitation methods (e.g., physical therapy, occupational therapy, or drug treatment), this co-intervention as an item was taken into account. Thus, nine items were finally included in the adapted PEDro scale: (1) randomization; (2) concealed allocation; (3) similar baseline; (4) blinding of assessors; (5) more than 85% retention; (6) missing data management; (7) between-group comparison; (8) point measure and measure of variability; and (9) and co-intervention. Each individual RCT could obtain a maximum of nine points.

2.5. Data Synthesis

The pooled effect size of each outcome of interest was computed using the Comprehensive Meta-Analysis Version 2.2 Software (Biostat, Englewood, NJ, USA). We synthesized the study results of individual studies through the random-effect model and 95% confidence interval. We used the I2 statistic to quantify the degree of heterogeneity (25% = small, 50% = medium, 75% = large). Since there were less than 10 RCTs on each individual outcome of interest, moderator analysis was not performed in this systematic review.

3. Results

3.1. Literature Search

We found a total of 347 initially-identified records through both English and Chinese databases. According to the title and author name, we removed 308 duplicates, resulting in 39 remaining records. Full-text articles were further evaluated based on the pre-determined inclusion criteria and 23 were removed due to the following reasons: (1) non-RTCs (n = 7); (2) no MB exercise (n = 5); (3) no interesting outcome (n = 8); (4) and unable to extract quantitative data (n = 3). Ultimately, this systematic review includes 16 RCTs. The flowchart showing the retrieval of studies for this systematic review is presented in Figure 1.

3.2. Study Characteristics

The features of the 16 eligible RCTs are presented in Table 1. These studies were published between 2009 and 2017. A total of 1136 stroke survivors (a mean age from 51.38 ± 14.83 to 77.59 ± 12.33 or age range from 33 to 78), with attrition rate ranging from 8% to 16% (sample size in the RCTs ranged from 24 to 145). Course of disease varied from two weeks to 81.6 months on average. Only 37.5% of the 16 RCTs reported the number of stroke type in each group. For the MB exercise groups (qigong = 1, toga = 1, tai chi = 14), intervention duration ranged from four weeks to 12 weeks, with two to seven sessions per week. A typical session lasted between 15 and 90 min. Training modes in MB exercises were self-practiced, group-based, and mixed method. MB exercise intervention was combined with other components (e.g., usual nursing, general rehabilitation, exercise rehabilitation, usual treatment, drug therapy, physical therapy, or educational program) in 81.25% of the studies selected. Only two studies used follow-up assessment to evaluate the long-term effect of MB exercise on the rehabilitative outcomes. These follow-up assessments occurred at six weeks [30] and 12 months [37], respectively.

3.3. Methodological Quality

The PEDro scores of 16 RCTs are presented in Table 2. The sum PEDro scores ranged from five to nine points (fair-to-good methodological quality). Concealed allocation was not used in 81.25% of the 16 RCTs. This is followed by absence of blinded assessors (n = 10) and lack of missing data management (n = 8). Other points deducted were due to a lack of an attrition rate of more than 15% [30], similar baseline [36] and between-group comparison [39], and absence of point measures and measures of variability [42,43].

3.4. Meta-Analysis of Outcome Measured

The selected RCTs investigated the effects of MB exercises on depression (n = 7), anxiety (n = 3), and sleep quality (n = 3), with lower scores indicating better performance. We used meta-analytic methods to individually synthesize the study findings of each interesting outcome. The aggregated results have shown significant benefit in favor of MB exercises on reducing depression (Hedges’ g = −0.76, 95% CI −1.16 to −0.35, p < 0.001, I2 = 74.84%; Figure 2) and anxiety (Hedges’ g = −1.04, 95% CI −1.33 to −0.74, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%). However, MB exercises did not significantly improve overall sleep quality (Hedges’ g = −0.24, 95% CI −0.56 to 0.08, p = 0.14, I2 = 0%).
The selected RCTs investigated the effects of MB exercises on ADL (n = 6) and mobility (n = 5), with higher positive values indicating better performance. The overall result of the meta-analysis showed that MB exercise intervention was associated with significantly improved ADL (Hedges’ g = 1.31, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.77, p < 0.001, I2 = 79.82%; Figure 3) and mobility (Hedges’ g = 0.67, 95% CI 0.25 to 1.09, p < 0.001, I2 = 69.65%; Figure 4).

4. Discussion

The present meta-analytical review was conducted to statistically evaluate the existing literature for the efficacy of MB exercises including tai chi, qigong, and yoga on mood and functional capacities among post-stroke patients. The pooled estimates suggest that MB exercises may have significant benefits in depression, activities of daily life, and mobility among stroke survivors, but positive results on overall sleep quality was not found. There were limited findings for MB exercise effects on anxiety due to the small sample size, however, further study is warranted. The emerging literature has increasingly shown that tai chi/qigong may be a promising adjunct rehabilitative treatment for stroke survivors. To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis that included the rehabilitative effects of tai chi and qigong among stroke survivors. The main findings from this systematic review are of great significance for the public health sector since many stroke survivors have varying degrees of depression and loss of functional capacity—both of which affect their mood, functioning, and quality of life [45]. MB exercises can be employed as safe and inexpensive complementary treatments to offer these patients more favorable outcomes.
The underlying mechanisms of how tai chi, qigong, and yoga affect mood and functional capacities in post-stroke patients still remains unclear, though there are several theories that seem plausible. The most notable of these theories is a contemporary concept which suggests these MB exercises enhance physiological proprioception by combining a special state of consciousness with physical movement and breathing techniques, thereby improving and strengthening the overall state of vegetative regulation (homeostasis) [46]. Given that tai chi, qigong, and yoga are physical activities that coordinate complex movements, balance, strengthening, and breathing, the combination of these physical aspects may drive the elicitation of improved functional capacities in patients with stroke. Furthermore, the relaxation and personal integration aspects of these exercises contribute to mindful awareness and personal acceptance [47,48] which may help to establish a more refined mind-body connection, thus strengthening the individual’s homeostatic state. Overall, there are numerous advantages to using MB exercises as adjunctive treatment for stroke survivors. It is accessible to people of all ages and physical strength, easy to learn, and has minimal known side effects. The disadvantage is that when qualified instructors are required to train individuals at the novice level, but there may not be available in some areas.
This study included recently published RCTs in both English and Chinese which used tai chi, qigong, and yoga as the primary intervention. This method is appropriate and important since, thus far, most of the studies on these MB exercises for stroke rehabilitation were conducted in China (including Hong Kong) and were published mostly in Chinese language. By including articles in Chinese, the contributions of researchers on MB exercise studies published in Chinese peer-reviewed journals are acknowledged and the findings are more representative of studies using these MB exercises. Other strengths of this study include the use of a standardized scale to assess the risk of bias for the RCTs, and a recognized meta-analytic method to evaluate the magnitude of the intervention effect of these MB exercise, and the I2 value to determine the degree of heterogeneity.
We would like to acknowledge the following methodological limitations as they may influence interpretation of these research findings. First, we included tai chi, qigong, and yoga in this review as one large category of MB exercises and summarized their outcomes on post-stroke rehabilitation. While leading researchers in mind-body research propose that tai chi, qigong, and yoga can be considered as mindfulness-based exercises and use similar techniques [49], further studies are needed to confirm that these exercises, in fact, have comparable effects for post-stroke rehabilitation. Second, more than half of the selected RCTs lacked blinding of assessors which might lead to subjectivity and social desirability bias. Third, stroke survivors did not only receive one of these MB exercise interventions in most RCTs, but also simultaneously underwent other rehabilitation programs (e.g., balance training, general rehabilitation, or drug therapy). This co-intervention makes it difficult for researchers to conclude whether the outcomes were due to MB exercises alone, a synergetic intervention effect, or the conventional treatment received by the patients. Nevertheless, the findings of this study provides support for MB exercises as an add-on treatment for post-stroke patients to improve their mood, daily activities, and mobility. Fourth, a variety of interventions were received by control groups which made interpretations of outcomes difficult. Fifth, the frequency and the duration of the MB exercises varied a great deal among different studies. These findings make it difficult to make specific recommendations on the format of the intervention. Sixth, most of the studies were conducted in Asia. It remains unclear whether the results are generalizable to non-Asian populations. In particular, the three included studies that were performed in Western countries [28,29,39] all showed little effect on depression, while the remaining studies showed moderate to large positive effects. These findings raised the question whether the interventions were comparable in different regions. Seventh, studies that report positive or significant results are more likely to be published and outcomes that are statistically significant have greater possibility of being fully reported. Therefore, publication bias and outcome reporting bias might have existed in the included studies, and the effect sizes of MB exercises might have been overestimated. Lastly, although the alpha level was significant in both ADL and mobility, the confidence intervals cross over 1, thus, statistically significant differences in the pooled effect between groups was actually absent. This may be due to the sample size being too small to have enough power to detect a statistically significant results if one exits. Therefore, future studies with large sample sizes may clear things up.

5. Conclusions

The findings of this study suggest that, as an add-on treatment, the MB exercises may potentially improve depression, activities of daily living, and mobility of these post-stroke patients. Though there were significant weaknesses in the design of these studies and the outcomes varied in different regions, this should not deter the importance of these findings. Future studies with more robust methodology will be needed to provide a more definitive conclusion; however, the current results appear promising.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by Shanghai Philosophy and Sociology (no. 2017BTY002) and the Fund for Science and Technology Innovation of Shanghai Jiao Tong University (no. JCZD005).

Author Contributions

Liye Zou, Albert Yeung, and Huiru Wang contributed to the conception and design of the review. Liye Zou applied the search strategy. Liye Zou, Albert Yeung, Nan Zeng, Chaoyi Wang, Li Sun, and Huiru Wang applied the selection criteria. Liye Zou, Nan Zeng, and Chaoyi Wang completed assessment of risk of bias. Liye Zou, Nan Zeng, and Chaoyi Wang analyzed the data and interpreted data. Liye Zou and Albert Yeung wrote this manuscript. Huiru Wang, Chaoyi Wang, Li Sun, and Garrett Anthony Thomas edited the manuscript. Liye Zou is responsible for the overall project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Hall, S.; DeFrances, C. Hospitalization for Stroke in U.S. Hospitals, 1989–2009; National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD, USA, 2012.
  2. Benjamin, J.; Blaha, J.; Chiuve, S.; Cushman, M.; Das, S.; De Ferranti, S.; Floyd, J.; Fornage, M.; Gillespie, C.; On Behalf of the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee; et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2017 update: A report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017, 135, e229–e445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Wang, D. China Stroke Prevention Report; Peking Union Medical College Press: Beijing, China, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jette, D.U.; Latham, N.K.; Smout, R.J.; Gassaway, J.; Slavin, M.D.; Horn, S.D. Physical Therapy Interventions for Patients with Stroke in Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities. Phys. Ther. 2005, 85, 238–248. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Sivan, M.; Gallagher, J.; Makower, S.; Keeling, D.; Bhakta, B.; O’Connor, R.J.; Levesley, M. Home-based computer assisted arm rehabilitation (hCAAR) robotic device for upper limb exercise after stroke: Results of a feasibility study in home setting. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2014, 11, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Morone, G.; Paolucci, S.; Cherubini, A.; De Angelis, D.; Venturiero, V.; Coiro, P.; Iosa, M. Robot-assisted gait training for stroke patients: Current state of the art and perspectives of robotics. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 2017, 13, 1303–1311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chang, W.; Kim, Y. Robot-assisted Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation. J. Stroke 2013, 15, 174–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Gordon, F.; Gulanick, M.; Costa, F.; Fletcher, G.; Franklin, B.; Roth, E.; Shephard, T. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: An American Heart Association scientific statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology, Subcommittee on Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention; the Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the Stroke Council. Circulation 2004, 109, 2031–2041. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Lan, C.; Lai, J.; Chen, S. Tai Chi Chuan: Tai Chi Chuan: An ancient wisdom on exercise and health promotion. Sports Med. 2002, 32, 217–224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Van Duijnhoven, H.; Heeren, A.; Peters, M.; Veerbeek, J.; Kwakkel, G.; Geurts, A.; Weerdesteyn, V. Effects of Exercise Therapy on Balance Capacity in Chronic Stroke: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Stroke 2016, 47, 2603–2610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Lubetzky-Vilnai, A.; Kartin, D. The Effect of balance training on balance performance in individuals post-stroke: A Systematic Review. J. Neurol. Phys. Ther. 2010, 34, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Vanderbeken, I.; Kerckhofs, E. Select this result for bulk action: A systematic review of the effect of physical exercise on cognition in stroke and traumatic brain injury patients. NeuroRehabilitation 2017, 40, 33–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Kim, S.; Choi-Kwon, S. Post-stroke depression and emotional incontinence: Correlation with lesion location. Neurology 2000, 54, 1805–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Niall, M.; Terence, J.; Azmil, A.; Matthew, W.; Jonathan, E. Depression and anxiety symptoms post-stroke/TIA: Prevalence and associations in cross-sectional data from a regional stroke registry. BMC Neurol. 2014, 14, 198. [Google Scholar]
  15. Almeida, O.; Xiao, J. Mortality associated with incident mental health disorders after stroke. Aust. N. Z. J. Psychiatry 2007, 41, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Zou, L.; Pan, Z.; Yeung, A.; Talwar, S.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Shu, Y.; Chen, X.; Thomas, G. A Review Study on the Beneficial Effects of Baduanjin. J. Altern. Complement. Med. 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Zou, L.; SasaKi, J.; Wang, H.; Xiao, Z.; Fang, Q.; Zhang, M. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Baduanjin Qigong for Health Benefits: Randomized Controlled Trials. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 2017, 4548706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Zou, L.; Wang, C.; Chen, K.; Shu, Y.; Chen, X.; Luo, L.; Zhao, X. The Effect of Taichi Practice on Attenuating Bone Mineral Density Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14, 1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zou, L.; Wang, H.; Xiao, Z.; Fang, Q.; Zhang, M.; Li, T.; Du, G.; Liu, Y. Tai chi for health benefits in patients with multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0170212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Lou, L.; Zou, L.; Fang, Q.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Tian, Z.; Han, Y. Effect of Taichi Softball on Function-Related Outcomes in Older Adults: A Randomized Control Trial. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2017, 2017, 4585424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Zou, L.; Wang, C.; Wang, H. Effect of a long-term modified Tai Chi-based intervention in attenuating bone mineral density in postmenopausal women in southeast China: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Clin. Trials Degener. Dis. 2017, 2, 46–55. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zou, L.; Wang, H.; Li, T.; Shu, Y.; Wang, C. Traditional Chinese exercise intervention improves symptoms in a patient with ankylosing spondylitis: A case study. Int. J. Adv. Res. 2017, 5, 888–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zou, L.; Wang, H.; Li, T.; Lu, L. Effect of Health-Qigong on spinal mobility and disease activity in people with ankylosing spondylitis. Trav. Hum. 2017, 80, 1585–1598. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yeung, A.; Chan, J.; Cheung, J.; Zou, L. Qigong and Tai-Chi. For mood regulation. Focus-Am. Psychiatr. Publ. 2018, 16, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zou, L.; Wang, C.; Tian, Z.; Wang, H.; Shu, Y. Effect of Yang-Style Tai Chi on Gait Parameters and Musculoskeletal Flexibility in Healthy Chinese Older Women. Sports 2017, 5, 52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kachan, D.; Olano, H.; Tannenbaum, S.; Annane, D.; Mehta, A.; Arheart, K.; Fleming, L.; Yang, X.; McClure, L.; Lee, D. Prevalence of Mindfulness Practices in the U.S. Workforce: National Health Interview Survey. Prev. Chronic Dis. 2017, 14, 160034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cai, W.; Liang, C. Effects of sitting Baduanjin on the ability of activities daily living of patients with stroke sequelae in community. J. Nurs. Adm. 2011, 11, 810–811. [Google Scholar]
  28. Immink, M.; Hillier, S.; Petkov, J. Randomized controlled trial of yoga for chronic poststroke hemiparesis: Motor function, mental health, and quality of life outcomes. Top. Stroke Rehabil. 2014, 21, 256–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Taylor-Piliae, R.; Hoke, T.; Hepworth, J.; Latt, L.; Najafi, B.; Coull, B. Effect of Tai Chi on physical function, fall rates and quality of life among older stroke survivors. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2014, 95, 816–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Au-Yeung, S.; Hui-Chan, C.; Tang, J. Short-form Tai Chi improves standing balance of people with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2009, 23, 515–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kim, H.; Kim, Y.; Lee, S. Effects of therapeutic Tai Chi on balance, gait, and quality of life in chronic stroke patients. Int. J. Rehabil. Res. 2015, 38, 156–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wang, W.; Sawada, M.; Noriyama, Y.; Arita, K.; Ota, T.; Sadamatsu, M.; Kiyotou, R.; Hirai, M.; Kishimoto, T. Tai Chi exercise versus rehabilitation for the elderly with cerebral vascular disorder: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Psychogeriatrics 2010, 10, 160–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zou, L.; Yeung, A.; Quan, X.; Hui, S.; Hu, X.; Chan, J.; Wang, C.; Boyden, S.; Sun, L.; Wang, H. Mindfulness-based Baduanjin exercise for depression and anxiety in people with physical or mental illnesses: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zou, L.; Yeung, A.; Quan, X.; Wang, H. A Systematic review and Meta-analysis of Mindfulness-based (Baduanjin) exercise for alleviating musculoskeletal pain and improving sleep quality in people with chronic diseases. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2018, 15, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Fu, C.; Zhang, Q. Effects of Taijiquan on balance function and walking ability of stroke hemiplegic patients in convalescent phase. J. Rehabil. Med. 2016, 31, 536–539. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yang, H.; Tang, Q. Effects of Tai Chi Quan on motor function among stroke survivors. Chin. J. Rehabil. Med. Res. 2016, 31, 1146–1148. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zheng, W.; Zhang, Y.; Jiang, X.; Chen, R.; Xiao, W. Effects of persistent Tai Chi exercise on rehabilitation in ischemic stroke: A prospective randomized controlled trial. J. Integr. Chin. Med. 2015, 13, 304–307. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zhou, Q.; Xu, J.; Hu, A.; Jiang, W.; Wang, L.; Yang, L.; Yang, B.; Du, H. Observation on recover of cerebral infraction patients by TaijiQuan training. Chin. J. Pract. Nerv. Dis. 2010, 13, 20–22. [Google Scholar]
  39. Taylor-Piliae, R.; Coull, B. Community-based Yang-style Tai Chi is safe and feasible in chronic stroke: A pilot study. Clin. Rehabil. 2011, 26, 121–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Yang, Z.; Liu, D.; Chang, Y.; Sun, P.; Zhao, G.; Jia, L. The therapeutic effects of Tai Chi balance training for stroke with balance disorders. Contemp. Med. 2013, 19, 5–6. [Google Scholar]
  41. Li, X.; Yang, S.; Li, T.; Cai, S. The rehabilitative effects of Tai Chi motor imagery for stroke survivors. Fujian J. Trad. Chin. Med. 2011, 42, 5–6. [Google Scholar]
  42. Li, Y.; Hu, S.; Cui, L. Clinical observation on sitting Tai Chi exercise used for 30 cases of patients with depression after stroke. Chin. Nurs. Res. 2012, 26, 2254–2255. [Google Scholar]
  43. Li, Y.; Ling, H.; Wen, X. Application of sitting Tai Chi exercise in the rehabilitation training in patients with post-stoke depression. Qilu J. Nurs. 2013, 19, 4–6. [Google Scholar]
  44. Zhao, B.; Tang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, L.; Yang, H.; Ye, T. Effects of Taijiquan on motor function and depression in patients with post-stroke depression. Chin. J. Rehabil. Theory Pract. 2017, 23, 334–337. [Google Scholar]
  45. Saunders, D.; Sanderson, M.; Hayes, S.; Kilrane, M.; Greig, C.; Brazzelli, M.; Mead, G. Physical fitness training for stroke patients. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016, 24, cd003316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Matos, L.; Sousa, C.; Gonçalves, M.; Gabriel, J.; Machado, J.; Greten, H. Qigong as a Traditional Vegetative Biofeedback Therapy: Long-term conditioning of physiological mind-body effects. BioMed Res. Int. 2015, 2015, e531789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Oken, B.; Zajdel, D.; Kishiyama, S.; Flegal, K.; Dehen, C.; Haas, M.; Kraemer, D.; Lawrence, J.; Leyva, J. Randomized, controlled, six-month trial of yoga in healthy seniors: Effects on cognition and quality of life. Altern. Ther. Health Med. 2006, 12, 40–47. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  48. Garrett, R.; Immink, M.; Hillier, S. Becoming connected: The lived experience of yoga participation after stroke. Disabil. Rehabil. 2011, 33, 2404–2415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Payne, P.; Crane-Godreau, M. Meditative movement for depression and anxiety. Front. Psychiatry 2013, 24, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Flowchart showing the retrieval of studies for review (PEDro = Physiotherapy Evidence Database; CNKI = Chinese National Knowledge Information Database).
Figure 1. Flowchart showing the retrieval of studies for review (PEDro = Physiotherapy Evidence Database; CNKI = Chinese National Knowledge Information Database).
Ijerph 15 00721 g001
Figure 2. Effect of mind-body exercises on depression. (Circled symbol represents the effect size of each individual study and squared symbol represents an overall/pooled effect size of all studies on each outcome).
Figure 2. Effect of mind-body exercises on depression. (Circled symbol represents the effect size of each individual study and squared symbol represents an overall/pooled effect size of all studies on each outcome).
Ijerph 15 00721 g002
Figure 3. Effect of mind-body exercises on activities of daily living. ADL: activities of daily living. (Circled symbol represents the effect size of each individual study and squared symbol represents an overall/pooled effect size of all studies on each outcome).
Figure 3. Effect of mind-body exercises on activities of daily living. ADL: activities of daily living. (Circled symbol represents the effect size of each individual study and squared symbol represents an overall/pooled effect size of all studies on each outcome).
Ijerph 15 00721 g003
Figure 4. Effect of mind-body exercises on mobility function. (Circled symbol represents the effect size of each individual study and squared symbol represents an overall/pooled effect size of all studies on each outcome).
Figure 4. Effect of mind-body exercises on mobility function. (Circled symbol represents the effect size of each individual study and squared symbol represents an overall/pooled effect size of all studies on each outcome).
Ijerph 15 00721 g004
Table 1. Characteristics of studies selected in this systematic review.
Table 1. Characteristics of studies selected in this systematic review.
ReferenceParticipant CharacteristicsMind-Body Intervention
ISZ (AT)
MB/CG
Mean Age or Age RangeCourse of DiseaseIschemic/HemorrhageTraining Frequency and Length (MB Component)Training ModeOutcomes/InstrumentFU
Cai et al. [27], China60 (0%) 30/30MB: 60.27 (10.48)
CG: 61.27 (7.42)
MB: 29.7 (7.38) wk
CG: 28.81 (5.37) wk
MB: 21/9
CG: 24/6
MB: 30 min × 4–5 sessions/wk, 12 wks (Baduanjin qigong) + educational program;
CG: educational program
GroupActivities of daily living (Barthel Scale)No
Immink et al. [28], Austria25 (12%)
12/13
MB: 56.1 (13.6)
CG: 63.2 (17.4)
MB: 81.6 (77.5) M
CG: 23.3 (12.5) M
NRMB: 90 min × 1 session/wk (group-based), 10 wks + 6 × 40 min/session (individual) (yoga);
CG: no treatment
Mixedmobility (2-MWD), depression (GDS), anxiety (STAI)No
Taylor-Piliae [29], USA145 (10%)
MB: 53
CG1: 44
CG2: 48
MB: 71.5 (10.3)
CG1: 69.6 (9.4)
CG2: 68.2 (10.3)
MB: 39 (40.2) M
CG1: 33 (58.7) M
CG2: 38.7 (46.7) M
MB: 33/12
CG1: 32/8
CG2: 30/14
16 unknown
MB: 60 min × 3 sessions/wk, 12 wks
(24-style tai chi);
CG1: strength and range of movement exercises; CG2: weekly phone call
Groupdepression (CES-D), sleep quality (PSQI)No
Au-Yeung et al. [30], China136 (16%)
74/62
MB: 61.7 (10.5)
CG: 65.9 (10.7)
MB: 54.1 (79.2) M
CG: 64.2 (106.4) M
NRMB: 60 min × 1 session/wk (group) + 60 min × 3 sessions/wk (self-practice), 12 wks (simplified tai chi);
CG: General exercises rehabilitation
Mixedmobility (TUG)6-wk
Kim et al. [31], Korea24 (8%)
12/12
MB: 53.45 (11.54)
CG: 55.18 (10.2)
NRNRMB: 60 min × 2 sessions/wk, 6 wks (simplified tai chi) + (general rehabilitation + physical therapy);
CG: general rehabilitation + physical therapy
Groupmobility (TUG)No
Wang et al. [32], Japan34 (14.7%)
17/17
MB: 76.53 (9.74)
CG: 77.59 (12.33)
NRNRMB: 50 min × 1 session/wk, 12 wks (24-style tai chi) + usual treatment;
CG: Usual treatment and exercise rehabilitation
Groupsleep quality (PSQI)No
Fu et al. [35], China60 (0%)
30/30
MB: 59.7 (7.6)
CG: 60.3 (8.4)
Less than 3 monthsMB: 13/17
CG: 10/20
MB: 15 min × 6 sessions/wk, 8 wks (24-style tai chi) + General rehabilitation
CG: General rehabilitation
Individualmobility (FAC)No
Yang et al. [36], China60 (0%)
30/30
MB: 58 (11.27)
CG: 60.07 (7.87)
NRNRMB: 15 min × 7 sessions/wk, 4 wks (Tai Chi balance training) + General rehabilitation;
CG: General rehabilitation
NRmobility (FAC), Activities of daily living (Barthel Scale)No
Zheng et al. [37], China112 (5%)
56/56
MB: 59 (13)
CG: 60 (12)
NR112/0MB: 60 min × unclear, 12 wks (tai chi) + General rehabilitation;
CG: General rehabilitation
NRActivities of daily living (Barthel Scale), anxiety (HAMA), depression (HAMB)12-M
Zhou et al. [38], China68 (0%)
34/34
65.2 (8.5) for all participantsNR0/68MB: unclear × 2 sessions/wk, 4 wks (24-style tai chi) + General rehabilitation;
CG: General rehabilitation + drug treatment
NRanxiety (HAMA)No
Taylor-Piliae et al. [39], China28 (11%)
16/12
MB: 72.8 (10.1)
CG: 64.5 (10.9)
MB: 58.3 (46.7) M
CG: 47.9 (42.5) M
MB: 12/4
CG: 9/3
MB: 60 min × 3 sessions/wk, 12 wks (24-style tai chi);
CG: usual treatment
Groupdepression (CES-D), sleep quality (PSQI)No
Yang et al. [40], China100 (0%)
50/50
MB: 54.3 (13.8)
CG: 55.2 (14.6)
MB: 44.7 (18.4) d
CG: 42.6 (16.7) d
unable to identifyMB: 45 min × 6 sessions/wk, 4 wks (tai chi balance training);
CG: exercise rehabilitation
NRactivity of daily living (Barthel Scale)No
Li et al. [41], China67 (0%)
35/32
MB: 56 (5.58)
CG: 54 (6.23)
NRNRMB: 30–35 min × 5 sessions/wk, 6 wks (tai chi motor imagery) + General rehabilitation; CG: General rehabilitationIndividualactivities of daily living (Barthel Scale)No
Li et al. [42], China68 (12%)
36/32
38–76 yearsNRNRMB: 30 min × 2 sessions/wk, 5 wks (sitting-style tai chi) + usual nursing;
CG: usual nursing
GroupDepression (HAMB)No
Li et al. [43], China89 (10%)
47/42
33–78 years2 wks or belowNRMB: 30 min × 2 sessions/wk, 5 wks (sitting-style tai chi) + usual nursing;
CG: usual nursing
GroupDepression (HAMB)No
Zhao et al. [44], China60 (0%)
30/30
MB: 53.85 (11.69)
CG: 51.38 (14.83)
MB: 40.58 (23.11) d
CG: 42.16 (19.82) d
NRMB: 30 min × 5 sessions/wk, 8 wks (simplified three-form tai chi) + General rehabilitation;
CG: General rehabilitation
GroupDepression (HAMB), activities of daily living (Barthel Scale)No
Note: ISZ = initial sample size, AT = attrition rate; wk. = week; M = month(s); d = day(s); MB = mind-body exercise; CG = control group; FAC = Functional Ambulation classification) HAMDMB = Hamilton Depression Scale; GDS = Geriatric Depression Scale-Short Form; STAI = State Trait Anxiety Inventory; CES-D = the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale; PSQI = Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index; TUG = Timed-up and go test; HAMA = Hamilton anxiety rating scale; HAMDMB = Hamilton Depression Scale; FU = follow-up assessment. NR = not reported; MWD = 2-minute Walk Distance Test.
Table 2. Methodological quality for randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled studies.
Table 2. Methodological quality for randomized controlled trials and non-randomized controlled studies.
Author [Reference]Item 1Item 2Item 3Item 4Item 5Item 6Item 7Item 8Item 9Score
Cai et al. [27]1010111117/9
Immink et al. [28]1111101118/9
Taylor-Piliae et al. [29]1111111119/9
Au-Yeung et al. [30]1011011117/9
Kim et al. [31]1010101116/9
Wang et al. [32]1011101117/9
Fu et al. [35]1011111118/9
Yang et al. [36]1000111116/9
Zheng et al. [37]1010101116/9
Zhou et al. [38]1010111117/9
Taylor-Piliae et al. [39]1111100117/9
Yang et al. [40]1010111117/9
Li et al. [41]1010101116/9
Li et al. [42]1010101015/9
Li et al. [43]1010101015/9
Zhao et al. [44]1010111117/9
Note: Item 1 = randomization; Item 2 = concealed allocation; Item 3 = similar baseline; Item 4= blinding of assessors; Item 5 = more than 85% retention; Item 6 = missing data; management (intention-to-treat analysis); Item 7 = between-group comparison; Item 8 = point measure and measures of variability; Item 9 = Co-intervention (should be either be avoided in the trial design or similar between the index and control groups); 1 = explicitly described and present in details; 0 = absent, inadequately described, or unclear.

© 2018 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health EISSN 1660-4601 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top