Next Article in Journal
Elaboration and Characterization of a New Heavy Metal Sensor Functionalized by Extracellular Polymeric Substances Isolated from a Tunisian Thermophilic Microalga Strain Graesiella sp.
Next Article in Special Issue
A USV-UAV Cooperative Trajectory Planning Algorithm with Hull Dynamic Constraints
Previous Article in Journal
Few-Shot User-Adaptable Radar-Based Breath Signal Sensing
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Hybrid Prognostic Method for Proton-Exchange-Membrane Fuel Cell with Decomposition Forecasting Framework Based on AEKF and LSTM
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

OL-SLAM: A Robust and Versatile System of Object Localization and SLAM

Sensors 2023, 23(2), 801; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23020801
by Chao Chen 1,†, Yukai Ma 1,†, Jiajun Lv 1, Xiangrui Zhao 1, Laijian Li 1, Yong Liu 1,* and Wang Gao 2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Sensors 2023, 23(2), 801; https://doi.org/10.3390/s23020801
Submission received: 21 October 2022 / Revised: 26 December 2022 / Accepted: 26 December 2022 / Published: 10 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Efficient Intelligence with Applications in Embedded Sensing)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors have proposed  a SLAM and  object tracking algorithm with multiple sensors  fusion. Although the manuscript contains somewhat novelity but the provision of datasets makes it more appealing. I have following observation before the manuscript is accepted for publication,

 1. The manuscript title needs to be modified localization instead of location will be a more appropriate word. The title overall can be modified and will improve readership of the paper. 

2. I would suggest the authors to provide more literature on the subject. Specifically the literature survey on tracking is not sufficient.

3. Although the manuscript uses real data from sensors, a comparison with any existing technique or more detail regarding the experimental setup and execution of the algorithm is necessary. For instance is the algorithm real time? what platform has been used? How were the authors able to make the yolo algorithm run in real time and what was the frame rate or the execution time? training data etc must be presented in tabular form regarding the specifics mentioned in the para above.

4. the conclusion may be expanded and should provide more detail.

 

I would suggest the authors to look into scenarios where  the gps signal is denied, how does the system cope with such scenarios? Cite some relevant papers like,

https://doi.org/10.3390/s19245357

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2020.10.018

tracking:

https://doi.org/10.3390/s20143821

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2017.01.017

https://doi.org/10.1117/1.OE.54.5.053110

10.1109/TAES.2008.4655350

Yolo in tracking

10.1109/ICIRCA51532.2021.9544598

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4274384

 

Author Response

Thank you for reading, please open the attachment for details!

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Dear Authors,

Find attached file for reviews.

Regards;

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Thank you for reading, please open the attachment for details

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop