Next Article in Journal
Association of Influenza Vaccination and Reduced Risk of Stroke Hospitalization among the Elderly: A Population-Based Case-Control Study
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Resolution Mapping of Anthropogenic Heat in China from 1992 to 2010
Previous Article in Journal
Use of a 3-D Dispersion Model for Calculation of Distribution of Horse Allergen and Odor around Horse Facilities
Previous Article in Special Issue
Spatial Pattern of Land Use Change and Its Driving Force in Jiangsu Province
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 11
Issue 4
10.3390/ijerph110403618
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Social-Ecological Patterns of Soil Heavy Metals Based on a Self-Organizing Map (SOM): A Case Study in Beijing, China

by
Binwu Wang
1,2,
Hong Li
3 and
Danfeng Sun
1,2,*
1
College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, No. 2 Yuan Ming Yuan west Road, Beijing 100193, China
2
Key Laboratory of Agricultural Land Quality, Ministry of Land and Resources, No. 2 Yuan Ming Yuan west Road, Beijing 100193, China
3
Institute of Agricultural Integrated Development, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, No. 9 Shu Guang Hua Yuan Middle Road, Beijing 100097, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11(4), 3618-3638; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110403618
Submission received: 20 February 2014 / Revised: 18 March 2014 / Accepted: 19 March 2014 / Published: 31 March 2014
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assessment, Management, and Policy-Making for Environmental Pollution Related to Land Use and Land Cover)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The regional management of trace elements in soils requires understanding the interaction between the natural system and human socio-economic activities. In this study, a social-ecological patterns of heavy metals (SEPHM) approach was proposed to identify the heavy metal concentration patterns and processes in different ecoregions of Beijing (China) based on a self-organizing map (SOM). Potential ecological risk index (RI) values of Cr, Ni, Zn, Hg, Cu, As, Cd and Pb were calculated for 1,018 surface soil samples. These data were averaged in accordance with 253 communities and/or towns, and compared with demographic, agriculture structure, geomorphology, climate, land use/cover, and soil-forming parent material to discover the SEPHM. Multivariate statistical techniques were further applied to interpret the control factors of each SEPHM. SOM application clustered the 253 towns into nine groups on the map size of 12 × 7 plane (quantization error 1.809; topographic error, 0.0079). The distribution characteristics and Spearman rank correlation coefficients of RIs were strongly associated with the population density, vegetation index, industrial and mining land percent and road density. The RIs were relatively high in which towns in a highly urbanized area with large human population density exist, while low RIs occurred in mountainous and high vegetation cover areas. The resulting dataset identifies the SEPHM of Beijing and links the apparent results of RIs to driving factors, thus serving as an excellent data source to inform policy makers for legislative and land management actions.

1. Introduction

Accumulation of heavy metals in agricultural soils may cause serious problems to human well-being by influencing soil quality, groundwater and food chains [1,2,3,4,5]. For the last two decades, instead of natural factors, anthropogenic activity has significantly increased the circulation of toxic metals through soil, water and air. In China, a growing public concern has been focused on the trace elements environment owing to the rapid industrialization, urbanization and increasing reliance on agrochemicals in the last two decades [6,7,8]. Thus the complex system management of trace elements requires understanding the interaction between the natural system and human socio-economic activities (social-ecological patterns), not only to monitor the distribution status, but also to identify the patterns and processes in different ecoregions or ecosystems. Each ecoregion may respond relatively homogeneously to human activity or management actions [9,10,11,12,13,14].
Identifying and quantifying the social-ecological patterns of heavy metals (SEPHM) is a challenging task to due to the variety and complexity of social-ecological data [7,10,15,16,17,18]. Conventional multivariate methods are somewhat limited for interpreting the non-linear and complex dynamic nature. Agent models from biologically inspired machine intelligence have been proposed recently for analyzing and processing complex data to understand the ecological and physiological functioning of life systems [12,19,20], including artificial neural networks, genetic algorithms, support vector machines, individual-based models, cellular automata, fuzzy models, etc. [12,21,22] . Extensive information and examples can be found in Recknagel [23].
SOM is a very interesting and promising classification approach employing an innovative and data-driven classification method based on unsupervised artificial neural networks. Its capabilities of clustering, classification, estimation, and prediction have been used in a widely spread range of disciplines, including engineering, agriculture, health, environment management, and remote sensing image classification, etc. The SOM component planes can reveal very useful information to interpret results that remain hidden with the traditional approaches, such as the principal component analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis [24,25,26].
The heavy metal contamination of Beijing soils has been widely reported. Huo et al. [4] assessed the spatial variability of heavy metals with a total of 1,018 samples covering the entire Beijing agricultural soils area using Geostatistics, furthermore, combining Geostatistics with Moran’s I analysis to produce high quality heavy metals interpolation maps [27,28]. Jiang et al. [5] and Wang et al. [29] assessed the potential eco-risk of heavy metals in agricultural and urban soils, respectively. Many investigations have been done on the heavy metal pollution in different land uses of Beijing [29,30,31,32,33,34,35]. Li et al. [36] attempted to quantify the spatial linkages of the heavy metals in Beijing agricultural soil using complex network theory in order to identify their diffusion evolutionary mechanisms. However, there is still a notable lack of the social-ecological patterns study to elucidate the underlying processes between the natural system and human socio-economic activities with heavy metals and the remediation methods and policies.
Therefore, the objectives of this study were to explore the potential of the SOM approach to identify the SEPHM in Beijing, and to propose individualized approaches to the management of the soil heavy metal pollution.

2. Study Sites

Beijing, with an estimated area of 16.4 thousand km2, is located in the northwestern part of China’s north plain, generally between longitude 115°24'–117°30'E and latitude 39°38'–41°05'N. Its elevation slopes downward from 2,250 m in the northwest to 10 m in the southeast, and the mountainous area covers about 62% and plain 38% of the whole area (Figure 1).
Ijerph 11 03618 g001 1024
Figure 1. Distribution of sample sites in the study area.
Figure 1. Distribution of sample sites in the study area.
Ijerph 11 03618 g001
The area has a temperate continental monsoonal climate with an annual average temperature of 11.8° (average maximum 26° in July and average minimum −5° in January). The annual average temperature difference is 30.4°, while the daily average temperature difference is 11.4°. Annual precipitation in this area is 470–660 mm, about 60% of which comes in July and August. Annual average evaporation is 1,800–2,000 mm. The area is the source of five big rivers, the Yongding, Chaobai, Beiyun, Jiyun and Daqing. Annual average runoff is about 1.8 × 109 m3, but had decreased to 1.3 × 109 m3 by the end of the last century. The main soil types include drab soil, brown soil and skeleton soil in mountainous areas, and fluvo-aquic soil in plain areas. The population of the study areas was about 20.69 million, and the vehicle population reached 5.4 million in 2012. Heavy metals management is an important and complicated factor in the development of an ecological environment strategy in Beijing, because its environmental problems might represent the future of the other metropolis in China [37].

3. Material and Methods

3.1. Sampling and Sample Processing

In this study, 1,018 soil samples were collected in Beijing in 2006 using an irregular stratified sampling technique based on the agricultural land distribution and land use type maps [4]. All the samples' geographical locations were recorded in the WGS84 geographical system in order to process the data into the Geographical Information System (GIS). More details of the soil sampling procedure can be found in the guidelines described in the monitoring protocol [4,5]. The metal concentrations were determined by the methods described in the Chinese Environmental Quality Standard for Soils [38]. The Cr, Ni, Cu, and Zn concentrations were analyzed by flame atomic absorption spectrophotometry after digestion in a mixture of HCl, HNO3, and HClO4. Pb and Cd were analyzed by graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrophotometry, and the As concentration was determined by potassium borohydride silver nitrate spectrophotometry. In addition, the Hg concentration was determined by cold atomic absorption spectrophotometry after digestion with a mixture of H2SO4, HNO3, and KMnO4. Quality assurance and quality control procedures were conducted using the standard reference material Geochemical Standard Soil.

3.2. Social-ecological Data

In China, communities and/or towns are the smallest administrative units and usually act as the basic unit for planning and management purposes [39]. Environmental problems have been especially significant for the development of Beijing as the capital of China. The classification of heavy metals social-ecological patterns at the town-level will provide useful information for the establishing sustainable environmental management strategies in Beijing. Therefore, the town-level scale was the basic unit in this study.
Numerous factors need to be considered for ecoregional characteristics clusters. It is a fundamental point to understand the correlations between ecological factors and heavy metals concentration. According to the previous literature investigations, the major inputs of trace elements to agricultural soils including atmospheric deposition, livestock manures, fertilizers and agrochemicals, sewage irrigation, sewage sludge, and some other sources [7,40]. Table 1 lists the contribution and the rank of each source to each individual heavy metals in soils. The complex sources of heavy metals are quantified and our classification datasets are also based on previous works on the spatial autoregression model [41] and risk grade assessment for heavy metals concentration of Beijing [5,27,42]. Additional geodata are from the Statistics yearbook, field surveys and spatial databases (Table 2, Figure 2).
Town-wise statistics metadata mainly consist of these parameters: human population density of each town (ind.·km−2), livestock (unit·km−2), fertilizers and agrochemicals input (t·km−2), land use cover data (km·km−2 or percent distribution), elevation (m), precipitation (mm). Among them, land use cover data has six categories including Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), industrial and mining land (percent distribution), river (km·km−2), road (km·km−2), single cropped and double cropped land (percent distribution). We gathered detailed information on bovine, ovine, porcine and avian livestock at the town-wise level for the year 2007. Livestock unit (LSU) was calculated in a standardized manner [43]. Overall, they correspond to a total of 60,657 livestock units in the study area. Human population data and fertilizers and agrochemicals input data were obtained from the Statistics yearbook of Beijing. Precipitation data was supported by China Meteorological Data Sharing Service System [44], and the monthly average of precipitation from 2000 to 2010 were calculated.
Table
Table 1. The contribution and the rank of sources to heavy metals in soils.
Table 1. The contribution and the rank of sources to heavy metals in soils.
SourcesDetermined ElementsReference
CrNiZnHgCuAsCdPb
Atmospheric deposition✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓[7]
Livestock manures✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓
Irrigation water✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓
Sewage sludge✓✓✓✓✓--✓
Fertilizers✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓
Agrochemicals--✓-✓✓✓--
Industrial plants✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓[27,41]
Soil parent materials✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓
Mining✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓✓
Table
Table 2. Metadata used to classify the social-ecological patterns of heavy metals.
Table 2. Metadata used to classify the social-ecological patterns of heavy metals.
GroupVariableAbbreviationUnitLast Update
DemographicPopulation DensityPDind.·km−22007
Agriculture structureLivestock UnitsLSUunit·km−22007
Fertilizers and Agrochemicals InputFAIt·km−22007
Double CroppingDC%2007
Single CroppingSC%2007
GeomorphologyDigital Elevation ModelDEMm2000
ClimatePrecipitationPRECmm2000–2010
Land use coverIndustrial and Mining LandIML%2008
Normalized Difference Vegetation IndexNDVI-2008
River DensityRIDkm·km−22008
Road DensityRODkm·km−22008
Soil-forming parent materialLoessLOE%2006
LoamLOA%2006
SandstoneSAS%2006
Arenaceous shaleARS%2006
LimestoneLS%2006
Acidic rockAR%2006
ClayCL%2006
Neutral rockNR%2006
Potential Ecological Risk indexRisk IndicesRI-2006
Ijerph 11 03618 g002 1024
Figure 2. Main spatial data on the map of Beijing. (A) Elevation; (B) Actual land-use map; (C) Road Density; (D) Industrial and Mining Land Density; (E) Map of soil-forming parent material; (F) Map of potential ecological risk index (RI).
Figure 2. Main spatial data on the map of Beijing. (A) Elevation; (B) Actual land-use map; (C) Road Density; (D) Industrial and Mining Land Density; (E) Map of soil-forming parent material; (F) Map of potential ecological risk index (RI).
Ijerph 11 03618 g002
Land use cover data obtained from Beijing Municipal Bureau of Land and Resources, while the cropping patterns were classified by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) image [45]. All the related data were stored and managed in the Beijing agricultural resources and economic data system [46]. The eco-toxicity of heavy metals depends to a great degree on their bioavailability in soils and their toxicological factors and soil properties (e.g., soil organic matter, soil pH, mineral contents), when estimating their bio-availability to animals or human health [29]. As for the purpose of land use management, the procedures based on the total heavy metal contents in soils were employed in this study. A number of methods have been suggested to quantify the enrichment of heavy metals in contaminated soils, such as Contamination factor (CF), Enrichment factor (EF), Nemerow index (NI)，Health risk index (HRI), Potential ecological risk index (RI) [47,48,49]. Among them, CF and RI are the typical representative pollution indexes, which have a wide range of application [5]. RI, also called the Hakanson potential ecological risk index, integrates the “toxic-response” factor and pollutant concentration of a given pollutant. Eri reflects the potential health risk in an ecosystem to a certain degree. The quantitative equation of the RI of a given pollutant was defined as follows:
Eri = Tri × Cri
where Tri is the toxic-response factor for a given pollutant, and Cri is the contamination factor. Cri was calculated by the measured concentration of metal i in the sample divided by the reference value. In this study, environmental quality standard secondary grade for soils, a soil limitation to ensure agricultural production and human health was applied [38]. The Tri values of metals were as follows: Hg (40) > Cd (30) > As (10) > Cu (5) = Pb (5) = Ni (5) > Cr (2) > Zn (1) [5]. The following terminologies are used to describe risk levels: Eri < 40, low potential ecological risk; 40 ≤ Eri < 80, moderate potential ecological risk; 80 ≤ Eri < 160, considerable potential ecological risk; 160 ≤ Eri < 320, high potential ecological risk; and Eri > 320, very high ecological risk. To facilitate clustering 253 towns by SOM, the biophysical dataset (such as CF and RI of each elements) was interpolated into a grid by Kriging, and the average of these indices were resampled at a town-wise level to match the socio-economic data for the further utilization of SOM.

3.3. SOM Application and Statistical Analysis

A SOM algorithm also known as Kohonen Map or Self-Organizing Feature Map, is an unsupervised neural network based on competitive learning [50,51]. It projects high-dimensional input data onto a low dimensional (usually two-dimensional) space. The machine learning is accomplished by first choosing an output neuron that most closely matches the presented input pattern, then determining a neighborhood of excited neurons around the winner, and finally, updating all of the excited neurons [52]. This process iterates and fine tunes, and it is called self-organizing. The outcome weight vectors of the SOM nodes are allocated to have characteristic data patterns. The similar patterns based on k-means are combined with neighboring regions on the map, while dissimilar patterns are located further apart. An illustration of the flow chart of a SOM application is given in Figure 3. Detailed methodological aspects can be found in other computational papers [26,51,53].
Ijerph 11 03618 g003 1024
Figure 3. Illustration of how an SOM works.
Figure 3. Illustration of how an SOM works.
Ijerph 11 03618 g003
In this study, the size of data used in training was 253 cases (i.e., unit towns) multiplied by 20 environmental parameters (Table 2). Map size determination is one of the important features in any SOM application [53]. The optimum map size is selected based on minimum values for quantization error (QE) and topographic error (TE) [54,55]. QE exhibits the average distance between each data vector and its ‘best matching unit’ (BMU), and thus measures map resolution. TE represents the proportion of all data vectors for which 1st and 2nd BMUs are not adjacent, and is used for the measurement of topology preservation [56]. Moreover, QE and TE were adopted to adjust the obtained number of map units, therefore, to minimize errors in performance standard setting. Once the SOM had converged, the U-matrix and K-means algorithm were used in order to find clusters in the nodes of the SOM. To select the best patterning among partitions with different numbers of clusters, the Davies-Bouldin index (DBI) [57] was calculated. The smaller the DBI, the better the clustering. Calculations can be made by using the SOM Toolbox package for Matlab [58]. Cross competitive learning similar patterns are mapped onto neighboring regions on the map, while dissimilar patterns are located further apart (see e.g., [20,57] for further details).
SOM was used to classify the region. A statistical analysis method was employed to facilitate the understanding of the relationship between heavy metals risk index and social-ecological factors. Correlation coefficients were determined using Spearman’s rank correlation test where p-values less than 0.05 were considered statistically significant [59]. Data were subjected to one-way ANOVA and Duncan’s test was used for multiple comparisons among the zones. All statistical analysis was performed using the SPSS 17 statistical package. Figure 4 depicts the complete framework of the present study.
Ijerph 11 03618 g004 1024
Figure 4. Flow chart of SOM for heavy metals socio-ecological pattern identification.
Figure 4. Flow chart of SOM for heavy metals socio-ecological pattern identification.
Ijerph 11 03618 g004

4. Results

4.1. SOM Application and Clustering

The QE and TE are summarized at the different map sizes (from 40 to 198 map units) in Table 3. An 84-unit map (12 × 7) was selected with a quantization error of 1.809 and a topographic error of 0.0079, as it exhibited the smallest quantization error and topographic error values among the models. Figure 5 shows the U-matrix and cluster arrangements of nine clusters for the variables using the SOM model. U-matrix is the method for discriminating between the groups (nine clusters), and indicating the distances between the groups. The k-means also shows nine clear clusters based on the minimum DBI (DBI = 0.89) (Table 4). The clusters defined by the U-matrix and k-means methods were consistent with each other. Thus, the communities were classified into nine groups (1–9) based on the U-matrix (Figure 5).
Table
Table 3. Map quality measures at different map sizes of the trained SOM.
Table 3. Map quality measures at different map sizes of the trained SOM.
Map Size8 × 5 = 409 × 6 = 5410 × 7 = 7012 × 7 = 8412 × 8 = 9613 × 9 = 11714 × 10 = 14016 × 11 = 17618 × 11 = 198
QE2.7272.5582.42541.8092.222.12041.98931.89381.8106
TE0.0080.0120.01580.00790.01190.02370.02240.01190.0119
Ijerph 11 03618 g005 1024
Figure 5. The U matrix and cluster arrangements of nine clusters for the variables (i.e., 253 towns); each node on the U matrix describes the Euclidean distance between nodes in the SOM; therefore there is one node on the U matrix for every adjacent node on the SOM. Red U-matrix node indicates a large distance and blue nodes indicate a small distance.
Figure 5. The U matrix and cluster arrangements of nine clusters for the variables (i.e., 253 towns); each node on the U matrix describes the Euclidean distance between nodes in the SOM; therefore there is one node on the U matrix for every adjacent node on the SOM. Red U-matrix node indicates a large distance and blue nodes indicate a small distance.
Ijerph 11 03618 g005
Table
Table 4. Davies-Bouldin index (DBI) of k-means clustering at different number of clusters on the trained SOM.
Table 4. Davies-Bouldin index (DBI) of k-means clustering at different number of clusters on the trained SOM.
Number of Clusters2345678910
DBI1.321.081.070.911.041.010.930.890.93
The distribution patterns of 20 input variables on the SOM plane are shown in Figure 6. The socio-geographical characteristics strongly affected the concentration of heavy metals in soil. The map unit in lower and right nodes showed higher scores for RI. Among these factors, PD, IML and ROD were similarly distributed to the RI. DEM, PREC and NDVI tended to be distributed in the upper left corner, which was relatively opposite to the RI. Agricultural inputs (LSU and FAI) have no significant contribution to the RI, and show higher values in the upper left corner. DC and SC showed a similar distribution, and tended to be related to the agricultural inputs. Soil-forming parent materials might influence the RI. However, this relationship is still unclear in this figure. SOM has the ability to express non-linear relationships, and the complexity in every variable was detected and included in the SOM maps.
Ijerph 11 03618 g006 1024
Figure 6. Component maps of the SOM model. The name of each panel represents the input parameters shown as the above. The information of parameter name abbreviation can be found in Table 2.
Figure 6. Component maps of the SOM model. The name of each panel represents the input parameters shown as the above. The information of parameter name abbreviation can be found in Table 2.
Ijerph 11 03618 g006

4.2. Descriptive Cluster Statistics

4.2.1. Pattern of Heavy Metals Contamination

When considering the differences in factors among the nine clusters, variance analysis was employed and the results are shown in Table 5. For example, PREC, NDVI, LS were higher in cluster 1, while other land use cover PD, RID and ROD were lower in this pattern. DEM and NDVI were both higher in cluster 1, 3 and 4. Livestock Units (LSU), agricultural land (DC and SC), and soil Soil-forming parent material (CL) were higher in cluster 2, 5, and 6. Among the nine clusters, the demographic driver (PD), critical land use cover (IML and ROD), and state risk (RI) showed relatively high values in cluster 7, 8, and 9. These clusters indicate different interaction patterns between ecological systems for heavy metals contamination. For the spatial distribution of nine clusters on the GIS platform (Figure 7), cluster 1 mainly located in the Pinggu district, including parts of Miyun and Shunyi.
Table
Table 5. The mean value and standard error of environment variables in each cluster defined in SOM.
Table 5. The mean value and standard error of environment variables in each cluster defined in SOM.
VariablesClusters
123456789
PD196.4 (230.98) ef1,254.55 (1,572) de877.23 (1,889.3) ef61.42 (69.25) f576.46 (1,538.48) ef2,078.62 (2,245.1) cd5,864.87 (2,199.98) b7,718.2 (2,483.98) a2,833.9 (2,736.27) c
LSU443.87 (686.3) b363.22 (396.16) bc100.14 (106.67) d61.85 (61.52) d835.39 (843.66) a351.37 (300.94) bc98.42 (150.75) d23.64 (143.4) d189.92 (220.14) cd
FAI76.59 (67.79) b57.74 (44.97) bc15.4 (25.46) d7.31 (8.08) d112.68 (68.54) a54.83 (39.68) c11.84 (14.77) d3.87 (14.58) d24.96 (24.03) d
DEM203.84 (151.56) c113.79 (159.38) d363.98 (237.79) b588.52 (213.74) a51.25 (89.47) d33.59 (6.99) d48.91 (23.68) d57.05 (17.93) d57.63 (27.33) d
PREC533.39 (37.7) a452.41 (28.07) de452.58 (24.73) de502.39 (31.96) b474.61 (28.58) d463.11 (13.74) cd451.76 (15.28) de442.93 (10.97) e440.38 (31.29) e
IML0.03 (0.02) d0.12 (0.08) bc0.09 (0.07) c0.01 (0.01) d0.08 (0.05) c0.14 (0.04) b0.23 (0.1) a0.16 (0.12) b0.21 (0.09) a
NDVI0.43 (0.04) a0.31 (0.04) d0.38 (0.04) b0.44 (0.04) a0.36 (0.04) c0.29 (0.04) e0.22 (0.04) g0.21 (0.03) g0.27 (0.04) f
RID0.07 (0.08) e0.21 (0.2) bcd0.15 (0.1) de0.17 (0.08) cd0.27 (0.14) bc0.3 (0.14) b0.48 (0.3) a0.21 (0.18) bcd0.19 (0.16) cd
ROD2.72 (0.73) h3.39 (0.75) ef2.94 (1.22) fg1.82 (0.45) h3.76 (0.44) de4.08 (0.69) cd4.93 (1.46) ab5.53 (1.58) a4.42 (1.5) bc
DC0 (0) b0.01 (0.02) b0 (0.01) b0 (0) b0.22 (0.26) a0.02 (0.05) b0 (0) b0 (0) b0 (0) b
SC0.04 (0.05) c0.37 (0.36) b0.03 (0.08) c0.01 (0.03) c0.62 (0.31) a0.05 (0.07) c0 (0) c0 (0) c0.04 (0.16) c
LOE26.65 (21.14) a10.57 (15.59) bc7.71 (14.29) bcd5.18 (11.79) bcd12.77 (24.65) b0 (0) d0.15 (0.83) d0.78 (4.61) cd22.15 (31.57) a
LOA8.26 (17.15) e34.77 (32.39) d3.1 (8.14) e1.41 (3.43) e67.39 (24.16) bc76.83 (13.94) ab85.63 (23.04) a35.57 (31.03) d58.53 (41.87) c
SAS0.91 (3.87) c41.05 (31.32) a1.05 (3.74) c1.01 (4.94) c12.17 (14.88) b0.5 (1.99) c1.92 (8.52) c1.29 (6.15) c2.27 (5.4) c
ARS0 (0) b0.1 (0.5) b13.38 (18.36) a0.12 (0.7) b0 (0) b0 (0) b0 (0) b0.06 (0.33) b1.41 (6.78) b
LS56.52 (32.27) a6.54 (19.03) c49.39 (30.89) a22.95 (24.1) b3.55 (7.49) c0.07 (0.23) c2.28 (6.47) c7.43 (20.67) c2.14 (4.92) c
AR7.61 (24.63) b2.2 (6.06) b6.58 (13.99) b15.76 (20.48) a0.03 (0.15) b0 (0) b0 (0) b0 (0) b7.13 (23.67) b
CL0 (0) b0.08 (0.27) b0 (0) b0 (0) b2.36 (7.08) b22.6 (13.45) a0.34 (1.87) b0 (0) b0.04 (0.18) b
NR0.05 (0.22) c3.13 (9.04) c15.09 (17.91) b41.01 (30.12) a1.18 (5.79) c0 (0) c0.12 (0.64) c8.81 (22.16) bc2.17 (9.32) c
RI208.47 (40.76) e203.35 (31.36) e274.79 (72.14) d221.71 (37.2) e198.81 (73.73) e365.5 (118.24) b513.48 (88.93) a553.65 (78.3) a321 (124.45) c
Note: Different alphabet letters indicate significant differences among the clusters based on Dunn’s multiple comparison tests at the 0.05 levels.
A dozen regional patches were found in cluster 2 in the city’s peripheral suburbs. Cluster 3 and cluster 4 locate in the north and west quadrant of Beijing, respectively. Cluster 5 and cluster 6 were found in the vicinity of agricultural land in the east quadrant. Cluster 7, 8 and 9 were toward the city center area, relatively, where high eco-risk areas were observed.
Ijerph 11 03618 g007 1024
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of the clustering results in Beijing.
Figure 7. Spatial distribution of the clustering results in Beijing.
Ijerph 11 03618 g007
Table
Table 6. Concentrations and multiple comparisons of heavy metals of different clusters (milligrams per kilogram).
Table 6. Concentrations and multiple comparisons of heavy metals of different clusters (milligrams per kilogram).
Element12345678 *9
n961891091472878114-95
NiMeans ± SD29.91 ± 8.6525.98 ± 8.7229.53 ± 7.331.99 ± 11.8727.77 ± 9.5326.65 ± 7.8632.2 ± 25.14-28.65 ± 20.08
Multiple comparisonsabbabaabba-ab
CrMeans ± SD58.07 ± 17.3953.76 ± 11.8562.54 ± 13.4178.11 ± 37.7757.33 ± 14.1461.29 ± 14.1556.61 ± 11.75-58.9 ± 10.61
Multiple comparisonsbccbabcbcbc-bc
CuMeans ± SD53.81 ± 37.1853.59 ± 35.6267.51 ± 65.2562.69 ± 44.4753.98 ± 40.5667.68 ± 43.9479.08 ± 58.14-71.44 ± 54.82
Multiple comparisonsbbababbaba-ab
ZnMeans ± SD74.23 ± 20.3170.24 ± 19.5779.72 ± 23.1583.61 ± 18.0572.18 ± 17.5580.96 ± 28.2887.51 ± 22.84-81.64 ± 22.2
Multiple comparisonsbcddabcacdaba-ab
AsMeans ± SD17.1 ± 10.7115.47 ± 7.8818.63 ± 10.7514.79 ± 7.8715.17 ± 7.4516.87 ± 7.6115.14 ± 6.09-17.56 ± 7.98
Multiple comparisonsabababbabb-ab
CdMeans ± SD0.24 ± 0.150.24 ± 0.150.24 ± 0.190.22 ± 0.120.23 ± 0.290.25 ± 0.120.33 ± 0.29-0.25 ± 0.2
Multiple comparisonsbbbbbaba-ab
PbMeans ± SD49.93 ± 48.2644.25 ± 34.4853.98 ± 39.6455.58 ± 61.3643.76 ± 30.0754.65 ± 34.6965.44 ± 45.49-63.08 ± 43.5
Multiple comparisonsabbababbaba-a
HgMeans ± SD0.15 ± 0.280.13 ± 0.10.28 ± 0.480.2 ± 0.240.14 ± 0.150.29 ± 0.190.94 ± 0.73-0.42 ± 0.55
Multiple comparisonsddccddca-b
Notes: * There was no soil sample located in Cluster 8; Different alphabet letters indicate significant differences among the clusters based on Dunn’s multiple comparison tests at the 0.05 levels.

4.2.2. Differences in Heavy Metals Contamination among SOM Clusters

Table 6 illustrates the soil samples variations in the amounts of Ni, Cr, Cu, Zn, As, Cd, Pb, and Hg in Beijing under different clusters. The ANOVA results indicated that most of clusters had significant differences in the accumulation of heavy metals in Beijing. Most of the elements had the highest contents in cluster 7, except for Cr and As. Simultaneously, relatively high contents of all elements were found in cluster 9. Cluster 7 and cluster 9 are located in zone III, where there is mainly urban land. Ni, Cr, and Zn were relatively higher in cluster 4, which consisted of the communities located in higher DEM, precipitation and Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). The distribution of As was homogeneous in each cluster, which might indicate that the source of As is from the natural indigenous soil minerals in Beijing. The contents of Cu and Zn are not greater in cluster 2, 5, and 6 (zone II) than the cluster 7 and 9 (zone III), suggesting that fertilizers and agricultural input had less impact than the ritual casting of bronze which started over 4,000 years ago and automobile tire wear in modern Beijing. For Cd, Pb and Hg, the classification results provided the best outcomes. The distribution of these elements was separated into two dimensions: a higher concentration in clusters 7 and 9 (urbanized areas), while a lower concentration in the others.

4.3. Relationships between Soil Heavy Metals Risk and Environmental Variables

Correlation analysis was performed to investigate the relationships between environmental variables and soil heavy metals among the nine clusters. Most comparison cases in the Spearman correlation matrix showed a clear statistical significance when community characterizations were conducted (Table 7).
Table
Table 7. Spearman rank correlation coefficient of variables and heavy metal RI to the town-wise data (n = 253) of nine clusters.
Table 7. Spearman rank correlation coefficient of variables and heavy metal RI to the town-wise data (n = 253) of nine clusters.
RI_1RI_2RI_3RI_4RI_5RI_6RI_7RI_8RI_9
PD0.05−0.0920.409 *−0.0310.925 **0.812 **0.3130.2680.05
LSU0.495 **−0.371−0.2030.2480.707 **−0.141−0.183−0.2140.495 **
FAI0.312−0.2760.459 **0.358 *0.792 **−0.564 *−0.203−0.2770.312
DEM−0.2840.022−0.262−0.2170.0550.611 *−0.301−0.569 **−0.284
PREC0.088−0.237−0.2890.534 **−0.385 *−0.511 *0.3370.783 **0.088
IML0.369 *0.2010.254−0.0080.646 **0.605 *−0.272−0.738 **0.369
NDVI−0.155−0.101−0.262−0.158−0.709 **−0.828 **−0.398 *−0.560 **−0.155
RID0.010.2050.1220.057−0.449 *0.3110.2370.2840.01
ROD−0.14−0.0950.648 **−0.090.0910.2450.3520.423 **−0.14
DC−0.288−0.111−0.0550.2620.011−0.488−0.15−0.306−0.288
SC−0.205−0.184−0.258−0.218−0.484 **−0.586 *−0.495 **−0.442 **−0.205
LOE−0.0170.021−0.434 **−0.333 *0.032a0.062−0.17−0.017
LOA0.1450.344a−0.1350.0260.0720.039−0.1090.145
SAS0.138−0.2560.13−0.268−0.173−0.2550.167−0.1410.138
ARS0.438 **0.2740.406 *0.207aaa−0.1850.438 *
LS0.478 **0.097−0.1120.166−0.127−0.1670.192−0.355 *0.478 *
AR−0.194−0.236−0.269−0.420 **−0.127aaa−0.194
CL−0.1320.39aa0.026−0.0340.07a−0.132
NR0.212−0.531 **0.150.24−0.13a0.062−0.373 *0.212
Notes: *. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed); **. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed); a. Cannot be computed because at least one of the variables is constant.
Different relationships were detected among the nine clusters (i.e., NDVI is strongly negatively related to the soil heavy metal risk in clusters 5, 6 and 8, while has no significant correlation coefficients in the others). Many more factors have significantly correlated coefficients (p < 0.01) in clusters 5, 6, and 8, indicating that the function of soil heavy metals risk is complicated in these clusters. In contrast, the structure and function are relatively simple in clusters 2, 7, and 9.
As for concrete environmental variables, the increased population density also caused soil heavy metals risk in clusters 3, 5 and 6 located at the suburban vicinity. Livestock and IML were positively related with RI in cluster 1 and cluster 5. Among the factors, most of them were related to the risk of heavy metals in Beijing. However, the area of double cropping, loam and clay in communities were not significantly correlated with RI.

5. Discussion

Ecology is not able to quantify all the relations between exposure and effects of contaminants such as heavy metals, because of the complexity of the sources and their interactions with human well-being. Thus, ecologists and environmental managers endeavor to find environmental indicators which can represent parts of these complex environmental relationships. In recent decades, there have been a series of classifications of different subjects, such as aquatic ecosystem classifications (AEC), biodiversity conservation classification and forest service classification. Social-ecological patterns represent the comprehensive interaction of substance and energy, which form the live organisms and the environment. Thus, difference-oriented policies should be made based on the local ecosystems, which share a number of basic structural and functional characteristics [10,13]. In this study, SOM was performed to classify the region of Beijing into nine clusters at the town-wise level, and a number of the major factors that control heavy metals contamination were identified in each cluster.
SOM have been proven to be a promising tool for describing the evolution of metal accumulations in terrestrial ecosystems. The SOM projection shifts the complicated structure from high dimensional arrays into the lower dimensional clusters based on the neighborhood relations, which is important to ecological classifications for environmental management. For instance, the spatial generalization of environmental data are measured at single sites as well as in dynamic global change modeling in land use or environmental planning [11,60,61]. Land classifications provide spatial reference systems that may indicate long-term effects (responses), for example, structural and functional, resulting from the bioaccumulation of contaminants. Such effects depend both on the stress intensity and on the ecological characteristics and related sensitivities of the land unit which is exposed [10].
From the results of this study, it can be concluded that the heavy metals contamination patterns are strongly related to human populations, IML, and ROD distribution. Additionally, vegetation and geographical aspects of the land also affected heavy metals concentration. We could hypothesize the sequential pattern as the following: (1) high heavy metals risk areas locate in urbanized areas that exhibit high population and low elevation, which are suitable for increased road and IML density; (2) these areas, are more frequently invaded by vehicular traffic volumes and urbanization; (3) therefore, land use management on community units (at a town level) is needed in the more populated areas in order to reduce the heavy metals risk.
Results from the ANOVA analysis of the element contents show differences among the clusters indicating that heavy element contents in clusters 7, 8 and 9 (the urban area) were higher than the other clusters. Cu, Zn, Cd, Pb and Hg in urban soils usually come from gasoline, car components, oil lubricants, and industrial and incinerator emissions [6,34,62,63,64]. Although leaded gasoline has been banned in Beijing since 1997, the impact on this area may last for the coming years [6], and also decoration waste deposition from the repairs of time-honored parks was considered [29]. The source of Cd in this area may be from coal combustion, solid wastes such as plastics and automobile tires [29,34]. The casting of bronze ritual figures and the automobile tire wear were considered to be the main sources of Cu and Zn. Hg mainly came from the atmospheric deposition along the roadside. Therefore, traffic volume regulations and air cleaning plans should be implemented in these areas. Clusters 2, 5 and 6 are mainly located in the agricultural areas and are far away from the central city, while Cr, Cu, Zn, Hg exhibited ascending trends among them. These may illustrate that the sources were both from industrial emissions and agrochemical inputs [8,31,33]. Therefore, green agriculture is suitable in these communities, which should decrease the use of the Cd-containing, Cu-containing agricultural material inputs from agricultural activities. Heavy metals in clusters 1, 3 and 4 showed higher level elevation, vegetation index, precipitation and parent materials diversity than other clusters. Restoration management was needed in these areas, which was consistent with the report of the Beijing Government [65].
To meet the land-use management needs, besides the identification of metal accumulation spatial patterns, the consecutive spatial patterns are also an important component of zoning [66]. Integrating the fragmentary zones benefits soil trace elements management at the generalized scale. According to the analysis in Section 4.2, in the present study, the main soil heavy metals contamination patterns could be drawn in three zones. Figure 8A illustrates the spatial distribution of communities in Beijing in accordance with clustering results analysis and SOM model.
Ijerph 11 03618 g008 1024
Figure 8. (A) Further presentation of clustering results and (B) Major function oriented zone of Beijing.
Figure 8. (A) Further presentation of clustering results and (B) Major function oriented zone of Beijing.
Ijerph 11 03618 g008
Zone I was located in the mostly mountainous areas and had relatively high vegetation cover in the west and northwest of Beijing (Figure 2A,B). Zone II consisted of the communities located in the peripheral suburbs, whose predominant land use type was agricultural land (Figure 2B). Furthermore, Yanqing was also detected and grouped into zone II, where was used to be a large state farm. Zone III Ⅲ was formed with the remaining area, and located inside the 6th ring, and this contains the most recently urbanized area of Beijing (Figure 2B–D). Regarding the clusters, clusters 1, 3 and 4 were mainly contained in zone I, clusters 2, 5, and 6 were attached to zone II, and the remainder were located in zone III. In order to prove the cluster results we proposed, the current development plan of Beijing was employed for analysis.
In China, the concept of major function oriented zone (MOFZ) was proposed to achieve coordinated regional development and environmental protection based on the territorial functions [67,68]. More recently, the MOFZ of Beijing municipality was released [69] and it clearly stated four function-oriented zones (the capital function core area, the urban function extended district, the new districts of urban development and the ecological preservation districts, see Figure 8B). However, the four districts may not be satisfactory for concrete environmental management policy formulations. The nine zones proposed in the present study were clustered by a bottom-up approach based on SOM. Although the MOFZ was made by political or legal means, the integrated zones in accordance with the SOM and multivariate statistical techniques were consistent with the MOFZ of Beijing, indicating that the classification in this literature was reasonable and suited for the actual conditions of the study area. However, a slight difference could be found between Figure 8A,B. The former zones were not limited by the administrative boundary lines. For example, the propagation pathway of zone III was similar to the new districts of urban development in the downwind southeast quadrant of the city. Moreover, the direction of expansion of the Changping and Fangshan districts should be considered by government decision makers.

6. Conclusions

Ecoregional synthesis and management classification are the key issues of agricultural soil heavy metal environmental monitoring and management, linking the metals accumulation at individual soil sites with the social-ecological dataset of the area managed [10,13,14]. A total of 1,018 soil samples were investigated in order to conduct a comprehensive monitoring and management of the soil heavy metals in Beijing. Social-ecological datasets were developed according to the possible potential sources of the heavy metals. Self-organizing map (SOM) and multivariate statistics were employed to cluster the data into nine habit types which could reveal the homogeneity and regularity of heavy metal migration. It can be used to further soil environment management and land use planning at a province level.
The main outcomes of the study can be drawn as follows: (i) SOM was verified to be a promising approach for pattern recognition and, in particular, for delineating social-ecological patterns of soil heavy metals; (ii) the main factors that influence the heavy metal concentration in Beijing were associated with the population density, vegetation index, industrial and mining land percent and road density—this is useful information for reference in future research; (iii) the social-ecological patterns of heavy metals in Beijing were detected in nine clusters and mainly categorized into three zones. The results are critical for improving the efficiency of the soil heavy metals management; (iv) classification of social-ecological patterns on soil heavy metals (SEPHM) provides a great deal of information enhancing the risk status source identification at the community scale, although the temporal spatial patterns were merely considered in this study. The spatialization of other factors such as the atmospheric deposition, sewage irrigation and sewage sludge may modify the patterns in a greater refinement. Designing a theoretical framework for combining these perspectives will be an exciting open problem for future analysis.

Acknowledgments

The research was supported partly by the Chinese Universities Scientific Fund (2013YJ003), the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 41130526), Special Environmental Research Funds for Public Welfare (No. 201309001) and Beijing Municipal Bureau of Finance programs support, Beijing Municipal Natural Science Foundation (No. 8122020). We would like to thank all reviewers and editors for their valuable comments and suggestions for improving this manuscript. We also would like to thank Chunyang Wang for SOM model building from Henan Polytechnic University, and Linjun Yu, Luo Liu for their kind help with data analysis from Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Author Contributions

The work presented here was carried out in collaboration among all authors. Binwu Wang and Danfeng Sun conceived and designed the study. Binwu Wang and Hong Li acquired, analyzed and interpreted the data. Binwu Wang drafted the article, Hong Li and Danfeng Sun reviewed the manuscript. All authors have contributed to, seen and approved the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Keller, A.; Schulin, R. Modelling regional-scale mass balances of phosphorus, cadmium and zinc fluxes on arable and dairy farms. Eur. J. Agron. 2003, 20, 181–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mielke, H.W.; Gonzales, C.R.; Powell, E.; Jartun, M.; Mielke, P.W. Nonlinear association between soil lead and blood lead of children in metropolitan New Orleans, Louisiana: 2000–2005. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 388, 43–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Miranda, M.L.; Kim, D.; Galeano, M.; Paul, C.J.; Hull, A.P.; Morgan, S.P. The relationship between early childhood blood lead levels and performance on end-of-grade tests. Environ. Health. Perspect. 2007, 115, 1242–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Huo, X.N.; Zhang, W.W.; Sun, D.F.; Li, H.; Zhou, L.D.; Li, B.G. Spatial pattern analysis of heavy metals in Beijing agricultural soils based on spatial autocorrelation statistics. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 2074–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jiang, F.F.; Sun, D.F.; Li, H.; Zhou, L.D. Risk grade assessment for farmland pollution of heavy metals in Beijing. (in Chinese). Trans. CSAE 2011, 27, 330–337. [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen, J.Z.; Chen, J.; Xie, X.J.; Mao, J.G.; Zhang, X.L. The distribution character of heavy metals in periurban area of Beijing. Acta Pedol. Sin. 2005, 42, 149–152. [Google Scholar]
  7. Luo, L.; Ma, Y.B.; Zhang, S.Z.; Wei, D.P.; Zhu, Y.G. An inventory of trace element inputs to agricultural soils in China. J. Environ. Manage. 2009, 90, 2524–2530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Hu, K.L.; Zhang, F.R.; Hong, L.; Feng, H.; Li, B.G. Spatial patterns of soil heavy metals in urban-rural transition zone of Beijing. Pedosphere 2006, 16, 690–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bailey, R.G. Delineation of ecosystem regions. Environ. Manage. 1983, 7, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Schroeder, W.; Pesch, R. Synthesizing bioaccumulation data from the German metals in mosses surveys and relating them to ecoregions. Sci. Total Environ. 2007, 374, 311–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pesch, R.; Schmidt, G.; Schroeder, W.; Weustermann, I. Application of CART in ecological landscape mapping: Two case studies. Ecol. Indic. 2011, 11, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Chon, T.S. Self-organizing Maps applied to ecological sciences. Ecol. Inform. 2011, 6, 50–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zeng, X.B.; Xu, J.M.; Huang, Q.Y.; Tang, S.R.; Li, Y.T.; Li, F.B.; Zhou, D.M.; Wu, Z.J. Some deliberations on the issues of heavy metals in farmlands of China. (in Chinese). Acta Pedol. Sin. 2013, 50, 186–194. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lin, Y.; Teng, T.; Chang, T. Multivariate analysis of soil heavy metal pollution and landscape pattern in Changhua county in Taiwan. Landsc. Urban Plan. 2002, 62, 19–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Liu, J.G.; Dietz, T.; Carpenter, S.R.; Alberti, M.; Folke, C.; Moran, E.; Pell, A.N.; Deadman, P.; Kratz, T.; Lubchenco, J.; et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 2007, 317, 1513–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Knights, A.M.; Koss, R.S.; Robinson, L.A. Identifying common pressure pathways from a complex network of human activities to support ecosystem-based management. Ecol. Appl. 2013, 23, 755–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hersperger, A.M.; Burgi, M. Going beyond landscape change description: Quantifying the importance of driving forces of landcape change in a Central Europe case study. Land Use Policy 2009, 26, 640–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, Y.P.; Cheng, B.Y.; Chu, H.J.; Chang, T.K.; Yu, H.L. Assessing how heavy metal pollution and human activity are related by using logistic regression and kriging methods. Geoderma 2011, 163, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Park, Y.S.; Tison, J.; Lek, S.; Giraudel, J.L.; Coste, M.; Delmas, F. Application of a self-organizing map to select representative species in multivariate analysis: A case study determining diatom distribution patterns across France. Ecol. Inform. 2006, 1, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kalteh, A.M.; Hiorth, P.; Bemdtsson, R. Review of the self-organizing map (SOM) approach in water resources: Analysis, modelling and application. Environ. Model. Softw. 2008, 23, 835–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Chon, T.S.; Park, Y.S. Ecological informatics as an advanced interdisciplinary interpretation of ecosystems. Ecol. Inform. 2006, 1, 213–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lin, Y.P.; Chu, H.J.; Wu, C.F.; Verburg, P.H. Predictive ability of logistic regression, auto-logistic regression and neural network models in empirical land-use change modeling-a case study. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2011, 25, 65–87. [Google Scholar]
  23. Recknagel, F. Ecological Informatics: Scope, Techniques and Applications, 2nd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006; p. 496. [Google Scholar]
  24. Brosse, S.; Giraudel, J.L.; Lek, S. Utilisation of non-supervised neural networks and principal component analysis to study fish assemblages. Ecol. Model. 2001, 146, 159–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Voyslavov, T.; Tsakovski, S.; Simeonov, V. Soil contamination interpretation using self-organizing maps. Global NEST J. 2012, 14, 3–9. [Google Scholar]
  26. Astel, A.; Chepanova, L.; Simeonov, V. Soil contamination interpretation by the use of monitoring data analysis. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 216, 375–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Huo, X.N.; Zhang, W.W.; Sun, D.F.; Li, H.; Zhou, L.D.; Li, B.G. Spatial pattern analysis of heavy metals in Beijing agricultural soils based on spatial autocorrelation statistics. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2011, 8, 2074–2089. [Google Scholar]
  28. Huo, X.N.; Li, H.; Sun, D.F.; Zhou, L.D.; Li, B.G. Combining geostatistics with Moran’s I analysis for mapping soil heavy metals in Beijing, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 995–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, M.E.; Bai, Y.Y.; Chen, W.P.; Markert, B.; Peng, C.; Ouyang, Z.Y. A GIS technology based potential eco-risk assessment of metals in urban soils in Beijing, China. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 161, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, W.H.; Zhao, J.Z.; Ouyang, Z.Y.; Soderlund, L.; Liu, G. H. Impacts of sewage irrigation on heavy metal distribution and contamination in Beijing, China. Environ. Int. 2005, 31, 805–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zheng, Y.M.; Chen, H.; Chen, T.B.; Zheng, G.D.; Wu, J.L.; Zhou, H.T. Spatial distribution patterns of Cr and Ni in soils of Beijing. (in Chinese). Quat. Sci. 2003, 23, 436–445. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zheng, Y.M.; Lou, J.F.; Chen, T.B.; Chen, H.; Zheng, G.D.; Wu, H.T.; Zhou, J.L. Cadmium accumulation in soils for different land uses in Beijing. (in Chinese). Geogr. Res. 2005, 4, 542–548. [Google Scholar]
  33. Zheng, Y.M.; Song, B.; Chen, T.B.; Zheng, G.D.; Huang, Z.C. Zinc accumulation and pollution risk in soils under different land use types in Beijing. (in Chinese). J. Natur. Resour. 2006, 21, 64–72. [Google Scholar]
  34. Chen, X.; Xia, X.H.; Zhao, Y.; Zhang, P. Heavy metal concentrations in roadside soils and correlation with urban traffic in Beijing, China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 181, 640–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xia, X.H.; Chen, X.; Liu, R.M.; Liu, H. Heavy metals in urban soils with various types of land use in Beijing, China. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011, 186, 2043–2050. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, S.M.; Li, H.; Sun, D.F.; Huo, X.N.; Zhou, L.D. Network analysis of agricultural soil heavy metals’ spatial distribution in Beijing. (in Chinese). Trans. CSAE. 2012, 28, 208–215. [Google Scholar]
  37. Zhang, F.R.; Guo, L.N.; Xu, Y; Guan, X.K; Zhu, F.K. The advantages of multi-cluster structure in city planning: From nutrient flow balance and environmental protection perspective—Take Beijing for example. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2012, 65, 130–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chinese Environmental Quality Standard for Soils. No. GB15618–1995.
  39. Sun, D.F.; Wang, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, W.W.; Zhou, L.D. Spatializing regional fertilizer input based on MODIS NDVI time series. (in Chinese). Trans. CSAE 2010, 26, 175–180. [Google Scholar]
  40. Nicholson, F.A.; Smith, S.R.; Alloway, B.J.; Carlton-Smith, C.; Chambers, B.J. An inventory of heavy metals inputs to agricultural soils in England and Wales. Sci. Total Environ. 2003, 311, 205–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Huo, X.N.; Li, H.; Sun, D.F.; Zhang, W.W.; Zhou, L.D.; Li, B.G. Spatial autoregression model for heavy metals in cultivated soils of Beijing. Trans. CSAE 2010, 26, 78–82. [Google Scholar]
  42. Sun, D.F.; Dawson, R.; Li, B.G. Agricultural causes of desertification risk in Minqin, China. J. Environ. Manage. 2006, 79, 348–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Commission European. Glossary: Livestock Unit, 2013. Available online: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/statistics_explained/index.php/Glossary:LSU (accessed on 4 July 2013).
  44. China Meteorological Data Sharing Service System. Available online: http://cdc.cma.gov.cn/home.do (accessed on 4 July 2013).
  45. Liu, J.G.; Dietz, T.; Carpenter, S.R.; Alberti, M.; Folke, C.; Moran, E.; Pell, A.N.; Deadman, P.; Kratz, T.; Lubchenco, J.; et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 2007, 317, 1513–1516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Dong, S.W.; Sun, D.F.; Zhang, W.W.; Li, H.; Yu, J.; Zhou, L.D. Application and decisions of resource use based on agricultural resources and economic data platform. (in Chinese). Trans. CSAE 2012, 28, 127–132. [Google Scholar]
  47. Liu, C.; Cui, J.; Jiang, G.F.; Chen, X.F.; Wang, L.; Fang, C.M. Soil heavy metal pollution assessment near the largest landfill of China. Soil Sediment Contam. 2013, 22, 390–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Swarnalatha, K.; Letha, J.; Ayoob, S. An investigation into the heavy metal burden of Akkulam-Veli Lake in south India. Environ. Earth Sci. 2013, 68, 795–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Xue, Z.J.; Liu, S.Q.; Liu, Y.L.; Yan, Y.L. Health risk assessment of heavy metals for edible parts of vegetables grown in sewage-irrigated soils in suburbs of Baoding City, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184, 3503–3513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kohonen, T. Self-organization and Associative Memory; Springer-Verlag: New York, USA; Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  51. Kohonen, T. Self-organizing Maps; Springer-Verlag: New York, NY, USA; Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  52. Vesanto, J.; Alhoniemi, E. Clustering of the self-organizing map. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 2000, 11, 586–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Liu, Y.; Weisberg, R.H. A Review of Self-organizing Map Applications in Meteorology and Oceanography. In Self-organizing Maps—Applications and Novel Algorithm Design; Mwasiagi, J.I., Ed.; InTech: Rijeka, Croatia, 2011; pp. 253–272. [Google Scholar]
  54. Park, Y.S.; Tison, J.; Lek, S.; Giraudel, J.L.; Coste, M.; Delmas, F. Application of a self-organizing map to select representative species in multivariate analysis: A case study determining diatom distribution patterns across France. Ecol. Inform. 2006, 1, 247–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Jeong, K.S.; Hong, D.G.; Byeon, M.S.; Jeong, J.C.; Kim, H.G.; Kim, D.K.; Joo, G.J. Stream modification patterns in a river basin: Field survey and self-organizing map (SOM) application. Ecol. Inform. 2010, 5, 293–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Céréghino, R.; Park, Y.S. Review of the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) approach in water resources: Commentary. Environ. Model. Softw. 2009, 24, 945–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Davies, D.L.; Bouldin, D.W. A cluster separation measure. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1979, 1, 224–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Alhoniemi, E.; Himberg, J.; Parhankangas, J.; Vesanto, J. SOM Toolbox for Matlab. 2000. Available online: http://www.cis.hut.fi/projects/somtoolbox/ (accessed on 5 July 2013).
  59. Spearman, C. The proof and measurement of association between two things. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2010, 39, 1137–1150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Turner, M.G.; Dale, V.H.; Gardner, R.H. Predicting across scales: Theory development and testing. Landsc. Ecol. 1989, 3, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Miller, J.R.; Turner, M.G.; Smithwick, E.; Dent, C.L.; Stanley, E.H. Spatial extrapolation: The science of predicting ecological patterns and processes. Bioscience 2004, 54, 310–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Li, X.D.; Poon, C.S.; Liu, P.S. Heavy metal contamination of urban soils and street dusts in Hong Kong. Appl. Geochem. 2001, 16, 1361–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Adachi, K.; Tainosho, Y. Characterization of heavy metal particles embedded in tire dust. Environ. Int. 2004, 30, 1009–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Chen, J.Z.; Chen, J.; Xie, X. J.; Mao, J.G.; Zhang, X.L. The distribution character of heavy metals in periurban area of Beijing. Acta Pedol. Sin. 2005, 42, 149–152. [Google Scholar]
  65. The official Website of the Beijing Government. Available online: http://zhengwu.beijing.gov.cn/ghxx/qtgh/t1240927.htm (accessed on 21 October 2013).
  66. Liu, Y.L.; Wang, H.; Ji, Y.L.; Liu, Z.Q.; Zhao, X. Land use zoning at the county level based on a multi-objective particle swarm optimization algorithm: A case study from Yicheng, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2012, 9, 2801–2826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Fan, J.; Sun, W.; Zhou, K.; Chen, D. Major function oriented zone: New method of spatial regulation for reshaping regional development pattern in China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 2012, 22, 196–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Fan, J.; Sun, W.; Yang, Z.S.; Fan, P.; Chen, D. Focusing on the major function-oriented zone: A new spatial planning approach and practice in China and its 12th five-year plan. Asia Pac. Viewp. 2012, 53, 86–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. The Major Function Oriented Zone of Beijing Municipality. Available online: http://www.bj.chinanews.com/news/2012/0918/25580.html (accessed on 21 October 2013).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, B.; Li, H.; Sun, D. Social-Ecological Patterns of Soil Heavy Metals Based on a Self-Organizing Map (SOM): A Case Study in Beijing, China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 3618-3638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110403618

AMA Style

Wang B, Li H, Sun D. Social-Ecological Patterns of Soil Heavy Metals Based on a Self-Organizing Map (SOM): A Case Study in Beijing, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014; 11(4):3618-3638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110403618

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Binwu, Hong Li, and Danfeng Sun. 2014. "Social-Ecological Patterns of Soil Heavy Metals Based on a Self-Organizing Map (SOM): A Case Study in Beijing, China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11, no. 4: 3618-3638. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph110403618

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop