Next Article in Journal
The Deep Mining Era: Genomic, Metabolomic, and Integrative Approaches to Microbial Natural Products from 2018 to 2024
Previous Article in Journal
A Comparative Study of the Phytochemical Composition, Antioxidant Properties, and In Vitro Anti-Diabetic Efficacy of Different Extracts of Caulerpa prolifera
Previous Article in Special Issue
Production, Transport, Fate and Effects of Lipids in the Marine Environment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Salinity on the Growth Performance and Docosahexaenoic Acid Positional Distribution in Triacylglycerols of the Newly Isolated Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1

by
Sitong Ye
1,
Xiaonan Wang
1,
Youcai Zhou
1,2,
Xuehua Xiao
1,
Pingying Liu
1,
Chengdeng Chi
1,
Peipei Sun
3,4,*,
Mingmin Zheng
1,
Bilian Chen
1,
Ruoyu Mao
5,* and
Yongjin He
1,*
1
College of Life Science, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China
2
School of Food and Biological Engineering, Fujian Polytechnic Normal University, Fuqing 350300, China
3
Institute of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100193, China
4
National Center of Technology Innovation for Comprehensive Utilization of Saline-Alkali Land, Dongying 257091, China
5
Feed Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2025, 23(7), 260; https://doi.org/10.3390/md23070260
Submission received: 9 May 2025 / Revised: 20 June 2025 / Accepted: 21 June 2025 / Published: 23 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Lipids from Marine Sources)

Abstract

Schizochytrium-derived omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (e.g., docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA)) are proven to be health-beneficial bioactive substances that have been widely applied in the pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and food industries. In this work, the newly isolated Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 strain was selected to investigate the effects of salinity on the growth performance, lipid production, DHA yield, and positional distribution of triacylglycerols (TAGs). In addition, Schizochytrium sp. 20888 was used as a control strain. The obtained results showed that Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 could grow with a low biomass in the absence of sea salt; however, Schizochytrium sp. 20888 did not grow in the medium without sea salt. Moreover, Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 achieved the highest biomass in 10‰ salinity, whilst Schizochytrium sp. 20888 attained the greatest biomass in 40‰ salinity. In terms of the total lipid content and TAG fraction percentage, Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 grown in 5–20‰ salinity had high total lipid contents (57.04–60.02%), with TAGs accounting for over 90% of the lipid fraction. The highest DHA contents for total lipids (41.38%) and TAGs (40.18%) were obtained when Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 was grown under 10‰ salinity conditions. Additionally, under the same culture condition, EPA contents of lipids and TAGs were significantly higher for Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 compared with Schizochytrium sp. 20888. Furthermore, nuclear magnetic resonance analysis found that the salinity level had a distinct impact on the positional distribution of DHA in TAGs in these two Schizochytrium strains. Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 grown under 40‰ salinity conditions produced TAGs with the greatest percentage of sn-2 DHA (81.24%). The percentages were higher than those found for the other groups of this microalga and Schizochytrium sp. 20888. Taken together, Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 could be a potential candidate to produce highly valued DHA lipids or TAG bioproducts by regulating salinity.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), a type of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid, exhibits anti-inflammatory properties [1], reduces blood glucose and lipid concentrations [2], enhances immune factor expression [3], and promotes the cognitive development of infants [4,5]. At present, commercial bioproducts containing DHA have been widely applied in the pharmaceutical, nutraceutical, and food industries. Currently, the primary source of DHA for human consumption is mainly derived from fish oil. However, many studies have revealed that the oil extracted from marine fish often contains harmful heavy metals (such as mercury and lead) and pesticide residues because of ocean pollution. Thus, the safety of fish oil has come into question. To sustainably provide valuable lipids rich in DHA for consumption, scientists have found that some microorganisms, such as Schizochytrium strains, can produce the desired lipids with DHA [6,7]. Until now, algal oil containing DHA produced by Schizochytrium sp. has been approved as a new resource food by the US Food and Drug Administration, European Novel Food Regulation, and the Ministry of Health of China [8]. Therefore, research using Schizochytrium sp. for DHA biosynthesis and production has become a hotspot in the field of DHA oil studies.
Schizochytrium sp. is a typical single-celled heterotrophic marine microalga. Extensive research has demonstrated that the predominant lipidic class synthesized by Schizochytrium strain is triacylglycerols (TAGs), accounting for over 80% of all lipidic species [9]. As reported by T. Zhang et al., the Schizochytrium limacinum SR31 yields 93.81% TAGs among total lipids [10]. On the other hand, recent studies have demonstrated DHA accumulation is closely related to the distribution of DHA in digested TAGs. The main reason is that DHA distributed at the sn-2 position of the glycerol backbone is more conducive to the generation of vital chylomicron with sn-2 DHA in the intestinal tract. This is subsequently deposited it into different tissues, where the physiological functions of DHA are performed [11,12,13]. To the best of our knowledge, available studies mainly focus on the growth and DHA yield of the Schizochytrium strain [14,15,16,17]. However, studies using the Schizochytrium strain to synthesize DHA distributed at the sn-2 position of TAGs have not been reported.
Existing studies have shown that the growth performance and DHA yield for a given Schizochytrium strain are largely associated with the salinity concentration of the utilized medium [18]. W. Chen et al. found that Schizochytrium sp. S056 cultivated in 20‰ salinity obtained the highest biomass of 34.76 g/L and the greatest DHA yield of 6.61 g/L [19]. G. Ludevese-Pascual et al. stated that Schizochytrium sp. LEY7 was capable of excellent growing in 15–30‰ salinity [20]. In addition, low or high salinity had negative impacts on the growth performance and DHA biosynthesis ability of the Schizochytrium strain due to the unsuitable salinity that generated improper osmotic pressure of fungal cell and affected absorption of nutrients for growth [19,21]. It should be noted that these reported works have not focused on the DHA distribution of Schizochytrium-derived TAGs affected by different levels of salinity. Thus, it is important to investigate the effect of salinity on the growth performance, DHA biosynthesis, and TAG-derived DHA distribution of a specific Schizochytrium strain.
On this background, our team selected a new strain of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 isolated from the Quanzhou Bay Estuarine Wetland Nature Reserve (Quanzhou, China) that can grow in a low-salt environment. To understand the DHA distribution of TAGs, the work aimed to investigate the effects of varying salinity levels on the growth performance, lipid production, and DHA biosynthesis and distribution of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1. Additionally, the positional distribution of DHA in TAGs obtained from Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 was analyzed using carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. In the addition, the common strain Schizochytrium sp. 20888 with a high 18s rRNA sequence similarity to Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 was selected as a control strain to analyze the different features of growth performance as well as DHA biosynthesis and distribution influenced by different salinities. The obtained details in this work will provide scientific insights into the high-value DHA-enriched algal oil obtained from the Schizochytrium strain.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Molecular Identification of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1

The strain Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 was isolated from the estuarine wetland nature reserve of Quanzhou Bay. The 18s rRNA gene of this strain was sequenced, and the phylogenetic results showed that the isolated microalga exhibited 96% sequence similarity with Schizochytrium sp. UMACC-T022 (Figure 1A). In addition, the results from morphological observation (Figure 1B) found that the cell size of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 was in the range of 7 μm to 30 μm. These values were consistent with the value reported by G. Chi et al. [7]. Thus, the isolated strain FJ-1 was identified and named as Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1.

2.2. Effects of Salinity on the Growth Performance of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 and 20888

Figure 2 shows the changes in the growth of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 and 20888 under different salinity conditions. It was found that Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 cultivated in the medium without sea salt had a low biomass (1.39 g/L) after 6 d (Figure 2A); however, Schizochytrium sp. 20888 could not grow in the absence of sea salt (Figure 2B). The possible reason was that Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 was isolated from a low-salinity or sea salt-free environment in estuarine wetland nature reserve of Quanzhou Bay (Section 3.1). In this case, the isolated Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 might exhibit its individual physiological characteristics to adapt to the sea salt-free condition.
Moreover, in the salinity range of 5–10‰, Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 biomass rapidly increased in the early stage (0–4 days) and then distinctly decreased in the late stage (4–6 days); however, the microalgal biomass in 20–40‰ salinity was kept relatively stable (Figure 2A). The possible reason was that the different salinity levels might affect the nutrient absorption of algal cells for growth. In contrast, for Schizochytrium sp. 20888, microalga in 5‰ salinity had a longer lag phase (0–5 days), indicating that this salinity levels was not conducive for microalgal growth. In addition, the growth curve of Schizochytrium sp. 20888 in 10‰ salinity entered the stationary phase on the 5th day (Figure 2B). It was noted that the stationary phase for Schizochytrium sp. 20888 in 20–40‰ salinity was in the range from the 4th day to 6th day (Figure 2B). These different results from the growth curves of two Schizochytrium strains could be attributed to the fact that the individual metabolism features associated with growth properties of these two microalgal strains were affected by the salinity of the culture conditions.
Furthermore, the results in Figure 1A reveal that the optimal salinity for Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 growth was 10‰. In addition, higher salinity (>10‰) had obvious negative impacts on the growth performance of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1, as presented in Figure 2A, indicating that Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 was more suitable for growth in 10‰ salinity. This level might be close to the real salinity level of its natural environment. On the other hand, the optimum salinity for Schizochytrium sp. 20888 growth was 40‰ (Figure 2B). The possible reason was that, among the designed salinity levels, 40‰ salinity was close to the real seawater salinity level. This value offers a stable osmotic pressure for Schizochytrium sp. 20888 for reproduction and nutrient absorption.

2.3. Effects of Salinity on Glucose Utilization by Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 and 20888

Glucose, as the main carbon source in the culture medium, can be utilized by Schizochytrium sp. for growth and polyunsaturated fatty acid synthesis [22]. Figure 3A illustrates the glucose utilization of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 under different salinity levels. As depicted in Figure 3A, Schizochytrium sp., FJ-1 in the absence of sea salt just utilized around 3 g glucose of the fermentation medium, leading to the low biomass (Figure 2A). It was noted that Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 could utilize all glucose of the medium with 10‰ salinity on the 5th day. However, microalga incompletely consumes glucose at the other salinity levels, as shown in Figure 3A. These results indicated that different salinity levels might influence the osmotic pressure of microalgal cells to perform glucose transporter activity for glucose assimilation [21].
For Schizochytrium sp. 20888, the algal cells under sea salt-free conditions did not absorb the glucose of the culture medium (Figure 3B). This was because Schizochytrium sp. 20888 cells in the absence of sea salt were in a hypotonic environment that led to cell swelling and rupture, which was consistent with the phenomenon reported by Hu et al. [23]. Additionally, an increase in salinity was conducive to absorb the glucose in the culture medium by Schizochytrium sp. 20888 (Figure 3B), showing that the suitable salinity for glucose utilization by Schizochytrium sp. 20888 was 20–40‰. Based on the results from Figure 3, it was concluded that the optimal salinity for glucose utilization was 10‰ for Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 and 20–40‰ for Schizochytrium sp. 20888.

2.4. Effects of Salinity on the Total Lipid Content and TAG Fraction Percentage of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 and 20888

At the end of experiments, Schizochytrium cells were collected. The total lipid contents of the microalgal biomass are shown in Figure 4. In this study, Schizochytrium sp. 20888 cells could not grow under sea salt-free conditions; in this case, the total lipid content was not recorded. It was evident that Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 in 5–20‰ salinity achieved the highest total lipid contents. In contrast, low or high salinity had negative impacts on lipid biosynthesis by Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 (Figure 4A) due to the fact that microalgal cells grown under unsuitable salinity conditions could not assimilate glucose to offer sufficient energy for lipid biosynthesis.
Moreover, the changes in the total lipid content of Schizochytrium sp. 20888 are presented in Figure 4B. It was found that the increase in salinity from 5‰ to 20‰ distinctly promoted lipid synthesis in Schizochytrium sp. 20888 (Figure 4B). No significant differences in total lipid contents were observed in 20‰ and 40‰ salinity, as shown in Figure 4B, demonstrating that Schizochytrium sp. 20888 cultivated in 20–40‰ salinity exhibited the great capability for lipid biosynthesis. Furthermore, the highest lipid content (58.6%) of Schizochytrium sp. 20888 was very close to that of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 (60.07%) (Figure 4), showing that Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 is a microorganism that can produce the desired lipid.
It is well-known that the lipids synthesized by the Schizochytrium strain mainly exist as TAGs. The silica column technique was employed to record the TAG fraction percentage of the total lipids extracted from Schizochytrium. It was found that the TAG percentage of total lipids obtained from Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 sharply increased from 53.76% to 95.73% when the salinity level was in the range of 0–20‰ (Figure 4A); however, high salinity (40‰) was unfavorable for the TAGs biosynthesis by Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1. Similarly, Schizochytrium sp. 20888 grown in low- or high-salinity conditions could not attain high TAG levels among total lipids. It was noted that Schizochytrium sp. 20888 in 10‰ salinity achieved the highest TAG percentage (97.96%) of total lipids. Based on the obtained results, it was suggested that the salinity level might regulate the activities of key enzymes (e.g., glycerol-3-phosphate acyl-transferase (GPAT), lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase (LPAAT), diacylglycerol acyltransferase (DGAT)) of the Kennedy pathway for TAG biosynthesis by the Schizochytrium strain. Additionally, previous works have demonstrated that overexpression of LPAAT and/or DGAT obviously elevated the TAG content among synthesized lipids in oleaginous microorganisms [24,25,26].
Additionally, under the optimal salinity conditions, the lipid and TAG yields of Schizochytrium sp. 20888 and Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 were 4.19 and 2.75 g/L, respectively (Figure 4). The phenomenon was due to the fact that the lipid and TAG yields were largely related with the growth stage of the strain and the final biomass (Figure 3). Thus, it was concluded that the best salinity levels for Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 and 20888 to produce the greatest lipid and TAG yields are 10‰ and 40‰, respectively.

2.5. Effects of Salinity on the Fatty Acid Composition of Total Lipids from Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 and 20888

The fatty acid composition of the extracted total lipids from two Schizochytrium strains is presented in Table 1. As seen in Table 1, when the salinity increased from 0‰ to 10‰, the DHA content of Schizochytrium-derived total lipids was remarkably increased from 31.9% to 41.38% (Table 1), and DPA content significantly decreased. However, high salinity might improve the biosynthesis of specific saturated or monounsaturated fatty acids, leading to the low PUFA content for Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 (Table 1). Similarly, Schizochytrium sp. 20888 grown in 10–20‰ salinity obtained the highest PUFA content. Low- and high-salinity levels are conducive to the production of saturated or monounsaturated fatty acid(s) by Schizochytrium sp. 20888. Similar phenomena were reported by An M, showing that the dehydrogenase and elongase activities of fatty acid biosynthesis and/or the polyketide synthase (PKS) pathway for a given microorganism were largely associated with salinity [27,28].
It is worth noting that Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 cultivated in 10–40‰ salinity achieved 6.44–7.17% EPA. This was higher than that noted under the low-salinity condition, implying that high salinity was beneficial to modulate EPA biosynthesis pathway activity. In addition, the highest EPA content of Schizochytrium sp. 20888 was significantly lower than that noted for Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1. Additionally, the EPA content of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 was close to that of Schizochytrium sp. M20231041, but was comparable to the values obtained for Schizochytrium sp. HX-308 and S056 and S. limacinum SR21 (Table 2). Thus, the results on the EPA content of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 showed that this microalga could be a potential microorganism to produce the highly valued EPA.
On the other hand, DPA and DHA were the main PUFAs synthesized by two Schizochytrium strains, as stated in Table 1. Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 grown in 10‰ salinity had the highest contents of DPA (17.92%) and DHA (41.38%); however, Schizochytrium sp. 20888 could achieve higher DPA and DHA contents in comparison to the results obtained for Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 (Table 1). The possible reason was that these two Schizochytrium strains demonstrated their natural fatty acid biosynthesis metabolism (e.g., PKS pathway) toward DPA and DHA. In addition, as stated in Table 2, Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 grown in 10‰ salinity obtained 17.92% DPA and 41.38% DHA. These values were comparable to those obtained for S. limacinum SR21, Schizochytrium sp. 20888, and Schizochytrium sp. S056, but was lower than values noted for Schizochytrium sp. HX-308 and Schizochytrium sp. S31. Some previous studies pointed out that the DPA and DHA contents of Schizochytrium strains were influenced by the cultivation conditions. To increase the DPA and DHA contents, further work will optimize the cultivation parameters for DPA and DHA biosynthesis by Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1.

2.6. Effects of Salinity on the Fatty Acid Composition of the TAG Fraction from Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 and 20888

The TAGs of Schizochytrium-derived lipids were purified using a silica column. It was found that the purified TAGs of the two Schizochytrium strains exhibited several chemical shifts in the range of 68.7–69.7 ppm (Figure 5A) that were consistent with the previous studies using Schizochytrium TAGs. The results showed that the lipids purified using the silica column were mainly comprised of TAG species.
The fatty acid composition of Schizochytrium TAGs is recorded in Table 3. It was clear that the TAGs of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 grown in the absence of sea salt had the lowest DHA content and the greatest palmitic acid content, as stated in Table 3. Nevertheless, Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 grown in 10‰ salinity synthesized TAGs with the highest EPA, DPA, and DHA contents (Table 3). Higher salinity could significantly lower PUFA biosynthesis by Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1, as shown in Table 3. These results further indicated that low and high salinity levels might regulate the activities of dehydrogenase and elongase —enzymes involved in lipid metabolism—to a great extent, influencing the synthesis of PUFAs in this microalga. Moreover, except at 10‰ salinity, the EPA, DPA and DHA contents (Table 3) in Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 were lower across the four groups than those in its total lipids (Table 1), implying that these fatty acids might be preferentially distributed in other lipidic species.
Moreover, the fatty acid composition of TAGs obtained from Schizochytrium sp. 20888 was very close to the results for total lipids (Table 1 and Table 3). For instance, the TAGs of Schizochytrium sp. 20888 had 1.59% EPA, 19.32% DPA, and 50.61% DHA, and these values were very consistent with the values for total lipids (EPA, 1.64%; DPA, 20.1%; DHA, 50.89%). The results in Table 1 and Table 3 showed that the two Schizochytrium strains indeed utilized their natural TAG biosynthesis pathway that exhibits a preference toward fatty acid selectivity. It had been reported that the LPAAT and DGAT of the Kennedy pathway in microorganisms exhibit fatty acid selectivity and positional specificity [34] (Figure 6). The results obtained by L. L. Wayne et al. demonstrated that expression of the Schizochytrium LPAAT in DHA-producing Arabidopsis significantly increased the total DHA amount in seed oil and drove DHA accumulation at the sn-2 position of TAGs [35]. Moreover, many review articles and experimental data demonstrated that overexpression of the DGAT gene(s) could increase PUFA biosynthesis and the positional distribution of microalga-derived TAGs [26]. On the basis of the results in Table 3, it was suggested that salinity might modulate the activities of key enzymes in the Kennedy pathway, promoting the deposition of PUFAs into TAGs species by the Schizochytrium strain [21,24].
The 13C-NMR technique is a useful tool to record the positions of some fatty acid species of TAGs. The resonances of Schizochytrium-TAGs acyl chains (carbonyl carbons) were from 172 to 173.4 ppm as presented in Figure 5B. The resonances of SFAs (PA, etc.) chains at the sn-1,3 and sn-2 positions of TAGs were 173.25 ppm and 172.86 ppm, respectively (Figure 5B). The ∆9 fatty acyl residues (palmitoleic acid and oleic acid) were recorded at the peak of 173.24 ppm for the sn-1 and 3 positions and the peak of 172.83 ppm for the sn-2 position. The chemical shifts of EPA (∆5 fatty acyl chain) at the sn-1,3 and sn-2 positions were 172.94 ppm and 172.6 ppm, respectively. DPA (n-6, ∆4 fatty acyl chain) and DHA (n-3, ∆4 fatty acyl chain) were recorded in the same 13C-NMR spectrum (sn-1 and 3, 172.52 ppm; sn-2, 172.14 ppm). These findings agreed with the results reported by L. Shen et al. [36].
Additionally, many studies have shown that the 13C-NMR tool could quantify the specific fatty acids (e.g., EPA, DHA) of TAGs [37]. After the analysis of EPA and DPA/DHA among the purified TAGs, it was clear that salinity had remarkable impacts on the positional distribution of EPA and DPA/DHA among the TAGs obtained from two Schizochytrium strains (Figure 5B). It was noted that the TAGs obtained from the Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 grown in the absence of sea salt had the lowest EPA (53.33%) and DPA/DHA (43.2%) percentages at the sn-2 position. In addition, the highest DPA/DHA percentage (81.24%) at the sn-2 position of TAGs was observed in Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 cultivated in 40‰ salinity (Table 4), which was significantly greater than the values obtained at the other salinity levels. Additionally, TAGs obtained from Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 grown in the presence of sea salt had higher percentages of EPA (64.55–69.23%) in comparison to the group grown in the absence of sea salt (Table 4). These results further indicated that the salinity level indeed affected the positional distribution of EPA, DPA and DHA among the TAGs synthesized by Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 by regulating the fatty acid selectivity of key enzymes of the Kennedy pathway (Figure 6). Regarding Schizochytrium sp. 20888, the increase in salinity distinctly led an increase in the percentage of DPA/DHA distributed at the sn-2 position of TAGs (Table 4). However, the highest sn-2 EPA percentage was found for 10‰ salinity, and this results was different from the results obtained for Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1. The phenomenon could be due to the fact that different Schizochytrium strains possess distinct triacylglycerol biosynthesis pathways, with specific regulatory enzymes influencing fatty acid selectivity and positional specificity (Figure 6).
As mentioned above, the distribution of PUFAs at the sn-2 position of TAGs is beneficial for promoting their deposition into tissues to perform their biological functions. For Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1, 10‰ salinity was helpful for improving growth performance, but was not conducive for the synthesis and distribution of PUFAs at the sn-2 position of TAGs. To address this issue, the future work will further illustrate the potential regulatory mechanisms governed by salinity that affect the biosynthesis and positional distribution of PFUAs in Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 using multi-omics techniques. These mechanisms will be leveraged to increase the growth rate and PUFA biosynthesis, thereby promoting the distribution of PUFAs at the sn-2 position of TAGs for high-valued lipid production by this microalga.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Strains of Schizochytrium

The strain Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 was isolated from the Quanzhou Bay Estuarine Wetland Nature Reserve and stored in the laboratory. Schizochytrium sp. ATCC-20888 was kindly donated by Dr. Sun Dongzhe (College of Life Sciences, Hebei Normal University).

3.2. Culture Media

Seed liquid medium (g/L): glucose 20 g, yeast extract 4 g, peptone 4 g, sea salt 20 g, natural pH, trace elements 1 mL, sterilized at 115 °C for 15 min.
Fermentation medium: glucose 20 g, yeast extract 4 g, peptone 4 g, sea salt (0–40 g), natural pH, trace elements 1 mL, sterilized at 115 °C for 15 min.
Trace element stock solution: 52 mg/L ZnSO4, 52 mg/L MnCl2, 500 mg/L CaCl2, 100 mg/L FeSO4, 100 mg/L H3BO3, 480 mg/L CuSO4, 7.6 mg/L vitamin B1, 12 mg/L vitamin B12.

3.3. Effects of Different Salinity Levels on the Fermentation Performance of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 and 20888

Schizochytrium cells were incubated in 250 mL Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 mL of seed liquid medium at 28 °C and 200 rpm for 48 h. Then, the Schizochytrium cells (0.1 g/L) were treated in the fermentation media containing different concentrations of sea salt (0, 5, 10, 20, and 40‰). Microalgal cells were cultivated in the dark at 28 °C and 200 rpm for 6 days. During fermentation, samples were taken every 24 h to measure the biomass and glucose consumption. At the end of experiments, the biochemical components of the algal cells were determined using the following methods.

3.4. Analytical Methods

3.4.1. Determination of Schizochytrium sp. Biomass and Glucose Concentration of the Culture Medium

Schizochytrium sp. biomass was primarily determined using the dry weight method. One milliliter of algal solution was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 5 min. Then, the supernatant was discarded, and the algal pellet was washed twice with ultrapure water and collected with centrifugation. The pellet was then placed on a pre-weighed glass dish and dried in an oven at 80 °C to obtain a constant weight. The microalgal biomass was calculated using the following equation:
B i o m a s s   C o n c e n t r a t i o n g L = A g B g T h e   v o l u m e   o f   t h e   a l g a l   s o l u t i o n   t a k e n L
where A is the glass dish weight containing the dried microalgal cells, and B is the glass dish weight without microalgal cells.
The glucose concentration of the culture medium was determined using the SBA-40E biosensor analyzer (Biology Institute of Shandong Academy of Sciences, Jinan, China). The measurement procedure was as follows: 1 mL of the algal solution was centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 5 min; consequently, the supernatant was collected to record the residual glucose concentration of the medium.

3.4.2. Determination of Total Lipid Content of Schizochytrium Cells

After fermentation, the fermentation culture was centrifuged to collect the algal cells. The freeze-drying method was then employed to prepare the dry algal powder.
The total lipid content of microalgal cells was detected using the following experimental steps [38]. Briefly, 20 mg algal powder was treated with 3 mL of a chloroform–methanol solution (2:1, v: v) for 12 h. Afterward, 1 mL of distilled water was added and centrifuged at 8000 rpm for 5 min to collect the chloroform phase. The precipitate was further treated twice to collect the chloroform phase. The organic solvent of the combined chloroform sample was removed using a rotary evaporator RE-52AA (Shanghai Yarong Biochemical Instrument Factory, Shanghai, China). The total lipid content was recorded using the following equation:
T o t a l   l i p i d   c o n t e n t % = C m g A l g a l   p o w d e r m g × 100 %
where C is the weight of extracted lipids (mg).

3.4.3. Determination of the TAG Fraction Percentage of Total Lipids in Schizochytrium sp.

Freeze-dried Schizochytrium sp. powder (1 g) and chloroform–methanol solution (2:1, v:v) of 100 mL were mixed to extract total lipids. Afterward, 200 mg total lipids and 10 mL acetone were mixed thoroughly for 30 min. Then, the acetone-soluble fraction was collected. After removing the acetone by evaporation, the collected lipids were further purified using a silica column according to our reported method [39]. Subsequently, TAGs fraction was treated to remove the organic solvent. The TAG percentage of total lipids was calculated using the following equation:
T A G s   p e r c e n t a g e % = D m g E m g × 100 %
where D is the weight of TAGs (mg), and E is the weight (mg) of total lipids of the treated Schizochytrium stains.

3.4.4. Determination of Fatty Acid Composition

The samples obtained as the total lipid and TAG fractions were methylated and quantified using a gas chromatography-flame ionization detector (GC-FID) (SCION 436-GC, Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) equipped with an Omegawax® 250 capillary column (30 m × 0.32 mm × 0.25 μm, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA). Specific fatty acid profiles were identified using a mixture of 37 standards (Supelco Inc., Bellefonte, PA, USA) as well as methyl ester (HAME, 99% purity) as a standard.

3.4.5. C-13 Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (13C-NMR) Analysis of Schizochytrium-Derived TAGs

Approximately 200 mg of the Schizochytrium-derived TAGs fraction was dissolved in 500 μL deuterated chloroform (CDCl3), and the solution was placed in the NMR tube. Quantitative 13-C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker Avance 600 MHZ spectrometer (Bruker Co. Ltd., Fällanden, Switzerland). All fatty acid peaks in the range of 171.9–173.4 ppm were integrated using MestReNova 10 software based on previous works. The percentages of EPA, DPA, and DHA distributed at the sn-1 (3) and 2 positions as determined using 13C-NMR were estimated with the following equations:
s n - 1 3 F A   p e r c e n t a g e % =   s n - 1 3 F A s n - 1 3 F A + s n - 2   F A × 100 %
s n - 2   F A   p e r c e n t a g e % =   s n - 2   F A   s n - 1 3 F A + s n - 2   F A × 100 %

3.5. Data Processing and Statistical Analysis

All data in this experiment were processed from three repeated trials. Analysis and processing were performed using Excel 2016 and Origin 2021 software and shown as the mean (n = 3) ± the standard deviation (±SD). The experimental data were subjected to one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) as implemented in the GraphPad prism 8 statistics platform. Before performing ANOVA, the assumptions of normality and homogeneity of variances were verified and satisfied. Tukey simultaneous tests were conducted to determine the statistical differences between treatments. In order to ascertain whether the observed variations in lipid and TAG contents/yield or the fatty acid composition of Schizochytrium total lipids/TAGs under different salinity conditions were statistically significant, probability (p) values were determined. A 95% confidence level (p < 0.05) was applied for all analyses.

4. Conclusions

In this work, the newly isolated Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 strain was selected to investigate the influences of salinity on the growth performance, lipid production, DHA yield, and positional distribution of TAGs. The obtained results found that microalga could grow in the absence of sea salt; however, the best growth performance was observed at 10‰ salinity. Additionally, Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 grown in 10‰ salinity achieved the highest lipid, TAG, and DHA yields. Moreover, high salinity (40‰) was beneficial for the accumulation of DHA at the sn-2 position of TAGs in Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1, indicating that salinity might regulate the TAG biosynthesis pathway and influence the positional distribution of DHA. Based on these results, it was concluded that the newly isolated Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 could represent a promising candidate for the highly valued TAG bioproduct with high DHA levels at the ideal position by regulating salinity.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.Y., X.W., X.X., P.L., and C.C.; Data curation, S.Y., Y.Z., P.S., R.M., and Y.H.; Funding acquisition, B.C. and Y.H.; Investigation, X.W., M.Z., and P.S.; Methodology, Y.Z., S.Y., and Y.H.; Project administration, R.M., P.S., Y.H., and B.C.; Validation, S.Y., Y.Z., and X.W.; Writing—original draft, S.Y.; Writing—review and editing, R.M. and Y.H.; All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Key R&D Program of Shandong Province, China (2024SFGC0401), National Natural Science Foundation of China, China (No. 32172997), Key Projects of Department of Science and Technology of Fujian Province of China, China (2020N0008), Fujian Provincial Science and Technology Major Project (2023YZ037002).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Djuricic, I.; Calder, P.C. Beneficial Outcomes of Omega-6 and Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids on Human Health: An Update for 2021. Nutrients 2021, 13, 2421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Omachi, D.O.; Aryee, A.N.A.; Onuh, J.O. Functional Lipids and Cardiovascular Disease Reduction: A Concise Review. Nutrients 2024, 16, 2453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Barta, D.G.; Coman, V.; Vodnar, D.C. Microalgae as sources of omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids: Biotechnological aspects. Algal Res. 2021, 58, 102410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Fleith, M.; Clandinin, M.T. Dietary PUFA for Preterm and Term Infants: Review of Clinical Studies. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005, 45, 205–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Derbyshire, E.J.; Birch, C.S.; Bonwick, G.A.; English, A.; Metcalfe, P.; Li, W. Optimal omegas—Barriers and novel methods to narrow omega-3 gaps. A narrative review. Front. Nutr. 2024, 11, 1325099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sehl, A.; Caderby, E.; Bouhouda, S.; Rébeillé, F.; Griffiths, H.; Da Rocha Gomes, S. How do algae oils change the omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids market? OCL 2022, 29, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chi, G.; Xu, Y.; Cao, X.; Li, Z.; Cao, M.; Chisti, Y.; He, N. Production of polyunsaturated fatty acids by Schizochytrium (Aurantiochytrium) spp. Biotechnol. Adv. 2022, 55, 107897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens (NDA); Turck, D.; Bohn, T.; Castenmiller, J.; De Henauw, S.; Hirsch-Ernst, K.I.; Maciuk, A.; Mangelsdorf, I.; McArdle, H.J.; Naska, A.; et al. Safety of oil from Schizochytrium sp. (strain CABIO-A-2) for use in infant and follow-on formula as a novel food pursuant to Regulation (EU) 2015/2283. EFSA J. 2023, 21, e8415. [Google Scholar]
  9. Puri, M.; Gupta, A.; Sahni, S. Schizochytrium sp. Trends. Microbiol. 2023, 31, 872–873. [Google Scholar]
  10. Zhang, T.; Lou, F.; Tao, G.; Liu, R.; Chang, M.; Jin, Q.; Wang, X. Composition and Structure of Single Cell Oil Produced by Schizochytrium limacinum SR31. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2016, 93, 1337–1346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, F.; Yibing, N.; Yiren, Z.; Huidong, H.; Qingbin, Y.; Xingguo, W.; Wei, W. Positional distribution of DHA in triacylglycerols: Natural sources, synthetic routes, and nutritional properties. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2025, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jin, J.; Jin, Q.; Wang, X.; Akoh, C.C. High Sn-2 Docosahexaenoic Acid Lipids for Brain Benefits, and Their Enzymatic Syntheses: A Review. Engineering 2020, 6, 424–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Christensen, M.S.; Høy, C.E.; Becker, C.C.; Redgrave, T.G. Intestinal absorption and lymphatic transport of eicosapentaenoic (EPA), docosahexaenoic (DHA), and decanoic acids: Dependence on intramolecular triacylglycerol structure. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1995, 61, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, Q.; Han, W.; Jin, W.; Gao, S.; Zhou, X. Docosahexaenoic acid production by Schizochytrium sp.: Review and prospect. Food Biotechnol. 2021, 35, 111–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Sahin, D.; Tas, E.; Altindag, U.H. Enhancement of docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) production from Schizochytrium sp. S31 using different growth medium conditions. AMB Express. 2018, 8, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Półbrat, T.; Konkol, D.; Korczyński, M. Optimization of docosahexaenoic acid production by Schizochytrium sp.—A review. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2021, 35, 102076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sun, L.; Ren, L.; Zhuang, X.; Ji, X.; Yan, J.; Huang, H. Differential effects of nutrient limitations on biochemical constituents and docosahexaenoic acid production of Schizochytrium sp. Bioresour. Technol. 2014, 159, 199–206. [Google Scholar]
  18. Gao, M.; Song, X.; Feng, Y.; Li, W.; Cui, Q. Isolation and characterization of Aurantiochytrium species: High docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) production by the newly isolated microalga, Aurantiochytrium sp. SD116. J. Oleo Sci. 2013, 62, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, W.; Zhou, P.; Zhu, Y.; Xie, C.; Ma, L.; Wang, X.; Bao, Z.; Yu, L. Improvement in the docosahexaenoic acid production of Schizochytrium sp. S056 by replacement of sea salt. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2016, 39, 315–321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ludevese-Pascual, G.; Dela Peña, M.; Tornalejo, J. Biomass production, proximate composition and fatty acid profile of the local marine thraustochytrid isolate, Schizochytrium sp. LEY 7 using low-cost substrates at optimum culture conditions. Aquac. Res. 2016, 47, 318–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jiang, J.Y.; Zhu, S.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, X.; Hu, X.; Huang, H.; Ren, L.J. Integration of lipidomic and transcriptomic profiles reveals novel genes and regulatory mechanisms of Schizochytrium sp. in response to salt stress. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 294, 122231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wu, S.-T.; Yu, S.-T.; Lin, L.-P. Effect of culture conditions on docosahexaenoic acid production by Schizochytrium sp. S31. Process Biochem. 2005, 40, 3103–3108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hu, X.-C.; Ren, L.-J.; Chen, S.-L.; Zhang, L.; Ji, X.-J.; Huang, H. The roles of different salts and a novel osmotic pressure control strategy for improvement of DHA production by Schizochytrium sp. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2015, 38, 2129–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Dong, L.; Wang, F.; Chen, L.; Zhang, W. Metabolomic analysis reveals the responses of docosahexaenoic-acid-producing Schizochytrium under hyposalinity conditions. Algal Res. 2023, 70, 102987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wang, W.; Xue, Y.; Li, B.; Sheng, X.; Shi, Y.; Zou, Q.; Li, J.; Li, T.; Wang, X.; Xue, J. Effect of peroxisome proliferation and salt stress on enhancing the potential of microalgae as biodiesel feedstock. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2025, 212, 115398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, X.; Liu, S.-F.; Li, R.-Y.; Yang, W.-D.; Liu, J.-S.; Lin, C.S.K.; Balamurugan, S.; Li, H.-Y. TAG pathway engineering via GPAT2 concurrently potentiates abiotic stress tolerance and oleaginicity in Phaeodactylum tricornutum. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2020, 13, 160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. An, M.; Mou, S.; Zhang, X.; Zheng, Z.; Ye, N.; Wang, D.; Zhang, W.; Miao, J. Expression of fatty acid desaturase genes and fatty acid accumulation in Chlamydomonas sp. ICE-L under salt stress. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 149, 77–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Atikij, T.; Syaputri, Y.; Iwahashi, H.; Praneenararat, T.; Sirisattha, S.; Kageyama, H.; Waditee-Sirisattha, R. Enhanced lipid production and molecular dynamics under salinity stress in green microalga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii (137C). Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhu, L.; Zhang, X.; Ji, L.; Song, X.; Kuang, C. Changes of lipid content and fatty acid composition of Schizochytrium limacinum in response to different temperatures and salinities. Process Biochem. 2007, 42, 210–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chen, L.; Liu, X.; Li, C.; Li, H.; Chen, W.; Li, D. Transcriptome analyses reveal the DHA enhancement mechanism in Schizochytrium limacinum LD11 mutant. Algal Res. 2022, 67, 102868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhang, Z.-X.; Wu, H.-X.; Lin, Y.-C.; Xu, Y.-S.; Ma, W.; Sun, X.-M.; Huang, H. Polyketide synthase acyltransferase domain swapping for enhanced epa recognition and efficient coproduction of EPA and DHA in Schizochytrium sp. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2024, 73, 2461–2470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Ou, Y.; Qin, Y.; Feng, S.; Yang, H. Dual stress factors adaptive evolution for high EPA production in Schizochytrium sp. and metabolomics mechanism analysis. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2024, 47, 863–875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chang, M.; Zhang, T.; Li, L.; Lou, F.; Ma, M.; Liu, R.; Jin, Q.; Wang, X. Choreography of multiple omics reveals the mechanism of lipid turnover in Schizochytrium sp. S31. Algal Res. 2021, 54, 102182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sutton, G.C.; Quinn, P.J.; Russell, N.J. The effect of salinity on the composition of fatty acid double-bond isomers and sn-1/sn-2 positional distribution in membrane phospholipids of a moderately halophilic Eubacterium. Curr. Microbiol. 1990, 20, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Wayne, L.L.; Gachotte, D.J.; Graupner, P.R.; Adelfinskaya, Y.; McCaskill, D.G.; Metz, J.G.; Zirkle, R.; Walsh, T.A. Plant and algal lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferases increase docosahexaenoic acid accumulation at the sn-2 position of triacylglycerol in transgenic Arabidopsis seed oil. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0256625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shen, L.; Li, F.; Jiang, C.; Cao, X.; Jin, J.; Wang, X.; Wei, W. Comparative analysis of DHA positional distribution and triacylglycerol molecular species in algal oil (Schizochytrium sp.) from different oil processing. Food Biosci. 2024, 58, 103634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, Y.; Chang, L.; Yang, B.; Zhao, J.; Chen, W.; Chen, H. Dynamic Changes in Lipid Composition Reveal the Mechanism of Arachidonic Acid Accumulation in Mortierella alpina. Food Biosci. 2025, 2025, 106019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zhang, J.; He, Y.; Luo, M.; Chen, F. Utilization of enzymatic cell disruption hydrolysate of Chlorella pyrenoidosa as potential carbon source in algae mixotrophic cultivation. Algal Res. 2020, 45, 101730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. He, Y.; Huang, Z.; Zhong, C.; Guo, Z.; Chen, B. Pressurized liquid extraction with ethanol as a green and efficient technology to lipid extraction of Isochrysis biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2019, 293, 122049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree analysis of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 based on the 18s rRNA gene (A) and morphological observation (B).
Figure 1. Phylogenetic tree analysis of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 based on the 18s rRNA gene (A) and morphological observation (B).
Marinedrugs 23 00260 g001
Figure 2. Effects of salinity on the growth performance of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 (A) and 20888 (B).
Figure 2. Effects of salinity on the growth performance of Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 (A) and 20888 (B).
Marinedrugs 23 00260 g002
Figure 3. Effects of salinity on glucose utilization in Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 (A) and 20888 (B).
Figure 3. Effects of salinity on glucose utilization in Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 (A) and 20888 (B).
Marinedrugs 23 00260 g003
Figure 4. Effects of salinity on lipid and TAG content/yield for Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 (A) and 20888 (B). Values are means ± SD. Values with different letters in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05) (n = 3).
Figure 4. Effects of salinity on lipid and TAG content/yield for Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 (A) and 20888 (B). Values are means ± SD. Values with different letters in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05) (n = 3).
Marinedrugs 23 00260 g004
Figure 5. The glycerol backbone carbon regions of 68–75.5 ppm (A) and 171.8–173.35 ppm (B) for the Schizochytrium TAGs obtained using 13C NMR analysis.
Figure 5. The glycerol backbone carbon regions of 68–75.5 ppm (A) and 171.8–173.35 ppm (B) for the Schizochytrium TAGs obtained using 13C NMR analysis.
Marinedrugs 23 00260 g005
Figure 6. The potential mechanism for TAG biosynthesis in Schizochytrium cells mediated by salinity conditions (G-3-P: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; PKS: polyketide synthase; FAS: fatty acid synthase; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; PDH: pyruvate dehydrogenase; ME: malic enzyme; ACLY: ATP-citrate lyase; Accase: acetyl-CoA carboxylase; GPAT: glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase; KS: ketoacyl synthase; KR: ketoreductase; DH: dehydratase; ER: enoylreductase; Des: desaturase; Elo: elongase; LPA: lysophosphatidic acid; LPAAT: lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase; PA: phosphatidic acid; PAP: phosphatidic acid phosphatase; DAG: diacylglycerol; DGAT: diacylglycerol acyltransferase; TAG: triacylglycerol; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; sn-: stereospecific numbering; OA: oleic acid; EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA: docosahexaenoic acid).
Figure 6. The potential mechanism for TAG biosynthesis in Schizochytrium cells mediated by salinity conditions (G-3-P: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate; PKS: polyketide synthase; FAS: fatty acid synthase; GAPDH: glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase; PDH: pyruvate dehydrogenase; ME: malic enzyme; ACLY: ATP-citrate lyase; Accase: acetyl-CoA carboxylase; GPAT: glycerol-3-phosphate acyltransferase; KS: ketoacyl synthase; KR: ketoreductase; DH: dehydratase; ER: enoylreductase; Des: desaturase; Elo: elongase; LPA: lysophosphatidic acid; LPAAT: lysophosphatidic acid acyltransferase; PA: phosphatidic acid; PAP: phosphatidic acid phosphatase; DAG: diacylglycerol; DGAT: diacylglycerol acyltransferase; TAG: triacylglycerol; ER: endoplasmic reticulum; sn-: stereospecific numbering; OA: oleic acid; EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid; DHA: docosahexaenoic acid).
Marinedrugs 23 00260 g006
Table 1. The fatty acid composition of lipids from two Schizochytrium strains cultivated under different salinity conditions.
Table 1. The fatty acid composition of lipids from two Schizochytrium strains cultivated under different salinity conditions.
Fatty AcidSalinity Concentration (‰)
Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1Schizochytrium sp. 20888
051020405102040
C12:06.35 ± 2.32 B4.83 ± 1.17 B5.11 ± 0.59 B6.63 ± 0.23 B16.68 ± 1.83 A----
C14:01.02 ± 0.060.73 ± 0.170.59 ± 0.150.85 ± 0.121.47 ± 0.342.69 ± 0.85 B2.65 ± 0.25 B3.28 ± 0.22 B6.66 ± 0.08 A
C15:01.78 ± 0.47 C10.59 ± 1.90 B8.76 ± 1.66 B16.57 ± 1.26 A11.82 ± 1.64 B9.58 ± 1.40 A5.50 ± 0.22 B3.80 ± 0.11 C1.52 ± 0.04 C
C16:015.69 ± 1.81 A16.49 ± 2.24 A8.43 ± 0.07 B9.84 ± 0.68 B7.82 ± 0.51 B28.49 ± 5.42 A15.48 ± 1.01 C15.30 ± 0.74 C24.30 ± 0.59 B
C16:10.64 ± 0.16 B1.88 ± 0.25 B3.05 ± 0.68 B3.44 ± 0.63 B10.65 ± 1.77 A0.90 ± 0.28 A0.43 ± 0.05 B0.29 ± 0.07 B0.61 ± 0.03 AB
C17:00.79 ± 0.20 C8.14 ± 1.30 A4.63 ± 0.27 B6.24 ± 0.62 AB4.47 ± 0.75 B4.10 ± 0.70 A2.26 ± 0.06 A1.55 ± 0.06 A0.69 ± 0.10 B
C18:09.64 ± 0.52 A1.85 ± 0.21 B1.56 ± 0.44 B1.98 ± 0.26 B1.90 ± 0.46 B1.34 ± 0.160.90 ± 0.030.90 ± 0.110.92 ± 0.16
C18:16.73 ± 2.70 A1.06 ± 0.64 B1.54 ± 1.09 B0.81 ± 0.65 B0.72 ± 0.07 B1.80 ± 0.71 A0.16 ± 0.01 B0.10 ± 0.01 B0.16 ± 0.01 B
EPA4.36 ± 2.14 B2.75 ± 0.16 B7.05 ± 0.76 A6.44 ± 0.56 A7.17 ± 0.40 A0.55 ± 0.06 B1.64 ± 0.10 A1.83 ± 0.20 AB0.91 ± 0.02 B
DPA21.12 ± 1.69 A17.04 ± 1.28 A17.92 ± 0.52 A13.83 ± 1.22 B11.16 ± 0.13 C12.89 ± 1.59 C20.10 ± 0.15 A19.64 ± 0.23 AB16.41 ± 0.20 B
DHA31.90 ± 3.56 C34.64 ± 5.57 B41.38 ± 0.85 A33.37 ± 1.55 B26.15 ± 1.15 C37.63 ± 3.77 C50.89 ± 0.81 A53.31 ± 1.03 A47.79 ± 0.63 B
ΣSAFs35.27 ± 0.69 A42.63 ± 0.43A29.07 ± 0.54 C43.28 ± 0.89 A44.15 ± 0.91 A43.69 ± 0.19 A26.78 ± 1.02 C24.84 ± 1.46 C34.08 ± 0.56 B
ΣMUFAs7.37 ± 2.83 B2.94 ± 0.98 C4.59 ± 0.77 B4.52 ± 1.51 B11.37 ± 1.80 A2.13 ± 0.14 A0.59 ± 0.04 B0.38 ± 0.14 B0.76 ± 0.03 B
ΣPUFAs57.37 ± 0.41 B54.43 ± 0.56 C66.35 ± 2.12 A52.21 ± 0.62 B44.48 ± 0.90 C54.13 ± 0.39 C72.63 ± 1.07 A74.78 ± 1.56 A65.20 ± 0.56 B
ΣSAFs, saturated fatty acids; ΣMUFAs, monounsaturated fatty acids; ΣPUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids. Values are means ± SD. Values with different letters in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05) (n = 3).
Table 2. EPA, DPA, and DHA production capacities of different strains of Schizochytrium sp.
Table 2. EPA, DPA, and DHA production capacities of different strains of Schizochytrium sp.
StrainTotal Lipid (%)EPA (%)DPA (%)DHA (%)Ref.
S. limacinum SR2141.330.717.6336.65[29]
S. limacinum B4D155.980.427.7138.70[30]
Schizochytrium sp. HX-30850.820.8018.1048.19[31]
Schizochytrium sp. S05647.270.677.2540.23[19]
Schizochytrium sp. M2023104160.707.2021.1833.41[32]
Schizochytrium sp. S31 (ATCC 20888)51.702.8219.9550.43[33]
Schizochytrium sp. FJ-157.817.0517.9241.38This work
Table 3. The fatty acid composition of Schizochytrium TAGs under different salinity conditions.
Table 3. The fatty acid composition of Schizochytrium TAGs under different salinity conditions.
Fatty AcidSalinity Concentration (‰)
Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1Schizochytrium sp. 20888
051020405102040
C12:01.59 ± 0.250.78 ± 0.290.64 ± 0.190.81 ± 0.261.36 ± 1.18----
C14:01.46 ± 0.010.69 ± 0.160.9 ± 0.161.56 ± 0.011.37 ± 0.552.55 ± 0.73 B3.01 ± 0.40 A3.88 ± 0.34 A6.81 ± 0.83 A
C15:01.84 ± 0.63 B7.57 ± 1.13 C12.53 ± 2.29 B24.43 ± 1.22 A15.54 ± 0.26 B8.99 ± 1.61 A5.51 ± 0.75 AB4.38 ± 0.19 B1.48 ± 0.2 C
C16:025.41 ± 1.68 A20.51 ± 3.14 AB11.53 ± 0.61 C14.39 ± 3.32 B16.89 ± 0.84 B27.61 ± 5.01 A16.23 ± 2.41 B18.27 ± 0.84 B23.9 ± 2.49 A
C16:13.67 ± 2.36 B8.35 ± 6.67 AB3.17 ± 0.75 B2.66 ± 2.02 C13.20 ± 2.32 A0.98 ± 0.170.57 ± 0.210.50 ± 0.070.73 ± 0.15
C17:00.91 ± 0.22 B6.76 ± 1.02 A6.18 ± 0.75 A9.08 ± 0.6 A5.90 ± 1.19 A3.69 ± 0.78 A2.15 ± 0.34 AB1.72 ± 0.11 B0.74 ± 0.10 B
C18:020.58 ± 1.77 A6.22 ± 1.9 B2.6 ± 0.23 C3.41 ± 2.07 B7.51 ± 0.15 B1.79 ± 0.600.90 ± 0.161.17 ± 0.170.87 ± 0.16
C18:12.86 ± 0.45 A0.46 ± 0.19 B0.34 ± 0.11 B0.25 ± 0.16 B0.29 ± 0.13 B1.83 ± 0.65 A0.12 ± 0.01 B0.14 ± 0.05 B0.17 ± 0.01 B
EPA2.99 ± 0.04 B1.99 ± 0.42 B4.88 ± 0.8 A3.23 ± 0.23 B3.50 ± 0.25 B0.58 ± 0.051.59 ± 0.261.75 ± 0.210.90 ± 0.09
DPA15.23 ± 0.11 A13.88 ± 2.86 A17.06 ± 0.67 A12.31 ± 2.51 AB10.18 ± 2.01 B12.80 ± 1.30 B19.32 ± 0.53 A18.72 ± 0.11 A16.17 ± 0.65 A
DHA23.62 ± 0.19 C32.79 ± 7.74 B40.18 ± 1.6 A27.94 ± 6.59 BC24.27 ± 2.73 C39.20 ± 3.50 B50.61 ± 3.50 A49.46 ± 1.03 A48.23 ± 3.17 A
ΣSAFs51.63 ± 0.45 AB42.53 ± 0.42 C37.37 ± 0.8 C53.61 ± 0.23 A48.56 ± 1.31 B44.61 ± 0.13 A27.79 ± 0.34 B29.43 ± 0.21 B33.8 ± 0.07 B
ΣMUFAs6.53 ± 0.67 B8.81 ± 0.75 AB0.51 ± 1.02 C2.91 ± 0.60 C13.49 ± 0.70 A2.81 ± 1.030.69 ± 0.160.64 ± 0.530.9 ± 0.11
ΣPUFAs41.84 ± 0.22 B48.66 ± 1.9 B62.12 ± 0.75 A43.48 ± 2.14 B37.95 ± 0.67 C52.58 ± 0.13 C71.52 ± 2.48 A69.93 ± 0.16 A65.3 ± 1.23 B
ΣSAFs, saturated fatty acids; ΣMUFAs, monounsaturated fatty acids; ΣPUFAs, polyunsaturated fatty acids. Values are means ± SD. Values with different letters in the same column are significantly different (p < 0.05) (n = 3).
Table 4. The percentage of EPA and DPA/DHA distributed at the sn-1,3 and 2 positions of TAGs derived from Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 and 20888.
Table 4. The percentage of EPA and DPA/DHA distributed at the sn-1,3 and 2 positions of TAGs derived from Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1 and 20888.
Schizochytrium StrainEPA and DPA/DHA at the sn-1,3 PositionsEPA and DPA/DHA at the sn-2 Position
EPADPA/DHAEPADPA/DHA
Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1
0‰ salinity46.67 ± 3.5356.80 ± 3.0853.33 ± 2.8643.20 ± 2.78
5‰ salinity30.76 ± 2.6735.34 ± 2.7769.23 ± 4.3264.66 ± 2.58
10‰ salinity32.33 ± 2.8236.76 ± 2.3167.67 ± 2.5563.24 ± 4.02
20‰ salinity31.58 ± 2.6437.04 ± 2.6968.42 ± 3.5862.96 ± 2.96
40‰ salinity35.45 ± 3.0518.76 ± 1.5864.55 ± 3.0681.24 ± 4.05
Schizochytrium sp. 20888
5‰ salinity57.69 ± 2.5638.46 ± 2.4742.31 ± 1.9661.54 ± 2.66
10‰ salinity32.08 ± 2.5335.46 ± 1.9867.92 ± 2.5564.54 ± 2.07
20‰ salinity51.10 ± 2.6632.05 ± 2.3848.90 ± 2.7567.95 ± 3.81
40‰ salinity48.25 ± 2.9631.15 ± 1.6351.75 ± 2.8268.84 ± 3.02
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ye, S.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Xiao, X.; Liu, P.; Chi, C.; Sun, P.; Zheng, M.; Chen, B.; Mao, R.; et al. Effects of Salinity on the Growth Performance and Docosahexaenoic Acid Positional Distribution in Triacylglycerols of the Newly Isolated Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1. Mar. Drugs 2025, 23, 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23070260

AMA Style

Ye S, Wang X, Zhou Y, Xiao X, Liu P, Chi C, Sun P, Zheng M, Chen B, Mao R, et al. Effects of Salinity on the Growth Performance and Docosahexaenoic Acid Positional Distribution in Triacylglycerols of the Newly Isolated Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1. Marine Drugs. 2025; 23(7):260. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23070260

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ye, Sitong, Xiaonan Wang, Youcai Zhou, Xuehua Xiao, Pingying Liu, Chengdeng Chi, Peipei Sun, Mingmin Zheng, Bilian Chen, Ruoyu Mao, and et al. 2025. "Effects of Salinity on the Growth Performance and Docosahexaenoic Acid Positional Distribution in Triacylglycerols of the Newly Isolated Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1" Marine Drugs 23, no. 7: 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23070260

APA Style

Ye, S., Wang, X., Zhou, Y., Xiao, X., Liu, P., Chi, C., Sun, P., Zheng, M., Chen, B., Mao, R., & He, Y. (2025). Effects of Salinity on the Growth Performance and Docosahexaenoic Acid Positional Distribution in Triacylglycerols of the Newly Isolated Schizochytrium sp. FJ-1. Marine Drugs, 23(7), 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23070260

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop