Next Article in Journal
Feature Selection for Machine Learning Based Step Length Estimation Algorithms
Previous Article in Journal
Characterization of a COTS-Based RF Receiver for Cubesat Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Rectangular Notch-Band UWB Antenna with Controllable Notched Bandwidth and Centre Frequency

Departement of Computer and Communication Engineering, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju 28644, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(3), 777; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030777
Submission received: 7 January 2020 / Revised: 23 January 2020 / Accepted: 29 January 2020 / Published: 31 January 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Remote Sensors)

Abstract

:
This paper presents the design and realization of a compact ultra-wideband (UWB) antenna with a rectangular notch wireless area network (WLAN) band that has controllable notched bandwidth and center frequency. The UWB characteristics of the antenna are achieved by truncating the lower ends of the rectangular microstrip patch, and the notch characteristics are obtained by using electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) structures. EBGs consist of two rectangular metallic conductors loaded on the back of the radiator, which is connected to the patch by shorting pins. A rectangular notch at the WLAN band with high selectivity is realized by tuning the individual resonant frequencies of the EBGs and merging them. Furthermore, the results show that the bandwidth and frequency of the rectangular notch band could be controlled according to the on-demand rejection band applications. In the demonstration, the rectangular notch band was shifted to X-band satellite communication by tuning the EBG parameters. The simulated and measured results show that the proposed antenna has an operational bandwidth from 3.1–12.5 GHz for |S11| < -10 with a rectangular notch band from 5–6 GHz, thus rejecting WLAN band signals. The antenna also has additional advantages: the overall size of the compact antenna is 16 × 25 × 1.52 mm3 and it has stable gain and radiation patterns.

1. Introduction

During the last two decades, ultra-wideband (UWB) technology has attracted the attention of both academics and industries. UWB is a technology that uses a very low energy level for short-range, high-information spread over a large bandwidth, usually more than 500 MHz. Due to the short duration of UWB pulses, it is easier to engineer high data rates with low latency. This encourages the usage of UWB in sensor networks, wireless positioning systems, biomedical imaging, and high data short-range communications [1].
Antennas have a major effect on the performance of UWB communication systems, therefore, the design of an antenna must meet its typical requirements, such as impedance matching, radiation stability, compact size, and low cost, which is quite challenging to achieve. The patch antennas are good candidates for UWB applications because of their lightweight, planar geometry, and ease of integration with other electronic components [2,3].
The main challenge in UWB communication is to avoid existing licensed and unlicensed wireless communication bands within the UWB spectrum, such as local area networks (WLAN) (IEEE802.11a, HIPERLAN/2,) operating in the 5.15–5.825 GHz band, WiMax (3.3–3.6 GHz), and X-band satellite communication (7.25–8.395 GHz). Filters are usually used to reject unwanted bands to improve communication quality. However, the use of filters increases the cost and volume of the system as well as insertion losses [4,5]. Therefore, much research has been focused on the design of UWB antennas that have band rejection features to avoid potential interference from existing bands. Previous studies have developed many notched band UWB antennas using different approaches to avoid interference problems. These band rejection techniques include etching slots on patch [6,7,8], split-ring resonators [9,10,11], electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) structures [12,13,14], and inserting a resonant cell in a microstrip line [15,16]. Some researchers achieved notched band capabilities by coupling parasitic elements to the radiator [17,18].
These techniques facilitate the design of notch-band antennas. However, References [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18] designs had the common disadvantage of a conventional notch with poor selectivity. The conventional notch is only capable of rejecting interference in the central frequency of a targeted band. To notch the unwanted bands in practical applications, a rectangular notch with high selectivity is required. Figure 1 shows a typical conventional notch and rectangular notch bands.
In recent years, few rectangular notched antennas have been reported, because of their potential to reject the unwanted bands [19,20,21,22,23,24]. In [19], using a large antenna, two conventional notch bands were attained at 5.2 and 5.8 GHz to reject the wireless local area network WLAN (5–6 GHz) without filtering the bandwidth between two bands. In [20], a rectangular notch-band antenna is presented at the WLAN band; however, the size of the antenna is too large to be used in modern compact electronic devices. In [21], several slots and split-ring resonators were coupled to a Coplanar Waveguide (CPW) line to achieve a wideband notch; however, because of its complicated geometry, the antenna does not offer frequency shifting of the notch band. In [22], to achieve a sharp-selectivity notch band, multiple quarter-wavelength slits were etched on the ground, and half-wavelength stubs were coupled to a microstrip; however, the geometry of the antenna was too complicated and required two-port excitations for its operation. In [23], folded strips and two pairs of inductively coupled resonators were employed for band-rejection with the advantage of controllable bandwidth. However, the geometry of the antenna was complex, and the overall size of the antenna is large. In [24], many slots and split-ring resonators were used to realize a notch with sharp selectivity with controllable bandwidth; however, because of the complex geometry, the notch-band frequency cannot be shifted. Hence, the design of a compact rectangular notch UWB antenna with controllable notch bandwidth and frequency is needed.
This paper presents the design and realization of a compact UWB microstrip patch antenna with a rectangular notch band having controllable notch bandwidth and frequency. Two EBGs are used to realize the rectangular notch at the WLAN band. Moreover, we demonstrate that notch bandwidth and frequency could be controlled according to the application requirements by tuning the parameters of the EBG.

2. Antenna Design

2.1. Antenna Structure

The geometry of the proposed antenna is shown in Figure 2. The antenna consists of a modified rectangular patch and two EBG structures. The lower corners of the patch are truncated by a semicircle with radius R to achieve UWB characteristics. The EBG structures consist of two rectangular conductors that are connected to the radiator using two shorting pins with radius p. The EBGs are usually made up of small metal patches on dielectric substrates with shorting vias and have the potential to create a stopband to block electromagnetic waves of a certain frequency [25]. The motive of using EBG structure is the ease of design, and simplification of the antenna. The antenna is printed on Taconic TLY-5A substrate (εr = 2.17 and tanδ = 0.0009) with length L and width A. The antenna is fed with a coplanar waveguide with a characteristic impedance of 50 Ω. The optimized dimensions of the antenna are as follows: A = 16 mm, L = 25 mm, h = 1.52 mm, Lg = 7 mm, Lp = 12 mm, r = 0.3 mm, Sw = 3.2 mm, Wd = 0.6 mm, l1 = 16 mm, l2 = 16 mm, w1 = 0.9 mm, w2 = 2 mm, s = 1.1 mm, g = 1 mm, and p = 0.2 mm.

2.2. Design of the UWB Antenna

The design of the UWB antenna evolved from the simulation of a conventional rectangular patch antenna (Antenna-1) that is fed with a coplanar waveguide in CST Microwave Studio. Because conventional monopoles have a narrow bandwidth, the lower ends of Antenna-1 were truncated in a semicircle with radius R to achieve UWB characteristics. Figure 3 shows the evolution of the UWB patch antenna design, which is designated as Antenna-2.
The optimized parameters of the Antenna-1: A = 16 mm, L = 24 mm, h = 1.52 mm, g = 1 mm, Lg = 7 mm, Lp =12 mm, Sw = 3.2 mm, and Wd = 0.6 mm. The optimized parameters of the Antenna-2: A = 16 mm, L = 24 mm, h = 1.52 mm, g = 1 mm, Lg = 7 mm, Lp =12 mm, Sw = 3.2 mm, Wd =0.6 mm, and r = 0.3 mm.
The impedance characteristics of both antennas in terms of |S11| are shown in Figure 4. The Antenna-1 showed an impedance bandwidth ranging from 3.1–7.8 GHz for |S11| < -10 dB, which is dramatically increased from 3.1 to 12.5 GHz in Antenna-2. It is worth noting that the impedance bandwidth of the antenna covered the entire bandwidth required for UWB technology, which is proposed by the Federal Communication Commission (FCC).

2.3. Design of The UWB Antenna with A Conventional Notch

The notch characteristics are realized in UWB antennas to reject signals from unwanted bands using EBG structures. To achieve the notch characteristics in the UWB antenna (i.e., Antenna-2), a rectangular EBG was introduced on the back of the substrate, which is connected to the patch by a shorting pin, as shown in Figure 5 and designated as Antenna-3. Figure 6 shows a comparison of the |S11| characteristics of Antenna-2 and Antenna-3. The antenna with the one optimized EBG achieved a conventional notch at the WLAN band (5.15–5.9 GHz) without degrading the overall bandwidth of the UWB antenna. Thus, a notch was successfully realized.
The optimized parameters of the Antenna-3: A = 16 mm, L = 24 mm, h = 1.52 mm, g = 1 mm, Lg = 7 mm, Lp = 12 mm, Sw = 3.2 mm, Wd = 0.6 mm, r = 0.3 mm, l1 = 16 mm, w1 = 0.9 mm, s = 1.1 mm, and p = 0.2 mm.

2.4. Design of the UWB Antenna with the Rectangular Notch

The conventional notch using one EBG described in the previous section had high selectivity at lower frequencies but low selectivity at higher frequencies. Therefore, another EBG was added to Antenna-3 and optimized to obtain high selectivity in the entire rejection band by merging the individual notch bands of EBG1 and EBG2. Figure 7 shows the geometry of the rectangular notch-band antenna with EBG1 and EBG2 (i.e., Antenna-4). The |S11| characteristics of Antenna-3 and Antenna-4 are shown in Figure 8. The conventional notch of Antenna-3 (with one EBG) was changed to a rectangular notch band with high selectivity in Antenna-4 (with two EBGs). The important parameters that affected the notch-band characteristics are discussed later in this paper.
The design summary of the rectangular notch UWB antenna is illustrated in the detailed flowchart shown in Figure 9. First, a simple rectangular patch that is fed with a microstrip line with the partial ground plan is designed. The antenna is then optimized by varying the parameters of the antenna. The lower ends of the patch are then truncated in the semicircle R and tuned to attain UWB characteristics. A rectangular EBG is introduced, and its parameters (l1, w1, and s) are optimized to realize a conventional notched band. Finally, another EBG is designed and its parameters (l2, w2, and s1) are tuned to achieve a rectangular notch band in the UWB antenna.

2.5. Controllable Notch Bandwidth and Frequency

The bandwidth of the rejection band is an important characteristic of the design of UWB antennas. The notch bandwidth and frequency should be adjusted according to the requirements of the wireless communication system. In the proposed antenna, the length and width of both EBG structures are key parameters that affect the notch bandwidth of the antenna. To make it clear, we are studying the parametric study. It is to be noted that during the parametric study, only one parameter is changed, and all other parameters are unchanged. Figure 10a shows the |S11| of the antenna according to different lengths (l1) of EBG1. The upper frequency of the notch band shifted linearly toward the left side, increasing the l1 without affecting the passband of the antenna. Because EBG1 controls the upper frequency of the notch, the lower frequency showed almost no change in the l1. However, the length (l2) of EBG2 affects the lower frequency of the notch band, as shown in Figure 10b. The lower frequency of the notch shifted toward the left side, increasing (l2) while showing a negligible change in the upper frequency of the notch band.
Figure 11 shows the effect of changing the EBG widths on the |S11| of the antenna. The variations in the width of EBG1 (w1) and EBG2 (w2) show a response similar to the change in the length of the EBG. The upper frequency of the notch band moved to the left side, increasing the values of w1, and w2 changed the lower frequency of the notch band in the same way as w1. These observations indicate that by tuning the dimensions of the EBGs, we can control the bandwidth and notch frequency of the proposed antenna according to the demands of the application. In the demonstration, the bandwidth of the notch band was reduced from 5–6 to 5.2–5.8 GHz, and the notch band was shifted to the X-band satellite downlink (7–8 GHz), as shown in Figure 12. For the reduction (5.2–5.8 GHz) in the bandwidth of the notch band l1 was increased by 2 mm, while l2 was decreased by 2 mm from the optimized values. Moreover, to shift the notch from WLAN to the X-band, the width, length, and spacing between the EBGs were reoptimized. The optimized parameters of the X-band notch antenna are as follows: A = 16 mm, L = 24 mm, h = 1.52 mm, g = 1 mm, Lg = 7 mm, Lp =12 mm, Sw = 3.2 mm, Wd = 0.6 mm, r = 0.3 mm, l1 = 8.5 mm, w1 = 2 mm, s = 3.5 mm, and p = 0.2 mm, l2 = 8.5 mm, w2 = 2, and s1 = 11.3 mm.

3. Antenna Measurements

The modeled antenna was fabricated on Taconic TLY 5A (1.52 mm) for experimental verification, as shown in Figure 13. The impedance and radiation characteristics of the designed antenna were measured by an Agilent vector network. Figure 14 shows the simulated and measured impedance characteristics. The measured and simulated results are well-matched. The antenna showed good impedance matching characteristics throughout the entire UWB spectrum (3.1–12.5 GHz) with the exception of the WLAN band (5.1–5.9 GHz), which was rejected to avoid interference. There is a difference between simulated and measurement |S11| results, especially at high frequencies. This discrepancy is most likely due to cable losses and fabrication tolerances.
The measured and simulated peak gains of the antenna are plotted as a function of frequency, as shown in Figure 15. In the measurement of peak gain, a well-calibrated standard horn antenna was used as the source antenna while the fabricated prototype was measured as the receiving antenna. Transmit and receiver amplifiers were used to provide stable power reception. The antenna under test was rotated to measure the peak gain at different orientations. A stable peak gain curve was obtained in the frequency range of interest with a maximum value of 4.5 dBi, but it sharply decreased to about -6 dBi at the notch band. This demonstrates the effectiveness of the antenna’s rectangular notching characteristics.
Figure 16 shows the simulated and measured radiation patterns in H-plane (xz-plane) and E-plane (yz-plane) at 3, 7, and 10 GHz. The radiation pattern at H-plane is nearly symmetrical and omnidirectional for 3, 7, and 10 GHz, however, in E-plane the radiation patterns are bidirectional with dumbbell shape. The radiation pattern at E-plane in 10 GHz shows little deterioration because of the increased radiating area at higher frequencies.
Finally, the antenna is compared with the previously reported rectangular notched band antennas [19,20,21,22,23,24] in terms of overall size, controllability of the notch-band bandwidth and frequency, and design complexity (Table 1). Almost all the antennas are large and have complex geometries. The antenna presented in [19, 21] are very large and lack controllable frequency and bandwidth. Although the antennas reported in [20, 22] offer the advantages of controllable bandwidth and frequency, the former is very large, and the latter have the disadvantage of design complexity, which is due to the presence of many stubs and slots; moreover, they require two-port excitations in its operation. The antenna designs proposed in [23, 24] offer controllable bandwidth without frequency shifting of the notch band, which is due to their complex geometry. In summary, the proposed antenna outperformed the existing rectangular notch UWB antennas based on its simple design and small size, as well as the controllable bandwidth and frequency of the notch band.

4. Conclusion

A rectangular notched band UWB antenna with controllable bandwidth and frequency with an overall compact size of 16 × 25 × 1.52 mm3 is presented. The antenna is fabricated on the TLY 5A (εr=2.17) substrate. The proposed antenna covers the entire UWB spectrum from 3.1 to 12.5 GHz. The UWB characteristic of the antenna is achieved by truncating the lower ends of the patch. The conventional notch is obtained by using a single EBG structure, and a rectangular notch at the WLAN band is realized by using two EBG structures with optimized parameters, which are laid on the back of the substrate and connected to the patch by shorting pins. The results showed that the notch band and frequency can be tuned by changing the EBG parameters. The measurement results of the fabricated antennas are well-matched to the simulation results.

Author Contributions

Investigation, K.S.S. and T.K.; Project administration, N.K.; Writing—original draft, A.A.; Writing—review & editing, N.H., M.-J.J. and J.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the ICT R&D Program of MSIT/IITP, Republic of Korea. [No. 2019-0-00102, A Study on Public Health and Safety in a Complex EMF Environment].

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ullah, S.; Ruan, C.; Sadiq, M.S.; Haq, T.U.; He, W. High Efficient and Ultra Wide Band Monopole Antenna for Microwave Imaging and Communication Applications. Sensors 2020, 20, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  2. Khurshid, A.; Dong, J.; Shi, R. A Metamaterial-Based Compact Planar Monopole Antenna for Wi-Fi and UWB Applications. Sensors 2019, 19, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kim, J.; Sung, Y. Dual-band microstrip patch antenna with switchable orthogonal linear polarization. J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci. 2018, 18, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Kim, P.; Jeong, Y. A coupled line impedance transformer for high termination impedance with a bandpass filtering response. J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci. 2018, 18, 41–45. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wu, T.L.; Pan, Y.M.; Hu, P.F.; Zheng, S.Y. Design of a low profile and compact omnidirectional filtering patch antenna. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 1083–1089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Park, J.; Jeong, M.; Hussain, N.; Rhee, S.; Kim, P.; Kim, N. Design and fabrication of triple-band folded dipole antenna for GPS/DCS/WLAN/WiMAX applications. Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 2019, 6, 1328–1332. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hussain, N.; Jeong, M.; Park, J.; Rhee, S.; Kim, P.; Kim, N. A compact size 2.9–23.5 GHz microstrip patch antenna with WLAN band-rejection. Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 2019, 61, 1307–1313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhang, Y.; Hong, W.; Yu, C.; Kuai, Z.; Don, Y.; Zhou, J. Planar ultrawideband antennas with multiple notched bands based on etched slots on the patch and/or split ring resonators on the feed line. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2008, 56, 3063–3068. [Google Scholar]
  9. Mok, K.Y.; Rhee, Y.C.; Yoon, J.H. Design of a pot-shaped monopole antenna with dual band notched characteristics for UWB application. J. Electromagn. Eng. Sci. 2017, 17, 44–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Bong, H.; Jeong, M.; Hussain, N.; Rhee, S.-Y.; Gil, S.-K.; Kim, N. Design of an UWB antenna with two slits for 5G/WLAN-notched bands. Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 2019, 61, 1295–1300. [Google Scholar]
  11. Jeong, M.J.; Hussain, N.; Bong, H.-U.; Park, J.W.; Shin, K.S.; Lee, S.W.; Rhee, S.Y.; Kim, N. Ultrawideband microstrip patch antenna with quadruple band notch characteristic using negative permittivity unit cells. Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 2019, 62, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Yazdi, M.; Komjani, N. Design of a band-notched UWB monopole antenna by means of an EBG structure. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2011, 10, 170–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jaglan, N.; Kanaujia, B.K.; Gupta, S.D.; Srivastava, S. Triple band notched UWB antenna design using electromagnetic band gap structures. Prog. Electromagn. Res. C 2016, 66, 139–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Iqbal, A.; Smida, A.; Mallat, N.K.; Islam, M.T.; Kim, S. A Compact UWB Antenna with Independently Controllable Notch Band. Sensors 2019, 19, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Qu, S.W.; Li, J.I.; Xue, Q. A band-notched ultrawideband printed monopole antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2006, 5, 495–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bao, X.L.; Ammann, M.J. Printed UWB antenna with coupled slotted element for notch-frequency function. Int. J. Antennas Propag. 2008, 713921, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhu, F.; Gao, S.; Ho, A.T.S.; See, C.H.; Abd-Alhameed, R.A.; Li, J.; Xu, J.D. Design and analysis of planar ultra-wideband antenna with dual band-notched function. Prog. Electromagn. Res. 2012, 127, 523–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Choi, N.; Jung, C.; Byun, J.; Harackiewicz, F.J.; Park, M.-J.; Chung, Y.-S.; Kim, T.; Lee, B. Compact UWB antenna with I-shaped band-notch parasitic element for laptop applications. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2009, 8, 580–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gheethan, A.A.; Anagnostou, D.E. Dual band-reject UWB antenna with a sharp rejection of narrow and closely-spaced bands. IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech. 2012, 60, 2071–2076. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Peng, L.; Wen, B.J.; Li, X.F.; Jiang, X.; Yadav, S.; Li, S.M. CPW Fed UWB antenna by EBGs with wide rectangular notched-band. IEEE Access 2016, 4, 9545–9552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Siddiqui, J.Y.; Saha, C.; Antar, Y.M.M. Compact dual-SRR-loaded UWB monopole antenna with dual frequency and wideband notch characteristics. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2015, 14, 100–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, W.A.; Tu, Z.H.; Chu, Q.X.; Wu, X.H. Differential stepped-slot UWB antenna with common-mode suppression and dual sharp-selectivity notched bands. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett. 2016, 15, 1120–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ma, T.; Tsai, J. Band-Rejected ultrawideband planar monopole antenna with high-frequency selectivity and controllable bandwidth using inductively coupled-resonator pairs. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2010, 58, 2747–2752. [Google Scholar]
  24. Chu, Q.; Mao, C.; Zhu, H. A compact notched band UWB slot antenna with sharp selectivity and controllable bandwidth. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 2013, 61, 3961–3966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, N.; Chen, Z.N.; Wang, Y.Y.; Chia, M.Y. A two-layer compact electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) structure and its applications in microstrip filter design. Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 2003, 37, 62–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conventional notch and the rectangular notch.
Figure 1. Conventional notch and the rectangular notch.
Sensors 20 00777 g001
Figure 2. Geometry of proposed antenna: (a) front view (b) side view, and (c) back view.
Figure 2. Geometry of proposed antenna: (a) front view (b) side view, and (c) back view.
Sensors 20 00777 g002
Figure 3. The design evolution of the ultra-wideband patch antenna.
Figure 3. The design evolution of the ultra-wideband patch antenna.
Sensors 20 00777 g003
Figure 4. |S11| characteristics of Antenna-1 and Antenna-2.
Figure 4. |S11| characteristics of Antenna-1 and Antenna-2.
Sensors 20 00777 g004
Figure 5. Design procedure to achieve conventional notched UWB patch antenna.
Figure 5. Design procedure to achieve conventional notched UWB patch antenna.
Sensors 20 00777 g005
Figure 6. |S11| characteristics of Antenna-2 and Antenna-3.
Figure 6. |S11| characteristics of Antenna-2 and Antenna-3.
Sensors 20 00777 g006
Figure 7. Characteristics of Antenna-2 and antenna design procedure to achieve conventional notched UWB patch antenna.
Figure 7. Characteristics of Antenna-2 and antenna design procedure to achieve conventional notched UWB patch antenna.
Sensors 20 00777 g007
Figure 8. |S11| characteristics of Antenna-3 and Antenna-4.
Figure 8. |S11| characteristics of Antenna-3 and Antenna-4.
Sensors 20 00777 g008
Figure 9. Design procedure of the proposed antenna with rectangular notch-band characteristics.
Figure 9. Design procedure of the proposed antenna with rectangular notch-band characteristics.
Sensors 20 00777 g009
Figure 10. |S11| of the antenna for different lengths of: (a) EBG1 l1, and (b) EBG2 l2.
Figure 10. |S11| of the antenna for different lengths of: (a) EBG1 l1, and (b) EBG2 l2.
Sensors 20 00777 g010
Figure 11. |S11| of the antenna for different widths of (a) EBG1 w1 and (b) EBG2 w2.
Figure 11. |S11| of the antenna for different widths of (a) EBG1 w1 and (b) EBG2 w2.
Sensors 20 00777 g011
Figure 12. Demonstration of controllable notch band of the proposed antenna: (a) bandwidth and (b) frequency.
Figure 12. Demonstration of controllable notch band of the proposed antenna: (a) bandwidth and (b) frequency.
Sensors 20 00777 g012
Figure 13. Photo of fabricated UWB antenna with rectangular notched band: (a) front side (b) back side.
Figure 13. Photo of fabricated UWB antenna with rectangular notched band: (a) front side (b) back side.
Sensors 20 00777 g013
Figure 14. |S11| characteristics of the proposed antenna.
Figure 14. |S11| characteristics of the proposed antenna.
Sensors 20 00777 g014
Figure 15. The measured and simulated gain of the proposed antenna.
Figure 15. The measured and simulated gain of the proposed antenna.
Sensors 20 00777 g015
Figure 16. Simulated measure radiation pattern in E-and H-plane radiation pattern at 3, 7, and 10 GHz.
Figure 16. Simulated measure radiation pattern in E-and H-plane radiation pattern at 3, 7, and 10 GHz.
Sensors 20 00777 g016
Table 1. Performance comparison of the proposed antenna with existing rectangular notched antenna in literature.
Table 1. Performance comparison of the proposed antenna with existing rectangular notched antenna in literature.
Ref. antennasAntenna size (mm3)Controllable notch-bandwidthControllable notch frequencyDesign complexity
[19]44 × 44.4 × 0.1NoNosimple
[20]48 × 50 × 1YesYessimple
[21]50 × 50 × 1.575NoNocomplex
[22]28 ×18 × 0.8YesYesvery complex
[23]38 × 42 × 0.5YesNovery complex
[24]8.5 × 22 × 0.8YesNocomplex
This work16 × 25 × 1.52YesYessimple

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abbas, A.; Hussain, N.; Jeong, M.-J.; Park, J.; Shin, K.S.; Kim, T.; Kim, N. A Rectangular Notch-Band UWB Antenna with Controllable Notched Bandwidth and Centre Frequency. Sensors 2020, 20, 777. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030777

AMA Style

Abbas A, Hussain N, Jeong M-J, Park J, Shin KS, Kim T, Kim N. A Rectangular Notch-Band UWB Antenna with Controllable Notched Bandwidth and Centre Frequency. Sensors. 2020; 20(3):777. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030777

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abbas, Anees, Niamat Hussain, Min-Joo Jeong, Jiwoong Park, Kook Sun Shin, Taejoon Kim, and Nam Kim. 2020. "A Rectangular Notch-Band UWB Antenna with Controllable Notched Bandwidth and Centre Frequency" Sensors 20, no. 3: 777. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20030777

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop