Next Article in Journal
Vision for Robust Robot Manipulation
Next Article in Special Issue
Polarization-Modulated, Goos–Hanchen Shift Sensing for Common Mode Drift Suppression
Previous Article in Journal
Application of Deep-Learning Methods to Bird Detection Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Imagery
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tapered Fiber-Optic Mach-Zehnder Interferometer for Ultra-High Sensitivity Measurement of Refractive Index

1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Victoria, Victoria, BC V8W 2Y2, Canada
2
Department of Mechanical and Mechatronics Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
3
School of Mechanical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2019, 19(7), 1652; https://doi.org/10.3390/s19071652
Submission received: 5 March 2019 / Revised: 31 March 2019 / Accepted: 3 April 2019 / Published: 6 April 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Refractive Index Sensors)

Abstract

:
A Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) based fiberoptic refractive index (RI) sensor is constructed by uniformly tapering standard single mode fiber (SMF) for RI measurement. A custom flame-based tapering machine is used to fabricate microfiber MZI sensors directly from SMFs. The fabricated MZI device does not require any splicing of fibers and shows excellent RI sensitivity. The sensor with a cladding diameter of 35.5 µm and length of 20 mm exhibits RI sensitivity of 415 nm/RIU for RI range of 1.332 to 1.384, 1103 nm/RIU for RI range of 1.384 to 1.4204 and 4234 nm/RIU for RI range of 1.4204 to 1.4408, respectively. The sensor reveals a temperature sensitivity of 0.0097 nm/°C, which is relatively low in comparison to its ultra-high RI sensitivity. The proposed inexpensive and highly sensitive optical fiber RI sensors have numerous applications in chemical and biochemical sensing fields.

1. Introduction

Fiber optic refractive index (RI) sensors have attracted considerable attention for chemical and biochemical monitoring applications over the past few years [1,2] because of their useful characteristics, such as small size, high-resolution detection, excellent aging characteristics, ability to operate in chemically hazardous environments, and immunity to electromagnetic noise. Many researchers have tried to enhance the effectiveness of optical fiber RI sensors by improving sensitivity [3], enhancing resolution [4], simplifying fabrication techniques [5], dropping cost [6], increasing the robustness of sensor structure [7], and reducing insertion loss [8].
Gratings and interferometers are the two main configurations studied for fiber optic RI sensing [9]. Although long period gratings (LPGs) are a broadly used RI sensor [10,11,12,13,14], writing gratings are usually expensive and function only in narrow wavelength bands due to fiber gratings phase matching phenomenon. In-fiber interferometers such as Fabry-Perot interferometer (FPI), Michelson interferometer (MI), and Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) have been introduced as alternative and viable approaches for RI sensing [15]. Also, the combination of interferometers and gratings has been reported in the literature; for instance, MZI has been constructed based on a pair of LPGs to further increase RI sensitivity [14,15].
Fiber-optic MZI sensors have been used in diverse monitoring applications, including ambient RI [16,17], temperature [18], pressure [19], torsion [20], and structural health [21] measurements. Recently, fiber MZI based RI sensing has gained considerable attention due to its enhanced sensitivity and fabrication simplicity. Alternative configurations for MZI sensors can be achieved utilizing various fiber types (such as multimode [6,15,22], microfiber [23], or photonic crystal fiber (PCF) [15,17,24] or fabrication techniques (such as surface plasmon resonance (SPR) [4,25,26], core mismatch [27,28,29], and tapering [15,30]). For example, concatenation of core-offset section and SMF abrupt taper is suggested to form an MZI [31]. This sensor revealed a relatively low RI sensitivity of 28.2 nm/RIU for a sensor length of 30 mm and its fabrication involved complex steps. In 2015, Zhao et al. [32] reported a 30 mm long all-fiber MZI-based RI sensor by splicing an SMF stub between two SMFs with small core offset at two splicing points. The fabricated sensor showed RI sensitivity of 78.7 nm/RIU in the range of 1.333 to 1.374 [32]. Although the fabrication process was simple and cost-effective, the reported RI sensitivity was relatively low. Another MZI sensor for RI measurement based on sandwiching and core-mismatched splicing of an SMF between two short sections of thin-core fibers was proposed by Rong et al. [27]. The maximum RI sensitivity of 159 nm/RIU for water-based solutions with an RI close to 1.33 was reported. In 2015, a PCF taper-based MZI for sensing changes in refractive index was presented with an RI sensitivity of 51.902 nm/RIU by Wu et al. [30]. The MZI sensor was fabricated by splicing a stub of PCF between two SMFs followed by PCF tapering. Such MZI configurations may not be feasible for many monitoring applications due to their weak mechanical strength and the use of expensive fiber. An inexpensive and simple-to-fabricate RI sensor with RI sensitivity of 158.4 nm/RIU based on two cascaded SMF tapers was demonstrated by Wang et al. in 2016 [33]. The fabrication of an MZI sensor for RI measurement from a long tapered single mode fiber was proposed by Yadav et al. [34]. The protein sensing device exhibited an RI sensitivity of about 1500 nm/RIU in the limited RI range of 1.3325 to 1.3377.
In this work, we present an ultra-high sensitivity, easy to fabricate, inexpensive, and mechanically robust in-line MZI based RI sensor constructed by tapering an SMF. A customized flame-based tapering machine was used to achieve sharp taper transitions and a uniform long taper waist in an SMF to create the MZI structure. For a specific taper waist length, the dependence of the sensor’s RI sensitivity on taper waist diameter (TWD) was investigated. In the RI range of 1.333 to 1.38, the RI sensitivities of 203 nm/RIU, 230 nm/RIU, 250 nm/RIU, 292 nm/RIU, and 415 nm/RIU were achieved for sensors with TWDs of 62 µm, 51.5 µm, 49 µm, 40 µm, and 35.5, respectively. A maximum RI sensitivity of 4234 nm/RIU was attained in the RI range of 1.4204 to 1.4408 for TWD 35.5 µm and taper waist length of 19.8 mm.

2. Principle of Sensor Operation

Adiabatic tapering (both in down-taper and up-taper region) of SMF was used to achieve the MZI configuration. Such a down-taper region is shown to excite at least a few leaky modes, which then recombine with the core more at the up-taper region to produce an interference pattern [35]. Figure 1 provides a schematic representation of the long uniform tapered based Mach-Zehnder interferometer, which was constructed using an SMF. In the schematic, when light travels from region (I) to (II), higher order modes are excited, which travel along with the fundamental mode through the tapered region (III). Because of the significant difference between glass and air indices, the fundamental and higher order modes couple back together in the region (IV) to form an interferometric pattern. The resultant interference spectrum is described by the following formula [36]:
I o u t = I 1 + I 2 + 2 I 1 I 2 cos ( Δ φ )
where Iout, I1, and I2 are the intensities of the interference signal, core, and cladding modes, respectively. Δ φ is the phase difference between the core and cladding modes, which can be described by the following equation:
Δ φ = 2 π λ ( Δ n e f f ) L
where λ is the light source central wavelength and L is the fiber uniform waist length. Δ n e f f is the variance between the effective RI of the core and cladding modes:
Δ n e f f = n e f f c o r e n e f f c l a d d i n g
where n e f f c o r e and n e f f c l a d d i n g are the effective refractive indices of the core and cladding modes of the SMF, respectively. From Equations (1) and (2), it can be found that maximum transmission can happen when Δ φ = 2 π ( Δ n e f f ) L / λ = 2 m π (m is an integer). Therefore, the transmission signal shows peaks at the following wavelengths:
λ m = ( Δ n e f f ) L / m
n e f f c l a d d i n g and Δ n e f f will change if the RI of the solution being measured is differed. Δ λ m describes the m order shift of the interference spectrum and is given by:
Δ λ m = ( Δ n e f f + Δ n ) L m Δ n e f f L m = Δ n L m
where Δ n is the change in the RI of the measurand solution. Thus, from Equation (5), it can be seen that the variation of the transmission signal is a function of Δ n when the length of the sensor (L) is constant.

3. Sensor Fabrication

Figure 2a displays the Computer Aided Design (CAD) assembly model of the customized flame-based tapering machine designed for sensor fabrication. The enlarged image in Figure 2b shows the shutter mechanism integrated into the system to provide a controlled heat deposition into the fiber, which in turn offers an accurate geometry of the tapered profile. A pair of converging/diverging nozzles, as shown in Figure 3, was used to generate a heated volume that had a length of about 0.8 mm along the direction of the fiber axis. Hydrogen (99.99% pure) at a pressure of 20 psi was fed into the nozzles to avoid pollution on the tapered fiber. The flame temperature was controlled to remain above the fiber’s softening point, whilst keeping it below the glass’s melting point. For standard single mode fiber (SMF), the required temperature of 900 °C was maintained. After stripping and perfectly wiping the mid-section of an SMF with acetone, the fiber was clamped on two linear motorized stages. Travel distance, speed of each stage, and delay time to open or close the shutter were independently set in the tapering control software. The tapering parameters were tuned and optimized to obtain several tapered waist diameters, as shown in Table 1.
The difference in the pulling and pushing speeds causes the fiber material to move in front of the flame and thus creates a long uniform taper profile. The generated sharp tapering angle split the core light into core and cladding light at the first transition region, while the second transition re-combined these two beams of light into a core light. Therefore, because of the optical path difference (OPD) between core and cladding arms, an interference fringe was generated. Although the core mode is restricted in the core, the transmission properties of the cladding modes can change as a result of the RI variation at the cladding-ambient interface. Smaller fiber diameter enables the cladding modes to reach closer to the measurand solution. Therefore, this enabled fabrication of sensors with improved RI sensitivity. Figure 4 shows the left and right taper transition profiles and uniform taper waist of 35.5 µm in the middle.

4. Results and Discussion

Due to the high sensitivity of MZI sensors to fiber twisting, the sensor was thoroughly secured on two fiber clamps in the RI characterization setup. Subsequently, the fiber was connected to a broadband light source (AMONICS ASLD-CWDM-5-B-FA, spectrum range: 1250–1650 nm) and a spectrum analyzer (PHOTONETICS Walics, Resolution: 0.02 nm, Spectrum range: 1450–1650 nm), to study the optical characteristics of the tapered microfiber MZI. The schematic representation of the RI characterization setup is illustrated in Figure 5. The response of interference fringes due to ambient RI change was examined for the MZIs with fiber TWDs of 62 µm, 51.5 µm, 49 µm, 40 µm, and 35.5 µm. These sensors were characterized with glycerin solutions of various concentrations at a room temperature of 22 °C. They were submerged in glycerin solutions of different RI ranging from 1.332 to 1.440 to achieve characterization data. After each step, the sensors were thoroughly cleaned with acetone, before immersion in an increasingly greater concentration of glycerin solution. Figure 6 illustrates the ambient RI dependent spectral response of the MZI sensor with TWD of 35.5 µm. The interference between broadband core mode and narrowband cladding mode may give rise to the asymmetric spectrum, as explained by the Fano interference phenomenon [37]. The MZI structure that generates such transmission interference is also very sensitive to an external perturbation such as ambient RI change. This might explain why this sensor is ultra-sensitive to RI.
Figure 7 displays the RI dependent wavelength shifts of three tapered MZIs with different TWDs. The plot also includes the absolute value of wavelength shifts due to ambient RI change of the RI sensor fabricated by splicing a microfiber (diameter: 40 µm) between a lead-in and lead-out SMFs. As the surrounding RI increases, a red-shift was observed in the MZI interference fringe. The performance of the microfiber MZIs were evaluated by their sensitivities, which were interpreted as the ratio of resonance wavelength shift to the variation in solution refractive index. The microfiber MZI with smallest TWD (35.5 µm) was chosen and its elaborated sensitivity graphs plotted in Figure 8; this shows more details of RI sensitivity analysis. Three subplots were generated from Figure 6 for index ranges of 1.3327 to 1.3840, 1.3840 to 1.4204 and 1.4204 to 1.4408 (Figure 8).
The effect of temperature cross-sensitivity needs to be considered in ambient RI measurement as the RI of most solutions changes with temperature variation. To determine the temperature response of the sensor configuration, an MZI sensor with a TWD of 35.5 µm and a length of 19.8 mm was placed in an oven for temperature characterization. The oven temperature gradually elevated from 25 °C to 65 °C in 5 °C increments. The correlation between the wavelength shift and the sensor’s temperature is shown in Figure 9. The temperature sensitivity of the MZI sensor is 0.0097 nm/°C. As a result, the RI measurement error, because of temperature effect, is approximately 2.33 × 10−5 RIU/°C and, therefore, negligible.
Figure 10 illustrates the effect of decreasing TWD (while keeping the taper waist length approximately constant) on RI sensitivity of the fabricated MZIs in various RI ranges. As the TWD decreases, the RI sensitivity of the fabricated MZIs increases nonlinearly. Microfiber MZIs with fiber diameters of 35.5 µm, 40 µm, 49 µm, 51.5 µm, and 62 µm were characterized for RI range from 1.3327 to 1.4348.
The results of the RI sensitivity analysis for microfiber MZIs with TWDs of 62 µm, 49 µm, and 35.5 µm, over six different refractive index ranges, are summarized in Table 2.

5. Conclusions

An easy and cost-effective fabrication of a fiber-optic MZI for ultra-high sensitivity RI measurement is proposed in this study. The MZI is constructed by tapering a standard SMF-28 fiber. Several MZIs, with constant taper length but different uniform TWDs, were fabricated to investigate the sensor’s structural influence on RI measurement. The MZIs with uniform TWDs of 62 µm, 49 µm, and 35.5 µm show the maximum sensitivities of 956 nm/RIU, 1520 nm/RIU, and 4234 nm/RIU, respectively. The MZI device shows a temperature sensitivity of 0.0097 nm/°C, which is insignificant relative to its RI sensitivity. Since the fabrication of this sensor does not require any splicing, it is likely to have insignificant insertion losses and stronger mechanical properties compared to spliced microfiber MZI. Furthermore, the high sensitivity characteristic of Mach-Zehnder interferometers makes them suitable for chemical, biochemical, and biological sensing in an aqueous environment.

Author Contributions

V.A. proposed the idea and designed the experiments; V.A. and F.A. performed the experiments; V.A. validated the experimental results and run formal analysis; V.A. wrote the original draft of the paper; V.A. and F.A. guided the paper writing, reviewed the paper; C.B. and M.J. revised the manuscript and supervised the project and offered the funding.

Funding

This work was funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE), Korea with the following Grant number (10053248).

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support of Korea Carbon Capture and Sequestration Research and Development Center (KCRC) for this work. Also, the authors acknowledge the support of Research Program supported by the Technology Innovation Program at the Ministry of Trade, industry & Energy (MOTIE) in Korea.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, X.-d.; Wolfbeis, O.S. Fiber-Optic Chemical Sensors and Biosensors (2013–2015). Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 203–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wu, D.; Zhu, T.; Deng, M.; Duan, D.-W.; Shi, L.-L.; Yao, J.; Rao, Y.-J. Refractive index sensing based on Mach–Zehnder interferometer formed by three cascaded single-mode fiber tapers. Appl. Opt. 2011, 50, 1548–1553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Shao, M.; Qiao, X.; Fu, H.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, X.; Yao, N. High sensitivity refractive index sensing of Mach–Zehnder interferometer based on multimode fiber core sandwiched between two waist-enlarged fiber tapers. Opt. Commun. 2013, 311, 359–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Monzón-Hernández, D.; Villatoro, J. High-resolution refractive index sensing by means of a multiple-peak surface plasmon resonance optical fiber sensor. Sens. Actuators B 2006, 115, 227–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, L.; Xia, L.; Xie, Z.; Hao, L.; Shuai, B.; Liu, D. In-line fiber Mach–Zehnder interferometer for simultaneous measurement of refractive index and temperature based on thinned fiber. Sens. Actuators A 2012, 180, 19–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, H.; Meng, H.; Xiong, R.; Wang, Q.; Huang, B.; Zhang, X.; Yu, W.; Tan, C.; Huang, X. Simultaneous measurement of refractive index and temperature based on asymmetric structures modal interference. Opt. Commun. 2016, 364, 191–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ni, K.; Dong, X.; Chan, C.C.; Li, T.; Hu, L.; Qian, W. Miniature refractometer based on Mach–Zehnder interferometer with waist-enlarged fusion bitaper. Opt. Commun. 2013, 292, 84–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Tian, Z.; Yam, S.S.H.; Loock, H.-P. Single-Mode Fiber Refractive Index Sensor Based on Core-Offset Attenuators. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2008, 20, 1387–1389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Xu, Y.; Lu, P.; Chen, L.; Bao, X. Recent Developments in Micro-Structured Fiber Optic Sensors. Fibers 2017, 5, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Joo-Nyung, J.; Se Yoon, K.; Sun-Wook, K.; Min-Sung, K. Temperature insensitive long-period fibre gratings. Electron. Lett. 1999, 35, 2134–2136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, B.; Jiang, L.; Wang, S.; Tsai, H.-L.; Xiao, H. Femtosecond laser fabrication of long period fiber gratings and applications in refractive index sensing. Opt. Laser Technol. 2011, 43, 1420–1423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Smietana, M.; Korwin-Pawlowski, M.L.; Bock, W.J.; Pickrell, G.R.; Szmidt, J. Refractive index sensing of fiber optic long-period grating structures coated with a plasma deposited diamond-like carbon thin film. Meas. Sci. Technol. 2008, 19, 085301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ahmed, F.; Joe, H.-E.; Min, B.-K.; Jun, M.B.G. Characterization of refractive index change and fabrication of long period gratings in pure silica fiber by femtosecond laser radiation. Opt. Laser Technol. 2015, 74, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ahsani, V.; Amin-Naseri, M.; Knickerbocker, S.; Sharma, A. Quantitative analysis of probe data characteristics: Coverage, speed bias and congestion detection precision. J. Intell. Transp. Syst. 2019, 23, 103–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lee, B.H.; Kim, Y.H.; Park, K.S.; Eom, J.B.; Kim, M.J.; Rho, B.S.; Choi, H.Y. Interferometric fiber optic sensors. Sensors 2012, 12, 2467–2486. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wo, J.; Wang, G.; Cui, Y.; Sun, Q.; Liang, R.; Shum, P.P.; Liu, D. Refractive index sensor using microfiber-based Mach–Zehnder interferometer. Opt. Lett. 2012, 37, 67–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ahmed, F.; Ahsani, V.; Melo, L.; Wild, P.; Jun, M.B.-G. Miniaturized Tapered Photonic Crystal Fiber Mach-Zehnder Interferometer for Enhanced Refractive Index Sensing. IEEE Sens. J. 2016, 16, 8761–8766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Viet Nguyen, L.; Hwang, D.; Moon, S.; Seung Moon, D.; Chung, Y. High temperature fiber sensor with high sensitivity based on core diameter mismatch. Opt. Express 2008, 16, 11369–11375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Talataisong, W.; Wang, D.N.; Chitaree, R.; Liao, C.R.; Wang, C. Fiber in-line Mach–Zehnder interferometer based on an inner air-cavity for high-pressure sensing. Opt. Lett. 2015, 40, 1220–1222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sierra-Hernandez, J.M.; Castillo-Guzman, A.; Selvas-Aguilar, R.; Vargas-Rodriguez, E.; Gallegos-Arellano, E.; Guzman-Chavez, D.A.; Estudillo-Ayala, J.M.; Jauregui-Vazquez, D.; Rojas-Laguna, R. Torsion sensing setup based on a three beam path Mach–Zehnder interferometer. Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 2015, 57, 1857–1860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bao, Y.; Huang, Y.; Hoehler, M.S.; Chen, G. Review of Fiber Optic Sensors for Structural Fire Engineering. Sensors 2019, 19, 877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fu, H.; Li, H.; Shao, M.; Zhao, N.; Liu, Y.; Li, Y.; Yan, X.; Liu, Q. TCF-MMF-TCF fiber structure based interferometer for refractive index sensing. Opt. Lasers Eng. 2015, 69, 58–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ahmed, F.; Ahsani, V.; Saad, A.; Jun, M.B.G. Bragg Grating Embedded in Mach-Zehnder Interferometer for Refractive Index and Temperature Sensing. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 2016, 28, 1968–1971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zhao, Y.; Wu, D.; Wang, Q. All-fiber Mach-Zehnder interferometer using a tapered photonic crystal fiber for refractive index measurement. In Proceedings of the IEEE SENSORS 2014, Valencia, Spain, 2–5 November 2014; pp. 1080–1083. [Google Scholar]
  25. Grunwald, B.; Holst, G. Fibre optic refractive index microsensor based on white-light SPR excitation. Sens. Actuators A 2004, 113, 174–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Sharma, A.K.; Jha, R.; Gupta, B.D. Fiber-Optic Sensors Based on Surface Plasmon Resonance: A Comprehensive Review. IEEE Sens. J. 2007, 7, 1118–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Rong, Q.; Qiao, X.; Wang, R.; Sun, H.; Hu, M.; Feng, Z. High-Sensitive Fiber-Optic Refractometer Based on a Core-Diameter-Mismatch Mach–Zehnder Interferometer. IEEE Sens. J. 2012, 12, 2501–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Cao, Y.; Liu, H.; Tong, Z.; Yuan, S.; Su, J. Simultaneous measurement of temperature and refractive index based on a Mach–Zehnder interferometer cascaded with a fiber Bragg grating. Opt. Commun. 2015, 342, 180–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Chakraborty, P.; Adu-Gyamfi, Y.O.; Poddar, S.; Ahsani, V.; Sharma, A.; Sarkar, S. Traffic Congestion Detection from Camera Images using Deep Convolution Neural Networks. Transp. Res. Rec. 2018, 2672, 222–231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Wu, D.; Zhao, Y.; Li, J. PCF taper-based Mach–Zehnder interferometer for refractive index sensing in a PDMS detection cell. Sens. Actuators B 2015, 213, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yin, G.; Lou, S.; Zou, H. Refractive index sensor with asymmetrical fiber Mach–Zehnder interferometer based on concatenating single-mode abrupt taper and core-offset section. Opt. Laser Technol. 2013, 45, 294–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhao, Y.; Li, X.-g.; Cai, L. A highly sensitive Mach–Zehnder interferometric refractive index sensor based on core-offset single mode fiber. Sens. Actuators A 2015, 223, 119–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, Q.; Wei, W.; Guo, M.; Zhao, Y. Optimization of cascaded fiber tapered Mach–Zehnder interferometer and refractive index sensing technology. Sens. Actuators B 2016, 222, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Yadav, T.K.; Narayanaswamy, R.; Abu Bakar, M.H.; Kamil, Y.M.; Mahdi, M.A. Single mode tapered fiber-optic interferometer based refractive index sensor and its application to protein sensing. Opt. Express 2014, 22, 22802–22807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Jauregui-Vazquez, D.; Haus, J.W.; Negari, A.B.H.; Sierra-Hernandez, J.M.; Hansen, K. Bitapered fiber sensor: Signal analysis. Sens. Actuators B 2015, 218, 105–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ghatak, A. Optics, 4th ed.; Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited: New Delhi, India, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  37. Piao, X.; Yu, S.; Park, N. Control of Fano asymmetry in plasmon induced transparency and its application to plasmonic waveguide modulator. Opt. Express 2012, 20, 18994–18999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the internal structure of a microfiber MZI that was fabricated by employing the long uniform tapering technique.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the internal structure of a microfiber MZI that was fabricated by employing the long uniform tapering technique.
Sensors 19 01652 g001
Figure 2. (a) Assembly model of the custom flame-based tapering machine and, (b) design of the sliding shutter mechanism to control heat delivery to the fiber, and (c) assembled custom flame- based tapering machine.
Figure 2. (a) Assembly model of the custom flame-based tapering machine and, (b) design of the sliding shutter mechanism to control heat delivery to the fiber, and (c) assembled custom flame- based tapering machine.
Sensors 19 01652 g002
Figure 3. (a) Size of hydrogen flame used for long uniform tapering and, (b) the cross-section of the fabricated converging/diverging micro nozzle.
Figure 3. (a) Size of hydrogen flame used for long uniform tapering and, (b) the cross-section of the fabricated converging/diverging micro nozzle.
Sensors 19 01652 g003
Figure 4. (a,b) SMF taper transition, (c) long uniform taper waist, (d) magnified image of the uniform taper waist.
Figure 4. (a,b) SMF taper transition, (c) long uniform taper waist, (d) magnified image of the uniform taper waist.
Sensors 19 01652 g004
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for refractive index characterization, OSA (Optical Spectrum Analyzer).
Figure 5. Schematic diagram of the experimental setup for refractive index characterization, OSA (Optical Spectrum Analyzer).
Sensors 19 01652 g005
Figure 6. Spectral response of the MZI sensor with a 35.5 µm TWD to various concentrations of glycerin solution.
Figure 6. Spectral response of the MZI sensor with a 35.5 µm TWD to various concentrations of glycerin solution.
Sensors 19 01652 g006
Figure 7. The spectral shift of the microfiber MZIs, with various waist diameters, due to changes in RI.
Figure 7. The spectral shift of the microfiber MZIs, with various waist diameters, due to changes in RI.
Sensors 19 01652 g007
Figure 8. Linearization of the MZI sensor’s wavelength shift necessary to characterize sensitivity in three RI ranges. The characterized sensor has a TWD of 35.5 µm and taper waist length of 19.8 mm. The maximum RI sensitivity of ~ 4234 nm/RIU in the RI range of 1.4204 to 1.4408 was achieved.
Figure 8. Linearization of the MZI sensor’s wavelength shift necessary to characterize sensitivity in three RI ranges. The characterized sensor has a TWD of 35.5 µm and taper waist length of 19.8 mm. The maximum RI sensitivity of ~ 4234 nm/RIU in the RI range of 1.4204 to 1.4408 was achieved.
Sensors 19 01652 g008
Figure 9. Temperature characterization of the microfiber MZI RI sensor with a TWD of 35.5 µm.
Figure 9. Temperature characterization of the microfiber MZI RI sensor with a TWD of 35.5 µm.
Sensors 19 01652 g009
Figure 10. The relation between spectral wavelength shift and fiber waist diameter for various microfiber MZIs with different TWDS.
Figure 10. The relation between spectral wavelength shift and fiber waist diameter for various microfiber MZIs with different TWDS.
Sensors 19 01652 g010
Table 1. The manufacturing process parameters controlled to fabricate the sensors with a range of sensitivities.
Table 1. The manufacturing process parameters controlled to fabricate the sensors with a range of sensitivities.
Pushing Speed (µm/s)Pushing Distance (mm)Pulling Speed (µm/s)Pulling Distance (mm)Shutter Open Delay (ms)Shutter Close Delay (ms)TWD (µm)
255100202000062
253.514019.6200050051.5
30319519.5200050049
252.222519.6200050040
251.827519.8200050035.5
Table 2. The RI sensitivity of three microfiber MZIs with various TWDs and constant taper lengths are shown for different RI ranges.
Table 2. The RI sensitivity of three microfiber MZIs with various TWDs and constant taper lengths are shown for different RI ranges.
RI Range1.3327 to 1.37671.3767 to 1.40631.4063 to 1.43481.3327 to 1.38401.3840 to 1.42041.4204 to 1.4408
TWD
Microfiber MZI (62 µm)203 nm/RIU290 nm/RIU957 nm/RIUNANANA
Microfiber MZI (49 µm)277 nm/RIU550 nm/RIU1520 nm/RIUNANANA
Microfiber MZI (35.5 µm)NANANA415 nm/RIU1103 nm/RIU4234 nm/RIU

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ahsani, V.; Ahmed, F.; Jun, M.B.G.; Bradley, C. Tapered Fiber-Optic Mach-Zehnder Interferometer for Ultra-High Sensitivity Measurement of Refractive Index. Sensors 2019, 19, 1652. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19071652

AMA Style

Ahsani V, Ahmed F, Jun MBG, Bradley C. Tapered Fiber-Optic Mach-Zehnder Interferometer for Ultra-High Sensitivity Measurement of Refractive Index. Sensors. 2019; 19(7):1652. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19071652

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ahsani, Vahid, Farid Ahmed, Martin B.G. Jun, and Colin Bradley. 2019. "Tapered Fiber-Optic Mach-Zehnder Interferometer for Ultra-High Sensitivity Measurement of Refractive Index" Sensors 19, no. 7: 1652. https://doi.org/10.3390/s19071652

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop