Next Article in Journal
Abnormally Increased Prolactin Levels in Women with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome Are Associated with Risk of Obesity, Insulin Resistance and Prediabetes
Next Article in Special Issue
A Report of a Child with SEC31A-Related Neurodevelopmental Disorder
Previous Article in Journal
Innovative Amber-Based Composite—From Mechanochemical Synthesis and Physicochemical Characterization to Application in Cosmetics
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identification of Four New Mutations in the GLA Gene Associated with Anderson–Fabry Disease
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Case Report

A Novel Homozygous 9385 bp Deletion in the FERMT1 (KIND1) Gene in a Malaysian Family with Kindler Epidermolysis bullosa and a Review of Large Deletions

1
EB House Austria, Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
2
Special Care Clinic, Universidad de Chile, Olivos 943, Independencia, Santiago 8380544, Chile
3
Servicio de Dermatología, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago 7591538, Chile
4
DEBRA Chile, Santiago 8580670, Chile
5
Pediatrics and Pediatric Infectious Diseases of Clínica Alemana, Facultad de Medicina Alemana, Universidad del Desarrollo, Santiago 7591538, Chile
6
Department of Dermatology, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore 229899, Singapore
7
Research Center, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore 229899, Singapore
8
Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital of the Paracelsus Medical University, 5020 Salzburg, Austria
9
Centro de Genética Y Genómica, Facultad de Medicina Clínica Alemana, Universidad de Desarrollo, Santiago 7610658, Chile
10
Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 8320165, Chile
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(9), 4237; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094237
Submission received: 2 April 2025 / Revised: 22 April 2025 / Accepted: 23 April 2025 / Published: 29 April 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Genetic Mutations in Health and Disease)

Abstract

Kindler Epidermolysis bullosa (KEB; OMIM 173650) is a rare autosomal recessive genodermatosis characterized by bullous poikiloderma and photosensitivity. Additional presentations include blistering, poor wound healing, skin atrophy, and increased risk of skin cancer. Most cases of KEB result from aberrations in the FERMT1 (Fermitin family member 1) gene encoding kindlin-1 and include nonsense, frameshift, splicing, and missense variants. Large deletion variants have been reported in nine cases to date. Most variants are predicted to lead to premature termination of translation and to loss of kindlin-1 function. In this study, we report on a 33-year-old male patient who presented with typical clinical manifestations of KEB. As routine molecular testing failed to obtain a diagnosis, Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) of an Epidermolysis Bullosa (EB)-specific panel was carried out followed by the determination of the deletion breakpoints and verification at the mRNA and protein levels. This approach revealed a new large homozygous deletion of ~9.4 kb in the FERMT1 gene involving exons 7 to 9. Finally, we performed a literature review on large FERMT1 deletions. The deletion is predicted to skip exons 7 to 9 within the mRNA, which results in a frameshift. The patient’s phenotype is likely caused by the resulting truncated and non-functioning protein. Our report further enriches the spectrum of FERMT1 gene variants to improve genotype–phenotype correlations.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Kindler Epidermolysis bullosa (KEB; formerly Kindler Syndrome, OMIM 173650) is an autosomal recessive mechanobullous genodermatosis, which was first described by Theresa Kindler in 1954 [1,2]. It is caused by pathogenic loss-of-function variants in the FERMT1 gene encoding a focal adhesion protein, which is predominantly expressed in skin basal keratinocytes, periodontal tissues, and colon. Kindlin-1 plays a critical role in linking the actin cytoskeleton with the underlying extracellular matrix anchorage network.
Clinically, it presents with acral blistering that manifests at birth or in early infancy. In addition, patients suffer from photosensitivity, which is severe during childhood and usually improves after adolescence. Further clinical symptoms include progressive poikiloderma, cutaneous atrophy, palmoplantar hyperkeratosis, and pseudosyndactyly. Moreover, gingival fragility and oesophageal and gastrointestinal involvement is observed [3,4,5]. Diagnostic algorithms based on clinical symptoms have been proposed by Angelova-Fischer (2005) and Chopkar (2021) [3,6]. Ultrastructural hallmarks of KEB include keratinocyte separation, reduplication in the lamina densa, and the formation of fissures at different rates and levels of the dermoepidermal structure [7,8].
The treatment of KEB is mainly symptomatic and relies on the prevention of skin trauma, proper wound care, the prevention of infections, and surgical correction of stenoses. Antioxidants and flavonoid luteolin may reduce UV-B-induced keratinocyte apoptosis [9].
Approximately 250 cases [6] and a total of at least 107 molecular variants have been reported in the HGMD Professional 2023.4 (https://www.hgmd.cf.ac.uk/ac/gene.php?gene=FERMT1), accessed on 2 April 2025), which comprise nonsense and splicing variants as well as small and large deletions and insertions.
In this study, we present a 33-year-old male patient from Malaysia, with clinical signs of KEB. While no pathogenic variants in FERMT1 or any other EB-related gene could be found by exome sequencing, advanced molecular profiling identified a novel homozygous 9385 bp deletion variant spanning exons 7–9 in the FERMT1 gene. These results were correlated with the literature data on large FERMT1 deletions.

2. Results

2.1. The Patient

The index patient presented with chronic generalized skin blistering and wounding starting from birth, microstomia (Figure 1d), pseudosyndactyly, palmoplantar keratoderma, poikiloderma, diffuse hypo- and hyperpigmentation, and nail atrophy (Figure 1a–c,f). He further complained about recurrent skin infections and severe constipation. Oral examination showed severe microstomia with a maximal interincisal opening of 6 mm. The patient also presented with cheilitis, vestibular obliteration, periodontal disease, angular cheilitis, recurrent intraoral lesions and blisters, pitting enamel hypoplasia, multiple caries, and lower lip leukoplakia (Figure 1d).
Family history revealed that the parents of the index patient were first cousins without any history for skin diseases. Likewise, their older son was reported as clinically asymptomatic.
Later in his evolution, the patient also developed urethral stenosis, which had to be operated on.
Interestingly, he also exhibits amelogenesis imperfecta (Figure 1e), which has not been reported for KEB but frequently found in another type of EB, Junctional EB (JEB). Thus, the clinical phenotype was suggestive of a skin fragility disorder, particularly of Junctional or Kindler EB.
Our patient was initially treated and followed in Singapore, where a clinical exome had been performed to determine the molecular cause of his disease. At this point, no clear pathogenic EB-related variants had been found but only heterozygous single nucleotide polymorphisms in recessive EB-causing genes.

2.2. NGS-Based Variant Analysis

NGS-based data analysis with the Ion Reporter software (Version 5.20, Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) revealed no pathogenic variant in the FERMT1 (NM_017671.5) nor in any of the other genes of the Epidermolysis bullosa panel. While three LAMB3 heterozygous missense variants (M852L, A926D, N690S) were detected, these variants were considered to be non-pathogenic, referring to the considerably high minor allele frequency in the normal population.
Integrative Genome Viewer (IGV, https://software.broadinstitute.org/software/igv/) [10], accessed on 24 November 2022, analyses revealed that amplicons from exons 7, 8, and 9 of the patient’s allele have not been amplified (Figure 2).

2.3. Variant Identification and Sequence Analysis

To determine the 5′ and 3′ breakpoints of the deletion, a series of successive polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed within ~10 kb of intron 6 and ~5.8 kb of intron 9. The primer combination pr6F6 5′ACAATGCTTTACAGTGGCAAA3′ and pr9R2 5′GCCAAATATGAGGGCAATTTT3′ located nearby the supposed two breakpoints were designed to amplify a fragment of 894 bp in the case of the deleted allele of the homozygous patient and the heterozygous parents and helped us to confirm the deleted sequences by Sanger sequencing.
Profiling the 5′ and 3′ breakpoints (chr20:6,083,980; chr20:6,074,596; GRCh37/hg19) within intron 6 and 9 confirmed the 9 kb deletion and showed an insertion of 9 bp instead (TTATATCCC) (Figure 3a,b).
The deletion was further confirmed by using a primer combination of primer pr9F7 5′AACGGGCACTTCACTGGG3′ complementary to the deletion and primer pr9R7 5′AGCACTTTGGGAGGCCAAG3′ located outside the deletion. This application resulted in a 496 bp fragment observed only in both heterozygous parents and the wildtype sample (Figure 3b).

2.4. Genetic Analysis on mRNA Level

Reverse transcription-PCR amplification of the total RNA extracted from primary fibroblast cell culture from the patient and a keratinocyte cell culture from an unaffected individual (healthy control) resulted in a unique PCR product of 197 bp compared to the 487 bp control band on agarose gel. In order to obtain sufficient product for sequencing, the PCR product of 197 bp was threefold concentrated and vaporized before gel loading and sequencing to attenuate the effects of mRNA decay and strongly reduced expression of truncated RNA molecules (Figure 4a).
Sanger sequencing of the 197 bp PCR product obtained from the cDNA of the patient showed that it was missing 290 bp compared to the control sequence. This observation corresponds to the out-of-frame transcript carrying the deletion of exons 7, 8, and 9 (Figure 4b).

2.5. Gene Expression on RNA and Protein Levels

To assess the consequences of the 9 kb deletion, we studied FERMT1 expression with quantitative real-time PCR analysis performed on the cDNA derived from the fibroblast and keratinocyte cell culture established from the patient and control skin, respectively. RT-Primers were designed to target the sequence within exons 6 and 10, encompassing the deletion. As expected, no amplification was observed on the patient’s fibroblasts. Wildtype mRNA from keratinocytes resulted in extensively higher expression compared to wildtype mRNA from fibroblasts (Figure 4c).
Immunoblot analysis revealed complete loss of kindlin protein in the fibroblasts of the patient. In contrast, regular staining intensity of anti-kindlin antibody in the control keratinocytes compared to the healthy fibroblasts indicated 2.5× higher density in densitometric blot analysis (Figure 4d).

3. Discussion

In 2003, the genetic defect of KEB was first localized to loss-of-function variants in the FERMT1 (also formally named KIND1) gene mapped to chromosome 20p12.3 [7]. It codes for kindlin-1 protein, a 677-amino acid protein, expressed particularly in the basal keratinocytes, intestine, and kidney, whose loss results in defects in actin–extracellular matrix linkages and abnormal skin fragility [11].
In this paper, we report on a 33-year-old Malaysian patient with clinical findings suggestive of KEB. While the application of clinical exome and Ion Reporter software was unable to reveal any underlying molecular aberration, advanced molecular profiling using IGV (Integrative Genome Viewer) [10] revealed a previously unreported/new large FERMT1 homozygous deletion spanning exons 7–9. This deletion was later confirmed to be inherited from his parents who are both heterozygous carriers.
In more detail, we designed a primer pair targeting the breakpoint proximity of the 3017 bp deletion published by Zhou (2009) [12] to amplify a 400 bp fragment in the case of the deletion and 3417 bp in the case of the healthy control. We failed to amplify the 400 bp fragment that implicated an extended deletion far outside of this fragment.
Consequently, a series of successive polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed within ~10 kb of intron 6 and ~5.8 kb of intron 9 to explore the 5′ and 3′ breakpoints of the deletion which could be estimated within intron 6 and 9 (chr20:6,083,980; chr20:6,074,596; GRCh37/hg19) and herewith confirmed a 9 kb deletion.
An insertion of 9 bp (TTATATCCC) was detected between the recombination sites (Figure 3a). The primer combination pr6F6-ACAATGCTTTACAGTGGCAAA and pr9R2-GCCAAATATGAGGGCAATTTT designed in proximity of the two breakpoints amplified a fragment of 894 bp in the case of the deleted allele of the homozygous patient. This primer pair may serve as a PCR-based diagnostic substrate for rapid screening for this specific deletion in KEB patients.
The 9 kb deletion was also verified on mRNA and protein levels. RT-PCR analysis of the cultured patient fibroblasts performed in a single PCR product of 197 bp. “PCR end point” analysis resulted in minimized amplification levels presumably due to mRNA decay. Nonsense-mediated mRNA decay might downregulate the mature mRNA, a unique process shown for most of the variants identified in the FERMT1 gene [13,14]. Therefore, it was required to concentrate the volume of PCR by vaporization for gel loading and sequencing. Sanger sequencing verified out-of-frame transcription (del 290 bp) and deletion of exons 7, 8, and 9 (Figure 4a,b).
This result is also consistent with the measurement by quantitative real-time PCR. We demonstrated that mRNA from patient fibroblasts lack measurable amplification, which most likely reflects the effect of mRNA decay. Noteworthy, mRNA from wildtype keratinocytes resulted in a significantly higher expression (~10-fold) compared to wildtype fibroblasts (Figure 4c). The results of the immunoblot analysis corroborate the results at the mRNA level. Complete loss of kindlin-1 protein was shown by an antibody directed against kindlin-1 in the patient fibroblasts. The healthy keratinocytes show densely higher expression level compared to the control fibroblasts, as the densitometric analysis of the blot calculated a value of ~2.5-fold higher (Figure 4d).
Our data indicate that the deletion leads to the generation of a truncated protein lacking a substantial part of its c-terminal end. This aberration is predicted to cause mRNA decay. However, a reduced amount of c-terminally truncated kindlin-1 in keratinocytes cannot function correctly [15].
The nine FERMT1 deletions hitherto described in the literature are predicted to result in complete loss of full-length kindlin-1 protein and diminished function [12,13,16,17,18,19,20,21,22].
  • Most of them are out-of-frame deletions and affect one or more exons.
  • Only one deletion, affecting exons 2–6, is reported to be in-frame with the annotation that the deletion range also contains the translation initiation site (TIS) ATG located in exon 2 [17].
  • A deletion eliminating exons 14 and 15 extended beyond the FERMT1 coding region and 3′UTR, leading to partial mRNA decay [16].
  • A large deletion (g.-711-1241del), that spanned the putative FERMT1 promoter sequence and the first noncoding exon of the gene including the predicted transcription start site, was associated with a complete blockade and prevention of FERMT1 transcription [18].
DNA double-stand breaks (DSBs) can be caused by endogenous and exogenous DNA damaging agents. Two major pathways are responsible for the repair of DSBs, i.e., homologous recombination and nonhomologous end-joining. If the repair is failing, these DSBs may result in chromosomal re-organization [23].
Blasting the insertion sequence “TTATATCCC” occurring between the two recombination sites resulted in a homologous sequence 7228 bp upstream, whereas sequencing of this region confirmed no conspicuousness.
Misaligned repetitive elements (e.g., Alu sequences) often serve as a mediator for homologous recombination [23,24,25]. Has (2006) calculated an abundance of 52% of all noncoding regions of FERMT1 as repetitive sequences. Almost half of these repeats represented Alu elements [13].
An analysis of intronic intersperced repeat elements around the breakpoints by the RepeatMasker software (http://www.repeatmasker.org/cgi-bin/WEBRepeatMasker), accessed on 5 November 2023, resulted in the matching repeats L1ME4b of the LINE/L1 family and AluSx of the SINE/Alu family at the 5′ and 3′ breakpoints, respectively. The homologous recombination of the deletion breakpoints embedded in these repeats could be mediated by a combination of these elements.
Zhou (2009) [12] reported a similar but different deletion of 3017 bp including exons 7–9. However, these authors assumed matrix attachment regions (MARs), rather than being mediated by Alu elements to cause homologous recombination. The short homology sequence “GA” across the deletion junction, the sequence “TTTAAA” near the 3′ breakpoint, and the MARs near the 5′ and 3′ breakpoints favor involvement in nonhomologous end-joining [12]. The homology region between the two breakpoints was not demonstrated in this case, instead, a 9 bp insertion occurs but linkage to the homologous sequence upstream does not seem to exist.
Most FERMT1 variants comprising nonsense, splice site, small indel, and missense variants can be detected by NGS EB panel sequencing and Sanger sequencing, which both represent the current diagnostic standard. However, in distinct cases, direct sequencing of the coding region of the FERMT1 gene may fail to reveal the underlying variant, which may partly also account for the rather limited number of published cases with large scale deletion (Table 1) [13,26]. Therefore, advanced screening approaches for FERMT1 gene variants must allow for the evaluation for large deletions. In addition, the molecular assessment of patients implicated to suffer from KEB includes other genes that cause KEB-like features [27,28,29]. For example, a homozygous sequence variant was identified at the +4 position of intron 2 in the USB1 gene, encoding an exoribonuclease required for processing of U6 snRNA, a critical component of spliceosomes and another homozygous donor splice site mutation involving exon/intron 5 of tetraspanin CD151, a component of hemidesmosomes, as well as a key player in wound healing and the re-epithelialization process [30,31], were identified to cause KEB-like phenotypes [32].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Study Approval

Informed written consent was obtained from the patient and his parents prior to sample collection. This study was performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics committee from Clínica Alemana Universidad del Desarrollo # 2017-85.

4.2. NGS-Based Variant Analysis

Genomic DNA was isolated from the peripheral blood of the patient and his mother and the saliva of the patient’s father. Commercial kits were used to isolate DNA from the samples. An EB-specific sequencing panel including the FERMT1 gene was used. Sequencing was performed on 10 ng of DNA from the patient with a Personal Genome Machine (PGM) from Life Technologies according to the protocol of the company and analyzed with the Ion Reporter Software (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

4.3. Primary Cell Isolation

A 4 mm punch biopsy was taken from uninjured skin from the patient’s lower back. The biopsy was collected in saline solution and taken immediately to the laboratory for processing. Primary fibroblasts of the patient’s skin and normal human skin were cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2, in DMEM (catalog no. SH30243.02; Cytiva/Hyclone, Emerville, CA, USA), which was supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (catalog no. F2442; Sigma-Aldrich, Darmstadt, Germany).
Primary keratinocytes of normal human skin were cultured at 37 °C with 5% CO2, in Epilife medium supplemented with HKGS and calcium chloride (catalog no. MEPICF500; Cascade, Portland, OR, USA).

4.4. PCR and Sanger Sequencing

All primers used for sequential PCR were designed by freeware Primer3 (v. 0.4.0) [https://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/], accessed on 5 March 2023. PCR was performed by GoTaq enzyme denaturing at 94 °C for 2min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 60 s. The reaction ended with incubation at 72 °C for 5 min (Promega, Fitchburg, MA, USA). The PCR products were purified and direct sequencing of the fragments was carried out with an ABI 3500 automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Waltham, MA, USA).

4.5. Real-Time PCR

Quantitative PCR analysis was performed using cDNAs derived from the patient’s fibroblast, as well as wildtype control fibroblast and keratinocyte cell culture. Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA was incubated with DNaseI (Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and transcribed into cDNA with the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Real-time PCR was performed with the GoTaq qPCR Master Mix (Promega, Fitchburg, MA, USA) on the CFX96 Real-Time PCR Detection System (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).
The primers used were FERMT1_6for 5′ACTCCTCACGCTCCCTTATG3′ and FERMT1_10rev 5′GGTTCTCCTTGTTCAAGTTCCT3′; GAPDH_8F 5′GCCAACGTGTCAGTGGTGGA3′ and GAPDH_9R 5′CACCACCCTGTTGCTGTAGCC3′ were used as the internal reference control. The thermocycling conditions included an initial step at 94 °C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 57 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 60 s, and the reaction ended with a melting curve.

4.6. Protein Isolation and Western Blot

Cells were lysed with a radioimmunoprecipitation assay (RIPA) buffer (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany) and centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 5 min. Clear supernatant was further used and frozen at −20 °C. Proteins were mixed with 4× loading buffer (0.25 M tris, 8% SGS, 30% glycerol, 0.02% bromphenol blue, pH 6.8) before denaturation at 95 °C for 5 min. Western blot analysis was then performed as previously described [33]. Ponceau red staining (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was used after blotting to estimate the protein loading. Nitrocellulose membrane was blocked via blocking reagent (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) diluted 1:10 in Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween (TBS-T) for 1 h at room temperature. Kindlin-1 was detected via a polyclonal antibody (#720123, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Rockford, IL, USA) at a dilution of 1:1000 in blocking reagent (diluted 1:20 in TBS-T). The membrane was incubated overnight at 4 °C with the first antibody. The antibody directed to Annexin I (catalog no. sc-12740; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Heidelberg, Germany) diluted 1:1000 in blocking reagent (diluted 1:10 in TBS-T) was used as the internal reference. A goat anti-rabbit HRP-labeled antibody (Dako, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used as the secondary antibody. The membrane was incubated for 1 h at a dilution of 1:5000 in TBS-T. Protein bands were visualized with the ECL Select Western blotting Detection Reagent (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) and the ChemiDoc MP Imaging System (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA). Densitometric analysis was performed using the software Image Lab (BioRad, Hercules, CA, USA).

5. Conclusions

Advanced molecular profiling including NGS exome and panel sequencing identified a novel homozygous 9385 bp deletion variant spanning exons 7–9 in the FERMT1 gene that was confirmed by profiling the 5′ and 3′ breakpoints and further analyses on the mRNA and protein levels. To our knowledge, this is the first large deletion identified in Malaysian patients with KEB, joining a collection of various large deletions and expanding the variant database.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.K.; methodology, F.L. and A.K.; software, A.K.; validation, M.L. and I.F.; formal analysis, A.K.; investigation, A.K., F.L., S.K., F.P., M.J.Y., S.V., M.J.A.K., E.-C.T. and I.F.; resources, A.K., I.F. and J.W.B.; data curation, I.F.; writing—original draft preparation, A.K. and I.F.; writing—review and editing, M.L., J.W.B., S.K. and I.F.; visualization, A.K.; supervision, I.F.; project administration, A.K.; funding acquisition, A.K., I.F. and J.W.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by DEBRA Austria and DEBRA Chile. Grant support from the National Medical Research Council (grant no. NMRC/CG/006/2021), Ministry of Health Singapore.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This work was conducted with the human subjects’ understanding and consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (1964).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this paper.

Data Availability Statement

The authors confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the patient and his parents for their participation in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
FERMT1Fermitin Family Member 1
bpBase Pair
cDNAComplementary DNA
CoControl
DelDeletion
DMEMDulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium
EBEpidermolysis Bullosa
FFather
GAPDHGlycerinaldehyd-3-phosphat-Dehydrogenase
GRCh37Genome Reference Consortium Human Build 37
HGMDHuman Genome Mutation Database
IGVIntegrative Genome Viewer
InsInsertion
JEBJunctional Epidermolysis bullosa
kbKilo base
KEB Kindler Epidermolysis bullosa
KIND1Kindlin 1
LAMB3Laminin, beta 3
MMother
mRNAMessenger Ribonucleic Acid
NGSNext Generation Sequencing
OMIMOnline Mendelian Inheritance in Man
PPatient
qPCRQuantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction
RTRevere Transcription
UV-BUltraviolet-B

References

  1. Kindler, T. Congenital Poikiloderma with Traumatic Bulla Formation and Progressive Cutaneous Atrophy. Br. J. Dermatol. 1954, 66, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Has, C.; Bauer, J.W.; Bodemer, C.; Bolling, M.C.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L.; Diem, A.; Fine, J.-D.; Heagerty, A.; Hovnanian, A.; Marinkovich, M.P.; et al. Consensus reclassification of inherited epidermolysis bullosa and other disorders with skin fragility. Br. J. Dermatol. 2020, 183, 614–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Fischer, I.A.; Kazandjieva, J.; Vassileva, S.; Dourmishev, A. Kindler syndrome: A case report and proposal for clinical diagnostic criteria. Acta Dermatovenerol Alp Pannonica Adriat 2005, 14, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  4. Meng, L.; Yang, X.; Wu, Y.; Zhao, Z.; Yang, L.; Li, M.; Wang, X.; Zhang, G. A novel frameshift mutation in the FERMT1 gene in a Chinese patient with Kindler syndrome. Exp. Ther. Med. 2020, 20, 103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sadler, E.; Klausegger, A.; Muss, W.; Deinsberger, U.; Pohla-Gubo, G.; Laimer, M.; Lanschuetzer, C.; Bauer, J.W.; Hintner, H. Novel KIND1 gene mutation in Kindler syndrome with severe gastrointestinal tract involvement. Arch. Dermatol. 2006, 142, 1619–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chopkar, A.; Malpani, S.S.; Supekar, B.B.; Mukhi, J.I. Kindler syndrome: A rare case report. J. Clin. Images Med. Case Rep. 2021, 2, 1344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Siegel, D.H.; Ashton, G.H.S.; Penagos, H.G.; Lee, J.V.; Feiler, H.S.; Wilhelmsen, K.C.; South, A.P.; Smith, F.J.D.; Prescott, A.R.; Wessagowit, V.; et al. Loss of kindlin-1, a human homolog of the Caenorhabditis elegans actin-extracellular-matrix linker protein UNC-112, causes Kindler syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 2003, 73, 174–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Has, C.; Castiglia, D.; del Rio, M.; Diez, M.G.; Piccinni, E.; Kiritsi, D.; Kohlhase, J.; Itin, P.; Martin, L.; Fischer, J.; et al. Kindler syndrome: Extension of FERMT1 mutational spectrum and natural history. Hum. Mutat. 2011, 32, 1204–1212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Maier, K.; He, Y.; Wölfle, U.; Esser, P.R.; Brummer, T.; Schempp, C.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L.; Has, C. UV-B-induced cutaneous inflammation and prospects for antioxidant treatment in Kindler syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2016, 25, 5339–5352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Robinson, J.T.; Thorvaldsdóttir, H.; Winckler, W.; Guttman, M.; Lander, E.S.; Getz, G.; Mesirov, J.P. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat. Biotechnol. 2011, 29, 24–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Martignago, B.; Lai-Cheong, J.; Liu, L.; Mc Grath, J.; Cestari, T. Recurrent KIND1 (C20orf42) gene mutation, c.676insC, in a Brazilian pedigree with Kindler syndrome. Br. J. Dermatol. 2007, 157, 1281–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Zhou, C.; Song, S.; Zhang, J. A novel 3017-bp deletion mutation in the FERMT1 (KIND1) gene in a Chinese family with Kindler syndrome. Br. J. Dermatol. 2009, 160, 1119–1122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Has, C.; Wessagowit, V.; Pascucci, M.; Baer, C.; Didona, B.; Wilhelm, C.; Pedicelli, C.; Locatelli, A.; Kohlhase, J.; Ashton, G.H.; et al. Molecular basis of Kindler syndrome in Italy: Novel and recurrent Alu/Alu recombination, splice site, nonsense, and frameshift mutations in the KIND1 gene. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2006, 126, 1776–1783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kaçar, N.; Semerci, N.; Ergin, Ş.; Pascucci, M.; Zambruno, G.; Castiglia, D. A novel frameshift mutation in the KIND1 gene in Turkish siblings with Kindler syndrome. Br. J. Dermatol. 2008, 158, 1375–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Has, C.; Ludwig, R.; Herz, C.; Kern, J.; Ussar, S.; Ochsendorf, F.; Kaufmann, R.; Schumann, H.; Kohlhase, J.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L. C-terminally truncated kindlin-1 leads to abnormal adhesion and migration of keratinocytes. Br. J. Dermatol. 2008, 159, 1192–1196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Has, C.; Yordanova, I.; Balabanova, M.; Kazandjieva, J.; Herz, C.; Kohlhase, J.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L. A novel large FERMT1 (KIND1) gene deletion in Kindler syndrome. J. Dermatol. Sci. 2008, 52, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gao, Y.; Bai, J.-L.; Liu, X.-Y.; Qu, Y.-J.; Cao, Y.-Y.; Wang, J.-C.; Jin, Y.-W.; Wang, H.; Song, F. A novel large deletion mutation of FERMT1 gene in a Chinese patient with Kindler syndrome. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B 2015, 16, 957–962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Fuchs-Telem, D.; Nousbeck, J.; Singer, A.; McGrath, J.A.; Sarig, O.; Sprecher, E. New intragenic and promoter region deletion mutations in FERMT1 underscore genetic homogeneity in Kindler syndrome. Clin. Exp. Dermatol. 2014, 39, 361–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Has, C.; Chmel, N.; Levati, L.; Neri, I.; Sonnenwald, T.; Pigors, M.; Godbole, K.; Dudhbhate, A.; Bruckner-Tuderman, L.; Zambruno, G.; et al. FERMT1 promoter mutations in patients with Kindler syndrome. Clin. Genet. 2015, 88, 248–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Youssefian, L.; Vahidnezhad, H.; Barzegar, M.; Li, Q.; Sotoudeh, S.; Yazdanfar, A.; Ehsani, A.H.; Kajbafzadeh, A.-M.; Mozafari, N.; Daryani, N.E.; et al. The Kindler syndrome: A spectrum of FERMT1 mutations in Iranian families. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2015, 135, 1447–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Vahidnezhad, H.; Youssefian, L.; Saeidian, A.H.; Touati, A.; Sotoudeh, S.; Abiri, M.; Barzegar, M.; Aghazadeh, N.; Mahmoudi, H.; Norouz-Zadeh, S.; et al. Multigene Next-Generation Sequencing Panel Identifies Pathogenic Variants in Patients with Unknown Subtype of Epidermolysis Bullosa: Subclassification with Prognostic Implications. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2017, 137, 2649–2652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fukushi, R.; Tsuboi, R.; Maeda, T.; Kanda, Y.; Sakai, N.; Suzuki, S.; Harada, K. A case of Kindler syndrome in a young Indian female with exon deletion. Int. J. Dermatol. 2019, 58, e19–e21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Brugmans, L.; Kanaar, R.; Essers, J. Analysis of DNA double-strand break repair pathways in mice. Mutat. Res. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2007, 614, 95–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Toffolatti, L.; Cardazzo, B.; Nobile, C.; Danieli, G.; Gualandi, F.; Muntoni, F.; Abbs, S.; Zanetti, P.; Angelini, C.; Ferlini, A. Investigating the mechanism of chromosomal deletion: Characterization of 39 deletion breakpoints in introns 47 and 48 of the human dystrophin gene. Genomics 2002, 80, 523–530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rüdiger, N.S.; Gregersen, N.; Kielland-Brandt, M.C. One short well conserved region of Alu-sequences is involved in human gene rearrangements and has homology with prokaryotic chi. Nucleic Acids Res. 1995, 23, 256–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Jobard, F.; Bouadjar, B.; Caux, F.; Hadj-Rabia, S.; Has, C.; Matsuda, F.; Weissenbach, J.; Lathrop, M.; Prud’Homme, J.-F.; Fischer, J. Identification of mutations in a new gene encoding a FERM family protein with a pleckstrin homology domain in Kindler syndrome. Hum. Mol. Genet. 2003, 12, 925–935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Has, C.; Kiritsi, D.; Mellerio, J.E.; Franzke, C.-W.; Wedgeworth, E.; Tantcheva-Poor, I.; Kernland-Lang, K.; Itin, P.; Simpson, M.A.; Dopping-Hepenstal, P.J.; et al. The missense mutation p.R1303Q in type XVII collagen underlies junctional epidermolysis bullosa resembling Kindler syndrome. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2014, 134, 845–849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Lai-Cheong, J.; Ussar, S.; Arita, K.; Hart, I.; McGrath, J. Colocalization of kindlin-1, kindlin-2, and migfilin at keratinocyte focal adhesion and relevance to the pathophysiology of Kindler syndrome. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2008, 128, 2156–2165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Vahidnezhad, H.; Youssefian, L.; Saeidian, A.H.; Boyden, L.M.; Touati, A.; Harvey, N.; Naji, M.; Zabihi, M.; Barzegar, M.; Sotoudeh, S.; et al. Kindler epidermolysis bullosa-like skin phenotype and downregulated basement membrane zone gene expression in poikiloderma with neutropenia and a homozygous USB1 mutation. Matrix Biol. 2021, 99, 43–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Geary, S.M.; Cowin, A.J.; Copeland, B.; Baleato, R.M.; Miyazaki, K.; Ashman, L.K. The role of the tetraspanin CD151 in primary keratinocyte and fibroblast functions: Implications for wound healing. Exp. Cell Res. 2008, 314, 2165–2175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Cowin, A.J.; Adams, D.; Geary, S.M.; Wright, M.D.; Jones, J.C.; Ashman, L.K. Wound healing is defective in mice lacking tetraspanin CD151. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2006, 126, 680–689. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Vahidnezhad, H.; Youssefian, L.; Saeidian, A.H.; Mahmoudi, H.; Touati, A.; Abiri, M.; Kajbafzadeh, A.-M.; Aristodemou, S.; Liu, L.; McGrath, J.A.; et al. Recessive mutation in tetraspanin CD151 causes Kindler syndrome-like epidermolysis bullosa with mul-ti-systemic manifestations including nephropathy. Matrix Biol. 2018, 66, 22–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Koller, U.; Hainzl, S.; Kocher, T.; Hüttner, C.; Klausegger, A.; Gruber, C.; Mayr, E.; Wally, V.; Bauer, J.W.; Murauer, E.M. Trans-splicing improvement by the combined application of antisense strategies. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 1179–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Clinical features of patient. (a,b,f) Poikiloderma; (b) nails dystrophy with brownish discoloration and parallel lines of nail plate; (c) proximal pseudosyndactyly and absence of linearity in palms; (d) patient had undergone oral reconstruction due to severe microstomia with maximal interincisal opening of 6 mm; angular cheilitis; severe caries and lower lip leukoplakia. (e) early teeth extraction showing hypoplastic pitted syndromic amelogenesis imperfecta with generalized pits.
Figure 1. Clinical features of patient. (a,b,f) Poikiloderma; (b) nails dystrophy with brownish discoloration and parallel lines of nail plate; (c) proximal pseudosyndactyly and absence of linearity in palms; (d) patient had undergone oral reconstruction due to severe microstomia with maximal interincisal opening of 6 mm; angular cheilitis; severe caries and lower lip leukoplakia. (e) early teeth extraction showing hypoplastic pitted syndromic amelogenesis imperfecta with generalized pits.
Ijms 26 04237 g001
Figure 2. IGV illustration on EB Panel Next Generation Sequencing. Exonic copy number analysis revealed absence of sequencing reads for exons 7, 8, and 9.
Figure 2. IGV illustration on EB Panel Next Generation Sequencing. Exonic copy number analysis revealed absence of sequencing reads for exons 7, 8, and 9.
Ijms 26 04237 g002
Figure 3. A schematic illustration of the 9385 bp deletion in the FERMT1 genomic region spanning exons 7–9: (a) The Sanger sequence of the patient’s 894 bp fragment revealed 5′ and 3′ breakpoints (chr20:6,083,980; chr20:6,074,596, GRCh37/hg19) within intron 6 and 9, thereby confirming the 9 kb deletion with an 9 bp insertion instead (TTATATCCC). (b) Verification of the deletion by two different polymerase chain reactions. The primer combination pr6F6 and pr9R2 (both located outside of the deletion) was used to amplify the region spanning the breakpoints. Its application resulted in a fragment of 894 bp in the homozygous patient and heterozygous parents, reflecting the deleted allele. A dashed line is delineating the indel region. A single band of 894 bp was observed in the homozygous patient (P) and his heterozygous mother (M) and father (F), whereas the wildtype sample (WT) without deletion is lacking the band (left panel). A 496 bp fragment using primer pr9F7 (located within the deletion region) and pr9R7 (located outside) was observed only in the mother (M), father (F), and the wildtype sample (WT). An amplification within the patient’s deletion region was not found.
Figure 3. A schematic illustration of the 9385 bp deletion in the FERMT1 genomic region spanning exons 7–9: (a) The Sanger sequence of the patient’s 894 bp fragment revealed 5′ and 3′ breakpoints (chr20:6,083,980; chr20:6,074,596, GRCh37/hg19) within intron 6 and 9, thereby confirming the 9 kb deletion with an 9 bp insertion instead (TTATATCCC). (b) Verification of the deletion by two different polymerase chain reactions. The primer combination pr6F6 and pr9R2 (both located outside of the deletion) was used to amplify the region spanning the breakpoints. Its application resulted in a fragment of 894 bp in the homozygous patient and heterozygous parents, reflecting the deleted allele. A dashed line is delineating the indel region. A single band of 894 bp was observed in the homozygous patient (P) and his heterozygous mother (M) and father (F), whereas the wildtype sample (WT) without deletion is lacking the band (left panel). A 496 bp fragment using primer pr9F7 (located within the deletion region) and pr9R7 (located outside) was observed only in the mother (M), father (F), and the wildtype sample (WT). An amplification within the patient’s deletion region was not found.
Ijms 26 04237 g003
Figure 4. Verification of the 9385 bp deletion and variant consequences at mRNA and protein levels. (a) RT-PCR analysis of total RNA from patient fibroblasts resulted in a unique PCR product of 197 bp, which was threefold concentrated and vaporized before gel loading. Amplification from wildtype keratinocytes revealed the normal product of 487 bp. Mw, 100 bp DNA ladder. (b) The 197 bp PCR product was sequenced by Sanger and corresponded to an out-of-frame transcript (del 290 bp) carrying the deletion of exons 7, 8, and 9. (c) Measurement by quantitative real-time PCR. qPCR analysis was performed using cDNA derived from patient’s fibroblasts, as well as wildtype control fibroblast and keratinocyte cell culture. RT-Primers were located within the sequence of exons 6 and 10 surrounding the deletion (for primer sequences refer to 4.5). The results are depicted as relative expression levels set to a value of 1 for wildtype fibroblasts and normalized to the GAPDH gene +/− standard error. Patient’s mRNA from fibroblasts did not show any amplification. Wildtype mRNA from keratinocytes resulted in a ~10× higher expression compared to wildtype mRNA from fibroblasts. (d) Western blot analysis. Incubation with an antibody directed against kindlin-1 indicates complete loss of kindlin protein in patient’s fibroblasts. The healthy keratinocytes show a higher expression level compared to the control fibroblasts. Antibody directed to Annexin I served as the loading control.
Figure 4. Verification of the 9385 bp deletion and variant consequences at mRNA and protein levels. (a) RT-PCR analysis of total RNA from patient fibroblasts resulted in a unique PCR product of 197 bp, which was threefold concentrated and vaporized before gel loading. Amplification from wildtype keratinocytes revealed the normal product of 487 bp. Mw, 100 bp DNA ladder. (b) The 197 bp PCR product was sequenced by Sanger and corresponded to an out-of-frame transcript (del 290 bp) carrying the deletion of exons 7, 8, and 9. (c) Measurement by quantitative real-time PCR. qPCR analysis was performed using cDNA derived from patient’s fibroblasts, as well as wildtype control fibroblast and keratinocyte cell culture. RT-Primers were located within the sequence of exons 6 and 10 surrounding the deletion (for primer sequences refer to 4.5). The results are depicted as relative expression levels set to a value of 1 for wildtype fibroblasts and normalized to the GAPDH gene +/− standard error. Patient’s mRNA from fibroblasts did not show any amplification. Wildtype mRNA from keratinocytes resulted in a ~10× higher expression compared to wildtype mRNA from fibroblasts. (d) Western blot analysis. Incubation with an antibody directed against kindlin-1 indicates complete loss of kindlin protein in patient’s fibroblasts. The healthy keratinocytes show a higher expression level compared to the control fibroblasts. Antibody directed to Annexin I served as the loading control.
Ijms 26 04237 g004
Table 1. A comprehensive collection of the large deletions in FERMT1 compiled from the literature. Diagnostic PCR for detecting the specific deletions including primer sequences is listed whenever made available in the literature.
Table 1. A comprehensive collection of the large deletions in FERMT1 compiled from the literature. Diagnostic PCR for detecting the specific deletions including primer sequences is listed whenever made available in the literature.
SizePrimer ReversePrimer ForwardDiagnostic
PCR
ReferenceExonDeletionVariantGeographic OriginConsanguinitySexAgePatient
362 bpGTGCATGTGTTGCTACGTGCTGCCTGTAATCCCAGCTACCintron 9/11[13]10–113919 bpg.70250_74168delSouthern Italy (Calabria)NoF411
362 bpGTGCATGTGTTGCTACGTGCTGCCTGTAATCCCAGCTACCintron 9/11[13]10–113919 bpg.70250_74168delSouthern Italy (Calabria)YesF162
362 bpGTGCATGTGTTGCTACGTGCTGCCTGTAATCCCAGCTACCintron 9/11[13]10–113919 bpg.70250_74168delSouthern Italy (Calabria)YesF253
2 kbGGCTGCCAATAATGTTGGTTCTTGCACCAGCTACCCTCTCintron 13/15[16]14–158241 bpg.80929_89169del *Southern BulgariaNoM324
2 kbGGCTGCCAATAATGTTGGTTCTTGCACCAGCTACCCTCTCintron 13/15[16]14–158241 bpg.80929_89169del *Southern BulgariaNoF285
2 kbGGCTGCCAATAATGTTGGTTCTTGCACCAGCTACCCTCTCintron 13/15[16]14–158241 bpg.80929_89169del *Southern BulgariaNoF566
763 bpATGACAGAGCCCATTTCCTGAGGCAAGCAGTTAGGCCTAATintron 1/6[17]2–617,251 bpg.6121241_6103991delChinaYesF77
425 bpCTTGGCATTGAACTGTTCGAGGGGACAGAACAAGACTCCApromoter/intron 1[18]1_TSS 21952 bpg.-711-1241delMiddle EasternYesFn.a.8
425 bpCTTGGCATTGAACTGTTCGAGGGGACAGAACAAGACTCCApromoter/intron 1[18]1_TSS 21952 bpg.-711-1241delMiddle EasternYesFn.a.9
425 bpCTTGGCATTGAACTGTTCGAGGGGACAGAACAAGACTCCApromoter/intron 1[18]1_TSS 21952 bpg.-711-1241delMiddle EasternYesMn.a.10
425 bpCTTGGCATTGAACTGTTCGAGGGGACAGAACAAGACTCCApromoter/intron 1[18]1_TSS 21952 bpg.-711-1241delMiddle EasternYesMn.a.11
2693 bpGCTCTCCAGGGCATTACAAGCAATGCCACAGAAAGCTGAApromo1/intron 1[19]1_TSS 238,222 bpg.6140393_6102171
delinsCAAACTGA
IndiaYesM412
425 bpCTTGGCATTGAACTGTTCGAGGGGACAGAACAAGACTCCApromoter/intron 1[19]1_TSS 21952 bpg.-711-1241delSouthern Italia (West Sicily)NoM2213
362 bpGTGCATGTGTTGCTACGTGCTGCCTGTAATCCCAGCTACCintron 9/11[19]10–113919 bpg.70250_74168del *Southern Italia (West Sicily)NoM1514
400 bpAGCCCAAGGGGAGGTATATT 3TGGCTCACGCCTGTAATTC 3intron 6/9[12]7–8–93017 bpg.63601_66617delChinaYesM2315
894 bpGCCAAATATGAGGGCAATTTTACAATGCTTTACAGTGGCAAAintron 6/9this study7–8–99385 bpg.6083980_6074596
delinsTTATATCCC
MalaysiaYesM3316
n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.[20]52664 bp 1g.6109607_6112272delIranYesn.a. n.a.17
n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.[21]107055 bpc.(1139+1_1265-1)delTurkeyYesF1318
n.a.n.a.n.a.n.a.[22]10–11not definednot definedIndiaYesF2119
* Combined heterozygous to c.-20A>G; 1 Alu-mediated deletion; 2 TSS_putative transcription start site; 3 diagnostic primer sequence designed for this study; n.a., not available.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Klausegger, A.; Leditzky, F.; Krämer, S.; Palisson, F.; Yubero, M.J.; Véliz, S.; Koh, M.J.A.; Tan, E.-C.; Laimer, M.; Bauer, J.W.; et al. A Novel Homozygous 9385 bp Deletion in the FERMT1 (KIND1) Gene in a Malaysian Family with Kindler Epidermolysis bullosa and a Review of Large Deletions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 4237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094237

AMA Style

Klausegger A, Leditzky F, Krämer S, Palisson F, Yubero MJ, Véliz S, Koh MJA, Tan E-C, Laimer M, Bauer JW, et al. A Novel Homozygous 9385 bp Deletion in the FERMT1 (KIND1) Gene in a Malaysian Family with Kindler Epidermolysis bullosa and a Review of Large Deletions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(9):4237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094237

Chicago/Turabian Style

Klausegger, Alfred, Fabian Leditzky, Susanne Krämer, Francis Palisson, María Joao Yubero, Sebastián Véliz, Mark Jean Aan Koh, Ene-Choo Tan, Martin Laimer, Johann Wolfgang Bauer, and et al. 2025. "A Novel Homozygous 9385 bp Deletion in the FERMT1 (KIND1) Gene in a Malaysian Family with Kindler Epidermolysis bullosa and a Review of Large Deletions" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 9: 4237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094237

APA Style

Klausegger, A., Leditzky, F., Krämer, S., Palisson, F., Yubero, M. J., Véliz, S., Koh, M. J. A., Tan, E.-C., Laimer, M., Bauer, J. W., & Fuentes, I. (2025). A Novel Homozygous 9385 bp Deletion in the FERMT1 (KIND1) Gene in a Malaysian Family with Kindler Epidermolysis bullosa and a Review of Large Deletions. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(9), 4237. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094237

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop