Next Article in Journal
Isolation and Absolute Configurations of Diversiform C17, C21 and C25 Terpenoids from the Marine Sponge Cacospongia sp.
Previous Article in Journal
Discovery of an Unusual Fatty Acid Amide from the ndgRyo Gene Mutant of Marine-Derived Streptomyces youssoufiensis
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Marine Drugs
Volume 17
Issue 1
10.3390/md17010013
marinedrugs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Ciguatera in Mexico (1984–2013)

by
Erick J. Núñez-Vázquez
1,2,*,
Antonio Almazán-Becerril
3,
David J. López-Cortés
1,
Alejandra Heredia-Tapia
2,
Francisco E. Hernández-Sandoval
1,
Christine J. Band-Schmidt
4,
José J. Bustillos-Guzmán
1,
Ismael Gárate-Lizárraga
4,
Ernesto García-Mendoza
5,
Cesar A. Salinas-Zavala
1 and
Amaury Cordero-Tapia
1
1
Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas del Noroeste S.C. (CIBNOR), A. P. 128., La Paz C. P. 23096, Mexico
2
Investigación para la Conservación y el Desarrollo A. C. (INCODE), Nayarit 1325-A, Las Garzas, La Paz C. P. 23079, Mexico
3
Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán (CICY), Unidad de Ciencias del Agua, (UCIA), Calle 8, No. 39, Mz. 29, S. M. 64, Cancún C. P. 77524, Mexico
4
Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas (IPN-CICIMAR), Av. IPN s/n, Playa Palo de Santa Rita, La Paz C. P. 23096, Mexico
5
Centro de Investigación y Científica y de Educación Superior de Ensenada (CICESE), Carretera Ensenada-Tijuana 3918, Zona Playitas, Ensenada C. P. 22860, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2019, 17(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/md17010013
Submission received: 10 October 2018 / Revised: 4 December 2018 / Accepted: 12 December 2018 / Published: 28 December 2018
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Historical records of ciguatera in Mexico date back to 1862. This review, including references and epidemiological reports, documents 464 cases during 25 events from 1984 to 2013: 240 (51.72%) in Baja California Sur, 163 (35.12%) in Quintana Roo, 45 (9.69%) in Yucatan, and 16 (3.44%) cases of Mexican tourists intoxicated in Cuba. Carnivorous fish, such as snapper (Lutjanus) and grouper (Epinephelus and Mycteroperca) in the Pacific Ocean, and great barracuda (Sphyraena barracuda) and snapper (Lutjanus) in the Atlantic (Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea), were involved in all cases. In the Mexican Caribbean, a sub-record of ciguatera cases that occurred before 1984 exists. However, the number of intoxications has increased in recent years, and this food poisoning is poorly studied in the region. Current records suggest that ciguatera fish poisoning in humans is the second most prevalent form of seafood poisoning in Mexico, only exceeded by paralytic shellfish poisoning (505 cases, 21 fatalities in the same 34-year period). In this study, the status of ciguatera in Mexico (epidemiological and treatment), and the fish vectors are reviewed. Dinoflagellate species Gambierdiscus, Ostreopsis, and Prorocentrum are related with the reported outbreaks, marine toxins, ecological risk, and the potential toxicological impact.

1. Introduction

Ciguatera fish poisoning (CFP) is a food-borne illness endemic to tropical and subtropical waters. Numerous benthic and pelagic fishes accumulate the dinoflagellate’s ladder frame polyether toxins, ciguatoxins (CTXs), in their flesh and viscera [1,2]. In tropical regions, CFP is a serious problem impacting both human health and the fishing industry. More than 50,000 CFP cases are reported annually, which is the most commonly occurring cause of human poisoning through seafood consumption worldwide [3,4,5]. The true incidence of CFP is difficult to ascertain due to under-reporting of CFP-related symptoms (2 to 10%) to health authorities [6]. These symptoms are characterized by gastrointestinal, neurological, and cardiovascular disorders, which often persist for days, months, or even years, and in some severe cases, can lead to paralysis and coma, and in extreme cases, even death [4,7].
More than 400 species of fish have been identified as vectors of CTXs [5]. The primary causative organism is the benthic dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus toxicus [1,5,8,9,10,11]. The genus Gambierdiscus comprises 15 species and 12 of them are toxic [11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Other benthic dinoflagellate species of the genus Ostreopsis produce Palytoxin-like compounds (PTX) and some Prorocentrum species produce okadaic acid and its analogs (diarrheic shellfish toxins), which have also been associated with ciguatera [5,22]. However, there is little evidence that Ostreopsis and Prorocentrum species produce this syndrome [23]. Historical records of ciguatera have been documented in Mexico since 1862 [24]. In this study, we review the status of ciguatera in Mexico (epidemiological and treatment) from 1984 to 2013, the fish vectors implicated, and the potential causative dinoflagellates (Gambierdiscus spp., Ostreopsis spp., and Prorocentrum spp.).

1.1. Historical Records

Before 1984, only two cases of ciguatera poisoning were reported in Mexico. In 1968, Halstead [24] described an episode that occurred in 1862 when a French crew sailing into the Gulf of Mexico became intoxicated after eating parrotfish (Scarus sp.). The same author also described another case that occurred in Puerto Vallarta, Jalisco in 1962 where intoxication occurred after consuming wahoo fish (Acanthocybium solanderi).

1.2. Recent Cases

1.2.1. Ciguatera in the Mexican Pacific

All ciguatera cases registered in this area were reported in the state of Baja California Sur (B.C.S.). The cases were rare and sporadic and only four human intoxications have been reported from 1984 to 2011, involving a total of 240 people (Table 1) [25,26,27,28]. Parrilla-Cerrillo et al. [29] were the first to describe ciguatera in this region. In 1984, 200 persons became ill in La Paz, Baja California Sur (24.1405° N, 110.3123° W, Figure 1). The toxicity of snapper fish muscle of the genus Lutjanus was assessed by mouse bioassay (MBA) (Table 1 and Table 2). In 1992, 25 cases of CFP were associated with the consumption of flag cabrilla or starry grouper (Epinephelus labriformis) from Rocas Alijos (300 km west of Magdalena Bay; 24°57′31′′ N, 115°44′59′′ W, Figure 1; Table 1 and Table 2) [30]. In 1993, Lechuga-Devéze and Sierra-Beltrán [31] recorded another CFP outbreak, where seven members of a tuna ship crew were intoxicated after consuming cabrilla and garropa (Epinephelus sp. and Mycteroperca sp., respectively). In this last study, the presence of CTX-type toxins in the consumed fish was confirmed by mouse bioassay MBA (Table 1 and Table 2).
Between 1993 and 1997, fisherman reported five intoxications following consumption of fish liver from Serranidae (grouper) and Lutjanidae (snapper) in El Pardito Island and Punta San Evaristo (24°35.0′ N, 110°49.6′ W, Figure 1). The symptoms were diarrhea; nausea; eye, limb, and abdominal pains; headache; numbness; vomiting; weakness; pruritus; hyperesthesia; fatigue; desquamation around lips, eyebrows, hands, and feet; lip and tongue paralysis; and, in one case, convulsions. These symptoms appeared from 4 to 12 h after fish consumption and lasted a few days (Table 1 and Table 2). All these events occurred between March and July: one case in 1993, two in 1994, one in 1996, and another one in 1997 [28,32]. In the same location, the presence of neurotoxins of the CTX type were confirmed in livers of M. prionura and L. colorado by MBA and HPLC analysis [28,32].
Three new intoxication cases with similar symptoms occurred in 2004, involving the consumption of liver of big grouper (Ephinephelus sp.) in Punta Abreojos, B.C.S. (26°43′38′′ N, 113°34′29′′ W, Figure 1). The symptoms of these intoxications were more severe and lingered for several days, causing neurologic effects, with symptoms being reactivated by fish consumption several months afterward (unpublished data).

1.2.2. Ciguatera in the Mexican Atlantic (Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean)

Information compiled from databases provided by the Secretaría de Salud (SS; Mexican Health Ministry) and scientific literature, indicate that, between 1994 and 2013, 14 CFP events occurred in the Mexican Atlantic (Table 1 and Table 2). During these events, a total of 208 poisonings were reported. In the state of Quintana Roo, 88 cases were reported in Isla Mujeres, 20 on the island of Cozumel (21°13′ N, 86°43′ W), 14 in Cancun (21°09′38′′ N, 86°50′51′′ W), 5 in Puerto Aventuras (20°37′39′′ N, 87°04′52′′ W), 32 in Playa del Carmen (20°30′42′′ N, 87°14′3′′ W), and 4 in Tulum (20°37′39′′ N, 87°04′52′′ W) (Figure 1). In the state of Yucatan, 26 cases were reported in Merida (20°58′1.56′′ N, 89°37′25.68′′ W), 11 in El Progreso (20°56′ N, 89°34′ W), 6 in Kanasin, and 2 in a non-specified site (Figure 1). All cases were related with the consumption of Sphyraena barracuda (great barracuda). According to Arcila-Herrera et al. [33], ciguatera has always been present in this region. It is common to not register these poisonings and many are only known as anecdotal accounts. Although reported incidents have increased, CFP still remains poorly studied in Mexico. Sixteen other cases of Mexican tourists intoxicated by CFP were reported in Playa Girón, Cuba (22°13′ N, 81°10′ W, Table 1 and Table 2, Figure 1), and are included in this review (Table 2).
Arcila-Herrera et al. described the first record of CFP in the area of Isla Mujeres [33]. In July 1994, 10 people from two families were intoxicated after consuming grilled barracuda. The intoxicated people were transferred to Cancun, Quintana Roo, where six were hospitalized with acute symptoms. CFP symptoms started between 20 min and 12 h after fish ingestion, with diarrhea and cold hypersensitivity being the most common clinical symptoms, and cold-to-hot temperature reversal dysesthesia occurring in all cases. The evolution of the symptoms in the patients was tracked over the subsequent 34 months by the medical center in the city of Merida, Yucatan. One case presented itchiness after drinking low quantities of alcohol. Four people developed chronic to moderate symptoms, and one person had persistent arthralgia that prevented some mobility, although improved following administration of indomethacin.
A second case of CFP involved 30 French tourists in Isla Mujeres during the summer of 1995. They also consumed grilled barracuda (10–12 kg) in a local restaurant. Patients were treated and hospitalized in the Antipoison Center of Marseille in France to evaluate the efficiency of the CFP treatment with mannitol. All patients presented gastrointestinal disorders within 4–6 h after consumption of barracuda, also developing neurosensory disorders and diffuse pain during the flight back to France. They presented low plasma cholinesterase levels. All patients who experienced high severity symptoms upon admission into the hospital reported persistent intoxication symptoms that lasted between one and seven months after fish consumption. In six of these patients, symptoms re-occurred following subsequent ingestion of seafood and alcohol [34,35].
In 1996, a CFP intoxication outbreak following consumption of barracuda affected six residents of Kanasin and 15 residents of Merida, Yucatan. Ten of the cases from Merida were infants between one and four years old, with the primary symptoms being paresthesia and muscular spasms [36]. A fourth case occurred in 2000 in Progreso, Yucatan following consumption of barracuda. Ten adults and a four-year-old child were intoxicated, with symptoms including muscular contracture, abdominal and limb pain, vomiting, diaphoresis, hypersalivation, affected awareness, severe muscular spasms, mydriasis of the central pupil, bradyarrhythmia, and filiform pulse. The affected individuals were hospitalized in the Centro Médico Americano in Progreso, with the child being transferred to the pediatric emergency center of the Hospital General Agustin O’Horan in Merida, and treated with mannitol, which resulted in improvement [37].
Farstad and Chow [38] described a case of CFP in 2001, where a woman and a man became intoxicated in Cancun, Quintana Roo. Symptoms, beginning six hours after consuming barracuda, included vomiting, abdominal pain, and profuse watery diarrhea that decreased within 12 h. Several days after the first symptoms, both patients noticed bizarre facial and extremity paresthesia, as well as the peculiar sensation that cold food seemed hot, and hot drinks felt icy cold. The woman had swollen glands in the neck and a sore throat. The man was more seriously affected with headaches, malaise, as well as debilitating and burning numbness in the hands and feet. When exercising, the man experienced unbearable pruritus and severe pubic pain during ejaculation. Five weeks after the onset of symptoms the CFP diagnosis was confirmed, but since both parties improved dramatically, no treatment was prescribed. After 10 weeks both patients were symptom free.
In 2004, Keynan and Pottesman [39] from the Infectious Diseases Unit, Bnei-Zion Medical Center in Haifa, Israel, described another CFP case. A woman developed paresthesia of the right arm and legs after traveling to the Peninsula of Yucatan and Guatemala where she consumed seafood, but could not recall a specific fish consumed. The paresthesia spread to her face, affecting the entire left side. She also felt cold and had difficulty falling asleep. The symptoms continued for at least five weeks, consisting of pruritus, paresthesia, myalgia, fatigue, and sleepiness.
In the autumn of 2006 in Isla Mujeres, Quintana Roo, nine local residents displayed CFP symptoms after consuming barracuda and were hospitalized at the Jesús Kumate Rodríguez General Hospital. They suffered diarrhea and vomiting that led to severe dehydration. These symptoms worsened and they were transferred to the Hospital General of Cancun. The Mexican government health authorities of the Comisión de Fomento Sanitario prohibited the sale of barracuda after this outbreak.
In August 2007, 13 cases with symptoms of CFP occurred in Cozumel, Quintana (Q.) Roo that required hospitalization. In October of the same year, five more cases were reported in the same locality. Patients were hospitalized in the Hospital General de Cozumel and the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social after consuming barracuda. While hospitalized, two patients had convulsions and one had difficulties speaking. In April 2009, 12 fishermen of Isla Mujeres, Q. Roo were admitted to the Hospital Integral with CFP symptoms after consuming barracuda with an estimated weight to 12–15 kg. After two hours, they experienced gastrointestinal disturbances with vomiting, chills, muscle and headache pain, lip and tongue numbness, dehydration, and subsequently weight loss.
In March 2010, a CFP outbreak involving 12 patients occurred in Cancun, Q. Roo. All had abdominal pain, diarrhea, general discomfort, muscular pain, vomiting, paresthesia, and headaches, with two cases requiring hospitalization. Later in the same month, in Puerto Aventuras, Q. Roo, another CFP outbreak was recorded involving five people following consumption of barracuda. All patients experienced diarrhea, general discomfort, muscular pain, vomiting, and paresthesia, and one person was hospitalized.
In April 2010 in the city of Merida, 11 people from two families were intoxicated by consumption of barracuda acquired in a local market. Another outbreak occurred in August 2011 in Playa del Carmen, Q. Roo. In this event 29 people were intoxicated by eating barracuda acquired in a local fish market. In some cases, hospitalization lasted two weeks.
At the end of August 2011 in Isla Mujeres, Q. Roo, 27 people from five countries (Philippines, England, Canada, Mexico, and U.S.A.) were intoxicated by consuming barracuda (Sphyraena) and cubera (Lutjanus sp.). All were hospitalized in Cancun (Hospital General Z-3, Hospital Regional 17, Hospital Amerimed, and Hospital Galenia).
Two cases were reported in Playa del Carmen in March 2012, and in Tulum in May of 2013, with three and four people, respectively. These cases were also associated with the consumption of barracuda. They entered the Hospital General de Playa del Carmen.
The main signs and symptoms of intoxication in these cases (Table 2) were gastrointestinal symptoms (nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea), neurological symptoms (paresthesia, dysesthesia, and dyspnea), neuropsychological (depression, emotional lability, and fatigue) symptoms, and, in some cases, cardiovascular symptoms (bradycardia and hypotension). Gastrointestinal symptoms arose in the first few hours, followed by neurological and neuropsychological symptoms, which lasted for weeks, and in some cases months (Table 2). In one case of the Isla Mujeres intoxications [33], symptoms remained even after one year. It is possible that other chronic ciguatera cases with long-term symptoms exist in Mexico; however, most patients associated with CFP outbreaks in Mexico have not been tracked for chronic, long-lasting effects.
In the majority of outbreaks (84%) of CFP in Mexico, treatment was supported by the use of calcium gluconate, analgesic, antidiarrheal, antihistaminic, anti-inflammatory, antiemetic, antibiotics, anxiolytic, and vitamin supplements. Since 1995, however, mannitol has been used by physicians (Table 2) in four outbreaks (16%) with rapid health recovery of the affected patients.
In Mexico, the body temperature of patients has unfortunately not been documented in the majority of CFP cases during the acute phase of intoxication, though this is a useful physiological parameter, given that hypothermia (<36.5 °C) has been observed in both intoxicated humans [42,43] and in murine models [44,45]. Obtaining this basic physiological parameter could be useful in the future monitoring of ciguatera fish poisoning cases.
In the Mexican Pacific, fish species involved in CFP were from Serranidae and Lutjanidae families, whereas in the Mexican Caribbean, 100% of the outbreaks involved barracuda (S. barracuda) (Table 1). When comparing the signs and symptoms between the Pacific and the Atlantic coast, the cases of intoxication from the Pacific were characterized by the early presence of neurological signs and desquamation in two outbreaks (Table 2).

1.3. Dinoflagellate Species Associated with CFP

The presence of G. toxicus along the Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico coasts has been reported since the 1990s [46,47,48,49]. However, Litaker et al. [15], based on both molecular and morphological characterization, considered that G. toxicus was not present in these zones. Therefore, previous reports of the presence of this species in these regions [50,51,52,53,54] are not conclusive and could be misidentifications of other Gambierdiscus species, such as G. carpenteri, G. carolinianus, or G. caribaeus [55,56,57,58]. These species, together with G. belizeanus, have shown toxicity in the Caribbean [59,60,61]; therefore, they could potentially be the species responsible for CTXs production along the Caribbean coasts of Mexico.
In the Pacific, there are reports of G. toxicus in Pardito Island, Magdalena Bay (Gulf of California), and the coasts of Nayarit and Revillagigedo [62,63,64,65]. However, considering the increasing diversity of this genus and the difficulty in identifying these species based only on morphological features, it is necessary to perform toxicological and genetic studies to confirm the presence of G. toxicus in this zone. Thus, the causative agent of intoxication events in the Pacific still requires confirmation. In addition, a newly described Gambierdiscus species, which may be involved, has been reported for Bahía de la Paz [66].
Increasing numbers of studies related to benthic dinoflagellates in the coasts of the Gulf of Mexico, Caribbean, Gulf of California, and Tropical Pacific of Mexico are being completed [51,52,54,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82]. Consequently, the knowledge of the number of species and their geographic distribution has increased. At present, there is evidence for the occurrence of the following potentially toxic species: Ostreopsis siamensis, O. lenticularis, O marina, O. ovata, Gambierdiscus sp, Prorocentrum lima, and P. rhathymum along the Pacific coast (Table 3; Figure 2); and G. carolinianus, G. belizeanum, G. caribaeus, G. carpenteri, Fukuyoa yasumotoi (=G. yasumotoi), Ostreopsis ovata, O. lenticularis, O. belizeanus, O. marina, O. siamensis, O. heptagona, and several benthic species of the genus Prorocentrum (P. lima, P. concavum, P. hoffmannianum, P. belizeanum, P. rhathymum and P. emarginatum) along the Atlantic coast (Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico) (Table 3; Figure 2).
There are ongoing studies describing dinoflagellate distribution associated with ciguatera in Mexico. Several cultured strains of the dinoflagellate species mentioned above exist in national and international collections (Table 4). Morphological variation, molecular phylogeny, isozyme analyses, and toxicity of Gambierdiscus strains isolated from Mexican waters have been investigated in comparative studies between strains of different origins [46,59,60,61,83,84]. In most cases, the toxicity (toxin profile and toxin concentration) and the genetic and physiological characteristics of Gambierdiscus species reported in the literature are unknown. Most taxonomic and ecological studies have been performed with preserved samples.
Benthic dinoflagellates inhabit a variety of substrates. They have been collected from macroalgae, seagrasses, sandy bottoms, rocks, and coral skeletons in rocky and coral reefs [51,52,56,57,58,79,80,81,85]. Ostreopsis siamensis and O. lenticularis occur in the water column [78,82]. Demographic descriptions of benthic dinoflagellate communities are better known in the Atlantic than in the Pacific. Prorocentrum has the greatest species richness in the Caribbean and the Gulf of Mexico [51,56,79,80], and P. lima was reported as the dominant species in the port of Veracruz from March to June, reaching abundances of 2.97 × 104 cells g−1 of Thalassia testudinum [51]. Along the Yucatan, P. rhathymum was the dominant species reaching similar abundances of 2.41 × 104 cells g−1 [79,80]. In the Northern Caribbean, Ostreopsis (mainly O. marina and O. heptagona) was the dominant genus, reaching densities of 3.0 × 104 cells g−1 [85]. Gambierdiscus genus has been registered in this zone but at abundances lower than 1 × 103 cells g−1.
These results suggest a high biodiversity, wide geographic distribution, and heterogeneous population dynamics of benthic dinoflagellates in the Mexican coastal waters, potentially explaining the unpredictability of CFP events. Ciguatera outbreaks could increase in the next few years along the coasts of Mexico due to the degradation of the coral reef and other coastal ecosystems (i.e., eutrophication).

1.4. Fish Species Involved in CFP

All recent cases of CFP along both the Pacific and Atlantic coasts of Mexico have been related to the consumption of carnivorous fish such as lutjanids (snapper), serranids (grouper), and sphryraenids (barracuda) (Table 5). These families of fish are commonly consumed and economically important in regional coastal fisheries, representing a valuable protein source for the population [87,88]. In the Caribbean, herbivorous fishes are not usually associated with ciguatera [89,90]. In contrast, many species of carnivorous fish cause ciguatera (Muraenidae, Lutjanidae, Serranidae, Lethrinidae, Scombridae, Carangidae, and Sphyraenidae). The last two families are especially important vectors of CFP in the Caribbean.

1.5. Marine Toxins

1.5.1. Dinoflagellate Toxins

The toxicity of Mexican Gambierdiscus species has been evaluated in a few strains: CZ2, CZ3, and CZ4 (Table 4) isolated from Cozumel, Q. Roo (20°30’ N, 86°57’ W; Figure 1) and from the strains Mex Algae 1 gam, Mex Algae gam 1, and Mex Algae 2 gam 1 isolated from Cancun. Babinchak et al. [46] evaluated toxicity (CZ2, CZ3, and CZ4) by mouse bioassay, cytotoxicity assay in rat pituitary tumor cells (GH4C1), calcium uptake experiments, and the brevotoxin (PbTx) displacement assay; however, they did not describe the specific toxicity of the strains. Hemolytic activity (attributed to maitotoxin (MTX) of G. carolinianus Mex Algae gam 1 (149–201 EC50 cells log phase) and G. caribaeus Mexico Algae 1 gam 1 (198–212 EC50 cells log phase) was evaluated by in vitro human erythrocyte lysis assay [59]. Litaker et al. [61] analyzed the toxicity of G. caribaeus Mexico Algae 1 (1.29 ± 0.40 fg CTX3C eq. cell−1) and G. carpenteri Mexico Algae 2 Gam 1 (1.14 ± 0.18 fg CTX3C eq cell−1) in Cancun strains using a cell-based neuro-2a cytotoxicity assay. Heredia-Tapia et al. [75] evaluated the toxicity of P. lima (strain PRL-1) isolated offshore near Isla El Pardito in the Gulf of California (Figure 1) by mouse and Artemia bioassays, antimicrobial test, TLC, and HPLC-MS. Results demonstrated the presence of diarrhetic shellfish-toxins okadaic acid (OA) and dinophysistoxin-1 (DTX1) in the unusual proportion of 1:2, as well as a fast acting toxin (FAT), presumably prorocentrolide [91].

1.5.2. Fish Toxins

Lewis [90] classified CTXs according to their area of origin: Pacific Ocean and Caribbean Sea CTX toxin families (Figure 3), with toxin structures differing between the two regions. In the Pacific zone, the most potent and principal ciguatoxin is ciguatoxin-1 (P-CTX-1; P stands for Pacific), followed by P-CTX-2 and P-CTX-3. Structural modifications were mainly observed in the terminal of the toxin molecules, mostly following oxidation. Caribbean ciguatoxins (C-CTX-1, C stands for Caribbean) are less polar than P-CTX-1 and Caribbean ciguatoxin structures (C-CTX-1 and C-CTX-2) have been determined [86]. Differences in the structure of the two families help explain the different symptoms of CFP in the Pacific and Caribbean regions [5]. Figure 4 compares the frequency of symptoms in CFP cases in the Mexican Pacific and Atlantic (Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea).
Notably, in most of the Mexican CFP outbreaks, there has been no or minimal effort to determine the chemical nature and concentration of the toxins. Barton et al. [30] reported the first CFP epidemic involving 25 cases due to the consumption of flag cabrilla (E. labriformias). Hospitals in Southern California, U.S.A. successfully tracked the source of the outbreak to fish caught in the Rocas Alijos area off the coast of B.C.S., Mexico. Fish and blood samples of patients were sent to the University of Hawaii (Dr. Hokama Laboratory, Honolulu, HI, USA). A CTX-like compound was detected in the fish samples with a stick-enzyme immunoassay, although CTXs in blood samples from the affected patients were not determined, since normal serum lipids interfered with the assay. In the second case, Núñez-Vázquez et al. [32] described human poisoning events at El Pardito Island and Punta San Evaristo in B.C.S. in the Gulf of California that occurred during the spring season between 1993 and 1997. Gastrointestinal, neurological and cardiovascular disorders followed the consumption of liver from large Serranidae and Lutjanidae fish. During the spring of 1996, an adult specimen of M. prionura and another of L. colorado were obtained from the area. Liposoluble toxins extracted from the liver were evaluated by MBA, with mice developing clinical signs attributable to CFP. The sample from M. prionura reached 3.42 µg of ciguatoxin/kg of tissue. The extracts were analyzed by HPLC and samples from toxic fish showed chromatography peaks that were absent in negative fish controls. Their chromatographic behavior corresponded to fractions described as Ciguatoxin-1 (presumably P-CTX-1). LC-MS analysis did not reveal the presence of OA or its analogs in these samples (personal communication with Prof. T. Yasumoto). Only one report described the presence of OA in barracuda implicated in CFP in the Caribbean [92]. P-CTX-1 is one of the most important toxins in carnivorous fishes due to its high relative concentration in tissues as well as its toxicity [4]. This toxin presents the highest toxic potential of all the CTXs [1]. P-CTX-1 and P-CTX-3 analogues are thought to be products of the oxidative metabolism (biotransformation) of P-CTX-4B by cytochrome enzymes in fish livers [23]. P-CTX-3 is hypothesized to be an intermediate in the metabolism of GTX-4B to P-CTX-1. In the bio-oxidation of GTX-4B to P-CTX, there is a 10-fold increase in toxicity [93]. The biotransformation commonly occurs in the liver of the fish and can be a part of the detoxification process. Specifically, in major carnivorous fishes, the biotransformation of CTX-s to more polar forms with lower potency can be a strategy that accelerates the depuration and/or detoxification of the CTX-s in fish [9,23].
Compared with CFP, which is caused by CTXs, intoxication by palytoxin in fish seems to be much more severe and often results in death [99,100,101,102,103]. In addition to some of the hallmark symptoms of CFP, patients intoxicated with palytoxin exhibit acute respiratory distress and muscle spasms, cyanosis, metal taste, renal failure (no urine produced), and elevated serum enzyme levels. In severe cases, patients die within 30 min to a few days [99,100,103]. Wiles et al. [104] found the toxin hemorrhagic and destructive to cardiovascular, kidney, gastrointestinal, and respiratory systems [101]. Diarrhea is also reported in human poisoning cases and is an important indicator of experimental palytoxicosis, as well as cyanosis and progressive paralysis [105]. In all cases of CFP analyzed in this study for Mexico, no clinical signs or symptomatology (Table 2) corresponded to palytoxicosis, and as far as it was possible to determine, PTX and its analogs did not provoke the reported effects.

1.6. Ecological Risk

Coral reef bleaching has been associated with extreme natural events such as hurricanes, climatic global change, the El Niño phenomenon, tsunamis, seismic activity, and submarine volcanism [106]. Physical deterioration of coral reefs are related to human activities such as tourism, military operations, industry developments, dyke construction, wharfs, and channel dredging, among others. Eutrophication and disturbance of coral reefs are also thought to increase the risk of CFP outbreaks by providing a benthic substrate for dinoflagellate growth [4,107,108,109,110,111,112].
Along the peninsulas of Baja California and Yucatan where tourism activities have increased significantly along with high population growth, the presence of CFP has increased in the last few years. These changes in human behavior have caused a higher contribution of wastewater from the cities, increasing the organic load in the ocean, which, together with increasing agricultural and aquaculture activities in the peninsula of Yucatan (Table 6), have helped cause eutrophication in some coastal areas [113].
According to the Consejo Nacional de Población, in 1950 [115], there were 1.54 million inhabitants along the Mexican Pacific coastal zone, with the population subsequently increasing to 9.04 million in 1995. On the west coast of the Gulf of Mexico during the same period, the number of inhabitants increased from 828,000 to 3.25 million, while in the Mexican Caribbean, the population increased from 183,000 to 1.37 million inhabitants [116]. The INEGI records from 2005 reported a population of more than 3 million inhabitants with a high rate of population growth associated with the increase in tourism [114].
Quintana Roo, Yucatan, and Baja California Sur are highly vulnerable to hurricanes. In the Atlantic Ocean, hurricanes have increased in intensity during the last few decades, impacting the Caribbean Sea, where the largest coral reefs exist. From 1988 to 2007, this area was affected by seven H3 to H5 hurricanes (Saffir-Simpson scale) that wreaked havoc upon the coasts. From 1995 to 2005, this zone was affected by four huge hurricanes (Table 7), which devastated sea shores, provoking the break-up and death of large portions of coral reefs [117].
Along the Mexican Pacific Coast, there has also been a high incidence of hurricanes, with an increase on the Baja California Peninsula. Ten hurricanes (H1 or H2 categories) have impacted Baja California Sur in the last three decades. Around 12 to 16% of the hurricanes originating in the NW Pacific basin affected the Baja California Sur coasts [118] (Table 7). However, information regarding the effects of these hurricanes on the coral populations is lacking.
Fragments of dead coral could be a substrate for different macroalgae species [108], as they can be colonized by epiphytic dinoflagellates such as G. toxicus. Bagnis [119] concluded that the presence of G. toxicus is scarce in healthy coral reefs, but its abundance can increase rapidly between filamentous and calcareous macroalgae established on impacted coral reefs. Kohler and Kohler [108] found that dead or bleached coral is used as a substrate by macroalgae in the British Virgin Islands and United States Virgin Island. These macroalgae contained the toxic epiphytic dinoflagellates O. lenticularis, Prorocentrum concavum, and P. lima. They also observed different herbivorous fishes that grazed on filamentous macroalgae that were prey for carnivorous fish, providing a route for accumulation of CTXs in the trophic pathways of tropical coral reefs. The authors concluded that when the substrate is available, as in the case of affected coral reefs, the increase in ciguatera events may occur. Yasumoto et al. [120] reported that dead coral surfaces are covered by filamentous and calcareous macroalgae, which are a suitable environment for colonization and proliferation of G. toxicus. Bomber et al. [121] suggested that the macroalga Heterosiphonia gibbesii, based on its morphology, flexibility, and surface area, is also a good substrate for Gambierdiscus species. These algae probably excrete metabolites and produce chelating substances that promote the growth of Gambierdiscus and other toxic dinoflagellates [121,122]. It is hypothesized that hurricanes affecting the Caribbean Sea and the Gulf of Mexico have resulted in the death and fragmentation of coral reefs, increasing the habitat for Gambierdiscus populations and increasing the risk of CFP. However, this has not been confirmed for the coastal waters of Mexico.
Anthropogenic eutrophication in coastal zones of Southeastern Mexico is increasing. Agriculture, aquaculture, and tourism services have decreased the water quality in coastal zones of the Yucatan Peninsula [123,124]. The northern coast of the Yucatan Peninsula harbors a karstic aquifer with a highly permeable carbonated substrate. There, the discharges from human activities reaches the groundwater and becomes an important source of inorganic nutrients and dissolved organic matter. The residues generated by chicken and pig farms (Table 6) could potentially increase the input of nutrients, including nitrogen- and phosphorus-containing compounds, which in turn could favor the proliferation of toxic microalgae species when the aquifer discharges into the coastal waters. Smayda [125] found a correlation between continental nutrient loads and phytoplankton blooms. The detection of 15 harmful phytoplankton species in this area suggests a deterioration of the coastal marine environment [113]. This deterioration could benefit the growth of some macroalgae species, increasing the substrate for toxic epiphyte dinoflagellates [48].
In Baja California Sur, some of the ecosystems at risk are the biosphere reserves and natural protected zones, as well as Ramsar sites [126]. Many of these ecosystems are pristine, although there are zones close to these sites with increasing human population, aquaculture, and tourism activities, mainly in the Los Cabos corridor and Bahía de La Paz. The coastal zone of these regions is influenced by the marine currents of the Gulf of California and by the tropical surface waters of the Pacific Ocean [127,128,129]. Seasonal water flow changes the water column, which suppresses the accumulation of nutrients, although historical data show variations in the nitrate, phosphate, and silicate concentrations, attributed mainly to the increase in tourism and land use [130].
Temperature is another key environmental variable capable of changing the structure and function of coastal ecosystems, with elevated sea temperature being a factor associated with the presence and transmission of ciguatoxin in the marine web [131]. Anomalous temperatures have been recorded, for example, in the Pacific Ocean during the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events. Hales et al. [109] calculated a positive correlation between superficial increase in sea temperature associated with El Niño and ciguatera in the islands of the South Pacific. These authors established that high temperatures promote bleaching and death of the coral reefs, followed by the colonization of dead coral fragments by macroalgae, and subsequently, of Gambierdiscus populations that use the macroalgae as substrates. Therefore, the presence of Gambierdiscus and CFP could be indicators of natural disturbances or anthropogenic impacts on coral ecosystems.
During the 1982–1983 ENSO, large extensions of coral became bleached in Central America [132]. A similar phenomenon of coral death was recorded for the strongest El Niño in 1998 in the Indian Ocean [133].
Lechuga-Devéze and Sierra-Beltrán [35] associated ciguatera cases in Rocas Alijos in the Mexican West Pacific with possible thermal anomalies caused by the ENSO of 1991–1993. In artificial microcosms of coral reefs, Goodlett et al. [134] recorded two blooms of G. toxicus caused by water temperature variations and by a massive bloom of the macroalgae Dictyota sp. and high concentrations of copper. Dictyota is known to be a good substrate for the growth of G. toxicus. Increases in the population and toxicity of the benthic dinoflagellate Ostreopsis lenticularis and the low proportion of G. toxicus, as well as the presence of the carnivorous predator Sphyraena barracuda, were associated with high superficial sea temperature [131,132].
At the National Park of Cabo Pulmo, Baja California Sur in the Gulf of California, record anomalies above 3 °C were measured during the 1997–1998 ENSO, which were responsible for the bleaching of 32.2% and death of 59.3% of the coral population [135]. In 1996, 1998, 2010, and 2011, there were massive losses of fishes in the area and the presence of potentially harmful benthic microalgal species of the genus Ostreopsis (Figure 3), Gambierdiscus, Amphidinium, Prorocentrum, Coolia, and Lyngbya [136]. Proliferations of toxic benthic microalgae such as Lyngbya majuscula were detected in the Caleta Balandra (La Paz Bay, Gulf of California) from the summer of 2010 to date. In 2011, after a bloom of these cyanobacteria, two swimmers who had direct contact presented with intense dermatitis in the legs and arms. Samples of L. majuscula and of the opistobranch Stylocueilus striatus (which feed specifically on Lyngbya) presented toxicity of lyngbyatoxins- and aplysiatoxins-like compounds, and paralytic shellfish toxins were detected by MBA and HPLC-FLD [137,138].
Petroleum platforms can also act like an artificial coral reef, offering substrate for macroalgae and Gambierdiscus populations. Villarreal et al. [112] recorded Gambierdiscus in the structures located in a the western part of the Gulf of Mexico and concluded that these platforms are a risk factor for expansion of ciguatera due to future increase in sea surface temperature linked to the invasion of tropical species [106]. Currently, there are 255 platforms associated with the petroleum industry in the Mexican portion of the Gulf of Mexico [139]. These represent potential sites for the establishment of Gambierdiscus and other toxic microalgae species reported in the southeast of the Gulf of Mexico [47,48].
There are important zones with coral reefs in the southeastern side of the Gulf of Mexico where different epiphytic toxic microalgae species occur [47]. These reefs have been mainly affected by hurricanes and grounded ships associated with the petroleum, fishing, and tourism industries [116,140]. In the Sonda of Campeche, the Alacranes reef is one of the most affected areas. Since 1524, ships have been stranded in this area, and during the 1990s, more than five ships have grounded in this region [140] (Table 2). From 1990 to 2001, the coral reef in the state of Veracruz has been one the most affected by the severe impacts of ship groundings [141]. The damage to these reefs has also been associated with contaminants generated by the petroleum industry, river discharge, and human and agricultural residues. If physical deterioration of coral reefs continues, as well as thermal changes, water turbidity, hurricanes, construction of docks, piers, and industrial and tourist activities, there is a high probability that changes in the ecological equilibrium will favor the proliferation of toxic benthic species. On a positive note, the threats are now recognized and there are at least incipient management plans for these areas [142].

1.7. Legislation, Management, and Prevention

National and international sanitary legislations regulate CTXs. In some areas, public health officials have adopted actions to prevent CFP, like the prohibition of the commercialization of fish of some sizes or high-risk species fished from high-CFP-risk zones. The amount of the toxin accumulated in fish is thought, by many authors, to be related to their size and age. Consequently, when an intoxication case occurs, restrictions on fish sale are often imposed, in some cases without analyzing the presence of the toxins. Prohibitions of this type have been imposed in Samoa Americana, Queensland Australia, French Polynesia, Fiji, Hawaii, and Miami [5,143]. The United States Food Drug Administration has established concentration limits for natural CFP-related toxins as follows: 0.01 ppb P-CTX-1 equivalents for Pacific ciguatoxin and 0.1 ppb C-CTX-1 equivalents for Caribbean ciguatoxin [144]. In the European community, the Directiva del Consejo 91/493/EEC prohibits marketing marine products related to ciguatera. In Platypus Bay and Queensland, Australia, the capture of Scomberomorus commerson and S. jello is prohibited. Carnivorous fishes, such as those from the Muraenidae family and Symphorus nematophorus, among others, are not commercialized. In Mexico, the Comisión Federal para la Protección Contra Riesgos Sanitarios (COFEPRIS) [145] of the Secretaría de Salud published a recommendation of maximum values permissible for marine products of 2.5 MU/100 g of ciguatoxins [146]. Since 2007 in the Mexican Caribbean (Q. Roo), COFEPRIS took action to protect against health risks by CFP through the inspection of fishing cooperatives to restrict the capture and sale of fish species involved, particularly barracudas. They implemented an inspection of seafood product retail establishments and, in some instances, destroyed fishery products from species considered to be hazardous to public health. Additionally, they implemented a public information campaign through the distribution of 8,000 leaflets (Figure 5) with the theme “Together we avoid Ciguatera” [147].

2. Conclusions

There have been 464 CFP intoxication cases over 25 separate outbreaks recorded in Mexican coastal zones between 1984 and 2013: 240 (51.72%) in Baja California Sur, 163 (35.12%) in Quintana Roo, 45 (9.69%) in Yucatan, and 16 (3.44%) cases of Mexican tourists intoxicated in Cuba (Table 1). Carnivorous fish were involved in all cases: snapper (Lutjanus) and grouper (Epinephelus and Mycteroperca) in the Pacific Ocean, and snapper (Lutjanus) and great barracuda (S. barracuda) in the Atlantic Ocean (Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea) (Table 5). However, an underestimation of CFP cases in the Mexican Caribbean is likely, since this problem is likely to have always been present. Reports of CFP in Mexico are increasing, although they have been poorly studied. Present records suggest that CFP is the second most common cause of seafood intoxication in Mexico, preceded only by paralytic shellfish poisoning. The dinoflagellates that have been linked to CFP events belong to the genus Gambierdiscus, Ostreopsis, and Prorocentrum (Table 3 and Table 4; Figure 3). However, the toxicity (toxins profile and levels), physiology, and genetic identification of most of the dinoflagellates species is unknown. The chemistry of the toxins s has only been determined in fish samples by Barton et al. [30] and Núñez-Vázquez et al. [32], so considerably more work is required to elucidate the toxins present in Mexican CFP outbreak samples.
The incidence and propagation of Gambierdiscus species is associated with bleaching and death of coral reefs provoked by the changes in sea temperature and the fragmentation of reefs caused by hurricanes. Also, anthropogenic activities, such as petroleum platforms, marine construction, and other tourism developments, create substrates for different species of macroalgae, microalgae, and benthic invertebrates, which might influence toxic dinoflagellate populations. In Mexico, there is limited research on the physiology and ecology of Gambierdiscus and other toxic benthic species, so developments in this area are required. The peninsulas of Yucatán and Baja California Sur, which are regions where ciguatera has been recorded, could provide a good baseline for ciguatera studies associated with anthropogenic effects and natural phenomenon, since multiple activities are steadily increasing in both zones, such as aquaculture, infrastructure development, tourism, and human population growth. Additionally, these zones are frequently affected by hurricanes. It is important to have a continuous monitoring program in this area with a permanent site to monitor the toxicity and the factors that favor the proliferation and production of Gambierdiscus/CTXs [47].
Mexico is surrounded by four seas (Pacific Ocean, Gulf of California, Gulf of Mexico, and Caribbean Sea) with a high number of endemic species, species richness, and diversity, which are comparable to its continental biota. Marine and land biodiversity are complementary, having different ecosystems and biota that confer upon Mexico the designation of the fourth-most megadiverse country in the world [148]. This megadiversity is attributed to Mexican marine microorganisms and possibly to metabolites (phycotoxins included) they produce (chemical diversity), making it necessary to develop a knowledge database of the responsible organisms to a species level, as well as genotypes. This should include information of the environmental conditions that favor the growth of these species and CTX prevalence and composition in each case.
The existing research highlights the importance of performing systematic investigations following reported poisoning cases after seafood consumption in Mexico. There is an absence of comprehensive and reliable epidemiology records of CFP cases in Mexico, which may have resulted from a shortage of human resources with the knowledge for accurate diagnostics of all cases. With the increased number of cases and expected continuation in future decades, there is an urgent need to identify the toxicity levels (periodicity and anatomical distribution) and to determine the toxin chemistry, as well as the toxin biotransformation products, in affected fish and fish consumers in order to develop and ultimately deliver effective treatment.

Author Contributions

E.J.N.-V. conceived, designed the study, collected data, wrote and edited the document; A.A.-B. collected data, wrote, revised, and edited the document; D.J.L.-C. collected data, wrote, and revised document; A.H.-T. and F.E.H.-S. built the figures and tables; C.J.B.-S. and I.G.-L. wrote and editing document; J.J.B.-G. revised the document; E.G.-M. revised and edited the document; C.A.S.-Z. and A.C.-T. revised the document.

Funding

To the network RedFAN (Red Temática sobre Florecimientos Algales Nocivos) of the Mexican National Council of Science and Technology (CONACyT) for the support received to complete this work. FORDECYT-CONACYT project number 260040-2015, and CONABIO project MQ001

Acknowledgments

This work is dedicated to the memory of J.L. Ochoa† (1951–2007) who worked at CIBNOR. Ochoa was a pioneer of CFP research in Mexico and other research areas related to marine toxins. We thank B.W. Halstead† (World Life Research Institute, Carlsbad, CA, USA), P.J. Scheuer† (University of Hawaii, Honolulu, HI, USA) for literature and suggestions, T. Yasumoto (Japan for Research Laboratories, Japan) for LC-MS analysis in fishes, L. De Haro (Anti-Poison Center of Marseille, France) for epidemiological information of the French patients, J.L. Vázquez-Castellanos (Regional Epidemiology, DGE-Health Ministry), S. Gómez-Carro (Regional Epidemiology DGE-Health Ministry), R. Montesano-Castellanos (ex-Sub Director of Epidemiological Alertness DGE, Health Ministry), F. Chávez-Peón (CENIDS, Health Ministry), H. Arcila-Herrera (Yucatecan Academy of Medicine and Surgery) for providing epidemiological information on cases of ciguatera in Mexico. Thanks to M.V.Z.G. Arroyo-Gómez (Gerente de Seguimiento de Programas, Comisión de Operación Sanitaria/COFEPRIS) for valuable information. The author AAB thanks S. Escobar-Morales† and B. Delgado-Pech for technical assistance. Special thanks to B.Y. Hornelas Orozco (ICMyL-UNAM), A. Cruz-Villacorta (CIBNOR) and F. Pool-Barredo (CICY) for SEM analysis. D. Johnson and A. Turner (CEFAS, UK) provided important editorial corrections, comments, and suggestions. We also thank the three anonymous referees for their helpful comments and suggestions. CJBS and IGL are COFAA and EDI fellowships.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yasumoto, T.; Satake, M. Chemistry, etiology and determination methods of Ciguatera toxins. J. Toxicol.-Toxin Rev. 1996, 15, 91–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yasumoto, T. The Chemistry and Biological function of natural marine toxins. Chem. Rec. 2001, 1, 228–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fleming, L.E.; Baden, D.G.; Bean, J.A.; Weisman, R.; Blythe, D.G. Seafood toxin diseases: Issues in epidemiology and community outreach. In Harmful Algae; Reguera, B., Blanco, J., Fernández, M.L., Wyatt, T., Eds.; Xunta Galicia and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO: Vigo, Spain, 1998; pp. 245–248. [Google Scholar]
  4. Lehane, L.; Lewis, R. Ciguatera, recent advances but the risk remains. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2000, 36, 1515–1518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. FAO. Marine Biotoxins; FAO Food and Nutrition paper 80; Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  6. Friedman, M.A.; Fleming, L.E.; Fernández, M.; Bienfang, P.; Schrak, K.; Dickey, R.; Bottien, M.-Y.; Backer, L.; Ayyar, R.; Weisman, R.; et al. Ciguatera Fish Poisoning: Treatment, Prevention and Management. Mar. Drugs 2008, 6, 456–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Lange, R.W. Ciguatera Fish Poisoning. Am. Fam. Phys. 1994, 50, 579–584. [Google Scholar]
  8. Legrand, M. Ciguatera toxins: Origin, transfer through the food chain and toxicity humans. In Harmful Algae; Reguera, B., Blanco, J., Fernández, M.L., Wyatt, T., Eds.; Xunta Galicia and Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO: Vigo, Spain, 1998; pp. 39–43. [Google Scholar]
  9. Holmes, M.J.; Lewis, R. The Origin of Ciguatera. Mem. Qld. Mus. Brisb. 1994, 34, 497–504. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hokama, Y.; Yoshikawa-Ebesu, J.S.M. Ciguatera Fish Poisoning: A Foodborne Disease. J. Toxicol.-Toxin Rev. 2001, 20, 85–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Adachi, R.; Fukuyo, Y. The thecal plate structure of a marine toxic dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus toxicus gen. et sp. nov. collected in a ciguatera endemic area. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish. 1979, 45, 67–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Faust, M. Observation of sand-dwelling toxic dinoflagellates (Dinophyceae) from widely differing sites, including two new species. J. Phycol. 1995, 31, 996–1003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Holmes, M.J. Gambierdiscus yasumotoi, sp. nov. (Dinophyceae), a toxic benthic dinoflagellate from Southeastern Asia. J. Phycol. 1998, 34, 661–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chinain, M.; Faust, M.A.; Pauillac, S. Morphology and molecular analysis of three toxic species of Gambierdiscus (Dinophyceae): G. pacificus, sp. nov., G. australes, sp. nov., and G. polynesiensis, sp. nov. J. Phycol. 1999, 35, 1282–1296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Litaker, R.W.; Vandersea, M.W.; Faust, M.A.; Kibler, S.R.; Chinain, M.; Holmes, M.J.; Holland, W.C.; Tester, P. Taxonomy of Gambierdiscus: Including four new species, Gambierdiscus caribaeus sp. nov., Gambierdiscus carolinianus sp. nov., Gambierdiscus carpentei sp. nov. and Gambierdiscus ruetzleri sp. nov. (Gonyaulacales Dinophyceae). Phycologia 2009, 48, 344–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Fraga, S.; Rodríguez, F.; Caillau, A.; Diogène, J.; Raho, N.; Zapata, M. Gambierdiscus excentricus sp. nov (Dinpophyceae), a benthic toxic dinoflagellate from Canary Islands (NE Atlantic Ocean). Harmful Algae 2010, 11, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Fraga, S.; Rodríguez, F. Genus Gambierdiscus in the Canary Islands (NE Atlantic Ocean) with description of Gambierdiscus silvae sp. nov., a new potentially toxic epiphytic benthic dinoflagellate. Protist 2014, 125, 839–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Nishimura, T.; Sato, S.; Tawong, W.; Sakanari, H.; Yamaguchi, H.; Adachi, M. Morphology of Gambierdiscus scabrosus sp. nov. (Gonyaulacales): A new epiphytic dinoflagellate from coastal areas of Japan. J. Phycol. 2014, 50, 506–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fraga, S.; Rodríguez, F.; Riobó, P.; Bravo, I. Gambierdiscus balechii sp. nov (Dinophyceae), a new benthic toxic dinoflagellate from the Celebes Sea (SW Pacific Ocean). Harmful Algae 2016, 58, 93–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Smith, K.F.; Rhodes, L.; Verma, A.; Curley, B.G.; Harwood, D.; Kohli, G.S.; Solomona, D.; Rongo, T.; Munday, R.; Murray, S.A. A new Gambierdiscus species (Dinophyceae) from Rarotonga, Cook Islands: Gambierdiscus cheloniae sp. nov. Harmful Algae 2016, 60, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kretzschmar, A.L.; Verma, A.; Harwood, T.; Hoppenrath, M.; Murray, S. Characterization of Gambierdiscus lapillus sp. nov. (Gonyaulacales, Dinophyceae): A new toxic dinoflagellate from the Great Barrier Reef (Australia). J. Phycol. 2017, 53, 283–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tosteson, T.R. The diversity and origins of toxins in ciguatera fish poisoning. PRHSJ 1995, 14, 117–129. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lewis, R.; Holmes, M. Origin and transfer of toxins involved in Ciguatera. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. 1993, 106, 615–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Halstead, B.W. Poisonous and Venomous Marine Animals of the World, Vol. II; U.S. Government Printing Office: Washington, DC, USA, 1967; 1070p.
  25. Núñez-Vázquez, E.J. Biotoxinas Marinas en peces comestibles de Baja California Sur: Origen, Identificación y Cuantificación. Bachelor’s Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur, La Paz, Mexico, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  26. Núñez-Vázquez, E.J.; Almazán-Becerril, A.; Heredia-Tapia, A.; Hernández-Becerril, D.U.; Troccoli-Ghinaglia, L.; Arredondo-Vega, B.O.; Herrera-Silveira, J.A.; Vázquez-Castellanos, J.L.; Ochoa, J.L. Incidencia del envenenamiento por Ciguatera en Mexico. In 4ª Reunión de expertos en envenenamientos por animales ponzoñosos; Instituto de Biotecnología-Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, International Society Toxinology-Panamerican Section, Inst. Bioclon, Lab. Silanes: Cuernavaca, Mexico, 2000; pp. 56–57. [Google Scholar]
  27. Núñez-Vázquez, E.J.; Ochoa, J.L.; Band-Schmidt, C.J.; Gárate-Lizárraga, I.; Heredia-Tapia, A.; López-Cortés, A.; Hernández-Sandoval, F.E.; Bustillos-Guzmán, J. Ciguatera in Mexico. In Proceedings of the Abstracts of the 13th International Conference on Harmful Algae, Hong Kong, China, 3–7 November 2008; p. 98. [Google Scholar]
  28. Núñez-Vázquez, E.J.; Bustillos-Guzmán, J.; Heredia-Tapia, A.; Yasumoto, T.; Cruz-Villacorta, A.; Band-Schmidt, C.J.; Gárate-Lizárraga, I.; López-Cortés, D.; Hernández-Sandoval, F.E.; Ochoa, J.L. Múltiples toxinas marinas en el hígado de Mycteroperca prionura, M. rosacea y Lutjanus colorado asociados a la ciguatera en la isla El Pardito, B.C.S., México. In Resúmenes del III Taller sobre Florecimientos Algales Nocivos: Integración del conocimiento sobre eventos de FAN en México; Laboratorio Estatal de Salud Pública Dr. Galo Soberón y Parra, Secretaría de Salud México: Acapulco, Mexico, 2009; p. 52. [Google Scholar]
  29. Parrilla-Cerrillo, M.C.; Vázquez-Castellanos, J.L.; Sáldate-Castañeda, E.O.; Nava-Fernández, L.M. Brotes de toxiinfecciones alimentarias de origen microbiano y parasitario. Salud Pública Mex. 1993, 35, 456–463. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Barton, E.D.; Tanner, P.; Turchen, S.G.; Tungen, C.L.; Manoguerra, A.; Clarck, R.F. Ciguatera fish poisoning: A Southern California epidemic. West J. Med. 1995, 163, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Lechuga-Devéze, C.; Sierra-Beltrán, A. Documented case of ciguatera on the Mexican Pacific Coast. Nat. Toxins 1995, 3, 415–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Núñez-Vázquez, E.; Sierra-Beltrán, A.; Cruz-Villacorta, A.; Ochoa, J.L. Ciguatoxins on Serranidae and Lutjanidae fish of Baja California Sur, Mexico. Toxicon 1998, 36, 1224. [Google Scholar]
  33. Arcila-Herrera, H.; Castello-Navarrete, A.; Mendoza-Ayora, J.; Montero-Cervantes, L.; González-Franco, M.; Brito-Villanueva, O.W. Diez casos de ciguatera en Yucatán. Rev. Investig. Clín. 1998, 50, 149–152. [Google Scholar]
  34. De Haro, L.; Hayek-Lanthois, M.; Joosen, F.; Pes, P.; Castanier, L.; Jouglard, J. Medical management in the Marseilles Poison Centre o a ciguatera poisoning collective case after a meal of one barracuda in Mexico. Toxicon 1997, 35, 810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. De Haro, L.; Hayek-Lanthois, M.; Joossen, F.; Affaton, M.-F.; Jouglard, J. Intoxication collective ciguaterique apres ingestion d´ un barracuda au Mexique: Deductions pron ostique et therapeutique. Med. Trop. 1997, 57, 55–58. [Google Scholar]
  36. Chávez-Peón, F. Reporte de 21 casos de Ciguatera en Yucatán. CENIDS-Secretaria de Salubridad y Asistencia; Dirección General de Epidemiología: Ciudad de México, México, 1997; pp. 1–2. [Google Scholar]
  37. Quiñones-Vega, C.M. Intoxicación por ciguatera en Yucatán. Boletín epidemiológico; Hospital General “Agustín O’Horán” Urgencias Pediátricas: Mérida, México, 2000; pp. 3–6. [Google Scholar]
  38. Farstad, D.J.; Chow, T. A brief case report and review of ciguatera poisoning. Wild. Environ. Med. 2001, 12, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Keynan, Y.; Pottesman, I. Neurological symptoms in a traveler returning from Central America. J. Intern. Med. 2004, 256, 174–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Slobbe, L.; van Genderen, P.J.J.; Wismans, P.J. Two patients with ciguatera toxicity: A seafood poisoning in travellers to (sub) tropical areas. Neth. J. Med. 2008, 66, 389–391. [Google Scholar]
  41. Montesano-Castellanos, R.; Galindo-Rodríguez, C. Flores-Dinoris. Intoxicación por ciguatera: Informe de un brote en turistas mexicanos y revisión bibliográfica. Arch. Neurocien. 1996, 1, 124–129. [Google Scholar]
  42. Gatti, C.; Oelher, E.; Legrand, A.M. Severe seafood poisoning in French Polynesia: A retrospective analysis of 129 medical files. Toxicon 2008, 51, 746–753. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Boucaud-Maitre, D.; Vernoux, J.P.; Pelczar, S.; Daudens-Vaysee, E.; Aubert, L.; Boa, S.; Ferraci, S.; Garnier, R. Incidence and clinical characteristics of ciguatera fish poisoning in Guadeloupe (French West Indies) between 2013 and 2016: A retrospective cases-series. Sci. Rep. 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Gordon, C.J.; Ramsdell, J.S. Effects of marine algal toxins on thermoregulation in mice. Neurotoxicol. Teratol. 2005, 27, 727–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Sawyer, P.R.; Jollow, D.J.; Scheuer, P.J.; York, R.; McMillan, J.P.; Withers, N.W.; Fudenberg, H.H.; Higerd, T.B. Effect of Ciguatera-Associated Toxins on Body Temperature in Mice. In Seafood Toxins; Ragelis, E.P., Ed.; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 1984; Volume 262, pp. 321–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Babinchak, J.A.; Moeller, P.D.R.; Van Dolah, F.M.; Eyo, P.B.; Ramsdell, J.S. Productions of ciguatoxins in cultured Gambierdiscus toxicus. Mem. Qld. Mus. 1994, 34, 447–453. [Google Scholar]
  47. Tindall, D.; Tindall, P. Tropical Dinoflagellates. Living Collections. Southern Illinois University, Carbondale. 1997. Available online: http//www.siu.edu/~dinos/collect.htm (accessed on 10 December 1997).
  48. Troccoli-Ghinaglia, L.; Herrera-Silviera, J.A. Fitoplancton e hidrografía en una zona costera con descargas de agua subterránea. In Resúmenes de la X Reunión Nacional de la Sociedad Mexicana de Planctología, A. C. y III Reunión Internacional de Planctología; Mazatlán, Sinaloa, México, 1999; SOMPAC: Mazatlán, México, 1999; p. 26. [Google Scholar]
  49. Almazán-Becerril, A. Estudio taxonómico de algunos dinoflagelados potencialmente tóxicos en el Caribe Mexicano. Master’s Thesis, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  50. Hernández-Becerril, D.U.; Almazán-Becerril, A. Especies de dinoflagelados del género Gambierdiscus (Dinophyceae) del Mar Caribe Mexicano. Rev. Biol. Trop. 2004, 52 (Suppl. 1), 77–87. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  51. Okolodkov, Y.B.; Campos-Bautista, G.; Gárate-Lizárraga, I.; González-González, J.A.G.; Hoppenrath, M.; Arenas, V. Seasonal changes of benthic and epiphytic dinoflagellates in the Veracruz reef zone, Gulf of Mexico. Aquat. Microb. Ecol. 2007, 47, 223–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Okolodkov, Y.B.; Merino-Virgilio, F.C.; Herrera-Silveira, J.A.; Espinosa-Matías, S.; Parsons, M.R. Gambierdiscus toxicus in the southeastern Gulf of Mexico. Harmful Algal News 2009, 40, 12–14. [Google Scholar]
  53. Mier y Terán-Suárez, J.M.; Castro, G.V.; Mayor-Nucamendi, H.F.; Brito-López, J.A. Florecimientos Algales en Tabasco. Salud en Tabasco 2006, 12, 414–422. [Google Scholar]
  54. Poot-Delgado, C.A.; Rosado-García, P. Fitoplancton marino potencialmente nocivo en las aguas costeras de Champotón, Campeche. In Proceedings of the Memorias del XX Congreso Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología del Mar, Los Cabos, México, 1–5 October 2013; Dirección General de Ciencia y Tecnología del Mar, Secretaría de Educación Pública: Ciudad de México, México, 2013; pp. 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  55. Litaker, R.W.; Vandersea, M.W.; Faust, M.A.; Kibbler, S.R.; Nau, A.W.; Holland, W.C.; Chinain, M.; Holmes, M.J.; Tester, P.A. Global distribution of Ciguatera causing dinoflagellates in the genus Gambierdiscus. Toxicon 2010, 56, 711–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Martinez-Cruz, M.E.; Okolodkov, Y.B.; Aguilar-Trujillo, C.; Herrera-Silveira, J.A. Epiphytic dinoflagellates on the seagrass Thalassia testudinum at Dzilam, southeastern Gulf of Mexico. Cymbella 2015, 1, 2–9. [Google Scholar]
  57. Almazán-Becerril, A.; Escobar-Morales, S.; Rosiles-González, G.; Valadez, F. Benthic epiphytic dinoflagellates from the northen portion of the Mesoamerican Reff System. Bot. Mar. 2015, 58, 115–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Almazán-Becerril, A.; Irola-Sansores, E.D.; Escobar-Morales, S. El género Gambierdiscus de Quintana Roo, Mexico. In Florecimientos Algales Nocivos en Mexico; García-Mendoza, E., Quijano-Scheggia, S.I., Olivos-Ortíz, A., Núñez-Vázquez, E.J., Eds.; CICESE: Ensenada, Mexico, 2016; pp. 366–377. ISBN 978-607-95688-5-6. [Google Scholar]
  59. Holland, W.C.; Litaker, R.W.; Tomas, C.R.; Kibler, S.R.; Place, A.R.; Davenport, E.D.; Tester, P.A. Differences in the toxicity of six Gambierdiscus (Dinophyceae) species measured using an in vitro human erythrocyte lysis assay. Toxicon 2013, 65, 15–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Pisapia, F.; Sibat, M.; Herrenknecht, C.; Lhaute, K.; Gaiani, G.; Ferron, P.-J.; Fessard, V.; Fraga, S.; Nascimento, S.M.; Litaker, W.; et al. Maitotoxin-4, a novel MTX analog produced by Gambierdiscus excentricus. Mar. Drugs 2017, 15, 220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Litaker, R.W.; Holland, W.C.; Hardison, D.R.; Pisapia, F.; Hess, P.; Kibler, S.R.; Tester, P.A. Ciguatoxicity of Gambierdiscus and Fukuyoa species from the Caribbean and Gulf of Mexico. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0185776. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Sierra, B.A.; Cruz, A.; Núñez-Vázquez, E.J.; Del Villar, L.M.; Cerecero, J.; Ochoa, J.L. An overview of the marine food poisoning in Mexico. Toxicon 1998, 36, 1493–1502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Okolodkov, Y.B.; Gárate-Lizárraga, I. An annoted checklist of dinoflagellates (Dinophyceae) from the Mexican Pacific. Acta Bot. Mex. 2006, 72, 1–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Gárate-Lizárraga, I.; Band-Schmidt, C.J.; Verdugo-Díaz, G.; Muñetón-Gómez, M.J.; Félix-Pico, E. Dinoflagelados (Dinophyceae) del sistema lagunar Magdalena-Almejas. In Estudios Ecológicos en Bahía Magdalena; Funes-Rodríguez, R., Gómez-Gutiérrez, J., Palomares-García, R., Eds.; Gobierno del Estado de B. C. S., Secretaria de Turismo de B. C. S., Fondo para la Protección de los Recursos Marinos de B. C. S., Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas: La Paz, México, 2007; pp. 145–174. [Google Scholar]
  65. Cortés-Altamirano, R. Two new localities for Gambierdiscus toxicus in the Mexican Pacific. Harmful Algae News 2012, 45, 10–11. [Google Scholar]
  66. Garate-Lizarraga, I.; Okolodkov, Y.B.; Cortés-Altamirano, R. Microalgas formadoras de florecimientos algales en el Golfo de California. In Florecimientos Algales Nocivos en Mexico; García-Mendoza, E., Quijano-Scheggia, S.I., Olivos-Ortíz, A., Núñez-Vázquez, E.J., Eds.; CICESE: Ensenada, México, 2016; pp. 130–145. ISBN 978-607-95688-5-6. [Google Scholar]
  67. Osorio-Tafall, B.F. El Mar de Cortés y la productividad fitoplanctónica de sus aguas. Anales de la Escuela Nacional de Ciencias Biológicas 1942, 3, 73–118. [Google Scholar]
  68. Gilmartin, M.; Revelante, N. The phytoplankton characteristics of the barrier island lagoons of the Gulf of California. Estuar. Coast. Mar. Sci. 1978, 7, 29–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Hernández-Becerril, D.U. Especies del fitoplancton tropical del Pacífico mexicano. II. Dinoflagelados y cianobacterias. Rev. Latinam. Microbiol. 1987, 30, 187–196. [Google Scholar]
  70. Hernández-Becerril, D.U.; Vázquez-Martínez, A. Fitoplancton en aguas costeras de Quinta Roo: Composición y Distribución. Memorias del V Congreso Latinoamericano de Ciencias del Mar, La Paz, México, 27 September–1 October 1993; COLACMAR: La Paz, México, 1993; p. 96. [Google Scholar]
  71. Licea, S.; Moreno, J.L.; Santoyo, H.; Figueroa, G. Dinoflageladas del Golfo de California; UABCS-FOMES-SEP-PROMARCO: La Paz, Mexico, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  72. Gárate-Lizárraga, I.; Martínez-López, A. Primer registro de una marea roja de Prorocentrum mexicanum (Prorocentraceae) en el Golfo de California. Rev. Biol. Trop. 1997, 45, 1263. [Google Scholar]
  73. Almazán-Becerril, A.; Hernández-Becerril, D.U. Toxic and potentially toxic dinoflagellates from the Mexican Caribbean Sea. In Proceedings of the Abstracts of the ninth Intenational Conference on Harmful Algal Blooms, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 7–11 February 2000; p. 111. [Google Scholar]
  74. Popowsky, G.; Alvarez-Cadena, J.N.; Delgado, G.; Sánchez, M. Inventario de la microflora fitoplantónica de la laguna Bojorquez, Caribe Mexicano. Rev. Investig. Mar. 2002, 23, 173–178. [Google Scholar]
  75. Heredia-Tapia, A.; Arredondo-Vega, B.O.; Núñez-Vázquez, E.J.; Yasumoto, T.; Yasuda, M.; Ochoa, J.L. Isolation of Prorocentrum lima (Syn. Exuviaella lima) and diarrhetic shellfish poisoning (DSP) risk assessment in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Toxicon 2002, 40, 1121–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Cortés-Altamirano, R.; Sierra-Beltrán, A.P. Morphology and taxonomy of Prorocentrum mexicanum and reinstatement of Prorocentrum rhathymum (Dinophyceae). J. Phycol. 2003, 39, 221–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cortés-Lara, M.C.; Cortés-Altamirano, R.; Sierra-Beltrán, A.; Reyes-Juárez, A. Ostreopsis siamensis (Dinophyceae) a new tychoplanktonic record from Isabel Island National Park, Pacific Mexico. Harmful Algal News 2006, 28, 4–5. [Google Scholar]
  78. Zepeda-Esquivel, M.A.; Resendíz-Flores, M.I.; Morales-Zamorano, L.A. Identificación de Ostreopsis sp en la columna de agua de Bahía Azufre en la Isla Clarión. In Resúmenes del II Taller sobre Florecimientos Algales Nocivos; CICESE: Ensenada, México, 2007; p. 11. [Google Scholar]
  79. Okolodkov, Y.B.; Merino-Virgilio, F.C.; Aké-Castillo, J.A.; Aguilar-Trujillo, A.C.; Espinosa-Matias, S.; Herrera-Silveira, J.A. Seasonal changes in epiphytic dinoflagellates assemnlages near the northern coast of the Yucatan Peninsula, Gulf of Mexico. Acta Bot. Mex. 2014, 107, 121–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Aguilar-Trujillo, A.C.; Okolodkov, Y.B.; Herrera-Silveira, J.A.; Merino-Virgilio, F.C.; Galicia-García, C. Taxocoenosis of epibenthic dinoflagellates in coastal waters of the northern Yucatan Peninsula before and after the harmful algal bloom event in 2011–2012. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2017, 119, 396–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Almazán-Becerril, A.; Escobar-Morales, S.; Irola-Sansores, E.D.; Delgado-Pech, B. Morfología y taxonomía de los géneros Ostreopsis y Coolia en el Caribe Mexicano. In Florecimientos Algales Nocivos en Mexico; García-Mendoza, E., Quijano-Scheggia, S.I., Olivos-Ortíz, A., Núñez-Vázquez, E.J., Eds.; CICESE: Ensenada, Mexico, 2016; pp. 378–393. ISBN 978-607-95688-5-6. [Google Scholar]
  82. Gárate-Lizárraga, I.; González-Armas, R.; Okolodkov, Y.B. Ocurrence of Ostreopsis lenticualris (Dinophyceae:Gonyaulacales) from the Archipiélago de Revillagigedo, Mexican Pacific. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2018, 128, 390–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Babinchak, J.A.; Doucette, G.J.; Ball, R.M. Partial characterization of the LSU rRNA gene from the ciguatoxic dinoflagellate. Gambierdiscus toxicus. In Harmful and Toxic Algal Blooms; Yasumoto, T., Oshima, Y., Fukuyo, Y., Eds.; IOC-UNESCO: Vigo, Spain, 1996; pp. 459–462. [Google Scholar]
  84. Richlen, M.L.; Morton, S.L.; Barber, P.H.; Lobel, P.S. Phylogeography, morphological variation and taxonomy of the toxic dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus toxicus (Dinophyceae). Harmful Algae 2008, 7, 614–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Irola-Sansores, E.D. Dinámica poblacional de los dinoflagelados bentónicos em dos géneros de macroalgas: Dictyota y Amphiroa em dos sistemas arrecifales de norte de Quintana Roo. Master’s Thesis, Centro de Investigación Científica de Yucatán, Cancún, México, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  86. Colección de Dinoflagelados Marinos (CODIMAR). Available online: https://www.cibnor.gob.mx/investigacion/colecciones-biologicas/codimar (accessed on 12 October 2018).
  87. Diario Oficial de la Federación. Carta Nacional Pesquera; Secretaria de Agricultura, Ganaderia, Desarrollo Rural, Pesca y Alimentación (SAGARPA): Ciudad de México, México, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  88. Castro-González, M.I.; Ojeda, V.A.; Montaño, B.S.; Ledesma, C.E.; Pérez-Gil, R.F. Evaluación de los ácidos grasos n-3 de 18 especies de pescados marinos mexicanos como alimentos funcionales. Archiv. Latinoam. Nutrición 2007, 57, 1–10. [Google Scholar]
  89. Pottier, I.; Vernoux, J.P.; Lewis, R. Ciguatera Fish Poisoning in the Caribbean islands and Western Atlantic. In Reviews of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology; Ware, G.W., Ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2001; Volume 168, pp. 99–141. ISBN 978-1-4613-0143-1. [Google Scholar]
  90. Lewis, R.L. The changing face of ciguatera. Toxicon 2001, 39, 97–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Núñez-Vázquez, E.J.; Heredia-Tapia, A.; Pérez-Urbiola, J.C.; Alonso-Rodríguez, R.; Arellano-Blanco, J.; Cordero-Tapia, A.; Pérez-Linares, J.; Ochoa, J.L. Evaluation of dinoflagellate toxicity implicated in recent HAB events in the Gulf of California, Mexico. In Proceedings of the HABTech 2003, APEC. A Workshop on Technologies for Monitoring of Harmful Algal Blooms and Marine Biotoxins, Cawtron Report No. 906, Nelson, New Zealand, 26–30 November 2003; p. 64. [Google Scholar]
  92. Gamboa, P.M.; Parck, D.L.; Fremy, J.M. Extraction and purification of toxic fractions from barracuda (Sphyraena barracuda) implicated in ciguatera poisoning. In Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Ciguatera Fish Poisoning, Puerto Rico; Tosteson, T.R., Ed.; Polyscience Publications: Laval, QC, Canada, 1992; pp. 13–24. [Google Scholar]
  93. Murata, M.; Legrand, A.M.; Ishibashi, Y.; Fukui, M.; Yasumoto, T. Structures and configurations of ciguatoxin from the moray eel Gymnothorax javanicus and its likely precursor from the dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus toxicus. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 4380–4386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Lewis, R.L.; Sellin, M.; Poli, M.A.; Norton, R.S.; Mac Leod, J.K.; Sheil, M.M. Purification and characterization of ciguatoxins from moray eel (Lycodontis javanicus, Muraenidae). Toxicon 1991, 29, 1115–1127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Lewis, R.J.; Norton, R.S.; Brereton, I.M.; Eccles, C.D. Ciguatoxin-2 is a diastereomer of ciguatoxin-3. Toxicon 1993, 31, 637–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Satake, M.; Murata, M.; Yasumoto, T. The structure of CTX3C, a ciguatoxin congener isolated from cultured Gambierdiscus toxicus. Tetrahedron Lett. 1993, 34, 1975–1978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Lewis, R.; Vernoux, J.-P.; Brereton, I.M. Structure of Caribbean ciguatoxin isolated from Caranx latus. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1998, 120, 5914–5920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Satake, M.; Ishibashi, Y.; Legrand, A.M.; Yasumoto, T. Isolation and structure of ciguatoxin-4A, a new ciguatoxin precursor, from cultures of dinoflagellate Gambierdiscus toxicus and parrotfish Scarus gibbus. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 1997, 60, 2103–2105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Alcala, A.C.; Alcala, L.C.; Garth, J.S.; Yasumura, D.; Yasumoto, T. Human fatality due to ingestion of the crab Demania reynaudii that contained a palytoxin-like toxin. Toxicon 1988, 26, 105–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Kodama, A.M.; Hokama, Y.; Yasumoto, T.; Fukui, M.; Manea, S.J.; Sutherland, N. Clinical and laboratory findings implicating palytoxin as cause of ciguatera poisoing due to Decapterus macrosoma (mackerel). Toxicon 1989, 27, 1051–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Ito, E.; Ohkusu, M.; Yasumoto, T. Intestinal injuries caused by experimental palytoxicosis in mice. Toxicon 1996, 34, 643–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Ito, E.; Ohkusu, M.; Terao, K.; Yasumoto, T. Effects of repeated injections of palytoxin on lymphoid tissues in mice. Toxicon 1997, 35, 679–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Onuma, Y.; Satake, M.; Ukena, T.; Roux, J.; Chanteau, S.; Rasolofonirina, N.; Ratsimaloto, M.; Naoki, H.; Yasumoto, T. Identification of putative palytoxin as the cause clupeotoxism. Toxicon 1999, 37, 55–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Wiles, J.S.; Vick, J.A.; Christensen, M.K. Toxicological evaluation of palytoxin in several animal species. Toxicon 1974, 12, 427–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Fukui, M.; Murata, M.; Inou, A.; Gawel, M.; Yasumoto, T. Occurrence of palytoxin in a trigger fish Melichtys vidua. Toxicon 1987, 25, 1121–1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Moore, A.K.; Trainer, V.L.; Mantua, N.J.; Parker, M.S.; Laws, E.A.; Backer, L.C.; Fleming, L.E. Impacts of climatic variability and future climate change on harmful algal blooms ans human health. Environ. Health 2008, 7 (Suppl. 2), 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Ruff, T.A. Ciguatera in the Pacific: A link with military activities. Lancet 1989, 8631, 201–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kholer, S.T.; Kholer, C.C. Dead bleached coral provides new surfaces dinoflagellates implicated in ciguatera fish poisonings. Environ. Biol. Fish. 1992, 35, 413–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Hales, S.; Weinstein, P.; Woodward, A. Ciguatera (fish poisoning), El Niño, and Pacific Sea surface temperature. Ecosyst. Health 1999, 5, 20–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Hales, S.; Kowats, S.; Woodward, A. What El Niño can tell us about human health and global climate change. Glob. Chance Hum. Health 2000, 1, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Lehane, L. Ciguatera update. Med. J. Aust. 2000, 172, 176–179. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  112. Villarreal, T.; Hanson, S.; Qualia, S.; Jester, E.L.E.; Granade, H.R.; Dickey, R.W. Petroleum production platforms as sites for the expansion of ciguatera in northwestern Gulf of Mexico. Harmful Algae 2007, 6, 253–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Herrera-Silveira, J.A.; Morales-Ojeda, S.M. Evaluation of the health status of a coastal ecosystem in southeast Mexico: Assessment of water quality, phytoplankton and submerged aquatic vegetation. Mar. Poll. Bull. 2009, 59, 72–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica, Geografia e Informatica (INEGI), 2005–2007. Available online: http://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/espanol/sistemas/conteo2005/default.asp?c=6790 (accessed on 13 December 2018).
  115. Consejo Nacional de Población. Situación sociodemografica de las zonas costeras. In La situación demográfica de Mexico, 1999; CONAPO: Mexico City, Mexico, 1999; pp. 73–89. ISBN 970-628-397-8. [Google Scholar]
  116. Jordan-Dahlgren, E. Los Arrecifes coralinos del Golfo de Mexico: Caracterización y Diagnóstico. In Diagnóstico Ambiental del Golfo de Mexico; Caso, M., Pisanty, I., Escurra, E., Eds.; Instituto Nacional de Ecologia, Secretaria de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales: Mexico City, Mexico, 2004; pp. 555–572. [Google Scholar]
  117. Villanueva, G.E. El ciclón Liza: Historia de los huracanes en B.C.S; Universidad Autónoma de Baja California Sur: La Paz, Mexico, 2004; p. 227. ISBN 9688961418. [Google Scholar]
  118. Martínez-Gutiérrez, G.; Mayer, L. Huracanes en Baja California, Mexico y sus implicaciones en la sedimentación en el Golfo de California. GEOS 2004, 24, 57–64. [Google Scholar]
  119. Bagnis, R. Natural versus anthropogenic disturbance to coral reefs: Comparison in epidemiological patterns of ciguatera. Mem. Qld. Mus. 1994, 34, 455–460. [Google Scholar]
  120. Yasumoto, T.; Fujimoto, K.; Oshima, Y.; Inoue, A.; Ochi, T.; Fukuyo, Y. Environmental studies on a toxic dinoflagellate responsable for ciguatera. Bull. Jpn. Soc. Sci. Fish 1980, 46, 1397–1404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Bomber, J.W.; Rubio, M.G.; Norris, D.R. Epiphytism of dinoflagellates associated with the disease ciguatera: Substrate specificity and nutrition. Phycologia 1989, 28, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Parsons, M.L.; Preskitt, L.B. A survey of epiphytic dinoflagellates from the coastal water of the island of Hawaii. Harmful Algae 2007, 6, 658–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Herrera-Silveira, J.A.; Comin, F.A.; Aranda-Cirero, N.; Troccoli, L.; Capurro, L. Coastal water quality assessment in the Yucatan Peninsula: Management implications. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2004, 47, 625–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Tapia-Gonzalez, F.U.; Herrera-Silveira, J.A.; Aguirre-Macedo, M.L. Water quality variability and eutrophic trends in karstic tropical coastal lagoons of Yucatán Peninsula. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2008, 76, 418–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Smayda, T.J. Eutrophication and phytoplankton. In Drainage Basin Nutrient Inputs and Eutrophication: An Integral Approach; Wassmann, P., Olli, K., Eds.; University of Tromsø: Tromsø, Norway, 2005; pp. 89–98. [Google Scholar]
  126. Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat. Ramsar (Iran). Mexico reaches 86 wetlands of International Importance. 2009. Available online: ramsar.conanp.gob.mx/sitios_ramsar.html (accessed on 13 December 2018).
  127. Lavín, M.F.; Beier, E.; Badan, A. Estructura hidrográfica y circulación del Golfo de California: Escalas estacional e interanual. In Contribuciones a la Oceanografía Física en Mexico; Lavín, M.F., Ed.; Unión Geofísica Mexicana Monografía No. 3: Ensenada, Mexico, 1997; pp. 141–171. ISBN 9687829001. [Google Scholar]
  128. Monreal-Gómez, M.A.; Molina-Cruz, A.; Salas-de León, D.A. Water masses and cyclonic circulation in Bay of La Paz, Gulf of California, during June 1988. J. Mar. Syst. 2001, 30, 305–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Obeso-Nieblas, M.; Shirasago-Germán, B.; Gaviño-Rodríguez, J.H.; Obeso-Huerta, H.; Pérez-Lezama, E.L. Jimenéz-Illescas. Hidrografía en la Boca Norte de la Bahía de La Paz, Baja California Sur, México. Cienc. Mar. 2007, 33, 281–291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Cervantes-Duarte, R.; Guerrero-Godínez, R. Variación espacio-temporal de nutrientes de la Ensenada de La Paz, B.C.S. México. An. Inst. Cienc. del Mar y Limnol. UNAM 1987, 15, 129–142. [Google Scholar]
  131. Tosteson, T.R.; Ballantine, D.L.; Winter, A. Sea surface temperature, benthic dinoflagellate tocxicity and toxin transmission in the Ciguatera food web. In Harmul Algae; Reguera, B., Blanco, J., Fernández, M.L., Wyatt, T., Eds.; Xunta de Galicia and Intergovernamental Oceanographic Commission of UNESCO: Vigo, Spain, 1998; pp. 48–49. [Google Scholar]
  132. Glynn, P.W. Widespread coral mortality and the 1982/83 El Niño warming event. Environ. Conserv. 1984, 11, 133–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Wilkinson, C.; Lindén, O.; Cesar, H.; Hodgson, G.; Rubens, J.; Strong, A.E. Ecological and socioeconomic impacts of 1998 coral mortality in the Indian Ocean: An ENSO impact and a warning of future change? Ambio 1999, 28, 188–196. [Google Scholar]
  134. Goodlett, R.O.; Van Dolah, F.M.; Babinchak, J.A. Re-occurrence of a ciguatera outbreak in a coral reef microcosm at the Pittsburgh Zoo. In Proceeding of the International Symposium on Ciguatera and Marine Natural Products; Hokama, Y., Scheuer, P.J., Yasumoto, T., Eds.; Asian Pacific Research Foundation: Honolulu, HI, USA, 1994; p. 300. [Google Scholar]
  135. Iglesias-Prieto, R.; Reyes-Bonilla, H.; Riosmena-Rodríguez, R. Effects of 1997-1998 ENSO on coral reef communities in the Gulf of California, Mexico. Geofis. Intern. 2003, 42, 467–471. [Google Scholar]
  136. Núñez-Vázquez, E.J.; Hernández-Sandoval, F.E.; Cordero-Tapia, A.; Almazán-Becerril, A.; Band-Schmidt, C.J.; Bustillos-Guzmán, J.; López-Cortés, D.; Salinas-Zavala, C.A.; Morales-Zárate, M.V.; Mejía-Rebollo, A.; et al. Presencia de microalgas bénticas potencialmente nocivas y mortandad de peces asociadas al Parque Marino de Cabo Pulmo, B.C.S. In Proceedings of the II Congreso Nacional de Sociedad Mexicana para el estudio de los Florecimientos Algales Nocivos, Manzanillo, México, 30–31 October 2013; p. 41. [Google Scholar]
  137. Núñez-Vázquez, E.J.; Pérez-Estrada, C.J.; Cordero-Tapia, A.; Martínez-Gutiérrez, C.A.; Hernández-Sandoval, F.E.; Bustillos-Guzmán, J.; Latisnere-Barragán, H.; López-Cortés, D.J.; Ley-Martínez, T. Proliferación de Lyngbya majuscula en la playa de Balandra, B.C.S. y detección de cianotoxinas tipo lyngbyatoxinas y paralizantes. In Proceedings of the II Congreso Nacional de Sociedad Mexicana para el estudio de los Florecimientos Algales Nocivos, Manzanillo, México, 30–31 October 2013; p. 67. [Google Scholar]
  138. Pérez-Estrada, C.J.; Núñez-Vázquez, E.J.; Cordero-Tapia, A.; Hernández-Sandoval, F.E.; Bustillos-Guzmán, J.; Band-Schmidt, C.J.; López-Cortés, D.J.; Martínez-Gutiérrez, C.A.; Ley-Martínez, T. Detección de cianotoxinas en la proliferación de la cianobacteria Lyngbya majuscula y en el opistobranquio Stylocueilus striatus en la Playa de Balandra, Baja California Sur, Mexico. In Proceedings of the I Taller Nacional de Biotoxinas Emergentes, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México, 9–10 November 2015; REDFAN-CONACYT, CIBNOR, CICIMAR-IPN: La Paz, México, 2015; p. 27. [Google Scholar]
  139. Petróleos Mexicanos (PEMEX). Anuario Estadístico 2008; Exploración y Producción. PEMEX: Mexico City, Mexico, 2017; pp. 1–119. [Google Scholar]
  140. Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP). Parque Nacional Arrecife Alacranes. 2004. Available online: https://www.gob.mx/conanp/documentos/region-peninsula-de-yucatan-y-caribe-mexicano?state=published (accessed on 13 December 2018).
  141. Ortíz-Lozano, L.D. Análisis crítico de las zonas de regulación y planeacion en el parque nacional sistema arrecifal veracruzano. Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad Autónoma de Baja California, Ensenda, Mexico, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  142. Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas (CONANP). Parque Nacional Sistema Arrecifal Veracruzano. Available online: https://simec.conanp.gob.mx/ficha.php?anp=135&reg=5 (accessed on 13 December 2018).
  143. De Fouw, J.C.; Van Egmond, H.P.; Speijers, G.J.A. Ciguatera Fish Poisoning: A Review; RIVM Report No. 388802021; Ministerie van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport: Bilthoven, The Netherlands, 2001.
  144. FDA. Fish and Fishery Products Hazards and Control Guidance, 4th ed.; US Department of Health and Human Services, Food Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition: College Park, MD, USA, 2011; 476p. [Google Scholar]
  145. COFEPRIS. Instrucción de trabajo para el muestreo de fitoplancton y detección de biotoxinas marinas; Secretaria de Salud: Ciudad de México, México, 2005; pp. 21–147. [Google Scholar]
  146. Norma Oficial Mexicana. Norma Oficial Mexicana NOM-242-SSA1-2009, Productos y servicios. Productos de la pesca frescos, refrigerados, congelados y procesados. Especificaciones sanitarias y métodos de prueba. Diario Oficial de la Federación, 10 febrero 2011. [Google Scholar]
  147. González-Zihel, M. Quintana Roo desarrolla acciones de protección contra riesgos sanitarios por la ingesta de pescado contaminado por ciguatoxina. Red Sanitaria Secretaria de Salud 2007, 3, 11. [Google Scholar]
  148. Aguilar, V.; Kolb, M.; Hernández, D.; Urquiza, T.; Koleff, P. Prioridades de Conservación de la Biodiversidad Marina de Mexico. Biodiversitas 2008, 79, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
Marinedrugs 17 00013 g001 550
Figure 1. Locations of Ciguatera Fish Poisoning outbreaks along the Mexican coast: Rocas Alijos and Punta Abreojos in the Pacific Ocean; La Paz, San Evaristo, and El Pardito island in the Gulf of California; Mérida, El Progreso, and Kanasin in the Gulf of Mexico; and Isla Mujeres, Cozumel, Playa del Carmen, Puerto Aventuras, and Cancun in the Caribbean Sea.
Figure 1. Locations of Ciguatera Fish Poisoning outbreaks along the Mexican coast: Rocas Alijos and Punta Abreojos in the Pacific Ocean; La Paz, San Evaristo, and El Pardito island in the Gulf of California; Mérida, El Progreso, and Kanasin in the Gulf of Mexico; and Isla Mujeres, Cozumel, Playa del Carmen, Puerto Aventuras, and Cancun in the Caribbean Sea.
Marinedrugs 17 00013 g001
Marinedrugs 17 00013 g002 550
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy images of dinoflagellates potentially associated with ciguatera fish poisoning in Mexico. Gambierdiscus cf. carolinianus from the Mexican Caribbean: (A) epitheca, (B) hypotheca, and (C) Prorocentrum belizeanus from Puerto Morelos, Q. Roo; (D) P. hoffmannianum from Tulum, Q. Roo; (E) P. lima from Isla Contoy, Q. Roo; (F) P. lima (PRL-1) isolated from of El Pardito island, B.C.S.; (G) O. siamensis from Cabo Pulmo, B.C.S.; and (H) O. heptagona from Puerto Morelos, Q. Roo.
Figure 2. Scanning electron microscopy images of dinoflagellates potentially associated with ciguatera fish poisoning in Mexico. Gambierdiscus cf. carolinianus from the Mexican Caribbean: (A) epitheca, (B) hypotheca, and (C) Prorocentrum belizeanus from Puerto Morelos, Q. Roo; (D) P. hoffmannianum from Tulum, Q. Roo; (E) P. lima from Isla Contoy, Q. Roo; (F) P. lima (PRL-1) isolated from of El Pardito island, B.C.S.; (G) O. siamensis from Cabo Pulmo, B.C.S.; and (H) O. heptagona from Puerto Morelos, Q. Roo.
Marinedrugs 17 00013 g002
Marinedrugs 17 00013 g003 550
Figure 3. Structure of Pacific Ocean and Caribbean Sea ciguatoxins (CTXs): P-CTX-1 [93], PCTX-3 [94,95], P-CTX-4B [92], P-CTX-3C [96], and C-CTX-1 [97]. The energetically less-favored epimers, P-CTX-2 (52-epi P-CTX-3) [95], P-CTX-4A (52-epi P-CTX-4B) [98], and C-CTX-2 (56-epi C-CTX-1) [97], are shown in parenthesis. Image modified from Lewis. [90].
Figure 3. Structure of Pacific Ocean and Caribbean Sea ciguatoxins (CTXs): P-CTX-1 [93], PCTX-3 [94,95], P-CTX-4B [92], P-CTX-3C [96], and C-CTX-1 [97]. The energetically less-favored epimers, P-CTX-2 (52-epi P-CTX-3) [95], P-CTX-4A (52-epi P-CTX-4B) [98], and C-CTX-2 (56-epi C-CTX-1) [97], are shown in parenthesis. Image modified from Lewis. [90].
Marinedrugs 17 00013 g003
Marinedrugs 17 00013 g004 550
Figure 4. Frequency of symptoms (%) of ciguatera fish poisoning in Mexico (Atlantic and Pacific coasts).
Figure 4. Frequency of symptoms (%) of ciguatera fish poisoning in Mexico (Atlantic and Pacific coasts).
Marinedrugs 17 00013 g004
Marinedrugs 17 00013 g005 550
Figure 5. Example of educational material development for “Ciguata” (Ciguatera) (COFEPRIS, Quintana Roo, Mexico).
Figure 5. Example of educational material development for “Ciguata” (Ciguatera) (COFEPRIS, Quintana Roo, Mexico).
Marinedrugs 17 00013 g005
Table
Table 1. Events of ciguatera fish poisoning in Mexico (1984–2013).
Table 1. Events of ciguatera fish poisoning in Mexico (1984–2013).
Cases (M:F)Locality (Cases)Fish InvolvedAnalysisYearReference
200 (n.d.)La Paz, B.C.S.Lutjanus sp.MBA1984[29]
25 (17:4) *Rocas Alijos, B.C.S.Epinephelus labriformisMBA and immunoassay1992[30]
7 (7:0)Rocas Alijos, B.C.S.Epinephelus sp. and Mycteroperca sp.MBA1993[31]
5 (4:1)Isla El Pardito (3), Punta San Evaristo (2), B.C.S.Mycteroperca prionura and Lutjanus coloradoMBA and HPLC1993–1997[32]
3 (1:3)Punta Abreojos, B.C.S.Epinephelus sp.MD2004[28]
10 (5:5)Isla Mujeres, Q. RooSphyraena barracudaMD1994[33]
30 (14:16)Isla Mujeres, Q. RooS. barracudaMD1995[34,35]
21 (n.d.)Merida (15), Kanasin (6), Yuc.S. barracudaMD1996[36]
11 (1:0) *Progreso, Yuc.S. barracudaMD2000[37]
2 (1:1)Cancun, Q. RooS. barracudaMD2001[38]
1 (0:1)Yucatann.d.MD2004[39]
9 (n.d.)Isla Mujeres, Q. RooS. barracudaMD2006HMR
13 (n.d.)Cozumel, Q. RooS. barracudaMD2007HMR
5 (n.d.)Cozumel, Q. RooS. barracudaMD2007HMR
1 (0:1)Mexicon.d.MD2008[40]
2 (n.d.)Cozumel, Q. RooS. barracudaMD2009HMR
12 (12:0)Isla Mujeres, Q. RooS. barracudaMD2009HMR
11 (n.d.)Merida, Yuc.S. barracudaMD and MBA2010HMR
12 (4:8)Cancun, Q. RooS. barracudaMD2010HMR
5 (2:3)Puerto Aventuras, Q. RooS. barracudaMD2010HMR
29 (n.d.)Playa del Carmen, Q. RooS. barracudaMD2011HMR
27 (14:13)Isla Mujeres, Q. RooLutjanus sp. & S. barracudaMD2011HMR
3 (2:1)Playa del Carmen, Q. RooS. barracudaMD2012HMR
4 (3:0)Tulum, Q. RooS. barracudaMD2013HMR
16 (3:9)*CubaLutjanus sp.MD1986[41]
Total: 464 (90:66)
* Incomplete information of male:female (M:F) cases ** Personal communication Dr. F. Chávez-Peón (Centro Nacional de información y Documentación de Salud, Secretaría de Salud). n.d. (not determined). MBA: Mouse bioassay. CTX presence was determined using a refined bioassay method based on Lewis et al [31,32]). MD: Medical Diagnostic. HMR: Health Ministry Report. Q. Roo=Quintana Roo. Yuc. = Yucatan.
Table
Table 2. Signs, symptoms, and treatment of CFP cases in Mexico (1984–2013).
Table 2. Signs, symptoms, and treatment of CFP cases in Mexico (1984–2013).
Locality/YearSigns & SymptomsDurationTreatmentRef.
La Paz, B.C.S., 1984Ciguatera symptoms (not specified).n.d.n.d.[29]
Rocas Alijos, B.C.S., 1992Nausea; vomiting; diarrhea; loose stools; neurological complaints; paresthesia of the face, arms, and legs; bradycardia and hypotension; dizziness; stomachache; tingling and numbness in legs and fingers, feeling like they were asleep; moist skin; difficulty walking; myalgia; chills; sensitive cold; temperature reverse; pruritus; and night sweats.Several daysHistamine blockers and palliative supports[30]
Rocas Alijos, B.C.S., 1993Diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, neurophysiological disorders.15 daysn.d.[31]
El Pardito Island and Punta San Evaristo B.C.S., 1993–1997Diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, eye; muscle and abdominal pain; headache, numbness, weakness, pruritus, desquamation, hyperesthesia, lip and tongue paralysis, and convulsion in one case.Several daysPalliative support, histamine blockers, and antibiotics[28,32]
Isla Mujeres, Q. Roo, 1994Gastrointestinal disturbances, watery diarrhea (dehydration and shock in 2 cases), cold-to-hot temperature reversal, dysesthesia in all cases with differences in the occurrence of nausea, vomiting, cramps, abdominal pain, weakness, paresthesia, arthralgia, myalgia, dizziness, dysuria, dyspnea, headache, pruritus, lip numbness, dry mouth, dental pain, chills, tremors, fasciculations, blurred vision, hypersalivation and dysphagia, emotional lability (2 cases). Painful ejaculation and dyspareunia (2 cases). Nipple hyperesthesia (1 female).Chronic (4 cases, several months)Palliative supports. Indomethacin (1 chronic case)[33]
Isla Mujeres, Q. Roo, 1995Hypotension, bradycardia, headache, arthralgia, pruritus, myalgia, asthenia, paresthesia in tongue, lips and extremity, abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea.1–7 monthsAntidiarrheal drugs, vitamins C, B1, B6 and B12, anti-histaminics, anxiolytic drugs, atropine, mannitol[34,35]
Merida and Kanasin, Yuc., 1996Paresthesia and muscle spasm, pharyngeal edema dysesthesia, contracture.n.d.Palliative supports[36]
Merida, Yuc., 2000Abdominal and leg pain; vomiting; muscle contracture; diaphoresis; hypersalivation; severe muscle, carpel bone and tarciano bone spasm; mydriasis, bradyarrhythmia; bradycardia; thready pulse; awareness alteration (1 child).Daysmethylprednisolone, diazepam, adrenaline, atropine, calcium gluconate, mannitol[37]
Cancun, Q. Roo, 2001Vomiting, abdominal pain, profuse watery diarrhea, fatigue, bizarre facial and extremity paresthesia, as well as the peculiar sensation that cold foods seemed hot, and hot drinks tasted ice cold, headaches, malaise, and debilitating burning and numbness in hand and feet, pruritus. During ejaculation, severe pubic pain.Several weeksn.d.[38]
Yucatan, 2004Paresthesia extended from face to hands and legs, muscle pain, pruritus, myalgia, fatigue, sleepiness.Several weeksClarithromycin, ibuprofen[39]
Isla Mujeres, Q. Roo, 2006Diarrhea, vomiting, severe electrolyte imbalance.DaysPalliative supports, serumHMR
Cozumel, Q. Roo, 2007Diarrhea, vomiting, dehydration.DaysPalliative supports, serumHMR
Cozumel, Q. Roo, 2007Diarrhea, muscle pain, nausea, vomiting, headache, itching; change in temperature perception, convulsion (two cases), speech loss (1 case), mouth, hand and feet numbness.DaysPalliative supportsHMR
Mexico n.d.Headache, pain in back and joints, abdominal discomfort and sweating, nausea and itching.DaysPalliative supports[40]
Cozumel, Q. Roo, 2009Diarrhea and dehydration.DaysPalliative supportsHMR
Isla Mujeres, Q. Roo, 2009Abdominal pain, headache, diarrhea, vomiting, chills, fever, muscle pain, numbness of limbs and tongue, dehydration.DaysPalliative supports, serumHMR
Merida, Yuc., 2010Abdominal pain, diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, cramps, tingling, muscle pain.DaysPalliative supportsHMR
Cancun, Q. Roo, 2010Abdominal and muscle pain, diarrhea, vomiting, paresthesia, headache, general discomfort.DaysPalliative supportsHMR
Puerto Aventuras, Q. Roo, 2010Diarrhea, vomiting, muscle pain, paresthesia, general discomfort.DaysPalliative supportsHMR
Playa del Carmen Q. Roo, 2011Diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, dehydration, muscle pain, paresthesia.DaysPalliative supportsHMR
Isla Mujeres, Q. Roo, 2011Diarrhea, nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, paresthesia.DaysHartmann solution, hydrocortisone, mannitol and adrenalineHMR
Playa del Carmen, Q. Roo, 2012Profuse watery diarrhea, vomiting, colic, paresthesia extended from face to hands and legs, hypothermia sensation.Days to weeksPalliative supportsHMR
Tulum, Q. Roo, 2013Diarrhea, abdominal pain, paresthesia, respiration difficulty, weakness.DaysMannitolHMR
Cuba, 1986Profuse watery diarrhea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, metal taste, diaphoresis, headache, myalgia, arthralgia, paresthesia, paresis, flaccidity, asthenia, adynamia, dyspnea, skin hypersensitivity, burning of palms and soles, intense pruritus, priapism, urinary incontinence, sleepiness, affliction, depression.MonthsAntihistaminic, antiemetic, analgesic, tranquillizer, palliative supports[41]
HMR: Health Ministry Report.
Table
Table 3. Distribution of potentially toxic dinoflagellates along Mexican coasts.
Table 3. Distribution of potentially toxic dinoflagellates along Mexican coasts.
DinoflagellateDistributionReference
Gambierdiscus toxicusQuintana Roo, Yucatán, Tabasco, Veracruz, Nayarit (Isla Isabel), B.C.S., Revillagigedo Islands[46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,63,64,65]
G. carolinianusQuintana Roo[57,58,59,61]
G. belizeanumQuintana Roo[49,50,58]
G. caribaeusQuintana Roo, Yucatán[56,57,58,59,80,85]
G. carpenteriQuintana Roo[61]
Gambierdiscus sp.Campeche, Baja California Sur[54,66]
F. yasumotoi (=G. yasumotoi)Quintana Roo[53,54]
Ostreopsis ovataBaja California, Baja California Sur[25,63,86]
O. lenticularisBaja California Sur, Revillagigedo Islands[63,82]
O. marinaQuintana Roo, Baja California Sur[81,85,86]
O. belizeanumQuintana Roo[81]
O. siamensisQuintana Roo, Nayarit (Isla Isabel), B.C.S. (Isla San José), Revillagigedo Islands[57,59,63,66,77]
Ostreopsis sp.Revillagigedo Islands, B.C.S.[78]
O. heptagonaVeracruz, Quintana Roo[51,57,79,80,81,85]
P. limaQuintana Roo, Yucatán, Veracruz, Baja California, Baja California Sur, Sonora, Oaxaca[25,49,51,56,57,63,64,66,71,73,75,79,80,85,86]
P. hoffmannianumQuintana Roo, Campeche, Yucatán, Veracruz[49,51,54,56,57,79,80,85]
P. concavumQuintana Roo, Yucatán, Veracruz, Baja California Sur[25,51,56,57,63,79,86]
P. belizeanumQuintana Roo, Yucatán, Baja California Sur[49,57,63,64,79,85]
P. rhathymumQuintana Roo, Yucatán, Baja California Sur[49,56,57,63,66,79,80,85]
Table
Table 4. Species and strains of benthic dinoflagellates potentially associated with ciguatera fish poisoning in Mexico.
Table 4. Species and strains of benthic dinoflagellates potentially associated with ciguatera fish poisoning in Mexico.
DinoflagellateStrainOriginCulture CollectionReference
G. toxicusCM2K, CM3K & CM4KI
M510K, IM512K
IM513K & IM514K
CM515K, reef
CM516K, reef
CM517K, reef
CM518K, reef
CM519K, reef
CM520K, reef		Cozumel, Q. Roo
Parque El Garrafón,
Isla MujeresClub Med, Cancun, Q. Roo		Tropical Dinoflagellate (Southern Illinois University, Carbondale)[47]
PO528K, Lagoon
CZ2, CZ3 & CZ4		Pat O’Brien’s, Cancun, Q. Roo
Cozumel, Q. Roo		National Marine Fisheries Service (Charleston Lab.)[46]
G. caribaeusMex Algae 1 Gam 1Cancun, Q. Roo [59]
G. carpenteriMex Algae 2 Gam 1Cancun, Q. Roo [61]
G. carolinianusMex Algae Gam 1Cancun, Q. Roo [59]
P. limaCM563K, reef
PRL-1
PLV-1,a PLV-3		Club Med, Cancun, Q. Roo
Isla El Pardito, B.C.S.
B. de La Paz, B.C.S.		Tropical Dinoflagellate CODIMAR-CIBNOR
CODIMAR-CIBNOR		[47]
[86]
[86]
P. belizeanumCM559K, reef
CM560K, reef
CM561K, reef
CM568K, reef
IM553K
CZ565		Club Med, Cancun, Q. Roo
Parque El Garrafón, Isla Mujeres, Q. Roo
Chankanaab reef, Cozumel		Tropical Dinoflagellate[47]
P. concavum
P. cf. concavum		CM559, reef
PCJV-1 a PCJV-3		Club Med, Cancun, Q. Roo
Isla San José, B.C.S.		Tropical Dinoflagellate
CODIMAR-CIBNOR		[47]
[86]
P. mexicanumPO567AK, lagoon
PXCV-1,
PXPV-1 & PXPV-2		Pat O’Brien’s, Cancun, Q. Roo
B. Concepción & B. de La Paz, B.C.S.		Tropical Dinoflagellate
CODIMAR-CIBNOR		[47]
[86]
O. marinaOMPV-1B. de La Paz, B.C.S.CODIMAR-CIBNOR[86]
O. cf. ovataOOJV-1
a OOJV-9
OOPV-1		Isla San José, B.C.S.
B. de La Paz, B.C.S.		CODIMAR-CIBNOR[86]
Ostreopsis sp. San José del Cabo, B. C. SStrain Collection of the CIBNORVirgen-Félix, 2008 *
* Personal communication with M. Virgen-Félix (responsible for the strain collection of CIBNOR). CODIMAR=Colección de Dinoflagelados Marinos del CIBNOR.
Table
Table 5. Fish species responsible for ciguatera fish poisoning in Mexico (1984–2013).
Table 5. Fish species responsible for ciguatera fish poisoning in Mexico (1984–2013).
Responsible Fish Genera FrequencyPercentageIntoxications (%)
Lutjanus414.2848.81
Epinephelus310.716.88
Mycteroperca27.142. 36
Sphyraena1760.7141.53
Unknown27.140.39
Total:28100100
Table
Table 6. Data of population, hotels and other socio-economic activities in Quintana Roo, Yucatán, and Baja California Sur, Mexico. Mexican states with the presence of ciguatera fish poisoning.
Table 6. Data of population, hotels and other socio-economic activities in Quintana Roo, Yucatán, and Baja California Sur, Mexico. Mexican states with the presence of ciguatera fish poisoning.
DataQuintana RooYucatánBCS
Inhabitants1,215,2371,818,948535,808
Hotels763330290
Hotel rooms73,108888015 384
Tourists7,546,7201,589,9401,834,515
Touristic docks14127
Biosphere reserves322
National parks622
Water treatments plants2926094
Volume of water discharged under federal control (million m3)215,193,5051.01279.0
Fisheries production (ton)386127,179.2134,803
Aquaculture production (ton)56.7973.44421
Swine production (heads)156,375792,20215,210
Avian production (heads)4,003,73017,512,20662,087
Source: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática (INEGI), 2005–2007 [114].
Table
Table 7. Hurricanes with ground impact in Quintana Roo, Yucatan, and Baja California Sur, Mexico. The sites of impact are cities where ciguatera fish poisoning had been documented.
Table 7. Hurricanes with ground impact in Quintana Roo, Yucatan, and Baja California Sur, Mexico. The sites of impact are cities where ciguatera fish poisoning had been documented.
Year/HurricaneSite of ImpactWind Intensity (km/h)Category Saffir-Simpson
Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean Sea
1988 GilbertQuintana Roo287H5
Yucatan
1995 RoxanaTulum, Q. Roo185H3
1996 DolyFelipe Carrillo Puerto, Q. Roo130H1
2000 KeithChetumal, Q. Roo148H1
2002 IsidoreTelchac Puerto, Yucatan205H3
2005 WilmaIsla Cozumel, Q. Roo230H4
Puerto Morelos, Q. Roo220H4
2005 EmilyTulum, Q. Roo215H4
2005 StanFelipe Carrillo Puerto, Q. Roo75Tropical Storm
2007 DeanQuintana Roo280H4
Yucatan
2008 DollyCancun, Q. Roo85Tropical Storm
Pacific Ocean
1995 HenrietteCabo San Lucas, B.C.S.158H2
1996 FaustoTodos Santos B.C.S.130H1
1997 NoraBahía Tortugas, B.C.S.120H1
1998 IsisLos Cabos, B.C.S.110Tropical Storm
1999 GregSan José del Cabo, B.C.S.120H1
2001 JulietteLa Paz, Ciudad Constitución, B.C.S.120H1
2003 IgnacioCiudad Constitución, B.C.S.165H2
2003 MartySan José del Cabo, B.C.S.160H2
2006 JohnEl Saucito, B.C.S.175H2
2007 HenrietteLos Cabos, B.C.S.150 H1
2008 NorbertBahía Magdalena, B.C.S.215H2
Sources: CNA, Estadísticas del agua en Mexico, 2007. Comisión Nacional del Agua. Mexico, D. F., 2007.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Núñez-Vázquez, E.J.; Almazán-Becerril, A.; López-Cortés, D.J.; Heredia-Tapia, A.; Hernández-Sandoval, F.E.; Band-Schmidt, C.J.; Bustillos-Guzmán, J.J.; Gárate-Lizárraga, I.; García-Mendoza, E.; Salinas-Zavala, C.A.; et al. Ciguatera in Mexico (1984–2013). Mar. Drugs 2019, 17, 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17010013

AMA Style

Núñez-Vázquez EJ, Almazán-Becerril A, López-Cortés DJ, Heredia-Tapia A, Hernández-Sandoval FE, Band-Schmidt CJ, Bustillos-Guzmán JJ, Gárate-Lizárraga I, García-Mendoza E, Salinas-Zavala CA, et al. Ciguatera in Mexico (1984–2013). Marine Drugs. 2019; 17(1):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17010013

Chicago/Turabian Style

Núñez-Vázquez, Erick J., Antonio Almazán-Becerril, David J. López-Cortés, Alejandra Heredia-Tapia, Francisco E. Hernández-Sandoval, Christine J. Band-Schmidt, José J. Bustillos-Guzmán, Ismael Gárate-Lizárraga, Ernesto García-Mendoza, Cesar A. Salinas-Zavala, and et al. 2019. "Ciguatera in Mexico (1984–2013)" Marine Drugs 17, no. 1: 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17010013

APA Style

Núñez-Vázquez, E. J., Almazán-Becerril, A., López-Cortés, D. J., Heredia-Tapia, A., Hernández-Sandoval, F. E., Band-Schmidt, C. J., Bustillos-Guzmán, J. J., Gárate-Lizárraga, I., García-Mendoza, E., Salinas-Zavala, C. A., & Cordero-Tapia, A. (2019). Ciguatera in Mexico (1984–2013). Marine Drugs, 17(1), 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/md17010013

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop