Next Article in Journal
An Empirical Performance Analysis of the Speak Correct Computerized Interface
Next Article in Special Issue
Non-Thermal Atmospheric Plasma for Microbial Decontamination and Removal of Hazardous Chemicals: An Overview in the Circular Economy Context with Data for Test Applications of Microwave Plasma Torch
Previous Article in Journal
Physico-Chemical Properties of Red Pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) as Influenced by Different Drying Methods and Temperatures
Previous Article in Special Issue
Purposely Development of the Adaptive Potential of Activated Sludge from Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant Focused on the Treatment of Landfill Leachate
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Potential Use of Microbial Fuel Cell Technology in Wastewater Treatment

Chemical Technologies Department, Faculty of Technical Science, “Prof. Asen Zlatarov” University, 8010 Burgas, Bulgaria
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Processes 2022, 10(3), 486; https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10030486
Submission received: 1 February 2022 / Revised: 15 February 2022 / Accepted: 21 February 2022 / Published: 28 February 2022

Abstract

:
Two options, in regard to applying microbial fuel cells (MFCs) in water treatment, are under discussion, namely the conversion of the chemical energy of organic substrates to electricity, as well as the use their potential to reduce different species, such as the ionic form of copper (Cu2+ converted to metal copper) and iron (Fe3+ converted to Fe2+). The high reduction potential of Cu2+ and Fe3+ makes the processes of electricity production and metal reduction, to be performed simultaneously in MFC, achievable. The electrical yield measurement during the experiments of anodic organic matter degradation by MFC in treating an artificial wastewater with chemical oxygen demand (COD) 0.6 and 1.6 g O2·dm−3, as initial COD, are given. It is demonstrated that the higher organic load is associated with better electrical yield. A comparison of MFC and conventional anaerobic digestion performance is discussed, as well. Experimental proofs of copper removal and phosphate mobilization, following the iron reduction of FePO4, are also reported.

1. Introduction

Major challenge in wastewater treatment is to find technological solutions with higher energy yield and lower secondary pollution of the environment. One of the sub-directions is the utilization of organic matter, contained in wastewater and sludge. Anaerobic digestion (AD) is considered to be one of the most effective and efficient methods for the stabilization of waste [1]. During this treatment, the organic matter in waste is reduced, and some energy is recovered in the form of biogas. As an alternative, bio-electrochemical processes offer many of the benefits of the anaerobic digestion, while avoiding some of the AD drawbacks. MFCs are examples of bio-electrochemical types of reactors, which are intensively studied in the recent years. They combine biological and electrochemical processes, in order to generate electricity, hydrogen, or other useful chemicals from organic substrates, including waste organics. MFCs have attracted interest, following the recent trends of developing sustainable methods and products. They offer simultaneous wastewater treatment and direct electrical energy harvesting, which could significantly improve the water management environmental footprint, in general [2].
The typical microbial fuel cell usually consists of an anode and cathode, connected by an external circuit and separated in different compartments by a proton exchange membrane (PEM). In the anodic chamber, microbial decomposition (biological oxidation) of organic substrates generates electrons and protons that are transferred to the cathode through the circuit and membrane, respectively (Figure 1). By transferring electrons from the negative terminal (anode) to the positive terminal (cathode) against a load, an electric current is generated [3]. On the cathode surface, the electrons react with the final electron acceptor. Mostly O2 is applied as electron acceptor because of its abundance in nature. Recently, air-cathodes, based on the gas-diffusion layers, are in use, avoiding forced O2 provision at the cathode. Commonly used catholytes include oxygen, ferricyanide, and permanganate [4]. From a biochemical point of view, there is fundamental difference between the conventional anaerobic digestion and bio-electrochemical processes, even though both processes are anaerobic. Anaerobic digestion is predominantly fermentative transformation of the substrates, without the involvement of any complex electron transport mechanisms for ATP synthesis. On the contrary, in the microbial fuel cell, a respiratory type of metabolism is implemented, with all the typical energy benefits for the bacterial cell. Anaerobic cellular respiration is similar to aerobic cellular respiration, in that electrons extracted from a fuel molecule (organic substrate or the pollutants in the treated wastewater) are passed through an electron transport system, driving ATP synthesis. The only difference between the two processes is the terminal electron acceptor, due to the absence of oxygen, attributed to the anaerobic conditions.
Other different species can be used as electron acceptor in the cathodic semi-reactions, such as manganese, copper and iron ions, nitrates, sulphate, etc., resulting in their chemical reduction and transformation into a preferable form. Recently, the processes involved in the MFCs were intensively studied as an alternative energy source and method for wastewater treatment. Actually, the main benefit of this technology seems to be in the opportunity to mineralize organic matter to water and CO2 in anaerobic conditions. This perspective is promising, since more that 50% of the wastewater treatment costs are due to the energy demand of aeration systems [6]. Another bio-electrochemical modification is the microbial electrolysis cell (MEC), which is functioning at free electron acceptor condition and external potential applied between electrodes. The released protons from biological oxidation are transferred through the proton exchange membrane to the cathode chamber, where the consumption of protons, via hydrogen evolution, results in a local pH increase. Recent studies show that such a reagent-free pH increase can be used in struvite precipitation at the cathode. The anodic and cathodic half-reactions can be used for application in several water purification and treatment processes [7]. In general, BOD and COD can be reduced in the anode compartment from treated wastewater or, alternatively, excess activated sludge can be stabilized [8,9]. Cathodic processes can be applied for denitrification, reduction of metal ions, and production of hydrogen [10].
Heavy metals pollution is nowadays recognized as one of the most concerning environmental issues, due to their toxicity to the biosphere. In recent years, various physical, chemical, and biological treatment approaches for the removal of heavy metals from wastewater have been largely practiced. These methods include mainly chemical precipitation, coagulation-flocculation, adsorption, membrane filtration, and electrochemical treatment technologies [11]. However, major setbacks of these technologies include the high cost of operation and large amounts of sludge (in case of precipitation/coagulation processes) that are generated [12], i.e., the niche for development of both economical and eco-friendly technologies for heavy metal removal and recovery exists [13].
The recent years of studies have proved that bio-electrochemical technology, which can biocatalyze easily biodegradable organic material at anode to produce protons and electrons that will be accepted by electron acceptor at cathode, is a promising alternative [14]. Once at the cathode, electrons and protons are used for the eventual oxygen reduction reaction to form water [15]. While the produced electrons are transferred from the anode to the cathode via an external circuit, the protons issued from the anaerobic respiration diffuse through the PEM, leading to electricity generation. Commonly used catholytes include oxygen, ferricyanide, and permanganate [4]. Heavy metal-containing wastewaters with high redox potential were proposed as catholytes for metal reduction and treatment. The reduced metal would either be deposited on the cathode, precipitate in the solution or remain in soluble form in the catholyte, based on its chemistry [10].
The MEC technique has a great potential to remove heavy metals, such as nickel, zinc, chromium, and copper in MFC [10]. Copper especially is regarded as one of the toxic metals causing many health hazards and harmful effects on human beings due to its wide occurrence in mine drainage wastewater. In addition to numerous treatment technologies developed for copper removal [16], it will be favorable to achieve copper recovery for reuse and recycle in industry, especially in wastewater with low copper concentrations. The high reduction potential of Cu2+ (+0.34 V vs. SHE) indicated that electricity production and copper recovery can be achieved simultaneously through the MFC. Experimental proofs of removal and recovery of metals, such as Cr(VI), V(V), and Cu(II), using both single and double chambered MFCs, have been reported [17].
However, besides the successes in MFC copper removal a number of challenges such as low production rates and limited efficiencies make the application of this technology restricted to lab scale only [18]. Obviously, efforts towards optimization of the microbial fuel cells processes applied in in the treatment of heavy metals, in particular copper contaminated wastewater are needed.
Summarizing the above, it is clear that the bio-electrochemical processes offer a promising alternative of the conventional processes for wastewater treatment. The paper describes three different case studies of bio-electrochemical processes applied for water depollution and resource recovery, based on the implementation of MFC, namely the processes for organic matter, copper, and phosphates removal/recovery.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. General Conditions

