Next Article in Journal
Scalable Combinatorial Tools for Health Disparities Research
Previous Article in Journal
The Impact of Different Proportions of a Treated Effluent on the Biotransformation of Selected Micro-Contaminants in River Water Microcosms
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJERPH
Volume 11
Issue 10
10.3390/ijerph111010406
ijerph-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluating the Effect of a Novel Molluscicide in the Endemic Schistosomiasis Japonica Area of China

by
Jing Xia
1,2,
Yi Yuan
2,
Xingjian Xu
2,
Fenghua Wei
2,
Guiling Li
3,
Min Liu
3,
Jianqiang Li
4,
Rujuan Chen
4,
Zhengping Zhou
4 and
Shaofa Nie
1,*
1
Department of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
2
Institute of Schistosomiasis Control, Hubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan 430079, China
3
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Industry, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
4
Sichuan Chemical Industry Research and Design Institute, Chengdu 610041, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11(10), 10406-10418; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111010406
Submission received: 18 July 2014 / Revised: 15 September 2014 / Accepted: 19 September 2014 / Published: 10 October 2014
Browse Figure
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Oncomelania hupensis is the sole intermediate host snail of Schistosoma japonicum in China. Snail control by molluscicide remains one of the most effective measures of schistosomiasis japonica control. A 50% wettable powder of niclosamide ethanolamine salt (WPN) is widely used for snail control in China. However, WPN is costly and toxic to fish. A novel molluscicide named LDS, the salt of quinoid-2′, 5-dichloro-4′-nitrosalicylanilide from niclosamide, has been developed. To evaluate the effects of large-scale field application of LDS on field snail control, tests were conducted in 15 counties of Hubei Province, China. Active adult snails, were immersed in 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 g/m3 of 10% LDS, 1.0 g/m3 of 50% WPN was used as the molluscicide control, and then the mortality rates of snails were investigated after 1, 2, and 3 days. In addition, four active concentrations of 10% LDS (0.4, 0.6, 0.8 and 1.0 g/m2) were applied by spraying and powdering in the field. 1.0 g/m2 of 50% WPN was used as the molluscicide control, and then the mortality rates of snails were observed after 1, 3, and 7 days. The results indicated that 0.4 g/m3 LDS applied by the immersion or 0.6 g/m2 LDS applied by spraying and powdering achieved the same molluscicidal effect as that of WPN, regardless of exposure time. By using different methods, the snail mortality rates in the molluscicide groups were related to exposure time and concentration, respectively. LDS costs less than WPN; thus, LDS is suitable and applicable for use as a molluscicide in schistosomiasis japonica epidemic areas.

1. Introduction

Schistosomiasis remains a major public health problem in many parts of the developing world [1]. Worldwide, almost 800 million individuals are at risk of schistosomiasis. About 200 million people are infected, over half of whom have some degree of morbidity [2]. This leads to a disease burden that might be as high as 4.5 million disability-adjusted life-years [3]. Schistosomiasis japonica is mainly prevalent in the People’s Republic of China (P.R. China), the Philippines, and small pockets of Indonesia, with P.R. China as the most heavily endemic of these three countries [4,5]. In China, schistosomiasis japonica persists in the five provinces situated around the Yangtze River Basin and its lakes, as well as in two mountainous provinces. In 2011, there were an estimated total of 286,836 cases of S. japonicum infection, about 372,664.10 ha of areas infested with Oncomelania Hupensis were found, and 1163.87 ha newly detected O. hupensis areas were reported [6]. The snail is widely distributed in a complex environment, resulting in challenges for S. japonicum control in China [6,7].
O. hupensis is the sole intermediate host snail of S. japonicum in China, extirpation of the snail makes it possible to halt the transmission dynamics of S. japonicum [8]. Application of chemical molluscicides is one of the most effective measures for snail control [9]. Niclosamide has been recommended by the WHO for use as a molluscicide since the 1960s and is still the molluscicide of choice [10,11]. A 50% wettable powder of niclosamide ethanolamine salt (WPN) has been widely used as a molluscicide in China [9,12,13]. Currently, 50% WPN at a dose of 1.0 mg/L is recommend by the Ministry of Health, P.R. China for snail control in the field [7]. However, WPN is costly and highly toxic to fish and other aquatic animals [14,15,16,17,18]; it therefore cannot be used in some economically poor areas and fish or crab breeding areas in China. O. hupensis escape from these areas after the application of WPN, thereby reducing the molluscicidal effect of the chemical [19,20,21,22].
To overcome these problems, a novel molluscicide was recently developed by derivation from niclosamide. LDS is the salt of quinoid-2′, 5-dichloro-4′-nitrosalicylanilide (10% total LDS content), which is the active ingredient of LDS and the molecular formula is a C13H7Cl2N2O4- M+. The filler is Na2SO4 (89% total LDS content) and the surfactant (1% total LDS content).The fusion point of LDS is more than 300 °C, which dissolved to water and ethanol, and the solubility of LDS in the water is a 1.4 g/L. LDS is formulated as a wettable powder [23,24,25,26].
LDS has been evaluated in the laboratory and the field [23,24,25,26]. To assess the effects of large-scale field application of LDS we conducted field tests in 15 counties in schistosomiasis japonica endemic areas of Hubei Province, China. The molluscicidal effects of 10% LDS and 50% WPN were compared.

2. Methods

2.1. Study Site

Hubei Province is located in the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, which is an area highly endemic area for schistosomiasis in China [6,27,28]. The marshlands along the Yangtze River are dry in winter and flooded in summer, and the water levels of the marshlands are difficult to control. Most marshlands are easily flooded during the flood season, creating ideal breeding sites for O. hupensis [29]. In 2011, about 76,733.10 ha were infested with O. hupensis, and 133 ha of newly detected O. hupensis areas were reported in Hubei Province [6]. In the spring of 2011, the effects of LDS were tested in 15 counties in Hubei Province (Figure 1). Snail habitats in small irrigation and drainage ditches were selected for application of LDS using an immersion method and floodplains were selected to test the effects of LDS application by spraying and powdering. All testing sites in 15 counties were in identical ecological environments.
Ijerph 11 10406 g001 1024
Figure 1. Location of the study counties, Hubei Province, China.
Figure 1. Location of the study counties, Hubei Province, China.
Ijerph 11 10406 g001

2.2. Molluscicide

A 10% LDS (series number 20100247), and 50% WPN (series number 2010-0-84) were obtained from Sichuan Academy of Chemical Industry and Design, Chengdu, China.

2.3. Molluscicidal Activity

The snails used in immersion tests were collected from the rural marshlands of 15 counties. The snails were washed with water and placed in a container with dechlorinated water. After 24 h, adult snails that climbed out of the water and displayed strong activity within four hours were selected for testing. The test was conducted in the field in the spring in 15 counties, Hubei Province. During field testing, the air temperature was between15 °C and 34 °C, the median air temperature was 21 °C to 28 °C. Small irrigation and drainage ditches near a river were selected as an immersion field, with an average snail density of 11~18/0.11 m2. The irrigation and drainage ditch, 200 m in length, 0.3~0.5 m in width and 0.35~0.45 m in depth, with stable water level, comprised the testing site which was divided into five equal segments separated by a 3-meter buffer. The volume of water in each segment was calculated, three active concentrations of the LDS were tested: 0.2, 0.4, and 0.6 g/m3 (mg/L). 1.0 g/m3 (mg/L) active concentration of WPN was applied as a molluscicide control. One segment was a blank control. Nine nylon bags each containing 30 snails were immersed in each segment. Three bags were removed from each section on days 1, 2, and 3. Snails collected were washed three times with dechlorinated water, than placed on a plate containing dechlorinated water and maintained for 48 h. The snails were hammered to identify whether the snails died and the numbers of snail that had died were counted [22].
The floodplain snail habitats were selected as spraying field in 15 counties, with an average snail density of 11~18/0.11 m2.The test sites were divided into six 100 m2 sections separated by a 3-meter buffer to prevent snail migration between sections. All vegetation was cut down from each section prior to the start of the experiment. The weather conditions were described above and the soil moisture content was 20%~30% in test field. Four active concentrations of LDS were tested: 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 g/m2. 1.0 g/m2 active concentration of WPN was used as the molluscicide control. After 1, 3, and 7 days, snails were collected by a checkerboard sampling method [22]. On each sampling day, all snails within 10 sampling frames were collected from each section. The snails were tested for viability as already described above.
In the powdering test, the floodplain snail habitats were selected as testing sites, with an average snail density of 11~17/0.11 m2. Test sites for powdering application were prepared in the same manner as those used for tests of sprayed molluscicide. Four active concentrations of the LDS were tested: 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0 g/m2. 1.0 g/m2 active concentration of WPN was used as molluscicide control. Molluscicide for each group was mixed with sand (1:4) and the mixture was scattered over each section. After 1, 3, and 7 days, snail were collected using a checkerboard sampling method [22]. The snails were collected and tested for viability in the same way as spraying.

2.4. Cost Comparison

Chinese Yuan is the currency of P. R. China. The labor cost is same with when using either of the two molluscicides. The cost of WPN and LDS with the recommended concentrations was compared for each application method. We compared the cost of two molluscicides on the same cubic meter and square meter of area. The WPN cost is 38,000 CNY/ton; LDS is 12,000 CNY/ton:
Ijerph 11 10406 i001

2.5. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using the Statistics Analysis System, SPSS. Comparisons between the snail mortality rates with LDS and WPN were performed using the Chi-square test. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the effect of concentration of molluscicide and exposure time on snail mortality. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered to be statistically significant.

3. Results

3.1. Comparison between the Snail Mortality Rate of LDS and WPN

There was no significant difference in snail mortality in the 0.2 g/m3 LDS groups and WPN groups after 2, or 3 days immersion(P = 0.387, P = 0.490, Table 1). The results indicate no significant differences between the snail mortality rates at 0.4 g/m3 LDS and WPN after 1, or 3 days immersion (P = 0.442, P = 0.087, Table 1). There was a significant difference in snail mortality between the 0.6 g/m3 LDS groups and the WPN group after 1, 2, and 3 days (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.005, Table 1), the snail mortality rate after exposure to 0.6 g/m3 LDS for 1, 2, and 3 days were higher than that of WPN (Table 1).
Table
Table 1. Comparison of the adjusted mortality of snails exposed for 24–72 h to different concentrations of LDS and WPN applied by immersion in 15 counties of Hubei Province.
Table 1. Comparison of the adjusted mortality of snails exposed for 24–72 h to different concentrations of LDS and WPN applied by immersion in 15 counties of Hubei Province.
MolluscicideDose (g/m3)1 day2 days3 days
Mortality Rate (%)χ2P-value *Mortality Rate (%)χ2P-value *Mortality Rate (%)χ2P-value *
LDS0.283.92 (1284/1530)6.6110.01094.05 (1439/1530)0.7490.38798.76 (1511/1530)0.4760.490
0.488.10 (1348/1530)0.5920.44296.60 (1478/1530)6.2070.01399.54 (1523/1530)2.9300.087
0.692.22 (1411/1530)20.9820.00098.50 (1507/1530)32.6420.00099.80 (1527/1530)8.0470.005
WPN1.087.19 (1334/1530) 94.77 (1450/1530) 99.02 (1515/1530)
control0.03.40 (42/1530) 4.12 (63/1530) 4.38 (67/1530)
Note:* The mortality of snails exposed to WPN compared with that of snails exposed to three active concentrations of LDS.
There was a significant difference in snail mortality between the 0.4 g/m2 LDS and the WPN spraying groups after 1, 3, and 7 days (P = 0.002, P < 0.001, P = 0.001, Table 2).
Table
Table 2. Comparison of the mortality of snails exposed for 1, 3, or 7 days to different concentrations of LDS and WPN applied by spraying and powdering in 15 counties of Hubei Province.
Table 2. Comparison of the mortality of snails exposed for 1, 3, or 7 days to different concentrations of LDS and WPN applied by spraying and powdering in 15 counties of Hubei Province.
Molluscicide MethodMolluscicideDose (g/m2)1 Day 3 Days 7 Days
Mortality Rate (%)χ2P-value * Mortality Rate (%)χ2P-value * Mortality Rate (%)χ2P-value *
sprayingLDS0.473.09 (1388/1899)9.2840.002 82.25 (1520/1848)15.3400.000 88.57 (1635/1846)12.0350.001
0.676.62 (1494/1950)0.3110.577 86.26 (1595/1849)0.3320.565 93.42 (1703/1823)2.8190.093
0.881.41 (1546/1899)9.3990.002 88.13 (1589/1803)1.2440.265 94.15 (1707/1813)6.7050.010
1.083.98 (1599/1904)26.4700.000 89.08 (1680/1886)4.1490.042 92.32 (1732/1876)0.1610.688
WPN1.077.37 (1450/1874) 86.91 (1600/1841) 91.97 (1672/1818)
control0.04.07 (75/1843) 4.45 (85/1910) 5.64 (108/1915)
powderingLDS0.469.41 (1305/1880)0.0120.912 79.18 (1453/1835)5.3040.021 84.30 (1664/1974)35.5900.000
0.671.75 (1392/1940)2.1210.145 82.28 (1500/1823)0.0040.952 89.58 (1625/1814)1.1330.287
0.877.08 (1544/2003)27.3800.000 84.12 (1573/1870)2.3900.122 92.17 (1847/2004)3.0030.083
1.079.96 (1584/1981)54.1260.000 86.61 (1663/1920)13.7340.000 92.94 (1842/1982)6.9890.008
WPN1.069.58 (1249/1795) 82.20 (1469/1787) 90.62 (1758/1940)
control0.03.79 (71/1873) 4.66 (86/1846) 5.11 (103/2016)
Note:* The mortality of snails exposed to WPN compared with that of snails exposed to four active concentrations of LDS.
There was a significant difference between the snail mortality rates at 0.4 g/m2 LDS and WPN after 3, or 7 days powdering (P = 0.021, P < 0.001, Table 2). The results of the spraying and powdering tests indicated no significant difference in mortality after exposure to 0.6 g/m2 LDS and the WPN for 1, 3, and 7 days (Table 2). Snail mortality after exposure to 0.8, and 1.0 g/m2 LDS for 1, 3, and 7 days was higher in comparison to sprayed or powered WPN.

3.2. The Snail Mortality Rate by Molluscicide Concentration and Exposure Time in Different Molluscicide Methods

A binary logistic regression model was used to analyze the correlation between snail mortality and molluscicide concentration and exposure time (Table 3). In the immersion group, showed a higher snail mortality risk at 2, 3 days than 1 days (OR = 3.329, P < 0.001; OR = 19.320, P < 0.001; Table 3). In the spraying and powdering groups, indicated a higher snail mortality rate risk at 3, 7 days than 1 day (Table 3); The immersion test showed a higher snail mortality risk in 0.4, and 0.6 g/m3 LDS than that of WPN. In spraying group and powdering test, there was no significant difference in snail mortality between 0.6 g/m2 LDS and WPN (P = 0.983; P = 0.630; Table 3), however, it showed higher snail mortality was observed with 0.8, and 1.0 g/m2 LDS in comparison to WPN.
Table
Table 3. Analyzing the influence factors of the mortality of snails in different molluscicide methods by binary logistic regression.
Table 3. Analyzing the influence factors of the mortality of snails in different molluscicide methods by binary logistic regression.
Molluscicide MethodVariablesEstimateStd. ErrorOR (95% CI)P-value
ImmersionIntercept1.8430.0666.317 (6.242, 6.390)0.000
Day
1--1.000-
21.2030.0763.329 (2.867, 3.865)0.000
32.9600.15619.320 (14.219, 26.251)0.000
molluscicide
0.2 LDS−0.2290.0840.795 (0.674, 0.938)0.006
0.4 LDS0.2090.0921.233 (1.030, 1.476)0.022
0.6 LDS0.7570.1062.132 (1.733, 2.622)0.000
1.0 WPN--1.000-
SprayingIntercept1.2680.0433.555 (3.267, 3.866)0.000
Day
1--1.000-
30.5690.0401.767 (1.635, 1.909)0.000
71.1640.0463.204 (2.927, 3.507)0.000
molluscicide
0.4 LDS−0.3060.0520.736 (0.665, 0.815)0.000
0.6 LDS−0.0010.0540.999 (0.898, 1.111)0.983
0.8 LDS0.2210.0571.247 (1.116, 1.393)0.000
1.0 LDS0.2770.0571.319 (1.179, 1.475)0.000
1.0 WPN--1.000-
PowderingIntercept0.9340.0392.544 (2.357, 2.747)0.000
Day
1--1.000-
30.5560.0361.744 (1.625, 1.873)0.000
71.1710.0413.225 (2.976, 3.496)0.000
molluscicide
0.4 LDS−0.2060.0480.814 (0.742, 0.894)0.000
0.6 LDS0.0240.0491.024 (0.930, 1.128)0.630
0.8 LDS0.2630.0511.300 (1.178, 1.436)0.000
1.0 LDS0.4310.0521.539 (1.389, 1.704)0.000
1.0 WPN--1.000-

3.3. Cost Comparison

The costs of the recommended applications concentrations of LDS and WPN were compared. The recommended active concentration of LDS for immersion was 0.4 g/m3; it was 0.6 g/m2 for both spraying and powdering. In all cases, the cost of applying LDS was lower than that for applying WPN. Relative to WPN cost, application of LDS by immersion could reduce costs by 36.84% and application by spraying or powdering could reduce costs by 5.26% (Table 4).
Table
Table 4. Cost comparisons between LDS and WPN at the recommended application concentration.
Table 4. Cost comparisons between LDS and WPN at the recommended application concentration.
Content50% WPN10% LDSCost Reduction by Use of LDS Relative to Cost of WPN (%)
Commercial price of molluscicide (CNY Yuan/kg)38.00012.000-
Recommended immersion concentration (Kg/m3)0.0020.004-
Market price of application by immersion (CNY Yuan/ m3)0.0760.048Decline 36.842
Recommended spraying or powdering concentration (kg/ m2)0.0020.006-
Market price of application by spraying or powdering (CNY Yuan/ m2)0.0760.072Decline 5.263
Note: Recommended concentration WPN = Recommended active concentration WPN÷50%. Recommended concentration LDS = Recommended active concentration LDS÷10%.

4. Discussion

In China, snail control is an important strategy for schistosomiasis control, and mollusciciding is the most widely used methods for snail control. Since the 1950s, more than 2000 chemicals have been screened for mollusciciding properties by Chinese scientists [30]. The chemical molluscicides, such as sodium pentachlorophenate, nicotinanilide, and bromoacetamide, have been in use since the 1950s [31]. However, these molluscicides are toxic to non-target animals and cause environmental pollution [32,33,34]. More than 50 plant species, of the 1000 or so that have been tested, have been confirmed to contain components with molluscicidal activity against O. hupensis [35]. Unfortunately, some plant molluscicides have low efficacy and/or high toxicity towards fish or other non-target animals [36]. In recent years some molluscicides have been reported as being effective in molluscicides have been reported as being effective and less toxic, such as the suspension concentrate of niclosamide [37], a potential molluscicide derived from the plant Solanum xanthocarpum [36], Piplartine against Biomphalaria glabrata [38], and some compound molluscicides [39,40].
LDS was recently developed in China to reduce the problems associated with WPN use. According to “Toxicological test methods of pesticides for registration” the national standard of the People’s Republic of China (GBl5670—1995), the acute LDS toxicity test was carried out via mouth, skin and inhalation with Wistar rats. Meanwhile, the eye and skin stimulating test with rabbit as well as skin stimulating tests with guinea pigs were also conducted. The results showed that LDS was weakly toxic to Wistar rats; and had no acute stimulation to rabbit skin and eye. The guinea pig skin sensitization test showed that it was a weak sensitizing substance [26]. In a comparison of WPN and LDS toxicity to fish, after 24 h of exposure to 0.4 g/m3 of WPN, fish mortality was 100%, whereas exposure to the same concentration of LDS resulted in 40% fish mortality. The 24-h median lethal concentration (LC50) of LDS to fish is 0.5657 g/m3 (mg/L). The LC50 of WPN to fish is 0.2049 g/ m3 (mg/L), which is 1.7 times that of WPN [23]. With the concentration of 0.4 g/ m3 (mg/L) for 72 h, the fish death rate using LDS and WPN was 50.0% and 100% respectively [24]. After exposure for 1, 6, 24, and 48 h to 0.25 g/ m3 (mg/L) of LDS or WPN, the up-climbing rates of snails in LDS were 62.2%, 50.0%, 42.2%, and 32.2%, respectively, whereas in WPN, the up-climbing rates were 70%, 56.7%, 48.9%, and 46.7%, respectively. This indicates that O. hupensis did not escape from LDS more easily than from WPN [24].
In immersion, the results indicate that there wasn’t a significant difference between the snail mortality rates of 0.4 g/m3 LDS and WPN after 1 and 3 days. In spraying and powdering, the molluscicdal effect of 0.6 g/m2 LDS is the same as that of WPN. 0.4 g/m3 LDS applied using the immersion method or 0.6 g/m2 LDS applied by spraying and powdering achieved the same molluscicidal effect as WPN. In our study, by using different methods, the snail mortality rates of molluscicide groups were related to exposure time and concentration respectively; it increased with concentration and exposure time. If the recommended application active concentration of LDS for immersion was 0.4 g/m3, and was 0.6 g/m2 for both spraying and powdering, the cost of applying LDS was lower than that for applying WPN, moreover, LDS is simpler to manufacture than WPN, and the production cost of LDS is about 10% less than that of WPN [23,25].
In this study, we tested the efficacy of LDS applied using three different methods. In China, different molluscicide application methods are typically used in different snail breeding environments. Immersion is used in irrigation ditches and drainage ditches, and ponds in inner embankments areas, in which the water levels are easy to control. Spraying is a commonly used method of molluscicide application, especially in environments where application by immersion is impractical [22]. Powdering is used in areas where there is a lack of water in the environment, such as mountainous areas [41]. LDS is formulated as a wettable powder, as is WPN. In some environments that experience water percolation and that are flushed with running all year round, the molluscicidal effect may be reduced. Such areas may require repeated application of molluscicide, thus increasing the molluscicide costs [41,42]. To ensure the effectiveness of LDS in different environments, we are currently researching a slow-release formulation of LDS.
Two LDS patents have been obtained from the State Intellectual Property Office of the People’s Republic of China (ZL200610005300.4, ZL201010274645.6). The patents have already been transferred to companies for production. At the time of publication, 6 tons of LDS will have been produced and applied in two counties in Hubei Province in China that is a schistosomiasis japonica endemic area.
Our study had some potential limitations. The pH and organic matter content of soil, vegetation and sunlight may influence the effective concentration of molluscicide [43]. We observed the meteorological conditions in the field, but we did not analyze the possible effects of these environmental factors at the field sites. Therefore, we were not able to evaluate the influence of these factors on molluscicidal effects.

5. Conclusions

The recommended application of active concentration of LDS is 0.4 g/m3 when applied by immersion and 0.6 g/m2 when applied by spraying or powdering. The cost of LDS is less than that of WPN. Therefore, LDS is a molluscicide suitable for application in schistosomiasis japonica epidemic areas.

Acknowledgements

We are very grateful to all staff at the Caidian, Gongan, Hanchuan, Honghu, Jiayu, Jianli, Jiangling Jingshan, Qianjiang, Songzi, Tianmen, Xiaonan, Yangxin, Yingcheng, Zhongxiang County Institute for Schistosomiasis Control. We acknowledge Qiu Juan for assistance in the preparation of the map. This study was funded by grants from the National High Technology Research Development Plan in China (863 plan; 2004AA2Z3560), the National Important Sci-tech Projects in China (2012ZX10004-909), the Department of Health of Hubei Province Science Youth Fund Special Project of Schistosomiasis Control (XF2008-18, XF2010-4).

Author Contributions

Jing Xia, Yi Yuan, Xingjian Xu, Shaofa Nie conceived and designed the experiments. Jing Xia, Xingjian Xu, Yi Yuan, Fenghua Wei, Guiling Li, Min Liu, Jianqiang Li, Rujuan Chen, Zhengping Zhou performed the experiments. Jing Xia, Xingjian Xu, Shaofa Nie wrote the manuscript. Jing Xia analyzed the data. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Wu, Z.D.; Lv, Z.Y.; Yu, X.B. Development of a vaccine against Schistosoma japonicum in China: A review. Acta Tropica 2005, 96, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Steinmann, P.; Keiser, J.; Bos, R.; Tanner, M.; Utzinger, J. Schistosomiasis and water resources development: Systematic review, meta-analysis, and estimates of people at risk. The Lancet Infect. Dis. 2006, 6, 411–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, L.D.; Utzinger, J.; Zhou, X.N. Schistosomiasis control: Experiences and lessons from China. The Lancet 2008, 372, 1793–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chitsulo, L.; Engels, D.; Montresor, A.; Savioli, L. The global status of schistosomiasis and its control. Acta Tropica 2000, 77, 41–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gryseels, B.; Polman, K.; Clerinx, J.; Kestens, L. Human schistosomiasis. Lancet 2006, 368, 1106–1118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Zheng, H.; Zhang, L.J.; Zhu, R.; Xu, J.; Li, S.Z.; Guo, J.G.; Xiao, N.; Zhou, X.N. Schistosomiasis situation in People’s Repubic of China in 2011. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2012, 24, 621–626. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen, X.Y.; Wang, L.Y.; Cai, J.M.; Zhou, X.N.; Zheng, J.; Guo, J.G.; Wu, X.H.; Engels, D.; Chen, M.G. Schistosomiasis control in China: the impact of a 10-year World Bank Loan Project (1992–2001). Bull. World Health Organ. 2005, 83, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Mao, C.P. Biology of Schistosome and Control of Schistosomiasis; People’s Health Press: Beijing, China, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yang, G.J.; Li, W.; Sun, L.P.; Wu, F.; Yang, K.; Huang, Y.X.; Zhou, X.N. Molluscicidal efficacies of different formulations of niclosamide: Result of meta-analysis of Chinese literature. Parasit. Vectors 2010, 3, 84–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Perrett, S.; Whitfield, P.J. Currently available molluscicides. Parasitol. Today 1996, 12, 156–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. WHO. Division of control of tropical diseases. In The Role of Mollusciciding in Schistosomiasis Control; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1992; pp. 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  12. Huang, Y.X.; Sun, L.P.; Hong, Q.B.; Yang, K.; Jiang, Y.J.; Xi, W.P. Study on molluscicidal effect of niclosamide ethanolamine salt dustable powder against oncomelania hupensis in marshland of Yangtze river ahead of schedule in spring. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2004, 16, 334–337. [Google Scholar]
  13. He, J.X.; Wang, H.; Wu, M.Y.; Chen, X.F.; Shu, Q.M.; Tao, W.; Xu, Y.X.; Zhang, S.Q. Observation on the molluscicidal effect of niclosamide ethanolamine salt dustable powder by dusting in fields. J. Trop. Dis. Parasitol. 2007, 5, 153–154. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhang, T.; Jiang, Q.W. Study on the toxicology of niclosamide. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2002, 14, 234–236. [Google Scholar]
  15. Xiu, R.Q.; Cheng, C.; Xu, Y.X.; Gao, S.R.; Ren, G.Y.; Zheng, J. Studies on toxicities of niclosamide against fish and water flea. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 1996, 8, 355–357. [Google Scholar]
  16. Xiong, W.K.; Cai, D.Q.; Lu, Y.S.; Bai, Z.H.; Zuo, S.H.; Xi, J.Y.; Liu, G.H. Safety trial of releasing mollucicides of niclosamide in fish. Environ. Pollut. Control. 1992, 14, 11–12. [Google Scholar]
  17. Zhu, M.D.; Hong, L.D.; Cai, Z.H.; Shao, F.Y.; Jiang, L.X.; XU, S.F.; Chen, J.H.; Wen, L.Y. Effective duration of niclosamide and influencing factors in water and soil. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2005, 17, 373–376. [Google Scholar]
  18. Fang, Y.M.; Huang, Y.X. Application of niclosamide ethanolamine salt dustable powder. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2007, 19, 398–400. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, T.P.; Zhang, G.H.; Xiao, X.; Lv, D.B.; Wu, D.G.; Chen, B.; Fang, G.R.; Wang, Q.Z.; Zhang, S.Q. Observation on the molluscicidal effect of Shangchongding against oncomelania hupensis in laboratory and marshland field. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2001, 14, 134–138. [Google Scholar]
  20. Sarquis, O.; Pieri, O.S.; dos Santos, J.A. Effects of Bayluscide WP 70® on the survival and water-leaving behaviour of Biomphalaria. straminea, snail host of schistosomiasis in Northeast Brazil. Mem. Inst. Oswaldo Cruz 1997, 92, 619–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Liu, X.S.; Zhang, S.Q.; Wang, T.P.; Xu, X.Z.; WD, W. Observation mollusciciding effect of niclosamide ethanolamine salt wettable powder. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 1994, 6, 13–15. [Google Scholar]
  22. Chinese Ministry of Health. Handbook of Schistosomiasis Control; Shanghai Scientific and Technological Literature Publishing House: Shanghai, China, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  23. Xu, X.J.; Yuan, Y.; Li, G.L.; Wei, F.H.; Zhao, Y.B.; Tu, Z.W.; Liu, M.; Cao, M.M.; He, H.; Fan, H.P. Molluscicidal effect of a novel molluscicide, LDS. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2007, 19, 328–333. [Google Scholar]
  24. Jin, W.; Du, J.K.; Yuan, Y.; Wei, F.H.; Liu, W.; Wang, H.; Li, G.L.; Xu, X.J. Study on molluscicidal effect of chlorosalicylicamide. Chin. J. Parasitol. Parasit. Dis. 2007, 25, 411–414. [Google Scholar]
  25. Yuan, Y.; Dong, H.F.; Xu, X.J.; Li, G.L.; Wei, F.H.; Zhao, Y.B.; Tu, Z.W.; Liu, M.; Cao, M.M.; He, H. Evaluation of a new molluscicide for counteracting the intermediate snail host of Schistosoma. Japonicum. Malacologia. 2011, 53, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yuan, Y.; Xu, X.J.; Wei, F.H.; Li, G.L.; Zhao, Y.B.; Liu, M. Acute toxicity of LDS, a molluscicide. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2007, 19, 188–191. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hao, Y.; Zheng, H.; Zhu, R.; Guo, J.G.; Wang, L.Y.; Chen, Z.; Zhou, X.N. Schistosomiasis situation in People’s Republic of China in 2009. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2010, 22, 521–527. [Google Scholar]
  28. Lei, Z.N.; Zheng, H.; Zhang, L.J.; Guo, J.G.; Li, S.Z.; Wang, L.Y.; Chen, C.; Zhou, X.N. Schistosomiasis status in People’s Republic of China in 2010. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2011, 23, 599–604. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhu, H.M.; Xiang, S.; Yang, K.; Wu, X.H.; Zhou, X.N. Three Gorges Dam and its impact on the potential transmission of schistosomiasis in regions along the Yangtze River. Ecohealth 2008, 5, 137–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Yuan, Y.; Xu, X.J.; Dong, H.F.; Jiang, M.S.; Zhu, H.G. Transmission control of schistosomiasis japonica: Implementation and evaluation of different snail control interventions. Acta Tropica 2005, 96, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Y.F.; Peng, Y.; Liu, F.X. A brief review on oncomelania hupensis Control in China. Sichuan J. Zool. 2005, 24, 213–216. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, R. History and current status of molluscicides research. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2003, 15. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Huang, S.S.; Zhu, H.G.; Xia, P.F.; Peng, D.Y. Study on the Molluscicidal Effect and Toxic with Compound Nicotinanilide. (In Chinese)Available online: http://kns.chkd.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?recid=&FileName=ZJSB199202032&DbName=CHKJ7993&DbCode=CHKJ&uid=WEEvREcwSlJHSldRa1FhcXVzR0l5bnYyeFVkNnVoSVZzc0hGNnBGQ05XSU82bG5oOThRdWZmN1k2MldneVZ3REtRPT0=$9A4hF_YAuvQ5obgVAqNKPCYcEjKensW4IQMovwHtwkF4VYPoHbKxJw!! (accessed on 18 July 2014).
  34. Chen, C. Molluscicides and their application in China. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2003, 15, 321–322. [Google Scholar]
  35. Zou, F.C.; Duan, G.; Xie, Y.J.; Zhou, Y.; Dong, G.D.; Lin, R.Q.; Zhu, X.Q. Molluscicidal activity of the plant Eupatorium adenophorum against Oncomelania hupensis, the intermediate host snail of Schistosoma japonicum. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2009, 103, 549–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Wei, F.H.; Xu, X.J.; Liu, J.B.; Dai, Y.H.; Dussart, G.; Trigwell, J. Toxicology of a potential molluscicide derived from the plant Solanum xanthocarpum: A preliminary study. Ann. Trop. Med. Parasitol. 2002, 96, 325–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Dai, J.R.; Wang, W.; Liang, Y.S.; Li, H.J.; Guan, X.H.; Zhu, Y.C. A novel molluscicidal formulation of niclosamide. Parasitol. Res. 2008, 103, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Rapado, L.N.; de Sá Pinheiro, A.; de Moraes Victor Lopes, P.O.; Fokoue, H.H.; Scotti, M.T.; Marques, J.V.; Ohlweiler, F.P.; Borrely, S.I.; de Braganca Pereira, C.A.; Kato, M.J.; et al. Schistosomiasis control using piplartine against biomphalaria glabrata at different developmental stages. PLos Negl. Trop. Dis. 2013, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yuan, Y.; Xu, X.J.; Dong, H.F.; Cao, M.M.; Tu, Z.W.; Wei, F.H.; Jiang, M.S. Experimental study of complex molluscicidal with nicotinanilide and niclosamide produced in different manufactories. Chin. J. Endemilol. 2005, 24, 167–169. [Google Scholar]
  40. Dai, J.R.; Zhu, Y.C.; Liang, Y.S.; Li, H.J.; Gong, M.T.; Zhang, J.S.; Guan, X.H. Development of a novel synergism compound suspension cocentrate of niclosamide and chlorphoxim I. Formula and its characteristics. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2005, 17, 413–416. [Google Scholar]
  41. Huang, Y.X.; Hong, Q.B.; Sun, L.P.; Wu, F.; Xi, W.P.; Cai, G. Studies on molluscicidal effect of niclosamide ethanolamine salt dustable powder against oncomelania hupensis. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2003, 15, 255–258. [Google Scholar]
  42. Li, B.G.; Li, W.B.; Dong, Y.; Xiong, M.T.; Feng, X.G.; Mu, L.X.; Tian, S.H.; Li, P.; Xiong, K.; Dong, X.Q. Molluscicidal effect of LDS in mountainous areas of Yunnan Province. Chin. J. Schisto. Control. 2011, 23, 395–401. [Google Scholar]
  43. Zhou, X.N. Chapter 5: Biochemistry and histochemistry of snail. Chapter 10: Snail control. In Science of Oncomelania. Snail; Science Press: Beijing, China, 2005; pp. 97–108, 317–318. [Google Scholar]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Xia, J.; Yuan, Y.; Xu, X.; Wei, F.; Li, G.; Liu, M.; Li, J.; Chen, R.; Zhou, Z.; Nie, S. Evaluating the Effect of a Novel Molluscicide in the Endemic Schistosomiasis Japonica Area of China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 10406-10418. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111010406

AMA Style

Xia J, Yuan Y, Xu X, Wei F, Li G, Liu M, Li J, Chen R, Zhou Z, Nie S. Evaluating the Effect of a Novel Molluscicide in the Endemic Schistosomiasis Japonica Area of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2014; 11(10):10406-10418. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111010406

Chicago/Turabian Style

Xia, Jing, Yi Yuan, Xingjian Xu, Fenghua Wei, Guiling Li, Min Liu, Jianqiang Li, Rujuan Chen, Zhengping Zhou, and Shaofa Nie. 2014. "Evaluating the Effect of a Novel Molluscicide in the Endemic Schistosomiasis Japonica Area of China" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 11, no. 10: 10406-10418. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111010406

APA Style

Xia, J., Yuan, Y., Xu, X., Wei, F., Li, G., Liu, M., Li, J., Chen, R., Zhou, Z., & Nie, S. (2014). Evaluating the Effect of a Novel Molluscicide in the Endemic Schistosomiasis Japonica Area of China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11(10), 10406-10418. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph111010406

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop