Next Article in Journal
Conditional Enhanced Variational Autoencoder-Heterogeneous Graph Attention Neural Network: A Novel Fault Diagnosis Method for Electric Rudders Based on Heterogeneous Information
Previous Article in Journal
A Semantic Segmentation Method Based on AS-Unet++ for Power Remote Sensing of Images
Previous Article in Special Issue
Fluorescent Imprinted Nanoparticles for Sensing of Chlorogenic Acid in Coffee Extracts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Susceptibility of the Different Oxygen-Sensing Probes to Interferences in Respirometric Bacterial Assays with Complex Media

1
School of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, University College Cork, Pharmacy Building, College Road, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
2
Cell Analysis Division, Agilent Inc., Euro House, Little Island, T45 WK12 Cork, Ireland
3
National Research Council of Italy, Institute of Sciences of Food Production, Via Amendola 122/O, 70126 Bari, Italy
4
School of Chemistry, University College Cork, Pharmacy Building, College Road, T12 YN60 Cork, Ireland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2024, 24(1), 267; https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010267
Submission received: 7 November 2023 / Revised: 20 December 2023 / Accepted: 30 December 2023 / Published: 2 January 2024
(This article belongs to the Collection Collection:Fluorescent Biosensors)

Abstract

:
Respirometric microbial assays are gaining popularity, but their uptake is limited by the availability of optimal O2 sensing materials and the challenge of validating assays with complex real samples. We conducted a comparative evaluation of four different O2-sensing probes based on Pt-porphyrin phosphors in respirometric bacterial assays performed on standard time-resolved fluorescence reader. The macromolecular MitoXpress, nanoparticle NanO2 and small molecule PtGlc4 and PtPEG4 probes were assessed with E. coli cells in five growth media: nutrient broth (NB), McConkey (MC), Rapid Coliform ChromoSelect (RCC), M-Lauryl lauryl sulfate (MLS), and Minerals-Modified Glutamate (MMG) media. Respiration profiles of the cells were recorded and analyzed, along with densitometry profiles and quenching studies of individual media components. This revealed several limiting factors and interferences impacting assay performance, which include probe quenched lifetime, instrument temporal resolution, inner filter effects (mainly by indicator dyes), probe binding to lipophilic components, and dynamic and static quenching by media components. The study allowed for the ranking of the probes based on their ruggedness, resilience to interferences and overall performance in respirometric bacterial assays. The ‘shielded’ probe NanO2 outperformed the established MitoXpress probe and the small molecule probes PtGlc4 and PtPEG4.

1. Introduction

Measurement of bacterial cell respiration allows for the monitoring of microbial growth and metabolism, of the effects of drugs and antimicrobial treatments, of microbial contamination and spoilage of food and environmental samples and of sterility, toxicity, etc. [1,2,3,4]. Optical-oxygen-sensor-based respirometry is well suited for this, and has been used in food and pharmaceutical industries, biomedical research, and environmental science, particularly for the high throughput analysis of total aerobic viable counts (TVCs) and determination of EC50 values [2,3,4]. This technique provides a more rapid, simple, and convenient alternative to conventional agar plating [2,4] and other methods that are more laborious, time-consuming, and poorly automated [5,6].
Quenched-phosphorescence sensing systems allow facile quantification of dissolved O2 concentration in biological samples and the measurement of the respiration activity of both mammalian [7] and bacterial [1,2] cells on widely available spectroscopic equipment, such as multi-label plate readers [1,2,4]. Depending on the type of oxygen-sensitive material, assay vessel, detector and samples used, respirometric assays form several categories. One common platform, here called macro-respirometry, employs solid-state sensor coatings based on near-infrared Pt-benzoporphyrin dye [8,9], deposited inside disposable plastic tubes (2 mL, 15 mL, or 50 mL volume) and read with a handheld sensor reader such as Optech (Mocon/Ametek) or Firesting-GO2 (Pyroscience) [8,9]. Another platform, called micro-respirometry, uses a red-emitting O2 sensing probe based on Pt-coproporphyrin dye (PtCP), which is added directly to liquid samples and measured in standard 96/384-well plates on a benchtop time-resolved fluorescence (TR-F) reader [2,3,7]. The MitoXpress-Xtra (MitoXpress) probe used in this platform has convenient spectral and lifetime characteristics and compatibility with various TR-F readers. This probe provides good sensitivity and signal-to-noise ratio, stable and calibration-free phosphorescence lifetime-based sensing of O2. MitoXpress has been validated in many bioanalytical applications and is currently regarded as the gold standard in micro-respirometry [3].
O2 sensor-based respirometric assays have been successfully used with different bacteria (E. coli and others) in simple-growth media, such as nutrient broth (NB) [3]. However, in more complex media that are used for the selective determination of bacteria, micro-respirometry assays with a MitoXpress probe did not perform well and were superseded by macro-respirometry assays with solid-state sensors [9]. Thus, in some selective media that contain indicator dyes, chromogenic substrates, surfactants, or other additives for the enrichment of certain bacteria [10], MitoXpress probes are susceptible to strong interferences.
On the other hand, new O2 probes, structurally different but spectrally similar to MitoXpress and which can potentially improve performance and ruggedness of micro-respirometry assays, have been described in recent years [11,12,13]. In this study, we investigated four different soluble O2 probes based on Pt-porphyrin phosphors, including the benchmark MitoXpress probe, in model micro-respirometry assays with E. coli cells and five growth media with complex compositions and optical properties [9]. We aimed to identify the best performing probe for such assays and elaborate on the causes of interference on probe signals and respiration profiles.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Thiamine, pantothenic acid, nicotinic acid, bile salts, ferric ammonium citrate, “Lab-Lemco”, peptone, yeast extract, sodium lauryl sulfate, (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta-D-galacto-pyranoside (X-gal), 4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide (MUG), isopropyl ß-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG), neutral red, phenol red, bromocresol purple, lactose, and sorbitol were acquired from Sigma-Aldrich (Burlington, MA, USA). Nutrient broth (NB) was acquired from Fisher Scientific Oxoid (Dublin, Ireland), selective and differentiating media specific for E. coli including the MacConkey (MC), Rapid Coliform ChromoSelect (RCC), M-lauryl sulfate (MLS), and Minerals-Modified Glutamate (MMG) broths, were prepared as described in [9]. Heavy mineral oil was acquired from Cargille Laboratories. All other chemicals and solvents were of analytical grade and solutions were prepared from Milli-Q water (Millipore, Carrigtwohill, Ireland) or sterile DMSO (Sigma-Aldrich). MitoXpress-Xtra (MitoXpress) probe was acquired from Agilent. NanO2 probe was synthesized in our lab as described in [12], and PtGlc4 and PtPEG4 probes as described in [11,14].

2.2. Respirometric and Turbidimetric Assay Procedures

Escherichia coli (E. coli) cells, strain NCIMB 11943, were obtained from the School of Microbiology, University College Cork and stored in LB broth containing 80% glycerol at −80 °C. Fresh working stock of E. coli was prepared by overnight incubation in NB as described in [4,9], from which 1:10 serial dilutions in each medium were made. Then, O2 probes were added to produce final E. coli concentrations of 104 and 106 CFU/mL and MitoXpress (0.3 µM), NanO2 (0.3 µM), PtGlc4 (3 μM) or PtPEG4 (3 μM). Then, 200 µL aliquots of each solution were dispensed in triplicates into wells of a 96-well plate (Sarstedt). Solutions of the probes in sterile media without bacteria (negative controls) and E. coli dilutions in media without O2 probe were also prepared, dispensed on the plate, and measured as blank signals. Sample wells were then sealed with 70 μL of mineral oil and the plate was placed in a Victor2 (PerkinElmer) reader equilibrated at 37 °C and monitored in time-resolved fluorescence (TR-F) mode for 10 h, measuring signals in each well every 5 min, under the following settings: excitation filter—340 nm, emission filter—642 nm, two delay times—30 μs and 70 μs, and gate time—100 μs (for each delay). Phosphorescence lifetime values (LT) were calculated using the formula for rapid lifetime determination (RLD): LT = (t1 − t2)/ln(F1/F2), where t1 and t2 are the delay times, and F1 and F2 are the corresponding intensity signals [2,4,7]. The resulting LT values were plotted over time to produce respiration profiles for each well, media and probe controls. For PtGlc4 and PtPEG4 probes, t1 and t2 were set at 25 μs and 50 μs, respectively [11,14].
Profiles of absorbance/light scattering were also measured on a Victor2 reader in a plate with samples of E. coli in the different media (no probe) and negative controls (media, no cells), using 600 nm and 405 nm filters and the same temperature and kinetic settings as for TR-F measurements.

2.3. Phosphorescence Quenching Experiments

Phosphorescence quenching experiments with individual media components were carried out on a Cary Eclipse fluorescence spectrometer as follows. Compounds were prepared as concentrated 20× stock solutions in water or DMSO. They were added stepwise to a standard 10 mm quartz cuvette containing 2 mL of working dilution of the probe in NaCl (5.0 g/L), to produce 0.5×, 1× and 2× concentrations (where 1× is the compound concentration in the media). Before and after each addition, phosphorescence spectra were recorded (excitation 390 nm, emission 600–700 nm), and after the last compound addition phosphorescence decay was also measured (Exc390 nm/Em650 nm). The resulting Int and LT data were analyzed to determine the Stern–Volmer quenching constant, KSV [15], and the % of quenching at 1× concentration. Sample absorbance spectra (300–600 nm) were also recorded and analyzed for possible interferences on the TR-F and lifetime signals.

2.4. Imaging of Phosphorescently Stained E. coli Cells

E. coli cells, 106 per mL, were incubated with the probes at standard working dilutions in NB for 3 h at 37 °C. Cells were pelleted at 3000 rpm for 10 min, the supernatant was removed, and pellets were resuspended in 100 μL of NB containing the probe. Small aliquots were dispensed on a MilliCell Disposable Haemocytometer and imaged in phosphorescence intensity and PLIM mode on the confocal microscope at room temperature under 405 nm laser excitation and 40× magnification lens.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Selection of the Cell Model and Media

E. coli is a classical bacterial cell model, frequently used in non-selective assays such as the total aerobic viable counts (TVCs) performed by plating on solid media (ISO 4833-1:2013 agar plating method [16]). It is also used in conventional assays with selective media with enrichment and/or predictive identification of bacterial groups or families such as coliforms, Enterobacteriaceae [17,18], or pathogenic species [19,20]. E. coli cells have been extensively validated in O2 sensor-based respirometric assays, e.g., in rapid TVC testing of crude food samples in liquid media [4,8,21]. Various non-selective and selective media are used with E. coli cells in different applications [9]. We have chosen the five media used in the previous study with the solid-state O2 sensor coatings and MitoXpress probe [9]: nutrient broth (NB), McConkey (MC), RCC, MMG and MLS, which each have different compositions (Table S1, ESI) and contain basic nutrients and special additives, such as indicator dyes, metabolites, surfactants, vitamins, substrates. These components promote the growth of target microorganisms while suppressing unwanted species, or report on the presence of target microorganisms by color changes or other means. Due to the different composition and optical properties (Figure 1), these media are expected to act differently on the O2 probes and corresponding respirometric assays.

3.2. Selection and General Comparison of the O2 Probes

MitoXpress probes are well established and routinely used in micro-respirometry with mammalian and bacterial cells [2,3,7,9], normally at a working concentration of 0.3 µM (with respect to the dye, Table 1). They comprise a macromolecular structure produced by covalent linkage of an amino-reactive phosphor, PtCP-NCS, with a water-soluble polypeptide carrier, BSA (Figure 2) [2,3,7]. PtCP phosphor has high emission yield (Φ = ~0.4, unquenched) and specific brightness (ε*Φ = 34,000 M−1cm−1) [22]. Upon conjugation to BSA its brightness in aqueous buffers becomes reduced several fold due to static quenching [7], but MitoXpress still produces high Int signals and stable LT values on different instruments and produces smooth and meaningful respiration profiles in various cell-based assays, with modest consumption of the reagent [3,7].
The other three probes comprise the PtPFPP phosphor placed in different micro-environments: an amphiphilic polymer for the NanO2 or aqueous medium for the small molecule probes (Figure 2). While PtPFPP is hydrophobic and ~5 times less bright than PtCP [22], it is readily available, inexpensive, and amenable to simple click-modifications with thiols [23,24,25]. Thus far, these probes have not been assessed in micro-respirometry assays.
NanO2 was developed for sensing intracellular O2 and phosphorescence lifetime imaging microscopy (PLIM) [12]. It comprises an aqueous dispersion of cationic nanoparticles of an amphiphilic RL-100 hydrogel, with PtPFPP molecules physically trapped in their hydrophobic core (Figure 2B, Table 1). The polymer ‘shields’ the phosphor from external environment and interferences by sample components, and provides optimal quenching and sensitivity to O2. The nanoparticles have an average size of 35–40 nm and positive surface charge. They can penetrate and passively stain various mammalian cells and tissue samples by simple addition to the medium and incubation [18]. NanO2 can be stored for many years (as concentrated stock in water, at 4 °C); however, its colloidal and structural stability in different environments has not been studied in detail.
PtGlc4 is a hydrophilic small-molecule probe with cell-penetrating ability, designed for intracellular use, deep tissue staining and the mapping of O2 concentration by PLIM. It is produced by click-modification of PtPFPP with four β-D-thio-glucose moieties (Figure 2C) [11]. Compared with MitoXpress and NanO2, PtGlc4 shows a high degree of internal quenching of the PtPFPP phosphor [11]. PtPEG4 is another derivative of PtPFPP, with four thiolated hexa-PEG peripheral chains (Figure 2C). PtPEG4 is less hydrophilic than PtGlc4 and is cell-impermeable [14].

3.3. Basal and Maximal Phosphorescent Signals of the Probes in the E. coli Assays

In standard non-selective NB medium, a MitoXpress probe produces stable baseline with mean basal LT of ~23 µs, which increases to ~75 µs upon sample deoxygenation caused by bacterial growth (Table 2). Such LT and spectral characteristics of MitoXpress (excitation at 360–400 nm, emission at 640–670 nm, respectively) are suitable for its detection on standard TR-F readers. The latter usually employ Xe-flash lamp excitation (pulse duration ~20 μs) and time-gated detection of emission with a photon counting PMT, which provide high intensity signals and signal-to-background (S:B) ratio, with fast and accurate determination of the probe LT by the rapid lifetime determination (RLD) method [26].
The NanO2 probe, when used at the same working concentration as MitoXpress (0.3 μM) in NB, produces ~6-times higher Int signals (1.75M cps vs. 240 k cps) and similar LT values: 26.9 µs and 70.8 µs in air-saturated and deoxygenated conditions, respectively (Table 2). Its long LT is attributed to the rigid micro-environment of PtTFPP molecules inside the nanoparticles, which decreases non-radiative quenching from vibronic coupling [15].
PtGlc4 showed a high degree of internal quenching, which reduces its Int and LT signals [11]: 160 k cps and 10.3 µs in air-saturated and 7.50 k cps and 17.1 µs in deoxygenated conditions, respectively (Table 2). These signals correspond to 3 μM concentration, i.e., 10-times higher than for MitoXpress and NanO2 (Table 1).
PtPEG4 also showed significant internal quenching. At 3 μM concentration, its Int and LT signals in NB were 26 k cps and 11.3 µs in air-saturated and 180 k cps and 29.1 µs in deoxygenated conditions, respectively (Table 2).
From the data in Table 2, the following conclusions can be drawn:
  • For the MitoXpress probe, basal intensity signals in the RCC and MLS media (highlighted in red) were strongly quenched, dropping below the acceptable levels (>30 k cps) for this type of instrument and assay [27]. On the other hand, its maximal Int signals remained high and easy to measure in all of the media. Because LT in RCC and MLS reduced considerably, this required customized LT thresholds to be used for the determination of TT values. Overall, the usability of the MitoXpress probe in RCC and MLS media was somehow problematic.
  • The NanO2 probe retained high basal and very high maximal Int signals in all of the media, despite their 3–6-fold quenching in MMG and MLS media. LT signals also remained stable but moderately quenched in MMG—the only problematic media for NanO2.
  • The PtGlc4 and PtPEG4 probes produced low basal Int signals in NB and MLS, and their basal LT signals were <13 µs in all of the media. Such short LT of PtGlc4 and PtPEG4 resulted in large losses of Int signals measured at standard delay times of 30 µs and 70 µs. When t1 and t2 settings were changed to 25 µs and 50 µs, blank signals largely increased and S:B ratio decreased for these probes. Lowest basal Int signals for these probes were seen in NB and MLS, and highest in RCC. Despite their similar structure, PtGlc4 produced much higher maximal Int signals than PtPEG4, and different pattern of signals in the media. Thus, under standard respirometric assay settings, both PtGlc4 and PtPEG4 probes are barely usable in all of the media.

3.4. Full Respiration Profiles of E. coli Produced with Different Media and Probes

Phosphorescent signals of an O2 sensor have a reciprocal relationship with sample O2 concentration, described by the Stern–Volmer equation [3,7,15]. As a result, in respirometric bacterial assays, O2 probes produce characteristic sigmoidal profiles of the intensity (Int, cps) and lifetime (LT, µs) signals. Initially, the signal produces a flat baseline, which corresponds to air-saturated conditions in the sample with maximal quenching of the probe by O2. Then, at a certain time, the signal undergoes steep transition from its low baseline to high plateau levels. This reflects the change from oxygenated to deoxygenated conditions in the sample, due to rapid exponential growth and increase in cell density. The time of this transition is governed by the initial concentration of bacteria in the sample, the type of growth media and assay conditions [2,3]. Bacterial cell respirometry usually monitors primary sensor signals (Int or LT). The LT-based mode provides reliable determination of TT values (h) for respiring samples. It allows simple enumeration of bacteria in unknown samples: adding the sample to growth medium, monitoring its respiration profile, and determining the time to reach signal threshold (TT, hours) which is set above the baseline. Then, measured TT values are converted into cell concentrations (CFU/mL or CFU/g) by applying a known calibration equation [2,8,9]. However, this basic theory does not account for possible optical effects and interferences associated with the medium, cells or probe used. O2 concentration readout is more prone to measurement errors and artefacts than an LT-based readout [3]. Especially in the challenging conditions used here.
Figure 3A shows full respiration profiles of E. coli for the different probes in simple non-selective NB media. NB contains only NaCl, peptone (source of organic nitrogen, amino acids, and long chain fatty acids), yeast extract (source of carbohydrates, vitamins, other organic nitrogen compounds and salts) and no additives [15]. It appears that classical respiration profiles are recognizable in NB only for the MitoXpress (Int and LT) and NanO2 (LT) probes. The Int signal of NanO2 showed a downward drift in the plateau region and a small upward drift of the baseline, which can be attributed to probe binding to surfaces or media components. Nevertheless, NanO2 provides the reliable and accurate determination of TT values, so it remains usable. Conversely, PtGlc4 and PtPEG4 probes produced unusual bell-shaped Int profiles and non-classical LT profiles, with marked upward drifts of the Int baseline and unstable LT baseline (Figure 3A). We attribute these effects to the low LT values and S:B ratio, which make these assays susceptible to interferences and changes in sample optical properties (absorption, scattering) during the assay (see below).
MC medium resembles NB, with yeast extract replaced by bile salts and lactose, and with neutral red indicator (pKa = 6.9), which changes color from orange to magenta (Figure 1). Int signals for all of the probes in MC were 1.5–2-times lower than in NB. Again, PtPEG4 and PtGlc4 showed unacceptably low baseline Int and LT (<15 µs) signals (Table 2) and skewed respiration profiles (Figure 3B).
RCC medium contains peptone, sorbitol and salts, sodium lauryl sulphate (anionic surfactant, 0.1 g/L) and UV chromogenic substrates X-Gal and MUG. In colorless RCC, basal and maximal LT signals of NanO2 were close to normal, but some odd spikes occurred at the start of the plateau region. The MitoXpress probe showed very low basal intensity signals, reduced basal and maximal LT signals. We attribute these effects to the denaturing action of SLS on the BSA carrier. PtGlc4 showed bell-shaped profiles and low LT signals (Table 2, Figure 3C). Response to sample deoxygenation and TT values were detectable, though with difficulties for some of the probes.
Figure 3D shows Int and LT profiles of E. coli cells in MMG medium, which contains a Fe2+ salt, essential vitamins (pantothenic acid), aromatic compounds (thiamine, nicotinic acid), and bromocresol purple pH indicator which, in the presence of E. coli, turns media color from pale blue to light yellow [9] (Figure 1). In MMG, baseline and maximal Int signals of all of the probes are reduced 3–6 fold. For PtPEG4, baseline Int signals dropped below the acceptable threshold for respirometry (>30 k cps) [26,27]. Only the NanO2 probe showed close-to-normal sigmoidal profiles of Int and LT signals, but its LT baseline reduced to 15 µs and maximal LT down to 30 µs (Table 2). LT profiles of MitoXpress were close to sigmoidal, but Int profiles were bell-shaped. PtPEG4 also showed bell-shaped Int profiles, complex LT profiles, and lowered and drifting up Int and LT baselines. Nevertheless, response to sample deoxygenation was visible for all of the probes, except PtGlc4. In addition, signal onset times (or TT values) in MMG medium were 0.2–0.4 h longer than in NB (Table 2), reflecting a shift between 104 and 106 E. coli CFU/mL. These results suggest that bromocresol purple indicator, or other components of MGG, quench the probes’ signals and thus alter the shape of their respiration profiles.
MLS medium contains 1 g/L of SLS surfactant, i.e., 10 times more than RCC, and phenol red indicator (pKa = 8.0) which changes color from red to orange. MLS is likely to denature the MitoXpress probe, thus reducing its basal Int signal and making it difficult to use in respirometric assays. PtGlc4 and PtPEG4 are also strongly quenched and unusable in MLS. Only NanO2 retained sufficient brightness and appropriate span of LT changes, which are shifted down. From its lifetime profile it was possible to calculate TT value, though upper Int and LT signals were not so stable and flat (Table 2, Figure 3E).

3.5. Analysis of Blank Signals and Spectroscopic Effects of the Media

The observed effects on the probe signals and respirometric profiles of E. coli cells in the different media can be due to the inner filter effects (IFE), or to static and dynamic quenching by media components [15]. However, the bumps on signal profiles, drift of the baseline, and bell-shaped and other unusual signal profiles are more difficult to explain. These effects can have instrumental (light scattering, high blanks, low S/N, inaccurate LT calculation, etc.), biological (metabolic switching, changes of cell density, growth rate), or chemical origin.
To explain these effects, we first measured blank Int signals for the samples containing different media, with or without cells, and with no probe, under the settings used in the respirometry. Such blanks, measured at a delay time of 30 μs, appeared to be high: ~3 k cps for the MMG, ~7 k for the MLS and ~15 k cps for the MC (Figure 4A,B). When delay time was reduced to 25 μs, blank signals increased more than 3 fold (Figure 4C,D). Thus, such optimization of the measurement conditions for the small molecule probes is not efficient. On the other hand, flat profiles of the blank samples suggest that probe signals are not influenced by changing cell density (largely increases over 10 h), and sample deoxygenation which occurred at ~2.5 h for Figure 4A,C (refer to Figure 3A–E). Moreover, introducing blank correction in the RLD method of LT calculation did not improve the resulting respiration profiles, which kept the same shape for NanO2 and MitoXpress (not shown) and strange shape for PtGlc4 and PtPEG4 (see exemplary profiles in Figure S1, ESI). Thus, high blanks only partly explain the unusual effects on the respiration profiles of tested probes and media.
Next, we carried out densitometry with the same samples as in O2 respirometry but measuring absorbance profiles at 405 nm and 600 nm (Figure 5). The first wavelength is close to the excitation band (300–380 nm) of the probes, while the second is close to their emission. Such measurements were expected to reveal the effects of changing cell density and light scattering during the assay, as well as color changes in the media induced by metabolizing cells. Notably, A600 densitometry is also used to enumerate bacteria [28,29].
The A405 profiles of E. coli in the different media (Figure 5A) reveal the following:
  • Baseline A405 values and changes were rather low (0.12–0.3 AU) for the NB, MMG and RCC; moderate for MC (0.5–0.9 AU); and very high and practically unusable for MLS (A405 > 3 AU). This explains the large attenuation of probe Int signals in MLS and moderate attenuation in MC, due to the prominent inner filter effects for these media.
  • A405 profiles in MMG and RCC had a sigmoidal shape, while a bi-phasic shape with a linear terminal part was observed in NB and MC.
  • Compared with the corresponding respiration profiles, signal onset (TT) occurred later in the densitometry, and subsequent signal changes lasted longer (Figure 5, Table 3).
The A600 profiles in NB, MC and RCC (Figure 5B) were similar in shape to A405, while MMG had an inverted shape with no changes occurring in the first 5 h. Again, A600 profiles reflected mostly changes in media color, rather than in the biomass and light scattering. Notably, A600 profiles in MLS were measurable, had a sigmoidal shape and long TT values (>4 h). The observed differences with respirometry data are understandable. While both assays report on cell growth and the number of bacteria, their measured parameters—dissolved O2 for respirometry and light scattering and absorption for densitometry—have a different relationship with CFU numbers [2].
The main contributing instrumental factors identified so far have been high blank signals and low S:N ratio, due to light scattering and short-lived autofluorescence and to Xe-flash lamp afterglow that limits the temporal resolution of the TRF/RLD to >15 μs [30,31]. The optical effects of selective media are mainly due to the broad absorption bands of the different indicator dyes and spectral changes taking place during the assay [9]. The indicators produce strong inner filter effects (IFE), attenuating probe excitation at around 390 nm and emission at 650 nm. These effects are more specific to the media; however, probes producing low S:B ratio could be more affected than those with high S:B. At the same time, certain media components can also have interfering effects on the probes and assays.

3.6. Analysis of Individual Media Components for Interferences

The complex composition of the selective media (Table S1) points to possible interfering action by some components on probe signals. To identify the main interfering components and their mode of action, we carried out fluorometric titrations of MitoXpress, NanO2 and PtGlc4 probes at working concentrations in 5.0 g/L NaCl with individual components of the media (Table S1). Absorption spectra and changes in probe Int and LT signals upon addition of the compound were measured in a cuvette, and % of signal change at the concentrations used in the media were calculated (Table 4).
As expected, simple media components, such as salts (NaCl, phosphates) and small-molecule metabolites (saccharides, vitamins, etc.) did not show any significant interference on the probes. On the other hand, some more complex ingredients (peptone, yeast extract), colored or chromogenic components (pH indicators, enzyme substrates) and special additives (surfactants, metal ions) did have an effect. Thus, in addition to its strong Int quenching, bromocresol purple also reduced LT of the NanO2 (12%), MitoXpress (32%) and PtGlc4 (12%), thus pointing to dynamic quenching or FRET [32].
Peptone and yeast extract showed significant absorbance and IFE on the probes, while Lab-Lemco, peptone and yeast extract enhanced (by up to 436%) the Int signals of PtGlc4 and MitoXpress probes, without affecting their LT values (Table 4). Peptone also showed strong fluorescence with maximum at 560 nm (Figure S2), which resembles that of riboflavin [33].
Because the ‘shielded’ NanO2 probe was least affected, we attribute these effects to binding interactions between the probe phosphor and lipophilic components present in peptone and yeast extract, which can also prevent stacking interactions and/or phosphor aggregation in aqueous solution. The latter is supported by the effects of bile salts (lipophilic derivatives of cholesterol), which largely enhanced the Int signals of PtGlc4 (826%), MitoXpress (62%) and NanO2 (31%) probes, with little effect on the LT. Bile salts are known to form micelles and solubilize hydrophobic molecules [34].
Sodium lauryl sulfate, an anionic surfactant, largely enhanced the Int signal of PtGlc4 (268%), moderately quenched MitoXpress (21%) and had a marginal effect on NanO2. Because quenching of the LT was significant (50–16%—see Table 4), we attribute these effects to phosphor solubilization by the SLS and denaturation of BSA carrier, which in turn, changed the phosphor’s micro-environment and KSV.
Ferric ammonium citrate (used for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae) slightly quenched the Int and LT signals of PtGlc4 (8.5/7%) and MitoXpress (4/12%), while NanO2 was unaffected. The quenching could be due to the heavy atom and paramagnetic effects of the Fe3+ ions [35] and the tendency of phenyl groups to coordinate Fe3+ [36].
MUG (4-methylumbelliferyl-β-D-glucuronide), a fluorogenic substrate of β-galactosidase, absorbs below 400 nm and, when hydrolyzed, produces blue fluorescence under 365 nm excitation. X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-beta-D-galacto-pyranoside), a cell-permeable chromogenic substrate of β-galactosidase, when hydrolyzed, produces blue precipitate (Amax at 615 nm) and fluorescence at 600–700 nm. X-Gal and MUG quenched the Int of all the probes by 16–17%, with a minor quenching of the LT by MUG (3.7–6.7%), but not X-Gal.
All other compounds, including thiamine (vitamin b1, co-factor for essential enzymes), pantothenic acid (vitamin B5, required for fatty acid biosynthesis) and nicotinic acid (growth factor) were seen to alter probe signals only marginally. Of these, only thiamine was reported as a quencher for o-phenanthroline derivatives [37].

3.7. Cell Penetration and Staining Ability of the Probes

Cell-penetrating ability of different compounds, including O2 probes, is determined by many factors, which relate to the cell, medium and compound in question. Such factors have been investigated in detail, but mainly with mammalian cells. Thus, positive charges and saccharide substituents (e.g., glucose, galactose) on the compound/probe tend to promote compound internalization [11,12,38], whereas PEGylation prevents it [14]. However, these rules are not universal and for each system theoretical predictions usually require tedious experimental studies to optimize probe structure and elucidate the mechanisms of cellular uptake. Moreover, the cell-penetrating behavior of an O2 probe determined with mammalian cells cannot be simply extrapolated on bacterial cells, as they have very different membrane compositions, transport mechanisms, growth rates, etc.
Of the four probes, NanO2 and PtGlc4 are known as cell-permeable for mammalian cells, allowing them to passively stain, sense and image intracellular O2 concentrations [11,12]. In contrast, MitoXpress and PtPEG4 probes are regarded as cell impermeable, as they poorly stain mammalian cells [7,14]. However, the cell penetrating ability and phosphorescent staining efficiency of all these probes with respect to bacterial cells have not been studied so far.
Using confocal fluorescence microscopy [11,12], we performed phosphorescent staining and imaging experiments with E. coli cells and determined cell-staining behavior of the probes in conditions of respirometric assays. Phosphorescence intensity images in Figure 6 reveal that, after 3 h incubation with E. coli (106 CFU/mL) in NB at 37 °C, only the NanO2 probe provided efficient phosphorescent staining and visualization of the cells. The other probes showed no cell staining (MitoXpress) or very few stained cells in the field of view (more cells for PtPEG4 than for PtGlc4).
Thus, unlike with mammalian cells [11], PtGlc4 did not show good staining of E. coli, and behaved as a cell-impermeable probe. MitoXpress and PtPEG4 behaved as extracellular, cell-impermeable probes, i.e., as with mammalian cells (see Table 1, [12,13]).

3.8. Overall Comparison and Ranking of the Probes

The above results reveal that a number of components present in the selected media can influence probe signals and respiration profiles. The observed effects range from 86% quenching to 826% enhancement of basal Int signal and up to 55% quenching of the LT. IFE can also occur (Table 4). Note that, if a media contains several such components, the overall effect will be additive. While such interferences can be tolerated by MitoXpress and NanO2, PtPEG4 and PtGlc4 probes with low S:N ratio and low ‘spare’ sensitivity cannot operate reliably. These produce unusual respiration profiles, which are difficult to interpret and use for the enumeration of bacteria via TT determination [9].
Such quenching interferences and attenuation of probe Int signals can be counter-acted by: (i) using higher probe concentrations; (ii) choosing brighter probes, such as NanO2; (iii) excluding the main interfering components, provided they are not critical for the intended action of the medium; and (iv) choosing alternative or new media with different composition but similar biological end result and lower interferences. However, these strategies have their own limitations (e.g., probe/media availability, assay costs).
The four Pt-porphyrin-based probes of different type (small molecules, macromolecular conjugate and core–shell nanoparticle structures, Figure 1) produced different interference patterns in the assays with the chosen media (Table 4). The data collected allows for the ranking of the probes based on their behavior and analytical performances.
Comparative analysis of the respiration profiles in the different media (Figure 2, Figure 3 and Figure S2), blank samples and absorption profiles (Figure 5 and Figure 6), and Table 4 data, puts NanO2 probe on top of the list. NanO2 shows consistently lower interferences than the other probes (Table 4), it operated reliably in four out of the five media, including the most challenging RCC and MLS, but had some issues with RCC (Table 5). The superiority of NanO2 is due to its ‘shielded’ structure, such that phosphor molecules in the nanoparticle core are not accessible for sample/medium components. The cell-penetrating ability of NanO2 with bacteria is also beneficial, as the cells further shield the probe from interfering compounds in the media. Therefore, NanO2 replaces MitoXpress probe, which is currently used in bacterial assays and regarded as the ‘gold standard’.
The benchmark probe, MitoXpress, although it worked reliably in the NB and MC, failed in RCC and MLS, and to some degree in MMG. Thus, it was ranked second. Additionally, the PtGlc4 and PtPEG4 small-molecule probes both performed poorly, even when used at 10-times higher concentrations. PtGlc4 still worked, though with problems, in the NB, MC and RCC, but failed in MMG and MLS, so was ranked third and the outsider PtPEG4 worked only in NB and RCC. The main limiting factors for PtPEG4 and PtGlc4 were their short lifetimes, below-instrument temporal resolution, low brightness, and hydrophilicity. While other O2 probes are available (e.g., fluorescent Ru(II) or Ir(III) complexes [39,40,41]), their LT and/or spectral characteristics are poorly suited for respirometric assays on standard TRF readers.

4. Conclusions

General usability and performance of the four different types of soluble O2 probes in respirometric bacterial assays were assessed using E. coli cells and five complex media designed for selective bacterial assays. The detailed spectroscopic analysis of this model has revealed multiple interfering and limiting factors, which include the instrumentation used, probe structure and photophysical characteristics, and action of particular media components on the probes.
Regarding instrumental factors and probe characteristics, short LTs of the probe (<15 μs) fall below the instrument temporal resolution, limited by the Xe-flash lamp pulse duration [9]. This leads to large measurement errors and inaccurate LT determination by the RLD method [30]. Similarly, high blank signals producing low S:B ratio for the ‘dim’ PtGlc4 and PtPEG4 probes, lead to unstable measurements and LT-based O2 sensing, with respiration profiles of unusual shape. The asynchronous changes in sample absorbance, light scattering and probe Int signal, especially when combined with low S:B ratio, may also result in weird bumps and respiration profiles for some probes and media.
A number of individual media components were seen to interfere with the probes, and such interferences were probe-specific. They can be categorized based on their mode(s) of action as follows:
  • Colored substances acting via inner filter effect or FRET, such as pH indicators, chromogenic substrates (MUG, X-gal), and other UV absorbers;
  • Surfactants and lipophilic molecules (e.g., lauryl sulphate, bile acids) which can denature protein-based probes, solubilize the phosphor in small molecules or disturb the nanoparticle structures, thus changing phosphor’s micro-environment and O2 sensitivity, seen as quenching or enhancement of probe signals;
  • Complex ingredients of biological origin (peptone, yeast extract, Lab-Lemco), which have similar effects as the previous group, mediated by probe binding;
  • Compounds containing heavy atoms (X-Gal, Ferric ammonium citrate) that may cause dynamic or static quenching; and reducing or oxidizing agents that can modify phosphor’s structure and environment.
Comparative analysis of respiration profiles produced by the different probes and media allows for the ranking of the probes, based on their ruggedness, resilience to interferences and operational performance. This puts the ‘shielded’ NanO2 probe on top of the list, as it showed consistently lower interferences and operated reliably in four out of the five complex media, including the most challenging RCC and MLS media, with some problems seen in RCC. The ‘gold standard’ MitoXpress probe was ranked second, as it was usable only in two or three out of the five media. The small molecule probes PtGlc4 and PtPEG4 were the least usable, being hampered by their low brightness, low basal LT signals, and stronger interactions with media components.
Thus, the order of probe performance is NanO2 > MitoXpress > PtGlc4 > PtPEG4. Similarly, the five media can also be ranked based on their ‘harshness’ with respect to the O2 sensing probes, as follows: MLS > MMG > RCC > MC > NB. Consideration of these factors and effects of the different sample/media components aids the selection of appropriate probe and media for new applications, and the development of improved probes for O2 respirometry.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/s24010267/s1: Figure S1: Blank-corrected respiration profiles of the Int and LT signals for E. coli cells in MLS media, produced by PtGlc4 probe (correspond to Figure 3E); Figure S2: Absorption and fluorescence spectra of yeast extract (2.0 g/L), peptone (5.0 g/L) and Lab-Lemco (1.0 g/L) in PBS buffer. Table S1: Composition of the different media.

Author Contributions

C.Z. experimental setup, data acquisition and analysis, writing, reviewing; L.L. experimental setup, quenching studies, data acquisition, reviewing; R.D.L.G. experimental design, data interpretation, reviewing; E.S. data analysis, processing and interpretation; S.E. experimental setup, data collection and processing; S.G.C. data curation, visualization, reviewing and editing; A.R.M. probe design, synthesis, reviewing; D.B.P. conceptualization, supervision, writing and funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Irish Department of Agriculture, Food and the Marine, grant DAFM 17/F/222, the Science Foundation Ireland, grants SFI/12/RC/2276_P2 and SFI-847652-SPARKLE-H2020-MSCA-COFUND, and by the EU H2020, grant 847652 SPARKLE.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

R.D.L.G. is an employee of Agilent Inc, a company whose product (MitoXpress probe) was used in the study.

References

  1. Stitt, D.T.; Nagar, M.S.; Haq, T.A.; Timmins, M.R. Determination of growth rate of microorganisms in broth from oxygen-sensitive fluorescence plate reader measurements. Biotechniques 2002, 32, 684–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. O’Mahony, F.C.; Papkovsky, D.B. Rapid high-throughput assessment of aerobic bacteria in complex samples by fluorescence-based oxygen respirometry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006, 72, 1279–1287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Papkovsky, D.B.; Kerry, J.P. Oxygen sensor-based respirometry and the landscape of microbial testing methods as applicable to food and beverage matrices. Sensors 2023, 23, 4519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Elisseeva, S.; Kelly, C.; Cruz-Romero, M.; Zhdanov, A.V.; Kerry, J.P.; Papkovsky, D.B. The use of optical oxygen sensing and respirometry to quantify the effects of antimicrobials on common food spoilage bacteria and food samples. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 322, 128572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Patel, J.R.; Bhagwat, A.A.; Sanglay, G.C.; Solomon, M.B. Rapid detection of Salmonella from hydrodynamic pressure-treated poultry using molecular beacon real-time PCR. Food Microbiol. 2006, 23, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rattanasomboon, N.; Bellara, S.R.; Harding, C.L.; Fryer, P.J.; Thomas, C.R.; Al-Rubeai, M.; McFarlane, C.M. Growth and enumeration of the meat spoilage bacterium Brochothrix thermosphacta. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 1999, 51, 145–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Papkovsky, D.B.; Hynes, J.; Will, Y. Respirometric screening technology for ADME-Tox studies. Expert Opin. Drug Metab. Toxicol. 2006, 2, 313–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Santovito, E.; Elisseeva, S.; Cruz-Romero, M.C.; Duffy, G.; Kerry, J.P.; Papkovsky, D.B. A simple sensor system for onsite monitoring of O2 in vacuum-packed meats during the shelf life. Sensors 2021, 21, 4256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Elisseeva, S.; Santovito, E.; Linehan, E.; Kerry, J.P.; Papkovsky, D.B. Performance assessment of the two oxygen sensor based respirometric platforms with complex media and in selective bacterial assays. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2023, 383, 133582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Bonnet, M.; Lagier, J.C.; Raoult, D.; Khelaifia, S. Bacterial culture through selective and non-selective conditions: The evolution of culture media in clinical microbiology. New Microbes New Infect. 2020, 34, 100622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Dmitriev, R.; Kondrashina, A.; Koren, K.; Klimant, I.; Zhdanov, A.; Pakan, J.; McDermott, K.; Papkovsky, D. Small molecule phosphorescent probes for O2 imaging in 3D tissue models. Biomater. Sci. 2014, 2, 853–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Fercher, A.; Borisov, S.M.; Zhdanov, A.V.; Klimant, I.; Papkovsky, D.B. Intracellular O2 sensing probe based on cell-penetrating phosphorescent nanoparticles. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 5499–5508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dmitriev, R.I.; Papkovsky, D.B. Optical probes and techniques for O2 measurement in live cells and tissue. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69, 2025–2039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zanetti, C.; Gaspar, R.D.L.; Zhdanov, A.V.; Maguire, N.M.; Joyce, S.A.; Collins, S.G.; Maguire, A.R.; Papkovsky, D.B. Heterosubstituted derivatives of PtPFPP for O2 sensing and cell analysis: Structure–activity relationships. Bioconjugate Chem. 2022, 33, 2161–2169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Lakowicz, J. Principles of Fluorescence Spectroscopy, 3rd ed.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  16. International Organisation for Standardization. Microbiology of the Food Chain: Horizontal Method for the Enumeration of Microorganisms—Part 1: Colony Count at 30 °C by the Pour Plate Technique; International Organisation for Standardization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  17. Blood, R.M.; Curtis, G. Media for ‘total’ Enterobacteriaceae, coliforms and Escherichia coli. Prog. Ind. Microbiol. 1995, 34, 163–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rompre, A.; Servais, P.; Baudart, J.; De-Roubin, M.-R.; Laurent, P. Detection and enumeration of coliforms in drinking water: Current methods and emerging approaches. J. Microbiol. Methods 2002, 49, 31–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Yousef, A.E. Detection of Bacterial Pathogens in Different Matrices: Current Practices and Challenges. In Principles of Bacterial Detection: Biosensors, Recognition Receptors and Microsystems; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; pp. 31–48. [Google Scholar]
  20. Váradi, L.; Luo, J.L.; Hibbs, D.E.; Perry, J.D.; Anderson, R.J.; Orenga, S.; Groundwater, P.W. Methods for the detection and identification of pathogenic bacteria: Past, present, and future. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46, 4818–4832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Qiu, W.; Nagl, S. Automated miniaturized digital microfluidic antimicrobial susceptibility test using a chip-integrated optical oxygen sensor. ACS Sens. 2021, 6, 1147–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Quaranta, M.; Borisov, S.M.; Klimant, I. Indicators for optical oxygen sensors. Bioanal. Rev. 2012, 4, 115–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Che, C.-M.; Hou, Y.-J.; Chan, M.C.W.; Guo, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Y. [meso-Tetrakis(pentafluorophenyl)porphyrinato]platinum(ii) as an efficient, oxidation-resistant red phosphor: Spectroscopic properties and applications in organic light-emitting diodes. J. Mater. Chem. 2003, 13, 1362–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Koren, K.; Borisov, S.M.; Klimant, I. Stable optical oxygen sensing materials based on click-coupling of fluorinated platinum(II) and palladium(II) porphyrins-A convenient way to eliminate dye migration and leaching. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2012, 169, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Hoyle, C.E.; Lowe, A.B.; Bowman, C.N. Thiol-click chemistry: A multifaceted toolbox for small molecule and polymer synthesis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2010, 39, 1355–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. O’Riordan, T.C.; Zhdanov, A.V.; Ponomarev, G.V.; Papkovsky, D.B. Analysis of intracellular oxygen and metabolic responses of mammalian cells by time-resolved fluorometry. Anal. Chem. 2007, 79, 9414–9419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Zhdanov, A.V.; Hynes, J.; Dmitriev, R.I.; Papkovsky, D.B. O2 Analysis on a Fluorescence Spectrometer or Plate Reader. In Phosphorescent Oxygen-Sensitive Probes; Papkovsky, D.B., Zhdanov, A.V., Fercher, A., Dmitriev, R.I., Hynes, J., Eds.; Springer: Basel, Switzerland, 2012; pp. 29–69. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mallette, M. Chapter XV Evaluation of Growth by Physical and Chemical Means. In Methods in Microbiology; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1969; pp. 521–566. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zhang, H.; Zhao, Y.; He, X.; Gao, P. A novel approach for assessing the susceptibility of Escherichia coli to antibiotics. Sci. China Life Sci. 2010, 53, 1346–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sen, R.; Li, L.; Zhdanov, A.V.; Gaspar, R.D.; Papkovsky, D.B. Phosphorescence lifetime measurements with sensor materials: Comparison of the four different detection platforms. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2022, 371, 132496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Kuusisto, A.; Hänninen, P. Time-Domain Measurements. In Lanthanide Luminescence: Photophysical, Analytical and Biological Aspects; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 263–277. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zu, F.; Yan, F.; Bai, Z.; Xu, J.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y.; Zhou, X. The quenching of the fluorescence of carbon dots: A review on mechanisms and applications. Microchim. Acta 2017, 184, 1899–1914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kotaki, A.; Naoi, M.; Okuda, J.; Yagi, K. Absorption and fluorescence spectra of riboflavin tetrabutyrate in various solvents. J. Biochem. 1967, 61, 404–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Subuddhi, U.; Mishra, A.K. Micellization of bile salts in aqueous medium: A fluorescence study. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2007, 57, 102–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Poulin, B.A.; Ryan, J.N.; Aiken, G.R. Effects of iron on optical properties of dissolved organic matter. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48, 10098–10106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Kim, H.; Koo, B. Iron(III) sensors based on the fluorescence quenching of poly(phenylene ethynylene)s and iron-detecting PDMS pads. Macromol. Res. 2021, 29, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, H.; Chen, H.; Li, H.; Pan, S.; Ran, Y.; Hu, X. Construction of a novel turn-on-off fluorescence sensor used for highly selective detection of thiamine via its quenching effect on o-phen-Zn(2+) complex. Luminescence 2018, 33, 1128–1135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Hirohara, S.; Nishida, M.; Sharyo, K.; Obata, M.; Ando, T.; Tanihara, M. Synthesis, photophysical properties and photocytotoxicity of mono-, di-, tri- and tetra-glucosylated fluorophenylporphyrins. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2010, 18, 1526–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Yoshihara, T.; Yamaguchi, Y.; Hosaka, M.; Takeuchi, T.; Tobita, S. Ratiometric molecular sensor for monitoring oxygen levels in living cells. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 4148–4151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Neugebauer, U.; Pellegrin, Y.; Devocelle, M.; Forster, R.J.; Signac, W.; Moran, N.; Keyes, T.E. Ruthenium polypyridyl peptide conjugates: Membrane permeable probes for cellular imaging. Chem. Commun. 2008, 5307–5309. Available online: https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2008/cc/b810403d/unauth (accessed on 2 January 2014). [CrossRef]
  41. Koren, K.; Borisov, S.M.; Saf, R.; Klimant, I. Strongly phosphorescent Iridium(III)–porphyrins—New oxygen indicators with tuneable photophysical properties and functionalities. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 2011, 1531–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Photographs of 96-well plates with the different media and E. coli loads (zero, 104 or 106 CFU/mL), before (left) and after (right) an overnight incubation at 30 °C.
Figure 1. Photographs of 96-well plates with the different media and E. coli loads (zero, 104 or 106 CFU/mL), before (left) and after (right) an overnight incubation at 30 °C.
Sensors 24 00267 g001
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the O2 probes used: (A) MitoXpress, comprising a macromolecular conjugate of bovine serum albumin (BSA) and PtCP-NCS; (B) NanO2, comprising core–shell nanoparticles of a cationic hydrogel, RL-100, with PtPFPP molecules embedded in the core; (C) small molecule derivatives of PtPFPP: tetra-PEGylated, PtPEG4 and tetra-glucosylated PtGlc4.
Figure 2. Schematic representation of the O2 probes used: (A) MitoXpress, comprising a macromolecular conjugate of bovine serum albumin (BSA) and PtCP-NCS; (B) NanO2, comprising core–shell nanoparticles of a cationic hydrogel, RL-100, with PtPFPP molecules embedded in the core; (C) small molecule derivatives of PtPFPP: tetra-PEGylated, PtPEG4 and tetra-glucosylated PtGlc4.
Sensors 24 00267 g002
Figure 3. Intensity (cps) and LT (µs) profiles of MitoXpress (0.3 µM), NanO2 (0.3 µM), PtGlc4 (3 µM), PtPEG4 (3 µM), in NB (A), MC (B), RCC (C), MMG (D), and MLS (E) media with 104 (green curves) and 106 (light blue) E. coli CFU/mL, at 37 °C. Negative controls (probe in sterile media, no cells) are also shown (dark blue).
Figure 3. Intensity (cps) and LT (µs) profiles of MitoXpress (0.3 µM), NanO2 (0.3 µM), PtGlc4 (3 µM), PtPEG4 (3 µM), in NB (A), MC (B), RCC (C), MMG (D), and MLS (E) media with 104 (green curves) and 106 (light blue) E. coli CFU/mL, at 37 °C. Negative controls (probe in sterile media, no cells) are also shown (dark blue).
Sensors 24 00267 g003aSensors 24 00267 g003b
Figure 4. Profiles of blank Int signals (no probe) for the different media, recorded at delay times of 30 and 70 µs (A,B), or 25 and 50 µs (C,D), with 106 E. coli CFU/mL (A,C) and without E. coli (B,D).
Figure 4. Profiles of blank Int signals (no probe) for the different media, recorded at delay times of 30 and 70 µs (A,B), or 25 and 50 µs (C,D), with 106 E. coli CFU/mL (A,C) and without E. coli (B,D).
Sensors 24 00267 g004
Figure 5. Densitometry profiles at 405 nm (A) and 600 nm (B) for the different media, at E. coli concentrations of 104 (dark blue), 106 (green) and zero (light blue) CFU/mL, and at 37 °C.
Figure 5. Densitometry profiles at 405 nm (A) and 600 nm (B) for the different media, at E. coli concentrations of 104 (dark blue), 106 (green) and zero (light blue) CFU/mL, and at 37 °C.
Sensors 24 00267 g005
Figure 6. Phosphorescence intensity images of E. coli cells, pre-incubated for 3 h at 37 °C with NanO2 (A), MitoXpress/PtCP-BSA (B), PtGlc4 (C), and PtPEG4 (D) at working concentrations and measured on a confocal fluorescence microscope. (E) Transmission image of E. coli cells in NB broth in a haemocytometer.
Figure 6. Phosphorescence intensity images of E. coli cells, pre-incubated for 3 h at 37 °C with NanO2 (A), MitoXpress/PtCP-BSA (B), PtGlc4 (C), and PtPEG4 (D) at working concentrations and measured on a confocal fluorescence microscope. (E) Transmission image of E. coli cells in NB broth in a haemocytometer.
Sensors 24 00267 g006
Table 1. The O2 probes used in this study and their characteristic features.
Table 1. The O2 probes used in this study and their characteristic features.
Probe Porphyrin PhosphorWorking DilutionProbe TypeSpecial Features
MitoXpressPtCP0.3 µMMacromolecular conjugateProtein based, cell-impermeable
NanO2PtPFPP0.3 µMNanoparticlePolymeric core–shell NPs, shielded, cell-permeable *
PtGlc4Modified PtPFPP3 µMSmall moleculeCell-permeable *
PtPEG4Modified PtPFPP3 µMSmall moleculeCell-impermeable *
* Assessed mostly mammalian cells and tissues.
Table 2. Basal and maximal phosphorescence signals of the probes in the different media.
Table 2. Basal and maximal phosphorescence signals of the probes in the different media.
ProbeMediumIbase
(cps)
Imax
(cps)
LTbase
(µs)
LTmax
(µs)
Comments
PtCP-BSANB
MC
RCC
MMG
MLS
279k
110k
14k
56.9k
22k
2.4M
715k
908k
424k
120k
22.1
25.2
15.6
19.6
18.8
74.6
65.3
40.5
46.7
35.0
Normal sigmoid, stable signals
Altered sigmoid
Almost normal sigmoid
Bell-shaped Int, sigmoidal LT profiles
Bell-shaped sigmoid
NanO2NB
MC
RCC
MMG
MLS
1.7M
717k
738k
259k
530k
13.8M
6.5M
9.1M
2.1M
2.9M
27.1
22.4
21.8
14.7
26.4
70.6
62.8
57.7
32.9
62.5
Normal sigmoid, stable signals
Almost sigmoidal profiles
Almost sigmoidal profiles
Sigmoidal profiles, shorter LT
Altered sigmoid with downward trend
PtGlc4NB
MC
RCC
MMG
MLS
164k
86k
75k
36k
29k
756k
397k
1.7M
230k
43k
10.3
8.7
13.3
11.3
9.2
17.1
18.5
22.6
17.3
12.1
Bell-shaped Int and sigmoidal LT with upward drift
Altered profiles with two subsequent signal growth
Signal drop followed by a plateau
Altered sigmoid with upward trend
Strongly quenched signals
PtPEG4NB
MC
RCC
MMG
MLS
36k
69k
53k
17k
41k
178k
133k
303k
66k
109k
11.9
8.8
13.1
10.9
8.2
29.1
18.5
27.5
20.9
11.8
Almost sigmoidal profiles
Low Int change and altered LT profile
Bell shaped Int and almost sigmoidal LT
Almost sigmoidal signals, lower amplitude
Signal quenching
Ibase = basal intensity; Imax = maximal intensity; cps = count per second; LT or τ = lifetime (µs). Maximal signals were obtained at [E. coli] = 106 CFU/mL. Questionable signals are highlighted in red.
Table 3. Main parameters of the densitometry profiles (A405 and A600) of E. coli (at 106 CFU/mL) in the different media at 37 °C, and comparison of their TT values with respirometry.
Table 3. Main parameters of the densitometry profiles (A405 and A600) of E. coli (at 106 CFU/mL) in the different media at 37 °C, and comparison of their TT values with respirometry.
MediaRegistration WavelengthA0AmaxTTD, hTTR, h
NB405 nm
600 nm
0.12
0.04
0.26
0.15
2.18
2.83
2–2.2
MC405 nm
600 nm
0.52
0.15
0.88
0.51
4.13
4.13
2.5–2.9
RCC405 nm
600 nm
0.15
0.04
0.32
0.21
3.15
3.48
2.2–2.9
MMG405 nm
600 nm
0.18
0.27
0.33
0.13
3.48
5.10
2.1–2.7
MLS405 nm
600 nm
>3
0.25
n.m.
0.42
n.m.
4.13
2.2–2.9
A—absorbance (AU), TTD and TTR—threshold times for densitometry and respirometry; n.m.—not measurable.
Table 4. Effects of the different components of the media on the O2 probes.
Table 4. Effects of the different components of the media on the O2 probes.
IngredientConcentration and Media UsedChanges in
A390/A650,
%/% at 1x
Quenching of Probe Int and LT signals
%/% at 1x
NanO2MitoXpressPtGlc4
LactoseMMG—20 g/L
MLS—30 g/L
0/09.1/3.9−13.7/0−25.7/0
L-cystineMMG—0.04 g/L0/01.5/0−1.0/4.50.9/0
ThiamineMMG—0.002 g/L0/06.5/3.90/00.6/5.6
Pantothenic acidMMG—0.002 g/L0/08.1/3.7−1.8/4.32.3/0
Nicotinic acidMMG—0.002 g/L0/0−1.4/40/05.3/0
Bile saltsMC—5.0 g/L0/0−31.1/0−62.0/4.8−825/55
Ferric ammonium citrateMMG—0.02 g/L<0.13.9/03.9/128.8/6.7
Lab-LemcoNB—1.0 g/L0.02/0−16.3/0−6.6/0−17.9/0
Peptone NB—5.0 g/L
MC—20 g/L
RCC—5.0 g/L
0.15/0−1.6/0−54.4/0−281/20
Yeast extract NB—2.0 g/L
MLS—6 g/L
0.5/06.1/3.5−116/4.8−436/6.3
Sodium lauryl sulphateMLS—1 g/L
RCC—0.1 g/L
0/03.5/1621.0/23.8−268/50
X-galRCC—0.08 g/L0/033.2/3.542.9/045.0/0
MUG RCC—0.05 g/L0/015.9/3.717.5/4.2−16.1/6.7
IPTGRCC—0.1 g/L0/06.2/0−8.4/8.31.7/6.7
Neutral redMC—0.075 g/L0.2/0.05n.m. (IFE)n.m. (IFE)n.m. (IFE)
Phenol redMLS—0.2 g/L>3.0/0n.m. (IFE)n.m. (IFE)n.m. (IFE)
Bromocresol purpleMMG—0.02 g/L0.5/047.8/12.085.9/31.844.7/12.5
n.m.—not measurable; IFE—inner filter effect. Significant effects are shown in red (negative values correspond to signal enhancement).
Table 5. Summary of the general usability of the probes in the different growth media.
Table 5. Summary of the general usability of the probes in the different growth media.
ProbeNBMCRCCMMGMLS
MitoXpress++-+/--
NanO2+++/-++
PtmPEG4+/--+/---
PtGlc4+/-+/-+/---
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zanetti, C.; Li, L.; Gaspar, R.D.L.; Santovito, E.; Elisseeva, S.; Collins, S.G.; Maguire, A.R.; Papkovsky, D.B. Susceptibility of the Different Oxygen-Sensing Probes to Interferences in Respirometric Bacterial Assays with Complex Media. Sensors 2024, 24, 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010267

AMA Style

Zanetti C, Li L, Gaspar RDL, Santovito E, Elisseeva S, Collins SG, Maguire AR, Papkovsky DB. Susceptibility of the Different Oxygen-Sensing Probes to Interferences in Respirometric Bacterial Assays with Complex Media. Sensors. 2024; 24(1):267. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010267

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zanetti, Chiara, Liang Li, Rafael Di Lazaro Gaspar, Elisa Santovito, Sophia Elisseeva, Stuart G. Collins, Anita R. Maguire, and Dmitri B. Papkovsky. 2024. "Susceptibility of the Different Oxygen-Sensing Probes to Interferences in Respirometric Bacterial Assays with Complex Media" Sensors 24, no. 1: 267. https://doi.org/10.3390/s24010267

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop