Next Article in Journal
Tacrolimus- and Mycophenolate-Mediated Toxicity: Clinical Considerations and Options in Management of Post-Transplant Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Spotlight on the Mechanism of Action of Semaglutide
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Plant Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Main Families and Roles: A Review of the Literature

by
Samuel Salomão Silva de Oliveira
,
Milena Bellei Cherene
,
Gabriel Bonan Taveira
,
Érica de Oliveira Mello
,
André de Oliveira Carvalho
and
Valdirene Moreira Gomes
*
Laboratório de Fisiologia e Bioquímica de Microrganismos, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro, Rio de Janeiro 28013-602, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47(1), 1; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47010001
Submission received: 12 November 2024 / Revised: 17 December 2024 / Accepted: 19 December 2024 / Published: 24 December 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Microbiology)

Abstract

:
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are constituent molecules of the innate defense system and are naturally produced by all organisms. AMPs are characterized by a relatively low molecular weight (less than 10 kDa) and a variable number of cysteine residues that form disulfide bonds and contribute to the stabilization of the tertiary structure. In addition, there is a wide repertoire of antimicrobial agents against bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa that can provide a large number of prototype peptides for study and biochemical manipulation. In this sense, plant AMPs stand out because they have a wide range of biological functions against microorganisms and potential applications in medicine and agriculture. Herein, we describe a mini-review of the principal AMP families, such as defensins, lipid transfer proteins (LTPs), thionins, heveins, and cyclotides. The objective of this work was to present the main discoveries regarding the biological activities of these plant AMP families, especially in the last 20 years. We also discuss the current knowledge of their biological activities, gene expression, and possible uses as antimicrobial molecules and in plant biotechnology.

1. Introduction

1.1. Antimicrobial Peptides: Brief History and Mechanism of Action

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) play a role in the defense and are naturally produced by all organisms, from bacteria to plants, vertebrates, invertebrates, and even eukaryotic cell populations [1,2]. AMPs are characterized by their small size (10 to 100 amino acid residues), compact structure, rigidity, and resistance to denaturation by temperature and pH. In addition, they have a broad repertoire of antimicrobial activities against bacteria, viruses, fungi, and protozoa and can provide a large number of prototype peptides for study and biochemical manipulation [3].
In 1939, an antimicrobial peptide was discovered in prokaryotic cells that lyse the living cells of a wide range of Gram-positive bacteria, providing protection for mice against pneumococcal infection. This peptide was later called gramicidin and became the first antimicrobial peptide; it is a nonribosomal peptide that was clinically tested and commercially manufactured as an antibiotic agent [1,2].
In 1941, tyrocidin was discovered and shown to have antimicrobial effects on other forms of Gram-positive bacteria in general. In 1942, an antimicrobial peptide was isolated from wheat triploid endosperm tissue, later called purothionin, and was considered effective against Pseudomonas solanacearum, Xanthomonas campestris, and Corynebacterium michiganense [4,5].
In plants, several other peptides with ribosomal synthesis were isolated and characterized almost 40 years after the isolation of purothionin from wheat, including cyclotides, snakins, lipid transfer proteins, hevein, puroindolines, and defensins, among others [6,7].
AMPs provide the first line of defense against invading pathogens and are constitutively produced and/or induced when an active infection or endotoxin is detected by host cells. They are cationic molecules due to their high content of lysine and arginine and are organized in an amphipathic structure. They have hydrophilic and hydrophobic ends, providing solubility in both aqueous and hydrophobic environments. AMPs electrostatically bind to specific targets present on the cell membrane that have a negative surface charge. AMPs have a positive charge that varies between them, and this net charge is highly important for determining the affinity of a molecule for the anionic site of the target [1,8].
AMPs contain hydrophobic residues that are inserted into the lipid bilayers of the cell membrane to mediate permeabilization and membrane rupture, leading to rapid cell death [6,7]. Cell membrane permeabilization is the most common mechanism of action; however, some AMPs, such as buforin II, spontaneously pass through the membrane, inhibiting cell functions by binding to cell DNA and RNA [9,10,11].
Some AMP molecules demonstrate no secondary structure in an aqueous environment but assume a secondary structure when exposed to lipids, such as those present in bacterial cell membranes [1]. Electrostatic attraction between AMPs and membrane lipids occurs through teichoic and lipoteichoic acids in Gram-positive bacteria or through lipopolysaccharides in Gram-negative bacteria. This attraction results in instability of the outer membrane, which allows the translocation of AMPs across the membrane, causing bacterial lysis. There are different models by which AMPs can damage pathogen membranes, such as the barrel model, toroidal pore model, and carpet model [12].
Studies on the interactions between AMPs and bacterial membranes demonstrate that it is difficult for bacteria to develop resistance to AMPs, supporting the wide application of AMPs in livestock, food production, and drugs to avoid the excessive use of antibiotics [13]. Because microbial resistance to conventional drugs involves drastic changes in membrane phospholipid composition, affecting multiple systems in turn, AMPs do not contribute to the emergence of resistant pathogens [14]. The diverse mechanisms of action of AMPs and the selectivity of antimicrobial agents for microbial cells give AMPs a broad spectrum of effects against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, fungi, parasites, viruses, and tumor cells. In addition, some AMPs mediate chemotaxis, apoptosis, immunomodulatory effects, and wound healing, which make them suitable for the development of new therapeutics [14,15].
Natural cationic amphipathic peptides have potential in the development of multiple drugs. They exhibit low toxicity and/or hemolytic activity toward mammalian cells; however, as concentrations increase, they may become unsuitable for direct use in therapeutic development, because their cytotoxic effect will be greater than their therapeutic effect [13].
Hydrophobicity is related to the cytotoxicity of AMPs because the more hydrophobic the peptide is, the greater its ability to penetrate cell membranes, affecting prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells. Toxicity can occur by binding to cell membranes, leading to hemolysis or cytotoxicity. The cytotoxicity of the peptide is likely associated with its hydrophobicity, amphipacity, and helicity [16]. Therefore, certain chemical modifications are needed to enable the development of AMPs as therapeutic antimicrobial agents [16].
This review was designed in response to the growing body of research on plant AMPs over the past two decades, with the aim of organizing and synthesizing key findings related to the major families of plant AMPs and their biological activities. To achieve this goal, we conducted a comprehensive literature search using the databases Google Scholar, the Antimicrobial Peptide Database (APD), and PubMed, covering the period from 2002 to 2023. Keywords such as “plant antimicrobial peptides”, “peppers”, “Capsicum”, “thionin”, “hevein-like”, “defensins”, “lipid transfer proteins”, and “cyclotides” were employed to identify relevant academic papers. Studies were included if these terms appeared in titles, abstracts, or keywords, with a focus on articles that explored the biological activities of AMPs. The novelty of this review lies in its structured, chronological presentation of the evolution of plant AMP research, particularly emphasizing its biotechnological potential. This work offers a more detailed timeline and analysis of AMP families, providing a comprehensive resource for understanding key trends and advancements in this field. Moreover, these findings highlight gaps in the current knowledge, suggesting targeted approaches for future research on the biological functions of plant AMPs.

1.2. Classification and Structure of AMPs

AMPs can be classified into four families based on their three-dimensional structure according to the Antimicrobial Peptide Database (ADP): alpha (α), beta (β), alpha-beta (αβ), and non-alpha-beta (nonαβ) (Figure 1). The alpha family is composed of AMPs with helical structures (e.g., magainins and LL-37). Beta family peptides are composed of AMPs with at least one β-sheet in their structure (e.g., human α-defensins and lactoferricidin). AMPs from the alpha-beta family have both α-helices and β-sheets in their 3D structure (e.g., β-defensins), while AMPs from the non-alpha-beta family contain neither α- α-helices nor β-sheets in their structure; for example, indolicidin [17].
Furthermore, some authors divide AMPs based on their secondary structure into α-helixes, β-sheets, and extended peptides. α-helices AMPs have a linear structure when in an aqueous solution but become an amphipathic helical structure when in contact with the bacterial membrane or organic solvents because they contain hydrophobic residues capable of interacting with various types of membranes. The α-helical structure leads to high affinity between peptides and microbial membranes, resulting in better permeabilization of bacterial membranes [18,19,20,21]. This group of AMPs is mostly less than 40 amino acids in length; for example, cecropins (from the Hyalophora cecropia L. insect), magainin (from the clawed frog Xenopus laevis Daudin), and pleurocidin (isolated from several fish) [22,23,24].
β-sheet AMPs are generally cyclic molecules formed by at least two antiparallel β-sheets stabilized by disulfide bonds between conserved cysteine residues, forming a rigid structure, as in the defensin family [18,19,20,21,25]. Extended peptides do not have regular secondary structures, as they are stabilized only by hydrogen bonds and van der Waals interactions that induce membrane permeabilization. These peptides are often rich in specific amino acids, such as glycine, arginine, tryptophan, proline, and histidine residues [26,27,28].
AMPs are also classified according to their biological activities as antibacterial, antibiofilm, anti-endotoxin, antitoxin, antiviral, anti-HIV, antifungal, antiparasitic, antimalarial, anticancer, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, insecticidal, protease inhibitor, antioxidant, or synergistic. In addition, these methods can be based on the biological source of bacterial AMPs, plant AMPs, and animal AMPs, among others [29,30].
This work aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the different families of AMPs, including their biological activities and potential applications in medicine and agriculture. This review article identifies the principal groups of plant AMPs that have been the subject of the most extensive research over the past two decades and contributes as a reference source for future studies involving biotechnological applications of plant antimicrobial peptides.

2. Plant Antimicrobial Peptides

Plant AMPs have high genetic variability and thus greater diversity and ability to recognize different targets [26,27,28]. Most plant AMPs have positive charges that are fundamental for interaction with pathogen membrane lipids [31]. The composition of plant AMPs confers protection against invading pathogens through membrane rupture and pore formation, which promote interaction and interference with fundamental proteins in microbial processes [6,32].
In addition, peptide-based plant genetic engineering holds significant promise for enhancing crop productivity through enhanced resistance against pests and pathogens. Numerous prior studies have demonstrated the remarkable efficacy of transgenic plants that overexpress AMP genes, resulting in heightened resistance to pathogen-induced assaults.
Plant AMPs are commonly grouped into different families. The most studied of these in the last 20 years have been thionins, defensins, hevein-like proteins, lipid-transfer proteins (LTPs), and cyclotides [33,34].
Table 1 is a compilation of representative peptides from each family of plant AMPs, as well as their name, origin, biological activity, and target.

2.1. Thionins

Thionins, which are short plant peptides (~5 kDa) consisting of 45 to 48 amino acid residues, have been identified in a variety of plant species, including cereals, mistletoe, mustard, and poppy [33,34]. Thionins, a term encompassing α/β-thionins and γ-thionins, denote two clearly delineated groups of plant peptides. Despite their shared nomenclature and probable distant ancestral origin, these peptide classes possess dissimilar three-dimensional structures. The three-dimensional structures of thionins, which are small, cysteine-rich antimicrobial peptides. Structurally, thionins are amphipathic molecules. The long arm of this structure consists of two antiparallel α-helices, while the short arm comprises two parallel β-strands. This arrangement forms a groove between the two domains, which is thought to be crucial for their antimicrobial activity (Figure 1a) [7]. Hence, recognizing these proteins as distinct protein families is appropriate, as γ-thionins are more accurately classified as plant defensins. This distinction emphasizes the significance of comprehending the structural attributes and exceptional antimicrobial properties of these materials [6,7,117].
The initial discovery of a plant, thionin, occurred in 1942 when it was isolated from wheat flour and is commonly referred to as purothionin [118]. Thionins quickly gained recognition for their potent toxicity against a range of organisms, including bacteria, fungi, insect larvae, and both animal and plant cells [7]. These hydrophobic peptides engage directly with hydrophobic residues and membrane protein receptors, and their three-dimensional structure is closely tied to their antimicrobial activity. Notably, thionins interact with negatively charged phospholipids present in the cell membrane, disrupting its fluidity and ultimately leading to cell membrane lysis [119,120]. This intricate relationship between structure and function sheds light on the remarkable antimicrobial potential of thionins.
Peptides from the thionin family sourced from black cumin seeds (Nigella sativa L.) of the Ranunculaceae family were successfully isolated and characterized. These peptides demonstrated remarkable inhibitory effects against filamentous fungi, specifically Aspergillus ochraceus and Aspergillus fumigatus, as evidenced by in vitro assays. Additionally, the cytotoxic effects of these compounds were assessed in both tumor and normal cell lines, the results of which were promising and consistent with previous studies that reported nearly 90% cell death induction in RD and Jukart cell lines [39,50]. In another investigation, scientists isolated a genomic clone of a thionin from opium poppy (Papaver somniferum L.) of the Papaveraceae family. The expression of this thionin in Escherichia coli revealed its noteworthy in vitro antimicrobial activity against Fusarium oxysporum and Botrytis cinerea fungi [120].
The thionin family has been the subject of extensive research in the past two decades, leading to the elucidation of numerous biological activities and gene expression in transgenic plants (Figure 2). Notably, a thionin derived from cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) of the Fabaceae family has been found to possess selective inhibitory activity against trypsin, as demonstrated in studies conducted by Melo et al. in 2002 [40].
Thionin isolated from walnuts (Pyrularia pubera M.) belonging to the Santalaceae family exhibits a broad spectrum of antimicrobial activities. Specifically, the thionin P. pubera thionin (Pp-TH) has been demonstrated to have in vitro activity against various bacteria, including Gram-negative strains such as Rhizobium meliloti, X. campestris pv. translucens, and X. campestris pv. campestris, as well as Gram-positive bacteria such as C. michiganensis. Furthermore, Pp-TH also exhibited antifungal activity against phytopathogenic fungi, including Pseudonebularia cucumerina, F. oxysporum, and B. cinerea [44]. Additionally, within Pp-TH, a segment known as the serine nonapeptide (SNP) has been identified. This SNP segment has been found to exert an effect on the prothrombinase assay, stimulating the activity of the prothrombinase complex, which plays a crucial role in blood clotting [45]. In other studies, researchers discovered and extracted peptides named Tu-AMP 1 and Tu-AMP 2 from tulip bulbs (Tulipa gesneriana L.) belonging to the Liliaceae family. These peptides, which are part of the thionin family, exhibited potent antimicrobial effects on a range of bacteria (Pectobacterium carotovora, Agrobacterium radiobacter, Agrobacterium rhizogenes, Clavibacter michiganensis, and Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens) as well as pathogenic fungi (F. oxysporum and Geotrichum candidum) [51].
In addition to their antifungal, antibacterial, larvicidal, insecticidal, and nematicidal activities, these antimicrobial peptides exhibit various other biological properties. Within the thionin family, ligatoxin B, isolated from the mistletoe Phoradendron liga (Gill.) Eichl. of the Viscaceae family, commonly known as European mistletoe, shares a three-dimensional structure with viscotoxins and purothionins. These peptides have demonstrated cytotoxic effects on the human lymphoma cell line U-937-GTB and the primary multidrug-resistant renal adenocarcinoma cell line ACHN in vitro. Moreover, they are known to be a group of DNA-binding proteins [46].
Another group of proteins, called foratoxins, which belong to the thionin family, was isolated from the leafy mistletoe or Christmas mistletoe (Phoradendron tomentosum (DC.) Engelm. ex A. Gray). These proteins have shown cytotoxicity in human cell lines and have exhibited sensitivity toward solid tumor samples of breast cancer cells [47]. AMPs have also been identified, isolated, and characterized from wheat seeds (Triticum kiharae Dorof. et Migusch). Among the various sequenced peptides, thionin-like AMPs, including β-purothionin, have been identified. This peptide has demonstrated antimutagenic activity in human RD cells and has shown high efficacy in protecting the DNA of human cells exposed to cadmium chloride, thus highlighting its potential [48]. These findings further underscore the effectiveness of this plant defense strategy in the production of AMPs [124,125].
Transgenic tobacco plants expressing peptides from the thionin family have demonstrated antimicrobial activity, providing resistance against pathogenic fungi (B. cinerea), phytopathogenic bacteria (P. solanacearum), and insect larvae (Helicoverpa armigera) [121]. Furthermore, additional studies have confirmed the antifungal properties of thionin genes when expressed in Arabidopsis thaliana plants, resulting in resistance against phytopathogenic fungi (F. graminearum) [49].
Thionin genes have been isolated from etiolated barley seeds and seedlings and found to be upregulated in wild-type rice. Consequently, transgenic rice plants expressing elevated levels of thionins from oats in their cell walls exhibited normal growth, even when germinated with phytopathogenic bacteria of the species Burkholderia plantaii [35]. This discovery highlights the protective role of thionins in conferring resistance to bacterial infections and underscores the potential of utilizing thionin-based genetic engineering strategies in crop improvement for enhanced disease resistance. In other studies, the expression of rice thionin genes has demonstrated nematocidal activity against detrimental root pathogens in agricultural settings. Specifically, thionins have been shown to reduce susceptibility to nematode infection (Meloidogyne graminicola) and colonization by oomycetes (Pythium graminicola) [52]. Furthermore, researchers have identified and characterized thionin-like AMPs in A. thaliana plants. These peptides have shown in vitro resistance against nematodes (Heterodera schachtii) from beet cysts [117].
AMPs derived from the thionin family of Arabidopsis thaliana L. have been investigated for their potential applications. AMPs were expressed in the bovine endothelial cell line BVE-E6E7 and exhibited significant antimicrobial activity against various pathogens, including Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus aureus), Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli), and pathogenic fungi (Candida albicans). Additionally, these AMPs demonstrated security to different mammalian cell lines, suggesting their potential use in the treatment of bovine mastitis and other infectious diseases in mammals [36,37]. In another study, a thionin gene from A. thaliana L. was expressed in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.), a member of the Solanaceae family. This expression resulted in antimicrobial activity against the bacterium Ralstonia solanacearum and the fungus F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici [122]. When expressed in sweet potato, barley thionin has antimicrobial activity that effectively combats the pathogenic fungus Ceratocystis fimbriata. This expression of thionin reduces damage to both leaves and roots, thus promoting the potential use of transgenic foods containing antimicrobial peptides. Such development aims to minimize the dependence on agricultural chemicals [38]. Additionally, when barley thionins are expressed in Nicotiana benthamiana Domin., they exhibit remarkable antimicrobial activity. The overexpression of thionins in this plant species has been shown to decrease the susceptibility of the green aphid (Myzus persicae), suggesting that the thionin genes possess insecticidal properties [43].
Moreover, antimicrobial activities have been observed for thionins expressed in transgenic onions. In a recent study, the expressed thionin exhibited a 52% inhibitory effect on the germination of Aspergillus niger spores, further validating the antifungal properties against pathogenic fungi, which has been consistently reported in previous studies [42].
In conclusion, studies have consistently demonstrated the effectiveness of transgenic plants overexpressing AMP genes in increasing resistance to various pathogenic fungi, bacteria, and insects. These findings emphasize the potential of thionin-based genetic engineering approaches for crop improvement and the development of genetically modified foods with improved disease resistance, thus reducing reliance on agricultural chemicals.

2.2. Heveins

Hevein-like peptides are small molecules comprising 29 to 45 amino acids, characterized by a high content of glycine, cysteine, and aromatic amino acids, along with three to five disulfide bonds. These cysteine-rich peptides adopt a compact fold stabilized by multiple disulfide bonds, ensuring exceptional stability. Their three-dimensional structure includes a chitin-binding domain, enabling specific interactions with fungal cell walls by recognizing chitin. The conserved structure of heveins features a β-sheet and cysteine knot motifs, ensuring functional specificity and resistance to degradation. These compounds are found in several monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants, for example, in rubber tree latex. These peptides have chitin as their main target, which is useful for studying the interaction of peptides with carbohydrates, which is mainly based on hydrogen bonding and van der Waals forces (Figure 1b) [11,41].
The conformation of hevein-like peptides favors the inhibition of fungal hyphal growth by binding to fungal chitin, protecting plants from a wide variety of fungal pathogens [119]. Hevein-like peptides are of medical and agricultural interest for their association with latex allergy problems and for their antifungal and insecticidal activities. In addition, some hevein-like peptides also have a compact structure that makes them resistant to thermal, chemical, and proteolytic degradation [126].
Furthermore, studies indicate that hevein-like compounds can also act as flocculating agents. Hevein-like peptides were identified in the seeds of moringa species (Moringa oleifera), which are members of the Moringaceae family and exhibit coagulation/flocculation activities, demonstrating the highly efficient potential of these peptides [127].
Studies on the biological activities and gene expression of hevein-like AMPs have shown that they exhibit many antimicrobial activities, especially in resistance against phytopathogenic fungi (Figure 3). Hevein-like AMPs were isolated from the bark of the tree (Euonymus europaeus L.), which belongs to the Celastraceae family. These peptides showed antifungal activity against phytopathogenic fungi, including B. cinerea [53]. In other studies, hevein-like AMPs were also isolated from tree bark (Eucommia ulmoides Oliv.) of the Eucommiaceae family and shown to have inhibitory effects on oomycete (Phytophthora infestans) and phytopathogenic fungi, Aculops lycopersicum, Verticillium dahliae, Gibberella zeae, Alternaria nicotianae, Fusarium moniliforme, F. oxysporum and Colletotrichum gossypii [54].
Studies have shown that hevein-like peptides from Hevea brasiliensis Muell. Arg. from the Euphorbiaceae family have antimicrobial activity. The peptides exhibited inhibitory effects on species of pathogenic fungi (C. albicans, Candida tropicalis, and Candida krusei) and Gram-negative bacteria (Porphyromonas gingivalis, Prevotella intermedia, Tannerella forsythia, Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans) [55].
Hevein-like antimicrobial peptides were found in plants of the Moraceae family (Broussonetia papiyrifera (L.) L’Hér. ex Vent. and Morus papirifera L.). These peptides were isolated, identified, and characterized, and shown to have antifungal effects on Trichoderma viride fungi obtained from paper mulberry leaves [56].
Hevein-like peptides were isolated from weed leaves (Stellaria media L.) belonging to the Caryophillaceae family. These peptides showed in vitro antimicrobial activities against phytopathogenic fungi (F. solani, Alternaria alternata, Bipolaris sorokiniana, B. cinerea and Aspergillus niger) and bacteria (E. coli, P. carotovora, Clavibacter michiganensis pv. michiganensis, A. rhizogenes, Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato) [57].
Other hevein-like peptides were isolated and characterized from Pharbitis nil seeds. These peptides were expressed in tobacco plants, conferring resistance against pathogenic fungi and parasites such as the oomycete Phytophthora parasitica, the causative agent of black cinnamon disease in plants [58].
Hevein-like peptides have been identified in the leaves of plants (Wasabia japonica L.) belonging to the Brassicaceae family. The isolated and characterized peptides exhibit antimicrobial activity when expressed in plants (N. benthamiana) of the Solanaceae family, where they confer resistance against pathogenic fungi (B. cinerea) and bacteria (Pseudomonas cichorii, Pseudomonas glumae, Pseudomonas plantaii, A. tumefaciens and E. coli). Furthermore, the peptides inhibited the growth of phytopathogenic fungi (A. alternata, B. cinerea, F. solani and Magnaporte grisea) and Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli) in vitro [59].
Previous studies have shown that hevein-like peptides isolated from Ipomoea nil (L.) of the Convolvulaceae family exhibit antifungal activity against a broad spectrum of fungi containing or not containing chitin [60]. Later studies showed that these peptides expressed in tomato (L. esculentum Mill.) exhibited antifungal activity, conferring resistance against oomycete (Phytophthora capsici) and chitin-containing fungus (F. oxysporum) [61].
In other studies, hevein-like genes were isolated from the rubber tree (H. brasiliensis Muell. Arg.) and expressed in Nipponbare rice (Oryza sativa). Transgenic rice plants exhibit antimicrobial activity against rice blast fungus (Magnaporthe grisea), which regulates fungal infections on leaves [62].
Hevein-like peptides isolated from chickweed seeds (S. media) showed antimicrobial activity. These peptide genes were expressed in mustard (A. thaliana L.) and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Samsun-NN) plants resistant to phytopathogenic fungi (Bipolaris sorokiniana and Thielaviopsis basicola) [63].
Later studies identified hevein-like peptides in common chickweed plants (S. media (L.) Vill.) of the Caryophyllaceae family that showed antifungal activity in transgenic plant lines. The peptides were expressed in potatoes (Solanum tuberosum L.) of the Solanaceae family and aided in resistance against fungi of the genus Alternaria [64].
Hevein-like genes were expressed in tissues of flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) of the Linaceae family infected with F. oxysporum fungi. Flax-expressing genes from the hevein family exhibited reduced fungal growth, suggesting that these genes confer antifungal activity [128]. In conclusion, these studies revealed the potential of hevein-like peptides as antimicrobial agents in plants, mainly against phytopathogenic fungi and bacteria. These findings are relevant for the development of new plant disease control strategies and alternative antimicrobial options and offer promising prospects for innovative plant protection strategies and potential applications in biotechnology.

2.3. Defensins

Defensins are amphipathic molecules of 45 to 54 amino acid residues that contain cationic charges and highly conserved cysteine bonds throughout the family, forming at least four intramolecular disulfide bonds. This conformation allows the formation of three antiparallel β structures and an α-helix that confers high stability. The three-dimensional structure of defensins features an α-helix and an antiparallel triple-stranded β-sheet. The primary structural hallmark of the defensin molecule is the so-called cysteine-stabilized α-helix β-sheet motif (CSαβ), where two cysteine residues separated by a turn in the α-helix are connected to two cysteines located at a single amino acid within the third β-strand (Figure 1c) [9].
Plant defensins are classified into two groups based on the structure of the precursor: class I (absence of the C-terminal prodomain), which provides the first line of defense against the invasion of phytopathogens into the extracellular space, and class II (presence of the prodomain C-terminal), which prevents the phytotoxic effects of defensin against other host cells. In addition, many defensins have been isolated from seeds, but they have also been identified in other tissues, such as leaves, fruits, flowers, and roots [129,130,131,132].
The primary structure of plant defensins is quite diverse, with the exception of the eight cysteine residues, which reflects the different in vitro biological activities already described. These include a broad spectrum of activities, such as antibacterial, antifungal, insecticidal, antiviral, and anticancer activities; the inhibition of trypsin activity; and the production of α-amylases in some insects and fungi. In addition, they have antiproliferative effects, acting as ion channel inhibitors and pathogen protein synthesis inhibitors; inducing the formation of Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS); promoting apoptosis in yeast and other fungal species; and promoting wound healing, proliferation control, and chemotaxis. Its biological functions are relevant, and it has therapeutic potential in combination with medicinal and agricultural treatments [133,134,135,136].
The mechanism of action of defensins may be subject to electrostatic interactions, preferentially related to negatively charged structures of the cell membrane of pathogens, resulting in increased membrane permeability and cell leakage followed by cell death. Some studies point to an alternative mechanism of action that does not damage the cell membrane of pathogens. In this case, these defense peptides are internalized in the intracellular environment, leading to high ionic penetrability via reactions with membrane phospholipids [137].
The biological activities and gene expression of plant defensins have been extensively studied over the years due to their range of bioactive properties against pathogens and for the treatment of human diseases (Figure 4). For example, defensins isolated from the Mexican avocado (Persea americana var. drymifolia Mill.) of the Lauraceae family are cytotoxic to the Jurkat lineage of acute lymphocytic leukemia cells. In the present study, defensins inhibited cell viability and induced cell death through caspase-dependent apoptosis. In addition, inducing increased ROS production and a decrease in the mitochondrial membrane potential presents great potential for studies of anticancer activity [138].
Defensins isolated from the dahlia plant (Dahlia merckii Lehm.) of the Asteraceae family have membrane interactions with sphingolipids isolated from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. In the present study, the interaction of defensin with the membrane increased in the presence of ergosterol, and these data suggest that this peptide has antifungal activity [139]. In other studies, this defensin was expressed in eggplant plants (Solanum melongena L.) of the Solanaceae family, which were resistant to the pathogenic fungi B. cinerea and Verticillium albo-atrum [140].
In studies carried out by [141], defensin peptides found in the plant Medicago truncatula Gaertn., which belongs to the Fabaceae family, exhibited growth-inhibitory activity against Gram-negative bacteria (E. coli, P. syringae pv. syringae, Sinorhizobium meliloti, and Xanthomonas alfalfae subsp. alfafa) and filamentous fungi (Phoma medicaginis and F. solani).
Defensins isolated from ornamental tobacco flowers (Nicotiana alata Link and Otto) of the Solanaceae family have antifungal and antibacterial effects on filamentous fungi and bacteria, inhibiting the growth of F. oxysporum and B. cinerea in vitro [142,143]. These results are similar to those of studies in which defensins were isolated from buckwheat seeds (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.) that also showed antibacterial activity conferring resistance against Gram-positive (Clavibacter michiganensis and Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens) and Gram-negative (P. carotovora, A. rhizogenes and A. radiobacter) strains and antifungal activity against filamentous (F. oxysporum) and nonfilamentous (Geotrichum candidum) fungi [144].
Furthermore, defensin-like AMPs were isolated from alfalfa seeds (Medicago sativa L.) of the Fabaceae family and characterized. The defensins of this leguminous plant showed in vitro antifungal activity, conferring resistance to fungi of the F. graminearum species [145].
Defensin-like AMPs have also been extracted from adzuki bean (V. angularis (Willd.) Ohwi and H. Ohashi) seeds of the Fabaceae family, showing antimicrobial activity. The defensin was purified and characterized, and it was found that it exhibited antifungal and antibacterial activity, conferring inhibition of the growth of pathogenic fungi (F. oxysporum, F. oxysporum, F. sp. pisi and Trichophyton rubrum), Gram-positive bacteria (Staphylococcus epidermidis and Bacillus cereus) and Gram-negative bacteria (Xanthomonas campestris pv. vesicatoria, Salmonella typhimurium, Salmonella enteritidis, E. coli, P. carotovora pv. carotovora, Proteus vulgaris and P. syringae pv. syringae) [146].
Defensin-like AMPs isolated from the lima bean (Phaseolus limensis L.) seed of the Fabaceae family have already been identified. AMPs showed antifungal and antibacterial activity, inhibiting the growth of B. cinerea, F. oxysporum, and Mycosphaerella arachidicola [147]. In radish seeds (Raphanus sativus), AMPs from the defensin family that exhibited antifungal activity were identified. In the present study, defensin inhibited the growth of the yeast species C. albicans and Pichia pastoris [148].
In other studies, defensins isolated from radish seeds (R. sativus L.) that interact with glycosylceramides were shown to have antifungal activity. Defensins exhibit fungal cell membrane permeabilization activity, fungal cell wall stress, and reactive oxygen species production in C. albicans, conferring growth-inhibitory activity against fungal cells [149,150]. In later studies, these defensins induced apoptosis and concomitantly triggered the activation of caspases or caspase-like proteases in C. albicans [159]. Furthermore, the potential antibiofilm activity of radish defensins expressed in P. pastoris in combination with caspofungin against C. albicans biofilms was analyzed [151].
Plant defensins isolated from Chinese cabbage seeds (Brassica campestris L. ssp. pekinensis) were expressed in E. coli and showed antimicrobial activity. These overexpressed peptides exhibited antifungal activity, conferring resistance against the phytopathogenic fungi A. solani, Neurospora crassa, Phytophthora parasitica, and F. oxysporum [152]. Plant defensins overexpressed in rice (Oryza sativa cv. Sasanishiki) also exhibit antifungal activity, conferring resistance to phytopathogenic fungi (Magnaporthe grisea) in transgenic rice [153].
Defensin-like AMPs were identified from a cDNA clone isolated from winter wheat tissue (Triticum aestivum L.) that exhibited antibacterial activity. Peptides expressed in winter wheat sprouts inhibited the growth of the phytopathogenic bacterium P. cichorii [154].
Plant defensins were isolated from mung bean or mung bean leguminous plants (Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek) of the Fabaceae family, known as moyashi. Plant defensins expressed in artificial seeds exhibited in vitro insecticidal activity against the beetle Callosobruchus chinensis, inhibiting the growth of bruchid larvae [160]. In later studies, mung bean defensin was expressed in P. pastoris and showed antifungal activity against the fungi F. oxysporum, Pyricularia oryzae, Rhizoctonia solani, and Trichophyton rubrum [155].
Defensins isolated from cowpea or black-eyed pea (V. unguiculata) seeds were expressed in E. coli. These AMPs showed enzymatic inhibitory effects and inhibited α-amylases in insect pests (Acanthoscelides obtectus and Zabrotes subfasciatus), highlighting their potential in the development of transgenic plants to control insect pests [65,66].
Antimicrobial peptides of the defensin family were isolated from common bean seeds (Phaseolus vulgaris cv. Pérola) and characterized. From messenger RNA (mRNA) of P. vulgaris seeds, complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized by reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT–PCR) and cloned; this cDNA encoded a peptide belonging to the defensin family. These defensins inhibited the growth of yeasts (C. albicans, Candida parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, Candida guilliermondii, Kluyveromyces marxiannus, and S. cerevisiae) and inhibited the growth of phytopathogenic fungi (F. oxysporum, F. solani, F. lateritium, and Rizoctonia solani) [67].
Recombinant defensins isolated from Mexican radish seeds (Pachyrhizus erosus (L.) Urb.) showed antifungal activity. Studies have shown that defensins expressed in P. pastoris exhibit growth-inhibitory effects on various pathogenic fungi (F. oxysporum f. sp. vasinfectum, Verticillium dahliae, Aspergillus flavus, Penicillium spp., Colletotrichum gloeosporioides, B. cinerea, Bipolaris maydis, A. niger, F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici and Rhizopus stolonifer) [68].
Recombinant AMPs of the defensin family were identified and isolated from Peruvian maca (Lepidium meyenii) of the Brassicaceae family and showed antimicrobial activity. The recombinant peptide exhibited in vitro growth inhibition activity against P. infestans [69]. Recombinant pea (Pisum sativum) defensins expressed in yeast (P. pastoris) showed antifungal activity, conferring resistance against Aspergillus niger [70].
Recombinant defensins were isolated from fenugreek plants (Trigonella foenum-graecum), and when expressed in E. coli, they exhibited antifungal activity against phytopathogenic fungi (Rhizoctonia solani and Phaeoisariopsis personata) [71]. Furthermore, AMPs from the defensin family isolated from the alfalfa (M. sativa L.) family Fabaceae when expressed in transgenic tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum Mill.) showed antifungal activity. Transgenic tomato plants were shown to be resistant to pathogenic fungi (F. oxysporum f. sp. lycopersici) [72]. Additionally, plant defensin-like genes were isolated from Nicotiana alata and shown to exhibit antifungal activity when expressed in transgenic cotton. These defensin-like compounds showed antifungal activity against Fusarium oxysporum e Verticillium dahliae wilt [73].
Some studies have shown that the biological activity of some plant defensins is related to an amino acid region located between the β2 and β3 strands, called the γ-core region. De Samblanx et al., 1997 showed that alterations in the amino acid residues present in the γ-core reduced the biological activity of RsAFP2 (a Raphanus sativus defensin). Another study showed that the γ-core region is a determinant of the antifungal activity of MsDef1 and MtDef4 (defensins from M. sativa and M. truncatula, respectively) [74]. Overall, these findings underscore the vast potential of plant defensins as resources for developing novel strategies against infectious diseases and plant protection against pathogens and for potential therapeutic applications in cancer research and human disease treatment. The exploration of plant defensins has led to the identification of their diverse biological activities, holding promise for future advancements in biotechnology and medicine.

2.4. Lipid Transfer Proteins

Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) were isolated for the first time from potato tubers [75]. These cationic molecules are highly expressed in most tissues but are absent in most groups of basal plants. These peptides consist of approximately 100 amino acid residues and are relatively larger in size than other AMPs, such as defensins [41,76]. LTPs have a three-dimensional structure that enables them to interact with lipids and mediate their transport between cellular membranes. Many LTPs exhibit a compact, barrel-like structure, often containing hydrophobic residues and a β-barrel or α-helix motif, stabilizing the protein while allowing flexibility in lipid binding and transport, forming a binding cavity that accommodates lipids for transfer (Figure 1d) [77].
LTPs are divided into two major subfamilies according to their molecular size: LTP1 and LTP2. However, LTPs have recently been grouped according to the position of the conserved intron, the identity of the amino acid sequence, and the spacing between cysteine residues; there are five main types of LTPs: LTP1, LTP2, LTPc, LTPd, and LTPg. Its C-terminal sequence allows the integration of LTPs on the extracellular side of the membrane [77,78,119].
In general, LTPs perform activities that mediate the transfer of lipids across the cytoplasm; that is, they supply lipids at membrane contact sites, which include fatty acids, phospholipids, prostaglandin B2, lysate derivatives, and acyl-coenzyme A or sterols [79]. In this way, they can stimulate the extraction of lipids from the membrane, mobilization of lipids into the aqueous cytoplasm, and reinsertion of lipids into a different membrane. LTPs can inhibit the growth of fungi and some bacterial pathogens and are also involved in the plant defense system [77].
Several studies have shown that LTPs play an important role in plant defense. The LTPs identified in coffee species (Coffea canephora L.) belonging to the Rubiaceae family exhibited high antimicrobial activity. The isolated peptides inhibited the growth of phytopathogenic fungi (Colletotrichum lindemuthianum, C. gloeosporioides, Fusarium solani, Fusarium lateritium, and Colletotrichum sp.) and Gram-negative bacteria (Xanthomonas euvesicatoria), in addition to increasing the membrane permeability and inducing ROS in all the fungi tested [80]. Currently, studies on LTPs show that these peptides have other therapeutic potential, such as cytotoxic and antiproliferative effects on tumor-derived cells, antiviral activity, inhibition of digestive enzymes, and antinociceptive activity [81].
Studies have shown that LTP-type AMPs have great therapeutic potential due to their antifungal, antibacterial, and antiviral properties (Figure 5). LTP-like AMPs have been identified from pepper leaf cDNA (Capsicum annuum L. cv. Bugang). The expression of LTPs was induced when the leaves were infected with TMV. In other studies, LTPs were expressed in response to pepper leaf infection by pathogenic bacteria (X. campestris pv. vesicatoria), suggesting that LTPs play an important role in plant defense against viral and bacterial pathogens [82,83].
Likewise, LTPs isolated, purified, and identified from rice leaves showed antimicrobial activity in vitro. LTPs exhibit antifungal and antibacterial activity by inhibiting the germination of fungal spores (P. oryzae) and the growth of Gram-negative bacteria (Xanthomonas oryzae) [84].
Furthermore, nonspecific lipid transfer protein (nsLTP) AMPs were isolated from mung bean seeds (Phaseolus mungo) and exhibited antifungal and antibacterial activity. LTPs confer resistance against pathogenic fungi (F. solani, F. oxysporum, Pythium aphanidermatum, and Sclerotium rolfsii) and Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus) [85].
The LTPs identified in potato plants were induced by an oomycete (Ph. infestans) and phytohormones (ABA, abscisic acid, salicylic acid, and jasmonic acid), providing plant resistance against the pathogen Ph. infestans correlated with the amount of ROS generated during plant defense responses [86]. The nsLTP-like AMPs isolated from motherwort seeds (Leonurus japonicus Houtt.) showed in vitro antifungal and antibacterial activity. LTPs inhibited the growth of filamentous fungi (F. oxysporum, Alternaria brassicae, Bipolaris maydis, and Rhizoctonia cerealis), yeasts (S. cerevisiae), and Gram-positive bacteria (Bacillus subtilis) [87].
LTP-like AMPs were isolated from seeds of Brassica campestris L. and showed antifungal activity. LTPs exhibited inhibitory effects on the mycelial growth of pathogenic fungi (F. oxysporum and M. arachidicola) [88]. LTPs isolated from sunflower seeds (Helianthus annuus) have been previously described to have high antifungal activity (F. solani f. sp. eumartii). Later studies demonstrated that these LTPs were able to inhibit the germination of spores from other phytopathogenic fungi, such as A. alternata [89].
LTP-like AMPs isolated from daffodils (Narcissus tazetta var. chinensis L.) exhibited in vitro antiviral activity. These LTPs were able to significantly inhibit plaque formation via respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) and cytopathic effects via the influenza A (H1N1) virus [90].
LTPs isolated from the seeds of black cumin flowers (N. sativa L.) exhibited antifungal activity. These AMPs inhibit the growth of phytopathogenic fungi (P. debaryanum) and oomycetes (Ph. infestans) [91]. Likewise, LTP-like AMPs have also been isolated and identified from coffee seeds (Coffea canephora). These LTPs showed antifungal activity against yeasts (C. albicans) in addition to conferring morphological alterations to C. tropicalis and inhibiting the activity of α-amylase in mammals in vitro [92].
The nsLTP-like AMPs isolated from transgenic wheat were expressed in P. pastoris and exhibited growth-inhibitory effects on a pathogenic fungus (F. graminearum). In addition, nsLTPs suppressed ROS production in plants [93]. Other LTP-like AMPs isolated from wheat and expressed in E. coli also exhibited antifungal activity against pathogenic fungi (Alternaria sp., Rhizoctonia solani, Curvularia lunata, Bipolaris oryzae, Cylindrocladium scoparium, B. cinerea and Sarocladium oryzae) [94].
LTP-like AMPs isolated from dill (Anethum graveolens L.) when expressed in E. coli bacteria showed weak antifungal activity. However, they inhibited spore germination, delayed the elongation of A. niger hyphae, and exhibited binding with phytohormones [95].
LTPs from onions (Allium cepa L.) were expressed in the ears of transgenic wheat plants and showed antifungal activity. LTPs confer resistance to phytopathogenic fungi (Blumeria graminis f. sp. tritici and Neovossia indica) in transgenic rice [96]. In other studies, the LTPs expressed in transgenic wheat (T. aestivum) conferred plant resistance to the leaf rust pathogen (Puccinia triticina Erikss.) and induced the plant to produce ROS [97].
In conclusion, LTPs are found in various natural food sources, including pepper leaves, rice leaves, mung bean seeds, and potatoes. These plants exhibit antifungal, antibacterial, and antiviral activities and play an important role in enhancing plant defense against pathogens. Moreover, LTPs possess diverse antimicrobial properties and hold promise as potential therapeutic agents in medicine and agriculture.

2.5. Cyclotides

Cyclotides are plant-derived cyclic antimicrobial peptides that occur in a wide variety of families, including Rubiaceae (coffee family), Violaceae (violet family), Fabaceae (legumes), Solanaceae (belladonna family and peppers of the genus Capsicum) and Cucurbitaceae (cucurbits) [161,162]. These cyclic peptides typically comprise 30 amino acids and can be found in a wide variety of plant tissues, including leaves, flowers, stems, and roots.
Cyclotides are characterized by a cyclic backbone, which is stabilized by three disulfide bonds that form a cysteine knot that makes them resistant to proteolysis and thermal denaturation. Structurally, cyclotides consist of a fold forming a cyclic structure that is often surrounded by hydrophobic residues (Figure 1e) [162,163].
In the 1970s, the first cyclotide, called kalata B1, found in the African tropical plant Oldenlandia affinis was described and was used by local populations as a medicine to accelerate “childbirth”. In 1995, this fungus was characterized, and since then, other cyclic peptides have been isolated from plant biomass and characterized [163].
Cyclotides have a cyclic cystine knot (CCK), a structure with six conserved cysteines and composed of two disulfide bonds (CysI-CysIV and CysII-CysV) combined with a third disulfide bond in the β strand (CysIII-CysVI). This conformation results in a unique protein fold. The distorted triple strand together with the structural complexity of “head-tail” cyclization is responsible for exceptional biological activities, as the peptide exhibits resistance to enzymatic and proteolytic breakdown, high thermal stability, and chemical denaturation [164]. These cyclic peptides have diverse biological activities, including hemolytic, neurotensin antagonist, anti-HIV, antimicrobial, protease inhibitor, insecticidal, antitumor, antifouling, nematicidal, molluskicidal, immunosuppressive, and inhibitory activities of the enzyme prolyl oligopeptidase [165,166,167].
Cyclotides can be classified into three subfamilies: Möbius, bracelet, and trypsin inhibitors. Möbius cyclotides can be found in Rubiaceae family plants such as O. affinis. The trait structure of Möbius is the presence of a Pro residue in the cis-peptide bond in loop 5, which induces a 180° twist in the peptide backbone. Bracelet cyclotides, such as V. odorata, are found in the Violaceae family and are distinguished by the absence of Pro residues, although the möbius and bracelet subfamilies are highly hydrophobic and have conserved residues that enable interactions in cell membrane binding. The trypsin inhibitor cyclotides can be found in Cucurbitaceae plants, such as M. cochinchinensis. Furthermore, these proteins have low sequence similarity with other subfamilies but possess the characteristic CCK motif of cyclotides [168,169].
Recent phylogenetic studies have sought to understand the evolutionary history of cyclotide precursor diversity among Solanaceae plant species. Researchers have revealed new cyclotide precursor genes in the Solanaceae family, unlike what has been found to date. The identification of cyclotide precursor genes helps in exploring their evolutionary link with other families, in addition to investigating their biological activities, enabling the development of new therapies [170].
Cyclotides have been intensely studied due to their bioactive properties of medical interest (Figure 6). These compounds exhibit a range of biological activities that make them promising for development as therapies against cancer and infectious diseases. [171]. Previous studies have shown that AMPs from the cyclotide family isolated from field pansy (Viola arvensis Murr.) and wood violet (Viola odorata L.) exhibit antitumor and cytotoxic effects on human tumor cell lines. These studies were important for identifying the anticancer effects of cyclotides and demonstrating their potential in the development of antitumor drugs based on AMPs [98,99].
In other studies, on plant AMPs, cyclotides isolated from the Indian medicinal herb Hybanthus enneaspermus (L.) F. Muell.) of the Violaceae family with in vivo aphrodisiac properties were identified. Studies have suggested that cyclotides can increase libido in addition to facilitating erectile function in male rats [100]. Furthermore, the cyclotides of this indigenous plant also showed anticancer activity. These AMPs have been shown to induce membrane blistering and cell necrosis [101]. This finding suggested that cyclotides have great potential for anticancer activity, as already reported in other studies [102,103].
Recent research has shown that cyclotide-containing extracts from wild pansy (Viola tricolor) exhibit in vitro inhibitory activity against human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) [104]. Cyclotides exhibited inhibitory effects on HIV by reducing the cytopathic effects of HIV infection [105]. These findings are similar to those of other previous studies in which cyclotide-like AMPs were isolated from the Chinese medicinal herb Viola yedoensis Makino which showed antimicrobial activity. Plant extracts containing cyclotides exhibited anti-HIV activity according to in vitro MTT assays [106].
In recent studies, cyclotides isolated from wood violet were shown to significantly reduce inflammation and demyelination in mice and alleviate neurological deficits in an experimental model of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) [107]. In other studies, cyclotides isolated from O. affinis were investigated for their suppressive anti-inflammatory and antiplasmodial activities against Plasmodium berghei in rodents, which significantly inhibited acute and chronic inflammation in rodent models [108]. In addition, these AMPs have also been identified in plants of the genus Allexis of the Violaceae family that exhibit protease inhibitory activity, conferring inhibition of human prolyl oligopeptidase activity [109].
Studies show that cyclotides are particularly potent against Gram-negative bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Aeromonas salmonicida, Vibrio ordalii, Vibrio anguillaru, Flavobacterium psychrophilum and E. coli [110,111]. Plant pathogenic bacteria are more susceptible than human pathogenic bacteria. However, previous studies have shown that cyclotides isolated from wood violet plants exhibit antibacterial activity by inhibiting the growth of Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus) [112]. In recent studies, cyclotides isolated from the leaves and petioles of Geophila repens of the family Rubiaceae demonstrated antibacterial and cytotoxic activity. AMPs of the cyclotide family showed antibacterial activity against E. coli and cytotoxic activity in the U-937 human lymphoma cell line [113].
Cyclotides exhibit a wide range of bioactive activities, including insecticidal activities. AMPs exhibit insecticidal activity, reducing the growth and development of moth larvae (Helicoverpa armigera) [114,115]. In a recent study, cyclotides isolated from extracts of O. affinis, Clitoria ternatea, Viola odorata, and Hybanthus enneaspermus showed nematocidal effects on Caenorhabditis elegans larvae. Cyclotides can cause death and damage, such as membrane disruption and toxicity, in Caenorhabditis elegans, possibly leading to larval death [116].
In conclusion, cyclotides are bioactive peptides with diverse therapeutic potential. They exhibit promise as cancer therapies, display antiviral and antibacterial properties, and show activity against insects and nematodes. Additionally, cyclotides have been shown to have aphrodisiac and anti-inflammatory effects. The biological activity of cyclotides highlights their potential applications in medicine and agriculture, suggesting that they are promising therapeutic agents.

3. AMPs from the Solanaceae Family

The Solanaceae family is home to a group of important plants, mainly in the Brazilian culture and economy, as potatoes, tomatoes, eggplant, and peppers, which belong to this family, have typically been present in the country’s cuisine for decades. Among the most studied plants, those of the genus Capsicum can be highlighted due to their biological activities against pathogens, enhancing their therapeutic use [172].
Recent studies have shown that several groups of antimicrobial peptides of vegetal origin present in the Solanaceae family act as the main components in defense mechanisms against microorganisms. For example, [173] extracted protein from potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) with the ability to inhibit the growth of oomycetes (P. infestans) and bacteria (S. aureus), suggesting new possibilities for the use of potato protein. AMPs present in the Solanaceae family could be used for the development of transgenic plants resistant to pathogens for crop improvement.
AMPs extracted from potatoes exhibit broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity both in vitro and in vivo, highlighting their important role in the defense system of plants. For example, potato Snakina-1 (SN1) is active in vitro against bacteria, fungi, yeast, and even animal/human pathogens, as transgenic potato plants overexpressing SN1 exhibited growth-inhibitory activity against bacterial and fungal pathogens. Furthermore, it has been shown to confer in vivo protection against commercially relevant pathogens in potato, wheat, and lettuce plants. In this way, SN1 could be a candidate for pharmaceutical or agricultural biotechnology applications by acting as a preservative agent for the food, pharmaceutical or cosmetic industry [174].
In other studies, defensin-like AMPs and snakins were isolated from tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.). The peptides exhibited antimicrobial activity against yeast (Cryptococcus neoformans and C. albicans), Gram-positive (Clavibacter michiganensis), and Gram-negative (P. savastanoi and P. carotovorum) bacteria. In this way, it becomes possible to use these peptides as new antimicrobial agents to control bacterial wilt and canker in tomato plants, in addition to being promising in the development of pharmaceutical products [175].
In the Solanaceae family, many antimicrobial peptides that have great potential in the development of products of medical and agricultural interest have already been identified and characterized. Among the classes of AMPs isolated from this family are defensins, LTPs, thionins, and protease inhibitors. Normally, these AMPs are produced in response to injury and inoculation by pathogens [176].
Studies on plants of the genus Capsicum of the Solanaceae family have shown that several AMPs have already been identified and characterized, and most of them have antifungal and enzyme inhibition activities (Figure 7). For example, LTPs were identified and sequenced in seeds of peppers of the species C. annuum L. In these studies, the characterization, immunolocalization, and identification of in vitro mammalian α-amylase inhibitory activity and antifungal activity of LTPs were performed against phytopathogenic fungi (F. oxysporum and C. lindemuthianum) and yeasts (S. cerevisiae, Pichia membranifaciens, C. tropicalis and C. albicans) [177]. Likewise, in other studies, these LTP-like AMPs have been shown to have fungicidal effects on C. albicans, S. cerevisiae, and Schizosaccharomyces pombe in addition to causing morphological changes in yeasts [178].
In other studies, defensin-like peptides capable of inhibiting the activity of different α-amylase enzymes were identified and characterized in Capsicum chinense fruits and yeasts of the Candida genus, revealing high antifungal potential [131]. In addition, [179] isolated peptides from C. chinense fruits that exhibit inhibitory effects on the growth of phytopathogenic fungi, in addition to causing membrane permeabilization, induction of endogenous ROS, activation of caspases, and functional collapse of mitochondria in fungi of the genus Fusarium.
Thionin-like AMPs were identified in the genus Capsicum highlighting the relevance of research on this genus. In these studies, several aspects of the mechanism of action of these thionin-like peptides were described, and antimicrobial activity against yeast and bacterial species was assayed. The peptides inhibited the growth of the yeasts S. cerevisiae, C. albicans, and C. tropicalis, inducing alterations in the membranes and permeabilization, in addition to causing a reduction in the growth of the bacterial species E. coli and P. aeruginosa [123].
Recent studies have shown that defensin-like AMPs are isolated from the seedless fruits of C. chinense Jacq. exhibit antifungal activity against yeast species (C. albicans and C. tropicalis) [180]. These studies corroborate previous studies, such as Da Silva Gebara et al. (2020), who identified defensin-like AMPs in pepper fruits (C. annuum L.) that exhibit growth-inhibitory effects on fungal species (C. albicans, Candida parapsilosis, Candida buinensis, and C. tropicalis) and pathogenic bacteria (Mycobacterium tuberculosis). Furthermore, AMPs induce ROS production and fungal cell membrane permeabilization [156].
Thionin-like cationic peptides (CaThi) were also isolated and characterized from fruits of C. annuum, and when combined with fluconazole, it was possible to identify antimicrobial activities. In the present study, CaThi showed antifungal activity against species of the genus Fusarium, resulting in the total death of F. solani by apoptosis when CaThi was combined with fluconazole [157]. In other studies, CaThi, in addition to having antifungal effects on yeast (C. tropicalis) and filamentous fungi, was shown to also exhibit antimicrobial activity against bacteria, inducing the activation of caspases and ROS. Furthermore, this peptide promotes an imbalance in pH homeostasis, highlighting its role in modulating H+ transport systems [158].
In other studies of the genus Capsicum peptides that inhibit enzymes and proteins extracted from the leaves and roots of pepper plants (C. annuum L.) were found. The extracts of leaves and roots inhibited trypsin and α-amylase activity and showed antifungal effects on Colletotrichum scovillei [181]. Previous studies have also identified proteinase inhibitor-like AMPs and 2S albumin from pepper seeds that inhibited the growth of yeasts (S. cerevisiae, C. albicans, C. parapsilosis, C. tropicalis, C. guilliermondii, Pichia membranifaciens, and K. marxiannus) [182].
The protease inhibitors identified in the genus Capsicum were extracted from C. chinense Jack. seeds and showed antifungal activities against filamentous fungi (C. gloeosporioides, C. lindemuthianum, F. oxysporum, and F. solani), causing mainly membrane permeability and oxidative stress. In addition, they also reported that these peptides are bifunctional inhibitors that inhibit trypsin activity and Tenebrio molitor larval α-amylase activity [183]. Recent research has shown that AMPs isolated from seeds of pepper (C. chinense Jacq.) exhibit antifungal activity against phytopathogenic fungi. Peptide-type serinic protease inhibitors inhibited the growth of the fungal species C. lindemuthianum and F. oxysporum, causing damage to fungal cells. Furthermore, these peptides have been shown to inhibit trypsin, human salivary α-amylase, and T. molitor larval α-amylase [184].
Protease inhibitor-like AMPs were identified in sweet pepper fruits (C. chinense) and shown to have antifungal activity and enzymatic inhibition. In addition to inhibiting the growth of phytopathogenic fungi (C. lindemuthianum, F. lateritium, F. solani and F. oxysporum), AMPs have been shown to inhibit trypsin and α-amylase activities [132]. In another study, AMPs isolated from pepper seeds (Capsicum baccatum) inhibited mammalian and insect α-amylase (Callosobruchus maculatus) in addition to inhibiting the growth of pathogenic fungi (S. cerevisiae, C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and K. marxiannus) [185].
In other studies, serine protease inhibitor-type AMPs isolated from C. annuum seeds were identified; these AMPs exhibited antifungal activity and growth inhibition in yeasts (S. cerevisiae, C. albicans, C. tropicalis, and K. marxianus), in addition to demonstrating inhibitory activity against human and insect salivary α-amylases (C. maculatus) [186].
Hevein-like AMPs extracted from bell pepper leaves (C. annuum L. Magali R) showed in vitro antibacterial activity, conferring resistance against Gram-positive bacteria (Clavibacter michiganensis ssp. michiganensis), Gram-negative bacteria (Ralstonia solanacearum, and P. carotovora) and phytopathogenic fungi (Alternaria solani). In addition, other classes of peptides that have been detected are involved in plant defense against phytopathogens [187].
In a recent study, defensins isolated from Habanero Chile pepper (C. chinense L.) were shown to be effective against cancer cells. The peptides were cytotoxic to K562 leukemia cells by modifying the mitochondrial membrane potential and amount of intracellular calcium. Furthermore, these peptides induce caspase-independent apoptosis in cancer cells, suggesting that therapeutic alternatives are promising [188]. In addition, defensin-like compounds isolated from Habanero peppers (C. chinense L.) and avocado (Persea americana) inhibited the proliferation and migration of cells stimulated by vascular endothelial growth factor. These studies showed that defensin-like peptides could be potential angiogenic modulators [189].
Recent research has shown that protease inhibitors, defensin-like proteins, and lipid transporter proteins isolated from leaf peppers (C. annuum L.) exhibit antimicrobial activity against the yeasts C. albicans, C. tropicalis, C. parapsilosis, and C. buinensis. Peptides have various effects on yeasts, such as growth inhibition and morphological and physiological changes. These studies suggest that these peptides have the potential to be antimicrobial agents [190]. In another study, AMPs identified and isolated from the leaves and roots of peppers (C. annuum L.) exhibited antifungal activity against filamentous fungi. Proteinase inhibitor peptides inhibited fungal growth in the species C. scovillei by causing cell membrane permeabilization, endogenous reactive oxygen species induction, and mitochondrial activity reduction [191].
In other studies, synergistic effects of the aqueous extract of bell pepper (C. annuum) and chitosan, which exhibit antibacterial activity, were identified. In that study, the combination of chitosan and bell pepper extract demonstrated antibacterial activity against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and S. typhimurium, causing significant damage to the bacterial membrane potential [192]. In addition, trypsin protease inhibitors were isolated from yellow bell pepper seeds (C. annuum L.) and showed potent antifungal activity against pathogenic fungi. These inhibitors exhibited low cytotoxic activity in human cells and strong antifungal activity in vitro against C. albicans and were able to inhibit α-1,4-glucosidase [193].
In conclusion, a diverse range of AMPs has been identified within the Solanaceae family, with an emphasis on the genus Capsicum. These peptides display significant biological activity against pathogens, demonstrating their therapeutic potential. Within the Capsicum genus, AMPs, such as LTPs, defensins, and protease inhibitors, which exhibit antifungal and antibacterial activities, have been characterized. The extensive range of AMPs present in the Solanaceae family provides insight into the development of medical and agricultural products, and ongoing research continues to unravel their potential applications.

4. Toxicity and Potential Applications of Plant AMPs

Although AMPs are interesting alternatives for drug development, few studies with this objective have advanced to the preclinical phase of animal testing. The physical and chemical instability of peptides, short half-life, proteolytic degradation and pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics of AMPs are the main obstacles to their clinical application [194,195]. More than 3000 AMPs have been identified, but few have advanced to the clinical testing phase. A few enzymatically synthesized antimicrobial peptides, such as gramicidins and polymyxins, are approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and most of them are used for topical use in bacterial and fungal skin infections [196,197]. Currently, a defensin derivative named Pezadeftide is the only example of plant AMP that is in the preclinical trial. This compound is being developed by Hexima Limited company for the treatment of nail mycosis with excellent clinical efficiency. Other AMPs are in the clinical testing phase but are not of plant origin. Brilacidin is a synthetic defensin derivative that is being developed for the treatment of oral mucositis in patients with head and neck cancer, and Plectasin is a defensin variant that is being developed for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-positive bacteria [198].
Toxicity to mammalian cells is the main bottleneck for the approval of bioactive peptides [199]. Finding a balance between AMP bioactivity and patient safety is the main challenge for drug development. However, AMPs of natural origin can serve as a framework for the development of drugs with reduced toxicity, maintaining or increasing their bioactivities. To achieve this goal, synthetic peptides can be designed to have greater selective toxicity by adjusting their amino acid composition and peptide chain structure, or AMPs can be conjugated with other molecules, such as biopolymers, magnetic nanoparticles, liposomes, and other compounds, for the creation of drug delivery systems. Furthermore, the emergence of pathogens and pests resistant to these peptides is rare, due to their target specificity (cell membranes) and their rapid action. From the amino acid sequence and structural information of naturally occurring AMPs, a new generation of short synthetic AMPs can be obtained using bioinformatics tools for therapeutic purposes, with better selectivity and biocidal activity. Various new strategies such as cyclization, hydrophobicity modifications, and the incorporation of non-natural amino acids have enormous potential to improve the stability of AMPs while maintaining or improving their selective toxicity [200].

5. Conclusions

Notably, in the last two decades, the number of studies involving plant AMPs has increased. In this scenario, AMPs isolated from plants of the genus Capsicum of the Solanaceae family exhibit mainly antifungal activities and enzymatic inhibition activities, and it is necessary to better investigate their potential for other biological activities. This review elucidates the potential for the production of bioactive compounds by plant AMPs, highlighting new knowledge about their bioactive properties. In addition, this study provides new perspectives for the study of plant AMP families and their potential in the treatment of infections caused by pathogens of medical and agricultural interest, because microorganisms are less likely to develop resistance to such compounds. Thus, the study of plant AMPs contributes to increasing food productivity and the development of new therapies to improve the population’s quality of life.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.S.d.O. and V.M.G.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S.S.d.O.; writing—review and editing, M.B.C., G.B.T., É.d.O.M. and A.d.O.C.; funding acquisition, V.M.G., G.B.T. and É.d.O.M.; supervision, V.M.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)—Finance Code 001. We acknowledge the financial support from the Brazilian agencies CNPq (307590/2021-6) FAPERJ (E-26/200567/2023; E-26/210.353/2022; E-26/200.127/2023).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This work was performed at the Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro (UENF).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Fry, D.E. Antimicrobial peptides. Surg. Infect. 2018, 19, 804–811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Luong, H.X.; Thanh, T.T.; Tran, T.H. Antimicrobial peptides—Advances in development of therapeutic applications. Life Sci. 2020, 260, 118407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Kumar, P.; Kizhakkedathu, J.N.; Straus, S.K. Antimicrobial peptides: Diversity, mechanism of action and strategies to improve the activity and biocompatibility in vivo. Biomolecules 2018, 8, 4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Balls, A.K.; Hale, W.S.; Harris, T.H. A crystalline protein obtained from a lipoprotein of wheat flour. Cereal Chem. 1942, 19, 279–288. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ohtani, S.; Okada, T.; Yoshizumi, H.; Kagamiyama, H. Complete primary structures of two subunits of purothionin A, a lethal protein for brewer’s yeast from wheat flour. J. Biochem. 1977, 82, 753–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Nawrot, R.; Barylski, J.; Nowicki, G.; Broniarczyk, J.; Buchwald, W.; Goździcka-Józefiak, A. Plant antimicrobial peptides. Folia Microbiol. 2014, 59, 181–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Stec, B. Plant thionins—The structural perspective. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2006, 63, 1370–1385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Zasloff, M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms: My perspective. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1117, 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Odintsova, T.I.; Slezina, M.P.; Istomina, E.A. Defensins of grasses: A systematic review. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 1029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Park, C.B.; Kim, H.S.; Kim, S.C. Mechanism of action of the antimicrobial peptide buforin II: Buforin II kills microorganisms by penetrating the cell membrane and inhibiting cellular functions. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1998, 244, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Slavokhotova, A.A.; Shelenkov, A.A.; Andreev, Y.A.; Odintsova, T.I. Hevein-Like Antimicrobial Peptides of Plants. Biochemistry 2017, 82, 1659–1674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Mwangi, J.; Hao, X.; Lai, R.; Zhang, Z.Y. Antimicrobial peptides: New hope in the war against multidrug resistance. Zool. Res. 2019, 40, 488–505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, J.; Dou, X.; Song, J.; Lyu, Y.; Zhu, X.; Xu, L.; Li, W.; Shan, A. Antimicrobial peptides: Promising alternatives in the post feeding antibiotic era. Med. Res. Rev. 2019, 39, 831–859. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Qin, Y.; Qin, Z.D.; Chen, J.; Cai, C.G.; Li, L. From antimicrobial to anticancer peptides: The transformation of peptides. Recent Pat. Anti-Canc. Drug Discov. 2019, 14, 70–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhong, G.; Cheng, J.; Liang, Z.C.; Xu, L.; Lou, W.; Bao, C.; Ong, Z.Y.; Dong, H.; Yang, Y.Y.; Fan, W. Short synthetic β-sheet antimicrobial peptides for the treatment of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa burn wound infections. Adv. Heal. Mater. 2017, 6, 1601134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bobone, S.; Stella, L. Selectivity of antimicrobial peptides: A complex interplay of multiple equilibria. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2019, 1117, 175–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Wang, G. Antimicrobial Peptides: Discovery, Design and Novel Therapeutic Strategies; Wang, G., Ed.; CABI Publishing: Wallingford, UK, 2010; 240p. [Google Scholar]
  18. Lima, P.G.; Oliveira, J.T.A.; Amaral, J.L.; Freitas, C.D.T.; Souza, P.F.N. Synthetic antimicrobial peptides: Characteristics, design, and potential as alternative molecules to overcome microbial resistance. Life Sci. 2021, 278, 119647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ma, Z.; Yang, J.; Han, J.; Gao, L.; Liu, H.; Lu, Z.; Zhao, H.; Bie, X. Insights into the antimicrobial activity and cytotoxicity of engineered α-helical peptide amphiphiles. J. Med. Chem. 2016, 59, 10946–10962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Mahlapuu, M.; Håkansson, J.; Ringstad, L.; Björn, C. Antimicrobial peptides: An emerging category of therapeutic agents. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 2016, 6, 194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Muttenthaler, M.; King, G.F.; Adams, D.J.; Alewood, P.F. Trends in peptide drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 309–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hirano, M.; Saito, C.; Yokoo, H.; Goto, C.; Kawano, R.; Misawa, T.; Demizu, Y. Development of antimicrobial stapled peptides based on magainin 2 sequence. Molecules 2021, 26, 444. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Manzo, G.; Hind, C.K.; Ferguson, P.M.; Amison, R.T.; Hodgson-Casson, A.C.; Ciazynska, K.A.; Weller, B.J.; Clarke, M.; Lam, C.; Man, R.C. A pleurocidin analogue with greater conformational flexibility, enhanced antimicrobial potency and in vivo therapeutic efficacy. Commun. Biol. 2020, 3, 697. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yang, Y.; Wu, D.; Wang, C.; Shan, A.; Bi, C.; Li, Y.; Gan, W. Hybridization with insect cecropin a (1–8) improve the stability and selectivity of naturally occurring peptides. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 1470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Mookherjee, N.; Anderson, M.A.; Haagsman, H.P.; Davidson, D.J. Antimicrobial host defence peptides: Functions and clinical potential. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2020, 19, 311–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mishra, A.K.; Choi, J.; Moon, E.; Baek, K.H. Tryptophan-rich and proline-rich antimicrobial peptides. Molecules 2018, 23, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nielsen, J.E.; Lind, T.K.; Lone, A.; Gerelli, Y.; Hansen, P.R.; Jenssen, H.; Cárdenas, M.; Lund, R. A biophysical study of the interactions between the antimicrobial peptide indolicidin and lipid model systems. Biochim. Biophys. Acta—Biomembr. 2019, 1861, 1355–1364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shruti, S.R.; Rajasekaran, R. Identification of therapeutic peptide scaffold from tritrpticin family for urinary tract infections using in silico techniques. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 38, 4407–4417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Boparai, J.K.; Sharma, P.K. Mini review on antimicrobial peptides, sources, mechanism and recent applications. Protein Pept. Lett. 2020, 27, 4–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, G.; Li, X.; Wang, Z. APD3: The antimicrobial peptide database as a tool for research and education. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016, 44, D1087–D1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sinha, R.; Shukla, P. Antimicrobial peptides: Recent insights on biotechnological interventions and future perspectives. Protein Pept. Lett. 2019, 26, 79–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vilas Boas, L.C.P.; Campos, M.L.; Berlanda, R.L.A.; de Carvalho Neves, N.; Franco, O.L. Antiviral peptides as promising therapeutic drugs. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2019, 76, 3525–3542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Cardillo, A.B.; Martínez Ceron, M.C.; Romero, S.M.; Cascone, O.; Camperi, S.A.; Giudicessi, S.L. Péptidos antimicrobianos de plantas. Rev. Farm. 2018, 160, 28–46. [Google Scholar]
  34. Santos-Silva, C.A.D.; Zupin, L.; Oliveira-Lima, M.; Vilela, L.M.B.; Bezerra-Neto, J.P.; Ferreira-Neto, J.R.; Oliveira-Silva, R.L.D.; Pires, C.D.J.; Aburjaile, F.F.; Oliveira, M.F.D. Plant antimicrobial peptides: State of the art, in silico prediction and perspectives in the omics Era. Bioinform. Biol. Insights 2020, 14, 1177932220952739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Iwai, T.; Kaku, H.; Honkura, R.; Nakamura, S.; Ochiai, H.; Sasaki, T.; Ohashi, Y. Enhanced resistance to seed-transmitted bacterial diseases in transgenic rice plants overproducing an oat cell-wall-bound thionin. Mol. Plant Microbe. Interact. 2002, 15, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Loeza-Angeles, H.; Sagrero-Cisneros, E.; Lara-Zárate, L.; Villagómez-Gómez, E.; López-Meza, J.E.; Ochoa-Zarzosa, A. Thionin Thi2.1 from Arabidopsis thaliana expressed in endothelial cells shows antibacterial, antifungal and cytotoxic activity. Biotechnol. Lett. 2008, 30, 1713–1719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Ochoa-Zarzosa, A.; Loeza-Angeles, H.; Sagrero-Cisneros, E.; Villagómez-Gómez, E.; Lara-Zárate, L.; López-Meza, J.E. Antibacterial activity of thionin Thi2.1 from Arabidopsis thaliana expressed by bovine endothelial cells against Staphylococcus aureus isolates from bovine mastitis. Vet. Microbiol. 2008, 127, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Muramoto, N.; Tanaka, T.; Shimamura, T.; Mitsukawa, N.; Hori, E.; Koda, K.; Otani, M.; Hirai, M.; Nakamura, K. Transgenic sweet potato expressing thionin from barley gives resistance to black rot disease caused by Ceratocystis fimbriata in leaves and storage roots. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31, 987–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Kul’ko, A.B.; Kisl, O.V.; Sadykova, V.S.; Mikhailov, V.F.; Vasilieva, I.M.; Shulenina, L.V.; Zasukhina, G.D.; Rogozhin, E.A. Investigation of thionins from black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) seeds showing cytotoxic, regulatory and antifungal activity. Antibiot. Khimioter. 2016, 61, 8–16. [Google Scholar]
  40. Melo, F.R.; Rigden, D.J.; Franco, O.L.; Mello, L.V.; Ary, M.B.; Grossi de Sá, M.F.; Bloch, C., Jr. Inhibition of trypsin by cowpea thionin: Characterization, molecular modeling, and docking. Proteins 2002, 48, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Tam, J.P.; Wang, S.; Wong, K.H.; Tan, W.L. Antimicrobial Peptides from Plants. Pharmaceuticals 2015, 8, 711–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Tawfik, E.; Hammad, I.; Bakry, A. Production of transgenic Allium cepa by nanoparticles to resist Aspergillus niger infection. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2022, 49, 1783–1790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Escudero-Martinez, C.M.; Morris, J.A.; Hedley, P.E.; Bos, J.I.B. Barley transcriptome analyses upon interaction with different aphid species identify thionins contributing to resistance. Plant Cell Environ. 2017, 40, 2628–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Vila-Perelló, M.; Sánchez-Vallet, A.; García-Olmedo, F.; Molina, A.; Andreu, D. Synthetic and structural studies on Pyrularia pubera thionin: A single-residue mutation enhances activity against Gram-negative bacteria. FEBS Lett. 2003, 536, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Osório e Castro, V.R.; Vernon, L.P. Stimulation of prothrombinase activity by the nonapeptide Thr-Trp-Ala-Arg-Asn-Ser-Tyr-Asn-Val, a segment of a plant thionin. Peptides 2003, 24, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Li, S.S.; Gullbo, J.; Lindholm, P.; Larsson, R.; Thunberg, E.; Samuelsson, G.; Bohlin, L.; Claeson, P. Ligatoxin B, a new cytotoxic protein with a novel helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain from the mistletoe Phoradendron liga. Biochem. J. 2002, 366 Pt 2, 405–413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Johansson, S.; Gullbo, J.; Lindholm, P.; Ek, B.; Thunberg, E.; Samuelsson, G.; Larsson, R.; Bohlin, L.; Claeson, P. Small, novel proteins from the mistletoe Phoradendron tomentosum exhibit highly selective cytotoxicity to human breast cancer cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2003, 60, 165–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Odintsova, T.I.; Vassilieva, I.M.; Korostyleva, T.V.; Utkina, L.L.; Slavokhotova, A.A.; Rogozhin, E.A.; Shiyan, A.N.; Pukhalskii, V.A.; Zasukhina, G.D. Antimutagenic activity of wheat β-purothionin Tk-AMP-BP. Russ. J. Genet. 2011, 47, 1128–1131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Hao, G.; Bakker, M.G.; Kim, H.S. Enhanced resistance to Fusarium graminearum in transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing a modified plant thionin. Phytopathology 2020, 110, 1056–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Barashkova, A.S.; Sadykova, V.S.; Salo, V.A.; Zavriev, S.K.; Rogozhin, E.A. Nigellothionins from black cumin (Nigella sativa L.) seeds demonstrate strong antifungal and cytotoxic activity. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fujimura, M.; Ideguchi, M.; Minami, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Tadera, K. Purification, characterization, and sequencing of novel antimicrobial peptides, Tu-AMP 1 and Tu-AMP 2, from bulbs of tulip (Tulipa gesneriana L.). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2004, 68, 571–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ji, H.; Gheysen, G.; Ullah, C.; Verbeek, R.; Shang, C.; De Vleesschauwer, D.; Höfte, M.; Kyndt, T. The role of thionins in rice defence against root pathogens. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2015, 16, 870–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Van den Bergh, K.P.B.; Van Damme, E.J.M.; Peumans, W.J.; Coosemans, J. Ee-CBP, a hevein-type antimicrobial peptide from bark of the spindle tree (Euonymus europaeus L.). Meded. Rijksuniv. Gent. Fak. Landbouwkd. Toegep. Biol. Wet. 2002, 67, 327–331. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  54. Huang, R.H.; Xiang, Y.; Liu, X.Z.; Zhang, Y.; Hu, Z.; Wang, D.C. Two novel antifungal peptides distinct with a five-disulfide motif from the bark of Eucommia ulmoides Oliv. FEBS Lett. 2002, 521, 87–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kanokwiroon, K.; Teanpaisan, R.; Wititsuwannakul, D.; Hooper, A.B.; Wititsuwannakul, R. Antimicrobial activity of a protein purified from the latex of Hevea brasiliensis on oral microorganisms. Mycoses 2008, 51, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Zhao, M.; Ma, Y.; Pan, Y.H.; Zhang, C.H.; Yuan, W.X. A hevein-like protein and a class I chitinase with antifungal activity from leaves of the paper mulberry. Biomed. Chromatogr. 2011, 25, 908–912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Rogozhin, E.A.; Slezina, M.P.; Slavokhotova, A.A.; Istomina, E.A.; Korostyleva, T.V.; Smirnov, A.N.; Grishin, E.V.; Egorov, T.A.; Odintsova, T.I. A novel antifungal peptide from leaves of the weed Stellaria media L. Biochimie 2015, 116, 125–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Koo, J.C.; Chun, H.J.; Park, H.C.; Kim, M.C.; Koo, Y.D.; Koo, S.C.; Ok, H.M.; Park, S.J.; Lee, S.H.; Yun, D.J.; et al. Over-expression of a seed specific hevein-like antimicrobial peptide from Pharbitis nil enhances resistance to a fungal pathogen in transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 2002, 50, 441–452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Kiba, A.; Saitoh, H.; Nishihara, M.; Omiya, K.; Yamamura, S. C-terminal domain of a hevein-like protein from Wasabia japonica has potent antimicrobial activity. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 296–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Koo, J.C.; Lee, S.Y.; Chun, H.J.; Cheong, Y.H.; Choi, J.S.; Kawabata, S.; Miyagi, M.; Tsunasawa, S.; Ha, K.S.; Bae, D.W.; et al. Two hevein homologs isolated from the seed of Pharbitis nil L. exhibit potent antifungal activity. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1998, 1382, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lee, O.S.; Lee, B.; Park, N.; Koo, J.C.; Kim, Y.H.; Prasad, D.T.; Karigar, C.; Chun, H.J.; Jeong, B.R.; Kim, D.H.; et al. Pn-AMPs, the hevein-like proteins from Pharbitis nil confers disease resistance against phytopathogenic fungi in tomato, Lycopersicum esculentum. Phytochemistry 2003, 62, 1073–1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Pujade-Renaud, V.; Sanier, C.; Cambillau, L.; Arokiaraj, P.; Jones, H.; Ruengsri, N.; Chrestin, H.; Montoro, P. Molecular characterization of new members of the Hevea brasiliensis hevein multigene family and analysis of their promoter region in rice. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2005, 1727, 151–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Shukurov, R.R.; Voblikova, V.D.; Nikonorova, A.K.; Komakhin, R.A.; Komakhina, V.V.; Egorov, T.A.; Grishin, E.V.; Odintsova, T.I. Transformation of tobacco and Arabidopsis plants with Stellaria media genes encoding novel hevein-like peptides increases their resistance to fungal pathogens. Transgenic Res. 2012, 21, 313–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Beliaev, D.V.; Yuorieva, N.O.; Tereshonok, D.V.; Tashlieva, I.I.; Derevyagina, M.K.; Meleshin, A.A.; Rogozhin, E.A.; Kozlov, S.A. High resistance of potato to early blight is achieved by expression of the Pro-SmAMP1 gene for hevein-like antimicrobial peptides from common chickweed (Stellaria media). Plants 2021, 10, 1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Dos Santos, I.S.; de Carvalho, A.O.; de Souza-Filho, G.A.; do Nascimento, V.V.; Machado, O.L.T.; Gomes, V.M. Purification of a defensin isolated from Vigna unguiculata seeds, its functional expression in Escherichia coli, and assessment of its insect alpha-amylase inhibitory activity. Protein Expr. Purif. 2010, 71, 8–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Pelegrini, P.B.; Lay, F.T.; Murad, A.M.; Anderson, M.A.; Franco, O.L. Novel insights on the mechanism of action of alpha-amylase inhibitors from the plant defensin family. Proteins 2008, 73, 719–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Games, P.D.; dos Santos, I.S.; Mello, E.O.; Diz, M.S.S.; Carvalho, A.O.; de Souza-Filho, G.A.; Da Cunha, M.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Ferreira, B.D.S.; Gomes, V.M. Isolation, characterization and cloning of a cDNA encoding a new antifungal defensin from Phaseolus vulgaris L. seeds. Peptides 2008, 29, 2090–2100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Song, X.; Wang, J.; Wu, F.; Li, X.; Teng, M.; Gong, W. cDNA cloning, functional expression and antifungal activities of a dimeric plant defensin SPE10 from Pachyrrhizus erosus seeds. Plant Mol. Biol. 2005, 57, 13–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Shiau, Y.S.; Horng, S.B.; Chen, C.S.; Huang, P.T.; Lin, C.; Hsueh, Y.C.; Lou, K.L. Structural analysis of the unique insecticidal activity of novel mungbean defensin VrD1 reveals possibility of homoplasy evolution between plant defensins and scorpion neurotoxins. J. Mol. Recognit. 2006, 19, 441–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Cabral, K.M.S.; Almeida, M.S.; Valente, A.P.; Almeida, F.C.L.; Kurtenbach, E. Production of the active antifungal Pisum sativum defensin 1 (Psd1) in Pichia pastoris: Overcoming the inefficiency of the STE13 protease. Protein Expr. Purif. 2003, 31, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Olli, S.; Kirti, P.B. Cloning, characterization and antifungal activity of defensin Tfgd1 from Trigonella foenum-graecum L. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2006, 39, 278–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Abdallah, N.A.; Shah, D.; Abbas, D.; Madkour, M. Stable integration and expression of a plant defensin in tomato confers resistance to fusarium wilt. GM Crops 2010, 1, 344–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Gaspar, Y.M.; McKenna, J.A.; McGinness, B.S.; Hinch, J.; Poon, S.; Connelly, A.A.; Anderson, M.A.; Heath, R.L. Field resistance to Fusarium oxysporum and Verticillium dahliae in transgenic cotton expressing the plant defensin NaD1. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 1541–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Sagaram, U.S.; Pandurangi, R.; Kaur, J.; Smith, T.J.; Shah, D.M. Structure-activity determinants in antifungal plant defensins MsDef1and MtDef4 with different modes of action against Fusarium graminearum. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e18550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Kader, J.C. Proteins and the intracellular exchange of lipids. I. Stimulation of phospholipid exchange between mitochondria and microsomal fractions by proteins isolated from potato tuber. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1975, 380, 31–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Hanada, K. Lipid transfer proteins rectify inter-organelle flux and accurately deliver lipids at membrane contact sites. J. Lipid Res. 2018, 59, 1341–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Wong, L.H.; Čopič, A.; Levine, T.P. Advances on the transfer of lipids by lipid transfer proteins. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2017, 42, 516–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. de Oliveira Carvalho, A.; Gomes, V.M. Role of plant lipid transfer proteins in plant cell physiology—A concise review. Peptides 2007, 28, 1144–1153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kjellberg, M.A.; Backman, A.P.E.; Möuts, A.; Mattjus, P. Purification and validation of lipid transfer proteins. Methods Mol. Biol. 2017, 1609, 231–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Bard, G.C.V.; Zottich, U.; Souza, T.A.M.; Ribeiro, S.F.F.; Dias, G.B.; Pireda, S.; Da Cunha, M.; Rodrigues, R.; Pereira, L.S.; Machado, O.L.T.; et al. Purification, biochemical characterization, and antimicrobial activity of a new lipid transfer protein from Coffea canephora seeds. Genet. Mol. Res. 2016, 15, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Maximiano, M.R.; Franco, O.L. Biotechnological applications of versatile plant lipid transfer proteins (LTPs). Peptides 2021, 140, 170531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Jung, H.O.W.; Kim, W.; Hwang, B.K. Three pathogen-inducible genes encoding lipid transfer protein from pepper are differentially activated by pathogens, abiotic, and environmental stresses. Plant Cell. Environ. 2003, 26, 915–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Park, C.J.; Shin, R.; Park, J.M.; Lee, G.J.; You, J.S.; Paek, K.H. Induction of pepper cDNA encoding a lipid transfer protein during the resistance response to tobacco mosaic virus. Plant Mol. Biol. 2002, 48, 243–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ge, X.; Chen, J.; Li, N.; Lin, Y.; Sun, C.; Cao, K. Resistance function of rice lipid transfer protein LTP110. J. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2003, 36, 603–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  85. Wang, S.Y.; Wu, J.H.; Ng, T.B.; Ye, X.Y.; Rao, P.F. A non-specific lipid transfer protein with antifungal and antibacterial activities from the mung bean. Peptides 2004, 25, 1235–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Wang, C.; Gao, H.; Chu, Z.; Ji, C.; Xu, Y.; Cao, W.; Zhou, S.; Song, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhu, C. A nonspecific lipid transfer protein, StLTP10, mediates resistance to Phytophthora infestans in potato. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2021, 22, 48–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Yang, X.; Li, J.; Li, X.; She, R.; Pei, Y. Isolation and characterization of a novel thermostable non-specific lipid transfer protein-like antimicrobial protein from motherwort (Leonurus japonicus Houtt) seeds. Peptides 2006, 27, 3122–3128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lin, P.; Xia, L.; Ng, T.B. First isolation of an antifungal lipid transfer peptide from seeds of a Brassica species. Peptides 2007, 28, 1514–1519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Gonorazky, A.G.; Regente, M.C.; de la Canal, L. Stress induction and antimicrobial properties of a lipid transfer protein in germinating sunflower seeds. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162, 618–624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ooi, L.S.M.; Tian, L.; Su, M.; Ho, W.-S.; Sun, S.S.M.; Chung, H.Y.; Wong, H.N.C.; Ooi, V.E.C. Isolation, characterization, molecular cloning and modeling of a new lipid transfer protein with antiviral and antiproliferative activities from Narcissus tazetta. Peptides 2008, 29, 2101–2109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Oshchepkova, Y.I.; Veshkurova, O.N.; Rogozhin, E.A.; Musolyamov, A.K.; Smirnov, A.N.; Odintsova, T.I.; Egorov, T.A.; Grishin, E.V.; Salikhov, S.I. Isolation of the lipid-transporting protein Ns-LTP1 from seeds of the garden fennel flower (Nigella sativa). Russ. J. Bioorg. Chem. 2009, 35, 315–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zottich, U.; Da Cunha, M.; Carvalho, A.O.; Dias, G.B.; Silva, N.C.M.; Santos, I.S.; Nascimento, V.V.; Miguel, E.C.; Machado, O.L.T.; Gomes, V.M. Purification, biochemical characterization and antifungal activity of a new lipid transfer protein (LTP) from Coffea canephora seeds with α-amylase inhibitor properties. Biochim. Biophys. Acta—Gen. Subjects 2011, 1810, 375–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. McLaughlin, J.E.; Darwish, N.I.; Garcia-Sanchez, J.; Tyagi, N.; Trick, H.N.; McCormick, S.; Dill-Macky, R.; Tumer, N.E. A lipid transfer protein has antifungal and antioxidant activity and suppresses Fusarium head blight disease and DON accumulation in transgenic wheat. Phytopathology 2021, 111, 671–683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Kirubakaran, S.I.; Begum, S.M.; Ulaganathan, K.; Sakthivel, N. Characterization of a new antifungal lipid transfer protein from wheat. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2008, 46, 918–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Melnikova, D.N.; Mineev, K.S.; Finkina, E.I.; Arseniev, A.S.; Ovchinnikova, T.V. A novel lipid transfer protein from the dill Anethum graveolens L.: Isolation, structure, heterologous expression, and functional characteristics. J. Pept. Sci. 2016, 22, 59–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Roy-Barman, S.; Sautter, C.; Chattoo, B.B. Expression of the lipid transfer protein Ace-AMP1 in transgenic wheat enhances antifungal activity and defense responses. Transgenic Res. 2006, 15, 435–446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Zhao, J.; Bi, W.; Zhao, S.; Su, J.; Li, M.; Ma, L.; Yu, X.; Wang, X. Wheat Apoplast-Localized Lipid Transfer Protein TaLTP3 Enhances Defense Responses Against Puccinia triticina. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 771806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Goransson, U.; Svangard, E.; Claeson, P.; Bohlin, L. Novel strategies for isolation and characterization of cyclotides: The discovery of bioactive macrocyclic plant polypeptides in the Violaceae. Curr. Protein Pept. Sci. 2004, 5, 317–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Lindholm, P.; Göransson, U.; Johansson, S.; Claeson, P.; Gullbo, J.; Larsson, R.; Bohlin, L.; Backlund, A. Cyclotides: A novel type of cytotoxic agents. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2002, 1, 365–369. [Google Scholar]
  100. Du, Q.; Huang, Y.H.; Bajpai, A.; Frosig-Jorgensen, M.; Zhao, G.; Craik, D.J. Evaluation of the in vivo aphrodisiac activity of a cyclotide extract from Hybanthus enneaspermus. J. Nat. Prod. 2020, 83, 3736–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Du, Q.; Chan, L.Y.; Gilding, E.K.; Henriques, S.T.; Condon, N.D.; Ravipati, A.S.; Kaas, Q.; Huang, Y.-H.; Craik, D.J. Discovery and mechanistic studies of cytotoxic cyclotides from the medicinal herb Hybanthus enneaspermus. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 10911–10925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Niyomploy, P.; Chan, L.Y.; Harvey, P.J.; Poth, A.G.; Colgrave, M.L.; Craik, D.J. Discovery and characterization of cyclotides from Rinorea species. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 2512–2520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Pinto, M.E.F.; Najas, J.Z.G.; Magalhães, L.G.; Bobey, A.F.; Mendonça, J.N.; Lopes, N.P.; Leme, F.M.; Teixeira, S.P.; Trovó, M.; Andricopulo, A.D.; et al. Inhibition of breast cancer cell migration by cyclotides isolated from Pombalia calceolaria. J. Nat. Prod. 2018, 81, 1203–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Conzelmann, C.; Muratspahić, E.; Tomašević, N.; Münch, J.; Gruber, C.W. In vitro inhibition of HIV-1 by cyclotide-enriched extracts of Viola tricolor. Front. Pharmacol. 2022, 13, 888961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Chen, B.; Colgrave, M.L.; Daly, N.L.; Rosengren, K.J.; Gustafson, K.R.; Craik, D.J. Isolation and characterization of novel cyclotides from Viola hederaceae: Solution structure and anti-HIV activity of vhl-1, a leaf-specific expressed cyclotide. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 22395–22405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Wang, C.K.L.; Colgrave, M.L.; Gustafson, K.R.; Ireland, D.C.; Goransson, U.; Craik, D.J. Anti-HIV cyclotides from the Chinese medicinal herb Viola yedoensis. J. Nat. Prod. 2008, 71, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Dayani, L.; Dinani, M.S.; Aliomrani, M.; Hashempour, H.; Varshosaz, J.; Taheri, A. Immunomodulatory effects of cyclotides isolated from Viola odorata in an experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis animal model of multiple sclerosis. Mult. Scler. Relat. Disord. 2022, 64, 103958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Nworu, C.S.; Ejikeme, T.I.; Ezike, A.C.; Ndu, O.; Akunne, T.C.; Onyeto, C.A.; Okpalanduka, P.; Akah, P.A. Anti-plasmodial and anti-inflammatory activities of cyclotide-rich extract and fraction of Oldenlandia affinis (R. & S.) DC (Rubiaceae). Afr. Health Sci. 2017, 17, 827–843. [Google Scholar]
  109. Gattringer, J.; Ndogo, O.E.; Retzl, B.; Ebermann, C.; Gruber, C.W.; Hellinger, R. Cyclotides Isolated from Violet Plants of Cameroon Are Inhibitors of Human Prolyl Oligopeptidase. Front. Pharmacol. 2021, 12, 707596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Álvarez, C.A.; Barriga, A.; Albericio, F.; Romero, M.S.; Guzmán, F. Identification of Peptides in flowers of Sambucus nigra with antimicrobial activity against aquaculture pathogens. Molecules 2018, 23, 1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Strömstedt, A.A.; Park, S.; Burman, R.; Göransson, U. Bactericidal activity of cyclotides where phosphatidylethanolamine-lipid selectivity determines antimicrobial spectra. Biochim. Biophys. Acta—Biomembr. 2017, 1859, 1986–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Zarrabi, M.; Dalirfardouei, R.; Sepehrizade, Z.; Kermanshahi, R.K. Comparison of the antimicrobial effects of semipurified cyclotides from Iranian Viola odorata against some of plant and human pathogenic bacteria. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2013, 115, 367–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Rajendran, S.; Slazak, B.; Mohotti, S.; Muhammad, T.; Strömstedt, A.A.; Kapusta, M.; Wilmowicz, E.; Göransson, U.; Hettiarachchi, C.M.; Gunasekera, S. Screening for cyclotides in sri lankan medicinal plants: Discovery, characterization, and bioactivity screening of cyclotides from Geophila repens. J. Nat. Prod. 2023, 86, 52–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  114. Jennings, C.; West, J.; Waine, C.; Craik, D.; Anderson, M. Biosynthesis and insecticidal properties of plant cyclotides: The cyclic knotted proteins from Oldenlandia affinis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 10614–10619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Jennings, C.V.; Rosengren, K.J.; Daly, N.L.; Plan, M.; Stevens, J.; Scanlon, M.J.; Waine, C.; Norman, D.G.; Anderson, M.A.; Craik, D.J. Isolation, solution structure, and insecticidal activity of kalata B2, a circular protein with a twist: Do Möbius strips exist in nature? Biochemistry 2005, 44, 851–860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Bajpai, A.; Jackson, M.A.; Huang, Y.H.; Yap, K.; Du, Q.; Chau, T.C.Y.; Craik, D.J.; Gilding, E.K. Nematicidal activity of cyclotides: Toxicity against Caenorhabditis elegans. J. Nat. Prod. 2023, 86, 1222–1229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Almaghrabi, B.; Ali, M.A.; Zahoor, A.; Shah, K.H.; Bohlmann, H. Arabidopsis thionin-like genes are involved in resistance against the beet-cyst nematode (Heterodera schachtii). Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 140, 55–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Colilla, F.J.; Rocher, A.; Mendez, E. γ-Purothionins: Amino acid sequence of two polypeptides of a new family of thionins from wheat endosperm. FEBS Lett. 1990, 270, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Yamuna, S.; Kumar, V.; Subramaniam, D.; Kumaravel, K. Antimicrobial peptides from plants and their mode of action. Am. Int. J. Res. Sci. Technol. Eng. Math. 2019, 105, 265–269. [Google Scholar]
  120. Höng, K.; Austerlitz, T.; Bohlmann, T.; Bohlmann, H. The thionin family of antimicrobial peptides. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0254549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Charity, J.A.; Hughes, P.; Anderson, M.A.; Bittisnich, D.J.; Whitecross, M.; Higgins, T.J.V. Pest and disease protection conferred by expression of barley β-hordothionin and Nicotiana alata proteinase inhibitor genes in transgenic tobacco. Funct. Plant Biol. 2005, 32, 35–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Chan, Y.L.; Prasad, V.; Sanjaya; Chen, K.H.; Liu, P.C.; Chan, M.T.; Cheng, C.P. Transgenic tomato plants expressing an Arabidopsis thionin (Thi2.1) driven by fruit-inactive promoter battle against phytopathogenic attack. Planta 2005, 221, 386–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Taveira, G.B.; Carvalho, A.O.; Rodrigues, R.; Trindade, F.G.; Da Cunha, M.; Gomes, V.M. Thionin-like peptide from Capsicum annuum fruits: Mechanism of action and synergism with fluconazole against Candida species. BMC Microbiol. 2016, 16, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Oard, S.V.; Enright, F.M. Expression of the antimicrobial peptides in plants to control phytopathogenic bacteria and fungi. Plant Cell Rep. 2006, 25, 561–572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Lima, A.M.; Azevedo, M.I.G.; Sousa, L.M.; Oliveira, N.S.; Andrade, C.R.; Freitas, C.D.T.; Souza, P.F. Plant antimicrobial peptides: An overview about classification, toxicity and clinical applications. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2022, 214, 10–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Wong, K.H.; Tan, W.L.; Kini, S.G.; Xiao, T.; Serra, A.; Sze, S.K.; Tam, J.P. Vaccatides: Antifungal Glutamine-Rich Hevein-Like Peptides from Vaccaria hispanica. Front. Plant. Sci. 2017, 8, 1100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Sousa, A.M.P.; Salles, H.O.; de Oliveira, H.D.; de Souza, B.B.P.; de Lima Cardozo Filho, J.; Sifuentes, D.N.; Prates, M.V.; Junior, C.B.; Bemquerer, M.P.; do Egito, A.S. Mo-HLPs: New flocculating agents identified from Moringa oleifera seeds belong to the hevein-like peptide family. J. Proteom. 2020, 217, 103692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Petrova, N.; Mokshina, N. Using FIBexDB for In-Depth analysis of flax lectin gene expression in response to Fusarium oxysporum infection. Plants 2022, 11, 163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Lay, F.T.; Poon, S.; McKenna, J.A.; Connelly, A.A.; Barbeta, B.L.; McGinness, B.S.; Fox, J.L.; Daly, N.L.; Craik, D.J.; Heath, R.L.; et al. The C-terminal propeptide of a plant defensin confers cytoprotective and subcellular targeting functions. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Shafee, T.M.A.; Lay, F.T.; Phan, T.K.; Anderson, M.A.; Hulett, M.D. Convergent evolution of defensin sequence, structure and function. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2017, 74, 663–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Aguieiras, M.C.L.; Resende, L.M.; Souza, T.A.M.; Nagano, C.S.; Chaves, R.P.; Taveira, G.B.; Carvalho, A.O.; Rodrigues, R.; Gomes, V.M.; Mello, E.O. Potent Anti-Candida fraction isolated from Capsicum chinense Fruits contains an antimicrobial peptide that is similar to plant defensin and is able to inhibit the activity of different α-amylase enzymes. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2021, 13, 862–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Resende, L.M.; de Oliveira Mello, É.; de Lima Aguieiras, M.C.; Nagano, C.S.; Chaves, R.P.; Taveira, G.B.; da Silva, M.S.; de Oliveira Carvalho, A.; Gomes, V.M. Inhibition of serine protease, α-amylase and growth of phytopathogenic fungi by antimicrobial peptides from Capsicum chinense fruits. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2021, 15, 502–515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Campos, M.L.; Lião, L.M.; Alves, E.S.F.; Migliolo, L.; Dias, S.C.; Franco, O.L. A structural perspective of plant antimicrobial peptides. Biochem. J. 2018, 475, 3359–3375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Kovaleva, V.; Bukhteeva, I.; Kit, O.Y.; Nesmelova, I.V. Plant defensins from a structural perspective. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Skalska, J.; Andrade, V.M.; Cena, G.L.; Harvey, P.J.; Gaspar, D.; Mello, É.O.; Henriques, S.T.; Valle, J.; Gomes, V.M.; Conceição, K.; et al. Synthesis, structure, and activity of the antifungal plant defensin PvD1. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 63, 9391–9402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Skalska, J.; Oliveira, F.D.; Figueira, T.N.; Mello, É.O.; Gomes, V.M.; McNaughton-Smith, G.; Castanho, M.A.R.B.; Gaspar, D. Plant defensin PvD1 modulates the membrane composition of breast tumour-derived exosomes. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 23366–23381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Ishaq, N.; Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H.M.N. Medicinal potentialities of plant defensins: A review with applied perspectives. Medicines 2019, 6, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Jiménez-Alcántar, P.; López-Gómez, R.; López-Meza, J.E.; Ochoa-Zarzosa, A. PaDef (Persea americana var. Drymifolia), a plant antimicrobial peptide, triggers apoptosis, and induces global epigenetic modifications on histone 3 in an acute lymphoid leukemia cell line. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2022, 9, 801816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Thevissen, K.; François, I.E.J.A.; Takemoto, J.Y.; Ferket, K.K.A.; Meert, E.M.K.; Cammue, B.P.A. DmAMP1, an antifungal plant defensin from dahlia (Dahlia merckii), interacts with sphingolipids from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2003, 226, 169–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Turrini, A.; Sbrana, C.; Pitto, L.; Ruffini Castiglione, M.; Giorgetti, L.; Briganti, R.; Bracci, T.; Evangelista, M.; Nuti, M.P.; Giovannetti, M. The antifungal Dm-AMP1 protein from Dahlia merckii expressed in Solanum melongena is released in root exudates and differentially affects pathogenic fungi and mycorrhizal symbiosis. New Phytol. 2004, 163, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sathoff, A.E.; Velivelli, S.; Shah, D.M.; Samac, D.A. Plant defensin peptides have antifungal and antibacterial activity against human and plant pathogens. Phytopathology 2019, 109, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Lay, F.T.; Brugliera, F.; Anderson, M.A. Isolation and properties of floral defensins from ornamental tobacco and petunia. Plant Physiol. 2003, 131, 1283–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Van Der Weerden, N.L.; Lay, F.T.; Anderson, M.A. The plant defensin, NaD1, enters the cytoplasm of Fusarium oxysporum hyphae. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283, 14445–14452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Fujimura, M.; Minami, Y.; Watanabe, K.; Tadera, K. Purification, characterization, and sequencing of a novel type of antimicrobial peptides, Fa-AMP1 and Fa-AMP2, from seeds of buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench.). Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2003, 67, 1636–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Spelbrink, R.G.; Dilmac, N.; Allen, A.; Smith, T.J.; Shah, D.M.; Hockerman, G.H. Differential antifungal and calcium channel-blocking activity among structurally related plant defensins. Plant Physiol. 2004, 135, 2055–2067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Chen, G.H.; Hsu, M.P.; Tan, C.H.; Sung, H.Y.; Kuo, C.G.; Fan, M.J.; Chen, H.M.; Chen, S.; Chen, C.S. Cloning and characterization of a plant defensin VaD1 from azuki bean. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 982–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Wong, J.H.; Ng, T.B. Limenin, a defensin-like peptide with multiple exploitable activities from shelf beans. J. Pept. Sci. 2006, 12, 341–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  148. Thevissen, K.; Warnecke, D.C.; François, I.E.J.A.; Leipelt, M.; Heinz, E.; Ott, C.; Zähringer, U.; Thomma, B.P.H.J.; Ferket, K.K.A.; Cammue, B.P.A. Defensins from insects and plants interact with fungal glucosylceramides. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 3900–3905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Aerts, A.M.; François, I.E.J.A.; Meert, E.M.K.; Li, Q.T.; Cammue, B.P.A.; Thevissen, K. The antifungal activity of RsAFP2, a plant defensin from Raphanus sativus, involves the induction of reactive oxygen species in Candida albicans. J. Mol. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2007, 13, 243–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Thevissen, K.; de Mello Tavares, P.; Xu, D.; Blankenship, J.; Vandenbosch, D.; Idkowiak-Baldys, J.; Govaert, G.; Bink, A.; Rozental, S.; de Groot, P.W.J.; et al. The plant defensin RsAFP2 induces cell wall stress, septin mislocalization and accumulation of ceramides in Candida albicans. Mol. Microbiol. 2012, 84, 166–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Vriens, K.; Cools, T.L.; Harvey, P.J.; Craik, D.J.; Braem, A.; Vleugels, J.; De Coninck, B.; Cammue, B.P.A.; Thevissen, K. The radish defensins RsAFP1 and RsAFP2 act synergistically with caspofungin against Candida albicans biofilms. Peptides 2016, 75, 71–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Park, H.C.; Kang, Y.H.; Chun, H.J.; Koo, J.C.; Cheong, Y.H.; Kim, C.Y.; Kim, M.C.; Chung, W.S.; Kim, J.C.; Yoo, J.H.; et al. Characterization of a stamen-specific cDNA encoding a novel plant defensin in Chinese cabbage. Plant Mol. Biol. 2002, 50, 59–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Kanzaki, H.; Nirasawa, S.; Saitoh, H.; Ito, M.; Nishihara, M.; Terauchi, R.; Nakamura, I. Overexpression of the wasabi defensin gene confers enhanced resistance to blast fungus (Magnaporthe grisea) in transgenic rice. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2002, 105, 809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  154. Koike, M.; Okamoto, T.; Tsuda, S.; Imai, R. A novel plant defensin-like gene of winter wheat is specifically induced during cold acclimation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2002, 298, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Chen, J.J.; Chen, G.H.; Hsu, H.C.; Li, S.S.; Chen, C.S. Cloning and functional expression of a mungbean defensin VrD1 in Pichia pastoris. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 2256–2261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. da Silva Gebara, R.; Taveira, G.B.; de Azevedo dos Santos, L.; Calixto, S.D.; Simão, T.L.B.V.; Lassounskaia, E.; Muzitano, M.F.; Ferreira, A.T.; Perales, J.; Rodrigues, R.; et al. Identification and characterization of two defensins from Capsicum annuum fruits that exhibit antimicrobial activity. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2020, 12, 1253–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  157. Taveira, G.B.; Mello, É.O.; Carvalho, A.O.; Regente, M.; Pinedo, M.; de La Canal, L.; Rodrigues, R.; Gomes, V.M. Antimicrobial activity and mechanism of action of a thionin-like peptide from Capsicum annuum fruits and combinatorial treatment with fluconazole against Fusarium solani. Biopolymers 2017, 108, e23008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Taveira, G.B.; Mello, É.O.; Souza, S.B.; Monteiro, R.M.; Ramos, A.C.; Carvalho, A.O.; Rodrigues, R.; Okorokov, L.A.; Gomes, V.M. Programmed cell death in yeast by thionin-like peptide from Capsicum annuum fruits involving activation of caspases and extracellular H+ flux. Biosci. Rep. 2018, 38, BSR20180119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Aerts, A.M.; Carmona-Gutierrez, D.; Lefevre, S.; Govaert, G.; François, I.E.J.A.; Madeo, F.; Santos, R.; Cammue, B.P.A.; Thevissen, K. The antifungal plant defensin RsAFP2 from radish induces apoptosis in a metacaspase independent way in Candida albicans. FEBS Lett. 2009, 583, 2513–2516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Chen, K.C.; Lin, C.Y.; Kuan, C.C.; Sung, H.Y.; Chen, C.S. A novel defensin encoded by a mungbean cDNA exhibits insecticidal activity against bruchid. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 7258–7263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  161. de Veer, S.J.; Kan, M.W.; Craik, D.J. Cyclotides: From Structure to Function. Chem. Rev. 2019, 119, 12375–12421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  162. Weidmann, J.; Craik, D.J. Discovery, structure, function, and applications of cyclotides: Circular proteins from plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 4801–4812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Grain, L. Isolation of oxytocic peptides from Oldenlandia affinis by solvent extraction of tetraphenylborate complexes and chromatography on sephadex LH-20. Lloydia 1973, 36, 207–208. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  164. Slazak, B.; Haugmo, T.; Badyra, B.; Göransson, U. The life cycle of cyclotides: Biosynthesis and turnover in plant cells. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 1359–1367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Cao, P.; Yang, Y.; Uche, F.I.; Hart, S.R.; Li, W.W.; Yuan, C. Coupling Plant-Derived Cyclotides to Metal Surfaces: An Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Study. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. Huang, Y.H.; Du, Q.; Craik, D.J. Cyclotides: Disulfide-rich peptide toxins in plants. Toxicon 2019, 172, 33–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Oguis, G.K.; Gilding, E.K.; Jackson, M.A.; Craik, D.J. Butterfly Pea (Clitoria ternatea), a Cyclotide-Bearing Plant With Applications in Agriculture and Medicine. Front. Plant Sci. 2019, 10, 645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Qu, H.; Smithies, B.J.; Durek, T.; Craik, D.J. Synthesis and Protein Engineering Applications of Cyclotides. Aust. J. Chem. 2016, 70, 152–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Troeira Henriques, S.; Craik, D.J. Cyclotide Structure and Function: The Role of Membrane Binding and Permeation. Biochemistry 2017, 56, 669–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  170. Rizwan, Z.; Aslam, N.; Zafar, F.; Humma, R.; Jamil, A. Isolation of novel Cyclotide encoding genes from some Solanaceae species and evolutionary link to other families. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 2021, 58, 169–177. [Google Scholar]
  171. Mammari, N.; Krier, Y.; Albert, Q.; Devocelle, M.; Varbanov, M.; on behalf of the OEMONOM. Plant-derived antimicrobial peptides as potential antiviral agents in systemic viral infections. Pharmaceuticals 2021, 14, 774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Afroz, M.; Akter, S.; Ahmed, A.; Rouf, R.; Shilpi, J.A.; Tiralongo, E.; Hossain, M.A.; Jahan, R.; Rahmatullah, M. Ethnobotany and antimicrobial peptides from plants of the Solanaceae family: An update and future prospects. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Bártová, V.; Bárta, J.; Jarošová, M. Antifungal and antimicrobial proteins and peptides of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers and their applications. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2019, 103, 5533–5547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Almasia, N.I.; Nahirñak, V.; Hopp, H.E.; Vazquez-Rovere, C. Potato Snakin-1: An antimicrobial player of the trade-off between host defense and development. Plant Cell Rep. 2020, 39, 839–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Slezina, M.P.; Istomina, E.A.; Kulakovskaya, E.V.; Abashina, T.N.; Odintsova, T.I. Synthetic oligopeptides mimicking γ-core regions of cysteine-rich peptides of Solanum lycopersicum possess antimicrobial activity against human and plant pathogens. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2021, 43, 1226–1242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Maracahipes, Á.C.; Taveira, G.B.; Mello, E.O.; Carvalho, A.O.; Rodrigues, R.; Perales, J.; Teixeira-Ferreira, A.; Silva, M.S.; Rocha, G.L.; Fernandes, K.V.S.; et al. Biochemical analysis of antimicrobial peptides in two different Capsicum genotypes after fruit infection by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Biosci. Rep. 2019, 39, BSR20181889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Cruz, L.P.; Ribeiro, S.F.F.; Carvalho, A.O.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Rodrigues, R.; Da Cunha, M.; Gomes, V.M. Isolation and partial characterization of a novel lipid transfer protein (LTP) and antifungal activity of peptides from chilli pepper seeds. Protein Pept. Lett. 2010, 17, 311–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Diz, M.S.S.; Carvalho, A.O.; Rodrigues, R.; Neves-Ferreira, A.G.C.; Da Cunha, M.; Alves, E.W.; Okorokova-Façanha, A.L.; Oliveira, M.A.; Perales, J.; Machado, O.L.T.; et al. Antimicrobial peptides from chilli pepper seeds causes yeast plasma membrane permeabilization and inhibits the acidification of the medium by yeast cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta—Gen. Subjects 2006, 1760, 1323–1332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. de Azevedo Dos Santos, L.; Taveira, G.B.; da Silva, M.S.; da Silva Gebara, R.; da Silva Pereira, L.; Perales, J.; Teixeira-Ferreira, A.; Mello, E.O.; Carvalho, A.O.; Rodrigues, R.; et al. Antimicrobial peptides from Capsicum chinense fruits: Agronomic alternatives against phytopathogenic fungi. Biosci. Rep. 2020, 40, BSR20200950. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Ribeiro, M.C.; Gebara, R.S.; Taveira, G.B.; Carvalho, A.d.O.; Rodrigues, R.; Mello, E.O.; Nagano, C.S.; Chaves, R.P.; Gomes, V.M. Anti-Candida potential of peptides from immature and ripe fruits of Capsicum chinense Jacq. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2022, 15, 1124–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  181. Pereira, L.D.S.; Souza, T.A.M.; Walter, R.; Sudré, C.P.; Dos Santos, L.D.A.; Maracahipes, Á.C.; Taveira, G.B.; Carvalho, V.S.; Nagano, C.S.; Chaves, R.P.; et al. Identification of enzyme inhibitors and antimicrobial activities from Capsicum annuum L. protein extracts against Colletotrichum scovillei. Hortic. Environ. Biotechnol. 2021, 62, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Ribeiro, S.F.F.; Carvalho, A.O.; Da Cunha, M.; Rodrigues, R.; Cruz, L.P.; Melo, V.M.M.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Melo, E.J.T.; Gomes, V.M. Isolation and characterization of novel peptides from chilli pepper seeds: Antimicrobial activities against pathogenic yeasts. Toxicon 2007, 50, 600–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. da Silva, M.S.; Gomes, V.M.; Taveira, G.B.; de Azevedo dos Santos, L.; Maracahipes, Á.C.; Rodrigues, R.; de Oliveira Carvalho, A.; Fernandes, K.V.S.; Oliveira, A.E.A. Bifunctional inhibitors from Capsicum chinense seeds with antimicrobial activity and specific mechanism of action against phytopathogenic fungi. Protein Pept. Lett. 2021, 28, 149–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. da Silva, M.S.; de Azevedo dos Santos, L.; Taveira, G.B.; Nagano, C.S.; Chaves, R.P.; de Oliveira Carvalho, A.; Rodrigues, R.; Gomes, V.M. Trypsin/α-amylase inhibitors from Capsicum chinense seeds: Characterization and antifungal activity against fungi of agronomic importance. Protein Pept. Lett. 2023, 30, 260–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  185. Vieira Bard, G.C.; Nascimento, V.V.; Oliveira, A.E.A.; Rodrigues, R.; Da Cunha, M.; Dias, G.B.; Vasconcelos, I.M.; Carvalho, A.O.; Gomes, V.M. Vicilin-like peptides from Capsicum baccatum L. seeds are α-amylase inhibitors and exhibit antifungal activity against important yeasts in medical mycology. Biopolymers 2014, 102, 335–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  186. Vieira Bard, G.C.; Nascimento, V.V.; Ribeiro, S.F.F.; Rodrigues, R.; Perales, J.; Teixeira-Ferreira, A.; Carvalho, A.O.; Fernandes, K.V.S.; Gomes, V.M. Characterization of peptides from Capsicum annuum hybrid seeds with inhibitory activity against α-amylase, serine proteinases and fungi. Protein J. 2015, 34, 122–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Games, P.D.; da Silva, E.Q.G.; Barbosa, M.O.; Almeida-Souza, H.O.; Fontes, P.P.; de Magalhães, M.J., Jr.; Pereira, P.R.G.; Prates, M.V.; Franco, G.R.; Faria-Campos, A.; et al. Computer aided identification of a Hevein-like antimicrobial peptide of bell pepper leaves for biotechnological use. BMC Genom. 2016, 17 (Suppl. 12), 999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Flores-Alvarez, L.J.; Jiménez-Alcántar, P.; Ochoa-Zarzosa, A.; López-Meza, J.E. The Antimicrobial Peptide γ-Thionin from Habanero Chile (Capsicum chinense) induces caspase-independent apoptosis on human K562 Chronic myeloid leukemia cells and regulates epigenetic marks. Molecules 2023, 28, 3661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Falcón-Ruiz, E.A.; López-Meza, J.E.; Ochoa-Zarzosa, A. The plant defensins PaDef and γ-thionin inhibit the endothelial cell response to VEGF. Peptides 2023, 165, 171008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  190. Cherene, M.B.; Taveira, G.B.; Almeida-Silva, F.; da Silva, M.S.; Cavaco, M.C.; da Silva-Ferreira, A.T.; Perales, J.E.A.; Carvalho, A.O.; Venâncio, T.M.; Motta, O.V.; et al. Structural and biochemical characterization of three antimicrobial peptides from Capsicum annuum L. var. annuum leaves for anti-Candida use. Probiotics Antimicrob. Proteins 2023, 16, 1270–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Pereira, L.S.; Taveira, G.B.; Souza, T.A.M.; Carvalho, A.O.; Carvalho, V.S.; Rodrigues, R.; Fernandes, K.V.S.; Mello, E.O.; Gomes, V.M. Biotive protease inhibitor from leaves of Capsicum annuum L.: Potential use as an antifungal molecule against Colletotrichum scovillei. JSFA Rep. 2023, 3, 248–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Aldayel, M.F. The synergistic effect of Capsicum aqueous extract (Capsicum annuum) and chitosan against multidrug-resistant bacteria. J. King Saud. Univ.—Science 2023, 35, 102438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Cotabarren, J.; Ozón, B.; Claver, S.; Geier, F.; Rossotti, M.; Garcia-Pardo, J.; Obregón, W.D. A multifunctional trypsin protease inhibitor from yellow bell pepper seeds: Uncovering its dual antifungal and hypoglycemic properties. Pharmaceutics 2023, 15, 781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Cardoso, M.H.; Orozco, R.Q.; Rezende, S.B.; Rodrigues, G.; Oshiro, K.G.N.; Cândido, E.S.; Franco, O.L. Computer-Aided Design of Antimicrobial Peptides: Are We Generating Effective Drug Candidates? Front. Microbiol. 2020, 10, 3097. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Chen, C.H.; Lu, T.K. Development and Challenges of Antimicrobial Peptides for Therapeutic Applications. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  196. Koo, H.B.; Seo, J. Antimicrobial peptides under clinical investigation. Pept Sci. 2019, 111, e24122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Greco, I.; Molchanova, N.; Holmedal, E.; Jenssen, H.; Hummel, B.D.; Watts, J.L.; Håkansson, J.; Hansen, P.R.; Svenson, J. Correlation between hemolytic activity, cytotoxicity and systemic in vivo toxicity of synthetic antimicrobial peptides. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 13206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Hein, M.J.A.; Kvansakul, M.; Lay, F.T.; Phan, T.K.; Hulett, M.D. Defensin–lipid interactions in membrane targeting: Mechanisms of action and opportunities for the development of antimicrobial and anticancer therapeutics. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2022, 50, 423–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Gupta, S.; Kapoor, P.; Chaudhary, K.; Gautam, A.; Kumar, R.; Raghava, G.P.S. Peptide Toxicity Prediction. In Computational Peptidology; Methods in Molecular Biology; Zhou, P., Huang, J., Eds.; Humana Press: New York, NY, USA, 2015; Volume 1268, pp. 143–157. Available online: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4939-2285-7_7 (accessed on 18 December 2024).
  200. Wei, D.; Zhang, X. Biosynthesis, bioactivity, biotoxicity and applications of antimicrobial peptides for human health. Biosaf. Health 2022, 4, 118–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Thionin from Viscum album L. (PDB: 1OKH). (b) Hevein-like from Gypsophila vaccaria (PDB: 5XDI). (c) Defensin from Oryza sativa (PDB: 6LCQ). (d) LTP from Hordeum vulgare (PDB: 1LIP) (e) Cyclotides from Oldenlandia affinis (PDB: 2M9O).
Figure 1. (a) Thionin from Viscum album L. (PDB: 1OKH). (b) Hevein-like from Gypsophila vaccaria (PDB: 5XDI). (c) Defensin from Oryza sativa (PDB: 6LCQ). (d) LTP from Hordeum vulgare (PDB: 1LIP) (e) Cyclotides from Oldenlandia affinis (PDB: 2M9O).
Cimb 47 00001 g001
Figure 2. Timeline of scientific papers about main biological activities and gene expression of thionin-type AMPs from 2002 to 2023 [35,36,37,38,39,40,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,117,120,121,122,123].
Figure 2. Timeline of scientific papers about main biological activities and gene expression of thionin-type AMPs from 2002 to 2023 [35,36,37,38,39,40,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,117,120,121,122,123].
Cimb 47 00001 g002
Figure 3. Timeline of scientific papers about main biological activities and gene expression of hevein-like type AMPs from 2002 to 2023 [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,127,128].
Figure 3. Timeline of scientific papers about main biological activities and gene expression of hevein-like type AMPs from 2002 to 2023 [53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,127,128].
Cimb 47 00001 g003
Figure 4. Timeline of scientific papers about main biological activities and gene expression of defensin-type AMPs from 2002 to 2023 [65,66,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,131,132,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158].
Figure 4. Timeline of scientific papers about main biological activities and gene expression of defensin-type AMPs from 2002 to 2023 [65,66,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,131,132,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151,152,153,154,155,156,157,158].
Cimb 47 00001 g004
Figure 5. Timeline of scientific papers about main biological activities and gene expression of LTP-type AMPs from 2002 to 2023 [77,80,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97].
Figure 5. Timeline of scientific papers about main biological activities and gene expression of LTP-type AMPs from 2002 to 2023 [77,80,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97].
Cimb 47 00001 g005
Figure 6. Timeline of scientific papers about main biological activities and gene expression of cyclotide types of AMPs from 2002 to 2023 [98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,115,116].
Figure 6. Timeline of scientific papers about main biological activities and gene expression of cyclotide types of AMPs from 2002 to 2023 [98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,115,116].
Cimb 47 00001 g006
Figure 7. Timeline of scientific papers about main biological activities and gene expression found in plants of the genus Capsicum for the period from 2002 to 2023 [123,131,132,156,157,158,173,174,175,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193].
Figure 7. Timeline of scientific papers about main biological activities and gene expression found in plants of the genus Capsicum for the period from 2002 to 2023 [123,131,132,156,157,158,173,174,175,177,178,179,180,181,182,183,184,185,186,187,188,189,190,191,192,193].
Cimb 47 00001 g007
Table 1. Compilation of representative peptides from plant thionins, hevein-like peptides, defensins, LTPs, and cyclotides.
Table 1. Compilation of representative peptides from plant thionins, hevein-like peptides, defensins, LTPs, and cyclotides.
ThioninsPlantBiological
Activity
Main TargetReference
Asthi1Oryza sativa L.AntibacterialBurkholderia plantarii[35]
Thionin
Thi2.1
Arabidopsis thaliana L.Antibacterial,
antifungal, and
cytotoxic
Staphylococcus aureus,
Escherichia coli,
Candida albicans; various
mammalian cell lines
[36]
Thionin
Thi2.1
(transgenic)
Lycopersicon esculentum
Mill.
AntimicrobialRalstonia solanacearum and
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.
lycopersici
[37]
Barley
thionin
Ipomoea batatas (L.)
Lam.
AntifungalCeratocystis fimbriata[38]
NsW1 and
NsW2
Nigella sativa L.Antifungal and
Cytotoxic
Aspergillus ochraceus and
A. fumigatus;
RD, Jukart cell lines
[39]
Cp-thioninVigna unguiculata L.Trypsin
inhibitor
Trypsin[40]
ThioninNicotiana tabacumAntifungal and
antibacterial
Botrytis cinerea, Ralstonia
solanacearum,
Helicoverpa armigera
[41]
ThioninAllium cepaAntifungalAspergillus niger[42]
Barley
thionin
Nicotiana benthamiana
Domin.
Antimicrobial
and
insecticidal
Myzus persicae[43]
Pp-THPyrularia pubera M.Antifungal and
antibacterial
activities
anticoagulant
R. meliloti, X. campestris pv.
translucens, and
X. campestris pv. campestris,
C. michiganensis;
Pseudonebularia cucumerina,
F. oxysporum,
and B. cinerea
[44,45]
Ligatoxin BPhoradendron liga (Gill.)
Eichl
CytotoxicHuman lymphoma cell line
U-937-GTB and the primary multidrug-resistant renal adenocarcinoma
cell line ACHN
[46]
Phoratoxins
C-F
Phoradendron tomentosum (DC.)
Engelm. ex A.Gray
AntitumoralSolid tumor and hematological
tumor
[47]
β-purothioninTriticum kiharaeAntimutagenic
Human RD cells; DNA protection
from cadmium chloride
[48]
Thionin
Thi2.1
Arabidopsis thaliana L.Antibacterial,
antifungal, and
cytotoxic
Staphylococcus aureus,
Escherichia coli,
Candida albicans; various
mammalian cell lines
[36]
Thionin-like AMPsArabidopsis thaliana L.NematocidalHeterodera schachtii[36]
MthioninArabidopsis thaliana L.AntifungalFusarium graminearum[49]
PsoTHI1.7Papaver somniferum L.AntifungalFusarium oxysporum f. sp.
matthiolae and Botrytis cinerea
[50]
Tu-MP 1 (a)
and Tu-MP 2 (b)
Tulipa gesneriana L.Antifungal and
antibacterial
P. carotovora, A. radiobacter,
A. rhizogenes, C. michiganensis, and
C. flaccumfaciens; F. oxysporum and G. candidum
[51]
ThioninOryza sativa L.NematocidalMeloidogyne graminicola,
Pythium graminicola
[52]
HeveinsPlantBiological
Activity
Main TargetReference
Ee-CBPEuonymus europaeus L.AntifungalBotrytis cinerea[53]
Hevein-like AMPsEucommia ulmoides Oliv.AntifungalPhytophthora infestans,
Aculops lycopersicu,
[54]
Verticillium dahliae,
Gibberella zeae,
Alternaria nicotianae,
Fusarium moniliforme,
Fusarium oxysporum,
Corythucha gossypii
Hb-AMP1Hevea brasiliensis
Muell. Arg.
Antifungal and
antibacterial
Candida albicans,
Candida tropicalis,
Candida krusei,
Porphyromonas gingivalis,
Prevotella intermedia,
Tannerella forsythia,
Aggregatibacter
actinomycetemcomitans
[55]
Hevein-like AMPsBroussonetia papyrifera
(L.) L’Hér. ex Vent.,
Morus papyrifera L.
AntifungalTrichoderma viride[56]
Sm-AMP-XStellaria media L.Antifungal and
antibacterial
Fusarium solani, Alternaria
alternata,
Bipolaris sorokiniana,
Botrytis cinerea,
Aspergillus niger, Escherichia coli,
P. carotovora,
Clavibacter michiganensis pv.
michiganensis,
Agrobacterium rhizogenes,
Bacillus subtilis,
Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato
[57]
Pn-AMP1 and Pn-AMP2Pharbitis nil L.AntifungalCandida albicans,
Candida tropicalis, Candida krusei,
Phytophthora capsici
[58]
Hevein-like genesHevea brasiliensis
Muell. Arg.
AntifungalMagnaporthe grisea[59]
Wj-AMPWasabia japonica L.Antifungal and antibacterialBotrytis cinerea,
Pseudomonas cichorii,
Pseudomonas glumae, Pseudomonas plantaii,
Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Escherichia coli
[60]
Sm-AMPStellaria media L.AntifungalBipolaris sorokiniana,
Thielaviopsis basicola
[61]
Pro-SmAMP1Stellaria media L.AntifungalAlternaria spp.[62]
Hevein-like genesLinum usitatissimum L.AntifungalFusarium oxysporum[63]
Hevein-like peptidesMoringa oleiferaCoagulation/
flocculation
activities
Highly efficient potential of
peptides
[64]
DefensinsPlantBiological
Activity
Main TargetReference
PaDef1Persea americana
var. drymifolia Mill.
AnticancerJurkat lineage of acute
lymphocytic leukemia cells
[65]
DmDef1Dahlia merckii Lehm.AntifungalSaccharomyces cerevisiae[66]
DmDef2,
DmDef3
Dahlia merckii Lehm.AntifungalBotrytis cinerea,
Verticillium albo-atrum
[67]
MtDef1,
MtDef2
Medicago truncatula
Gaertn.
Antibacterial
and
antifungal
Escherichia coli,
Pseudomonas syringae
pv. syringae, Sinorhizobium meliloti,
Xanthomonas alfalfae
subsp. alfalfae,
Phytophthora medicaginis,
Fusarium solani
[68]
NaDef1,
NaDef2
Nicotiana alata
Link and Otto
Antifungal and
antibacterial
Fusarium oxysporum,
Botrytis cinerea
[69]
FeDef1,
FeDef2
Fagopyrum esculentum
Moench.
Antibacterial
and
antifungal
Clavibacter michiganensis,
Curtobacterium flaccumfaciens,
P. carotovora, Agrobacterium spp.,
Fusarium oxysporum,
Geotrichum candidum
[70]
MsDef1Medicago sativa L.AntifungalFusarium graminearum[71]
VaDef1,
VaDef2
Vigna angularis
(Willd.) Ohwi and H.
Ohashi
Antibacterial
and
antifungal
Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium sp. pisi, Trichophyton rubrum,
Staphylococcus epidermidis,
Bacillus cereus,
Xanthomonas campestris
pv. vesicatoria
[72]
PlDef1Phaseolus limensis L.Antifungal and
antibacterial
Botrytis cinerea,
Fusarium oxysporum,
Mycosphaerella arachidicola
[73]
RsAFP2Raphanus sativusAntifungalCandida albicans, Pichia pastoris[74]
BcDef1Brassica campestris L. ssp.
pekinensis
AntifungalAlternaria solani,
Neurospora crassa,
Phytophthora parasitica,
Fusarium oxysporum
[75]
OsDef1Oryza sativa cv.
Sasanishiki
AntifungalMagnaporthe grisea[76]
TaDef1Triticum aestivum L.AntibacterialPseudomonas cichorii[77]
VrDef1Vigna radiata (L.)
Wilczek
Insecticidal and
antifungal
Callosobruchus chinensis larvae,
Fusarium oxysporum,
Pyricularia oryzae,
Rhizoctonia solani, Trichophyton
rubrum
[78]
VuDef1Vigna unguiculataEnzymatic
inhibitor
Acanthoscelides obtectus,
Zabrotes subfasciatus
[79]
PvDef1Phaseolus vulgaris
cv. Pérola
Antifungal and
antibacterial
Candida albicans, Candida
parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis,
Candida guilliermondii,
Kluyveromyces marxianus,
Saccharomyces cerevisiae,
Fusarium oxysporum, Fusarium
solani, Fusarium lateritium,
Rhizoctonia solani
[80]
PeDef1Pachyrhizus erosus
(L.) Urb.
AntifungalFusarium oxysporum f. sp.
vasinfectum, Verticillium dahliae,
Aspergillus flavus,
Penicillium spp., Colletotrichum
gloeosporioides,
Botrytis cinerea, Bipolaris maydis,
Aspergillus niger,
Fusarium oxysporum f. sp.
lycopersici,
Rhizopus stolonifer
[81]
LmDef1Lepidium meyeniiAntimicrobialPhytophthora infestans[82]
PsDef1Pisum sativumAntifungalAspergillus niger[83]
TfDef1Trigonella foenum-graecumAntifungalRhizoctonia solani,
Phaeoisariopsis personata
[84]
MsDef2Medicago sativa L.AntifungalFusarium oxysporum f. sp.
lycopersici
[85]
NaDef3Nicotiana alataAntifungalFusarium oxysporum,
Verticillium dahliae
[86]
RsAFP2Raphanus sativusAntifungalSpecific amino acid region
affecting activity (RsAFP2)
[87]
MsDef1,
MtDef4
Medicago sativa,
Medicago truncatula
AntifungalSpecific amino acid region
affecting activity
(MsDef1, MtDef4)
[88]
LTPsPlantBiological
Activity
Main TargetReference
LTPCoffea canephora L.Antifungal and
antibacterial
Colletotrichum lindemuthianum,
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides,
Fusarium solani,
Fusarium lateritium,
Colletotrichum sp.,
Xanthomonas euvesicatoria
[80]
LTP-like AMPsCapsicum annuum L. cv.
Bugang
Antibacterial
and
antiviral
Tobacco mosaic virus (TMV),
Xanthomonas campestris
pv. vesicatoria
[82,83]
LTPOryza sativaAntimicrobialPyricularia oryzae, Xanthomonas oryzae[84]
nsLTP AMPsPhaseolus mungoAntifungal and
antibacterial
Fusarium solani, Fusarium
oxysporum, Pythium
aphanidermatum, Sclerotium rolfsii, Gram-positive bacteria
Staphylococcus aureus
[85]
LTPPotato plantsAntimicrobialPhytophthora infestans[86]
nsLTP-like AMPsLeonurus japonicus Houtt.Antifungal and
antibacterial
Fusarium oxysporum, Alternaria
brassicae, Bipolaris maydis, Rhizoctonia
cerealis, Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Bacillus
subtilis
[87]
LTP-like AMPsBrassica campestris L.AntifungalFusarium oxysporum,
Mycosphaerella arachidicola
[88]
LTPHelianthus annuusAntifungalFusarium solani f. sp. eumartii,
Alternaria alternata
[89]
LTP-like AMPsNarcissus tazetta var. chinensis L.AntiviralRespiratory syncytial virus (RSV),
Influenza A (H1N1) virus
[90]
LTPNigella sativa L.AntifungalPythium debaryanum, oomycetes
Phytophthora infestans
[91]
LTP-like AMPsCoffea canephoraAntifungalCandida albicans, Candida tropicalis,
inhibition of α-amylase in mammals
[92]
nsLTP-like AMPsTransgenic wheatAntifungalFusarium graminearum[93]
LTP-like AMPsWheatAntifungalAlternaria sp., Rhizoctonia solani,
Curvularia lunata, Bipolaris oryzae,
Cylindrocladium scoparium,
Botrytis cinerea,
Sarocladium oryzae
[94]
LTP-like AMPsAnethum graveolens L.AntifungalWeak antifungal activity,
inhibition of spore
germination, delay in hyphae
elongation of
Aspergillus niger
[95]
LTPAllium cepa L.AntifungalBlumeria graminis f. sp. tritici,
Neovossia indica
[96]
LTPTriticum aestivumAntifungalPuccinia triticina Erikss.[97]
CyclotidesPlantBiological
Activity
Main TargetReference
kalata B1,
kalata B2, cycloviolacin O2
Viola arvensis Murr.,
Viola odorata L.
Antitumor and
cytotoxic
effects
Human tumor cell lines[98,99]
hylin C,
hylin D
Hybanthus enneaspermus
(L.) F. Muell.
Anticancer,
aphrodisiac
properties
Erectile function in male rats,
membrane blistering and
cell necrosis
[100,101]
rin A, rin BRinorea spp.CytotoxicityPathogenic bacteria and possibly cancer cells[102]
pom A,
pom B
Pombalia calceolariaAnticancerHuman tumor cell lines[103]
varv A,
varv F
Viola tricolorInhibitory
activity
against HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV)
[104]
vhl-1Viola hederaceaInhibitory
activity
against HIV
Human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV)
[105]
viy AViola yedoensis MakinoAnti-HIVHuman immunodeficiency virus
(HIV)
[106]
CyclotidesViola odorataAnti-inflammatory,
reduces
demyelination
Inflammation, neurological
deficits in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis
model
[107]
CyclotidesOldenlandia affinisAnti-inflammatory,
antiplasmodial
Plasmodium berghei, acute and
chronic inflammation in
rodent models
[108]
CyclotidesAllexis spp.Protease
inhibitor
Inhibition of human
prolyl oligopeptidase activity
[109]
SNC1 and SNC2Sambucus nigraAntibacterialAeromonas salmonicida,
Vibrio ordalii,
Vibrio anguillaru,
Flavobacterium psychrophilum,
E. coli
[110]
cycloviolacin O2Viola tricolorAntibacterialPseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis.[111]
CyclotidesViola odorataAntibacterialStaphylococcus aureus[112]
CyclotidesGeophila repensAntibacterial
and cytotoxic
activity
Escherichia coli,
U-937 human lymphoma cell line
[113]
Kalata B1, Kalata B2, OlaC1,
OlaC2
Oldenlandia affinisInsecticidalMoth larvae Helicoverpa armigera[114,115]
CyclotidesO. affinis, Clitoria ternatea,
Viola odorata,
Hybanthus enneaspermus
Nematocidal
effects
Caenorhabditis elegans juvenile[116]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

de Oliveira, S.S.S.; Cherene, M.B.; Taveira, G.B.; de Oliveira Mello, É.; de Oliveira Carvalho, A.; Gomes, V.M. Plant Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Main Families and Roles: A Review of the Literature. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47010001

AMA Style

de Oliveira SSS, Cherene MB, Taveira GB, de Oliveira Mello É, de Oliveira Carvalho A, Gomes VM. Plant Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Main Families and Roles: A Review of the Literature. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2025; 47(1):1. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47010001

Chicago/Turabian Style

de Oliveira, Samuel Salomão Silva, Milena Bellei Cherene, Gabriel Bonan Taveira, Érica de Oliveira Mello, André de Oliveira Carvalho, and Valdirene Moreira Gomes. 2025. "Plant Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Main Families and Roles: A Review of the Literature" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 47, no. 1: 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47010001

APA Style

de Oliveira, S. S. S., Cherene, M. B., Taveira, G. B., de Oliveira Mello, É., de Oliveira Carvalho, A., & Gomes, V. M. (2025). Plant Antimicrobial Peptides and Their Main Families and Roles: A Review of the Literature. Current Issues in Molecular Biology, 47(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb47010001

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop