Next Article in Journal
Genetic k-Means Clustering Approach for Mapping Human Vulnerability to Chemical Hazards in the Industrialized City: A Case Study of Shanghai, China
Next Article in Special Issue
Risk Selection, Risk Adjustment and Choice: Concepts and Lessons from the Americas
Previous Article in Journal
Generational Differences in Work-Family Conflict and Synergy
 
 
Article

Can Decision Biases Improve Insurance Outcomes? An Experiment on Status Quo Bias in Health Insurance Choice

by 1,† and 2,3,*,†
1
Fakultät für Wirtschaftswissenschaften, Universität Duisburg Essen, Schützenbahn 70, 45127 Essen, Germany
2
Wirtschaftswissenschaftliche Fakultät, Universität Basel, Peter Merian-Weg 6, CH 4002, Basel, Switzerland
3
CINCH—Health Economics Research Center, Edmund-Körner-Platz 2, D-45127 Essen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10(6), 2560-2577; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10062560
Received: 13 May 2013 / Revised: 5 June 2013 / Accepted: 9 June 2013 / Published: 19 June 2013
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Health Market: Incentives and Competition)
Rather than conforming to the assumption of perfect rationality in neoclassical economic theory, decision behavior has been shown to display a host of systematic biases. Properly understood, these patterns can be instrumentalized to improve outcomes in the public realm. We conducted a laboratory experiment to study whether decisions over health insurance policies are subject to status quo bias and, if so, whether experience mitigates this framing effect. Choices in two treatment groups with status quo defaults are compared to choices in a neutrally framed control group. A two-step design features sorting of subjects into the groups, allowing us to control for selection effects due to risk preferences. The results confirm the presence of a status quo bias in consumer choices over health insurance policies. However, this effect of the default framing does not persist as subjects repeat this decision in later periods of the experiment. Our results have implications for health care policy, for example suggesting that the use of non-binding defaults in health insurance can facilitate the spread of co-insurance policies and thereby help contain health care expenditure. View Full-Text
Keywords: experimental health economics; health insurance; liberal paternalism experimental health economics; health insurance; liberal paternalism
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Krieger, M.; Felder, S. Can Decision Biases Improve Insurance Outcomes? An Experiment on Status Quo Bias in Health Insurance Choice. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2013, 10, 2560-2577. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10062560

AMA Style

Krieger M, Felder S. Can Decision Biases Improve Insurance Outcomes? An Experiment on Status Quo Bias in Health Insurance Choice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2013; 10(6):2560-2577. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10062560

Chicago/Turabian Style

Krieger, Miriam, and Stefan Felder. 2013. "Can Decision Biases Improve Insurance Outcomes? An Experiment on Status Quo Bias in Health Insurance Choice" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 10, no. 6: 2560-2577. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph10062560

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop