Next Article in Journal
A Comparison of Partial Discharge Sensors for Natural Gas Insulated High Voltage Equipment
Previous Article in Journal
Rapid Non-Destructive Quantification of Eugenol in Curdlan Biofilms by Electronic Nose Combined with Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Special Issue
3D-Printed Flow Cells for Aptamer-Based Impedimetric Detection of E. coli Crooks Strain
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Letter

Voltammetric Determination of Pb(II) by a Ca-MOF-Modified Carbon Paste Electrode Integrated in a 3D-Printed Device

by
Evaggelia Vlachou
1,
Antigoni Margariti
2,
Giannis S. Papaefstathiou
2 and
Christos Kokkinos
1,*
1
Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15771 Athens, Greece
2
Laboratory of Inorganic Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 15771 Athens, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(16), 4442; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164442
Submission received: 24 June 2020 / Revised: 4 August 2020 / Accepted: 6 August 2020 / Published: 9 August 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue 3D Printing Technologies in Electrochemical (Bio)Sensing)

Abstract

:
In this work, a voltammetric method based on a metal organic framework (Ca-MOF)-modified carbon paste electrode for lead determination was developed. The MOF-based electrode was packed in a new type of 3D-printed syringe-type integrated device, which was entirely fabricated by a dual extruder 3D printer. After optimization of the operational parameters, a limit of detection of 0.26 µg L−1 Pb(II) was achieved, which is lower than that of existing MOF-based lead sensors. The device was used for Pb(II) determination in fish feed and bottled water samples with high accuracy and reliability. The proposed sensor is suitable for on-site analyses and provides a low-cost integrated transducer for the ultrasensitive routine detection of lead in practical applications.

1. Introduction

Lead ion is considered one of the most toxic heavy metal ions and is concentrated in aquatic ecosystems and poses a serious hazard to human health, even at trace levels [1,2,3]. Numerous diseases are related to Pb(II), such as anemia, cardiovascular and developmental disorders, and muscle paralysis, while a low concentration of Pb(II) can harm the brain, liver, and nerves [2,3]. Thus, for health and environmental protection, it is vital to employ sensitive and routine methods suitable for on-site monitoring of this hazardous element. Different spectrometric techniques (the most frequently applied is inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS)), are used for the measurement of lead concentration, but they require expensive and bulky instrumentation as well as expert technicians, which make them unsuitable for on-site applications [4,5]. On the other hand, anodic stripping voltammetry (ASV), providing inexpensive and portable instrumentation, simple operational protocols, and enhanced analytical sensitivity, has been recognized as the gold standard technique for heavy metal determination [6,7]. Commonly, the ASV determination of lead is carried out for mercury, bismuth, and antimony film electrodes formed either by electrodeposition or the sputtering process [8,9,10].
Nowadays, metal-organic frameworks (MOFs), which are assembled from metal clusters and organic ligands, have gained considerable attention as novel functional materials, thanks to their exceptional features, such as high porosity, plethora of functional groups, and adjustable chemical functionality [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19]. However, only a few works have managed to use MOFs as an electrode material or modifier due to their poor electronic conductivity and water stability [13]. Regarding the ASV determination of Pb(II), UiO-66-NH2 MOF, [13], MIL-100(Cr) MOF [14], Ni-MOF [15], NH2-MIL-53(Cr) MOF [16], and MOF-5 [17] have been applied as electrode modifiers offering limits of detection from 1.5 × 10−9 to 5.1 × 10−7 mol L−1. However, these applications require the use of “large-size” external reference and counter electrodes [13,14,15,16,17], while the fabrication of MOF-based electrodes (except an MOF-5 modifier) follows a multistep procedure based on drop-casting of an MOF on the surface of a glassy carbon electrode (GCE) [13,14,15,16]. According to the drop-casting process, each time and before each electrochemical measurement, the bare GCE surface is abraded and polished, cleaned via sonication in different solutions, and then the MOF is dripped onto the GCE and air-dried. Consequently, these drop-casted MOF-based electrodes cannot be considered ready-to-use and complete sensors.
We have recently reported a 2D Ca-MOF ([Ca(H4L)(DMA)2]·2DMA where H6L is the N,N’-bis(2,4-dicarboxyphenyl)-oxalamide and DMA is the N,N-dimethylacetamide), which is insoluble in aqueous media and presents sorption and exchange properties towards many heavy metal cations [18,19]. Here, we show that this Ca-MOF, which is a highly efficient Pb(II) sorbent, can be utilized as an electrode modifier by its mixing with graphite paste (GP). The Ca-MOF/GP mixture is packed in a 3D-printed syringe, which serves as the working electrode (WE) of a 3D-printed electrochemical device. The device is fabricated entirely by a dual extruder 3D printer and it also features two conductive electrodes (counter, pseudo-reference) printed from a carbon-loaded polylactic acid (PLA) filament and an electrode holder printed from a PLA non-conductive filament (Figure 1). The electric contact of the WE with the potentiostat is established through a conductive plunger (printed from conductive PLA filament). The WE surface can be renewed by slight pressing on the syringe plunger and removing the excess of the Ca-MOF/GP at the tip of the syringe. The device was used for Pb(II) ASV determination in fish feed and bottled water samples.
As we have shown in our previous studies, the Ca-MOF is capable of exchanging the Ca2+ ions with other divalent metal ions, such as Pb(II), Cd(II), Ni(II), Zn(II) or Cu(II), when immersed in their aqueous solutions as evidenced by the absence of Ca2+ in the final M-MOFs [M(II) = Pb(II), Cd(II), Ni(II), Zn(II) or Cu(II)] materials [18,19]. Constricting further discussion to Pb(II), the Ca-MOF showed one of the highest Pb(II) sorption capacities (~522 mg g−1) reported for MOFs [18]. The nature of the Pb-MOF and the mechanism of the Ca2+ exchange by Pb(II) were elucidated by the combination of various spectroscopic and physical techniques. We have found that the Ca-MOF is capable of exchanging its one Ca2+ ion (per formula unit) with two Pb(II) cations, a process that involves further deproprotonation of the oxalamide ligand, H6L, to afford its tetraanionic form, i.e., H2L4−, in the exchanged product, Pb-MOF. We have also isolated a new form Pb(II) MOF from the direct reaction of PbCl2 with H6L, which also supports the presence of two Pb(II) ions per one H2L4− ligand. Further evidence of the nature of the Pb-MOF is provided here by highlighting some salient features of the thermogavimetric analysis. The TGA analysis of a Pb-MOF over silica gel dried overnight exhibits a weight loss of 23.17% between room temperature and 225 °C (Figure S1). If we take that the residue at 225 °C (76.83%) as [Pb2(H2L)], then the Pb-MOF is formulated as Pb2(H2L)(H2O)14. With this formula in mind, the removal of 14 H2O molecules corresponds to 24.99% (experimental 23.17 %), while the residue of 35.96 above 600 °C corresponds to two Pb (theoretical value 38.4 %). It is worth mentioning that the other M-MOF materials [M(II) = Ni(II), Zn(II) or Cu(II)], obtained by the same method, exhibited lower mass residues at high temperatures (i.e., above 600 °C), which is in accordance with the exchange of one Ca2+ by one M(II) [18,19].
The developed MOF-based 3D-printed device presents distinct and significant advantages over existing MOF-based electrodes used for the ASV of Pb(II) [13,14,15,16,17]. The use of 3D-printing technology for the preparation of the device offers plenty of smart features including desktop-sized equipment, very low costs, production speed, strict control of the printing parameters, and ease of printing operation, while it generates negligible non-toxic waste [20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32]. The adopted process of mixing a small quantity of MOF with GP to produce the WE is by far simpler than drop-casting leading to stand-alone sensors, as the surface of the WE is renewed via a slight pressure on the syringe plunger. Finally, the 3D-printed MOF-based device features integrated counter and reference electrodes (thus they do not require any external electrodes) and is suitable for on-site analysis, while the final geometry of the device fits to any conventional voltammetric cell. For the printing of counter and pseudo-reference electrodes, the same material (carbon-loaded PLA) is chosen for fabrication simplicity and speed. The use of 3D-printed carbon-loaded electrodes as a pseudo-reference electrode has been showed to be adequate for most electrochemical applications [33,34,35].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Reagents and Apparatus

The stock solutions of metal cations were prepared by dilution of 1000 mg L−1 atomic absorption standards with double-distilled water. The non-conductive PLA filament was purchased from 3DEdge (Athens, Greece), while the conductive PLA filament was carbon-loaded and was obtained from Proto-Pasta (Vancouver, BC Canada) (both had a diameter of 1.75 mm). A microwave digestion oven (CEM, Mars X, North Carolina, USA) was used for the digestion of the fish feed sample. The electrochemical experiments were carried out with a PGSTAT101 (Metrohm Autolab, Ioannina, Greece) potentiostat, and the baseline correction of the voltammograms was performed with NOVA 1.8 software (Metrohm Autolab, Ioannina, Greece). The dual extruder 3D-printer was a Creator Pro from Flashforge. The Ca-MOF and Pb-MOF were synthesized as described previously [18,19]. Thermogravimetric analyses (TGA) were carried out on a Mettler-Toledo TGA/DSC1, Athens, Greece instrument under a N2 flow of 50 mL min−1 from room temperature to 800 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1.

2.2. Fabrication of the 3D-Printed Ca-MOF-Based Device

A photograph of the 3D-printed sensor is presented in Figure 1. The device was designed with Tinkercad software, while Flashprint software was used for the printing process, applying a temperature of the platform: 60 °C, temperature of head dispensers: 200 °C, and printing speed: 70 mm s−1. For the fabrication of the graphite paste electrode modified with the Ca-MOF, 0.30 g graphite powder (grade #38, Fisher Scientific, Athens, Greece), 60 mg of Ca-MOF, and 0.10 g paraffin were mixed in a mortar. The resulting paste was transferred to the 3D-printed syringe, and a 3D-printed conductive plunger was used as an electric connector. Similarly, unmodified GP electrodes without Ca-MOF were also fabricated for comparison purposes.

2.3. Electrochemical Measurements

All potentials are referred to with respect to the carbon pseudo-RE, and the voltammetric measurements were conducted in the presence of oxygen. The sample was placed in the cell, and preconcentration was conducted at −1.2 V for 360 s under stirring. Afterwards, the WE was subjected to an anodic differential pulse (DP) voltammetric scan (pulse 40 mV for 10 ms, scan rate 10 mV s−1), and then the voltammogram was recorded. Quantification was carried out by standard additions of Pb(II). Linear sweep (LS) voltammetry of the 3D-printed MOF-based device was conducted in 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5) with a scan rate of 50 mV s−1.

2.4. Preparation of Samples

The fish feed sample and the bottled water were obtained from a local supermarket. For fish feed preparation a portion of 0.25 g of fish feed was spiked with Pb(II) and was digested in a microwave (350 Watt) for 20 min in the presence of 5 mL HCl (30%). The resulting solution was buffered to pH 4.5 using 0.1 mol L−1 ammonia solution and diluted with 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5) to a final volume of 50 mL. The final concentration of Pb(II) in the working solution was 7.5 µg L−1. The bottled water was acidified with 1.0 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5) and spiked with Pb(II) to a final concentration of 10 µg L−1. For ASV analysis, 5 mL of each sample was added to the voltammetric cell.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Voltammetric Determination of Pb(II)

Firstly, the graphite paste electrode modified with Ca-MOF (Ca-MOF/GP) was tested by LS in 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5) at potential range from −2.5 to 2.5 V (Figure 2A). For the voltammogram, the anodic limit was set by the oxidation of water and the cathodic limit by the reduction of hydroxonium ions. The useful operational potential window was about 3V, and as Pb(II) gives an anodic peak at about −0.52 V, the presented electrode is suitable as a Pb sensor. The effective working area of the electrode was determined to be 0.17 cm2 using the Randles–Sevcik equation (Figure S2).
In addition, the Ca-MOF/GP sensor was compared to bare GPE in terms of their response to Pb(II) using DPASV (Figure 2B). The DPASV sensitivity of Pb(II) at the Ca-MOF/GP sensor was about four times higher than that of the unmodified graphite paste electrode (GPE), confirming the enhanced voltammetric features of Ca-MOF and the suitability of the device for the voltammetric analysis of Pb(II).
An important aspect of the device is the performance of the 3D-printed carbon pseudo-reference electrode, in terms of both the potential stability and the within-sensor potential reproducibility. The potential stability of the 3D-printed carbon pseudo-reference electrode was studied for 20 repetitive measurement, while the within-sensor potential reproducibility was measured at five different 3D-printed carbon pseudo-reference electrodes. All comparative measurements were conducted in a solution containing 50 µg L−1 Pb(II) in 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5) (Figure S3). The potential, in which the Pb voltammetric peak appears, remained statistically stable during the 20 repetitive measurements, while the % relative standard deviation (%RSD) of the potential recorded at five different 3D-printed carbon pseudo-reference electrodes was 2.4%. These data indicate that the potential stability of the 3D-printed carbon pseudo-reference electrode and the within-electrode potential reproducibility are satisfactory.
To enhance the electroanalytical performance of the 3D-printed Ca-MOF device for lead determination, the effect of the preconcentration potential and time of the response of 50 µg L−1 of Pb(II) in 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5) were optimized (Figure 3). As depicted in Figure 3A, the peak current of Pb(II) was high and almost constant at potential values from −1.4 to −1.2 V, and then gradually decreased at more positive potentials. A preconcentation potential of −1.2 V (with respect to the carbon pseudo-RE) was chosen for further experiments.
Regarding the effect of the electrolytic preconcentration time on the DPASV sensitivity of Pb(II), it was tested in the range of 0–600 s (Figure 3B). The peak current increased in a rectilinear fashion with respect to the preconcentration time: at lower preconcentration times, the peak current increased rapidly (from 60–360 s), while at longer preconcentration times (higher than 360 s) the rate of increase dropped. A preconcentration time of 360 s was selected for further experiments, as an optimum compromise between high sensitivity and fast analysis.
Calibration of Pb(II) at various concentrations was performed at the Ca-MOF sensor, and the device showed a linear concentration dependence in the tested concentration range [0–130 µg L−1 for Pb(II)] ( Figure 4). The calibration curve is expressed by the following first-order equation:
IPb (μA) = (0.18 ± 0.001)[Pb(ΙI)] (μg L−1) + (0.06 ± 0.09), r2 = 0.998
The limit of detection (LOD) was 0.26 µg L−1 (1.25 10−9 mol L−1) and was calculated using the equation LOD = 3 sd/a, where sd is the standard deviation of the intercept of the calibration plot and a is the slope of the calibration plot. This LOD is lower than that obtained with existing MOFs used for Pb(II) determination [13,14,15,16,17]. More specifically, the LOD of the presented Ca-MOF 3D-printed device is significantly lower than that offered by MIL-100(Cr) [14], Ni-MOF [15], NH2-MIL-53(Cr) [16], and MOF-5 [17] (ranged from 4.9 10−9 to 5.1 10−7 mol L−1) and slightly lower than that obtained with a drop-casted UiO-66-NH2 MOF-based electrode in which the LOD is 1.5 10−9 mol L−1 [13]. The repeatability of the Ca-MOF-based electrode was studied by testing 30 µg L−1 Pb(ΙΙ) for five repeated measurements, and the RSD% was calculated at 4.2%. In addition, three different 3D-printed sensors of Ca-MOF/GPEs were prepared for the determination of 30 µg L−1 Pb(ΙΙ), and the RSD% of the measurements for the three sensors was 5.8% (n = 3). These results confirmed satisfactory reproducibility of the device. The stability of the Ca-MOF/GPE was tested over a period of three months, and a t-test confirmed that the electrochemical response of the device was statistically unaffected.
Cu(II), Cd(II) may interfere with the determination of Pb(II), but at the Ca-MOF/GPE in 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5), Cu(II) and Cd(II) presented peaks that were well separated from the respective Pb peak (Figure 5). Indeed, Cu(II) and Cd(II) did not significantly interfere with the analysis of Pb(II) at 10-fold higher concentrations over Pb(II) (signal variation lower than 15% in the case of Cd and lower than 10% in the case of Cu). Besides, in the presence of other common cations, such as Mn(II), Co(II), Ni(I), Na(I), K(I), Ca(II), Mg(II), Zn(II) at a 10-fold excess over Pb(II), the voltammetric signal of Pb remained almost unaffected (signal variation lower than 5%).

3.2. Applications

To test the practicality of the method, the 3D-printed Ca-MOF device was applied to the determination of lead concentration in spiked fish feed and bottled water samples, following the procedure described in Section 2.4. Both analyses were conducted by the standard addition method, and the representative DP voltammograms of Pb(II) in the fish feed sample are presented in Figure 6. In addition, the samples were analyzed by electrothermal atomic absorption spectrometry (ETAAS, Perkin Elmer Analyst 600, Akron, OH, USA) and the values are listed in Table 1. The electrochemical 3D-printed MOF sensor exhibited adequate accuracy with a relative error of about 4% and recoveries between 97% and 102%. These results indicate that the device can be successfully used as a sensor for the sensitive and accurate analysis of Pb(II) in complex samples.

4. Conclusions

In this study, a 3D-printed syringe-type voltammetric sensor for lead determination is described that features a Ca-MOF-modified carbon paste working electrode. Under optimized conditions, the sensor allowed a limit of detection for lead at the sub μg L−1 level and satisfactory precision. Applications in detecting Pb(II) in fish feed and bottled water samples also demonstrated that the presented device can be used for analyses of real samples with high accuracy and reliability. The favourable electroanalytical performance, the easy renewal of the electrode surface as well as the scope for rapid and low-cost 3D-printed fabrication make these sensors very promising for on-site monitoring purposes.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/20/16/4442/s1, TGA curve, Determination of the active area of the electrode, Potential stability of the 3D-printed carbon pseudo-reference electrode.

Author Contributions

E.V.: Investigation. A.M.: Investigation. G.S.P.: Supervision, Resources. C.K.: Conceptualization, Supervision, Visualization, Project administration, Resources, Writing—original draft, Writing—review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by the Special Account for Research Grants (SARG) of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA). The Bodossaki Foundation is gratefully acknowledged for donating the TGA to NKUA.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rodriguez, B.B.; Bolbot, J.A.; Tothill, I.E. Development of urease and glutamicdehydrogenase amperometric assay for heavy metals screening in pollutedsamples. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2004, 19, 1157–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Liew, J.; Goyer, R.A.; Waalkes, M.P. Toxic effects of metals. In Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons; Klaassen, C.D., Ed.; The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 2008; pp. 931–972. [Google Scholar]
  3. Huang, K.; Li, B.; Zhou, F.; Mei, S.; Zhou, Y.; Jing, T. Selective Solid-Phase Extraction of Lead Ions in Water Samples Using Three-Dimensional Ion-Imprinted Polymers. Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 6820–6826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Xing, Z.; Lu, S.; Wang, A.; Yang, R. A subsequent procedure for further deciphering weapons after application of the Trace Metal Detection Test (TMDT): Proof of concept. Forensic Sci. Int. 2020, 310, 110253. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Vicentino, P.O.; Cassella, R.J.; Leite, D.; Resano, M. Extraction induced by microemulsion breaking as a novel tool for the simultaneous determination of Cd, Mn, Pb and Sb in gasoline samples by ICP-MS and discrete sample introduction. Talanta 2020, 206, 120230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Liu, X.; Yao, Y.; Ying, Y.; Ping, J. Recent advances in nanomaterial-enabled screen-printed electrochemical sensors for heavy metal detection. TRAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2019, 115, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kokkinos, C.; Economou, A. Recent advances in voltammetric, amperometric and ion-selective (bio)sensors fabricated by microengineering manufacturing approaches. Curr. Opin. Electrochem. 2020, 23, 21–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Ariño, C.; Serrano, N.; Díaz-Cruz, J.M.; Esteban, M. Voltammetric determination of metal ions beyond mercury electrodes. A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2017, 990, 11–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Kokkinos, C.; Economou, A. Stripping Analysis at Bismuth-Based Electrodes. Curr. Anal. Chem. 2008, 4, 183–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pournara, A.D.; Tarlas, G.D.; Papaefstathiou, G.S.; Manos, M.J. Chemically modified electrodes with MOFs for the determination of inorganic and organic analytes via voltammetric techniques: A critical review. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2019, 6, 3440–3455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Fotouhi, L.; Naseri, M. Recent Electroanalytical Studies of Metal-Organic Frameworks: A Mini-Review. Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2015, 46, 323–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Serrano, N.; Díaz-Cruz, J.M.; Ariño, C.; Esteban, M. Antimony- based electrodes for analytical determinations. TRAC-Trends Anal. Chem. 2016, 77, 203–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Lu, M.; Deng, Y.; Luo, Y.; Lv, J.; Li, T.; Xu, J.; Chen, S.; Wang, J. Graphene Aerogel–Metal–Organic Framework-Based Electrochemical Method for Simultaneous Detection of Multiple Heavy-Metal Ions. Anal. Chem. 2018, 91, 888–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Wang, D.; Ke, Y.; Guo, D.; Guo, H.; Chen, J.; Weng, W. Facile fabrication of cauliflower-like MIL-100(Cr) and its simultaneous determination of Cd2+, Pb2+, Cu2+ and Hg2+ from aqueous solution. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2015, 216, 504–510. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guo, H.; Zheng, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, H.; Xu, Q. Highly selective detection of Pb2+ by a nanoscale Ni-based metal–organic framework fabricated through one-pot hydrothermal reaction. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 248, 430–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guo, H.; Wang, D.; Chen, J.; Weng, W.; Huang, M.; Zheng, Z. Simple fabrication of flake-like NH 2 -MIL-53(Cr) and its application as an electrochemical sensor for the detection of Pb 2+. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 289, 479–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Xie, J.; Hu, X. Metal–organic framework modified carbon paste electrode for lead sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2013, 177, 1161–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pournara, A.D.; Margariti, A.; Tarlas, G.D.; Kourtelaris, A.; Petkov, V.; Kokkinos, C.; Economou, A.; Papaefstathiou, G.S.; Manos, M.J. A Ca2+ MOF combining highly efficient sorption and capability for voltammetric determination of heavy metal ions in aqueous media. J. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 15432–15443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Margariti, A.; Rapti, S.; Katsenis, A.D.; Friščić, T.; Georgiou, Y.; Manos, M.J.; Papaefstathiou, G.S. Cu2+ sorption from aqueous media by a recyclable Ca2+ framework. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2017, 4, 773–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ambrosi, A.; Pumera, M. 3D-printing technologies for electrochemical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016, 45, 2740–2755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Hamzah, H.H.; Shafiee, S.A.; Abdalla, A.; Patel, B.A. 3D printable conductive materials for the fabrication of electrochemical sensors: A mini review. Electrochem. Commun. 2018, 96, 27–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hudkins, J.R.; Wheeler, D.G.; Pena, B.; Berlinguette, C.P. Rapid prototyping of electrolyzer flow field plates. Energy Environ. Sci. 2016, 9, 3417–3423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Vaněčková, E.; Bouša, M.; Lachmanová, Š.N.; Rathouský, J.; Gál, M.; Sebechlebská, T.; Kolivoška, V. 3D printed polylactic acid/carbon black electrodes with nearly ideal electrochemical behavior. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 857, 113745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wirth, D.M.; Sheaff, M.J.; Waldman, J.V.; Symcox, M.P.; Whitehead, H.D.; Sharp, J.D.; Doerfler, J.R.; Lamar, A.A.; LeBlanc, G. Electrolysis Activation of Fused-Filament-Fabrication 3D-Printed Electrodes for Electrochemical and Spectroelectrochemical Analysis. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 5553–5557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. O’Neil, G.D.; Ahmed, S.; Halloran, K.; Janusz, J.N.; Rodriguez, A.; Rodriguez, I.M.T. Single-step fabrication of electrochemical flow cells utilizing multi-material3D printing. Electrochem. Commun. 2019, 99, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Cardoso, R.M.; Mendonca, D.M.H.; Silva, W.P.; Silva, M.N.T.; Nossol, E.; da Silva, R.A.B.; Richter, E.M.; Munoz, R.A.A. 3D printing for electroanalysis: From multiuse electrochemical cells to sensors. Anal. Chim. Acta. 2018, 1033, 49–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Walters, J.G.; Ahmed, S.; Terrero Rodriguez, I.M.; O’Neil, G.D. Trace Analysis of Heavy Metals (Cd, Pb, Hg) Using Native and Modified 3D Printed Graphene/Poly(Lactic Acid) Composite Electrodes. Electroanalysis 2020, 32, 859–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Vaněčková, E.; Bouša, M.; Vivaldi, F.; Gál, M.; Rathouský, J.; Kolivoška, V.; Sebechlebská, T. UV/VIS spectroelectrochemistry with 3D printed electrodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 857, 113760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rymansaib, Z.; Iravani, P.; Emslie, E.; Medvidovic-Kosanovic, M.; Sak-Bosnar, M.; Verdejo, R.; Marken, F. All-Polystyrene 3D-Printed Electrochemical Device with Embedded Carbon Nanofiber-Graphite-Polystyrene Composite Conductor. Electroanalysis 2016, 28, 1517–1523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Dos Santos, M.F.; Katic, V.; dos Santos, P.L.; Pires, B.M.; Formiga, A.L.B.; Bonacin, J.A. 3D-Printed Low-Cost Spectroelectrochemical Cell for In Situ Raman Measurements. Anal. Chem. 2019, 91, 10386–10389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Foster, C.W.; Elbardisy, H.M.; Down, M.P.; Keefe, E.M.; Smith, G.C.; Banks, C.E. Additively manufactured graphitic electrochemical sensing platforms. Chem. Eng. J. 2020, 381, 122343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vaněčková, E.; Bouša, M.; Sokolová, R.; Moreno-Garcia, P.; Broekmann, P.; Shestivska, V.; Rathouský, J.; Gál, M.; Sebechlebská, T.; Kolivoška, V. Copper electroplating of 3D printed composite electrodes. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2020, 858, 113763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Katseli, V.; Thomaidis, N.; Economou, A.; Kokkinos, C. Miniature 3D-printed integrated electrochemical cell for trace voltammetric Hg(II) determination. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2020, 308, 127715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Katseli, V.; Economou, A.; Kokkinos, C. Single-step fabrication of an integrated 3D-printed device for electrochemical sensing applications. Electrochem. Commun. 2019, 103, 100–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Katseli, V.; Economou, A.; Kokkinos, C. A novel all-3D-printed cell-on-a-chip device as a useful electroanalytical tool: Application to the simultaneous voltammetric determination of caffeine and paracetamol. Talanta 2020, 208, 120388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Photograph of the 3D-printed device.
Figure 1. Photograph of the 3D-printed device.
Sensors 20 04442 g001
Figure 2. (A) LS voltammograms of the 3D-printed Ca-MOF device in 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5). Scan rate, 50 mV s−1. (B) DP voltammogram of 20 µg L−1 of Pb(II) (black line) obtained with the modified GPE with Ca-MOF and DP voltammograms of 20 µg L−1 of Pb(II) (red line) obtained with the bare GPE in 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5).
Figure 2. (A) LS voltammograms of the 3D-printed Ca-MOF device in 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5). Scan rate, 50 mV s−1. (B) DP voltammogram of 20 µg L−1 of Pb(II) (black line) obtained with the modified GPE with Ca-MOF and DP voltammograms of 20 µg L−1 of Pb(II) (red line) obtained with the bare GPE in 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5).
Sensors 20 04442 g002
Figure 3. (A) Effect of the preconcentration potential (with respect to the carbon pseudo-RE) on the peak heights of 50 µg L−1 Pb(II) in 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5) at the Ca-MOF/GP. (B) Effect of the preconcentration time of 50 µg L−1 Pb(II) in 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5) at Ca-MOF/GP. The points in the plots are the mean value ± SD (n = 4). Other DPASV parameters were pulse 40 mV for 10 ms and scan rate 10 mV s−1.
Figure 3. (A) Effect of the preconcentration potential (with respect to the carbon pseudo-RE) on the peak heights of 50 µg L−1 Pb(II) in 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5) at the Ca-MOF/GP. (B) Effect of the preconcentration time of 50 µg L−1 Pb(II) in 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5) at Ca-MOF/GP. The points in the plots are the mean value ± SD (n = 4). Other DPASV parameters were pulse 40 mV for 10 ms and scan rate 10 mV s−1.
Sensors 20 04442 g003
Figure 4. DP voltammograms at the Ca-MOF/GPE for increasing concentrations of Pb(II) in the range of 0–130 µg L−1 (0, 2.5, 5, and 10–130 with a 10 µg L−1 step of Pb(II)). The corresponding calibration plot is shown as an inset. Each bar is the mean value ± sd (n = 3). Supporting electrolyte: 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5); preconcentration potential: −1.2 V; preconcentration time: 360 s. Other DPASV parameters were pulse 40 mV for 10 ms and scan rate 10 mV s−1.
Figure 4. DP voltammograms at the Ca-MOF/GPE for increasing concentrations of Pb(II) in the range of 0–130 µg L−1 (0, 2.5, 5, and 10–130 with a 10 µg L−1 step of Pb(II)). The corresponding calibration plot is shown as an inset. Each bar is the mean value ± sd (n = 3). Supporting electrolyte: 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5); preconcentration potential: −1.2 V; preconcentration time: 360 s. Other DPASV parameters were pulse 40 mV for 10 ms and scan rate 10 mV s−1.
Sensors 20 04442 g004
Figure 5. DP voltammograms at the Ca-MOF/GPE of 40 µg L−1 Pb(II), 80 µg L−1 Cd(II), and 80 µg L−1 Cu(II) in 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5). Preconcentration potential: −1.2 V; preconcentration time: 360 s; pulse 40 mV for 10 ms; scan rate: 10 mV s−1.
Figure 5. DP voltammograms at the Ca-MOF/GPE of 40 µg L−1 Pb(II), 80 µg L−1 Cd(II), and 80 µg L−1 Cu(II) in 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5). Preconcentration potential: −1.2 V; preconcentration time: 360 s; pulse 40 mV for 10 ms; scan rate: 10 mV s−1.
Sensors 20 04442 g005
Figure 6. DP voltammograms for the determination of Pb(II) in spiked fish feed sample with 7.5 µg L−1 of Pb(II) at the Ca-MOF/GPE. From below: spiked sample and three standard additions of 10 µg L−1 of Pb. (Inset) Standard additions curve. Supporting electrolyte: 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5); preconcentration potential: −1.2 V; preconcentration time: 360 s; pulse 40 mV for 10 ms; scan rate: 10 mV s−1.
Figure 6. DP voltammograms for the determination of Pb(II) in spiked fish feed sample with 7.5 µg L−1 of Pb(II) at the Ca-MOF/GPE. From below: spiked sample and three standard additions of 10 µg L−1 of Pb. (Inset) Standard additions curve. Supporting electrolyte: 0.1 mol L−1 acetate buffer (pH 4.5); preconcentration potential: −1.2 V; preconcentration time: 360 s; pulse 40 mV for 10 ms; scan rate: 10 mV s−1.
Sensors 20 04442 g006
Table 1. Recovery of Pb(II) in Spiked Samples and Comparison with ETAAS.
Table 1. Recovery of Pb(II) in Spiked Samples and Comparison with ETAAS.
SamplePb Content
(μg L−1) a
Pb Added
(μg L−1)
Pb Determined
(μg L−1) b
Recovery (%)Pb Determined with ETAAS
(μg L−1) b
Relative Error (%)
Fish oil<LOD7.57.3 (± 0.5)977.6 (± 0.3)−3.9
Bottled water<LOD1010.2 (± 0.7)1029.8 (± 0.4)4.1
a Measured with ASV and ETAAS; b Mean value ± sd (n = 3).

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vlachou, E.; Margariti, A.; Papaefstathiou, G.S.; Kokkinos, C. Voltammetric Determination of Pb(II) by a Ca-MOF-Modified Carbon Paste Electrode Integrated in a 3D-Printed Device. Sensors 2020, 20, 4442. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164442

AMA Style

Vlachou E, Margariti A, Papaefstathiou GS, Kokkinos C. Voltammetric Determination of Pb(II) by a Ca-MOF-Modified Carbon Paste Electrode Integrated in a 3D-Printed Device. Sensors. 2020; 20(16):4442. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164442

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vlachou, Evaggelia, Antigoni Margariti, Giannis S. Papaefstathiou, and Christos Kokkinos. 2020. "Voltammetric Determination of Pb(II) by a Ca-MOF-Modified Carbon Paste Electrode Integrated in a 3D-Printed Device" Sensors 20, no. 16: 4442. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20164442

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop