Next Article in Journal
CD133+CD24+ Renal Tubular Progenitor Cells Drive Hypoxic Injury Recovery via Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1A and Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Expression
Previous Article in Journal
Short-Chain Fatty Acids and the Gut–Retina Connection: A Systematic Review
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Depletion of Fkbp5 Protects Against the Rapid Decline in Ovarian Reserve Induced by Prenatal Stress in Female Offspring of Wild-Type Mice

1
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33602, USA
2
Department of Internal Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33612, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(6), 2471; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062471
Submission received: 30 December 2024 / Revised: 4 March 2025 / Accepted: 8 March 2025 / Published: 10 March 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Biology)

Abstract

Prenatal stress (PNS) impairs offspring ovarian development by exerting negative long-term effects on postnatal ovarian function and folliculogenesis. FKBP51 is a stress-responsive protein that inhibits glucocorticoid and progesterone receptors. We hypothesize that FKBP51 contributes to impaired ovarian development and folliculogenesis induced by PNS. Timed-pregnant Fkbp5+/+ (wild-type) and Fkbp5−/− (knockout) mice were randomly assigned to either the undisturbed (nonstress) or PNS group, with exposure to maternal restraint stress from embryonic days 8 to 18. Ovaries from the offspring were harvested and stained, and follicles were counted according to their stages. Ovarian expressions of FKBP51 were evaluated by immunohistochemistry and Fkbp5 and steroidogenic enzymes were evaluated by qPCR. Compared to controls, Fkbp5+/+ PNS offspring had increased peripubertal primordial follicle atresia and fewer total follicles in the adult and middle-aged groups. In adult Fkbp5+/+ offspring, PNS elevated FKBP51 levels in granulosa cells of primary to tertiary follicles. Our results suggest that PNS administration increased FKBP51 levels, depleted the ovarian reserve, and dysregulated ovarian steroid synthesis. However, these PNS effects were tolerated in Fkbp5−/− mice, supporting the conclusion that FKBP51 contributes to reduced ovarian reserve induced by PNS.

1. Introduction

Stress significantly impacts psychological, physical, and physiological states by disrupting homeostasis [1]. Stress-associated disorders are more common in women, who also experience faster and more prolonged stress responses than men [2]. This is due to the close interaction between the female reproductive system and the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal (HPA) [3] and –ovarian (HPO) axes [4]. By activating these axes, stress inhibits female reproductive function by impairing ovarian function and follicle development, as well as reducing oocyte number and/or quality [5]. Specifically, stress-induced activation of the HPA axis prompts the hypothalamus to release corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), stimulating the pituitary gland to secrete adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), which triggers the adrenal cortex to produce and release glucocorticoids (cortisol in humans and primarily corticosterone in rodents) [6]. Elevated glucocorticoid levels negatively affect the hypothalamus and pituitary gland by inhibiting the secretion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). This, in turn, reduces the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) [7], which are crucial for ovarian functions, including follicular growth, ovulation, and the production of steroid hormones estrogen and progesterone (P4) [8]. Elevated glucocorticoid levels also increase the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in the ovary [9,10,11], which induce apoptosis in oocytes and granulosa cells, promote meiotic errors in the oocyte, and trigger oocyte fragmentation, resulting in decreased oocyte quality and quantity [12,13,14,15].
A growing body of research indicates that maternal stress and prenatal stress (PNS), defined as stressful life events during gestation, significantly impact pregnancy outcomes and negatively affect both the mother and child’s health, including functions of reproductive organs throughout the lifespan [16]. However, the exact mechanisms by which PNS causes later reproductive dysfunction in female offspring remain unknown. We previously demonstrated that maternal restraint stress activated the maternal HPA axis, as evidenced by significant increases in serum corticosterone and cortisol levels in both Fkbp5+/+ and Fkbp5−/− dams [17]. Similarly, studies in sheep [18] and nonhuman primates [19] have shown that prenatal stress increases maternal cortisol levels during early to mid-gestation, which in turn elevates fetal cortisol circulation and suppresses fetal ACTH production. As pregnancy progresses toward parturition, elevated levels of placental 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2 (11β-HSD-2) begin to inactivate cortisol as it enters fetal circulation, acting as an incomplete barrier. This reduction in fetal circulating cortisol is thought to subsequently activate the fetal HPA axis, which plays a crucial role in promoting the growth and development of the fetal adrenal glands [20].
Previous studies in mice and rats have shown that PNS, by causing aberrant HPA axis development through an unclear mechanism [21], alters the expression of genes involved in ovarian steroidogenesis and decreases systemic estradiol [22,23] and P4 levels [24] while increasing corticosterone levels in adult offspring [25]. PNS in rats also impairs the estrous cycle, resulting in prolonged estrous cycles in the offspring [24]. Additionally, adult female offspring prenatally exposed to dexamethasone (DEX) as a model for PNS display delayed puberty, reduced ovarian volume, and decreased numbers of follicles in rats [26,27], as well as decreased germ cell density, as seen in human fetal ovaries after exposure to DEX [28].
FK506-binding protein 51 (FKBP51), a 51-kDa immunophilin, is a co-chaperone protein that interacts with heat shock proteins 90, 70, and p23, as well as steroid receptors glucocorticoid receptor (GR) and progesterone receptor (PR). It plays a role in immunoregulation as well as protein folding and trafficking [29]. FKBP51 levels are robustly upregulated by glucocorticoid and, to a lesser extent, by progestins [30,31,32,33]. However, elevated FKBP51 levels reduce P4 and glucocorticoid responses by inhibiting ligand binding and nuclear translocation, thereby negatively regulating GR and PR transcriptional activity [29]. Given FKBP51’s critical role in steroid receptor signaling, it is not surprising that altered FKBP51 levels are linked to many psychiatric and endocrine-related diseases, including depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorders, cancers, and metabolic and immune-related diseases [34].
Moreover, our lab recently identified the following: (1) significantly elevated FKBP51 levels in the nuclei of decidualized endometrial stromal cells from laboring versus non-laboring term placentas [32] and (2) increased FKBP51 levels in the decidua of patients with idiopathic preterm birth (PTB) versus gestational age-matched controls [17]. Consistent with the role of FKBP51 in labor, we also found that compared to Fkbp5 wild-type (+/+) mice, Fkbp5 knockout (−/−) mice display extended gestation and are resistant to maternal stress-induced PTB [17]. These results suggest FKBP51 is a potential mediator of PNS.
As a key modulator of the stress response, FKBP51 levels are affected by FKBP5 gene polymorphisms, epigenetic modifications, aging, and early-life stress [35,36,37]. Fkbp5-deficient mice exhibit resistance to stress due to enhanced HPA axis feedback, altered stress signaling pathways, and improved stress resilience [38]. Stress effects on female fertility include a decline in ovarian reserve, which is crucial for female fertility, since females are born with a finite number of oocytes, and the quantity and quality of oocytes declines with age [39,40].
A growing body of evidence suggests that prenatal stress (PNS) is associated with accelerated ovarian aging [41,42]; however, the mechanisms by which PNS affects ovarian aging are not yet well understood. Wang et al. found that prenatal exposure to famine in Chinese women was linked to an increased risk of premature ovarian failure and early menopause [43]. Animal models have also explored various prenatal stressors and their effects on reproductive aging. For example, prenatal malnutrition in rats led to reduced ovarian vascularity, a sign of ovarian aging [44]. Prenatal immunological stress was associated with early ovarian senescence [45], while chronic prenatal hypoxia resulted in several indicators of accelerated ovarian aging in adult offspring, including a decreased reserve of primordial follicles, increased oxidative stress, impaired DNA repair mechanisms, and shortened ovarian telomere lengths [46]. The decline in reproductive ability with age is related to a decreased ovarian reserve and damage to remaining oocytes, such as reduced mitochondrial activity and increased aneuploidy [47,48,49]. Unlike somatic cells, oocytes’ telomeres shorten with age due to damage from ROS [48]. Follicular fluid and oocytes from older individuals exhibit altered antioxidant profiles, impairing their ability to scavenge ROS [9,50]. Additionally, significant stress levels have been shown to produce follicular phenotypes similar to those observed in aged ovaries, suggesting that stress may contribute to accelerated ovarian aging [11,13]. Therefore, in the current study, we hypothesize that PNS negatively impacts female ovarian function, leading to reduced ovarian reserve in female offspring. Additionally, we propose that PNS-mediated and/or age-related effects are mitigated in Fkbp5−/− mice, potentially extending ovarian reproductive lifespan, as FKBP51 levels increase with age [35,51]. Thus, to test this hypothesis, we analyzed the effect of PNS on ovarian reserve by examining female offspring subjected to maternal restraint stress in both wild-type and Fkbp5-deficient mouse models.

2. Results

2.1. PNS Administration Affects the Follicular Reserve in Adult Fkbp5+/+ Mice

To investigate the effect of PNS and its association with Fkbp5 on the ovarian reserve, we first assessed follicle development in the ovaries of unstimulated 2-month-old mature Fkbp5+/+ and Fkbp5−/− mice, subjected to either a prenatally unrestrained (physiologic) state (control) or a prenatally (maternal restraint) stressed (PNS) state. Follicles at all developmental stages were present in the ovaries of both Fkbp5+/+ and Fkbp5−/− mice under both control and PNS conditions (Figure 1A). No significant difference was detected for the total number of healthy follicles between Fkbp5+/+ versus Fkbp5−/− control groups (1851.7 ± 122.9 versus 1614.6 ± 70.7; p = 0.1, Figure 1B). However, significantly reduced numbers of healthy follicles were detected between PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice (1240.4 ± 133.2) versus Fkbp5+/+ control mice (1851.7 ± 122.9; p < 0.01), but not between PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− mice versus Fkbp5−/− control mice (1698.3 ± 138.4 versus 1614.6 ± 70.7; p = 0.6, Figure 1B). Additionally, the total number of healthy follicles was significantly lower in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ versus PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− mice (1240.4 ± 133.2 versus 1698.3 ± 70.7; p < 0.05, Figure 1B).
Similarly, PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice also displayed significantly lower numbers of primordial and primary follicles compared to Fkbp5+/+ control mice (590 ± 45.6 versus 917.1 ± 67.5, p < 0.01; 270 ± 35.9 versus 435 ± 33, p < 0.01, respectively, Figure 1B), but no differences were noted between PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− mice versus Fkbp5−/− control mice (888.3 ± 90.3 versus. 835.4 ± 42.4, p = 0.6; 330 ± 34.4 versus 321.2 ± 33.5, p = 0.9, respectively, Figure 1B). Significantly fewer primordial follicles were reported in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice compared to PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− mice (p < 0.05), yet no difference in primary follicles was seen (p = 0.3). However, the number of primary follicles was lower in Fkbp5−/− control mice compared to Fkbp5+/+ control mice (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in the number of growing follicles, including secondary, tertiary, and antral ones, among groups (Figure 1C).
To investigate whether the PNS-induced reduction in the follicle number is linked to increased follicular atresia, we counted atretic follicles in both Fkbp5+/+ and Fkbp5−/− mice under control and PNS conditions. The number of atretic follicles at each follicular stage did not differ among groups (Figure 1D). These results are also supported by active caspase-3 immunostaining showing no differences among groups (Figure S1A,B). Active caspase-3 immunostaining was primarily detected in granulosa cells of growing follicles, but not in primordial or primary follicles (Figure S1A).

2.2. PNS Increases FKBP51 Expression in Granulosa Cells in Adult Offspring Ovary

As shown in Figure 1B, PNS-induced reduction in primordial and primary follicle numbers did not happen in Fkbp5−/− mice. Thus, we first examined ovarian Fkbp5 expression in control and PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice. Analysis of qPCR results revealed that ovarian Fkbp5 mRNA levels were similar in control versus PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice (1.0 ± 0.1 versus 1.2 ± 0.2; p = 0.6, Figure 2A). Subsequently, ovarian FKBP51 levels were analyzed by immunohistochemistry using anti-goat FKBP51 antibody, which revealed immunoreactivity in several cell types, including oocytes, granulosa, cumulus, theca, luteal, and endothelial cells. FKBP51 was weakly expressed in oocytes throughout all follicular stages, from primordial to antral follicles, but was intensely expressed in granulosa cells across all follicle stages and luteal cells in the corpus luteum (Figure 2B). Next, we compared follicle stage-specific immunostaining of FKBP51 in control versus PNS-induced mice. FKBP51 immunoreactivity in granulosa cells of primordial follicles was similar in control and PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice (Figure 2B). However, stronger FKBP51 immunoreactivity was observed in granulosa cells of primary, secondary, and tertiary follicles in PNS-induced versus control groups of Fkbp5+/+ mice (Figure 2B). Semi-quantitative analysis of signal intensity confirmed significantly higher FKBP51 levels in primary (37.1 ± 3.4 versus 24.7 ± 3.3; p < 0.05), secondary (42.9 ± 3.4 versus 32.5 ± 2.7; p < 0.05), and tertiary follicles (42.3 ± 3.9 versus 30.0 ± 2.0, p < 0.01) in the PNS versus control groups of Fkbp5+/+ mice (Figure 2C). No difference in FKBP51 intensity was seen in primordial follicles in the PNS versus control groups of Fkbp5+/+ mice (30.6 ± 3.3 versus 25.4 ± 2.5, p = 0.2). Additionally, no significant difference was observed in FKBP51 intensity in granulosa cells of antral follicles (p = 0.3) or in luteal cells (p = 0.9) of corpus luteum between the PNS and control groups of Fkbp5+/+ mice (Figure 2C).

2.3. PNS Reduces Hsd11b2 Levels in Adult Fkbp5+/+ Mice

We previously reported that [17] restraint stress significantly elevates serum corticosterone levels in pregnant Fkbp5+/+ mice, whereas pregnant Fkbp5−/− mice display significantly lower serum corticosterone levels in response, indicating that Fkbp5−/− mice are resistant to stress-induced changes. Therefore, we first measured serum levels of corticosterone as a main glucocorticoid involved in regulation of stress in the mouse [52]. In adult offspring, PNS administration did not induce an increase in serum corticosterone levels in either Fkbp5+/+ (123.3 ± 15.7 ng/mL) or Fkbp5−/− (64.6 ± 10.6) mice compared to their respective control (131.6 ± 18.8 and 93.4 ± 12.5, respectively). However, multiple factor ANOVA indicated that serum corticosterone levels were lower in both control and PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− mice compared to wild-type mice (p < 0.01). This reduction was significantly lower in PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− versus PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice (64.6 ± 10.6 versus 123.3 ± 15.7; p < 0.05, Figure 3A), although it did not attain significance in control Fkbp5−/− (93.4 ± 12.5) versus control Fkbp5+/+ (131.6 ± 18.8) mice (p = 0.1, Figure 3A). We also measured the levels of Nr3c1 gene encoding GR [53]. However, ovarian Nr3c1 levels did not differ among groups (Figure 3A).
The local effects of glucocorticoids are not solely dependent on serum concentrations, since intracellular glucocorticoid levels are tightly regulated by two isoforms of 11β-HSD. The HSB11β1 converts inactive corticosterone to active form, while HSD11β2 reverses this reaction, producing the inactive form of glucocorticoids at tissue levels [7]. Thus, to investigate the impact of PNS on local glucocorticoid regulation within the ovary, we measured the relative expression of ovarian Hsd11b1 and Hsd11b2 mRNA levels. Levels of Hsd11b1 did not differ among groups in adult mice (Figure 3A), whereas Hsd11b2 levels were significantly lower in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice (0.6 ± 0.2) versus controls (1.1 ± 0.1; p < 0.05, Figure 3A), but not in PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− mice (0.6 ± 0.2) versus control Fkbp5−/− (0.7 ± 0.3; p = 0.9) mice, suggesting that reduced Hsd11b2 levels contribute to increased local availability of glucocorticoids in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice.

2.4. PNS Effects on Progesterone Signaling in Adult Offspring

The stress effect on P4 and its metabolism has been reported as either stimulatory [54] or inhibitory [55,56] in the literature [57]. Thus, we first investigated the impact of PNS on serum progesterone levels. Serum progesterone levels were similar between control Fkbp5+/+ (4.2 ± 1.0) and Fkbp5−/− (2.8 ± 1.1; p = 0.3) adult mice. However, PNS administration significantly increased serum progesterone levels in Fkbp5+/+ (7.1 ± 1.1) versus Fkbp5−/− mice (3.3 ± 0.9; p < 0.05, Figure 3B).
Later, we measured ovarian expression of Pgr, which encodes PR, which plays a crucial role in regulating ovulation and luteinization [58]. We also measured the levels of the aldo-keto reductase gene Akr1c18 encoding 20α-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase enzyme, which metabolizes P4 into the less potent 20α-hydroxyprogesterone [59]. Analysis of qPCR results revealed that (1) in adult mice, Pgr relative expression did not significantly differ in Fkbp5+/+ PNS mice (3.7 ± 1.4) compared to Fkbp5−/− PNS mice (0.9 ± 0.4; p = 0.2, Figure 3B) and (2) the relative expression of Akr1c18 was not significantly different in both PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ (0.7 ± 0.2) and Fkbp5−/− (0.6 ± 0.2) mice compared to their corresponding controls (1.5 ± 0.6 and 1.5 ± 0.8, respectively; p = 0.6, Figure 3B).
Ovarian steroidogenesis is the process through which ovarian cells produce hormones for maintaining reproductive tissues and regulating ovarian function [60]. To investigate if PNS caused any changes in steroidogenesis regulation, we assessed mRNA levels of (1) Star, the first enzyme responsible for transporting cholesterol into the inner mitochondrial membrane [61], and (2) Cyp11a1, which converts imported cholesterol to pregnenolone [61]. However, ovarian levels of Star and Cyp11a1 levels did not differ among groups (Figure 3C).

2.5. The Impact of PNS on Androgen Signaling in Adult Offspring

Androgens, via binding to the androgen receptor encoded by the Nr3c4 gene, are essential for maintaining ovarian function, i.e., follicular growth and estrogen synthesis, and they are also implicated in ovarian disease such as polycystic ovarian syndrome [62]. In contrast to its effects on PR- and GR-mediated transcription, FKBP51 induces androgen receptor-mediated transcriptional activity [63]. Thus, to investigate the effects of PNS or genotype, we first measured the whole ovary expression of Nr3c4. In adult mice, multiple factor ANOVA analysis revealed a significant effect of genotype on relative Nr3c4 mRNA expression (p < 0.05). Relative expression was lower in control (0.8 ± 0.1) and PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− (0.7 ± 0.1) mice compared to their Fkbp5+/+ counterparts (1.0 ± 0.1 and 1.0 ± 0.1, respectively; Figure 3D).
Next, to investigate the effect of PNS on ovarian androgen synthesis, we measured ovarian expression of Cyp17a1, which catalyzes a first step in androgen synthesis from P4 metabolites [64]. In adult mice, PNS administration did not significantly decrease Cyp17a1 expression in Fkbp5+/+ and Fkbp5−/− mice compared to their own controls (0.4 ± 0.2 versus 1.3 ± 0.4, p = 0.051, and 0.04 ± 0.01 versus 1.1 ± 0.4, p = 0.06, respectively; Figure 3D). Later, we measured levels of Cyp19a1 encoding the aromatase enzyme, which converts androgen precursors produced in the ovary to estrogens [65]. No significant change was detected in Cyp19a1 relative expression in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice (0.4 ± 0.1) compared to control Fkbp5+/+ mice (1.6 ± 0.6; p = 0.3, Figure 3D).

2.6. PNS Administration Increases Primordial Follicle Atresia in Peripubertal Fkbp5+/+ Offspring

To determine if the reduction in ovarian reserve observed in PNS Fkbp5+/+ adult mice was due to lower initial ovarian reserve, we counted the number of follicles in ovaries collected from peripubertal mice at 24 days. The number of healthy primordial follicles was similar in either PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ (1154.6 ± 88.6) or PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− (1205.8 ± 81.4) mice compared to their controls (1298.3 ± 77.3 and 1245.8 ± 124.4, respectively; Figure 4A). However, a significantly higher number of atretic primordial follicles was found in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice (167.9 ± 16.9) versus Fkbp5+/+ controls (102.9 ± 13.9; p < 0.05, Figure 4B), but not in PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− versus Fkbp5−/− controls. The number of atretic primordial follicles was also significantly higher in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice (167.9 ± 16.9) versus PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− mice (63.3 ± 10.7; p < 0.001, Figure 4B). We then calculated the ratio of atretic primordial follicles to healthy primordial follicles to assess the extent of primordial follicle activation leading to atresia as opposed to growth. In peripubertal mice, PNS significantly increased this ratio in Fkbp5+/+ compared to Fkbp5+/+ control or Fkbp5−/− PNS mice (0.14 ± 0.01 versus 0.08 ± 0.01, p < 0.05, or versus 0.05 ± 0.01, p < 0.001, respectively; Figure 4B). However, PNS administration did not alter the ratio in Fkbp5−/− mice (Figure 4B), indicating that Fkbp5 deletion prevents ovarian follicular atresia induced by PNS in mice.

2.7. Fkbp5 Depletion Reduces Follicle Recruitment in Peripubertal Control Offspring

To investigate if PNS affects follicle recruitment, the process of activating dormant primordial follicles into the growing follicle pool [66], we counted the numbers of growing follicles including primary, secondary, tertiary, and early antral follicles. We then calculated the ratio of growing to primordial follicles to determine the rate of follicle recruitment among groups. PNS administration did not alter the rate of follicle recruitment in either Fkbp5+/+ (0.62 ± 0.03 versus 0.67 ± 0.03) or Fkbp5−/− (0.55 ± 0.04 versus 0.51 ± 0.03, Figure 4C) mice, indicating no additional PNS effect. However, the recruitment rate was significantly lower in Fkbp5−/− than Fkbp5+/+ mice (F [1, 20] = 12.686; p < 0.01, Figure 4C), suggesting a regulatory mechanism that controls the transition from primordial to growing follicles in Fkbp5−/− mice. Additionally, significantly fewer atretic follicles were observed in Fkbp5−/− versus Fkbp5+/+ control (240 ± 25.3 versus 341.3 ± 13.7; p < 0.01) and in Fkbp5−/− versus Fkbp5+/+ PNS mice (228.8 ± 22 versus 329.6 ± 27.1; p < 0.05, Figure 4D). However, PNS administration did not alter the total number of atretic follicles in Fkbp5+/+ and Fkbp5−/− mice compared to their own controls (p = 0.7 and p = 0.7, respectively, Figure 4D), indicating that the effects are genotype-specific rather than due to PNS administration.

2.8. PNS Delays Pubertal Onset in Fkbp5+/+ Mice

In mice, vaginal opening is widely accepted as a marker for the onset of puberty [67]. To understand pubertal maturation, we monitored vaginal opening (Figure S2) in peripubertal mice across groups. No significant difference was observed between control Fkbp5+/+ versus Fkbp5−/− mice (p = 0.1). However, PNS administration significantly delayed vaginal opening in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ versus Fkbp5+/+ control mice (32.63 ± 0.9 versus 29.2 ± 0.5, respectively, p < 0.05; Table 1), but not in PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− (33.33 ± 0.96) versus Fkbp5−/− control mice (31.08 ± 0.8, p = 0.1).

2.9. PNS Causes a Rapid Decline in Ovarian Reserve in Middle-Aged Fkbp5+/+ Mice

Reproductive aging involves a natural, progressive decline in follicle number, leading to fertility loss due to ovarian dysfunction [68,69]. To define whether PNS accelerates this decline with aging, we investigated the total follicle number in middle-aged (10-month-old) mice. As shown in adult offspring (Figure 1B), in middle-aged groups, we found a significantly reduced number of total healthy follicles in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ (480.8 ± 22.5) versus Fkbp5+/+ control mice (700 ± 59.5; p < 0.01; Figure 5A), but this effect was not observed in PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− PNS (577.5 ± 46.7) versus Fkbp5−/− control mice (560 ± 54.6; p = 0.8, Figure 5A). Moreover, the number of healthy primordial follicles was significantly lower in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ (244.2 ± 15.0) versus Fkbp5+/+ control mice (366.7 ± 28.6, p < 0.01) or PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− (338.3 ± 25.5; p < 0.05, Figure 5A), suggesting that PNS exacerbates the progressive loss of ovarian reserve in Fkbp5+/+ mice as they age. We then counted the growing follicles. In middle-aged mice, the number of healthy primary follicles was significantly lower in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ (106.7 ± 16.2) versus Fkbp5+/+ control mice (168.3 ± 18.2; p < 0.05), but not in PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− versus Fkbp5−/− control mice (118.3 ± 17 versus 117.5 ± 15.3; p = 1.0, Figure 5B). However, the number of healthy secondary, tertiary, and antral follicles did not differ among groups (Figure 5B).
To better understand the changes in the ovarian reserve across the reproductive life course, we assessed the percentage change in healthy primordial follicles between the peripubertal and adult age groups and between the adult and middle-aged groups. The percentage change in healthy primordial follicles from the peripubertal to the adult was significantly greater in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ (−48.7% ± 2.5) than in Fkbp5+/+ control mice (−28.9% ± 4.84; p < 0.01) or in PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− mice (−28.9% ± 7.5; p < 0.05, Figure 5C). Conversely, PNS administration did not alter the percent change in healthy primordial follicles from adult to middle age in Fkbp5+/+ (−56.7% ± 5.4) and Fkbp5−/− (−59% ± 6.3) mice compared to their respective controls (−59.2% ± 3.9 and −62.2% ± 4, respectively).

2.10. The Effect of PNS on FKBP51 Expression in the Middle-Aged Offspring Ovary

To investigate whether reproductive aging increases ovarian FKBP51 levels in middle-aged PNS Fkbp5+/+ mice, we performed qPCR and immunohistochemistry. PNS administration did not significantly increase Fkbp5 relative expression (2.0 ± 0.3) compared to controls (1.2 ± 0.3; p = 0.1, Figure 6A). Immunostaining intensity of FKBP51 was comparable between groups in primordial, primary, secondary, and antral follicles (p ≥ 0.05, Figure 6B,C). However, in tertiary follicles, FKBP51 immunoreactivity was significantly higher in Fkbp5+/+ PNS mice compared to controls (29.5 ± 2.2 versus 21.9 ± 2.9; p < 0.05, Figure 6B,C).

2.11. PNS Disruptions in Cholesterol Transport in Middle-Aged Fkbp5+/+ Offspring Ovaries

Like adult mice, PNS administration did not significantly increase Star relative expression in middle-aged Fkbp5+/+ mice compared to controls (2.1 ± 0.5 and 1.3 ± 0.3, respectively; p = 0.2, Figure 6C). However, Star levels were significantly decreased in PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− versus PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice (1.5 ± 0.2; p < 0.05).

3. Discussion

The negative impact of maternal stress on pregnancy outcomes [70] and on the neurodevelopment of offspring [71] has been well documented. Additionally, both rat and human studies have demonstrated the adverse effects of early life events on female reproductive function [72,73,74], although there is variability between and limitations among these studies. Differences among stress models include variations in species, types of stressors, timing and duration of stress administration, age, and gender [75,76]. Therefore, in the current study, to assess the effects of PNS on reproductive function, we employed a maternal restraint stress model, which is accepted as a physiologic model designed to mimic everyday human stress, such as the repetitive stress of a demanding job or familial pressures [77]. This stress model was tested using Fkbp5+/+ and Fkbp5−/− mice since previous results [78,79,80,81] clearly indicate that Fkbp5−/− mice displayed maximal resistance to stress-related pathophysiologic changes. Thus, to evaluate the role of FKBP51 as a stress response protein in ovarian folliculogenesis across the lifespan, we selected Fkbp5+/+ and Fkbp5−/− mice at three stages: 24 days (prepubertal), 2 months (reproductively active), and 10 months (reproductive aging). The period from 2 to 10 months represents a time of significant ovarian reserve decline, which is a hallmark of reproductive aging [82,83]. Thus, this is the first study to reveal the effects of PNS on ovarian function in both Fkbp5+/+ and Fkbp5−/− mice and age-dependent ovarian FKBP51 expression in Fkbp5+/+ mice, as well as to demonstrate tolerance of Fkbp5−/− mice to the PNS-induced decline in ovarian reserve.
Previous studies in humans, mice, and sparrows showed that stressful circumstances upregulate FKBP51 expression by activating the HPA axis and increasing glucocorticoid release [34,36,37,84]. Several studies have linked higher FKBP51 expression with increased susceptibility to post-traumatic stress disorders, major depressive disorders, and anxiety, as well as aging [85,86]. The current study demonstrates that maternal stress increased offspring FKBP51 levels primarily in granulosa cells of primary, secondary, and tertiary follicles in 2-month-old mice and in tertiary follicles in 10-month-old mice, while total ovarian Fkbp5 mRNA levels were not altered. This suggests that the stress response may vary across different follicle stages, impact granulosa cell function, and play a critical role in the transition from growing preantral follicles to antral follicles preparing for ovulation. Such a mechanism could be crucial for women’s reproductive health, as defects in folliculogenesis are among the primary causes of female infertility [87].
Ovarian reserve is a key determinant of reproductive lifespan, as females are born with a finite number of oocytes, which gradually decreases over their lifetime [68,69]. Both stress and aging are well-known potential contributing factors to the decline of the ovarian reserve throughout the reproductive life [88,89]. Poulain et al. [28] previously demonstrated that exposure to glucocorticoid impaired fetal oogenesis by increasing apoptosis of germ cells in an in vitro cultured human fetal ovary, but this detrimental effect was observed in only high doses (10 and 50 µM, but not in 2 µM) of glucocorticoid. Thus, we counted primordial follicle number in the peripubertal ovaries to investigate whether the reduced primordial follicle numbers in 2-month-old Fkbp5+/+ PNS mice are associated with a lower ovarian reserve at birth due to higher corticosterone exposure during pregnancy, as indicated by our previous study [17], which found significantly higher serum corticosterone levels in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ dams versus Fkbp5+/+ controls and lower levels in PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− and control Fkbp5−/− dams.
However, in the peripubertal ovaries, the number of healthy primordial follicles was similar among groups. This could be explained by the possibility that the increased corticosterone levels in dams are not high enough to induce germ cell apoptosis, as suggested by Poulain et al. [28], or that the fetal ovary could be resistant to changes in GR signaling, as suggested by Cincotta et al. [90]. However, PNS-exposed Fkbp5+/+ mice in the peripubertal period showed increased primordial follicle atresia. This increased atresia may result from defective follicular activation, which triggers granulosa cell death during the transition into adulthood [91]. Supporting this, Liew et al. [92] showed the apoptotic mechanism underlying loss of primordial follicles during the pubertal window in mice (20–50 days) using pro-apoptotic protein BLC-2 modifying factor knocked out mice. Since no difference was found for atretic follicular numbers between PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− and Fkbp5−/− control mice, collectively, these results indicate prevention of PNS-associated follicular atresia in Fkbp5-deficient mice, suggesting FKBP5 as a potential therapeutic target in women with diminished ovarian reserve.
To investigate the impact of aging on ovarian reserve, we calculated the decline rate of primordial follicles throughout life and found the most significant loss between peripubertal and adulthood in Fkbp5+/+ PNS mice, but not in Fkbp5−/− PNS mice. This indicates a physiological wave of primordial follicle loss during puberty, followed by a more gradual decline after sexual maturity. These findings are consistent with other studies in humans and mice demonstrating significant decline in primordial follicles during pubertal development [92,93,94,95,96]. Taken together, our findings suggest that Fkbp5 deficiency may have a protective effect on PNS-exacerbated loss of primordial follicles around puberty.
A previous study reported that chronic stress increases the activation rate of primordial follicles, leading to higher numbers of primary follicles, possibly due to increased corticotropin-releasing hormone signaling in mice. However, this increase in primary follicles was accompanied by a decrease in growing follicles [97]. Similarly, our results show that peripubertal Fkbp5+/+ mice had higher levels of primordial follicle activation leading to growth compared to Fkbp5−/− mice. This effect was not influenced by PNS (Figure 4C), suggesting that genotype, rather than PNS, affects primordial follicle selection for growth. Contrary to prepubertal mice, in adult and middle-aged Fkbp5+/+ mice, PNS exposure resulted in lower numbers of primary follicles, although the activation rate remained unchanged. This reduction in primary follicles in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice is likely due to a reduced pool of primordial follicles resulting from increased loss during puberty transition. This finding supports the idea seen in mice and cattle that the activation of primordial follicles is proportional to the remaining pool of dormant primordial follicles [98,99]. Taken together, the lower primary follicles observed in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ in adulthood can be explained by proportional activation of the primordial follicle pool. Conversely, in Fkbp5−/− control mice, the reduction in primary follicles in adulthood can be explained by reduced activation of primordial follicles. These findings may help us to explain why PNS-induced middle-aged Fkbp5+/+ mice approach ovarian senescence more rapidly than the other groups.
Middle-aged mice displayed significantly elevated ovarian levels of Star in Fkbp5+/+ PNS mice. Changes in Star expression in Fkbp5+/+ mice may be associated with activation of primordial follicles, since a recent study showed cholesterol metabolism mediated activation of primordial follicles in mice [100]. Additionally, increased Star expression was reported in theca cells of growing follicles in patients with polycystic ovarian syndrome, which is characterized by hyperandrogenism and abnormal follicle growth [101]. Since FSH and LH through the cAMP-PKA pathway are main regulators of Star expression [102], contribution of this pathway to mediating PNS-induced ovarian changes needs further investigation. Ding et al. [103] also demonstrated increased follicular atresia accompanied with abnormal upregulation of P4 and STAR levels in cold-exposed female mice. In this context, upon reaching sexual maturity, PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice showed elevated FKBP51 levels in granulosa cells, which may reduce PR sensitivity and increase P4 EC50 for PR activation [31], explaining the higher serum P4 levels compared to PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− mice.
Creutzberg et al. [76] revealed that a PNS-induced rise in glucocorticoid is more consistently seen in PNS models using rats but is not necessarily consistent in mouse models. In our model, PNS did not increase serum corticosterone levels in offspring. However, the depletion of Fkbp51 did result in decreased serum corticosterone levels in adult female mice, as shown previously in mice [35,78]. In contrast to systemic corticosterone levels, the lower ovarian expression of Hsd11b2 in PNS-induced Fkbp5+/+ mice but not in PNS-induced Fkbp5−/− mice further supports the idea that PNS increases local corticosteroid effects by reducing Hsd11b2 levels, suggesting that there is a Fkbp5-dependent local mechanism for governing the intra-follicular corticosteroid milieu, which may cause GR signaling overactivation.
Consistent with other studies in rats [22,23,104], Fkbp5+/+ PNS mice exhibited a significant delay in puberty, indicating potential irregularities in the hypothalamus. In humans, FKBP51 is associated with stress-induced psychiatric disorders [34], which commonly occur during puberty [105]. This effect may reflect dysregulation of the HPO/HPA axes, as the hormonal milieu changes dramatically throughout life, with puberty being a particularly critical period for the development of pathologies such as anxiety and depression [106].
A major limitation of our model is that the global knockout of Fkbp5 makes it difficult to separate direct effects on the ovary from broader impacts on the hippocampus, hypothalamus, pituitary gland, and adrenal gland. In our previous study, we found that Fkbp5+/+ dams exposed to restraint stress exhibited the following: (1) significantly higher ovarian levels of Ak1c18, a progesterone-metabolizing enzyme, with no differences in levels of Cyp11a1 and Hsd3b2, steroidogenic enzymes involved in progesterone production, compared to Fkbp5+/+ control dams or control and PNS-exposed Fkbp5−/− dams. Importantly, there was no difference in corpus luteal morphology or regression; (2) shortened gestational length and induced preterm birth in Fkbp5+/+ dams, but not in Fkbp5−/− dams, indicating greater tolerance to stress; and (3) increased maternal serum corticosterone levels in Fkbp5+/+ dams, but significantly lower levels in Fkbp5−/− dams, which also experienced prolonged gestation [17]. In the current study, most of the effects observed in the offspring ovaries are due to prenatal exposure, while differences in the ratio of growing follicles to primordial follicles (Figure 4C) and the total number of atretic follicles (Figure 4D) are attributed to the absence of the Fkbp5 gene. Collectively, the results from our previous and current studies suggest that the effects of maternal restraint stress on both dams and offspring are mitigated by Fkbp5 deletion.
Additionally, translating our findings to humans is challenging because mice do not experience true menopause [106]. However, using the global knockout and a physiological stress model more accurately reflects human conditions. Additionally, more pronounced effects are likely to be observed in humanized mouse models carrying the FKBP5 risk allele of the single-nucleotide polymorphism rs1360780, which enhances responsiveness to glucocorticoid stimulation [107].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Animals

Fkbp5+/+ and Fkbp5−/− mice were obtained by mating heterozygous breeders. Fkbp5+/− heterozygous breeders from a mixed SvJ × C57BL/6–129 background were generated by replacing the first coding exon 2 with a targeting vector containing the lacZ and PGKneo cassette, as previously described [79,108]. Mice were maintained in a temperature and humidity-controlled room under a 12:12 h light/dark cycle, housed in ventilated cages, and they received ad libitum access to water and food. All experiments were performed in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC), and the breeding and experimental procedures were approved by the IACUC at the University of South Florida (10898M, 10574R, respectively).

4.2. Experimental Design

Female Fkbp5+/+ and Fkbp5−/− mice (8 to 12 weeks old) were mated with an adult Fkbp5+/+ and Fkbp5−/− male (12 to 24 weeks old), respectively, by housing them together in a 1:1 ratio for 4 h. Pregnancy was confirmed by the presence of a vaginal plug, which was designated as gestational day 0. Time-mated pregnant dams were then randomly assigned to either the control or maternal restraint stress (prenatally stressed, PNS) group. PNS was administered daily for 1 h three times for 10 consecutive days using a standard restraint chamber (1.5″ × 4″; Braintree Scientific, Inc, Braintree MA, USA.), starting on gestational day (E) 8 through 18. The control group was left undisturbed during the whole pregnancy (Figure S3). To prevent habituation, the stress schedule varied each day. Female offspring from the four dam groups (Fkbp5+/+ control, Fkbp5+/+ PNS, Fkbp5−/− control, and Fkbp5−/− PNS) were used for experimental analyses at postnatal day 24 (peripubertal), 2 months (adult), and 10 months (middle-aged).

4.3. Determination of Estrous Cycle Phase

The estrous cycle of mature female offspring mice was assessed using vaginal cytology, as described [109]. The stages of the estrous cycle were identified based on the predominant cell types: nucleated epithelial cells (proestrus), cornified squamous epithelial cells (estrus), a mix of nucleated epithelial cells, squamous epithelial cells, and leukocytes (metestrus), and leukocytes (diestrus). Briefly, vaginal smears were collected using a Pasteur pipette with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH: 7.0–7.4; ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). The suspension placed on a microscope slide was air-dried, stained with 0.1% crystal violet (ThermoFisher) for 1 min, and then washed with tap water to remove excess staining. The slides were examined under light microscopy at 200× magnification. Mice assigned to estrus were euthanized for tissue collection.

4.4. Sampling Procedure

Mice were deeply anesthetized with isoflurane anesthesia to collect blood samples via cardiac puncture and then euthanized by cervical dislocation to harvest ovarian tissues between 9:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. to minimize the effects of circadian rhythm on hormone levels. To obtain serum, blood samples were collected in lithium heparin separator tubes (BD; Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA), centrifuged for 10 min at 6000 rpm at room temperature, and stored at −80 °C until hormone quantification. Ovaries were dissociated from the surrounding fat and oviduct under dissection microscopy. The left ovary was stored at −80 °C for RNA analysis, whereas the right one was fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution for 18 h at room temperature. Later, tissue was dehydrated in serial ethanol solutions and embedded in paraffin for immunohistochemistry analysis or follicle counting.

4.5. Histomorphometric Analysis of Folliculogenesis in Ovaries

Serial sections (4 μm thick) from PFA-fixed, paraffin-embedded ovaries obtained from control and PNS Fkbp5+/+ or Fkbp5−/− mice at 24 days, 2 months, and 10 months (n = 6/group per age) were stained with Periodic acid-Schiff (PAS; Sigma-Aldrich; St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and counterstained with hematoxylin. Every 5th section was analyzed, and the total number of follicles per ovary was determined by counting the follicles with visible oocyte-displaying nuclei, then multiplying the count by five. Primordial, primary, secondary, preantral (tertiary), and antral follicles were classified as previously described [110,111,112]. Briefly, primordial follicles were defined as a small oocyte surrounded by a layer of squamous granulosa cells; primary follicles were described as an enlarged oocyte surrounded by a single layer of cuboidal granulosa cells; secondary follicles possessed an oocyte surrounded by two layers of cuboidal granulosa cells, with the presence of a theca cell layer; tertiary follicles contained an oocyte surrounded by more than two layers of cuboidal granulosa cells without an antrum and surrounded by theca cells; and early antral follicles were defined as a large follicle containing several layers of granulosa cells with an antral cavity, as well as the presence of theca interna and externa layers [110]. Atretic follicles were characterized by a degenerating oocyte with pyknotic granulosa cells, a loss of organized follicular structure, and/or the presence of the zona pellucida remnants [111]. Follicles were examined under an Axio Imager II microscope (Zeiss; White Plains, NY, USA) using ZEN 2011 software.

4.6. Reverse Transcription and Quantitative Real Time (q)-PCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted from the ovaries of control and PNS Fkbp5+/+ or Fkbp5−/− mice at 2 months (Hsd11b2 Fkbp5+/+ PNS n = 7, the rest n = 6) and 10 months (n = 6/group) using the RNEasy Mini Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. After DNase treatment (Qiagen), 1 µg total RNA from each sample was reverse transcribed using the RETROscript kit (Ambion, Austin, TX, USA) with the following cycling conditions: 85 °C for 3 min, 42 °C for 1 h, and 92 °C for 10 min to inactive reverse transcriptase enzyme. The expression levels of target genes (Table S1) were analyzed by qPCR using TaqMan gene expression assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) on an ABI 7500 thermocycler instrument. Each sample was run in duplicate, and the average value was used. Gene expression levels were normalized to Actb (β-actin) gene as an internal control. The 2−△△Ct.(cycle threshold) method was used to calculate relative expression levels and reported as fold-change in gene expression between different groups.

4.7. Immunohistochemistry and Quantification of Staining Intensity Analysis

Immunostaining was performed on 4% PFA-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections of ovaries from age- and cycle-matched controls and PNS Fkbp5+/+ or Fkbp5−/− mice at 2 months and 10 months (n = 6 animals/group per age), as previously described [17]. After deparaffinization and antigen retrieval using citrate buffer (pH: 6.0) or 0.025% Trypsin-EDTA (Life Technologies: Grand Island, NY, USA), endogenous peroxidase activity was quenched with 3% hydrogen peroxide. Following washing steps with Tris-buffered saline with 0.1% Tween 20 (TBS-T), slides were blocked with 5% normal goat or horse serum (Vector Labs; Newark, CA, USA) for 30 min, then with an Avidin–Biotin blocking kit for 30 min (Vector Labs). The primary antibodies (Table S2) were applied overnight in a humidified chamber at 4 °C. After washing steps, the slides were incubated with biotinylated secondary antibodies (Vector Labs) for 30 min, and then washed and incubated with streptavidin-conjugated peroxidase complex (Vector Labs) for 30 min. After several rinses with TBS-T, immunoreactivity was developed using diaminobenzidine (Vector Labs) as the chromogen, and sections were counterstained with hematoxylin. For each protein of interest, three sections approximately 40 µm apart were microscopically examined.
The intensity of FKBP51 immunostaining was semi-quantitatively evaluated by using Photoshop-based image analysis methods, as described [113,114,115]. Briefly, all images were captured on an Axio Imager II microscope (Zeiss) using ZEN 2011 software at 200× magnification and exposure set to 40 ms to ensure standardization of optical settings. DAB-stained and corresponding negative control images were uploaded to Adobe Photoshop 7.0 (Adobe Inc., San Jose, CA, USA), converted to grayscale by removing RBG color information, and then adjusted using the invert command (Figure S2). Luminosity was measured using the rectangular marquee tool in 54 pixels (px) by 54 px areas with the Histogram command, and mean value was calculated. For quantification, all follicles were measured as follows: one measurement for small structures (primordial and primary follicles), the average of two measurements for secondary follicles, and the average of three measurements for larger tertiary follicles, antral follicles, corpora lutea, and ovarian stroma. Measures were also taken from negatively stained slides (hematoxylin-stained ovarian tissues), and the mean luminosity of negative measurements was subtracted from the mean luminosity of positive samples to remove background signals.
Immunostaining of cleaved caspase-3 cells was scored by the percentage of positively stained cells for each follicular stage. Scoring was performed independently by two blind investigators, and the average score of both was used.

4.8. Hormone Assessment

Serum P4 (n = 6/group) and corticosterone levels (n = 6/group) were measured in 2-month-old mice using ELISA kits (BioVendor Group; Brno, Czech Republic, and R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA, respectively) on the Bio-Rad Microplate Reader (Bio-Rad Laboratories; Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturers’ protocol. Final concentrations of P4 and corticosterone were derived from the standard curve and analyzed using Microplate Manager Software Version 6.3 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).

4.9. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS (version 28; IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Data normality was assessed with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. Normally distributed data were analyzed by independent sample t-test or multi-factor ANOVA followed by post-hoc comparisons for data that contained two independent variables. If the data failed normality, the Mann–Whitney U test was used. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. GraphPad Prism version 9.0 (GraphPad, San Diego, CA, USA) for Windows was used for graphing.

5. Conclusions

Our findings demonstrate that PNS delayed puberty, reduced the follicular reserve primarily through the loss of primordial follicles during puberty, and dysregulated steroidogenesis in an age-dependent manner. However, deletion of Fkbp5 protects ovarian function against these PNS-induced adverse effects. The mechanisms mediated by FKBP51 are likely multifaceted, affecting the global regulation of the HPA and/or HPO axes. Overall, our findings provide the first evidence that maternal stress exposure in utero causes Fkbp5-dependent impairment of ovarian function in offspring and support FKBP51 as a potential therapeutic target.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms26062471/s1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.M., U.A.K., C.J.L. and O.G.-K.; methodology, M.M., U.A.K., N.S.-G., C.J.L. and O.G.-K.; validation, B.C.-U., P.S., U.A.K. and O.G.-K.; formal analysis, M.M. and O.G.-K.; investigation, M.M. and B.C.-U.; resources, M.M., U.A.K., C.J.L. and O.G.-K.; data curation, M.M. and N.S.-G.; writing—original draft preparation, M.M.; writing—review and editing, P.S., M.T., U.A.K., C.J.L. and O.G.-K.; visualization, M.M., M.T., U.A.K. and O.G.-K.; supervision, M.T., U.A.K., C.J.L. and O.G.-K.; project administration, U.A.K., C.J.L. and O.G.-K.; funding acquisition, U.A.K., C.J.L. and O.G.-K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of the University of South Florida (#IS00010574R approved 7 June 2022).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material; further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We thank Ronald Magness and Frederick Schatz (Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA) for their contributions to discussions and suggestions during evaluation of the results of this manuscript. We also thank current and previous lab members Asli Ozmen, Kellie Larsen, Xiaofang Guo, Hasan Alhasan, and Burak Un for their contributions to troubleshooting and maintaining laboratory operations during the production of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Yaribeygi, H.; Panahi, Y.; Sahraei, H.; Johnston, T.P.; Sahebkar, A. The impact of stress on body function: A review. EXCLI J. 2017, 16, 1057–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Li, S.H.; Graham, B.M. Why are women so vulnerable to anxiety, trauma-related and stress-related disorders? The potential role of sex hormones. Lancet Psychiatry 2017, 4, 73–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Musanejad, E.; Haghpanah, T.; Mirzaie, V.; Ezzatabadipour, M. Effects of ethanol and nicotine co-administration on follicular atresia and placental histo-morphology in the first-generation mice pups during intrauterine development and lactation periods. Toxicol. Rep. 2021, 8, 793–803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Pooley, A.E.; Benjamin, R.C.; Sreedhar, S.; Eagle, A.L.; Robison, A.J.; Mazei-Robison, M.S.; Breedlove, S.M.; Jordan, C.L. Sex differences in the traumatic stress response: The role of adult gonadal hormones. Biol. Sex. Differ. 2018, 9, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhai, Q.Y.; Wang, J.J.; Tian, Y.; Liu, X.; Song, Z. Review of psychological stress on oocyte and early embryonic development in female mice. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2020, 18, 101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ramamoorthy, S.; Cidlowski, J.A. Corticosteroids: Mechanisms of Action in Health and Disease. Rheum. Dis. Clin. N. Am. 2016, 42, 15–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Whirledge, S.; Cidlowski, J.A. Glucocorticoids, stress, and fertility. Minerva Endocrinol. 2010, 35, 109–125. [Google Scholar]
  8. Richards, J.S.; Pangas, S.A. The ovary: Basic biology and clinical implications. J. Clin. Investig. 2010, 120, 963–972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Demyttenaere, K.; Nijs, P.; Evers-Kiebooms, G.; Koninckx, P.R. Coping and the ineffectiveness of coping influence the outcome of in vitro fertilization through stress responses. Psychoneuroendocrinology 1992, 17, 655–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ebbesen, S.M.; Zachariae, R.; Mehlsen, M.Y.; Thomsen, D.; Højgaard, A.; Ottosen, L.; Petersen, T.; Ingerslev, H.J. Stressful life events are associated with a poor in-vitro fertilization (IVF) outcome: A prospective study. Hum. Reprod. 2009, 24, 2173–2182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Prasad, S.; Tiwari, M.; Pandey, A.N.; Shrivastav, T.G.; Chaube, S.K. Impact of stress on oocyte quality and reproductive outcome. J. Biomed. Sci. 2016, 23, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lane, S.L.; Parks, J.C.; Russ, J.E.; Khan, S.A.; Schoolcraft, W.B.; Yuan, Y.; Katz-Jaffe, M.G. Increased Systemic Antioxidant Power Ameliorates the Aging-Related Reduction in Oocyte Competence in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 13019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Tatone, C.; Di Emidio, G.; Vitti, M.; Di Carlo, M.; Santini, S., Jr.; D’Alessandro, A.M.; Falone, S.; Amicarelli, F. Sirtuin Functions in Female Fertility: Possible Role in Oxidative Stress and Aging. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2015, 2015, 659687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Tiwari, M.; Prasad, S.; Tripathi, A.; Pandey, A.N.; Ali, I.; Singh, A.K.; Shrivastav, T.G.; Chaube, S.K. Apoptosis in mammalian oocytes: A review. Apoptosis 2015, 20, 1019–1025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yang, L.; Chen, Y.; Liu, Y.; Xing, Y.; Miao, C.; Zhao, Y.; Chang, X.; Zhang, Q. The Role of Oxidative Stress and Natural Antioxidants in Ovarian Aging. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 617843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nakamura, K.; Sheps, S.; Arck, P.C. Stress and reproductive failure: Past notions, present insights and future directions. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2008, 25, 47–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Guzeloglu-Kayisli, O.; Semerci, N.; Guo, X.; Larsen, K.; Ozmen, A.; Arlier, S.; Mutluay, D.; Nwabuobi, C.; Sipe, B.; Buhimschi, I.; et al. Decidual cell FKBP51-progesterone receptor binding mediates maternal stress-induced preterm birth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2021, 118, e2010282118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Wood, C.E.; Rudolph, A.M. Can maternal stress alter fetal adrenocorticotropin secretion? Endocrinology 1984, 115, 298–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Pepe, G.J.; Albrecht, E.D. Actions of Placental and Fetal Adrenal Steroid Hormones in Primate Pregnancy*. Endocr. Rev. 1995, 16, 608–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Schoof, E.; Girstl, M.; Frobenius, W.; Kirschbaum, M.; Repp, R.; Knerr, I.; Rascher, W.; Dötsch, J. Course of placental 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 and 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase mRNA expression during human gestation. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2001, 145, 187–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Liu, M.Y.; Wei, L.L.; Zhu, X.H.; Ding, H.C.; Liu, X.H.; Li, H.; Li, Y.Y.; Han, Z.; Li, L.D.; Du, Z.W.; et al. Prenatal stress modulates HPA axis homeostasis of offspring through dentate TERT independently of glucocorticoids receptor. Mol. Psychiatry 2023, 28, 1383–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Medeiros, L.D.S.; Rodrigues, P.D.S.; Santos, D.N.L.; Silva-Sampaio, A.C.; Kirsten, T.B.; Suffredini, I.B.; Coque, A.C.; da Silva, R.A.; Bernardi, M.M. Prenatal restraint stress downregulates the hypothalamic kisspeptidergic system transcripts genes, reduces the estrogen plasma levels, delayed the onset of puberty, and reduced the sexual behavior intensity in female rats. Physiol. Behav. 2023, 260, 114055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Barra, R.; Cruz, G.; Mayerhofer, A.; Paredes, A.; Lara, H.E. Maternal sympathetic stress impairs follicular development and puberty of the offspring. Reproduction 2014, 148, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. García-Vargas, D.; Juárez-Rojas, L.; Rojas Maya, S.; Retana-Márquez, S. Prenatal stress decreases sperm quality, mature follicles and fertility in rats. Syst. Biol. Reprod. Med. 2019, 65, 223–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhou, Q.; Suzuki, A.; Iinuma, M.; Wang, K.Y.; Kubo, K.Y.; Azuma, K. Effects of Maternal Chewing on Prenatal Stress-Induced Cognitive Impairments in the Offspring via Multiple Molecular Pathways. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ristić, N.; Nestorović, N.; Manojlović-Stojanoski, M.; Trifunović, S.; Ajdžanović, V.; Filipović, B.; Pendovski, L.; Milošević, V. Adverse effect of dexamethasone on development of the fetal rat ovary. Fundam. Clin. Pharmacol. 2019, 33, 199–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ristić, N.; Nestorović, N.; Manojlović-Stojanoski, M.; Trifunović, S.; Ajdžanović, V.; Filipović, B.; Pendovski, L.; Milošević, V. Prenatal dexamethasone exposure and developmental programming of the ovary of the offspring: A structural study in the rat. Reprod. Fertil. Dev. 2021, 33, 245–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Poulain, M.; Frydman, N.; Duquenne, C.; N’Tumba-Byn, T.; Benachi, A.; Habert, R.; Rouiller-Fabre, V.; Livera, G. Dexamethasone induces germ cell apoptosis in the human fetal ovary. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2012, 97, E1890–E1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hähle, A.; Merz, S.; Meyners, C.; Hausch, F. The Many Faces of FKBP51. Biomolecules 2019, 9, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Vermeer, H.; Hendriks-Stegeman, B.I.; van der Burg, B.; van Buul-Offers, S.C.; Jansen, M. Glucocorticoid-induced increase in lymphocytic FKBP51 messenger ribonucleic acid expression: A potential marker for glucocorticoid sensitivity, potency, and bioavailability. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2003, 88, 277–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hubler, T.R.; Denny, W.B.; Valentine, D.L.; Cheung-Flynn, J.; Smith, D.F.; Scammell, J.G. The FK506-binding immunophilin FKBP51 is transcriptionally regulated by progestin and attenuates progestin responsiveness. Endocrinology 2003, 144, 2380–2387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Schatz, F.; Guzeloglu-Kayisli, O.; Basar, M.; Buchwalder, L.F.; Ocak, N.; Guzel, E.; Guller, S.; Semerci, N.; Kayisli, U.A.; Lockwood, C.J. Enhanced Human Decidual Cell–Expressed FKBP51 May Promote Labor-Related Functional Progesterone Withdrawal. Am. J. Pathol. 2015, 185, 2402–2411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Guzeloglu Kayisli, O.; Kayisli, U.A.; Basar, M.; Semerci, N.; Schatz, F.; Lockwood, C.J. Progestins Upregulate FKBP51 Expression in Human Endometrial Stromal Cells to Induce Functional Progesterone and Glucocorticoid Withdrawal: Implications for Contraceptive- Associated Abnormal Uterine Bleeding. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0137855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Malekpour, M.; Shekouh, D.; Safavinia, M.E.; Shiralipour, S.; Jalouli, M.; Mortezanejad, S.; Azarpira, N.; Ebrahimi, N.D. Role of FKBP5 and its genetic mutations in stress-induced psychiatric disorders: An opportunity for drug discovery. Front. Psychiatry 2023, 14, 1182345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Sabbagh, J.J.; O’Leary, J.C., III; Blair, L.J.; Klengel, T.; Nordhues, B.A.; Fontaine, S.N.; Binder, E.B.; Dickey, C.A. Age-Associated Epigenetic Upregulation of the FKBP5 Gene Selectively Impairs Stress Resiliency. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e107241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zannas, A.S.; Jia, M.; Hafner, K.; Baumert, J.; Wiechmann, T.; Pape, J.C.; Arloth, J.; Ködel, M.; Martinelli, S.; Roitman, M. Epigenetic upregulation of FKBP5 by aging and stress contributes to NF-κB–driven inflammation and cardiovascular risk. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2019, 116, 11370–11379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Criado-Marrero, M.; Gebru, N.T.; Gould, L.A.; Smith, T.M.; Kim, S.; Blackburn, R.J.; Dickey, C.A.; Blair, L.J. Early Life Stress and High FKBP5 Interact to Increase Anxiety-Like Symptoms through Altered AKT Signaling in the Dorsal Hippocampus. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 2738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, L.; Wojcieszak, J.; Kumar, R.; Zhao, Z.; Sun, X.; Xie, S.; Winblad, B.; Pavlov, P.F. FKBP51-Hsp90 Interaction-Deficient Mice Exhibit Altered Endocrine Stress Response and Sex Differences Under High-Fat Diet. Mol. Neurobiol. 2023, 61, 1479–1494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Camaioni, A.; Ucci, M.A.; Campagnolo, L.; De Felici, M.; Klinger, F.G.; On behalf of the Italian Society of Embryology, Reproduction and Research. The process of ovarian aging: It is not just about oocytes and granulosa cells. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet. 2022, 39, 783–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Moghadam, A.R.E.; Moghadam, M.T.; Hemadi, M.; Saki, G. Oocyte quality and aging. JBRA Assist. Reprod. 2022, 26, 105–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Arabin, B.; Hellmeyer, L.; Maul, J.; Metz, G.A.S. Awareness of maternal stress, consequences for the offspring and the need for early interventions to increase stress resilience. J. Perinat. Med. 2021, 49, 979–989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Faught, E.; Santos, H.B.; Vijayan, M.M. Loss of the glucocorticoid receptor causes accelerated ovarian ageing in zebrafish. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2020, 287, 20202190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, N.; Huang, Y.; Wen, J.; Su, Q.; Huang, Y.; Cai, L.; Lin, W.; Zong, L.; Huang, H.; Qian, X.; et al. Early life exposure to famine and reproductive aging among Chinese women. Menopause 2019, 26, 463–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Chan, K.A.; Bernal, A.B.; Vickers, M.H.; Gohir, W.; Petrik, J.J.; Sloboda, D.M. Early life exposure to undernutrition induces ER stress, apoptosis, and reduced vascularization in ovaries of adult rat offspring. Biol. Reprod. 2015, 92, 110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Sominsky, L.; Meehan, C.L.; Walker, A.K.; Bobrovskaya, L.; McLaughlin, E.A.; Hodgson, D.M. Neonatal immune challenge alters reproductive development in the female rat. Horm. Behav. 2012, 62, 345–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Aiken, C.E.; Tarry-Adkins, J.L.; Spiroski, A.M.; Nuzzo, A.M.; Ashmore, T.J.; Rolfo, A.; Sutherland, M.J.; Camm, E.J.; Giussani, D.A.; Ozanne, S.E. Chronic gestational hypoxia accelerates ovarian aging and lowers ovarian reserve in next-generation adult rats. FASEB J. 2019, 33, 7758–7766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Cimadomo, D.; Fabozzi, G.; Vaiarelli, A.; Ubaldi, N.; Ubaldi, F.M.; Rienzi, L. Impact of Maternal Age on Oocyte and Embryo Competence. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kordowitzki, P. Oxidative Stress Induces Telomere Dysfunction and Shortening in Human Oocytes of Advanced Age Donors. Cells 2021, 10, 1866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nagarajan, S.; Seddighzadeh, B.; Baccarelli, A.; Wise, L.A.; Williams, M.; Shields, A.E. Adverse maternal exposures, methylation of glucocorticoid-related genes and perinatal outcomes: A systematic review. Epigenomics 2016, 8, 925–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Katz-Jaffe, M.G.; Lane, S.L.; Parks, J.C.; McCallie, B.R.; Makloski, R.; Schoolcraft, W.B. Antioxidant Intervention Attenuates Aging-Related Changes in the Murine Ovary and Oocyte. Life 2020, 10, 250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Blair, L.J.; Nordhues, B.A.; Hill, S.E.; Scaglione, K.M.; O’Leary, J.C., III; Fontaine, S.N.; Breydo, L.; Zhang, B.; Li, P.; Wang, L.; et al. Accelerated neurodegeneration through chaperone-mediated oligomerization of tau. J. Clin. Investig. 2013, 123, 4158–4169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sopinka, N.M.; Patterson, L.D.; Redfern, J.C.; Pleizier, N.K.; Belanger, C.B.; Midwood, J.D.; Crossin, G.T.; Cooke, S.J. Manipulating glucocorticoids in wild animals: Basic and applied perspectives. Conserv. Physiol. 2015, 3, cov031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Laryea, G.; Schütz, G.; Muglia, L.J. Disrupting hypothalamic glucocorticoid receptors causes HPA axis hyperactivity and excess adiposity. Mol. Endocrinol. 2013, 27, 1655–1665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Yuan, X.H.; Yang, B.Q.; Hu, Y.; Fan, Y.Y.; Zhang, L.X.; Zhou, J.C.; Wang, Y.Q.; Lu, C.L.; Ma, X. Dexamethasone altered steroidogenesis and changed redox status of granulosa cells. Endocrine 2014, 47, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Michael, A.E.; Pester, L.A.; Curtis, P.; Shaw, R.W.; Edwards, C.R.; Cooke, B.A. Direct inhibition of ovarian steroidogenesis by cortisol and the modulatory role of 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase. Clin. Endocrinol. 1993, 38, 641–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Huang, T.-J.; Shirley Li, P. Dexamethasone Inhibits Luteinizing Hormone-Induced Synthesis of Steroidogenic Acute Regulatory Protein in Cultured Rat Preovulatory Follicles1. Biol. Reprod. 2001, 64, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Bhaumik, S.; Lockett, J.; Cuffe, J.; Clifton, V.L. Glucocorticoids and Their Receptor Isoforms: Roles in Female Reproduction, Pregnancy, and Foetal Development. Biology 2023, 12, 1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Akison, L.; Robker, R. The Critical Roles of Progesterone Receptor (PGR) in Ovulation, Oocyte Developmental Competence and Oviductal Transport in Mammalian Reproduction. Reprod. Domest. Anim. 2012, 47, 288–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Runnebaum, B.; Zander, J. Progesterone and 20 alpha-dihydroprogesterone in human myometrium during pregnancy. Acta Endocrinol. Suppl. 1971, 150, 3–45. [Google Scholar]
  60. Jamnongjit, M.; Hammes, S.R. Ovarian steroids: The good, the bad, and the signals that raise them. Cell Cycle 2006, 5, 1178–1183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Miller, W.L.; Auchus, R.J. The Molecular Biology, Biochemistry, and Physiology of Human Steroidogenesis and Its Disorders. Endocr. Rev. 2011, 32, 81–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Walters, K.A.; Allan, C.M.; Jimenez, M.; Lim, P.R.; Davey, R.A.; Zajac, J.D.; Illingworth, P.; Handelsman, D.J. Female mice haploinsufficient for an inactivated androgen receptor (AR) exhibit age-dependent defects that resemble the AR null phenotype of dysfunctional late follicle development, ovulation, and fertility. Endocrinology 2007, 148, 3674–3684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Stechschulte, L.A.; Sanchez, E.R. FKBP51—A selective modulator of glucocorticoid and androgen sensitivity. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2011, 11, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Burris-Hiday, S.D.; Scott, E.E. Steroidogenic cytochrome P450 17A1 structure and function. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2021, 528, 111261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Fitzpatrick, S.L.; Richards, J.S. Regulation of cytochrome P450 aromatase messenger ribonucleic acid and activity by steroids and gonadotropins in rat granulosa cells. Endocrinology 1991, 129, 1452–1462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lintern-Moore, S.; Moore, G.P. The initiation of follicle and oocyte growth in the mouse ovary. Biol. Reprod. 1979, 20, 773–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Ojeda, S.; Urbanski, H.; Knobil, E.; Neill, J. Puberty in the rat. Physiol. Reprod. 1994, 2, 363–409. [Google Scholar]
  68. Broekmans, F.J.; Soules, M.R.; Fauser, B.C. Ovarian aging: Mechanisms and clinical consequences. Endocr. Rev. 2009, 30, 465–493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Findlay, J.K.; Hutt, K.J.; Hickey, M.; Anderson, R.A. How Is the Number of Primordial Follicles in the Ovarian Reserve Established?1. Biol. Reprod. 2015, 93, 111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Traylor, C.S.; Johnson, J.D.; Kimmel, M.C.; Manuck, T.A. Effects of psychological stress on adverse pregnancy outcomes and nonpharmacologic approaches for reduction: An expert review. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM 2020, 2, 100229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Wu, Y.; De Asis-Cruz, J.; Limperopoulos, C. Brain structural and functional outcomes in the offspring of women experiencing psychological distress during pregnancy. Mol. Psychiatry 2024, 29, 2223–2240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Klimek, M.; Entringer, S.; Matras, A.; Blukacz, M.; Nenko, I.; Galbarczyk, A.; Jasienska, G. Early-life adversities and later-life reproductive patterns in women with fully traced reproductive history. Sci. Rep. 2023, 13, 9328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Bräuner, E.V.; Koch, T.; Doherty, D.A.; Dickinson, J.E.; Juul, A.; Hart, R.; Hickey, M. The association between in utero exposure to maternal psychological stress and female reproductive function in adolescence: A prospective cohort study. Compr. Psychoneuroendocrinol. 2021, 5, 100026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Yano, K.; Matsuzaki, T.; Iwasa, T.; Mayila, Y.; Yanagihara, R.; Tungalagsuvd, A.; Munkhzaya, M.; Tokui, T.; Kamada, S.; Hayashi, A.; et al. The influence of psychological stress in early life on sexual maturation and sexual behavior in male and female rats. Reprod. Med. Biol. 2020, 19, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Atrooz, F.; Alkadhi, K.A.; Salim, S. Understanding stress: Insights from rodent models. Curr. Res. Neurobiol. 2021, 2, 100013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Creutzberg, K.C.; Sanson, A.; Viola, T.W.; Marchisella, F.; Begni, V.; Grassi-Oliveira, R.; Riva, M.A. Long-lasting effects of prenatal stress on HPA axis and inflammation: A systematic review and multilevel meta-analysis in rodent studies. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2021, 127, 270–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Seewoo, B.J.; Hennessy, L.A.; Feindel, K.W.; Etherington, S.J.; Croarkin, P.E.; Rodger, J. Validation of Chronic Restraint Stress Model in Young Adult Rats for the Study of Depression Using Longitudinal Multimodal MR Imaging. eNeuro 2020, 7, 1–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hoeijmakers, L.; Harbich, D.; Schmid, B.; Lucassen, P.J.; Wagner, K.V.; Schmidt, M.V.; Hartmann, J. Depletion of FKBP51 in female mice shapes HPA axis activity. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e95796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. O’Leary III, J.C.; Dharia, S.; Blair, L.J.; Brady, S.; Johnson, A.G.; Peters, M.; Cheung-Flynn, J.; Cox, M.B.; de Erausquin, G.; Weeber, E.J. A new anti-depressive strategy for the elderly: Ablation of FKBP5/FKBP51. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e24840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Maiarù, M.; Tochiki, K.K.; Cox, M.B.; Annan, L.V.; Bell, C.G.; Feng, X.; Hausch, F.; Géranton, S.M. The stress regulator FKBP51 drives chronic pain by modulating spinal glucocorticoid signaling. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, ra319–ra325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Touma, C.; Gassen, N.C.; Herrmann, L.; Cheung-Flynn, J.; Büll, D.R.; Ionescu, I.A.; Heinzmann, J.-M.; Knapman, A.; Siebertz, A.; Depping, A.-M.; et al. FK506 Binding Protein 5 Shapes Stress Responsiveness: Modulation of Neuroendocrine Reactivity and Coping Behavior. Biol. Psychiatry 2011, 70, 928–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Isola, J.V.V.; Ocañas, S.R.; Hubbart, C.R.; Ko, S.; Mondal, S.A.; Hense, J.D.; Carter, H.N.C.; Schneider, A.; Kovats, S.; Alberola-Ila, J.; et al. A single-cell atlas of the aging mouse ovary. Nat. Aging 2024, 4, 145–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Ansere, V.A.; Ali-Mondal, S.; Sathiaseelan, R.; Garcia, D.N.; Isola, J.V.V.; Henseb, J.D.; Saccon, T.D.; Ocañas, S.R.; Tooley, K.B.; Stout, M.B.; et al. Cellular hallmarks of aging emerge in the ovary prior to primordial follicle depletion. Mech. Ageing Dev. 2021, 194, 111425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Zimmer, C.; Hanson, H.E.; Martin, L.B. FKBP5 expression is related to HPA flexibility and the capacity to cope with stressors in female and male house sparrows. Horm. Behav. 2021, 135, 105038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Criado-Marrero, M.; Rein, T.; Binder, E.B.; Porter, J.T.; Koren, J.; Blair, L.J. Hsp90 and FKBP51: Complex regulators of psychiatric diseases. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2018, 373, 20160532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Galigniana, N.M.; Ballmer, L.T.; Toneatto, J.; Erlejman, A.G.; Lagadari, M.; Galigniana, M.D. Regulation of the glucocorticoid response to stress-related disorders by the Hsp90-binding immunophilin FKBP51. J. Neurochem. 2012, 122, 4–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Gershon, E.; Dekel, N. Newly Identified Regulators of Ovarian Folliculogenesis and Ovulation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. He, X.; Wang, Y.; Wu, M.; Wei, J.; Sun, X.; Wang, A.; Hu, G.; Jia, J. Secoisolariciresinol Diglucoside Improves Ovarian Reserve in Aging Mouse by Inhibiting Oxidative Stress. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2021, 8, 806412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Ahmed, T.A.; Ahmed, S.M.; El-Gammal, Z.; Shouman, S.; Ahmed, A.; Mansour, R.; El-Badri, N. Oocyte Aging: The Role of Cellular and Environmental Factors and Impact on Female Fertility. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2020, 1247, 109–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Cincotta, S.A.; Richardson, N.; Foecke, M.H.; Laird, D.J. Differential susceptibility of male and female germ cells to glucocorticoid-mediated signaling. eLife 2024, 12, RP90164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Findlay, J.K.; Dunning, K.R.; Gilchrist, R.B.; Hutt, K.J.; Russell, D.L.; Walters, K.A. Selection of primordial follicles. In The Ovary, 3rd ed.; Pckley, A., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2019; pp. 5–8. [Google Scholar]
  92. Liew, S.H.; Nguyen, Q.N.; Strasser, A.; Findlay, J.K.; Hutt, K.J. The ovarian reserve is depleted during puberty in a hormonally driven process dependent on the pro-apoptotic protein BMF. Cell Death Dis. 2017, 8, e2971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Johnson, J.; Canning, J.; Kaneko, T.; Pru, J.K.; Tilly, J.L. Germline stem cells and follicular renewal in the postnatal mammalian ovary. Nature 2004, 428, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Wallace, W.H.; Kelsey, T.W. Human ovarian reserve from conception to the menopause. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e8772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Bristol-Gould, S.K.; Kreeger, P.K.; Selkirk, C.G.; Kilen, S.M.; Mayo, K.E.; Shea, L.D.; Woodruff, T.K. Fate of the initial follicle pool: Empirical and mathematical evidence supporting its sufficiency for adult fertility. Dev. Biol. 2006, 298, 149–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kerr, J.B.; Myers, M.; Anderson, R.A. The dynamics of the primordial follicle reserve. Reproduction 2013, 146, R205–R215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Xu, M.; Sun, J.; Wang, Q.; Zhang, Q.; Wei, C.; Lai, D. Chronic restraint stress induces excessive activation of primordial follicles in mice ovaries. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0194894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Liew, S.H.; Vaithiyanathan, K.; Cook, M.; Bouillet, P.; Scott, C.L.; Kerr, J.B.; Strasser, A.; Findlay, J.K.; Hutt, K.J. Loss of the proapoptotic BH3-only protein BCL-2 modifying factor prolongs the fertile life span in female mice. Biol. Reprod. 2014, 90, 77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Ireland, J.L.; Scheetz, D.; Jimenez-Krassel, F.; Themmen, A.P.; Ward, F.; Lonergan, P.; Smith, G.W.; Perez, G.I.; Evans, A.C.; Ireland, J.J. Antral follicle count reliably predicts number of morphologically healthy oocytes and follicles in ovaries of young adult cattle. Biol. Reprod. 2008, 79, 1219–1225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Zhou, J.; Lin, L.; Cai, H.; Liu, L.; Wang, H.; Zhang, J.; Xia, G.; Wang, J.; Wang, F.; Wang, C. SP1 impacts the primordial to primary follicle transition by regulating cholesterol metabolism in granulosa cells. FASEB J. 2023, 37, e22767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Kahsar-Miller, M.D.; Conway-Myers, B.A.; Boots, L.R.; Azziz, R. Steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR) in the ovaries of healthy women and those with polycystic ovary syndrome. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2001, 185, 1381–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Song, T.; Chen, J.; Yang, S.; Liu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Cheng, J.C.; Fang, L. Resveratrol stimulates StAR expression and progesterone production by GPER-mediated downregulation of Snail expression in human granulosa cells. J. Food Drug Anal. 2023, 31, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Ding, M.; Lu, Y.; Wen, Q.; Xing, C.; Huang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, W.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, M.; Meng, F.; et al. Ovarian PERK/NRF2/CX43/StAR/progesterone pathway activation mediates female reproductive dysfunction induced by cold exposure. Sci. Rep. 2024, 14, 10248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Smith, J.T.; Waddell, B.J. Increased Fetal Glucocorticoid Exposure Delays Puberty Onset in Postnatal Life. Endocrinology 2000, 141, 2422–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Paus, T.; Keshavan, M.; Giedd, J.N. Why do many psychiatric disorders emerge during adolescence? Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2008, 9, 947–957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Koebele, S.V.; Bimonte-Nelson, H.A. Modeling menopause: The utility of rodents in translational behavioral endocrinology research. Maturitas 2016, 87, 5–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Nold, V.; Richter, N.; Hengerer, B.; Kolassa, I.T.; Allers, K.A. FKBP5 polymorphisms induce differential glucocorticoid responsiveness in primary CNS cells—First insights from novel humanized mice. Eur. J. Neurosci. 2021, 53, 402–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Blair, L.J.; Criado-Marrero, M.; Zheng, D.; Wang, X.; Kamath, S.; Nordhues, B.A.; Weeber, E.J.; Dickey, C.A. The Disease-Associated Chaperone FKBP51 Impairs Cognitive Function by Accelerating AMPA Receptor Recycling. eNeuro 2019, 6, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Caligioni, C.S. Assessing Reproductive Status/Stages in Mice. Curr. Protoc. Neurosci. 2009, 48, A.4I.1–A.4I.8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lee, E.B.; Chakravarthi, V.P.; Wolfe, M.W.; Rumi, M.A.K. ERβ Regulation of Gonadotropin Responses during Folliculogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 10348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Uslu, B.; Dioguardi, C.C.; Haynes, M.; Miao, D.Q.; Kurus, M.; Hoffman, G.; Johnson, J. Quantifying growing versus non-growing ovarian follicles in the mouse. J. Ovarian Res. 2017, 10, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Guzeloglu-Kayisli, O.; Lalioti, M.D.; Aydiner, F.; Sasson, I.; Ilbay, O.; Sakkas, D.; Lowther, K.M.; Mehlmann, L.M.; Seli, E. Embryonic poly(A)-binding protein (EPAB) is required for oocyte maturation and female fertility in mice. Biochem. J. 2012, 446, 47–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. Kuyatt, B.L.; Reidy, C.A.; Hui, K.Y.; Jordan, W.H. Quantitation of smooth muscle proliferation in cultured aorta. A color image analysis method for the Macintosh. Anal. Quant. Cytol. Histol. 1993, 15, 83–87. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  114. Lehr, H.-A.; van der Loss, C.M.; Teeling, P.; Gown, A.M. Complete Chromogen Separation and Analysis in Double Immunohistochemical Stains Using Photoshop-based Image Analysis. J. Histochem. Cytochem. 1999, 47, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Moriarty, N.; Gantner, C.W.; Hunt, C.P.J.; Ermine, C.M.; Frausin, S.; Viventi, S.; Ovchinnikov, D.A.; Kirik, D.; Parish, C.L.; Thompson, L.H. A combined cell and gene therapy approach for homotopic reconstruction of midbrain dopamine pathways using human pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 2022, 29, 434–448.e435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. PNS administration reduced follicular numbers in Fkbp5+/+ adult offspring. (A) Representative image of PAS-stained healthy and atretic follicles at various developmental stages: primordial (Prim), primary (Pri), secondary (Sec), tertiary (Ter), and early antral (E Ant). Scale bars = 20 µm; (B) the total number of healthy primordial and primary follicles; (C) numbers of healthy growing secondary, tertiary, and antral follicles; (D) total number of atretic follicles. Bars represent mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05 or ** p < 0.01; n = 6/group. Arrows indicate primordial follicles.
Figure 1. PNS administration reduced follicular numbers in Fkbp5+/+ adult offspring. (A) Representative image of PAS-stained healthy and atretic follicles at various developmental stages: primordial (Prim), primary (Pri), secondary (Sec), tertiary (Ter), and early antral (E Ant). Scale bars = 20 µm; (B) the total number of healthy primordial and primary follicles; (C) numbers of healthy growing secondary, tertiary, and antral follicles; (D) total number of atretic follicles. Bars represent mean ± SEM; * p < 0.05 or ** p < 0.01; n = 6/group. Arrows indicate primordial follicles.
Ijms 26 02471 g001
Figure 2. Increased FKBP51 immunostaining in granulosa cells of ovaries from offspring exposed to PNS. (A) Expression of Fkbp5 mRNA levels in whole ovaries from control and PNS-exposed Fkbp5+/+ offspring. Mean ± SEM; 1.02 ± 0.1 versus 1.17 ± 0.2, n = 6/group; independent samples t-test p = 0.6. (B) Representative images showing FKBP51 immunoreactivity (brown) in granulosa and luteal cells from Fkbp5+/+ control and PNS mice. Arrows indicate primordial follicles. Scale bars = 20 µm. (C) Quantification of FKBP51 immunostaining intensity in every follicular stage and the corpus luteum. Bars represent mean ± SEM; n = 6 mice/group, compared to PNS versus control, primordial (Prim) (30.6 ± 3.3 versus 25.4 ± 2.5; p = 0.2); primary (Pri) (37.1 ± 3.4 versus 24.7 ± 3.3; * p < 0.05); secondary (Sec) (42.9 ± 3.4 versus 32.5 ± 2.7; * p < 0.05); tertiary (Ter) (42.3 ± 3.9 versus 30.0 ± 2.0; ** p < 0.01); early antral (E Ant) (36.3 ± 5.5 versus 42.5 ± 4.4; p = 0.3); corpus luteum (CL) (29.6 ± 2.9 versus 30.0 ± 4.3; p = 0.9).
Figure 2. Increased FKBP51 immunostaining in granulosa cells of ovaries from offspring exposed to PNS. (A) Expression of Fkbp5 mRNA levels in whole ovaries from control and PNS-exposed Fkbp5+/+ offspring. Mean ± SEM; 1.02 ± 0.1 versus 1.17 ± 0.2, n = 6/group; independent samples t-test p = 0.6. (B) Representative images showing FKBP51 immunoreactivity (brown) in granulosa and luteal cells from Fkbp5+/+ control and PNS mice. Arrows indicate primordial follicles. Scale bars = 20 µm. (C) Quantification of FKBP51 immunostaining intensity in every follicular stage and the corpus luteum. Bars represent mean ± SEM; n = 6 mice/group, compared to PNS versus control, primordial (Prim) (30.6 ± 3.3 versus 25.4 ± 2.5; p = 0.2); primary (Pri) (37.1 ± 3.4 versus 24.7 ± 3.3; * p < 0.05); secondary (Sec) (42.9 ± 3.4 versus 32.5 ± 2.7; * p < 0.05); tertiary (Ter) (42.3 ± 3.9 versus 30.0 ± 2.0; ** p < 0.01); early antral (E Ant) (36.3 ± 5.5 versus 42.5 ± 4.4; p = 0.3); corpus luteum (CL) (29.6 ± 2.9 versus 30.0 ± 4.3; p = 0.9).
Ijms 26 02471 g002
Figure 3. Evaluation of serum corticosterone and progesterone levels and ovarian expression profiles of target genes in adult offspring. (A) Serum corticosterone levels (n = 6/group) as well as the expression of glucocorticoid receptor (Nr3c1) and 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (Hsd11b1 and b2) genes in the ovary. (B) Serum progesterone (P4) levels (n = 6/group) as well as expression of progesterone receptor (Pgr) and aldo-keto reductase family 1-member c18 (Akr1c18) mRNA levels in the ovary; (C) expression of steroidogenic enzymes steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (Star) and Cytochrome P450 family 11, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 (Cyp11a1); and (D) androgen receptor (Nr3c4), Cytochrome P450 family 17, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 (Cyp17a1) and family 19, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 (Cyp19a1) levels in the ovary. Bars represent mean ± SEM, Hsd11b2 Fkbp5+/+ PNS n = 7, the rest n = 6; * p < 0.05.
Figure 3. Evaluation of serum corticosterone and progesterone levels and ovarian expression profiles of target genes in adult offspring. (A) Serum corticosterone levels (n = 6/group) as well as the expression of glucocorticoid receptor (Nr3c1) and 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (Hsd11b1 and b2) genes in the ovary. (B) Serum progesterone (P4) levels (n = 6/group) as well as expression of progesterone receptor (Pgr) and aldo-keto reductase family 1-member c18 (Akr1c18) mRNA levels in the ovary; (C) expression of steroidogenic enzymes steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (Star) and Cytochrome P450 family 11, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 (Cyp11a1); and (D) androgen receptor (Nr3c4), Cytochrome P450 family 17, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 (Cyp17a1) and family 19, subfamily a, polypeptide 1 (Cyp19a1) levels in the ovary. Bars represent mean ± SEM, Hsd11b2 Fkbp5+/+ PNS n = 7, the rest n = 6; * p < 0.05.
Ijms 26 02471 g003
Figure 4. PNS-induced atresia in peripubertal offspring. (A) The number of healthy primordial follicles in peripubertal control or PNS Fkbp5+/+ and Fkbp5−/− offspring; (B) the atretic primordial follicles and the ratio of atretic to healthy primordial follicles indicating the loss of primordial follicles; (C) the ratio of total healthy growing to healthy primordial follicles; and (D) total number of atretic growing follicles. Bars represent mean ± SEM, n = 6/each, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Figure 4. PNS-induced atresia in peripubertal offspring. (A) The number of healthy primordial follicles in peripubertal control or PNS Fkbp5+/+ and Fkbp5−/− offspring; (B) the atretic primordial follicles and the ratio of atretic to healthy primordial follicles indicating the loss of primordial follicles; (C) the ratio of total healthy growing to healthy primordial follicles; and (D) total number of atretic growing follicles. Bars represent mean ± SEM, n = 6/each, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001.
Ijms 26 02471 g004
Figure 5. Reproductive aging is associated with a progressive decline of ovarian reserve in middle-aged Fkbp5+/+ PNS offspring. (A) Reduced total healthy follicle numbers (480.8 ± 22.5 versus 700 ± 59.5; p < 0.01) and healthy primordial follicle numbers in middle-aged Fkbp5+/+ PNS mice versus Fkbp5+/+ control mice (244.2 ± 15 versus 366.7 ± 28.6, p < 0.01); (B) the number of growing follicles, including primary, secondary, tertiary, and early antral follicles, among middle-aged groups. Reduced primary follicle number in middle-aged Fkbp5+/+ PNS versus middle-aged Fkbp5+/+ control mice (106.7 ± 16.2 versus 168.3 ± 18.2; p < 0.05); (C) the dynamic changes in number of healthy primordial follicles from peripubertal to adult and then to middle-aged mice. The number of primordial follicles rapidly declined in Fkbp5+/+ PNS versus Fkbp5+/+ control (independent-samples t-test; a p < 0.01) and Fkbp5−/− PNS (independent-samples t-test; b p < 0.05) groups between peripubertal and adult age points. Bars represent mean ± SEM, n = 6/each, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Figure 5. Reproductive aging is associated with a progressive decline of ovarian reserve in middle-aged Fkbp5+/+ PNS offspring. (A) Reduced total healthy follicle numbers (480.8 ± 22.5 versus 700 ± 59.5; p < 0.01) and healthy primordial follicle numbers in middle-aged Fkbp5+/+ PNS mice versus Fkbp5+/+ control mice (244.2 ± 15 versus 366.7 ± 28.6, p < 0.01); (B) the number of growing follicles, including primary, secondary, tertiary, and early antral follicles, among middle-aged groups. Reduced primary follicle number in middle-aged Fkbp5+/+ PNS versus middle-aged Fkbp5+/+ control mice (106.7 ± 16.2 versus 168.3 ± 18.2; p < 0.05); (C) the dynamic changes in number of healthy primordial follicles from peripubertal to adult and then to middle-aged mice. The number of primordial follicles rapidly declined in Fkbp5+/+ PNS versus Fkbp5+/+ control (independent-samples t-test; a p < 0.01) and Fkbp5−/− PNS (independent-samples t-test; b p < 0.05) groups between peripubertal and adult age points. Bars represent mean ± SEM, n = 6/each, * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01.
Ijms 26 02471 g005
Figure 6. Expression of FKBP51 in middle-aged offspring ovaries. (A) Ovarian Fkbp5 expression by qPCR from middle-aged Fkbp5+/+ control and PNS mice. Bar represents mean ± SEM, n = 6/each. (B) Representative FKBP51 immunoreactivity (brown) in granulosa and luteal cells from 10-month-old Fkbp5+/+ control and PNS mice. Scale bars = 20 µm. (C) Bars show intensity of FKBP51 immunostaining in every follicular stage and corpus luteum. Prim: primordial; Pri: primary; Sec: secondary; Ter: tertiary; E Ant: early antral; and CL: corpus luteum. Bars represent mean ± SEM, n = 6 mice/group; compared to PNS versus control, primordial (Prim; 28.2 ± 3.3 versus 24.1 ± 5.2; p = 0.5); primary (Pri; 30.2 ± 3.3 versus 21.6 ± 5.8; p = 0.15); secondary (Sec; 24.7 ± 3.7 versus 27.7 ± 5.9; p = 0.8); tertiary (Ter; 21.9 ± 2.9 versus 29.5 ± 2.2; p < 0.05); early antral (E Ant; 36 ± 3.7 versus 32.9 ± 7.2; p = 0.16); corpus luteum (CL 31 ± 4.3 versus 34.8 ± 3.3; p = 0.2). (D) Ovarian Star expression by qPCR from middle-aged mice. Bars represent mean ± SEM, n = 6/each, * p < 0.05.
Figure 6. Expression of FKBP51 in middle-aged offspring ovaries. (A) Ovarian Fkbp5 expression by qPCR from middle-aged Fkbp5+/+ control and PNS mice. Bar represents mean ± SEM, n = 6/each. (B) Representative FKBP51 immunoreactivity (brown) in granulosa and luteal cells from 10-month-old Fkbp5+/+ control and PNS mice. Scale bars = 20 µm. (C) Bars show intensity of FKBP51 immunostaining in every follicular stage and corpus luteum. Prim: primordial; Pri: primary; Sec: secondary; Ter: tertiary; E Ant: early antral; and CL: corpus luteum. Bars represent mean ± SEM, n = 6 mice/group; compared to PNS versus control, primordial (Prim; 28.2 ± 3.3 versus 24.1 ± 5.2; p = 0.5); primary (Pri; 30.2 ± 3.3 versus 21.6 ± 5.8; p = 0.15); secondary (Sec; 24.7 ± 3.7 versus 27.7 ± 5.9; p = 0.8); tertiary (Ter; 21.9 ± 2.9 versus 29.5 ± 2.2; p < 0.05); early antral (E Ant; 36 ± 3.7 versus 32.9 ± 7.2; p = 0.16); corpus luteum (CL 31 ± 4.3 versus 34.8 ± 3.3; p = 0.2). (D) Ovarian Star expression by qPCR from middle-aged mice. Bars represent mean ± SEM, n = 6/each, * p < 0.05.
Ijms 26 02471 g006
Table 1. Day of vaginal opening (VO) in female offspring as an approximation of pubertal onset. PNS significantly delayed VO in Fkbp5+/+ mice, but not in Fkbp5−/− mice.
Table 1. Day of vaginal opening (VO) in female offspring as an approximation of pubertal onset. PNS significantly delayed VO in Fkbp5+/+ mice, but not in Fkbp5−/− mice.
Experimental GroupnDay of VO
Mean ± SEM
Fkbp5+/+ Control1529.20 ± 0.56 b
Fkbp5+/+ PNS832.63 ± 0.96 a
Fkbp5−/− Control1231.08 ± 0.80
Fkbp5−/− PNS1233.33 ± 0.96
a Significantly different (p < 0.05) from Fkbp5+/+ control mice. b Significantly different (p < 0.05) from Fkbp5+/+ PNS mice.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Moore, M.; Cetinkaya-Un, B.; Sarkar, P.; Kayisli, U.A.; Semerci-Gunay, N.; Teng, M.; Lockwood, C.J.; Guzeloglu-Kayisli, O. Depletion of Fkbp5 Protects Against the Rapid Decline in Ovarian Reserve Induced by Prenatal Stress in Female Offspring of Wild-Type Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 2471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062471

AMA Style

Moore M, Cetinkaya-Un B, Sarkar P, Kayisli UA, Semerci-Gunay N, Teng M, Lockwood CJ, Guzeloglu-Kayisli O. Depletion of Fkbp5 Protects Against the Rapid Decline in Ovarian Reserve Induced by Prenatal Stress in Female Offspring of Wild-Type Mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(6):2471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062471

Chicago/Turabian Style

Moore, Monica, Busra Cetinkaya-Un, Papri Sarkar, Umit A. Kayisli, Nihan Semerci-Gunay, Michael Teng, Charles J. Lockwood, and Ozlem Guzeloglu-Kayisli. 2025. "Depletion of Fkbp5 Protects Against the Rapid Decline in Ovarian Reserve Induced by Prenatal Stress in Female Offspring of Wild-Type Mice" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 6: 2471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062471

APA Style

Moore, M., Cetinkaya-Un, B., Sarkar, P., Kayisli, U. A., Semerci-Gunay, N., Teng, M., Lockwood, C. J., & Guzeloglu-Kayisli, O. (2025). Depletion of Fkbp5 Protects Against the Rapid Decline in Ovarian Reserve Induced by Prenatal Stress in Female Offspring of Wild-Type Mice. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(6), 2471. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26062471

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop