Next Article in Journal
A Proposal for Research Involving New Biomarkers of Hypertension, Lifestyle, and Environmental Exposure
Next Article in Special Issue
Signaling Mechanism of Budding, Proliferation, and Tissue Regeneration in Cnidaria
Previous Article in Journal
Pinosylvin: A Multifunctional Stilbenoid with Antimicrobial, Antioxidant, and Anti-Inflammatory Potential
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comprehensive Review Exploring the Role of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins [BMP]: Biological Mechanisms
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Adaptations of the Genus Bradyrhizobium to Selected Elements, Heavy Metals and Pesticides Present in the Soil Environment

by
Joanna Banasiewicz
1,*,
Aleksandra Gumowska
2,
Agata Hołubek
2 and
Sławomir Orzechowski
1,*
1
Department of Biochemistry and Microbiology, Institute of Biology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
2
Faculty of Biology and Biotechnology, Warsaw University of Life Sciences (SGGW), Nowoursynowska 159, 02-776 Warsaw, Poland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47(3), 205; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47030205
Submission received: 15 February 2025 / Revised: 8 March 2025 / Accepted: 17 March 2025 / Published: 18 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Latest Review Papers in Molecular Biology 2025)

Abstract

:
Rhizobial bacteria perform a number of extremely important functions in the soil environment. In addition to fixing molecular nitrogen and transforming it into a form available to plants, they participate in the circulation of elements and the decomposition of complex compounds present in the soil, sometimes toxic to other organisms. This review article describes the molecular mechanisms occurring in the most diverse group of rhizobia, the genus Bradyrhizobium, allowing these bacteria to adapt to selected substances found in the soil. Firstly, the adaptation of bradyrhizobia to low and high concentrations of elements such as iron, phosphorus, sulfur, calcium and manganese was shown. Secondly, the processes activated in their cells in the presence of heavy metals such as lead, mercury and arsenic, as well as radionuclides, were described. Additionally, due to the potential use of Bradyrhziobium as biofertilizers, their response to pesticides commonly used in agriculture, such as glyphosate, sulfentrazone, chlorophenoxy herbicides, flumioxazine, imidazolinone, atrazine, and insecticides and fungicides, was also discussed. The paper shows the great genetic diversity of bradyrhizobia in terms of adapting to variable environmental conditions present in the soil.

1. Introduction

Rhizobia is a collective term for a group of soil bacteria that are best known for their ability to engage in mutualistic interactions with legume plants. They are diazotrophs that fix the atmospheric N2 gas into ammonia, constituting one of the most important sources of bioavailable nitrogen on Earth [1]. It is estimated that rhizobial bacteria in leguminous plants provide 70 to 80% of the plant’s nitrogen needs [2]. Additionally, rhizobia not only promote plant growth through nitrogen fixation in legumes, but also by various other mechanisms such as phytohormone and vitamin production, precipitated phosphorus solubilization, siderophore production, and by reduction in ethylene levels to cope with drought stress [3,4]. Furthermore, rhizobia can contribute to crop growth through interactions with other beneficial microorganisms and reduction in or prevention of harmful effects caused by pathogenic microorganisms, mainly through the synthesis of antibiotics or fungicidal compounds, and induction of systemic resistance to pathogens [4]. All these factors make rhizobia one of the best choices when it comes to using them as biofertilizers, which are an alternative to chemical fertilizers that have harmful effects on the environment [2]. Low-cost microbial inoculants are already known and have been successfully used to help improve plant growth, enhance their adaptation to soils contaminated with heavy metals, and control phytopathogens to enhance sustainable agriculture [5,6]. However, the bacterial strains used in vaccinations may not dominate during nodule formation due to competition with indigenous strains in the crop field, which are better adapted to the physicochemical conditions present there [6].
The most abundant and diverse genus of the rhizobia group is Bradyrhizobium. The genus represents a large and diverse assemblage of cosmopolitan bacteria capable of nodulating a variety of legumes from around the world and has been regarded as a model of legume–rhizobia symbiosis and an ecologically significant group [7,8]. Currently, more than 60 species of Bradyrhizobium are known [7]. Bradyrhizobia have biologically significant functions in soils, including nitrogen fixation, photosynthesis, denitrification, degradation of aromatic compounds, and many others [8,9,10,11,12,13,14]. Understanding the mechanisms of bradyrhizobial adaptation to independent existence in diverse and variable environments is becoming increasingly important and thus may reveal the genetic potential of this globally significant group of rhizobia [8]. It seems particularly important to know the influence of various substances present in soils on bradyrhizobial strains and the mechanisms that influence how this group of bacteria copes with them. The presented review describes the influence of selected elements, heavy metals and pesticides on bacteria from the Bradyrhizobium genus, as well as the molecular pathways present in the cells of these microorganisms, which are activated in response to the action of the above-mentioned factors.

2. The Influence of Selected Elements Present in Soil on Bradyrhizobia and Their Symbiotic Processes

As mentioned above, the relationship between leguminous plants and Bradyrhizobium bacteria plays a crucial role in the nitrogen cycle and represents one of the most efficient examples of symbiosis in nature. The process of atmospheric nitrogen fixation by these bacteria is essential for the functioning of ecosystems [15]. However, the impact of Bradyrhizobium on the availability of other soil elements, such as iron, phosphorus, sulfur, calcium, and manganese, remains the subject of ongoing research. This chapter presents the current state of knowledge on the influence of Bradyrhizobium on the content and availability of these elements in the soil and how the bacteria cope with situations of deficiency or excess of these elements in their environment.

2.1. Iron

Iron is one of the most important micronutrients for all living organisms, including Bradyrhizobium. It plays a crucial role in many cellular processes, including the synthesis of various enzymes—catalase, peroxidase, and cytochrome—and cellular respiration. It is also involved in DNA biosynthesis. Soil usually contains low levels of this element. In an oxygenated environment, iron exists in an oxidized form (iron hydroxide), which makes the particles insoluble [16,17,18,19]. Excessively high or low concentrations of this element are toxic and can alter functioning of Bradyrhizobium cells as well as their relationships with plants [16].

2.1.1. Iron Deficiency

Iron deficiency in the soil is a widespread challenge for Bradyrhizobium, resulting from the low solubility of iron and the soil’s pH [20]. For this reason, bacteria have developed many mechanisms to acquire and supplement iron deficiencies. One such mechanism is the acquisition of a wide range of siderophores from various microorganisms, enabled by single mutations in the genes of outer membrane receptors, which provide an evolutionary advantage in a changing environment [21,22].
A study by Ong A. [22] on Bradyrhizobium japonicum showed that the fsrB gene is key to the utilization of various new iron siderophores, as well as synthetic chelators, to meet the bacterium’s iron requirements. Mutants lacking fsrB have a defect in iron reduction and its release from siderophores. Iron uptake by B. japonicum is highly specific at the stage of binding to outer membrane receptors. However, subsequent stages occur non-specifically, thanks to FsrB, which releases Fe3⁺ ions. Iron is then transported to the cytoplasm by the FeoAB transporter, regardless of the type of chelator. The bacterium can effectively utilize a variety of iron sources. Another mechanism of response to low iron levels is to prevent the uptake of this microelement by other microorganisms inhabiting the soil [22].
A study by Dutta K. [20] suggests that low iron levels induce increased expression of the fadD gene, which is responsible for deactivating DSF (diffusible signal factor)—signaling molecules produced by other bacteria. This limits their ability to effectively capture iron and reduces their virulence. In this way, B. japonicum improves its chances of acquiring iron.

2.1.2. Excess Iron

Excess iron is not common in the environment. However, an excess of this element in bacterial cells results in the formation of high oxidative stress. Iron has the ability to catalyze the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [16,23]. The fight against this challenge is characterized mainly by the use of various exporters, such as P-type ATPases [24,25], the major facilitator superfamily (MFS) [26], or cation diffusion facilitators (CDFs) [27].
Oxidative stress induced by high concentrations of the described element in Bradyrhizobium strains with varying symbiotic efficiency triggers the expression of genes encoding antioxidant enzymes, such as superoxide dismutase, glutathione reductase, glutathione synthetase, and bacterioferritin [28]. Bacterioferritin present in Bradyrhizobium strains plays a crucial role in iron storage, which may reduce its toxic effects and enhance bacterial survival in iron-rich soils while simultaneously minimizing the risk of oxidative stress [29].
In response to stress caused by elevated iron levels in the soil, Bradyrhizobium can increase the activity of nitrogenase, a key enzyme in the nitrogen fixation process. This response allows plants to maintain optimal nitrogen availability despite the presence of stress factors [30]. Additionally, heavy metal-tolerant Bradyrhizobium strains facilitate iron uptake by plants, leading to increased chlorophyll synthesis and improved plant nutrition [31,32]. The presence of genes encoding enzymes such as ACC deaminase and auxin suggests that Bradyrhizobium may regulate stress hormone levels, particularly ethylene, while also promoting root development, thereby enhancing plant resistance to heavy metals [30,32,33].

2.2. Phosphorus

Phosphorus is another essential element for proper functioning of both Bradyrhizobium and plant cells [34]. Similar to iron, phosphorus in the soil is present in a poorly available form, which can limit the efficiency of establishing symbiosis and fixing nitrogen by Bradyrhizobium. For this reason, phosphorus deficiencies in the soil are often addressed by applying phosphate fertilizers, including rock phosphate [35,36]. Although this solution can be effective in the short term, it is important to note that Earth’s phosphorus reserves are limited, and their depletion is only a matter of time, estimated to be around 200–300 years [37,38]. Therefore, it is crucial to explore more sustainable solutions, for instance, improving the efficiency of phosphorus use in agriculture and optimizing Bradyrhizobium’s ability to acquire and utilize phosphorus for enhanced nitrogen fixation [39].

2.2.1. Phosphorus Deficiency

Phosphorus-deficient soils pose a challenge not only for plants but also for symbiotic bacteria. The interaction between leguminous plants and Bradyrhizobium under phosphorus-deficient conditions relies on integrated mechanisms that enable optimal utilization of the available phosphorus. Under such conditions, plant roots undergo physiological and metabolic modifications. The plant develops proteoid or cluster roots [40,41], where there is increased synthesis and secretion of organic acids, acid phosphatase [42,43], and flavonoids [44]. These substances increase phosphorus availability in the soil by solubilizing it and other micronutrients in the rhizosphere [45], and they also influence the activity of soil microorganisms [46]. Insufficient phosphorus supply leads to metabolic disturbances in Bradyrhizobium, inhibiting processes related to nitrogen fixation and the formation of a large number of root nodules. Under soil acidification conditions with organic acids such as malate or citrate, the activity associated with nitrogen assimilation and amino acid synthesis may be reduced, while the production of organic acids increases [47]. Root nodules are the main phosphorus storage for the plant [48], as a large amount of phosphorus associated with ribosomal RNA is necessary for the process of protein synthesis, including nitrogenase enzymes, which, due to their functions, are particularly susceptible to damage and require constant regeneration [49].
In response to phosphorus deficiency, bradyrhizobial bacteria use a phosphorus transport mechanism in which the pstSCAB operon plays a key role. The genes in this operon encode a transporter with a high affinity for phosphorus, allowing bacteria to effectively absorb phosphorus from the environment, even at very low concentrations of this element. This is particularly important under phosphorus-limited conditions, as the Pst transporter enables efficient acquisition of this element, making it a key mechanism in bacterial adaptation to phosphorus deficiency [50].

2.2.2. Excess Phosphorus

Excess phosphorus in the soil, similar to iron, is not a common occurrence. However, it does not bring any positive benefits for plants or for Bradyrhizobium. Excess phosphorus in the nutrient solution caused significant changes in phosphorus metabolism in both the plants and the root nodules of soybean. As a result of the phosphorus excess, the fresh and dry weight of the root nodules decreased by almost 50%, and their number decreased by 35% compared to plants grown in control conditions. Excess phosphorus also affected the total nitrogenase activity, the enzyme responsible for reducing atmospheric nitrogen to ammonia. In plants with excess phosphorus, its activity was reduced by more than half, indicating inhibition of nitrogen fixation processes [51].

2.3. Sulfur

Sulfur is an essential element for Bradyrhizobium, playing a crucial role in its metabolism. It is a component of amino acids, including cysteine and methionine, which serve as the building blocks of proteins. Additionally, sulfur is a constituent of coenzyme A and other important compounds, contributing to enzymatic and metabolic processes in Bradyrhizobium [52,53]. These bacteria also participate in biogeochemical cycles, including the sulfur cycle, which influences their ability to establish symbiosis and fix nitrogen. However, the ability of Bradyrhizobium to uptake and utilize sulfur depends not only on its availability in the environment but also on interactions with other microorganisms and the presence of various environmental factors, for instance, heavy metals [54,55].

2.3.1. Sulfur Deficiency

Sulfur deficiency in soybean crops results in delayed and reduced formation of root nodules, which limits the effectiveness of symbiotic nitrogen fixation by Bradyrhizobium. Consequently, the number of effective nodules on plant roots decreases, directly impacting seed yield and soybean biomass [56,57]. Sulfur deficiency also reduces nitrogenase activity due to a decrease in the production of amino acids, such as cysteine and methionine, which negatively affects nitrogen processes in plants. Furthermore, sulfur deficiency limits its involvement in critical metabolic reactions, such as protein synthesis, which significantly affects seed quality, particularly the content of sulfur-containing amino acids with high nutritional value [58,59]. Low sulfur concentrations in the soil impair the production of leghemoglobin, glucose, ATP, and ferredoxin in nodules, thereby reducing oxygen availability and limiting the energy required for nitrogen fixation. In the absence of sufficient sulfur, the nitrogen fixation process in plants is severely compromised [60].
Bacteria, including Bradyrhizobium japonicum, demonstrate an extraordinary ability to adapt to various environmental conditions, including the utilization of diverse sulfur sources. While sulfur is most commonly supplied as sulfates under laboratory conditions, in natural ecosystems—particularly in soils—most sulfur is present in organic form, associated with various organic compounds. Bacteria have developed specialized metabolic mechanisms that enable them to efficiently utilize these complex sulfur sources, which is crucial for their survival and growth under conditions of limited availability of readily available sulfur [52]. Studies by Sugawara [61] have identified genes in the Bradyrhizobium japonicum genome responsible for the utilization of sulfonates, such as bll6451, bll7010, and bll6452, which play a role in converting organic sulfur into a form that can be assimilated by plants. Mutants of B. japonicum with disrupted genes involved in sulfur metabolism, such as ΔssuD, exhibit reduced metabolic activity and impaired efficiency in symbiotic nitrogen fixation, leading to limited nitrogen assimilation and decreased plant quality [62].

2.3.2. Excess Sulfur

Excessive sulfur application, especially at rates exceeding 40 kg ha−1, negatively affects Bradyrhizobium japonicum–soybean symbiosis, leading to reduced nodulation efficiency. High sulfur doses limit the availability of sulfates (SO42−) in the soil, resulting in lower concentrations of these ions in the root zone, which, in turn, reduces the plant’s ability to absorb sulfur and other essential nutrients [58,63]. Excess sulfur can also lead to the leaching of sulfates from the soil layer occupied by the root system, especially during excessive rainfall, further reducing the availability of SO42− in the soil [63]. As a result, a deficiency of soil sulfates can limit the ability of Bradyrhizobium japonicum to establish an effective symbiosis with plants, resulting in a reduced number of effective root nodules and decreased nitrogenase activity [59,60]. The reduced number of nodules leads to lower seed yields and soybean biomass, which is a clear indication of the negative consequences of excess sulfur on symbiotic processes in this system [60].

2.4. Calcium

Calcium plays a critical role in the establishment of symbiosis between legumes and bacteria of the genus Bradyrhizobium. The initiation of this symbiosis is closely linked to dynamic changes in calcium concentrations within bacterial cells. Flavonoids secreted by the plant induce an increase in cytosolic calcium levels in bacteria [64]. This triggers a signaling cascade that leads to the expression of nod genes. In turn, an increase in calcium concentration in plant cells, prompted by bacterial signals, initiates processes that result in the formation of root nodules [65,66]. An optimal level of calcium in the soil promotes the proper development of root nodules while maintaining the structural integrity of roots, which is essential for effective infection and nodule formation [67].

2.4.1. Calcium Deficiency

Calcium is indispensable for the proper adhesion of bacteria to the root surface. Calcium ions are involved in activating the signaling cascade that leads to the transcription of nod genes, which are responsible for nodule formation [64]. Its deficiency hinders bacterial colonization of roots, the first step in the infection process. Furthermore, calcium is crucial for forming the structural elements of root nodules, enabling their proper development [68].
Calcium plays a key role in stabilizing the hopanoid barrier, which limits oxygen diffusion into the symbiosome, thereby creating conditions conducive to nitrogenase activity. Excess oxygen leads to nitrogenase inactivation. Under calcium-deficient conditions, the hopanoid barrier becomes less stable, resulting in increased oxygen permeability into the symbiosomal space and a significant reduction in nitrogen fixation efficiency [1]. An alternative protective mechanism in the absence of hopanoids is calcium binding to polar membrane lipids, which also shields nitrogenase from oxygen. However, in calcium-deficient conditions, this strategy fails, leading to uncontrolled exposure of nitrogenase to oxygen and further diminishing the efficiency of the symbiotic process [69].
Calcium is also involved in the functionality of leghemoglobin, a protein responsible for binding and regulating oxygen levels in root nodules. A calcium deficiency adversely affects leghemoglobin’s efficiency, exacerbating the challenge of maintaining optimal oxygen conditions in the symbiosome and weakening nitrogenase protection [1,70].

2.4.2. Excess Calcium

High levels of calcium, similar to calcium deficiency, have a significant impact on the symbiotic processes occurring between bradyrhizobial bacteria and leguminous plants, influencing, among other factors, the adhesion of bacteria to root surfaces, their colonization, and nodule formation [67,68]. It is important to note that different bacterial strains may have varying calcium requirements, which determine their ability to establish effective symbiosis [67].
Elevated calcium concentrations, particularly above 12 mM, promote increased bacterial adhesion and enhanced colonization efficiency in most Bradyrhizobium strains, indicating their calciphilic nature. These strains exhibit improved attachment to legume roots, facilitating the infection process and nodule formation [68]. However, Bradyrhizobium japonicum is an exception, as it is calciphobic and prefers lower calcium concentrations (e.g., 127 µM). At high calcium concentrations, such as 1000 µM, the adhesion of this strain to roots significantly decreases, negatively affecting its ability to colonize effectively and form nodules [67].
Andreev’s study [71] demonstrated that excessive calcium levels may accelerate the aging process of nodule cells. High calcium content was observed in various parts of the cell, such as the symbiosome, vacuole, and apoplast. The accumulation of calcium in these areas led to the disruption of nodule cell structures. It is hypothesized that this phenomenon may occur as a response to the accumulation of abscisic acid (ABA) due to high calcium concentrations in the environment. ABA is a phytohormone responsible for reducing leghemoglobin levels and the rate of atmospheric nitrogen assimilation [72]. During the aging process of nodule cells, studies revealed an increase in calcium concentration in the symbiosomal space. This phenomenon was not observed in immature cells, suggesting that the increase in calcium concentration is associated with the aging process of nodule cells [71].

2.5. Manganese

Manganese is the 12th most abundant element on our planet. In the soil, it predominantly occurs in the form of oxides, carbonates, and silicates due to its ability to easily oxidize. As a result of natural erosion processes, significant amounts of manganese are released into the environment, where it becomes integrated into the biogeochemical cycle, meeting the needs of various organisms [73,74]. Within bacterial cells, manganese is primarily recognized for its role in oxidative defense, acting as a cofactor for manganese-dependent superoxide dismutase [75]. Mn2⁺ ions participate in redox reactions, generating reactive oxygen species (ROS) that can stimulate root nodule formation and enhance nitrogen fixation efficiency in Bradyrhizobium [76]. Its ability to both neutralize and generate reactive oxygen species allows for the maintenance of a delicate redox balance, essential for proper cellular function. Manganese is a crucial element required for the proper functioning of Bradyrhizobium japonicum under non-stressful aerobic growth conditions [77]. Unlike other bacteria [78], where manganese is primarily utilized in response to oxidative stress, in B. japonicum, this metal plays an essential role in daily metabolic processes [77].

2.5.1. Manganese Deficiency

The study by Hohle and O’Brian [78] demonstrated that the MntH protein, encoded by the mntH gene, plays a crucial role in the transport of manganese into the cells of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Mutation of this gene leads to a decrease in manganese levels within the cell, thereby inhibiting bacterial growth under conditions of low manganese availability. The expression of the mntH gene is tightly regulated by the Fur (Ferric Uptake Regulator) protein. Under low-manganese conditions, Fur does not bind to the promoter of the mntH gene, allowing its expression and enhancing manganese uptake. Interestingly, despite the lack of a functional mntH gene, the bacterium is still able to form a symbiotic relationship with the host plant, suggesting the presence of alternative mechanisms for manganese acquisition in symbiotic conditions.
Another study by Hohle and O’Brian [77] indicates that B. japonicum exhibits a clear dependence on manganese, which is essential for the activity of glycolytic enzymes, including pyruvate kinase PykM. Unlike other bacteria, this enzyme prefers Mn2⁺ over Mg2⁺ as a cofactor, highlighting the importance of manganese in the metabolism of this microorganism. The bacterium possesses a specialized manganese transport system, including a high-affinity Mn2⁺ transporter and the membrane channel MnoP, which allows efficient manganese uptake even in environments with very low manganese concentrations. B. japonicum cannot compensate for manganese deficiency using other enzyme-independent mechanisms, emphasizing the critical role of manganese in the basic cellular processes of this organism.
Both studies demonstrated that manganese plays a key, multifunctional role in the metabolism of B. japonicum, being essential for both growth and the proper functioning of glycolytic enzymes as well as antioxidative mechanisms [75,78].

2.5.2. Excess Manganese

Excessive manganese concentrations in soil and in the growth environment of plants in symbiosis with root nodule bacteria, such as Bradyrhizobium japonicum, can exert a negative impact on the biological processes of these microorganisms. In low-pH soils, where aluminum and manganese ion concentrations are elevated, the symbiosis between leguminous plants and root nodule bacteria may be significantly restricted [79]. Specifically, manganese, similar to copper, affects the activity of nodule bacteria by disrupting the formation of new nodules and inhibiting bacterial function in already established nodules [80,81].
Furthermore, under conditions of high manganese concentrations, B. japonicum exhibits reduced metabolic activity, negatively affecting its ability to carry out essential cellular processes, including energy metabolism. Fertilizer studies have shown that even small excesses of manganese, particularly in combination with other metals, can have a detrimental effect on bacterial viability, emphasizing the importance of optimal manganese concentrations for the proper functioning of these microorganisms [82,83,84].
The influence of selected elements on Bradyrhizobium is shown in Table 1.

3. Adaptation of Bradyrhizobia to Environments Rich in Heavy Metals and Radionuclides

Some heavy metals, such as lead, mercury, and arsenic, as well as radionuclides, pose a serious threat to microorganisms, including bacteria from the Bradyrhizobium genus [85,86,87,88]. Exposure to these elements can disrupt the metabolism and overall functioning of these bacteria [85]. In response to such conditions, microorganisms can develop different defense strategies [89]. Research on the impact of these components on the evolution and defense mechanisms of Bradyrhizobium is crucial for improving crop productivity.

3.1. Lead

Lead is one of the metals that negatively affects Bradyrhizobium bacteria. However, some strains show tolerance to high concentrations of lead, which may support bioremediation processes. Studies describe three Bradyrhizobium strains isolated from root nodules that can tolerate lead acetate concentrations of up to 300 μg mL−1. These strains were also capable of forming functional nodules on the roots of Retama monosperma in the presence of lead [85]. This indicates their ability to maintain symbiosis even in contaminated environments. Genome sequencing studies revealed that these strains are closely related to the species Bradyrhizobium algeriense, which also tolerates heavy metals [90].
The molecular mechanisms responsible for lead tolerance in Bradyrhizobium include factors like efflux pumps and membrane transporters, which help remove toxic metal ions from bacterial cells [85]. Additionally, genes such as nodC, which are important for nodule formation, may play a role in regulating stress responses caused by lead exposure. The ability to tolerate lead may also be linked to maintaining symbiotic functions. These mechanisms include enzymes that neutralize the toxic effects of metals and structural changes in the cell membrane that help the bacteria adapt to polluted environments [85].

3.2. Mercury

Mercury is one of the most toxic heavy metals, posing a threat to human, animal, and plant health, as well as causing environmental degradation. Some Bradyrhizobium strains have shown tolerance to high mercury concentrations, which could be useful in mercury-contaminated environments [85]. Other studies indicate that certain Bradyrhizobium strains exhibit mercury reductase activity (gene merA), which converts Hg2⁺ into the less toxic Hg⁰ [89]. Strains such as Bradyrhizobium canariense, which exhibit higher merA activity, may contribute to better soil detoxification [89].
Other studies on Bradyrhizobium isolated from mercury mines also showed high tolerance to this metal, with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) above 150 μM [91]. Additionally, mercury-tolerant strains were also resistant to other heavy metals, such as zinc, lead, and chromium, which may indicate the presence of multi-component detoxification systems [91]. Strains belonging to clade III were sensitive to mercury, suggesting that tolerance mechanisms may depend on phylogenetic affiliation and the environmental conditions in which the bacteria evolved [91].

3.3. Arsenic

Arsenic in the soil affects its physicochemical and enzymatic properties, and its bioavailability depends on speciation and factors such as organic matter, pH, and the presence of calcium [92]. This element has a negative impact on Bradyrhizobium, disrupting its biochemical activities in plant roots. In the presence of arsenic, bacteria produce more siderophores, which suggests an attempt to bind and neutralize the stress factor, while also increasing auxin production [93]. The produced siderophores play a role as chelating compounds, reducing the toxicity of the element for both bacteria and plants. The increase in the production of these important compounds is especially noticeable in plants inoculated with Bradyrhizobium, indicating the activation of defense mechanisms under stress conditions [94]. Additionally, arsenic affects the activity of antioxidant enzymes, such as peroxidases, including ascorbate peroxidase (APx), which, when Bradyrhizobium is inoculated, are used to neutralize free radicals produced due to oxidative stress caused by the metal [94]. According to studies, arsenic contributes to changes in the metabolism of microorganisms, affecting their ability to form nodules, which is a result of the toxic effect of the described element on Bradyrhizobium, disrupting the symbiotic processes with plants [93]. Moreover, different Bradyrhizobium strains exhibit varying tolerance to arsenic, which affects the efficiency of symbiosis and adaptation to contaminated environments [95].

3.4. Radionuclides

Radionuclides, or radioactive isotopes, also have a significant impact on bacteria from the Bradyrhizobium genus. Studies conducted on soils contaminated with radionuclides, antibiotics, and heavy metals have shown that these microorganisms possess diverse genes related to adaptation to toxic environments, suggesting that the presence of radionuclides (e.g., 3H, 137Cs, 90Sr, americium-241, cerium-244 and plutonium-239, 240) promotes the selection of resistant strains [88]. Metagenomic studies revealed that isolates found in contaminated soils often have genes coding for ABC transport proteins and two-component regulators, which help remove toxic ions such as nickel, cobalt, and zinc [88]. Additionally, in Bradyrhizobium strains, increased expression of genes related to arsenate detoxification and metal stress regulation, such as arsC and czcR, was detected, which may enhance their survival in environments contaminated with radionuclides [88].
Similar relationships have also been observed in other environments with high levels of heavy metals and antibiotics. Previous studies have shown that exposure to metals and radionuclides leads to the co-selection of genes resistant to both antibiotics and metals, which may serve as an adaptive mechanism for Bradyrhizobium in contaminated habitats [96,97].

4. Bradyhizobia and Pesticides Used in Agriculture

Pesticides are widely used in agriculture to protect crops from harmful factors like weeds and pests because of their high effectiveness and quick action [98]. However, there is increasing concern about the potential harmful effects of these substances on naturally occurring microorganisms in the soil, especially Bradyrhizobium species [99,100]. The use of pesticides in legume cultivation may disturb the balance of the rhizosphere microbiome and negatively affect symbiosis efficiency [101].

4.1. Herbicides and Their Effect on Bradyrhizobia

Herbicides, which are a type of pesticide, are widely used in agriculture, including in the cultivation of plants from the Fabaceae family, to control weeds. Their presence in the soil can affect bacteria from the Bradyrhizobium genus. Studies highlight that herbicides may reduce the population of these bacteria in the soil, disrupting their ability to form effective symbiosis with the host, which affects the nitrogen fixation process [102]. Furthermore, some herbicides can induce oxidative stress in bacteria, leading to changes in the expression of genes related to stress response and detoxification [103]. As a result, prolonged use of herbicides may promote the selection of strains resistant to these substances, which alters the composition of the soil microbiota [104]. This is a relevant issue in the context of sustainable agriculture.

4.1.1. Glyphosate

One of the commonly used herbicides is glyphosate (GP), which has a broad spectrum of activity against both perennial and annual weeds [105]. Its negative impact on the soil microbiome involves inhibiting the shikimate pathway, which reduces the availability of important nutrients [106]. The most effective way to defend against the harmful effects of glyphosate is its degradation to aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA), which is also toxic, but to a lesser extent [107,108]. Some Bradyrhizobium species possess the glycine oxidase gene (thiO), which participates in the oxidation of GP to AMPA, thereby influencing the concentration of the herbicide in the soil (Figure 1) [109]. These studies suggest that these strains have a greater ability to survive in environments contaminated with these harmful chemicals, which helps maintain agricultural productivity.

4.1.2. Sulfentrazone

Sulfentrazone is an herbicide applied before the germination process and is known for its mobility in certain types of soil [110]. Its presence in the environment promotes the growth of fungi and actinomycetes, while inhibiting the growth of bacteria [111].
Recent studies show that the symbiosis between Bradyrhizobium sp. and plants may enhance tolerance to sulfentrazone, as evidenced by the reduction in residual herbicide concentrations in the soil. This phenomenon may represent a bacterial adaptation mechanism to the environment [112]. Plants inoculated with the bacteria also showed an improvement in the fresh shoot mass compared to non-inoculated plants, especially at higher herbicide doses [112]. The increased C-CO2 production in soils containing Bradyrhizobium suggests the activation of metabolic mechanisms related to sulfentrazone detoxification [112]. It can also be assumed that these bacteria improve the microbiological activity of the soil, which leads to better degradation of the herbicide [112].

4.1.3. Chlorophenoxy Herbicides

Chlorophenoxy herbicides are used to control broadleaf weeds. Some microorganisms can degrade certain pesticides in this group, such as 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D), indicating the potential use of microorganisms in bioremediation [113,114]. Bradyrhizobium sp. RD5-C2 has the ability to degrade chlorophenoxyacetic acids due to the presence of two distinct cad gene clusters [115].
Phylogenetic analysis suggests that this bacterium, initially capable of breaking down other compounds than 2,4-D, acquired the cad1 cluster through horizontal gene transfer, allowing it to effectively degrade 2,4-D [115]. This ability, along with the widespread presence of Bradyrhizobium in the soil, can contribute to improving soil and water quality and supporting ecological balance in agricultural areas affected by chlorophenoxy herbicide contamination.

4.1.4. Flumioxazin and Imidazolinone

Flumioxazin is a pre-emergence herbicide with a broad spectrum of activity [116]. Imidazolinone herbicides, such as imazapyr, are used mainly to control grasses and weeds [117]. Both herbicides are commonly used in agriculture as replacements for glyphosate and can have a short-term, positive effect on rhizobial bacteria [118]. A temporary, positive effect on nitrogen fixation by these microorganisms was also observed, indicating improved efficiency in nitrogen-related processes while maintaining soil microbiome balance [118]. It can be assumed that Bradyrhizobium benefits from changes in nutrient availability or ecological niche caused by these applied herbicides, allowing them to colonize the soil environment more effectively.

4.1.5. Atrazine

Bradyrhizobium plays a role in atrazine degradation in the soil, as described in studies on processes in the rhizosphere of plants [119,120,121]. Higher numbers of Bradyrhizobium were found in the rhizosphere of vetiver plants (Chrysopogon zizanioides L.) compared to soil without these plants, suggesting that Bradyrhizobium may be key in the degradation of atrazine [119]. Along with other bacteria that degrade this herbicide, such as Arthrobacter, Nocardioides, and Rhodococcus, these microorganisms form a network that effectively contributes to the removal of atrazine from the soil [119]. Additionally, studies on the metabolism of atrazine showed that these plants can metabolize the herbicide, creating various metabolites in shoots and roots [119]. These results suggest that microorganisms like Bradyrhizobium can use these metabolites, further contributing to atrazine degradation and improving soil properties by eliminating toxic substances. In studies on soybeans exposed to atrazine, the introduction of the Bradyrhizobium AC20 strain reduced the herbicide’s toxicity [120]. This suggests that changes in the microbiological composition of the soil, influenced by atrazine-degrading bacteria, could impact the plant’s ability to adapt in the presence of the herbicide [120].
Studies on plants such as Liriope striata and Carya ferrea also confirm that Bradyrhizobium is one of the dominant microorganisms in soil where atrazine has been applied [121]. Genes responsible for atrazine degradation, such as atzD, atzE, and atzF, were detected among the microorganisms, indicating that bacteria like Bradyrhizobium can potentially accelerate the degradation of the pesticide and reduce its toxic effects on plants [121]. However, studies also suggest the presence of other atrazine-degrading microorganisms, such as Agrobacterium rhizogenes, Candidatus muproteobacteria, and Micromonospora, pointing to the broad role of the soil microbiome in this process [121].

4.2. Effects of Insecticides and Fungicides on Bradyrhizobium

Bradyrhizobium shows some potential for adapting to the presence of insecticides and fungicides, but research indicates that these substances negatively affect bacterial survival [99]. In the study, strains of Bradyrhizobium japonicum SEMIA 5079, Bradyrhizobium elkanii SEMIA 587, and Bradyrhizobium diazoeficiens SEMIA 5080 were exposed to pesticides containing pyraclostrobin, methyl thiophanate, and fipronil, which led to changes in the morphology of these strains (smaller colony size), though these changes were reversible once the stressor was removed [99]. This adaptive potential suggests that under suitable conditions, the negative effects of pesticides can be reduced, improving symbiosis efficiency in soils exposed to these chemicals.

4.3. Bradyrhizobia as Biopesticides

Microorganisms belonging to Bradyrhizobium have potential as biopesticides [122]. Macrophomina phaseolina is a pathogenic fungus that causes root rot in soybean [123]. Recent studies describe the effect of Bradyrhizobium japonicum 406 in reducing the occurrence and severity of this disease [122]. The mechanism is based on strengthening plant resistance by activating defense enzymes (peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, catalase) and synthesizing specific chemical compounds, such as flavonoids and isoflavones, which have antimicrobial properties [122]. Because of these properties, it can be an effective alternative to traditional pesticides.
The classification of pesticides and their effects on Bradyrhizobium is provided in Table 2.

5. Conclusions

This review describes the effect of selected elements, heavy metals and pesticides on one of the most important groups of rhizobia bacteria, the genus Bradyrhizobium, which not only shapes many processes occurring in the natural soil environment but is also widely used as a biofertilizer, especially in field crops of legume plants. This study shows that bradyrhizobia have developed a number of adaptations to diverse soil conditions, in which there are excesses or deficiencies of certain compounds or which are contaminated with mutagenic factors. Moreover, they are not only able to survive unfavorable environmental conditions, but they have also developed pathways that allow them to function properly under these stressful conditions, resulting in a better adaptation of the soil environment for other bacteria and plants occurring there. We believe that understanding the impact of various factors affecting bradyrhizobia will help in the selection of strains, which in the future can be used as very effective bacterial vaccines supporting plant growth and helping to eliminate the harmful effects of human activity on the soil environment.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Science Centre, Poland, grant number DEC-2022/06/X/NZ8/01165 (J.B.).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Ledermann, R.; Schulte, C.C.M.; Poole, P.S. How Rhizobia Adapt to the Nodule Environment. J. Bacteriol. 2021, 203, e0053920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Pereira, F.; Pereira, A.; Menezes, L.D.; Sawaikar, R. Rhizobium as a Biofertilizer for Non-Leguminous Plants. Discov. Food 2024, 4, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Fahde, S.; Boughribil, S.; Sijilmassi, B.; Amri, A. Rhizobia: A Promising Source of Plant Growth-Promoting Molecules and Their Non-Legume Interactions: Examining Applications and Mechanisms. Agriculture 2023, 13, 1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Mohammad, R.H.; Alobaidy, B.S.J. The Effect of Rhizobia Inoculum and Mineral Fertilizers on the Number of Root Nodes, Growth, and Yield of Groundnut. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2023, 1252, 012027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Avontuur, J.R.; Palmer, M.; Beukes, C.W.; Chan, W.Y.; Tasiya, T.; van Zyl, E.; Coetzee, M.P.A.; Stepkowski, T.; Venter, S.N.; Steenkamp, E.T. Bradyrhizobium altum sp. nov., Bradyrhizobium oropedii sp. nov. and Bradyrhizobium acaciae sp. nov. from South Africa Show Locally Restricted and Pantropical nodA Phylogeographic Patterns. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. 2022, 167, 107338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Fasusi, O.A.; Babalola, O.O. The Multifaceted Plant-Beneficial Rhizobacteria toward Agricultural Sustainability. Plant Protect. Sci. 2021, 57, 95–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bitire, T.D.; Abberton, M.; Oyatomi, O.; Babalola, O.O. Effect of Bradyrhizobium japonicum Strains and Inorganic Nitrogen Fertilizer on the Growth and Yield of Bambara Groundnut (Vigna subterranea (L.) Verdc) Accessions. Front. Sustain. Food Syst. 2022, 6, 913239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, N.; Jin, C.-Z.; Zhuo, Y.; Li, T.; Jin, F.-J.; Lee, H.-G.; Jin, L. Genetic Diversity into a Novel Free-Living Species of Bradyrhizobium from Contaminated Freshwater Sediment. Front. Microbiol. 2023, 14, 1295854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Avontuur, J.R.; Wilken, P.M.; Palmer, M.; Coetzee, M.P.A.; Stępkowski, T.; Venter, S.N.; Steenkamp, E.T. Complex Evolutionary History of Photosynthesis in Bradyrhizobium. Microb. Genom. 2023, 9, 001105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, Y.; Øverlie Arntzen, M.; Kjos, M.; Bakken, L.R.; Frostegård, Å. Denitrification by Bradyrhizobia under Feast and Famine and the Role of the bc1 Complex in Securing Electrons for N2O Reduction. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2023, 89, e0174522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Qu, Y.; Spain, J. Molecular and Biochemical Characterization of the 5-Nitroanthranilic Acid Degradation Pathway in Bradyrhizobium sp. Strain JS329. J. Bacteriol. 2011, 193, 3057–3063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Eppinger, E.; Stolz, A.; Ferraroni, M. Crystal Structure of the Monocupin Ring-Cleaving Dioxygenase 5-Nitrosalicylate 1,2-Dioxygenase from Bradyrhizobium sp. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D 2023, 79, 632–640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Kalyoncu, S.; Heaner, D.P.; Kurt, Z.; Bethel, C.M.; Ukachukwu, C.U.; Chakravarthy, S.; Spain, J.C.; Lieberman, R.L. Enzymatic hydrolysis by transition-metal-dependent nucleophilic aromatic substitution. Nat. Chem. Biol. 2016, 12, 1031–1036. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhang, J.; Zhao, R.; Cao, L.; Yusha, L.; Liu, J.; Feng, J.; Fu, W.-J.; Li, X.; Li, B. High-Efficiency Biodegradation of Chloramphenicol by Enriched Bacterial Consortia: Kinetics Study and Bacterial Community Characterization. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 384, 121344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Gruber, N.; Galloway, J. An Earth-System Perspective of the Global Nitrogen Cycle. Nature 2008, 451, 293–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, F.; O’Brian, M.R. The Divalent Metal Ion Exporter IhpABC Is Required to Maintain Iron Homeostasis under Low to Moderate Environmental Iron Conditions in the Bacterium Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Mol. Microbiol. 2024, 121, 85–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Braun, V.; Killmann, H. Bacterial Solutions to the Iron-Supply Problem. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1999, 24, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Ouati, D. Iron and Oxidative Stress in Bacteria. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2000, 373, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Frawley, E.R.; Fang, F.C. The Ins and Outs of Bacterial Iron Metabolism. Mol. Microbiol. 2014, 93, 609–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Dutta, K.; Shityakov, S.; Maruyama, F. DSF Inactivator RpfB Homologous FadD Upregulated in Bradyrhizobium japonicum under Iron Limiting Conditions. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 8701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Niehus, R.; Picot, A.; Oliveira, N.M.; Mitri, S.; Foster, K.R. The Evolution of Siderophore Production as a Competitive Trait. Evolution 2017, 71, 1443–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ong, A.; O’Brian, M.R. The Bradyrhizobium japonicum fsrB Gene Is Essential for Utilization of Structurally Diverse Ferric Siderophores to Fulfill Its Nutritional Iron Requirement. Mol. Microbiol. 2023, 119, 340–349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pi, H.; Helmann, J.D. Ferrous Iron Efflux Systems in Bacteria. Metallomics 2017, 9, 840–851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Turner, A.G.; Ong, C.Y.; Djoko, K.Y.; West, N.P.; Davies, M.R.; McEwan, A.G.; Walker, M.J. The PerR-Regulated P1B-4-Type ATPase (PmtA) Acts as a Ferrous Iron Efflux Pump in Streptococcus pyogenes. Infect. Immun. 2017, 85, e00140-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Meade, J.C. P-Type Transport ATPases in Leishmania and Trypanosoma. Parasite 2019, 26, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Frawley, E.R.; Crouch, M.L.; Bingham-Ramos, L.K.; Robbins, H.F.; Wang, W.; Wright, G.D.; Fang, F.C. Iron and citrate export by a major facilitator superfamily pump regulates metabolism and stress resistance in Salmonella typhimurium. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, 12054–12059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bennett, B.D.; Brutinel, E.D.; Gralnick, J.A. A ferrous iron exporter mediates iron resistance in Shewanella oneidensis MR-1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81, 7938–7944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Alves de Souza, A.; Michel, D.; Aragão, O.O.; Castro, J.; Ferreira, M.; Moreira, F. Symbiotic efficiency with Enterolobium contortisiliquum, adaptability, and functional genes of Bradyrhizobium strains isolated from soils with high Fe and Mn content. Authorea, 2024; preprint. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Sankari, S.; O’Brian, M.R. Synthetic lethality of the bfr and mbfA genes reveals a functional relationship between iron storage and iron export in managing stress responses in Bradyrhizobium japonicum. PLoS ONE 2016, 11, e0157250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Rangel, W.M.; Thijs, S.; Janssen, J.; Oliveira Longatti, S.M.; Bonaldi, D.S.; Ribeiro, P.R.; Jambon, I.; Eevers, N.; Weyens, N.; Vangronsveld, J.; et al. Native rhizobia from Zn mining soil promote the growth of Leucaena leucocephala on contaminated soil. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2017, 19, 142–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jinal, H.N.; Gopi, K.; Prittesh, P.; Kartik, V.P.; Amaresan, N. Phytoextraction of Iron from Contaminated Soils by Inoculation of Iron-Tolerant Plant Growth-Promoting Bacteria in Brassica juncea L. Czern. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2019, 26, 32815–32823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chandwani, S.; Chavan, S.M.; Paul, D.; Amaresan, N. Bacterial Inoculations Mitigate Different Forms of Iron (Fe) Stress and Enhance Nutrient Uptake in Rice Seedlings (Oryza sativa L.). Environ. Technol. Innov. 2022, 26, 102326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Upadhyay, R.; Saini, R.; Shukla, P.K.; Tiwari, K.N. Role of Secondary Metabolites in Plant Defense Mechanisms: A Molecular and Biotechnological Insight. Phytochem. Rev. 2024, 24, 953–983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Buoso, S.; Zamboni, A.; Franco, A.; Commisso, M.; Guzzo, F.; Varanini, Z.; Pinton, R.; Tomasi, N.; Zanin, L. Nodulating white lupins take advantage of the reciprocal interplay between N and P nutritional responses. Physiol. Plant. 2022, 174, e13607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Brownlie, W.J.; Alexander, P.; Cordell, D.; Maslin, M.; Metson, G.S.; Sutton, M.A.; Spears, B.M. National phosphorus planning for food and environmental security. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2024, 90, 103226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tiessen, H. Phosphorus in the Global Environment. In Ecophysiology of Plant-Phosphorus Interactions; White, P.J., Hammond, J.P., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  37. Valentine, A.J.; Kleinert, A.; Benedito, V.A. Adaptive strategies for nitrogen metabolism in phosphate deficient legume nodules. Plant Sci. 2017, 256, 46–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Alewell, C.; Ringeval, B.; Ballabio, C.; Robinson, D.A.; Panagos, P.; Borrelli, P. Global phosphorus shortage will be aggravated by soil erosion. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hufnagel, B.; Marques, A.; Soriano, A.; Marquès, L.; Divol, F.; Doumas, P.; Sallet, E.; Mancinotti, D.; Carrere, S.; Marande, W.; et al. High-quality genome sequence of white lupin provides insight into soil exploration and seed quality. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gardner, W.K.; Parbery, D.G.; Barber, D.A. The acquisition of phosphorus by Lupinus albus L. I. Some characteristics of the soil/root interface. Plant Soil 1982, 67, 19–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Pueyo, J.J.; Quiñones, M.A.; Coba de la Peña, T.; Fedorova, E.E.; Lucas, M.M. Nitrogen and phosphorus interplay in lupin root nodules and cluster roots. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 644218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Gilbert, G.A.; Knight, J.D.; Vance, C.P.; Allan, D.L. Acid phosphatase activity in phosphorus-deficient white lupin roots. Plant Cell Environ. 2002, 22, 801–810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Vance, C.P.; Uhde-Stone, C.; Allan, D.L. Phosphorus acquisition and use: Critical adaptations by plants for securing a nonrenewable resource. New Phytol. 2003, 157, 423–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Tomasi, N.; Weisskopf, L.; Renella, G.; Landi, G.; Pinton, R.; Varanini, Z.; Nannipieri, P.; Torrent, J.; Martinoia, E.; Cesco, S. Flavonoids of white lupin roots participate in phosphorus mobilization from soil. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2008, 40, 1971–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Lamont, B.B. Structure, ecology and physiology of root clusters—A review. Plant Soil 2003, 248, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Su, M.; Meng, L.; Zhao, L.; Tang, Y.; Qiu, J.; Tian, D.; Li, Z. Phosphorus deficiency in soils with red color: Insights from the interactions between minerals and microorganisms. Geoderma 2021, 404, 115311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Williams, A.; Langridge, H.; Straathof, A.L.; Muhamadali, H.; Hollywood, K.A.; Goodacre, R.; de Vries, F.T. Root functional traits explain root exudation rate and composition across a range of grassland species. J. Ecol. 2022, 110, 21–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Schulze, J.; Temple, G.; Temple, S.J.; Beschow, H.; Vance, C.P. Nitrogen fixation by white lupin under phosphorus deficiency. Ann. Bot. 2006, 98, 731–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Raven, J.A. The evolution of autotrophy in relation to phosphorus requirement. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 4023–4046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Yuan, Z.C.; Zaheer, R.; Finan, T.M. Regulation and properties of PstSCAB, a high-affinity, high-velocity phosphate transport system of Sinorhizobium meliloti. J. Bacteriol. 2006, 188, 1089–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. iTsvetkova, G.; Georgiev, G. Effect of phosphorus nutrition on the nodulation, nitrogen fixation and nutrient-use efficiency of Bradyrhizobiumjaponicun soybean (Glycine max L. Merr.) symbiosis. Bulg. J. Plant Physiol. 2003, 3, 315–335. [Google Scholar]
  52. Autry, A.R.; Fitzgerald, J.W. Sulfonate S: A major form of forest soil organic sulfur. Biol. Fertil. Soils 1990, 10, 50–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Saleem, S.; Mushtaq, N.U.; Rasool, A.; Shah, W.H.; Tahir, I.; Rehman, R.U. Chapter Two—Plant Nutrition and Soil Fertility: Physiological and Molecular Avenues for Crop Improvement. In Sustainable Plant Nutrition; Aftab, T., Hakeem, K.R., Eds.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2023; pp. 23–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Berhe, A.; Barnes, R.; Six, J.; Marin-Spiotta, E. Role of Soil Erosion in Biogeochemical Cycling of Essential Elements: Carbon, Nitrogen, and Phosphorus. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2018, 46, 521–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, J.; Shi, Q.; Fan, S.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, M.; Zhang, J. Distinction Between Cr and Other Heavy-Metal-Resistant Bacteria Involved in C/N Cycling in Contaminated Soils of Copper Producing Sites. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 402, 123454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Kuykendall, F.M.; Hashem, W.J.; Hunter, W.J. Enhanced Competitiveness of a Bradyrhizobium japonicum Mutant Strain Improved for Nodulation and Nitrogen Fixation. Plant Soil 1996, 186, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Rao, N.S.S.; Tilak, K.V.B.R.; Singh, C.S. Dual Inoculation with Rhizobium sp. and Glomus fasciculatum Enhances Nodulation, Yield, and Nitrogen Fixation in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum Linn.). Plant Soil 1986, 95, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Deak, E.A.; Martin, T.N.; Stecca, J.D.L.; Conceição, G.M.; Ferreira, M.M.; Rumpel, V.S.; Grolli Carvalho, A.F.; Baena, F.J.L. Sulfur Fertilization and Inoculation of Soybean with Azospirillum brasilense and Bradyrhizobium spp. Can Improve Grain Yield and Quality. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2024, 56, 573–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Habetamu, G.; Gebreslassie, H.; Hirut, B. Effect of Sulfur and Bradyrhizobium Inoculation on Nodulation and Yield of Soybean (Glycine max L.) on Nitisols of Southwestern Ethiopia. Agric. For. Fish. 2021, 10, 280–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Becana, M.; Wienkoop, S.; Matamoros, M.A. Sulfur Transport and Metabolism in Legume Root Nodules. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sugawara, M.; Shah, G.R.; Sadowsky, M.J.; Paliy, O.; Speck, J.; Vail, A.W.; Gyaneshwar, P. Expression and Functional Roles of Bradyrhizobium japonicum Genes Involved in the Utilization of Inorganic and Organic Sulfur Compounds in Free-Living and Symbiotic Conditions. Mol. Plant-Microbe Interact. 2011, 24, 451–457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Speck, J.J.; James, E.K.; Sugawara, M.; Sadowsky, M.J.; Gyaneshwar, P. An Alkane Sulfonate Monooxygenase Is Required for Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation by Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens (syn. Bradyrhizobium japonicum) USDA110T. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85, e01552-19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Karimizarchi, M.; Aminuddin, H.; Khanif, M.; Radziah, O. Elemental Sulphur Application Effects on Nutrient Availability and Sweet Maize (Zea mays L.) Response in a High pH Soil of Malaysia. Malays. J. Soil Sci. 2014, 18, 75–86. [Google Scholar]
  64. Kobayashi, H.; Broughton, W.J. Fine-Tuning of Symbiotic Genes in Rhizobia: Flavonoid Signal Transduction Cascade. Nitrogen Fixat. Orig. Appl. Res. Prog. 2008, 7, 117–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yuan, P.; Luo, F.; Gleason, C.; Poovaiah, B.W. Calcium/Calmodulin-Mediated Microbial Symbiotic Interactions in Plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 984909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Luan, S.; Wang, C. Calcium Signaling Mechanisms Across Kingdoms. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2021, 37, 311–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Kadreva, I.; Ignatov, G. Role of Ca2+ in Bradyrhizobium japonicum Strain 273 Attachment Ability and Accumulation on Soybean Root Surface. J. Plant Physiol. 1995, 145, 577–579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Liu, X.; Zhang, K.; Liu, Y.; Zou, D.; Wang, D.; Xie, Z. Effects of Calcium and Signal Sensing Systems on Azorhizobium caulinodans Biofilm Formation and Host Colonization. Front. Microbiol. 2020, 11, 563367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Vitiello, G.; Oliva, R.; Petraccone, L.; Vecchio, P.D.; Heenan, R.K.; Molinaro, A.; Silipo, A.; D’Errico, G.; Paduano, L. Covalently Bonded Hopanoid-Lipid A from Bradyrhizobium: The Role of Unusual Molecular Structure and Calcium Ions in Regulating the Lipid Bilayers Organization. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 594, 891–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Tookmanian, E.; Junghans, L.; Kulkarni, G.; Ledermann, R.; Saenz, J.; Newman, D.K. Hopanoids Confer Robustness to Physicochemical Variability in the Niche of the Plant Symbiont Bradyrhizobium diazoefficiens. J. Bacteriol. 2022, 204, e0044221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Andreeva, I.N.; Kozharinova, G.M.; Izmailov, S.F. Senescence of legume nodules. Rus. J. Plant Physiol. 1998, 45, 101–112. [Google Scholar]
  72. Zhou, S.; Zhang, C.; Huang, Y.; Chen, H.; Yuan, S.; Zhou, X. Characteristics and Research Progress of Legume Nodule Senescence. Plants 2021, 10, 1103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Yokel, R.A. Manganese flux across the blood-brain barrier. Neuromol. Med. 2009, 11, 297–310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Dey, S.; Tripathy, B.; Kumar, M.S.; Das, A.P. Ecotoxicological consequences of manganese mining pollutants and their biological remediation. Environ. Chem. Ecotoxicol. 2023, 5, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Sobota, J.M.; Imlay, J.A. Iron enzyme ribulose-5-phosphate 3-epimerase in Escherichia coli is rapidly damaged by hydrogen peroxide but can be protected by manganese. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 5402–5407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Sun, X.D.; Yuan, X.Z.; Jia, Y.; Feng, L.J.; Zhu, F.P.; Dong, S.S.; Liu, J.; Kong, X.; Tian, H.; Duan, J.L.; et al. Differentially charged nanoplastics demonstrate distinct accumulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020, 15, 755–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hohle, T.H.; O’Brian, M.R. Manganese is required for oxidative metabolism in unstressed Bradyrhizobium japonicum cells. Mol. Microbiol. 2012, 84, 766–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Hohle, T.H.; O’Brian, M.R. The mntH gene encodes the major Mn(2+) transporter in Bradyrhizobium japonicum and is regulated by manganese via the Fur protein. Mol. Microbiol. 2009, 72, 399–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Pisarek, I.; Grata, K. The Influence of Sewage Sludge and Fly Ash Fertilization on the Total Number of Bacteria (TNB) and Bradyrhizobium Species in Soybean Agroecosystem. Agriculture 2023, 13, 201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Nogueira, M.; Magalhaes, G.; Cardoso, E. Manganese toxicity in mycorrhizal and phosphorus-fertilized soybean plants. J. Plant Nutr. 2007, 27, 141–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. El-Jaoual, T.; Cox, D.A. Manganese toxicity in plants. J. Plant Nutr. 2008, 21, 353–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Swędrzyńska, D.; Sawicka, A. The effect of copper on bacteria of the genus Azospirillum in the rhizosphere of maize and wheat seedlings. Water-Environ. Rural. Areas 2010, 10, 167–178. [Google Scholar]
  83. Brzezińska, A.; Mrozek-Niećko, A. The effect of seeds treatment with a micronutrient fertilizer on chlorophyll content in leaves and yield of soya. Fragm. Agron. 2019, 36, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Brzezińska, A.; Mrozek-Niećko, A. Effect of selected micronutrient seed fertilizers on the viability of Bradyrhizobium japonicum. Prog. Plant Prot. 2021, 61, 17–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lamin, H.; Alami, S.; Lamrabet, M.; Bouhnik, O.; Bennis, M.; Abdelmoumen, H.; Bedmar, E.J.; Missbah-El Idrissi, M. Bradyrhizobium sp. sv. retamae nodulates Retama monosperma grown in a lead and zinc mine tailings in Eastern Morocco. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2021, 52, 639–649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Wang, Y.; Wiatrowski, H.A.; John, R.; Lin, C.C.; Young, L.Y.; Kerkhof, L.J.; Yee, N.; Barkay, T. Impact of mercury on denitrification and denitrifying microbial communities in nitrate enrichments of subsurface sediments. Biodegradation 2013, 24, 33–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Talano, M.A.; Cejas, R.B.; González, P.S.; Agostini, E. Arsenic effect on the model crop symbiosis Bradyrhizobium-soybean. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2013, 63, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Thomas, J.C.; Oladeinde, A.; Kieran, T.J.; Finger, J.W., Jr.; Bayona-Vásquez, N.J.; Cartee, J.C.; Beasley, J.C.; Seaman, J.C.; McArthur, J.V.; Rhodes, O.E., Jr.; et al. Co-occurrence of antibiotic, biocide, and heavy metal resistance genes in bacteria from metal and radionuclide contaminated soils at the Savannah River Site. Microb. Biotechnol. 2020, 13, 1179–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Arregui, G.; Hipólito, P.; Pallol, B.; Lara-Dampier, V.; García-Rodríguez, D.; Varela, H.P.; Tavakoli Zaniani, P.; Balomenos, D.; Paape, T.; Coba de la Peña, T.; et al. Mercury-Tolerant Ensifer medicae Strains Display High Mercuric Reductase Activity and a Protective Effect on Nitrogen Fixation in Medicago truncatula Nodules Under Mercury Stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 560768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Agashe, R.; George, J.; Pathak, A.; Fasakin, O.; Seaman, J.; Chauhan, A. Shotgun Metagenomics Analysis Indicates Bradyrhizobium spp. as the Predominant Genera for Heavy Metal Resistance and Bioremediation in a Long-Term Heavy Metal-Contaminated Ecosystem. Microbiol. Resour. Announc. 2024, 13, e0024524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Salmi, A.; Boulila, F. Heavy Metals Multi-Tolerant Bradyrhizobium Isolated from Mercury Mining Region in Algeria. J. Environ. Manag. 2021, 289, 112547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Singh, S.B.; Srivastava, P.K. Bioavailability of Arsenic in Agricultural Soils Under the Influence of Different Soil Properties. SN Appl. Sci. 2020, 2, 153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Seraj, M.F.; Rahman, T.; Lawrie, A.C.; Reichman, S.M. Assessing the Plant Growth Promoting and Arsenic Tolerance Potential of Bradyrhizobium japonicum CB1809. Environ. Manag. 2020, 66, 930–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Vezza, M.E.; Pramparo, R.D.P.; Wevar Oller, A.L.; Agostini, E.; Talano, M.A. Promising Co-Inoculation Strategies to Reduce Arsenic Toxicity in Soybean. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2022, 29, 88066–88077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Peralta, J.M.; Travaglia, C.N.; Romero-Puertas, M.C.; Furlan, A.; Castro, S.; Bianucci, E. Unraveling the Impact of Arsenic on the Redox Response of Peanut Plants Inoculated with Two Different Bradyrhizobium sp. Strains. Chemosphere 2020, 259, 127410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Seiler, C.; Berendonk, T.U. Heavy Metal Driven Co-selection of Antibiotic Resistance in Soil and Water Bodies Impacted by Agriculture and Aquaculture. Front. Microbiol. 2012, 3, 399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Baker-Austin, C.; Wright, M.S.; Stepanauskas, R.; McArthur, J.V. Co-selection of Antibiotic and Metal Resistance. Trends Microbiol. 2006, 14, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Salomao, H.M.; Trezzi, M.M.; Viecelli, M.; Pagnoncelli Junior, F.D.B.; Patel, F.; Damo, L.; Frizzon, G. Weed Management with Pre-emergent Herbicides in Soybean Crops. Commun. Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 60–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Rodrigues, T.F.; Bender, F.R.; Sanzovo, A.W.S.; Ferreira, E.; Nogueira, M.A.; Hungria, M. Impact of Pesticides in Properties of Bradyrhizobium spp. and in the Symbiotic Performance with Soybean. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2020, 36, 172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Fan, X.; Chang, W.; Sui, X.; Liu, Y.; Song, G.; Song, F.; Feng, F. Changes in Rhizobacterial Community Mediating Atrazine Dissipation by Arbuscular Mycorrhiza. Chemosphere 2020, 256, 127046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Feng, L.; Xu, N.; Qu, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Ke, M.; Lu, T.; Qian, H. Synergetic Toxicity of Silver Nanoparticle and Glyphosate on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 797, 149200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zablotowicz, R.M.; Reddy, K.N. Impact of Glyphosate on the Bradyrhizobium japonicum Symbiosis with Glyphosate-Resistant Transgenic Soybean: A Minireview. J. Environ. Qual. 2004, 33, 825–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Verma, J.; Singh, D.; Kumar, A. Herbicide-Induced Oxidative Stress in Bradyrhizobium and Its Effects on Symbiotic Nitrogen Fixation. J. Hazard. Mater. 2017, 336, 84–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Saxena, S.; Kumar, V.; Chandra, R. Impact of Herbicides on Soil Microbial Communities and Resistance of Bradyrhizobium to Herbicides. Agric. Microbiol. 2020, 72, 323–333. [Google Scholar]
  105. Zhang, C.; Hu, X.; Luo, J.; Wu, Z.; Wang, L.; Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Sun, G. Degradation Dynamics of Glyphosate in Different Types of Citrus Orchard Soils in China. Molecules 2015, 20, 1161–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Singh, S.; Kumar, V.; Gill, J.P.K.; Datta, S.; Singh, S.; Dhaka, V.; Kapoor, D.; Wani, A.B.; Dhanjal, D.S.; Kumar, M.; et al. Herbicide Glyphosate: Toxicity and Microbial Degradation. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Zhan, H.; Feng, Y.; Fan, X.; Chen, S. Recent advances in glyphosate biodegradation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2018, 102, 5033–5043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Qu, M.; Wang, L.; Xu, Q.; An, J.; Mei, Y.; Liu, G. Influence of glyphosate and its metabolite aminomethylphosphonic acid on aquatic plants in different ecological niches. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2022, 246, 114155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Hernández Guijarro, K.; De Gerónimo, E.; Erijman, L. Glyphosate Biodegradation Potential in Soil Based on Glycine Oxidase Gene (thiO) from Bradyrhizobium. Curr. Microbiol. 2021, 78, 1991–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Shaner, D.L. Field Dissipation of Sulfentrazone and Pendimethalin in Colorado. Weed Technol. 2012, 26, 633–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Martinez, C.O.; Silva, C.M.; Fay, E.F.; Abakerli, R.B.; Maia, A.H.; Durrant, L.R. Microbial degradation of sulfentrazone in a Brazilian rhodic hapludox soil. Braz. J. Microbiol. 2010, 41, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Mielke, K.C.; Bertuani, R.R.; Pires, F.R.; Bueno Cotta, A.J.; Egreja Filho, F.B.; Madalão, J.C. Does Canavalia ensiformis inoculation with Bradyrhizobium sp. enhance phytoremediation of sulfentrazone-contaminated soil? Chemosphere 2020, 255, 127033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Muhammad, J.B.; Shehu, D.; Usman, S.; Dankaka, S.M.; Gimba, M.Y.; Jagaba, A.H. Biodegradation potential of 2,4 dichlorophenoxyacetic acid by Cupriavidus campinensis isolated from rice farm cultivated soil. Case Stud. Chem. Environ. Eng. 2023, 8, 100434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Serbent, M.P.; Rebelo, A.M.; Pinheiro, A.; Giongo, A.; Tavares, L.B.B. Biological agents for 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid herbicide degradation. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 5065–5078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Hayashi, S.; Tanaka, S.; Takao, S.; Kobayashi, S.; Suyama, K.; Itoh, K. Multiple Gene Clusters and Their Role in the Degradation of Chlorophenoxyacetic Acids in Bradyrhizobium sp. RD5-C2 Isolated from Non-Contaminated Soil. Microb. Environ. 2021, 36, ME21016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Eason, K.; Grey, T.; Cabrera, M.; Basinger, N.; Hurdle, N. Assessment of Flumioxazin Soil Behavior and Thermal Stability in Aqueous Solutions. Chemosphere 2022, 288, 132477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Xu, Z.; Li, B.; Jia, Y.; Guo, X.; Lv, F. Biodegradation of Imazethapyr by Bacterial Strain IM9601 Isolated from Agricultural Soil. Curr. Microbiol. 2023, 81, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Araujo, A.S.F.; Pertile, M.; Costa, R.M.; Costa, M.K.L.; de Aviz, R.O.; Mendes, L.W.; de Medeiros, E.V.; da Costa, D.P.; Melo, V.M.M.; Pereira, A.P.A. Short-term responses of plant growth-promoting bacterial community to the herbicides imazethapyr and flumioxazin. Chemosphere 2023, 328, 138581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Zhang, F.; Sun, S.; Rong, Y.; Mao, L.; Yang, S.; Qian, L.; Li, R.; Zheng, Y. Enhanced phytoremediation of atrazine-contaminated soil by vetiver (Chrysopogon zizanioides L.) and associated bacteria. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int. 2023, 30, 44415–44429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Jiang, D.; Li, Y.; Wang, J.; Lv, X.; Jiang, Z.; Cao, B.; Qu, J.; Ma, S.; Zhang, Y. Exogenous application of Bradyrhizobium japonicum AC20 enhances soybean tolerance to atrazine via regulating rhizosphere soil microbial community and amino acid, carbohydrate metabolism related genes expression. Plant Physiol. Biochem. PPB 2023, 196, 472–483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Aguiar, L.M.; Souza, M.F.; de Laia, M.L.; de Oliveira Melo, J.; da Costa, M.R.; Gonçalves, J.F.; Silva, D.V.; Dos Santos, J.B. Metagenomic analysis reveals mechanisms of atrazine biodegradation promoted by tree species. Environ. Pollut. (Barking Essex 1987) 2020, 267, 115636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Khalid, U.; Aftab, Z.E.; Anjum, T.; Bokhari, N.A.; Akram, W.; Anwar, W. Harnessing the Biocontrol Potential of Bradyrhizobium japonicum FCBP-SB-406 to Manage Charcoal Rot of Soybean with Increased Yield Response for the Development of Sustainable Agriculture. Microorganisms 2024, 12, 304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Mufti, R.; Bano, A. PGPR-induced defense responses in the soybean plant against charcoal rot disease. Eur. J. Plant Pathol. 2019, 155, 983–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Reaction scheme for the conversion of GP to AMPA.
Figure 1. Reaction scheme for the conversion of GP to AMPA.
Cimb 47 00205 g001
Table 1. Classification of selected elements and their effects on Bradyrhizobium, as described in the literature.
Table 1. Classification of selected elements and their effects on Bradyrhizobium, as described in the literature.
Type of ElementStudied Bacterial StrainEffect of ElementsReferences
IronBradyrhizobium japonicumUnder iron deficiency, the signaling molecule DSFs from other bacteria are deactivatedDutta K. et al. (2023) [20]
Bradyrhizobium japonicumUnder iron deficiency, fsrB expression is upregulatedOng A., O’Brian M.R. (2023) [22]
PhosphorusBradyrhizobium sp.Under phosphorus deficiency, reduction in nitrogen assimilationWilliams A. et al. (2022) [47]
SulfurBradyrhizobium sp.Under sulfur deficiency, reduction in metabolic activityHabetamu G. et al. (2021) [59]
CalciumBradyrhizobium spp.Under calcium deficiency, inactivation of nitrogenaseLedermann R. et al. (2021) [1]
ManganeseBradyrhizobium japonicumManganese excess limits symbiosisPisarek I. (2023) [79]
Bradyrhizobium japonicumLimitation of cellular processesBrzezińska A., Mrozek-Niećko A. (2021) [84]
Table 2. Classification of pesticides and their effects on Bradyrhizobium as described in the literature.
Table 2. Classification of pesticides and their effects on Bradyrhizobium as described in the literature.
Type of PesticidePesticideSoil PersistenceStudied Bacterial StrainEffect of PesticideReferences
HerbicidesGlyphosateLow to medium persistenceBradyrhizobium sp.Bacteria have a thiO gene, which oxidizes GP to AMPAHernánde Guliaro K. et al. (2021) [109]
SulfentrazoneMedium persistenceBradyrhizobium japonicum SEMIA 5079Increasing herbicide tolerance in plantsMielke K.C. et al. (2020) [112]
2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acidLow to medium persistenceBradyrhizobium sp.The bacterium has a cad1 clusterHayashi S. et al. (2020) [115]
FlumioxazinMedium persistenceBradyrhizobium sp.Temporary positive effect on nitrogen fixationAraújo A. S. et al. (2023) [118]
ImazapyrHigh persistence
AtrazineMedium to high persistenceBradyrhizobium sp.Potential impact on pesticide degradation Zhang, F. et al. (2023) [119]
Bradyrhizobium japonicum AC20Mitigation of pesticide effect on soil Jiang, D et al. (2023) [120]
Bradyrhizobium sp.Possess genes degrading atrazine (atzD, atzE, atzF)Aguiar, L et al. (2020) [121]
Insecticides and fungicidesPyraclostrobinMedium persistenceBradyrhizobium
japonicum SEMIA 5079,
Bradyrhizobium elkanii SEMIA 587, Bradyrhizobium diazoeficiens SEMIA 5080
Morphological changes in strainsRodrigues T. et al. (2020) [99]
Thiofanate-methylMedium to high persistence
FipronilHigh persistence
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Banasiewicz, J.; Gumowska, A.; Hołubek, A.; Orzechowski, S. Adaptations of the Genus Bradyrhizobium to Selected Elements, Heavy Metals and Pesticides Present in the Soil Environment. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47030205

AMA Style

Banasiewicz J, Gumowska A, Hołubek A, Orzechowski S. Adaptations of the Genus Bradyrhizobium to Selected Elements, Heavy Metals and Pesticides Present in the Soil Environment. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2025; 47(3):205. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47030205

Chicago/Turabian Style

Banasiewicz, Joanna, Aleksandra Gumowska, Agata Hołubek, and Sławomir Orzechowski. 2025. "Adaptations of the Genus Bradyrhizobium to Selected Elements, Heavy Metals and Pesticides Present in the Soil Environment" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 47, no. 3: 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47030205

APA Style

Banasiewicz, J., Gumowska, A., Hołubek, A., & Orzechowski, S. (2025). Adaptations of the Genus Bradyrhizobium to Selected Elements, Heavy Metals and Pesticides Present in the Soil Environment. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 47(3), 205. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47030205

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop