Next Article in Journal
Measurement and Study of Lidar Ratio by Using a Raman Lidar in Central China
Next Article in Special Issue
Generalized Confidence Intervals and Fiducial Intervals for Some Epidemiological Measures
Previous Article in Journal
Which Factors Determine Metal Accumulation in Agricultural Soils in the Severely Human-Coupled Ecosystem?
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Simulation-Based Comparison of Covariate Adjustment Methods for the Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Open AccessArticle

Applications of a Novel Clustering Approach Using Non-Negative Matrix Factorization to Environmental Research in Public Health

Independent Consultant, Paris 75006, France
YGM Consult, CEO, Paris 75015, France
School of Statistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
Institute Louis Bachelier, Paris 75002, France
Department of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Biomathematics, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20057, USA
CGStat, CEO, Raleigh, NC 27607, USA
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Igor Burstyn
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13(5), 509;
Received: 29 February 2016 / Revised: 11 May 2016 / Accepted: 12 May 2016 / Published: 18 May 2016
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Methodological Innovations and Reflections-1)
Often data can be represented as a matrix, e.g., observations as rows and variables as columns, or as a doubly classified contingency table. Researchers may be interested in clustering the observations, the variables, or both. If the data is non-negative, then Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) can be used to perform the clustering. By its nature, NMF-based clustering is focused on the large values. If the data is normalized by subtracting the row/column means, it becomes of mixed signs and the original NMF cannot be used. Our idea is to split and then concatenate the positive and negative parts of the matrix, after taking the absolute value of the negative elements. NMF applied to the concatenated data, which we call PosNegNMF, offers the advantages of the original NMF approach, while giving equal weight to large and small values. We use two public health datasets to illustrate the new method and compare it with alternative clustering methods, such as K-means and clustering methods based on the Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) or Principal Component Analysis (PCA). With the exception of situations where a reasonably accurate factorization can be achieved using the first SVD component, we recommend that the epidemiologists and environmental scientists use the new method to obtain clusters with improved quality and interpretability. View Full-Text
Keywords: SVD; PCA; NMF; K-means SVD; PCA; NMF; K-means
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Fogel, P.; Gaston-Mathé, Y.; Hawkins, D.; Fogel, F.; Luta, G.; Young, S.S. Applications of a Novel Clustering Approach Using Non-Negative Matrix Factorization to Environmental Research in Public Health. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 509.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

Back to TopTop