Next Article in Journal
Investigation of E. coli and Virus Reductions Using Replicate, Bench-Scale Biosand Filter Columns and Two Filter Media
Next Article in Special Issue
Food Safety in Low and Middle Income Countries
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of Smoking Reduction Therapy on Smoking Cessation for Smokers without an Intention to Quit: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of the Bacterial Community Naturally Present on Commercially Grown Basil Leaves: Evaluation of Sample Preparation Prior to Culture-Independent Techniques
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 12
Issue 9
10.3390/ijerph120910254
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Detection of Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Milk: A Public Health Implication

by
Muyiwa Ajoke Akindolire
1,†,
Olubukola Oluranti Babalola
1,2,† and
Collins Njie Ateba
1,2,*,†
1
Department of Biological Sciences, School of Environmental and Health Sciences, Faculty of Agriculture, Science and Technology, North-West University, Mmabatho, Mafikeng Campus, South Africa
2
Food Security and Safety Niche Area, Faculty of Agriculture, Science and Technology, North-West University, Mmabatho, Mafikeng 2735, South Africa
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12(9), 10254-10275; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120910254
Submission received: 24 June 2015 / Revised: 13 August 2015 / Accepted: 15 August 2015 / Published: 25 August 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Food Safety)
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The aim of this study was to investigate the occurrence, antibiotic susceptibility profiles, and virulence genes determinants of S. aureus isolated from milk obtained from retail outlets of the North-West Province, South Africa. To achieve this, 200 samples of raw, bulk and pasteurised milk were obtained randomly from supermarkets, shops and some farms in the North-West Province between May 2012 and April 2013. S. aureus was isolated and positively identified using morphological (Gram staining), biochemical (DNase, catalase, haemolysis and rapid slide agglutination) tests, protein profile analysis (MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry) and molecular (nuc specific PCR) methods. The antimicrobial resistance profiles of the isolates were determined using the phenotypic agar diffusion method. Genes encoding enterotoxins, exfoliative toxins and collagen adhesins were also screened using PCR. Among all the samples examined, 30 of 40 raw milk samples (75%), 25 of 85 bulk milk samples (29%) and 10 of 75 pasteurised milk samples (13%) were positive for S. aureus. One hundred and fifty-six PCR-confirmed S. aureus isolates were obtained from 75 contaminated milk samples. A large proportion (60%–100%) of the isolates was resistant to penicillin G, ampicillin, oxacillin, vancomycin, teicoplanin and erythromycin. On the contrary, low level resistance (8.3%–40%) was observed for gentamicin, kanamycin and sulphamethoxazole. Methicillin resistance was detected in 59% of the multidrug resistant isolates and this was a cause for concern. However, only a small proportion (20.6%) of these isolates possessed PBP2a which codes for Methicillin resistance in S. aureus. In addition, 32.7% of isolates possessed the sec gene whereas the sea, seb sed, see, cna, eta, etb genes were not detected. The findings of this study showed that raw, bulk and pasteurised milk in the North-West Province is contaminated with toxigenic and multi-drug resistant S. aureus strains. There is a need to implement appropriate control measures to reduce contamination as well as the spread of virulent S. aureus strains and the burden of disease in humans.

1. Introduction

Milk is high in nutrients such as vitamins, proteins, lactose, fat, minerals and water. It plays an important role in assisting individuals meet their nutrient requirements [1,2,3,4]. It has been reported worldwide that foods of animal origin, particularly milk and other dairy products, are often associated with food-borne diseases if proper sanitary and health care procedures are not implemented during the production and marketing of these products [5,6,7]. This is mainly due to the fact that milk may serve as an excellent medium for the survival and growth of many different types of pathogenic microorganisms. Milk is regarded as a potential vehicle for the transmission of bacteria, including staphylococci to humans [8,9].
Staphylococci are bacteria that easily grow and establish themselves as commensals on the skin and mucous membranes of warm-blooded animals [10,11,12,13,14]. In line with this, a number of coagulase positive and coagulase negative species have been isolated from humans and animals [11,12,15,16,17]. However, S. aureus is well known as a pathogen in both human and animal medicine, and it is currently considered as one of the world’s most important pathogens [18]. S. aureus is known to cause a number of pathological conditions in humans and animals that range from mild skin infections, bacteremia, systemic diseases, osteomyelitis to the more complicated toxic shock syndrome and staphylococcal food poisoning (SFP) [18,19,20].
S. aureus is reported to be one of the most common causative agents of food poisoning associated with the consumption of raw milk and milk products [21]. Foodstuff contamination may occur directly from infected food-producing animals or may result from poor hygiene during production processes, or the retail and storage of food, since humans may also harbour microorganisms [8,9,22]. As such, food products such as milk, cheese, yoghurt and other dairy products have been implicated as potential sources for the transmission of the pathogen to humans [8]. Moreover, foods contaminated with antibiotic resistant bacteria represent ideal vehicles for the transmission of antibiotic resistant strains [23,24].
Antimicrobial resistance is an important health problem worldwide [25,26]. The development of resistance, both in human and animal bacterial pathogens, has been ascribed to the extensive therapeutic use of antimicrobials or with their use as growth promoters in animal feed production [27,28,29,30]. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) was first described in 1961, shortly after the introduction of methicillin [31]. S. aureus becomes methicillin resistant by acquisition of the mecA gene which encodes a modified penicillin binding protein (PBP2a) that has a low affinity for β-lactams [8,32,33]. The modified PBP2a in MRSA isolates is therefore capable of replacing the biosynthetic functions of normal penicillin binding proteins even in the presence of β-lactam antibiotics, thereby preventing cell lysis. As such, S. aureus strains producing PBP2a are resistant to all β-lactam antibiotics [32] as well as other classes of antibiotics. Since the development of MRSA, vancomycin has been used as the antibiotic of choice to treat infections caused by S. aureus strains that are resistant to methicillin and oxacillin. In addition, the emergence of vancomycin-resistant S. aureus has been reported in some studies [16,34,35].
The multi-drug resistant S. aureus strains may have an increased ability to spread, especially if they are also enhanced with virulence genes. This does not only provide therapeutic challenges for clinicians but may be very detrimental to human health [36]. The study was designed to determine the occurrence of S. aureus and MRSA strains in milk products obtained from some supermarkets, shops and farms in the North West Province of South Africa. Moreover, the possible health risks to consumers based on the presence of virulence genes and antibiotic resistance profiles of the isolates were also investigated.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Study Design

A cross-sectional study design was used to determine the bacteriological analysis of raw, tank and pasteurised milk in the North-West Province of South Africa.

2.2. Study Site

This study was conducted in Mafikeng town, North-West Province of South Africa. The province has an estimated population of 3,509,953 million inhabitants [37]. The North-West province is located in the north of South Africa, on the Botswana border. It is surrounded by the Kalahari desert to the west, Gauteng province to the east, and the Free State to the south.

2.3. Sample Collection

From May 2012 to April 2013, a total of 200 milk samples including raw, bulk and pasteurised milk were randomly collected from 18 sources (supermarkets, shops and farms) in the four districts of the North-West province of South Africa (Table 2). Two to five (the number depends on the size of the district) representative stores were chosen in each district for sampling. Each milk sample (500 mL) was collected, labelled properly, kept at 4 °C in an insulated ice box and transported to the laboratory for analysis. Upon arrival in the laboratory, samples were analysed for S. aureus within 4 h of collection.

2.4. Enrichments and Isolation of S. aureus

Isolation of S. aureus was done as described [38]. Isolation involved a non-selective enrichment procedure [39] where a 5 mL aliquot of each milk sample was mixed with 5 mL double strength Trypticase Soy Broth (TSB) (Biolab, Wadeville, South Africa). This preparation was incubated for 3 h at 37 °C. Ten milliliters of a single-strength TSB supplemented with 20% NaCl was later added and incubated for 24 h at 37 °C. Aliquots of 0.1 mL were spread-plated onto mannitol salt agar (MSA) (Biolab, Modderfontein, South Africa). The plates were incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. Presumptive S. aureus colonies that were yellow in colour from each MSA (Biolab, Modderfontein, South Africa) plate were sub-cultured onto fresh MSA (Biolab, Modderfontein, South Africa) plates for isolate purification and incubated aerobically at 37 °C for 24 h. Isolates were retained for further identification.

2.5. Bacterial Identification

Presumptive S. aureus colonies were identified by standard microbiological tests which included Gram-staining; catalase testing (using 3% hydrogen peroxide); slide agglutination test; DNase test; and the oxidation and fermentation of mannitol salt agar (Biolab, Modderfontein, South Africa) [40].

2.5.1. Biochemical Identification of Staphylococci

Isolates were Gram-stained using standard techniques [41]. Colonies that were Gram-positive cocci, arranged in clusters, were further identified. S. aureus isolates were screened for DNase production using the DNase agar (Fluka® Analytical: Sigma-Aldrich Chemie GmbH, Buchs, Switzerland) [42], the catalase test [43], haemolysin test using 5% (w/v) sheep blood agar [44] and slide agglutination test using the PASTOREXTM STAPH-PLUS (Bio-Rad Laboratories Diagnostics Group, Redmond, WA, USA) which facilitates simultaneous detection of bound coagulase also known as clumping factor; protein A; and capsular polysaccharides that are specific for S. aureus. All tests were performed according to standard guidelines and S. aureus (ATCC® 25923) was used as a positive control in each test protocol.

2.6. Determination of the Identities of Isolates using the Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS)

Pure isolates were sub-cultured on MSA agar and plates incubated at 37 °C for 24 h. The plates were transported to the Microbiology Laboratory of the University of Pretoria (South Africa) for MALDI-TOF MS analysis by the equipment specialist using standard protocols and procedures. The MALDI Biotyper identifies organisms using the Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry by measuring the unique protein fingerprint of highly abundant proteins in an organism. The characteristic patterns of these proteins are used to reliably identify the particular microorganism by matching the respective patterns with an extensive open database. Analysis was performed and isolates identified to species level.

2.7. Molecular Identification by PCR

2.7.1. DNA Extraction

Genomic DNA was extracted using a ZR Genomic DNATM–Tissue MiniPrep kit (Zymo Research Corp, Irvine, CA, USA). The extraction protocol used was as instructed by the manufacturer. The quality and quantity of the extracted genomic DNA was determined using a Nanodrop 2000 Spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) and diluted to a working concentration of 50 ng/μL. The eluted DNA was stored at −20 °C and used for molecular identification of the isolates.

2.7.2. 16S rRNA Specific PCR for the Detection of Staphylococci

The identities of organisms belonging to the genus staphylococci were determined using a 16S rRNA specific PCR assay that amplifies the 16S rRNA gene sequence specific for staphylococci [45]. Primer sequences used are shown in Table 1. PCR was conducted using a C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Johannesburg, South Africa) and the cycling conditions were an initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min; followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 seconds, 64 °C for 30 seconds, 72 °C for 60 seconds and a final elongation step of 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were stored at 4 °C and later separated by agarose gel electrophoresis.

2.7.3. Specific PCR for the Identification of Staphylococcus aureus

The identities of S. aureus isolates were confirmed using a specific PCR that targeted the thermonuclease (nuc) gene specific for S. aureus [46] using primers sequences listed in Table 1. PCR was conducted using a C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Johannesburg, South Africa) and the cycling conditions utilized were initial denaturation of 94 °C for 5 min; followed by 30 cycles of 94 °C for 30 seconds, 55 °C for 30 seconds, 72 °C for 60 seconds and a final elongation step of 72 °C for 5 min. The PCR products were stored at 4 oC and later separated by agarose gel electrophoresis. After identification, each S. aureus strain was stored at −80 °C in Brain Heart Infusion broth (BHI) (Oxoid, Basingstoke, UK) with glycerol (15% v/v).

2.8. Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) Detection of Gene Sequences that Encode Virulence Determinants in S. aureus

Multiplex PCR was used to screen for the presence of genes encoding different virulent determinants: staphylococcal enterotoxins A to E (sea, seb, sec, sed and see) [47], exfoliative toxins A and B (eta and etb) [48] and cna gene [49]. Primer sequences used for the PCR assays are listed in Table 1. Two sets of multiplex PCR mixes containing enterotoxins A to E primers and another with eta, etb and cna primers were prepared. Each of the multiplex PCR mix contained 10–50 ng of template DNA, 1.5 µL of 25 mM MgCl2 (Promega Corporation, Madison, USA), 1.5 µL of 5 × Green Go Taq® reaction buffer (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA), 12.5 µL of 2 × PCR master mix (Thermo Scientific, Johannesburg, Sounth Africa) and 50 pmol of each primer (Inqaba Biotech, Pretoria, Sounth Africa). The volume of this reaction mixes was adjusted to 25 µL with nuclease free water. DNA amplification was carried out in a C1000 Touch Thermal Cycler (Bio-Rad, Johannesburg, South Africa) with the following cycling conditions: an initial denaturation of 94 °C for 5 min was followed by 35 cycles of amplification (denaturation at 94 °C for 2 min, annealing at 57 °C for 2 min and extension at 72 °C for 1 min), ending with a final extension at 72 °C for 7 min.

2.9. Agarose Gel Electrophoresis of DNA Extracted and PCR Products

DNA extracted and PCR products were separated by electrophoresis on a 0.8% (w/v) and 2% (w/v) agarose (Sigma-Aldrich, Seakme®, Rockland, ME, USA) gel. A 100 bp or 1 kb DNA ladder (Fermentas, Glen Burnie, GB, USA) was included in all PCR and fingerprinting gels as a molecular weight standard. ChemiDocTM MP Imaging system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was used to visualise and capture the images.
Table
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used for molecular identification and multiplex detection of virulence determinant genes.
Table 1. Oligonucleotide primers used for molecular identification and multiplex detection of virulence determinant genes.
Primer SequenceTarget GeneAmplicon Size (bp)
16S rRNA FGTAGGTGGCAAGCGTTACC16S rRNA228
16S rRNA RCGCACATCAGCGTCAG
Nuc FGCGATTGATGGTGGATACGGTNuc279
Nuc RAGCCAAGCCTTGACGAACTAAAGC
Sea FGGTTATCAATGTGCGGGTGGSea102
Sea RCGGCACTTTTTTCTCTTCGG
Seb FGTATGGTGGTGTAACTGAGCSeb164
Seb RCCAAATAGTGACGAGTTAGG
Sec FAGATGAAGTAGTTGATGTGTATGGSec451
Sec RCACACTTTTAGAATCAACCG
Sed FCCAATAATAGGAGAAAATAAAAGSed278
Sed RATTGGTATTTTTTTTCGTTC
See FAGGTTTTTTCACAGGTCATCCSee209
See RCTTTTTTTTCTTCGGTCAATC
Eta FATATCAACGTGAGGGCTCTAGTACSta1155
Eta RATGCAGTCAGCTTCTTACTGCTA
Etb FCACACATTACGGATAATGCAAGEtb604
Etb RTCAACCGAATAGAGTGAACTTATCT
Cna FAAAGCGTTGCCTAGTGGAGACan192
Cna RAGTGCCTTCCCAAACCTTTT

2.10. Determination of the Antibiotic Resistance Profiles of S. aureus Isolates

Antibiotic Disc Susceptibility Test, Detection of Multiple Antibiotic Resistant (MAR) Phenotypes and Penicillin Binding Protein (PBP2a)

An antibiotic susceptibility test was performed using the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method [50]. Susceptibilities of the isolates to a panel of 11 different antimicrobial agents that include penicillin G (10 μg), oxacillin (5 μg), ampicillin (10 μg), streptomycin (10 μg), kanamycin (30 μg), gentamicin (10 μg), erythromycin (15 μg), oxytetracycline (30 μg), vancomycin (30 μg), teicoplanin (30 μg) and sulphamethoxazole (15 μg) (Mast Diagnostics, Merseyside, UK) were determined. The test was performed and results were interpreted according to standard guidelines [51]. All isolates were tested for the production of PBP2a, the protein encoded by mecA, using the PBP2a latex agglutination assay (Bio-Lab, Pretoria, South Africa) that employs a serological procedure for the detection of Methicillin and Oxacillin resistant S. aureus. The test was performed as instructed by the manufacturer. The MAR phenotypes were generated for isolates resistant to three and more antibiotics using the abbreviations that appear on antibiotic discs [52]. A methicillin susceptible S. aureus (ATCC® 25923) and an MRSA strain (ATCC® 43300) were used as a negative and positive control, respectively.

3. Results

3.1. Presumptive Detection of Staphylococcus Species in Milk Samples Based on Cultural Characteristics

A total of 200 milk samples were collected and screened for the presence of Staphylococcus species. This comprised of 40 samples from raw milk, 85 from tank milk and 75 from pasteurised milk. The bacterium was detected in 75% (30/40), 29% (25/85), 13% (10/75) of raw milk (RM), tank milk (TM) and pasteurised milk (PM), respectively. The overall occurrence of S. aureus contamination in the milk samples was 32.5% (65/200).
A total of 380 isolates obtained from the contaminated milk samples were screened for the characteristics of S. aureus. Only isolates that satisfied both preliminary and confirmatory biochemical tests, such as Gram staining, catalase test, slide agglutination test, DNase test were considered. A large proportion 56% (211/380) of the isolates were positively identified by using the slide agglutination test. All the isolates were Gram-positive and catalase-positive and a large number 65% (138/211) of the isolates were positive for DNase production. The majority of the isolates 74% (156/211) showed haemolytic activity on sheep blood agar plates: 50% (78/156) of the haemolytic S aureus isolates produced α-haemolysin while 44% (69/156) displayed β-haemolysis and 6% (9/156) were α and β-haemolytic. The results revealed that S. aureus was frequently isolated from milk samples obtained from the North-West Province. Although all the milk samples were contaminated with S. aureus, isolates obtained from Coligny, Wolmaranstad, Lehurutshe and Madibogo were not positively identified by the slide agglutination test and thus not included in the study. The results in Table 5A and Table 5B indicate the number of isolates screened from the different sampling areas and those that were positive for the different tests. All the isolates that were positively identified as S. aureus by the slide agglutination test were subjected to confirmatory identification using molecular methods. In this study, staphylococci were detected in all the different types of milk samples analysed. Bacteria were more frequently isolated from raw milk than tank milk and pasteurised milk obtained from the supermarkets.

3.2. Molecular Characterisation of S. aureus Isolates from Milk

3.2.1. Specific PCR for the Identification of Staphylococcus aureus

A total of 211 S. aureus isolates that were positively identified by the Staph Xtra Latex agglutination test were subjected to specific simplex PCR analysis for the detection of 16S rRNA gene and the S. aureus thermonuclease (nuc) gene. The 16S rRNA gene is specific for the genus Staphylococcus while the nuc gene is species specific for S. aureus. A Figure of a 2% (w/v) agarose gel depicting the 16S rRNA gene fragments amplified by PCR using genomic DNA extracted from S. aureus isolates was reported as Supplementary Material. The 16S rRNA and nuc gene fragments with the expected amplicon sizes of 228bp and 279bp were respectively obtained and the agarose gel pictures were reported as Supplementary Material. Table 2 shows the number of isolates screened from the different sampling sites and those that were positive for the targeted genes.
As shown in Table 2, the proportion of isolates that was positive for the 16S rRNA gene (100%) PCR analysis was higher than those that possessed the nuc gene (74%). This is not surprising since the nuc gene is more specific in detecting isolates belonging to the species S. aureus compared to the 16S rRNA gene that is common to the genus Staphylococcus and will detect other Staphylococcus species in addition to S. aureus.

3.2.2. Detection of Virulence Genes in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates

A total of 156 S. aureus isolates were subjected to multiplex PCR analysis for the detection of virulence genes. Results obtained are shown in Table 2. Only the sec virulence gene was amplified from isolates screened and the sea, seb, sed, see, cna, eta and etb genes were not detected in any of the isolates. Generally, 51 (32.7%) of the isolates possessed the sec gene and a large proportion of the isolates were obtained from Rooigrond (47%) and Disaneng (24%). None of the isolates from Rustenburg, Mabule, Taung and Lehurutshe possessed the sec virulence determinant. A 2% (w/v) agarose gel depicting the sec virulence gene fragments amplified by PCR using genomic DNA extracted from S. aureus isolates was reported as Supplementary Material. Amplicons obtained were of the expected sizes (451 bp).
Table
Table 2. Areas where milk samples were collected and number of S. aureus isolates positive for the 16S rRNA, nuc and virulence gene determinants.
Table 2. Areas where milk samples were collected and number of S. aureus isolates positive for the 16S rRNA, nuc and virulence gene determinants.
Sample Source Number of Isolates TestedNumber of Isolates Positive for the Targeted Genes
16S rRNA genenuc genesea geneseb genesec genesee genesed genecna geneeta geneetb gene
Coligny10
Carletonville1016161200200000
Potchefstroom1088600100000
Wolmaranstad10
Zeerust1012121000200000
Swartruggens101111500100000
Rustenburg1018181500000000
Rooigrond15(15)*343430002400000
Mabule101010500000000
Mafikeng15(15)*15151200400000
Disaneng20(15)*303024001200000
Taung1066500000000
Vryburg1020201400200000
Setlagole101212800100000
Stella101212800100000
Madibogo10
Lehurutshe1055000000000
Tshidilamolomo1022200100000
Total 211211156 51
* Number of raw milk samples collected from the different areas based on availability.

3.3. Identification of S. aureus Isolates Using the MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometry

A total of 36 S. aureus isolates that were positive for the 16S rRNA gene and the nuc gene PCR analysis were subjected to the MALDI Biotyper identification tool using the Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Mass Spectrometry. Using the isolates obtained from the present study as unknowns, highly reproducible mass spectral profiles were obtained and compared with those of the reference spectra deposited in an extensive open database. Unique protein fingerprints of highly abundant proteins in each isolate were obtained. A representation of the proteins profiles, peaks and mass spectral profiles of representative S. aureus isolates from milk obtained from Rooigrond was reported as Supplementary Material. The identities of isolates obtained after analysis and the scores used to determine the reliability of the technique in classifying an isolate as member of a particular genus and species are shown in Table 3. All the isolates were positively identified as S. aureus to species level.
Table
Table 3. Number of S. aureus isolates positively identified using the MALDI Biotyper technique.
Table 3. Number of S. aureus isolates positively identified using the MALDI Biotyper technique.
Isolate NumberScore ValueIdentity Based on MALDI-TOF MS Analysis
Best Match
1RO32.234Staphylococcus aureus
1RO42.097Staphylococcus aureus
1RO52.223Staphylococcus aureus
1RO62.068Staphylococcus aureus
1RO92.076Staphylococcus aureus
2RO12.234Staphylococcus aureus
2RO22.259Staphylococcus aureus
2RO42.124Staphylococcus aureus
2RO52.232Staphylococcus aureus
3RO12.177Staphylococcus aureus
3RO22.31Staphylococcus aureus
3RO32.255Staphylococcus aureus
3RO62.048Staphylococcus aureus
3RO91.921Staphylococcus aureus
4R12.288Staphylococcus aureus
4R22.338Staphylococcus aureus
4R32.224Staphylococcus aureus
4R42.249Staphylococcus aureus
4R52.296Staphylococcus aureus
14Z12.228Staphylococcus aureus
15Z12.188Staphylococcus aureus
16Z12.086Staphylococcus aureus
16Z22.254Staphylococcus aureus
20Z12.129Staphylococcus aureus
20Z22.127Staphylococcus aureus
20Z32.179Staphylococcus aureus
20Z42.109Staphylococcus aureus
21Z12.215Staphylococcus aureus
21Z22.291Staphylococcus aureus
22Z12.165Staphylococcus aureus
22Z22.113Staphylococcus aureus
22Z32.163Staphylococcus aureus
22Z42.069Staphylococcus aureus
6S32.027Staphylococcus aureus
6S12.129Staphylococcus aureus
7S12.194Staphylococcus aureus
As shown in Table 3, the score value for best match organism of all the isolates screened ranged from 2.027 to 2.338 indicating a reliable genus and species identification. Moreover, the greatest peak density or hits of mass ions were detected at about m/z 2800 and all the isolates correctly identified to genus and species level as S. aureus. Generally, all the isolates showed similar profiles and it is suggested that the consistent mass ions at m/z 2000 to m/z 10000 appear to be biomarkers specific for the S. aureus specie. When the nuc specific PCR and the MALDI-TOF MS data were compared, it was evident that both could be used for correct identification of bacteria isolates under controlled laboratory and experimental conditions.

3.4. Antibiotic Resistance of S. aureus Isolates from Milk Samples

A total 156 S. aureus isolates from milk obtained from different sampling sites in the North-West Province that possessed the nuc gene were tested to evaluate their susceptibilities against a panel of 11 antimicrobial agents. Data depicting the susceptibilities of the isolates were presented in percentages as shown in Table 4. A large proportion (60%–100%) of the S. aureus isolates obtained from Carletonville, Potchefstroom and Zeerust were resistant to penicillin G, ampicillin, oxacillin, streptomycin, vancomycin, and erythromycin. In addition, a similarly large proportion of isolates from Swartruggens, Rustenburg, Stella, Setlagole, Vryburg, Taung and Disaneng were resistant to penicillin G and oxacillin (Table 4). Despite the fact that a relatively large proportion (50%–71%) of the isolates from Vryburg, Setlagole and Disaneng were resistant to gentamicin, on the contrary, only a small proportion (8.3%–40%) of isolates from the other stations sampled were resistant to this antimicrobial agent. With the exception of Disaneng, Carletonville and Potchefstroom all isolates obtained from the other sample sites were highly susceptible to kanamycin. Similar low level resistance was observed against sulphamethoxazole (Table 4). A cause for concern is the fact that multiple antibiotic resistant (MAR) isolates that are also resistant to oxacillin were detected in this study. These isolates could serve as reservoirs for the transmission and spread of antibiotic resistant determinants within a population.

3.5. Latex Agglutination Assay for the Detection of Penicillin Binding Protein 2a (PBP2a) in S. aureus Isolates from Milk Samples

A total of 92 MAR antibiotic resistant S. aureus strains isolated from milk obtained from different sampling sites in the North-West Province were subjected to a serological test using the Latex PBP2a test kit. This aim was to detect PBP2a which is used to identify Methicillin resistance in S. aureus and the Latex technology provides an alternative to the PCR technique to detect the mecA gene product serologically. All the 92 isolates were resistant to oxacillin based on the antibiotic disc susceptibility test. Results obtained are shown in Table 5. Despite the fact that only a small proportion (19) 20.6% of the isolates were positively identified to possess the gene responsible for Methicillin resistance in S. aureus, the presence of this gene was a cause for concern. Moreover, the ability to determine whether a test is positive or not depends on the person interpreting the results and therefore the actual occurrence of PBP2a may be higher than the reported value. Consequently, the isolates were also screened by PCR analysis for the mecA gene.
Table
Table 4. The number and percentages of S. aureus isolates from various sampling sites resistant to different antibiotics.
Table 4. The number and percentages of S. aureus isolates from various sampling sites resistant to different antibiotics.
Sampling Area PGAMPOXSKGMVATECTEESMX
Carletonville
NT = 12		NR1212127611038120
%10010010058508.3832566.71000
Potchefstroom
NT = 6		NR66643166061
%100100100675017100100010017
Zeerust
NT = 10		NR101097439102101
%1001009070403090100201010
Swartruggens
NT =5		NR54351044351
%100806010020080806010020
Rustenburg
NT = 15		NR1515118351515993
%10010073532033100100606020
Stella
NT = 8		NR83440257733
%1003850500256388883838
Setlagole
NT = 8		NR84732555866
%100508838256363631007575
Vryburg
NT = 14		NR146108610991378
%10043715743716464935057
Taung
NT = 5		NR50100225500
%100020004040404000
Disaneng
NT = 24		NR171823191714111211134
%7175967971584650465417
Mafikeng
NT = 11		NR9918517118114
%8282973459641007310036
Mabule
NT = 5		NR43140024451
%806020800040808010020
Rooigroond
NT = 30		NR995983242519193
%3030173027108083636310
Tshidilamolomo
NT = 2		NR21010010010
%10050050005000500
PG = penicillin G; Amp = ampicillin; OX = oxacillin; S = streptomycin; K = kanamycin; GM = gentamicin; VA = vancomycin; TEC = teicoplanin, TE=tetracycline, E = erythromycin, SMX = sulphamethoxazole. NT = Number tested; NR = number resistant.

3.6. Multiple Antibiotic Resistance Phenotypes of S. aureus Isolates from Milk Samples

Multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) phenotypes were generated from 110 S. aureus isolates showing resistance to three or more antibiotics [52]. Data indicating the predominant MAR phenotypes are shown in Table 6. The MAR phenotype PG-AMP-VA-TEC-TE-E was observed in 60% of isolates from Taung, while 25% of those from Mafikeng displayed this phenotype. The MAR phenotypes PG-AMP-OX-S-VA-TEC-E was dominant among 50%, 30% and 29% of samples from Potchefstroom, Zeerust and Carletonville, respectively. The predominant MAR phenotypes for isolates from raw milk from Disaneng and pasteurized milk from Vryburg were PG-AMP-OX-S-K-CN-VA-TEC-E and PG-AMP-SK-VA-TEC-TE-E-SMX obtained at 20% and 30%, respectively. These results reveal that MAR S. aureus were isolated from milk samples. It is therefore suggested that these MAR isolates may have severe health implications in individuals who consume such milk products.
Table
Table 5. Proportion of S. aureus isolates from various sampling sites that were positive for the PBP2a Latex agglutination test.
Table 5. Proportion of S. aureus isolates from various sampling sites that were positive for the PBP2a Latex agglutination test.
Sample SourceNumber of Isolates TestedNumber of Isolates Positive for the PBP2’ Test
Carletonville123
Potchefstroom52
Zeerust92
Swartruggens31
Rustenburg122
Rooigrond50
Mafikeng40
Vryburg71
Setlagole50
Stella53
Mabule30
Disaneng225
Total9219
Table
Table 6. Predominant multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) phenotypes for S. aureus isolates from milk.
Table 6. Predominant multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) phenotypes for S. aureus isolates from milk.
Sampling AreaPhenotypesNumber ObservedPercentage (%) Observed
Carletonville (N = 7)PG-AMP-OX-S-K-VA-TEC-E343
PG-AMP-OX-S-VA-TEC-E229
PG-AMP-OX-VA-TEC-E229
Potchefstroom (N = 4) PG-AMP-OX-S-VA-TEC-E250
Zeerust (N = 10) PG-AMP-OX-S-VA-TEC-E330
Rustenburg (N = 10)PG-AMP-OX-S-VA-TEC-TE-E-SMX220
PG-AMP-S-GM-VA-TEC-TE-E330
Stella (N = 5) PG-AMP-OX-S-K-VA-TEC-TE-E-SMX120
Setlagole (N = 4) PG-AMP-OX-S-K-GM-TEC-TE-E-SMX125
Vryburg (N = 10)PG-AMP-OX-S-K-GM-TE-E-SMX220
PG-AMP-S-K-VA-TEC-TE-E-SMX330
PG-AP-OX-K-GM-VA-TEC-TE220
Taung (N = 5)PG-AMP-VA-TEC-TE-E360
Disaneng (N = 20)PG-AMP-OX-S-K-GM-VA-TEC-TE-E210
PG-AMP-OX-S-K-GM-TE-E315
PG-AMP-OX-S-K-GM-VA-TEC-E420
PG-AMP-OX-S-K-GM-TEC-E-SMX315
AMP-OX-S-K-GM210
Mafikeng (N = 8) PG-AMP-VA-TEC-TE-E225
Mabule (N = 4)PG-AMP-S-VA-TEC-TE-E-SMX125
Rooigrond (N = 30)OX-VA-TEC-E27
VA-TEC-E310
VA-TEC-TE27
OX-VA-TEC-TE27
VA-TEC-TE-E27
Tshidilamolomo (N = 2)PG-AMP-S-VA-TEC150
PG = penicillin G; AMP = ampicillin; OX = oxacillin; S = streptomycin; K = kanamycin; GM = gentamicin; VA = vancomycin; TEC = teicoplanin; TE = tetracycline; E = erythromycin; SMX = sulphamethoxazole.

4. Discussion

The primary objective of this study has been to isolate and identify S. aureus from milk obtained from supermarkets, shops and farms around the North-West Province, South Africa. The main motivation is that food-borne pathogens, including S. aureus, have been isolated from milk and dairy products worldwide [53,54,55,56]. Moreover, a baseline study previously conducted in the area revealed the presence of S. aureus in milk collected from a communal farm and two commercial farms [35]. Despite the fact that outbreaks and even sporadic cases of staphylococcal food poisoning have rarely been reported to date in South Africa, the pathogen has been isolated from milk and food products in the area [35,56]. This therefore indicates that there is a possibility of transmitting S. aureus and their associated virulence determinants to consumers when unpasteurised milk or its associated products are consumed as is the case in some rural communities in the North West Province of South Africa.
Reasonable attention has been given to pathogenic S. aureus strains, especially those equipped with virulence factors even in developed countries that have proper public health facilities [5,57,58]. There is currently little information on the occurrence of this pathogen and its associated virulence determinants in South Africa [35,56]. Data on the occurrence of S. aureus and MRSA in South Africa among animals and humans is limited and the determination of its presence in milk may provide an indication of the health risks associated with the consumption of these products and serve as a tool for assessing its public health risks. Previous studies have evaluated the presence of S. aureus in milk using conventional microbiology methods [35]. The present study is the first in the area in which a combination of phenotypic, genotypic and proteomic tools were used to concurrently determine the occurrence, antibiotic resistance profiles and virulence gene profiles of S. aureus strains isolated from milk samples obtained from retail outlets and farms in the North-West Province, South Africa. Data obtained could provide options for developing S. aureus control strategies in the study area.
In the present study, the overall presence of the pathogen was 32.5% among samples screened. However, the proportion of S. aureus was higher (75%) in raw milk than in pasteurised milk (29%). This observation was not surprising although it is a cause for concern. The presence of these bacteria, after pasteurisation, can be attributed to inefficacy of the thermal process or post-process contamination. Similar observations have been noticed in which there was a high occurrence of S. aureus from raw and pasteurised milk [5,49,59,60]. However, contrary to observations made in some studies, lower proportions of the pathogen have been reported [61,62]. It is therefore suggested that the occurrence of S. aureus in milk samples greatly depends on the methods used for isolation, the sample size and geographical region.
In this study, the Pastorex Staph-plus serological assay, amplification of Staphylococcus genus specific 16S rRNA gene fragment and the thermo nuclease gene (nuc) specific for S. aureus, and the MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry were used for positive identification of S. aureus strains. Traditionally, bacteria species are identified using phenotypic traits based on results obtained for biochemical tests. Despite the fact that biochemical protocols and assays are constantly being refined, results obtained from these tests are usually not very reliable, and are time consuming [63]. The matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionisation time of light mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) of intact cells has been reported to be an attractive alternative method that is accurate, rapid, and requires minimal sample preparation time for the correct identification of bacteria isolates.
Different studies have been conducted in which various identification tools were employed for detecting S. aureus [62,63,64]. Regardless of the isolation and identification techniques employed, the presence of these pathogens in milk highlights the need for both strict farm management practices and proper sanitary procedures to be implemented during milking operations such as storage, handling and transportation, which are considered to be critical points for S. aureus cross contamination. It is therefore suggested that the presence of S. aureus in pasteurised milk samples that have not gone past their expiry dates could be attributed to improper handling and holding temperatures during the storage and retail of the products.
Another objective of the study was to determine and compare the antibiotic resistance profiles of S. aureus strains isolated from milk samples which may enter the food chain and be transmitted to humans. A motivation for this is that recent studies have revealed an increasing trend towards the occurrence of multiple antibiotic resistant S. aureus isolates worldwide [8,35,65]. S. aureus isolates that harbour multiple antibiotic resistant traits have been reported to negatively impact on the treatment of staphylococcal infections, especially in immune-compromised individuals, the elderly and young children [66]. In the present study, multiple antibiotic resistant S. aureus strains defined as isolates resistant to three or more antibiotics were obtained in a large proportion of milk samples analysed. Development of multiple antibiotic resistance among most of these isolates may be attributed to the acquisition of resistance (R-factor) which is plasmid-mediated [67]. Usually, S. aureus is known to contain a number of multiple antibiotic resistant plasmids that may account for the phenotypes observed [67]. In general, a large proportion (60%–100%) of the isolates from different areas and sample types were resistant to penicillin G, ampicillin, oxacillin, streptomycin, vancomycin, tetracycline and erythromycin. Similar patterns of resistance have been reported against S. aureus in previous studies [65,68].
The misuse of antibiotics in dairy farms is currently known to be one of the major factors responsible for the emergence of drug resistant bacteria worldwide. Ampicillin and tetracycline are mostly used on dairy cattle farms in the study area and this may account for the resistance levels observed. Furthermore, isolates that are resistant to ampicillin may cross-select for resistance to other β-lactam antibiotics including penicillin and ampicillin resistant isolates may portray β-lactam characteristics and phenotypes. Despite the fact that erythromycin and vancomycin are not used in the area, it has been reported that the use of macrolides tylosin and avoparcin as growth promoters in animals was associated with the emergence of Erythromycin and vancomycin resistance in S. aureus [69].
Contrary to the above trends, smaller proportions (22.8%–28%) of the isolates were resistant to Gentamicin, Kanamycin and sulphamethoxazole. Similar observations have been previously reported [63,70]. In addition, these trends may be due to the fact that the antimicrobial agents are rarely or not used at all in animal and human medicine. However, a cause for concern was the detection of oxacillin resistant S. aureus isolates in the study using the antibiotic disc susceptibility phenotypic assay despite the fact that the drug is rarely used in both human and animal medicine worldwide. Similar observations have been reported for S. aureus from animals, humans, food and water sources [60,62]. Methicillin resistance in staphylococci is due to the presence of the mecA gene that encodes for an altered penicillin-binding protein 2a (PBP2a) and therefore, has reduced affinity for β-lactam antibiotics [16]. However, in the present study, only a small proportion (12.1%) of the isolates that exhibited phenotypic resistance to Oxacillin expressed the PBP2a and thus carried the mecA gene. Similar observations have previously been reported and it is suggested that in some S. aureus strains, phenotypic resistance to oxacillin is not intrinsically mediated by the mecA gene [48,71,72], but it is executed through other mechanisms. This non-mecA mediated resistance is caused by modifications to the penicillin binding proteins, which results in hyper-production of beta-lactamase or methicillinase enzymes [71]. However, the detection of non-mecA, S. aureus strains that are phenotypically resistant to oxacillin and methicillin are known to pose serious health concerns and are of great clinical relevance [72]. Moreover, these non-mecA S. aureus strains are still classified as MRSA isolates [72]. Therefore, epidemiological investigations are needed to constantly monitor the antibiotic resistance profile of S. aureus strains isolated from different sources in a given area and to implement reliable genetic tracking tools that would facilitate the detection of point source contamination within the food chain. This would greatly reduce the transmission of these pathogens to consumers and reduce the incidence of staphylococcal infections in humans.
A further objective of the study was to determine the presence of staphylococcal virulence genes that include enterotoxin genes, exfoliative genes and collagen adhesin (cna) genes using specific PCR analysis. Enterotoxin genes are known to be the major virulence factors of S. aureus and therefore responsible for most of the pathogenicity observed in humans, especially when the pathogen is consumed in food products [18]. These toxins are known to modulate immune response through super antigen activity and various diseases caused by strains that produce them [73].
Previous reports designed to detect these toxin genes (enterotoxins, eta and etb genes) in S. aureus revealed great diversity of these genes among isolates from different areas [74,75]. Despite the fact that in the present study 32% of isolates tested possessed the sec gene, none of the other virulence determinants were detected. This is not very surprising since the sec gene has been previously reported to be the most prevalent virulence factor among S. aureus isolates [75,76]. However, the detection of S. aureus strains that harbour the sec virulence gene indicates that these isolates have the potential to cause either sporadic cases or food borne outbreaks of infections [68].
Similar to previous reports, none of the eta, etb and cna virulence genes were detected in this study [57,77]. In S. aureus, the exfoliative toxin genes are associated with bullous impetigo [78] while the collagen adhesin protein (cna) gene mediates the binding of clinical isolates to host specific matrix [73]. The cna gene is frequently associated with clinical S. aureus isolates, although it has also been detected in isolates from both food and environmental sources [75]. Moreover, the cna gene product is not easily detected S. aureus strains by PCR analysis [79].
In the present study, isolates were assayed for other putative virulence factors including haemolytic activity, the presence of the coagulase enzyme and DNase production that enhance the pathogenic characteristics of S. aureus isolates [80]. All the isolates were positive for coagulase activity, which enables them to promote the clotting of fibrin in the blood stream and this is a mechanism by which pathogens protect themselves from destruction during infection [81]. It is therefore suggested that these isolates may present health complications to humans if consumed in contaminated milk or its associated products.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, S. aureus was successfully isolated from milk samples and a large proportion of S. aureus isolates exhibited resistance towards the 11 different antibiotics tested. Thus, it is evident that most of the isolates possessed multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) attributes. Though the development of antibiotic resistant determinants in S. aureus is associated with the uncontrolled usage of antibiotics in human and veterinary medicine, the incidence of drug-resistant S. aureus in raw, tank and pasteurised milk samples warrants closer monitoring.
The MAR isolates obtained in this study possessed a number of virulence factors such as haemolysin, coagulase, DNase, catalase, but only few of them carried the enterotoxin gene (sec). This supports the notion that though the epidemiological statistics of milk-borne diseases are unavailable, milk products possess pathogenic S. aureus strains and may be cause foodborne diseases in consumers. In addition, the sec gene was found to be the predominant enterotoxin gene in this genetically diverse South African milk isolates and the presence of this gene is not genotype specific.

Supplementary Files

Supplementary File 1

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the North-West University, Mafikeng Campus, South Africa. We would like to thank the University of Pretoria—South Africa and NRF for their assistance with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry analysis.

Author Contributions

CNA designed the concept; MA performed the laboratory experiments; CNA supervised the laboratory bench work; OOB, MA and CNA all participated in writing the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Swaisgood, H.E. Protein and amino acid composition of bovine milk. In Handbook of Milk Composition; Jensen, R.C., Ed.; Academic Press: London, UK, 1995; pp. 464–467. [Google Scholar]
  2. Haug, A.; Hostmark, A.T.; Harstad, O.M. Bovine milk in human nutrition—A review. Lipids Health Dis. 2007, 6, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ebringer, L.; Ferenčík, M.; Krajčovič, J. Beneficial health effects of milk and fermented dairy products—Review. Folia Microbiol. 2008, 53, 378–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Michaelidou, A.M. Factors influencing nutritional and health profile of milk and milk products. Small Rumin. Res. 2008, 79, 42–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jørgensen, H.J.; Mørk, T.; Høgasen, H.R.; Rørvik, L.M. Enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus in bulk milk in Norway. J. Microb. Biotechnol. 2005, 99, 158–166. [Google Scholar]
  6. Havelaar, A.H.; Brul, S.; de Jong, A.; de Jonge, R.; Zwietering, M.H.; Ter Kuile, B.H. Future challenges to microbial food safety. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 139, S79–S94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Newell, D.G.; Koopmans, M.; Verhoef, L.; Duizer, E.; Aidara-Kane, A.; Sprong, H.; Opsteegh, M.; Langelaar, M.; Threfall, J.; Scheutz, F.; et al. Food-borne diseases—The challenges of 20 years ago still persist while new ones continue to emerge. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2010, 139, S3–S15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Normanno, G.; La Salandra, G.; Dambrosio, A.; Quaglia, N.; Corrente, M.; Parisi, A.; Santagada, G.; Firinu, A.; Crisetti, E.; Celano, G. Occurrence, characterization and antimicrobial resistance of enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus isolated from meat and dairy products. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 115, 290–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Huong, B.T.M.; Mahmud, Z.H.; Neogi, S.B.; Kassu, A.; Nhien, N.V.; Mohammad, A.; Yamato, M.; Ota, F.; Lam, N.T.; Dao, H.T.A. Toxigenicity and genetic diversity of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from Vietnamese ready-to-eat foods. Food Control 2010, 21, 166–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Evans, C.A.; Smith, W.M.; Johnston, E.A.; Giblett, E.R. Bacterial Flora of the Normal Human Skin. J. Invest. Dermatol. 1950, 15, 305–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Neely, A.N.; Maley, M.P. Survival of enterococci and staphylococci on hospital fabrics and plastic. J. Cli. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 724–726. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rasmussen, T.; Kirkeby, L.; Poulsen, K.; Reinholdt, J.; Kilian, M. Resident aerobic microbiota of the adult human nasal cavity. APMIS 2000, 108, 663–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Guardabassi, L.; Schwarz, S.; Lloyd, D.H. Pet animals as reservoirs of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria Review. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004, 54, 321–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Westh, H.; Zinn, C.S.; Rosdahl, V.T. An international multicenter study of antimicrobial consumption and resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates from 15 hospitals in 14 countries. Microb. Drug Resist. 2004, 10, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Nagase, N.; Sasaki, A.; Yamashita, K.; Shimizu, A.; Wakita, Y.; Kitai, S.; Kawano, J. Isolation and species distribution of staphylococci from animal and human skin. J. Vet. Med. Sci. 2002, 64, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lee, J.H. Methicillin (oxacillin)-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from major food animals and their potential transmission to humans. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2003, 69, 6489–6494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. van Duijkeren, E.; Box, A.; Heck, M.; Wannet, W.; Fluit, A. Methicillin-resistant staphylococci isolated from animals. Vet. Microbiol. 2004, 103, 91–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Le Loir, Y.; Baron, F.; Gautier, M. Staphylococcus aureus and food poisoning. Genet. Mol. Res. 2003, 2, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  19. Lina, G.; Piémont, Y.; Godail-Gamot, F.; Bes, M.; Peter, M.O.; Gauduchon, V.; Vandenesch, F.; Etienne, J. Involvement of panton-valentine leukocidin—Producing Staphylococcus aureus in primary skin infections and pneumonia. Genet. Mol. Res. 1999, 29, 1128–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Hageman, J.C.; Uyeki, T.M.; Francis, J.S.; Jernigan, D.B.; Wheeler, J.G.; Bridges, C.B.; Barenkamp, S.J.; Sievert, D.M.; Srinivasan, A.; Doherty, M.C. Severe community-acquired pneumonia due to Staphylococcus aureus, 2003–04 influenza season. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2006, 12, 894–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Spanu, V.; Spanu, C.; Virdis, S.; Cossu, F.; Scarano, C.; de Santis, E.P.L. Virulence factors and genetic variability of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from raw sheep’s milk cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 153, 53–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Vázquez-Sánchez, D.; López-Cabo, M.; Saá-Ibusquiza, P.; Rodríguez-Herrera, J.J. Incidence and characterization of Staphylococcus aureus in fishery products marketed in Galicia (Northwest Spain). Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 157, 286–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Angulo, F.; Nargund, V.; Chiller, T. Evidence of an Association between Use of Anti-microbial Agents in Food Animals and Anti-Microbial Resistance among Bacteria Isolated from Humans and the Human Health Consequences of Such Resistance. J. Vet. Med. 2004, 51, 374–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Phillips, I.; Casewell, M.; Cox, T.; de Groot, B.; Friis, C.; Jones, R.; Nightingale, C.; Preston, R.; Waddell, J. Does the use of antibiotics in food animals pose a risk to human health? A critical review of published data. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2004, 53, 28–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Carmeli, Y.; Troillet, N.; Karchmer, A.W.; Samore, M.H. Health and economic outcomes of antibiotic resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Arch. Intern. Med. 1999, 159, 1127–1132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Cosgrove, S.E. The relationship between antimicrobial resistance and patient outcomes: Mortality, length of hospital stay, and health care costs. Genet. Mol. Res. 2006, 42, S82–S89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Hsueh, P.R.; Chen, W.H.; Luh, K.T. Relationships between antimicrobial use and antimicrobial resistance in Gram-negative bacteria causing nosocomial infections from 1991–2003 at a university hospital in Taiwan. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2005, 26, 463–472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Rogues, A.M.; Dumartin, C.; Amadéo, B.; Venier, A.G.; Marty, N.; Parneix, P.; Gachie, J.P. Relationship between rates of antimicrobial consumption and the incidence of antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from 47 French hospitals. Infect. Control. Hosp. Epidemiol. 2007, 28, 1389–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Sapkota, A.R.; Lefferts, L.Y.; McKenzie, S.; Walker, P. What do we feed to food-production animals? A review of animal feed ingredients and their potential impacts on human health. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007, 663–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Silbergeld, E.K.; Graham, J.; Price, L.B. Industrial food animal production, antimicrobial resistance, and human health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 2008, 29, 151–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Jevsons, M.P. Celbenin-resistant staphylococci. Br. Med. J. 1961, 1, 24–25. [Google Scholar]
  32. Lim, D.; Strynadka, N.C. Structural basis for the β-lactam resistance of PBP2a from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Nat. Struct. MolBiol. 2002, 9, 870–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Fuda, C.; Suvorov, M.; Vakulenko, S.B.; Mobashery, S. The basis for resistance to β-lactam antibiotics by penicillin-binding protein 2a of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 40802–40806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Tenover, F.C.; Weigel, L.M.; Appelbaum, P.C.; McDougal, L.K.; Chaitram, J.; McAllister, S.; Clark, N.; Killgore, G.; O’Hara, C.M.; Jevitt, L. Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolate from a patient in Pennsylvania. Antimicrob. Agents and Chemother. 2004, 48, 275–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ateba, C.N.; Mbewe, M.; Moneoang, M.S.; Bezuidenhout, C.C. Antibiotic-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from milk in the Mafikeng Area, North West province, South Africa. S. Afr. J. Sci. 2010, 106, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chakraborty, S.P.; KarMahapatra, S.; Bal, M.; Roy, S. Isolation and Identification of Vancomycin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Post Operative Pus Sample. Available online: http://ajms.alameenmedical.org/ArticlePDFs/AJMS.4.2.2011%20p%20152-168.pdf (assessed on 18 August 2015).
  37. Map of the North-West Province. Available online: http://www.places.co.za/maps/north_west_map.html (accessed on 22 August 2015).
  38. Bergdoll, M.S.; Wong, A.L. Staphylococcus . In Encyclopedia of Food Science, Food Technology and Nutrition; Macrae, R., Robinsons, R., Michele, S., Eds.; Academic Press Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1993; pp. 5551–5556. [Google Scholar]
  39. Sperber, W.A.; Moorman, M.A.; Freier, T.A. Cultural Methods for the Enrichment and Isolation of Microorganisms. In Compendium of Methods for the Microbiological Examination of Foods; Downes, F.P., Ito, K., Eds.; American Public Health Association: Washington DC, USA, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  40. Pelisser, M.R.; Klein, C.S.; Ascoli, K.R.; Zotti, T.R.; Arisi, A.C.M. Ocurrence of Staphylococcus aureus and multiplex pcr detection of classic enterotoxin genes in cheese and meat products. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2009, 40, 145–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Cruickshank, R.; Duguid, J.P.; Marmion, B.R.; Swain, R.H. Medical Microbiology, 12th ed.; Churchill-Living Stone: London, UK, 1975. [Google Scholar]
  42. Winn, W.C.; Stephen, A.; Janda, W.; Koneman, E.; Procop, G.; Schreckenberger, P.; Woods, G. Koneman’s Color Atlas and Textbook of Diagnostic Microbiology; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  43. Thomas, M. A blue peroxide slide catalase test. Mon. Bull. Minist. Health 1963, 22, 124–125. [Google Scholar]
  44. Turkyilmaz, S.; Kaya, O. Determination of some virulence factors in Staphylococcus spp. isolated from various clinical samples. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2006, 30, 127–132. [Google Scholar]
  45. Løvseth, A.; Loncarevic, S.; Berdal, K. Modified multiplex PCR method for detection of pyrogenic exotoxin genes in staphylococcal isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 3869–3872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Maes, N.; Magdalena, J.; Rottiers, S.; de Gheldre, Y.; Struelens, M. Evaluation of a triplex PCR assay to discriminate Staphylococcus aureus from coagulase-negative staphylococci and determine methicillin resistance from blood cultures. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2002, 40, 1514–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Peles, F.; Wagner, M.; Varga, L.; Hein, I.; Rieck, P.; Gutser, K.; Keresztúri, P.; Kardos, G.; Turcsányi, I.; Béri, B. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine milk in Hungary. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 118, 186–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Mehrotra, M.; Wang, G.; Johnson, W.M. Multiplex PCR for Detection of Genes for Staphylococcus aureus Enterotoxins, Exfoliative Toxins, Toxic Shock Syndrome Toxin 1, and Methicillin Resistance. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2000, 38, 1032–1035. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Montanaro, L.; Renata Arciola, C.; Baldassarri, L.; Borsetti, E. Presence and expression of collagen adhesin gene (cna) and slime production in Staphylococcus aureus strains from orthopaedic prosthesis infections. Biomaterials 1999, 20, 1945–1949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bauer, A.W.; Kirby, W.M.; Sherris, J.C.; Turck, M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am. J. Clin. Pathol. 1996, 45, 493–496. [Google Scholar]
  51. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; 17th Supplement, Approved Standard (M100-S17). 2007. Available online: http//www.microbiolab-bg.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/CLSI.pdf (accessed on 22 August 2015).
  52. Rota, C.; Yanguela, J.; Blanco, D.; Carramilana, J.J.; Arino, A.; Herrera, A. High prevalence of multiple resistance to antibiotics in 144 listeria isolates from Spanish dairy and meat products. J. Food Prot. 1996, 59, 938–943. [Google Scholar]
  53. Løvseth, A.; Loncarevic, S.; Berdal, K. Modified multiplex PCR method for detection of pyrogenic exotoxin genes in staphylococcal isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2004, 42, 3869–3872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Jones, T.F.; Kellum, M.E.; Porter, S.S.; Bell, M.; Schaffner, W. An outbreak of community-acquired foodborne illness caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2002, 8, 82–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. O’Ferrall-Berndt, M. A comparison of selected public health criteria in milk from milk-shops and from a national distributor. J. S. Afr. Vet. Assoc. 2003, 74, 35–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Akineden, Ö.; Hassan, A.A.; Schneider, E.; Usleber, E. Enterotoxigenic properties of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from goats’ milk cheese. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2008, 124, 211–216. [Google Scholar]
  57. Argudin, M.; Tenhagen, B.A.; Fetsch, A.; Sachsenröder, J.; Käsbohrer, A.; Schroeter, A.; Hammerl, J.A.; Hertwig, S.; Helmuth, R.; Bräunig, J. Virulence and resistance determinants of German Staphylococcus aureus ST398 isolates from nonhuman sources. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2011, 77, 3052–3060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Intrakamhaeng, M.; Komutarin, T.; Pimpukdee, K.; Aengwanich, W. Incidence of enterotoxin-producing MRSA in bovine mastitis cases, bulk milk tanks and processing plants in Thailand. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2012, 11, 655–661. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kamal, R.M.; Bayoumi, M.A.; Abd El Aal, S.F.A. MRSA detection in raw milk, some dairy products and hands of dairy workers in Egypt, a mini-survey. Food Control 2013, 33, 49–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zouharova, M.; Rysanek, D. Multiplex PCR and RPLA Identification of Staphylococcus aureus enterotoxigenic strains from bulk tank milk. Zoonoses Public Health 2008, 55, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Mirzaei, H.; Tofighi, A.; Sarabi, H.K.; Farajli, M. Prevalence of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Raw Milk and Dairy Products in Sarab by Culture and PCR Techniques. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 2011, 10, 3107–3111. [Google Scholar]
  62. Pereira, V.; Lopes, C.; Castro, A.; Silva, J.; Gibbs, P.; Teixeira, P. Characterization for enterotoxin production, virulence factors, and antibiotic susceptibility of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from various foods in Portugal. Food Microbiol. 2009, 26, 278–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Gücükoğlu, A.; Onur Kevenk, T.; Uyanik, T.; Çadirci, Ö.; Terzi, G.; Alişarli, M. Detection of enterotoxigenic Staphylococcus aureus in raw milk and dairy products by multiplex PCR. J. Food Sci. 2012, 77, M620–M623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Andrighetto, C.; Knijff, E.; Lombardi, A.; Torriani, S.; Vancanneyt, M.; Kersters, K.; Swings, J.; Dellaglio, F. Phenotypic and genetic diversity of enterococci isolated from italian cheeses. J. Dairy Res. 2001, 68, 303–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Pesavento, G.; Ducci, B.; Comodo, N. Antimicrobial resistance profile of Staphylococcus aureus isolated from raw meat: A research for methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Food Control 2007, 18, 196–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Ito, T.; Okuma, K.; Ma, X.X.; Yuzawa, H.; Hiramatsu, K. Insights on antibiotic resistance of Staphylococcus aureus from its whole genome: Genomic island SCC. Drug Resist. Updat. 2003, 6, 41–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yamamoto, T.; Hung, W.C.; Takano, T.; Nishiyama, A. Genetic nature and virulence of community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. BioMedicine 2013, 3, 2–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Kérouanton, A.; Hennekinne, J.; Letertre, C.; Petit, L.; Chesneau, O.; Brisabois, A.; de Buyser, M. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus strains associated with food poisoning outbreaks in France. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2007, 115, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Boerlin, P.; Burnens, A.P.; Frey, J.; Kuhnert, P.; Nicolet, J. Molecular epidemiology and genetic linkage of macrolide and aminoglycoside resistance in Staphylococcus intermedius of canine origin. Vet. Microbiol. 2001, 79, 155–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Aydin, A.; Sudagidan, M.; Muratoglu, K. Prevalence of staphylococcal enterotoxins, toxin genes and genetic-relatedness of foodborne Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated in the Marmara Region of Turkey. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2011, 148, 99–106. [Google Scholar]
  71. Oliveira, D.C.; de Lencastre, H. Multiplex PCR strategy for rapid identification of structural types and variants of the mec element in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2002, 46, 2155–2161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Swenson, J.M.; Lonsway, D.; McAllister, S.; Thompson, A.; Jevitt, L.; Zhu, W.; Patel, J.B. Detection of mecA-mediated resistance using reference and commercial testing methods in a collection of Staphylococcus aureus expressing borderline oxacillin MICs. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2007, 58, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Peacock, S.J.; Moore, C.E.; Justice, A.; Kantzanou, M.; Story, L.; Mackie, K.; O’Neill, G.; Day, N.P. Virulent combinations of adhesin and toxin genes in natural populations of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect. Immun. 2002, 70, 4987–4996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Fueyo, J.; Martın, M.; Gonzalez-Hevia, M.; Mendoza, M. Enterotoxin production and DNA fingerprinting in Staphylococcus aureus isolated from human and food samples. Relations between genetic types and enterotoxins. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2001, 67, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Mašlanková, J.; Pilipčincová, I.; Tkáčiková, L. Pheno and genotyping of Staphylococcus aureus isolates of sheep origin. Acta Vet. Brno. 2009, 78, 345–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Scherrer, D.; Corti, S.; Muehlherr, J.; Zweifel, C.; Stephan, R. Phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of Staphylococcus aureus isolates from raw bulk-tank milk samples of goats and sheep. Vet. Microbiol. 2004, 101, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Karahan, M.; Açık, M.N.; Cetinkaya, B. Investigation of toxin genes by polymerase chain reaction in Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from bovine mastitis in Turkey. Foodborne Pathog. Dis. 2009, 6, 1029–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Rogolsky, M. Non-enteric toxins of Staphylococcus aureus. Microbiol. Rev. 1979, 43, 320–336. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  79. Zecconi, A.; Scali, F. Staphylococcus aureus virulence factors in evasion from innate immune defenses in human and animal diseases. Immunol. Lett. 2013, 150, 12–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Pavlov, D.; de Wet, C.M.E.; Grabow, W.O.K.; Ehlers, M.M. Potentially pathogenic features of heterotrophic plate count bacteria isolated from treated and untreated drinking water. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2004, 92, 275–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Gillapsy, A.F.; Landolo, J.J. Staphylococcus . In The Desk Encyclopedia of Microbiology, 2nd ed.; Schaechter, M., Ed.; Elsevier Academic Press: San Diego, CA, USA, 2009. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Akindolire, M.A.; Babalola, O.O.; Ateba, C.N. Detection of Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Milk: A Public Health Implication. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 10254-10275. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120910254

AMA Style

Akindolire MA, Babalola OO, Ateba CN. Detection of Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Milk: A Public Health Implication. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2015; 12(9):10254-10275. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120910254

Chicago/Turabian Style

Akindolire, Muyiwa Ajoke, Olubukola Oluranti Babalola, and Collins Njie Ateba. 2015. "Detection of Antibiotic Resistant Staphylococcus aureus from Milk: A Public Health Implication" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 12, no. 9: 10254-10275. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120910254

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop