Next Article in Journal
Beyond Purification: Evolving Roles of Fusion Tags in Biotechnology
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanisms Linking Obesity with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease (NAFLD) and Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs)—The Role of Oxidative Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Mechanistic Insights into the Abiotic Stress Adaptation of Salix Species: A Comprehensive Review of Physiological, Molecular, and Sex-Dimorphic Responses

1
National Key Laboratory for the Development and Utilization of Forest Food Resources, The Southern Modern Forestry Collaborative Innovation Center, State Key Laboratory of Tree Genetics and Breeding, Key Laboratory of State Forestry and Grassland Administration on Subtropical Forest Biodiversity Conservation, College of Life Sciences, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China
2
State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology, College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271000, China
3
State Key Laboratory of Desert and Oasis Ecology, Xinjiang Institute of Ecology and Geography, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Urumqi 830011, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47(9), 767; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47090767
Submission received: 11 May 2025 / Revised: 17 June 2025 / Accepted: 1 July 2025 / Published: 17 September 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Plant Responses to Environmental Stresses)

Abstract

As key species for ecological restoration, Salix spp. thrive in harsh environments, including high-altitude regions, arid zones, and saline–alkaline soils, demonstrating remarkable resilience to abiotic stressors. Recent advances in genomics, transcriptomics, and functional gene research have shed light on the mechanisms underlying Salix species’ responses to drought, salinity, heavy metals, and low-temperature stresses. This review systematically synthesizes the physiological, biochemical, and molecular adaptations of Salix to abiotic stress, with a particular focus on underexplored areas such as sex-dimorphic regulation and integrated hormone-ROS signaling pathways. We emphasize the dynamic interplay between transcription factors, hormonal crosstalk, and ROS signaling that underpins the stress response, highlighting sex-specific variations that modulate adaptive capacity. Moreover, we discuss the synergistic roles of exogenous additives and rhizosphere microorganisms in enhancing stress resistance. This comprehensive analysis provides critical insights for breeding stress-resilient Salix cultivars and for future research into stress adaptation mechanisms in woody plants.

1. Introduction

Willows (Salix spp.), a widely distributed genus of woody plants, are known for their remarkable adaptability to diverse and often harsh environments [1]. Due to their rapid growth, robust root systems, and high tolerance to abiotic stresses, willows have been widely utilized in ecological restoration, phytoremediation, and afforestation projects in vulnerable habitats such as riverbanks, saline–alkaline lands, and high-altitude plateaus [2].
In recent years, increasing attention has been paid to the mechanisms by which willows respond to abiotic stresses such as salinity, drought, and heavy metal toxicity. Studies have shown that willows employ a variety of strategies, including morphological and physiological adaptations, activation of antioxidant defenses, and osmotic regulation [3]. The application of exogenous substances such as lysine, calcium, silicon, acetic acid, and spermidine has been shown to mitigate stress-induced damage by enhancing antioxidant enzyme activities, modulating hormonal signaling, and improving nutrient uptake [4,5].
At the molecular level, transcription factors (TFs) and associated regulatory networks play a critical role in stress perception and signal transduction. TF families such as Trihelix, WRKY, MYB, HD-Zip, NAC, AP2/ERF, and Hsf have been identified in willows, with increasing evidence supporting their roles in stress adaptation [6,7].
Despite extensive studies on model plants, knowledge of the molecular and physiological mechanisms underlying abiotic stress responses in Salix species remains fragmented. While previous work has identified stress-induced physiological changes and candidate genes, an integrated understanding of hormone signaling, transcriptional regulation, and sex-specific adaptation in Salix is still lacking. Moreover, how Salix species coordinate responses to different abiotic stressors—either independently or in combination—has not been systematically reviewed.
Therefore, this review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the current knowledge on Salix responses to abiotic stresses, including drought, salinity, temperature extremes, heavy metals, and UV radiation. Particular emphasis is placed on transcriptional regulation, redox homeostasis, hormone signaling, and the interplay between stress responses and plant sex. We also highlight recent genomic and transcriptomic advances, compare interspecific and sex-dimorphic responses, and propose future directions to guide stress-resilient breeding and functional studies in Salix.

Search Strategy

We performed a bibliometric analysis using the Web of Science. The database used was the Web of Science Core Collection, and the search keywords included “Salix”, “Abiotic Stresses”, “Cold”, “Heat”, “Drought”, “Heavy Metal”, “Salt”, “Strong Light”, “Waterlogging”, and “Mechanical Damage”. For the construction of the network map of the bibliometric analysis, references from the past five years (2020–2025) were selected. For the heatmap of the bibliometric analysis, references from the past ten years (2016–2025) were selected. To generate the network map, we exported the relevant Excel files and used Pajek (version 5.19) and Bibexcel (version 2016-02-20) for analysis. First, the “Keywords Plus” column was selected from the exported Excel file. Using Bibexcel, keyword frequency statistics were performed, and keywords with frequencies below six were removed before calculating keyword co-occurrence frequencies. Bibexcel was then used to generate the co-occurrence matrix, which produced the .net file for visualizing the network map of the bibliometric analysis. The .net and .vet files generated by Bibexcel were imported into Pajek for data visualization, centrality calculations, and layout adjustments. Finally, VOSviewer (version 1.6.19) was used to refine the visualization.
For the heatmap of the bibliometric analysis, we selected the top 20 keywords by frequency and retrieved literature data for the past ten years. Origin 2025 (version 10.200196) was then used to create the heatmap (Figure 1).
The analysis results showed that in recent years, studies focusing on Salix species and their roles in adapting to environmental stresses have increased significantly. According to the results of the network map of the bibliometric analysis, research on the response of Salix species to heavy metals is particularly abundant, reflecting the substantial impact of heavy metals, especially cadmium, on the growth and development of Salix species. Other stress factors, such as drought, water availability, and NaCl, were also frequently investigated. Most studies have focused on the effects of environmental stress on the growth and development of Salix species, whereas molecular mechanisms underlying Salix responses to environmental stress remain less explored. The heatmap of the bibliometric analysis yielded similar conclusions to those of the network map, further indicating that research on the responses of Salix species to environmental stresses is gaining increasing attention. However, most studies have concentrated on the effects of environmental stresses on plant growth and development, and there is still ample room to advance research on the molecular mechanisms involved.

2. Abiotic Stress Responses in Salix Species: Physiological, Morphological, and Ecological Perspectives

Salix species inhabit ecologically diverse environments, ranging from alpine zones and arid regions to floodplains and saline–alkaline soils. This wide distribution exposes them to various abiotic stressors, either individually or in combination, with substantial spatiotemporal variability. To cope with these dynamic environmental challenges, willows have developed integrated adaptive mechanisms involving physiological adjustments, morphological plasticity, and ecological niche specialization. A comprehensive analysis of stress types, their ecological contexts, and genus-specific responses is essential for understanding the environmental adaptability and physiological ecology of Salix.

2.1. Multifaceted Impacts of Drought Stress on Salix Species

Drought exerts widespread and profound effects on Salix species, disrupting physiological metabolism, inhibiting growth and reproduction, and weakening ecological adaptability [8,9]. Physiologically, drought induces stomatal closure to limit water loss, but this also suppresses photosynthesis and reduces carbon assimilation [10]. Growth is markedly inhibited, with restricted root development and reduced aboveground biomass, resulting in stunted plants and leaf curling or premature abscission [3,11]. Reproductive processes are similarly impaired: drought reduces floral bud differentiation, pollen viability, seed yield, and germination rate, and also decreases the success of vegetative propagation such as cuttings and root suckers, thus threatening population regeneration [10]. Ecologically, drought drives hydrophilic Salix species to retreat to moist habitats, alters community structure, and facilitates replacement by more xerophytic species [12]. Moreover, drought compromises stress resistance, increasing susceptibility to pests and pathogens [13].

2.2. Physiological and Ecological Consequences of Salt Stress in Salix Species

Salt stress imposes multifaceted challenges on Salix species, primarily through osmotic imbalance, ion toxicity, and oxidative stress. High salinity impairs water uptake, inducing osmotic stress that manifests as leaf wilting, chlorosis, and necrosis [14]. Excessive accumulation of Na+ and Cl disrupts cell membrane integrity [15], inhibits photosynthetic enzyme activity, reduces chlorophyll content, and ultimately diminishes photosynthetic efficiency [14]. Salinity also interferes with the uptake of essential nutrients such as K+ and Ca2+, leading to metabolic disturbances and growth inhibition [16]. Prolonged exposure severely restricts root development and biomass accumulation, reducing the plant’s capacity for water and nutrient absorption [17]. Reproductive processes are also compromised, with declines in seed germination and seedling survival, ultimately limiting natural population regeneration [18]. Although salt tolerance varies among Salix genotypes, salinity broadly constrains their distribution and ecological functionality [19].

2.3. Physiological and Reproductive Impacts of Temperature Stress on Salix Species

Salix species are highly sensitive to temperature extremes, with both heat and cold stress significantly affecting their physiological metabolism, reproductive success, and ecological adaptability.
High temperature stress compromises cellular homeostasis by disrupting membrane integrity, increasing permeability, and enhancing ion leakage, ultimately impairing water balance [20]. Elevated temperatures denature proteins and reduce the activity of key enzymes such as ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco), leading to diminished photosynthetic efficiency. Heat stress also damages chloroplast ultrastructure, accelerates chlorophyll degradation, reduces the stability of photosystem II (PSII), and intensifies photoinhibition. Enhanced respiration rates further deplete carbon reserves and energy [21]. Morphologically, symptoms include leaf scorching, curling, premature senescence and abscission, epidermal sunburn cracking, suppressed apical meristem activity, stunted growth, and reduced biomass accumulation. Reproductively, heat stress decreases pollen viability and stigma receptivity, impairs fertilization, and increases seed abortion rates. Root development in seedlings is also inhibited, weakening subsequent stress resistance [21].
Low temperature stress alters membrane fluidity by inducing a phase shift from the liquid-crystalline to the gel state, increasing permeability and ion leakage, and disrupting intracellular ionic balance. Extracellular ice formation reduces water potential, causing cellular dehydration, while prolonged freezing may lead to intracellular ice crystal formation, resulting in membrane rupture and cell death. Cold stress also inhibits photosynthetic electron transport, reduces chlorophyll synthesis, and lowers light energy utilization [22].

2.4. Toxicological and Ecological Effects of Heavy Metal Stress on Salix Species

Heavy metal contamination imposes both toxicological and ecological burdens on Salix species [23]. High concentrations of metals such as cadmium (Cd) and copper (Cu) inhibit cell division in root elongation zones, damage the ultrastructure of root tip cells, and cause root browning and atrophy, thereby impairing water and nutrient uptake [24]. At the physiological level, heavy metals disrupt chlorophyll biosynthesis, leading to chlorosis, and displace essential metal cofactors such as Mg2+ and Fe2+ from enzymatic active sites, impairing the photosynthetic electron transport chain and reducing carbon assimilation [25]. Although some Salix species exhibit tolerance mechanisms—such as cell wall immobilization and vacuolar compartmentalization—chronic exposure to heavy metals results in stunted growth, as reflected by reduced plant height and lower annual ring density [26]. Ecologically, heavy metal stress alters the composition of root exudates, which in turn reshapes the diversity and function of rhizosphere microbial communities. This disruption compromises the phytoremediation capacity of willows and their ecological role as pioneer species in polluted environments [27,28].

2.5. Metabolic and Morphological Adaptations of Salix Species to Flooding Stress

Flooding stress in Salix species triggers a cascade of responses, including hypoxia-induced metabolic reprogramming and subsequent morphological adaptations. In hypoxic conditions, mitochondrial aerobic respiration in roots is inhibited, reducing ATP production. Consequently, plants shift to anaerobic pathways—mainly ethanol and lactic acid fermentation—to meet energy demands. However, these pathways lead to the accumulation of toxic intermediates such as acetaldehyde and lactate [29]. Physiologically, flooding induces prolonged stomatal closure, decreasing photosynthetic rates. Additionally, root hypoxia reduces nitrate reductase activity, impairing nitrogen assimilation, which results in chlorosis in older leaves and thinning of newly developed ones [30]. Extended submergence also triggers programmed cell death in cortical cells, promoting the formation of aerenchyma—a specialized tissue that facilitates internal oxygen transport. However, this adaptation weakens the mechanical strength of the root system [31,32]. Morphologically, flooding induces hydrophytic features such as the proliferation of adventitious roots and basal stem swelling. However, it also causes irreversible damage, including primary root decay and malformation of xylem vessels [33].

2.6. Photoinhibition and Adaptive Responses of Salix Species to High Light and UV Stress

High light and ultraviolet (UV) stress impose complex and dynamic effects on Salix species, characterized by an ongoing interaction between photodamage and photoprotection. Under intense irradiance, the absorbed light energy exceeds the capacity of the photosynthetic apparatus, leading to accelerated degradation of photosystem II (PSII) reaction center proteins, a decrease in maximum photochemical efficiency, and the onset of photoinhibition [34]. Exposure to UV-B significantly impacts root anatomy and stress tolerance. In S. nigra cuttings, UV-B treatment increased root porosity (POR) from 25% in the control group to 47%, representing a physiological adaptation that enhances environmental stress tolerance [31]. Moreover, combined UV-B and elevated temperature stress resulted in a 4–5% reduction in bud length in 2010, with the effect being more pronounced in male plants than in females [35]. However, other studies suggest that vegetative bud size is primarily regulated by seasonal temperature, and UV-B-induced changes are generally weaker and transient [35].

2.7. Integrated Comparative Analysis of Abiotic Stress Responses in Salix Species

2.7.1. Common Physiological Adaptations

The diverse abiotic stressors faced by Salix species—including drought, salinity, temperature extremes, heavy metals, flooding, and high light/UV—elicit both shared and stress-specific adaptive mechanisms. Common physiological responses across these stressors involve the accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and subsequent oxidative damage, which plants mitigate through antioxidant systems. Photosynthetic impairment is another frequent consequence, arising from stomatal closure under drought or chloroplast dysfunction under multiple stresses. At the morphological level, most stressors suppress root development, reduce overall biomass, and induce leaf abnormalities such as curling, chlorosis, or premature abscission. Reproductive success is consistently vulnerable, with stressors often reducing pollen viability, seed yield, and seedling establishment, thereby threatening population regeneration.

2.7.2. Unique Stress-Specific Mechanisms

Despite these commonalities, each stressor triggers distinct adaptive strategies. Drought and salt stress both require osmotic adjustment, but salinity uniquely demands ion homeostasis mechanisms to exclude toxic Na+ and Cl. Temperature extremes disrupt cellular stability in opposing ways—cold stress alters membrane fluidity, while heat stress causes protein denaturation and exacerbates photoinhibition. Heavy metals induce specialized detoxification pathways, such as cell wall immobilization and vacuolar sequestration, whereas flooding prompts metabolic shifts toward anaerobic respiration and morphological adaptations like aerenchyma formation. High light and UV stress, meanwhile, elicit photoprotective responses, including increased root porosity, but exhibit gender-specific effects on reproductive structures, highlighting the complexity of stress interactions.

2.7.3. Ecological Implications and Habitat Shifts

Ecologically, these responses influence habitat distribution and community dynamics. Drought and salinity often push Salix species toward moist or less saline niches, facilitating replacement by more xerophytic or halophytic competitors. In contrast, flooding and heavy metal tolerance reinforce Salix’s role as a pioneer species, though chronic stress can impair its phytoremediation capacity. The integration of these physiological, morphological, and ecological strategies underscores Salix’s remarkable plasticity, enabling it to navigate trade-offs between stress survival and long-term fitness in unpredictable environments.
Table 1 summarizes the physiological and molecular responses of Salix species to major abiotic stresses, highlighting shared and stress-specific mechanisms that underpin their adaptability.
Figure 2 is a conceptual model illustrating the interactions between multiple abiotic stressors (e.g., drought, salinity, heavy metals) and their effects on Salix growth, including reduced biomass, impaired photosynthesis, and oxidative damage. The diagram also shows the mitigating roles of exogenous additives (e.g., lysine, silicon, spermidine) and rhizosphere microorganisms, which enhance antioxidant defenses and osmotic adjustment. This figure is based on a synthesis of the published literature rather than direct experimental data.

3. Abiotic Stress Response Mechanisms in Salix: Osmotic Regulation, ROS Signaling, and Hormonal Control

Physiological and biochemical responses form the first line of defense for Salix species in response to abiotic stress. These mechanisms enable plants to rapidly adjust their internal environment, maintaining metabolic processes and minimizing cellular damage. Osmotic regulation and antioxidant defense systems act synergistically to alleviate cellular damage caused by stressors such as drought and salinity. Additionally, the regulation of plant hormones plays a crucial role in promoting adaptive responses at the cellular level. Through these integrated mechanisms, willows are able to sustain growth and reproductive capacity under a variety of adverse environmental conditions, demonstrating their remarkable ecological adaptability.

3.1. Osmotic Adjustment: Solute Accumulation and Membrane Stability

Osmotic adjustment, a crucial physiological adaptation mechanism, enables plants to maintain turgor pressure and water uptake under abiotic stress through active solute accumulation to reduce cellular osmotic potential [36]. In Salix spp., this process is central to their ecological adaptability, facilitating survival across diverse habitats from arid deserts to riparian wetlands [6]. P The osmotic regulation in Salix spp. involves coordinated accumulation of multiple solutes under drought and salinity stress, including proline, sucrose, trehalose [22], and inorganic ions (K+, Ca2+, Na+) [37]. Beyond osmotic balance, these compounds stabilize macromolecular structures, scavenge reactive oxygen species (ROS), and maintain membrane integrity. In S. daphnoides Vill. and S. purpurea L., drought reduced shoot biomass but increased bark proline content. Phenolic compound responses varied by chemical class, species, and stress duration: salicylates remained stable, whereas flavonoids, phenolic acid derivatives, and salireposide exhibited dynamic accumulation patterns under drought [38]. Metabolomic studies in S. sinopurpurea and S. suchowensis identified 67 and 64 drought-responsive metabolites, respectively. These metabolites functioned as compatible solutes, energy reserves, and antioxidants. Carbohydrate, amino acid, and lipid metabolism were pivotal for drought adaptation, with S. sinopurpurea accumulating aspartate, glutamate, serine, threonine, and sedoheptulose—potential contributors to its enhanced drought tolerance. Conversely, S. suchowensis exhibited drought sensitivity linked to suppressed phenylalanine and phytosterol biosynthesis [8]. Under salt stress, osmotic regulation remains critical: salinity decreased chlorophyll, carotenoids, and relative water content while elevating proline, soluble sugars, soluble proteins, and Na+/K+ ratios across tested clones [39].

3.2. ROS Signaling and Antioxidant Defense Networks

Studies on abiotic stress responses in Salix spp. have demonstrated the central role of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in stress signaling and damage mitigation. Under stress conditions, upregulated genes enhance antioxidant enzyme activities (e.g., superoxide dismutase [SOD] and catalase [CAT]), facilitating ROS detoxification and improving stress tolerance [40]. While ROS-mediated systemic signaling remains uncharacterized in Salix spp., evidence from other plants indicates ROS function as dual agents—both damaging molecules and key signaling mediators that regulate gene expression and coordinate with Ca2+ to propagate ROS waves for inter-tissue stress signaling [41].
Recent advances elucidate the antioxidant and ROS-signaling networks in Salix spp. For example, in S. matsudana Koidz., exogenous hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and methylglyoxal (MG) alleviated cadmium-induced oxidative stress by regulating glutathione metabolism [42]. Multiple abiotic stressors (flooding, salinity, drought, low temperature) trigger ROS responses in S. matsudana, activating antioxidant enzymes and stress-responsive genes [43]. Beyond enzymatic systems, metabolites also mediate ROS signaling under abiotic stress. In S. matsudana subjected to combined cadmium and drought stress, excessive ROS accumulation severely inhibited seedling growth (root length and plant height). Salicylic acid (SA) treatment, however, elevated proline biosynthesis via enhanced ornithine aminotransferase (OAT) activity and suppressed proline dehydrogenase (ProDH), while proline exerted multifunctional protective roles in SA-mediated stress adaptation [44].

3.3. Regulation of Abiotic Stress Responses in Salix by Plant Hormones

Plant hormones play a critical role in regulating the response of willow species (Salix spp.) to abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, and heavy metal toxicity, coordinating physiological and molecular mechanisms to enhance stress tolerance. Among these hormones, abscisic acid (ABA) is widely recognized as a key signaling molecule in stress responses. Under drought or osmotic stress, ABA rapidly accumulates in leaves, roots, and root tips, contributing to reduced water loss through stomatal closure. For example, significant increases in ABA levels were observed in detached leaves and roots of S. dasyclados following dehydration, with higher accumulation in younger tissues compared to mature ones, resulting in rapid stomatal closure and delayed reopening during recovery [45]. In S. viminalis, transient elevation of ABA in leaves and apical tissues was associated with a decline in the apical growth rate and bud senescence, coinciding with decreased water potential. Exogenous ABA application suppressed growth and increased stomatal resistance, while gibberellic acid (GA3) treatment reversed these inhibitory effects [46]. In S. pentandra seedlings, exogenous ABA significantly increased stomatal resistance and reduced transpiration and growth rates, although it failed to induce growth cessation or bud dormancy under a 24 h photoperiod, suggesting that ABA alone is insufficient to trigger photoperiod-mediated dormancy induction [47]. Under combined drought and nitrogen deposition, S. rehderiana exhibited altered foliar ABA levels linked to modified flavonoid biosynthesis pathways, ultimately affecting growth dynamics and drought resilience [48].
In addition to ABA, other hormones have also been implicated in willow responses to abiotic stresses. Under arsenic stress in the roots of S. purpurea, transcripts encoding ACC synthase, the enzyme responsible for ethylene precursor biosynthesis, were upregulated nearly eightfold, along with the ethylene-insensitive factor (EIN), suggesting activation of ethylene biosynthesis and signaling under metal stress. In contrast, transcripts of ACC oxidases (ACOs) and ethylene response factors (ERFs) were downregulated in stems and leaves, indicating organ-specific regulation of ethylene signaling [49]. In a transcriptomic study of shrub willows under salt stress, the salt-tolerant genotype JW2372 exhibited more differentially expressed genes involved in ethylene signaling compared to the salt-sensitive JW9-6, further supporting ethylene’s role as a key hormone in salt stress adaptation [50].
Salicylic acid (SA) also plays a significant role in chemical stress responses in willows. In S. matsudana seedlings, exogenous SA treatment significantly enhanced tolerance to 2,4-dinitrophenol (2,4-DNP), as evidenced by improved photosynthetic efficiency, increased antioxidant enzyme activity, and reduced toxicity, suggesting SA as a regulator of chemical stress resistance [51]. Jasmonic acid (JA) signaling has been implicated in willow responses to drought stress [3]. Comprehensive transcriptomic analyses have revealed that willow responses to salt stress involve crosstalk among multiple hormonal signaling networks, including auxin and cytokinin. However, the specific roles of these hormones in Salix species remain insufficiently characterized and require further investigation [50].
In summary, osmotic regulation, ROS signaling, and hormonal pathways constitute a highly integrated and conserved defense system against diverse abiotic stressors in Salix species. Both drought and salinity trigger osmotic adjustments through the accumulation of proline, soluble sugars, and inorganic ions, which contribute to turgor maintenance and cellular protection. ROS production is a universal response; however, the magnitude and composition of antioxidant systems differ by stressor: drought and heat stress commonly activate superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase (CAT), while heavy metal stress additionally requires metal-chelating pathways. Hormonal regulation shows extensive cross-talk among ABA, ethylene, and SA pathways, with ABA predominating under drought, salinity, and heavy metal stress, while ethylene and SA display more stressor-specific roles. Overall, as the first line of defense in environmental perception, willows inhabiting harsh environments have developed diverse physiological and biochemical strategies to mitigate abiotic stresses. Over long-term evolution, these species have also evolved stable and enduring molecular regulatory mechanisms. These mechanisms are closely linked to, yet distinct from, the physiological and biochemical responses: they enable rapid responses to transient environmental fluctuations while contributing to long-term adaptation from an evolutionary perspective.

4. Molecular Mechanisms of Salix Resistance to Abiotic Stress

In the preceding section, we examined in detail the mechanisms through which willows respond to abiotic stress, emphasizing osmotic regulation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) signaling, and hormonal control. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying willow resistance to abiotic stress offer considerable research potential beyond these well-established response pathways. Investigating specific molecular pathways and the roles of key genes will provide deeper insights into how willows fine-tune their responses to various stressors. These mechanisms not only involve traditional antioxidant systems but also include processes such as metal ion transport and the regulation of drought-related genes. Such studies are essential for advancing our understanding of willow stress resistance and for improving phytoremediation efforts using these species (Figure 3).

4.1. Perception and Signaling Mechanisms of Abiotic Stress in Salix spp.

The plasma membrane is the primary site where Salix spp. perceive abiotic stresses. Receptor-like kinases (RLKs) and receptor-like cytoplasmic kinases (RLCKs) on the cell membrane can directly or indirectly detect changes in salinity, osmotic pressure, and other environmental factors, thereby triggering downstream signaling cascades [52]. Although Salix-specific RLKs have been scarcely studied, the RLCK family member SpRLCK1 from S. psammophila provides valuable insights. SpRLCK1 is a cytoplasm-localized RLCK VIIa protein with high expression in roots and is induced by drought and salt stress. Overexpression of this gene in Arabidopsis enhanced ROS-scavenging enzyme activity, thereby improving stress tolerance [53].
Abiotic stresses often induce a transient increase in intracellular calcium ion (Ca2+) concentration, which activates calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs) and the calcineurin B-like (CBL)/CBL-interacting protein kinase (CIPK) signaling pathway. External stimuli such as phytohormones, gravity, light, temperature fluctuations, drought, hypoxia, salinity, mechanical injury, and pathogens rapidly elevate cytosolic Ca2+ levels. These changes are decoded by downstream effectors to trigger specific biological responses [54]. In the salt-stressed root transcriptome of S. matsudana, CBL (SOS3), CIPK (SOS2), and the Na+/H+ antiporter SOS1 were identified as key differentially expressed genes (DEGs), indicating that the Ca2+–CBL/CIPK module plays a central role in salt signal transduction [55].
In response to stress, Salix cells also significantly increase the production of ROS. In S. matsudana, homologs of NADPH oxidase (RBOH), such as AtRBOHF/D, are upregulated under salt stress, promoting ROS accumulation [56]. ROS act as both damaging byproducts and signaling molecules, mediating kinase activation and antioxidant gene expression. Elevated Ca2+ and ROS levels facilitate intracellular signal transduction. Studies have shown that hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) activates the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) cascade through phosphorylation of MKK4/5 via upstream activation of ANP1, which subsequently activates MPK3. H2O2 can also directly activate MPK3 by inducing nucleoside diphosphate kinase 2 (NDPK2) [57]. Moreover, transcriptome analysis of the hybrid S. matsudana × S. alba under combined salt and flooding stress revealed enrichment of Ca2+ signaling, kinase activity, and MAPK pathways. Genes in the MAPK pathway were shown to be essential in mediating responses to salt-flood stress, as stress-induced ROS imbalance rapidly activated the MAPK cascade [58].

4.2. Transcription Factors in Salix: Regulatory Modules and Functional Evidence

Upon perceiving stress signals, willow (Salix spp.) cells activate a series of regulatory mechanisms, among which transcriptional regulation plays a central role. Transcription factors (TFs) are essential in modulating the expression of stress-responsive genes.
WRKY transcription factors are key regulators of abiotic stress responses. In S. matsudana, researchers found that the drought-inducible gene SmWRKY12 was upregulated in the roots of the drought-tolerant cultivar 9901 under stress conditions, as determined by qPCR analysis. Overexpression of SmWRKY12 in the callus tissue of S. matsudana significantly enhanced drought tolerance. Y1H and dual-luciferase reporter assays demonstrated that SmWRKY12 activates the SmEXPA13 promoter and physically interacts with SmRAP2-7. Their interaction further strengthened SmWRKY12-mediated activation of SmEXPA13, which encodes a cell wall-loosening expansin protein. Transgenic expression of SmEXPA13 improved drought tolerance in both S. matsudana and Nicotiana benthamiana, highlighting a novel regulatory module involving SmWRKY12, SmRAP2-7, and SmEXPA13 [59]. In salt stress studies, the transcription factor SmMYB1R1-L was identified in S. matsudana as a positive regulator. Overexpression of SmMYB1R1-L in willow calli enhanced physiological responses to salt stress, partly through upregulation of SmEXPA13 [60].
Homeodomain-leucine zipper (HD-Zip) transcription factors are plant-specific and play crucial roles in stress responses. In S. suchowensis, 55 HD-Zip genes (SsHD-Zips) were identified. GO annotation and promoter analysis indicated potential roles in multiple stress responses, while qPCR showed variable expression patterns under salt, PEG, and heat treatments. Co-expression network analysis suggested synergistic interactions among SsHD-Zip I genes under stress. Notably, SsHox34, SsHox36, and SsHox51 were prominently involved, although downstream targets remain unidentified [61].
Transcriptome profiling of two Salix genotypes (salt-sensitive JW9-6 and salt-tolerant JW2372) under salt stress revealed pronounced differential expression of ERF, MYB, NAC, and WRKY TFs in JW9-6, but lacked functional validation [50].
AP2/ERF transcription factors are critical in abiotic stress responses. Using an HMM profile search in the Salix matsudana protein database, a total of 364 AP2/ERF genes were identified and categorized. RNA-seq data suggested their involvement in salt stress adaptation [62]. A subsequent study isolated SmAP2-17, a salt-inducible gene. Overexpression of SmAP2-17 in Arabidopsis increased salt sensitivity, possibly because this gene is a target of salt stress-induced microRNAs. Interestingly, when an optimized codon version of SmAP2-17 with a modified binding site was introduced into Arabidopsis, the transgenic plants exhibited significantly enhanced salt tolerance. A dual-luciferase reporter assay further demonstrated that SmAP2-17 enhances stress tolerance by upregulating SOS3 and ABI5 [7].
In S. suchowensis, 27 heat shock transcription factor (Hsf) genes (SsuHsfs) were identified through whole-genome sequencing and were found to be associated with abiotic stress responses. The expression profiles of these 27 SsuHsfs under various tissues and stress conditions (high temperature, drought, salt, and ABA treatment) were analyzed using RT-PCR. The results indicated that SsuHsfs are involved in abiotic stress responses. Hsfs regulate heat shock proteins (Hsps), which are crucial for protein stability under stress [63].
In S. linearistipularis, the cell number regulator (CNR) family member SlCNR8 was shown to confer resistance to heavy metals such as Cd, Zn, Cu, Fe, and Mn. Overexpression of SlCNR8 in poplar seedlings resulted in decreased Cd accumulation and altered expression of metal transporter genes. Subcellular localization studies showed that SlCNR8 is located in both the nucleus and plasma membrane and exhibits transactivation activity in yeast, suggesting its function in regulating metal ion homeostasis [64].
In S. matsudana, members of the C-repeat binding factor (CBF) family, including SmDREB A1-4, have been identified as homologs of Arabidopsis AtCBFs [65]. CBFs are well-characterized transcription factors involved in plant responses to abiotic stresses, particularly cold stress [66]. SmDREB A1-4 was shown to localize in both the nucleus and cytoplasm, and its promoter contains TC-rich repeats and ABRE motifs associated with NaCl-induced expression. Overexpression of SmDREB A1-4 in Arabidopsis enhanced salt tolerance in transgenic plants, while silencing of this gene via virus-induced gene silencing (VIGS) reduced salt tolerance in willow seedlings. Further studies revealed four putative downstream targets of SmDREB A1-4: RBOHF, SOS1, ABI5, and DREB2A. Notably, dual-luciferase reporter assays demonstrated that SmDREB A1-4 directly binds to the promoters of SOS1 and DREB2A, indicating that it functions as a transcriptional regulator of these genes in the salt stress response of willow [65].
Despite the well-established roles of transcription factors in plant stress responses, relatively few studies have explored their regulatory roles in willows under abiotic stress. Most existing research has relied on transcriptomic data mining. Future studies should focus on elucidating the transcriptional regulatory networks that underlie abiotic stress adaptation in Salix species.

4.3. Other Key Genes Involved in Salix Responses to Abiotic Stress

Genes encoding novel antioxidant components, such as SmGASA06 in S. matsudana, enhance H2O2 scavenging capacity under stress [67]. For details on classical ROS-scavenging enzymes (e.g., CAT, SOD, APX, POD), see Section 3.2.
Metal transporters critically mediate heavy metal homeostasis. In S. matsudana, cadmium (Cd) stress induces SmZIP8, a Zrt/Irt-like protein that enhances root-to-shoot Cd translocation via subcellular redistribution (vacuolar sequestration over cell wall binding). Transgenic SmZIP8 expression reduces photosynthetic toxicity by compartmentalizing Cd into leaf epidermal cells, concurrently improving phytoextraction efficiency (elevated accumulation/translocation factors) and stress tolerance [68]. Tobacco expressing SmZIP8 showed mitigated Cd cytotoxicity through enhanced mitosis, antioxidant activation, and photosynthetic protection [69].
Phytoextraction is a key method in the phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils [70]. Identification of metal-tolerant plants and key genes involved in metal ion transport is central to this research. A plant cadmium resistance (PCR) gene, SlPCR6, was identified in the roots of S. linearistipularis, a species known for its heavy metal tolerance. SlPCR6 expression was induced by Cd stress and localized to the plasma membrane. Its overexpression in transgenic poplar (84K) decreased Cd and Cu accumulation and enhanced tolerance to both metals, without significantly affecting the expression of other known metal transporter genes. These results suggest that SlPCR6 may directly mediate Cd and Cu transport, offering a candidate gene for improving phytoextraction efficiency via genetic engineering [71].
Pleiotropic drug resistance (PDR) transporters, part of the ABCG subfamily of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, have been implicated in heavy metal tolerance. In S. purpurea, a total of 21 pleiotropic drug resistance (PDR) transporter genes were identified using the BLASTP algorithm, and their promoters contained cis-elements related to various abiotic stress responses. Under heavy metal stress, PDR gene expression varied among tissues and in response to different metals. However, the functional roles of these genes remain to be experimentally validated [72].
In S. matsudana, whole-genome data analysis identified 28 members of the PIN gene family, encoding proteins that mediate auxin transport. Under 200 mM NaCl treatment, transcriptome analysis showed that the expression levels of SmPIN1e, SmPIN1h, and SmPIN3c were higher in salt-tolerant varieties than in salt-sensitive ones, indicating that these genes respond to salt stress. After 4–12 h of flooding treatment, transcriptome data showed that SmPIN1c, SmPIN2c, and SmPIN2d were significantly upregulated in flooding-tolerant varieties. Following 24–48 h of flooding treatment, SmPIN3b and SmPIN3d exhibited higher expression levels in flooding-tolerant varieties than in flooding-sensitive ones. Other genes, such as SmPIN2d, SmPIN2c, and SmPIN5b, were found to regulate root development in callus cultures of S. matsudana [73].
A study on S. matsudana also identified SmCML56, a member of the calmodulin-like (CML) gene family. Under 100 mM NaCl treatment, overexpression of SmCML56 in Arabidopsis enhanced salt tolerance. Additionally, after 16 days of treatment with 150 mM NaCl, S. matsudana overexpression plants exhibited improved salt tolerance, while VIGS-mediated silencing of SmCML56 reduced salt tolerance, confirming its functional importance in salt stress resistance [74].
The salt tolerance hub gene SmERF B1–2 was identified in S. matsudana. It contributes to salt stress resistance by regulating Na+/K+ homeostasis [75].
In S. linearistipularis, exposure to 50 mM Na2CO3 stress triggered proline and soluble sugar accumulation for osmotic adjustment, along with enzymatic and non-enzymatic ROS scavenging. A chloroplast-localized rubredoxin gene, SlRUB, was highly expressed under alkali stress and associated with proteins involved in photosynthesis and ROS detoxification. Functional studies in Arabidopsis suggest that SlRUB is crucial for maintaining photosynthetic performance and oxidative balance under alkali stress [76].
Previously discussed transcription factors SmWRKY12 [59] and SmMYB1R1-L [60] regulate SmEXPA13, an expansin gene involved in cell wall loosening. SmEXPA13 expression is induced by salt stress and helps reduce Na+ accumulation while enhancing K+ uptake. Similarly, SmEXPA23 also contributes to salt tolerance by maintaining Na+/K+ balance [77,78].
In another study, the 4-hydroxy-tetrahydrodipicolinate synthase gene SlDHDPS from S. linearistipularis was found to alleviate salt stress during seed germination and seedling growth by regulating lysine biosynthesis. Exogenous lysine application significantly improved germination and growth under salt stress, with optimal effects observed at 3 mM [79].

4.4. Integrated Signaling Pathways: Hormone-ROS-Genes Crosstalk

The crosstalk between hormone signaling, reactive oxygen species (ROS) homeostasis, and stress-responsive genes plays a pivotal role in abiotic stress adaptation in Salix species. In S. matsudana, overexpression of the AP2/ERF transcription factor SmAP2-17 significantly upregulated ABA-responsive genes ABI5 and SOS3, conferring enhanced salt tolerance in transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana, highlighting the critical role of ABA signaling components in Salix stress adaptation [7]. Similarly, in S. psammophila, the transcription factor SpABR1 (a GRAM domain-containing protein) was identified as a key positive regulator of drought tolerance. SpABR1 overexpression reduced ROS accumulation and boosted antioxidant enzyme activity by activating ABA biosynthesis and responsive genes, including DREB2A, RD22, and RD29, which were markedly upregulated under osmotic stress [80]. Further mechanistic studies revealed that the NAC family member SpNAC2 binds to the SpABR1 promoter, activating its expression. Transgenic Arabidopsis overexpressing SpABR1 exhibited enhanced drought tolerance, increased ABA sensitivity, and elevated antioxidant activity, demonstrating the hierarchical regulation within this pathway [80].
Another NAC family gene, SpsNAC005 from S. psammophila, enhanced salt and drought tolerance when overexpressed in Populus hopeiensis. Transgenic plants showed higher SOD and POD activities, increased proline content, and reduced MDA levels, though intriguingly, the expression of SOS1, MPK6, HKT1, P5CS1, and PRODH1 was downregulated, suggesting a complex regulatory network [81]. In S. linearistipularis, SlWRKY28 enhanced alkali-salt tolerance by upregulating antioxidant genes (PtAPX, PtSOD, PtEnolase, and PtSPDS) while minimally affecting PtP5CS expression, underscoring the specificity of transcriptional regulation in ROS scavenging [82].
Beyond drought and salt stress, Salix species employ conserved mechanisms for flooding tolerance. In S. matsudana Koidz, 78 Trihelix transcription factors (SmTTFs) were identified, with SmTTF30 rapidly induced by flooding. Overexpression of SmTTF30 in Arabidopsis enhanced flood tolerance, evidenced by higher leaf cell viability, elevated POD activity, and reduced MDA levels under stress [43]. Further analysis revealed that SmDREB A1-10 directly binds to the SmTTF30 promoter, functioning upstream of it. Silencing SmDREB A1-10 suppressed SmTTF30 and hypoxia-responsive genes, exacerbating submergence stress [1].
In summary, these integrated signaling pathways demonstrate the complex interplay between hormones, ROS, and transcription factors in Salix spp. under abiotic stress. The convergence of these pathways orchestrates gene expression and physiological adjustments that collectively enhance stress adaptation (Table 2).
In addition to transcriptional regulation, emerging evidence suggests that epigenetic regulation, non-coding RNAs, and post-translational modifications play important roles in plant responses to abiotic stresses. Although limited data are currently available in Salix spp., studies in other woody plants have highlighted the roles of DNA methylation and histone modifications in modulating stress-responsive gene expression and stress memory. Non-coding RNAs, such as microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), are known to fine-tune the expression of key transcription factors and signaling molecules under stress. Moreover, post-translational modifications, including phosphorylation, ubiquitination, and sumoylation, dynamically regulate the stability, activity, and subcellular localization of stress-responsive proteins, thereby contributing to rapid stress adaptation.
Future studies should integrate multi-omics approaches to systematically investigate these regulatory layers in Salix spp., which will help build a more comprehensive model of stress adaptation and provide potential targets for improving stress resilience through breeding or biotechnological approaches.
In conclusion, the molecular mechanisms of Salix responses to abiotic stresses involve both common and stress-specific regulatory modules. Transcription factors such as WRKY, MYB, and AP2/ERF families consistently contribute to stress tolerance by modulating downstream stress-responsive genes. Notably, WRKY factors are broadly involved in drought, salt, and heavy metal stress, while AP2/ERF factors exhibit roles in salinity and cold stress. Shared signal transduction elements, including receptor-like kinases (RLKs), calcium-dependent protein kinases (CDPKs), and ROS-producing NADPH oxidases, are repeatedly recruited under various stress conditions. However, stress-specific differences emerge, such as the prominent role of metallothioneins and metal transporters under heavy metal stress, and the unique induction of aquaporins and cell wall-modifying genes during flooding. Understanding both the shared and unique regulatory mechanisms will be key to breeding Salix cultivars with broad-spectrum stress resilience.

5. Abiotic Stress Response Strategies: Male vs. Female Willows

Willows (Salix spp.) are dioecious, with sex determination mechanisms varying among species due to differences in sex chromosome evolution and the localization of sex-determining regions (SDRs) [83]. In the ZW system, females are heterogametic (ZW), while males are homogametic (ZZ). In contrast, the XY system involves heterogametic males (XY) and homogametic females (XX) [84]. Some Salix species exhibit a transition from XY to ZW systems [85]. Many studies have demonstrated sexually dimorphic responses to abiotic stresses in willows.

5.1. Morphological and Physiological Differences

Under drought and high nitrogen deposition, female S. myrtillacea cuttings exhibit superior growth and drought resistance compared to males, attributed to enhanced water acquisition, higher water use efficiency (WUE), elevated foliar ABA and IAA levels, and better ROS scavenging capacity [11,48]. In S. paraplesia, drought reduced growth and photosynthesis in both sexes; however, females showed higher biomass, chlorophyll content, and antioxidant enzyme activity, indicating superior drought tolerance [86].
Interestingly, in S. matsudana, males developed stronger root systems and higher biomass under salinity stress [87]. In S. viminalis exposed to cadmium stress, females initially accumulated more H2O2 and developed larger roots, but over time, males exhibited higher cadmium tolerance with increased antioxidant enzyme activity [88].

5.2. Hormonal and Metabolite Profiles

Exogenous acetic acid (AA) enhances drought resistance in S. rehderiana, S. babylonica, and S. matsudana, with females showing greater improvements in root development, osmotic adjustment, antioxidant activity, and photosynthesis [89]. AA also modulates jasmonic acid signaling, activating it in females while suppressing it in males, contributing to sex-specific drought responses [3].
Proteomic and acetylproteomic analyses in S. myrtillacea revealed that drought-tolerant females suffered less photosynthetic and oxidative damage, while drought-sensitive males activated acetyl-CoA biosynthesis, fatty acid metabolism, and jasmonic acid pathways [5]. Under salt stress in S. linearistipularis, female plants exhibited higher SOD and POD activities, lower H2O2 content, and enhanced photosynthetic capacity compared to males [79,90]. Females also had lower Na+ accumulation in leaves and higher Na+ efflux in roots, likely due to higher expression of SlNHX3, 5, 6, and 7 [79,90].

5.3. Transcriptional and Molecular Differences

Transcriptomic analysis of S. matsudana under salinity stress showed that both sexes upregulated stress-related genes (e.g., ADH, oxygenase-related genes); however, males additionally upregulated other abiotic stress response genes, while females downregulated nitrogen metabolism genes to mitigate salt damage [87]. Under combined drought and low-temperature stress, S. myrtillacea females accumulated more amino acids and sugar alcohols, while males produced more flavonoids, indicating a trade-off between growth and defense strategies [22].
Proteomic studies revealed that exogenous AA regulated acetyl-CoA metabolism differently in males and females, contributing to stress-specific performance [5]. Notably, LysAc (lysine acetylation) modifications also showed sexual dimorphism in histones, transcription factors, and metabolic enzymes, affecting stress-responsive gene expression [5].
Overall, Salix species exhibit sexually dimorphic responses to abiotic stresses at morphological, physiological, hormonal, metabolite, and transcriptional levels. These differences highlight evolutionary trade-offs between growth and defense strategies, driven by complex gene regulatory networks and epigenetic modifications. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for developing stress-resilient willow cultivars.

6. Exogenous Treatments and Microbial Interactions in Enhancing Salix Resistance to Abiotic Stresses

6.1. Exogenous Additives: Amino Acids, Hormones, and Elements

As previously mentioned, lysine plays a crucial role in helping plants resist salt stress. Exogenous lysine supplementation alleviates salt stress phenotypes during germination and seedling development in Salix spp. [79]. In a study on S. matsudana Koidz., it was found that the application of silicon (Si) reduced cadmium accumulation by inhibiting plant cadmium absorption, while spermidine (Spd) alleviated cadmium toxicity by enhancing antioxidant capacity. This was primarily due to exogenous Si and Spd increasing antioxidant enzyme activity and reducing oxidative damage caused by cadmium [4]. Moreover, exogenous calcium has also been reported to promote the growth of S. matsudana seedlings under NaCl stress. This positive effect was linked to enhanced activities of antioxidant enzymes such as catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and peroxidase (POD), as observed in Ulmus pumila seedlings under different NaCl concentrations [91].
Furthermore, as previously mentioned, exogenous acetic acid (AA) effectively improves drought resistance in Salix spp. Female willows treated with AA exhibited more extensive root systems, stronger root vitality, enhanced osmoregulatory capacity, increased antioxidant activity, and higher photosynthetic rates, along with lower reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels and fewer stomatal closures mediated by abscisic acid. AA treatment also enhanced the jasmonic acid signaling pathway in female willows but suppressed it in males, which resulted in superior drought resistance in females compared to males. Overall, AA application enhanced drought resistance more in female than male willows, further emphasizing the sexual dimorphism under drought stress [3]. This was mainly due to AA irrigation significantly increasing the relative content of amino acid metabolites (e.g., glycyl-l-tyrosine, l-glutamine, and seryl-tryptophan) and decreasing phenylpropanoid metabolite levels (e.g., resveratrol and sinapyl aldehyde) in the soil. The enrichment of nitrogen-fixing bacteria (Azotobacter) and Pseudomonas in the rhizosphere was significantly correlated with the accumulation of these metabolites, promoting nitrogen uptake in Salix spp. and improving drought stress resistance [89].

6.2. Mycorrhizal Symbioses and Phytoremediation Enhancement

In a study of the response of S. linearistipularis to saline–alkaline stress, plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) played a crucial role. In a study of the response of S. linearistipularis to saline–alkaline stress, plant growth-promoting PGPR played a crucial role. Inoculation with Trichoderma sp. strains M4 and M5 increased proline and soluble sugar contents, enhanced SOD, POD, CAT, and APX activities, and reduced lipid peroxidation; strain M4 was more effective. M4 alleviated seedling damage by lowering oxidative stress, boosting organic acid and amino acid metabolism, and activating phenylpropanoid biosynthesis to scavenge reactive oxygen species [92].
From the roots of S. alba, Bacillus thuringiensis (Accession MW979616) was isolated. Inoculation of wheat (Triticum aestivum) seeds with this strain and root powder markedly improved biomass accumulation and antioxidant enzyme activities under cadmium stress [93].
Salix spp., being dual mycorrhizal plants, associate with both arbuscular (AM) and ectomycorrhizal (EM) fungi. In S. miyabeana, inoculation with the EM fungus Sphaerosporella brunnea, the AM fungus Rhizophagus irregularis, or both was tested across two growing seasons. S. brunnea notably promoted biomass production and phytoextraction of heavy metals—particularly Cd—and contributed to reductions in certain soil metal concentrations. AM or dual inoculation had minimal effects on these parameters [94].
Figure 4 conceptually illustrates the multifaceted impacts of abiotic stressors on Salix growth dynamics, including the interplay between stressors and mitigation strategies by exogenous additives and rhizosphere microorganisms. This conceptual framework helps contextualize the subsequent discussion of physiological and molecular responses.

7. Discussion and Future Perspectives

This review provides an integrated perspective on the physiological, molecular, and sex-dimorphic responses of Salix species to diverse abiotic stressors. While significant advances have been made in identifying key stress-related pathways, much of the current understanding remains fragmented and largely descriptive. A more critical evaluation reveals that different Salix genotypes and species exhibit distinct adaptive strategies under specific stress conditions. For instance, drought-tolerant species such as S. sinopurpurea display enhanced osmotic regulation and metabolite accumulation, while S. suchowensis shows reduced resilience due to suppression of key metabolic pathways. Under salt stress, S. matsudana maintains superior ion homeostasis and water retention, contrasting with salt-sensitive genotypes like JW9-6. Similar genotypic variation is observed under heavy metal exposure, where S. linearistipularis demonstrates more effective detoxification mechanisms than S. purpurea. These differences highlight the necessity of comparative studies across genotypes and species to uncover the genetic basis of stress adaptation and inform targeted breeding efforts.
Moreover, sexual dimorphism introduces another layer of complexity to Salix stress responses. Female individuals often exhibit enhanced ROS scavenging, hormonal regulation, and osmotic adjustment under drought, while males may show greater resilience under salinity or flooding through improved root architecture and ion transport. These divergent strategies reflect sex-specific regulatory mechanisms and trade-offs between growth and defense, which remain underexplored in current research. Understanding how male and female Salix integrate hormonal signals, epigenetic regulation, and metabolic shifts under stress will be crucial for developing comprehensive stress-resilience models and for sex-informed breeding strategies.
Despite the identification of numerous transcription factors such as WRKY, MYB, NAC, and AP2/ERF that modulate stress responses, functional characterization in Salix lags behind. Much of the existing evidence is derived from transcriptomic profiling or heterologous expression in Arabidopsis, which cannot fully capture the physiological and developmental context of woody perennials. The lack of efficient transformation systems in Salix poses a significant bottleneck for functional genomics research. Future studies must prioritize the development of species-specific gene editing and transformation platforms to enable in situ validation of candidate genes. This will be essential for moving from gene discovery to practical applications in breeding and ecological restoration.
Furthermore, most current studies focus on individual stressors, whereas plants in natural environments are frequently exposed to multiple simultaneous stresses. Drought, salinity, heat, and heavy metals often co-occur, resulting in complex interactions that cannot be inferred from single-stress models. The crosstalk among hormone signaling pathways, ROS homeostasis, and transcriptional regulation under combined stress conditions remains poorly understood in Salix. Integrative multi-omics approaches—including transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and epigenomics—particularly at the single-cell or spatial resolution level, are needed to dissect these complex networks and reveal how plants prioritize and coordinate responses under multifactorial stress.
In addition to intrinsic genetic mechanisms, increasing attention should be given to the role of rhizosphere microbiomes in enhancing stress tolerance. Symbiotic interactions with beneficial microbes, including nitrogen-fixing bacteria, mycorrhizal fungi, and plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR), have been shown to improve nutrient acquisition, modulate hormonal balance, and reduce oxidative stress in Salix. Microbiome engineering, when integrated with host genetic improvement, holds great promise for building resilient plant-microbe systems adapted to adverse environments.
Practical applications such as phytoremediation, ecological restoration, and biomass production will greatly benefit from these mechanistic insights. Genomic-assisted breeding, including genome-wide association studies (GWAS), genomic selection, and pan-genome analysis, should be implemented to accelerate the development of stress-resilient Salix cultivars. Future research should also incorporate field-based phenotyping under natural or simulated multi-stress conditions to ensure translational relevance.
In conclusion, while significant progress has been made in elucidating the abiotic stress responses of Salix species, further depth is needed through cross-species comparisons, functional validation, and systems-level analysis. A concerted effort to integrate molecular biology, physiology, microbial ecology, and breeding science will be essential for translating laboratory findings into practical outcomes. Advancing this field will not only contribute to fundamental plant science but also support the deployment of Salix as a keystone genus for ecological and environmental resilience in a changing world.

Funding

This work was supported by the Biological Breeding-National Science and Technology Major Project (No. 2023ZD04056). Supported by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation under Grant Number 2025M772738.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Chen, Y.; Deng, M.; Huang, Q.; Liu, G.; Zhang, J. SmDREB A1-10 Is Required for SmTTF30-Mediated Hypoxia Stress Tolerance in Salix matsudana. Plant Cell Environ. 2025, 48, 4415–4429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Brereton, N.J.B.; Gonzalez, E.; Marleau, J.; Nissim, W.G.; Labrecque, M.; Joly, S.; Pitre, F.E. Comparative Transcriptomic Approaches Exploring Contamination Stress Tolerance in Salix sp. Reveal the Importance for a Metaorganismal de Novo Assembly Approach for Nonmodel Plants. Plant Physiol. 2016, 171, 3–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Xia, L.; Yao, Y.; Zeng, Y.; Guo, Z.; Zhang, S. Acetic acid enhances drought tolerance more in female than in male willows. Physiol. Plant. 2023, 175, e13890. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mao, W.; Guo, L.; Sun, T.; Song, X.; Gao, S.; Li, X.; Yu, K.; Ruan, Y. Exogenous Application of Silicon and Spermidine Alleviate Cadmium Toxicity by Modulating Endogenous Polyamines Level and Glutathione Metabolism in Salix matsudana Koidz. Seedlings. J. Plant Growth Regul. 2024, 44, 2583–2599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Xia, L.; Li, M.; Chen, Y.; Dai, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, S. Sexually dimorphic acetyl-CoA biosynthesis and utilization in response to drought and exogenous acetic acid. Plant J. 2024, 119, 1967–1985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jia, H.; Zhang, J.; Li, J.; Sun, P.; Zhang, Y.; Xin, X.; Lu, M.; Hu, J. Genome-wide transcriptomic analysis of a desert willow, Salix psammophila, reveals the function of hub genes SpMDP1 and SpWRKY33 in drought tolerance. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chen, Y.; Dai, Y.; Li, Y.; Yang, J.; Jiang, Y.; Liu, G.; Yu, C.; Zhong, F.; Lian, B.; Zhang, J. Overexpression of the Salix matsudana SmAP2-17 gene improves Arabidopsis salinity tolerance by enhancing the expression of SOS3 and ABI5. BMC Plant Biol. 2022, 22, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Jia, H.; Wang, L.; Li, J.; Sun, P.; Lu, M.; Hu, J. Physiological and metabolic responses of Salix sinopurpurea and Salix suchowensis to drought stress. Trees 2019, 34, 563–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sha, S.; Cai, G.; Liu, S.; Ahmed, M.A. Roots to the rescue: How plants harness hydraulic redistribution to survive drought across contrasting soil textures. Adv. Biotechnol. 2024, 2, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Li, S.; Pezeshki, S.R.; Goodwin, S.; Shields, F.D. Physiological responses of black willow (Salix nigra) cuttings to a range of soil moisture regimes. Photosynthetica 2004, 42, 585–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Cai, Z.; Han, Y.; Duan, B.; Song, H. Salix myrtillacea Female Cuttings Performed Better than Males under Nitrogen Deposition on Leaves and Drought Conditions. Forests 2022, 13, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Savage, J.A.; Cavender-Bares, J. Habitat specialization and the role of trait lability in structuring diverse willow (genus Salix) communities. Ecology 2012, 93, S138–S150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Showalter, D.N.; Villari, C.; Herms, D.A.; Bonello, P. Drought stress increased survival and development of emerald ash borer larvae on coevolved Manchurian ash and implicates phloem-based traits in resistance. Agric. For. Entomol. 2018, 20, 170–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Feng, S.; Ren, L.L.; Sun, H.W.; Qiao, K.; Liu, S.K.; Zhou, A.M. Morphological and physiological responses of two willow species from different habitats to salt stress. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 18228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ran, X.; Wang, X.; Gao, X.; Liang, H.; Liu, B.; Huang, X. Effects of salt stress on the photosynthetic physiology and mineral ion absorption and distribution in white willow (Salix alba L.). PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0260086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ran, X.; Wang, X.; Huang, X.; Ma, C.; Liang, H.; Liu, B. Study on the Relationship of Ions (Na, K, Ca) Absorption and Distribution to Photosynthetic Response of Salix matsudana Koidz Under Salt Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 860111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, B.; Ouyang, J.; Li, C.; Shang, X.; Zou, J. Response to NaCl Stress in Salix matsudana Koidz Seedlings. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2018, 27, 753–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Shurong, M.; Qian, L.; Meijiao, Z.; Shenkui, L. Influence of NaCl and NaHCO3 upon Salix sungkianica Seed Germination and Seedling Growth. Mol. Soil Biol. 2015, 6, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Markus-Michalczyk, H.; Crawford, M.L.; Baldwin, A.H. Salinity Tolerance and Occurrence of Salix nigra Marshall (Black Willow) in Tidal Wetlands of Chesapeake Bay Tributaries. Northeast. Nat. 2020, 27, 229–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yang, J.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, T.H. Heat and drought tolerance of two willow species, Salix gordejevii and Salix babylonica: A comparative study. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 2004, 52, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Celma, S.; Vendina, V.; Lazdina, D. Salix alba Clone Wilting Response to Heat Stress. Agronomy 2021, 11, 1821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. He, Y.; Dai, Y.J.; Li, H.H.; Li, M.H.; Zhang, S. Growth and defense trade-offs in dioecious Salix myrtillacea exposed to drought and low temperature stress. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2023, 215, 105504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Punshon, T.; Dickinson, N.M. Acclimation of Salix to metal stress. New Phytol. 1997, 137, 303–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Tozser, D.; Magura, T.; Simon, E. Heavy metal uptake by plant parts of willow species: A meta-analysis. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 336, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ambroise, V.; Legay, S.; Jozefczak, M.; Leclercq, C.C.; Planchon, S.; Hausman, J.F.; Renaut, J.; Cuypers, A.; Sergeant, K. Impact of Heavy Metals on Cold Acclimation of Salix viminalis Roots. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Urošević, J.; Stojnić, S.; Jokanović, V.; Stanković, D.; Ištok, I.; Jokanović, D. Variability of Morpho-Anatomical Characteristics of Different Willow Clones Contaminated with Heavy Metals. Croat. J. For. Eng. 2024, 45, 421–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yergeau, E.; Sanschagrin, S.; Maynard, C.; St-Arnaud, M.; Greer, C.W. Microbial expression profiles in the rhizosphere of willows depend on soil contamination. ISME J. 2014, 8, 344–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, J.; Zhang, R.; Wang, P.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, J. Responses of soil and rhizosphere microbial communities to Cd-hyperaccumulating willows and Cd contamination. BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Li, J.; Li, Z.; Li, H.; Mao, J.; Zhai, F.; Liu, J.; Sun, Z. Gender-specific responses of Salix viminalis roots in morphology and physiology subjected to flooding. Flora 2023, 303, 152296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Mozo, I.; Rodríguez, M.E.; Monteoliva, S.; Luquez, V.M.C. Floodwater Depth Causes Different Physiological Responses During Post-flooding in Willows. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 575090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Baud, D.R.; Pezeshki, S.R. Root Porosity Changes in Salix nigra Cuttings in Response to Copper and Ultraviolet-B Radiation Exposure. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2011, 221, 99–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jackson, M.B.; Attwood, P.A. Roots of willow (Salix viminalis L.) show marked tolerance to oxygen shortage in flooded soils and in solution culture. Plant Soil 1996, 187, 37–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wu, A.-P.; Zhao, Y.-X.; Qi, L.-Y.; Zhu, G.-R.; Chen, F.-L.; Liang, Y.-S.; Cao, T.; Zhong, W. Faster response to water level increase facilitates Salix cavaleriei survival in Lake Erhai. J. Freshw. Ecol. 2019, 34, 469–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Śliwa, M.; Kaszycki, P.; Supel, P.; Kornaś, A.; Kaproń, A.; Lüttge, U.; Miszalski, Z. Selected physiological parameters of creeping willow [Salix repens subsp. arenaria (L.) Hiit.]: A shrubby plant inhabiting degraded industrial areas. Trees 2019, 33, 1447–1457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sivadasan, U.; Randriamanana, T.R.; Julkunen-Tiitto, R.; Nybakken, L. The vegetative buds of Salix myrsinifolia are responsive to elevated UV-B and temperature. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2015, 93, 66–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Blum, A. Osmotic adjustment is a prime drought stress adaptive engine in support of plant production. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 4–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, M.; Ma, C.; Qiao, S.; Li, H.; Zhao, W.; Liu, B. Compensatory growth and ion balance adaptation mechanisms of Salix matsudana koidz under heterogeneous salinity stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2025, 25, 231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Köhler, A.; Förster, N.; Zander, M.; Ulrichs, C. Compound-specific responses of phenolic metabolites in the bark of drought-stressed Salix daphnoides and Salix purpurea. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2020, 155, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kaur, M.; Thakur, S.; Choudhary, O.P.; Kaur, R.; Kaila, V.; Sharma, J.P.; Bharti. Effect of salt stress on morpho-physiological and anatomical attributes of Salix clones. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 2023, 70, 253–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Nadarajah, K.K. ROS Homeostasis in Abiotic Stress Tolerance in Plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. You, J.; Chan, Z. ROS Regulation During Abiotic Stress Responses in Crop Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Guo, L.; Ling, L.; Wang, X.Q.; Cheng, T.; Wang, H.Y.; Ruan, Y.A. Exogenous hydrogen sulfide and methylglyoxal alleviate cadmium-induced oxidative stress in Salix matsudana Koidz by regulating glutathione metabolism. BMC Plant Biol. 2023, 23, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yang, J.; Tang, Z.; Yang, W.; Huang, Q.; Wang, Y.; Huang, M.; Wei, H.; Liu, G.; Lian, B.; Chen, Y.; et al. Genome-wide characterization and identification of Trihelix transcription factors and expression profiling in response to abiotic stresses in Chinese Willow (Salix matsudana Koidz). Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1125519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, X.; Guo, L.; Sun, T.; Yu, K.; Zhang, J.; Ruan, Y. Salicylic acid provides resistance to cadmium toxicity and drought stress in Salix matsudana Koidz. Chemoecology 2024, 35, 29–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Liu, L.; McDonald, A.J.S.; Stadenberg, I.; Davies, W.J. Abscisic acid in leaves and roots of willow: Significance for stomatal conductance. Tree Physiol. 2001, 21, 759–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Barros, R.S.; Neill, S.J. Shoot growth in willow (Salix viminalis) in relation to abscisic acid, plant water status and photoperiod. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 70, 708–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Johansen, L.G.; Odén, P.C.; Junttila, O. Abscisic acid and cessation of apical growth in Salix pentandra. Physiol. Plant. 2006, 66, 409–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Cai, Z.Y.; Fu, M.Y.; Yao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Song, H.F.; Zhang, S. Differences in phytohormone and flavonoid metabolism explain the sex differences in responses of Salix rehderiana to drought and nitrogen deposition. Plant J. 2023, 114, 534–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yanitch, A.; Brereton, N.J.B.; Gonzalez, E.; Labrecque, M.; Joly, S.; Pitre, F.E. Transcriptomic Response of Purple Willow (Salix purpurea) to Arsenic Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2017, 8, 1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Sui, D.; Wang, B. Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Complex Defensive Mechanisms in Salt-Tolerant and Salt-Sensitive Shrub Willow Genotypes under Salinity Stress. Int. J. Genom. 2020, 2020, 6870157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Wu, C.; Zhang, L.; Fu, Y.; Fu, G.; Fu, D.; Li, H.; Su, S.; Xie, H.; Tian, H.; Wang, R.; et al. Exogenous Salicylic Acid Alleviates Physiological Stress in Salix matsudana Seedlings and Increases 2,4-Dinitrophenol Removal. Forests 2024, 15, 1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Liang, X.; Zhou, J.-M. Receptor-Like Cytoplasmic Kinases: Central Players in Plant Receptor Kinase–Mediated Signaling. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2018, 69, 267–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Jia, H.; Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Sun, P.; Lu, M.; Hu, J. The Salix psammophila SpRLCK1 involved in drought and salt tolerance. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 144, 222–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yu, S.; Wu, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhu, H.; Sun, Q.; Zhao, P.; Huang, R.; Guo, Z. A calmodulin-like protein (CML10) interacts with cytosolic enzymes GSTU8 and FBA6 to regulate cold tolerance. Plant Physiol. 2022, 190, 1321–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Zhou, J.; Huang, J.; Tian, X.; Zheng, J.; He, X. Transcriptome analysis reveals dynamic changes in the salt stress response in Salix. J. For. Res. 2020, 31, 1851–1862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chen, Y.H.; Jiang, Y.N.; Chen, Y.; Feng, W.X.; Liu, G.Y.; Yu, C.M.; Lian, B.L.; Zhong, F.; Zhang, J. Uncovering candidate genes responsive to salt stress in Salix matsudana (Koidz) by transcriptomic analysis. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0236129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Pang, Y.; Guo, L.; Wang, T.; Liu, W.; Mao, P.; Cao, X.; Geng, Y.; Cao, B. Screening of Key Indices and the Gene Transcriptional Regulation Analysis Related to Salt Tolerance in Salix matsudana Seedlings. Forests 2022, 13, 754. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chen, Z.A.; Gao, H.D.; Wu, H.Q.; Xue, X.M.; Ren, J.H. Comparative Transcriptome Analysis Reveals the Molecular Mechanism of Salt Combined with Flooding Tolerance in Hybrid Willow (Salix matsudana × alba). Forests 2023, 14, 1858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Zhao, H.; Gong, L.; Xu, J. The SmWRKY12-SmRAP2-7-SmEXPA13 module in Salix matsudana koidz enhances plant tolerance to drought stress. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2025, 284, 138077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Zhang, J.; Wang, L.; Wu, D.; Zhao, H.; Gong, L.; Xu, J. Regulation of SmEXPA13 expression by SmMYB1R1-L enhances salt tolerance in Salix matsudana Koidz. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 270, 132292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Wang, Y.; Wang, H.; Yu, C.; Yan, X.; Chu, J.; Jiang, B.; Zhu, J. Comprehensive bioinformation analysis of homeodomain-leucine zipper gene family and expression pattern of HD-Zip I under abiotic stress in Salix suchowensis. BMC Genom. 2024, 25, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Zhang, J.; Shi, S.Z.; Jiang, Y.; Zhong, F.; Liu, G.; Yu, C.; Lian, B.; Chen, Y. Genome-wide investigation of the AP2/ERF superfamily and their expression under salt stress in Chinese willow (Salix matsudana). PeerJ 2021, 9, e11076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Jia, H.X.; Li, J.B.; Huang, J.; Lu, M.Z.; Hu, J.J. The heat shock factor gene family in Salix suchowensis: A genome-wide survey and expression profiling during development and abiotic stresses. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6, 748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Wang, D.; Zhang, H.; Hu, X.; Zhang, H.; Feng, S.; Zhou, A. Cell number regulator 8 from Salix linearistipularis enhances cadmium tolerance in poplar by reducing cadmium uptake and accumulation. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2024, 206, 108216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Chen, Y.H.; Huang, Q.H.; Hua, X.; Zhang, Q.; Pan, W.J.; Liu, G.Y.; Yu, C.M.; Zhong, F.; Lian, B.L.; Zhang, J. A homolog of AtCBFs, SmDREB A1-4, positively regulates salt stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and Salix matsudana. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2023, 202, 107963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Jiang, B.; Shi, Y.; Peng, Y.; Jia, Y.; Yan, Y.; Dong, X.; Li, H.; Dong, J.; Li, J.; Gong, Z.; et al. Cold-Induced CBF–PIF3 Interaction Enhances Freezing Tolerance by Stabilizing the phyB Thermosensor in Arabidopsis. Mol. Plant 2020, 13, 894–906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Wei, H.; Chen, J.; Lu, Z.; Zhang, X.; Feng, Y.; Liu, G.; Lian, B.; Zhong, F.; Zhang, J. A systematic analysis of GASA family members in the Salix matsudana genome: Characterization, expression profile, and putative function in antioxidation. Ind. Crops Prod. 2024, 220, 119264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jiang, Y.; Han, J.; Xue, W.; Wang, J.; Wang, B.; Liu, L.; Zou, J. Overexpression of SmZIP plays important roles in Cd accumulation and translocation, subcellular distribution, and chemical forms in transgenic tobacco under Cd stress. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 214, 112097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zou, J.; Han, J.; Wang, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Han, B.; Wu, K.; Wang, B.; Wu, Y.; Fan, X. Cytological and physiological tolerance of transgenic tobacco to Cd stress is enhanced by the ectopic expression of SmZIP8. Plant Sci. 2022, 319, 111252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Zhang, Q.-H.; Chen, Y.-Q.; Li, Z.-B.; Tan, X.-T.; Xin, G.-R.; He, C.-T. Defense guard: Strategies of plants in the fight against Cadmium stress. Adv. Biotechnol. 2024, 2, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Hu, X.F.; Wang, S.A.; Zhang, H.F.; Zhang, H.Z.; Feng, S.; Qiao, K.; Lv, F.L.; Gong, S.F.; Zhou, A.M. Plant cadmium resistance 6 from Salix linearistipularis (SlPCR6) affects cadmium and copper uptake in roots of transgenic Populus. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 245, 114116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Chen, S.X.; Chen, J.J.; Lu, Z.C.; Jia, Y.H.; Yang, Y.Y.; Zhuo, R.Y.; Han, X.J. Genome-Wide Identification of Pleiotropic Drug Resistance (PDR) Transporters in Salix purpurea and Expression Analysis in Response to Various Heavy Metal Stresses. Agronomy 2023, 13, 2330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Wei, H.; Cao, Y.; Xu, T.; Yang, P.; Zhou, X.; Liu, G.; Lian, B.; Zhong, F.; Zhang, J. Comprehensive analysis of the SmPIN gene family in Salix matsudana: Roles in growth, development, and stress adaptation. Tree Genet. Genomes 2025, 21, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Xu, T.; Wei, H.; Yang, P.; Zhou, X.; Ma, D.; Luo, C.; Chen, Y.; Zhang, J. Genome-wide identification of CML gene family in Salix matsudana and functional verification of SmCML56 in tolerance to salts tress. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2025, 221, 109600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Huang, Q.H.; Hua, X.; Zhang, Q.; Pan, W.J.; Wang, Y.Q.; Liu, G.Y.; Wei, H.; Chen, Y.H.; Zhang, J. Identification and functional verification of salt tolerance hub genes in Salix matsudana based on QTL and transcriptome analysis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2023, 215, 105470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Song, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, S.; Chang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Feng, H.; Zhang, X.; Sun, M.; Sha, W.; Li, Y.; et al. Na2CO3-responsive mechanism insight from quantitative proteomics and SlRUB gene function in Salix linearistipularis seedlings. Tree Physiol. 2024, 44, tpae011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhang, J.; Yang, R.; Wang, Y.; Wang, X.; Wang, L.; Xu, J. The expansin gene SmEXPA13 in Salix matsudana in association with plant salt tolerance. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2023, 154, 219–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Yang, R.; Yang, L.; Wang, X.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Xu, J. Over-expression of the Salix matsudana expansin gene SmEXPA23 enhances plant salt tolerance. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. (PCTOC) 2023, 152, 309–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Fan, D.L.; Fu, W.C.; Li, L.X.; Liu, S.K.; Bu, Y.Y. Differential salt stress resistance in male and female Salix linearistipularis plants: Insights from transcriptome profiling and the identification of the 4-hydroxy-tetrahydrodipicolinate synthase gene. Planta 2024, 260, 91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Zhao, J.; Yang, Y.; Jia, X.; Meng, H.; Diao, K.; Zheng, G.; Li, T.; Li, J. Ectopic expression of SpABR1 positively regulates drought stress tolerance through the ABA-dependent pathway and by promoting ROS scavenging in Arabidopsis. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2023, 215, 105491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Yang, H.; Fan, L.; Yu, X.; Zhang, X.; Hao, P.; Wei, D.; Zhang, G. Analysis of the NAC Gene Family in Salix and the Identification of SpsNAC005 Gene Contributing to Salt and Drought Tolerance. Forests 2022, 13, 971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wang, X.; Ajab, Z.; Liu, C.; Hu, S.; Liu, J.; Guan, Q. Overexpression of transcription factor SlWRKY28 improved the tolerance of Populus davidiana × P. bolleana to alkaline salt stress. BMC Genet. 2020, 21, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Hu, N.; Sanderson, B.J.; Guo, M.H.; Feng, G.Q.; Gambhir, D.; Hale, H.; Wang, D.Y.; Hyden, B.; Liu, J.Q.; Smart, L.B.; et al. Evolution of a ZW sex chromosome system in willows. Nat. Commun. 2023, 14, 7144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Li, W.; Fu, W.; Hou, J.; Yang, Y.; Yin, T. Evolution of plant sex and molecular mechanisms underlying plants sex separation. For. Res. 2023, 3, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wang, Y.; Gong, G.N.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, R.G.; Horandl, E.; Zhang, Z.X.; Charlesworth, D.; He, L. Gap-free X and Y chromosome assemblies of Salix arbutifolia reveal an evolutionary change from male to female heterogamety in willows, without a change in the position of the sex-determining locus. New Phytol. 2024, 242, 2872–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Liao, J.; Song, H.; Tang, D.; Zhang, S. Sexually differential tolerance to water deficiency of Salix paraplesia—A female-biased alpine willow. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 9, 8450–8464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Liu, G.; Wang, Y.; Lian, B.; Ma, Z.; Xiang, X.; Wu, J.; Luo, C.; Ma, D.; Chen, Y.; Yu, C.; et al. Molecular responses to salinity stress in Salix matsudana (Koidz) females and males. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1122197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Zou, J.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Ma, X.; Liu, J.; Peng, X.; Sun, Z. Sexual differences in root growth and antioxidant characteristics in Salix viminalis exposed to cadmium stress. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2021, 23, 1466–1475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Kong, X.; Guo, Z.; Yao, Y.; Xia, L.; Liu, R.; Song, H.; Zhang, S. Acetic acid alters rhizosphere microbes and metabolic composition to improve willows drought resistance. Sci. Total Environ. 2022, 844, 157132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Feng, S.; Sun, H.W.; Ma, H.P.; Zhang, X.; Ma, S.R.; Qiao, K.; Zhou, A.M.; Bu, Y.Y.; Liu, S.K. Sexual Differences in Physiological and Transcriptional Responses to Salinity Stress of Salix linearistipularis. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 517962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Li, H.; Huang, S.; Ren, C.; Weng, X.; Zhang, S.; Liu, L.; Pei, J. Optimal exogenous calcium alleviates the damage of Snow-melting agent to Salix matsudana seedlings. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 928092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Li, Y.; Gao, M.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.; Yu, S.; Lu, L. Halotolerant Enterobacter asburiae A103 isolated from the halophyte Salix linearistipularis: Genomic analysis and growth-promoting effects on Medicago sativa under alkali stress. Microbiol. Res. 2024, 289, 127909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Shahzad, A.; Hameed, S.; Qin, M.; Li, H.; Zafar, S.; Siddiqui, S.; Sattar, S.; Mahmood, Z.; Mehwish, S. Cadmium (Cd) detoxification and activation of plant defense enzymes in wheat (Triticum aestivum) through the use of endophytic Bacillus thuringiensis and Salix alba root powder. Environ. Pollut. 2025, 364, 125147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Dagher, D.J.; Pitre, F.E.; Hijri, M. Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Inoculation of Sphaerosporella brunnea Significantly Increased Stem Biomass of Salix miyabeana and Decreased Lead, Tin, and Zinc, Soil Concentrations during the Phytoremediation of an Industrial Landfill. J. Fungi 2020, 6, 87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. A bibliometric analysis of research on the responses of Salix species to abiotic stresses based on the Web of Science Core Collection database. (A) Density visualization map of the bibliometric analysis on the responses of Salix species to abiotic stresses, where the color gradient from white to blue indicates a progressive increase in item density. (B) Heatmap of bibliometric analysis, the number of documents with the keywords “Salix”, “Abiotic Stresses”, “Cold”, “Heat”, “Drought”, “Heavy Metal”, “Salt”, “Strong Light”, “Waterlogging”, and “Mechanical Damage”.
Figure 1. A bibliometric analysis of research on the responses of Salix species to abiotic stresses based on the Web of Science Core Collection database. (A) Density visualization map of the bibliometric analysis on the responses of Salix species to abiotic stresses, where the color gradient from white to blue indicates a progressive increase in item density. (B) Heatmap of bibliometric analysis, the number of documents with the keywords “Salix”, “Abiotic Stresses”, “Cold”, “Heat”, “Drought”, “Heavy Metal”, “Salt”, “Strong Light”, “Waterlogging”, and “Mechanical Damage”.
Cimb 47 00767 g001
Figure 2. Impacts of multiple abiotic stressors on Salix growth dynamics, with synergistic mitigation by exogenous additives and rhizosphere microorganisms.
Figure 2. Impacts of multiple abiotic stressors on Salix growth dynamics, with synergistic mitigation by exogenous additives and rhizosphere microorganisms.
Cimb 47 00767 g002
Figure 3. Molecular mechanisms underlying the responses of Salix species to abiotic stresses. This figure integrates transcriptomic and proteomic data from published studies to present a hypothetical signaling network involving transcription factors, ROS signaling, and hormone crosstalk. The diagram includes key components (e.g., WRKY, MYB, AP2/ERF transcription factors; ROS; ABA hormones) and their interactions in stress responses. Arrows indicate proposed regulatory relationships based on gene expression patterns and functional studies.
Figure 3. Molecular mechanisms underlying the responses of Salix species to abiotic stresses. This figure integrates transcriptomic and proteomic data from published studies to present a hypothetical signaling network involving transcription factors, ROS signaling, and hormone crosstalk. The diagram includes key components (e.g., WRKY, MYB, AP2/ERF transcription factors; ROS; ABA hormones) and their interactions in stress responses. Arrows indicate proposed regulatory relationships based on gene expression patterns and functional studies.
Cimb 47 00767 g003
Figure 4. A schematic overview of the core signaling pathways involved in abiotic stress adaptation in Salix species.
Figure 4. A schematic overview of the core signaling pathways involved in abiotic stress adaptation in Salix species.
Cimb 47 00767 g004
Table 1. Physiological and molecular responses of Salix to major abiotic stresses.
Table 1. Physiological and molecular responses of Salix to major abiotic stresses.
Stress Type Species Physiological Responses Molecular Responses
DroughtS. sinopurpurea,
S. suchowensis
Stomatal closure, reduced photosynthesis, proline accumulation Upregulation of WRKY, NAC TFs, ABA signaling
SaltS. matsudana,
S. linearistipularis
Osmotic imbalance, Na+/K+ ratio increaseCa2+-CBL/CIPK pathway, AP2/ERF, MYB TFs
Heavy MetalS. linearistipularis,
S. purpurea
Reduced biomass, chlorosis, ROS surge Metal transporters, ROS scavenging
FloodingS. matsudana,
S. viminalis
Hypoxia, aerenchyma formation, stomatal closure Trihelix TFs, hypoxia-responsive genes
TemperatureS. myrtillacea,
S. alba
Membrane damage, reduced photosynthesis CBF, Hsf TFs, ROS signaling
High Light/UV S. nigra,
S. myrsinifolia
Photoinhibition, increased root porosity Photoprotective genes
Table 2. Summary of key transcription factors, stress type, downstream targets, and species.
Table 2. Summary of key transcription factors, stress type, downstream targets, and species.
TF FamilyGene NameStress TypeSpeciesValidation
Evidence
Downstream Targets
WRKYSmWRKY12DroughtS. matsudanaOverexpression (callus)SmEXPA13 (cell wall loosening)
WRKYSlWRKY28SaltS. linearistipularis-Antioxidant genes
SmRAP2-7DroughtS. matsudana-SmEXPA13 (cell wall loosening)
NACSpNAC2Drought/SaltS. psammophilaOverexpression (Arabidopsis)SpABR1 (ABA signaling, antioxidants)
TrihelixSmTTF30FloodingS. matsudanaOverexpression (Arabidopsis)Hypoxia-responsive genes
AP2/ERFSmAP2-17SaltS. matsudanaTransgenic
Arabidopsis
SOS3, ABI5 (salt stress response)
HD-ZipSsHox36Salt/HeatS. suchowensisTranscriptome onlyStress-related genes
DREBSmDREB A1-10WaterloggingS. matsudanaOverexpression
Arabidopsis and Salix VIGS
SmTTF30
DREBSmDREB A1-4SaltS. matsudanaOverexpression
Arabidopsis and Salix VIGS
SOS1 and DREB2A
MYBSmMYB1R1-LSaltS. matsudanaOverexpression (callus)SmEXPA13 (cell wall loosening)
CNRSlCNR8Heavy MetalS. linearistipularisOverexpression (poplar)Metal homeostasis genes
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sun, P.; Fan, F.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, F. Mechanistic Insights into the Abiotic Stress Adaptation of Salix Species: A Comprehensive Review of Physiological, Molecular, and Sex-Dimorphic Responses. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47090767

AMA Style

Sun P, Fan F, Liu Y, Zhu F. Mechanistic Insights into the Abiotic Stress Adaptation of Salix Species: A Comprehensive Review of Physiological, Molecular, and Sex-Dimorphic Responses. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2025; 47(9):767. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47090767

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sun, Pengcheng, Fangjing Fan, Yinggao Liu, and Fuyuan Zhu. 2025. "Mechanistic Insights into the Abiotic Stress Adaptation of Salix Species: A Comprehensive Review of Physiological, Molecular, and Sex-Dimorphic Responses" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 47, no. 9: 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47090767

APA Style

Sun, P., Fan, F., Liu, Y., & Zhu, F. (2025). Mechanistic Insights into the Abiotic Stress Adaptation of Salix Species: A Comprehensive Review of Physiological, Molecular, and Sex-Dimorphic Responses. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 47(9), 767. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47090767

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop