Next Article in Journal
Anti-Alzheimer’s Molecules Derived from Marine Life: Understanding Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential
Previous Article in Journal
The Marine Natural Product Furospinulosin 1 Induces Apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 Triple Negative Breast Cancer Cell Spheroids, But Not in Cells Grown Traditionally with Longer Treatment
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 19
Issue 5
10.3390/md19050250
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Lymphoid Organ Specific Anti-Lipopolysaccharide Factor from Litopenaeus vannamei Exhibits Strong Antimicrobial Activities

by
Mingzhe Sun
1,
Shihao Li
1,2,3,*,
Xinjia Lv
1,
Jianhai Xiang
1,2,3,
Yuanan Lu
4 and
Fuhua Li
1,2,3,5,*
1
Key Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China
2
Laboratory for Marine Biology and Biotechnology, Qingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology, Qingdao 266237, China
3
Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 266071, China
4
Environmental Health Laboratory, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Hawaii at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA
5
The Innovation of Seed Design, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430072, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2021, 19(5), 250; https://doi.org/10.3390/md19050250
Submission received: 12 April 2021 / Revised: 26 April 2021 / Accepted: 26 April 2021 / Published: 28 April 2021
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Different shrimp species are known to possess apparent distinct resistance to different pathogens in aquaculture. However, the molecular mechanism underlying this finding still remains unknown. One kind of important antimicrobial peptides, anti-lipopolysaccharide factors (ALF), exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activities. Here, we reported a newly identified ALF from the shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei and compared the immune function with its counterpart in the shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis. The ALF, designated as LvALF8, was specifically expressed in the lymphoid organ of L. vannamei. The expression level of LvALF8 was apparently changed after white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) or Vibrio parahaemolyticus challenges. The synthetic LBD peptide of LvALF8 (LvALF8-LBD) showed strong antibacterial activities against most tested Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria. LvALF8-LBD could also inhibit the in vivo propagation of WSSV similar as FcALF8-LBD, the LBD of LvALF8 counterpart in F. chinensis. However, LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD exhibited apparently different antibacterial activity against V. parahaemolyticus, the main pathogen causing acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND) of affected shrimp. A structural analysis showed that the positive net charge and amphipathicity characteristics of LvALF8-LBD peptide were speculated as two important components for its enhanced antimicrobial activity compared to those of FcALF8-LBD. These new findings may not only provide some evidence to explain the distinct disease resistance among different shrimp species, but also lay out new research ground for the testing and development of LBD-originated antimicrobial peptides to control of shrimp diseases.

1. Introduction

Shrimp products are known to be a significant source of aquatic animal protein [1] and shrimp aquaculture production reached more than 3,000,000 metric tons in 2018, according to the statistics of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) (http://www.fao.org/fishery/statistics/en, accessed on 7 February 2021). Among the cultured shrimp species, Pacific whiteleg shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei accounts for the main part of the global shrimp production [2]. Since the introduction into China in the 1990s [3], L. vannamei has rapidly replaced its close relative Fenneropenaeus chinensis and become the main cultured shrimp species [1]. One of the main reasons for the replacement is that L. vannamei appears to be more tolerant to the hypersaline environment and pathogens infection than F. chinensis [4,5,6]. However, investigation on the molecular mechanism underlying the difference is very limited.
Shrimps mainly rely on the innate immune response to control and clear invading pathogens following infection, and antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are the key components of their innate immune system [7]. Anti-lipopolysaccharide factor (ALF), crustin, penaeidin, and stylicin are the main types of AMPs identified in shrimp [7]. Previous studies have revealed that ALFs, with a common feature of the functional domain termed the LPS-binding domain (LBD) and a disulfide loop formed by two conserved cysteine residues, possess a broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria, fungi and viruses [8,9]. Knock-down of ALF genes by double-strand RNA (dsRNA) could significantly increase the mortality rates of shrimp Marsupenaeus japonicus infected by Vibrio spp. [10] and result in the rapid proliferation of endogenous bacteria in Exopalaemon carinicauda [11]. The recombinant FcALF5 protein could directly interact with the envelope protein VP24 of white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) and inhibit its infection to shrimp after pre-incubation with the virus [12]. These data revealed that ALFs are essential effectors in innate immune system of shrimp. Therefore, we speculated that different antimicrobial activities of AMPs, such as ALFs, might be related to the discrepancy of disease resistance among different shrimp species.
Present studies on shrimp have shown that different ALF family members co-existed in one organism [13,14,15], and different ALF family members from a single organism showed varied tissue expressions and distinct antimicrobial activity [16,17,18,19]. Eight ALF family members have been reported from F. chinensis [20,21]. The synthetic LBD peptides from diverse FcALFs showed distinct antimicrobial activities against various bacteria and WSSV [17,20]. Application of the LBD peptides of FcALF1, FcALF2, FcALF5, and FcALF7 effectively inhibited WSSV propagation in vivo [17]. The LBD peptides of FcALF1, FcALF2, FcALF7, and FcALF8 could effectively inhibit the growth of Gram-positive bacteria Micrococcus luteus, while FcALF1, FcALF4, Fc ALF6, FcALF7 and FcALF8 showed antibacterial activities on Gram-negative bacteria Escherichia coli [17,20]. Several ALF genes have been identified in L. vannamei and a few were functionally characterized. It was reported that the transcription and protein levels of LvAV-K were up-regulated following WSSV or Vibrio anguillarum infection [22]. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) of the LvALF1 gene was related to WSSV-resistance [23]. Until now, there have been no reports about the comparison on the activity of ALFs from different shrimp species, which might provide some explanations on their different disease resistance.
In our previous study, lymphoid organ of F. chinensis was identified to specifically express FcALF8 and its synthetic LBD peptide exhibited high inhibition activity against bacterial pathogens, both in vivo and in vitro [20]. In this study, we report the identification of LvALF8, the homologue of FcALF8, from the lymphoid organ of the Pacific whiteleg shrimp L. vannamei. The antibacterial and antiviral activities of LvALF8 were characterized, including comparative analysis between LvALF8 and FcALF8. These new findings might provide new insights into the function of AMPs in crustaceans and lay out creative instructions for the design of LBD-originated antimicrobial drugs for shrimp aquaculture.

2. Results

2.1. Sequences and Phylogenetic Analysis of LvALF8

The full-length cDNA of LvALF8 was 600 bp, with an open reading frame of 399 bp encoding 132 deduced amino acid (aa) residues. A signal peptide with 27 aa was predicted. The putative LPS-binding domain (LBD) located between Cys61 and Cys82 with two conserved cysteine residues (Figure 1).
The full-length sequences of LvALF8 and other 39 ALF proteins excluding signal peptides from 12 crustacean species (Table 1) were used to construct the neighbor-joining phylogenetic tree, to assess the evolutionary relationships among them. As shown in Figure 2, all mature ALFs could be classified into seven categories, among which the bootstrap replications are <40%. LvALF8 had a closer evolutionary relationship with FcALF8.

2.2. Tissue Distribution of LvALF8 Transcripts

Fifteen tissues, including brain, epidermis, eyestalk, gill, hemocytes, hepatopancreas, heart, intestine, muscle, lymphoid organ (Oka), ovary, stomach, testis, thoracic ganglia, and ventral nerve cord were collected for the expression analysis of LvALF8 transcripts. The results showed that LvALF8 was specifically expressed in the lymphoid organ (Figure 3).

2.3. Expression Profiles of LvALF8 after WSSV or Vibrio Parahaemolyticus Infection

The expression profiles of LvALF8 in Oka after viral and bacterial infection were measured by qRT-PCR. After WSSV infection, the expression level of LvALF8 significantly decreased at 6 h post infection (hpi), and then increased at 24 hpi (Figure 4A). However, expression pattern of LvALF8 after V. parahaemolyticus infections very different and showed an initially significant increase at 3 hpi (the highest) and 6 hpi, but dramatically decreased at 12 hpi and 24 hpi (Figure 4B).

2.4. Anti-Bacterial Activities of LvALF8-LBD Peptide

The anti-bacterial activities of LvALF8-LBD were analyzed by detecting the minimal inhibitory concentration of synthetic LvALF8-LBD peptide on different bacteria. As shown in Table 2, LvALF8-LBD showed strong anti-bacterial activities against most bacteria with different concentrations, including 1–2 µM against V. parahaemolyticus, V. harveyi, V. alginolyticus, and V. owensii, 2–4 µM against Photobacterium damselae and Staphylococcus epidermidis, 4–8 µM against E. coli, Kurthia gibsonii, and S. aureus.

2.5. In Vivo Anti-Bacterial Function of LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD

Simultaneous injection of two peptides of LBD8 together with V. parahaemolyticus could inhibit the in vivo proliferation of the bacteria. In the LvALF8-LBD + V. parahaemolyticus (designated as LV) group, the total viable bacteria are 4.62 × 102 cfu/g in hepatopancreas, which were significantly lower than the 1.36 × 103 cfu/g detected in the hepatopancreas of shrimp group (designated as FV) injected with the FcALF8-LBD + V. parahaemolyticus. In addition, the total bacterial counts in the hepatopancreas of these two treated groups were both lower than the count (1.42 × 104 cfu/g) detected in the hepatopancreas of the GFP + V. parahaemolyticus (designated as GV) group (Figure 5A). Further analysis shrimp hepatopancreas for bacteria identification showed that the predominant bacteria were V. parahaemolyticus in the GV group (green spots in Figure 5C). However, V. parahaemolyticus were undetectable in the LV group and less detected in the FV group (2.82 × 102 cfu/g), which was significantly lower than that in the GV group (8.82 × 103 cfu/g) (Figure 5B). Moreover, the numbers of other bacteria such as V. owensii and V. harveyi detected in the LV group were less compared to the control group (yellow spots in Figure 5C).

2.6. Agglutination Activity of LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD

Agglutination test on the two peptides showed that both LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD could lead to distinct agglutination of the bacteria V. parahaemolyticus in comparison with the negative controls (PBS and GFP groups) (Figure 6).

2.7. In Vivo Anti-Virus Function of LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD

The copy numbers of WSSV were measured and compared for different groups at 48 h post injection. The WSSV copy numbers in LvALF8-LBD + WSSV (designated as LW) and FcALF8-LBD + WSSV (designated as FW) groups were significantly reduced compared to the GFP + WSSV (designated as GW) group (Figure 7). However, no significant difference in WSSV copy number was detected between LW and FW groups.

2.8. Structure Analysis of LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD

Sequence alignments of LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD were performed to understand the relationship between the amino acid sequence of LBD and its high antibacterial activity. The result showed that 18 of the 22 residues in LBD were the same between LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD. The residues #10, 13, 18 and 20 of FcALF8-LBD were replaced from isoleucine, glutamine, threonine, and isoleucine to leucine, arginine, serine, and valine in LvALF8-LBD, respectively (Figure 8A). The physicochemical properties and amphipathic characters of LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD were analyzed by ProtParam tool and HeliQuest analysis. The helix wheel diagram (Figure 8B) showed that the positively charged hydrophilic amino acid residues of LvALF8-LBD were located on two sides, whereas the hydrophobic residues were on the other two sides, presenting a perfect amphipathic structure for LvALF8-LBD, which is similar to that of FcALF8-LBD. The analysis also showed that the arginine residue in LvALF8-LBD peptide replaced the glutamine residue of the FcALF8-LBD peptide, making basic residues enriched on one side. The physiochemical parameters of LvALF8-LBD were shown in Table 3. The positive net charge and hydrophilicity of LvALF8-LBD were higher than those of FcALF8-LBD peptide.

3. Discussion

Like many other animals, shrimp are subjective to bacterial infections, including various forms of Vibrio pathogens (V. alginolyticus, V. harveyi, and V. parahaemolyticus) and P. damselae [24,25,26,27]. Antimicrobial peptides play essential roles in host defense against these pathogens. ALF is one of the well-studied antimicrobial peptides in crustaceans; eight different ALF genes have recently been identified in F. chinensis [20]. Importantly, the lymphoid organ specific FcLAF8 encoded by one of the ALF genes exhibited strong activities against several Vibrio pathogens, including V. alginolyticus, V. harveyi, and P. damselae [20]. Here, we have identified a new ALF, LvALF8, from the whiteleg shrimp L. vannamei. LvALF8 and FcALF8 are homologues existing in the two kinds of shrimps, sharing high sequence identity, closer evolutionary relationship and the same tissue distribution. Therefore, they provided a good case to study whether antimicrobial peptides could contribute to the distinct pathogen resistance abilities of different shrimp species.
As one typical antimicrobial peptide, LvALF8 exhibits strong antimicrobial activities against both bacteria and viruses. LvALF8 showed significant transcriptional responses in the lymphoid organ upon WSSV or V. parahaemolyticus infection, indicating that it might play important immune roles during pathogen infections. Although we only compared the expression of LvALF8 in its mainly expressed organ after infection, it is possible that the expression of LvALF8 may significantly increase in other organs. LvALF8 had strong in vitro and in vivo activities against several Vibrio pathogens. It had better inhibition against V. alginolyticus and V. harveyi than several reported ALFs, like LsALF-D1, LsALF-B1 and PmALF-B1 [28]. Moreover, LvALF8 also exhibited stronger in vitro antibacterial activity against Gram-positive pathogens, including S. aureus and S. epidermidis, as compared to some other AMPs [20,29]. In addition, LvALF8-LBD peptide could lead to the detectable agglutination of V. parahaemolyticus, which is consistent to the finding from a modified LBD peptide against several bacteria, including E. coli and V. harveyi [30]. Agglutination is known to be one of the important host responses to recognize the foreign pathogens, thereby mediating further immune responses in the invertebrate immune defense system [31]. The data showed that the LBD peptide of LvALF8 could not only directly kill pathogens, but also inhibit their infection through modulating host immune responses.
It is shown in this study that both LvALF8 and FcALF8 exhibited strong inhibition against several important pathogenic Vibrio pathogens and a similar antiviral activity against WSSV. However, their antibacterial activity against V. parahaemolyticus was quite different. V. parahaemolyticus is considered as the major shrimp pathogen causing the acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease (AHPND), an emerging and severe disease of cultured shrimp in recent years [27]. Although both LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD could agglutinate V. parahaemolyticus in vitro, both in vivo and in vitro tests revealed that LvALF8-LBD exhibited much stronger antibacterial activity against V. parahaemolyticus as compared to FcALF8-LBD [20]. In addition, much stronger inhibition against E. coli and S. epidermidis was also detected by using LvALF8-LBD peptide than FcALF8-LBD [20]. These data suggested that one homologous gene encoding an antimicrobial peptide in different shrimp had distinct antimicrobial activities, which might contribute to the distinct pathogen resistance of different shrimp species.
A previous study showed that the distinct functions of AMPs were mainly determined by their amino acid sequences [7]. This study showed that the four residues between LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD are different from each other. Importantly, the 13th residue, glutamine of FcALF8-LBD, was replaced by a basic amino acid Arginine in LvALF8-LBD. Net cationic charge, amphipathicity and hydrophobicity are considered as the key characteristics of active AMPs [32]. Most ALF belongs to cationic AMPs, in which the basic amino acids acted as an important factor to bind to negatively charged surface in lipid membrane of bacteria [33]. Dathe et al. reported that the net charge and basic amino acids in LBD peptides greatly contribute to their activities, and the loss of basic amino acids in LBD peptides leads to the decrease of antimicrobial functions in F. chinensis [34]. Increasing the net charge from magainin 2 could increase its antimicrobial activity [35]. Similarly, decreasing the net charge of AMPs could reduce their antimicrobial activity [36]. No acidic amino acids and a total of six basic amino acids, including three lysine residues and three arginine residues exist in the LBD peptide of LvALF8, resulting in one more net charge than the FcALF8-LBD peptide. The increased net charge of LvALF8-LBD peptide resulting from the one more arginine residue might be responsible for the enhanced antibacterial activity, in comparison with the FcALF8-LBD peptide.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Experimental Animals, Pathogen Stimulation and Tissue Collection

Healthy adult Pacific whiteleg shrimp with a body weight of 2.5 ± 0.4 g, were routinely cultured in our laboratory and used for tissue distribution analysis and pathogen stimulation experiments. All the animal tests were conducted in accordance with the guidelines of the respective Animal Research and Ethics Committees of the Chinese Academy of Sciences. Before any experimental test, shrimp were acclimated in air-pumped circulating sea water at 25 ± 1 °C and fed with commercial food pellet for about a week. Shrimp were selected randomly in each experimental test. Hemocytes, brain, epidermis, eyestalk, gill, hepatopancreas, heart, intestine, muscle, lymphoid organ, nerve cord, stomach, ovary and testis were collected from nine shrimps for tissue distribution analysis and same tissue from three individuals were polled together as one sample.
For the pathogen stimulation experiment, WSSVs were prepared according to the method described by Sun et al. [37], and V. parahaemolyticus isolated in our lab were cultured to the mid-logarithmic-phase. Experimental animals were randomly divided into three groups, including PBS control group, WSSV group and V.p group, with 45 shrimps per group. The WSSV was diluted with PBS buffer (137 mmol/L NaCl, 2.7 mmol/L KCl, 10 mmol/L Na2HPO4, 1.8 mmol/L KH2PO4, pH 7.4) to the final concentration of 800 copies/μL, and bacteria were diluted with PBS buffer to the final concentration of 106 cfu/mL. Ten microliters of pathogen solution were injected into each shrimp at the III and IV abdominal segments for the WSSV and V.p groups. The equal volume of PBS was injected into each shrimp in the PBS group. Lymphoid organs from nine shrimps were sampled at each of five time points as 0, 3, 6, 12, 24 hpi; one sample for three shrimp and three samples for each time point.

4.2. Total RNA Extraction and cDNA Synthesis

The total RNA was extracted by TRIzol reagent (Takara, Kyoto, Japan) and its quality was confirmed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. cDNA template was synthesized using 1 µg of total RNA for each sample using RevertAid First Strand cDNA synthesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), with random primers according to the manufacturer’s protocols.

4.3. Sequence Analysis of LvALF8 Gene

The open reading frame (ORF) of LvALF8 was amplified by PCR with the primers LvALF8-F (5′-TCTCGGCAACACGACAGCAAC-3′) and LvALF8-R (5′-ACGTCCTTGCAACCGGTCAAT-3′) designed based on the sequence with accession number MF135544 and confirmed by Sanger sequencing. The BLAST algorithm (NCBI, http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/, accessed on 27 October 2020) was used to analyze the nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid sequence of LvALF8. CBS prediction servers (http://www.cbs.dtu.dk/services, accessed on 27 October 2020) were used to predict the signal peptide. Unlike the well characterized and designated ALF family members in F. chinensis, the designation in L. vannamei is confused. Different ALF protein sequences (Table 1) obtained from the NCBI database were used to construct a phylogenic tree using MEGA-X software (https://www.megasoftware.net/, accessed on 27 October 2020) by the neighbor joining distance algorithm.

4.4. Quantitative Real-Time qPCR

The mRNA expressions of LvALF8 in different tissues were detected by quantitative real-time qPCR with a pair of primers LvALF8-qF (5′-TGACGAATCTGCGAACTCCA-3′) and LvALF8-qR (5′-CGCCATCTTTGACCAGGGAA-3′) using THUNDERBIRD™ SYBR® qPCR Mix Without ROX (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan). The 18S rRNA (accession number EU920969) amplified via a pair of primers 18S-qF (5′-TATACGCTAGTGGAGCTGGAA-3′) and 18S-qR (5′-GGGGAGGTAGTGACGAAAAAT-3′) was employed as an internal control for cDNA normalization. The PCR product was denatured to produce a melting curve to check the specificity of the PCR product. The expression levels of all selected genes were detected in three biological replicates.

4.5. Synthesis of LvALF8-LBD

The LBD peptide of LvALF8, named as LvALF8-LBD, was purchased from a Chinese commercial company (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China). The amino acid residue of LvALF8-LBD, Ac-(CSYSTRPYFLRWRLKFKSKVWC)-NH2, was amidated in the C-terminal and acetylated in the N-terminal. The two cysteine residues formed a disulfide bond. The synthetic LvALF8-LBD peptide was tested by mass spectrometry and high-performance liquid chromatography. The LBD peptide of FcALF8-LBD, Ac-(CSYSTRPYFIRWQLKFKTKIWC)-NH2, was synthesized for comparison analysis. A partial peptide of Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) (Accession number: AAN41637), Ac-(TTGKLPVPWPTLVTTFSYGVQCFS)-NH2, was included as a negative control.

4.6. Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) Assay

The antimicrobial activity of peptides was determined using the minimal growth inhibition concentration (MIC) assay against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria, as described previously [20]. A total of nine different bacterial strains, including six Gram-negative bacteria, E. coli, V. alginolyticus, V. harveyi, P. damselae, V. parahaemolyticus, and V. owensii and three Gram-positive bacteria, S. aureus, S. epidermidis, and K. gibsonii, were used for detection. Briefly, bacterial cells harvested at the mid-logarithmic phase were diluted to 1 × 105 cfu/mL in PBS buffer (137 mmol/L NaCl, 2.7 mmol/L KCl, 10 mmol/L Na2HPO4, 1.8 mmol/L KH2PO4, pH 7.4). In this test, 15 µL/well of diluted peptide solutions (1/2-fold serial dilutions with the PBS) were added to a 96-well plate (Corning, New York, NY, USA). The final concentration of peptide in the medium ranged from 64 µM, 32 μM, 16 μM, 8 μM, 4 μM, 2 μM, 1 μM to 0.5 μM. Fifteen microliters PBS and 15 µL pGFP solution were also used as blank group and negative control. Each well of the plate was added 133 µL growth medium, and the mixtures were incubated for 6 to 8 h depending on different bacterial strains. Absorbance at 600 nm for Gram-positive bacteria or at 560 nm for Gram-negative bacteria was determined using a precision micro-plate reader (TECAN infinite M200 PRO, TECAN, Salzburg, Austria). The assay was conducted in triplicate.

4.7. Peptide Injection and Pathogens Infection

Considering that FcALF8-LBD did not show strong antibacterial activity to V. parahaemolyticus in our previous study [19], the shrimps with body weight of 1.25 ± 0.17 g were used to further analyze the function of LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD against V. parahaemolyticus was through the in vivo analysis of the anti-bacterial activity of two synthetic LBD8 peptides. In this test, the experimental animals were randomly divided into four groups: PBS, GFP + V. parahaemolyticus (designated as GV), FcALF8-LBD + V. parahaemolyticus (designated as FV), LvALF8-LBD + V. parahaemolyticus (designated as LV), and each group contained 30 individuals. For FV and LV groups, V. parahaemolyticus at the final concentration of 106 cfu/mL was mixed with 64 μM of FcALF8-LBD or LvALF8-LBD peptides respectively, then 10 μL solution was immediately injected into each shrimp. For the GV and PBS group, each shrimp was injected with 10 μL (104 cfu) of V. parahaemolyticus mixed with 64 μM GFP peptide or 10 μL PBS solution alone as negative controls. At 24 h after injection, the hepatopancreas, the target tissue of V. parahaemolyticus [38], was collected from 15 sacrificed individuals for each group and pooled at three per sample and five samples per group.
To analyze the antiviral activity of LvALF8-LBD, the shrimps with a body weight of 1.56 ± 0.23 g were used, and these experimental animals were randomly divided into three groups: GFP + WSSV (designated as GW), FcALF8-LBD + WSSV (designated as FW), LvALF8-LBD + WSSV (designated as LW), and 30 animals per group were used. For shrimp in FW and LW groups, 500 copies/μL of WSSV was incubated with 64 μM of FcALF8-LBD or LvALF8-LBD peptides for 2 h at room temperature, respectively, then 10 μL mixture/shrimp was injected for 30 shrimps. For the GW group, each shrimp was injected with 10 μL of WSSV (5000 copies) WSSV pre-incubated with 64 μM GFP peptide for 2 h at room temperature as control. At 48 h after injection, the pleopods were collected from 15 shrimps in each group and pooled at three per sample and five samples per group.

4.8. Bacterial Count and Strain Identification

The collected hepatopancreas samples were weighted, crushed, and blended in sterile PBS separately. Then, 100 μL of the suspension with different dilution was seeded onto TCBS agar media. After incubation at 28 °C for 18 h, the number of total bacterial colonies on the plate was counted. Ten single colonies of the dominant bacteria were picked and used as DNA templates for PCR amplification of a partial sequence of the 16S rDNA, with the universal primers 27F and 1492R. Bacterial identification was carried out through sequencing and analyzing the amplified products.

4.9. DNA Extraction and WSSV Load Quantification

Total DNA was extracted from pooled pleopods using the Genomic DNA Kit (Tiangen, Beijing, China) with the addition of Protease K (Roche, Mannheim, Germany) at a final concentration of 5.7 mg/mL for digestion, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Quantification of extracted DNA was conducted by NanoDrop 2000 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). SYBR green-based quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was used to quantitatively analyze the viral loads in the pleopods according to the method described by Sun et al. [37]. Briefly, The DNA encoding the WSSV envelope protein VP28 was amplified and cloned into pMD19-T simple vector (Takara, Kyoto, Japan). The standard curve was generated using the purified and quantified plasmid. Primers VP28-qF (5′-AAACCTCCGCATTCCTGTGA-3′) and VP28-qR (5′-TCCGCATCTTCTTCCTTCAT-3′) were used to detect the viral loads in the pleopods. Each assay was carried out in quadruplicate.

4.10. Bacterial Agglutination Experiment

The bacteria at their logarithmic growth phase were harvested and fixed with a 0.1 mg/mL FITC solution. Then, the FITC-labeled bacteria cells were diluted to 107 cfu/mL, mixed with 64 μM of either FcALF8-LBD peptide solution or LvALF8-LBD peptide solution. The PBS and 64 μM pGFP peptide solution were also used as negative controls. Following 1 hr incubation at room temperature within 1 h, the affected cells were added to the glass slide and observed under an optical Nikon TS100 microscope (Nikon Corporation, Tokyo, Japan).

4.11. Structure Analysis on the Peptide LvALF8-LBD

The online program ProtParam tool (http://web.expasy.org/protparam/, accessed on 4 February 2021) and Antimicrobial Peptide Database (http://aps.unmc.edu/AP/main.php, accessed on 4 February 2021) were used to calculate the physicochemical properties of peptides, including net charge and hydrophobic percentage. The online program HeliQuest analysis (http://heliquest.ipmc.cnrs.fr/cgi-bin/ComputParams.py, accessed on 4 February 2021) was used to predict the amphipathic characters of these peptides.

4.12. Statistical Analysis

All the data were expressed in the form of mean ± S.E. and analyzed with one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t-test comparisons. Differences between treatments and controls were considered significant at p < 0.05 and extremely significant at p < 0.01.

5. Conclusions

In conclusion, a novel ALF gene, LvALF8, was detected to be specifically expressed in the lymphoid organ of whiteleg shrimp L. vannamei. The LBD peptide of LvALF8 showed a strong antibacterial effect against all the bacteria tested in this study, including six Gram-negative and three Gram-positive bacteria. The LBD peptide of LvALF8 also led to the distinct agglutination with V. parahaemolyticus. In vivo tests confirmed its antibacterial activity to V. parahaemolyticus. In addition, the peptide exhibited significant antiviral activity against WSSV in shrimp. Both in vivo and in vitro tests showed that LvALF8-LBD peptide-mediated antibacterial activity was much stronger than that detected with FcALF8-LBD, especially to V. parahaemolyticus. This might be related to the higher net cationic charge and enriched hydrophobicity on one side, which resulted from a replaced basic amino acid residue in LvALF8-LBD peptide. The present findings may provide new insights into ALF functions in crustaceans and will provide useful information that is essential for the design of LBD-originated antimicrobial substances.

Author Contributions

S.L., F.L. and J.X. conceived and designed the project; M.S. and X.L. performed all the experiments and prepared the figures; M.S., S.L. and F.L. wrote the manuscript; Y.L. revised the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (31830100), the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (31772880, 41776158), China Agriculture Research system-48 (CARS-48), and Distinguished Young Scientists Research Fund of Key Laboratory of Experimental Marine Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KLEMB-DYS01).

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study (Manuscript ID: marinedrugs-19-00250; Title: A Lymphoid Organ Specific Anti-lipopolysaccharide Factor from Litopenaeus vannamei Exhibits Strong Antimicrobial Activities) used shrimp and experimental animals, which is not endangered invertebrates. In addition, there is no genetically modified organism used in the study. According to the national regulation (Fisheries Law of the People’s Republic of China), no permission is required to collect the animals and no formal ethics approval is required for this study.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Li, F.H.; Xiang, J.H. Recent advances in researches on the innate immunity of shrimp in China. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2013, 39, 11–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, F.; Xiang, J. Signaling pathways regulating innate immune responses in shrimp. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2013, 34, 973–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Miao, W.-M. Status of aquaculture of Penaeus vannamei in China. In Proceedings of the Regional Technical Consultation on the Aquaculture of P. vannamei and Other Exotic Shrimps in Southeast Asia, Manila, Philippines, 1–2 March 2005; pp. 84–91. [Google Scholar]
  4. Feng, Y.; Dong, L.; Meng, X.; Kong, J.; Luo, K.; Luan, S.; Li, X.; Shi, X.; Cao, J.; Wang, M. The difference of tolerance to White spot syndrome virus between Litopenaeus vannamei and Fenneropenaeus chinensis at different temperatures. Prog. Fish. Sci. 2018, 39, 120–127. [Google Scholar]
  5. Feng, Y.; Kong, J.; Luo, K.; Luan, S.; Cao, B.; Liu, N.; Lu, X.; Cao, J.; Wang, M.; Wang, J.; et al. The comparison of the sensitivity to the White spot syndrome virus between Fenneropenaeus chinensis and Litopenaeus vannamei. Prog. Fish. Sci. 2017, 38, 78–84. [Google Scholar]
  6. Yin, W.; Sui, L. Effect of Salinity on Survival and Growth of Litopenaeus vannamei, Fenneropenaeus chinensis and Penaeus monodon Postlarvae. J. Tianjin Univ. Sci. Technol. 2012, 1, 23–26. [Google Scholar]
  7. Rosa, R.D.; Barracco, M.A. Antimicrobial peptides in crustaceans. Invert. Surviv. J. 2010, 7, 262–284. [Google Scholar]
  8. Li, S.; Li, F. The Anti-lipopolysaccharide Factors in Crustaceans. Subcell. Biochem. 2020, 94, 63–80. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Hoess, A.; Watson, S.; Siber, G.R.; Liddington, R. Crystal structure of an endotoxin-neutralizing protein from the horseshoe crab, Limulus anti-LPS factor, at 1.5 A resolution. EMBO J. 1993, 12, 3351–3356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kadowaki, T.; Inagawa, H.; Kohchi, C.; Nishizawa, T.; Takahashi, Y.; Soma, G.I. Anti-lipopolysaccharide Factor Evokes Indirect Killing of Virulent Bacteria in Kuruma Prawn. In Vivo 2011, 25, 741–744. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Lv, X.; Li, S.; Liu, F.; Li, F.; Xiang, J. Identification and function analysis of an anti-lipopolysaccharide factor from the ridgetail prawn Exopalaemon carinicauda. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2017, 70, 128–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Yang, H.; Li, S.H.; Li, F.H.; Lv, X.J.; Xiang, J.H. Recombinant expression and functional analysis of an isoform of anti-lipopolysaccharide factors (FcALF5) from Chinese shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2015, 53, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ponprateep, S.; Tharntada, S.; Somboonwiwat, K.; Tassanakajon, A. Gene silencing reveals a crucial role for anti-lipopolysaccharide factors from Penaeus monodon in the protection against microbial infections. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012, 32, 26–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Premruethai, S.; Sirawut, K.; Rath, P.; Ikuo, H.; Takashi, A.; Anchalee, T. Antimicrobial peptides discovered in the black tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon using the EST approach. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 2004, 61, 123–135. [Google Scholar]
  15. Soonthornchai, W.; Chaiyapechara, S.; Klinbunga, S.; Thongda, W.; Tangphatsornruang, S.; Yoocha, T.; Jarayabhand, P.; Jiravanichpaisal, P. Differentially expressed transcripts in stomach of Penaeus monodon in response to AHPND infection. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2016, 65, 53–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Liu, Y.; Cui, Z.; Luan, W.; Song, C.; Nie, Q.; Wang, S.; Li, Q. Three isoforms of anti-lipopolysaccharide factor identified from eyestalk cDNA library of swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2011, 30, 583–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Li, S.H.; Guo, S.Y.; Li, F.H.; Xiang, J.H. Functional Diversity of Anti-Lipopolysaccharide Factor Isoforms in Shrimp and Their Characters Related to Antiviral Activity. Mar. Drugs 2015, 13, 2602–2616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Liu, Y.; Cui, Z.; Li, X.; Song, C.; Li, Q.; Wang, S. Molecular cloning, expression pattern and antimicrobial activity of a new isoform of anti-lipopolysaccharide factor from the swimming crab Portunus trituberculatus. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2012, 33, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Lv, X.J.; Li, S.H.; Zhang, C.S.; Xiang, J.H.; Li, F.H. Multiple Isoforms of Anti-Lipopolysaccharide Factors and Their Antimicrobial Functions in the Ridgetail Prawn Exopalaemon carinicauda. Mar. Drugs 2018, 16, 145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Li, S.; Lv, X.; Li, F.; Xiang, J. Characterization of a Lymphoid Organ Specific Anti-lipopolysaccharide Factor From Shrimp Reveals Structure-Activity Relationship of the LPS-Binding Domain. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Li, S.H.; Zhang, X.J.; Sun, Z.; Li, F.H.; Xiang, J.H. Transcriptome Analysis on Chinese Shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis during WSSV Acute Infection. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e58627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Zhan, W.; He, L.; Wei, X.; Wang, X.; Tang, X. An Anti-Lipopolysaccharide Factor in Litopenaeus Vannamei Participates in the Immune Defense Against WSSV and Vibrio Anguillarum. J. Crustacean Biol. 2015, 35, 670–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Liu, J.; Yu, Y.; Li, F.; Zhang, X.; Xiang, J. A new anti-lipopolysaccharide factor (ALF) gene with its SNP polymorphisms related to WSSV-resistance of Litopenaeus vannamei. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2014, 39, 24–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Liu, F.; Liu, G.X.; Li, F.H. Characterization of two pathogenic Photobacterium strains isolated from Exopalaemon carinicauda causing mortality of shrimp. Aquaculture 2016, 464, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Liu, C.H.; Cheng, W.; Hsu, J.P.; Chen, J.C. Vibrio alginolyticus infection in the white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei confirmed by polymerase chain reaction and 16S rDNA sequencing. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 2004, 61, 169–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Soto-Rodriguez, S.A.; Gomez-Gil, B.; Lozano, R. ‘Bright-red’ syndrome in Pacific white shrimp Litopenaeus vannamei is caused by Vibrio harveyi. Dis. Aquat. Organ. 2010, 92, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Zhang, B.C.; Liu, F.; Bian, H.H.; Liu, J.; HUang, J. Isolation, identification, and pathogenicity analysis of a Vibrio parahaemolyticus strain from Litopenaeus vannamei. Prog. Fish. Sci. 2012, 33, 56–62. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rosa, R.D.; Vergnes, A.; de Lorgeril, J.; Goncalves, P.; Perazzolo, L.M.; Saune, L.; Romestand, B.; Fievet, J.; Gueguen, Y.; Bachere, E.; et al. Functional Divergence in Shrimp Anti-Lipopolysaccharide Factors (ALFs): From Recognition of Cell Wall Components to Antimicrobial Activity. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e67937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Liu, N.; Lan, J.F.; Sun, J.J.; Jia, W.M.; Zhao, X.F.; Wang, J.X. A novel crustin from Marsupenaeus japonicus promotes hemocyte phagocytosis. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2015, 49, 313–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, H.; Li, S.H.; Li, F.H.; Xiang, J.H. Structure and Bioactivity of a Modified Peptide Derived from the LPS-Binding Domain of an Anti-Lipopolysaccharide Factor (ALF) of Shrimp. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Jacobs, C.G.C.; Spaink, H.P.; Zee, M.V.D. The extraembryonic serosa is a frontier epithelium providing the insect egg with a full-range innate immune response. eLife 2014, 3, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Chen, Y.X.; Guarnieri, M.T.; Vasil, A.I.; Vasil, M.L.; Mant, C.T.; Hodges, R.S. Role of peptide hydrophobicity in the mechanism of action of alpha-helical antimicrobial peptides. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 1398–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Russell, A.L.; Spuches, A.M.; Williams, B.C.; Venugopal, D.; Klapper, D.; Srouji, A.H.; Hicks, R.P. The effect of the placement and total charge of the basic amino acid clusters on antibacterial organism selectivity and potency. Bioorgan. Med. Chem. 2011, 19, 7008–7022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Guo, S.Y.; Li, S.H.; Li, F.H.; Zhang, X.J.; Xiang, J.H. Modification of a synthetic LPS-binding domain of anti-lipopolysaccharide factor from shrimp reveals strong structure-activity relationship in their antimicrobial characteristics. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2014, 45, 227–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dathe, M.; Nikolenko, H.; Meyer, J.; Beyermann, M.; Bienert, M. Optimization of the antimicrobial activity of magainin peptides by modification of charge. FEBS Lett. 2001, 501, 146–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Giangaspero, A.; Sandri, L.; Tossi, A. Amphipathic alpha helical antimicrobial peptides—A systematic study of the effects of structural and physical properties on biological activity. Eur. J. Biochem. 2001, 268, 5589–5600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Sun, Y.; Li, F.; Xiang, J. Analysis on the dynamic changes of the amount of WSSV in Chinese shrimp Fenneropenaeus chinensis during infection. Aquaculture 2013, 376–379, 124–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lee, C.-T.; Chen, I.-T.; Yang, Y.-T.; Ko, T.-P.; Huang, Y.-T.; Huang, J.-Y.; Huang, M.-F.; Lin, S.-J.; Chen, C.-Y.; Lin, S.-S.; et al. The opportunistic marine pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus becomes virulent by acquiring a plasmid that expresses a deadly toxin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 10798–10803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g001 550
Figure 1. Nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid sequence of LvALF8. The start codon and stop codon were boxed. The dotted underlined residues represented predicted signal peptide. The residues marked with dark background were putative LPS-binding domain and conserved cysteine residues were underlined.
Figure 1. Nucleotide sequence and deduced amino acid sequence of LvALF8. The start codon and stop codon were boxed. The dotted underlined residues represented predicted signal peptide. The residues marked with dark background were putative LPS-binding domain and conserved cysteine residues were underlined.
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g001
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g002 550
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analyses of anti-lipopolysaccharide factors (ALFs) from twelve crustacean species. The GenBank accession numbers of ALFs were listed in Table 1. Whole deduced amino acid sequences of mature ALFs were used for phylogenic analysis by Neighbor Joining, with the Bootstrap value at 1000. Divergence distance and percentage of bootstrap replications were shown in the figure. Different type ALFs (with <40% of bootstrap replications) were classified into seven branches shown with different colors. LvALF8 sequence was marked with a red five-pointed star ( Marinedrugs 19 00250 i001) and FcALF8 sequence was marked with a black triangle (▲).
Figure 2. Phylogenetic analyses of anti-lipopolysaccharide factors (ALFs) from twelve crustacean species. The GenBank accession numbers of ALFs were listed in Table 1. Whole deduced amino acid sequences of mature ALFs were used for phylogenic analysis by Neighbor Joining, with the Bootstrap value at 1000. Divergence distance and percentage of bootstrap replications were shown in the figure. Different type ALFs (with <40% of bootstrap replications) were classified into seven branches shown with different colors. LvALF8 sequence was marked with a red five-pointed star ( Marinedrugs 19 00250 i001) and FcALF8 sequence was marked with a black triangle (▲).
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g002
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g003 550
Figure 3. The tissue distribution of LvALF8 transcripts. Vertical bars represented mean ± S.E. (n = 3). Br, brain; Epi, epidermis; Es, eyestalk; Gi, gill; Hc, hemocytes; Hp, hepatopancreas; Ht, heart; In, intestine; Ms, muscle; Oka, lymphoid organ; Ov, ovary; St, stomach; Te, testis; Tg, thoracic ganglia; Vn, ventral nerve cord. Letters, ‘‘a’’, and “b’’ represented significant differences among tissues at p < 0.01.
Figure 3. The tissue distribution of LvALF8 transcripts. Vertical bars represented mean ± S.E. (n = 3). Br, brain; Epi, epidermis; Es, eyestalk; Gi, gill; Hc, hemocytes; Hp, hepatopancreas; Ht, heart; In, intestine; Ms, muscle; Oka, lymphoid organ; Ov, ovary; St, stomach; Te, testis; Tg, thoracic ganglia; Vn, ventral nerve cord. Letters, ‘‘a’’, and “b’’ represented significant differences among tissues at p < 0.01.
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g003
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g004 550
Figure 4. Expression levels of LvALF8 in the lymphoid organ of shrimp at different time post-WSSV (A) or V. parahaemolyticus (B) challenge. PBS stands for shrimps injected with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), (WSSV) stands for shrimps injected with white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) and V.p stands for shrimps injected with V. parahaemolyticus. Gene expression levels with significant differences (p < 0.01) between the two treatments were shown with stars (**).
Figure 4. Expression levels of LvALF8 in the lymphoid organ of shrimp at different time post-WSSV (A) or V. parahaemolyticus (B) challenge. PBS stands for shrimps injected with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), (WSSV) stands for shrimps injected with white spot syndrome virus (WSSV) and V.p stands for shrimps injected with V. parahaemolyticus. Gene expression levels with significant differences (p < 0.01) between the two treatments were shown with stars (**).
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g004
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g005 550
Figure 5. In vivo anti-bacterial function of LvALF8 in L. vannamei. (A) Total viable bacteria count in hepatopancreas (Hp) of shrimp injected with synthetic peptide and V. parahaemolyticus. (B) V. parahaemolyticus counts in hepatopancreas (Hp) of shrimp injected with synthetic peptide and V. parahaemolyticus. (C) Spread plates of hepatopancreas homogenate of shrimp injected with synthetic peptide and V. parahaemolyticus. PBS, injected with PBS solution; LV, injected with synthetic LvALF8-LBD peptide and V. parahaemolyticus; FV, injected with synthetic FcALF8-LBD peptide and V. parahaemolyticus; GV, injected with synthetic GFP peptide and V. parahaemolyticus. Bacteria numbers with significant differences between the two treatments were shown with stars (* at p < 0.05 and ** at p < 0.01).
Figure 5. In vivo anti-bacterial function of LvALF8 in L. vannamei. (A) Total viable bacteria count in hepatopancreas (Hp) of shrimp injected with synthetic peptide and V. parahaemolyticus. (B) V. parahaemolyticus counts in hepatopancreas (Hp) of shrimp injected with synthetic peptide and V. parahaemolyticus. (C) Spread plates of hepatopancreas homogenate of shrimp injected with synthetic peptide and V. parahaemolyticus. PBS, injected with PBS solution; LV, injected with synthetic LvALF8-LBD peptide and V. parahaemolyticus; FV, injected with synthetic FcALF8-LBD peptide and V. parahaemolyticus; GV, injected with synthetic GFP peptide and V. parahaemolyticus. Bacteria numbers with significant differences between the two treatments were shown with stars (* at p < 0.05 and ** at p < 0.01).
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g005
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g006 550
Figure 6. Bacterial agglutination assay of LvALF8. 107 cfu/mL V. Parahaemolyticus is incubated with 64 μM LvALF8-LBD, FcALF8-LBD and GFP peptides within 1 h, respectively, and observed under a microscope. Scale bar is 20 μm.
Figure 6. Bacterial agglutination assay of LvALF8. 107 cfu/mL V. Parahaemolyticus is incubated with 64 μM LvALF8-LBD, FcALF8-LBD and GFP peptides within 1 h, respectively, and observed under a microscope. Scale bar is 20 μm.
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g006
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g007 550
Figure 7. In vivo anti-viral function of LvALF8 in L. vannamei after infection of WSSV pre-incubated with peptides. The copy number of WSSV was shown by measuring the content of VP28 per ng DNA. GW, FW and LW showed three different groups injected with WSSV pre-incubated with GFP, FcALF8-LBD and LvALF8-LBD peptides, respectively. Viral copy numbers with significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two treatments were shown with star (*). No significant difference was shown with “ns”.
Figure 7. In vivo anti-viral function of LvALF8 in L. vannamei after infection of WSSV pre-incubated with peptides. The copy number of WSSV was shown by measuring the content of VP28 per ng DNA. GW, FW and LW showed three different groups injected with WSSV pre-incubated with GFP, FcALF8-LBD and LvALF8-LBD peptides, respectively. Viral copy numbers with significant differences (p < 0.05) between the two treatments were shown with star (*). No significant difference was shown with “ns”.
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g007
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g008 550
Figure 8. Sequence alignments and helical wheel prediction of LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD. (A) Sequence alignments of LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD. The 22 amino acid residues of LBD sequences were listed, and their identical residues were marked darkly. (B) Helical wheel prediction of the distribution of amino acid side chains: LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD. The basic residues were shown in blue, the hydrophobic residues were shown in yellow, and the hydrophilic residues with different hydrophilic abilities were shown in other colors.
Figure 8. Sequence alignments and helical wheel prediction of LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD. (A) Sequence alignments of LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD. The 22 amino acid residues of LBD sequences were listed, and their identical residues were marked darkly. (B) Helical wheel prediction of the distribution of amino acid side chains: LvALF8-LBD and FcALF8-LBD. The basic residues were shown in blue, the hydrophobic residues were shown in yellow, and the hydrophilic residues with different hydrophilic abilities were shown in other colors.
Marinedrugs 19 00250 g008
Table
Table 1. The information of ALFs used in the present study.
Table 1. The information of ALFs used in the present study.
SpeciesGene NameAccession Number
Fenneropenaeus chinensisAntilipopolysaccharide factor isoform 1AFU61124
Fenneropenaeus chinensisAntilipopolysaccharide factor isoform 2AFU61125
Fenneropenaeus chinensisAntilipopolysaccharide factor isoform 3AFU61126
Fenneropenaeus chinensisAntilipopolysaccharide factor isoform 4AFU61127
Fenneropenaeus chinensisAntilipopolysaccharide factor isoform 5AFU61128
Fenneropenaeus chinensisAntilipopolysaccharide factor isoform 6AFU61129
Fenneropenaeus chinensisAntimicrobial peptide (FcALF7)AAX63831
Fenneropenaeus chinensisAntilipopolysaccharide factor isoform 8MH998632
Macrobrachium nipponenseAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor 5ALF02821
Macrobrachium nipponenseAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor 4ALF02820
Macrobrachium nipponenseAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor 3ALF02819
Macrobrachium nipponenseAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor 2ALF02817
Macrobrachium nipponenseAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor 1ALF02818
Portunus trituberculatusAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor isoform 7AFA42358
Portunus trituberculatusAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor isoform 6AFA42334
Portunus trituberculatusAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor isoform 5AFA42332
Portunus trituberculatusAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor isoform 4AFA42333
Portunus trituberculatusAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor isoform 3ACS45385
Portunus pelagicusAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor precursorAFM77968
Scylla serrataAnti-lipopolysaccharide factorADW11095
Scylla serrataAntilipopolysaccharide factor precursorACH87655
Scylla paramamosainAnti-lipopolysaccharide factorAHB62419
Scylla paramamosainAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor isoform 4CCW43202
Scylla paramamosainAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor-6CCW43204
Scylla tranquebaricaAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor precursorAFM77969
Penaeus monodonAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor isoform 3ABP73289
Penaeus monodonAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor isoform 6AER45468
Penaeus monodonAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor isoform 2ABP73291
Penaeus monodonAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor isoform 7ANP92039
Litopenaeus vannameiAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor isoform 1AHG99284
Litopenaeus vannameiAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor AV-K isoformACT21197
Litopenaeus vannameiAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor 5 (LvALF8)AVP74305
Litopenaeus schmittiAnti-lipopolysaccharide factorABJ90465
Litopenaeus stylirostrisAnti-lipopolysaccharide factorAAY33769
Macrobrachium rosenbergiiAnti-lipopolysaccharide factorAFC93433
Macrobrachium rosenbergiiAnti-lipopolysaccharide factorAEP84102
Macrobrachium rosenbergiiAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor 3AFW04306
Macrobrachium rosenbergiiAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor 2AFW04305
Macrobrachium rosenbergiiAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor 1AFW04304
Macrobrachium rosenbergiiAnti-lipopolysaccharide factor 2ADI80707
Table
Table 2. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the synthetic LPS-binding domain (LBD) peptide.
Table 2. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) of the synthetic LPS-binding domain (LBD) peptide.
MicroorganismsMICMBC
Gram negative bacteria (G−):
Vibrio parahemolyticus1–2 μM4–8 μM
Vibrio harveyi1–2 μM4–8 μM
Vibrio alginolyticus1–2 μM4–8 μM
Vibrio owensii1–2 μM4–8 μM
Photobacterium damselae2–4 μM8–16 μM
Escherichia coli4-8 μM>64 μM
Gram positive bacteria (G+):
Staphylococcus epidermidis2–4 μM32–64 μM
Staphylococcus aureus4–8 μM>64 μM
Kurthia gibsonii4–8 μM4–8 μM
Table
Table 3. Key physicochemical parameters of LvALF8-LBD, FcALF8-LBD and GFP peptides.
Table 3. Key physicochemical parameters of LvALF8-LBD, FcALF8-LBD and GFP peptides.
PeptideSequenceNetC aH bpI cGRAVY dμH e
LvALF8-LBDAc-Y(CSYSTRPYFLRWRLKFKSKVWC)P-NH260.57110.20−0.5410.040
FcALF8-LBDAc-Y(CSYSTRPYFIRWQLKFKTKIWC)P-NH250.6519.90−0.4450.080
GFPAc-TTGKLPVPWPTLVTTFSYGVQCFS-NH210.7327.860.33330.314
a NetC represents net charge. Lys (K), and Arg (R) were assigned with +1 charge; b H represents average hydrophobicity, that is, total hydrophobicity indices of all residue divided by the number of residues; c pI represents isoelectric point; d GRAVY represents the Grand Average hydropathy value; e μH represents average hydrophobic moment.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, M.; Li, S.; Lv, X.; Xiang, J.; Lu, Y.; Li, F. A Lymphoid Organ Specific Anti-Lipopolysaccharide Factor from Litopenaeus vannamei Exhibits Strong Antimicrobial Activities. Mar. Drugs 2021, 19, 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19050250

AMA Style

Sun M, Li S, Lv X, Xiang J, Lu Y, Li F. A Lymphoid Organ Specific Anti-Lipopolysaccharide Factor from Litopenaeus vannamei Exhibits Strong Antimicrobial Activities. Marine Drugs. 2021; 19(5):250. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19050250

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Mingzhe, Shihao Li, Xinjia Lv, Jianhai Xiang, Yuanan Lu, and Fuhua Li. 2021. "A Lymphoid Organ Specific Anti-Lipopolysaccharide Factor from Litopenaeus vannamei Exhibits Strong Antimicrobial Activities" Marine Drugs 19, no. 5: 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19050250

APA Style

Sun, M., Li, S., Lv, X., Xiang, J., Lu, Y., & Li, F. (2021). A Lymphoid Organ Specific Anti-Lipopolysaccharide Factor from Litopenaeus vannamei Exhibits Strong Antimicrobial Activities. Marine Drugs, 19(5), 250. https://doi.org/10.3390/md19050250

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop