Next Article in Journal
A Stretchable Pressure-Sensitive Array Based on Polymer Matrix
Previous Article in Journal
A Reliability-Based Method to Sensor Data Fusion
Article Menu
Issue 7 (July) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Sensors 2017, 17(7), 1573;

MPH-M, AODV-M and DSR-M Performance Evaluation under Jamming Attacks

Universidad Panamericana. Facultad de Ingeniería. Prolongación Calzada Circunvalación Poniente 49, Zapopan, Jalisco 45010, Mexico
Telemática Telemetría y Radiofrecuencia, Francia 1717, Col. Moderna, Guadalajara 44190, Mexico
Escuela de Ingeniería y Ciencias, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus Estado de México, Carretera al lago de Guadalupe Km 3.5, Col. Margarita M. de Juárez, Atizapán 52926, Mexico
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Tecnológico de Monterrey, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada #2501 Sur, Monterrey 64849, Mexico
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 29 April 2017 / Revised: 14 June 2017 / Accepted: 23 June 2017 / Published: 5 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Section Sensor Networks)
Full-Text   |   PDF [1784 KB, uploaded 5 July 2017]   |  


In this work, we present the design of a mitigation scheme for jamming attacks integrated to the routing protocols MPH, AODV, and DSR. The resulting protocols are named MPH-M (Multi-Parent Hierarchical - Modified), AODV-M (Ad hoc On Demand Distance Vector - Modified), and DSR-M (Dynamic Source Routing - Modified). For the mitigation algorithm, if the detection algorithm running locally in each node produces a positive result then the node is isolated; second, the routing protocol adapts their paths avoiding the isolated nodes. We evaluated how jamming attacks affect different metrics for all these modified protocols. The metrics we employ to detect jamming attack are number of packet retransmissions, number of CSMA/CA (Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance) retries while waiting for an idle channel and the energy wasted by the node. The metrics to evaluate the performance of the modified routing protocols are the throughput and resilience of the system and the energy used by the nodes. We evaluated all the modified protocols when the attacker position was set near, middle and far of the collector node. The results of our evaluation show that performance for MPH-M is much better than AODV-M and DSR-M. For example, the node energy for MPH-M is 138.13% better than AODV-M and 126.07% better than DSR-M. Moreover, we also find that MPH-M benefits much more of the mitigation scheme than AODV-M and DSR-M. For example, the node energy consumption is 34.61% lower for MPH-M and only 3.92% and 3.42% for AODV-M and DSR-M, respectively. On throughput, the MPH protocol presents a packet reception efficiency at the collector node of 16.4% on to AODV and DSR when there is no mitigation mechanism. Moreover, MPH-M has an efficiency greater than 7.7% with respect to AODV-M and DSR-M when there is a mitigation scheme. In addition, we have that with the mitigation mechanism AODV-M and DSR-M do not present noticeable modification. However, MPH-M improves its efficiency by 8.4%. We also measure the resilience of these algorithms from the average packet re-transmissions perspective, and we find that MPH-M has around a 15% lower change rate than AODV-M and DSR-M. The MPH-M recovery time is 5 s faster than AODV-M and 2 s faster than DSR-M. View Full-Text
Keywords: Wireless Sensor Networks; jamming; routing algorithms Wireless Sensor Networks; jamming; routing algorithms

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited (CC BY 4.0).

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Del-Valle-Soto, C.; Mex-Perera, C.; Monroy, R.; Nolazco-Flores, J.A. MPH-M, AODV-M and DSR-M Performance Evaluation under Jamming Attacks. Sensors 2017, 17, 1573.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Sensors EISSN 1424-8220 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top