Next Article in Journal
Social Networking Sites and Addiction: Ten Lessons Learned
Next Article in Special Issue
Risk of Suicide and Dysfunctional Patterns of Personality among Bereaved Substance Users
Previous Article in Journal
Spatially Correlated Time Series and Ecological Niche Analysis of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Afghanistan
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Social Norms of Suicidal and Self-Harming Behaviours in Scottish Adolescents
Open AccessArticle

Clinical Prediction of Suicide and Undetermined Death: A Pseudo-Prospective Clinical and Medico-Legal Study of Substance Abusers

Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Psychiatry, Lund University, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden
Forensic Medicine, Lund University, SE-221 85 Lund, Sweden
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Rory O’Connor and Gwendolyn Portzky
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2017, 14(3), 310;
Received: 31 January 2017 / Revised: 1 March 2017 / Accepted: 14 March 2017 / Published: 17 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue From Understanding Suicide Risk to Preventing Suicide)


This study examines aspects of prediction of suicide and death of undetermined intent. We investigated all consecutive, autopsied patients between 1993 and 1997 who had been in contact with the Addiction Centre in Malmö from 1968 onwards. The staff was asked, shortly after autopsy but before they knew of the manner of death, if they thought the patient had committed suicide. The case records were blindly evaluated, and toxicological autopsy findings for alcohol in blood samples investigated. The specificity of prediction was 83% and significantly more often correct than the sensitivity, which was only 45% for suicide and for suicide/death of undetermined intent (93% versus 39%). Suicidal communication was more often considered non-serious before death of undetermined intent than before suicide. The former could be predicted by ideation but not by suicide attempt reported in case records, unlike suicide, which was predicted by both. The undetermined group also showed higher levels of alcohol in the blood at autopsy. We concluded that more serious clinical investigation of suicidal feelings, which may be hidden and not taken seriously, and treatment of alcohol use disorders with active follow-up appear urgent in the efforts to prevent suicide.
Keywords: substance use disorders; death of undetermined intent; suicide; suicide attempt; suicidal ideation; prediction; autopsy findings substance use disorders; death of undetermined intent; suicide; suicide attempt; suicidal ideation; prediction; autopsy findings

1. Introduction

Suicide is a major health problem, with more than 800,000 people killing themselves every year [1]. The prediction of accomplished suicide in order to prevent it is urgent but difficult. Different rating scales have been developed, such as the Scale of Suicidal Ideation (SSI) [2], the Suicidal Intent Scale (SIS) [3], and the Sad Persons Scale [4]. However, a recent review of the predictive value for future suicide attempts has not been encouraging [5], with the conclusion that none of the known rating scales reached a sensitivity of 80%, nor was a specificity of 50% reached. Clinical judgement as a complement to rating scales was strongly recommended. Typical scales for suicide prediction can be less effective when a respondent has alcohol or other substance use disorders, so additional clinical judgement is warranted.
Alcohol use disorders are also commonly found among suicide victims [6,7,8]. These are usually regarded as the second most common diagnosis among suicide victims after depression, and have been related to deaths of undetermined intent [8,9,10]. In population-based surveys, suicide and death of undetermined intent are usually combined in the analyses [11,12], and similarities have been shown between the two groups in several studies [13,14,15]. However, although there are similarities between these manners of death, differences in background variables have been highlighted recently [10], as well as similarities between accidental overdoses and death with undetermined intent rather than with suicide in substance use disorders [16].
Alcohol and other substance use disorders also show a high risk of suicide [17,18]. Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts are also common among people with alcohol use disorders [19]. However, predictors such as suicide attempts and suicidal ideation are often considered less serious among people with alcohol use disorders, especially if occurring during drinking and intoxication. Though attempted suicide has also been shown to be a highly significant risk factor for completed suicide in young males with alcohol use disorders, this group was found to have a significantly lower risk of completed suicide than other suicide attempters [20]. Likewise, the suicide risk in suicide attempters who had recently consumed alcohol was assessed as less severe, and they were less often referred to a psychiatrist compared with those who had not [21]. Other investigators have found that a correlation between suicidal intent and the lethality of the suicide attempt was seen only among patients without a diagnosis of alcohol dependence [22]. Low scores on the SIS when alcohol was used prior to self-harm have also been shown [23].
However, other authors have pointed out the triggering effect of alcohol on suicidal behaviour. According to one study, 50% of attempted suicides happened within one hour of alcohol use [24]. Attempted suicide can be triggered by alcohol [25], and alcohol use has been associated with a faster transition from suicidal impulse to action [26]. High levels of alcohol at autopsy have been found in people with brittle/sensitive personalities [27], and a dose-response relationship between the number of drinks and suicidal behaviour has also been shown [28].
The present study is based on a sample of patients who had been treated at the Addiction Centre in Malmö from 1968 onwards, who died in the period from 1993 to 1997, and who were autopsied at the Department of Forensics. The sample has been presented in a previous study on unnatural death and drugs used in life [29]. This special sample is now revisited, with the study inspired by recent findings and discussions of the limited sensitivity and specificity of known rating scales for suicide risk. Complementary clinical evaluation was recommended.
The first aim was to investigate the accuracy of the staff’s clinical prediction of suicide and death of undetermined intent, and possible differences between these manners of death. A second aim was to investigate, using case record evaluation, the predictive value of suicidal ideation and attempt of suicide and death by undetermined intent. Finally, alcohol levels at autopsy by those manners of death were compared.

2. Material and Methods

A forensic examination sampling procedure was used. The procedure was carried out on all consecutive autopsies of patients who had been in contact with the Addiction Centre in Malmö University Hospital. In Sweden, a forensic examination is carried out on most people who have died outside hospitals by suspected natural causes (disease) but with no medical history that can explain the death, or by unnatural manner (trauma including homicide, suicide, death of undetermined intent, and accidental fatal intoxications).
In all, 388 consecutive forensic autopsies on previous patients at the Department of Forensic Medicine in Lund from 1993 to 1997 inclusive were investigated (Figure 1), as well as an investigation of case records from 1968 onwards. The sampling was carried out in the 1990s, but there have been no significant changes in methodology since then, and changes in the epidemiology of deliberate self-harm do not apply to suicidal ideation and attempt investigated in the present sample.
Substance use was diagnosed according to International Classification of Disease (ICD 9 and 10) [30,31] for all inpatients, who constituted 76% of the sample. The remaining 24% had been admitted as outpatients, and had applied because they subjectively considered themselves to have a substance use problem. It is safe to conclude that they all fulfilled the criteria for alcohol dependence and/or had a drug problem. From 1968 to 1994, all the patients treated at the Department of Clinical Alcohol Research were admitted for alcohol problems; after that date, the clinic became an Addiction Centre, which also received patients with narcotic misuse. Some of them may not have had an alcohol problem, but in only seven cases could alcohol use disorder not be confirmed (1.8% of the total sample), though it could be suspected. A total of 89 patients had used illegal drugs (some legal drugs as well) and another 73 had used legal drugs. A previous study had shown that the number of drugs used in life increased the risk of death of undetermined intent but not suicide [29]. However, number of drugs detected at autopsy showed similar rates for undetermined intent and suicide.
The interviews were performed within a few days of the patient’s death, with nurses and nursing assistants who had previously had contact with the patient. Most of the services provided involved psychosocial interventions by nurses and registered nurses; the group of physicians was small and the younger physicians had often only worked at the department for a few months. We therefore decided to interview nurses/registered nurses to ensure that we acquired the most reliable information.
As the interviews were performed shortly after death, the interviewer and the interviewees did not know the manner of death. The staff remembered 157 patients, as expected more often those with a recent contact (Table 1). However, there was no difference in remembering manner of death. The suicidal outcome as judged by staff was dichotomized into ‘yes’ or ‘no’, but they sometimes stated that it was ‘only a threat’ or ‘just when drunk’, which made up a third category ‘intent not considered serious’.
The entire records were evaluated for those who had been in- or outpatients at the Addiction Centre in Malmö University Hospital from first admission and onwards. Consequently, these ratings were not biased by any knowledge of the manner of death. The ratings of suicidal ideation and attempt were used in the present study.
There were similar rates of patients who had been in contact with the clinic within the previous three months, regardless of manner of death. Furthermore, there was no evidence of more people seeking help in later contact in future suicide victims or those who died by undetermined intent (27% of the suicide cases, 30% of the undetermined cases, and 23% of the others, see Table 2. There were also similar numbers for other time intervals, one year, five years, etc. We chose to include all remembered patients, regardless of time passed since last contact, and then compared those with recent contact with more distant.
Femoral blood samples of alcohol concentration had been collected for in 43/45 cases of suicide and in 86/91 of deaths by undetermined intent.

2.1. Statistics

A logistic regression with odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) was used to relate suicidal ideation and attempt to undetermined death and completed suicide. Fisher’s exact test was used for comparison between groups. Student’s t-test was used for comparison of continuous variables.

2.2. Ethical Considerations

Ethical approval was not required for deceased persons in Sweden at that time. However, the National Board of Forensic Medicine approved the study by oral confirmation number 1993.

3. Results

3.1. Staff Judgement

Suicide predicted by staff and ‘intent not considered serious’ were compared for suicides and death of undetermined intent (Table 3). A significantly higher incidence of ‘intent not considered serious’ was found in the undetermined group (8/17 versus 0/9, Fisher’s exact test p = 0.023).

3.1.1. Suicide versus Non-Suicide

Sensitivity was 9/20 (45%) for the prediction of future suicide, but specificity was high 114/137 (83%). The latter prediction was significantly more often correct as compared to the prediction of suicide (p < 0.0001).

3.1.2. Suicide and Undetermined Intent versus Other Manners of Death

The sensitivity was 18/67 (26%) if suicide and death of undetermined intent were aggregated. If ‘intent not considered serious’ was included, the sensitivity was higher 26/67 (39%), more similar to suicide, and the specificity was also high, 84/90 (93%).
The prediction of no suicide/death of undetermined intent was significantly more often correct, as compared to the prediction for suicide/undetermined intent (84/90 versus 26/67, p < 0.0001).
The figures were similar for those with recent contact within a year and for the total group.
The prediction of neither suicide nor death of undetermined intent was 20/20 (100%), while the prediction of suicide/death of undetermined intent was 7/18 (39%) (p < 0.0001).

3.2. Suicidal Behaviour Reported in the Case Records Related to Suicide and Undetermined Death

The association between suicidal behaviour (ideation and attempt) reported in the case records and manner of death is presented in Table 4. The sensitivity of the prediction of suicide by suicide ideation was 36%, and the specificity was 84%. The sensitivity of prediction by suicide attempt was 33% and the specificity was 83%. The sensitivity of prediction of suicide/undetermined death by suicidal ideation was 29% and the specificity was 88%. The sensitivity of prediction of suicide/undetermined death by suicide attempt was 26% and the specificity was 83%. In all cases the sensitivity was lower than the specificity.
The sensitivity ranged from 26% (suicide attempt in case records for suicide/undetermined intent) to 45% (prediction by staff, regardless of time span since last contact.)
The specificity ranged from 83% (suicide attempt in case records for suicide) to 100% (prediction by staff within a year before suicide). Thus, a somewhat better prediction was made by staff.
A logistic regression was performed to assess the impact of suicidal ideation and suicide attempt on suicide and undetermined death. Suicidal ideation was related to both suicide (OR: 2.95, CI = 1.50–5.81, p = 0.002) and death of undetermined intent (OR: 1.92, CI = 1.09–3.37, p = 0.023). However, suicide attempt was only related to suicide (2.41, CI = 1.22–4.75, p = 0.011), and there was no significant correlation with death of undetermined intent.

3.3. Toxicological Autopsy Findings

The blood levels of alcohol were higher in death of undetermined intent (1.79 per mille) as compared to suicide (0.72 per mille) (t-test p = 0.0001).
In the suicide group, alcohol was detected in 25/43 (58%) versus 60/82 (73%) in the undetermined group, a non-significant difference. One person with a positive test in urine was included.

4. Discussion

The present study considers clinical prediction without the use of any rating scales. This prediction did not seem to be very accurate for suicide, less than 50% with or without the inclusion of death of undetermined intent. On the other hand, the specificity was high, and the prediction that persons would not commit suicide was often correct (83%–93%). When suicide attempt or ideation were used as predictors, a similar sensitivity and specificity showed the same relationship with a higher specificity.
However, the highest specificity was found by staff intuition within a year before death.
This contradicts the conclusion by the Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU) review of questionnaires [5], which showed a low specificity and higher sensitivity, mostly including repeated suicide attempts rather than completed suicide. A meta-analysis of suicide risk within a year after discharge showed that 60% of future suicide victims were considered to be at low risk at discharge, so 40% were high risk, similar to the present finding (39%–45%) [32]. Prediction by staff intuition could be a complement to rating scales.
The poor prediction of suicide may reflect unawareness of life events occurring after last contact that may trigger suicide. The staff could judge resilience only, which corresponds to trait factors in suicide risk but not state as described by Goldston et al. [33]. Better follow-up may improve the possibility of providing support in the event of distressing life events.
The better prediction of survival may also reflect better contact. The staff seemed to know who would survive, but they did not know who would commit suicide, and prediction had escaped their attention. Ringel [34] proposed a presuicidal syndrome, which included ‘Einengung’ or constriction of human relationships and values. In this state, the person may be very much alone and not communicative with others. Furthermore, in an investigation of the long-term course of depression after a suicide attempt [35], some subjects pointed out that the decision to continue living was a very private one, not necessarily communicated with others. Therefore, the decision to commit suicide may very well be a decision taken in a lonely state.
The present findings support both views, which may be an explanation for the poor sensitivity and a need to be more open to exploring suicidal feelings and existential issues among the patients. Suicidal communication was sometimes not taken seriously. This type of communication was related to death of undetermined intent rather than suicide. These patients may themselves have been less serious in their intent, and jeopardised their lives with a fatal outcome. Worthy of note is that, overall, they also had higher levels of alcohol in their blood samples at autopsy. Heavy drinking leads to loss of inhibitions and risk-taking, which may trigger self-inflicted death despite less serious intent. It has been shown that those who die by undetermined intent more frequently have alcohol in the blood at autopsy, 62% versus 35% [36], as compared to 73% versus 58% in the present sample, a non-significant difference. Only people with alcohol use disorder were included in the present study, which may explain the higher rates in the suicide group.
The present findings support the hypothesis of the triggering effect of alcohol on suicide and death of undetermined intent [25,26], especially the latter.
Suicide attempt was related to completed suicide, but no relation could be shown with death by undetermined intent. This is in agreement with a recent study [10], which showed a correlation between hospitalisation for self-harm and later suicide, but not undetermined death, in the female group. Other investigators have found suicidal threats (34%) and previous suicide attempts (31%) in cases of undetermined intent, but the sample only included 31% with an alcohol problem [37]. The present findings from the case records are compatible with the results from the staff interviews and autopsy findings of higher blood levels. It indicates a less serious intent in undetermined cases, though self-inflicted death may be triggered by alcohol.
The present study supports the view of a continuum from more ambivalent suicidality in the case of death of undetermined intent to less ambivalent suicidality in the case of suicide, as proposed by other authors in a multicentre study of a general population of self-inflicted deaths [38]. Alcohol use seems to trigger more serious suicidal behaviour. More knowledge is needed about suicidal behaviour as a predictor of death by undetermined intent, and a more thorough clinical investigation of suicidal intent.
The staff knew that the patient was dead, which may have impacted their judgement. The impact of the knowledge is not known. Furthermore, anyone using a rating scale will probably undertake preventative measures, which was not possible in the present study, reducing that confounder.
Another limitation (also often inherent in rating scales) is that the staff did not know the life events that may occur and trigger an accomplished suicide. The impact of traits (such as disease, personality) and states (such as life events) have been discussed in the context of suicide [33]. In most cases only traits or resilience could be judged.
Some people were not remembered, possibly because they had not been to the clinic shortly before death. There were at least similar rates for those who had been in contact within a year and after more than a year, so the effect of recall bias due to time lapse since last contact does not appear to affect the results. However, there is some recall bias due to closer relationships with the staff or more serious illness, which we cannot control for. No scales were used in the present study, so the comparison between staff judgement was made against findings in literature.
The major strength in the present study was the pseudo-prospective design and the use of multiple sources of data, clinically from interviews with staff and case records, as well as autopsy findings.

5. Conclusions

The implications of the present study are that clinical predictions by people who know the patient are good without any systematic inquiry (83%–93%) in the case of deciding who is not going to commit suicide. This reflects their intuition about the patient’s resilience. However, the prediction of suicide was poor, less than chance (39%–45%). Suicide scales have also appeared to be inadequate. We propose more active clinical inquiry of suicidal tendencies, especially as people tend to be very private about their suicidal feelings, and also more active follow-up.
Suicidal ideation should be taken more seriously among people with substance use disorders, including those regarded as ‘just a threat’ or ‘only when drunk’. Suicidal ideation of all levels may be predictive of death of undetermined intent, and alcohol appears to trigger fatal suicidal behaviour. Vigorous treatment of alcohol use disorders is also urgent in the ambition to prevent suicide and death by undetermined intent.


Governmental funding of clinical research within the Swedish NHS (National Health Service) and Ellen and Henrik Sjöbring’s Memorial Foundation supported the study. Anna Lindgren provided statistical advice. Leslie Walke revised the language.

Author Contributions

M.B. and P.L. designed the study. A.F. performed the interviews and the case record evaluation. M.B. and L.B. analysed the data. L.B. wrote the paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. World Health Organization 2016. Available online: (accessed on 30 January 2017).
  2. Beck, AT.; Kovacs, M.; Weissman, A. Assessment of suicidal intention: The Scale for Suicide Ideation. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1979, 47, 343–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Beck, R.W.; Morris, J.B.; Beck, A.T. Cross-validation of the Suicidal Intent Scale. Psychol. Rep. 1974, 34, 445–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Patterson, W.M.; Dohn, H.H.; Bird, J.; Patterson, G.A. Evaluation of suicidal patients: The SAD PERSONS scale. Psychosomatics 1983, 24, 343–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment (SBU). Instrument för Bedömning av Suicidrisk. En Systematisk Litteraturöversikt; SBU-Rapport Nr 242; Statens Beredning för Medicinsk Och Social Utvärdering: Stockholm, Sweden, 2015. (In Swedish) [Google Scholar]
  6. Arsenault-Lapierre, G.; Kim, C.; Turecki, G. Psychiatric diagnoses in 3275 suicides: A meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2004, 4, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  7. Bertolote, J.M.; Fleischmann, A.; De Leo, D.; Wasserman, D. Psychiatric diagnoses and suicide: Revisiting the evidence. Crisis 2004, 25, 147–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Brådvik, L.; Mattisson, C.; Bogren, M.; Nettelbladt, P. Mental disorders in suicide and undetermined death in the Lundby study. The contribution of severe depression and alcohol dependence. Arch. Suicide Res. 2010, 14, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Donaldson, A.E.; Larsen, G.Y.; Fullerton-Gleason, L.; Olsson, L.M. Classifying undetermined poisoning deaths. Inj. Prev. 2006, 12, 338–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Björkenstam, C.; Johansson, L.-A.; Nordström, P.; Thiblin, I.; Fugelstad, A.; Hallqvist, J.; Ljung, R. Suicide or undetermined intent? A register-based study of signs of misclassification. Popul. Health Metr. 2014, 12, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Hawton, K.; Bergen, H.; Simkin, S.; Dodd, S.; Pocock, P.; Bernal, W.; Gunnell, D.; Kapur, N. Long term effect of reduced pack sizes of paracetamol in poisoning deaths and liver transplant activity in England and Wales: Interrupted time series analyses. BMJ 2013, 346, f403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Runeson, B.; Tidemalm, D.; Dahlin, M.; Lichtenstein, P.; Långström, N. Method of attempted suicide as predictor of subsequent successful suicide: National long term cohort study. BMJ 2010, 340, c3222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Evenson, R.C.; Cho, D.W.; Holland, R. Identifying psychiatric suicides for research purposes. J. Clin. Psychol. 1988, 44, 1029–1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gray, D.; Coon, H.; McGlade, E.; Callor, W.B.; Byrd, J.; Viskochil, J.; Bakian, A.; Yurgelun-Todd, D.; Grey, T.; McMahon, W.M. Comparative analysis of suicide, accidental, and undetermined cause of death classification. Suicide Life-Threat. Behav. 2014, 44, 304–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Linsley, K.R.; Schapira, K.; Kelly, T.P. Open verdict v. suicide—Importance to research. Br. J. Psychiatry 2001, 178, 465–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Olsson, M.O.; Brådvik, L.; Öjehagen, A.; Håkansson, A. Risk factors for unnatural death; Fatal accidental intoxication, undetermined intent and suicide: Register follow-up in a criminal justice population with substance use problems. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016, 162, 176–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Inskip, H.M.; Harris, E.C.; Barraclough, B. Lifetime risk of suicide for affective disorder, alcoholism, and schizophrenia. Br. J. Psychiatry 1998, 172, 35–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wilcox, H.C.; Conner, K.R.; Caine, E.D. Association of alcohol and drug use disorders and completed suicide: An empirical review of cohort studies. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2004, 76, S11–S19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Darvishi, N.; Farhadi, M.; Haghtalab, T.; Poorolajal, J. Alcohol-related risk of suicidal ideation, suicide attempt, and completed suicide: A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2015, 20, e0126870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Rossow, I.; Romelsjö, A.; Leifman, H. Alcohol abuse and suicidal behaviour in young and middle aged men: Differentiating between attempted and completed suicide. Addiction 1999, 94, 1199–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Suokas, J.; Lönnqvist, J. Suicide attempts in which alcohol is involved: A special group in general hospital emergency rooms. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1995, 91, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Nielsen, A.S.; Stenager, E.; Brahe, U.B. Attempted suicide, suicidal intent, and alcohol. Crisis 1993, 14, 32–38. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Haw, C.; Casey, D.; Holmes, J.; Hawton, K. Suicidal Intent and Method of Self-Harm: A Large-scale Study of Self-Harm Patients Presenting to a General Hospital. Suicide Life-Threat. Behav. 2015, 45, 732–746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ghanbari, B.; Malakouti, S.K.; Nojomi, M.; De Leo, D.; Saeed, K. Alcohol Abuse and Suicide Attempt in Iran: A Case-Crossover Study. Glob. J. Health Sci. 2015, 3, 58–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ribeiro, D.B.; Terra, M.G.; Soccol, K.L.; Schneider, J.F.; Camillo, L.A.; Plein, F.A. Reasons for attempting suicide among men who use alcohol and other drugs. Rev. Gauch. Enferm. 2016, 37, e54896. [Google Scholar]
  26. Bryan, C.J.; Garland, E.L.; Rudd, M.D. From impulse to action among military personnel hospitalized for suicide risk: Alcohol consumption and the reported transition from suicidal thought to behavior. Gen. Hosp. Psychiatry 2016, 41, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Berglund, M.; Krantz, P.; Lundqvist, G. Suicide in alcoholism: A prospective study of 55 cases with autopsy findings. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1987, 76, 381–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Borges, G.; Cherpitel, C.J.; Orozco, R.; Ye, Y.; Monteiro, M.; Hao, W.; Benegal, V. A dose-response estimate for acute alcohol use and risk of suicide attempt. Addict. Biol. 2016, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Brådvik, L.; Berglund, M.; Frank, A.; Lindgren, A.; Löwenhielm, P. Number of addictive substances used related to increased risk for unnatural death: A combined medico-legal and case-record study. BMC Psychiatry 2009, 9, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. International Stastistical Classification of Disease ICD 9; Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD, USA, 1977. (In Swedish)
  31. International Stastistical Classification of Disease ICD 10; Center for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics: Hyattsville, MD, USA, 1997. (In Swedish)
  32. Large, M.; Smith, G.; Sharma, S.; Nielssen, O.; Singh, S.P. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical factors associated with the suicide of psychiatric in-patients. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 2011, 124, 18–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Goldston, D.B.; Reboussin, B.A.; Daniel, S.S. Predictors of suicide attempts: State and trait components. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2006, 115, 842–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Ringel, E. Selbstmordverhütung; Verlag Hans Huber: Bern, Switzerland; Stuttgart, Germany; Vienna, Austria, 1969. (In German) [Google Scholar]
  35. Crona, L.; Stenmarker, M.; Öjehagen, A.; Asklund, U.; Brådvik, L. Taking care of oneself by regaining control—A key to staying alive four to five decades after a suicide attempt in severe depression. BMC Psychiatry 2017, 17, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Sjögren, H.; Eriksson, A.; Ahlm, K. Role of alcohol in unnatural deaths: A study of all deaths in Sweden. Alcohol.: Clin. Exp. Res. 2000, 24, 1050–1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ohberg, A.; Lonnqvist, J. Suicides hidden among undetermined deaths. Acta Psychiatr. Scand. 1998, 98, 214–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Bergen, H.; Hawton, K.; Kapur, N.; Cooper, J.; Steeg, S.; Ness, J.; Waters, K. Shared characteristics of suicides and other unnatural deaths following non-fatal self-harm? A multicentre study of risk factors. Psychol. Med. 2012, 42, 727–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Sampling procedure (modified after [29]).
Figure 1. Sampling procedure (modified after [29]).
Ijerph 14 00310 g001
Table 1. Length of time since last contact with the clinic before death, total sample and patients remembered by staff (%).
Table 1. Length of time since last contact with the clinic before death, total sample and patients remembered by staff (%).
TimeAll PatientsPatients Remembered
<3 months9864 (65)
<1 year8643 (50)
<5 years10637 (35)
<10 years4411 (25)
>10 years512 (4)
Total385157 (41)
In three cases the last date of contact was not known.
Table 2. Time since last contact with the clinic by manner of death.
Table 2. Time since last contact with the clinic by manner of death.
Manner of Death<3 Months1 Year5 Years5–10 Years>10 Years
Suicide12 (27)13 (29)5 (11)8 (18)6 (13)
Undetermined27 (30)20 (22)21 (23)16 (18)7 (8)
Other59 (23)53 (21)80 (32)20 (8)42 (17)
Total98 (25)86 (22)106 (28)44 (11)51 (13)
In three cases the last date of contact was not known.
Table 3. Suicidal outcome by manner of death according to staff’s judgement.
Table 3. Suicidal outcome by manner of death according to staff’s judgement.
Manner of DeathNo Intent Not Considered SeriousYesTotal
Suicide 110920
Undetermined death 308 *947
Other 844290
Total 1251220157
* intent not considered serious versus suicidal outcome; undetermined death versus suicide, p = 0.023.
Table 4. Suicidal ideation and suicide attempt by manner of death according to case record evaluation in the long-term course.
Table 4. Suicidal ideation and suicide attempt by manner of death according to case record evaluation in the long-term course.
Manner of DeathSuicidal IdeationSuicide AttemptTotal
Suicide16 (36%)15 (33%)45
Undetermined death24 (26%)17 (18%)91
Other manners of death30 (12%)42 (17%)252
Total70 (18%)74 (19%)388
Back to TopTop