Next Article in Journal
Physiological Effects of Oxidative Stress Caused by Saxitoxin in the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans
Next Article in Special Issue
Insights on the UV-Screening Potential of Marine-Inspired Thiol Compounds
Previous Article in Journal
Preparation and Characterization of an Oyster Peptide–Zinc Complex and Its Antiproliferative Activity on HepG2 Cells
Previous Article in Special Issue
The Anti-Photoaging Activity of Peptides from Pinctada martensii Meat
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 21
Issue 10
10.3390/md21100543
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Isolation and Structure Elucidation of Novel Mycosporine-like Amino Acids from the Two Intertidal Red Macroalgae Bostrychia scorpioides and Catenella caespitosa

by
Maria Orfanoudaki
1,
Mostafa Alilou
1,
Anja Hartmann
1,
Julia Mayr
1,
Ulf Karsten
2,
Hieu Nguyen-Ngoc
1,3,4 and
Markus Ganzera
1,*
1
Institute of Pharmacy, Pharmacognosy, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 80-82, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria
2
Institute of Biological Sciences, Applied Ecology & Phycology, University of Rostock, Albert-Einstein-Str. 3, 18059 Rostock, Germany
3
Faculty of Pharmacy, Phenikaa University, Hanoi 12116, Vietnam
4
A&A Green Phoenix Group JSC, Phenikaa Research and Technology Institute (PRATI), No.167 Hoang Ngan, Trung Hoa, Cau Giay, Hanoi 11313, Vietnam
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2023, 21(10), 543; https://doi.org/10.3390/md21100543
Submission received: 22 September 2023 / Revised: 12 October 2023 / Accepted: 15 October 2023 / Published: 18 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Photoprotective Compounds from Marine Organisms)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This study presents a phytochemical survey of two common intertidal red algal species, Bostrychia scorpioides and Catenella caespitosa, regarding their MAA (mycosporine-like amino acid) composition, which are known as biogenic sunscreen compounds. Six novel MAAs from Bostrychia scorpioides named bostrychines and two novel MAAs from Catenella caespitosa named catenellines were isolated using a protocol which included silica gel column chromatography, flash chromatography on reversed phase material and semipreparative HPLC (High-Performance Liquid Chromatography). The structure of the novel MAAs was elucidated using NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) and HR-MS (High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry), and their absolute configuration was confirmed by ECD (Electronic Circular Dichroism). All isolated MAAs possess a cyclohexenimine scaffold, and the metabolites from B. scorpioides are related to the known MAAs bostrychines A-F, which contain glutamine, glutamic acid and/or threonine in their side chains. The new MAAs from C. caespitosa contain taurine, an amino sulfonic acid that is also present in another MAA isolated from this species, namely, catenelline. Previous and new data confirm that intertidal red algae are chemically rich in MAAs, which explains their high tolerance against biologically harmful ultraviolet radiation.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Bostrychia scorpioides (Hudson) Montagne ex Kützing and Catenella caespitosa (Withering) L. M. Irvine are two of the most common red macroalgae growing in the intertidal zone of estuarine to marine coasts in Europe [1].
Bostrychia scorpioides is the only species out of 40 accepted taxa of the genus Bostrychia abundant on European coasts [2,3]. It is an Atlantic estuarine and marine species living as epiphyte on salt marsh plants such as Halimione portulacoides in the upper intertidal from the British Isles to Morocco. Other Bostrychia species mainly occur as epiphytes on mangrove root systems in warm-temperate to tropical regions [4]. These algae tolerate long periods of desiccation during the tidal cycle due to their high-shore position [5], and they survive several weeks exposed to air by adjusting the intracellular solute content, resulting in partial or complete turgor regulation. This is achieved by changing internal concentrations of the main ions K+, Na+ and Cl− and adopting in the organic osmolyte content such as polyols (sorbitol and dulcitol), amino acids or quaternary ammonium compounds [2]. Additionally, B. scorpioides produces a set of unique mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs), bostrychines A to F (approximately 2–10 mg/g of dry weight in total) [6,7], compounds with established photoprotective but questionable osmoprotective properties [8]. Because of its high number of representatives of this compound class (eight to twelve MAAs), it stands out among other red algae of the same biogeographic region [9] or other Bostrychia species from all over the world. B. scorpioides has also been reported to produce a high number of the carotenoids violaxanthin, zeaxanthin and β-carotene (in total, 0.65 mg/g DW) and a significantly increased concentration of phycoerythrin and chlorophyll a in summer, as compared to in winter, possibly due to the higher exposure to light radiation and desiccation stress [9].
Only five species of the genus Catenella have been accepted taxonomically [3]. One of them, C. caespitosa, has a wide biogeographic distribution in Europe and America, and it grows on sheltered shady rocks or sediment between high tide levels and supralittoral zones [1,10]. Catenelline, a sulfonic acid-bearing MAA, has been isolated as the main MAA from the former species Catenella repens (synonym of C. caespitosa) with an amount ranging from 0.3–1.8 mg/g of dry weight, but at least one additional but unknown MAA is reported to be present in lower amounts [10].
The main focus of the present study was to complete the phytochemical profile of two intertidal red macroalgae found in Europe, B. scorpioides and C. caespitosa. Previous studies indicated that both produce MAAs, which had not been identified [6,10]. Thus, this study focused on the isolation of yet-unexplored UV-sunscreen molecules.
MAAs are water soluble, colourless secondary metabolites found in variety of marine and aquatic organisms including algae, bacteria, fungi, lichens, corals, sponges, sea urchins, scallop and fish [11,12,13] in order to mitigate the harmful effects of UV irradiation [14], as well as desiccation or osmotic stress [15]. They also serve as nitrogen reservoirs during nitrogen limitation [16]. They have a 5-hydroxy-5-hydroxymethyl-cyclohex-1, 2-ene ring structure and a methoxy-substituent in C2, and they are further substituted by a variety of amino acids or other substituents at positions 1 and 3 [14,17]. Some terrestrial organisms, e.g., the cyanobacterium Nostoc commune [18], green algae of the genera Coelastrella [19], Interfilum and Klebsormidium [20] and the terrestrial fungus Pyronema omphalodes [21] produce MAAs too, which are in most cases glycosylated [18,20,21]. Depending on the substitution at position 1, they can be divided into the cyclohexenone type, with an absorption maximum at 310 nm in the UV-B range, or the cyclohexenimine type, with a maximum in the UV-A region (320–360 nm) [14,18,20]. The have high molar absorption coefficients (ε = 12.400–58.800 M−1·cm−1) [22]. Their biosynthetic pathways include either the shikimate or pentose phosphate pathway [17].
MAAs are commercially attractive compounds since they are biocompatible, biodegradable and have no toxic properties [23,24]. Some commercial formulations such as Helioguard®365 and Helionori® contain them as active ingredients [25]. They show a promising future for applications in the pharmaceutical and cosmetic industries as natural sunscreens and anti-photoaging molecules, being in demand because of the rapid increase in skin damage in humans due to UV radiation [26] and the harmful effects of synthetic sunscreens on human health and the environment [14,23]. Unfortunately, the utilization of their biological sources for the mass production of these economically important molecules has been hindered because of the incomplete understanding of their effect on human skin and their low abundance in the producing organisms [13,17]. Algaculture, biotechnology or semisynthetic approaches could be alternatives for overcoming the supply issue [17,27].

2. Results

2.1. Isolation

The combined aqueous and methanolic extracts of B. scorpioides and C. caespitosa were first fractionated on a silica gel column in order to remove non-polar constituents such as chlorophylls in the early eluting fractions and sugars in the later, more polar fractions so as to obtain MAA-enriched fractions (details in Section 4.2). This initial step was followed by separations using reversed phase material on flash chromatography and semipreparative HPLC. The purification procedure resulted in the isolation of six novel compounds from B. scorpioides and two novel compounds from C. caespitosa.

2.2. Structure Elucidation

Characteristic NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) shifts of compound 1 (Table 1 and Table 2) indicated the presence of a cyclohexenimine-type MAA scaffold. The side chain was identified as glutamine based on a COSY (Correlation Spectroscopy) chain correlation of H-9/H-11/H-12 and two carbonyl groups at δC 179.5 and 181.1 and by comparison with the literature values [6]. Its position was confirmed by long-range correlations visible in the HMBC (Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation) spectrum (H-9 at δH 4.21 to C-3 at δC 161.7). Specifically, a methine group at δH 4.21 (H-9) showed a correlation in the COSY spectrum with the protons of the methylene at δH 2.18 and δH 2.27 (H-11) and an HMBC correlation with the carbonyl group at δC 179.5 (C-10). Furthermore, the protons of the methylene at C-12 (δH 2.45) showed a correlation in the COSY spectrum with the protons of the methylene at position 11 (δH 2.18 and 2.27) and an HMBC correlation with the carbonyl group at δC 181.1 (C-13). However, the 1H-NMR spectrum revealed extra signals, two doublets of doublets of a methylene at δH 3.44/3.51 (H-1′), a multiplet of an oxygenated methine at δH 4.03 (H-2′) and a doublet of a methyl-group at δH 1.24 (J = 6.4 Hz, H-3′), which showed a correlation in the COSY spectrum (H-1′/H-2′/H-3′). These signals, in addition to the HMBC connectivities (H-3′/C-2′ and C-1′, H-1′/C-2′ and C-3′), indicated the presence of a threamine moiety. The HMBC correlation of the same proton (H-1′) to carbon C-1 at δC 163.5 confirmed that threamine is attached to position C-1. The two amino acid residues of the side chains of this MAA have already been observed individually in other MAAs; glutamine has been found in MAAs from B. scorpioides—for example, in bostrychines A and B [6], while threamine is a constituent of the MAAs aplysiapalythine A and bostrychine E [6,28].
The advanced Marfey’s method, an established LC-MS (Liquid Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry)-based procedure for determining the absolute configuration, has confirmed the presence of l-glutamic acid and R-threamine as constituent of other MAAs in this species [7]. In order to determine the absolute stereochemistry of C-5, geometrical optimization followed by ECD (Electronic Circular Dichroism) calculation at the m062x/6−31 + g(d,p)/smd//wb97xd/6−31 + g(d,p) level in H2O resulted in an ECD spectrum showing a high similarity to the experimentally obtained spectrum. The absolute configuration was established as 5R,1′S,3′R, and therefore, compound 1 (Figure 1) was finally identified as a new MAA, (S)-5-amino-2-(((S,E)-5-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)-3-(((R)-2-hydroxypropyl)amino)-2-methoxycyclohex-2-en-1-ylidene)ammonio)-5-oxopentanoate, with the molecular formula C16H27N3O7 (high-resolution MS data: for [M + H]+, m/z = 374.1911; calculated for C16H28N3O7, 374.1927), for which we propose the trivial name bostrychine G.
Compound 2 was assigned the molecular formula C16H27N3O7, as established by a positive ion (for [M + H]+, m/z = 374.1913; calculated for C16H28N3O7, 374.1927) in the HR-MS (High-Resolution–Mass Spectrometry) spectrum. Characteristic NMR chemical shifts indicated the presence of a cyclohexenimine-type MAA. The side chain was identified as threonine based on a COSY chain correlation of H-1′/H-3′/H-4′ and a carbonyl group at δC 178.3 and by comparison with the literature values. Its position was confirmed by long-range correlations visible in the HMBC spectrum (H-1′ at δH 4.05 to C-3 at δC 162.2). The COSY spectrum revealed an extra coupling network, including the protons of three methylene units H-9/H-10/H-11. Additionally, HMBC correlations of H-10 (δH 1.96) and H-11 (δH 2.39) to a carbonyl group at δC 180.7 (C-12) revealed the presence of 4-aminobutanamide as a side chain (Figure 2). An HMBC correlation of proton H-9 (δH 3.51) to carbon C-1 at δC 163.4 indicated at which position the 4-aminobutanamide moiety is attached to the cyclohexenimine scaffold. The advanced Marfey’s method of bostrychines B, D and F has shown the presence of l-threonine as a constituent of the final product of the reaction, indicating that this amino acid residue in the MAA has an l-configuration [7]. The determination of the absolute stereochemistry of compound 2 by geometrical optimization followed by ECD calculation at the m062x/6−31 + g(d,p)/smd//wb97xd/6−31 + g(d,p) level in H2O resulted in an ECD spectrum showing an excellent match with the experimentally obtained spectrum, therefore establishing the absolute configuration as 5R,1′S,3′R. Compound 2 was finally identified as a new MAA, (2S,3R)-2-(((R,1E,3E)-3-((4-amino-4-oxobutyl)-l4-azaneylidene)-5-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methoxycyclohexan-2-ylium-1-ylidene)-l4-azaneyl)-3-hydroxybutanoate, for which we propose the trivial name bostrychine H.
Compounds 3 and 4 had similar retention times in the HPLC chromatogram (Figure 3), and they were obtained as a mixture. The integration of the signals in the 1H-NMR spectra showed that the relative ratio of the two compounds was 0.7:1 (compound 3: compound 4). The side chain of both compounds at position 3 was identified as glutamine based on COSY chain correlations of H-9/H-11/H-12 and characteristic NMR values which were in accordance with the literature values. The second side chain of compound 3 contained a cis conformation double bond, which was indicated by characteristic 1H-NMR (H-1′, δH 6.39 and H-2′, δH 5.42) and 13C-NMR (C-1′, δC 124.7 and C-2′, δC 120.3) values and the coupling constants of H-1′ (J = 8.0/1.2 Hz). Moreover, a methyl group at δH 1.78 (H-3′) showed a correlation in the COSY spectrum with the protons of H-2′ at δH 5.42 and an HMBC correlation with the carbons of the double bond at δC 120.3 and 124.7 (C-2′ and C-1′), revealing the presence of a propene side group. Its position was confirmed by long-range correlations visible in the HMBC spectrum (H-1′ at δH 6.39 to C-1 at δC 158.0). The NMR signals of compound 4 were highly similar to those of compound 3. However, protons H-1′ and H-2′ were deshielded (H-1′, δH 6.57 and H-2′, δH 5.77), and the coupling constants of H-1′ were higher (J = 13.6/2.0 Hz), indicating that the conformation of the double bond was trans. Thus, compounds 3 and 4 were identified as (2S)-5-amino-2-(((1E,3E)-5-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methoxy-3-(((Z)-prop-1-en-1-yl)-l4-azaneylidene)cyclohexan-2-ylium-1-ylidene)-l4-azaneyl)-5-oxopentanoate and (2S)-5-amino-2-(((1E,3E)-5-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methoxy-3-(((E)-prop-1-en-1-yl)-l4-azaneylidene)cyclohexan-2-ylium-1-ylidene)-l4-azaneyl)-5-oxopentanoate, respectively. They are new MAAs with the molecular formula C16H25N3O6 (high-resolution MS data: [M + H] + = 356.1808; calculated for C16H26N3O6, 356.1822, Figure S20) and the proposed trivial names bostrychines I and J, respectively.
Compounds 5 and 6 were obtained as a mixture, and the integration of the signals in the 1H-NMR spectrum indicated that they were present in almost equal concentrations. Additionally, the NMR shifts were highly similar to those of compounds 3 and 4, with the exception of the carbon atoms C-12 and C-13, which were slightly deshielded, indicating the presence of a carboxylic acid at position C-13 instead of an amide functionality. Furthermore, the HRMS data indicated the molecular formula C16H24N2O7 (for [M + H]+, m/z = 357.1648; calculated for C16H25N2O7, 357.1662), which confirmed the presence of glutamic acid at C-3 of the cyclohexenimine structure. Compounds 5 and 6 were finally identified as (2S)-4-carboxy-2-(((1E,3E)-5-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methoxy-3-(((Z)-prop-1-en-1-yl)-l4-azaneylidene)cyclohexan-2-ylium-1-ylidene)-l4-azaneyl)butanoate and (2S)-4-carboxy-2-(((1E,3E)-5-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methoxy-3-(((E)-prop-1-en-1-yl)-l4-azaneylidene)cyclohexan-2-ylium-1-ylidene)-l4-azaneyl)butanoate, for which we propose the trivial names bostrychines K and L.
When analyzing the C. caespitosa extract by HPLC, compound 7 eluted after catenelline (Figure 4), and characteristic NMR shifts indicated the presence of a cyclohexenimine-type MAA, too. The side chain was identified as 2-aminoethane-1-sulfonic acid based on a COSY chain correlation of H-9/H-10 and by comparison with the literature values [9]. Its position was evidenced by long-range correlations visible in the HMBC spectrum (H-9 at δH 3.87 to C-3 at δC 163.3), and relevant connectivities are indicated by arrows in Figure 2. Specifically, a methylene group at δH 3.87 (H-9) showed a correlation in the COSY spectrum with the protons of the methylene at δH 3.23 (H-10), as well as a HMBC correlation with the carbon at δC 42.1 (C-10). 2-aminoethane-1-sulfonate has already been found as a moiety in catenelline. The latter was first described by Hartmann et al. in 2015 [12]. A comparison of the experimental and calculated spectrum at the m062x/6−31 + g(d,p)/smd//wb97xd/6−31 + g(d,p) level in the H2O of compound 7 (Figure 5) indicated the S chirality of C-5. Compound 7 was finally identified as a new MAA, (S,Z)-2-((3-(l4-azaneylidene)-5-hydroxy-5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methoxycyclohexan-2-ylium-1-ylidene)-l4-azaneyl)ethane-1-sulfonate, with the molecular formula: C10H18N2O6S (high-resolution MS data: for [M + H]+, m/z = 295.0947; calculated for C10H19N2O6S, 295.0964; Figure S32) and the proposed trivial name catenelline B.
The characteristic NMR shifts (Table 1 and Table 2) and 2D-NMR data of compound 8 indicated the same substructure as that of compound 7. However, the 1H-NMR spectrum showed two additional signals, two triplets at δH 3.60 (J 5.4 Hz, H-11) and δH 3.77 (J = 5.4 Hz, H-12). The protons of these two methylene groups showed a correlation in the COSY spectrum, and in the HMBC, the protons of H-11 showed a correlation with the carbon at δC 63.1 (C-12), revealing the presence of a 2-aminoethan-1-ol moiety. Furthermore, the HMBC correlation of the same proton (H-11) to carbon C-3 at δC 163.3 indicated that this side chain is attached to position C-3. The purity of this compound was approximately 70%; thus, the optical rotation value and the molar absorption coefficient (ε) were not determined. The ECD spectrum of compound 8 was highly similar to that of compound 7. The calculation of the ECD spectrum at the m062x/6−31 + g(d,p)/smd//wb97xd/6−31 + g(d,p) level in H2O and the comparison with the experimental spectrum in H2O resulted in deciphering the absolute stereochemistry as 5S. As the NMR data of all substructures were in good agreement with the literature values, compound 8 was finally identified as a new MAA, 2-(((S,1Z,3E)-5-hydroxy-3-((2-hydroxyethyl)-l4-azaneylidene)-5-(hydroxymethyl)-2-methoxycyclohexan-2-ylium-1-ylidene)-l4-azaneyl)ethane-1-sulfonate, with the molecular formula: C12H22N2O7S (high-resolution MS data: for [M + H]+, m/z = 339.1212; calculated for C12H23N2O7S, 339.1226), for which we propose the trivial name catenelline C.

2.3. Physical and Spectroscopic Data

2.3.1. Compound 1

Pale yellow amorphous powder; [α]21D = −14.8 (c 1, H2O); UV λmax = 334 nm; ε = 28,535 M−1·cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data (600/151 MHz; D2O), Table 1 and Table 2; ESIMS: [M + H]+, m/z = 374; HRESIMS: [M + H]+, m/z = 374.1911; calculated for C16H28N3O7, 374.1927).

2.3.2. Compound 2

Pale yellow amorphous powder; [α]21D = −10.2 (c 1, H2O); UV λmax = 334 nm; ε = 19,571 M−1·cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data (600/151 MHz; D2O), Table 1 and Table 2; ESIMS: [M + H]+, m/z = 374; HRESIMS: [M + H]+, m/z = 374.1913 (calculated for C16H28N3O7, 374.1927).

2.3.3. Compound 3

Pale yellow amorphous powder; UV λmax = 360 nm; 1H and 13C NMR data (600/151 MHz; D2O), Table 1 and Table 2; ESIMS: [M + H]+, m/z = 356; HRESIMS: [M + H]+, m/z = 356.1808 (calculated for C16H26N3O6, 356.1822).

2.3.4. Compound 4

Pale yellow amorphous powder; UV λmax = 360 nm; 1H and 13C NMR data (600/151 MHz; D2O), Table 1 and Table 2 ESIMS: [M + H]+, m/z = 356; HRESIMS: [M + H]+, m/z = 356.1808 (calculated for C16H26N3O6, 356.1822).

2.3.5. Compound 5

Pale yellow amorphous powder; UV λmax = 357 nm; 1H and 13C NMR data (600/151 MHz; D2O), Table 1 and Table 2; ESIMS m/z 357 [M + H]+; HRESIMS: m/z 357.1648 [M + H]+ (calculated for C16H25N2O7, 357.1662).

2.3.6. Compound 6

Pale yellow amorphous powder; UV λmax = 357 nm; 1H and 13C NMR data (600/151 MHz; D2O), Table 1 and Table 2; ESIMS: [M + H]+, m/z = 357; HRESIMS: [M + H]+, m/z = 357.1648 (calculated for C16H25N2O7, 357.1662).

2.3.7. Compound 7

Pale yellow amorphous powder; [α]21D = +59.7 (c 1, H2O); UV λmax = 320 nm; ε = 73,825 M−1·cm−1; 1H and 13C NMR data (600/151 MHz; D2O), Table 1 and Table 2; ESIMS: [M + H]+, m/z = 295; HRESIMS: [M + H]+, m/z = 295.0947 (calculated for C10H19N2O6S, 295.0964).

2.3.8. Compound 8

Pale yellow amorphous powder; UV λmax = 330 nm; 1H and 13C NMR data (600/151 MHz; D2O), Table 1 and Table 2; ESIMS: [M + H]+, m/z = 339; HRESIMS: [M + H]+, m/z = 339.1212 (calculated for C12H23N2O7S, 339.1226).

3. Discussion

Mycosporine-like amino acids are compounds with photoprotective, antioxidant [22], anti-inflammatory [29], wound-healing [30] and immunomodulatory [31] properties. The producing organisms are mainly various micro- and macroalgae, and the prevailing hypothesis is that they synthesize MAAs because they protect against the UV damages of sun irradiation and thermal stress [32]. They might also participate in the osmotic equilibrium, especially in photosymbiotic partnerships [33]. The osmotic function of MAAs in marine organisms, however, has been questioned because the intracellular concentrations are generally too low for a major contribution to the osmotic potential [34]. MAAs also have other physiological functions; they serve as antioxidants [32], ROS-scavengers [35,36], reproductive regulators [37] and an intracellular nitrogen reservoir [17], while some studies suggest that MAAs, especially in cyanobacteria, play a negligible role in the protection against UV radiation and might be involved in the formation of extracellular matrix and cell–cell interactions [38,39,40].
Recently, MAAs have attracted increasing attention, and there are a large number of patents in international databases for several products and methods with MAAs [22,29]. They offer a great potential for the development of novel UV sunscreens because of their direct and indirect protective properties. Therefore, the investigation of unexplored MAA-producing organisms and their unambiguous structure elucidation increase the understanding on chemical diversity [29]. It is noteworthy to mention that most of the MAAs utilized in these patents provide minimal protection in the more damaging UVB range. Additionally, the MAA concentration in the algal extract is often very low when compared to the concentration of other photoprotective ingredients in most sunscreen products [22,41]; thus, the identification of organisms producing higher yields of these metabolites or the preparation of semisynthetic analogues is very important.
In the present study, MAAs of two intertidal red macroalgae, B. scorpioides and C. caespitose, were investigated. The presence of these MAAs had been described in previous studies, although their isolation and structural assignment were not feasible previously [6,9,10]. After the usage of a slightly different isolation protocol in this study, six novel MAAs were obtained from B. scorpioides and two novel compounds were obtained from C. caespitosa using chromatographic techniques. Their structures were elucidated, and their stereochemistry was revealed after the combination of NMR and ECD experiments.
The newly isolated MAAs from B. scorpioides are related to the reported bostrychines A-F [6] since they contain the amino acid residues threonine, threamine, glutamine and glutamic acid in their side chains. Compounds 3–6 (bostrychines I to L) additionally contain (E)- and (Z)-prop-1-en-1-amine, which is also a substituent of the known MAAs usujirene [42] and palythene [43] and another MAA tentatively identified as dehydroxyl-usujirene [44]. It is notable that the latter three MAAs, along with the newly isolated bostrychines I-L, all containing an extra double bond in their side chain, have a λmax of 357–360 nm in water. This is uncommon since the majority of cyclohexenimine-type MAAs have an λmax of 325–337 nm in the same solvent, while those with a cyclohexenone scaffold show a maximum absorption of around 310–324 nm in water [22,33,45]. Regarding the MAAs isolated from C. caespitosa, both compounds contained taurine in their side chain, which is also reported to be a moiety of catenelline, isolated from the same species previously [10]. Additionally, there is a high similarity of catenelline B and mycosporine-taurine isolated from the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima, with the difference being that the first MAA possesses the cyclohexenimine scaffold (λmax: 320 nm in water), whereas the second one possesses the cyclohexenone scaffold (λmax: 309 nm) [46].
Bostrychia scorpioides is an ecologically fascinating red alga, as it grows as an epiphyte on the basal stems of saltmarsh vegetation. Consequently, it is immersed by seawater only during extreme high tides and hence exhibits a rather atmophytic lifestyle due to long periods of exposure to air, leading to enhanced desiccation and osmotic and radiation stress [6]. These stressors can be well compensated by various ecophysiological and biochemical traits. Most important is the capability to synthesize and accumulate protective organic compounds like the polyols sorbitol and dulcitol [2]. In addition, B. scorpioides is regularly confronted with high solar insolation including ultraviolet radiation (UVR). UVR affects various biological functions in living organisms, and extensive exposure can lead to significant stress and deleterious effects at the molecular and cellular level [47,48,49]. Adaptive mechanisms against enhanced UVR typically include in many micro- and macroalgae photoprotective MAAs [50]. Most algae investigated so far typically contain a small set of MAAs (one to five) [9,51], while B. scorpioides exhibited at least twelve chemically different MAAs, named in a previous publication and in the present publication as bostrychines A to L [6,7]. The biosynthesis of each of these MAAs requires individual enzymatic steps [8,52], and hence, the question arises of why this red alga invests so much metabolic energy for the formation of such an array of chemically similar compounds. As we can only speculate at this stage, it might be possible that bostrychines A to L all exhibit slightly different functions as anti-stress compounds, i.e., some act as UV-sunscreens and others as antioxidants.
Catenella caespitosa also grows as an intertidal species mainly exposed to the atmosphere. Although it can occur as epiphyte on saltmarsh plants, too, this species preferentially grows in the upper littoral zone on exposed rocky shores. For salinity acclimation, C. caespitosa uses as an organic osmolyte floridoside, and for UVR protection, it uses the previously identified MAA catenelline [10]. In the present study, two additional and chemically related MAAs (catenelline B and C) were identified, which might also be involved in the protection against UVR and oxygen radicals.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Biological Material

The algae investigated in this study were collected in 2018 next to Roscoff, Brittany, France and morphologically identified by some of the authors (Maria Orfanoudaki, Anja Hartmann and Markus Ganzera), together with Ulf Karsten, from the University of Rostock, Germany, using their taxonomic expert knowledge in conjunction with standard identification keys [3,53]. Voucher samples were deposited at the Institute of Pharmacy, Pharmacognosy, University of Innsbruck, Austria (B. scorpioides) and at the University of Rostock, Germany (C. caespitosa).

4.2. Extraction and Isolation

The combined aqueous and methanolic extract of B. scorpioides was first fractionated on a silica gel column, followed by further purification using flash chromatography on reversed phase material and semipreparative HPLC. The procedure resulted in the isolation of six compounds. The same extraction and isolation protocol was used for the isolation and identification of MAAs from C. caespitosa, with the addition of column chromatography on Sephadex LH-20 as the last purification step.
B. scorpioides (approximately 350 g) was extracted three times in an ultrasonic bath (Bandelin Sonorex 35 KHz, Berlin, Germany) for 15 min successively with methanol and water (100%). Afterwards, the combined and dried extract (50 g) was fractionated on a silica gel column using EtOAc and methanol (from 10:0 to 0:10) as the eluent, resulting in 15 subfractions, in order to remove non-polar constituents such as chlorophylls in the early eluting fractions and sugars in the polar fractions. The HPLC analysis of the fractions indicated that fractions 9–12 contained MAAs; therefore, they were combined and used for further purification. This collective fraction (approximately 15 g) was separated with reversed phase flash chromatography using water–methanol (10:0–0:10) to give ten subfractions. Subfraction 6 (5 g) was subjected to semipreparative HPLC (H2O-MeOH) to yield compounds 1 (2 mg, 0.0006% yield) and 2 (2 mg, 0.0006% yield). Subfraction 7 (4 g) was also separated by semipreparative HPLC (H2O-MeOH) to give a mixture of compounds 3 and 4 (9.2 mg, 0.003% yield) and a mixture of compounds 5 and 6 (0.9 mg, 0.0003% yield).
C. caespitosa (approximately 500 g) was extracted as described above. The combined methanolic and water extract (40 g) was fractionated on a silica gel column using EtOAc and methanol (from 10:0 to 0:10), resulting in 19 subfractions. The HPLC analysis of the fractions indicated that fractions 9–11 contained MAAs; therefore, they were pooled and used for further fractionation. The combined fractions 9–11 (approximately 12 g) were separated with reversed phase flash chromatography using water–methanol (10:0–0:10) to give 7 subfractions. The further purification of subfraction 2 (2 g) via semipreparative HPLC (H2O acidified with 0.1% formic acid-MeOH) and column chromatography on Sephadex LH-20 with methanol–water (3:1) resulted in the isolation of compounds 7 (8.8 mg, 0.002% yield) and 8 (1.1 mg, 0.0002% yield).

4.3. Instrumentation

4.3.1. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

NMR experiments were performed on a Bruker Avance II 600 spectrometer (Karlsruhe, Germany) operating at 600.19 (1H) and 150.91 MHz (13C). The isolated compounds were dissolved in D2O using tetramethylsilane (TMS) as an internal standard.

4.3.2. Mass Spectrometry

High-resolution mass spectra were measured with an Exploris 120 Orbitrap mass spectrometer (Thermo, MA, USA). The experiments were performed in positive ESI mode with the following parameters: capillary energy: 3500 V; sheath gas: 2 U; aux gas: 2 U and a vaporizer temperature of 250 °C; the recorded scan range was 100–600 m/z and the Orbitrap resolution was set to 15,000. Low-resolution mass spectra were recorded on an Agilent InfinityLab LC/MSD System. It comprised an Agilent 1260 HPLC, equipped with a binary pump, autosampler, column oven and photodiode array detector (Santa Clara, CA, USA).

4.3.3. Other Techniques Utilized

Optical rotations were measured with a P-2000 polarimeter (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan) using a 10.0 cm tube and water as the solvent. ECD experiments were conducted on a J-1500 spectrophotometer (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan). For the purification of compounds, a Reveleris® X2 iES flash chromatography system (Büchi, Flawil, Switzerland) and a semi-preparative UltiMate 3000 HPLC from Dionex (Thermo, Waltham, MA, USA), comprising a P580 pump, an ASI 100 automated sample injector, an UVD 170 U detector and a fraction collector, were used. Sephadex LH-20 material was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MI, USA). Analytical HPLC experiments were performed on an LC-20AD XR System (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan). UV spectra and molar absorption coefficients were measured with a Shimadzu UV 1800 instrument after the dissolution in water, the blank (water) measurement, the measurement of the absorbance at λmax and the conversion to ε according to the Beer–Lambert law.

4.4. Calculation of Electronic Circular Dichroism Spectra and Optical Rotation Calculation

3D structures of isolated compounds were drawn in Maestro (Schrödinger. LLC, New York, NY, USA) and subjected to conformational analysis using MacroModel 9.1 (Schrödinger. LLC) and OPLS-3 as a force field in water by the implementation of the Monte Carlo method. For the geometrical optimization and energy calculation of conformers occurring in an energy window of 2 Kcal·mol−1, the same methods as those in our previous publication on MAAs were utilized [30]. Briefly, geometry optimizations were conducted at DFT/wb97xd/6−31 + g(d,p) in the gas phase, followed by the calculation of ECD spectra at the TD--DFT/wb97xd/6−31 + g(d,p) level using SMD (Solvation Model Density) in water, using Gaussian 16 (Revision A.03, Gaussian, Wallingford, CT, USA 2016). The obtained ECD spectra (with a half-band of 0.25–0.3 eV and a UV shift of 8–20 nm) were Boltzmann-averaged and scaled spectra compared with the experimental spectra obtained in water.

4.5. Chemicals

All of the solvents required for the extraction and isolation were purchased from VWR International (Vienna, Austria), and ethyl acetate (EtOAc) was distilled before use. The solvents for the analytical experiments a had pro analysis (p.a.) quality at least and were obtained from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany). Deuterated solvents were supplied by Euriso-Top (Saint-Aubin, France). Ultrapure water was produced by a Sartorius Arium® 611 UV (Göttingen, Germany) purification system. Silica gel 40–63 µm and pre-packed cartridges for flash chromatography were purchased from Merck (Darmstadt, Germany) and Büchi (Flawil, Switzerland), respectively.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/md21100543/s1, HRMS spectra, 1D and 2D NMR spectra of all the new compounds 1–8, population of Boltzmann-averaged conformers of compounds 1, 2, 7 and 8 as well as UV spectra of the isolated MAAs.

Author Contributions

M.O. carried out all the practical work, along with M.A., H.N.-N. and J.M., and prepared the first draft of the manuscript; M.A. performed the ECD calculation; U.K., A.H. and M.G. supervised M.O., helped with all the methodological approaches and finalized the paper along with the other co-authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF), project No. P29671.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Raw data discussed in this study are available in Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully thank Svenja Heesch (Station Biologique de Roscoff), Vivien Hotter (Institute of Biological Sciences, Applied Ecology & Phycology, University of Rostock), Stefanie Hofer (Institute of Pharmacy, Pharmacognosy, University of Innsbruck) and the employees of Station Biologique de Roscoff, France for their assistance during the collection of the plant material. Open Access Funding by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ruiz-Nieto, M.; Fernández, J.A.; Niell, F.X.; Carmona, R. Mechanisms of inorganic carbon acquisition in two estuarine Rhodophyceans: Bostrychia scorpioides (Hudson) ex Kützing Montagne and Catenella caespitosa (Withering) L. M. Irvine. Photosynth. Res. 2014, 121, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Karsten, U.; Kirst, G.O. Incomplete turgor pressure regulation in the “terrestial” red alga, Bostrychia scorpioides (Huds.) Mont. Plant Sci. 1989, 61, 29–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guiry, M.D.; Guiry, G.M. AlgaeBase. World-Wide Electronic Publication. National University of Ireland: Galway. Available online: http://www.algaebase.org (accessed on 24 March 2023).
  4. Maggs, C.A.; Hommersand, M.H. Seaweed of the British Isles; Rhodophyta. Part 3A, Ceramiales; HMSO: London, UK, 1993; Volume 1, 444p. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mercado, J.; Niell, F.X. Carbon dioxide uptake by Bostrychia scorpioides (Rhodophyceae) under emersed conditions. Eur. J. Phycol. 2000, 35, 45–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Orfanoudaki, M.; Hartmann, A.; Miladinovic, H.; Nguyen Ngoc, H.; Karsten, U.; Ganzera, M. Bostrychines A-F, six novel mycosporine-like amino-acids and a novel betaine from the red alga Bostrychia scorpioides. Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Orfanoudaki, M.; Hartmann, A.; Mayr, J.; Figueroa, F.L.; Vega, J.; West, J.; Bermejo, R.; Maggs, C.; Ganzera, M. Analysis of the mycosporine-like amino acid (MAA) pattern of the salt marsh red alga Bostrychia scorpioides. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Carreto, J.I.; Carignan, M.O. Mycosporine-like amino acids: Relevant secondary metabolites. Chemical and ecological aspects. Mar. Drugs 2011, 9, 387–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Lalegerie, F.; Lajili, S.; Bedoux, G.; Taupin, L.; Stiger-Pouvreau, V.; Connan, S. Photo-protective compounds in red macroalgae from Brittany: Considerable diversity in mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs). Mar. Environ. Res. 2019, 147, 37–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hartmann, A.; Becker, K.; Karsten, U.; Remias, D.; Ganzera, M. Analysis of mycosporine-like amino acids in selected algae and cyanobacteria by hydrophilic interaction liquid chromatography and a novel MAA from the red alga Catenella repens. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 6291–6305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Karentz, D.; McEuen, F.S.; Land, M.C.; Dunlap, W.C. Survey of mycosporine-like amino acid compounds in Antarctic marine organisms: Potential protection from ultraviolet exposure. Mar. Biol. 1991, 108, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Shick, J.M.; Dunlap, W.C. Mycosporine-like amino acids and related gadusols: Biosynthesis, accumulation, and UV-protective functions in aquatic organisms. Annu. Rev. Physiol. 2002, 64, 223–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chrapusta, E.; Kaminski, A.; Duchnik, K.; Bober, B.; Adamski, M.; Bialczyk, J. Mycosporine-like amino acids: Potential health and beauty ingredients. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Singh, A.; Čížková, M.; Bišová, K.; Vítová, M. Exploring mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) as safe and natural protective agents against UV-induced skin damage. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Mogany, T.; Kumari, S.; Swalaha, F.M.; Bux, F. In silico analysis of enzymes involved in mycosporine-like amino acids biosynthesis in Euhalothece sp.: Structural and functional characterization. Algal Res. 2022, 66, 102806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oren, A.; Gunde-Cimerman, N. Mycosporines and mycosporine-like amino acids: UV protectants or multipurpose secondary metabolites? FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2007, 269, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Raj, S.; Kuniyil, A.M.; Sreenikethanam, A.; Gugulothu, P.; Jeyakumar, R.B.; Bajhaiya, A.K. Microalgae as a source of mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs); Advances and future prospects. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 12402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nazifi, E.; Wada, N.; Asano, T.; Nishiuchi, T.; Iwamuro, Y.; Chinaka, S.; Matsugo, S.; Sakamoto, T. Characterization of the chemical diversity of glycosylated mycosporine-like amino acids in the terrestrial cyanobacterium Nostoc commune. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2015, 142, 154–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zaytseva, A.; Chekanov, K.; Zaytsev, P.; Bakhareva, D.; Gorelova, O.; Kochkin, D.; Lobakova, E. Sunscreen effect exerted by secondary carotenoids and mycosporine-like amino acids in the aeroterrestrial chlorophyte Coelastrella rubescens under high light and UV-A irradiation. Plants 2021, 10, 2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hartmann, A.; Glaser, K.; Holzinger, A.; Ganzera, M.; Karsten, U. Klebsormidin A and B, two new UV-sunscreen compounds in green microalgal Interfilum and Klebsormidium species (Streptophyta) from terrestrial habitats. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bernillon, J.; Bouillant, M.-L.; Pittet, J.-L.; Favre-Bonvin, J.; Arpin, N. Mycosporine glutamine and related mycosporines in the fungus Pyronema omphalodes. Phytochemistry 1984, 23, 1083–1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Geraldes, V.; Pinto, E. Mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs): Biology, chemistry and identification features. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rosic, N.; Climstein, M.; Boyle, G.M.; Thanh Nguyen, D.; Feng, Y. Exploring mycosporine-like amino acid UV-absorbing natural products for a new generation of environmentally friendly sunscreens. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sen, S.; Mallick, N. Mycosporine-like amino acids: Algal metabolites shaping the safety and sustainability profiles of commercial sunscreens. Algal Res. 2021, 58, 102425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Schmid, D.; Schürch, C.; Zülli, F. Mycosporine-like amino acids from red algae protect against premature skin-aging. Euro Cosmet. 2006, 9, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  26. Umar, S.A.; Tasduq, S.A. Ozone layer depletion and emerging public health concerns — an update on epidemiological perspective of the ambivalent effects of ultraviolet radiation exposure. Front. Oncol. 2022, 12, 866733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Vega, J.; Schneider, G.; Moreira, B.R.; Herrera, C.; Bonomi-Barufi, J.; Figueroa, F.L. Mycosporine-like amino acids from red macroalgae: UV-photoprotectors with potential cosmeceutical applications. Appl. Sci. 2021, 11, 5112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kamio, M.; Kicklighter, C.E.; Nguyen, L.; Germann, M.W.; Derby, C.D. Isolation and structural elucidation of novel mycosporine-like amino acids as alarm cues in the defensive ink secretion of the sea hare Aplysia californica. Helv. Chim. Acta 2011, 94, 1012–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kageyama, H.; Waditee-Sirisattha, R. Chapter 5—Mycosporine-like amino acids as multifunctional secondary metabolites in cyanobacteria: From biochemical to application aspects. In Studies in Natural Products Chemistry; Attaur, R., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2018; Volume 59, pp. 153–194. [Google Scholar]
  30. Orfanoudaki, M.; Hartmann, A.; Alilou, M.; Gelbrich, T.; Planchenault, P.; Derbré, S.; Schinkovitz, A.; Richomme, P.; Hensel, A.; Ganzera, M. Absolute configuration of mycosporine-like amino acids, their wound healing properties and in vitro anti-aging effects. Mar. Drugs 2019, 18, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Becker, K.; Hartmann, A.; Ganzera, M.; Fuchs, D.; Gostner, J.M. Immunomodulatory effects of the mycosporine-like amino acids shinorine and porphyra-334. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Wada, N.; Sakamoto, T.; Matsugo, S. Mycosporine-like amino acids and their derivatives as natural antioxidants. Antioxidants 2015, 4, 603–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. La Barre, S.; Roullier, C.; Boustie, J. Mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) in biological photosystems. In Outstanding Marine Molecules; La Barre, S., Kornprobst, J.M., Eds.; Wiley: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 333–360. [Google Scholar]
  34. Karsten, U. Defense Strategies of algae and cyanobacteria against solar ultraviolet radiation. In Algal Chemical Ecology; Amsler, C.D., Ed.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 273–296. [Google Scholar]
  35. Singh, D.K.; Pathak, J.; Pandey, A.; Rajneesh; Singh, V.; Sinha, R.P. Purification, characterization and assessment of stability, reactive oxygen species scavenging and antioxidative potentials of mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs) isolated from cyanobacteria. J. Appl. Phycol. 2022, 34, 3157–3175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Matsui, K.; Nazifi, E.; Kunita, S.; Wada, N.; Matsugo, S.; Sakamoto, T. Novel glycosylated mycosporine-like amino acids with radical scavenging activity from the cyanobacterium Nostoc commune. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2011, 105, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Gorbushina, A.A.; Whitehead, K.; Dornieden, T.; Niesse, A.; Schulte, A.; Hedges, J.I. Black fungal colonies as units of survival: Hyphal mycosporines synthesized by rock-dwelling microcolonial fungi. Can. J. Bot. 2003, 81, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Hu, C.; Völler, G.; Süßmuth, R.; Dittmann, E.; Kehr, J.-C. Functional assessment of mycosporine-like amino acids in Microcystis aeruginosa strain PCC 7806. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 17, 1548–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Hu, C.; Ludsin, S.A.; Martin, J.F.; Dittmann, E.; Lee, J. Mycosporine-like amino acids (MAAs)—Producing microcystis in Lake Erie: Development of a qPCR assay and insight into its ecology. Harmful Algae 2018, 77, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Hu, C. Chapter 11—Mycosporine-like amino acids in the freshwater bloom-forming cyanobacterium Microcystis: Detection, biosynthesis, genetic markers, and biofunctions. In Cyanobacterial Physiology; Kageyama, H., Waditee-Sirisattha, R., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2022; pp. 137–146. [Google Scholar]
  41. Lawrence, P.K.; Long, F.P.; Young, R.A. Mycosporine-like amino acids for skin photoprotection. Curr. Med. Chem. 2018, 25, 5512–5527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tsujino, I. Isolation and structure of a 357 nm UV-absorbing substance, usujirene, from the red alga Palmaria palmata (L) O. Kuntze. Jpn. J. Phycol. 1986, 34, 185–188. [Google Scholar]
  43. Uemura, D.; Katayama, C.; Wada, A.; Hirata, Y. Crystal and molecular structure of palythene possessing a novel 360 nm chromophore. Chem. Lett. 1980, 9, 755–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zhang, L.; Li, L.; Wu, Q. Protective effects of mycosporine-like amino acids of Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and their partial characterization. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B Biol. 2007, 86, 240–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Losantos, R.; Sampedro, D.; Churio, M.S. Photochemistry and photophysics of mycosporine-like amino acids and gadusols, nature’s ultraviolet screens. Pure Appl. Chem. 2015, 87, 979–996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Stochaj, W.R.; Dunlap, W.C.; Shick, J.M. Two new UV-absorbing mycosporine-like amino acids from the sea anemone Anthopleura elegantissima and the effects of zooxanthellae and spectral irradiance on chemical composition and content. Mar. Biol. 1994, 118, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. D’Orazio, J.; Jarrett, S.; Amaro-Ortiz, A.; Scott, T. UV radiation and the skin. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14, 12222–12248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Griffin, G.K.; Booth, C.A.G.; Togami, K.; Chung, S.S.; Ssozi, D.; Verga, J.A.; Bouyssou, J.M.; Lee, Y.S.; Shanmugam, V.; Hornick, J.L.; et al. Ultraviolet radiation shapes dendritic cell leukaemia transformation in the skin. Nature 2023, 618, 834–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Downie, A.T.; Wu, N.C.; Cramp, R.L.; Franklin, C.E. Sublethal consequences of ultraviolet radiation exposure on vertebrates: Synthesis through meta-analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2023; early view. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bhatia, S.; Garg, A.; Sharma, K.; Kumar, S.; Sharma, A.; Purohit, A.P. Mycosporine and mycosporine-like amino acids: A paramount tool against ultra violet irradiation. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2011, 5, 138–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Figueroa, F.L. Mycosporine-like amino acids from marine resource. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Dextro, R.B.; Delbaje, E.; Geraldes, V.; Pinto, E.; Long, P.F.; Fiore, M.F. Exploring the relationship between biosynthetic gene clusters and constitutive production of mycosporine-like amino acids in Brazilian cyanobacteria. Molecules 2023, 28, 1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Hiscock, S. A Field Key to the British Red Seaweeds (Rhodophyta); Field Studies Council Publication: Birmingham, UK, 1986. [Google Scholar]
Marinedrugs 21 00543 g001
Figure 1. The structures of the novel MAAs from Bostrychia scorpioides (1–6) and Catenella caespitosa (7, 8).
Figure 1. The structures of the novel MAAs from Bostrychia scorpioides (1–6) and Catenella caespitosa (7, 8).
Marinedrugs 21 00543 g001
Marinedrugs 21 00543 g002
Figure 2. Key 1H-13C HMBC (indicated by arrows) and 1H-1H COSY correlations (indicated by bold bonds) of compounds 1–8 from Bostrychia scorpioides and Catenella caespitosa.
Figure 2. Key 1H-13C HMBC (indicated by arrows) and 1H-1H COSY correlations (indicated by bold bonds) of compounds 1–8 from Bostrychia scorpioides and Catenella caespitosa.
Marinedrugs 21 00543 g002
Marinedrugs 21 00543 g003
Figure 3. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) separation of the Bostrychia scorpioides extract. Peak assignment is according to Figure 1; BOS-A: bostrychine-A, BOS-B: bostrychine-B, BOS-C: bostrychine-C, BOS-D: bostrychine-D, BOS-E: bostrychine-E, BOS-F: bostrychine-F; column: Pack Pro C18 RS (150 × 4.6 mm, 3 µm) from YMC; mobile phase: 0.9% (v/v) formic acid and 0.1% (v/v) acetic acid in water (A) and methanol (B); gradient: 0–15 min: 0% B, 23 min: 10% B, 30 min: 15% B, 35–40 min: 98% B, 40.1–55 min: 0% B; λ = 330 and 350 nm; flow rate = 0.55 mL/min; T = 25 °C.
Figure 3. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) separation of the Bostrychia scorpioides extract. Peak assignment is according to Figure 1; BOS-A: bostrychine-A, BOS-B: bostrychine-B, BOS-C: bostrychine-C, BOS-D: bostrychine-D, BOS-E: bostrychine-E, BOS-F: bostrychine-F; column: Pack Pro C18 RS (150 × 4.6 mm, 3 µm) from YMC; mobile phase: 0.9% (v/v) formic acid and 0.1% (v/v) acetic acid in water (A) and methanol (B); gradient: 0–15 min: 0% B, 23 min: 10% B, 30 min: 15% B, 35–40 min: 98% B, 40.1–55 min: 0% B; λ = 330 and 350 nm; flow rate = 0.55 mL/min; T = 25 °C.
Marinedrugs 21 00543 g003
Marinedrugs 21 00543 g004
Figure 4. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) separation of the Catenella caespitosa extract. Peak assignment is according to Figure 1; 7: Catenelline B, 8: Catenelline C; column: Pack ODS (250 × 4.60 mm, 5 μm) from YMC; mobile phase: 20 mM ammonium formate and 0.25% (v/v) formic acid in water (A) and methanol (B); gradient: 0–20 min: 0% B, 30 min: 20% B, 35–40 min: 98% B, 40.1–55 min: 0% B; λ = 330 nm; flow rate = 0.65 mL/min; T = 7 °C.
Figure 4. High-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Ultraviolet (HPLC-UV) separation of the Catenella caespitosa extract. Peak assignment is according to Figure 1; 7: Catenelline B, 8: Catenelline C; column: Pack ODS (250 × 4.60 mm, 5 μm) from YMC; mobile phase: 20 mM ammonium formate and 0.25% (v/v) formic acid in water (A) and methanol (B); gradient: 0–20 min: 0% B, 30 min: 20% B, 35–40 min: 98% B, 40.1–55 min: 0% B; λ = 330 nm; flow rate = 0.65 mL/min; T = 7 °C.
Marinedrugs 21 00543 g004
Marinedrugs 21 00543 g005
Figure 5. Electronic Circular Dichroism spectra (calculated: red; calculated mirror image: blue) of compounds 1, 2 (Bostrychia scorpioides) and 7, 8 (Catenella caespitosa) compared to their experimentally recorded spectra (black curves) in H2O. Δε is the molar ellipticity of the compounds, “Calc.” is the abbreviation for “calculated for” and mirror displays the opposite spectra corresponding to the respective enantiomer of each compound.
Figure 5. Electronic Circular Dichroism spectra (calculated: red; calculated mirror image: blue) of compounds 1, 2 (Bostrychia scorpioides) and 7, 8 (Catenella caespitosa) compared to their experimentally recorded spectra (black curves) in H2O. Δε is the molar ellipticity of the compounds, “Calc.” is the abbreviation for “calculated for” and mirror displays the opposite spectra corresponding to the respective enantiomer of each compound.
Marinedrugs 21 00543 g005
Table 1. 1H NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) data of compounds 1–6 (isolated from B. scorpioides) and 7 and 8 (isolated from Catenella caespitosa).
Table 1. 1H NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) data of compounds 1–6 (isolated from B. scorpioides) and 7 and 8 (isolated from Catenella caespitosa).
pos.1 (400 MHz)2 (600 MHz)3 (400 MHz)4 (400 MHz)5 (600 MHz)6 (600 MHz)7 (600 MHz)8 (600 MHz)
δH (J in Hz)δH (J in Hz)δH (J in Hz)δH (J in Hz)δH (J in Hz)δH (J in Hz)δH (J in Hz)δH (J in Hz)
42.81, d (17.2)
2.76, d (17.2)		2.75, d (17.6)
2.90, d (17.6)		2.79–2.93 a, d (18.0)2.79–2.93 a, d (18.0)2.75–2.92 a, d (18.0)2.75–2.92 a, d (18.0)2.92, d (16.8)
2.98, d (16.8)		2.90, d (17.4)
2.92, d (17.4)
62.91, s2.88, d (17.2)
2.92, d (17.2)		2.79–2.93 a, d (18.0)2.79–2.93 a, d (18.0)2.75–2.92 a, d (18.0)2.75–2.92 a, d (18.0)2.68, d (16.8)
2.94, d (16.8)		2.92, d (17.4)
2.97, d (17.4)
73.60, s3.60, s3.60, s3.60, s3.59, s3.59, s3.59, s3.62, s
83.64, s3.66, s3.71, s3.64, s3.68–3.70 a, s3.68–3.70 a, s3.61, s3.60, s
94.21, dd (8.0/4.8)3.51, t (7. 2)4.28, dd (8.0/4.8)4.25, dd (8.0/4.8)4.23–4.26 a, dd (8.0/5.6)4.23–4.26 a, dd (8.0/5.6)3.87, t (6.4)3.87, td (6.0/1.2)
10 1.96, m 3.23, t (6.4)3.23, t (6.0)
112.18, m
2.27, m		2.39, t (7.6)2.20, m
2.28, m		2.20, m
2.28, m		2.13, m
2.25, m		2.13, m
2.25, m
122.45, (td, 7.2/1.6) 2.46, m2.46, m2.35, m2.35, m
1′3.44, dd (14.4/7.8)
3.51, dd (14.4/2.4)		4.05, d (3.6)6.39, dd (8.0/1.2)6.57, dd (13.6/2.0)6.39, d (7.4)6.56, d (15.0) 3.60, t (5.4)
2′4.03, m 5.42, m5.77, m5.40, m5.74, m 3.77, t (5.4)
3′1.24, d (6.4)4.31, m1.78, dd (5.0/2.0)1.76, dd (5.2/1.6)1.76–1.77 a, dd (6.6/1.8)1.76–1.77 a, dd (6.6/1.8)
4′ 1.26, d (6.4)
a overlapping signals.
Table 2. 13C NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) data of compounds 1–6 (isolated from B. scorpioides) and 7 and 8 (isolated from Catenella caespitosa).
Table 2. 13C NMR (Nuclear Magnetic Resonance) data of compounds 1–6 (isolated from B. scorpioides) and 7 and 8 (isolated from Catenella caespitosa).
pos.1 d2 d3 d4 d5 e6 e7 e8 e
δC, TypeδC, TypeδC, TypeδC, TypeδC, TypeδC, TypeδC, TypeδC, Type
1163.5, C163.4, C158.0, C156.6, C157.1, Cc157.1, C c163.3, C162.0, C
2128.5, C128.3, C129.1, C128.6, C128.7, C c128.7, C c127.5, C128.2, C
3161.7, C162.2, C163.8, C162.8, C163.8, C c163.8, C c164.3, C163.3, C
435.9, CH235.5, CH235.8–36.1 a, CH235.8–36.1 a, CH235.7, CH2 b35.7, CH2 b36.1, CH235.8, CH2
573.9, C73.6, C73.8–73.9 a, C73.8–73.9 a, C73.9, C73.9, C74.2, C73.9, C
635.9, CH236.1, CH235.8–36.1 a, CH235.8–36.1 a, CH235.7, CH2 b35.7, CH 2 b38.6, CH235.4, CH2
770.5, CH270.3, CH270.4, CH270.4, CH270.5, CH270.5, CH270.3, CH270.3, CH2
862.1, CH362.2, CH362.3, CH362.4, CH362.4, CH362.4, CH361.9, CH361.9, CH3
961.3, CH45.7, CH261.5–61.6 a, CH61.5–61.6 a, CH62.3, CH62.3, CH42.1, CH241.9, CH2
10179.5, CO28.0, CH2178.9, CO179.2, CO179.6, CO c179.6, CO c52.5, CH252.6, CH2
1130.6, CH234.8, CH230.4–30.5 a, CH230.4–30.5 a, CH231.0, CH231.0, CH2
1234.2, CH2180.7, CO34.2, CH234.2, CH236.7, CH236.7, CH2
13181.1, CO 181.1, CO181.1, CO184.5, CO c184.5, CO c
1′52.9, CH267.2, CH124.7, CH126.5, CH124.1, CH b126.0, CH b 48.2, CH2
2′69.5, CH178.3, CO120.3, CH120.4, CH119.5, CH b119.7, CH b 63.1, CH2
3′22.2, CH371.0, CH13.5, CH317.3, CH313.4, CH317.3, CH3
4′ 22.3, CH3
a overlapping signals; b value established from the HSQC (Heteronuclear Single Quantum Coherence) spectrum; c value established from the HMBC (Heteronuclear Multiple Bond Correlation) spectrum; d measured at 100 MHz; e measured at 150 MHz.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Orfanoudaki, M.; Alilou, M.; Hartmann, A.; Mayr, J.; Karsten, U.; Nguyen-Ngoc, H.; Ganzera, M. Isolation and Structure Elucidation of Novel Mycosporine-like Amino Acids from the Two Intertidal Red Macroalgae Bostrychia scorpioides and Catenella caespitosa. Mar. Drugs 2023, 21, 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21100543

AMA Style

Orfanoudaki M, Alilou M, Hartmann A, Mayr J, Karsten U, Nguyen-Ngoc H, Ganzera M. Isolation and Structure Elucidation of Novel Mycosporine-like Amino Acids from the Two Intertidal Red Macroalgae Bostrychia scorpioides and Catenella caespitosa. Marine Drugs. 2023; 21(10):543. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21100543

Chicago/Turabian Style

Orfanoudaki, Maria, Mostafa Alilou, Anja Hartmann, Julia Mayr, Ulf Karsten, Hieu Nguyen-Ngoc, and Markus Ganzera. 2023. "Isolation and Structure Elucidation of Novel Mycosporine-like Amino Acids from the Two Intertidal Red Macroalgae Bostrychia scorpioides and Catenella caespitosa" Marine Drugs 21, no. 10: 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21100543

APA Style

Orfanoudaki, M., Alilou, M., Hartmann, A., Mayr, J., Karsten, U., Nguyen-Ngoc, H., & Ganzera, M. (2023). Isolation and Structure Elucidation of Novel Mycosporine-like Amino Acids from the Two Intertidal Red Macroalgae Bostrychia scorpioides and Catenella caespitosa. Marine Drugs, 21(10), 543. https://doi.org/10.3390/md21100543

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop