Next Article in Journal
A Stellar Imaging Error Correction Method Based on an Ellipsoid Model: Taking Ziyuan 3-02 Satellite Data Analysis as an Example
Next Article in Special Issue
Mathematical Methods and Algorithms for Improving Near-Infrared Tunable Diode-Laser Absorption Spectroscopy
Previous Article in Journal
Energy-Balancing Unequal Clustering Approach to Reduce the Blind Spot Problem in Wireless Sensor Networks (WSNs)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Less Data Same Information for Event-Based Sensors: A Bioinspired Filtering and Data Reduction Algorithm
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

A Regularized Weighted Smoothed L0 Norm Minimization Method for Underdetermined Blind Source Separation

Sensors 2018, 18(12), 4260; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124260
by Linyu Wang, Xiangjun Yin, Huihui Yue * and Jianhong Xiang
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Sensors 2018, 18(12), 4260; https://doi.org/10.3390/s18124260
Submission received: 22 October 2018 / Revised: 28 November 2018 / Accepted: 30 November 2018 / Published: 4 December 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensor Signal and Information Processing II)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Report attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

This paper presents a sparse recovery algorithm for compressed sensing, with application to underdetermined blind source separation. The authors find a better function (CIPF) to approximate L0-norm, and provide a new weighting function (exp(-|x|/sigma)), which helps promoting sparsity. In addition, gradient descent algorithm is adopted to solve the convex optimization problem and yields better recovery performance in a variety of numerical experiments. The outline is clear and the overall writing is good.


Some minor remarks on the paper.


1. Regarding CIPF parameters, what is the value of sigma? And why alpha is set to 10? Please elaborate more on this.


2. Paragraph under Eq. 12, what does factor 'c' stand for? Should it be 'alpha'?


3. In Candes' and Pant's papers, they came up with 1/(|x|+e) due to the fact that log(|x|+e) is a good approximate to L0-norm. In addition, Candes et al., addressed the 'computation on computer' problem for iterative reweighting by introducing e, although its value is sort of empirical. For the proposed weighted function in Eq. 14, what is the mathematical explanation for your choice? 


4. Line 104, missing eq. reference


5. Line 112, i.i.e, is it i.i.d? or i.e.?


6. What is in Fig. 4(f)?


7. For numerical experiments, I did not see the point why 2D image recovery is added since UBSS is the target application.


8. Please add references to the selected algorithms for comparison: SL0, NSL0, Lp-RLS, etc.,.


Author Response

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The paper proposed a method to compress and recover signal in sparse space. Comprehensive experiments are performed to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach  including experiments in various applications. 


However, there are limited number of setting in each application. For example, in image recovery application, only 2 images are used to perform an experiment. Also, in underdetermined blind source separation, which is the application mentioned in the title, only simulated signal is used to perform an experiment. Overall, more experiments on real world data on this topic is needed to ensure applicability of the proposed approach.

Author Response

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Report attached.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 3

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you for your explanation and further update. I now recommend acceptance and publication.

Back to TopTop