All chemicals in this study were of analytical or biochemical grade and supplied by Sigma-Algrich. If not mentioned otherwise, all experiment were conducted in anaerobic conditions and at room temperature (about 22 °C). Hach DR 3900 (Düsseldorf, Germany) was applied for the spectrophotometric analysis. All bio-electrochemical measurements were performed in a three-electrode system (AUTOLAB PGSTAT101, Metrohm Autolab, Utrecht, The Netherlands), namely working, counter, and reference electrode. Ag/AgCl (sat. KCl, 0.210 V vs. SHE, Metrohm Autolab, Utrecht, The Netherlands) was utilized as a reference electrode.

Microbial Fuel Cell

The system applied in all experiments represents a two-chambered cylindrical reactor. It consisted of PVC elements, with an inner diameter of 4.5 cm and length 3 cm and 1.5 cm for the anodic and cathodic chamber, respectively. Nafion membrane (Nafion® 242, Sigma-Aldrich, Saint Louis, MO, USA, diameter of 0.5 cm) served as separator for the two compartments. The working volume of cathodic and anodic chambers were 20 cm3 and 70 cm3, respectively. Both the anode and cathode were designed as carbon cloth circular plates, with diameter of 4 cm, and connected by an external electrical circuit with different resistances (depending on the experiment). The electrode distance was 3 cm.

2.2. Medium, Microorganisms, Cultivation Methods

2.2.1. Medium

As a medium for microbial growth and maintenance, rich nutrient medium LB (g/dm3) was used: casein trypton—10; yeast extract—5; NaCl—5, glucose—10, agar—2%.

2.2.2. Microorganisms

For MFC, operation microbial culture, with specific electroactive capabilities, was needed. The electrogenic bacteria used in this study were isolated from bottom sediment collected form “Yasna Polyana” dam in the Burgas region, Bulgaria. The mixed culture, used as inoculum, contained Bacillus sp.; Bacillus mycoides; Brevibacterium frigoritolerans; Brevundimonas vesicularis; Arthrobacter sp.; Viridibacillus arenosi.

2.2.3. Cultivation Methods

The sediment sample were transferred to a rich liquid culture medium (2.1). After 72 h of cultivation at 14–18 °C, the biomass was separated, washed, and resuspended in the same composition fresh medium with 80 mM acetate, instead of glucose. The final cell concentration was about 107 CFU/cm3. This suspension, serving as anolyte, was introduced into the anode chamber of the MFC. The system was brought into operation under general conditions, and the anolyte was replaced regularly with a fresh one for biofilm formation.

2.3. Analytical Methods

2.3.1. Electrochemical Measurements

The electrochemical characterization of cathodic processes was conducted with cathode as working, bio-anode as counter, and Ag/AgCl as reference electrode. Rates of 20 mV/s, in the range of −1 to +1 V, were applied. Anode reduction current was recorded with bio-anode as working, cathode as counter, and Ag/AgCl as reference electrode. The rate of the measurement was 15 mV/s, in the range of −800 to +800 mV.

2.3.2. Chemical Oxygen Demand (COD)

Cuvette tests (HACH LANGE LCK 514, 100–2000 mg O2·dm3) were used to monitor the dynamics of organic matter utilization in the anode chamber.

2.3.3. Ammonia Ions

Concentration of ammonia ions was measured by cuvette tests (HACH LANGE LCK 303 (2–47 mg NH4-N·dm−3), HACH LANGE LCK 304 (0.015–2.0 mg NH4-N·dm−3).

2.3.4. Copper Ions

Concentration of copper ions in cathodic chamber was determined by cuvette tests (HACH LANGE LCK 329 (0.1–8 mg Cu·dm−3).

2.3.5. Phosphate Ions

Concentration of phosphates were measured by cuvette tests (HACH LANGE LCK 049 (5–90 mg PO4 dm−3).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Wastewater COD Removal in MFC

The majority of the pollutants in wastewater are organic compounds. The typical approach toward this pollutant is based on the ability of microorganisms to utilize them as a substrate. Conventionally applied aerobic and anaerobic wastewater treatment methods have many disadvantages, such as high energy demand, production of huge amount of residual sludge, or requirement for temperature control and heating, which could elevate the environmental footprint of the wastewater management. MFC offers an alternative, which could minimize the sludge production and avoid the need of forced aeration. This could reduce 60–70% of the costs associated with the wastewater treatment.
To monitor the anode biofilm formation and activation, electrochemical measurements and cyclic voltammetry were applied, in order to detect the so-called anode reduction current, which is a result of the electron flow between the substrate/bacteria system and anode surface. The data obtained demonstrated that the biofilm development follows the typical microbial dynamics curve, with short initial lag phase and exponential grow and activation within the first 240 h of the process (Figure 2). The current values increase after the inoculation, indicating a change in the electrochemistry of the anode, related to the electrode colonization and biofilm formation. The biocatalytic current reaches its maximum of 219.39 µA at 288 h and remains relatively constant for another 29 days (696 h). Reaching a plateau after a certain period of time, under constant operating conditions, is usually associated with the successful colonization of the electrode and the electrochemical stabilization of the system. MFC reactor configuration and experimental design used during the COD removal experiments is shown in Figure 3.
In order to test the MFC capacity, two different experiments were carried out to simulate the COD removal and energy recovery during the treatment of model wastewater, with COD 0.6 and 1.6 g O2·dm−3.
The results (Figure 4a) obtained show that the mineralization processes follow the typical degradation dynamics, and, initially, the COD values increase slightly. This is known to be a sign of the enzymatic hydrolysis of complex organic compounds in the medium at the very beginning of the microbial utilization [19,20]. Both cases of low and high organics-containing wastewaters treated are effectively mineralized with high COD removal efficiency.
These results confirm our preliminary data obtained during direct comparison of MFC and conventional anaerobic digestion as methods for utilization of highly polluted wastewater. In both cases, a high COD removal efficiency (above 95%) was observed [21]. However, it was found that the anaerobic digestion requires significantly shorter treatment time to achieve this effect. Given that, anaerobic degradation is a process that has been very well-integrated in the industry for years, it has reached high advanced technical and technological state of development in terms of equipment design and process control and optimization, so these results are not unexpected. By the other side, the MFC technology is largely promising new concept, even though most of studies are based on lab prototypes. In certain stages of the biodegradation process in the MFC the maximum (instantaneous), COD removal rates observed in the MFC reactor are almost two times higher than the anaerobic digestion, reaching 722 mg/dm3/day, which clearly demonstrates the potential of bio-electrochemical methods [21]. The MFC technology probably hides significant opportunities that can be developed by optimizing both the technique (design) and the process parameters. Another positive characteristic of MFCs is the almost twice lower yield of excess sludge during the water treatment process, which can be a great technological advantage, given the fact that residual sludge in a secondary waste flow, which have to be managed and processed. In addition, MFCs offer a potential opportunity to recover energy from waste directly in the form of electricity, avoiding the additional technological stages, such as burning biogas to harvest energy [21].
The electrical measurement and data obtained in the experiment demonstrate different performance of the MFC when wastewater with high and low initial COD is utilized. As a general statement, the higher organic content is associated with better electrical performance. However, in the final stages of the process the behaviour of the MFC reactor with the lower COD feed is significantly different and demonstrated a sustainable tendency to generate higher current, reaching values close to those observed in the MFC, with the more concentrated substrate. Anyway, the maximum current values (35–38 µA), observed during this set of experiments, were measured in the reactor with the higher initial COD at the middle stage of the process (Figure 4b).

3.2. Phosphate Recovery in MFC by Cathode Reduction of Iron Phosphate and Mobilization of Ortho-Phosphates from Residual Sludge

The widely used chemical phosphorus removal during the wastewater treatment locks the phosphates, in the form of insoluble compounds, such as ferric phosphate (Ferric salts are used for coagulation) and makes direct P recovery impossible. MFC technology could be used to address this problem by reduction of the iron ions (form the active Fe(III) to inactive Fe(II) state), which will eventually result in mobilization of the phosphate ions. This reduction could be performed in the cathode chamber of the bio-electrochemical reactor if the electrochemical conditions needed are presented.
In this experiment, a MFC and cyclic voltammetry are used to study the dynamics and electrochemical mechanisms of phosphate mobilization form model suspension of ferric phosphate (Figure 5). The anode chamber was continuously fed with substrate in order to provide stationary conditions and microbial activity. The initial concentration of ferric phosphate in the cathode compartment was 500 mg PO4·dm−3. The process was monitored every 24 h, and the concentration of phosphates and cathode current expressing the transfer of electrons towards the Fe3+ ions are presented on Figure 6.
The data obtained show that the phosphate mobilization is very intensive in the first 72 h of the process and the speed is gradually reduced in next few days. The maximal concentration of soluble phosphates is reached in 144th hour after the start of the electrochemical mobilization, and then the process converts to opposite direction by fast desolubilization of the phosphates in the medium. The start of this negative tendency is also characterized by reversing the direction of the cathode current measured. In the studied system, the only possibility is that it is related to the autoxidation of the previously reduced iron to the initial Fe3+ state, following precipitation of ferric phosphate.
Probably, this tendency is related to the deterioration of electrochemical conditions in the MFC, due to depletion of electron acceptors in the cathode chamber, which leads to deterioration of physiological condition of electrogenic microorganisms and anode respiration. The positive values of the cathode current shows that the MFC polarization is reversed, due to this conditional changes.

3.3. Treatment of Copper Polluted Water by Reduction and Precipitation in MFC Cathode Reaction

Current wastewater treatment is technically able to remove copper mainly by different sorption or chemical precipitation techniques [22,23,24]. Despite the relatively good efficiency, these methods are not suitable for recovering copper or other valuable metals from the treated water, and they have significant environmental footprints [25,26].
In this study the concept of water treatment by cathodic reduction of Cu2+ to elemental copper—Cu0 in MFC was studied as an alternative approach, which enables simultaneous copper removal and recovery.
The cathode chamber of operating MFC reactor was filed with solution of CuSO4 at initial concentration of Cu2+ 200 mg dm−3. The dissolved copper ions amount was monitored every 24 h by sample collection and analysis (Figure 7). During the experiment, complete removal of copper ions introduced into the system was observed within 264 h. According to the results obtained, average copper removal rate of 0.9 mg dm−3 per hour was achieved during the process (Figure 8).
The dynamics of the copper reduction and removal follows linear tendency; however, in different stages of the process, the reduction rate could be different form the observed average and maximum rates. Following the conclusions made during the phosphate mobilization experiments, the process speed deterioration during the final stages could be related to the same reasons, a limited amount of electron acceptors for the cathode reaction (in this specific case the copper ions itself) leads to general inhibition of the MFC electrochemistry and anode biofilm biochemical activity.

4. Conclusions

4.1. MFC Assisted Organic Matter Removal

The MFC anodic biofilm formation was monitored through electrochemical measurements and cyclic voltammetry, in order to detect the anode reduction current resulting from the electron flow between the substrate/bacteria system and anode surface. During the study, it was found that the biofilm development follows the typical microbial dynamics curve, with short initial lag phase and exponential grow and activation within the first 240 h of the process. The electrical yield measurement demonstrates different performance of the MFC, when wastewater with high and low initial COD is utilized. As a general statement, the higher organic content is associated with better electrical performance. The obtained results confirm, as well, our preliminary data, related to the direct comparison of MFC and conventional anaerobic digestion as methods for utilization of highly polluted wastewater. In both cases, a high COD removal efficiency (above 95%) was observed, and even the kinetics of the anaerobic digestion were favourable.

4.2. MFC Assisted P Mobilization

Phosphorus is one of the essential elements for all living organisms. Phosphorus-containing bio-organic compounds are involved in cell energy storage and transformation, DNA and RNA synthesis, and building biological membranes. It is well-known that phosphorus is crucial for agriculture, and almost all of the extracted phosphorus minerals are used in the fertilizers production. According to recent reports, the peak of phosphorus production will soon be reached, which may lead to its depletion within the next 50–300 years [27,28]. Residual sludge stream formed during the wastewater treatment is known to contain significant amount of phosphorus, which could meet up to 20% of the agriculture industry demand [29]. In addition, recycling of nutrients from waste streams will have a positive impact on the surface and groundwater quality by avoiding eutrophication, due to eventual phosphorus and nitrogen pollution.
By the experiments reported here, it was proved that, by electrochemical transformation carried in MFC, a considerable rate of phosphate mobilization could be achieved. It was found that, within an acceptable retention time, from the technology point view, the initial soluble phosphates can be increased over 4.4 times. The data obtained shows that the phosphate mobilization is very intensive in the initial stage of ferric iron reduction. The ferric iron reduction could be performed in the cathode chamber of the bio-electrochemical reactor, following the conversion of the locked P, in form of insoluble compound to soluble form for further synthesis of valuable fertilizers. One example of P-based synthesis is the struvite production.

4.3. MFC Assisted Copper Removal

The study confirms the concept of copper removal by its cathodic reduction (Cu2+ to elemental copper Cu0) in a MFC. During the experiment, the complete removal of copper ions in the cathodic compartment was observed within 264 h. According to the results obtained, an average copper removal rate of 0.9 mg/dm3 was achieved during the process. Following the conclusions made during the phosphate mobilization experiments, the process rate slowed down during the final stages of the process. It could be attributed to limited amount of available electron acceptors needed for the cathode reaction (in this specific case the copper ions itself), leading to general inhibition of the MFC electrochemistry and anode biofilm biochemical activity.

Author Contributions

V.N. and H.Y., contributed conception of the manuscript. The research data were obtained by R.K., H.Y. and G.P. All the authors wrote sections and the first draft of the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Project BG05M2OP001-1.002-0019: Clean technologies for sustainable environment—water, waste, energy for circular economy (Clean&Circle), Centre of Competence.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lee, S.Y.; Sankaran, R.; Chew, K.W.; Tan, C.H.; Krishnamoorthy, R.; Chu, D.T.; Shown, P.-L. Waste to bioenergy: A review on the recent conversion technologies. BMC Energy 2019, 1, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mohan, S.V. Harnessing bioelectricity through microbial fuel cell from wastewater. Renew Energy 2012, 5, 24–28. [Google Scholar]
  3. Logan, B.E.; Hamelers, B.; Rozendal, R.; Schröder, U.; Keller, J.; Freguia, S.; Aelterman, P.; Verstraete, W.; Rabaey, K. Microbial Fuel Cells. Methodol. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 40, 5181–5192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Ucar, D.; Cokgor, E.U.; Şahinkaya, E. Evaluation of nitrate and perchlorate reduction using sulfur-based autotrophic and mixotrophic denitrifying processes. Water Sci. Technol. 2015, 16, 208–218. [Google Scholar]
  5. Koleva, R.; Yemendzhiev, H.; Nenov, V.A. Microbial fuel cell as a free-radical scavenging tool. Agric. Environ. Biotechnol. 2017, 31, 511–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Hussey, K.; Pittock, J. The energy-water nexus: Managing the links between energy and water for a sustainable future. Ecol. Soc. 2010, 17, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pant, D.; El Mekawy, A.; Srikanth, S. Food and agricultural wastes as substrates for bioelectrochemical system (BES): The synchronized recovery of sustainable energy and waste treatment. Food Res. Int. 2015, 73, 213–225. [Google Scholar]
  8. Bullen, R.A.; Arnot, T.C.; Lakeman, J.B.; Walsh, F.C. Biofuel cells and their development. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2006, 21, 2015–2045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Pant, D.; Singh, A.; Van Bogaert, G.; Olsen, S.I.; Nigam, P.S.; Diels, L.; Vanbroekhoven, K. Bioelectrochemical systems (BES) for sustainable energy production and product recovery from organic wastes and industrial wastewaters. RSC Adv. 2012, 2, 1248–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Nancharaiah, Y.V.; Venkata Mohan, S.; Lens, P.N.L. Metals removal and recovery in bioelectrochemical systems: A review. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 195, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Qasem, N.A.A.; Mohammed, R.H.; Lawal, D.U. Removal of heavy metal ions from wastewater: A comprehensive and critical review. NPJ Clean Water 2021, 4, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, Y.; Sun, J.; Hu, Y.; Li, S.; Xu, Q. Bio-cathode materials evaluation in microbial fuel cells: A comparison of graphite felt, carbon paper and stainless steel mesh materials. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 16935–16942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Jin, M.; Li, Y.; Li, S.; Kong, F.; Nan, J.; Wang, A. Copper removal and microbial community analysis in single-chamber microbial fuel cell. Bioresour. Technol. 2018, 253, 372–377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Logan, B.; Elimelech, M. Membrane-based processes for sustainable power generation using water. Nature 2012, 488, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. He, Y.R.; Du, F.; Huang, Y.X.; Dai, L.M.; Lia, W.; Yu, H.Q. Preparation of Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanotubes with Different Morphologies from Melamine-Formaldehyde Resin. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 7413–7420. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ciesielczyk, F.; Bartczak, P.; Klapiszewski, L.; Jesionowski, T. Treatment of model and galvanic waste solutions of copper(II) ions using a lignin/inorganic oxide hybrid as an effective sorbent. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 328, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Loubna, E.; Alae, E.; Saad, I.; Soumya, E.A. Challenges of microbial fuel cell architecture on heavy metal recovery and removal from wastewater. Front. Energy Res. 2019, 7, 1. [Google Scholar]
  18. Aiyer, K.S. Recovery of chromium, copper and vanadium combined with electricity generation in two-chambered microbial fuel cells. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2020, 367, fnaa129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shah Walter, S.R.; Jaekel, U.; Osterholz, H.; Fisher, A.T.; Huber, J.A.; Pearson, A.; Dittmar, T.; Girguis, P.R. Microbial decomposition of marine dissolved organic matter in cool oceanic crust. Nat. Geosci. 2018, 11, 334–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mckew, B.A.; Dumbrell, A.J.; Taylor, J.D.; Mcgenity, T.J.; Underwood, G.J.C. Differences between aerobic and anaerobic degradation of microphytobenthic biofilm-derived organic matter within intertidal sediments. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 2013, 84, 495–509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Mersinkova, Y.; Valentin Nenov, V.; Yemendzhiev, H. Comparative Analysis of Conventional Anaerobic Digestion and Bio-Electrochemical Systems in Waste Organics Utilization. J. Agric. Chem. Environ. 2021, 10, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hu, H.; Li, X.; Huang, P.; Zhang, Q.; Yuan, W. Efficient removal of copper from wastewater by using mechanically activated calcium carbonate. J. Environ. Manag. 2017, 203, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tahoon, M.A.; Siddeeg, S.M.; Salem Alsaiari, N.; Mnif, W.; Ben Rebah, F. Effective Heavy Metals Removal from Water Using Nanomaterials: A Review. Processes 2020, 8, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Li, N.; Liu, J.; Yang, R.; Wu, L. Distribution, characteristics of extracellular polymeric substances of Phanerochaete chrysosporium under lead ion stress and the influence on Pb removal. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 17633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Aziz, H.A.; Adlan, M.N.; Ariffin, K.S. Heavy metals (Cd, Pb, Zn, Ni, Cu and Cr(III)) removal from water in Malaysia: Post treatment by high quality limestone. Bioresour. Technol. 2008, 99, 1578–1583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Gunatilake, S.K. Methods of Removing Heavy Metals from Industrial Wastewater. JMESS 2015, 1, 12–18. [Google Scholar]
  27. Reilly, M. How Long Will it Last? New Sci. 2007, 94, 38–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Hein, L.; Leemans, R. The impact of first-generation biofuels on the depletion of the global phosphorus reserve. Ambio 2012, 41, 341–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Deng, L.W.; Zheng, P.; Chen, Z.A. Anaerobic digestion and post-treatment of swine wastewater using IC-SBR process with bypass of raw wastewater. Process Biochem. 2006, 41, 965–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Typical two chamber MFC; 1—anode, 2—cathode, 3—PEM, 4—external circuit and resistor [5].
Figure 1. Typical two chamber MFC; 1—anode, 2—cathode, 3—PEM, 4—external circuit and resistor [5].
Processes 10 00486 g001
Figure 2. Biofilm development expressed as anodic current measured by cyclic voltammetry.
Figure 2. Biofilm development expressed as anodic current measured by cyclic voltammetry.
Processes 10 00486 g002
Figure 3. MFC reactor configuration and experimental design used during the COD removal experiments; 1—anode, 2—cathode, 3—PEM, 4—external circuit and resistor, 5—reference electrode.
Figure 3. MFC reactor configuration and experimental design used during the COD removal experiments; 1—anode, 2—cathode, 3—PEM, 4—external circuit and resistor, 5—reference electrode.
Processes 10 00486 g003
Figure 4. Utilization of wastewater (with high organic load—orange, low organic load—blue) in MFC–COD removal (a) and electric current generated (b).
Figure 4. Utilization of wastewater (with high organic load—orange, low organic load—blue) in MFC–COD removal (a) and electric current generated (b).
Processes 10 00486 g004
Figure 5. MFC reactor configuration and experimental design used during the phosphate recovery; 1—anode, 2—cathode, 3—PEM, 4—external circuit and resistor, 5—reference electrode.
Figure 5. MFC reactor configuration and experimental design used during the phosphate recovery; 1—anode, 2—cathode, 3—PEM, 4—external circuit and resistor, 5—reference electrode.
Processes 10 00486 g005
Figure 6. MFC cathode current (blue) and phosphate mobilization (orange) dynamics.
Figure 6. MFC cathode current (blue) and phosphate mobilization (orange) dynamics.
Processes 10 00486 g006
Figure 7. MFC reactor used in the copper removal experiments; 1—anode, 2—cathode, 3—PEM, 4—external circuit and resistor.
Figure 7. MFC reactor used in the copper removal experiments; 1—anode, 2—cathode, 3—PEM, 4—external circuit and resistor.
Processes 10 00486 g007
Figure 8. The dynamics of copper reduction (orange) and MFC generated current (blue).
Figure 8. The dynamics of copper reduction (orange) and MFC generated current (blue).
Processes 10 00486 g008
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Koleva, R.; Peeva, G.; Yemendzhiev, H.; Nenov, V. Potential Use of Microbial Fuel Cell Technology in Wastewater Treatment. Processes 2022, 10, 486. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10030486

AMA Style

Koleva R, Peeva G, Yemendzhiev H, Nenov V. Potential Use of Microbial Fuel Cell Technology in Wastewater Treatment. Processes. 2022; 10(3):486. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10030486

Chicago/Turabian Style

Koleva, Ralitza, Gergana Peeva, Hyuseyin Yemendzhiev, and Valentin Nenov. 2022. "Potential Use of Microbial Fuel Cell Technology in Wastewater Treatment" Processes 10, no. 3: 486. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10030486

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop