Next Article in Journal
Metabolomics as a Prospective Tool for Soybean (Glycine max) Crop Improvement
Next Article in Special Issue
An Exploratory In Vivo Study on the Effect of Annurca Apple Extract on Hair Growth in Mice
Previous Article in Journal
Polyphenols and Small Phenolic Acids as Cellular Metabolic Regulators
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Identification of Seven Key Structural Genes in the Anthocyanin Biosynthesis Pathway in Sepals of Hydrangea macrophylla

Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Suxia Yuan is the first corresponding author.
Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44(9), 4167-4180; https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44090286
Submission received: 14 August 2022 / Revised: 5 September 2022 / Accepted: 6 September 2022 / Published: 12 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Anthocyanins: Bioactivity and Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Under specific cultivation conditions, the sepal color of Hydrangea macrophylla (H. macrophylla) changes from red to blue due to the complexation of aluminum ions (Al3+), delphinidin 3-glucoside, and copigments. However, this phenomenon cannot occur in all cultivars despite the presence of sufficient Al3+ and copigments. To explore the mechanism of sepal bluing in H. macrophylla, there is an urgent need to study the molecular regulation of the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway. However, the key structural genes, other than CHS, regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis in the sepals of H. macrophylla have not been identified. In this study, based on full-length transcriptome data from H. macrophylla ‘Bailmer’, the key structural genes regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis in the sepals of H. macrophylla were isolated and investigated. Ultimately, seven key structural genes, HmCHS1, HmCHI, HmF3H1, HmF3H1, HmF35H, HmDFR2, and HmANS3, were demonstrated to show high expression levels in colored sepals. The expression levels of these seven genes increased gradually with the development of sepals and were highest in the full-bloom stage. The trend of gene expression was consistent with the trend of anthocyanin contents. It was concluded that the seven selected genes were involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in the sepals of H. macrophylla. The full-length sequence data have been deposited into the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) with accession number PRJNA849710. This study lays a good foundation for the further elucidation of the molecular mechanism of sepal coloration in H. macrophylla.

1. Introduction

Hydrangea macrophylla (H. macrophylla) is a deciduous shrub in the family Hydrangeaceae. H. macrophylla is a popular ornamental plant due to its large inflorescences, various flower colors, and long flowering period; therefore, it is widely used for cut flower production and as a potted or landscape plant. The sepals of H. macrophylla are its main ornamental organs [1]. The colors of H. macrophylla sepals vary from white to pink, red, purple, and blue, among which blue sepals are popular with consumers in the market. Interestingly, the development of blue sepals depends on cultivation conditions. In suitable acidic soil, aluminum ions (Al3+) can be taken up by the roots and then transported into the vacuoles of sepals, where they form complexes with anthocyanins and copigments; thus, the sepal color changes from the original red coloration to purple and then blue [2,3,4,5]. In alkaline soil, aluminum exists as an Al(OH)3 precipitate and cannot be taken up, so the sepals retain their original color of red or pink [6,7,8].
Because of this unique characteristic, the mechanism of sepal color formation has become a research hotspot. Initially, it was found that the anthocyanin 3-O-glucosyldelphinidin and the copigment 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid or 5-O-p-coumaroylquinic acid were involved in the development of blue sepals [9,10,11,12,13]. Then, it was reported that the vacuole pH value also played a key role in coloration, as the pH levels of the blue and red vacuoles were significantly different, at 4.1 and 3.3, respectively. When 3-O-glucosyldelphinidin, 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid or 5-O-p-coumaroylquinic acid and Al3+ were mixed in buffer solution at a ratio of 1:1:1 at pH 4.0, the blue color could be reproduced in vitro [14], revealing the molecular structure of the blue metal complex pigment in H. macrophylla. A recent study indicated that the blue cells in the sepals were mainly located in the second cell layer and that the distributions of Al3+ and the H. macrophylla blue complex overlapped with the area of blue cells, which confirmed that aluminum and the H. macrophylla blue-complex exist in the blue cells of sepals and are involved in blue coloration [15].
Although the molecules included in the H. macrophylla blue complex have been identified, it is still difficult to regulate blue flower production, and not all cultivars can be induced to develop a blue color under specific cultivation conditions. At present, the molecular mechanism of flower color formation in sepals is still unclear.
In general, red and blue colors are determined by pelargonidins and delphinidins, respectively [10,16]. However, in H. macrophylla, all sepal colors originate from a common anthocyanin, 3-O-glucosyldelphinidin [9,14]. The anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway has been well studied as an important pathway of a branch of the plant flavonoid pathway; there are seven key structural genes in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway, including the chalcone synthase (CHS), chalcone isomerase (CHI), flavonoid 3-hydroxylase (F3H), flavonoid 3-hydroxylase (F3H), flavonoid 3-5 hydroxylase (F35H), dihydroflavonol 4-reductase (DFR), and anthocyanidin synthase (ANS) genes [17,18]. Although CHS, DFR, and F3H have been reported to regulate anthocyanin biosynthesis in the sepals of H. macrophylla, sequence information was found only for CHS [19,20,21]. To gain further insight into the molecular mechanism of sepal coloration, it is essential to determine the key structural genes regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis in the sepals of H. macrophylla. In this study, based on full-length transcriptome data from H. macrophylla ‘Bailmer’, the CHS, CHI, F3H, F3H, F35H, DFR, and ANS genes were selected as candidate genes, and the key structural genes regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis in sepals were identified.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Plant Materials and Sampling

Three cultivars of H. macrophylla were used in this research, among which ‘Bailmer’ and ‘Duro’ are cultivars with pink sepals, whereas ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’ has white sepals. Under aluminum sulfate treatment, the sepal color of ‘Bailmer’ turned blue, while that of ‘Duro’ and ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’ remained pink and white, respectively. These cultivars were planted in the greenhouse at the Institute of Vegetables and Flowers, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Beijing, China). Half of the ‘Bailmer’ plants were treated with an aluminum sulfate solution (Al2(SO4)3·18H2O dissolved in water), and the sepals turned blue (Tr group). The substrate mixture was soaked with the aluminum sulfate solution 9 times, and each pot was soaked in approximately 20 g of aluminum sulfate (Al2(SO4)3·18H2O) in total. The remaining half of the ‘Bailmer’ plants (CK group) and all ‘Duro’ and ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’ plants were grown without aluminum sulfate treatment.
The roots, stems, leaves, terminal buds, lateral buds, pedicels, flowers, and sepals were harvested at four developmental stages (S1: bud stage sepals, S2: discoloration stage sepals, S3: full-bloom stage sepals, S4: senescence stage sepals) (Figure 1). All of these plant materials were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C.

2.2. Determination of Total Anthocyanin Contents

For ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’, ‘Duro’, and ‘Bailmer’ (CK), the total anthocyanin contents of the sepals in four developmental stages (S1, S2, S3, and S4) were determined using a Plant Polyphenol-Chlorophyll Measuring Instrument (Dualex Scientific+, Orsay, France).

2.3. Full-Length Transcriptome Sequencing and Gene Annotation

Total RNA was extracted from the roots, stems, leaves, terminal buds, lateral buds, pedicels, and flowers of the CK group and Tr group of ‘Bailmer’ by grinding the tissue in TRIzol reagent (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) on dry ice and processing it according to the protocol provided by the manufacturer. An Agilent® 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent, Palo Alto, CA, USA) and a NanoDrop® series spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, Carlsbad, CA, USA) were used to determine the integrity and concentration of the RNA samples. The qualified RNA samples were mixed in equal amounts. mRNA was then enriched by using Oligo (dT) magnetic beads, and the enriched 5 μg mRNA was reverse transcribed into first-strand cDNA using the Clontech SMARTer PCR cDNA Synthesis Kit (Clontech, San Francisco, CA, USA). Then, PCR amplification was performed to synthesize double-stranded cDNA, and AMPure PB Beads (AMPure, Pasadena, CA, USA) were used to purify PCR amplification products. The SMRTbell template was annealed to a sequencing primer and bound to polymerase, and sequencing was conducted on the PacBio SequelII platform by Gene Denovo Biotechnology Co. (Guangzhou, China). The raw sequencing reads of the cDNA libraries were analyzed using an isoform sequencing (Iso-Seq) pipeline supported by Pacific Biosciences [22].
To annotate isoforms, they were subjected to BLAST searches against the NCBI nonredundant protein (Nr) database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov, accessed on 2 December 2020), the Swiss-Prot protein database (http://www.expasy.ch/sprot, accessed on 4 December 2020), the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (http://www.genome.jp/kegg, accessed on 7 December 2020), and the COG/KOG database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/COG, accessed on 9 December 2020). The BLASTx program (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/BLAST/, accessed on 26 December 2020) was run with an E-value threshold of 1 × 10−5 to evaluate sequence similarity with genes of other species.

2.4. Selection and Validation of Genes

2.4.1. Gene Selection

CHS, CHI, F3H, F3H, F35H, DFR, and ANS, which encode major enzymes in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway, were searched based on full-length transcriptome data. The open reading frames (ORFs) of the isoforms were analyzed online with NCBI ORF finder software (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/orffinder accessed on 1 September 2022, NCBI, Bethesda, USA), and the multiple sequence alignment of isoforms was carried out using DNAMAN software.

2.4.2. qRT–PCR analysis

The roots, leaves, and sepals at S1, S2, and S3 in ‘Bailmer’, the roots, leaves, and sepals at S3 in ‘Duro’, and sepals at S3 in ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’ from the CK group (without aluminum sulfate treatment) were harvested and were stored at −80 °C. All samples were ground to a powder in liquid nitrogen to extract total RNA using an RNA extraction kit (Huayueyang Biotechnology Inc., Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The integrity and concentration of the RNA were analyzed by using 1% agarose gel electrophoresis and an Ultramicro ultraviolet-visible spectrophotometer (ND-100C, Miulab, Hangzhou, China), respectively. First-strand cDNA was synthesized using a PrimeScriptTM RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Osaka, Japan) according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
The primer pairs targeting the genes were designed using Primer Premier 5.0 software (Premier, Ottawa, Canada) (Table 1). The EF1-β housekeeping gene (F- CGCAGCTGTTTTAGGGAAGCC, R- GCGAGCTGCGAAGACACAGA) was used as the internal control for normalization. The cDNA template was fully mixed with Taq Pro Universal SYBR qPCR Master Mix (Vazyme, Nanjing, China) for qRT–PCR in a Light Cycler 480 System (Roche, USA). The qRT–PCR protocol was as follows: 95 °C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of 95 °C for 10 s, and 60 °C for 30 s. Finally, melting curves were generated for all genes at 95 °C for 15 s, 60 °C for 60 s, and 95 °C for 15 s. The relative expression levels of the target genes were calculated via the 2−ΔΔCq method. One-way ANOVA (significant differences p = 0.05), Duncan’s method for multiple comparison tests, and Pearson correlation analysis were performed using SPSS 2.0 software (IBM, Armonk, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Anthocyanin Contents

In the two cultivars with colored sepals (‘Bailmer’ and ‘Duro’), the contents of total anthocyanins in the sepals increased from the bud stage (S1) to the full-bloom stage (S3) and then decreased in the senescence stage (S4), with the highest accumulation of anthocyanins being observed at S3 (Figure 2). In ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’ with white sepals, the anthocyanin content of the sepals remained low throughout their development.

3.2. Analysis of Full-Length Transcriptome Sequencing Data

A total of 72,848 high-quality isoforms were obtained from the full-length transcriptome sequencing data. A total of 67,941 (93.26%) of these isoforms were annotated in the Nr, SwissProt, KEGG, and KOG databases. The specific numbers of isoforms annotated in the NR, KEGG, KOG and SwissProt databases were 66,896 (91.83%), 65,418 (89.80%), 44,208 (60.69%), and 55,845 (76.66%), respectively (Figure 3).

3.3. Screening of Key Structural Genes Involved in Anthocyanin Biosynthesis

Thirty-seven isoforms related to structural genes in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway that showed similar sequences to CHS, CHI, F3H, F3H, F35H, DFR, and ANS were identified via NCBI BLAST searches. The sequences of isoforms showing more than 98% coverage and 98% identities in the CDS region were classified as belonging to the same gene. Thus, a total of 14 genes were obtained (Table 1). All of the structural genes except for CHI and F35H had multiple family members. The specific primer pairs used for each gene are listed in Table 1.

3.4. Expression Pattern Analysis of Key Structural Genes Involved in Anthocyanin Biosynthesis

The H. macrophylla CHS gene family has two members, HmCHS1 and HmCHS2. The expression patterns of HmCHS1 in the roots, stems, leaves, and full-bloom stage sepals were different from those of HmCHS2. In both ‘Bailmer’ and ‘Duro’, the expression levels of HmCHS1 were the highest in the sepals and lowest in the roots and stems (Figure 4A), whereas the expression level of HmCHS2 in sepals was lower than that in the other organs (Figure 4B).
Subsequently, the expression levels of HmCHS1 in the pink sepals of ‘Bailmer’ and ‘Duro’ were significantly higher than those in the white sepals of ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’. However, the expression levels of HmCHS2 in the sepals of ‘Bailmer’ and ‘Duro’ were lower than the level in ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’ (Figure 4C).
The results indicated that HmCHS1 is a key structural gene involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in sepals.
Only one CHI gene, named HmCHI, was obtained. In both ‘Bailmer’ and ‘Duro’, the expression levels of HmCHI were the highest in sepals among all the tested organs (Figure 5A). Moreover, the expression levels of HmCHI in the pink sepals of ‘Bailmer’ and ‘Duro’ were higher than those in the white sepals of ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’ (Figure 5B). Therefore, HmCHI is the key structural gene involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in sepals.
There are three members of the H. macrophylla F3H gene family, HmF3H1, HmF3H2, and HmF3H3. In both ‘Bailmer’ and ‘Duro’, HmF3H1 presented the highest expression level in sepals (Figure 6A), while HmF3H2 showed the highest expression level in leaves. (Figure 6B). Although HmF3H3 exhibited the highest expression level in the sepals of ‘Bailmer’, it exhibited the highest expression level in the roots of ‘Duro’ (Figure 6C). In addition, the expression levels of HmF3H1 were significantly higher in pink sepals than in white sepals (Figure 6D). Therefore, HmF3H1 is a key structural gene involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in sepals.
Two members of the F3H gene family were identified, HmF3H1 and HmF3H2. In ‘Bailmer’, the expression level of HmF3H1 was lower in sepals than in roots and leaves, and in ‘Duro’, its expression was lower in sepals than in leaves (Figure 7A). HmF3H2 presented the lowest expression level in sepals among all the tested organs (Figure 7B). Thus, the expression levels of HmF3H1 and HmF3H2 were not higher in sepals than in the other organs.
Furthermore, the expression levels of HmF3H1 in the colored sepals of the two cultivars were significantly higher than those in the white sepals of ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’. However, the expression level of HmF3H2 in the pink sepals of ‘Duro’ was lower than that in the white sepals of ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’ (Figure 7C).
In conclusion, HmF3H1 is a key structural gene involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in sepals.
Only one gene annotated as F35H, named HmF35H, was screened. The expression level of HmF35H was the highest in sepals among all the tested organs (Figure 8A). The expression level of HmF35H was significantly higher in colored sepals than in white sepals (Figure 8B). Therefore, HmF35H is a key structural gene involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in sepals.
Two DFR genes, HmDFR1 and HmDFR2, were found. The expression level of HmDFR1 was highest in sepals in ‘Bailmer’, whereas its expression was lower in sepals than in roots and stems in ‘Duro’ (Figure 9A). However, the expression levels of HmDFR2 were highest in sepals among all the examined organs of both ‘Bailmer’ and ‘Duro’ (Figure 9B).
Additionally, the expression level of HmDFR2 in colored sepals was higher than that in white sepals (Figure 9C). However, there was no significant difference in the expression level of HmDFR1 between colored sepals and white sepals.
It was concluded that HmDFR2 is a key structural gene involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in sepals.
Similar to F3H, there were three identified members of the ANS gene family, HmANS1, HmANS2, and HmANS3. In ‘Bailmer’ and ‘Duro’, only HmANS3 showed a higher expression level in sepals than in the other organs (Figure 10A–C). Moreover, the expression level of HmANS3 was significantly higher in colored sepals than in white sepals (Figure 10D).
Therefore, HmANS3 is a key structural gene involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in sepals.

3.5. Expression Patterns of the Seven Structural Genes Involved in Anthocyanin Biosynthesis during the Development of Sepals

In ‘Bailmer’ (CK) sepals, the expression levels of HmCHS1, HmCHI, HmF3H1, HmF3H1, HmF35H, HmDFR2, and HmANS3 increased gradually with the development of sepals (from S1 to S2, S3) and peaked at the full-bloom stage (S3) (Figure 11). The trend of gene expression was consistent with the trend of the anthocyanin contents (p < 0.01; Table 2). It was proven that the seven selected genes were related to anthocyanin biosynthesis in sepals.

4. Discussion

Anthocyanin accumulates in the vacuoles of petals and sepals and is the main pigment involved in flower color formation [7,23,24]. In the H. macrophylla ‘Meihong Mother’ cultivar, the anthocyanin content of sepals increases from the bud stage to the full-bloom stage and then decreases in the senescence stage. The accumulation of anthocyanin has also been reported to be highest in the full-flower stage in the ‘Thunb Ser’, ‘EndLess Summer’, and ‘Emile Mouillere’ cultivars [20,25]. In this study, the contents of the total anthocyanins in the colored sepals of ‘Bailmer’ and ‘Duro’ were similarly found to increase gradually from S1 to S2 and S3 and then decrease in S4 (Figure 2).
Although the genomics of H. macrophylla are being studied, and many complete or partial nucleotide sequences have been published in public databases [26], transcriptome sequencing remains an efficient method for mining genes. In our study, ‘Bailmer’ was selected for full-length transcriptome sequencing because of its unique characteristics, including blooming in new growth without a cold requirement, low-temperature resistance, and the development of blue flowers in acidic soil containing Al3+. The full-length transcriptome database is helpful for exploring the mechanisms of flower color formation and aluminum detoxification in H. macrophylla. In the full-length transcriptome database, the CHS, F3H, F3H, DFR, and ANS gene families showed multiple members, whereas CHI and F35H did not (Table 1). Similar to many other higher plants, genome evolution has produced gene families by gene duplication in this species [27]. In Chrysanthemum, there are multiple members of the structural gene families involved in the flavonoid biosynthesis pathway, with the exception of F35H and ANS [28]. In lily, four unigenes have been annotated as CHS genes [29]. In the H. macrophylla ‘Forever Summer’ cultivar, multiple members have been identified for all key structural gene families except for CHI [30]. In this study, HmCHS1, HmCHI, HmF3H1, HmF35H, HmDFR2, and HmANS3 were selected as key structural genes participating in anthocyanin biosynthesis in sepals, and other members of their gene families may participate in flavonoid biosynthesis pathways in other tissues of H. macrophylla.
CHS [19], DFR [20], and F3H [21] have been reported to be structural genes related to anthocyanin biosynthesis in H. macrophylla. The sequence of HmCHS1 identified in this experiment was highly similar (98.82%) to that of the CHS gene (AB011467.1) based on sequence comparison; thus, they should be identified as the same gene. However, there is a lack of sequence information about F3H and DFR in the literature, and we cannot determine whether the sequences of HmF3H1 and HmDFR2 selected in this study are the same as genes in previous reports.
Anthocyanins are the main compounds responsible for flower coloration, so the expression levels of structural genes regulating anthocyanin biosynthesis in sepals should be higher than those in other organs. All of the structural genes identified in this work except for HmF3H1 showed the highest expression levels in sepals. The two members of the F3′H family, both HmF3H1 and HmF3H2, did not show higher expression in sepals than in the other organs. A similar result was found in Camellia Nitidissima Chi, in which the expression level of the F3H gene in petals was lower than that in leaves, whereas it was highest in fruits [31]. In H. macrophylla, HmF3H1 and HmF3H2 may play vital roles in other biosynthesis processes in leaves, stems, and roots.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.Q. and S.Y.; methodology, H.Q., G.Z. and Z.C.; software, Z.C.; validation, H.Q., G.Z. and Z.C.; formal analysis, H.Q.; writing—original draft preparation, H.Q.; writing—review and editing, S.Y.; supervision, C.L. and S.Y.; project administration, C.L. and S.Y.; funding acquisition, C.L. and S.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (IVF-BRF2021019) and the Science and Technology Innovation Program of the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS-ASTIP-2021-IVFCAAS).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable for review.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study have been deposited into the CNGB Sequence Archive (CNSA) of the China National GeneBank DataBase (CNGBdb) (https://db.cngb.org/cnsa/, accessed on 10 May 2022) with accession number CNP0003032 and NCBI Sequence Read Archive (SRA) of National Center for Biotechnology Information (https://submit.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/subs/sra/, accessed on 10 May 2020) with accession number PRJNA849710. The mRNA sequence data have been submitted to the NCBI GenBank database under the accession number ON375338–ON375351.

Acknowledgments

Thanks to the National Center for Flower Improvement, and the Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Galopin, G.; Codarin, S.; Viemont, J.D.; Morel, P. Architectural development of inflorescence in Hydrangea macrophylla cv. Hermann Dienemann. HortScience 2008, 43, 361–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Atkins, W.R.G. Hydrogen-ion concentration of the soil in relation to the flower color of Hydrangea hortensis W. and the availability of iron. Sci. Proc. R. Dublin Soc. 1923, 17, 201–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Asen, S.; Siegelman, H.W. Effect of aluminum on absorption spectra of the anthocyanin and flavonols from sepals of Hydrangea macrophylla var. Merveille 1957.
  4. Okada, M.; Okawa, K. The Quantity of Aluminum and Phosphorus in Plants and Its Influence on the Sepal Color of Hydrangea macrophylla DC. Engei Gakkai Zasshi 2007, 42, 361–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ma, J.F.; Ryan, P.R.; Delhaize, E. Aluminium tolerance in plants and the complexing role of organic acids. Trends Plant Sci. 2001, 6, 273–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Takeda, K.; Yamashita, T.; Takahashi, A.; Timberlake, C.F. Stable blue complexes of anthocyanin-aluminium-3-p-coumaroyl- or 3-caffeoyl-quinic acid involved in the blueing of Hydrangea flower. Phytochemistry 1990, 29, 1089–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yoshida, K.; Toyama-Kato, Y.; Kameda, K.; Kondo, T. Sepal color variation of Hydrangea macrophylla and vacuolar pH value measured with a proton-selective microelectrode. Plant Cell Physiol. 2003, 44, 262–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ryan, P.R.; Delhaize, E. The convergent evolution of aluminium resistance in plants exploits a convenient currency. Funct. Plant Biol. 2010, 37, 275–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Takeda, K.; Kubota, R.; Yagioka, C. Copigments in the blueing of sepal colour of Hydrangea macrophylla. Pergamon 1985, 24, 1207–1209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Goto, T.; Kondo, T. Structure and molecular stacking of anthocyanins—Flower color variation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 1991, 30, 17–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kondo, T.; Toyama-Kato, Y.; Yoshida, K. Essential structure of co-pigment for blue sepal-color development of hydrangea. Tetrahedron Lett. 2005, 46, 6645–6649. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yoshida, K.; Kitahara, S.; Ito, D.; Kondo, T. Ferric ions involved in the flower color development of the himalayan blue poppy. meconopsis grandis. Phytochemistry 2006, 67, 992–998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Yoshida, K.; Toyama, K.Y.; Kondo, T. Synthesis of designed acylquinic acid derivatives involved in blue color development of Hydrangea and their co-pigmentation effect. Heterocycles 2007, 72, 239–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ito, T.; Oyama, K.I.; Yoshida, K. Direct observation of Hydrangea blue-complex composed of 3-O-glucosyldelphinidin, Al3+ and 5-O-acylquinic acid by esi-mass spectrometry. Molecules 2018, 23, 1424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Ito, T.; Aoki, D.; Fukushima, K.; Yoshida, K. Direct mapping of hydrangea blue-complex in sepal tissues of hydrangea macrophylla. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 5450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Mol, J.; Grotewold, E.; Koes, R. How genes paint flowers and seeds. Trends Plant Sci. 1998, 6, 212–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Winkel-Shirley, B. Flavonoid biosynthesis. A colorful model for genetics, biochemistry, cell biology, and biotechnology. Plant Physiol 2001, 126, 485–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Koes, R.; Verweij, W.; Quattrocchio, F. Flavonoids: A colorful model for the regulation and evolution of biochemical pathways. Trends Plant Sci 2005, 10, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Akiyama, T.; Shibuya, M.; Liu, H.M.; Ebizuka, Y. p-Coumaroyltriacetic acid synthase, a new homologue of chalcone synthase, from Hydrangea macrophylla var. thunbergii. FEBS J. 2010, 263, 834–839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Chen, D.D.; Li, M.; Peng, J.Q.; Tian, Y.C.; Chao, S.J. Association between HmDFR gene expression and flower color of Hydrangea macrophylla. Plant Physiol. J. 2020, 56, 1641–1649. [Google Scholar]
  21. Xue, C.; Han, J.Y.; Peng, J.Q.; Yang, Y.H.; Xiao, H.L.; Huang, S.Q.; Dong, X.J. Cloning and Expression Analysis of HmF3H Gene Related to Flower Color of Hydrangea macrophylla. Mol. Plant Breed. 2021, 19, 59–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Gordon, S.P.; Tseng, E.; Salamov, A.; Zhang, J.W.; Meng, X.D.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Kang, D.W.; Underwood, J.; Grigoriev, L.V.; Figueroa, M.; et al. Widespread polycistronic transcripts in fungi revealed by single-molecule mRNA sequencing. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0132628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Grotewold, E. The challenges of moving chemicals within and out of cells: Insights into the transport of plant natural products. Planta 2004, 219, 906–909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ito, D.; Shinkai, Y.; Kato, Y.; Kondo, T.; Yoshida, K. Chemical studies on different color development in blue- and red-colored sepal cells of hydrangea macrophylla. Biosci. Biotechnol. Biochem. 2009, 73, 1054–1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hu, Y.T.; Yuan, J.Z.; Chen, H.X. Effect of Aluminum Stress on Flower Color of Hydrangea Cultivar ‘Meihong Mother’. Mol. Plant Breed. 2021, 19, 6164–6171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yoshida, K.; Oyama, K.I.; Kondo, T. Insight into chemical mechanisms of sepal color development and variation in hydrangea: Reviews. Proc. Jpn. Acad. Ser. B Phys. Biol. Sci. 2021, 97, 51–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Ohta, T. Evolution of gene families. Gene 2000, 259, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Y.S.; Xu, Y.J.; Gao, L.P.; Yu, O.; Wang, X.Z.; He, X.J.; Jiang, X.L.; Liu, Y.J.; Xia, T. Functional analysis of flavonoid 3’,5’-hydroxylase from tea plant (Camellia sinensis): Critical role in the accumulation of catechins. BMC Plant Biol. 2014, 14, 347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Xu, L.; Yang, P.; Yuan, S.; Feng, Y.; Xu, H.; Cao, Y.; Ming, J. Transcriptome Analysis Identifies Key Candidate Genes Mediating Purple Ovary Coloration in Asiatic Hybrid Lilies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peng, J.; Dong, X.; Xue, C.; Liu, Z.; Cao, F. Exploring the Molecular Mechanism of Blue Flower Color Formation in Hydrangea macrophylla cv. “Forever Summer”. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 585665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Jiang, L.; Fan, Z.; Ran, T.; Yin, H.; Li, J.; Zhou, X. Flavonoid 3′-hydroxylase of Camellia nitidissima Chi. promotes the synthesis of polyphenols better than flavonoids. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2021, 48, 3903–3912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Materials of ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’, ‘Duro’, and ‘Bailmer’. (a) Sepals in four developmental stages (S1, S2, S3, and S4) from ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’; (b) roots, stem, leaf, and sepals in four developmental stages (S1, S2, S3, and S4) from ‘Duro’; (c) roots, stems, leaves, terminal buds, lateral buds, pedicels, and flowers from the CK and Tr groups of ‘Bailmer’ and sepals in four developmental stages (S1, S2, S3, and S4) from the CK group of ‘Bailmer’.
Figure 1. Materials of ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’, ‘Duro’, and ‘Bailmer’. (a) Sepals in four developmental stages (S1, S2, S3, and S4) from ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’; (b) roots, stem, leaf, and sepals in four developmental stages (S1, S2, S3, and S4) from ‘Duro’; (c) roots, stems, leaves, terminal buds, lateral buds, pedicels, and flowers from the CK and Tr groups of ‘Bailmer’ and sepals in four developmental stages (S1, S2, S3, and S4) from the CK group of ‘Bailmer’.
Cimb 44 00286 g001
Figure 2. Contents of total anthocyanins in sepals at different developmental stages in ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’, ‘Bailmer’(CK), and ‘Duro’. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 2. Contents of total anthocyanins in sepals at different developmental stages in ‘Saxon Kleiner Winterberg’, ‘Bailmer’(CK), and ‘Duro’. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Cimb 44 00286 g002
Figure 3. Venn diagram of isoform annotations according to four databases.
Figure 3. Venn diagram of isoform annotations according to four databases.
Cimb 44 00286 g003
Figure 4. (A) Expression levels of HmCHS1 in different organs; (B) expression levels of HmCHS2 in different organs; (C) expression levels of HmCHS1 and HmCHS2 in sepals among the three cultivars. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 4. (A) Expression levels of HmCHS1 in different organs; (B) expression levels of HmCHS2 in different organs; (C) expression levels of HmCHS1 and HmCHS2 in sepals among the three cultivars. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Cimb 44 00286 g004
Figure 5. (A) Expression levels of HmCHI in different organs; (B) expression levels of HmCHI in sepals among the three cultivars. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 5. (A) Expression levels of HmCHI in different organs; (B) expression levels of HmCHI in sepals among the three cultivars. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Cimb 44 00286 g005
Figure 6. (A) Expression levels of HmF3H1 in different organs; (B) expression levels of HmF3H2 in different organs; (C) expression levels of HmF3H3 in different organs; (D) expression levels of HmF3H1, HmF3H2, and HmF3H3 in sepals among the three cultivars. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 6. (A) Expression levels of HmF3H1 in different organs; (B) expression levels of HmF3H2 in different organs; (C) expression levels of HmF3H3 in different organs; (D) expression levels of HmF3H1, HmF3H2, and HmF3H3 in sepals among the three cultivars. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Cimb 44 00286 g006
Figure 7. (A) Expression levels of HmF3H1 in different organs; (B) expression levels of HmF3H2 in different organs; (C) expression levels of HmF3H1 and HmF3H2 in sepals among the three cultivars. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 7. (A) Expression levels of HmF3H1 in different organs; (B) expression levels of HmF3H2 in different organs; (C) expression levels of HmF3H1 and HmF3H2 in sepals among the three cultivars. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Cimb 44 00286 g007
Figure 8. (A) Expression levels of HmF35H in different organs; (B) expression levels of HmF35H in sepals among the three cultivars. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 8. (A) Expression levels of HmF35H in different organs; (B) expression levels of HmF35H in sepals among the three cultivars. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Cimb 44 00286 g008
Figure 9. (A) Expression levels of HmDFR1 in different organs; (B) expression levels of HmDFR2 in different organs; (C) expression levels of HmDFR1 and HmDFR2 in sepals among the three cultivars. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 9. (A) Expression levels of HmDFR1 in different organs; (B) expression levels of HmDFR2 in different organs; (C) expression levels of HmDFR1 and HmDFR2 in sepals among the three cultivars. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Cimb 44 00286 g009
Figure 10. (A) Expression levels of HmANS1 in different organs; (B) expression levels of HmANS2 in different organs; (C) expression levels of HmANS3 in different organs; (D) expression levels of HmANS1, HmANS2, and HmANS3 in sepals among the three cultivars. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. In summary, according to the expression patterns observed in different organs, and the differences in expression levels between colored sepals and white sepals, seven genes, HmCHS1, HmCHI, HmF3H1, HmF3H1, HmF35H, HmDFR2, and HmANS3, were identified as key structural genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in sepals.
Figure 10. (A) Expression levels of HmANS1 in different organs; (B) expression levels of HmANS2 in different organs; (C) expression levels of HmANS3 in different organs; (D) expression levels of HmANS1, HmANS2, and HmANS3 in sepals among the three cultivars. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test. In summary, according to the expression patterns observed in different organs, and the differences in expression levels between colored sepals and white sepals, seven genes, HmCHS1, HmCHI, HmF3H1, HmF3H1, HmF35H, HmDFR2, and HmANS3, were identified as key structural genes involved in anthocyanin biosynthesis in sepals.
Cimb 44 00286 g010
Figure 11. Expression patterns of seven structural genes in the three developmental stages (S1, S2, S3) of sepals. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Figure 11. Expression patterns of seven structural genes in the three developmental stages (S1, S2, S3) of sepals. Different lowercase letters indicating significant differences at the 0.05 level of probability according to Duncan’s multiple-range test.
Cimb 44 00286 g011
Table 1. The structural genes in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway in H. macrophylla and the corresponding primer sequences.
Table 1. The structural genes in the anthocyanin biosynthesis pathway in H. macrophylla and the corresponding primer sequences.
Protein NameGene NameFamily MemberIsoforms IDPrimer Sequence (5′-3′)Amplicon Length
Chalcone synthaseCHSHmCHS1Isoform0051878F-AATTTCAGCGCATGTGTGACAATT134
R-CCACCACCATGTCTTGTCTAGC
HmCHS2 F-AGGGCGCACGTGTTCTTGTT125
Isoform0001712R-GATCACCGCTGATGCACCGT
Isoform0002955
Chalcone isomeraseCHIHmCHIIsoform0062450F-ATTGTTCCTCGGTGGCGCAG124
Isoform0064242R-GCCCTTCCACTTAACGGCGA
Flavanone 3-hydroxylaseF3HHmF3H1Isoform0002931F-AGGGATGGTGGGAACACTTGG89
R-TTGCTCAGATAATGACCATGGTCG
Isoform0053472
HmF3H2Isoform0056122F-CCTCTTCTTTCAAGGAGGTGGTG211
R-CTCTGGTTCAGGACATGGTGG
HmF3H3Isoform0060184F-AACCCTCCTTCTTACAGAGAAGCT135
R-TTCACCACCACCAGCATCC
Flavonoid 3′-hydroxylaseF3HHmF3H1Isoform0047984F-AAGCCTTATTGATGGACATGGTGG178
R-TACGGGAGTTTTTGGATGTGGGAC
HmF3H2Isoform0013683F-GCAACTCCGATTCGGCTCCT119
Isoform0014970R-ACTTTCCGGCGGCGGTTTTA
Isoform0048829
Isoform0034725
Isoform0042732
Flavonoid 3′5′-hydroxylaseF35HHmF35HIsoform0001658F-AGGGCAAGCCGGACTTTCTT109
R-CCGGCAGTGAACAAATTCAAGAGTA
Dihydroflavonol-4-reductaseDFRHmDFR1Isoform0047641F-TCTCTGGAGCTCGCTTACGG151
Isoform0055957R-TCAATCCTCCAACATTGACCGAG
Isoform0057874
HmDFR2 F-GCTGCCAAAGGCTGAAAAGAACT146
Isoform0054800R-ACTTCATTCTCAGGGTCCTTGGA
Anthocyanidin synthaseANSHmANS1 F-AGCCATCCACGGGAGTGCA104
Isoform0064501R-CAAGCACCAATCTCTTCTCCTCCA
HmANS2Isoform0002842F-TGGTGATCAAATACAGGTTCTAAGC98
Isoform0004318R-AGAAGGCAAGCGATACGCG
Isoform0048013
HmANS3Isoform0054522F-CCTCTCGGTGCTATCCCTCG134
R-CCTAGAGCGAGCTCCGGTTG
Table 2. Correlation coefficients between the expression levels of genes and the contents of anthocyanins.
Table 2. Correlation coefficients between the expression levels of genes and the contents of anthocyanins.
HmCHS1HmCHIHmF3H1HmF3H1HmF35HHmDFR2HmANS3
Content of anthocyanins0.91 10.97 10.97 10.90 10.91 11.00 10.96 1
1 Indicates a significant correlation at the 0.01 level.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qi, H.; Zhang, G.; Chu, Z.; Liu, C.; Yuan, S. Identification of Seven Key Structural Genes in the Anthocyanin Biosynthesis Pathway in Sepals of Hydrangea macrophylla. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44, 4167-4180. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44090286

AMA Style

Qi H, Zhang G, Chu Z, Liu C, Yuan S. Identification of Seven Key Structural Genes in the Anthocyanin Biosynthesis Pathway in Sepals of Hydrangea macrophylla. Current Issues in Molecular Biology. 2022; 44(9):4167-4180. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44090286

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qi, Hui, Gaitian Zhang, Zhiyun Chu, Chun Liu, and Suxia Yuan. 2022. "Identification of Seven Key Structural Genes in the Anthocyanin Biosynthesis Pathway in Sepals of Hydrangea macrophylla" Current Issues in Molecular Biology 44, no. 9: 4167-4180. https://doi.org/10.3390/cimb44090286

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop