Next Article in Journal
A Comparison of the Anxiolytic Properties of Tofisopam and Diazepam: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Crossover, Placebo-Controlled Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Microbial Biosurfactants: Antimicrobial Activity and Potential Biomedical and Therapeutic Exploits
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Pharmaceuticals
Volume 17
Issue 1
10.3390/ph17010139
pharmaceuticals-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Harnessing Biomaterials for Safeguarding Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: An Artful Expedition in Mitigating Adverse Effects

by
Zhaozhao Chen
1,2,
Yu Hu
1,2,* and
Heng Mei
1,2,*
1
Institute of Hematology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, 1277 Jiefang Avenue, Wuhan 430022, China
2
Hubei Clinical Medical Center of Cell Therapy for Neoplastic Disease, Wuhan 430022, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17(1), 139; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17010139
Submission received: 20 December 2023 / Revised: 11 January 2024 / Accepted: 16 January 2024 / Published: 22 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Section Biopharmaceuticals)
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy has emerged as a groundbreaking approach in cancer treatment, showcasing remarkable efficacy. However, the formidable challenge lies in taming the formidable side effects associated with this innovative therapy, among which cytokine release syndrome (CRS), immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) and on-target off-tumor toxicities (OTOT) are typical representatives. Championing the next frontier in cellular immunotherapy, this comprehensive review embarks on an artistic exploration of leveraging biomaterials to meticulously navigate the intricate landscape of CAR-T cell therapy. Unraveling the tapestry of potential toxicities, our discourse unveils a symphony of innovative strategies designed to elevate the safety profile of this revolutionary therapeutic approach. Through the lens of advanced medical science, we illuminate the promise of biomaterial interventions in sculpting a safer and more efficacious path for CAR-T cell therapy, transcending the boundaries of conventional treatment paradigms.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

CAR-T therapy has revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of cancer, offering a paradigm shift in the treatment of hematologic malignancies [1]. The remarkable success of CAR-T therapy in achieving durable responses, particularly in refractory and relapsed (R/R) CD19+ leukemia and lymphoma, as well as B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)+ multiple myeloma [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11], has underscored its potential to transform the trajectory of cancer care. However, this groundbreaking approach is not without its challenges, as the clinical translation of CAR-T cells introduces formidable side effects that necessitate careful consideration and innovative solutions [12].
The adverse events post CAR-T cell infusion encompass CRS, ICANS, OTOT, secondary haemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis or macrophage activation syndrome (sHLH/MAS), infectious susceptibility, coagulopathy, hematologic cytopenia, latent human herpesvirus 6 reactivation, etc. [12,13,14,15,16,17,18]. At the forefront of these challenges are the intricate dynamics of adverse events, prominently exemplified by CRS, ICANS and OTOT. Various strategies have been devised to mitigate these adverse effects in efforts to alleviate these toxicities [19,20,21,22]. However, achieving the maximal cytotoxic potential of CAR-T cells while concurrently minimizing toxic side effects remains a challenging endeavor.
Biomaterials have been used in various biomedical fields, encompassing a diverse array of entities, ranging from inorganic and organic nanoparticles [23] to synthetic materials [24], hydrogels [25], and 3D scaffolds [26] that exhibit notable advantages, including strong targeting capabilities, sustained release effects, enhanced bioavailability, controlled responsivity, substantial drug-loading capacity, multifunctionality, ease of manipulation and customization, and minimal toxicity and adverse reactions [27,28,29,30]. This comprehensive review embarks on an artful expedition into the integration of biomaterials as a strategic modality to mitigate CAR-T-related adverse effects, thus fortifying the therapeutic potential of CAR-T cells. The juxtaposition of the exquisite efficacy of CAR-T therapy against the challenges posed by its side effects establishes the framework for our exploration. Through a meticulous examination of the evolving landscape of biomaterial-based interventions, we seek to unravel the tapestry of potential toxicities associated with CAR-T therapy and present an in-depth analysis of innovative strategies designed to elevate its safety profile.
As we navigate the intricate landscape of CAR-T cell therapy, the multifaceted nature of these toxicities becomes apparent. Traditional therapeutic paradigms often fall short in addressing the unique challenges posed by the balance of efficacy and toxicity [31,32]. Therefore, our discourse aims to unveil a symphony of innovative strategies grounded in the principles of biomaterial science to transcend the boundaries of conventional treatment paradigms. By doing so, we envision not only a refinement of CAR-T therapeutic strategies but also a broader impact on the field of cellular immunotherapy.
The lens through which we examine these challenges is that of advanced medical science, seeking to illuminate the promise of biomaterial interventions in sculpting a safer and more efficacious path for CAR-T cell therapy. By amalgamating the artistry of biomedical innovation with the precision of scientific inquiry, we strive to catalyze a transformative shift in the perception and application of CAR-T therapy. In the subsequent sections of this review, we will delve into the mechanisms underlying CRS, ICANS and OTOT, exploring the role of biomaterials in mitigating these adverse effects and providing a nuanced perspective on their potential clinical implications.

2. Mechanisms of CAR-T-Related Toxicities

2.1. Pathophysiological Mechanism of CRS

CRS, also known as a cytokine storm, is a systemic hyperinflammatory response triggered by the infusion of CAR-T cells into the body and their interaction with target tumor cells and other immune cells [33,34]. Typically manifesting within days post-treatment, this process involves the activation and proliferation of CAR-T cells, leading to the release of a substantial amount of inflammatory cytokines, including interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-γ (IFN-γ), among others [35,36]. These released cytokines go on to further stimulate immune cells, including monocytes, macrophages, T cells, B cells, dendritic cells (DCs), natural killer (NK) cells, as well as non-immune cells such as endothelial cells and tissue cells [35,37]. This intricate network of cellular interactions leads to a cascading release of a plethora of additional cytokines, fostering a milieu conducive to heightened immune activation, thereby underscoring the complex and dynamic nature of the immune response initiated by CAR-T cell therapy.
In this context, the subsequent release of an extensive array of cytokines serves as a key orchestrator in the intricate symphony of immune activation and the ensuing clinical manifestations. CRS manifests across a spectrum of clinical symptoms, with severity ranging from mild to life-threatening [38,39]. Mild CRS symptoms typically include a low to moderate fever, mild fatigue, occasional headaches, and muscle pain. As the intensity of CRS progresses to the moderate stage, patients may experience a persistent or increasing fever, low blood pressure requiring medical attention, elevated heart rate, and mild respiratory distress. In severe cases of CRS, patients may exhibit high and persistent fever, severe hypotension leading to shock, significant respiratory distress, and multi-organ dysfunction, including liver and kidney impairment [38,39]. Such severe manifestations demand immediate medical intervention, often in an intensive care setting. Based on the severity of CRS, it can be classified into grades 1 through 4, with higher grades indicating more severe manifestations [40].
The pathophysiological and biological mechanisms underlying CRS are highly complex and remain incompletely elucidated to date (Scheme 1). Several studies have endeavored to explore this intricate facet, although a comprehensive understanding has yet to be achieved. Morgane and her team investigated the roles of different CAR-T cell subsets in the occurrence of CRS in an immunocompetent mouse model, and they reported that CD4+, rather than CD8+ CAR-T cells, played an important role in inducing CRS in mice [41]. The incidence and severity of CRS were significantly correlated with the high absolute values of CD4+ CAR-T cells in the blood [41]. Theodoros and coworkers revealed that CAR-T-therapy-induced CRS was mainly mediated by IL-6, IL-1, and nitric oxide (NO) produced by recipient macrophages, not only CAR-T cells in a SCID-beige murine model of CRS [33]. They further discovered that CAR-T cells activated macrophages through the interaction of CD40L with CD40. Another group further demonstrated that monocyte-derived IL-1 and IL-6 were the key factors driving CRS in humanized SGM3 (HuSGM3) mice, and they suggested that tocilizumab did not confer protection against delayed lethal neurotoxicity. Conversely, the administration of the IL-1 receptor antagonist anakinra proved effective in mitigating both CRS and neurotoxicity, ultimately leading to a significant extension in leukemia-free survival [34]. Huang et al. observed that when CAR-T cells engaged with cancer cells, they activated Caspase-3 in the target cells and induced cancer cell pyroptosis through the activation of gasdermin E (GSDME). Consequently, this process led to the simultaneous release of factors such as ATP and HMGB1, which activated the Caspase-1-gasdermin D (GSDMD) and MAPK-NF-κB inflammatory pathways within macrophages, triggering an inflammatory factors storm [42]. The severity of CRS correlated positively with the levels of GSDME in patients-derived tumor cells. Another investigation revealed that catecholamines play a role in coordinating immune dysregulation linked to CRS through a self-amplifying loop within macrophages [43]. The deficiency of myeloid-specific tyrosine hydroxylase disrupted this loop. Elevated catecholamine levels coincided with the extensive release of cytokines, and inhibiting catecholamine synthesis reduces cytokine release both in vitro and in mice. The use of metyrosine for pharmacological catecholamine blockade protected mice from the lethal complications induced by CRS triggered by the use of CAR-T therapy [43].

2.2. Pathophysiological Mechanism of ICANS

ICANS, alternatively recognized as neurotoxicity, is another potential toxicity of CAR-T therapy [19]. It typically manifests within days to weeks following the infusion of CAR-T cells. Its clinical spectrum is wide-ranging, encompassing mild cognitive impairment to more severe neurological deficits. It often presents as a toxic encephalopathy, with early symptoms including confusion, diminished attention, language impairment, impaired writing function, emotional agitation, aphasia, somnolence, and tremors [35]. The American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy (ASTCT) classifies adult ICANS into five grades based on the immune effector cell-associated encephalopathy (ICE) score, depressed level of consciousness, seizures, motor findings, and elevated intracranial pressure/cerebral edema [40]. It is noteworthy that ICANS is intricately linked to alterations in electroencephalographic and neuroimaging outcomes [44]. Hence, it is imperative to establish a timely and precise diagnosis of ICANS through a comprehensive assessment encompassing clinical manifestations, neuroimaging, and electroencephalography. The integration of these diagnostic modalities not only enhances the accuracy of identifying ICANS but also provides valuable insights into the underlying neural mechanisms contributing to this syndrome. Recognizing the dynamic interplay between clinical presentations, neuroimaging findings, and electroencephalographic patterns becomes pivotal in deciphering the spectrum and severity of CAR T-cell-induced neurotoxicity.
The mechanisms of ICANS are not fully elucidated at present, involving the release of inflammatory cytokines, disruption of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), infiltration of immune cells into the central nervous system, and damage to glial cells [19,35] (Scheme 2). Reportedly, single-cell RNA sequencing analysis revealed the expression of CD19 in human brain barrier cells, including pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells [45]. This raised the possibility that on-target off-tumor effects would contribute to CD19 CAR-T cell-associated ICANS. Pericytes, which mainly form the BBB, express CD19, suggesting that the mechanism of ICANS may involve CRS-induced disruption of BBB integrity [45]. This allows CAR-T cells to breach the BBB, attacking pericytes expressing CD19, leading to further breakdown of the BBB. Subsequently, a large number of CAR-T cells enter the central nervous system (CNS), causing more severe neurotoxicity.

2.3. Pathophysiological Mechanism of OTOT

OTOT in CAR-T therapy refers to the phenomenon where CAR-T cells inadvertently harm normal tissues and cells while targeting the intended antigen [22]. This adverse reaction occurs because the tumor-associated antigen (TAA) designed for CAR-T cells is expressed not only in tumor cells but also in normal tissues outside of the tumor, leading to attacks on normal cells by CAR-T cells [22] (Scheme 3). This toxic reaction may trigger a range of adverse events, including but not limited to inflammatory reactions, tissue damage, and organ dysfunction. For example, CD19 CAR-T cells may attack normal B cells, causing B cell dysplasia [46]. In CAR-T therapy for solid tumors, the phenomenon is more pronounced due to the expression of certain target antigens to varying degrees in non-tumor tissues or organs. In a clinical study of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) CAR-T therapy for metastatic colon carcinoma, the patient experienced acute respiratory distress and succumbed to fatal pulmonary edema five days after cell infusion [47]. This was attributed to the CAR-T cells erroneously identifying low-level HER2 expression in the pulmonary epithelium, leading to lethal pulmonary edema.

3. Leveraging Biomaterials to Manage CAR-T-Related Toxicities

3.1. Biomaterials for the Treatment of CRS and ICANS

The clinical use of immunosuppressive glucocorticoids [48] and tocilizumab [49] may contribute to mitigating CRS. Severe ICANS is typically managed with corticosteroid therapy, while tocilizumab has shown limited efficacy in the majority of ICANS cases [50]. However, the use of tocilizumab has also raised concerns about adverse drug reactions, such as lung and liver sarcoidosis [51]. Corticosteroids, on the one hand, mediate broad anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects but concurrently inhibit the proliferation of CAR-T cells and the secretion of effector cytokines. On the other hand, the extensive use of corticosteroids brings about various side effects, including the risk of osteonecrosis and infections [52,53,54]. Therefore, delineating strategies to suppress CRS and ICANS, minimizing their toxicities while preserving the in vivo proliferation and cytotoxic functions of CAR-T cells, and ensuring that the therapeutic agents employed do not induce secondary side effects have emerged as pivotal research directions in the current investigative landscape. In this regard, two preclinical studies have endeavored to address this issue through the application of biomaterials.
Excessive cytokine production occurs during the process of CRS. Therefore, the precise modulation of the immune response through the neutralization or capture of cytokines holds the potential to reduce systemic inflammation levels, alleviating the systemic inflammatory reaction caused by cytokine storms.
IL-6 plays a crucial role in CRS induced by CAR-T cell therapy, serving as a key factor contributing to inflammation and other adverse effects [55]. Li et al. proposed a temperature-sensitive hydrogel conjugated with IL-6 antibodies, termed the IL-6 sponge (IL6S), which was prepared by chemically conjugating IL-6-specific antibodies to a thermo-responsive hydrogel poly (N-isopropylacrylamide-co-methacrylic acid) [56] (Scheme 4). IL6S can be administered subcutaneously prior to CAR-T cell infusion to capture the aberrantly increased IL-6 during CRS in real time. CRS models were established in SCID-beige and HuSGM3 mice. Mice were treated with PBS, IL-6 antibody, or IL6S before CAR-T cell infusion, and serum cytokines and CRS-related symptoms were continuously monitored. Compared to mice treated with PBS or IL-6 antibody, mice receiving IL6S exhibited a significant reduction in IL-6 concentration in serum. Moreover, IL6S significantly inhibited several other cytokines, including chemokine (C-C motif) ligand 2 (CCL2), TNF-α, GM-CSF, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), IL-3, and IL-10. IL6S treatment significantly lowered the mortality rate of CRS mice without significantly affecting blood pressure or causing adverse reactions such as fever or weight loss [56]. Importantly, no signs of neurotoxicity (such as meningeal thickening) were observed in mice receiving IL6S compared to the PBS-treated group. Overall, these results suggest that, in a preclinical CRS mouse model, IL6S can effectively reduce the levels of inflammatory cytokines and alleviate CRS-related symptoms [56].
Ultimately, as IL6S could not degrade in vivo, this study aimed to restore mobility by covering the injection area with an ice pack, inducing a gel-to-sol transition, enabling the removal of IL6S with a syringe. Researchers have also assessed the potential long-term toxicity associated with IL6S implantation and its impact on the anti-tumor efficacy of CAR-T cells. The results demonstrated that IL6S exhibited good biocompatibility and biosafety without compromising the tumor-clearing effectiveness in a xenograft mouse model transplanted with Raji cells [56].
However, this novel strategy employed a temperature-sensitive hydrogel conjugated with antibodies for IL-6 to mitigate CRS during CAR-T therapy. While the approach shows promise, a thorough evaluation of the limitations associated with this IL-6-adsorbing hydrogel (IL6S) is crucial from a biomaterial standpoint. First of all, this study did not delve into the degradation profile of the hydrogel and the clearance of its byproducts. These aspects are critical for ensuring the safe removal of the hydrogel and minimizing any residual material or potential immunogenicity post-removal. In addition, researchers have thus far investigated the ability of IL6S to sequester IL-6 exclusively in small animal models, utilizing mice and rabbits. However, the dosage, injection sites, and optimal timing of IL6S administration may significantly differ when transitioning to large animal models and non-human primate models that more closely approximate human physiology.
The monocyte–macrophage system plays a crucial role in the development of CRS, with the hyperactive response of these cells releasing cytokines such as IL-6 and IL-1, triggering CRS and ICANS [33,34]. Therefore, a potential therapeutic approach for the treatment of CRS and ICANS could be provided by blocking the interaction between CAR-T cells and monocytes to reduce the excessive activation of monocytes/macrophages. Gong et al. ingeniously designed a strategy for the in situ PEGylation of CAR-T cells to address CRS and ICANS [57] (Scheme 5). They pre-incubated CAR-T cells with Ac4ManNAz, displaying azido groups on their surfaces through bioorthogonal reaction. Subsequently, through click chemistry, they modified the T cell surface with polyethylene glycol (PEG) of different molecular weights. Further investigations revealed a significant reduction in the cytotoxicity of CAR-T cells against tumor cells when the cell surface was modified with 600K PEG. Moreover, the release of IL-6 from activated monocytes and TNF-α from activated CAR-T cells markedly decreased [57]. These findings suggest that successful PEGylation of CAR-T cells, under the spatial hindrance effect generated by high-molecular-weight PEG, effectively blocked contact with other cells, weakened monocyte activation, and reduced the release of inflammatory factors.
The researchers further explored the feasibility of in situ PEGylation of CAR-T cells in a CRS and ICANS model induced in HuSGM3 mice. They discovered that intravenously injected DBCO-PEG600K could couple with azide-modified CAR-T cells in vivo, undergoing in situ PEGylation. The experimental results indicated that doses of DBCO-PEG600K greater than 10 mg/kg could alleviate mouse CRS-associated symptoms, reverse weight loss, and lead to temperature elevation and cytokine release. Importantly, compared to tocilizumab, PEGylated CAR-T cells were effective in reducing neurotoxicity [57]. Interestingly, compared to unmodified CAR-T cells, DBCO-PEG-modified CAR-T cells collected on day 10 did not induce tumor cell killing and the release of cytokines (IL-6, IL-1, TNF-α). However, on day 15, DBCO-PEG-modified CAR-T cells induced substantial tumor cell killing and CAR-T cytotoxicity-related TNF-α release without a close association with CRS-related IL-6 and IL-1 [57]. This gradual dilution of DBCO-PEG600K on the CAR-T cell surface allowed interactions between cells to slowly recover. As CAR-T cell-tumor cell interactions recovered earlier than CAR-T cell–monocyte interactions, this approach allowed CAR-T cells to kill tumor cells before monocytes were activated, implying that this method effectively reduced side effects without compromising the clearance efficacy of CAR-T cells against tumors. Overall, this strategy ingeniously struck a balance between maximal anti-tumor efficacy and minimal adverse reactions.
The introduction of spatial hindrance through high molecular weight PEG modification via DBCO presents an innovative strategy to attenuate the interaction between CAR-T cells and monocytes, thereby alleviating CRS. Nevertheless, it is imperative to consider the immunogenicity of PEG and its impact on the immune system’s clearance of PEG. Owing to its excellent biocompatibility and tunable physicochemical properties, PEG plays a crucial role in various domains, including pharmaceuticals, biotechnology, the food industry, as well as cosmetics and personal care products. Therefore, people frequently come into contact with and use products containing PEG in their daily lives, and as a consequence, many individuals have produced antibodies against PEG [58]. Reportedly, more than 25% of healthy individuals possess anti-PEG IgM or IgG antibodies, respectively, and 8.3% concurrently harbor both anti-PEG IgM and IgG antibodies [59]. Hence, these pre-existing antibodies are likely to significantly impact the in vivo pharmacokinetics of DBCO-PEG upon infusion, as well as the efficacy of in situ PEGylation of CAR-T cells.

3.2. Biomaterials for Controlling CAR-T Activity and Avoiding OTOT

Currently, synthetic biology methods, such as logic-gated CAR-T cell technology, could be leveraged to regulate the activation of CAR-T cells and circumvent OTOT [22,60,61]. Nevertheless, due to the extensive overlap of antigens between tumor cells and normal tissues, it is challenging to identify ideal antigens that can distinguish between tumor and normal tissues. Additionally, pre-integrating suicide genes into the CAR structure can effectively eliminate CAR-T cells in vivo [62,63]. However, this approach faces difficulties in grasping the timing of suicide-inducing drug administration, and it may potentially impair the anti-tumor efficacy. Therefore, precise control over CAR-T activity is essential to achieve localized activation at the tumor site and reduce the toxicity of OTOT. Integrating stimulus-responsive biomaterial technology with immunotherapy to achieve remote control of CAR-T cells, enabling time and spatial-specific activation of CAR-T cells, could potentially offer a safer approach to inhibit tumor growth in the body.
Miller et al. ingeniously incorporated the HSPB1 into the CAR structure, creating a sophisticated “photothermal sensitive switch” that enables precise triggering of CAR expression [64] (Scheme 6). The exciting research findings revealed that after a brief heat treatment, CAR transgene expression in primary T cells significantly increased a lot [64]. To achieve localized thermal therapy for tumors, researchers judiciously selected plasmonic AuNR as highly efficient photothermal converters, which could efficiently convert NIR (650~900 nm) into thermal energy. After intravenous injection of AuNR and CAR-T cells, it was observed that only CD19+ tumors triggered significant CAR expression after NIR irradiation. Untreated or CD19 tumors failed to activate CD19 CAR-T cells. Furthermore, the study revealed that locally induced activation of CAR-T was spatially restricted to the heated area, with no CAR-T cells observed in distant tumors and spleen, efficaciously avoiding adverse effects on non-tumor organs [64].
Another team designed a more sophisticated photoresponsive biomaterial, which was a hexagonally shaped upconversion nanoplate (UCNPs) with a core–shell composition of β-NaYbF4: 0.5%Tm@NaYF4, where Yb3+ acts as a photosensitizer receiving NIR excitation light, and Tm3+ serves as a blue light emitter [65]. Upon 980 nm NIR excitation, UCNPs could function as miniature deep-tissue photon sensors, inducing intense blue light emission. Introducing the newly engineered photoresponsive module into the CAR structure, they constructed light-switchable CAR-T cells (LiCAR-T) combined with UCNPs. Upon NIR irradiation, these cells, LiCAR-T, could induce CAR expression only under dual activation of blue light signals and tumor antigens [65]. LiCAR-T cells exhibited antigen-dependent and spatiotemporally dependent cytotoxicity against tumors. Furthermore, they established OTOT mouse models and a CRS model based on SCID-beige mice, finding that CD19 LiCAR-T cells significantly reduced B cell aplasia and decreased the cytokine level [65].
Unlike the limited penetration capability of NIR, focused ultrasound (FUS) offers a safe and non-invasive means to deliver energy into deeper tissues [66]. The method of controlling CAR-T cell activity through short, pulsed waves of FUS has been reported [67], but currently, there are no stimulus-responsive biomaterials specifically designed for this purpose. Some researchers have provided an overview anticipating the use of nanotechnology and other external physical stimuli such as magnetic fields, X-rays, electric fields, etc., to remotely manipulate the activity of CAR-T cells for the treatment of malignant tumors [68], thereby eliciting a particularly powerful therapeutic effect on solid tumors and reducing the risk of OTOT. Similarly, these external means of physical manipulation have also overcome the drawback of NIR, namely its relatively insufficient penetration depth in the context of the human body [69], particularly in tissues abundant with blood or pigments, constraining its precision in accurately localizing and monitoring deep-seated tissues.

4. Conclusions and Future Prospects

In summary, the landscape of CAR-T therapy is undeniably transformative, marking a paradigm shift in cancer treatment efficacy. However, notable side effects, including CRS, ICANS, and OTOT, cast a looming shadow over its widespread application. This comprehensive review has undertaken an artful expedition into the realm of biomaterials, aiming to unravel the intricate tapestry of toxicities associated with CAR-T therapy and navigate a safer course for its future.
Our exploration began with an in-depth analysis of the pathological mechanisms underlying CRS, ICANS, and OTOT. The dysregulated immune responses and the cascade of inflammatory cytokines implicated in these toxicities were scrutinized, shedding light on the complex interplay between CAR-T cells and the host immune system. Understanding the intricacies of these toxicities is paramount for the development of targeted interventions, and our discourse has provided a roadmap for this endeavor.
The central theme of our discourse has been the utilization of biomaterials as a strategic tool to mitigate the adverse effects of CAR-T therapy. From engineering hydrogels to in situ PEGylation strategies, researchers have crafted an impressive symphony of innovative approaches. These biomaterial interventions act as guardians, providing nuanced control over the activity of CAR-T cells, creating a safeguard against the unleashed storm of cytokines, and avoiding OTOT. The success of these interventions in preclinical models underscores their potential for translation into clinical settings.
As we peer into the future, the promise of biomaterial interventions in sculpting a safer and more efficacious path for CAR-T cell therapy becomes evident. The inherent flexibility of biomaterial design allows for tailored solutions, addressing specific challenges posed by CRS, ICANS, and OTOT. The integration of stimuli-responsive materials and advanced gene editing techniques further enhances the precision and safety of these interventions. In the quest to champion safety in cellular immunotherapy, the role of biomaterials extends beyond mitigating toxicities. These materials open avenues for the development of controlled-release systems, enabling precise modulation of CAR-T cell activity. Additionally, the exploration of remote control, such as focused ultrasound, adds a layer of sophistication to the therapeutic arsenal.
Most recently, the prospective application of CAR-T cell therapy in non-neoplastic diseases has garnered considerable attention [70,71,72,73]. Current research indicates that CAR-T cells, through the modulation of immune system hyperactivation, hold promise in terms of interventions intended for autoimmune disorders. This technology has demonstrated potential therapeutic efficacy in the realm of autoimmune diseases and immune-mediated pathologies, encompassing refractory systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) [74,75,76], rheumatoid arthritis (RA) [77,78], type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) [79,80,81], pemphigus vulgaris [82], muscle-specific tyrosine kinase myasthenia gravis (MuSK MG) [83], as well as colitis [84,85] and multiple sclerosis (MS) [86]. In clinical settings, CAR-T therapy has been reported in the context of diseases such as SLE [75], anti-synthetase syndrome [87], and systemic sclerosis (SSc) [88]. Remarkably, treatment-related adverse effects, notably CRS, have manifested in patients undergoing these therapeutic interventions. These findings have generated widespread interest in the current academic milieu, offering valuable insights for the expanded application of CAR-T cell therapy in the treatment of diverse autoimmune conditions. Nonetheless, it is essential to underscore that further in-depth research and clinical practices are requisite to ensure the safety and efficacy of this technology. The documented cases underscore the imperative for ongoing scrutiny and refinement of CAR-T therapies in the clinical management of these conditions. As the therapeutic landscape evolves, meticulous monitoring and further investigations are warranted to enhance the safety and efficacy profile of CAR-T treatments in the realm of autoimmune disorders. Therefore, concurrently alleviating the toxicity associated with anti-tumor CAR-T treatments leveraging biomaterials while also extending the application of these to overcome adverse reactions in the treatment of autoimmune and immune-mediated pathologies and exploring the feasibility thereof represent a crucial avenue for future endeavors in advanced medical research.
Looking to the future, to begin with, from a biomaterial perspective, future efforts should primarily focus on conducting comprehensive safety evaluations of biomaterials in large animal models and non-human primates, which exhibit physiological characteristics more closely resembling those of humans. This includes an in-depth assessment of safety profiles in disease models. Simultaneously, investigations into appropriate administration routes, dosage, and timing in these models are essential. Additionally, careful consideration must be given to the immunogenicity of biomaterials and the impact of immune responses on their in vivo efficacy. These aspects require thorough evaluation to pave the way for successful clinical translation. Additionally, the translation of these innovative strategies from bench to bedside holds immense promise. Clinical trials investigating the safety and efficacy of biomaterial interventions in CAR-T therapy are on the horizon. Collaborative efforts between biomaterial scientists, immunologists, and clinicians will be pivotal in shaping the future of CAR-T therapy, ensuring its broader accessibility and minimizing the risks of adverse events.
In conclusion, the judicious integration of biomaterials into the realm of CAR-T therapy paints an optimistic outlook for the future. The artful expedition we have undertaken signifies not only a profound understanding of the challenges posed by toxicities but also a commitment to overcoming these challenges with ingenuity and precision. As we navigate this uncharted territory, the synergy between advanced medical science and biomaterial innovations emerges as a beacon of hope, paving the way for a safer and more effective era in cellular immunotherapy. The journey continues, and the promise of a transformative impact on cancer treatment remains within reach.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.H. and H.M.; resources, H.M.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.C. and H.M.; writing—review and editing, Y.H. and H.M.; visualization, Z.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82330005 to H.M., No. 82070124 to H.M.), the National Key R&D Program of China (2022YFC2502704 to H.M.), Technology innovation plan key research and development projects of Hubei Province (No. 2023BCB019), the Fundamental Research Support Program of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (No. 5003530166 to H.M.), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, HUST (No. 5003530176 to Z.C.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank all researchers for their contribution to this review. All the figures were created by using the website tool BioRender (https://www.biorender.com/, accessed on 20 December 2023).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors disclose no potential conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Abbasi, S.; Totmaj, M.A.; Abbasi, M.; Hajazimian, S.; Goleij, P.; Behroozi, J.; Shademan, B.; Isazadeh, A.; Baradaran, B. Chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cells: Novel cell therapy for hematological malignancies. Cancer Med. 2023, 12, 7844–7858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Abramson, J.S.; Palomba, M.L.; Gordon, L.I.; Lunning, M.A.; Wang, M.; Arnason, J.; Mehta, A.; Purev, E.; Maloney, D.G.; Andreadis, C.; et al. Lisocabtagene maraleucel for patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (TRANSCEND NHL 001): A multicentre seamless design study. Lancet 2020, 396, 839–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Locke, F.L.; Ghobadi, A.; Jacobson, C.A.; Miklos, D.B.; Lekakis, L.J.; Oluwole, O.O.; Lin, Y.; Braunschweig, I.; Hill, B.T.; Timmerman, J.M.; et al. Long-term safety and activity of axicabtagene ciloleucel in refractory large B-cell lymphoma (ZUMA-1): A single-arm, multicentre, phase 1-2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2019, 20, 31–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Neelapu, S.S.; Locke, F.L.; Bartlett, N.L.; Lekakis, L.J.; Miklos, D.B.; Jacobson, C.A.; Braunschweig, I.; Oluwole, O.O.; Siddiqi, T.; Lin, Y.; et al. Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 2531–2544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Schuster, S.J.; Bishop, M.R.; Tam, C.S.; Waller, E.K.; Borchmann, P.; McGuirk, J.P.; Jäger, U.; Jaglowski, S.; Andreadis, C.; Westin, J.R.; et al. Tisagenlecleucel in Adult Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma. N. Engl. J. Med. 2019, 380, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Maude, S.L.; Laetsch, T.W.; Buechner, J.; Rives, S.; Boyer, M.; Bittencourt, H.; Bader, P.; Verneris, M.R.; Stefanski, H.E.; Myers, G.D.; et al. Tisagenlecleucel in Children and Young Adults with B-Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2018, 378, 439–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. The National Medical Products and Drug Administration Approved the Marketing of Nachiolense Injection with Conditions. Available online: https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/directory/web/nmpa/zhuanti/cxylqx/cxypxx/20231108092415187.html (accessed on 20 December 2023).
  8. FDA Approves First Cell-Based Gene Therapy for Adult Patients with Multiple Myeloma. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/news-events/press-announcements/fda-approves-first-cell-based-gene-therapy-adult-patients-multiple-myeloma (accessed on 27 March 2021).
  9. National Medical Products Administration Approves the Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Injection. Available online: https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/directory/web/nmpa/yaowen/ypjgyw/20210623094232187.html (accessed on 23 June 2021).
  10. FDA Approves Ciltacabtagene Autoleucel for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma. Available online: https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-approves-ciltacabtagene-autoleucel-relapsed-or-refractory-multiple-myeloma (accessed on 28 February 2022).
  11. The National Medical Products and Drug Administration Approved the Listing of Yiji Orensai Injection with Conditions. Available online: https://www.nmpa.gov.cn/yaowen/ypjgyw/20230630195006116.html?type=pc&m= (accessed on 30 June 2023).
  12. Sterner, R.C.; Sterner, R.M. CAR-T cell therapy: Current limitations and potential strategies. Blood Cancer J. 2021, 11, 69. [Google Scholar]
  13. Zhang, Y.; Li, Y.; Cao, W.; Wang, F.; Xie, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, X.; Guo, R.; Jiang, Z.; Guo, R. Single-Cell Analysis of Target Antigens of CAR-T Reveals a Potential Landscape of “On-Target, Off-Tumor Toxicity”. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 799206. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sandler, R.D.; Tattersall, R.S.; Schoemans, H.; Greco, R.; Badoglio, M.; Labopin, M.; Alexander, T.; Kirgizov, K.; Rovira, M.; Saif, M.; et al. Diagnosis and Management of Secondary HLH/MAS Following HSCT and CAR-T Cell Therapy in Adults; A Review of the Literature and a Survey of Practice Within EBMT Centres on Behalf of the Autoimmune Diseases Working Party (ADWP) and Transplant Complications Working Party (TCWP). Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 524. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Stewart, A.G.; Henden, A.S. Infectious complications of CAR T-cell therapy: A clinical update. Ther. Adv. Infect. Dis. 2021, 8, 20499361211036773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Arai, Y. Coagulopathy related to CAR-T cell therapy. Jpn. J. Clin. Hematol. 2022, 63, 1205–1211. [Google Scholar]
  17. Si, X.; Gu, T.; Liu, L.; Huang, Y.; Han, Y.; Qian, P.; Huang, H. Hematologic cytopenia post CAR T cell therapy: Etiology, potential mechanisms and perspective. Cancer Lett. 2022, 550, 215920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lareau, C.A.; Yin, Y.; Maurer, K.; Sandor, K.D.; Daniel, B.; Yagnik, G.; Peña, J.; Crawford, J.C.; Spanjaart, A.M.; Gutierrez, J.C.; et al. Latent human herpesvirus 6 is reactivated in CAR T cells. Nature 2023, 623, 608–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Brudno, J.N.; Kochenderfer, J.N. Recent advances in CAR T-cell toxicity: Mechanisms, manifestations and management. Blood Rev. 2019, 34, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Neelapu, S.S. Managing the toxicities of CAR T-cell therapy. Hematol. Oncol. 2019, 37 (Suppl. 1), 48–52. [Google Scholar]
  21. Zhang, Y.; Qin, D.; Shou, A.C.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, L. Exploring CAR-T Cell Therapy Side Effects: Mechanisms and Management Strategies. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 6124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Flugel, C.L.; Majzner, R.G.; Krenciute, G.; Dotti, G.; Riddell, S.R.; Wagner, D.L.; Abou-El-Enein, M. Overcoming on-target, off-tumour toxicity of CAR T cell therapy for solid tumours. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 20, 49–62. [Google Scholar]
  23. Chiozzi, V.; Rossi, F. Inorganic-organic core/shell nanoparticles: Progress and applications. Nanoscale Adv. 2020, 2, 5090–5105. [Google Scholar]
  24. Yazdanian, M.; Alam, M.; Abbasi, K.; Rahbar, M.; Farjood, A.; Tahmasebi, E.; Tebyaniyan, H.; Ranjbar, R.; Arefi, A.H. Synthetic materials in craniofacial regenerative medicine: A comprehensive overview. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2022, 10, 987195. [Google Scholar]
  25. Ho, T.-C.; Chang, C.-C.; Chan, H.-P.; Chung, T.-W.; Shu, C.-W.; Chuang, K.-P.; Duh, T.-H.; Yang, M.-H.; Tyan, Y.-C. Hydrogels: Properties and Applications in Biomedicine. Molecules 2022, 27, 2902. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  26. Han, S.; Wu, J. Three-dimensional (3D) scaffolds as powerful weapons for tumor immunotherapy. Bioact. Mater. 2022, 17, 300–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Kajani, A.A.; Javanmard, S.H.; Asadnia, M.; Razmjou, A. Recent Advances in Nanomaterials Development for Nanomedicine and Cancer. ACS Appl. Bio Mater. 2021, 4, 5908–5925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dutta, B.; Barick, K.C.; Hassan, P.A. Recent advances in active targeting of nanomaterials for anticancer drug delivery. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 296, 102509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Lafuente-Gómez, N.; Latorre, A.; Milán-Rois, P.; Rodriguez Diaz, C.; Somoza, Á. Stimuli-responsive nanomaterials for cancer treatment: Boundaries, opportunities and applications. Chem. Commun. 2021, 57, 13662–13677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Nii, T.; Katayama, Y. Biomaterial-Assisted Regenerative Medicine. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 8657. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  31. Chohan, K.L.; Siegler, E.L.; Kenderian, S.S. CAR-T Cell Therapy: The Efficacy and Toxicity Balance. Curr. Hematol. Malig. Rep. 2023, 18, 9–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Andrea, A.E.; Chiron, A.; Bessoles, S.; Hacein-Bey-Abina, S. Engineering Next-Generation CAR-T Cells for Better Toxicity Management. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8620. [Google Scholar]
  33. Giavridis, T.; van der Stegen, S.J.C.; Eyquem, J.; Hamieh, M.; Piersigilli, A.; Sadelain, M. CAR T cell-induced cytokine release syndrome is mediated by macrophages and abated by IL-1 blockade. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 731–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Norelli, M.; Camisa, B.; Barbiera, G.; Falcone, L.; Purevdorj, A.; Genua, M.; Sanvito, F.; Ponzoni, M.; Doglioni, C.; Cristofori, P.; et al. Monocyte-derived IL-1 and IL-6 are differentially required for cytokine-release syndrome and neurotoxicity due to CAR T cells. Nat. Med. 2018, 24, 739–748. [Google Scholar]
  35. Morris, E.C.; Neelapu, S.S.; Giavridis, T.; Sadelain, M. Cytokine release syndrome and associated neurotoxicity in cancer immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2022, 22, 85–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fajgenbaum, D.C.; June, C.H. Cytokine Storm. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2255–2273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Xiao, X.; Huang, S.; Chen, S.; Wang, Y.; Sun, Q.; Xu, X.; Li, Y. Mechanisms of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity of CAR T-cell therapy and associated prevention and management strategies. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2021, 40, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Schubert, M.-L.; Schmitt, M.; Wang, L.; Ramos, C.; Jordan, K.; Müller-Tidow, C.; Dreger, P. Side-effect management of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Ann. Oncol. 2021, 32, 34–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yáñez, L.; Sánchez-Escamilla, M.; Perales, M.A. CAR T Cell Toxicity: Current Management and Future Directions. Hemasphere 2019, 3, e186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Lee, D.W.; Santomasso, B.D.; Locke, F.L.; Ghobadi, A.; Turtle, C.J.; Brudno, J.N.; Maus, M.V.; Park, J.H.; Mead, E.; Pavletic, S.; et al. ASTCT Consensus Grading for Cytokine Release Syndrome and Neurologic Toxicity Associated with Immune Effector Cells. Biol. Blood Marrow Transplant. 2019, 25, 625–638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Boulch, M.; Cazaux, M.; Cuffel, A.; Ruggiu, M.; Allain, V.; Corre, B.; Loe-Mie, Y.; Hosten, B.; Cisternino, S.; Auvity, S.; et al. A major role for CD4(+) T cells in driving cytokine release syndrome during CAR T cell therapy. Cell Rep. Med. 2023, 4, 101161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Liu, Y.; Fang, Y.; Chen, X.; Wang, Z.; Liang, X.; Zhang, T.; Liu, M.; Zhou, N.; Lv, J.; Tang, K.; et al. Gasdermin E-mediated target cell pyroptosis by CAR T cells triggers cytokine release syndrome. Sci. Immunol. 2020, 5, eaax7969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Staedtke, V.; Bai, R.-Y.; Kim, K.; Darvas, M.; Davila, M.L.; Riggins, G.J.; Rothman, P.B.; Papadopoulos, N.; Kinzler, K.W.; Vogelstein, B.; et al. Disruption of a self-amplifying catecholamine loop reduces cytokine release syndrome. Nature 2018, 564, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Saleki, K.; Mohamadi, M.H.; Alijanizadeh, P.; Rezaei, N. Neurological adverse effects of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Expert. Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2023, 19, 1361–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Parker, K.R.; Migliorini, D.; Perkey, E.; Yost, K.E.; Bhaduri, A.; Bagga, P.; Haris, M.; Wilson, N.E.; Liu, F.; Gabunia, K.; et al. Single-Cell Analyses Identify Brain Mural Cells Expressing CD19 as Potential Off-Tumor Targets for CAR-T Immunotherapies. Cell 2020, 183, 126–142.e117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Davila, M.L.; Kloss, C.C.; Gunset, G.; Sadelain, M. CD19 CAR-targeted T cells induce long-term remission and B Cell Aplasia in an immunocompetent mouse model of B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e61338. [Google Scholar]
  47. Morgan, R.A.; Yang, J.C.; Kitano, M.; E Dudley, M.; Laurencot, C.M.; A Rosenberg, S. Case report of a serious adverse event following the administration of T cells transduced with a chimeric antigen receptor recognizing ERBB2. Mol. Ther. 2010, 18, 843–851. [Google Scholar]
  48. Wang, X.; Qi, Y.; Li, H.; Liu, F.; Cao, J.; Chen, W.; Wang, Y.; Qi, K.; Yan, Z.; Zhu, F.; et al. Impact of glucocorticoids on short-term and long-term outcomes in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with CAR-T therapy. Front. Immunol. 2022, 13, 943004. [Google Scholar]
  49. Kotch, C.; Barrett, D.; Teachey, D.T. Tocilizumab for the treatment of chimeric antigen receptor T cell-induced cytokine release syndrome. Expert. Rev. Clin. Immunol. 2019, 15, 813–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Neelapu, S.S.; Tummala, S.; Kebriaei, P.; Wierda, W.; Gutierrez, C.; Locke, F.L.; Komanduri, K.V.; Lin, Y.; Jain, N.; Daver, N.; et al. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy—Assessment and management of toxicities. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018, 15, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Lambert, N.; Hansen, I.; El Moussaoui, M.; Giot, J.; Vercheval, C.; Lommers, É.; Somja, J.; Moutschen, M.; Maquet, P. Lung and liver sarcoidosis-like reaction induced by tocilizumab. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2021, 87, 4848–4852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chang, C.; Greenspan, A.; Gershwin, M.E. The pathogenesis, diagnosis and clinical manifestations of steroid-induced osteonecrosis. J. Autoimmun. 2020, 110, 102460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Li, W.; Huang, Z.; Tan, B.; Chen, G.; Li, X.; Xiong, K.; Zhu, R.; Li, R.; Li, S.; Ye, H.; et al. General recommendation for assessment and management on the risk of glucocorticoid-induced osteonecrosis in patients with COVID-19. J. Orthop. Translat 2021, 31, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  54. Sørup, S.; Darvalics, B.; Russo, L.; Oksen, D.; Lamy, F.; Verpillat, P.; Aa, K.; Ht, S.; Cronin-Fenton, D. High-dose corticosteroid use and risk of hospitalization for infection in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors—A nationwide register-based cohort study. Cancer Med. 2021, 10, 4957–4963. [Google Scholar]
  55. Hao, Z.; Li, R.; Meng, L.; Han, Z.; Hong, Z. Macrophage, the potential key mediator in CAR-T related CRS. Exp. Hematol. Oncol. 2020, 9, 15. [Google Scholar]
  56. Li, X.; Gong, N.; Tian, F.; Zhang, S.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Qing, G.; Wang, Y.; Li, F.; Xu, Y.; et al. Suppression of cytokine release syndrome during CAR-T-cell therapy via a subcutaneously injected interleukin-6-adsorbing hydrogel. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2023, 7, 1129–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gong, N.; Han, X.; Xue, L.; El-Mayta, R.; Metzloff, A.E.; Billingsley, M.M.; Hamilton, A.G.; Mitchell, M.J. In situ PEGylation of CAR T cells alleviates cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity. Nat. Mater. 2023, 22, 1571–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Gaballa, S.A.; Shimizu, T.; Ando, H.; Takata, H.; Emam, S.E.; Ramadan, E.; Naguib, Y.W.; Mady, F.M.; Khaled, K.A.; Ishida, T. Treatment-induced and Pre-existing Anti-peg Antibodies: Prevalence, Clinical Implications, and Future Perspectives. J. Pharm. Sci. 2023, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Chen, B.M.; Cheng, T.L.; Roffler, S.R. Polyethylene Glycol Immunogenicity: Theoretical, Clinical, and Practical Aspects of Anti-Polyethylene Glycol Antibodies. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 14022–14048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Roybal, K.T.; Williams, J.Z.; Morsut, L.; Rupp, L.J.; Kolinko, I.; Choe, J.H.; Walker, W.J.; McNally, K.A.; Lim, W.A. Engineering T Cells with Customized Therapeutic Response Programs Using Synthetic Notch Receptors. Cell 2016, 167, 419–432.e416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Roybal, K.T.; Rupp, L.J.; Morsut, L.; Walker, W.J.; McNally, K.A.; Park, J.S.; Lim, W.A. Precision Tumor Recognition by T Cells with Combinatorial Antigen-Sensing Circuits. Cell 2016, 164, 770–779. [Google Scholar]
  62. Amatya, C.; Pegues, M.A.; Lam, N.; Vanasse, D.; Geldres, C.; Choi, S.; Hewitt, S.M.; Feldman, S.A.; Kochenderfer, J.N. Development of CAR T Cells Expressing a Suicide Gene Plus a Chimeric Antigen Receptor Targeting Signaling Lymphocytic-Activation Molecule F7. Mol. Ther. 2021, 29, 702–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Bouquet, L.; Bôle-Richard, E.; Warda, W.; Da Rocha, M.N.; Trad, R.; Nicod, C.; Haderbache, R.; Genin, D.; Ferrand, C.; Deschamps, M. RapaCaspase-9-based suicide gene applied to the safety of IL-1RAP CAR-T cells. Gene Ther. 2023, 30, 706–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Miller, I.C.; Zamat, A.; Sun, L.-K.; Phuengkham, H.; Harris, A.M.; Gamboa, L.; Yang, J.; Murad, J.P.; Priceman, S.J.; Kwong, G.A. Enhanced intratumoural activity of CAR T cells engineered to produce immunomodulators under photothermal control. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 5, 1348–1359. [Google Scholar]
  65. Nguyen, N.T.; Huang, K.; Zeng, H.; Jing, J.; Wang, R.; Fang, S.; Chen, J.; Liu, X.; Huang, Z.; You, M.J.; et al. Nano-optogenetic engineering of CAR T cells for precision immunotherapy with enhanced safety. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2021, 16, 1424–1434. [Google Scholar]
  66. Izadifar, Z.; Izadifar, Z.; Chapman, D.; Babyn, P. An Introduction to High Intensity Focused Ultrasound: Systematic Review on Principles, Devices, and Clinical Applications. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Wu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Huang, Z.; Wang, X.; Jin, Z.; Li, J.; Limsakul, P.; Zhu, L.; Allen, M.; Pan, Y.; et al. Control of the activity of CAR-T cells within tumours via focused ultrasound. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 2021, 5, 1336–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Huang, K.; Liu, L.; Huang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Han, G. Remote control of cellular immunotherapy. Nat. Rev. Bioeng. 2023, 1, 440–455. [Google Scholar]
  69. Wu, G.L.; Tan, X.; Yang, Q. Recent Advances on NIR-II Light-Enhanced Chemodynamic Therapy. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2023, e2303451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Baker, D.J.; Arany, Z.; Baur, J.A.; Epstein, J.A.; June, C.H. CAR T therapy beyond cancer: The evolution of a living drug. Nature 2023, 619, 707–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Baker, D.J.; June, C.H. CAR T therapy extends its reach to autoimmune diseases. Cell 2022, 185, 4471–4473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Seif, M.; Einsele, H.; Löffler, J. CAR T Cells Beyond Cancer: Hope for Immunomodulatory Therapy of Infectious Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2711. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  73. Radic, M.; Neeli, I.; Marion, T. Prospects for CAR T cell immunotherapy in autoimmune diseases: Clues from Lupus. Expert. Opin. Biol. Ther. 2022, 22, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Jin, X.; Xu, Q.; Pu, C.; Zhu, K.; Lu, C.; Jiang, Y.; Xiao, L.; Han, Y.; Lu, L. Therapeutic efficacy of anti-CD19 CAR-T cells in a mouse model of systemic lupus erythematosus. Cell Mol. Immunol. 2021, 18, 1896–1903. [Google Scholar]
  75. Mackensen, A.; Müller, F.; Mougiakakos, D.; Böltz, S.; Wilhelm, A.; Aigner, M.; Völkl, S.; Simon, D.; Kleyer, A.; Munoz, L.; et al. Anti-CD19 CAR T cell therapy for refractory systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Med. 2022, 28, 2124–2132. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  76. Kambayana, G.; Surya Rini, S. Autologous CD19-Targeted Chimeric Antigen Receptor (CAR)T-Cells as the Future of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Treatment. Curr. Rheumatol. Rev. 2023, 19, 260–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhang, B.; Wang, Y.; Yuan, Y.; Sun, J.; Liu, L.; Huang, D.; Hu, J.; Wang, M.; Li, S.; Song, W.; et al. In vitro elimination of autoreactive B cells from rheumatoid arthritis patients by universal chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2021, 80, 176–184. [Google Scholar]
  78. Whittington, K.B.; Prislovsky, A.; Beaty, J.; Albritton, L.; Radic, M.; Rosloniec, E.F. CD8(+) T Cells Expressing an HLA-DR1 Chimeric Antigen Receptor Target Autoimmune CD4(+) T Cells in an Antigen-Specific Manner and Inhibit the Development of Autoimmune Arthritis. J. Immunol. 2022, 208, 16–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Tenspolde, M.; Zimmermann, K.; Weber, L.C.; Hapke, M.; Lieber, M.; Dywicki, J.; Frenzel, A.; Hust, M.; Galla, M.; Buitrago-Molina, L.E.; et al. Regulatory T cells engineered with a novel insulin-specific chimeric antigen receptor as a candidate immunotherapy for type 1 diabetes. J. Autoimmun. 2019, 103, 102289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Radichev, I.A.; Yoon, J.; Scott, D.W.; Griffin, K.; Savinov, A.Y. Towards antigen-specific Tregs for type 1 diabetes: Construction and functional assessment of pancreatic endocrine marker, HPi2-based chimeric antigen receptor. Cell Immunol. 2020, 358, 104224. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  81. Spanier, J.A.; Fung, V.; Wardell, C.M.; Alkhatib, M.H.; Chen, Y.; Swanson, L.A.; Dwyer, A.J.; Weno, M.E.; Silva, N.; Mitchell, J.S.; et al. Insulin B peptide-MHC class II-specific chimeric antigen receptor-Tregs prevent autoimmune diabetes. bioRxiv 2023. [CrossRef]
  82. Ellebrecht, C.T.; Bhoj, V.G.; Nace, A.; Choi, E.J.; Mao, X.; Cho, M.J.; Di Zenzo, G.; Lanzavecchia, A.; Seykora, J.T.; Cotsarelis, G.; et al. Reengineering chimeric antigen receptor T cells for targeted therapy of autoimmune disease. Science 2016, 353, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  83. Oh, S.; Mao, X.; Manfredo-Vieira, S.; Lee, J.; Patel, D.; Choi, E.J.; Alvarado, A.; Cottman-Thomas, E.; Maseda, D.; Tsao, P.Y.; et al. Precision targeting of autoantigen-specific B cells in muscle-specific tyrosine kinase myasthenia gravis with chimeric autoantibody receptor T cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 2023, 41, 1229–1238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Blat, D.; Zigmond, E.; Alteber, Z.; Waks, T.; Eshhar, Z. Suppression of murine colitis and its associated cancer by carcinoembryonic antigen-specific regulatory T cells. Mol. Ther. 2014, 22, 1018–1028. [Google Scholar]
  85. Elinav, E.; Adam, N.; Waks, T.; Eshhar, Z. Amelioration of colitis by genetically engineered murine regulatory T cells redirected by antigen-specific chimeric receptor. Gastroenterology 2009, 136, 1721–1731. [Google Scholar]
  86. Fransson, M.; Piras, E.; Burman, J.; Nilsson, B.; Essand, M.; Lu, B.; A Harris, R.; Magnusson, P.U.; Brittebo, E.; Loskog, A.S. CAR/FoxP3-engineered T regulatory cells target the CNS and suppress EAE upon intranasal delivery. J. Neuroinflamm. 2012, 9, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Müller, F.; Boeltz, S.; Knitza, J.; Aigner, M.; Völkl, S.; Kharboutli, S.; Reimann, H.; Taubmann, J.; Kretschmann, S.; Rösler, W.; et al. CD19-targeted CAR T cells in refractory antisynthetase syndrome. Lancet 2023, 401, 815–818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Merkt, W.; Freitag, M.; Claus, M.; Kolb, P.; Falcone, V.; Röhrich, M.; Rodon, L.; Deicher, F.; Andreeva, I.; Tretter, T.; et al. Third-generation CD19.CAR-T cell-containing combination therapy in Scl70+ systemic sclerosis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Pharmaceuticals 17 00139 sch001
Scheme 1. Here, a demonstration of the pathophysiological mechanism of CRS induced by CAR-T therapy is shown. Upon contact with tumor cells, CAR-T cells undergo activation, releasing TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-2, perforin, and granzymes. Following tumor cell pyroptosis, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), high mobility group box-1 protein (HMGB1), and damage-associated molecular patterns (DMAPs) are concurrently released, further activating corresponding inflammatory pathways within macrophages. Simultaneously, the TNF-α, IFN-γ, and granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) secreted by CAR-T cells, along with catecholamines, act on macrophages. The interaction between the two is facilitated through CD40 ligand (CD40L)/CD40. This intricate interplay ultimately leads to robust macrophage activation, resulting in the substantial production of IL-6 and IL-1β. Notably, IL-6 can impact endothelial cells, leading to the further release of cytokines, endothelial activation and damage, and the initiation of coagulopathy.
Scheme 1. Here, a demonstration of the pathophysiological mechanism of CRS induced by CAR-T therapy is shown. Upon contact with tumor cells, CAR-T cells undergo activation, releasing TNF-α, IFN-γ, IL-2, perforin, and granzymes. Following tumor cell pyroptosis, adenosine triphosphate (ATP), high mobility group box-1 protein (HMGB1), and damage-associated molecular patterns (DMAPs) are concurrently released, further activating corresponding inflammatory pathways within macrophages. Simultaneously, the TNF-α, IFN-γ, and granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) secreted by CAR-T cells, along with catecholamines, act on macrophages. The interaction between the two is facilitated through CD40 ligand (CD40L)/CD40. This intricate interplay ultimately leads to robust macrophage activation, resulting in the substantial production of IL-6 and IL-1β. Notably, IL-6 can impact endothelial cells, leading to the further release of cytokines, endothelial activation and damage, and the initiation of coagulopathy.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00139 sch001
Pharmaceuticals 17 00139 sch002
Scheme 2. Here, the pathophysiological mechanism of ICANS induced by CAR-T therapy is shown. Following the infusion of CAR-T cells and their interaction with tumor cells, there is concurrent activation of macrophages, leading to the extensive release of cytokines. The latter damages the BBB, enabling CAR-T cells to breach the barrier and enter the CNS through the gaps between damaged endothelial cells. Meanwhile, pericytes are erroneously targeted by CAR-T cells, causing further disruption of the BBB. This results in a significant influx of CAR-T cells and cytokines into the CNS, further triggering damage to glial cells and neurons, culminating in neurotoxicity.
Scheme 2. Here, the pathophysiological mechanism of ICANS induced by CAR-T therapy is shown. Following the infusion of CAR-T cells and their interaction with tumor cells, there is concurrent activation of macrophages, leading to the extensive release of cytokines. The latter damages the BBB, enabling CAR-T cells to breach the barrier and enter the CNS through the gaps between damaged endothelial cells. Meanwhile, pericytes are erroneously targeted by CAR-T cells, causing further disruption of the BBB. This results in a significant influx of CAR-T cells and cytokines into the CNS, further triggering damage to glial cells and neurons, culminating in neurotoxicity.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00139 sch002
Pharmaceuticals 17 00139 sch003
Scheme 3. Here, the pathophysiological mechanism of OTOT induced by CAR-T therapy is shown. CAR-T cells recognize TAAs on the surface of tumor cells, forming an immune synapse, followed by the activation of CAR-T cells. Subsequently, cytotoxic granules containing perforin and granzymes are released, along with the secretion of cytotoxic cytokines, inducing apoptosis in tumor cells. Additionally, CAR-T cells may recognize TAAs on non-malignant cells, leading to unintended lysis of healthy tissues, further causing non-specific damage to normal tissues and triggering the occurrence of OTOT.
Scheme 3. Here, the pathophysiological mechanism of OTOT induced by CAR-T therapy is shown. CAR-T cells recognize TAAs on the surface of tumor cells, forming an immune synapse, followed by the activation of CAR-T cells. Subsequently, cytotoxic granules containing perforin and granzymes are released, along with the secretion of cytotoxic cytokines, inducing apoptosis in tumor cells. Additionally, CAR-T cells may recognize TAAs on non-malignant cells, leading to unintended lysis of healthy tissues, further causing non-specific damage to normal tissues and triggering the occurrence of OTOT.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00139 sch003
Pharmaceuticals 17 00139 sch004
Scheme 4. Here, a schematic illustration of subcutaneous injection of IL6S adsorbing IL-6 in the treatment of CRS is shown. IL6S is prepared by chemically conjugating IL-6 specific antibodies to a thermosensitive hydrogel composed of N-isopropylacrylamide and methacrylic acid copolymer, and IL6S exhibits the capability to selectively capture IL-6 (A); after subcutaneous injection, IL6S undergoes a transition from a transparent liquid (sol state) to a cloud-like non-flowing hydrogel at 37 °C. IL6S can be prophylactically administered before CAR-T cell infusion, capturing elevated IL-6 levels in real time and mitigating CRS-related symptoms. Finally, following the gel–sol transition induced by ice coating, IL6S can be easily removed (B).
Scheme 4. Here, a schematic illustration of subcutaneous injection of IL6S adsorbing IL-6 in the treatment of CRS is shown. IL6S is prepared by chemically conjugating IL-6 specific antibodies to a thermosensitive hydrogel composed of N-isopropylacrylamide and methacrylic acid copolymer, and IL6S exhibits the capability to selectively capture IL-6 (A); after subcutaneous injection, IL6S undergoes a transition from a transparent liquid (sol state) to a cloud-like non-flowing hydrogel at 37 °C. IL6S can be prophylactically administered before CAR-T cell infusion, capturing elevated IL-6 levels in real time and mitigating CRS-related symptoms. Finally, following the gel–sol transition induced by ice coating, IL6S can be easily removed (B).
Pharmaceuticals 17 00139 sch004
Pharmaceuticals 17 00139 sch005
Scheme 5. Here, a schematic illustration of employing in situ PEGylation of CAR-T cells to alleviate CRS and ICANS is shown. CAR-T cells were co-cultivated with azide-modified chitosan for metabolic labeling. Subsequently, through click chemistry, azide-modified CAR-T cells were coupled with dibenzocyclooctyne-polyethylene glycol (DBCO-PEG), resulting in in situ PEGylation of CAR-T cells. Notably, CAR-T cells modified with 600 kDa DBCO-PEG essentially obstructed all intercellular interactions, reducing the activation of monocytes/macrophages and cytokine release. In addition, concomitant with the proliferation of CAR-T cells, the gradual diminishing of PEG on the cell surface in the late stage will lead to the restoration of specific recognition and clearance capabilities against tumor cells.
Scheme 5. Here, a schematic illustration of employing in situ PEGylation of CAR-T cells to alleviate CRS and ICANS is shown. CAR-T cells were co-cultivated with azide-modified chitosan for metabolic labeling. Subsequently, through click chemistry, azide-modified CAR-T cells were coupled with dibenzocyclooctyne-polyethylene glycol (DBCO-PEG), resulting in in situ PEGylation of CAR-T cells. Notably, CAR-T cells modified with 600 kDa DBCO-PEG essentially obstructed all intercellular interactions, reducing the activation of monocytes/macrophages and cytokine release. In addition, concomitant with the proliferation of CAR-T cells, the gradual diminishing of PEG on the cell surface in the late stage will lead to the restoration of specific recognition and clearance capabilities against tumor cells.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00139 sch005
Pharmaceuticals 17 00139 sch006
Scheme 6. Here, a schematic illustration of photothermally inducing CAR expression is shown. The optical energy from near-infrared light (NIR) is converted into thermal energy through gold nanorods (AuNR), subsequently initiating gene transcription under the mediation of the thermo-responsive heat shock protein β-1 (HSPB1) and a core promoter, thereby inducing the expression of the CAR protein.
Scheme 6. Here, a schematic illustration of photothermally inducing CAR expression is shown. The optical energy from near-infrared light (NIR) is converted into thermal energy through gold nanorods (AuNR), subsequently initiating gene transcription under the mediation of the thermo-responsive heat shock protein β-1 (HSPB1) and a core promoter, thereby inducing the expression of the CAR protein.
Pharmaceuticals 17 00139 sch006
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chen, Z.; Hu, Y.; Mei, H. Harnessing Biomaterials for Safeguarding Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: An Artful Expedition in Mitigating Adverse Effects. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17010139

AMA Style

Chen Z, Hu Y, Mei H. Harnessing Biomaterials for Safeguarding Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: An Artful Expedition in Mitigating Adverse Effects. Pharmaceuticals. 2024; 17(1):139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17010139

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chen, Zhaozhao, Yu Hu, and Heng Mei. 2024. "Harnessing Biomaterials for Safeguarding Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: An Artful Expedition in Mitigating Adverse Effects" Pharmaceuticals 17, no. 1: 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17010139

APA Style

Chen, Z., Hu, Y., & Mei, H. (2024). Harnessing Biomaterials for Safeguarding Chimeric Antigen Receptor T Cell Therapy: An Artful Expedition in Mitigating Adverse Effects. Pharmaceuticals, 17(1), 139. https://doi.org/10.3390/ph17010139

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop