Next Article in Journal
Heart Failure and Arrhythmias: Circadian and Epigenetic Interplay in Myocardial Electrophysiology
Previous Article in Journal
Immunotherapies Targeting CD123 and CD303: A New Frontier in Treating Blastic Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Neoplasm
Previous Article in Special Issue
Aspirin Foliar Spray-Induced Changes in Light Energy Use Efficiency, Chloroplast Ultrastructure, and ROS Generation in Tomato
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance

by
Michael Moustakas
Department of Botany, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(6), 2731; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062731
Submission received: 2 March 2025 / Accepted: 11 March 2025 / Published: 18 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance)

1. Introduction

Global climate change compromises sufficient food production, and it is estimated that it may be reduced by 11–25% at the end of this century [1,2]. During their life cycle, plants are constantly exposed to numerous biotic and abiotic stresses that adversely influence plant growth and development, and also crop production [3,4]. Ensuring food security will demand mitigating or compensating the crop damages caused by exaggerating adverse environmental conditions [5,6,7,8].
Plants have developed several mechanisms that allow them to avoid and/or tolerate abiotic stresses through morphological and physiological adjustments [3,4,9]. The morphological adjustments that provide an escape from drought stress, for example, involve a decreased leaf area, an increased leaf thickness, leaf rolling or folding to minimize evapotranspiration, reduced stomatal number and conductance, and also an increased root system [9]. Drought physiological tolerance traits associated with the preservation of the water status involve osmotic adjustment through the accumulation of osmolytes that help plants acclimate to water deficit [9].
Environmental stress conditions result in oxidative stress induced by reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation (Figure 1) [10,11,12]. The superoxide anion radical (O2), the hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), and the singlet oxygen (1O2) are the main ROS produced in plant cells, mainly in the light reactions of photosynthesis, but are kept in homeostasis by the antioxidative enzymatic and non-enzymatic systems [12,13,14,15,16,17].
The beneficial effect of a small-dose or short-duration exposure to a stressor of an organism that is followed by a destructive effect at a larger dose or longer duration exposure to the same stressor has been termed “hormesis” [19,20,21]. However, a small-dose or short-duration exposure to a stressor that causes metabolic inhibition and a larger-dose or longer-duration exposure that results in metabolic stimulation have also been described as a hormetic response [22,23,24,25]. This Special Issue highlights some molecular mechanisms of plant tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses that can assist in the development of realistic interventions for increasing agricultural productivity.

2. Mechanisms to Abiotic Stress Tolerance

As one of the most essential macro-nutrients for plant growth and development, nitrogen (N) is a key aspect that regulates crop yield [26], and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) is important for sustainable agriculture [27]. Soto-Cerda et al. [27] evaluated 123 accessions of Linum usitatissimum L. (flax) at the seedling stage for NUE-related traits under optimum N and N deficiency. They explored the genetic architecture of NUE-related traits by means of a multi-omics approach integrating genome-wide association studies (GWASs), transcriptome analysis, and genomic selection (GS). QTL dataset identified the candidate genes of NUE-related traits for further studies and suggested genomic breeding tools to accomplish superior NUE under low N input in Linum usitatissimum L. [27]. The authors recommended the use of GWAS-derived QTL associated with a target trait since it is the most precise, cost-effective, and computationally advantageous for NUE and other quantitative traits in flax [27].
The main source of the important element N for terrestrial plants is nitrate (NO3−), which plants absorb from the soil using specific transport mechanisms in the plasma membranes of the root cells [28]. Under low nitrate concentrations in soils that limit plant growth, nitrogen supply is displayed by the high-affinity NO3− transporters of the NRT2 family [29]. By cloning two genes of the high-affinity NO3− transporters, SaNRT2.1 and SaNRT2.5, from the euhalophyte Suaeda altissima to Arabidopsis thaliana, Khramov et al. [30] observed an increased expression of both genes under 500 mM NaCl (15-fold rise in SaNRT2.1 and 150-fold for SaNRT2.5). They suggested that SaNRT2.5 warrants a successful NO3− uptake by roots and functions as a fundamental high-affinity nitrate transporter under N deficiency of S. altissima plants [30]. A successful nitrate uptake and the consequential nitrogen assimilation serve as a feasible energy dissipation path safeguarding effective photosynthesis under high light conditions [31].
Jacalin-related lectins (JRLs) are broadly distributed in plants and are engaged in plant development and abiotic stress responses [32]. Quan et al. [32] examined the roles of JRLs in barley’s response to N deficiency and identified 32 HvJRL genes distributed at both ends of the seven barley chromosomes. Using transcriptome analysis, they identified in two barley genotypes with different N deficiency tolerance nine differentially expressed genes (DEGs) that encoded eight HvJRL proteins and suggested that the identified HvJRL DEGs could offer new candidate genes for tolerance to N deficiency [32].
Defoliation, which is the premature removal of leaves by cutting or grazing, is considered an unavoidable abiotic stress for forage and turf grasses [33]. Vegetative regrowth following defoliation is a decisive trait defining the persistence and productivity of these grasses [33]. Regrowth vigor is associated with photosynthetic ability, especially at the early stages of defoliation [33]. Sakashita et al. [33] using physiological and genetic analyses concluded that the regulation of vegetative regrowth upon defoliation in the newly emerged leaves is initiated by the de novo carbohydrate synthesis and the proper carbohydrate management.
Heat stress negatively impacts plant growth, development, and grain yield [34]. Zea mays (maize) production is severely affected by heat stress that is usually accompanied by drought stress [35]. The transcription factor ZmNF-YA1, which was identified as a positive regulator of the drought stress response in maize [36], was also identified to contribute to maize thermotolerance [35].
Cold stress is among the harmful abiotic stresses that affect plant growth and development, limiting the geographical distribution of plants and reducing plant quality and productivity [37]. Dou et al. [38], using RNA sequencing, identified 24,695 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in two cultivars of a tropical ornamental flower (Anthurium andraeanum) that had contrasting cold tolerance. From these DEGs, 9132 were common in the tolerant and susceptible cultivar, providing a basis for elucidating the mechanism of cold tolerance in A. andraeanum and the potential targets for molecular breeding.

3. Biostimulants in Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance

The agricultural industry has increasingly been focusing on the utilization of biostimulants for enhancing plant growth and crop production under both non-stress and stress conditions [39,40,41]. Owing to global climate change, agricultural yields have been significantly reduced, affecting global food security [42]. Melatonin (MT) molecules are considered to be hormones having a widespread distribution from prokaryotic bacteria to higher plants, which can be used to enhance crop yield by acting as photosynthetic biostimulants [41,43]. Muhammad et al. [44], reviewing the current literature on the beneficial impact of MT on plants under abiotic stress conditions, reported that under drought stress conditions, MT improved water use efficiency and reduced transpiration rate. They also described that MT employs protective effects against low humidity, heavy metal stress, nutrient deficiency, salinity, extreme temperatures, and waterlogging by upregulating the photosynthetic function and balancing ROS production [44].
Wu et al. [45], in a review article, highlight the pivotal role of MT and mepiquate chloride (MC) in regulating cotton growth and yield under abiotic stress conditions, emphasizing specifically cotton’s morpho-physiological and biochemical activities and their biosynthetic signaling and transduction pathways. Cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.), cultivated for the textile industry, is an economic crop that accounts for 35% of the worldwide fiber consumption [46]. MT and MC, by improving net photosynthetic activity, cell enlargement, antioxidant enzymes, and cytokinins, alleviated the adverse effects of abiotic stress in cotton and increased its yield [45].
Aspirin, which is extensively used in human health, can also be beneficial for plant health [47]. Aspirin is the trade name for acetylsalicylic acid, which, by hydrolysis, produces salicylic acid. Salicylic acid is a plant hormone produced in plant chloroplasts and its concentration is enhanced in response to biotic or abiotic stresses [48]. Aspirin foliar spray in tomatoes acts osmoregulatory, offering antioxidant protection, keeping a higher fraction of open reaction centers, and enhancing photosystem II (PSII) photochemistry (ΦPSII) [47]. Furthermore, it reduces ROS formation, decreasing the excess excitation energy on PSII and by acting as a photosynthetic biostimulant it can enhance crop yield [47].

4. Abiotic Stress Signal Recognition and Transduction

The response of plants to abiotic stress factors depends not only on the severity, the duration, the rate (number of times) at which the stress is imposed, and on the synergistic or antagonistic impact of stress combination, but also on the plant species, the organ or tissue affected, the developmental stage, and the genotype in question [49]. Failure to counteract a severe stress can result in the plant death (Figure 2a). Environmental stress signals that are received and recognized by plants are communicated throughout the plant and within cells (Figure 2b). After environmental stress recognition, the transduction of signals results in altered gene expression, which in turn modifies metabolism and plant development [49]. Global climate change severely impacts the information perceived by plants affecting plant physiology, defense, and development [4].
To perceive stress signals and to transduce these signals to intracellular responses, plants rely on protein kinases that initiate protein phosphorylation reactions which lead to structural changes in proteins, modulating their activity [50,51]. Protein kinases, like mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), calcium-dependent protein kinases, or receptor-like kinases (RLKs), play a fundamental role in modulating plant growth and development during abiotic stress [52,53]. Gandhi and Oelmüller [53], in a review article, discuss the available information on membrane-bound receptor-like kinases (RLKs), their role in abiotic stress tolerance, and their role in influencing plant–environment interactions, and they suggest possible novel approaches to engineer stress-tolerant crop varieties [53].
Plants recognize light signals through photoreceptors, between which phytochromes are the primary receptors responsible for absorbing red light (R)/far-red light (FR) [54,55]. Phytochromes are not only involved in regulating plant growth and development but also they play a vital role in facilitating plants to handle different abiotic stresses such as drought, salinity, high/low temperatures, and high/low light intensity [56]. Qiu et al. [56] reviewed recent studies on the mechanisms of action of phytochromes in plant stress tolerance and discussed the importance of modulating the genes involved in the phytochrome signaling pathways to coordinate plant growth, development, and stress responses.
The class of the peptide hormones C-TERMINALLY ENCODED PEPTIDEs (CEPs) play a principal role in regulating the response of plants to abiotic stress [57,58]. Mei et al. [59] identified 54, 59, 34, and 35 CEP genes from Gossypium hirsutum (2n = 4x = 52, AD1), G. barbadense (AD2), G. arboreum (2n = 2X = 26, A2), and G. raimondii (2n = 2X = 26, D5), respectively, and categorized cotton CEP genes into two subgroups based on their domain differentiation. They concluded that cotton CEP genes are generally expressed throughout the whole plant, but some genes display specific expression patterns [59].
Song et al. [60] examined the characteristics and functional divergence of universal stress proteins (USPs) in blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum). Universal stress proteins (USPs) perform important roles in hormonal regulation and plant development, and also in abiotic stress responses [60]. Song et al. [60] identified 72 VcUSP genes from the Genome Database of Vaccinium that could be divided into five groups based on their phylogenetic relationships [60]. From the 72 VcUSP genes, 21 VcUSPs responded to UV-B radiation, 7 responded to exogenous ABA, and 2 could act as bridges integrating UV-B and ABA signaling [60].
The cuticle that covers the outer epidermal surface of most above-ground tissues of plants prevents water loss, forming a diffusion barrier that limits water and solute transport, and protects the plants against pest and pathogen attack, and from chemical and mechanical damage, contributing to environmental adaptation [61,62]. However, even when stomata are completely closed, leaves still lose water, which can be defined by the leaf minimum conductance [63]. The cuticular wax biosynthesis was revealed to be regulated at the transcriptional level [64]. Liu et al. [65] identified the wheat MYB transcription factor TaMYB30 as a transcriptional activator that positively regulates wheat wax biosynthesis, probably via the transcriptional activation of TaKCS1 and TaECR. Increasing photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) was reported to increase cuticular wax deposition without altering the relative lipid composition or the rate of foliar water loss [66]. However, cuticular thickness, which was found to vary inversely with high temperatures, may impact photosynthetic capacity [67].
Karst regions, portrayed by a thin soil layer, are sensitive to climate change effects, especially changes in precipitation which can affect the survival of most at-risk species, leading to the extinction of particularly small plant populations [68,69]. Wu et al. [70] explored the molecular mechanisms involved in the drought tolerance of the endemic in the karst mountain areas, medicinal species Illicium difengpi (Schisandraceae), and concluded that abscisic acid (ABA), methyl jasmonate (MeJA), and zeatin riboside (ZR) play a regulatory role in the drought tolerance response of I. difengpi plants, while they identified by transcriptomics the key genes involved in the signal transduction [70].

5. Crop Damage by Biotic Stress

Biotic stress is estimated to reduce universal crop production by 5–30%, and the damage can be as high as 50% in the lack of insecticide application [71]. Aphids, one of the most noteworthy pests in worldwide agriculture, through sucking phloem sap, cause damage to crops and other plants, spreading plant viruses, and reducing photosynthetic efficiency [72]. Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (CYP450s) accomplish a range of physiological roles, including pesticide resistance [73]. Wang et al. [72] identified a total of 1100 CYP450 genes at the whole genome level in 19 aphid species. Differential expression analysis of CYP450 genes in the cereal crop aphids Sitobion miscanthi, Schizaphis graminum, Rhopalosiphum padi, and Diuraphis noxia provided evidence of organ specificity genes, tissue specificity genes, growth stage specificity genes, and detoxification metabolic genes among the four cereal crop aphids [72].

6. Conclusions

This Special Issue comprises 17 articles covering the different molecular mechanisms of abiotic stress tolerance. However, due to global climate change, which exaggerates the adverse environmental conditions, the plant tolerance mechanisms to abiotic stresses need additional investigation for a better understanding of the responses of plants to stress factors. This can help in the development of realistic interventions for increasing agricultural productivity.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Wing, I.S.; De Cian, E.; Mistry, M.N. Global vulnerability of crop yields to climate change. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 2021, 109, 102462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Moustakas, M.; Panteris, E.; Moustaka, J.; Aydın, T.; Bayçu, G.; Sperdouli, I. Modulation of photosystem II function in celery via foliar-applied salicylic acid during gradual water deficit stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Moustakas, M.; Sperdouli, I.; Moustaka, J. Early drought stress warning in plants: Color pictures of photosystem II photochemistry. Climate 2022, 10, 179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Apostolova, E.L. Molecular mechanisms associated with plant tolerance upon abiotic stress. Plants 2024, 13, 3532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dalin, C.; Wada, Y.; Kastner, T.; Puma, M.J. Groundwater depletion embedded in international food trade. Nature 2017, 543, 700–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kim, J.S.; Kug, J.-S.; Jeong, S.-J.; Huntzinger, D.N.; Michalak, A.M.; Schwalm, C.R.; Wei, Y.; Schaefer, K. Reduced North American terrestrial primary productivity linked to anomalous Arctic warming. Nat. Geosci. 2017, 10, 572–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, C.; Liu, B.; Piao, S.; Wang, X.; Lobell, D.B.; Huang, Y.; Huang, M.; Yao, Y.; Bassu, S.; Ciais, P.; et al. Temperature increase reduces global yields of major crops in four independent estimates. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 9326–9331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sahay, S.; Grzybowski, M.; Schnable, J.C.; Głowacka, K. Genetic control of photoprotection and photosystem II operating efficiency in plants. New Phytol. 2023, 239, 1068–1082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Shinozaki, K.; Uemura, M.; Bailey-Serres, J.; Bray, E.A.; Weretilnyk, E. Responses to Abiotic Stress. In Biochemistry & Molecular Biology of Plants, 2nd ed.; Buchanan, B.B., Gruissem, W., Jones, R.L., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2015; pp. 1051–1100. [Google Scholar]
  10. Apel, K.; Hirt, H. Reactive oxygen species: Metabolism, oxidative stress, and signal transduction. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2004, 55, 373–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sachdev, S.; Ansari, S.A.; Ansari, M.I.; Fujita, M.; Hasanuzzaman, M. Abiotic stress and reactive oxygen species: Generation, signaling, and defense mechanisms. Antioxidants 2021, 10, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Moustakas, M. Plant Photochemistry, Reactive Oxygen Species, and Photoprotection. Photochem 2022, 2, 5–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mittler, R. Oxidative stress, antioxidants and stress tolerance. Trends Plant Sci. 2002, 7, 405–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gill, S.S.; Tuteja, N. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol. Biochem. 2010, 48, 909–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Moustaka, J.; Tanou, G.; Adamakis, I.D.; Eleftheriou, E.P.; Moustakas, M. Leaf age dependent photoprotective and antioxidative mechanisms to paraquat-induced oxidative stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16, 13989–14006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hasanuzzaman, M.; Bhuyan, M.H.M.; Zulfiqar, F.; Raza, A.; Mohsin, S.M.; Mahmud, J.A.; Fujita, M.; Fotopoulos, V. Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant defense in plants under abiotic stress: Revisiting the crucial role of a universal defense regulator. Antioxidants 2020, 9, 681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Choudhury, F.K.; Rivero, R.M.; Blumwald, E.; Mittler, R. Reactive oxygen species, abiotic stress and stress combination. Plant J. 2017, 90, 856–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Buchanan, B.B.; Gruissem, W.; Jones, R.L. Biochemistry & Molecular Biology of Plants, 2nd ed.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  19. Agathokleous, E.; Calabrese, E.J. Hormesis can enhance agricultural sustainability in a changing world. Glob. Food Secur. 2019, 20, 150–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sperdouli, I.; Ouzounidou, G.; Moustakas, M. Hormesis responses of photosystem II in Arabidopsis thaliana under water deficit stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 9573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Agathokleous, E.; Sonne, C.; Benelli, G.; Calabrese, E.J.; Guedes, R.N.C. Low-dose chemical stimulation and pest resistance threaten global crop production. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 878, 162989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Agathokleous, E.; Kitao, M.; Calabrese, E.J. Environmental hormesis and its fundamental biological basis: Rewriting the history of toxicology. Environ. Res. 2018, 165, 274–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Agathokleous, E.; Calabrese, E.J. Hormesis: The dose response for the 21st Century: The future has arrived. Toxicology 2019, 425, 152249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Agathokleous, E.; Kitao, M.; Calabrese, E.J. Hormesis: Highly generalizable and beyond laboratory. Trends Plant Sci. 2020, 25, 1076–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Moustakas, M.; Moustaka, J.; Sperdouli, I. Hormesis in photosystem II: A mechanistic approach. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2022, 29, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Qin, L.; Walk, T.C.; Han, P.; Chen, L.; Zhang, S.; Li, Y.; Hu, X.; Xie, L.; Yang, Y.; Liu, J.; et al. Adaption of roots to nitrogen deficiency revealed by 3D quantification and proteomic analysis. Plant Physiol. 2019, 179, 329–347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Soto-Cerda, B.J.; Larama, G.; Cloutier, S.; Fofana, B.; Inostroza-Blancheteau, C.; Aravena, G. The Genetic dissection of nitrogen use-related traits in flax (Linum usitatissimum L.) at the seedling stage through the integration of multi-locus GWAS, RNA-seq and genomic selection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 17624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, Y.Y.; Hsu, P.K.; Tsay, Y.F. Uptake, allocation and signaling of nitrate. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 458–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lezhneva, L.; Kiba, T.; Feria-Bourrellier, A.B.; Lafouge, F.; Boutet-Mercey, S.; Zoufan, P.; Sakakibara, H.; Daniel-Vedele, F.; Krapp, A. The Arabidopsis nitrate transporter NRT2.5 plays a role in nitrate acquisition and remobilization in nitrogen-starved plants. Plant J. 2014, 80, 230–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khramov, D.E.; Rostovtseva, E.I.; Matalin, D.A.; Konoshenkova, A.O.; Nedelyaeva, O.I.; Volkov, V.S.; Balnokin, Y.V.; Popova, L.G. Novel proteins of the high-affinity nitrate transporter family NRT2, SaNRT2.1 and SaNRT2.5, from the euhalophyte Suaeda altissima: Molecular cloning and expression analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gilad, G.; Sapir, O.; Hipsch, M.; Waiger, D.; Ben-Ari, J.; Zeev, B.B.; Zait, Y.; Lampl, N.; Rosenwasser, S. Nitrogen assimilation plays a role in balancing the chloroplastic glutathione redox potential under high light conditions. Plant Cell Environ. 2025; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Quan, X.; Meng, C.; Xie, C.; Sun, H.; Xu, B.; Santos Bermudez, R.; He, W. Genome-wide and transcriptome analysis of jacalin-related lectin genes in barley and the functional characterization of HvHorcH in low-nitrogen tolerance in Arabidopsis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Sakashita, Y.; Kurashima, H.; Fukuda, M.; Hirano, H.; Lamsal, S.; Katayama, N.; Fukao, T. Possible roles of carbohydrate management and cytokinin in the process of defoliation–regrowth cycles in rice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 5070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Zhang, H.; Meng, X.; Liu, R.; Li, R.; Wang, Y.; Ma, Z.; Liu, Z.; Duan, S.; Li, G.; Guo, X. Heat shock factor ZmHsf17 positively regulates phosphatidic acid phosphohydrolase ZmPAH1 and enhances maize thermotolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2025, 76, 493–512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Yang, Y.; Li, Z.; Zhang, J. ZmNF-YA1 Contributes to maize thermotolerance by regulating heat shock response. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, Y.; Wang, B.; Wang, J.; He, C.; Zhang, D.; Li, P.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z. Transcription factors ZmNF-YA1 and ZmNF-YB16 regulate plant growth and drought tolerance in maize. Plant Physiol. 2022, 190, 1506–1525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Theocharis, A.; Clement, C.; Barka, E.A. Physiological and molecular changes in plants grown at low temperatures. Planta 2012, 235, 1091–1105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Dou, N.; Li, L.; Fang, Y.; Fan, S.; Wu, C. Comparative physiological and transcriptome analyses of tolerant and susceptible cultivars reveal the molecular mechanism of cold tolerance in Anthurium andraeanum. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Nephali, L.; Piater, L.A.; Dubery, I.A.; Patterson, V.; Huyser, J.; Burgess, K.; Tugizimana, F. Biostimulants for plant growth and mitigation of abiotic stresses: A metabolomics perspective. Metabolites 2020, 10, 505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Monteiro, E.; Gonçalves, B.; Cortez, I.; Castro, I. The role of biostimulants as alleviators of biotic and abiotic stresses in grapevine: A review. Plants 2022, 11, 396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Moustaka, J.; Sperdouli, I.; İşgören, S.; Şaş, B.; Moustakas, M. Deciphering the mechanism of melatonin-induced enhancement of photosystem II function in moderate drought-stressed oregano plants. Plants 2024, 13, 2590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Moustaka, J.; Moustakas, M. Early-stage detection of biotic and abiotic stress on plants by chlorophyll fluorescence imaging analysis. Biosensors 2023, 13, 796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Moustakas, M.; Sperdouli, I.; Adamakis, I.-D.S.; Şaş, B.; İşgören, S.; Moustaka, J.; Morales, F. Mechanistic approach on melatonin-induced hormesis of photosystem II function in the medicinal plant Mentha spicata. Plants 2023, 12, 4025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Muhammad, I.; Ahmad, S.; Shen, W. Melatonin-mediated molecular responses in plants: Enhancing stress tolerance and mitigating environmental challenges in cereal crop production. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 4551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Wu, Y.; Liu, J.; Wu, H.; Zhu, Y.; Ahmad, I.; Zhou, G. The roles of mepiquate chloride and melatonin in the morpho-physiological activity of cotton under abiotic stress. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Ahmad, I.; Zhu, G.; Zhou, G.; Song, X.; Hussein Ibrahim, M.E.; Ibrahim Salih, E.G.; Hussain, S.; Younas, M.U. Pivotal role of phytohormones and their responsive genes in plant growth and their signaling and transduction pathway under salt stress in cotton. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Moustaka, J.; Sperdouli, I.; Panteris, E.; Adamakis, I.-D.S.; Moustakas, M. Aspirin foliar spray-induced changes in light energy use efficiency, chloroplast ultrastructure, and ROS generation in tomato. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Moustakas, M.; Sperdouli, I.; Adamakis, I.-D.S.; Moustaka, J.; İşgören, S.; Şaş, B. Harnessing the role of foliar applied salicylic acid in decreasing chlorophyll content to reassess photosystem II photoprotection in crop plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 7038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Leyser, O.; Day, S. Signal Transduction. In Biochemistry & Molecular Biology of Plants, 2nd ed.; Buchanan, B.B., Gruissem, W., Jones, R.L., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.: Chichester, UK, 2015; pp. 834–871. [Google Scholar]
  50. Seok, S.H. Structural insights into protein regulation by phosphorylation and substrate recognition of protein kinases/phosphatases. Life 2021, 11, 957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Song, Y.; Li, F.; Ali, M.; Li, X.; Zhang, X.; Ahmed, Z.F.R. Advances in protein kinase regulation of stress responses in fruits and vegetables. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wankhede, D.P.; Misra, M.; Singh, P.; Sinha, A.K. Rice mitogen activated protein kinase kinase and mitogen activated protein kinase interaction network revealed by in-silico docking and yeast two-hybrid approaches. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e65011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Gandhi, A.; Oelmüller, R. Emerging roles of receptor-like protein kinases in plant response to abiotic stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 14762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Rockwell, N.C.; Su, Y.S.; Lagarias, J.C. Phytochrome structure and signaling mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2006, 57, 837–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Casal, J.J.; Candia, A.N.; Sellaro, R. Light perception and signalling by phytochrome A. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, 65, 2835–2845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Qiu, X.; Sun, G.; Liu, F.; Hu, W. Functions of plant phytochrome signaling pathways in adaptation to diverse stresses. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 13201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Roberts, I.; Smith, S.; De Rybel, B.; Van Den Broeke, J.; Smet, W.; De Cokere, S.; Mispelaere, M.; De Smet, I.; Beeckman, T. The CEP family in land plants: Evolutionary analyses, expression studies, and role in Arabidopsis shoot development. J. Exp. Bot. 2013, 64, 5371–5381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Kim, J.S.; Jeon, B.W.; Kim, J. Signaling peptides regulating abiotic stress responses in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2021, 12, 704490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Mei, Z.; Li, B.; Zhu, S.; Li, Y.; Yao, J.; Pan, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, W. A Genome-wide analysis of the CEP gene family in cotton and a functional study of GhCEP46-D05 in plant development. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 4231. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Song, Y.; Ma, B.; Feng, X.; Guo, Q.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, C. Genome-wide analysis of the universal stress protein gene family in blueberry and their transcriptional responses to UV-B irradiation and abscisic acid. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ingram, G.; Nawrath, C. The roles of the cuticle in plant development: Organ adhesions and beyond. J. Exp. Bot. 2017, 68, 5307–5321. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Ziv, C.; Zhao, Z.; Gao, Y.G.; Xia, Y. Multifunctional roles of plant cuticle during plant-pathogen interactions. Front. Plant Sci. 2018, 9, 1088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Duursma, R.A. Plantecophys—An R package for analysing and modelling leaf gas exchange data. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Lee, S.B.; Suh, M.C. Regulatory mechanisms underlying cuticular wax biosynthesis. J. Exp. Bot. 2022, 73, 2799–2816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Liu, L.; Li, H.; Wang, X.; Chang, C. Transcription factor TaMYB30 activates wheat wax biosynthesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 10235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Herzig, L.; Uellendahl, K.; Malkowsky, Y.; Schreiber, L.; Grünhofer, P. In a different light: Irradiation-induced cuticular wax accumulation fails to reduce cuticular transpiration. Plant Cell Environ. 2025; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Garen, J.C.; Michaletz, S.T. Temperature governs the relative contributions of cuticle and stomata to leaf minimum conductance. New Phytol. 2025; in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Zhang, Q.; Xu, C.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, X.; Han, Z. Precipitation extremes in a karst region: A case study in the Guizhou province, southwest China. Theor. Appl. Climatol. 2010, 101, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Zhao, S.; Pereira, P.; Wu, X.; Zhou, J.; Cao, J.; Zhang, W. Global karst vegetation regime and its response to climate change and human activities. Ecol. Indic. 2020, 113, 106208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wu, C.; Liu, B.; Zhang, X.; Wang, M.; Liang, H. Phytohormone response of drought-acclimated Illicium difengpi (Schisandraceae). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 16443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Sperdouli, I.; Andreadis, S.S.; Adamakis, I.-D.S.; Moustaka, J.; Koutsogeorgiou, E.I.; Moustakas, M. Reactive oxygen species initiate defence responses of potato photosystem II to sap-sucking insect feeding. Insects 2022, 13, 409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Wang, Z.; Hao, W.; Wang, H.; Deng, P.; Li, T.; Wang, C.; Zhao, J.; Chen, C.; Ji, W.; Liu, X. Genome-wide comparative analysis of the cytochrome p450 monooxygenase family in 19 aphid species and their expression analysis in 4 cereal crop aphids. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 6668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Feyereisen, R. Evolution of insect P450. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2006, 34, 1252–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Environmental stress factors enhance the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that results in oxidative stress in plant cells (From [18] after license).
Figure 1. Environmental stress factors enhance the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that results in oxidative stress in plant cells (From [18] after license).
Ijms 26 02731 g001
Figure 2. The response of plants to an environmental stress factor depends not only on the severity, the duration, the rate (number of times) at which the stress is imposed, and on the synergistic or antagonistic impact of stress combination, but also on the plant species, the organ or tissue affected, the developmental stage, and the genotype in question. The response to the stress can result in acclimation or susceptibility. Failure to counteract severe stress can result in plant death (From [18] after license) (a); the different environmental stress signals are recognized from the plant and the signals are transferred within cells and through the plant. After environmental stress recognition, the signals usually result in modified gene expression, which in turn impacts plant metabolism and development at the whole plant level (from [18] after license) (b).
Figure 2. The response of plants to an environmental stress factor depends not only on the severity, the duration, the rate (number of times) at which the stress is imposed, and on the synergistic or antagonistic impact of stress combination, but also on the plant species, the organ or tissue affected, the developmental stage, and the genotype in question. The response to the stress can result in acclimation or susceptibility. Failure to counteract severe stress can result in plant death (From [18] after license) (a); the different environmental stress signals are recognized from the plant and the signals are transferred within cells and through the plant. After environmental stress recognition, the signals usually result in modified gene expression, which in turn impacts plant metabolism and development at the whole plant level (from [18] after license) (b).
Ijms 26 02731 g002
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moustakas, M. Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062731

AMA Style

Moustakas M. Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(6):2731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062731

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moustakas, Michael. 2025. "Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 6: 2731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062731

APA Style

Moustakas, M. (2025). Molecular Mechanisms of Plant Abiotic Stress Tolerance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(6), 2731. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062731

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop