Next Article in Journal
Classification of Drivers’ Mental Workload Levels: Comparison of Machine Learning Methods Based on ECG and Infrared Thermal Signals
Next Article in Special Issue
Energy Balance of Wireless Sensor Nodes Based on Bluetooth Low Energy and Thermoelectric Energy Harvesting
Previous Article in Journal
Meter Wave Polarization-Sensitive Array Radar for Height Measurement Based on MUSIC Algorithm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Multi-User Joint Detection Using Bi-Directional Deep Neural Network Framework in NOMA-OFDM System
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Exploiting an Intermediate Latent Space between Photo and Sketch for Face Photo-Sketch Recognition

Sensors 2022, 22(19), 7299; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197299
by Seho Bae 1, Nizam Ud Din 2, Hyunkyu Park 1 and Juneho Yi 1,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Sensors 2022, 22(19), 7299; https://doi.org/10.3390/s22197299
Submission received: 12 August 2022 / Revised: 15 September 2022 / Accepted: 23 September 2022 / Published: 26 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges in Energy Perspective on Mobile Sensor Networks)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

 The manuscript used an intermediate latent space between photo and sketch for face photo-sketch recognition. In general, the manuscript gives a good description of method. However, I believe the manuscript needs to be revised.

 1. It is necessary to explain clearly the superiority of the proposed method through comparison with other methods.

2. There is no experimental comparison of the algorithm with previously known work.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The work provides a method for photo-sketch recognition. According to the authors the method works better than other published methods where they compare it with. The authors used the public part of a database and used part of the images as training set and part as test set, as is usual in this kind of research. Though it is not very reproducible, since it depends on which selection is made as such. Also a question is how many images the other researchers used and if the comparison of results can be made this way. So I would like to ask the authors to clarify this issue. 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

The paper has been improved and is good for publication

Back to TopTop