Next Article in Journal
A Fuzzy Controller for Lower Limb Exoskeletons during Sit-to-Stand and Stand-to-Sit Movement Using Wearable Sensors
Next Article in Special Issue
Use of Local Intelligence to Reduce Energy Consumption of Wireless Sensor Nodes in Elderly Health Monitoring Systems
Previous Article in Journal
An Integrated Thermal Compensation System for MEMS Inertial Sensors
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sensor Data Acquisition and Processing Parameters for Human Activity Classification
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:

Ambient Assisted Living Healthcare Frameworks, Platforms, Standards, and Quality Attributes

Department of Engineering, Aarhus University, Aarhus 8200, Denmark
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2014, 14(3), 4312-4341;
Submission received: 16 January 2014 / Revised: 19 February 2014 / Accepted: 24 February 2014 / Published: 4 March 2014


: Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) is an emerging multi-disciplinary field aiming at exploiting information and communication technologies in personal healthcare and telehealth systems for countering the effects of growing elderly population. AAL systems are developed for personalized, adaptive, and anticipatory requirements, necessitating high quality-of-service to achieve interoperability, usability, security, and accuracy. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the AAL field with a focus on healthcare frameworks, platforms, standards, and quality attributes. To achieve this, we conducted a literature survey of state-of-the-art AAL frameworks, systems and platforms to identify the essential aspects of AAL systems and investigate the critical issues from the design, technology, quality-of-service, and user experience perspectives. In addition, we conducted an email-based survey for collecting usage data and current status of contemporary AAL systems. We found that most AAL systems are confined to a limited set of features ignoring many of the essential AAL system aspects. Standards and technologies are used in a limited and isolated manner, while quality attributes are often addressed insufficiently. In conclusion, we found that more inter-organizational collaboration, user-centered studies, increased standardization efforts, and a focus on open systems is needed to achieve more interoperable and synergetic AAL solutions.

1. Introduction

Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) systems have a huge potential to meet the personal healthcare challenges and involve citizens in their healthcare through Information and Communication technologies (ICT) [1,2]. The AAL systems provide an ecosystem of medical sensors, computers, wireless networks and software applications for healthcare monitoring. The primary goal of AAL solutions is to extend the time which elderly people can live independently in their preferred environment using ICT technologies for personal healthcare [3,4]. Presently, there is a huge demand for AAL systems, applications and devices for personal health monitoring and telehealth services [5,6]. Moreover, personal health monitoring is setting a trend with increased empowerment of citizens in healthcare, stimulated by the growing awareness and understanding of healthcare concepts and systems, i.e., electronic health medical records, health monitoring systems, and mobile health applications [7]. The AAL systems are also used for telehealth and telemedicine facilities for providing remote healthcare services to the citizens. According to a report by InMedica, telehealth is projected to reach 1.8 million patients worldwide by 2017 for monitoring the post-acute and ambulatory patients [8].

AAL systems consist of medical sensors, wireless sensor and actuator networks (WSANs), computer hardware, computer-networks, software applications, and databases, which are interconnected to exchange data and provide services in an Ambient Assisted environment. Medical Sensors and actuators are connected with the AAL applications and home gateways for sending medical data to the health monitoring systems. The sensors rely on WSANs for connecting with home gateways and healthcare applications [9,10]. The home gateways, also known as smart home gateways, often use a wireless router that provides connectivity to enable multiple applications for real-time health monitoring through home networks [11]. Many of the available sensors used for monitoring blood sugar, blood pressure, and pulse-rate are capable of sending vital signs to the health monitoring systems, so that a caregiver or physician can monitor the patients remotely [12,13]. Moreover, due to increasing availability of portable, wireless medical devices and wide access to data networks the usage of medical devices is continuously growing. According to a recent research report [14], “Medical devices purchased by consumers used to self-monitor health conditions will account for more than 80% of wireless devices in 2016. The proportion of wireless devices used in managed telehealth programs is predicted to increase from 5% in 2011 to 20% in 2016”. Another report [15] cites, “The number of home health monitoring devices in use with embedded cellular connectivity increased from 420,000 in 2010 to about 570,000 in 2011, and is expected to hit 2.47 million in 2016”. The figures imply that the demand for healthcare devices and ambient assisted living systems is increasing to involve citizens' in personal healthcare, support independent living and economize the healthcare expenses.

In order to produce systems ensuring high-quality-of-service, it is important to consider different aspects of AAL systems to achieve interoperability, usability, security, and accuracy, which are essential requirements of AAL systems. However, the available systems do not consider all aspects of AAL systems having personalized, adaptive, and anticipatory requirements. To identify the essential aspects of AAL systems, we conducted a state-of-the art survey of the literature, which is presented in this paper. We also found other reviews of Ambient Assisted Living systems addressing AAL aspects in general. For example, a recent review by Rashidi et al. presents a general technical survey of ambient assisted living platforms, systems, algorithms and standards [16]. A short review by Iliev et al. provides a high-level survey of current Ambient Assisted Living systems targeting smart homes, middleware technologies and standards for elderly people [17]. A more distinct review by Antonino et al. specifically focuses on architecture-based quality attributes of AAL platforms and evaluates existing frameworks for reliability, security, maintainability, efficiency, and safety properties [18]. In our review, we present the latest research findings and technology advancements of the related AAL systems aspects addressed in these reviews. In addition, we review more aspects of AAL systems, which are also important but not covered in existing reviews.


The objectives of this review are to provide: (1) an overview of the main AAL concepts, (2) a survey of the current state-of-the-art in AAL frameworks, architectures, technologies and standards, and (3) an overview of current usage and real world deployment of specific AAL systems and platforms. Specifically, we want to increase our understanding of how AAL technology has proliferated from being research projects into real world deployment, which has not been covered by previous reviews in the area. Besides, we review more important aspects of AAL systems, including design methodologies, user experience, usability, security, dependability, and accuracy.

2. Methods and Materials

This review is primarily based on a state-of-the-art analysis performed through a literature survey of recent AAL frameworks, systems, and platforms. Additionally, we contacted the focal persons and correspondents of various AAL platforms and systems to collect the usage data of the platforms in terms of number of systems in use, supported technologies, standards, deployed devices and applications, service models, and cost per user per system. The analysis and surveys are presented in the subsequent part. We would like to mention here explicitly that this article does not review in depth the applications of ambient intelligence (AmI), robotics, wearable computers, and wireless networks used in AAL, because those are by themselves broad research areas and candidates for separate reviews.

2.1. State-of-the-Art Survey and Analysis

We performed a search on the scientific databases ACM DL, IEEE, PubMed, and Springer. We used “Ambient Assisted Living” as the main search criteria and included only those articles in the survey, which address the Ambient Assisted Living frameworks, platforms, and systems. We added the keywords of interoperability, integration, user experience, standards, architectures, security, usability, and design methodologies with the main search criteria. A total of 360 articles were found, from which we selected 90 articles to review from ACM DL (33), IEEE (26), PubMed (20), and Springer (11). A further analysis based on the 90 selected papers uncovered (22) more articles, also including important technical papers, analysis, talks, interviews, technology discussions, and web resources. We selected recent articles from 2007 to 2013 except seven articles published before 2007. The diagram shown in Figure 1 illustrates the review process for this article.

In our analysis, we evaluated contemporary AAL systems, platforms, standards, and technologies to identify essential AAL aspects to be included in the review. Based on the analysis, we categorized different aspects of AAL systems and selected the most important aspects for discussion, which were mentioned in significant number of articles. We classified the articles under the keywords, according to the particular AAL systems aspects addressed in the articles. The corresponding AAL aspects are presented in Sections 3.1–3.8, whereas, Section 3.9 presents the miscellaneous research in AAL. The AAL system aspects identified in our state-of-the-art analysis include medical device interoperability and integration; security, privacy and data protection; design and development methodologies; frameworks and open solutions; quality attributes; technology standards and specifications; and usability and user experience.

2.2. Email-Based Survey

We performed an email-based survey to analyze real world usage of contemporary AAL systems and platforms. We wanted to know the number of end-users using certain AAL platforms and systems; technologies and standards used for development, deployment, and integration; supported medical devices; operating systems and programming languages used for development; and cost of the solution per user. For this purpose, we formatted a structured survey form and sent to the correspondents of the AAL systems and platforms identified in the review phase. The survey form is enclosed for reference in Supplementary. We provided a filled form as a guideline to the correspondents for providing data regarding their system or platform. We sent first email requesting data with the survey form, which produced 12 responses. Moreover, eight out of 12 provided data about their solutions. In order to collect more data, we repeated the email as a soft reminder after four weeks and a final reminder email after another two weeks. As a result of this exercise in which we contacted a total of 62 correspondents, we received 40 responses. Out of 40, we received data in 16 responses. The data received through the email survey is discussed in Section 4.

3. Results

Table 1 shows the results of the research literature reviewed in our state-of-the-art survey. The first column of the Table 1 lists the essential AAL system aspects identified during the state-of-the-art survey and mentions the number of articles reviewed corresponding to a particular aspect. The second column shows the references of the surveyed literature. More detailed discussion of these aspects is followed by the Table 1 in the subsequent part from Sections 3.1–3.9.

3.1. Medical Device Interoperability and Integration

Interoperability and integration of medical devices in healthcare systems processing citizens' vital signs are the most frequently addressed attributes in AAL systems and platforms. Numerous studies have explained its importance and proposed solutions to achieve connected interoperable systems. Recent work by Thelen et al. has proposed a telemedicine system for pre-hospital emergency medical services used by the German Emergency Medical Services (EMS) departments [24]. They rely on Health Level 7 (HL7) [90], Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) [91] and IEEE11073 [111] standards for data-interchange and device integration. Another AAL system by Hein et al. addresses tele-rehabilitation after heart surgery, support to hearing impaired people, and monitoring of daily living activities in a generic Service-oriented Architecture (SOA) using the Open Service Gateway Initiative (OSGi) platform [19]. They implement services to collect the vital signs data from 3-lead Electrocardiography (ECG), blood pressure, and pulse Oximeter sensors. Hanak et al. propose a Lifestyle and Health Management System using communication and delivery services in a location-based manner with the Global Positioning System (GPS), Wi-Fi and 3G mobile connectivity [20]. They use Bluetooth-compatible blood pressure and weight measurement devices and wireless physiological sensors for monitoring of body activity, temperature, and stress parameters.

The Continua Alliance deals with Interoperability on a broader level with a focus on IEEE 11073 standard devices [21]. Continua is dedicated for collaborative efforts to improve the quality of personal healthcare and aims to establish an ecosystem of interoperable and connected medical devices for personal healthcare and well-being. The Continua reference architecture uses a Peripheral Area Network Interface (PAN-IF) with medical sensors. Similarly, the Assisted Living Platform (ALIP) in the DALLAS (delivering assisted living lifestyles at scale) program addresses interoperability as the major concern to achieve scalability in medical device communication [22]. The Interoperability Toolkit (ITK) in DALLAS helps integrate systems based on standardizing technologies and interoperability specifications. More research in ALIP i-focus reference architecture solves interoperability issues one step further using the DALLAS Interoperability Layer, which extends the ALIP platform with security features for user and component authentication [23]. To achieve interoperability; Damas et al. have used a data-model to transform 11073-compatible device data into a platform-compatible format, so that the home platform should be able to store and process the data without depending upon the device data formats [25]. Their research relies on an OSGi-based system for plug-n-play connectivity of ambient assisted devices. Whitehead et al. have elaborated interoperability requirements in a broader spectrum to accomplish a complete accurate electronic medical record system and also ensure health disaster preparedness, emergency handling, clinical support systems and remote health delivery [26,27]. According to them, only open and vendor-neutral platforms deploying systems-of-systems with innovative and intelligent health applications on top of them could realize the vision of “ideal interoperability”. In the same line of thoughts, Galarraga et al. investigated the design of robust technical telemonitoring solutions, which are open and interoperable at the same time [28]. Their findings lead to the conclusion that semantic and syntactic interoperability can enable better understanding of telemonitoring systems for lifestyle, genetics, physiology and pathology for management of personal health. AAL systems are used for monitoring a variety of health and well-being parameters also including chronic health problems, as also mentioned by Sanchez-Tato et al. in the Health@Home project [29]. Their telecare system monitors cardiovascular patients and ensures reliable data transmission into HL7-compliant data, emergency events detection and management, electronic reminders, and system failure detection. Other studies rely on service-oriented architectures and middleware technologies for integration of scattered business logic and data to provide personal health services ranging from device driver search to accessing Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems. For instance, Pérez et al. use the Device Profile for Web Services (DPWS) [92] and other web-services standards, i.e., WS-Discovery, WS-Eventing, and WS-Addressing for integrating ubiquitous devices in the AAL environments [30]. Middleware technologies have a key role for integration and interoperability in AAL systems. Abascal et al. have realized the AmbientNet middleware for integration of heterogeneous devices, device discovery, and management of context information [31]. Whereas, the SOA-based research by Corchado et al. focuses on the strategical distribution of different sensors and actuators to create the relevant context-awareness capabilities in the AAL systems [32]. In the SYLPH architecture, they have integrated systems using the SOA paradigm over wireless sensor networks and ambient-intelligent applications. Likewise, the SOA-based MPOWER solution by Mikalsen et al. have proposed a solution with web-based notifications and alarm services in AAL environments [33].

3.2. System Architectures

An AAL solution is an integrated system-of-systems composed of systems, subsystems and components, providing a part of the overall AAL system and its services. The architecture defines the distribution and relationship among the AAL systems, subsystems and components. To exemplify, the conceptual architecture by McNaull et al. consists of four architectural layers, i.e., base, data, information, and context layers used for evaluation of the quality attributes of sensors, ambient data, and communication interfaces [34]. The three-layered architecture S3OiA by Barbas et al. provides a parallel view of architecture for connecting Internet-of-Things (IoT) devices for smart home applications and AAL systems [35]. S3OiA integrates objects, people, and applications in an interoperable IoT ecosystem using tripe-space (TS) computing and RESTful web services. They employ TS computing technology for ubiquitous systems to use three dimensions, i.e., subject, predicate, and object for sharing knowledge among heterogeneous devices asynchronously. The open service architecture of the InMyOneWay system by Montes et al. detects location of the Alzheimer patients using Global Information System (GIS) system services [36]. Whereas, the architectural solution by Jara et al. relies on the ISO/EN 13606 standard to transfer information among distributed medical systems [37]. The proposed architecture ensures home automation, data security, comfort and ambient intelligence to improve quality of life of elderly people. An advanced cloud technology-based architecture by Ekonomou et al. uses a Data Capture and Auto Identification Reference (DACAR) platform, which enables controlled access to the clinical services for health monitoring [38]. DACAR is based on Microsoft's HealthVault platform, which provides user interfaces to review health data, define data sharing relationships and manage user profiles [112]. The architecture enforces role-based and service-based authorization using security and privacy policies for integrating homecare applications with hospital systems using a Translation Gateway (TG). The TG translates the access control rights among different integrated systems using trusted and secure connections for a reliable exchange of data. The system architecture can also provide ambient intelligence and runtime verification of safety-critical AAL applications. For instance, the SOA-based architecture by Coronato et al. is utilized to develop mechanisms of runtime verification of the correctness properties defined at design-time [39]. The runtime verification techniques are used in the testing phase and during system operation for monitoring of the system behavior.

3.3. Security, Privacy and Data Protection

Security and data protection are critical issues in healthcare systems, which exchange and store citizens' medical data. The medical data is security-sensitive. Therefore, legislation provides guidelines to design authorization policies regarding access and usage of the medical data to avoid intentional misuse or accidental disclosure [40,41]. Some of the major threats to data privacy in the AAL system-space are outlined by Rothenpieler et al. [42]. Security is considered the central issue for Internet-of-Things (IoT) mobile health devices explored by Doukas et al. [43]. They use a Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) based data encryption and digital certificate infrastructure for ensuring confidentiality and integrity of the medical data. The proposed solution collects medical data from mobile/wearable sensors and securely transmits the data to the cloud for access to caregivers and family members of the citizens. More investigations about security system technologies for identification of persons in AAL systems are highlighted by Villacorta et al. [44]. An access control model based on Role-based Access Control (RBAC) encompassing organizational models, goals and dependencies is presented by Massacci et al. to analyze security and dependability attributes in AAL systems [45]. Security patterns provide guidelines to engineers and developers to benefit from experienced and validated security solutions. In the SERENITY AAL framework, Sanchez-Cid et al. have investigated how different roles of software development life cycle, i.e., software engineer, component developer, application developer can use security patterns for modelling and development of an AAL ecosystem [46]. The technical implementation of security- and safety-critical AAL services Venkatesh et al. uses knopflerfish-OSGi based architecture [47]. Their solution implements multiple 3DES and AES encryption algorithms for data encryption depending upon required level of security and supported security controls by the devices in AAL systems. Recent research on UniversAAL framework considers security as crucial requirement of AAL scenarios requiring extended access control policies reflecting ambient elements. In this connection, Anton et al. propose an authentication and authorization architecture using semantic-based access control for management of distributed identifiers, cross-domain identity federation, multi-device credential management, and context-aware access control [48].

3.4. Design and Development Methodologies

Design and development methodologies play a key role in modelling and integration of AAL systems. An analysis by Valderrama et al. identifies the major methodologies from the AAL systems design perspective [49]. According to them, service-oriented architectures (SOA), model-driven architecture (MDA), reference model of open distributed processing (RM-ODP), Harmony, rational unified process (RUP), real-time SOA (RT-SOA), and system design through multiple perspectives (S2MP) approaches and methodologies can be used at different levels for development and validation of AAL systems. Likewise, Walderhaug et al. add an extra dimension of model-driven development methodology for the development of smart home healthcare applications using domain specific languages [50]. The Model-driven Engineering (MDE) approach is also used to create customized user interfaces at runtime for ambient intelligent systems as discussed by Adam et al. and Breiner et al. [51,52]. AAL systems are multi-engineering systems consisting of components and equipment from different engineering domains spanning device manufacturing, energy consumption, robotics, computing, and telecommunication. Ras et al. have investigated the multi-engineering aspects of AAL systems for the development of a prototype lab ambient intelligence Care and Assistant system (amiCA) [53]. The important multi-engineering aspects of the homecare domain identified by them are low-energy consumption devices, location and context aware devices, medical sensors, computer nodes, robotics, ad hoc communication networks, adaptive learning systems, virtual acoustics and audio engineering, interactive systems, ambient intelligence and usability. The user-centered and participatory development methodology with fast prototyping, involving interactive feedback from end-users produces better usable systems, as also argued by Kieffer et al. [54]. In their Keep-in-Touch project, they have used the participatory development paradigm to achieve multimodality, accessibility, adaptability, and usability in AAL systems. Another user-centered approach by Aquilano et al. proposes socio-medical services involving caregivers, elderly subjects, judicial researchers, and technological experts for the development of better usable AAL systems [55]. For their prototype, they have used different modules including health, wearable, sensor network, and ambient-intelligence as essential components of a complete and usable AAL system. O'Grady et al. on the other hand, discuss the evolutionary development of AAL systems outlining major technical and methodological approaches used for the development of AAL system components [56]. They apply the evolutionary development for tracking the elderly people in different parts of the home using infrared sensors as collaborating agents. Other methodologies are built upon formal validation and reasoning. For instance, Parente et al. rely on the formal modelling tools and techniques for Fault Tree Analysis (for dependability analysis), Evidential Reasoning (for impact of evidence analysis), Temporal Logic (for temporal reasoning), and Markovs Model (for system states) for ambient intelligence and analysis of system properties [57]. Semantics of ambient contents in AAL systems are investigated by Lugmayer et al. to add intelligence through interpretation algorithms and techniques and also collect attributes of context awareness and mobility of ambient data [58]. The NECESITY project by Botia et al. also defines a complete system development process for high-level modelling, formal analysis, architectural design and evaluation of in-home monitoring system for healthy independent elders [59].

3.5. Conceptual Frameworks and Open Solutions

System modelling and implementation of AAL systems is mostly led by the conceptual frameworks, architectures, and open solutions. There is substantial research in this direction; however, we will mention only some of the major frameworks and architectures for brevity. Tazari et al. present a reference model for AAL as the UniversAAL platform for large-scale integration of different AAL systems and solutions [60]. Their objective is to build a consensus among the AAL community and consolidate their efforts to produce technically feasible and economically affordable standardized AAL systems. The main conceptual components of the proposed domain-specific models in the UniversAAL platform consists of AAL services, network artefacts, AAL spaces, and AAL platforms, which lead the development of AAL systems. Schmidt et al. believe that AAL systems are too diverse and cannot be provided as commercial-of-the-shelf (COTS) solutions [61,62]. To cope with the diversity challenges of AAL systems, they propose an open middleware OpenAAL to enable easy implementation and configuration through situation-dependent and context-aware personalized AAL services. The middleware platform is built on the OSGi architecture and Business Process Execution Language (BPEL) used for deployment of loosely-coupled platform services and ontologies-based information to capture sensor and situation inputs in ambient environment. OpenALL was preceded by the SOPRANO project with similar objectives to support independent living and social participation empowering AAL systems with sensors, actuators, smart interfaces and artificial intelligent [63]. In the automatic smart home framework of the U-Health project, Agoulmine et al. have proposed four main conceptual layers, i.e., sensors & actuators, home communication network (HCN), automatic decision-making system (ADMS) and safety & healthcare services, as the most important elements of smart homes used for personal healthcare monitoring [64]. Also, the AmiVital interaction framework architecture by Jiménez et al. exhibits a relationship among functional and technological services [65]. Besides, it also provides components for context management, knowledge management and device connectivity. The architectural layers of the Hydra middleware by Eisenhauer et al. define the conceptual levels of ambient-intelligence systems as physical (Zigbee, Bluetooth, WLAN), OS (Windows, Linux, TinyOS), Hydra middleware (for applications and devices) and application (workflow, user interfaces, configuration and business logic) [66]. Their middleware provides security to the applications and devices, which are connecting through Hydra. Similarly, the OpenCare framework by Wagner et al. extends the conceptual architecture in four logical tiers of home, mobile, central, and public to provide a complete pervasive and connected infrastructure for healthcare monitoring [67]. The OpenCare framework is implemented as the Sekoia platform used for personal healthcare monitoring through locally-installed healthcare applications and telehealth services [68].

3.6. Quality Attributes

Quality attributes have a greater impact on the usability of AAL systems. Some of the essential quality attributes in AAL platforms are presented by Oliveira et al. They have evaluated different AAL projects including Alhambra, OpenAAL, UniversAAL, PERSONA, and Hydra [18] for quality attributes. In particular, their evaluation is based upon the quality attributes of reliability (recoverability), security (encryption and access control), maintainability (changeability and installability), efficiency (interoperability, resource consumption) and safety (single-point-of-failure, usage patterns). Accuracy is regarded as an important quality attribute for integration of data-intensive AAL systems. Jara et al. realize the importance of accurate health monitoring with the examples of glucose-level data [69]. According to them, glucose values are affected by many factors such as illness, psychological stress, drugs, fluids, and meal plans. Moreover, it is essential that diabetic patients using automatic insulin infusion should get an accurate dosage of insulin. They propose a diabetes therapy management system for AAL environment. Their home gateway is capable of identifying the patients through RFID and use the insulin infusion protocol based on artificial intelligence for adaptive insulin infusion through self-monitoring blood glucose sensors. The quality of data, information and contextual knowledge is crucial in AAL systems according to McNaull et al. [34]. They propose four layers of the AAL system architecture including base, data, information and context layers to investigate the quality attributes of sensors, ambient data, and communication interfaces. Accuracy in self-measurement of the vital signs is also a critical requirement. Wagner et al. have investigated the accuracy of self-measurement of blood pressure (BP) data, when patients are required to self-measure their BP at a regular basis in an unsupervised setting [70]. Their research uses a context-aware system, ValidAid, to gather context information of BP self-measurements to investigate the patients' adherence to the measurement recommendations. They conclude that understanding the measurement context, including time-rested before measurement, posture, noise-levels, and several additional parameters, is crucial for obtaining valid data from BP measurements and other types of self-measurements and self-care activities in the unsupervised setting. Finally, they conclude that current state-of-the-art telemedicine and AAL equipment cannot guarantee a sufficient data-quality, leading to serious misdiagnosis and potential treatment errors.

Usability is considered as one of the major quality attributes of AAL systems, mainly because the end-users have no technical expertise in handling different devices, applications, network equipment, gateways, and other infrastructural components. Moreover, the end-users also include patients, elderly people, and people with disabilities or specific health deficiencies. Considering these aspects, Kim et al. provide an extensible architecture for seamless integration of heterogeneous protocols and vendor-specific devices in a secure and interoperable manner [71]. The seamless integration of devices and protocols provides usability as end-users are not involved in handling device drivers and applications. The solution provides automatic connectivity and configurations for ready-to-use applications and devices. Their implementation is based on the OSGi platform and cloud technologies. OSGi is used at the home gateway for plug-n-play deployment and installation of heterogeneous devices during runtime. The home gateway connects to the cloud to download device drivers and applications from application store. Usability of medical devices, applications and systems is also elaborated by Boulos et al. [72,73]. To ensure maximum usability at different levels in the eCAALYX solution, they provide docking stations (for charging mobile devices), large-touch screens, automatic and seamless system updating, limited user interface screens and avoiding error prompts. Kleinberger et al. believe that accessibility, usability, and learning are key features of AAL systems. They emphasize that the disabled and elderly should be trained to use future technology interfaces, so that they might be capable of using personal healthcare devices without technical support [74]. Beyond the primitive services, they outline adaptivity, anticipatory human-computer interaction, heterogeneity, integration and, domain knowledge formalization as the key challenges for AAL success and acceptability. Likewise, Jiménez et al. propose a user interface framework based on adaptive interactions to enhance the usability of AAL systems [65]. The proposed middleware adapts user interfaces based on the user preferences and contextual data retrieved from the sensors. The challenges faced by usability engineers in designing user interfaces of multi-device and cross-platform AAL systems are discussed by Mourouzis et al. [75]. They propose a user interface adaptation platform infrastructure using a decision making specification language (DMSL) server and easy-to-use adaptive widget library. The AAL systems require personalized configurations; which implies that the medical sensors, network, system and applications are procured, installed, and configured corresponding to the requirements and preferences of an individual or a group of users. Installation and configuration of devices and applications is complex and requires intervention from technical personnel to set the environment for users as also agreed by Marinc et al. [76]. They propose an interactive and architectural configuration approach for comprehensive AAL environments targeting different types of users based on the levels of technical expertise as expert, normal and impaired users. Similarly, López-de-Ipiña et al. believe that middleware platforms supporting automatic integration of sensors and services in AAL-enabled homes can increase interoperability, integration and usability [77]. The infrastructure for the ZAINGUNE platform deployed by them consists of an OSGi-based middleware supported by rule-based reasoning engine, sensors, IP surveillance camera, VoIP telephony, and messaging actuation mechanisms. Automatic user identification through RFID tags by Iglesias et al. evaluates the usability of an AAL system for health monitoring using wirelessly connected medical sensors [78]. They conclude that automatic user and device identification reduces the complexity and increases the user acceptability. In a similar way, Busch et al. performed experiments to achieve unobtrusive, non-stigmatizing, and continuous acquisition of vital signs from medical devices into the computer-based systems to enhance AAL systems usability [79].

The ambient data in AAL systems deals with the healthcare of citizens. Any errors in the data created by sensors, computers processes, or network transmission can have a profound effect on the real-time operation of AAL systems. The consequences due to errors can be unfavorable to citizen's health. Realizing the importance of data quality in AAL systems, McNaull et al. have analyzed the data quality issues in medical sensors, activity sensors, location sensors, wireless communication sensors, and context-sensors used in AAL environments [34].

Dependability is one of the important quality parameters in AAL systems as mentioned by Rodrigues et al. According to them, the poor quality of system availability, safety, and integrity can lead to emergency and fatal consequences for lonely elderly citizens relying on home-based personal healthcare systems [80]. Their research technique uses the PRISM model-checking tool to validate UML behavioral models and analyze dependability and sensitivity properties of AAL system models. Moreover, AAL systems also require runtime verification of data and business processes to achieve reliability in safety-critical scenarios. Reliability of safety-critical ambient intelligence applications is evaluated by Coronato et al. for continuous monitoring of systems-in-execution, against correctness properties [39,81]. The approach uses rapid prototyping to verify several system characteristics using structural and behavioral patterns for runtime verification targeting location of the mobile users within smart homes.

3.7. Technology Standards and Specifications

Technology standards and specifications provide the basis to achieve interoperability, integration, and scalability through standardized protocols and data models. An end-to-end standard-based patient monitoring solution by Martinez et al. transforms the medical data from the X73 Point of Care Medical Device Communication (PoC-MDC) [82] devices into the EN13606 standard and stores at an electronic healthcare record (EHR) server [83,84]. EN13606 is the extensible European standard for interoperable EHR, which allows adding new medical information to the system, using archetype model that gathers domain concepts for extension [85]. Another work by them discusses how X73-PHD (personal health devices) can be used in the intensive care, hospital admission, and blood donor centers to check vital signs including blood pressure, heart-rate, temperature, and breathing-rate using X73 monitor and manager applications [111]. The X73 monitor converts the data from proprietary formats into X73 using a conversion tool. The ASTM F2761 standard considers the safety requirements in medical devices and systems as the main agenda [86]. It defines a framework for integrated clinical environment focusing on “device interoperability towards safety” for medical devices and equipment. The ASTM F2761 defines requirements and procedures for design, verification and validation of integrated clinical environments incorporating model-based integration of systems. Similarly, the differences in medical device communication standards for ECG are investigated by Trigo et al. [87]. They have proposed an x73-PHD model for an ECG device and evaluated other widely used ECG standards including, Standard Communication Protocol for Computer-assisted Electrocardiography (SCP-ECG), HL7 Annotated Electrocardiogram (aECG), Medical Waveform Format Encoding Rules (MFER), and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM). Whereas the research by Ferreira et al. focuses on web-service based AAL environment to collect vital signs from medical sensors and transform the data in the Continuity of Care Record (CCR)—ASTM E2369 standard [88]. The CCR provides snapshot data to patients' clinical, demographic, and administrative data in a structured electronic format [89]. CCR is used to develop clinical information systems to integrate CCR data as a part of HL7-Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) document, which enhances system scalability. Further standards used in AAL systems are related to wireless sensor networks (WSNs) as most of the medical devices are connected wirelessly with home gateways and homecare systems. In a review, Zubiete et al. have analyzed different wireless sensor technologies (i.e., ZigBee, Bluetooth, RFID, IEEE 802.15.4) used for health monitoring applications including fall detection, ECG, diabetes, scoliosis, body fluid, and breath-monitoring [93]. Likewise, the Common Accessibility Profile (CAP) in the ISO/IEC 24756 standard checks the accessibility options for users. Using this standard, Sala et al. have proposed a method and an Integrated Development Environment (IDE) to verify the accessibility constraints of an AAL system configuration against user capabilities [94]. The authoring and simulation environments in the proposed human centered design (HCD) framework allow designers to create, deploy components interactively and simulate the AAL solutions. Similarly, a smart home solution by Caballero et al. offers services in an ambient environment for electrical power management and health monitoring devices using the ZigBee Cluster Library (ZCL) to achieve interoperability and affordable AAL services [95].

3.8. User Experience

Several research studies have investigated the user experience of AAL systems in nursing homes and private homes. An assistive technology framework by Panek, et al. shares the experience of several living labs established at nursing homes in Austria [96]. The living labs at Schwechat use ZigBee-based sensors for temperature, Reed Relay-control, and acceleration measurements. A related exploratory study by Beringer et al. is based on case studies investigating acceptability of AAL devices and systems among the elderly users [97]. The findings suggest that there is a high interest and impact of AAL systems among the elderly users. However, the users are concerned about independence, security, privacy, and behavioral freedom within the home-space under the watchful eye of an AAL system. This is also verified by Ziefle et al. They found similar user attitudes in video-based monitoring for long-term care of elderly and disabled people in the smart homes [98]. In a user experience study, Ibarz et al. performed tests to validate user acceptability, usability, feasibility, and long-term sustainability in their exploratory research studies targeting elderly people with disabilities spanning five European countries [99]. Sun et al. believe that socialization can keep the AAL users connected with each other for better quality of life [100]. They suggest virtual communities to enhance the user experience for social intelligence in AAL systems supported by virtual reality applications. Some of the research studies address the emergency situation handling using AAL technologies. Kleinberger et al. performed experiments to measure the accuracy in monitoring of emergency situations using personal emergency response systems (PERS) and automatic behavior monitoring systems (ABMS) techniques [101]. They found positive results for long-term and short-term monitoring of elderly people in smart homes, equipped with appropriately positioned sensors at different locations.

3.9. Miscellaneous Research in AAL

In this subsection, we present the miscellaneous research in healthcare systems which is closely related to, but not discussed under the specific aspects of AAL presented in the previous subsections (3.1 to 3.8). In the broader scope of healthcare systems research, Blobel et al. have presented interaction and integration paths in eHealth discussing the standards, network protocols, applications, and middleware technologies [102]. They have defined a comprehensive set of non-functional requirements and services in mobile personal health including data security, usability, transparency, and scalability. Whereas, the reviews by Demiris et al. and Hensel et al. have categorized different smart home technologies and applications as physiological, functional, safety, security, social interaction monitoring, and cognitive & sensory assistance [103,104]. They ensue that earlier solutions focused more on intensive monitoring of the patients, whereas the recent systems are inclined towards empowerment of citizens through increased interaction and awareness among users and systems. They also found that current AAL systems research lack in user-perception, usability, ethical frameworks, informed consent mechanisms, and technical system evaluation procedures. Besides, security, privacy, reliability, and robustness are perceived by them as the main challenges in AAL systems. AAL system design involves multi-organizational interactions as different AAL components including medical sensors, device drivers, medical applications, medical records, and enterprise infrastructures, which are provided and managed by different organizations. The importance of organizational cooperation for AAL systems is elaborated in the VirtualECare project by Novais et al. [105]. The VirtualECare architecture service-point-of-view comprises of organizations, recommendations, technical infrastructure, and identity management as the main components for health monitoring. Dohr et al. have connected smart objects with closed-loop healthcare services to setup an infrastructure for AAL scenarios [106]. The key parameters identified by them for achieving “IoT for Ambient-assisted Living” are identification, location, sensing, and connectivity to achieve secure, safe, and social independent living. Similarly, the AAL solution by Takács, et al. provides integrated functionality for mental monitoring, mood assessment, and physical & relaxation exercises beyond basic health management services [107]. Their Ambient Facial Integration (AFI) technique uses photo-realistic animated faces for identifying emotional facial expressions (happiness, surprise, fear, sadness, and anger), non-verbal feedback, and body language for elderly persons. The AFI techniques are also used by them to identify the state of RFID-tagged fruits to check if those are fresh or stale or edible out of their physical properties, i.e., color, skin pattern. The concept of “ambience” is not limited to the home of elderly persons. Huertas et al. believe that it is equally important that the elderly people should be provided with health and information services while they are outside in the surroundings of their homes. Their concept of the Information and Assistance Bubble aims to achieve this objective [108]. The Bubble is defined as the physical space, which extends the mobility of the elderly users and is accessible within a wireless network providing health and information services. Montague elaborates a commercial Vitalsense responsive healthcare platform for connected personal healthcare to monitor ECG, heart-rate, respiration-rate, and accelerometer devices [109]. The Vitalsense platform covers a wide range of sensors and monitoring applications.

This concludes the section discussing the results of our state-of-the-art survey of AAL frameworks, platforms and systems, which is the primary focus of this review. In this section, we categorized the essential aspects of AAL systems and discussed the latest research in the corresponding areas. The next section supplements our state-of-the-art literature review with current status and usage data of contemporary AAL frameworks, systems and platforms, collected by us through an email-based survey as discussed in Section 2.

4. Usage of Contemporary AAL Systems and Platforms

We conducted an emailed-based survey to analyze the real world usage of contemporary AAL systems and platforms as detailed in Section 2.2. Based on the survey, Table 2 shows the data received from the correspondents and focal persons of different AAL system, platforms or solutions. A total of 62 correspondents were contacted, of which 40 responded. As shown in Table 2, 16 of the 40 correspondents communicated the required information about users, technologies, supported devices, platforms, standards, and cost. Whereas, 24 correspondents did not send any data due to project or business confidentiality policies. Of the 16 positive responses, 12 reported actual information concerning the number of end-users, staff users, and systems deployed, while 6 provided the cost per system per user. Most provided the information about technology, standards, supported devices, and platform. From the usage point-of-view, OpenCare/Sekoia [68], TemRas [24], WayFIS [113], and REMOTE [75] reported the maximum number of end users 2200, 300, 200, and 166, respectively (see Table 2). The medical devices supported by different platforms were mainly blood pressure, glucometer, pulse oximeter, fall detector, and weight scale. Besides, other devices such as heart-rate monitor, dehydration sensor, subcutaneous pump, intraoral device, and electronic stethoscope were also reported being used. The standards and specifications in-practice are dominated by the IEEE-11073 standard [21] for device communication and HL7 [90] for healthcare interoperability. Also, ISO standards are used for different purposes including ISO/IEC 29341 (UPnP Device Architecture), ISO-13485 (Medical devices—Quality management systems), and IEC 60601 (Requirements for medical electrical equipment and medical electrical systems used in the home healthcare environment). The operating systems being used are Windows, Linux, Android, and Symbion. Java, C#, C++, PHP, and Python are the major programming languages used for development of AAL platforms and applications. The communication among distributed architectures is achieved through the HTTP, SOAP, and RESTful protocols. The network architecture consists of WiFi, Ethernet, as well as ZigBee and Bluetooth for personal area network. The cost of the platforms ranges from EUR 500 to EUR 20,000 depending upon what is included in the platform and services.

5. Discussion

We found that a significant number of research and industry organizations are active within the AAL field. These organizations have engaged in a high number of recent research and development activities addressing different aspects of AAL, and publishing their results for the community as presented in Sections 3.1 to 3.9. However, as compared to the extensive research efforts presented, the real world usage appears to be fairly limited and confined to a few devices and standards being applied beyond the pilot-study level. An explanation for this could be the wide gap among the requirements of real world AAL system scenarios and the capabilities of currently available solutions and enabling technologies. Moving from research prototypes and pilot studies is difficult and requires more technical, economical, and organizational resources and commitment to succeed. Also, there are large differences in user populations leading to more complex user experience and socio-technical requirements, while the requirements to standardization and certification incurs higher efforts and cost of executing the research and development organizations, as compared to traditional system development.

Through our state-of-the-art survey, we learnt that research in AAL systems is getting aligned strategically with real world scenarios as more requirements are being identified with user-centered and participatory research methodologies. Besides, the ICT advancements in hardware and telecommunication systems, software engineering tools, techniques, and model-driven approaches are supporting the development of AAL systems to a greater extent in the technologically-heterogeneous service-oriented architectures. The formal modeling and validation tools are enhancing the reliability and dependability properties. These are not yet gaining ground in real world scenarios. Significant results have been achieved in terms of enhanced interoperability and integration among medical sensors and healthcare applications used in AAL systems, through the emergence of standards for data and device integration, as well as open frameworks for providing access to this. These include the IEEE 11073, HL7, ISO-13485, and IEC 60601 standards for exchanging data, while standards such as ZigBee, ZWave, Bluetooth provide wireless communication interfaces between the devices, and solutions. However, despite huge claims by device and application vendors, the system engineers are still dealing with closed solutions and proprietary protocols for exchanging the very basic medical data among devices and applications. Also, sharing specialized software components and applications between different projects is not possible without rewriting significant portions of the code, hampering the proliferation effort of relevant AAL applications and components even more.

Even so, the ‘Healthcare IT’ industry has promptly entered into the scene, but has failed to provide interoperable and affordable systems to citizens and support caregiver and governmental organizations. Opening up for standardized device data exchange, as mandated by the Continua Alliance, does not imply that systems become more open for sharing applications and algorithms. Opposed to this, the end-users are mainly concerned about the security and privacy of their personal medical data and want to be assured that their personal data is not exposed to unauthorized ends and that they can combine the AAL services from different vendors that they need. This is in contrast to many vendors and data providers relying on cloud and other server-based services for uploading and storing personal health data and other information, and not allowing other AAL systems access to accumulated data. The freedom of the individual patients for choosing the data-handling strategy has yet to be addressed by the AAL vendors, especially industry, as well as the freedom of choosing the AAL applications and services they want to use, rather than being handled as a silo package.

The conceptual frameworks, platforms and architectures provide guidelines for the software architects and developers to understand the requirements of AAL systems. However, only few of those have produced sustainable systems. Most frameworks focus only on a few aspects, ignoring the requirements of an entire AAL system as seen from different stakeholder and design perspectives. As a result most of the reviewed frameworks produce partial solutions only that cannot support full-fledged solutions ready for real world deployment. These findings are further supported by the usage-data collected during our survey. Here, we found that only 16 organizations were willing or able to provide relevant feedback out of the 62 projects included in the email survey. Almost 32% of the potential respondents, 20 out of 62 did not even respond to the email survey, despite repeated communications to different contact persons of the individual project and organization. Out of the 40, respondents, a majority did not feel their contribution would be relevant or did not know what the project status was, while another faction referred to “business confidentiality policies” as the reason for not sharing their data. Thus, we can only speculate on the real motives of the non-respondents, but we assume that the 16 full-respondents represent the AAL projects that are ongoing, while the others most likely represent the AAL projects that were closed after end-of-funding. Furthermore, out of the 16 respondents, only 12 provided usage data, while six provided actual system costs. Obviously, the AAL community would have benefitted significantly more from a higher response rate.

It is also evident from the survey that AAL research is not sufficiently focused on solving the most critical problems identified in this and other previous reviews, including interoperability, usability, security, reliability, and the quality of the user experience. Instead, the research most often only deals with the isolated aspects of AAL. Moreover, there is a disproportional high overlap between the reviewed AAL studies research objectives and activities, which results in a lack of innovation and focus for achieving usable and affordable AAL systems. The overall vision of producing heterogeneous, open, and reusable infrastructure platforms and components, consisting of diverse software and hardware elements spanning from reasoning algorithms to specific healthcare and assisted living devices, is still to be presented in the literature. The studies that do report on such open and heterogeneous systems do not sufficiently exemplify heterogeneity with specific inter-project and inter-vendor examples, but is usually focusing on presenting a few devices at the intra-project level with in sufficient details.

If the AAL community is to achieve the desired significant gains and reach the objectives set forth in the common AAL vision, the AAL organizations must open up for increased collaboration and integrate more systems into their evaluation sites. This calls for more open standards and open source solutions. Eventually, this could lead to more AAL services and devices being deployed at the existing end-user population, and more evaluation data reaching the AAL community, and thus provide the synergetic effects that are needed for the AAL vision to prevail.

6. Conclusions

The usage of ambient assisted living platforms and systems is growing with time as strategists and policy-makers have drawn the attention of governments, scientists and IT industry to the alarming numbers of growing elderly population. However, as we have shown in this review, current AAL solutions do not consider all the essential aspects of AAL systems and lacks the required interoperability and integration properties. Besides, usability, reliability, data accuracy, cost, security, and privacy are the major challenges for current AAL systems, resulting in unacceptable installation and deployment complexity, unappealing user interfaces, security threats, lack of quality-of-user-experience, and higher costs. Moreover, as the review has shown the end-users continue to require significant technical support and supervision from skilled IT personnel for keeping the home based AAL systems operational for daily use. This does not only hinder the objectives of supporting independent-living but also makes the solutions more expensive for the elderly population and their sponsors to acquire and maintain, as well as delays the proliferation into both public and private care institutions, and private homes.

Furthermore, we found that more validation and user experience studies are required to produce better AAL systems with additional user feedback and participatory development approaches. Design methodologies and paradigms can play a key role for evolving more robust, consistent, and reliable AAL solutions. Inter-organizational collaboration can also enhance the quality, provide outreach to end-users, and normalize the cost of AAL systems. For that, it is important to involve citizens, caregivers, healthcare IT industry, researchers, and governmental organizations in the development cycle of AAL systems, so that end-users can benefit more from the collaborative efforts.

This review has identified a high number of research and industry organizations who are currently active within the AAL field. However, the extensive research effort has not yet led to a significant proliferation of technologies into real world usage. Thus, our review only uncovered 12 projects which had continued their projects beyond the pilot phase and deployed their solutions into the real world, either at care facilities or private homes. Also, the review found, that despite the wide spread aims of supporting for openness and heterogeneity, most projects have not yet addressed this sufficiently for allowing for any substantial reuse of software and hardware components to become a reality. Thus, we argue that one of the major challenges facing the AAL field in the coming years is to reach the goal of openness for achieving more interoperable and synergetic AAL solutions that can gather the critical mass needed for succeeding with our efforts as a field. This challenge could arguably be conceived as the largest barrier to overcome.


This research is part of the CareStore Project ( funded by the European Commission as part of the Seventh Framework Programme. Grant agreement No. 315158.

Author Contributions

Mukhtiar Memon and Stefan Wagner developed the concept. Mukhtiar Memon surveyed the literature and analyzed existing ambient assisted living frameworks, platforms and systems. Mukhtiar Memon collected the usage data of contemporary AAL systems and platforms. Mukhtiar Memon wrote the main paper, whereas, Stefan Wagner analyzed the usage data and wrote discussion and conclusion parts. Stefan Wagner also provided progressive detailed feedback to improve the manuscript contents. Finn Overgaard Hansen, Christian Fischer Pedersen, and Femina Hassan Aysha provided critical feedback and suggestions.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.


  1. Belbachir, A.; Drobics, M.; Marschitz, W. Ambient assisted living for ageing well—An overview. Elektrotech. Inform. 2010, 127, 200–205. [Google Scholar]
  2. Costin, H.; Rotariu, C.; Adochiei, F.; Ciobotariu, R.; Andruseac, G.; Corciova, F. Telemonitoring of vital signs—An effective tool for ambient assisted living. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advancements of Medicine and Health Care through Technology, Cluj-Napoca, Romania, 29 August–2 September 2011; pp. 60–65.
  3. Providing for Older Adults Using Smart Environment Technologies. Available online: (accessed on 12 December 2013).
  4. Information Society Technologies. Ambient assisted living (AAL) for the Ageing Society. Available online: (accessed on 11 November 2013).
  5. Spitalewsky, K.; Rochon, J.; Ganzinger, M.; Knaup, P. Potential and requirements of IT for Ambient assisted living technologies: Results of a Delphi study. Methods Inf. Med. 2013, 52, 231–238. [Google Scholar]
  6. UNIK-LEV VEL. Konference: Velfærdsløftet Er Lige Om Hjørnet (Danish Conference), Copenhagen, Denmark, 23rd October 2013; Available online: (accessed on 8 October 2013).
  7. Rhode, D. Personal(ized) health monitoring, personalization, and personality. J. Technol. Hum. Serv. 2011, 29, 83–100. [Google Scholar]
  8. Morris, Iain. Telehealth to Reach 1.8 Million Patients by 2017. Available online: (accessed on 15 February 2013).
  9. Delicato, F.C.; Fuentes, L.; Gámez, N.; Pires, P.F. Variabilities of Wireless and Actuators Sensor Network Middleware for Ambient Assisted Living. In Distributed Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Bioinformatics, Soft Computing, and Ambient Assisted Living; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 851–858. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sliwa, J.; Benoist, E. Wireless sensor and actor networks: E-health, E-science, E-decisions. Proceedings of the International Conference on Selected Topics in Mobile and Wireless Networking (iCOST), Shanghai, China, 10–12 October 2011; pp. 1–6.
  11. Farrell, Amy. ZyXEL Introduces State-of-the-Art Smart Home Gateway for Health Monitoring Applications. Available online: (accessed on 16 October 2013).
  12. TeleCare. Cellular-Enabled Glucometer. Available online: (accessed on 16 October 2013).
  13. Tony Zarola. Medical Monitoring Gets Personal, Goes Mobile. Available online: (accessed on 15 November 2013).
  14. Arrowsmith, Lisa. Consumers, Not Telehealth Patients, to Drive Adoption of Wireless Technology in Medical Devices. Available online: (accessed on 12 November 2013).
  15. Dolan, Brian. 2.2M People Using Remote Patient Monitoring at the End of 2011. Available online: (accessed on 18 November 2013).
  16. Rashidi, P.; Mihailidis, A. A survey on ambient assisted living tools for older adults. Biomed. Health Inform. 2013, 17, 579–591. [Google Scholar]
  17. Iliev, I.; Dotsinsky, I. Assisted Living Systems for elderly and disabled people: A short review. Int. J. Bioautom. 2011, 15, 131–139. [Google Scholar]
  18. Antonino, P.O.; Schneider, D.; Hofmann, C.; Nakagawa, E.Y. Evaluation of AAL platforms according to architecture-based quality attributes. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Ambient Intelligence (AmI 2011), Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 6–18 November 2011; pp. 264–274.
  19. Hein, A.; Eichelberg, M.; Nee, O.; Schulz, A.; Helmer, A.; Lipprandt, M. A service oriented platform for health services and ambient assisted living. Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications, Bradford, UK, 26–29 May 2009; pp. 531–537.
  20. A Mobile Approach to Ambient Assisted Living. Available online:∼dhanak/iadis_wac.pdf (accessed on 16 October 2013).
  21. Carroll, R.; Cnossen, R.; Schnell, M.; Simons, D. Continua: An interoperable personal healthcare ecosystem. Pervasive Comput. 2007, 6, 90–94. [Google Scholar]
  22. Calder, D. The technology strategy board's Assisted Living Innovation Platform. Proceedings of the IET Seminar on Assisted Living, London, UK, 6 April 2011; pp. 1–43.
  23. Reference Architecture. Available online: (accessed on 22 September 2013).
  24. Thelen, S.; Schneiders, M.; Schilberg, D.; Jeschke, S. A multifunctional telemedicine system for pre-hospital emergency medical services. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on eHealth, Telemedicine, and Social Medicine (eTELEMED), Nice, France, 24 February–1 March 2013; pp. 53–58.
  25. Damas, M.; Pomares, H.; Gonzalez, S.; Olivares, A.; Rojas, I. Ambient assisted living devices interoperability based on OSGi and the X73 standard. Telemed. J. E Health 2012, 19, 54–60. [Google Scholar]
  26. Whitehead, S.F.; Goldman, J.M. Connectivity to improve patient safety: Making medical device “plug-and-play” interoperability a reality. Patient Saf. Qual. Healthcare 2010, 26–30. [Google Scholar]
  27. Medical Device Interoperability: “A Wicked Problem” of our Time. A Conversation with Julian M. Goldman. Available online: (accessed on 12 September 2013).
  28. Galarraga, M.; Serrano, L.; Martinez, I.; de Toledo, P.; Reynolds, M. Telemonitoring systems interoperability challenge: An updated review of the applicability of ISO/IEEE 11073 standards for interoperability in telemonitoring. Proceedings of the 29th Annual International Conference of IEEE on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, Lyon, France, 23“26 August 2007; pp. 6161–6165.
  29. Sánchez-Tato, I.; Senciales, J.C.; Salinas, J.; Fanucci, L.; Pardini, G.; Costalli, F.; Dalmiani, S.; de la Higuera, J.M.; Vukovic, Z.; Cicigoj, Z. Health @ home: A telecare SYSTEM for patients with chronic heart failure. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Broadband and Biomedical Communications (IB2Com), Malaga, Spain, 15–17 December 2010; pp. 1–5.
  30. Perez, J.A.; Alvarez, J.A.; Fernandez-Montes, A.; Ortega, J.A. Service-oriented device integration for ubiquitous ambient assisted living environments. Proceedings of the 10th International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks: Part II: Distributed Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Bioinformatics, Soft Computing, and Ambient Assisted Living, Salamanca, Spain, 10–12 June 2009; pp. 843–850.
  31. Abascal, J.; Bonail, B.; Gardeazabal, L.; Lafuente, A.; Salvador, Z. Managing intelligent services for people with disabilities and elderly people. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction (UAHCI), Part II: Intelligent and Ubiquitous Interaction Environments, San Diego, CA, USA; pp. 623–630.
  32. Corchado, J.M.; Bajo, J.; Tapia, D.I.; Abraham, A. Using heterogeneous wireless sensor networks in a telemonitoring system for healthcare. IEEEN Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed. 2010, 14, 234–240. [Google Scholar]
  33. Mikalsen, M.; Hanke, S.; Fuxreiter, T.; Walderhaug, S.; Wienhofen, L.; Trondheim, N. Interoperability services in the MPOWER ambient assisted living Platform. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2009, 150, 366–370. [Google Scholar]
  34. McNaull, J.; Augusto, J.C.; Mulvenna, M.; McCullagh, P. Data and information quality issues in ambient assisted living systems. J. Data Inf. Qual. 2012, 4, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  35. Vega-Barbas, M.; Casado-Mansilla, D.; Valero, M.A.; Lopez-de-Ipina, D.; Bravo, J.; Florez, F. Smart spaces and smart objects interoperability architecture (S3OiA). Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Innovative Mobile and Internet Services in Ubiquitous Computing (IMIS), Palermo, Italy, 4–6 July 2012; pp. 725–730.
  36. Fernandez-Montes, A.; Alvarez, J.A.; Ortega, J.A.; Madrid, N.M.; Seepold, R. An orientation service for dependent people based on an open service architecture. Proceedings of the 3rd Human-Computer Interaction and Usability Engineering of the Austrian Computer Society Conference on HCI and Usability for Medicine and Health Care, Graz, Austria, 22 November 2007; pp. 155–164.
  37. Jara, A.J.; Zamora, M.A.; Skarmeta, A.F. An architecture for ambient assisted living and health environments. Proceedings of the 10th International Work-Conference on Artificial Neural Networks: Part II: Distributed Computing, Artificial Intelligence, Bioinformatics, Soft Computing, and Ambient Assisted Living, Salamanca, Spain, 10–12 June 2009; pp. 882–889.
  38. Ekonomou, E.; Fan, L.; Buchanan, W.; Thuemmler, C. An integrated cloud-based healthcare infrastructure. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Cloud Computing Technology and Science (CloudCom), Athens, Greece, 29 November–1 December 2011; pp. 532–536.
  39. Coronato, A.; de Pietro, G. A middleware architecture for safety critical ambient intelligence applications. Proceedings of the 3rd Conference on Smart Spaces and Next Generation Wired/Wireless Networking, St. Petersburg, Russia, 23–25 August 2010; pp. 26–37.
  40. Lowrance, W. Learning from experience: Privacy and the secondary use of data in health research. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 2003, 8, 2–7. [Google Scholar]
  41. Yee, G.; Korba, L.; Song, R. Ensuring privacy for E-Health services. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Availability, Reliability and Security, Vienna, Austria, 20–22 April 2006; pp. 321–328.
  42. Rothenpieler, P.; Becker, C.; Fischer, S. Privacy Concerns in a Remote Monitoring and Social Networking Platform for Assisted Living. In Privacy and Identity Management for Life: IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; pp. 219–230. [Google Scholar]
  43. Doukas, C. Enabling data protection through PKI encryption in IoT M-Health devices. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Bioinformatics and Bioengineering (BIBE), Larnaca, Cyprus, 11–13 November 2012; pp. 25–29.
  44. Villacorta, J.J.; Del Val, L.; Jimenez, M.I.; Izquierdo, A. Security System Technologies Applied to Ambient Assisted Living. In Knowledge Management, Information Systems, E-Learning, and Sustainability Research; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2010; Volume 111, pp. 389–394. [Google Scholar]
  45. Massacci, F.; Nguyen, V.H.; Saidane, A. No purpose, no data. Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on Security and Privacy in Medical and Home-Care Systems (SPIMACS ‘09), Chicago, IL, USA, 9–13 November 2009; pp. 53–58.
  46. Sanchez-Cid, F.; Mana, A. SERENITY: Pattern-based software development life-cycle. Proceedings of the 19th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Application (DEXA ‘08), Turin, Italy, 1–5 September 2008; pp. 305–309.
  47. Venkatesh, V.; Vaithyanathan, V.; Kumar, M.P.; Raj, P. A secure ambient assisted living (AAL) environment: An implementation view. Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Communication and Informatics (ICCCI), Coimbatore, India, 10–12 January 2012; pp. 1–7.
  48. Anton, P.; Munoz, A.; Mana, A. Authentication and authorization in Ambient Assisting Living applications: An approach for UniversAAL. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ambient Assisted Living and Home Care, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain, 3–5 December 2012; pp. 135–142.
  49. Estudillo-Valderrama, M.A.; Roa, L.M.; Reina-Tosina, J.; Román-Martínez, I. Ambient assisted living: A methodological approach. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of IEEE on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Buenos Aires, Argentina, 31 August–4 September 2010; pp. 2155–2158.
  50. Walderhaug, S.; Stav, E.; Mikalsen, M. Experiences from Model-Driven Development of Homecare Services: UML Profiles and Domain Models. In Models in Software Engineering; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; Volume 5421, pp. 199–212. [Google Scholar]
  51. Adam, S.; Breiner, K.; Mukasa, K.S.; Trapp, M. Challenges to the Model-Driven Generation of User Interfaces at Runtime for Ambient Intelligent Systems. In Constructing Ambient Intelligence: Communications in Computer and Information Science; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2008; Volume 11, pp. 147–155. [Google Scholar]
  52. Breiner, K.; Gorlich, D.; Maschino, O.; Meixner, G.; Zuhlke, D. Run-Time Adaptation of a Universal User Interface for Ambient Intelligent Production Environments. In Human-Computer Interaction. Interacting in Various Application Domains; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; Volume 5613, pp. 663–672. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ras, E.; Becker, M.; Koch, J. Engineering tele-health solutions in the ambient assisted living lab. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, Niagara Falls, ON, Canada, 21–23 May 2007; pp. 804–809.
  54. Kieffer, S.; Lawson, J.L.; Macq, B. User-centered design and fast prototyping of an ambient assisted living system for elderly people. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Information Technology and New Generations, Las Vegas, NV, USA, 27–29 April 2009; pp. 1220–1225.
  55. Aquilano, M.; Cavallo, F.; Bonaccorsi, M.; Esposito, R.; Rovini, E.; Filippi, M.; Esposito, D.; Dario, P.; Carrozza, M.C. Ambient assisted living and ageing: Preliminary results of RITA project. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), San Diego, CA, USA, 28 August–1 September 2012; pp. 5823–5826.
  56. O'Grady, M.J.; Muldoon, C.; Dragone, M.; Tynan, R.; O'Hare, G.M. Towards evolutionary ambient assisted living systems. J. Ambient Intell. Humanized Comput. 2010, 1, 15–29. [Google Scholar]
  57. Parente, G.; Nugent, C.D.; Hong, X.; Donnelly, M.P.; Chen, L.; Vicario, E. Formal modeling techniques for ambient assisted living. Ageing Int. 2011, 36, 192–216. [Google Scholar]
  58. Lugmayer, A.; Kaario, J.; Risse, T.; Stockleben, B.; Laurila, K. Semantic ambient media experiences. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Semantic Ambient Media Experience (SAME ‘08), Newcastle, UK, 18–22 June 2012; pp. 1–82.
  59. Botia, J.A.; Villa, A.; Palma, J. Ambient assisted living system for in-home monitoring of healthy independent elders. Expert Syst. Appl. 2012, 39, 8136–8148. [Google Scholar]
  60. Tazari, M.; Furfari, F.; Valero, ÁF.; Hanke, S.; Höftberger, O.; Kehagias, D.; Mosmondor, M.; Wichert, R.; Wolf, P. The UniversAAL Reference Model for AAL. In Handbook of Ambient Assisted Living—Technology for Healthcare, Rehabilitation, and Well-being; IOS Press Ebooks: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2012; pp. 610–625. [Google Scholar]
  61. Wolf, P.; Schmidt, A.; Otte, J.P.; Klein, M.; Rollwage, S.; König-Ries, B.; Dettborn, T.; Gabdulkhakova, A. OpenAAL—The open source middleware for Ambient-Assisted Living (AAL). Proceedings of the AALIANCE Conference, Malaga, Spain, 11–12 March 2010.
  62. Wolf, P.; Schmidt, A.; Klein, M. Applying semantic technologies for context-aware AAL services: What we can learn from SOPRANO. GI Jahrestag. 2009, 154, 3077–3090. [Google Scholar]
  63. Sixsmith, A.; Meuller, S.; Lull, F.; Klein, M.; Bierhoff, I.; Delaney, S.; Savage, R. SOPRANO—An ambient assisted living system for supporting older people at home. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics, Tours, France, 1–3 July 2009; pp. 233–236.
  64. Kim, J.; Choi, H.; Wang, H.; Agoulmine, N.; Deerv, M.J.; Hong, J.W. POSTECH's U-Health smart home for elderly monitoring and support. Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on A World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks, Montreal, QC, Canada, 14–17 June 2010; pp. 1–6.
  65. Abril-Jiménez, P.; Vera-Muñoz, C.; Cabrera-Umpierrez, M.F.; Arredondo, M.T.; Naranjo, J.C. Design Framework for ambient assisted living Platforms. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Intelligent and Ubiquitous Interaction Environments; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; Volume 5615, pp. 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  66. Eisenhauer, M.; Rosengren, P.; Antolin, P. HYDRA: A development platform for integrating wireless devices and sensors into ambient intelligence systems. Proceedings of the Internet of Things: 20th Tyrrhenian Workshop on Digital Communications, Rome, Italy, 22–26 June 2009; pp. 367–373.
  67. Wagner, S.; Nielsen, C. OpenCare project: An open, flexible and easily extendible infrastructure for pervasive healthcare Assisted Living solutions. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare, London, UK, 1–3 April 2009; pp. 1–10.
  68. Sekoia Platform: An Open Platform for Applications on Welfare Issues. Available online: (accessed on 15 September 2013).
  69. Jara, A.J.; Zamora, M.A.; Skarmeta, A.F. An internet of things—Based personal device for diabetes therapy management in ambient assisted living (AAL). Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 2011, 15, 431–440. [Google Scholar]
  70. Wagner, S.; Buus, N.H.; Jespersen, B.; Ahrendt, P.; Bertelsen, O.W.; Toftegaard, T.S. Measurement adherence in the blood pressure self-measurement room. Telemed. J. E Health 2013, 19, 826–833. [Google Scholar]
  71. Kim, J.E.; Boulos, G.; Yackovich, J.; Barth, T.; Beckel, C.; Mosse, D. Seamless integration of heterogeneous devices and access control in smart homes. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Environments, Guanajuato, México, 26–28 June 2012; pp. 206–213.
  72. Boulos, M.N.; Wheeler, S.; Tavares, C.; Jones, R. How smartphones are changing the face of mobile and participatory healthcare: An overview with example from eCAALYX. Biomed. Eng. Online 2011, 10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kamel Boulos, M.N.; Lou, R.C.; Anastasiou, A.; Nugent, C.D.; Alexandersson, J.; Zimmermann, G.; Cortes, U.; Casas, R. Connectivity for healthcare and well-being management: Examples from six European projects. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2009, 6, 1947–1971. [Google Scholar]
  74. Kleinberger, T.; Becker, M.; Ras, E.; Holzinger, A.; Müller, P. Ambient intelligence in Assisted Living: Enable elderly people to handle future interfaces. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction: Ambient Interaction, Beijing, China, 22–27 July 2007; pp. 103–112.
  75. Mourouzis, A.; Leonidis, A.; Foukarakis, M.; Antona, M.; Maglaveras, N. A novel design approach for multi-device adaptable user interfaces: Concepts, methods and examples. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction: Design for all and eInclusion, Orlando, FL, USA, 9–14 July 2011; pp. 400–409.
  76. Marinc, A.; Stocklow, C.; Braun, A.; Limberger, C.; Hofmann, C.; Kuijper, A. Interactive Personalization of Ambient Assisted Living Environments. In Human Interface and the Management of Information. Interacting with Information; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; Volume 6771, pp. 567–576. [Google Scholar]
  77. López-de-Ipiña, D.; Laiseca, X.; Barbier, A.; Aguilera, U.; Almeida, A.; Orduña, P.; Vazquez, J.I. Infrastructural support for ambient assisted living. Proceedings of the 3rd Symposium of Ubiquitous Computing and Ambient Intelligence, Salamanca, Spain, 22–24 October 2008; pp. 66–75.
  78. Iglesias, R.; Parra, J.; Cruces, C.; de Segura, N.G. Experiencing NFC-based touch for home healthcare. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Pervasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, Corfu, Greece, 10–12 June 2009; pp. 1–4.
  79. Busch, B.; Welge, R. Unobtrusive vital sign acquisition in the domain of AAL. Biomed. Technol. 2012, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rodrigues, G.N.; Alves, V.; Silveira, R.; Laranjeira, L.A. Dependability analysis in the ambient assisted living domain: An exploratory case study. J. Syst. Softw. 2012, 85, 112–131. [Google Scholar]
  81. Coronato, A.; de Pietro, G. Tools for the rapid prototyping of provably correct ambient intelligence applications. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 2012, 38, 975–991. [Google Scholar]
  82. Galarraga, M.; Serrano, L.; Martínez, I.; de Toledo, P. Standards for medical device communication: X73 PoC-MDC. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2006, 121, 242–256. [Google Scholar]
  83. Martinez, I.; Fernandez, J.; Galarraga, M.; Serrano, L.; de Toledo, P.; Jimenez-Fernandez, S.; Led, S.; Martfnez-Espronceda, M.; Garcia, J. Implementation of an end-to-end standard-based patient monitoring solution. IET Commun. 2008, 2, 181–191. [Google Scholar]
  84. Martínez, I.; Escayola, J.; Martinez-Espronceda, M.; Serrano, L.; Trigo, J.; Led, S.; García, J. Standard-based middleware platform for medical sensor networks and u-health. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks (ICCCN ‘08), St. Thomas, U.S. Virgin Islands, 3–7 August 2008; pp. 1–6.
  85. Muñoz, A.; Somolinos, R.; Pascual, M.; Fragua, J.A.; González, M.A.; Monteagudo, J.L.; Salvador, C.H. Proof-of-concept design and development of an EN13606-based electronic health care record service. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2007, 14, 118–129. [Google Scholar]
  86. Goldmann, J. ASTM F2761-09: Medical Devices and Medical Systems—Essential Safety Requirements for Equipment Comprising the Patient-Centric Integrated Clinical Environment (ICE)—Part 1: General Requirements and Conceptual Model; ASTM International: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  87. Trigo, J.D.; Chiarugi, F.; Alesanco, A.; Martinez-Espronceda, M.; Chronaki, C.E.; Escayola, J.; Martínez, I.; Garcia, J. Standard-compliant real-time transmission of ECGs: Harmonization of ISO/IEEE 11073-PHD and SCP-ECG. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of IEEE on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), 3–6 September 2009; pp. 4635–4638.
  88. Ferreira, L.; Ambrosio, P. Towards an interoperable health-assistive environment: The eHealthCom platform. Proceedings of the IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI), Hongkong/Shenzhen, China, 2–7 January 2012; pp. 930–932.
  89. Botsivaly, M.; Spyropoulos, B.; Koutsourakis, K.; Mertika, K. Enhancing continuity in care: An implemantation of the ASTM E2369-05 standard specification for continuity of care record in a homecare application. Proceedings of the AMIA Annual Symposium, Washington, DC, USA, 11–15 November 2006; pp. 66–70.
  90. Dolin, R.H.; Alschuler, L.; Boyer, S.; Beebe, C.; Behlen, F.M.; Biron, P.V.; Shabo Shvo, A. HL7 clinical document architecture (Hl7-CDA), Release 2. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2006, 13, 30–39. [Google Scholar]
  91. Wein, B.B. IHE (integrating the healthcare enterprise): A new approach for the improvement of digital communication in healthcare. Rofo 2003, 175, 183–186. [Google Scholar]
  92. Zeeb, E.; Bobek, A.; Bohn, H.; Golatowski, F. Lessons learned from implementing the devices profile for web services (DPWS). Proceedings of the Digital EcoSystems and Technologies Conference (DEST ‘07), Cairns, Australia, 21–23 February 2007; pp. 229–232.
  93. Dorronzoro Zubiete, E.; Luque, L.F.; Medina Rodriguez, A.V.; Gonzalez, I.G. Review of wireless sensors networks in health applications. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of IEEE on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Boston, MA, USA, 30 August–3 September 2011; pp. 1789–1793.
  94. Sala, P.; Fernandez, C.; Mocholí, J.B.; Presencia, P.; Naranjo, J.C. Implementation of the ISO/IEC 24756 for the Interaction Modeling of an AAL Space. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Context Diversity; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; Volume 6767, pp. 210–219. [Google Scholar]
  95. Caballero, I.; Sáez, J.V.; Zapirain, B.G. Review and New Proposals for Zigbee Applications in Healthcare and Home Automation. In Ambient Assisted Living; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2011; Volume 6693, pp. 101–108. [Google Scholar]
  96. Panek, P.; Hlauschek, W.; Schrenk, M.; Werner, K.; Zagler, W.L. Experiences from user centric engineering of ambient assisted living technologies in the living lab schwechat. Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Concurrent Enterprising (ICE), Aachen, Germany, 20–22 June 2011; pp. 1–8.
  97. Beringer, R.; Sixsmith, A.; Campo, M.; Brown, J.; McCloskey, R. The acceptance of ambient assisted living: Developing an alternate methodology to this limited research lens. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Smart Homes and Health Telematics: Toward Useful Services for Elderly and People with Disabilities, Montreal, QC, Canada, 20–22 June 2011; pp. 161–167.
  98. Ziefle, M.; Rocker, C.; Holzinger, A. Medical technology in smart homes: Exploring the user's perspective on privacy, intimacy and trust. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Conference on Computer Software and Applications (COMPSACW), Munich, Germany, 18–22 July 2011; pp. 410–415.
  99. Ibarz, A.; Falcó, J.L.; Vaquerizo, E.; Lain, L.; Artigas, J.I.; Roy, A. MonAMI: Economic Impact of Mainstream AAL Open Platform in Home Care. In Ambient Assisted Living and Home Care; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; Volume 7657, pp. 127–134. [Google Scholar]
  100. Sun, H.; de Florio, V.; Gui, N.; Blondia, C. Towards building virtual community for ambient assisted living. Proceedings of the 16th Euromicro Conference on Parallel, Distributed and Network-Based Processing (PDP ‘08), Toulouse, France, 13–15 February 2008; pp. 556–561.
  101. Kleinberger, T.; Jedlitschka, A.; Storf, H.; Steinbach-Nordmann, S.; Prueckner, S. An Approach to and Evaluations of Assisted Living Systems Using Ambient Intelligence for Emergency Monitoring and Prevention. In Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Intelligent and Ubiquitous Interaction Environments; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; Volume 5615, pp. 199–208. [Google Scholar]
  102. Blobel, B.; Norgall, T. The future of personal health: Requirements, technology, applications, standards. Proceedings of the 12th International HL7 Conference, Orlando, FL, USA, 13–14 May 2011.
  103. Demiris, G. Smart homes and ambient assisted living in an aging society. New opportunities and challenges for biomedical informatics. Methods Inf. Med. 2008, 47, 56–57. [Google Scholar]
  104. Demiris, G.; Hensel, B. Technologies for an aging society: A systematic review of smart home applications. Biomed. Health Inform. 2008, 47, 33–40. [Google Scholar]
  105. Novais, P.; Costa, R.; Carneiro, D.; Neves, J. Inter-organization cooperation for ambient assisted living. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. 2010, 2, 179–195. [Google Scholar]
  106. Dohr, A.; Modre-Opsrian, R.; Drobics, M.; Hayn, D.; Schreier, G. The internet of things for ambient assisted living. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Information Technology and New Generations (ITNG), Las Vegas, NV, USA, 12–14 April 2010; pp. 804–809.
  107. Takács, B.; Hanák, D. A mobile system for assisted living with ambient facial interfaces. IADIS Int. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Syst. 2007, 2, 33–50. [Google Scholar]
  108. Huertas, S.; Lázaro, J.P.; Guillén, S.; Traver, V. Information and assistance bubbles to help elderly people in public environments. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of IEEE on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1–3 September 2010; pp. 208–211.
  109. Montague, S.W. Optimising the National Health Service through Remote Vital Signs Monitoring, Intellesens. Available online: (accessed on 7 October 2013).
  110. Sadri, F. Ambient intelligence: A survey. ACM Comput. Surv. 2011, 43, 1–66. [Google Scholar]
  111. Martínez, I.; Escayola, J.; Martínez-Espronceda, M.; Serrano, L.; Trigo, J.D.; Led, S.; García, J. Implementation experiences of ISO/IEEE11073 standard applied to new use cases for e-health environments. Proceedings of the Annual International Conference of IEEE on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Minneapolis, MN, USA, 2–6 September 2009; pp. 1679–1682.
  112. Microsoft HealthVault Platform. Available online: (accessed on 9 November 2013).
  113. Török, A.; Helfenbein, T. A novel framework for personalized and context-aware indoor navigation systems. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Mobile Services, Resources, and Users, Venice, Italy, 21–26 October 2012; pp. 60–63.
Figure 1. Search strategy and exclusion process for literature review of articles.
Figure 1. Search strategy and exclusion process for literature review of articles.
Sensors 14 04312f1 1024
Table 1. Main aspects of AAL systems and surveyed literature.
Table 1. Main aspects of AAL systems and surveyed literature.
AAL Aspects (No. of articles reviewed in state-of-the-art survey)Surveyed Literature (References of the surveyed literature)
Medical Device Interoperability and Integration (15)[1933]
AAL System Architectures (6)[3439]
Security, Privacy and Data Protection (9)[4048]
Design and Development Methodologies for AAL systems and Services (11)[4959]
Frameworks and Open Solutions (9)[6068]
Quality Attributes -Usability, Accuracy, Dependability, Availability, Reliability (17)[18,34,39,65,6981]
Technology Standards and specifications (14)[8295]
User Experience (06)[96101]
Miscellaneous Research in AAL Systems (08)[102109]
Reviews/Surveys in AAL (7)[1,5,1618,93,110]
Table 2. Data showing usage of contemporary AAL platform and systems.
Table 2. Data showing usage of contemporary AAL platform and systems.
No.Project Title/Description/URLSystems Deployed (#)End Users (#)Staff Users (#)Homes Deployed (#)Medical Devices SupportedStandardsOperating systemsProgramming LanguagesService ModelCost/system/user (EURO)
1AALuis—Ambient Assisted Living user interfaces,, 29341-x (UPnP Device Architecture)Windows, Linux, Mac OS X, AndroidJava, ECMA Script, XSLTN/AN/A

2AMICA—Autonomy, Motivation & Individual Self-Management for COPD patients,, X.509, Bluetooth LE/Continua, ISO 13485, ISO 60601-1-4, ISO 62304, ISO 9241Windows XP/Vista/7/8, AndroidC#, C++, Java, WSDLSOAP, .NET990/Year

3AAL-ALFA: Active Living for Alzheimer-patients, 4.1JavaN/AN/A

4HELP: Home-based Empowered Living for Parkinson's disease Patients2424924Blood pressure, Parkinson sensor, Subcutaneous pump, Intraoral deviceZigbee Health Profiles, IEEE 11073Windows Mobile, AndroidC++, JavaOSGi3500

5GoldUI: Adaptive embedded human interfaces designed for older people, http://www.goldui.euN/A4020N/AN/AISO/IEC 40500, ISO/IEC 18036, ISO 9241-151Windows XP/Vista/7/8, Linux, AndroidPHP, Java, JavaScript,Postgre SQLSaaSN/A

6WayFiS: Way Finding for SeniorsN/A20050N/AN/AISO 20282, ISO/IEC 27002, ISO 17267:2009Windows XP/Vista/7, Linux, AndroidPHP, Java, JavaScript, Postgre SQLSaaSN/A

7MyGuardian: A Pervasive Guardian for Elderly with Mild Cognitive ImpairmentsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/AISO 6709:20, ISO 20282, ISO/IEC 27002Windows XP/Vista/7, Linux, AndroidPHP, Java, Postgre SQL, .NETSaaSN/A

8HOMER—Home Event Recognition System50502050Continua Health certified devicesISO/IEEE 11073-10471Windows XP/Vista/7/8, LinuxJavaOSGi RESTWeb Socket, JSONN/A

9HOPE—smart home for elderly people737106Pulse counter, Fall detector, Panic-ButtonHL7Windows XP/Vista/7/8C++,, Java, C#N/AN/A

10NACODEAL: NAtural COmmunication DEvice For Assisted Living, XP/Vista/7/, LinuxN/AREST1000

11PAMAP—Physical Activity Monitoring for Ageing People, www.pamap.org3305+30Heart rate monitorHL7Windows, LinuxC++, JavaSOAPN/A

12REMOTE (Remote health and social care for independent living of isolated elderly with chronic conditions), bio harness, Dehydration sensor, Blood pressure device, weight scaleHTTP, SOAPSymbionOSJava, LWUI, JADESOAP30–35

13SmartTouch: Interaction as simple as touch,, Glucose Meter, Blood PressureN/AWindows XPC#SOAP, .NETN/A

14SOFTCARE, XP/Vista/7/8Java, CSOAP500

15TemRas: Telemedizinisches Rettungsassistenzsystem, Telemedical Rescue Assistance System6300130Monitor/Defibrillator for Emergency Medical Services (Philips HeartStart MRx), Electronic Stethoscope (3M-Littmann E3200)HL7Windows 7/2008 Server, GNU/LinuxJava, Python, C#AMQP, FTP20,000

16OpenCare Platform @ Sekoia Pressure, Glucometer, Pulse-Oximeter, Weight-scale and other Continua certified devices.HL7WindowsC#SOAP, RESTN/A

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Memon, M.; Wagner, S.R.; Pedersen, C.F.; Beevi, F.H.A.; Hansen, F.O. Ambient Assisted Living Healthcare Frameworks, Platforms, Standards, and Quality Attributes. Sensors 2014, 14, 4312-4341.

AMA Style

Memon M, Wagner SR, Pedersen CF, Beevi FHA, Hansen FO. Ambient Assisted Living Healthcare Frameworks, Platforms, Standards, and Quality Attributes. Sensors. 2014; 14(3):4312-4341.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Memon, Mukhtiar, Stefan Rahr Wagner, Christian Fischer Pedersen, Femina Hassan Aysha Beevi, and Finn Overgaard Hansen. 2014. "Ambient Assisted Living Healthcare Frameworks, Platforms, Standards, and Quality Attributes" Sensors 14, no. 3: 4312-4341.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop