Next Article in Journal
Hypotension and Environmental Noise: A Replication Study
Previous Article in Journal
Mineral Resource Dilemma: How to Balance the Interests of Government, Local Communities and Abiotic Nature
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 11
Issue 9
10.3390/ijerph110908645
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Clinical and Metabolic Parameters in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Colorectal Cancer Patients with and without KRAS Mutations

by
Ahmet Yilmaz
1,
Nehad Mohamed
1,
Kara A. Patterson
1,
Yan Tang
1,
Konstantin Shilo
1,
Miguel A. Villalona-Calero
2,
Michael E. Davis
3,
Xiao-Ping Zhou
1,
Wendy Frankel
1,
Gregory A. Otterson
2 and
Weiqiang Zhao
1,*
1
Department of Pathology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
2
Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
3
Department of Animal Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11(9), 8645-8660; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110908645
Submission received: 3 March 2014 / Revised: 28 July 2014 / Accepted: 15 August 2014 / Published: 25 August 2014
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Lung cancer (LC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) are the first and second deadliest types of cancer worldwide. EGFR-based therapy has been used in the treatment of these cancers with variable success. Presence of mutations in the KRAS driver oncogene, possibly induced by environmental factors such as carcinogens in diet and cigarette smoke, may confer worse prognosis and resistance to treatment for reasons not fully understood. Data on possible associations between KRAS mutational status and clinical and metabolic parameters, which may help in clinical management, as well as in identifying risk factors for developing these cancers, are limited in the current literature. We sequenced the KRAS gene and investigated the associations of variations in 108 patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), the most common form of LC, and in 116 patients with CRC. All of the mutations originated from the guanosine nucleotide and over half of all transversions in NSCLC and CRC were c.34 G>T and c.35 G>T, respectively. c.35 G>A was the most frequent type of transition in both cancers. Excluding smoking, the clinical and metabolic parameters in patients carrying mutant and wild type KRAS were similar except that the CRC patients with transversion mutations were 8.6 years younger than those carrying the transitions (P < 0.01). Dyslipidemia, hypertension, family cancer history, and age of diagnosis older than 60 years were more frequent in NSCLC than CRC (P ≤ 0.04). These results suggest that most of the clinical and metabolic parameters investigated in this study are probably not associated with the more aggressive phenotype and differences in response to EGFR-based treatment previously reported in patients with KRAS mutations. However, the increased rates of abnormal metabolic parameters in patients with NSCLC in comparison to CRC indicate that these parameters may be more important in the management of NSCLC. CRC patients carrying transition mutations are older than those carrying transversions, suggesting that age may determine the type of KRAS mutation in CRC patients.

1. Introduction

Lung cancer (LC) and colorectal cancer (CRC), the first and second deadliest types of cancer, are responsible for over 22% of all cancer deaths worldwide [1,2]. Mutations in KRAS, possibly induced by environmental factors, such as cigarette smoke in LC and diet in CRC, have been reported frequently [3,4]. KRAS (v-Ki-ras2 Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog) is a driver oncogene encoding for a small GTPase that activates proteins such as RAF, MEK, and ERK1/2 involved in the MAPK/ERK signal transduction pathway in response to extracellular signals received by the EGFR [5,6]. Mutations in KRAS result in the loss of its GTPase activity and constitutive activation of the downstream proteins, changes in G1 and G2/M cell-cycle transit times, decreased apoptosis rates, malignant transformation, and may confer worse prognosis and resistance to EGFR-based treatment [7,8,9,10].
It is known that carcinogens in cigarette smoke and Fe++ in red meat directly cause mutations in KRAS [11,12]. Smoking and unhealthy dietary habits are also associated with abnormal metabolic parameters such as dyslipidemia, hypertension, and presence of diabetes mellitus either directly due to exposure of cells to mutagens or indirectly via obesity-related hormonal changes [13]. However, possible associations between KRAS mutational status and metabolic measurements, which may help in clinical management of patients, as well as in identifying risk factors for developing these cancers, have not been investigated in the literature except that a patient with abnormal metabolic parameters and the KRAS G12C mutation has been reported recently [14].
Mutations in KRAS can be either transitions or transversions. Transitions are generally induced by alkylation, epigenetic events, or oxidative deamination, whereas transversions are generally induced by ionizing radiation or carcinogens such as those found in cigarette smoke. Changes in the normal ratio of transitions to transversions in KRAS have been reported in several cancers including subtypes of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and esophageal cancer [15,16]. The changes in the ratio may depend on mutagens exposed or organs involved [17,18]. High rates of transitions have been reported in patients with methylation of the promoter of the DNA repair gene O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) [19]. MGMT specifically repairs G>A transitions and lack of its expression is associated with high rates of transitions [20].
The objective of this study was to investigate possible associations of clinical and metabolic parameters with KRAS mutational status in patients with CRC and NSCLC. The nature and type of mutations, as well as transition to transversion ratios, in these patients were also investigated.

2. Materials and Methods

DNA was isolated from tissue samples taken after surgery and embedded in paraffin and fixed in formalin. We developed and validated a nested Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) assay followed by direct sequencing to identify KRAS mutations in codons 12 and 13, the mutational hotspot where over 90% of all KRAS mutations have been reported [21]. The forward 5′-TACTGGTGGAGTATTTGATAGTG-3′ and reverse 5′-CTGTATCAAAGAATGGTCCTG-3′ primers were used in the first round of PCR to amplify 5 to 100 ng of DNA in a 25 µL PCR reaction. A second pair of primers was used to amplify one µL of the PCR products obtained in the first round using the forward 5′-TGTAAAACGGCCAGTTAGTGTATTAACCTTATGTG-3′ and reverse 5′-CAGGAAACAGCTATGACCACCTCTATTGTTGGATCATATTCG-3′ primers.
PCR conditions used in the first round consisted of 95°C for 15 min and 30 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec, 48°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 30 sec. A final extension step was carried out at 72°C for 7 min. The same conditions were used in the second round of PCR except that the annealing temperature was raised to 58°C. The PCR products were purified using the Qia-Quick PCR purification kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) and were subjected to fluorescence-based capillary electrophoresis in an ABI 3130XL genetic analyzer (Life Technologies,Grand Island, NY, USA) to detect the mutations.
Results were interpreted using the SeqScape v2.6 sequencing analysis software (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA). The allelic ratio of mutated versus wild type alleles was calculated using the formula ((mutant peak height)/(wild type peak height + mutant peak height))× 100. Allelic ratio of 5% or higher was interpreted as the presence of KRAS mutation. Thirteen negative and two positive tissue samples previously diagnosed at The Ohio State University Medical Center (Columbus, OH, USA) or the MD Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX, USA) were re-tested using the PCR and analysis methods described above for cross-validation and identical results were obtained.
Counts and ratios were analyzed using the nonparametric Mann-Whitney test. Age was analyzed using Student’s t-test. Categorical variables were analyzed using the χ2 test except that Fisher’s exact test was used if the sample size in any of the cells in a contingency table was less than five. The significance level was set at P = 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Comparison of the clinical and metabolic parameters in patients with and without KRAS mutations

Smoking was more frequent in NSCLC patients carrying mutated than those carrying the wild type KRAS (P < 0.001, Table 1). The remaining variables were similar between the patients with and without mutations in KRAS. The similar variables included average age at diagnosis, and rates of male gender, age younger than 60 years at the time of diagnosis, alcohol consumption, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension, individual cancer history, and family cancer history.

3.2. Comparison of the clinical and metabolic parameters in patients with different types of KRAS mutations

We compared the parameters in patients carrying different types of KRAS mutations (i.e., transitions and transversions) to investigate whether these parameters were related to the type of mutations (Table 2). There was no statistically significant difference in any of the variables investigated except that the CRC, but not LC, patients carrying the transition mutations were 8.6 years older than those carrying the transversion mutations (61.03 (11.0) vs. 52.4 (10.9) years, P < 0.01). To further investigate this finding, we categorized the CRC patients into six different age groups (i.e., 30 to 39 years, 40 to 49 years, and so on). Plotting the transition/transversion ratios against the age groups showed that the transition mutations were absent in the youngest age group (i.e., 30 to 39 years) but were the most frequent type in the oldest age group (i.e., 80 to 89 years) (Figure 1).

3.3. Comparison of the clinical and metabolic parameters in NSCLC and CRC patients with the same KRAS mutational status

These comparisons showed that older age at diagnosis, smoking, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and family cancer history were more frequent in NSCLC than in CRC patients when KRAS mutations were present (P ≤ 0.04, Table 3). Older age at diagnosis and smoking were again more frequent in NSCLC than CRC when no KRAS mutations were present.

3.4. Comparison of the clinical and metabolic parameters in NSCLC and CRC patients with the same KRAS mutation type

To investigate whether the differences seen in parameters in NSCLC and CRC patients carrying KRAS mutations were associated with the type of KRAS mutation, we compared the parameters in these patients carrying the same type of KRAS mutation (Table 4). These comparisons did not show any significant differences when transitions were present. However, older age at diagnosis, smoking, and dyslipidemia were more frequent in NSCLC than CRC when transversions were present.

3.5. Nucleotide and amino acid changes in the NSCLC and CRC patients with KRAS mutations

Changes in the nucleotides and amino acids, as well as the total transition and transversion rates, in patients included in this study are presented in Table 5. c.34 G>T and c.35 G>T were the most frequent transversions in NSCLC and CRC, respectively. c.35 G>A was the most frequent type of transition in both cancers.
Table
Table 1. Clinical and metabolic parameters of the 108 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 116 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients screened for KRAS mutations.
Table 1. Clinical and metabolic parameters of the 108 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and 116 colorectal cancer (CRC) patients screened for KRAS mutations.
VariablesNLSCSCRC
MUT aWT aPMUT aWT aP
Patients5256 5660
Average age (SD), years61.0 (8.9)62.0 (11.6)0.3456.89 (11.7)56.1 (12.0)0.36
Male gender26/51 (51.0)29/56 (51.8)0.9325/56 (44.6)36/60 (60.0)0.10
Younger than 60 years of age b14/32 (43.8)14/42 (33.3)0.3730/56(53.6)34/60 (56.7)0.74
Smoker44/48 (91.7)36/52 (69.2)<0.001 *25/56 (44.6)25/59 (42.4)0.81
Consumes alcohol12/47 (25.5)7/46 (15.2)0.239/56 (16.1)12/59 (20.3)0.56
Diabetic8/47 (17.0)7/46 (15.2)0.8210/56 (17.9)9/60 (15.0)0.69
Dyslipidemia present20/47 (42.6)14/46 (30.4)0.239/56 (16.1)13/60 (21.7)0.46
Hypertension present32/48 (66.7)26/47 (55.3)0.2726/56 (46.4)26/60 (43.3)0.75
Individual cancer history present6/47 (12.8)5/46 (10.9)0.792/56 (3.6)5/59 (8.5)0.30
Family cancer history present33/47 (70.2)26/46 (56.5)0.1828/56 (50.0)32/60 (53.3)0.72
Notes: a Number of patients with each variable. Values in parentheses represent percentages. Abbreviations used: MUT = mutations in KRAS present, WT = no mutations in KRAS were found. b Younger than 60 years of age at the time of diagnosis.
Table
Table 2. Clinical and metabolic parameters in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with transition or transversion mutations in KRAS.
Table 2. Clinical and metabolic parameters in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with transition or transversion mutations in KRAS.
VariablesNSCLCCRC
TRN aTRV aPTRN aTRV aP
Patients1438 2927
Average age (SD), years62.1 (9.6)60.5 (8.6)0.3261.03 (11.0)52.4 (10.9)<0.01 *
Male gender10/14 (71.4)16/37 (43.2)0.0812/29 (41.4)13/27 (48.1)0.62
Younger than 60 years of age b6/11 (54.5)8/21 (38.1)0.3913/29 (44.8)17/27 (63.0)0.19
Smoker10/12 (83.3)34/36 (94.4)0.2817/29 (58.6)13/27 (48.1)0.45
Consumes alcohol5/14 (35.7)7/33 (21.2)0.324/29 (13.8)5/27 (18.5)0.64
Diabetic1/14 (7.1)7/33 (21.2)0.275/29 (17.2)5/27 (18.5)0.91
Dyslipidemia present7/14 (50.0)13/33 (39.4)0.516/29 (20.7)3/27 (11.1)0.35
Hypertension present11/14 (78.8)21/34 (61.8)0.2816/29 (55.2)10/27 (37.0)0.18
Individual cancer history present1/14 (7.1)5/33 (15.1)0.491/29 (3.4)1/27 (3.7)0.97
Family cancer history present11/14 (78.5)22/33 (66.7)0.4316/29 (55.2)12/27 (44.4)0.44
Notes: a Number of patients with each variable. Values in parentheses represent percentages. Abbreviations used: TRN = transition mutation(s) in KRAS present, TRV = transversion mutation(s) in KRAS present. b Younger than 60 years of age at the time of diagnosis.
Table
Table 3. Clinical and metabolic parameters in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with the same KRAS mutational status.
Table 3. Clinical and metabolic parameters in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with the same KRAS mutational status.
VariablesKRAS MutantKRAS Wild Type
NSCLC aCRC aPNSCLC aCRC aP
Patients5256 5660
Average age (SD), years61.0 (8.9)56.89 (11.7)0.04 *62.0 (11.6)56.1 (12.0)<0.001 *
Male26/51 (51.0)25/56 (44.6)0.5329/56 (51.8)36/60 (60.0)0.38
Younger than 60 years of age b14/32 (43.8)30/56 (53.6)0.4014/42 (33.3)34/60 (56.7)0.02 *
Smoker44/48 (91.7)25/56 (44.6)<0.01 *36/52 (69.2)25/59 (42.4)<0.01 *
Consumes alcohol12/47 (25.5)9/56 (16.1)0.257/46 (15.2)12/59 (20.3)0.51
Diabetic8/47 (17.0)10/56 (17.9)0.917/46 (15.2)9/60 (15.0)0.98
Dyslipidemia present20/47 (42.6)9/56 (16.1)<0.01 *14/46 (30.4)13/60 (21.7)0.31
Hypertension present32/48 (66.7)26/56 (46.4)0.04 *26/47 (55.3)26/60 (43.3)0.23
Individual cancer history present6/47 (12.8)2/56 (3.6)0.105/46 (10.9)5/59 (8.5)0.69
Family cancer history present33/47 (70.2)28/56 (50.0)0.04 *26/46 (56.5)32/60 (53.3)0.76
Notes: a Number of patients with each variable. Values in parentheses represent percentages. b Younger than 60 years of age at the time of diagnosis.
Table
Table 4. Clinical and metabolic parameters in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with transition or transversion mutations in KRAS.
Table 4. Clinical and metabolic parameters in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with transition or transversion mutations in KRAS.
VariablesTransition(s) in KRAS PresentTransversion(s) in KRAS Present
NSCLC aCRC aPNSCLC aCRC aP
Patients1429 3827
Average age (SD), years62.1 (9.6)61.03 (11.0)0.3960.5 (8.6)52.4 (10.9)<0.001 *
Male gender10/14 (71.4)12/29 (41.4)0.0716/37 (43.2)13/27 (48.1)0.72
Younger than 60 years of age b6/11 (54.5)13/29 (44.8)0.598/21 (38.1)17/27 (63.0)0.12
Smoker10/12 (83.3)17/29 (58.6)0.1534/36 (94.4)13/27 (48.1)<0.01 *
Consumes alcohol5/14 (35.7)4/29 (13.8)0.137/33 (21.2)5/27 (18.5)0.81
Diabetic1/14 (7.1)5/29 (17.2)0.407/33 (21.2)5/27 (18.5)0.81
Dyslipidemia present7/14 (50.0)6/29 (20.7)0.0613/33 (39.4)3/27 (11.1)0.02 *
Hypertension present11/14 (78.8)16/29 (55.2)0.1521/34 (61.8)10/27 (37.0)0.06
Individual cancer history present1/14 (7.1)1/29 (3.4)0.665/33 (15.1)1/27 (3.7)0.17
Family cancer history present11/14 (78.5)16/29 (55.2)0.1522/33 (66.7)12/27 (44.4)0.09
Notes: a Number of patients with each variable. Values in parentheses represent percentages. b Younger than 60 years of age at the time of diagnosis.
Table
Table 5. Nucleotide and amino acid changes in KRAS in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC).
Table 5. Nucleotide and amino acid changes in KRAS in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) and colorectal cancer (CRC).
Type of KRAS Mutation aNSCLC bCRC bP
c.34 G>T transversion (G12C)22 (57.9)7 (25.9)0.04 c
c.34 G>C transversion (G12R)1 (2.6)2 (7.4)
c.35 G>T transversion (G12V)9 (23.7)14 (51.9)
c.35 G>C transversion (G12A)3 (7.9)3 (11.1)
c.37 G>T transversion (G13C)3 (7.9)1 (3.7)
c.34 G>A transition (G12S)1 (7.1)4 (13.8)0.44 d
c.35 G>A transition (G12D)11 (78.6)17 (58.6)
c.38 G>A transition (G13D)2 (14.3)8 (27.6)
Total transversions38 (73.1)27 (48.2)<0.01 *,e
Total transitions14 (26.9)29 (51.8)
TOTAL52 (100)56 (100)
Notes: a “c” indicates the number of nucleotide in the cDNA sequence. b Number of patients with each variable. Values in parentheses represent percentages. c P is the significance value for the χ2 test with four degrees of freedom. d P is the significance value for the χ2 test with two degrees of freedom. e P is the significance value for the χ2 test with one degree of freedom.
Ijerph 11 08645 g001 1024
Figure 1. Association of KRAS transition/transversion ratios with age groups in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
Figure 1. Association of KRAS transition/transversion ratios with age groups in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
Ijerph 11 08645 g001
Because over half of all transversions in NSCLC and CRC patients consisted of the c.34 G>T and c.35 G>T, respectively, we compared clinical and metabolic parameters in patients with these mutations to those carrying the remaining types of transversions. These analyses did not show any significant differences in the variables analyzed (data not shown).

4. Discussion

KRAS is a driver oncogene frequently mutated in both NSCLC and CRC [22]. Associations of KRAS mutational status with progression, treatment outcome, and response to EGFR-based treatment have been reported in both of these cancers [21,23,24]. Behaviors such as cigarette smoking and consumption of certain food items are known to cause KRAS mutations [11,12]. Cigarette smoking and unhealthy diet are additionally associated with abnormal metabolic parameters such as hypertension, dyslipidemia, and presence of diabetes mellitus [13], suggesting that KRAS mutational status may be related to metabolic parameters. Such relationships could be important in the treatment as well as clinical management of the patients because the abnormal metabolic parameters themselves are putative risk factors for developing these cancers [25,26].

4.1. Comparison of the clinical and metabolic parameters in patients with and without KRAS mutations

Smoking was more frequent in NSCLC patients carrying mutations in KRAS (Table 1). All of the remaining parameters were similar between patients with and without mutations, suggesting that KRAS mutations were probably not associated with changes in these variables.
Similar age of diagnosis in patients carrying mutated and the wild type KRAS in our study is in agreement with previous studies [27,28]. In our study, KRAS mutation frequency in male and female patients was also similar. The role of gender in LC is subject to controversy in the literature. Some authors reported no difference in KRAS mutational status between the males and females [29], whereas others reported increased mutations in males [30,31,32] or females [33,34]. These discrepancies may be due to differences in sample size, patient characteristics such as ethnicity, smoking habits, age, or tumor characteristics such as grade and anatomical location. The role of gender in CRC is also subject to controversy in the literature. Some studies reported increased KRAS mutations in females [27,35], whereas others reported no difference between the two genders [28]. In a recent large study including a Brazilian cohort of 8234 metastatic CRC patients, KRAS mutations were more frequent among females [36].
Increased frequency of KRAS-mutated NSCLC among smokers found in our study is in agreement with previous studies [31,33,37]. The role of smoking in CRC has not been well established in the literature, although there is some evidence suggesting that some of the smoking characteristics such as inhalation and smoking frequency may increase CRC risk. Ex-smokers, but not current smokers, may be at increased risk for CRC without any mutation in KRAS when compared to those who never smoked [38]. Older women who smoke are also at increased risk for CRC with wild type KRAS [39]. Associations between cigarette smoking and a higher risk of developing both hyperplastic and adenomatous polyps with KRAS mutations have been reported [40].
Our results on alcohol intake in CRC patients do not agree with a previous study that reported a significant association between alcohol consumption and KRAS mutational status [41]. The absence of correlations between KRAS mutational status and individual and family cancer history in LC and CRC patients included in our study is in agreement with previous studies [42,43]. Taken together, our results suggest that the worse outcome and resistance to EGFR-based treatment seen in patients carrying mutations in KRAS are probably not related to the clinical parameters investigated.

4.2. Comparison of the clinical and metabolic parameters in patients with different types of KRAS mutations

Comparison of the parameters in patients carrying transition and transversion mutations did not show significant differences in the variables investigated except that the CRC patients carrying transition mutations were 8.6 years older than those carrying the transversion mutations (P < 0.01, Table 2). To our knowledge, the older age in CRC patients with transition mutations has been reported only by Einspahr et al. (2006) [2]. To further investigate this age difference, we categorized patients into six age groups. Interestingly, the transition/transversion ratio was zero at the youngest (i.e., 30 to 39 years) but 100% at the oldest age group (i.e., 80 to 89 years) (Figure 1). Increased transition rates in older CRC patients may be related to epigenetic events or the type or duration of exposure to mutagens in food, although further studies are needed to determine the exact cause of this phenomenon. It is known that MGMT is more frequently methylated in the CRC patients older than 60 years of age [20]. Since MGMT repairs G>A transitions resulting from formation of guanine adducts in DNA, methylation of its promoter may result in increased transition rates in older CRC patients [44]. Increased rate of transversions in younger patients may be due to high consumption of foods rich in animal fat or potential mutagens [45]. It would be interesting to investigate whether the increased transition rates in older individuals are also present in other genes, especially p53, in these as well as other cancer types.

4.3. Comparison of the clinical and metabolic parameters in NSCLC and CRC patients with the same KRAS mutational status

These comparisons showed that the NSCLC patients had higher rates of older age at diagnosis, smoking, dyslipidemia, hypertension, and family cancer history than the CRC patients when KRAS mutations were present (Table 3). Older age at diagnosis and smoking were again more frequent in NSCLC than in CRC patients who did not carry any mutations in KRAS, suggesting that these differences were probably due to reasons other than KRAS mutational status.
EGFR-based treatment may be more effective in NSCLC than in CRC patients carrying wild type KRAS [46]. Our results suggest that this difference in treatment outcome could partly be due to the differences in metabolic parameters investigated in our study. Significant family history of cancer in KRAS-mutated NSCLC in our study implies that smoking habits may be inherited in families of these patients.

4.4. Comparison of the clinical and metabolic parameters in NSCLC and CRC patients with the same KRAS mutation type

None of the clinical and metabolic parameters investigated were different between the NSCLC and CRC patients when transition mutations were present (Table 4). However, older age at diagnosis, smoking, and dyslipidemia were more frequent in NCSCL than in CRC patients when transversion mutations were present.
Dyslipidemia may increase cancer risk by inducing fatty acid synthase (FASN) activity, which is important in de novo fatty acid synthesis in the liver (reviewed by Lee et al., [47]). We are not aware of any studies evaluating associations between KRAS mutational status and dyslipidemia in the NSCLC and CRC patients except that an NSCLC patient with dyslipidemia, hypertension, and the KRAS G12C mutation has been reported recently [14]. Studies investigating associations between CRC and dyslipidemia without regards to the KRAS mutational status are limited in the literature and have produced conflicting results. Some authors have reported higher incidence of CRC in patients with dyslipidemia [48], whereas others reported no difference [49,50]. Yang et al. [51] reported that dyslipidemia was associated with improved survival and reduced recurrence in both men and women with CRC. Future larger studies are needed for a precise determination of associations between dyslipidemia and NSCLC and CRC risk.

4.5. Nucleotide and amino acid changes in NSCLC and CRC patients with KRAS mutations

Nucleotide and amino acid changes in patients included in this study are shown in Table 5. Our results are in general agreement with a previous study that analyzed 59 NSCLC tumors except that the frequency of the c.35 G>C variant was lower in our study (23.7% vs. 5.8% of all KRAS mutations) [34]. This discrepancy could be related to patient characteristics such as age or smoking habits. Overall rate of transversions and transitions were increased in NSCLC and CRC, respectively (Table 5), a result in agreement with previous studies [46,52]. The c.34 G>T and c.35 G>T transversions were the most common types of transversions in NSCLC and CRC, respectively. The high transversion rates in NSCLC are probably due to exposure to carcinogens in cigarette smoke that specifically induce transversion mutations [53].
The c.35 G>A transition was the most frequent type of transition in both cancers, indicating that it is a highly oncogenic mutational hotspot and may be independent of the type of mutagen exposed or organ involved. Previous studies have shown that it confers worse prognosis in CRC [54], but its importance in the prognosis of LC is less clear.
Comparison of the clinical and metabolic parameters in carriers of the most common forms of transversions (i.e., c.34 G>T in NSCLC and c.35 G>T in CRC) to those carrying the remaining types of transversions did not show significant differences, indicating that the presence of these mutations was probably not associated with changes in the parameters investigated.
The qualitative and quantitative differences in KRAS mutational spectra between the NSCLC and CRC patients in our study are likely due to tobacco-related carcinogenesis in NSCLC. Each KRAS mutation subtype detected in our study may affect downstream signaling events differently and represent molecular subtypes with distinct clinicopathologic characteristics. Therefore, biological, clinical, therapeutic, prognostic, and predictive implications of these KRAS mutation subtypes should further be investigated in larger patient populations.

5. Conclusions

The important results obtained in this study include the following: (1) metabolic parameters are similar in patients with and without KRAS mutations, and, therefore, KRAS mutational status is probably not associated with changes in the metabolic parameters investigated in this study in either NSCLC or CRC, (2) the older age seen in CRC patients carrying the transition mutations may have important implications in the management of patients with CRC where KRAS mutational status is a major determinant of treatment options, and (3) dyslipidemia and hypertension are more frequent in NSCLC than CRC, suggesting that these parameters may be more important in the pathogenesis and management of NSCLC.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank all the medical staff at The Ohio State University Medical Center for providing excellent patient care and resources for conducting medical research.

Author Contributions

The authors designed the study (Weiqiang Zhao), conducted experiments and contributed materials and analysis tools (Weiqiang Zhao, Ahmet Yilmaz, Nehad Mohamed, Konstantin Shilo, Miguel A. Villalona-Calero, Xiao-Ping Zhou, Wendy Frankel, Gregory A. Otterson, Yan Tang), analyzed and interpreted the data (Ahmet Yilmaz, Weiqiang Zhao) and wrote the manuscript (Ahmet Yilmaz, Weiqiang Zhao, Michael E. Davis, Kara A. Patterson). All authors critically read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Parkin, D.M.; Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Piasni, P. Estimating the world cancer burden: Globocan 2000. Int J. Cancer 2001, 94, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Einspahr, J.G.; Martinez, M.E.; Jiang, R.; Hsu, C.H.; Rashid, A.; Bhattacharrya, A.K.; Ahnen, D.J.; Jacobs, E.T.; Houlihan, P.S.; Webb, C.R.; et al. Associations of Ki-ras proto-oncogene mutation and p53 gene overexpression in sporadic colorectal adenomas with demographic and clinicopathologic characteristics. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2006, 15, 1443–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Cheng, Y.D.; Yang, H.; Chen, G.Q.; Zhang, Z.C. Molecularly targeted drugs for metastatic colorectal cancer. Drug Des. Dev. Ther. 2013, 7, 1315–1322. [Google Scholar]
  4. De Mello, R.A.; Madureira, P.; Carvalho, L.S.; Araújo, A.; O'Brien, M.; Popat, S. EGFR and KRAS mutations, and ALKfusions: Current developments and personalized therapies for patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Pharmacogenomics 2013, 14, 1765–1777. [Google Scholar]
  5. Riely, G.J.; Marks, J.; Pao, W. KRAS mutations in non-small cell lung cancer. Proc. Amer. Thorac. Soc. 2009, 6, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Amado, R.G.; Wolf, M.; Peeters, M.; van Cutsem, E.; Siena, S.; Freeman, D.J.; Juan, T.; Sikorski, R.; Suggs, S.; Radinsky, R.; et al. Wild-type KRAS is required for panitumumab efficacy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008, 26, 1626–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Cagnol, S.; Rivard, N. Oncogenic KRAS and BRAF activation of the MEK/ERK signaling pathway promotes expression of dual-specificity phosphatase 4 (DUSP4/MKP2) resulting in nuclear ERK1/2 inhibition. Oncogene 2013, 32, 564–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Orecchia, R.; Infusini, E.; Sciutto, A.; Rapallo, A.; di Vinci, A.; Nigro, S.; Geido, E.; Giaretti, W. Ki-ras activation in vitro affects G1 and G2M cell-cycle transit times and apoptosis. J. Pathol. 2000, 190, 423–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Heinemann, V.; Stintzing, S.; Kirchner, T.; Boeck, S.; Jung, A. Clinical relevance of EGFR- and KRAS-status in colorectal cancer patients treated with monoclonal antibodies directed against the EGFR. Cancer Treat. Rev. 2009, 35, 262–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Cushman-Vokoun, A.M.; Stover, D.G.; Zhao, Z.; Koehler, E.A.; Berlin, J.D.; Vnencak-Jones, C.L. Clinical utility of KRAS and BRAF mutations in a cohort of patients with colorectal neoplasms submitted for microsatellite instability testing. Clin. Colorectal Cancer 2013, 12, 168–178. [Google Scholar]
  11. Westra, W.H.; Slebos, R.J.; Offerhaus, G.J.; Goodman, S.N.; Evers, S.G.; Kensler, T.W.; Askin, F.B.; Rodenhuis, S.; Hruban, R.H. K-ras oncogene activation in lung adenocarcinomas from former smokers. Evidence that K-ras mutations are an early and irreversible event in the development of adenocarcinoma of the lung. Cancer 1993, 72, 432–438. [Google Scholar]
  12. Gilsing, A.M.; Fransen, F.; de Kok, T.M.; Goldbohm, A.R.; Schouten, L.J.; de Bruïne, A.P.; van Engeland, M.; van den Brandt, P.A.; de Goeij, A.F.; Weijenberg, M.P. Dietary heme iron and the risk of colorectal cancer with specific mutations in KRAS and APC. Carcinogenesis 2013, 34, 2757–2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Slagter, S.N.; Vliet-Ostaptchouk, J.V.; Vonk, J.M.; Boezen, H.M.; Dullaart, R.P.; Kobold, A.C.; Feskens, E.J.; van Beek, A.P.; van der Klauw, M.M.; Wolffenbuttel, B.H. Associations between smoking, components of metabolic syndrome and lipoprotein particle size. BMC Med. 2013, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gerber, D.E. Maintenance therapy for advanced lung cancer: Who, what, and when? J. Clin. Oncol. 2013, 31, 2983–2990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Doménech, E.; Gómez-López, G.; Gzlez-Peña, D.; López, M.; Herreros, B.; Menezes, J.; Gómez-Lozano, N.; Carro, A.; Graña, O.; Pisano, D.G.; et al. New mutations in chronic lymphocytic leukemia identified by target enrichment and deep sequencing. PLoS One 2012, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Langer, R.; Becker, K.; Feith, M.; Friess, H.; Höfler, H.; Keller, G. Genetic aberrations in primary esophageal melanomas: Molecular analysis of c-KIT, PDGFR, KRAS, NRAS and BRAF in a series of 10 cases. Mod. Pathol. 2011, 24, 495–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Oki, E.; Zhao, Y.; Yoshida, R.; Egashira, A.; Ohgaki, K.; Morita, M.; Kakeji, Y.; Maehara, Y. The difference in p53 mutations between cancers of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract. Digestion 2009, 79, 33–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Riely, G.J.; Kris, M.G.; Rosenbaum, D.; Marks, J.; Li, A.; Chitale, D.A.; Nafa, K.; Riedel, E.R.; Hsu, M.; Pao, W. Frequency and distinctive spectrum of KRAS mutations in never smokers with lung adenocarcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2008, 14, 5731–5734. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Esteller, M.; Risques, R.A.; Toyota, M.; Capella, G.; Moreno, V.; Peinado, M.A.; Baylin, S.B.; Herman, J.G. Promoter hypermethylation of the DNA repair gene O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase is associated with the presence of G:C to A:T transition mutations in p53 in human colorectal tumorigenesis. Cancer Res. 2001, 61, 4689–4692. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  20. Shen, L.; Kondo, Y.; Rosner, G.L.; Xiao, L.; Hernandez, N.S.; Vilaythong, J.; Houlihan, P.S.; Krouse, R.S.; Prasad, A.R.; Einspahr, J.G. MGMT promoter methylation and field defect in sporadic colorectal cancer. J. Natl. Cancer. Inst. 2005, 97, 1330–1338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Bazan, V.; Migliavacca, M.; Zanna, I.; Tubiolo, C.; Grassi, N.; Latteri, M.A.; La Farina, M.; Albanese, I.; Dardanoni, G.; Salerno, S.; et al. Specific codon 13 K-ras mutations are predictive of clinical outcome in colorectal cancer patients, whereas codon 12 K-ras mutations are associated with mucinous histotype. Ann. Oncol. 2002, 13, 1438–1446. [Google Scholar]
  22. Minamoto, T.; Mai, M.; Ronai, Z. K-ras mutation: Early detection in molecular diagnosis and risk assessment of colorectal, pancreas, and lung cancers—A review. Cancer Detect. Prev. 2000, 24, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  23. Span, M.; Moerkerk, P.T.; De Goeij, A.F.; Arends, J.W. A detailed analysis of K-ras point mutations in relation to tumor progression and survival in colorectal cancer patients. Int. J. Cancer 1996, 69, 241–245. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  24. Poehlmann, A.; Kuester, D.; Meyer, F.; Lippert, H.; Roessner, A.; Schneider-Stock, R. K-ras mutation detection in colorectal cancer using the Pyrosequencing technique. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2007, 203, 489–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Scartozzi, M.; Galizia, E.; Chiorrini, S.; Giampieri, R.; Berardi, R.; Pierantoni, C.; Cascinu, S. Arterial hypertension correlates with clinical outcome in colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line bevacizumab. Ann. Oncol. 2009, 20, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Van Kruijsdijk, R.C.; van der Graaf, Y.; Peeters, P.H.; Visseren, F.L. Second Manifestations of ARTerial Disease (SMART) Study Group. Cancer risk in patients with manifest vascular disease: Effects of smoking, obesity, and metabolic syndrome. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 2013, 22, 1267–1277. [Google Scholar]
  27. Gao, J.; Zhang, J.; Lu, T.; Li, X.Y.; Jia, N.; Liang, Z.Y. Correlation between KRAS mutations and clinicopathologic features in colorectal carcinomas. Zhonghua Bing Li Xue Za Zhi 2012, 41, 595–598. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  28. Roa, I.; Sánchez, T.; Majlis, A.; Schalper, K. KRAS gene mutation in colorectal cancer. Rev. Med. Chil. 2013, 141, 1166–1172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Bacchi, C.E.; Ciol, H.; Queiroga, E.M.; Benine, L.C.; Silva, L.H.; Ojopi, E.B. Epidermal growth factor receptor and KRAS mutations in Brazilian lung cancer patients. Clinics 2012, 67, 419–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Xu, J.; He, J.; Yang, H.; Luo, X.; Liang, Z.; Chen, J.; Cai, Z.; Xu, J.; Ren-Heidenreich, L. Somatic mutation analysis of EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA in 861 patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2012, 10, 63–69. [Google Scholar]
  31. Warth, A.; Penzel, R.; Lindenmaier, H.; Brandt, R.; Stenzinger, A.; Herpel, E.; Goeppert, B.; Thomas, M.; Herth, F.J.; Dienemann, H.; et al. EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and ALK gene alterations in lung adenocarcinomas: Patient outcome, interplay with morphology and immunophenotype. Eur. Respir. J. 2014, 43, 872–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Li, S.; Li, L.; Zhu, Y.; Huang, C.; Qin, Y.; Liu, H.; Ren-Heidenreich, L.; Shi, B.; Ren, H.; Chu, X.; et al. Coexistence of EGFR with KRAS, or BRAF, or PIK3CA somatic mutations in lung cancer: A comprehensive mutation profiling from 5125 Chinese cohorts. Brit. J. Cancer 2014, 110, 2812–2820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Takamochi, K.; Oh, S.; Suzuki, K. Differences in EGFR and KRAS mutation spectra in lung adenocarcinoma of never and heavy smokers. Oncol. Lett. 2013, 6, 1207–1212. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  34. Raparia, K.; Villa, C.; Raj, R.; Cagle, P.T. Peripheral lung adenocarcinomas with KRAS mutations are more likely to invade visceral pleura. Arch. Pathol. Lab. Med. 2014, in press. [Google Scholar]
  35. Saito, N.; Tomita, S.; Ichikawa, K.; Mitomi, H.; Imura, J.; Fujimori, T. Analysis of KRAS mutations in cases of metastatic colorectal cancer at a single institution in Tochigi, Japan. Pathobiology 2014, 81, 133–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Ferreira, C.G.; Aran, V.; Zalcberg-Renault, I.; Victorino, A.P.; Salem, J.H.; Bonamino, M.H.; Vieira, F.M.; Zalis, M. KRAS mutations: Variable incidences in a Brazilian cohort of 8234 metastatic colorectal cancer patients. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cserepes, M.; Ostoros, G.; Lohinai, Z.; Raso, E.; Barbai, T.; Timar, J.; Rozsas, A.; Moldvay, J.; Kovalszky, I.; Fabian, K.; et al. Subtype-specific KRAS mutations in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: A retrospective study of patients treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Eur. J. Cancer 2014, 50, 1819–1828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Weijenberg, M.P.; Aardening, P.W.; de Kok, T.M.; de Goeij, A.F.; van den Brandt, P.A. Cigarette smoking and KRAS oncogene mutations in sporadic colorectal cancer: Results from the Netherlands Cohort Study. Mutat. Res. 2008, 652, 54–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Samadder, N.J.; Vierkant, R.A.; Tillmans, L.S.; Wang, A.H.; Lynch, C.F.; Anderson, K.E.; French, A.J.; Haile, R.W.; Harnack, L.J.; Potter, J.D. Cigarette smoking and colorectal cancer risk by KRAS mutation status among older women. Amer. J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 107, 782–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Martinez, F.; Fernández-Martos, C.; Quintana, M.J.; Castells, A.; Llombart, A.; Iniguez, F.; Guillem, V.; Dasí, F. APC and KRAS mutations in distal colorectal polyps are related to smoking habits in men: Results of a cross-sectional study. Clin. Transl. Oncol. 2011, 9, 664–671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sinha, R.; Hussain, S.; Mehrotra, R.; Kumar, R.S.; Kumar, K.; Pande, P.; Doval, D.C.; Basir, S.F.; Bharadwaj, M. Kras gene mutation and RASSF1A, FHIT and MGMT gene promoter hypermethylation: Indicators of tumor staging and metastasis in adenocarcinomatous sporadic colorectal cancer in Indian population. PLoS One 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Aissi, S.; Buisine, M.P.; Zerimech, F.; Kourda, N.; Moussa, A.; Manai, M.; Porchet, N. Somatic molecular changes and histo-pathological features of colorectal cancer in Tunisia. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 19, 5286–5294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Okudela, K.; Woo, T.; Yazawa, T.; Ogawa, N.; Tajiri, M.; Masuda, M.; Kitamura, H. Significant association between EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma and past illness from gastric cancer or uterine myoma: Its implication in carcinogenesis. Lung Cancer 2009, 66, 287–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bello, M.J.; Alonso, M.E.; Amiñoso, C.; Anselmo, N.P.; Arjona, D.; Gonzalez-Gomez, P.; Lopez-Marin, I.; de Campos, J.M.; Gutierrez, M.; Isla, A. Hypermethylation of the DNA repair gene MGMT: Association with TP53 G:C to A:T transitions in a series of 469 nervous system tumors. Mutat. Res. 2004, 554, 23–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Kim, Y.S.; Milner, J.A. Dietary modulation of colon cancer risk. J. Nutr. 2007, 137, S2576–S2579. [Google Scholar]
  46. Maus, M.K.; Grimminger, P.P.; Mack, P.C.; Astrow, S.H.; Stephens, C.; Zeger, G.; Hsiang, J.; Brabender, J.; Friedrich, M.; Alakus, H.; et al. KRAS mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer and colorectal cancer: Implications for EGFR-targeted therapies. Lung Cancer 2014, 83, 163–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Lee, M.Y.; Lin, K.D.; Hsiao, P.J.; Shin, S.J. The association of diabetes mellitus with liver, colon, lung, and prostate cancer is independent of hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and gout in Taiwanese patients. Metabolism 2012, 61, 242–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Inoue, M.; Noda, M.; Kurahashi, N.; Iwasaki, M.; Sasazuki, S.; Iso, H.; Tsugane, S.; Japan Public Health Center-Based Prospective Study Group. Impact of metabolic factors on subsequent cancer risk: Results from a large-scale population-based cohort study in Japan. Eur. J. Cancer Prev. 2009, 18, 240–247. [Google Scholar]
  49. Sturmer, T.; Buring, J.E.; Lee, I.M.; Gaziano, J.M.; Glynn, R.J. Metabolic abnormalities and risk for colorectal cancer in the physicians’ health study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006, 15, 2391–2397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Tsilidis, K.K.; Brancati, F.L.; Pollak, M.N.; Rifai, N.; Clipp, S.L.; Hoffman-Bolton, J.; Helzlsouer, K.J.; Platz, E.A. Metabolic syndrome components and colorectal adenoma in the CLUE II cohort. Cancer Causes Control 2010, 21, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Yang, Y.; Mauldin, P.D.; Ebeling, M.; Hulsey, T.C.; Liu, B.; Thomas, M.B.; Camp, E.R.; Esnaola, N.F. Effect of metabolic syndrome and its components on recurrence and survival in colon cancer patients. Cancer 2013, 119, 1512–1520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Porta, M.; Crous-Bou, M.; Wark, P.A.; Vineis, P.; Real, F.X.; Malats, N.; Kampman, E. Cigarette smoking and K-ras mutations in pancreas, lung and colorectal adenocarcinomas: Etiopathogenic similarities, differences and paradoxes. Mutat. Res. 2009, 682, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Dogan, S.; Shen, R.; Ang, D.C.; Johnson, M.L.; D'Angelo, S.P.; Paik, P.K.; Brzostowski, E.B.; Riely, G.J.; Kris, M.G.; Zakowski, M.F. Molecular epidemiology of EGFR and KRAS mutations in 3026 lung adenocarcinomas: Higher susceptibility of women to smoking-related KRAS-mutant cancers. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012, 18, 6169–6177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bruera, G.; Cannita, K.; di Giacomo, D.; Lamy, A.; Frébourg, T.; Sabourin, J.C.; Tosi, M.; Alesse, E.; Ficorella, C.; Ricevuto, E. Worse prognosis of KRAS c.35 G>A mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) patients treated with intensive triplet chemotherapy plus bevacizumab (FIr-B/FOx). BMC Med. 2013, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Yilmaz, A.; Mohamed, N.; Patterson, K.A.; Tang, Y.; Shilo, K.; Villalona-Calero, M.A.; Davis, M.E.; Zhou, X.-P.; Frankel, W.; Otterson, G.A.; et al. Clinical and Metabolic Parameters in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Colorectal Cancer Patients with and without KRAS Mutations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 8645-8660. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110908645

AMA Style

Yilmaz A, Mohamed N, Patterson KA, Tang Y, Shilo K, Villalona-Calero MA, Davis ME, Zhou X-P, Frankel W, Otterson GA, et al. Clinical and Metabolic Parameters in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Colorectal Cancer Patients with and without KRAS Mutations. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014; 11(9):8645-8660. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110908645

Chicago/Turabian Style

Yilmaz, Ahmet, Nehad Mohamed, Kara A. Patterson, Yan Tang, Konstantin Shilo, Miguel A. Villalona-Calero, Michael E. Davis, Xiao-Ping Zhou, Wendy Frankel, Gregory A. Otterson, and et al. 2014. "Clinical and Metabolic Parameters in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma and Colorectal Cancer Patients with and without KRAS Mutations" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11, no. 9: 8645-8660. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110908645

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop