Next Article in Journal
Evaluation of the Survivability of Microorganisms Deposited on Filtering Respiratory Protective Devices under Varying Conditions of Humidity
Previous Article in Journal
Removal of Fecal Indicators, Pathogenic Bacteria, Adenovirus, Cryptosporidium and Giardia (oo)cysts in Waste Stabilization Ponds in Northern and Eastern Australia
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 13
Issue 1
10.3390/ijerph13010088
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cadmium Chloride Induces DNA Damage and Apoptosis of Human Liver Carcinoma Cells via Oxidative Stress

by
Anthony Skipper
1,
Jennifer N. Sims
2,
Clement G. Yedjou
1 and
Paul B. Tchounwou
1,*
1
Molecular Toxicology Research Laboratory, NIH-Center for Environmental Health, College of Science, Engineering and Technology, Jackson State University, 1400 Lynch Street, Box 18540, Jackson, MS 39217, USA
2
Department of Pathology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Bookline Avenue, Boston, MA 02215, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13(1), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010088
Submission received: 7 September 2015 / Revised: 16 November 2015 / Accepted: 25 November 2015 / Published: 2 January 2016
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Cadmium is a heavy metal that has been shown to cause its toxicity in humans and animals. Many documented studies have shown that cadmium produces various genotoxic effects such as DNA damage and chromosomal aberrations. Ailments such as bone disease, renal damage, and several forms of cancer are attributed to overexposure to cadmium.  Although there have been numerous studies examining the effects of cadmium in animal models and a few case studies involving communities where cadmium contamination has occurred, its molecular mechanisms of action are not fully elucidated. In this research, we hypothesized that oxidative stress plays a key role in cadmium chloride-induced toxicity, DNA damage, and apoptosis of human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells. To test our hypothesis, cell viability was determined by MTT assay. Lipid hydroperoxide content stress was estimated by lipid peroxidation assay. Genotoxic damage was tested by the means of alkaline single cell gel electrophoresis (Comet) assay. Cell apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry assessment (Annexin-V/PI assay). The result of MTT assay indicated that cadmium chloride induces toxicity to HepG2 cells in a concentration-dependent manner, showing a 48 hr-LD50 of 3.6 µg/mL. Data generated from lipid peroxidation assay resulted in a significant (p < 0.05) increase of hydroperoxide production, specifically at the highest concentration tested. Data obtained from the Comet assay indicated that cadmium chloride causes DNA damage in HepG2 cells in a concentration-dependent manner. A strong concentration-response relationship (p < 0.05) was recorded between annexin V positive cells and cadmium chloride exposure. In summary, these in vitro studies provide clear evidence that cadmium chloride induces oxidative stress, DNA damage, and programmed cell death in human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells.

1. Introduction

Cadmium is one of the naturally occurring heavy metals. However, it is often used in industry, and exerts toxic human health effects. It is classified as a human carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer and belongs to the group I carcinogens [1]. Cadmium intoxication in humans usually occurs through inhalation (cigarette smoke) and ingestion (consumption of contaminated water and food). Acute intoxication of cadmium may lead to liver, lung, and testis damages [2] while chronic intoxication may result in obstruction of pulmonary disease, disturbance of metabolism, disregulation of blood pressure, obstruction of kidney function, structure of bones and immune system [1,3,4]. Although the mechanism of cadmium induced toxicity is poorly understood, it has been reported that cadmium causes damage to cells through the generation of reactive oxygen species [5]. Studies using two-dimensional gel electrophoresis have shown that several stress response systems are expressed in response to cadmium exposure, including those for heat shock, oxidative stress, stringent response, cold shock, and Son of Sevenless (SOS) [6,7,8]. In vivo studies have shown that cadmium modulates male reproduction in a mice model at a concentration of 1 mg/kg body weight [9]. However, cadmium is a weak mutagen when compared with other carcinogenic metals [10]. Previous reports revealed that cadmium affects signal transduction pathways; inducing inositol polyphosphate formation, increasing cytosolic free calcium levels in various cell types [11], and blocking calcium channels [12,13]. A line of evidence shows that cadmium alters antioxidant defense mechanisms and increases generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) including superoxide anion and hydrogen peroxide [14,15,16]. Hence, the present investigation was designed to prove that oxidative stress plays a key role in cadmium chloride-induced DNA damage and apoptosis of human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals and Test Media

DMEM-F12 containing 2.5 mM L-glutamine, 15 mM HEPES, 0.5 mM sodium pyruvate, and 1200 mg/L sodium bicarbonate, was supplied by American Type Culture Collection-ATCC (Manassas, VA, USA), and was used as the growth medium. Costar Company (Cambridge, MA, USA) was the source for obtaining the ninety six-well plates, while Sigma Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO, USA) provided reagents such as fetal bovine serum (FBS), penicillin G and streptomycin, phosphate buffered saline (PBS), G418 and MTT assay kit.

2.2. Cell/Tissue Culture

Human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells obtained from ATCC were conserved in liquid nitrogen. During experimentation their containers/vials were gently shaken for 2 min in a water bath at 37 °C, and the content of each vial was transferred to a 25 cm2 tissue culture flask in which DMEM-F12 medium containing 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum (FBS), 0.4 mg/mL G418, and 1% (w/v) penicillin/streptomycin, was added up to a total volume of 10 mL. The cells were examined using an inverted tissue culture microscope, and incubated for 24 h in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. The Trypan blue exclusion test (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) was performed to determine the cell viability based on the number of live cells counted, using a hemocytometer.

2.3. Assessment of Cell Viability by MTT Assay

HepG2 cells were cultured in enriched DMEM-F12 medium as described above, and 180 µL aliquots cell suspension (5 × 105/mL) were pipetted and placed 96-well polystyrene tissue culture plates, followed by the addition of 20 µL aliquots of stock solutions to make-up six replicates of final cadmium chloride concentrations of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 µg/mL. Control cells received 20 µL of distilled water. After chemical treatment, HepG2 cells were incubated for 48 h in a humidified 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. After incubation, the MTT assay for cell viability was performed as previously described [17,18].

2.4. Assessment of Oxidative Stress by Lipid Hydroperoxide Assay

To test the hypothesis that oxidative stress plays a key role in cadmium chloride-induced toxicity to HepG2 cells, lipid hydroperoxide assay (Calbiochem-Novabiochem, San Diego, CA, USA) was performed and the production level of hydroperoxide content was estimated in untreated and treated cells. This experiment was conducted according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Calbiochem-Novabiochem) [19,20], with few modifications as previously described in our laboratory [21,22,23].

2.5. Assessment of DNA Damage by Comet Assay

The Comet assay was carried out by the method previously described by Collins and his collaborators [24,25] with some modifications [26]. Briefly, 1 × 106 cells/mL were treated with either media or cadmium chloride (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 µg/mL) respectively and incubated in a 5% CO2 at 37 °C for 48 h. After incubation, the cells were centrifuged, washed with cold PBS, and 1 × 105 cells/mL counted from the pool of untreated and treated cells were used for performing the comet assay as previously described [26,27].

2.6. Assessment of Apoptosis by Annexin V/PI Assay

Annexin V FITC/PI assay was performed as described previously [28] to evaluate the apoptotic effect of cadmium chloride to human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells. Briefly, 2 mL of cells (1 × 106 cells/mL) were added to each well of 6 plates and treated with 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 µg/mL of cadmium chloride for 48 h. Control well plates were also made without cadmium chloride. After 48 h of incubation, 1 × 106 cells/mL were counted and washed in PBS, re-suspended in binding buffer (10 mm Hepes/NaOH pH 7.4, 140 mm NaCl, 25mm CaCl2), and stained with FITC-conjugated annexin V (Pharmingen, Becton Dickinson Co., San Diego, CA, USA). After staining, the cells were incubated for 15 min in the dark at room temperature. Cells were re-washed with binding buffer and analyzed by flow cytometry (FACS Calibur; Becton-Dickinson) using CellQuest software.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Inhibition of Cell Viability by Cadmium Chloride

The results of the cytotoxicity of cadmium chloride to human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells are presented in Figure 1. Data obtained from this assay demonstrated a strong concentration-response relationship with regard to the cytotoxic of cadmium chloride in HepG2 cells. As indicated in this Figure, there was a gradual decrease in the viability of HepG2 cells, with increasing concentrations of cadmium chloride that resulted in a 48 hr-LD50 of 3.6 µg/mL. HepG2 cells exposed to cadmium chloride concentrations of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 µg/mL showed significant mortalities (p < 0.05) compared to control cells, according to ANOVA Dunnett’s test (Figure 1). Cadmium, a potent toxic metal, has a high potential to accumulate in the environment. It is very harmful to the environment and to human beings. The toxicity of cadmium as an industrial pollutant and a food contaminant, and as one of the major components in cigarette smoke is well established [29]. Cadmium can cause a number of lesions in many organs, such as the kidney, the testis, the lung, the liver, the brain, the bone, the blood system [30]. However, the mechanism of toxicity of cadmium is not yet clear. In the present study, we showed that cadmium chloride at the concentrations of 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 µg/mL significant caused cell mortalities (p < 0.05) compared to the control. Consistent with our report, recent study indicated that cadmium chloride is highly cytotoxic to human lens epithelial cells [31]. In vitro studies also indicated that cadmium induces cytotoxic effects and free radical-dependent DNA damage in bacteria [32,33], which causes single-strand DNA damage and disrupts the synthesis of nucleic acids and proteins [34]. Published studies reported that acute ingestion of cadmium causes health adverse effects such as abdominal pain, burning sensation, nausea, vomiting, salivation, muscle cramps, vertigo, shock, loss of consciousness and convulsions usually appear within 15 to 30 min [35]. Acute cadmium ingestion can also cause gastrointestinal tract erosion, pulmonary, hepatic or renal injury and coma, depending on the route of poisoning [35,36]. Cadmium can cause a number of lesions in many organs, such as the kidney, the testis, the lung, the liver, the brain, the bone, the blood system [30]. Human exposure to cadmium is possible through a number of several sources including employment in primary metal industries, eating contaminated food, smoking cigarettes, and working in cadmium-contaminated work places, with smoking being a major contributor [1,37]. Other sources of cadmium include emissions from industrial activities, including mining, smelting, and manufacturing of batteries, pigments, stabilizers, and alloys [38]. Cadmium is also present in trace amounts in certain foods such as leafy vegetables, potatoes, grains and seeds, liver and kidney, and crustaceans and mollusks [39].
Ijerph 13 00088 g001 1024
Figure 1. Cytotoxic effect of cadmium chloride on human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells. Cells were cultured with increasing concentrations (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 μg/mL) of cadmium chloride for 48 h as indicated in the Materials and Methods. Cell viability was determined based on the MTT assay. Each point represents a mean ± SD of three experiments with six replicates per concentration. * Significantly different (p < 0.05) from the control, according to the Dunnett’s test.
Figure 1. Cytotoxic effect of cadmium chloride on human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells. Cells were cultured with increasing concentrations (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 μg/mL) of cadmium chloride for 48 h as indicated in the Materials and Methods. Cell viability was determined based on the MTT assay. Each point represents a mean ± SD of three experiments with six replicates per concentration. * Significantly different (p < 0.05) from the control, according to the Dunnett’s test.
Ijerph 13 00088 g001

3.2. Induction of Lipid Hydroperoxide by Cadmium Chloride

To test whether oxidative stress plays a key role in cadmium chloride-induced toxicity to HepG2 cells, we performed a lipid hydroperoxide assay. As shown in Figure 2, our results indicated that the treatment of HepG2 cells with cadmium chloride resulted in a significant increase of lipid hydroperoxide levels, a major degradation product of unsaturated phospholipids and glycolipids. Similar results have been recorded by Bashandy and collaborators [40]. Our result is also in agreement with a previous report indicating that cadmium induces formation of superoxide ion and hydrogen peroxide in HeLa human tumor cells and bovine aorta endothelial cells [41]. Consistent with our result, previous reports also indicated that lead and cadmium-induced tissue damages through oxidative stress [42]. Cadmium stimulates the formation of metallothioneins and reactive oxygen species, thus causing oxidative damage to erythrocytes and various tissues resulting in loss of the membrane functions [43]. Another study indicated that chronic exposure to cadmium increased lipid peroxidation and caused inhibition of superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity showing oxidative damage in liver, kidney, and testes [44]. A previous scientific report showed that treatment with cadmium causes a more pronounced reduction in intracellular glutathione levels and a significantly higher free radical accumulation in progenitors [45]. Other reports indicated that cadmium decreases intracellular glutathione content and activities of cellular antioxidant enzymes, superoxide dismutase, peroxidase and catalase, leading to the accumulation of ROS and an increase in intracellular oxidative stress in cadmium exposed CRL-1439 normal rat liver kidney cells [46,47].
Ijerph 13 00088 g002 1024
Figure 2. Cadmium chloride-induced lipid peroxidation in human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells. Cells were incubated for 48 h with increasing concentrations of cadmium chloride (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 μg/mL). Lipid hydroperoxide levels were determined as described in Materials and Methods. * Significantly different (p < 0.05) from the control, according to the Dunnett’s test. Data are representative of three independent experiments.
Figure 2. Cadmium chloride-induced lipid peroxidation in human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells. Cells were incubated for 48 h with increasing concentrations of cadmium chloride (1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 μg/mL). Lipid hydroperoxide levels were determined as described in Materials and Methods. * Significantly different (p < 0.05) from the control, according to the Dunnett’s test. Data are representative of three independent experiments.
Ijerph 13 00088 g002

3.3. Induction of DNA Damage by Cadmium Chloride

To evaluate the ability of cadmium to trigger genotoxic damage in hepatocytes, HepG2 cells were treated with different concentrations of cadmium chloride, in the range 0–5 μg/mL for 48 h, and the degree of DNA damage was quantified by the means of LAI’s Comet Assay Analysis System software (Loates Associates, Inc. Westminster, MD, USA) after staining with SYBR Green. Our results showed that cadmium chloride at the concentrations of 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 μg/mL causes DNA single strand breaks in HepG2 cells and there is a gradual concentration-response relationship. The representative comet assay images of control and cadmium chloride-treated HepG2 cells are presented in Figure 3. This Figure showed a significant increase in the percentage of DNA damage and length of comet tail in a concentration-dependent manner in human liver carcinoma cells exposed to cadmium chloride. The percentages of DNA cleavage were as follows: (1.7 ± 1.2)%, (2.9 ± 1.6)%, (21.9 ± 5.5)%, (37.5 ± 4.7)%, (52.4 ± 11.4)%, and (66.5 ± 18.3)% for 0, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 µg/mL of cadmium chloride, respectively (Figure 4). Similar trend was observed in the mean length of comet tail. The tail lengths of DNA comets were all longer in cadmium chloride-treated cells compared to the control (p < 0.05) (Figure 4).
Several possible mechanisms may be involved in the induction of DNA damages. With the currently available data, cadmium chloride seems to have direct genotoxic activity to HepG2 cells at concentrations relevant tested. Studies have provided evidence that reactive oxygen species (ROS) are involved in DNA damage induced by carcinogenic metal ion [48]. It has been shown that cadmium enhances lipid peroxidation in cultured cells and animals [49,50]. Low concentrations of cadmium binds to proteins, decreases DNA repair [51], activates protein degradation, up-regulates cytokines and proto-oncogenes such as c-fos, c-jun, and c-myc [52], and induces expression of several genes including metallothioneins [53], heme oxygenases, glutathione transferases, heat-shock proteins, acute-phase reactants, and DNA polymerase β [54].
Ijerph 13 00088 g003 1024
Figure 3. Cadmium chloride induced DNA damage in human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells. Cells were treated for 48 hours with medium (A) supplemented with solvent or 1 (B); 2 (C); 3 (D); 4 (E); and 5 (F) μg/mL cadmium chloride. Representative comet images were analyzed using LAI’s Comet Assay Analysis System software (Loates Associates, Inc. Westminster, MD, USA).
Figure 3. Cadmium chloride induced DNA damage in human liver carcinoma (HepG2) cells. Cells were treated for 48 hours with medium (A) supplemented with solvent or 1 (B); 2 (C); 3 (D); 4 (E); and 5 (F) μg/mL cadmium chloride. Representative comet images were analyzed using LAI’s Comet Assay Analysis System software (Loates Associates, Inc. Westminster, MD, USA).
Ijerph 13 00088 g003
Ijerph 13 00088 g004 1024
Figure 4. Comet assay of HepG2 cells showing the percentages of DNA cleavage (Left) and comet tail lengths (Right) as a function of cadmium chloride concentrations. Each point represents mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * Significantly different (p < 0.05) from the control, according to the Dunnett’s test.
Figure 4. Comet assay of HepG2 cells showing the percentages of DNA cleavage (Left) and comet tail lengths (Right) as a function of cadmium chloride concentrations. Each point represents mean ± SD of three independent experiments. * Significantly different (p < 0.05) from the control, according to the Dunnett’s test.
Ijerph 13 00088 g004

3.4. Induction of Apoptosis by Cadmium Chloride

To gain insight into the mechanism of cadmium chloride-induced apoptosis, we examined the modulation of phosphatidylserine externalization in HepG2 cells. We observed that cadmium chloride induces cellular apoptosis of HepG2 cells in a concentration-dependent manner, showing a gradual increase of annexin positive cells in cadmium chloride-treated cells compared to the control (Figure 5). Figure 6 shows the percentages of both annexin V and PI positive cells were (10.3 ± 3.2)%, (14.4 ± 5.6)%, (21.4 ± 4.6)%, (30.5 ± 2.8)%, (43.2 ± 7.5)%, and (52.5 ± 9.4)% in 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 µg/mL cadmium chloride, respectively.
The effect of cadmium chloride was more pronounced at 5 μg/mL (p < 0.05) compared to the control cells. We observed that the percentage of annexin positive cells increased gradually (p < 0.05) with increasing cadmium chloride concentrations and reached a maximum of (52.5 ± 9.4)% cell death upon 48 h of exposure. Cadmium can affect cell proliferation and differentiation, cell cycle progression, DNA synthesis and repair, apoptosis and other cellular activities [55,56]. Recently, several reports have shown that cadmium can induce apoptosis of many tissues and cells both in vivo and in vitro including cells of the respiratory system, the testis, the kidney, the liver, and the immune system [57,58,59,60,61].
Ijerph 13 00088 g005 1024
Figure 5. Representative flow cytometry analysis data from annexin V/PI assay. The histograms show a comparison of the distribution of annexin V/PI negative cells (M1) and annexin V/PI positive cells (M2) after 48 h exposure to cadmium chloride. A = control; B = 1 μg/mL; C = 2 μg/mL; D = 3 μg/mL; E = 4 μg/mL; and F = 5 μg/mL.
Figure 5. Representative flow cytometry analysis data from annexin V/PI assay. The histograms show a comparison of the distribution of annexin V/PI negative cells (M1) and annexin V/PI positive cells (M2) after 48 h exposure to cadmium chloride. A = control; B = 1 μg/mL; C = 2 μg/mL; D = 3 μg/mL; E = 4 μg/mL; and F = 5 μg/mL.
Ijerph 13 00088 g005
Ijerph 13 00088 g006 1024
Figure 6. Annexin V and PI positive cells. Cells were exposed to different concentrations of cadmium chloride as described in the Materials and Methods. * Significantly different (p < 0.05) from the control, according to the Dunnett’s test.
Figure 6. Annexin V and PI positive cells. Cells were exposed to different concentrations of cadmium chloride as described in the Materials and Methods. * Significantly different (p < 0.05) from the control, according to the Dunnett’s test.
Ijerph 13 00088 g006
In addition to the apoptotic effects of cadmium, other reports have indicated that cadmium chloride decreases the viability of HepG2 cells and increases lactate dehydrogenase leakage, DNA damage, malondialdehyde, and antioxidant enzymes activities [62,63]. Additionally, a significant decrease in ATP production and increase in ROS levels in cadmium chloride-treated HepG2 cells was observed at all concentrations tested. A significant decrease in GSH/GSSG ratio was also found. These effects were reported to be attenuated when cells were co-exposed to N-acetylcysteine (NAC) and cadmium chloride [62,63].

4. Conclusions

The present in vitro study demonstrated that cadmium chloride exposure gradually decreases the viability of HepG2 cells; increases lipid hydroperoxide levels resulting from reactive oxygen species formation; induces DNA damage and triggers apoptosis of HepG2 cells through phosphatidylserine externalization. In summary, these findings suggest that oxidative stress plays a role in cadmium chloride-induced cyto/genotoxicity and apoptosis of HepG2 cells, especially at higher level of exposure (4 and 5 μg/mL) where CdCl2-treated cells show a statistically significant difference in lipid hydroperoxide concentrations compared to control cells. This study therefore provides insight into the mechanism underlying cadmium chloride-induced toxicity and apoptosis of HepG2 cells.

Acknowledgments

The research described in this publication was made possible in part by a grant from the National Institutes of Health (NIH/NIMHD-G12MD007581) through the RCMI-Center for Environmental Health at Jackson State University; and in part by the Mississippi INBRE grant (NIH/NIGMS-P20GM103476).

Author Contributions

Anthony Skipper, Clement G. Yedjou, and Paul B. Tchounwou conceived, designed, and drafted the manuscript. Jennifer N. Sims participated in the implementation of the study, acquisition, analysis and interpretation of data. All authors read and approved the final draft of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Monographs-Cadmium; International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC): Lyon, France, 1993.
  2. Kasuya, M.; Teranishi, H.; Aoshima, K.; Katoh, T.; Horiguchi, H.; Morikawa, Y. Water pollution by cadmium and the onset of Itai-itai disease. Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 25, 149–156. [Google Scholar]
  3. Jarup, L.; Berglund, M.; Elinder, C.; Nordberg, G.; Vahteram, M. Health effects of cadmium exposure-a review of the literature and a risk estimate. Scand. J. Work Environ. Health 1998, 1, 1–52. [Google Scholar]
  4. Jin, T.; Lu, J.; Nordberg, M. Toxicokinetics and biochemistry of cadmium with special emphasis on the role of metallothioneins. Neurotoxicology 1998, 19, 529–535. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  5. Stohs, S.J.; Bagchi, D. Oxidative mechanisms in the toxicity of metal ions. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1995, 18, 321–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Blom, A.; Harder, W.; Matin, A. Unique and overlapping pollutant stress proteins of Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992, 58, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  7. Feriance, P.A.; Farewell, A.; Nystrom, T. The cadmium-stress stimulon of Escherichia coli K-12. Microbiology 1998, 144, 1045–1050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Coogan, T.P.; Bare, R.M.; Waalkes, M.P. Cadmium-induced DNA strand damage in cultured liver cells: Reduction in cadmium genotoxicity following zinc pretreatment. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1992, 113, 227–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rossman, T.G.; Roy, N.K.; Lin, W.C. Is cadmium genotoxic? IARC Sci. Publ. 1992, 118, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  10. Smith, J.B.; Dwyer, S.C.; Smith, L. Lowering extracellular pH evokes inositol polyphosphate formation and calcium mobilization. J. Biol. Chem. 1989, 264, 8723–8728. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Th’evenod, F.; Jones, S.W. Cadmium block of calcium current in frog sympathetic neurons. Biophys. J. 1992, 63, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Suszkiw, J.; Toth, G.; Murawsky, M.; Cooper, G.P. Effects of Pb2+ and Cd2+ on acetylcholine release and Ca2+ movements in synaptosomes and subcellular fractions from rat brain and Torpedo electric organ. Brain Res. 1984, 323, 31–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Dally, H.; Hartwig, A. Induction and repair inhibition of oxidative DNA damage by nickel (II) and cadmium (II) in mammalian cells. Carcinogenesis 1997, 18, 1021–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Oh, S.H.; Lim, S.C. A rapid and transient ROS generation by cadmium triggers apoptosis via caspase-dependent pathway in HepG2 cells and this is inhibited through N-acetylcysteine-mediated catalase upregulation. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2006, 212, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Pathak, N.; Khandelwal, S. Oxidative stress and apoptotic changes in murine splenocytes exposed to cadmium. Toxicology 2006, 220, 26–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Valko, M.; Rhodes, C.J.; Moncol, J.; Izakovic, M.; Mazur, M. Free radicals, metals and antioxidants in oxidative stress-induced cancer. Chem. Biol. Interact. 2006, 160, 1–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Mosmann, T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: Applications to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J. Immunol. Method 1983, 65, 55–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tchounwou, P.B.; Wilson, B.; Schneider, J.; Ishaque, A.; Morrow, J.D.; Roberts, L.J. Cytogenic assessment of arsenic trioxide toxicity in the Mutatox, Ames II and CAT-Tox assays. Metal Ions Biol. Med. 2000, 6, 89–91. [Google Scholar]
  19. Halliwell, B.; Gutteridge, J.M. The antioxidants of human extracellular fluids. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 1990, 280, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Morrow, J.M.; Roberts, L.J. The isoprostanes: Unique bioactive products of lipid peroxidation. Prog. Lipid Res. 1997, 36, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kumar, S.; Yedjou, C.G.; Tchounwou, P.B. Arsenic trioxide induces oxidative stress, DNA damage, and mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in human leukemia (HL-60) cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Velma, V.; Tchounwou, P.B. Oxidative stress and DNA damage induced by chromium in liver and kidney of goldfish, Carassius auratus. Biomark Insights 2013, 8, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Patlolla, A.K.; Hackett, D.; Tchounwou, P.B. Silver nanoparticle-induced oxidative stress-dependent toxicity in Sprague-Dawley rats. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2015, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Collins, A.R. Comet Assay for DNA damage and repair: Principles, applications and limitations. Mol. Biotechnol. 2001, 26, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Collins, A.R.; Dusinská, M.; Horská, A. Detection of alkylation damage in human lymphocyte DNA with the comet assay. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2001, 48, 611–614. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Yedjou, C.G.; Tchounwou, P.B. In-vitro genotoxic effect of arsenic trioxide to human leukemia (HL-60) cells using the comet assay. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2007, 301, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Tchounwou, C.K.; Yedjou, C.G.; Farah, I.; Tchounwou, P.B. d-Glucose-induced cytotoxic, genotoxic, and apoptotic effects on human breast adenocarcinoma (MCF-7) cells. J. Cancer Sci. Ther. 2014, 6, 156–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Yedjou, C.G.; Tchounwou, P.B.; Jerkins, J.; McMurray, R. Basic mechanisms of arsenic trioxide (ATO)-induced apoptosis in human leukemia (HL-60) cells. J. Hematol. Oncol. 2010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Morselt, A.F. Environmental pollutants and diseases. A cell biological approach using chronic cadmium exposure in the animal model as a paradigm case. Toxicology 1991, 70, 1–132. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. World Health Organization. Environmental Health Criteria 134: Cadmium, 1st ed.; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1992. [Google Scholar]
  31. Song, N.H.; Koh, J.W. Effects of cadmium chloride on the cultured human lens epithelial cells. Mol. Vis. 2012, 18, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  32. Tsuzuki, K.; Sugiyama, M.; Haramaki, N. DNA single-strand breaks and cytotoxicity induced by chromate (VI), cadmium (II), and mercury (II) in hydrogen peroxide-resistant cell lines. Environ. Health Perspect. 1994, 102, 341–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Mukherjee, S.; Das, S.K.; Kabiru, W.; Russell, K.R.; Greaves, K.; Ademoyero, A.A.; Rhaney, F.; Hills, E.R.; Archibong, A.E. Acute cadmium toxicity and male reproduction. Adv. Reprod. 2002, 6, 143–155. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mitra, R.S. Protein synthesis in Escherichia coli during recovery from exposure to low levels of Cd2+. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1984, 47, 1012–1016. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  35. Baselt, R.C.; Cravey, R. Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man; Chemical Technology Institute: Foster City, CA, USA, 1995; Volume 4, pp. 105–107. [Google Scholar]
  36. Baselt, R.C. Disposition of Toxic Drugs and Chemicals in Man; Chemical Toxicology Institute: Forster City, CA, USA, 2000; pp. 3–4. [Google Scholar]
  37. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Berylium, cadmium, mercury and exposures in the glass manufacturing industry. In International Agency for Research on Cancer Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans; IARC Scientific Publications: Lyon, France, 1993; Volume 58, pp. 119–237. [Google Scholar]
  38. Paschal, D.C.; Burt, V.; Caudill, S.P.; Gunter, E.W.; Pirkle, J.L.; Sampson, E.J.; Miller, D.T.; Jackson, R.J. Exposure of the U.S. population aged 6 years and older to cadmium: 1988–1994. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2000, 38, 377–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR). Draft Toxicological Profile for Cadmium; ATDSR: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  40. Satarug, S.; Baker, J.R.; Urbenjapol, S.M.; Haswell-Elkins, M.; Reilly, P.E.; Williams, D.J.; Moore, M.R. A global perspective on cadmium pollution and toxicity in non-occupationally exposed population. Toxicol. Lett. 2003, 137, 65–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bashandy, S.A.; Alhazza, I.M.; Mubark, M. Role of zinc in the protection against cadmium induced hepatotoxicity. Int. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 2, 79–88. [Google Scholar]
  42. Szuster-Ciesielska, A.; Stachura, A.; Slotwinska, M.; Kaminska, T.; Sniezko, R.; Paduch, R.; Abramczyk, D.; Filar, J.; Kandefer-Szerszen, M. The inhibitory effect of zinc on cadmium-induced cell apoptosis and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in cell cultures. Toxicology 2006, 145, 159–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Patra, R.C.; Swarup, D.; Dwivedi, S.K. Antioxidant effects of α tocopherol, ascorbic acid and l-methionine on lead induced oxidative stress to the liver, kidney and brain in rats. Toxicology 2001, 162, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Patra, R.C.; Swarup, D.; Senapat, S.K. Effects of cadmium on lipid peroxides and superoxide dismutasein hepatic, renal and testicular tissue of rats. Vet. Hum. Toxicol. 1999, 41, 65–67. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  45. Almazan, G.; Liu, H.N.; Khorchid, A. Exposure of developing oligodendrocytes to cadmium causes HSP72 induction, free radical generation, reduction in glutathione levels, and cell death. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2000, 29, 858–869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ikediobi, C.O.; Badisa, V.L.; Ayuk-Takem, L.T.; Latinwo, L.M.; West, J. Response of antioxidant enzymes and redox metabolites to cadmium-induced oxidative stress in CRL-1439 normal rat liver cells. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2004, 14, 87–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Casalino, E.; Casalino, G.; Calzaretti, C.S. Molecular inhibitory mechanisms of antioxidant enzymes in rat liver and kidney by cadmium. Toxicology 2002, 179, 37–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pourahmad, J.; O’Brien, P.J.; Jokar, F.; Daraei, B. Carcinogenimetal induced sites of reactive oxygen species formation in hepatocytes. Toxicol. In vitro 2003, 17, 803–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Traore, A.; Ruiz, S.; Baudrimont, I.; Sanni, A.; Dano, S.D.; Guarigues, P.; Narbonne, J.F.; Creppy, E.E. Combined effects of okadaic acid and cadmium on lipid peroxidation and DNA bases modifications (m5dC and 8-(OH)-dG) in Caco-2 cells. Arch. Toxicol. 2000, 74, 79–84. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Yiin, S.J.; Chern, C.L.; Sheu, J.Y.; Lin, L.H. Cadmium-induced liver, heart, and spleen lipid peroxidation in rats and protection by selenium. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2000, 78, 219–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Abshire, M.K.; Devor, D.E.; Diwan, B.A.; Shaughnessy, J.D., Jr.; Waalkes, M.P. In vitro exposure to cadmium in rat L6 myoblasts can result in both enhancement and suppression of malignant progression in vivo. Carcinogenesis 1996, 17, 1349–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Durnam, D.M.; Palmiter, R.D. Transcriptional regulation of the mouse metallothionein-I gene by heavy metals. J. Biol. Chem. 1981, 256, 5712–5716. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  53. Hwua, Y.; Yang, J. Effect of 3-aminotriazole on anchorage independence and mutagenicity in cadmium- and lead-treated diploid human fibroblasts. Carcinogenesis 1998, 19, 881–888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Landolph, J. Molecular mechanisms of transformation of CH3/10T1/2 C1 8 mouse embryo cells and diploid human fibroblasts by carcinogenic metal compounds. Environ. Health Perspect. 1994, 102, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  55. Bertin, G.; Averbeck, D. Cadmium: cellular effects, modifications of biomolecules, modulation of DNA repair and genotoxic consequences (a review). Biochimie 2006, 88, 1549–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Beyersmann, D.; Hechtenberg, S. Cadmium, Gene Regulation, and Cellular Signaling in Mammalian Cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1997, 144, 247–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Hart, B.A.; Lee, C.H.; Shukla, G.S.; Shukla, A.; Osier, M.; Eneman, J.D.; Chiu, J.F. Characterization of cadmium-induced apoptosis in rat lung epithelial cells: Evidence for the participation of oxidant stress. Toxicology 1999, 133, 43–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhou, T.; Zhou, G.; Song, W.; Eguchi, N.; Lu, W.; Lundin, E; Jin, T.; Nordberg, G. Cadmium-induced apoptosis and changes in expression of p53, c-jun and MT-I genes in testes and ventral prostate of rats. Toxicology 1999, 142, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Somji, S.; Sens, D.A.; Garrett, S.H.; Sens, M.A.; Todd, J.H. Heat shock protein 27 expression in human proximal tubule cells exposed to lethal and sublethal concentrations of CdCl2. Environ. Health Perspect. 1999, 107, 545–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Habeebu, S.S.; Liu, J.; Klaassen, C.D. Cadmium-induced apoptosis in mouse liver. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1998, 149, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Tsangaris, G.T.; Tzortzatou-Stathopoulou, F. Cadmium induces apoptosis differentially on immune system cell lines. Toxicology 1998, 128, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Lawal, A.O.; Ellis, E.M. Differential sensitivity and responsiveness of three human cell lines HepG2, 1321N1 and HEK 293 to cadmium. J. Toxicol. Sci. 2010, 35, 465–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Oh, S.H.; Lim, S.C. A rapid and transient ROS generation by cadmium trigger apoptosis via caspase dependent pathway in HepG2 cells and this is inhibited through N acetyl cysteine mediated catalase regulation. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2006, 212, 212–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Skipper, A.; Sims, J.N.; Yedjou, C.G.; Tchounwou, P.B. Cadmium Chloride Induces DNA Damage and Apoptosis of Human Liver Carcinoma Cells via Oxidative Stress. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2016, 13, 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010088

AMA Style

Skipper A, Sims JN, Yedjou CG, Tchounwou PB. Cadmium Chloride Induces DNA Damage and Apoptosis of Human Liver Carcinoma Cells via Oxidative Stress. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2016; 13(1):88. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010088

Chicago/Turabian Style

Skipper, Anthony, Jennifer N. Sims, Clement G. Yedjou, and Paul B. Tchounwou. 2016. "Cadmium Chloride Induces DNA Damage and Apoptosis of Human Liver Carcinoma Cells via Oxidative Stress" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 13, no. 1: 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010088

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop